Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3-13-90Planning Commission proceeding.. e taped recorded and on file in the off of the Planning Dept. MINUTES ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, March 13, 1990 The Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia met in regular session on Tuesday, March 13, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Arcadia City Hall, 240 West Huntington Drive, with Chairman Larry Papay presiding. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Szany, Papay ABSENT: None MINUTES MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Amato, seconded by Commissioner Clark to approve the Minutes of February 27, 1990 as published. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Clark, seconded by Commissioner Hedlund to read the resolution by title only and waive reading the full body of the resolution. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. The City Attorney announced that pursuant to Code Section 549569(a), the Commission met in closed session tonight to discuss the existing City law suit vs. Ellis. OTHERS ATTENDING: Councilman Dennis Lojeski City Attorney Michael Miller Planning Director William Woolard Senior Planner Donna Butler Associate Planner Corkran Nicholson Associate Planner Wilfred Wong Secretary Silva Vergel PUBLIC HEARING V -90 -001 1031 Golden West Ave. Bade Construction Co., Inc. Consideration of a zone variance to permit a single - family residence on a 4,465 sq. ft. lot which is zoned R -3 (multiple - family zone). The staff report was presented. Staff said that based on the building permits there are 2 structures on the lot to the west. The public hearing was opened. Milton Bade, 909 S. Santa Anita, said that they are in agreement with all of the conditions in the staff report. He stated that the lot is too small for a multiple - family development and if not developed, it will remain in its present condition. Harold Ellis, 1504 S. Eight, spoke in opposition. He felt that the proposed development would not be appropriate on the lot and would create an odd situation. He said that the lot doesn't meet the width, area or depth requirements for R -3 and is too small for development. He didn't think that the City should allow substandard developments in order to bring the property in equality with the surrounding properties. An R -1 development should be on an R -1 zoned lot and not on an R -3 property. He felt that the City didn't have the legal authority to allow such a variance. No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Hedlund, seconded by Commissioner Clark to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. Commissioner Clark felt that this is an exceptional case and unless it is developed as proposed nothing else can be done with the property. He didn't think that the second -story rear setback modification was significant. Commissioner Hedlund thought that putting 2 dwellings on the lot would create a problem and if a house was too big it would be compatible with the surrounding dwellings. In answer to a question, Ms. Butler stated that there are no special front yard setbacks off of Golden West Avenue. Commissioner Szany agreed and said that the density was appropriate and Commissioner Amato felt that it is the best use of the lot. Chairman Papay commented that it is a special situation and was in favor of the proposal. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Clark, seconded by Commissioner Amato to approve V -90 -001 subject to the conditions in the staff report. ROLL CALL AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Szany, Papay NOES: None Chairman Papay noted there is a five working day appeal period after the adoption of the resolution. Arcadia City Planning Commission 3/13/90 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING TPM 90 -002 45 El Dorado Min -Su Hsieh Consideration of a tentative parcel map for a 2 -unit residential condominium project. The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened. Min -Su Hsieh, 120 W. Lemon, said that they are in agreement with all of the conditions in the staff report. There were no additional persons desiring to speak in favor of or in opposition to the proposal. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Szany, seconded by Commissioner Clark to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. The consensus of the Commission was favorable. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Szany, seconded by Commissioner Clark to approve TPM 90 -002 subject to the conditions in the staff report. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Szany, Papay NOES: None Chairman Papay noted that there is a ten day appeal period. PUBLIC HEARING T.A. 90 -001 Consideration of a text amendment to clarify, amend and add the following regulations to the R -O, R -M and R -1 zones: A. Amend and clarify the wording of "Single- Family Dwellings ". B. Amend the wording of 'Building Height" to incorporate the wording from the General Provisions section of the zoning ordinance. C. Add wording relating to "Equipment and Facilities" which is currently in the General Provisions section of the zoning ordinance. D. Add wording relating to "Swimming Pools and Spas" which is currently in the General Provisions section of the zoning ordinance. E. Clarify the wording for "Equine Animals" in the R -O and R -1 zones. F. Clarify the wording for "Animals and Fowl" in the R -1 zone. Arcadia City Planning Commission 3/13/90 Page 3 The staff report was presented. In answer to questions from the Commission, staff said that no portions of the structure can exceed the height limits. Mechanical equipment must be placed on the back side of the roof or dwelling or have to be screened so it won't be visible from the street. The public hearing was opened. Harold Ellis, 1504 S. Eighth, submitted photos of his property and the areas where he keeps his horses. He thought that limiting property owners to 5 horses is not correct and deprives him of the use of his property. He said that his property is maintained and there is ample room for the number of horses that he keeps. He commented that at times he has had between 12 -14 horses on his property and the pictures taken by the Police Department. He felt that restricting any property owner of the full use of his property is ridiculous and unconstitutional. He didn't think that babies should be counted and he said that this is an imposition on any one who owns horses. He commented that there is no support in the staff report for recommending the keeping of 5 horses and thought that there should be factual basis on that number. He said that he would take legal action if necessary if he was restricted to 5 horses on his property. No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition to the lot line adjustment. