The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMarch 4, 2008-- ~~.P ~,, CITY OF ARCADIA ~0 CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING c~0°'°^~ry^t"°~' TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 2008 AGENDA 6:00 p.m. Location: City Council Chamber Conference Room, 240 W. Huntington Drive CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS: Mickey Segal, Mayor/Agency Chair Robert Harbicht, Mayor Pro TemlAgency Vice Chair Peter Amundson, Council/Agency Member Roger Chandler, Council/Agency Member John Wuo, Council/Agency Member CLOSED SESSION/STUDY SE5SION PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per person) Any person wishing to address the City Council/Redevelopment Agency during the Public Comments period is asked to complete a"Public Comments" card available in the Council Chamber Lobby. The completed form should be submitted to the City Clerk/Agency Secretary prior to the start of the Closed Session/Study Session. In order to conduct a timely meeting, there will be a five (5)_mioute time limit per person. All comments are to be directed to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency and we ask that proper decorum be practiced during the meeting. State law prohibits the City Council/Redevelopment Agency from discussing topics or issues uniess they appear on the posted Agenda. STUDY SESSION a. Report, discussion and direction regarding the Mid Year Budget. 7:00 p.m., City Council Chamber RECONVENE CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING TO OPEN SESSION INVOCATION First Reader, Dr. Ro6ert Nafie, First Church of Christ, Scientist PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS: Amundson, Chandler, Harbicht, Wuo and Segal Any writings or documents provided to e majo~ity o( fhe City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available lor public inspecfion in the City Clerk's o~ce locafed at 240 W. Hunfington Drive, Arcadia, Califomia, dunng nomral business hours. REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEYIAGENCY COUNSEL ON CLOSED SESSION/STUDY SESSION ITEMS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS MOTION TO READ ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE THE READING IN FULL PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Proclamation declaring Arbor Day. b. Presentation of Certificate to Arcadia High School student Xuanji Wang. PUBLIC HEARING All interested persons are invited to appear at the Public Hearing and to provide evidence or testimony concerning the proposed items of consideration. You are hereby advised that should you desire to legally challenge any action taken by the City Council with respect to any Public Hearing item on this agenda, you may be limited to raising only those issues and objections which you or someone eise raised at or prior to the time of the Public Hearing. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS: a. 2007-2008 ANNUAL WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND PROTEST PUBLIC HEARING. Recommended Action: Approve 2007-2008 Weed Abatement Property List and direct the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner to abate nuisances upon those properties. PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per person) Any person wishing to address the City Council/Redevelopment Agency during the Public Comments period is asked to complete a"Public Comments° card availabie in the Council Chamber Lobby. The completed form should be submitted to the City Clerk/Agency Secretary prior to the start of the 7:00 p.m. Open Session. In order to conduct a timely meeting, there will be a five (5) minute time limit per person. All comments are to be directed to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency and we ask that proper decorum be practiced during the meeting. State law prohibits the City Council/Redevelopment Agency from discussing topics or issues unless they appear on the posted Agenda. REPORTS FROM MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CLERK 2. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Any wrifings or documents provided to a majority o/ the Cify Council regarding any item on fhis agenda will be mede available (or public inspection in the CRy Clerk's o/fice located at 240 W. Huntingfon Dnve, Arcadia, CaliPomia, during normal business hours. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYITEMS: a. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19. 2008. Recommended Action: Approve CITY COUNCIL ITEMS: b. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19. 2008. Recommended Action: Approve c. ADOPT ORDINANCE N0. 2239 EXTENDING THE TIME LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE TIME LIMIT TO PAY FOR THE CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(E)(2)(Dl. Recommended Ac4ion: Adopt ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 2240 AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE e. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6616 AUTHORIZING A MONTHLY INCREASE OF 3. CITY MANAGER a. LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008 -1. Any writings or documents p~ovided to a majority of the Ctty Council regarding any item on this agenda wil/ be made available /or public inspecfion in fhe Ciry Clerk's oKce located at 240 W, Huntington Drive, A/cadia, Ca!'domia, during normaf businass hours. Recommended Action: Adopt EMPLOYEES. Recommended Action: Adopt COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6611 PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT: AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6612 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM THE ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6613 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 200872009-- -- Recommended Action: Adopt - b. Recommended Action: Provide Direction ADJOURNMENT The City Council/Redevelopment Agency will adjourn to Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber Conference Room located at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia PURSUANT TO THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, PERSONS WITH A DISABILITY WHO REQUIRE A DISABILITY-RELATED MODIFICATION OR ACCOMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING, INCLUDING AUXILIARY AIDS OR SERVICES, MAY REQUEST SUCH MODIFICATION OR ACCOMODATION FROM THE CITY CLERK AT (626) 574-5455. NOTIFICATION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING WILL ENABLE THE CITY TO MAKE REASONABLE ARRANGEMENTS TO ASSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO THE MEETING. Any writings or documenfs provided to a majority ot the City Counci! regarding any ifem on this agenda will be made available (or public inspection in fhe City Clerk's office located at 240 W. Nuntington Dnve, Arcadia, Cali(omia, dunng norma! business hours. 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING ANNOTATED AGENDA March 4, 2008 STUDY SESSION 2. a. Report, discussion and direction regarding the Mid Year Budget. PUBLIC HEARING - CITY COUNCIL a. 2007-2008 ANNUAL WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND PROTEST PUBLIC HEARING. CONSENT CALENDAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM: a. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 2008. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS: b. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 2008. c. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 2239 EXTENDING THE TIME LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE TIME LIMIT TO PAY INDEBTEDNESS AND RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH ANQ SAFETY CODE SECTION 33670 UNDER THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(E)(2)(D). NO DIRECTION GIVEN TO STAFF 70 MAKE ANY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS APPROVED 5-0 APPROVED 4-0 (Segal Abstain) APPROVED 4-0 (Segal Abstain) ADOPTED5-0 d. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 2240 AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT ADOPTED 5- 0 TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS). ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6616 AUTHORIZING A MONTHLY INCREASE OF FIFTY DOLLARS ($50) IN MEDICAL CONTRIBUTION FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO SIDE LETTER AGREEMENTS WITH THE ARCADIA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (ACEA), THE ARCADIA PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (APWEA) AND THE ARCADIA FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION (AFFA) FOR A MONTHLY INCREASE OF FIFTY DOLLARS ($50) IN MEDICAL CONTRVBUTION; AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF $1,700,000 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCES FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE MEDICAL INCREASES AND ALL OTHER EXPENDITURES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN FY 2007-OS ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND RELATED BENEFITS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES. ADOPTEDS-0 . e .. 3. CITY MANAGER a. ADOPT VARIOUS RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT AND THE ARCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008 -1. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6610 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR ADOPTED 5- 0 THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6611 PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ADOPTED5-0 THE ENGINEER'S REPORT REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. ADOPT RESOLUTION N0. 6612 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ADOPTED 5- 0 FORM THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT; AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONDUCT A PROPERTY OWNER BALLOTING ON THE MATTER OF NEW ASSESSMENTS RELATED THEREO COMMENCING FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6613 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR ADOPTED 5- 0 THE FORMATION OF THE ARCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008-1; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6614 PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ADOPTED5-0 THE ENGINEER'S REPORT REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE ARCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008 -1; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. b. REPORT REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 6602 ESTABLISHING CITY OF ARCADIA PARK FACILITIES IMPACT FEES. 5-0 TO WAIVE THE PARK FACILITIES IMPACT FEES FOR ALL PROJECTS THAT CURRENTLY HAVE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL; IF A PROJECT HAS DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL AND HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PLAN CHECK, THE APPLICANT HAS 6 MONTHS TO 00 SO. IF A PROJECT IS IN PLAN CHECK, THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE PARK FEES UNTIL MARCH 14, 2009. IF THE PLAN CHECK IS TO EXPIRE, IT CAN BE RENEWED WITHOUT THE PARK FEES UNTIL MARCH 14, 2009 AS LONG AS A BUILDING PERMIT ~S PULLED BY MARCH 14, 2009. 50:0027 CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Segal called the Study Session Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS: PRESENT: Council/Agency Member Amundson, Chandler, Harbicht, Wuo and Segal ABSENT: None CLOSED SESSION/STUDY SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per person) None STUDY SESSION a. Report, discussion and direction regarding the Mid Year Budget. Shannon Huang, Financial Services Director/City Treasurer provided a Mid Year Budget overview of the General Fund balance, projected revenue and expenditure detail. She discussed the actual numbers from last fiscal year and noted that there is an increase of $1.4 million dollars more in the fund balance than originally projected. She noted that the City did better than expected in most of the major revenue categories such as propeRy tax, utility users tax and transient occupancy tax than last year; last year $1.5 million dollars was transferred to the equipment replacement fund; and $1 million dollars was transferred to the emergency reserve fund; she noted that based on information to date, the revenue side is up 2.5°/a more than projected last year. She explained that $1.5 million dollars on the expenditure side is a result of labor negotiations; and in this fiscal year, there will be a$2 million dollar shortfall with $1.4 million being transferred to the equipment replacement fund approved by the City Council last year. She further explained that the fiscal year will end with $472,000 more than originally projected. She noted that property tax revenue is expected to increase this year and next year; utility user tax and motor vehicle license tax should remain the same; there is an 11 % increase in transient occupancy tax; an increase of $1 million dollars in building permits which includes permit revenue from the Westfield expansion project; and an increase of $300,000 in rental income and parking citation revenue. She noted that the City started the year with $42.3 million dollars of expenditure money; the new MOU's and labor negotiations will cost $1.4 million dollars; $100,000 was added to legal expenses for personnel related issues; and an addition to the expenditure budget was made to cover the cost to establish the Citywide Lighting District. She indicated that the total expenditures this year will be about $46 million dollars. City Manager pon Penman provided the City Council with Economic and Revenue Data for the City. He explained the sales tax update chart and other data which illustrated some economic and revenue information, comparison information to other cities, sales and property tax information and racetrack data. 03-04-2008 50:0028 RECONVENE CITY COUNCtL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING TO OPEN SESSION Mayor Segal convened the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. INVOCATION First Reader, Dr. Robert Nafie, First Church of Christ, Scientist PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Janet Sporleder, Director of Library and Museum Services ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS: PRESENT: Council/Agency Member Amundson, Chandler, Harbicht, Wuo and Segal ABSENT: None REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEYlAGENCY COUNSEL ON CLOSED SESSION/STUDY SESSION ITEMS City Attorney Steve Deitsch reported that the City Council/Redevelopment Agency Board conducted a mid year budget review study session and no direction was given to staff to make any budget adjustments. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS None MOTION TO READ ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE THE READING IN FULL A motion was made by Council/Agency Member Amundson, seconded by Council/Agency Member Chandler and carried on roll call vote to read all ordinances and resolutions by title only and waive the reading in full. PRESENTATIONS a. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring Arbor Day. b. Presentation of Certificate to Arcadia High School student Xuanji Wang. 1. PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL ITEMS: a. 2007-2008 ANNUAL WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND PROTEST PUBLIC HEARING. Recommended Action: Approve 2007-2008 Weed Abatement Property List and direct the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner to abate nuisances upon those properties. 03-04-2008 50:0029 City Clerk James Barrows presented the staff report regarding the 2007-2008 Annual Weed Abatement Program. He noted that at the last City Council meeting, Resolution No. 6606 to abate noxious weeds, rubbish and refuse from various private properties in Arcadia was adopted and the public hearing was set for March 4, 2008 in order to provide those property owners an opportunity to be heard. He further noted that as required by law, the Los Angeles County Argricultural Commissioner mailed notice to all property owners whose properties in the City require removal of weeds, rubbish and refuse. The Public Hearing was opened and there were no members of the public appearing to provide testimony. A motion to close the public hearing was made by Council/Agency Member Chandler, seconded by CouncillAgency Member Harbicht, and seeing no further objection, Mayor Segal closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Council/Agency Member Harbicht, seconded by Council/Agency Member Chandler and carried on roll call vote to approve 2007-2008 Weed Abatement Property List and direct the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner to abate nuisances upon those properties. AYES: Council/Agency Member Harbicht, Chandler, Amundson, Wuo and Segal NOES: None PUBLIC COMMENTS Vince Vargas appeared and spoke in opposition of placing a cellular tower in the Santa Anita Oaks residential area and requested assistance to place the cellular tower in another location. Jeffrey Lee appeared and spoke regarding the implementation of the park facilities impact fees. REPORTS FROM THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CLERK Council Member Chandler congratulated Police Chief Sanderson who recently received an Executive Police O~cer Standard Training (POST) Certificate; he explained the requirements for receiving this certificate and noted that since 1959 only 1,049 individuals have received this award; and further noted that the Home Town Heroes video will show on Cable N right after the City Council meeting and those Arcadia families who currently have someone currently serving in the military will receive a copy of the video in the next couple of weeks. Council Member Amundson noted that last week he was approached by an individual who questioned his comments at the last City Council meeting regarding customer service at City Hall; he clarified his comments and noted that he would like to hear from the public regarding public service and provided contact information; he attended the Pony League opening day ceremonies at Bonita Park Pony League; he received a letter from a local hometown hero serving in the military, Corporal Nicholas Warbol and read an except regarding the media's inaccurate description of the war; he noted that the City Manager's office has a list of local soldiers serving in the military and encouraged everyone to adopt a soldier and send a card or a package; and he commented on the word "e~ciency" relating to the City's budget. 03-04-2008 50:0030 In response to a question by Council Member Wuo regarding cell towers in residential areas, Mr. Penman explained the conditional use process regarding cell towers and noted that the City Attorney is currently in the process of providing legal advice to the City regarding the level of control the City has in allowing cell towers in the public right-of-way. Mr. Wuo announced that the City Council attended the ribbon cutting at the 6 unit Alta Classic Project and noted that 3 homeowners are City employees and 3 are Arcadia residents. In response to an inquiry by Council Member Wuo regarding Dial-A-Ride services, Mr. Penman responded that a consultant was hired to assist the CiTy during the recruitment process. Mr. Wuo noted that he has received calls from citizens regarding Dial-A-Ride services and would like staff to speak with Arcadia Transit about the services they provide to the citizens. Mayor Pro Tempore Harbicht commented on the remarks made by Council Member Amundson at the last City Council meeting regarding customer service and noted that since he was first elected 22 years ago, the amount of compliments he received regarding City employees and the services they offer outweighs the complaints 10-1; he noted that he recently received a compliment about the Fire Department from a friend and that even though the Police Department receives negative comments because of the type of work they do, he receives many compliments on police services; he commented on a compliment he received some time ago regarding a building inspector. He read an article from the Pasadena Star Newspaper thanking the Arcadia Fire Department and Paramedics on January 14`h; and announced that the Mt. Wilson Vista Girl Scout Council in Arcadia broke the Guinness Book of World Records for stacking girl scout cookies 5' 6" tall. City Clerk Barrows announced that the Arcadia Recreation Department and the Civitan Club will sponsor 2 track meets at Arcadia High School, one on March 12th for elementary school students and middle school students on April 2nd. Mayor Segal commented on the ribbon cutting ceremony for the affordable housing Alta Classic Project built in conjunction with Trademark Development; he commended the building and planning staff and other staff who worked on the project; he received a letter from Comprised Structure's Inc. commending Building Official Don Stockham, Senior Planner Jim Kasama, and Building Technicians Christine Miller and Joanne Bevelaqua for their outstanding customer service; and also commended all Staff for doing a great job. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS: a. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19. 2008. Recommended Action: Approve CITY COUNCIL ITEMS: b. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19. 2008. Recommended Action: Approve 03-04-2008 50:0031 c. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 2240 AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERSl. Recommended Action: Adopt e. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6616 AUTHORIZING A MONTHLY INCREASE OF LETTER AGREEMENTS WITH THE ARCADIA CITY EMPLOYEES In response to a question by Council Member Amundson regarding Consent Item d, Mr. Penman explained that miscellaneous employees are everyone who is not a police officer or fire fighter; he explained that the 2.5% @ 55 retirement plan formula is based on age at retirement, salary and years of service and provided an example on how the formula works. Mr. Penman noted that the City is currently paying the entire employer share and explained that as a result of the recent increase, the total employer rate will increase and employees will now contribute 1°/a where in the past the employee did not contribute anything toward the PERS rate; and he further noted that police and fire have a 3% @ 50 retirement plan. In response to another question by Council Member Amundson regarding the cost to the City, Mr. Penman responded that the cost to the City would be $2,513,000 for all miscellaneous employees. A motion was made by Council/Agency Member Amundson, seconded by Council/Agency Member Chandler and carried on roll call vote to approve items 2.a through 2.e on the City Council/Agency Consent Calendar. AYES: Council Member Amundson, Chandler, Harbicht and Wuo NOES: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Segal (Consent Calendar Items 2.a and 2.b) 03-04-2008 INDEBTEDNESS AND RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33670 UNDER THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(E)(2)(D). Recommended Action: Adopt UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCES FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE MEDICAL INCREASES AND ALL OTHER EXPENDITURES Recommended Action: Adopt 50:0032 3. CITY MANAGER ADOPT VARIOUS RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT AND THE ARCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008 -1. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6610 INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT: AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6611 PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT: AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt ADOPT RESOLUTION N0. 6612 DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT: AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONDUCT A PROPERTY OWNER BALLOTING ON THE MATTER OF NEW ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt Tom Tait, Deputy Director of Public Works Services Director provided a summary of the proposed formation of the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District and Citywide Lighting District 2008- 1; he provided an overview of the existing street lighting map showing the 6 zones and explained that the cost would be shared between the City and property owners and noted that the assessments are based on the assessed value of the property which would vary from year to year. He explained that formation of the Citywide Street Lighting District would partially fund the operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting improvements throughout the City. He provided information on the balloting procedures for the Citywide District and noted that ballots will be mailed out the last week in May and the public hearing is scheduled for July 15`" and August 5`h and ballots for the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District, ballots will be mailed the week of March 17'" with a public hearing scheduled for May 6th and May 20'h. He further noted that 03-04-2008 OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009. Recommended Action: Adopt 50:0033 in order to establish the Citywide and the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District, staff recommends adoption of the five Resolutions. A motion was made by Council Member Chandler, seconded by Council Member Amundson and carried on roll call vote to adopt Resolution No. 6610 initiating proceedings for the formation of the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District; and the levy and collection of assessments related thereto commencing with fiscal year 2008(20~9. AYES: Council Member Chandler, Amundson, Harbicht, Wuo, and Segal NOES: None A motion was made by Council Member Wuo, seconded by Council Member Chandler and carried on roll call vote to adopt Resolution No. 6611 preliminarily approving the Engineer's Report regarding the formation of the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District; and the levy and collection of assessments related thereto commencing with fiscal year 2008/2009. AYES: Council Member Wuo, Chandler, Amundson, Harbicht and Segal NOES: None A motion was made by Council Member Wuo, seconded by Council Member Chandler and carried on roll call vote to adopt Resolution No. 6612 declaring its intention to form the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District; and declaring its intention to conduct a property owner balloting on the matter of new assessments related thereto commencing with fiscal year 2008/2009. AYES: Council Member Wuo, Chandler, Amundson, Harbicht and Segal NOES: None A motion was made by Council Member Wuo, seconded by Council Member Harbicht and carried on roll call vote to adopt Resolution No. 6613 initiating proceedings for the formation of the Arcadia Citywide Lighting District 2008-1; and the levy and collection of assessments related thereto commencing with fiscal year 2008/2009. AYES: Council Member Wuo, Harbicht, Amundson, Chandler and Segal NOES: None A motion was made by Council Member Wuo, seconded by Council Member Harbicht and carried on roll call vote to adopt Resolution No. 6614 preliminarily approving the Engineer's Report regarding the forrnation of the Arcadia Citywide Lighting District 2008-1; and the levy and collection of assessments related thereto commencing with fiscal year 2008/2009. AYES: Council Member Wuo, Harbicht, Amundson, Chandler and Segal NOES: None b. REPORT REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 6602 ESTABLISHING CITY OF ARCADIA PARK FACILITIES IMPACT FEES. Recommended Action: Provide Direction Jaso~ Kruckeberg, Development Services Director provided the staff report regarding the implementation of Park Facilities Impact Fees and noted that when the Parks and Recreation Master Plan was adopted in November 2007, consideration was given to establish a new Impact Fee: He also noted that the City contracted with MuniFinancial to develop an impact fee to 03-04-2008 50:0034 ensure that new development pays its fair share of costs associated with building new park and recreation facilities and infrastructure. He reported that the fee schedule recommended in the study was developed by converting the cost per capita to a fee per square foot of net new development on residential properties based on dwelling densities and historical sizes of single family and multi-family units. He noted that on January 15, 2008, the fee approved by the City Council was $2.85 per square foot for single family projects and $3.73 per square fee for multi- family projects for net new floor area. He explained the 3 options for consideration regarding the implementation of the Impact Fee which would be effective March 14, 2008. Mr. Kruckeberg noted that a letter of opposition was received from Scott Yang of Nevis Homes regarding the implementation of the Park Facilities Impact Fees. A motion was made by Council Member Harbicht, seconded by Council Member Wuo and carried on roll call vote to waive the fee for all projects that currently have design review approval; if any projects have design review approval and have not submitted for plan check, they have 6 months to do so; if a project is in plan check and the plan check is to expire, they can renew their plan check with the normal fee until March 14, 2009 and once any plan check expires the project is no longer exempt from the fees. AYES: Council Member Harbicht, Wuo, Amundson, Chandler and Segal NOES: None ADJOURNMENT The City Council/Redevelopment Agency adjourned this meeting at 9:10 p.m. to March 18, 2008 at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber Conference Room located at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia. James H. Barrows City Clerk ~~ % V~~~~ ~ ~r~ "; ~ `~ By: Lisa Mussenden, Chief Deputy City Clerk/ Records Manager 03-04-2008 50:0021 CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY,FEBRUARY19,2008 Mayor Pro Tem Harbicht called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Mayor Pro Tempore Robert Harbicht PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Pat Malloy, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Services Director ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS: PRESENT: Council/Agency Member Amundson, Chandler, Harbicht and Wuo ABSENT: Council/Agency Member Segal A motion was made by Council Member Chandler, seconded by Council Member Amundson to excuse Mayor Segal. REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY/AGENCY COUNSEL ON CLOSED SESSION/STUDY SESSION ITEMS City Attorney Steve Deitsch repoRed that the City Council/Redevelopment Agency Board met in closed session to consider the one (1) item listed on the posted agenda under closed session. No reportable action was taken. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS None MOTION TO READ ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE THE READING iN FULL A motion was made by Council/Agency Member Amundson, seconded by Council/Agency Member Chandler and carried on roll call vote to read all ordinances and resolutions by title only and waive the reading in full. 1. PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS: a. 02-19-2008 50:0022 AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(E)(21(D1. Recommended Action: Conduct Public Hearing and Introduce Ordinance No. 2239. City Manager pon Penman presented the staff report extending the time limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan by two years for the Central Redevelopment Project; he noted that as a result of state budget deficits, the state took tax increment away $315,456.75 in 2004-05 and $354,408.21 in 2005-06. He explained that by adoption of this Ordinance, the Central Redevelopment ProjecYs plan would be extended by two years which would allow an extension of time for the Agency to receive tax increment revenues and pay back any outstanding debt. The Public Hearing was opened and there were no members of the public appearing to provide testimony. A motion to close the public hearing was made by Council/Agency Member Wuo, seconded by Council/Agency Member Chandler, and seeing no further objection, Mayor Pro Tempore Harbicht closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Council/Agency Member Chandler, seconded by Council/Agency Member Wuo and carried on roll call vote to introduce Ordinance No. 2239 extending the time limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project and the time limit to pay indebtedness and receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34670 under the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(E)(2)(D). AYES: Council/Agency Member Chandler, Wuo, Amundson and Harbicht NOES: None ABSENT: Council(Agency Member Segal Mr. Penman noted that an article in the February 15 newspaper which quotes that "although the City asked to be excluded from plan (meaning the RHNA plan) which was approved by the Southern Califomia Association of Governments, Arcadia's appeal was rejected." He noted that he spoke to the author of the article Kevin Felt who apologized that the editor changed the article and a retraction would be printed. Mr. Penman clarified that the City appealed the numbers which was denied by SCAG, the City did not ask to be excluded from the plan. PUBL~C COMMENTS None REPORTS FROM THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CLERK Council Member Amundson noted that in response to Mr. Chandler's comment at the lasi meeting on the $850,000 to be allocated to the City's General Plan update, he responded that he could not have said it any better than Mr. Harbicht did. Fie commented ihat he was at a conference in Florida last week and the key note speaker was Ken Blanchard who was famous for his "one minute manager"; he quoted the City's Mission Statement "to serve the public in an atmosphere of courtesy, friendliness and respect, constantly treating everyone fairly within the 02-19-2008 50:0023 policies rules and regulations of Arcadia, to provide the highest quality municipal services with effective, creative and fiscal responsible manner." He noted that all Department Heads should review the City's Mission Statement with the employees and remind staff that the citizens are the customers and should be treated as stated in the Mission Statement. In response to an inquiry by Council Member Amundson regarding the Rusnak project, Mr. Penman responded that acquisitions are moving forward, the Agency owns the self-storage building and the Live Oak property is currently in escrow for the Church of Arcadia. He noted that Rusnak has communicated that Mercedes Benz has expressed to them about securing additional property to meet their dealership requirements, and the Agency is trying to acquire enough property for these improvements. He further noted that once escrow closes on the Church of Arcadia, it is planned to meet with Rusnak staff to discuss various options. He commented that he had a very productive meeting with the Elks Lodge and also noted that there has been no response from the owners of Rod's. Council Member Chandler announced that he attended the Arcadia High School Chinese Parent Booster Club Chinese New Year celebration with Council Member Wuo; and he congratulated the Arcadia High School Chinese Parent Booster Club on their 15th year anniversary. Council Member Wuo announced that the Historical Society hosted a state wide convention at the Historical Museum which he attended and that it was good to see many young high school volunteers. Mayor Pro Tempore Harbicht announced that he will be attending 2 little league opening day ceremonies; he noted that AYSO is run by volunteers and the City installed a new backstop at Longley Way Little League. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS: a. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 5. 2008. Recommended Action: Approve CITY COUNCIL ITEMS: b. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 5. 2008. Recommended Action: Approve c. A SEASONAL AND RECURRENT PUBLIC NUISANCE AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ABATEMENT THEREOF AND SCHEDULE THE PROTEST PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 4, 2008. Recommended Action: Adopt and Schedule Protest Public Hearing for March 4, 2008. 02-19-2008 50:0024 d. e. REPLACEMENT PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $324.516. Recommended Action: Approve f. AWARD A PURCHASE ORDER TO AUTOMOTIVE RESOURCES. INC. FOR g. AWARD A PURCHASE ORDER TO CLIPPINGER FLEET SERVICES FOR THE Recommended Action: h. WAIVE THE FORMAL BID PROCESS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE NOT TO EXCEED $18.995. Recommended Action: Approve i. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6615 APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF A motion was made by Council/Agency Member Chandler, seconded by Council/Agency Member Wuo and carried on roll call vote to approve items 2.a through 2.i on the City Council/Agency Consent Calendar. AYES: Council Member Chandler, Wuo, Amundson and Harbicht NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Segal ABSTAIN: Council Member Amundson (Consent Calendar Items 2.a and 2.b) 3. CITY MANAGERIAGENCY DIRECTOR ITEMS: a. ASSOCIATES FOR INSPECTION. MONITORING AND PLAN CHECKING 02-19-2008 30 000. Recommended Action: Approve Recommended Action: Approve JUNE 30. 2011. Recommended Action: Adopt 50:0025 Recommended Action: Approve Pat Malloy, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Services Director provided a summary of the City's Industrial Waste and Stormwater Programs; he noted that Hunter and Associates has been assisting the City in monitoring both programs for the past 10 years; and further noted that because of increased responsibilities with both programs, new proposals were solicited from five environmental firms. Susannah Turney, Environmental Services Officer presented a brief overview and visual presentation of the City's Stormwater and Industrial Waste Discharge Programs. She explained legal and illegal discharges, new state regulations, discharges in the storm drai~ system, programs to promote proper disposal, inspection, monitoring, enforcement, public outreach, staff training and plan checking services. She noted that the City adopted the Industrial Waste Discharge Program in 2000 to protect the City's owned sewer lines. A motion was made by Council Member Chandler, seconded by Council Member Amundson and carried on roll call vote to authorize the City Manager to enter into a one (1) year Professional Services Agreement with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc. for Inspection, Monitoring and Plan Checking Services for the Municipal Stormwater and Industrial Waste Programs in the amount of $91,441 and waive any informality in the bid or bidding process. AYES: Council Member Chandler, Amundson, Wuo and Harbicht NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Segal b. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6609 IN SUPPORT OF CONTINUED AB 939 Recommended Action: Adopt Mr. Penman explained that at the last City Council meeting Mayor Pro Tem Harbicht requested that staff bring back a resolution supporting diversion credit for use of green waste as alternative daily cover at landfills. Marie Rodriguez, Public Works Services, Management Aide, presented the staff report in support of continued AB 939 diversion credit for use of green waste as alternative daily cover at landfilis. She explained the purpose of Assembly Bill 939, known as the Integrated Waste Management Act, which mandates a reduction of waste being disposed in the landfills and further explained that AB 939 mandates a reduction of waste being disposed by requiring jurisdictions to meet a diversion goal of 50% though source reduction, recycling and composting. 5he explained that new legislation seeks to prohibit AB 939 credit for jurisdictions that use green waste for alternate daily cover and require that it be counted toward disposal. She noted that if the City is not allowed diversion credit for alternate daily cover, the City diversion rate would drop below 50°/o and may result in fines or compliance orders that would require the City to implement expensive new waste diversion programs. A motion was made by Council Member Wuo, seconded by Council Member Amundson and carried on roll call vote to adopt Resolution No. 6609 in support of continued AB 939 diversion credit for use of green waste as alternative daily cover at landfills. 02-19-2008 50:0026 AYES: Council Member Wuo, Amundson, Chandler and Harbicht NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Segal Mayor Pro Tem Harbicht requested that a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. c. BE HELD ON SATURDAY. APRIL 5, 2008. Recommended Action: Approve Police Chief Sanderson announced that on Saturday, April 5, 2008 will be the 14th anniversary of the Santa Anita Derby Day Walk and Run. Captain Gene Gioia presented a brief summary on the 14th Annual Santa Anita Derby Day 5K Run and Walk to be held on Saturday, April 5, 2008; he noted that this charitable event is co- sponsored by Methodist Hospital and Westfield Shoppingtown and proceeds from the race will go to the Arcadia High School Athletic Boosters Club, the Arcadia Historical Museum and the Arcadia Explorer Post. He noted that the event will cost about $1,500 to $2,000 in overtime for police personnel and explained that because this is a charitable event, Santa Anita is requesting that the cost of traffic control services be waived as in the past. A motion was made by Council Member Chandler, seconded by Council Member Wuo and carried on roll call vote to waive expenses related to traffic control services for the fourteenth annual Santa Anita Derby Day 5K run and walk to be held on Saturday, April 5, 2008. AYES: Council Member Chandler, Wuo, Amundson and Harbicht NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Segal ADJOURNMENT The City Council/Redevelopment Agency adjourned this meeting at 7:55 p.m. to March 4, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber Conference Room located at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia. James H. Barrows, City Clerk ~ ~1' ~ ~l ~~ (, ~/ ~"'S-r,n. ~ By: Lisa Mussenden, Chief Deputy City Clerk 02-19-2008 ORDINANCE NO. 2239 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA EXTENDING THE TiN1E LIMIT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE TIME LIMIT TO PAY INDEBTEDNESS AND RECENE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33670 UNDER THE REDEVELOPNIENT PLAN FOR THE CENT'RAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(e)(2)(D) WI-IEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Arcadia ("Agency") is a redevelopment agency established and acting pursuant to the Califomia Community Redevelopment Law (California Health & Safety Code Sections 33Q00, et seq.) ("CRL");.and WI-~REAS, pursuant to City Council of the City of Arcadia Ordinance No. 1490, adopted on December 26, 1973, the City Council of the City of Arcadia adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project. The Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project has been amended by the City Counci] of the City of Arcadia through the following ordinances: (1) Ordinance No. 1722, adopted on May 19, 1981; (2) Ordinance No. 1847, adopted on November 4, 1986; (3) Ordinance No. 2025, adopted on November 1, 1994; (4) Ordinance No. 2102, adopted on June 4, 1999; (5) Ordinance No. 2181, adopted on October 7, 2003; (6) Ordinance No. 2184, adopted on November 18, 2003; and (7) Ordinance No. 2231, adopted on August 7, 2007 (collectively, the "Redevelopment Plan"); and -1- WIIEREAS, pursuant to CRL Section 33333.6(e)(2)(D), the Redevelopment Plan may be amended by ordinance to extend both the time limit for the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit for the Agency to pay indebtedness and receive tax increment revenues pursuant to CRL Section 33670 under the Redevelopment Plan by one (1) year for each payment required of and made by the Agency to the County of Los Angeles Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund ("ERAF"} in fiscal years 2004/OS and 20Q5/06, pursuant to CRL Section 33681.12; and WI~REAS, the Agency was required to make and made ERAF payments in both the 2004/OS and 2005/06 fiscal years, pursuant to CRL Section 33681.12; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing regarding adoption of this Ordinance on February 19; 2008 at 7:00 p.m. at,the City of Arcadia City Council Chambers, 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California; and WHEREAS, notice of the publia hearing regarding adoption of this Ordinance was given to all affected taxing entities at least thirty (30) days before the date of the_ public hearing and was published in a newspaper of general circulation in the commuriity at ]east once, not less than ten,(10) days prior to the date of the public hearing;; and -Z- WI-IEREAS, City staff has determined that the enactment of this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"), pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(b)(3), because there is no possibility that enactment of this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, and pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15378(b)(4), because this Ordinance creates a government funding mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, TT~ CITY COUNCIL OF 'TI~ CITY OF ARCADIA DOES ORDAIN, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Arcadia makes the following findings and determinations: 1. Notice of the public hearing regarding adoption of this Ordinance was mailed to the governing bodies of all affected taxing entities at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the public hearing and published in a newspaper of general circulation, at least once, not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. -3- 2. The funds used to malce the ERAF payments in both the 2004/OS and 2005/06 fiscal years pursuant to CRL Section 33681.12 would otherwise have been used to pay the costs of projects and activities necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. 3. The time limit for the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan established pursuant to CRL Section 33333.6(a) is January 25, 2015, which is 10 years or less from the last day of each of the 2004/OS and 2005/06 fiscal years, and an ERAF payment was required of and made by the Agency pursuant to CRL Section 33681.12 in both the 2004/OS and 2005/06 fiscal years. 4. The Agency is in compliance with CRL Sections 33334.2 and 33334.6, has adopted an implementation plan in accordance with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, and is not subject to sanctions pursuant to CRL Section 33334.12 (e) for failure to expend, encumber or disburse an excess surplus. SECTION 2. Amendments to Redevelopment Plan. In accordance with CRL Section 33333.6(e)(2)(D), the following limitations for the Redevelopment Plan are established, subject to all other provisions of this Ordinance: -4- l. Except to the extent that a longer period of time may be allowed pursuant to the provisions of the CRL, as it may be amended from time to time, and notwithstanding any provision of the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment Plan shall be effective until January 25, 2017. 2. Except to the extent that a longer period af rime may be allowed pursuant to the provisions of the CRL, as it may be amended from time to time, the Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive tax increment revenues, pursuant to CRL Section 33670, after January 25, 2027. SECTION 3. Confirmation of Redevelopment Plan. The Redevelopment Plan, as amended by this Ordinance, sha11 be and remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. Authorization for Further Acts. The City Council authorizes and directs the City Manager to undertake such actions and execute such documents as may be reasonably necessary or convenient to carry out and administer the actions authorized by this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance as applied to any person or to any circumstance is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void or unenforceable for any reason, this fact shall in no way affect (to the maximum extent permissible by law) any other provision of this -5- Ordinance, the application of any such provision regarding another person or under circumstances different from those adjudicated by the court, or the validity or enforceability of this Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 6.. Repeal of Conflicting Laws. The parts of other ordinances of the City of Arcadia that are in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. Publication. The City Council authorizes and directs the City Clerk to publish this Ordinance in the manner and time required by law. SECTION 8. CEQA Notice of Exemption. The City Council authorizes and directs the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption, pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15062, with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles or other appropriate official designated by the County of Los Angeles for such filing, regarding the adoption of this Ordinance, within five (5) calendar days following the date of adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 9. Effecti'ive Date. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of this Ordinance to be published in the official newspaper of the Gity of Arcadia within fifteen (15) days after adoption of -6- this Ordinance. This Ordinance shall take effect on the thirty-first (31S`) day after its adoption. Passed, approved and adopted this ^ day of , 2008. Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~ I~~,.~~ ~~ Stephe~itsch City Attorney -7- STAFF REPORT Development Services Department DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: SUMMARY February 19, 2008 Mayor and City Council Jason Kruckeberg, ~evelopment 5ervices Director~ By: Mary Cynar, Economic Development Administrator~ Recommendation: Hold public liearing and introduce ordinance This is to request that the City Council hold,a public hearing and introduce the proposed ordinance for first reading. The ordinance extends the time limit for the plan effectiveness by two years for the Central Redevelopment Project, which would then allow the extension of time for the Agency to receive .tax increment revenues and pay back any outstanding indebtedness. DISCUSSION As a result of state budget ~deficits during the early 2000's, special ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund) legislation was passed. For 2004/05 and 2005/06 the legislation provided that if a redevelopment agency,remitted ERAF payments in those fiscal years, then plan effectiveness could be extended by one year for each respective year of payment. The Agency did make the ERAF payments for those fiscal years, but did not take full advantage qf the legislation by extending plan effectiveness pursuant to an adopted ordinance of the legislative body (City Council). With the adoption of the proposed ordinance the Central Redevelopment ProjecYs plan effectiveness shall be extend by two addifional years, from January 25, 2015 to January 25, 2017,. unless subsequentiy modified by other provisions of Community iVlayor and City Council February 19, 2008 Page 2 Redevelopment Law (CRL). All other provisions of the Redevelopment Plan will remain in full force and effect. The following findings are incorporated into the ordinance and must be made by the City Council: 1. Notice of the hearing was sent to all affected taxing :agencies at least 30-days prior to the public hearing and published in a newspaper of general circulation at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing; 2. Funds used to make the ERAF payments for fiscal years 2004/05 and 2005/06 would have otherwise been used to pay for the costs of projects and activities consistent with the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan; 3. The time limit for effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan is January 2015, which is 10 years or less from the last day of each of the 2004/05 and 2005/06 fiscal years and an ERAF payment was required for each of those fiscal years; and 4. The Agency is in compliance with CRL Sections 33334.2 and 33334.6, has adopted an implementation plan in accordance with the requirements of CRL Section 33490, and is not subject to sanctions pursuant to CRL Section 33334.12 (e) for failure to expend, encumber or disburse an excess surplus. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The ordinance is exempt from CEQA provisions, and once adopted, a Notice of Exemption, pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section15062, will be filed by the City Clerk with Los Angeles County within five days of adoption of the ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT The Agency has already remitted ERAF payments to Los Angeles County for fiscal years 2004/05 ($315,456.75) and 2005/06 ($354,408.21) and no further payments are required with the passage of this ordinance. With the adoption of the ordinance, the plan effectiveness is extended by two years, which essentially expands the time limit for the Agency',to receive tax increment revenues and repay any outstanding debt. ' Mayor and City Council February 19, 2008 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Hold the Public Hearing a~d introduce Ordinance #2239 of the City Council of the City of Arcadia extending the time limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project and the time limit to pay indebtedness and receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 under the! Redevelopment Plan for the Central Redevelopment Project pursuant to Heaith and Safety Code Section 33333.6 (E) (2) (D). Approved: ~e,~....~ Pw.„.,,.~ Donald Penman,l City Manager ,.<..o.. ~ ~ Date: March 4, 2008 STAFF REPORT Admiiustrative Services Department To: Mayor and City Council From: Mike Yelton, Interim Administrative Services Director ~ Michael A. Casalou, Human Resources Administrator ~ Subject: Ordinance No. 2240, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CALPERS) Recommendation: Adopt BACKGROUND On February 5, 2008, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 2240 authorizing an amendment to the contract between the Gity Council of the City of Arcadia and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. This past year, the City Council agreed to implement the 2.5% @ 55 CaIPERS retirement plan for miscellaneous employees effective September 28, 2008. FISCAL IMPACT A contract amendment cost analysis (actuarial valuation) has been completed and the Total Employer Rate will increase 2.135%, which represents approximately $260,000 for the 2008-09 FY. The member (employee) contribution rate will increase from 7% to 8% of reportable earnings. The City currently pays the entire 7% of the employees' member contribution rate. Effective September 28, 2008, the City will pay 7% and the employee is funding the additional 1% of the member contribution rate. Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 RECOMMENDATION That the City Council: Appraved Adopt Ordinance No. 2240, An Orrlinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. ~~~ Donaid Penman, City Manager Attachment ; ORDINANCE NO. 2240 ~ AN ORDINANCE OF TI~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ARCADIA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFOI2NIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. An amendment to the contract between the City of Arcadia and the Board of Administrarion, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby approved, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by such reference made a part hereof as though i herein set out in full. SECT'ION 2. The Mayor of the City of Arcadia is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of same to be published in the official newspaper of said City within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. 'I'his Ordinance shall talce effect on the thirty-first (31s') day after its adoption. 1 Passed, approved and adopted this day of , 2008. Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: `!. 'd~~ Step en P. Deitsch City Attorney ~ ~ii,,, Ca1PERS EXHIBIT Califomia Public Employees' Retirement System ~ AMENDN~NT TO CONTRACT Between the Board.of Admiaistration Califoraia Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council City of Arcadia ~ i'he Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the goveming body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective October 1, 1945, and witnessed September24, 1945, and as amended effective July 1, 1953, January 1, 1957, January 1, 1958, January 1, 1959, January 19, 1964, February 28, 1965, October 1, 1972, June 24, 1973, January 4, 1976, April 10, 1977, March 11, 1979, June 22, 1986, November 6, 1988, December 2, 1994, June 4, 1999, October 11, 1999, December 8, 1995, October 99, 2001 and March 5, 2004 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Baard and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 12 are hereby stricken from said contrac~ as executed efFective March 5, 2004, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs ra~rnbered 1 through 13 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in t'f~ Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined ~ unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shal~ m~ri age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety me~_ 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' ~nent System from and after October 1, 1945 making its employees as here~ provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Pubiic EJr~io~ses' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contrac~; agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendmenfs to said Law ~~r enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply or~ ~ the election of a contracting agency. ~yl~~ ~'A" PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY" r 3. Employees of Public Agency in the folldwing classes strali become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as ar~ excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members); c. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shaN rtot become members of said Retirement System: NO ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIONS 5. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service for local miscellaneous members in employment before and not on or after the effective date of this amendmerrt to contract shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law, subject to the reduction provided therein for service prior to March 31, 1977, termination of Social Securiry, for members whose service has been included in Federal Social Security (2°/a at age 55 Full and Modified). 6. The percentage of final compensation to be . provided for each year of credited prior and current service for local miscellaneous members in employment on or after the effective date of this amendment to contract shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354.4 of said Retirement Law, subject to the reduction provided therein for service prior to March 31, 1977, termination of Social Security, for members whose service has been included in Federal Social Security (2.5% at age 55 Full and Mod~ed). 7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21362.2 of said Retirement Law (3% at age 50 Full). 8. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the fal~ optional provisions: a. Section 21573 (Third Level of 1959 Survis~ Benefits) for local miscellaneous members and local police members o~fy_ b. Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation). c. Section 20965 (Credit for Unused Sick Leave). d. Sections 21624 and 21626 (Post-Retirement Surrriv~ADowance). PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY" e. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Pubiic Seivi~). f. Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor B~nefits) for local fire members only. g. Section 21027 (Military Service Credit for Retired Persons). 9. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Secfion 20790, ceased to be an "employer" for purposes of Section 20834 effective on April 10, 1977. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shail be faed and deterrnined as provided in Govemment Code Section 20834, and accumulated confributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as provided in Gouemment Code Section 20834. 10. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by acfuarial valuations of prior and future service liability wifh respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 11. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21573 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annua{ change.} In addition, ail assets and iiabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all local miscelianeous members and local police members. b. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its empioyees shall be pooled in a~le account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of ail local fire members. c. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the c~ of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special va{uations or of the periodic insr~tion and valuations required by law. d. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, paya3~~~ one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the cosfs of special v.~ations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the p~ investigation and ualuafions required by law. 12. Contributions required of Public Agenc'y and its empioyees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuat~on required by said Retirement Law. 13. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Pubiic Agency to the Retirement 5ystem within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said cont~ibutions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct a~o unt of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be m~a `yn connecfion with subsequent remiftances. Adjustments on account 4~'rors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payrr~{y~s between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall b~~ctive on fhe BOARD OF ADMINISTRA~1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' ~.l`(REMENT SYSTEM ~~~ . BY .ORI MGGA ND, CHIEF EMPLOYE RVICES DIVISION PUBLlC EM~LOYEES' RETlREMEN7 SYSTEM day of , CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ARCADIA BY ~ti~' PRESIDING OFFICER ~~~- ~~~~~ ;.~t Witness Date ,`CJ\J~`, Attest: ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ Cl~rk AMENDMENT ER# 94 PERS-CON-702A (Rev. '10105) ,~ ,~. ..,.. :~;.~.,~, ` . -.~ STAFF REPORT Admi~listrative Services Department Date: February 5, 2008 To: Mayor and City Council From: Michael A. Casalou, Human Resources Administrator ~~i Subject: Resolution No. 6607, a Resolution of lntention to approve an amendment to contract between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Arcadia Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 2240. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System Recommendation: I ntrod uce SUMMARY The City Council adopted Resolutions on August 21, 2007 establishing compensation and related benefits for Executive Management, Management, Part-Time Temporary employees, and employees represented by the Arcadia City Employees Association (ACEA) and the Arcadia Public Works Employees Association (APWEA). As part of the benefit changes, the City agreed to implement the 2.5% @ 55 PERS retirement plan effective October 1, 2008 with the employee paying the additional employee portion of the increase costs of 1°lo. DISCUSSION In order to implement the 2.5% @ 55 retirement plan, the City Counci{ must adopt a Resolution of Intention to approve the amendment, and introduce and subsequently adopt an Ordinance authorizing the amendment between the City of Arcadia and the California Public Employees' Retirement System. This Government Code Section also requires a secret ballot election by the employees affected whenever the contract is amended to provide a benefit, which changes the employees' rate of contribution. The contract shall not be Mayor and City Council February 5, 2008 amended if a majority of the affected members vote to disapprove the proposed ;' plan. However, disapproval of the plan is not anticipated, as the affected employee groups were made aware of the proposed plan change in the rate of contribution at the time of approval of the Memorandums of Understanding. The City is anticipating the following schedule for implementation: February 5, 2008 Adoption of the Resolution of Intention and Introduction of the Ordinance February 6- February 20th Employee Election March 4, 2008 Adoption of the Ordinance April 3, 2008 Effective date of Ordinance September 28, 2008 Effective date of plan amendment (if a plan amendment affects a change in the employee and/or employer contribution rates, this date must be a first day of a payroll period) FISCAL IMPACT A contract amendment cost analysis (actuarial valuation) has been completed and was based on the most recent annual valuation. Disclosure of the future annuals cost of the proposed contract amendment must be made public at a public meeting at least two weeks prior to the adoption of the final Ordinance. By disclosing this cost at the February 5, 2008 City Council meeting, this requirement is met. Future annual costs: Change in the Present Value of Benefits $ 3,623,261 Change in the Accrued Liability $ 1,372,610 Change in the Total Employer Rate 2.135% * ' The change'in the Total Employer Rate of 2.135% represents approximately $260,000 for the 2008-09 FY. Mayor and City Councif February 5, 2008 ; The member contribution rate will be 8% of the reportabie earnings, as of the effective date of the amendment to the contract. The City currently pays 7°10 of the employees' member contribution rates. The employee is funding the additional 1°/o. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council: Adopt Resolution No. 6607, a Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to contract between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Arcadia, and; Introduce Ordinance No. 2240. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. ,~ Approved: ~ {~c,,,,,.,_~. Donald Penman, City Manager \ /. DATE: March 4, 2008 STAFF REPORT Administrative Services Department TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mike Yelton, Interim Administrative Services Director Michael A. Casalou, Human Resources Administrator SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 6616 AUTHORIZING A MONTHLY INCREASE OF FIFTY DOLLARS IN MEDICAL CONTRIBUTION FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES: AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO SIDE LETTER AGREEMENTS WITH THE ARCADIA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (ACEA), THE ARCADIA PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (APWEA) AND THE ARCADIA FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION (AFFA) FOR A MONTHLY INCREASE OF FIFTY DOLLARS IN MEDICAL CONTRIBUTION; AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF $1,700,000 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED FUND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN FY 2007-08 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND RELATED BENEFITS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES Recommendation: Adopt SUMMARY Resolution No. 6616 authorizes an increase in medical contribution of fifty dollars ($50) per month for all members of the Arcadia City Employees Association (ACEA), Arcadia Public Works Employees Association (APWEA), Arcadia Firefighters' Association (AFFA) and Management employees. All of these items are retroactive to October 1, 2007. Resolution No. 6616 also authorizes an appropriation of $1,700,000 from unappropriated fund balances for the costs of these items and all other salary and benefit improvements for City employees previously approved by the City Council in FY 2007-08. DISCUSSION The City recently completed negotiations with the Arcadia Police Officers' Association (APOA) and now has agreements in place with all four bargaining groups as well as improvements to the salary and fringe benefits for Management employees. Given the extraordinary circumstances with the APOA, which was driven by numerous Police Officer vacancies, the City Council exceeded the amount of the agreements that were given to other City employees. As a result, the City Council authorized an additional fifty dollars in monthly medical contribution for all employees, excluding the members of Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 Page 2 of 2 the APOA. The effective date of these benefix improvements wiil be retroactive to October 1, 2007. FISCAL IMPACT The increase in medical contribution will cost $114,000 in FY 2007-08 and $135,000 on an annualized basis. Staff is recommending the City Council appropriate $1,700,000 from unappropriated fund balances for these items and all other salary and benefit improvements for City employees previously approved by the City Council in Fiscal Year2007-08. RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 6616 authorizing a Monthly Increase of Fifty Dollars in Medical Contribution for Management Employees; Authorizing the City Manager to enter into Side Letter Agreements with the Arcadia City Employees Association (ACEA), the Arcadia Public Works Employees Association (APWEA), and the Arcadia Firefighters' Association (AFFA) for a Monthly Increase of Fifty Doliars in Medical Contribution; and approve an appropriation of $1,700,000 from unappropriated fund balances for the costs associated with these medical increases and all other expenditures previously approved by the City Council in FY 2007-08 establishing compensation and related benefits for City employees. APPROVED: /' U*`''-'`'9 ~ Ur,l,~-c~r~ ~ Donald Penman, City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 6616 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COLTNCIL' OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORTZING A MONTHLY INCREASE OF FIFTY DOLLARS IN MEDICAL CONTRIBUTION FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO SIDE LETTER AGREEMENTS WITH THE ARCADIA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (ACEA), THE ARCADIA PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (APWEA) AND THE ARCADIA FIREFIGHTERS' ASSOCIATION (AFFA) FOR A MONTHLY INCREASE OF FIFTY DOLLARS IN MEDICAL CONTRIBUTION; AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION OF $1,700,000 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCES FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE MEDICAL 1NCREASES AND ALL OTHER EXPENDITL7RES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN FY 2007-08 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND RELATED BENEFITS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes a fifty dollar ($50) increase in the City's medical contribution effective retroactive to October 1, 2007 to Management Employees. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into Side Letter Agreements with the Arcadia City Employees Association (ACEA), the Arcadia Public Works Employees Association (APWEA) and Arcadia Firefighters' Association (AFFA) providing a fifty dollaz ($SO) increase in the City's medical contribution effective retroactive to October 1. 2007. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes an appropriation of $1,700,000 from unappropriated fund balances for the items mentioned in Sections 1-3 above and all other salary and benefit improvements for City employees previously approved by the City Council in FY 2007-08. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed, approved and adopted this day of , 2008. Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: _._ i" ~ City Attorney 9 ~.......... ., ~. ~~, Om4a+~Y~tNem`a STAFF REPORT Public Works Services Department DATE: March 4, 2008 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Pat Malloy, Assistant City ManagerlPublic Works Services Dir tor ~ Prepared by: Tom Tait, Deputy Director of Public Works Services Maria P. Aquino, Management Analyst SUBJECT: Resolution No 6610 initiatina the oroceedinas for the formation of the Santa Anita Oaks Liqhtina Districfi and the lew and collection of assessments related thereto commencina with Fiscal Year 2008/2009 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No 6612 declarina its irrtention to form the Santa Anita Oaks Liqhtins~ District~ and declarina its intention to conduct a oropertv owner ballotina on the matter of new assessments related thereto commencina with Fiscal Year 2008/2009 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No 6613 initiatina the proceedinas for the formation of the --- -. . .. . ~ -°-~- -~ Recommendation: Adopt Recommendation: Adopt Page 1 of 7 2008/2009 Recommendation: Adopt Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 SUMMARY At the January 15, 2008 Council meeting, City Council directed staff to allocate assessments to the proposed Citywide street lighting district based on the City's current contribution to the lighting system. The City will pay $710,858, or 60% of the Citywide street lighting assessment. In addition, the City Council directed staff to proceed with the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting Assessment District and property owner workshop. In order to establish the Citywide and Santa Anita Oaks Lighting Assessment Districts via the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, staff is recommending that the City Council adopt Resolution Numbers. 