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Szany, seconded by Commissioner Amato to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. Commissioner Hedlund said that most of the numbers appear to be the same from the previous text amendment regarding the maintenance of horses. The only new numbers seem to be in regard to spas and swimming pools. Commissioner Clark felt that this provides clarity as compared to the existing and makes it easier to understand. Mr. Woolard said that the existing horse regulations restrict the number of horses to 5 per lot and extra time was given to baby horses before separating them but baby horses were never in addition to 5 that can be kept. The City proposed changes to the keeping of horses and reviewing each case through the CUP process, but horse owners were against it and didn't want any changes. Mr. Miller said that the City recognizes the need for keeping baby horses with their mothers but to allow somebody with 5 mature horses and 5 baby horses would create an enforcement nightmare. He stated that ample time is given to property owners to comply. Notices are given and he noted that there are no modifications for equine animals. The number of horses is irrelevant to this text amendment, since this text amendment only deals with clarifying the wording for "equine animals ". The consensus of the Commission was favorable. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Szany, seconded by Commissioner Clark to recommend approval of T.A. 90 -001 to the City Council. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Szany, Papay NOES: None Arcadia City Planning Commission 3/13/90 Page 4 PUBLIC HEARING T.A. 90 -002 Consideration of a text amendment to: A. Amend the Lighting requirements in the CPD -1, C -O, C -1, C -2, C -M and M -1 zones, to allow for 20 foot high light standards. B. Amend the Inside and Outside Storage Refuse requirements in the CPD -1, C -O, C -1, C -2 C -M and M -1 zones. C. Amend the real estate sign regulations in the CPD -1, C- O, C -1, C -2 C -M and M -1 zones. The staff report was presented and the public hearing was opened. No one spoke in favor of or in opposition to the text amendment. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Szany, seconded by Commissioner Amato to close the public hearing. The motion passed by voice vote with none dissenting. Commissioner Amato was glad to see the changes. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Clark, seconded by Commissioner Amato to recommend approval of T.A. 90 -002 to the City Council. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Szany, Papay NOES: None AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION None TIME EXTENSION TM 45362 834 -838 Fairview James McDonough The staff report was presented. Consideration of a 6 -month time extension for a 16 -unit residential condominium. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Clark, seconded by Commissioner Amato, to grant a six month time extension to September 8, 1990. ROLL CAW AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Szany, Papay NOES: None Arcadia City Planning Commission 3/13/90 Page 5 Commissioner Szany abstained. RESOLUTION 1432 Mr. Woolard read the title of the resolution. A resolution denying CUP 90 -002 for a proposed 46 -lot residential planned development with related parking and building setback modifications at 702 -822 N. First Avenue and 105 -119 Haven Avenue. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Hedlund, seconded by Commissioner Amato to adopt Resolution and to formally affirm the decision of February 27, 1990, reflecting the findings of the Commission and the votes thereon. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Papay NOES: None ABSTAIN: Commissioner Szany Chairman Papay noted that there is a five working day appeal period. 1432 MATTERS FROM COUNCIL Councilman Lojeski discussed the latest developments regarding the following, (1) the Derby Restaurant, (2) the property located at northwest corner of 5th and Huntington, (3) the property located at Second and Huntington. He thanked the Commission for all their help through his term and said that he has had a very fulfilling 8 years serving on the Council. MATTERS FROM COMMISSION In regard to a question from Commissioner Clark, Mr. Miller said that he discussed the matter with the City Attorney at Monrovia and Mr. Woolard said that before the City can take any action, the property owner has to give consent. Commissioner Hedlund felt that a study should be conducted in increasing lot size requirements for R -2 and R- 3 properties. He suggested giving bonuses similar to the changes to the R -O and R -1 properties. He commented that he would like to see the elimination of subterranean and tuck under parking and would prefer surface parking. Chairman Papay said that by eliminating subterranean or tuck under parking would reflect the height requirements. Commissioner Amato said that he would like to see greater setbacks. Mr. Woolard stated that the Commission can make a motion to relay their concerns to the City Council and Council can then direct staff to conduct a survey. Arcadia City Planning Commission 3/13/90 Page 6 MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Amato, sizes seconded Co mi si ner Hedlund, to recommend to the City Council to review the minimum lot s ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Amato, Clark, Hedlund, Szany, Papay NOES: None MATTERS FROM STAFF None ADJOURNMENT 8:30 p.m. tfi • ", E:�,f Secretary, Arcadia Planning Commission Arcadia City Planning Commission 3/13/90 Page 7