6610, 6611, 6612, 6613 and 6614. BACKGROUND During the early 1970s, under the Street Lighting Act of 1919, the City's existing lighting districts were consolidated into several districts. Since then, significant areas of conc:em have developed: aging street lighting systems, Santa Anita Home Owner Association's request to upgrade their street lights, inequity of assessmerrts within the City; and the approaching sunset date of the existing assessment districts on June 30, 2010. Following several study sessions, the City Council awarded Munifinancial a contract to assist staff with the establishment of Citywide and Sarrta Anita Lighting Assessment Districts via the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (LLD 1972). The process included the evaluation and analysis of approximately 16,500 parcels. DISCUSSION At the January 15, 2008 City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to allocate the assessments to the proposed Citywide street lighting district based on the City's cuRent contribution to the lighting system. The annual budget for this work is estimated at $1,146,157. The City's portion will be $710,858, 60°~6, and the balance $435,289, 40%, will be assessed to the property owners in the City In addition, City Council directed staff to proceed with the Santa Mita Oaks Associations request to upgrade their street lights to a decorative pole and install 13 new street lights. Additionally, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (LLD 1972) will allow the City to form street lighting districts and levy assessments for both Citywide and Santa Anita Oaks for street lighting maintenance and improvements. The LLD 1972 further requires that the assessmerrts are to be levied according to street lighting benefit rather than assessed property value. A. Pronosed Citvwide Street Liahtina Assessmerrt District Three Zones The proposed citywide sVeet lighting assessment district will replace the existing six- zones (see Attachment "A"): Zones A- E and the remaining area in the City that does Page 2 of 7 Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 not pay for street lighting assessment. Staff is proposing to convert the entire City to three zones (see Attachment "B°). • Zone 1- area with good lighting • Zone 2- area with sporadic lighting • Zone 3- area w'~th no lighting Reducing the zones from six to three will more equitably assess the cost of street lighting to all property owners in the City. Areas are proposed to be assessed based on the level of benefit from street lighting and consequently, provide an equitable cost distribution for the entire City. Prooosed Citvwide Budaet Assessments - Revised The proposed budget assessmerrts are based on the City's annual street lighting cost of $1,146,157 for lighting maintenance, operations, administration, traffic signals, and a small reserve fund (see Attachment "C"). The reserve fund is approximately 2°k of the total budget which is set aside for emergency or urgent street lighting repairs or replacements due to unforeseen conditions. At its January 15, 2008 City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to revise its initial Citywide proposed assessments to allocate the assessments based on the City's current contribution of $710,858 to lighting system and traffic signal maintenance costs. Therefore, of the $1,146,157 annual proposed Citywide street lighting budget assessment, $710,858 will be contributed by the City and the remaining $435,289 will be proportionally assessed based on the level of benefit to each zone. The method of apportionment commonly used for districts formed under the 1972 Act is a weighted portion of apportionment known as an Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) methodology that utilizes the single-family home site as the basic unit of assessment. Each single-family residential property is assigned one (1.00) EBU. The single-family unit EBU will be the base value that all other properties (other than single family) are compared and weighted against. Therefore, the EBU unit will be the determinarrt factor in calculating each parcel's assessment (see Attachment "C-1°). Consequerrtly, to proportionally and equitably spread the districYs portion for street lighting cost, staff and Mun~nancial apportioned the budget costs based on the street lighting benefit that the public andlor local residents receive, i.e., general vs. special benefit assessment. A general benefit assessment is based on street lighting benefits to the general public. Conversely, a special benefit assessment is based on direct street lighting benefit to each specific streets and parcels. Page 3 of 7 Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 As shown in Attachmerrt "C", the revised Citywide street lighting proposed assessments for each zone are the following: Zone Proposed Assessment 1 $25.70 per year or $2.14 per month (49 cents per week) 2 $9.50 per year or $0.79 per month (18 cents per week) 3 $ 5 per year or $0.42 per month (10 cerrts per week) The above costs will be the maximum proposed assessment that each assessed parcel will pay for 2008-09 property tax roll, a 3°h inflationary adjustment rate is proposed to be added for each fiscal year thereafter to accourrt for reasonable increases in electricity and inflation that are inevitably associated with the ongoing maintenance and operations of street lights. However, it should be pointed out that this is the maximum amount that can be /evied to each parce! based on their assigned equivalent benefit unik !n the event the proposed annua/ budget for street lighting is less than the annua! assessment, the lower amount wi11 be applied. B. Santa Anita Oaks Liahtina Assessment District - Uuarade of Street Liahtina Poles and fixtures The Santa Anita Homeowner's Association has requested an upgrade of their street light poles and fixtures to a more decorative type (see Attachment "D°). As part of Zone 1, Santa Anita Oaks street lighting district will be paying the proposed annual maintenance and operations assessment plus the cost for their new street light poles, material and construction. There are 206 parcels to be levied in this neighborhood and the cost to complete this work is approximately $550,000. On February 6, 2008, staff conducted a property owner workshop for the neighborhood and a 10-year payment plan (with a 5°r6 annual interest) was established. Each assessed parcel is then expected to pay the following proposed budget assessment (see Attachment "E"): Plan Service* Maintenance 10 - Year $381 $26 7he debt se~vice is for sfreet lighfing const the term of the loan. i i per year or expenses arn per month f remain frxed Page 4 of 7 Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 Landscaaina and Liahtins~ Act of 7972 fLLD 1972) and Adoation of Resolutions The LLD 1972 permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies, for the purpose of providing public improvements including maintenance, operations, construction, and servicing of public street lights. Afong with this, Proposition 218 also requires a simple majority vote from the property owners in order for their assessments to be collected. Therefore, the following resolutions will need to be adopted by the City Council in order to comply with the LLD 1972 and Prop 218 requirements for the establishment of Citywide and Santa Anita Oaks Lighting Assessment Districts: • Resolution to Initiate Proceedings (No. 6610 for Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District and No. 6613 for Citywide) . Resolution to Approve Preliminary Engineer's Report (No. 6611 for Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District and No. 6614 for Citywide) - this data includes the necessary information regarding the districts and their assessments such as plans and spec~cations, budget, method of apportionment, and assessment diagram and roll. • Resolution of Intent to Form the District and Conduct a Property Owner Balloting (No. 6612 for Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District) - setting the Public Hearing date and conduct the balloting process for Sarrta Anita Oaks area only. Ballots are scheduled to be mailed during the week of March 17, with the Public Hearing in May 6 and May 20. The Citywide districYs Resolution of Intent will later be presented in May when their property owner information meetings have been conducted (March - May). Conclusion In order to establish the Citywide and Santa Mita Oaks street lighting assessment districts via the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218, staff is recommending that the City Council adopt Resolution Numbers 6610, 6611, 6612, 6613 and 6614. The next step in the process for the Citywide District will be the property owner information meetings, March 4o May, followed by mailed ballots the last week of May and a Public Hearing on July 15 and August 5. Ballots for the Santa Mita Oaks Lighting District will be mailed the week of March 17"', followed by a Public Hearing on May 6 and May 20. If the formation of the Citywide District fails, the City's general fund will have to shoulder the entire cost to operate and maintain the street lighting system throughout the City at approximately $1 million dollars per year beginning in July 1, 2010 or fiscal year 2010- 11, when the City's existing lighting districts will expire. Because of this, major services in the community such as park maintenance, street sweeping, general landscaping, tree trimming, public safety, may be impacted to absorb the City's street lighting costs. Page 5 of 7 Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The environmental assessment is not necessary for this evaluation. FISCAL IMPACT The total proposed citywide budget assessment is $1,146,157 with 16,109 parcels to be levied. Per City Council's direction, the proposed budget assessment for the general fund's portion is $710,858 (the City's current street lighting contribution), while the special benefit or the districts' portion was determined to be $436,289. The districts' portion was equitably and proportionally allocated based on the number of parcels, street lighting budget, and the lighting benefit that each assessed parcel and general public receives. In addition, the Santa Anita Oaks Homeowners' Lighting District construction cost to upgrade its street lighting poles is $550,000 plus Zone 1's annual maintenance and operations cost. Annual essessments will be based on a 10-year payment plan for construction costs, which will be initially funded by a loan from the City's general fund to the district. Upon successful establishment of a Citywide and the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting Assessmerrt Districts, the LLD 1972 wiil allow the City to collect a special benefit assessment through the property owners' annual property tax bill to fund the ongoing maintenance and operational costs as well as the lighting district improvements and upgrades. Additionally, a Citywide assessment district will provide an equitable cost distribution for assessing street lighting improvements and maintenance costs. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the following Resolutions for the Citywide and Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District formation via Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: LWLS/LUUy Page 6 of 7 Mayor and City Council March 4, 2008 Resolution No 6612 declarina its intention to form the Santa Anita Oaks with Fiscal Year 2008/2009 Resolution No 6613 initiatina the qroceedinas for the formation of the Arcadia Citwvide Liahtina District 2008-01 ~ and the levv and collection of assessments related thereto commencina with Fiscal Year 2008/2009 and coilection of assessments related thereto commencina with Fiscal Year 2008/2009 Approved by: ~'r+-~~~ Donald Penman, City Manager PM:MA: ma Attachments Page 7 of 7 ATTACHMENT A CITY OF ARCADIA __~` .b ,a ~ .. ~ / ~ °~ i ~ ~ ~ +~~ '' I ~ 1~ . ` ~ ,y t .) ~' ~ ~ ., . i ~p y :~ . ~ _ ~' ~ ~ '~ ~ 'r ~ . ~ I , ;~, , _ a~,~, ; ~,~~~ ~...~> a~ •._ ° ~ ~! 1 i ~ - ~ ~~ ~~~ • `J ~~~ ~:/ ~~~ 1 b3: t. , ~II ~~ ~~,~. , :,i. ~ ~° a ~ ~ ~. ; .I~ COLOR (CITV/OwNER) O ZONE A ~~ EDISON OWNED ZONE B ~ ~ ZONE C ~ ~ ZONE D ~. CITY OWNED ~ ZONE E ~ 0 UNZONE D ~ ~ NO STREETLIGHIS ., ,:, ~ r ~ I ~~~~ ~ / ~ / ` ; ~.. . L ATTACHMENT B CITY OF ARCADIA STREETLIGHTING ~ ZONE 1 ~..~.~ b~ ~;~ ~,;,:~,~ ZONE 2 - ZONE 3 ATTACHMENT C Tohl Garwnl TmelSpeciel ionat Zone] Zon) Butlpet Bena(~I Benafit pllontion Alloc~tion Allx~lion Direct Costs Tral6cSqnel j 2Pa,)60 S 220.)60 E - E - 5 . 5 . Pnmary6SecontleryLqhh(NOfLacalLgh[a) 300.]]0 103.950 96.820 BO5f0 8.520 I180 Sub~TOftlCRywiEelmpmvammu 521,5]0 ~YLT10 88,6]U l0,510 l,520 1,)BO LacalStmeWphlsfPorrwrySSecoMerySfreefa) iPB.800 - 128,900 f2<,450 4,350 - LocelSYrtefGD~~sNnMinResPoen4alNephborliooCS) JO)290 JOI.280 3e1dI0 SB~G $up4ofalLOC~llmprovam~nb 416,090 fT6,090 ~fi5,E]0 1~,]30 ToLI Annual MelnUnanca Butlgel 'S 997,6Y0 S 424,71~ S 672,810 S 646,980 S 18,740 { 7,790 R~M1~b110a4ontC~pbllmpovam~Ma T5,000 t9,B80 55,910 ' S2,)50 1,810 150 TotalDirectEcpenaes 1,072,620 444,400 626,220 599,130 20,550 8,540 Incidental Costs nem~o~.ve~o~ so,so~ - sqeo~ az,on ~,~~~ aov4 ReauwFunECOlMCtlon 32,03~ 33,eb1 21]83 828 ]15 Toinl Incidenfel Expenses 73,527 - 73,527 67,820 5,496 4,409 TOTALANNUALBUDGET $1,146,147 E444,400 5701,747 $662,950 E25,848 $12,949 GenerelFund Contribution p10,858) (444,400) (266,458) (257,347) (9,821) (5,290) BALANCE TO LEW 5435,289 EO 5435,289 5411,603 516,027 57,659 TofalPBtcels 18,568 tS,282 1,808 1,868 Pe¢als Lavlatl 16,OB7 13.070 1,579 1,502 TaLI EBIJ to 6e Levletl 19,R1C.SP6 16,015.886 7,BB7.056 1,571.7Bb Proposed Maximum Rates (FY08/09) E25.70 89.50 55.00 ~a~ow~.e a.u. io n. e.inne) ATTACHMENT C-1 Land Use 8enefrt Unk Calculations Single-Family Residential Property 1.000 per unft Mutti-Family Residential & Mixed Use PropeRy 0.750 0.625 0.500 0.375 0.250 per unit per unit per unit per unit per unit ~unue i-s~ ~unns sz~ ~~mm zsso> ~~nns si-~oo) ~u~ks erescer tnen too) Condominium/Town-home Property 0.750 per unit Developed Commercia~industrial Property 4.000 per acre (minimum 1.000 EBU; mmdmum 40.000 EBI~ Developed HoteUMotel Property 6.000 per acre (mfMmum 1.500 EBU; ma~dmum 80.000 EBU) Developed Institutional Property 2.000 per acre (minimum 0.500 EBU; medminn 20.000 EBU) Developed PuWic Property 2.000 per acre (mmlmum 0.500 EBU; mmdmum 20.OW EBU) Parking Lot/Limited Use Property 1.000 per acre (miNmum 0.250 EBU; rtm~dmum 10.000 EBtq Vacant Property 0.500 per acre (m6i'vman 0.125 EBU; mmdmum 5.000 EBU) PlannedResidentialProperty 0.500 0.250 perplanned per planned sinpie~Famayorcorwominiumunn R~1 Mul[i-Fanriy Planned Non-Residential Property 2.000 per acre (minimwn 0.5 EBU; mmdmivn 20.0 EBU) Exempt 0.000 per parcel Special Case Property varied based on circumstances associated with each parcel ATTACHMENT D W ~ Q ~ Q 0 Q ~"' z a Q ~ Q C/~ ~~ Q ~~3llb8b'~ ~d `d1113W2~`d~ 2~ D ~ R~ Jdy ~p~N OAK MEP p~ GP'~\• 22i 6,, SAN -~i6 ~O > Q ~Q ~~P~c~ OaN`d p pP w ~ ~O ~ G~OF''~P o w c~ ~ `E~~ ` o m O C~ ~ Y Q~O ~P~ J J D~a ~ Q ~ O O ~ ~ ~ I I NlMalb'8 ATTACHMENT E Santa Anita Oaks Proposed Budget 10-Year Payment Plan Debt Service O& M Total Direct Costs Average Principal Payment Average Interest Payment Streetlight Maintenance & Utilities Subtotal Direct Costs Indirect Costs Rehabilitation & Capital Improvements District Administration Reserve Collections Subtotal lncidental Expenses City Contribution for Mainfenance BALANCE TO LEVY (Budgeted) Total Parcels Total Parcels Levied Total Equivalent Benefit Units Calculated Levy per Benefit Unit Proposed Maximum Levy per Benefit Unit (Proposetl Rates to be Ballotetl) 55,000 - 55,000 16,228 - 16,228 - 6.924 6.924 $ 71,228 $ 6,924 $ 78,152 - 670 670 7,160 556 7,716 - 266 266 $ 7,160 $ 1,491 $ 8,651 (3,127) $ (3,121) $ 78,388 $ 5,294 $ 83,682 214 214 214 206 206 206 206.00 206.00 206.00 $ 380.52 $ 25.70 $ 406.22 $ 381.00 $ 26.00 $ 407.00 Total Estimate Loan Repayment per EBU $ 3,805.20 Total Maximum Loan Repayment per EBU $ 3,810.00 RESOLUTION N0. 6610 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Secrion 22500 (hereafter referred to as the "1972 Act") desires to iniriate proceedings for the formation of the "Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District" (hereafter referred to as the "District"); and to levy and collect annual assessments to pay for the construction and installarion of street lighting improvements within the District including related incidental expenses and financing costs, and for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities related thereto. The 1972 Act provides for the formation of an assessment district pursuant to Chapter 2 Article 1 of the - 1972 Act,-and the levy and collection of assessments by the County on behalf of the City pursuant to Chapter 4 Article 2 of the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the esrimated cost to construct and install street lighting improvements within the District is i greater than can be conveniently raised from a single annual assessment, and the City shall loan to the District, at an annual interest rate of five percent (S%), the funds estimated for such costs and the repayment of that loan shall be collected in eGual annual installment assessments over a period of ten years pursuant to Chapter 5, Secrion 22660 (b) of the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, the City has retained MuniFinancial as the Engineer of Work, for the purpose of assisting with the formation of the DisMct, the establishment of assessments, and to prepare and file an Engineer's Report with the Ciry Clerk in accordance with the 1972 Act and to assist with the property owner ballot proceedings connected therewith pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (hereafter referred to as the "Constitution"). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA> CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBy pIND~ DETERMII~rE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: _ _ _ _ _ _SECTION 1._ _ _ _ _IMPROVEI~IENTS.- T-he-improvements -generaily - - - - include, but are not limited to, the materials, equipment, utilities, labor, contract services, financing and incidental expenses associated with the construction and installation of new street lighting and replacement of z existing sireet light poles within the public right-of-ways on specific streets within the residential area lrnown as Santa Anita Oaks; as well as the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of street lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities that will provide special benefit to the properties within the District. Detailed maps and descriptions of the locarion and extent of the proposed improvements to be constructed, installed and maintained by the District are on file in the Office of Public Works Services Deparhnent of the City of Arcadia and by reference these plans and specifications are made part of this Resolution. SECTION 2. TERRITORY. The territory of land within the proposed District is within the residential area known as Santa Anita Oaks of the City of Arcadia, the County of Los Angeles, State of Califomia and is generally located south of Orange Grove Avenue, east of Baldwin Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard. The District includes two hundred fourteen (214) parcels that comprise two hundred six (206) single-family residential lots located on Arbolada Drive, Carmelita Place, Gloria Road, Hacienda_ _ Drive, Hampton Road, Oak Meadow Road, Oaklawn Place, Oaklawn Road, and San Carlos Road. These parcels are identified on all or a portion of Book 5796 Pages 17 through 25; and Book 5770 Pages 15, 16, 17 and 20 through 3 SECTION 3. ASSESSMENTS AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS. Based on the City's estimate of the cost of constructing the proposed street light improvements within the District ($550,000), upon successful formation of the District, the City shall provide a loan to the District for the construction of the improvements at an annual interest rate of five percent (5%), with the principal, interest and incidental expenses being repaid to the City fhrough the collection of equal annual assessment installments over the first ten years of the Dish-ict (Fiscal Year 2008/2009 through Fiscal Year 2017/2018). In addition to the annual installments (debt service payment), the proposed annual assessments shall include designated funding for the ongoing annual expenses to maintain, service and operate street lighting improvements (O&M payment) that provide special benefits to properties in the District. Collectively, the debt service payment and O&M payment for each parcel represent the annual assessment amount that shall be co]lected on the County tax rolls as a single assessment. SECTION 4. ENGINEER'S REPORT. The Ci ------------- _.__~ Council hereby -----.-------- oiders MuniFinancial to prepare and file with the City Clerk an Engineer's Report concerning the formation of the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District and the levy of specia] benefit assessments for properties therein including a annual installments to repay the City loan to finance the initial construction and installation of the improvements and the annual assessments for the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation associated with the street lighting that provides special benefits to those properties. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed approved and adopted this day of , 2008. Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: - - ` ~- '~~ln" ~~ ~~C„' _1%~---- - ~/ - - -•-- City Attorney 5 RESOLUTION NO. 6611 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO CONIMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolution, ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report (hereafter referred to as "Report") regarding the formation of an assessment district to be designated as the "Santa Anita Oaks Lighting DistricY' (hereafter referred to as "DistricP') and the proposed levy and collection of annual assessments for street lighting improvements, appurtenant facilities and activities related thereto, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighring Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the "1972 Act"); and WHEREAS, a Report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk - ~f_tl~e_City-of-Arcadia-in--accordance-with-Article-4-of~hapter-l-(Sections-- - 22565 through 22574) of the 1972 Act, said Report being entitled "City of Arcadia, Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District, Engineer's Formation Report, Fiscal Year 2008/2009"; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has presented to the City Council said Report as prescribed by Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 22586 of said 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and reviewed the Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents therein, and that the proposed assessments have been spread in accordance with the specia] benefits received from the proposed improvements as set forth in said Report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COLJNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORIVIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The preceding recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. REPORT CONTENT. The Report as presented, consists of the following: 2a) Plans and specifications that describe the District and Improvements. z 2b) Method of Apportionment that outlines the special benefit conferred on properties within the District from the improvements; and the calculations used to establish each parcel's proportional special benefit assessment commencing in fiscal year 2008/2009 including the establishment of: - Assessment installments to repay the City loan and related expenses for the construction and installation of the street light improvements; and, n Annual assessments for the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of street lighting improvements that provide special benefits to the properties in the District; and, ~ An Assessment Range Formula that provides for inflationary adjusrinents to the annual assessment for the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of street lighting improvements, thereby establishing the maximum assessment rate authorized each fiscal year. 2c) The Budget that outlines the costs and expenses associated with the City loan to the District and the estimated annual expenses to provide, maintain, and service the improvements, including incidental expenses authorized by the 1972 Act. 2d) An Assessment Diagram that identifies the boundaries of the District and associated lots, parcels and properties included therein. 3 2e) An Assessment Roll containing each of the Assessor Parcel Numbers that comprise the Dish~ict and the proportional assessments commencing Fiscal Year 2008/2009. SECTION 3. REPORT APPROVAL. The Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis (as submitted or amended), and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection. SECTION 4. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed Assessment Rates, Assessment Range Formula and method of apportionment described in the Report are hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and the resulting calculated Assessments shall be submitted to the property owners of record within the proposed District for approval pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID and applicable provisions California State law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adopfion of this Resolution. 4 Passed approved and adopted this day of , 2008. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~ 't~~ ~;"• f d-~~,~ City Attorney ` Mayor of the City of Arcadia RESOLUTION NO. 6612 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM THE SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT; AND DECLAR.iNG ITS INTENTION TO CONDUCT A PROPERTY OWNER BALLOTING ON THE MATTER OF NEW ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the "1972 Act") by previous Resolution initiated proceedings for the formation of the "Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District" (hereafter referred to as "District), and to levy and collect annual assessments to pay for street lighting improvements and appurtenarit facilities related thereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to form the District and to levy and collect annual assessments against lots and parcels of land within the District to pay the costs and expenses related to the improvements provided within the_D.istricLasautliorizedb3~-the-1-~7~-~ct;-and WHEREAS, the Engineer selected by the City Council has prepared and filed with the City Cierk a Report in connection with such proceedings for the proposed levy of assessments commencing with Fiscal Year 2008/2009 (July 1, 2008 and ending June 30, 2009) in accordance with Chapter l, Article 4(Sections 22565 through 22574) of the 1972 Act. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COLJNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l. INTENTION. The City Council hereby declares its intention to form the District and proposes to levy and collect annual assessments against parcels of land within the District commencing with fiscal year 2008/2009. The territory included within the District is generally described in Secrion 2 of this Resolution and shall be designated as the "Santa Anita Oaks Lighting DistricP'. SECTION 2. TERRITORY. The territory of land within the proposed District is within the residential area lrnown as Santa Anita Oaks of the City of Arcadia, the County of Los Angeles, State of California and is generally located south of Orange Grove Avenue, east of Baldwin Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard. The District includes two hundred fourteen (214) parcels that comprise two hundred six (206) single-family residential lots located on Arbolada Drive, Carmelita Place, Gloria Road, Hacienda Drive, Hampton Road, Oak Meadow Road, Oaklawn Place, Oaklawn Road, z and San Carlos Road. These parcels are identified on all or a portion of Book 5796 Pages 17 through 25; and Book 5770 Pages 15, 16, 17 and 20 through 24; of the Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Maps. SECTION 3. IMPROVEMENTS. The improvements generally include, but are not limited to the materials, equipment, urilities, labor, contract services, financing and incidental expenses associated with the construction and installation of new street lighting and replacement of existing street light poles within the public right-of-ways on specific streets within the proposed District; as well as the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of street lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities that will provide special benefit to the properties within the District. Detailed maps and descriptions of the location and extent of the proposed improvements to be constructed, installed and maintained by the District are on file in the Office of Public Warks Services Department of the City of Arcadia and by reference these plans and specifications are made part of this Resolution. SECTION 4. ASSESSMENTS AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS. Based on the City's estimate of the cost of constructing the proposed street light improvements within the District ($550,000), upon successful formation 3 construction of the improvements at an annual interest rate of five percent (5%), with the principal, interest and incidental expenses being repaid to the City through the collection of equal annua] assessment installments over the first ten years of the District (Fiscal Year 2008/2009 tlu~ough Fiscal Year 2017/2018). In addition to the annual installments (debt service payment), the proposed annual assessments shall include designated funding for the ongoing annual expenses to maintain, service and operate street lighting improvements (O&M payment) that provide special benefits to properties in the District. Collectively, the debt service payment and O&M payment for each parcel represent the annual assessment amount that shall be collected on the County tax rolls as a single assessment. These proposed assessments are outlined in the Engineer's Report and include a M~imum Assessment Rate, Assessment Range Formula, method of apportionment and proposed assessment for fiscal year 2008/2009, and the resulting calculated maximum assessments shall be submitted to the property owners of record within the proposed District for approval pursuant to the provisions of the Califomia Constitution Article XIIID and applicable provisions California State law. The City Council finds that the public's best interest requires such action and ]evy of assessments. a SECTION 5. PUBLIC HEARING: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a public hearing concerning the formarion of the District and the levy of new or increased assessments for said District in accordance with Government Code, Section 53753 and California Constitution, Article XIIID, Section 4(e). Notice is hereby given that a public hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the City Council Chambers, Arcadia City Hall, located at 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California. At the public hearing, all mterested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. Any interested person may also file a written protest with the Ciry Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing, or having previously filed such written protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection and such protest by a properiy owner within the District shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such property owner. s SECTION 6. CALL FOR ASSESMENT BALLOTING. The City Council hereby calls for a property owner protest balloting proceeding for the proposed 1972 Act assessments for the District in accordance with Government Code Section 53753 and pursuant to the California Constitution Article XIIID Section 4(e). SECTION 7. BALLOT PROCEEDINGS. A notice of the public hearing and ballot shall be distributed by first class mail to the property owners of record for each parcel within the District subject to a new or increased assessment not less than 45 days before the date of the public hearing, in accordance with the provisions of the California Constitution. Property owners being balloted for the new or increased assessment must return their ballots to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, at which time all valid ballots returned shall be opened and tabulated to deternrine if a majority protest exits. Only those ballots issued by the City or on behalf of the City shall be considered as valid ballots. Each property __ owner_may_ xeturn_the _ballot_by mail_or_. in..person .to.xhe-Ci .ty-Cler-k-no-later --.-._ _______ _ than the conclusion of the public hearing on Tuesday, May 6, 2008. Valid property owner protest ballots must be completed and received by the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing for tabularion. At the 6 conclusion of public hearing the City Clerk or their designee shall open and tabulate all valid ballots returned. The property owner protest ballot proceeding conducted for the District shall constitute the property owners' approval or rejection of the annua] levy of assessments and assessment range formula and the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financia] obligation of the affected properties to deternune if a majority protest exists. A majority protest exists if the valid ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the valid ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. SECTION 8. MAILING OF PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE AND BALLOT. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Clerk or his designee to prepare and mail notice of the public hearing and property owner protest ballots to the property owners of record regarding the proposed levy of the assessments and the assessment range formula as outlined in the Engineer's Report, in accordance with Government Code, - ___.____.Seciion_.53753._and__California...Constitution,__Article__XIIID,---Section-4(e)---- - - XIIID. ~ SECTIN 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed approved and adopted this day of , 2008. Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: (~. ~<7`e~~~ City Attorney s RESOLUTION N0. 6613 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF THE ARCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008-1; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighring Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter refened to as the "1972 AcP') desires to initiate proceedings for the formation of the "Arcadia Citywide Lighting District 2008-1" (hereafter refened to as the "District"); and to levy and collect annual assessments to pay for the operation, maintenance and servicing of public street lighting improvements and appurtenant faciliries related thereto. The 1972 Act provides for the formation of an assessment district pursuant to Chapter 2 Article 1 of the 1972 Act, and the levy and collection of assessments by the County on behalf of the City pursuant to Chapter 4 Article 2 of the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, the City has retained MuniFinancial as the Engineer of Work, for the purpose of assisting with the formation of the District, the establishment of assessments, and to prepare and file an Engineer's Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the 1972 Act and to assist with the property owner ballot proceedings connected therewith pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (hereafter referred to as the "Constiturion"). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l. IMPROVEMENTS. The proposed improvements shall include the operarion, maintenance and servicing of public lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities throughout the City of Arcadia that have been detern-nned to be of special benefit to properties within the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, the materials, equipment, utilities, labor, contract services and incidental expenses necessary for the ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of such improvements and appurtenant facilities within public right-of-ways or pubiic areas. Maps detailing the location and extent of the proposed improvements to be serviced and maintained by the District are on file in the Office of Public Works Services Department of the City of Arcadia and by reference these maps and specifications are made part of this Resolution. z SECTION 2. TERRITORY. The boundaries of the proposed District shall be coternunous with the boundaries of the City of Arcadia, within the County of Los Angeles, State of Califomia and shall include all parcels within said boundaries. Reference is hereby made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's maps for a detailed descnption of the lines and dimensions of the parcels therein. The proposed District may include zones of benefit where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. Each zone shall consist of all lots, subdivisions and parcels of land that will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements. SECTION 3. ASSESSMENTS AND FINANCIAL PROVISIONS. The proposed annual assessments for the District shall provide a funding source for the ongoing annual expenses to maintain, service and operate street lighting improvements that provide special benefits to properties in the District. The net annual cost of providing such improvements shall be collected on the County tax rolls as annual assessments. 3 SECTION 4. ENGINEER'S REPORT. The City Council hereby orders MuniFinancial to prepare and file with the City Clerk an Engineer's Report concerning the formarion of the Arcadia Citywide Lighting District 2008-1 and the levy of special benefit assessments for properties therein for the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation associated with the street lighting that provides special benefits to those properties. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed approved and adopted this day of , 2008. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: . ~ ~~ . l'~:C e .C City Attomey Mayor of the City of Arcadia - - - - 4 RESOLUTION NO. 6614 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT REGARDING THE FORMATION OF THE ARCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008-1; AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO COMMENCING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 WHEREAS, the City Counci] has, by previous Resolution, ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report (hereafter referred to as "ReporP') regarding the formation of an assessment district to be designated as the "Arcadia Citywide Lighting District 2008-1" (hereafter referred to as "DistricY') and the proposed levy and collection of annual assessments for street lighting improvements, appurtenant facilities and activities related thereto, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the "1972 Act"); and WHEREAS, a Report has been prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Arcadia in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1(Sections 22565 through 22574) of-the 1972 Act, said Report being entitled "City of Arcadia, Arcadia Citywide Lighting Distnct 2008-1, Engineer's Formation Report, Fiscal Year 2008/2009"; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has presented to the City Council said Report as prescribed by Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 22586 of said 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and reviewed the Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents therein, and that the proposed assessments have been spread in accordance with the special benefits received from the proposed improvements as set forth in said Report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The preceding recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. REPORT CONTENT. The Report as presented, consists of the following: 2a) Plans and specifications that describe the District and Improvements. 2b) Method of Apportionment that outlines the special benefit conferred on properties within the District from the improvements; and the z calculations used to establish each parcel's proportional special benefit assessment commencing in fiscal year 2008/2009 including the establishment of: - Annual assessments for the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of street lighting improvements that provide special benefits to the properties in the District; and, > An Assessment Range Formula that provides for inflationary adjustments to the annual assessment for the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of street lighting improvements, thereby establishing the maximum assessment rate authorized each fiscal year. 2c) The Budget that outlines the estimated annual expenses to provide, maintain and the improvements, including incidental expenses authorized by the 1972 Act. 2d) An Assessment Diagram that identifies the boundazies of the District, the designated zones of.benefit, and the associated lots, parcels and properties included therein. 2e) An Assessment Roll containing each of the Assessor Parcel Numbers that comprise the Dish-ict and the proportional assessments commencing Fiscal Year 2008/2009. 3 SECTION 3. REPORT APPROVAL. The Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis (as submitted or amended), and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection. SECTION 4. ASSESSMENTS. The proposed Assessment Rates, Assessment Range Formula and method of apportionment described in the Report are hereby approved on a preliminary basis, and the resulting calculated Assessments shal] be submitted to the property owners of record within the proposed District for approval pursuant to the provisions of the Califomia Constitution Article XIIID and applicable provisions California State law. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 4 Passed approved and adopted this day of , 2008. Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~~~,~„ ~. ~~3e~~ City Attorney ~ITY OF ARCADIA ~-RCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT 2008-1 ~NGINEER'S FORMATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 :~ ~~,.~~~~,~ INTENT MEETING: MnRCH 4, 2008 PUBLIC HEARING: TBD ~ MuniFinancial Corporate Office: 27368 Via lndustria Suite 110 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (951) 587-3500 Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) Fax: (951) 587-3510 Other Office Locations: Lancaster, CA Phoenix, AZ Oakland, CA Orlando, FL Sacramento, CA Seattle, WA Memphis, TN www.muni.com ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Formation of the Arcadia Citywide Lighting District 2008-1 And establishment of Annual Assessments for said District City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of Califomia This Repoxt and the enclosed descripuons, budget and assessment diagram outline the plans and specificavons for the formation of che Arcadia Citywide Lighdng District 2008-1 and establishmenc of the proposed assessments foi each ]ot, parcel, and subdivision of land wichin said District. Reference is hereb}~ made co the Los Angeles Count}~ Assessor's maps for a detailed descripdon of ~he Gnes and dimensions of parcels within che Discrict. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as dicected by the Ciry Council. Dated this day of , ~008. i~IuniFinancial Assessment Engineer On Behalf of the Cit~~ of Arcadia B y: Jim i~IcGuire Senior Project Manager By: Riehard Kopecky R. C. E. # 16742 TABLE O~' COIQT~NTS INTRODUCTION.... 1 PART I- PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .............................................................4 DESCRIPTION OF THE D[STRICT ...........................................................................................4 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ...............................................................~ Irr~ravementr and Senncet AuthonZed by !he 1972 Ad .................................................................. 5 Dirtnct Facilitier and Impravementr .................................................................................................6 PART II - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ......................................................8 BENEFIT ANALYSIS ..................................................... Specia! Ben~t ................................................................. General Ben~t ................................................................ ASSESShfENT METHODOLOGY .................................... Zoner of Ben~t ............................................................... Equrvalent Benefit Unitr ......:.......................................... Allocakon of Improvemenl Cortc ...................................... ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA ................................. PART III - DISTRICT BUDGET..... PART IV - DISTffiCT DIAGRAM ... ........................................................... 8 ................................................................ 9 .............................................................10 ......................................................:..11 ..........................................................1j .......................................................... 20 21 ......................................... 23 ....................................................... 25 PART V -ASSESSMENT ROLL .............................................................................27 Cih~ ofArcadio Engineer't FornJation Report Arcad:'a Cilymide Ltgbting Dirtrict 2008-7 I81~E'OCtibC~l0~1 The Ciry of Arcadia, Counry of I,os Angeles, State of California, (hereaftei reEerred to as "Cicd') has previousl}~ Foimed and annually leided assessmenes for street Gght improvements anthin portions of the City pursuant to che provisions oF the Srreet Lighring Acc of 1919, being Part 1 of Divisian 94 of the Calafornia ,Streetr and Highmayr Code commencing wilh ff 18000 (hereafrer referred to as the "1919 Act"). While these annual assessmencs have hiscoricallv funded a portion of the costs ro provide and maintain screet lighc improvemencs for vanous areas and neighborhoods in the Cit~~, the propercies that are levied such assessments (idendfied as Zones A, B, C, D and E) only represent a porrion of the properues u~ithin the Ciry that have street lighting improvements. In addition, because these 1919 Act assessments are apporcioned based on the assessed land value of each parcel (ad-valorem calculauon), the assessments can vary significantl}~ for similar properdes. Therefore, the Cin' Council has by pre~nous resoludon iniriated proceedings that called for the prepaxation and filing of an Engineei's Report to establisti a special benefic assessment discrict wi~hin che Ciry Gmits oi Arcadia to be designated as che: Arcadia Citywide Lighting District 2008-1 (hereafrer referxed to as `Diserict"), for the purpose of escablishing a citywide districc to fund in part, the ongoing operacion, maincenance and senncing of public lighring improvements chroughout the City of Arcadia based on the propordonal special benefiis to each property within the City. The City Council proposes to form the District and to levy and collect annual assessments on the County tax rolls to parcially fund public lighung improvements and appurtenant facilides including associaced incidental expenses authorized pursuant to the Z~rnd.rcape and Zightiirg AU of 1972, Part 2 of Ditdrion 1~ of the Calijornia .Streek and Higbwa}~r Code ff22500 and folloudng (hereafter referred ro as the "1972 Act'~. In conjuncdon with che authority of the 1972 Act [he proposed assessments shall be made in compGance wixh [he substantive and procedural requiremen[s of the Cal'rfarnr'a State CauktutionArtirle XIIID (hereafrer referred ro as the "California Consrixudod'). This Engineer's Repor~ (hereafrez referred to as "Report") has been prepared in connection with the es[ablishment of said Disvict and the levy and collecuon of annual assessments related chereto commencing in fiscal }~ear 2008/2009, pursuant co Chapter 1, Article 4 be~,nnning with ~22~65 oE the 1972 Act and the provisions of che California Constirution. Said Discrict shall include all lots and parcels of land within the Ciry of Arcadia at the dme this Repott u~as prepared, the 6oundanes oF which are conreraunous with the Cicy boundaries. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual pcoperty assigned its own Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) b}~ the Los Angeles Counh~ Assessor's OEfice. The Los Angeles Countc Auditox/Controller uses Assessor's Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properdes to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessmencs. ~MuniFinancial la°e ~ Cit~~ ofArcadia Engineer't Formation Ref~ort Arcadia Cztyunde Ilghting Dirtrict 2008J As pan of chis Distxict formarion, the Ciry shall conduct a propert~~ owner protest ballot proceeding for the proposed new assessments in accordance u-ith the provisions of Government Code, Secrion 53?53 and California Consnturion, Ardcle XIIID Secdon 4. In conjuncdon wich chis ballot proceeding, the Cin Councfl shall conduct a public heacing to consider public tesdmonies, comments and written protests regarding the foxmauon of che Distncc and le~ry~ of assessments. Upon conclusion of rlie public hearing, property owner piotest ballocs received will be opened and tabulated to determine whethex majorin- protest ewsts (ballots shall be pTOportionall} ~veighted based on each parcePs proposed assessment obligation), and by resoluuon the Cin~ Council will confirm che results of the ballot tabularion. IF inajorit} protest exists, che Cin~ Council shall abandon the formation of the District, and the proposed ]e~y of assessments described heiein, but mac condnue to levy the assessments authoeized under the pro~~sions of che 1919 Act undl such authorized assessmen[s expire. If majoriry pxotest does noc e~st, ~he Cin~ Council may, by resolution, adopt this Report (as submitted or amended) including the assessment diagram; order the formanon of the District; approve the le~ry and collecdon of the assassments including the assessment iange formula as described herein; and order the improvements to be made. In such case, the assessments (as provided herein or as amended) shall be submieted to che Los Angeles Counn~ Auditoc/Contioller for inclusion on the propem~ tax roll commencing in fiscal year 2008/2009 and the assessments historically lei2ed under the pTOVisions of the 1919 Act shall be eGminated and no longer assessed. Each subsequent Sscal yeat, an Engineer's Report shall be prepared and presented to the City Counci] describing the Disuict, any changes to the Disuict or improvements,, the proposed budget and assessments for that Escal vear, and che Cite- Counci] shal] hold a nouced public hearing regarding these matters prior co approving the annual levy of assessments. This Repott consiscs of five (5) parts: Pan I Plans and Specifications: Provides an overall description of the District and, the impiovements. While it has been decermined that public lights, specificalle screet lighung, e~sts throughout the Citv and these improvements overall will provide specia] benefits to each assessed paicel u~ithin the District, it is also recognized that street Gghcs do not eacist on all screets wichin the Cit~~ and some areas have less local street lighring than other areas oY the Ciry (location and pro~mity). Therefore che District wil] inidallj~ be formed wich chree (3) zones oF benefi[ (hereafrer referred co as "7_ones)", u~hich are described in more detail in this section o£ the Report as well as Patt II (1~7ethod of Appornonmenc). A diagram show~ng the exrezior boundaries of the Discric[ and the Zones escablished therein is attached and incorpoiated herein under Part IV (Boundarn Diagram). Part II The Method of Appottionment: This secno^ of the Repoxt provides a discussion of benefits to properries wichin the Discrict, xhe appomonment of the improvement costs, the method of calculadng each property's pxoporrional speciat henefit and the calculation of Pan e 2 ~jMuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadia Engineer'r Fornfation I{eport Arcadda Citywide Llghting Dirtrict 2008-1 annual assessments. This secdon also idenufies and outlines an Assessment Range FoRnula thac provides for an annual adjustrnen~ co che ma~mum assessmenc races initiall}' established by tMs Reporc This Assessment Range Formula limits increases on future assessments, but also provides for reasonable cosc adjustmen~s due to inflation in subsequent fiscal years without che added expense of addiriona] propexty owner protesc ballot pcoceedings to approve such anucipaced cost increases. Part III The District Bud~et: An esrimace of che annual funding required for the estimated annual maintenance, servicing and operadon of sueet lighung improvements detexmined to be of special benefit to the parcels within che Districc. The budget idenufies an estimace of ancicipated ongoing annual expenses to seroice, maintain and operate street lighring improvements throughout the Cin~ and each respective Zone including; but not limiced to servicing of the street lights and related Eacilides, energy costs and related administxadon espenses and collection of appropriate fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The budget establishes an inicial calculated maximum assessmenc cace for each Zone of the District. Because che annual cost of maintaining these improvemencs will clearly be affected by inEladon over the yeaxs, an annual infladonarv adjuscment (9ssessmenc Range Formula) will be applied in subsequenc fiscal years to the assessment caces established herein. Pan IV District Diagram: A Diagram showing the exteiior boundaxies of che District and the cuTxent Zones therein is provided in chis secdon of the Report and includes all pa~cels of land that will receive special benefits from the improvements and for which an assessment will be imposed as patt of this Disuict. ReEerence is hereby made to the Los Angeles County Assessox's maps for a detailed descriprion of the lines and dimensions of each loe and parcel of land within che Dis~rict. Pazt V Assessment Roll: A lisung of each parcel within the District and its coTrespondi~g maximum assessmenc amount to be presented to the property owneis of record in che prorest ballot proceedings. The proposed ma~mum assessmenc amount Eor each parce] is based on the parcel's proportional special benefit as calculated in accordance with the method of apportionment and the proposed initial maximum assessment rates outlined by the budget. Pa~; e 3 ~MuniFinancial Cih~ ofArcadia Engineer'r Repo~t Arcadia Cilyu~ide Iigbting Dirtnct 2008-1 Part I- Plans and Specifaeataons Description of the District The rerritory within [he Disuic[ consis~s oF a]] lots, parcels of land and subdivisions within the City of Arcadia, the boundaries of which are cocerminous with the Ciry's boundaries and by reference, the meets and bounds that define the Cin~ boundaries are incorporated heiein as the meecs and bounds of this Discrict. An Assessmen~ Diagram incorporated herein under Part TV of this Report, outlines the boundaries of che District, the Zones cherein. This diagram incorporates all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land u~thin the Distxict and Zones as the same existed at the dme this Report was pxepared. The Disuict geneially indudes al] oi a pomon of the parcels identified on the following Los Angeles Counn,' Assessor's Parcel Map Books: 5378; ~379; 5382; 5383; 5385; 57G4; 5765; ~?66; 5769; 5770; 5771; 5??2; 5773; 5775; 5776; 5?7?; 5778; 57?9; 5780; 5'81; 5?82; ~783; 5784; ~78~; 578?; 5788; 5789; 5790; 57)1; 8501; 8503; 8509; 8510; 8511; 8532; 8538; 8541; 854~; 8571; 8572; 85?3; 858G; 8587 ~Jithi~ the boundaries ot the District, rhree (3) Zones ~vill inidally be escablished to idenrify areas within the District that for reasons of variadons in proacimity and excent of the improvemencs, it has been determined thac the parcels wichin these Zones receive differing degrees of specia] benefits from the improvements and services to be procided by the Districc Each Zone has been es[ablished to incorporate all properues that will receive subscantially similar proporrional benefic from the Districc's canous street light improvements based on factors that consider their pro~mity' and nexus to the carious ssreet lights. The three Zones wichin the District are generally described and designaced as: Zone 01 - idendfies propexues chat benefit from the City's oveial] s[reet light network including bcal street light improvemencs locaced on the street or screecs in close proximitc co the property. This Zone includes appro~macely 80% of the paLCels in che District. Zone 02 - idenrifies properties thac benefic from the Cin's overall scree[ light network and also has loca] street light impxocements wichin their immediate pro~ciminS buc the number of local lights in the azea are notabl}~ less than che local lights associa~ed wi[h Zone Ol propexdes. This Zone includes slightly less than 10% of the paxcels in ihe District. Zone 03 - idenrifies properties tha[ benefic from che Cin's overall streec lighe nenvork, but these properties have limited or no direce benefit From local stxeet light improvements within their immediate pro~cimitt'. This 7one includes sGghd} more than 10"/~ of the parcels in the District. Page 4 ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArta~'a Engineer't Repor! Arcadia Cityvide I ighting Dirtnd 2008-1 IDescrap~io~ of Improveanents anai Services lmprovements and Services Authorized by the 19'72 Act As genexally defined by che Landscaping and Lighring Act of 1972 and applicable to this Distcict, the improvements and associated assessments ma~, indude but are not limited ~o some or all of the following: :• The insralladon ox construcnon of public lighnng facilities; :• The installation or construcdon of an}~ faciliaes which axe appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which ace necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but no[ Gmited to, ~rzacling, clearing, remova] of debxis, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, paving, or electrical faciliries; :• The acquisirion of any e~cisting improvemenc otheru~se authoxized pucsuant to the Aci; :• The maincenance ox servicing, of a~y of the foregoing including the fuxnishing of seroices and materials for the ordinarn and usual maintenance, operarion, and seroicing of any improvement including but noc limited co: - Repaic, removal, or replacement oF all or anp parc of an} improvemencs; - The cleaning, sandblasring, and paindng of improvemencs to remove or cover graffin; i Electric current or other illuminaring agent for any public lighang faciliries; :• The collecdon and accumulation of Funds as ceserves for the purpose of ensuing appropriate cash flow for opecariona] acdvides and long-term maintenance expenses. 'r Incidenta] expenses assouaced k~th the improvements including, buc not limited to: - The cost of preparation of the repoxt, including plans, specificadons, estimates, diagram, and assessmenc; - The costs of pcincing, advertising, and the publishing, posdng and mailing of notices; - Compensation payable ro che Counc}~ for collecdon of assessments; - Compensauon of any en~,~neec or attorne}' employed to render services; - Any expenses incidental to the issuance oF bonds or notes; - Costs associated with any elecdons held for the approcal of a new or inaeased assessment. i Any other expenses incidenral to [he construction, inscalladon, or maintenance and sen~icing of the improvemencs; d~a~ e .i ~MuniFinancial City ofArcar&a Engrneer'r Report Arcadia Cit~~wade Lighting Dirtntt 2008-1 Disfrict Facilities and Improvements Detailed maps and descriptions of the ]ocarion and extent of the Dis~ricc's existing s~zeec lighring improvements are on file in the Office of PubGc Works Sen~ices Deparcmen~, and by reference these documents are made part of this Report. The following table provides a summan' of the screet lighc invencory u~thin the City at the dme this Report was prepared for fiscal yeax 2008/2009: Edison-Owned City-Owned Total Lights Lights Lights District-wide Traffic Signal & Safety Lights (Intersections) - 59 ~ 59 District-wide Street Lights (Primary & Secondary Sheets)" Sub-Total District-wide Improvements Locel Street Lights (Primary & Secondary Streets)" Local Street Lights (Residential 8 Neighborhood Streets) Sub-Total Local Improvements 974 368 1,362 974 447 1,421 418 166 584 1,138 854 1.992 1,556 1,020 2,576 Grand Total 2,530 1,408 3,938 (') Util¢ing a ratio of ~he average numDer ot pamels per sUce~ light within Ne resitlenlial arees ot ihe District and applying ~hat rztio lo tne number ot parcels localetl on primary end secontlary siree~s, it has been delarminetl tha~ eppro:imalely 30°h ol the ~he primary antl secondary sireets are considered local street lights with ~he remeining lights being alloptetl as tlatnct-witle improvements. Appiosimately sixty-five percent (6~%) of the streedights wichin the Diserict are owned and mainrained by Souxhem California Ldison Company. The xemaining thim'-five percent (3~"/0) of the streetlights, the traffic signals and saien lights are owned b}~ che Citc oFArcadia and are maintained by the City. The maintenance and servicing of the Souchern CaGfornia Edison Compan~~-owned streetlighcs is furnished by the Southern CaliYornia Edison Company or by its successors or assignees. The races chazged by che Edison Compan} indude boch the power and maincenance cos[s and are regulated and authorized be che Pu6Gc Udlides Commission of the State of CaliEornia. 'I'he City of Arcadia Public Works Department furnishes the maintenance and servicing of the City-owned sxxeetlights. The ener~,n~ for Cicy-o~cned streetlights is also pro~~ded by Southem Caliiornia Edison Company and the rare chazged to the City is also regulated and authorized by the PubGc Udlities Commission. Pa~ e 6 ~'MuniFinancial City afArcadia Engineeri Re~on Arcadia Citywide I sghkng Dittnrt 2008-1 The maintenance, operation and servicing of the District lighdng improvements generally include the fumishing of labor, materials, equipment and eleariciry for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operanon, and seroicing of screet lights, crafFic signals and saEety Gghcs wichin the public right-of-ways and easements dedicated to the City. These acnvines include but are not limited to: 'r Regulax maintenance and servicing the stieet light systems and txaffic control devices including, deaning, sandblasring, repaindng of poles and equipmenc to remove or cover graffiti and as needed prevent corrosion; repair or replacement of signals and lighung standards, bulbs and fixtures; and fuxnishing of electric current or other illuminating agenc > Periodic repair and rehabilitadon of the screet lighung s}~srem including replacemenc of old equipmenc wieh new or recondidoned equipment, upgxades or modificanons to traffic signals at intexsections, repaix, removal or replacement of related equipment as required including but not limiced co lighdng fixtures, poles, mecers, condti~s, elecuical cable and associated appurtenanc Eacilines, relocarion of sueet light facilities as necessary induding the purchase and installauon of related equipment and facilides. Page : ~MuniFinancial City oft3rcad:'a Engzneeri I~epnrt Arcadla Cat~~mide Lt'gbting Dirtrict 2008-1 Part II - Ndethod of Apportion~nent Uulizing commonlc accepted assessmenc engineering pracrices and based on the provisions of the 1972 Act and the California Consdtudon, che following secnons summarize an analysis of the special benefits propernes will receive from the improvements and sendces co be pro~dded; the basis upon which the Distria Zones have been esxablished; [he formulas used ro calculace each parcel's proportiona] special benefit assessment based on the entirety of the cost to provide the improvements and ~he parcels receiving such special benefir, and the establishment of an Assessmenc Range Formula to addiess ancicipaced cost increases due co inflaaon. Bene~t Analysis The 1972 Act pexmits the establishmenc of assessment discriccs b}~ agencies for the purpose of pro~~ding cerrain public improvements, which include but are not Gmited to the construcuon, maintenance, opecadon and servicing of public lighnng improvements and appurtenant facilities. 'I'he 1972 Act fuxther requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefic rather than assessed value: `Tbe net amaunt to be atretred u~on landt within an arrerrment dirtnct ma}' be a~porlioned hy any fornsula ar nrethad whitb fair~~ dirtributer Ihe net amoamt amang a/! auerrahle lott or~arceLr ia proportlon to tbe erkmated ben~tr ta Ge mceived Gy each ruth lot or~iarcel from tbe inrfirovementr. " In conjuncnon u~ith [he piovisions of ~he 19i2 Act, the California Consnrution Article ~IIID addresses the ]ew~ of assessments, Disuicts and Special Bene6t as: 'An agency which proj~osec ta levy an arrertn7ent sball identijy al! jiarcelr whitb will have a rpecla! ben~it canferred upon tbem and upon u-bicb an arretament un!! be ar~rpated. Tbe praportionate ipeaa! ben~t derived by each identijted par~e! rbal! Ge deternained i~r relatianrbip ta the enkrety of the capita! cort of a public amprovemeat or the maintenarTCe and operakon, e~enrer of a pubk'c ampmvement or for tbe cort of the pmpert~ related rerui~e beirtg pronaded. No actetsmen! chall be impored on an~~ parcel u~bicb exteed~ the rearonaGle cort nj tbe pmportiana! rpetial ben~t tonferred on that parcel. " 'Dlydrict meanr an area determined 6~~ an agency to ronlain a(I parcelr lvbirb wal! receive a rpecial ben~t from a prapored public improvement orproyertJ~-related reruice °; ':Speczal benefiP' means a parizctrlar and dirtir~ct benefzt over and above genera! Gen~tr conferred on realproperh~ located in the dlatnct or to the pxblit at large. Geaera/ enhancement afpropert~~ value doet not con.rtltute "rf~ecaal ben~t. " T'he method ot apportionment (mechod of assessmenc) escablished herein is based on the premise that all properries to be assessed, receive special beneYits from the improvements and seroices to be funded by the District, and the assessment obligadon for ea~h parcel ceflects that parcePs proporuona] special benefits as compared to other properties that Fage 6 ~MuniFinancial City ofArca~'a Engineer'r I~epor! Arcadia Citymrde I ighting Di rtnd 2008-1 receive such bene5ts. To idendfy and determine the proportional special benefit to various parcels within the District it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvemenrs provided as well as the propexries that bene&t from those improvements. VC~hile the full extenc of the specific improvements and services to be provided by this District may be modified in subsequent years to reflect changes to the improvements.and available funding souxces, overall, these improvements direcdy affect the securiq~ and protecdon of property; the convenience, safety and protecrion of residents, employees and property owners; and generally enhance the ucban en~dronment and aesthetic appeal of the community and properries of Arcadia. The DistricPs improvemencs, the associated costs and proposed assessments described in this Repoxt, have been carefull~~ reviewed and have been idenufied and allocated based on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of the improvements to the benefiring properries pursuanc to the provisions. of Arricle %IIID and che 19?2 Acc. T'he location and extent oE the carious public lighnng improvements within the District and the associated costs have been idennfied as either "general benefit" (not assessed) or "special benefic". Special Benefit The special benefits of street lighdng and other pubGc lighring faciliries generally include, but are not limited to: S Enhanced deterrence of criminal acdvit~~ and an aid to police protecuon; :• Incxeased nighctime safen~ on roads and streets for motorists providing better visibiliry and improved tcaffic circularion thexeby reducing nightume accidents and petsonal property loss ; :• Improve reliabiliry of the streetlight system resulring from adequate maintenance and servicing of poles, light fixmres, cables, connectors, access points and appunenanf facilities; :• Reduced properry-related crimes (especially vandalism) againsc properues in ehe Disrrict through well-maintained and adequatel}' lighted surroundings; :• Enhanced desirabilih~ of properties through the direcc associauon with improvements that provide a positive representation of the communiry and aestheric appeal ofthose pcopernes; o Improves nightdme access, ingress and egress to residendal properties; :• Enhances nighttime access, ingress and egress for customexs, suppliexs and employees of non-residentia] properries. :• Improves nighc-rime pedescnan accessibiGty, safery and ambiance; :• Reduced culnerabiliry to cruninal assaulc of residencs, visitors, employees, pations and propercy~ owners ac night; :• The promotion of incxeased business and recreational acnvides during nighctime hours; Pagc 9 ~MuniFinancial Cih~ afArradra Engineer'r Report Artadia Cityunde Ilghkng Dittntt 2008-7 :• Reducdon of dumping, gxaffiti and loitering typicallv associated with poorly lighted areas; :• Enhances desirability of properues and the abilitt~ co conduct or expand business opportunines [hcough association wich an azea that has sufficienc screet lighdng; S Inczeased nighcrime socia] opporrunities and leisure activiries throughout the communiry and within residenual neighborhoods, u~hich result from safe and well- lighted streets; All of the preceding specia] benefics associated w~th che ongoing maincena~ce, sen-icing and opexadon of public lighting faciliues throughout che Cin~ contribute ro the securite, eschedc value and desirability of each of the assessed parcel and helps ensures che convenience, safet3~ and protecnon of those properties, people and goods. Furthermore, ir has been determined that the cost of providing such improvements (other than those improvements or costs that aze considered general benefic) should be proporrionaxelp shaced by all benefiting propernes within the Ciry of Arcadia and the lack of Funding to adequately service and maintain those improvemencs will ulrimacely resuk in the deceriaradon ok those improcements and facilines, which in turn could negatively impact the properdes rliey dizecdy benefit. Genera! 8enefit In reviewing the location and extent oF rhe Ciry's lighting improvements and the re]ationship these improvemencs have to the surrounding properties, ic is ecrident that a majonq~ of the lighting faciliries ~vithin the Ciry predominacelp serne as loca] street Gghdng improvemenrs tha~ were installed ic~ connecdon with the development of nearby properries or would ochenvise be necessary for the development of such properties co theie full and best use. As such, these local lighnng improvements, induding a portion of ~he lighcs located on arterial and collecror streets (primarp and secondary streets) pro~~de an ob~~ious and direcc special benefic and relarionship co the properdes located on or near those srreets. In addinon to this local Gghnng nesus, the primary and secondary streets wirhin the Ciry seroe as the 6ackbone and access rouces for rhe entire Cit~~ and the ongoing maintenance and sen~cing of these street lights also has a direct a[~d shared unpact on each assessed pazcel within ehe Disttict (district-wide proportional bene6t). VUhile the installaoon and need for street lighdng improvements in the Cin~ has most often resulted from properry~ developmenc or the specific needs of nearby properties (special benefit), the primary funcdon of some lighting improvements such as traffic signals and safetv lighu ac major intersecrions is to improve the overall ttaYfic safecy and circulation, which is not entirel~ the result of propem~ development anrhin rhe Cit}~. Similarly, a portion of the screet lights on primary and secondarc~ srreets are essential to the City~'s overall nightrime czaffic safeq~ and circulanon. Because the need for these street lighnng improvements is not endrel}~ associared anth properties wichin the Ciry, it is reasonable to conclude that a porrion of che costs to maintain these aanous improvements should be considered general bene&c. In accordance with the provisions of the California Consdturion .Arncle lIIID Secrion 4a: "...No astecrment ,chal! be ar~ored on any parce! which exceedr tbe reatonaGle cott of the Pa= e 70 ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadia Engineer't Repart Arcadin Citywade I igbkng Dirtrict 2008-1 proportional.rpeeaal benefit tonferned on that parcel. Only ipecza! ben~tr are arcerrable, and an agency rhal! reparate the general benefiu from tbe .r~ecia! ben~tr conferred on a parcel. " As previously noted, Article XIIID Secrion 2i defines Specia] Benefit as: `Specaa! ben~t" mean r a par[itxlar and ditk'ntt ben~J over aird above generQl ben~tr ca~ fe»zd on rea/propeny located in the dirtnct or to the pxhlic at large. Genera! enhancement ofpmpery value doea not canrtetute ':rpecial benefit." Based on discussions ecrith the Cin' staff and a repon completed b~ Meyec, Mohaddes Associates in Mazch 2006 regaxding the Cit~~'s Tcansportarion Impact Fee Program, it is esrimated chat the number of vehicular trips generared by properdes within the Cit~~ accounc for approximately 57% of the rotal daily trips on the Ciry's atteoal and collector streets, with 43"/o being pass chrough trips from outside the Citv. Utilizing this infoRnarion as a basis for separadng genexal benefits from special bene5es ic is reasona6te co conclude chat 43% oE the estimaxed annual cost of providing stxeet lights on the Cin's pnmary and sewnda~~ streets (that portion no~ considered as local lighting improvements) can be idenrified as general bene&t to the pubGc at large. Similaxly, it is xeasonable to apply this same 43"/o rationale to the vehicular trips geneiated by pcoperries wirhin the Ciry (~7% oF the cotal trips) to establish rhe general benefits confeaed on real pcopercy located in the Distmct (43% x 5?"/0 = 24.5%). Consequendy, it has bee~ determined thar appro~cimately 68% of the annual cost of providing street lights on the Cit~~'s primary and secondary stxeecs (that portion noc considered as local lighring improvements) is wnsidered general benefic and shall not be assessed as speciaf benefit co properries cvichin the Discncc ThereFore, onl}' 32% of the cost co pro~~de these impxovements is wnsidered special benefit and shall be proportionatek allocated to properties district-uhde (shared special benefit). Although this same logic and approach could be applied co the cost of pioviding ccaffic si~mals and safen~ lighu at major intersections, it has been determined that these parriculaz lighring improvemencs are primarilp for traffic cnitigarion and the general safety of the public. Therefore, che msc of mainraining and sen~cing these paxvcular lighcing improvements are substandally a general benefit to the public at lazge and shall noc be assessed as special bene6t co propemes arithin the District These improvements are however part of the District's ovexall lighring system and the cost of providing those facilities shall be included in rhe District budget. Please refer to the District Budget incorporated herein under Part III of this Repoxt, for a summary of the cotal esumated cosc of providing the various District impiovemencs and the allocadon of those costs as general benefit versus special benefit as well as the specific allocarion of chose special benefi[ costs to each Zone. Assessme~t 1Vlethodologg~ Zones of Benefit In an effort to ensure an appropriace allocadon of the estimated annual cost to provide the Distiict improvemencs based on Proportional special benefits, this Distzict u~ill be ~MuniFinancial P~°e 1l City afArtadia Engineer'c Reparl Arcadia Catyuda`e I tghting Dictrict 2008-1 established wixh benefit zones ("Zones") as author;zed pursuanc to Chapter 1 Article 4, Seckon 22574 of the 1972 Acr. `Tbe diagram and atterrment may clatt~~ vanaut areas witbin ait arretrment dittncJ into different ~oner when, by rea.ron of vanakonr !n the nature, location, and extent of tbe imprrrvementr, the vanaut arear mi11 reteive d~ering deg~ze.r af benefzt fmnz the impmvementr. A~one rhall coptitt af al! temtory which u~il! rereive rubrtantial~~ the rame degree of ben~t from tbe impravementr. " While the California Constitution states that "Tbe pmportionate rperial lienefzt denved fj~ eacb ldentified parce! rhal! Ge determined in relation rbip to the enkret~~ of the capita! cort of a J~:rGk'c inrprouement or tbe maintenance and operak'on expenser of a puhlic improvement.. ,"and it is reasonable to conclude that in their ennret~~, the Ciry's overall street lighting impzovements will benefit the communin~ as a whole, each improveme~t is not mucualle exclusive or isolated ro a particular parcel or area of the Ciry and the locanon and ewcent of the streec light improvemenes in relationship to parcels immediately adjacent or in close proxizniry co those impiovements must be considered. Based on a through review of the District's specific improcements and the relationship each of these improvements have to surrounding properries ic has been derermined thac there are clear and definable differences in the level of loca] street lighting in canous axeas of the District. In recogninon of these difFerences, the District shall be iniually established with three (3) non-contiguous Zones co reflect the proportional special benefi[s thac various areas of che Districc receive from specific streec lighc improvements. The following is a genexal desccipdon of the thxee 7ones: Zone O1 Zone Ol generally incocporares and inciudes those parcels wichin the Disrrict thac receive dirett special benefits from local street light improvements (lighcs ]ocaced on the parcePs street ox in close pro~min~ to the parcel) as well as the benefits dezived from che Cin,'s overall street light system (proportional special benefit of stceet Gghcs on the arterial and collector streecs within the City chat provide access co the properues in the District). This 7one cuziendy includes approacimacelv 80% of the parcels in the District based on their direct reladonship and prorimin' to street Gghcs that u~ill be supported b}~ the Discrict assessments. Zone 02 Zone 02 generally incocporates and includes those parcels within the Discrict that benefit from the City's overall street Gght sysrem (proporuonal special benefic of street lights oa the artenal and collector streecs uhthin che Cim that procide access ro the propenies in che District), and also receive specia] benefiu from local street light imPxovements anthin their neighborhood or immediate pro~mirn, but it has been determined that the number of G~hts ot 6ght density that are in proximirn to those parcels is substantiall~~ less [han ~hat associated unth parcels in Zone Ol, (Reduced ]evel of loca] stxeet ligh[ improvements). Based on their Pazo, e IZ ~MuniFinancial City ofArcadia Enganeer'r Report Arcadia Cityunde'I igbting Dictrict 2008-1 relationship and pro~mite co screet lights cha~ will be suppotted by the Discricc assessments, this Zone curxendy includes slighdy less than 10% of the parcels in che Distnct. Zone 03 Zone 03 incorporates and indudes those parcels within the District that are not included in Zones O] oc 02. Ic has been determined thac these parcels receive special benefi[s from the maincenance and servicing of the Ciry's overall sueec light system (proportional speual benefit of street lights on the arcexial and collector streecs within the City that provide access to the properties in the District), but ic has been determined thac these parcels have limiced or no local street light improvemencs within their immediate pro~min~. This Zone currendy includes slighdy more than 10% of the parcels in the District Details regarding the locanon and extenc of che street lighring improvements urichin the Discrict and the Zones therein are on Ele in the Office of Public Works Services Department and b}~ reference these documents are made part of this Reporc A diagram showing the extenor houndaries of the District and che three Zones therein is atcached and incorporated herein under Part IV of this Report. Equivalent Benefit Unifs In oider to calculate and idenufy the proportional special benefit received by each parcel and their pxoporcionate share of che improvement costs it is necessary [o consider not only the improvements and services to be provided, buc the reladonship each paxcel has to those improvements as compared to other parcels in the Discrict. In addition to the utilizing Zones of benefit, the method of apportionment most commonly used for distxiccs established under the 1972 Act is based on a weighced method of apporuonment rypically referred to as an Equicalent BeneEt Unic (EBi~ methodolo~,ry. This method of apporrionmenc typically uses the single-family home site as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family residendal unit is assigned one (1.0) Equicalent Benefit Unit (EBL~ and all. other land uses are proporrionacely weighced (assigned an EBU) based on an assessment formula chat equaces the propertv's specific chazacceiisucs to that of the single-family residentiai unit This proportional weighting may be based on sevexal factors that ma~~ include, but are not limited ro: the locanon of che proper~~, the type oE developmenc (land use), development-stacus (developed versus undeveloped), size of the pioperty, vehicular trip generadon, sueec froncage, densiries or othex propern~ related factors including anp development restricdons or limitadons. Generallp for most discricts the calculation of each parcePs propottional special beneFit can be zeasonably determined by applying one or more of these factors. For the proposed assessments outlined in this Report, ic has been determined thac the mosc appropriate proporuonal special benefi[ calculacion for each parcel is reasonably decermined by three basic properry characterisncs: Pa~e 13 ~MuniFinancial Caty ofArcodza Enganeer't Kefiort Arcadia Citywide Ligbting DtitriU 2008-1 :• I.ocation - As previously noced, each parcel in ~he Dis[rict shall be idennfied and grouped into one of thxee Zones based on each parcePs proumity and reladonship to the Distncc improvements; : Land use - Commercial/Industrial Use; Residennal Use, Institudonal Use, Vacant Land (Undeveloped Propern~), Public Properry etc.; and, :• Propern' Size - Acreage for no~-residendal properdes; Units for residendal properbes. The following outlines the equivalent 6enefit unit calculadons to be applied to each of the carious land use classificadons identified tor this Discncc ro esrablish each parcePs propozriona] special benefic compared to ocher parcels in thac Zone and the Disczict: Single-Family Residential Propem - This land use is defined as a fully~ subdivided residendal home sice with a single zesidenda] unir developed on xhe properry. For purposes of establishing equivalent benefic units For all ocher land uses in this Distxict, the single- family residendal land use is designaced as che basic unic ot assessment and shall be assigned a land use benefit of 1.000 EBU per parcel. Mulri-Family Residential & Mixed Use Property - This land use is defined as a fulle subdivided residential parcel chat has more chan one residencial unit developed on the parcel. (This ]and use includes apartments, duplexes, triplexes, ecc., but does not generall}~ include condominiums, co~vn-homes). Tlvs land use mav also includes pcopernes idendfied bv the county as mixed use property for which there is more than one residential unit (l:nou~n number oE units) associated u*ith the propem-, but there is also a commercial componenc or unic associaced u~th chat propem~. Although both mulu-famils~ residendal properties and mised use properries rypically incolves a single pacce] it has been dexermined tha2 an appropriate calculation of proportiona] 6enefit for these pxoperries should be based on the parcePs total number of residenrial units iather chan acreage and the weighting of. the proponional uni~s should be applied udlizing a sliding scale of benefic. Although muld- famil,v unit properties receive many of the same benefits that a single-family residendal properri- receives £rom screet Gght improvements, it ~vould noc be reasonable to conclude chat on a per unic basis, che benefits are equal. Srudies have consisrently shown chat xhe avexage multi-family unit impacts inFrastructure at a reduced level whe~ compared m a single-family residence which is reflected by a comparison of cheir average populanon densides, scruccure size and trip generanon. Furthermore, ic is also reasonable co condude that as the density (number of units) increase, the proportiona] beneflt ~er unit tends ro dedine because the unit size and people per unit usualle decreases. Based on these considerations, a reasonable and appropriate allocarion oF special benefit For multi-familv residential properties as compared to a single-famil} residenria] is best represented b}- the following special bene£t assignment: 0.750 EBU per unit Eox the first 5 uni~s; plus 0.62~ EBU per unit for units 6 through 2~; plus 0.500 EBL' per unit for units 26 through ~0; plus Par e 1~' ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadt'a Engineer't Report Anadr'a Ce~wide Lighting Dirtntt 2008-1 037~ EBU per unit for units 51 ehrough 100; plus 0.2~0 EBU per unit for units 101 or above. Condominium/Town-home Property - Condominiums and town-homes tend to shaie attributes of both single-family cesidendal and mulri-family residenual properties and is cherefore identified as a separate land use classificarion for rhis Discnct. Like most single- family residential properties, these properties are not usually considered zental property and genetally the County assigns each unic a separate Assessor's Pacce] Number (APN ox assessment number). However, condominiums and town-homes ofren have similarities [o muld-family residential properdes, in ~hat they are generally zoned medium to high density and in some cases may even involve mulnple unics on a single APN. In considerauon o£ these factors it has been determined rhat an appropriate allocadon of special benefir for condominiums, town-homes and similar residenda] properues is best repcesenced b}' an assignment of 0.7~0 EBU per unit regarclless of whether each unit is assigned an individual APN or chere are mulnple units assigned to a single APN. (There is no adjustment Yor parcels with more than five units as would be the case wich multi-family residenda] properties). Developed Commercial/Industrial Property - This land use is defined as a developed propert~~ with stmctuces (buildings) that is used or may be used for commeccial purposes, wheche~ the structures are occupied or not This land use does not include parcels for which the primary use of the properry is considexed residentiai. This land use classificanon includes al] rypes of commercial encerprises induding but not limited to commercial retail; food seroices; banks; shopping cenrers; recreauonal facilides; office buildings and piofessional buildings, as well as industrial pmperties including seroice centers; warehousing and manufacruring. T'his land use classification also includes any parce] that may incorporate a single residential unic, but is also used in u~hole or in parc for commercial purposes. Urilizing the acerage development densiries foi single residennal units per acre in the Cicy of Arcadia (single-family and wndominium developments), which is approximacely 4.OC unics per Acre, a proportional special benefit weighdng factor for commercial properties oF 4.000 EBU per acre is reasonable and appropciate. This proporrional benefit weighting is also supported by various trip generadon studies and daca, u~hich suggescs thac these types of non-residential uses collectively have benveen three and five rimes the daily ccip generauons as a single- Eamily residendal propercg. Howecer, because each of these parcels typically- represents a separate and independenc commercial enterpiise or business, ic has been determined that the proportional special benefic of any individual commercial/industrial paxcel should not be less than that oE a single-family residenrial property and parcels less chan one-quarter of an acre shall be assigned 1.000 EBU (minimum EBU). Likewise (minimum EBU) and an}' pareel that has been idendfied and is solely considered ro be a parking lot (no commercial sciuctuxe) shall be classified as vacanc properc~' iather than commercial properry, lrkewise, it is reasonable to conclude that there should be a limit (maximum EBL~ on che propordonal special benefit assigned to cery laxge commercial/induscxia] pxopezries. Therefore it has been decerauned thax commercia]/induscrial paxcels shall not be assessed for an}' acreage greater than ten (10.00) acres which secs the ma~cimum EBli at 40.0 EBU. Page I~ ~MuniFinancial Cit~, ofArtadta Engineeri Repor! Arcadia Cityvnde Isgbting Dictrict 2008-1 Developed Hotel/Motel Property - Alchough Hote]/Motel Properties are certainly viewed as a commercial enterprise, unlike most developed commercial/indusrrial propernes these properdes clearly have more significant nighttime use and traffic generadon than other commercial properties due ro their rsansient residenual acticines. Therefore ic has been deteimined xhat an appropriate allocauon oF proporuona] special benefit for these properries resuldng from their higher nighcdme use and incensixc is best represented b~, an assi~mment of 6.000 EBU with the same minimum and ma~cimum acreage limics that are applied to developed commercial/industrial pcoperties. These limics result in a minimum Equivalent Benefit U[vt of 1.500 EBU for parcels less than one-quarter of an acre and a ma~cimum Equivalent Benefit Unit of 60.000 EBL; for parcels greater than ten acres. Developed Instirurional Property - This land use is defined as developed privace properries used for che purposes of public related services or acdvities; including but not limited to Colleges, Private Schools, Places of ~;'orship, Day Care Centers, Fraternal Organizauons, Hospicals, Convalescenc or Rerirement Homes, or other sunilar public sen~ce or assembly type properties. While properties in this tand use classification are generally identified as non-residendal properties and are ofcen aeated as commercial encerpnses for assessment districts, because their purpose and funcdon is latgely providing public related sen~ces co the communic~~ (educarional, medical caze, religious etc.), and chey are very ofren non-profit or have limiced nightume use and crip generanon, it has been determined chat this land use classificadon warxants a reduced Equivalenc Benefic L'~nit allocation from chat oF a typical developed commercial/indusxrial propezt~~. Therefore this land use dassification shall be assigned 2.000 EBU pec acre with che same minimum and ma~mum acreage limits that are appGed to developed commercial/industrial propercies. These Gmits result in a minimum Equivalent Benefit Unit of Q.500 EBU for parcels less than one-quarter of an acre and a ma~mum Equivalenc Benefit Unit of 20.000 EBU for parcels greater than cen acres. Developed Public Property - This land use is defined as developed public or governrnent o~rned property used for pubGc relaced seroices or acdciries, including buc not limited ~o cirv facilides inciuding parks and communiq~ cenrers, fire and police stations, and ciry offices; county ox scate offices and facilides; federal, scate or countv court facilides; US postal seroice facilities; public. schools; pubGc uriGq~ facilides or offices; or other similar developed public properaes. \X/lvle man}' of these pcopexues have the potendal to be converted or utiGzed as commercial ox non-residendal enterprises, because their purpose and funcnon is specifically~ For pu6Gc related seroices and acrivities and they often have limited nightdme use and trip generation, it has been determined tha[ this ocerall land use classificauon also wanants a reduced EBU from that of a deceloped commexcial/i~dustrial propere}~. These parcels shall be assigned 2.000 EBU pex acre (Similax to Insritutional Properry) with a minimum Equivalenc Benefit LJnit of 0500 EBL for parcels less [han one-quar[er of an acre and a ma~mum Bquivalen~ Benefit Linit of 20.000 EBU for parcels greatex than ten acres. The Countv Tax Colleccor's OfFce genezally idencifies these properues as "Non-Taxable" and does noT rypicall~~ generate tax bills fox such parcels. Therefore as a matter oF pracuca] appGcadon, the calculated assessment obligarion foL the benefics received by such properries Pa~ e 1( ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadia Engineer't Report Arradra CitymJde Lsghting Dirtrict 2008-1 would not be collected on the Counry Tax Roll as other Discrict assessments. ThereEore, in addirion to those coscs decermined to be oF general benefi~, the Ciry shall contribute co the Disuict additional funding to cover the pxoportional assessmenc revenue that would otherwise be applied ro these properdes. Each fiscal yeai, the assessment engineer shall calculate the proporrional Financial obligation associated with chese properues and the annual budgec shall reflect a City concribution in an amount to che Distnct that is equa] co ox greater than that calculated obligation. (The amount of that contriburion aeed not be idenrified separately, but may be included as patt of the City's overall annual funding contribution to the District). Therefore, no accual assessment shall be levied on parcels classi5ed as Public Propercv and the annua] assessment roll shall xeflect no assessment for these parcels. Similacly, as paa of the notice and balloc proceedings being conducted in connecrion with the foxmation of the District, che ballots for these pxoperties shall xeflect a zero ($0.00) assessment amounc Pazking Lot/Limited Use Property - This land use classificadon is applied to developed pnvatelq owned pcoperries that the Ciq~ considers noc co be full}' developed commercial/industrial, institudonal or residential properties. This land use classification is ~~pically- app6ed to parcels that are idenrified as parking locs wich no or limired buildings and structures; bux land use classificarion may also be applied to parcels that hace limited oc restricted non-residenual use where the typica] commereial/industrial or instimdonal classification is not applicable or appzopriate. This land use dassificanon has been assigned 1.0 EBU per acre with a minimum Equivalenc Benefit Unit of 0.250 EBU for paxcels less chan one-quartec oF an acre and a maximum Equivalent Benefit Unit of ]0.000 EBU for parcels greater than ten acres. Vacant Property - This land use is defined as property that has been idendfied as undeveloped, but has reasonable development potendal (Few or no development restrictions). Based on a general consensus of many professional appraisers who appraise mazket propert} values for real estate in California, the land value of a developed properh~ rypically represents 20 to 30 percent of the total maxket value of those properties (the avezage being about 2~°/o). \X~hile this markec rado between the land and scructure values is noc typically xeflected by the acrual assessed value of those properties (Land generally represents at least halt ot a deceloped propect}~'s actual roral assessed value), chis genecal market value cozrelation does provide a ceasonable basis foi ehe proportional special benefit associated with vacant propezdes as compared to developed properdes. UdGzing this nvenrn- 5ve percent (2~%) cauo and the n~pical development densitp of single-family residennal units per acre in the City, a general comparison of benefit can be established (4 unies per acie x 25% = 1.00 EBU per acre). ~&'hile this calculation escablishes a Leasonable basis for comparison, it must also be noted that appro~cimacely half of the direct and immediace benefits of streec lighring ro a developed property~ results Erom the daily use of that propert~~. In recogniuon of these factors, it has been detexmined that a reasoriable and propordona] allocation of special beneFit to vacant properry is reflected by assigning these properties 0.500 EBII per acre. ]ust as with other properties in the District that ace assessed on acreage, minimum and ma~cimum acreage limics shall be applied xo this land use classification with a Page 17 ~jMuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadza Engineeri Report Aradia Catymide Ligbkng Dirtnct 2008-1 minimum Equivalent Benefi~ Unit of 0.125 EBU fox paxcels less than one-quarrer of an acre and a maximum Equivalen~ Benefit L7nit of a000 EBU for parcels greater than ten acxes. Planned Residential Peoperty - This land use is defined as any property ior which a centarive or final tract map has been filed and approved (a specific number of residential lots and units has been identified) and the property is expected to be subdivided in che near Future or is part of an overall development plan that has been appxoved. This land use classification often rimes involves more than a single pascel (e.g. the approved tract map encompasses moxe than a single APN). Each parcel that is part oF the approved txact map shall be assessed proporrionately for the proposed or esnmaced residendal type and units to 6e developed on that parcel as pan of the approved cract map. Accordingly, each paicel is assigned an appropxiate number of benefit units that reElects the future development of that property at build-out Howevei, because xhe property has not been deceloped the EBU assigned to each pazcel shall be the greater of 1.000 EBU per acre (similar to Vacant Propext~~); or 0.500 EBU per approved single-family ar condominium unit and 0.250 EBU per muln-family unit. (At the wridng of this Report, no properties have been idend5ed as Planned Residential Decelopmenc Properte'.) Planned Non-Residential Property - This land use is defined as any property for which a development plan, tentanve or fina] tract map has been filed and approved by the Cirn and the property is expected to be partially or fully developed for non-residendal use in the near future. It has been determined that a reasona6le and propordonal reflecdon of the special benefit for tliis land use classification is half that of a fully developed commercial/indusrtial properrn. Because such developments may involve more than a single parcel (e.g. che approved development encompasses more than a single APN). Each parcel that is part of the approved development plan shall be assessed proporuonatel~~ for the pioposed development in its enuret~~. Acmrdinglv, each parce] sha(1 be assigned an Equivalent Bene&t Unit num6ei o£ 2.OOQ EBli per acxe with the same minimum and maximum acieage limits that aze applied to developed commercial/induscrial pxoperties. These limits sesult in a minimum Equivalent Benefit Unit of 0500 EBU for parcels less than one-quarteT of an acre and a maarimum Equivalent Benefit linit of 20.000 EBU for parcels greater than ten acres. (At the wxidng of this Repor~, no properties have been idenufied as Planned Commecciat/Industxial Pxopexty.} Exempt Parcels - This land use identifies properdes that are not assessed and axe assi~med 0.0000 EBU. This land use classificauon may include but is nox limited to: :• Lots or parcels identified as public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an AP1V by ek~e Counry); A Dedicated public easements including open space areas, uulin~ rights-of-wa}~, greenbelts, patkways, or other publicl5, ou~ned or urility properties that serve the community or general public and are not considered ox classified as de~ eloped public properties.; and ~MuniFinancial ~a~ e 18 City ofArca~'a Engineer't Report Arcadia Citymide Lighting Dirtrict 2008-9 :• Pxivate properties thac cannot be developed independendy from an adjacent property, such as common areas, sliver parcels or bifurcated lots or properues with vero xescrictive developmenc potendal or use; These rypes of parcels are considered to receive litde or no benefit from the improvements and are thereFore exempted from assessment, but shall be reviewed annually by. the assessment engineex to confixm the paxcels current use and developmeht srams. Special Case Property - In many distxicts u~here multipie land use classificavons are involved, there may be one or more properties thac the standard Iand use classificauons does not accurately idenufy the use and special benefits received from the improvements or ~here may 6e someching about that pacticulax parcel that should be noeed for review in subsequent fiscal years. The following aze some examples of properties that may be classified as Special Case pxoperties: S Example 1: A parcel may be idendfied as a Vacant Property, howevex only a smal] pexcentage of the parcePs total acreage can acrually be developed. In this case, an appropriate calculadon would be 6ased on the net acreage thac can be urilized zather than the gross acreage of the paxcel. Thexefore the parcel is idenrified as a Specia] Case so that the assessment engineer knou~s co use the properry's net acreage rathex than gxoss acreage in calculating the parcePs propordonal special bene£t. :• Example 2: The use of a parriculai property and its proporriona] special benefit is not in quesuon, but there is some characterisric ox issue regarding the pxopexry thac shouid be noted ox reviewed in furure years. 3 Example 3: The most common reason for idendfying a parce] as a Special Case is usually xelated to development. A properry may be identified by the Counri~ as Vacant land, but the properry is either being developed or has already been developed. Another example of this could be a property that is Vacanc Land, but is curxendy being txeated as ~xempt due to curxene development restiicdons that wilt likely change in the fucure. Again this designation serves a prompt co review the status of that propertv each yeax, and if and when the stams of that pcoperty changes the land use designation can be appropriately changed. Thexefoxe the Equiva[ent Benefit Unixs assigned to Special Case Properdes will vart• depending on the circumstances and reasons for treating each paxdcular properry as a Special Case. The Equivalent Benefit Unit(s) assigned to each such parcel may be based on adjusted acreage, units or a combination of those factors; or the parcel ma~~ be temporatily treated as Esempt PropertS~ and assigned 0.000 EBU. The Cin~ and/or the assessment engineer tasked with the admitustration of the District shal] annually review each pazcel designared as a Special Case Properry~ and based on chat review shall make appxopriate adjustments to that pxoperty's land use and Equivalent Beneflt Unit assignmenc as warxanted. The following is a summary' of property types and the Equivalent Benefit Unit assignments described in the preceding discussion of Equivalent Benefit Units. rage 19 ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArtadia Engineer'r Reporl Arcads'a Citymade Ughting D:'rtrirt 2008-1 Land Use ~ Benefit Unit Calculations Single-Family Residenfial Property 1.000 per unit . Multi-Family Residential 8 Mized Use Property 0750 0.625 0.500 0.375 0.250 per unit per unit per unit per unit pef Unit ~~~~~s i-5) (uni~s s-25) . ~ (units zs-so~ ~~o~u si-ma~ (uni[s greater than 100) Condominium/TOwrnhome PropeAy 0.750 per unit Developed CommerciaVlndustrial Property 4.000 per acre (minimum 1.W0 EBU; mazmum 40.000 EBU) Developed HotellMotel Property 6.000 per acre (minimum 1.500 E9U; mazimum 60.000 EBU) Deveiopetl Institulional Property 2.000 per acre (minim~m 0.@oD Eeu~, mawmum 2o.00o Eeu) Developed Public Property 2.000 per acre lminimum o.50o EBU; mazimum 20.00o EBU) Parking LoVLimited Use Property 7.000 per acre (minimum 0.250 EeU; maeimum 10.000 EBU) Vacant Property ~ 0.500 pCf 2CfE (minimum 0. ~25 EBV; m~imum 5.000 EBU) Planned Residential Properly 0.500 0250 per planned per planned Single-Famiiy or Contlominium unit aesiaen~iai nnwci-Fam~iy Planned Non-Residential Property 2.000 per acre Im~~~mum o.5 Eeu~, max~m~m zoA EBU) Exempt 0.000 per parcel . Special Case Property varied based on circumstances associated with each parcel Alfocation of Improvement Costs Pursuanc co che provisions of the Califorrua Consnmuon, che pxopordonace special benefit derived by each parcel within the District and ics corresponding assessment obligarion shall be determined in relationship to the encirety of the capital cost of a public improvement or the maintenance and operadon expenses of a pubGc impcovement. The following formulas are used co calculate each parcePs Le~ry~ Amount (proportional assessment obligauon): Step 1: Based collectivel~ on the preceding discussion and findings, the esnmated annual cost to provide the various District improvements have been idenqfied as either general benefit or special benefit Those improvement costs determined to be of general benefi[ shall not be assessed to properues within the Distric[ and these costs aze deducted from the total budget co estabGsh the impioeemen[ costs derermined to be of special benefic. Total Budget - General Benefit Costs = Total Special Benefit Costs Fan e 20 ~jMuniFinancial City afArcadia Engineer'r Report Arcadia Cirywide Lighting Di.rtrzct 2008-1 Step 2: Those improvement costs determined to be of special benefit are apportioned to each of the three Zones established for this Districtin propordon to the cost of providing the improvements for that Zone. Together, the proportional Disuict-wide Costs appottioned to each Zone and the Zone-speciFic Coscs shall escablish the total budget for each Zone of the District. Proportional District-wide Benefit Costs + Zone Specific Costs = Total Zone Budget Scep 3: The Toral Zone Budget minus any addirional contributions from the City or other revenue souxces establishes the "Balance to Levy" for that Zone.'I'his Balance to Levy amount is the proportionatelp allocated to each parcel w7thin the Zone based on the'u calculared EBU: Total Zone Budget - Addirional Ciry Contribution = Balance to Lery (Zone) Step 4: Each parcePs propornonal special benefit is calculated based on the ~quivalent BeneAt Unit rarionale pceriously discussed: Parcel's Land Use Benefit x(Acreage or Units) = Parcel's EBU Step 5: The total numbec of Equivalent Benefit Units for the District and each Zone therein is decermined by the sum of all individual EBU(s) applied to parcels chat receive a special benefit from the impiovements. An assessment amount pex EBli (Assessment Rate) for each Zone is established b~ raking the Balance to Levy in chat Zone, and dividing that amounc by the total numbex of EBU(s) for that Zone. Total Balance to Levy/ Total EBU = Assessment Rate (Calculated for each Zone) Step 6: This Assessment Rate is chen applied back to each parcePs individual EBU to detexrsune the parcel's propordonate bene[it and assessment obGgarion. Rate per EBU x Parcel EBU = Parcel I.evy Amount The budgets thac establish che assessment rate for each Zone are outlined in the Distzict Budgec shoum in Section IV of rhis Repor[. Assessraaen~ R~~age &'os~aaala Pursuant to the California Constitudon Ardcle XIIID, the imposirion of any new or incxeased assessment requires cercain noticing and meedng requirements. Prior [o the passage of Proposinon 218 (Now Axdcles XII]C and ~iIIID of the CaliEornia Consumdon), F:i~ e Zi ~MuniFinancial Czl~~ afArcadia Englneer} Ref~or! Arcads'a Catywide Z ighting Dictnct 2008-1 legisladve changes in the Brown Act defined a"new or increased assessmenc" to exclude certain condirions. These condidons included "any assessment thac does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency ox appcoved by the vorers in the area where the assessment is imposed." This defininon and condidons were lacer ceaffirmed be Senace Bill 919 (I'roposinon 278 implementing legislarion), which is contained in Title 5, Division 2, Parc 1, Chaptex 4, Arricle 4.6 of the California Govemment Code commencing with Secnon 53?50 and referred co as the Proposidon 218 Omnibus Implementadon Act. As part of this District fozmadon and escabGshment of annual assessments to fund the ongoing operacion, maintenance and servicing of those improvemencs, ehe proposed assessments submitted [o the pcopert} ownecs of record shall include an annual inflanonarc adjustment refexred to as an Assessment Range Formula. The purpose of estabGshing an Assessment Range Formula is to provide for reasonable increases and infladonai}~ adjustment that ace inevitably associated with providing such improvements and activities, thereby reducing the need for addirional nodcing and mailing proceduxes simply because of inflationary faccors. This Assessment Range Foxmula is defined by the Follounng: The "Proposed b4aximum Rares FY08/09° for chis District as pcesented in this Report shall be annually adjusted by ~hree percent (3%) to establish the new Maximum Assessment Raees authorized foL che Discnct each fiscal year. (These new rates may be referred co as Adjusced Ma~mum Assessment Races). This 3°/~ adjusrments is based on historical inElationary adjustments and is sGghdp less than the average annual pereentage change in the Consumer Pxice Index (CPI) idenrified by the li.S. Deparunent of Labor; Buxeau of Labor Starisdcs foi "All Urban Consumers" in che I,os Angeles-Riverside-0range Count~~ Area over the pas[ twentv years. Beginning in the Discrict's second fisca] year (Fiscal Year 2009/2010) and each fiscal ceac chexeafrex, the Maximum Assessment Rates will be recalculaced and new Adjusted MaYim~m Assessment Rates ~ti7ll be established for che fiscal year utiGzing [he Assessment Range Formula described above. The Adjusced Maximum Assessment Rates shal] be calculaced independently of the Discric~'s annual budget and proposed assessments. An~~ proposed annual Zone assessment (Rate per EBU) less than or equal to the Adjusted Ma~mum Assessment Rate shall not be considered an increased assessment To impose a new or incxeased assessment other than the annual i~flationary- adjustmenc provided be [he preceding Assessment Range Pormula, the Ciry must compl~, u~th the provisions oE the California Constitution Arricle ~iIIID Section 4c, that requires a public hearing and certain protest peocedures induding mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloung. Property owners, through the balloring process, must approve a neu- or increased assessment be[ore such an assessment may be imposed. pa~,~. ~~ ~MuniFinancial `~ City afArradia . Engimeer'r Repart Artadia Citytvade Lighk'ng Da.ctnit 2008-1 Part IIH - Distract The District budget idenufies an esrimate of anticipated annual expenses associated u~tH the ongoing operadon, maintenance and servicing oF sueet light improvements that includes, but is not limited to maintenance of the sczeec lights and related faciliries, energy coscs and incidental expenses (including the collection of appiopriace fund balances) that are authorized b~ the 1972 Act The City is proposing the formation of this citywide Gghting distnct co pardally fund che operauon, maintenance and servicing of lighring improvements chzoughout the Ciq~ that pxovide special benefi~s ro properties wittun the City. This ciqnvide district includes three zones that ieflect the proportional special benefiis various pxoperties, developments and subdivisions Leceive from street ligh~s within the Cin~. In developing the proposed assessments for the citywide district, the City~ plans to conrinue its current ovezall funding suppore for streec lighring, which si~mificand}= reduces the proposed annual assessments that would otherwise be assessed eo the properties in.the Distcict for such services and acdczdes. The budget on the Eollounng page outlines the overall esdmated annual cosc to provide che District improvements, thac portion of the costs that are considered to be general bene&c and special benefits and the proporrional allocadon of those special benefit wsts to the three Zones in the Districc along with the addirional funding suppon &om the City co estabGsh the proposed inirial maximum assessment rates to be applied to the various parcels u~chin each Zone. Pa~e23 ~MuniFinancial '~ w ~~ ~ O .~ ~ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y H~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q O a Q `~ L ` ~ ~ O ~ ~ ^_ o ° ~' ° ~ ~ a oM o rn ~ ~°n ~ o ~ a i. n r N ~ O Q1 N f0 ~ ~ ~ If1 N O r ~ a ~ N ~ ~ a ~ ~ i1 ,,, ~ ~ w ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ j N ~/1 N Y i ~ C1 IV N A W N N O m O1 ~ ~ N N O tD h N N O ~ m ~ oo v~n e ~lf p N m 00 0 ~ °p ~ ~ .- Ih OI N o , ~ N ~ N Ol l tO ~ M a V ~ I y~ ~ ~ p C ' O O N N A ~ N Q ^ ~ 0 O M ~ ~ ~ O ~ h u~ e v m M n M Y 1 f 0 o n N ~ ~ ~ ~ N o ~D r ~ ro ~ N~ d ~ ~ M ~ N 1(~ C Y N ^ O ~, I D e 10 ~ ~ N ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o N a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ » ~ `1 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ u m m m N o n N °m m N ~ ~ N ~ N o ~NH 6 0 N n N N N ~ a N ~ ~ y° 01 T V ~ f N N YI ~ ~ ~ m N N I h O ~ J e'7 ~! t0 r ~ I ~ ~ eq N e ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~m ~ ^ p , eo 0 ' 0 ~ d u o n a ai eT d a ~ m N N O ' ~ O ~ V~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :J fq N ~ . ~ 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 "' a n ^ aD ~ ~ ~ v°ii ~ N o ~ °e N ~ m° m N ~ 1ff ~ d O O 4l h ~O N ~ N r O7 OI 0 N O N ~ IV ^ O 1~ 1~ 1~ N ry I N ~ O ~ O m OI O I h lT M ^ ~ ~ ~ w w I ~ I . Of O a ~ o p y s } N ~ LL t ~ a ~ h m N ~ a' Ol ~ F C1 m m 2 y +~ J" ~ m Y ~p ~ IO GI V . y~ o u ~~~~ o y Q = " ~ y o ~+ ~ m E .E a a m ~ d ~ ,., ~ E E~ ° ~ a ~ -O W J O J m c ' 3 m x ~ d m j V ~ K m ~ ~ m ° E m a ~ W C 0 a 'L .. . ~ 2 ~~ ~ (~ ~~ Z F• v p Y` rn?rn o a~i r ~~ U C ~ o '= ~ 10 C .~ ~ c) a LL C.~ u a~ J ~ Cf N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LL C " t .1 ~' Z c v` , v` , o _ d ~ °' Q m Q a m W O. ~ ~ c 10 `O t"' m " H C J m ci A O L i u 6 c ' H c i E a ° ~ ° a p ~ain ~ ~°m a arcF ~ C m ~ a i - N ~ \ ~ .~ C C 7 ~ ~ Crty ofArcadaa Engineer r Report Arcadia Cltymide I igbting Dirdnct 2008-1 Part IV - Dastrict I)iagraan The pareels within the Disuicc consis~ of the ]ots, parcels and subdivisions of land within the Cit}~ of Arcadia. The Districc Diagram idenafies the boundaries of the Districc and che Zones therein, and is based on the I.os Angeles Counry Assessor's i~laps and the Los 9ngeles Counry Assessor's information that e~cisted at ~he time this Repoxt was prepared. The combinadon of chis Diagram and the Assessment Roll oudined in Part V of this Report; collecrively consritute the Districc's Assessment Diagram. A copy of the District Diagram is pxovided on the following page. A fuI] size copy of chis diagram is on file in the Office of Public Wocks Sen~ices Department, and b~~ xeference chis diagram is made part of this Repon. Pat e 25 ~MuniFinancial City ofArcadia Engineer's Repon Arcadia Ciq~mide Lighting Dirtrid 2008-1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR ARCADIA CITYWIDE LIGHTING DISTffiCT 2008-1 CITY OFARCADIA, CO[,'t~TY OF LOS ANGELE.S', STATE OF CALIFOR'VIA IG ~~ ~s IE 3 Fa~ e 26 ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ afArcadia Engineer's Ref~ort Arcadia G'tywide Ligh#ng Dutract 2008-1 ~art V - Assessmerat Rol~ Parcel idennfication for each lot or parce] within the Districc is based on the Distcict Diagram presented herein and available parcel maps and properry data from che Los Angeles Counry Assessor's Office ae ~he time this Repon was prepared. A summars~ of the paccels to be assessed within this District along with the associated assessment amounts are provided herein. The actual assessment roll lisnng each of the paicels to be assessed within this Disuict along with their respecnve assessment amouncs (to be ballo[ed) have been procided co the Ciry Clerk under a separate covez due to che voluminous number of pioperties co be assessed. Non-assessable locs or parcels may include, but are not limited to public streets and other roadways (tt~pically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easemencs, open space areas, right-of-ways, common areas; small parcels cacated by the Counry, bifurcaced lots, and any other property thac can noc be developed or has litde or no value. These ty~es of parcels are considered ro zeceive litde or no bene&t fzom the improvements and axe therefore exempted from assessment. If any parcel submitted for collecdon is identified by the County Auditor/Concroller to be ac~ invalid paxcel number far the fisca] yeax, a corrected parce] number and/ox necc parcel numbers will be idenrified and resubmicted to che County Auditor/Controller. The assessmenc amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the mechod of apportionment and assessmenc rates described in chis Report as approved by the City Council rather than a propornonate share of the original assessment. The following is a summary of the paxcels and assessment aznounts for each Zone and the land use classificadon wichin the District as escablished by che assessment xates and method of apporrionmenc pieciously described. Summarv Zone 1 # of Calculated Land Use Code Paicels - Benefit EBUs-qoplied Levy Amount Developed Commercial/lndustrial Property 690 1,549.560 9,549.560 $39,82370 Condominium(fown-home Property 3,a22 2,566.500 2,566.500 $65,976.16 Developed HotellMotel Property t2 132.960 132,960 $3,ai7.12 Developed Institutional Property 59 132.980 132.980 $3,417.68 Multi-Family Residential 8 Mixed Use Property 849 3,s9Z625 3,69~.625 $95,031.60 Parking LoULimited Use Property 119 49.B8o 49.88o 51281.5a Developed Public Property 55 a~5.620 0.000 80.00 Single-Family Residential Property 7,759 7,759.000 7,759.000 $199,446.3o Special Case Property 14 92.780 92.780 $2,384.44 Vacant Property 89 3a.400 34.a00 $884.08 Exempt 22a O.OOO 0 Ooo $o 00 Totals 13,292 16,431.305 16,015.665 $411,622.62 Par e 2i ~MuniFinancial City ojArcadia Engineer'r Reporl Arcadia Cityrvide Ligbting Distnct 2008-1 Summarv Zone 2 ~ # of Calculated Land Use Code Parcels Benefit EBUs Applied LevyAmount Developed Commercial/Industrial Property 11 20.200 2020o Si91.9o Condominium(iown-home Property 49 36.750 36.750 $348.88 Developed Hotel/Motel Property 1 6.360 6.360 $60.42 Developed Institutional Property o O.OOO o.000 $o.00 Multi-Family Residential & Mixed Use Property 31 '142.750 142.750 $1,356.28 Parking LoVLimited Use Property 4 1J40 ~ 1.ta0 ^y10.84 Developed Public Property t2 57.000 0.000 $D.OD Single-Family ReSidential Property 1,a7s i,a79.oo0 1,a7e.o0o $1a,oa1.o0 Special Case Property o 0.000 0.000 50.00 Vacant Property 5 1.855 1.855 $'17.62 Exempt 15 0 000 0 000 $0 00 Totals t,6U6 t,738.055 1,667.055 $'16,026.94 Summarv Zone 3 # of Calculated ~ Land Use Code Parcels Benefrt EBUs Applied LevyAmount Developed Commercial/lndustrial Property 2 4.680 4.680 $23.40 Condominium(fown-home Property 7 5250 5.250 ~ $26.32 Developed Hotel/Motel Property 0 0.000 0.000 $0.00 Developed Institutional Propefty 3 5.080 5.o8o $25.40 Multi-Family Residential & Mixed Use Property 10 32.000 32.o0o $t6o.oo Parking LoULimited Use Property 0 0.00o O.ooo So.oo Developed Public Property a 57.s2o D.ooo $O.oo Single-Family Residentiai Property 1,474 i,a74.oo0 1,4i4.DDO $7,37D.D0 Special Case Property 23 0.500 0.5oo $2.52 Vacant Property a ~0275 t0.D5 $51.38 Exempt ~ 131 0 000 0 000 SO 00 7otals 1,656 1,589.705 1,537.765 $7,659.02 Summarv All Parcels # of Land Use Code Parcels Actual EBUs EBUSApplied LevyAmount Developed Commercial/Industrial Property 703 1,574.440 'I,574.44~ $40,039.00 Condominium/Town-home Property 3,a7s 2,soe.500 2,6oa.5oo $6fi,351.36 Developed Hotel/Motel Property 13 139.320 139.320 $3,477.54 Developed Institutional Property 62 138.060 138.060 $3,443.OB Multi-Family Residential & Mixed Use Property eso 3,872.375 3,872.375 $s6,547.88 Parking LoULlmited Use Property 723 51.020 51.020 $1,292.36 Developed Public Property 71 524.540 0.000 $0.00 Single-Family Residential Property 1o,7i~ to,7il.ooo 1o,77tooo ~22o,et7.3o Special Case Property 37 93280 93.280 $2,386.96 Vacant Property 98 46.530 46.530 $953.08 Exempt 370 0.000 0.000 $000 ToWls 16,556 19,759.065 19,234.525 $435,308.58 ~8a .N z~ ~MuniFinancial CITY OF ARCAD6A SANTA ANITA OAKS LIGHTING DISTRICT ENGINEER'S FORMATION EZEPORT FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 t~ ~ i.Yi-1 Yi Y 1 1 INTENT MEETING: MaacH 4, 2008 PUBLIC HEARING: Mnv 6, 2008 ~MuniFinancial Corporete Office: 27368 Via lndustria Suite 110 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (951) 587-3500 Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) Fax: (951) 587-3510 Other O~ce Locations: Lancaster, CA Phoenix, AZ Oakland, CA Orlando, FL Sacramento, CA Seattle, WA Memphis, TN www.muni.com ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT Formation of the Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District And establishment of Annual Assessments for said District City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California This Report and the enclosed descripdons, budget and assessmen~ diagram outline the plans and specifications for che focmation of the Santa Ani~a Oaks Lighung Districrand establishment of the proposed assessments for each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District. Refexence is hereby made to the I.os Angeles Counry Assessor's maps for a detailed descripnon of the lines and dimensions of paccels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Reporc as directed by the City Council. Dated this da}~ of , 2008. MuniFinancial Assessment Engineer On Behalf of the Cin~ of Arcadia By: Jim McGuire Senior Project l4anager By: Richaid Kopecky R. C. E. # 16742 "~."ABY.E OF CONT'ENTS INTRODUCTION ....................... ............................................. 3 PART I- PI.ANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .............................................................6 DESCRIPTIOIV OF THE DISTRICT ...........................................................................................C DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ...............................................................6 Impmvementc and ServicerAutboRZed by tbe 1972 Act .................................................................. i Planr and Specificataon.r (Facilitier and ImpmvemenzrJ ...................................................................... 8 Funding of the Impmvementr ..........................................................................................................10 PART II - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .....................................................11 BENEFIT ANALYSIS .......................................... Special Ben~t ...............................................:..... General Beneftt .................................................... ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................... Equivalent Ben~t L~ nits .................................................................................................. Asrarsment Calculations ................................................................................................... ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA ........ PART III - DIST1tICT BUDGET......... ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTIOA* COST SUMMARY...... ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICES SCHEDULE .............~ PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET AND ASSESSMENTS ............................................................11 ................................................................12 ................................................................12 ..13 ..13 ..14 ..16 ........ 18 18 ......................................................19 ...................................................... 20 PART IV - DISTRICT DIAGRAM ............................................. 21 PART V -ASSESSMENT ROLL ................................................:............................23 City afArcadta Engineer'r Aeporl Santa Anita Oakr Lighting Dutrict Int~roduction The City Council of the Ciry of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California (hexea$er referxed to as "Ciry'~, has by pxevious resolution inidated pxoceedings that called for the prepaxation and filing of an Engineer's Report to establish a special benefit assessment distsict to be designated as: Santa Anita Oaks Lighting District (heceafter referred to as "District"), for the purpose of funding the construction and installadon of new decorative shreet lights within the residenuat development known as Santa Anita Oaks, including the removal and teplacement of fozty-five elcisting stxeet lights, the installadon of thirteen additional stxeet lights and relaced materials, equipment and facilities within the boundaries of the Disuicc; and the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operauon of street light improvements and faciliues, including associated incidental expenses, authoxized puxsuant to the Landrrape and La'ghting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Divirion 15 of the Ca!'zfornia Streezc and Highwayr Code ,~22500 and following (hereafter referred to as the "1972 Act"). This Engineex's Report (hereafter referred to as "Report") has been ptepared in connection with the establishment of said District and the levy and collecuon of annual assessments relaced thereto .commencing in &scal year 2008/2009, p~suant to Chapter 1, Ardcle 4 beginning with ~22565 of the 1972 Act. In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the proposed assessments shall be made in compliance with the substantive and procedurai xequitements of the California State Conrktution Article XIIID (heteafrer referred to as the "Califocnia Consritution"~ and as such, the Districc includes all lots and pazcels of land that will receive special benefits fxom the proposed improvements. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refexs to an individual propert~~ assigned its own Assessor's Patcel Number (APNj by the Los Angeles Countf~ Assessor's Offrce. T'he Los Angeles Counry Auditot/Controller uses Assessor's Parcel Numbexs and specific Fund Numbexs to identi£y properries to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments. As part of this District formation, the City shall conducc a propertv ownei protest ballot proceeding for the pxoposed new assessments in accordance with the provisions of Government Code, Section 53753 and California Consnnition, Ardcle h~IID Section 4. In conjuncdon with this ballot proceeding, the Ciry Council shall conduct a public hearing to consider public eesrimonies, comments and written protescs regaxding the farmation of the District and levy of assessments. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, pcoperty ownex protest ballots xeceived wil] be opened and tabulated to detexmine whether majoriry protest e~sts (ballots shall be proporuonally weighted based on each parcel's proposed assessment obligadon), and by resolution the City Council will confirm the resulcs of the ballot tabulation. If majoxity protest e~cists, the City Council shall abandon the formauon of the Fage 3 ~MuniFnancial City ofAnadia Engineer'r Repon Santa Anita Oak c Zlgbting Dirhatt District, and the proposed improvemencs and assessments descxibed herein. If majority protest does not e~st, the Ciry Council may, by resoludon, adopt this Report (as submitted or amended) including the assessment diagram; arder the formanon of the District; appxove the lec~t~ and collection of the assessments including the assessment Tange formula as descTibed hexein; and order the improvements to be made. In such case, the assessments (as provided herein or as amended) shall be submitted to the Los Angeles County Auditox/Controller for inclusion on the propexry tax roll commencing in fiscal yeai 2008/2009. Each subsequent Fiscal year, an Engineex's Report shall be prepared and pxesented to the City Council describing the District, any changes to the District or improvements, the proposed budget and assessments for that fiscal yeax, and the City Council shall hold a noriced public hearing cegarding these matters prior to approving the annual levy of assessmencs. This Repon consists of five (5) pares: Part I Plans and Specifications: A description of the Districc boundaries and the proposed improvements associated with the Distncc. The Distcict is being formed with a single benefit zone encompassing aIl properries that wil] receive special benefits from the proposed street light improvements and associated maintenance, operauon and servicing of those street &ght improvements and facilities. Part II The Method of Apportionment: This secuon of the Report pxocides a discussion of benefics to propercies within the District, the apportionment of the improvement costs, rhe method of calculating each property's proportional special benefit and the calculation of annual assessments. This secrion also idenufies and outlines an Assessment Range Formula that will provide for an annual adjustment to that paruon of the assessments relaced to the opexauon, maintenance and senicing of the Gghdng improvements, thezeby providing for reasonabte cost adjustments due to inflation without the added expense of addidonal properry owner pxotest ballot pcoceedings. Part III The District BudQet: An esdmate of the annual Eunding xequired to repay the estimated construction and financing wsts associated with the installauon of the sueet lighung improvements, the annual administsative and incidental espenses for the District; and the funding Tequixed Fox the esdmated annua] maintenance, servicing and operauon of street lighting impxovements determined to be of special benefiz to the paxcels within the Discrict. The budget idenrifies the annual installments to repa~~ the esdmaced cost of conscmction and installation of the street light improvements, the financing cost for the project (hereafrer Faaue 4 ~jMuniFinancial Caty ofAr~adla Engrneer'r Beport Santa Anita Oak r L~'ghting District refexxed to collectively as "Loan Repayment") and the annual administcauon expenses associated with the District. These budget items establish che annual Debt Service expenses for the District and che calculated assessment rate far chese costs will Temain fixed until the origina] construction project costs have been repaid. In addition co the annual Debt Service costs, the budget idendfies an estimate of andcipated ongoing annual expenses to maintain, service and operate street lighring improvements including, but not limited to seroicing of the srreet lights ac~d xelated facilities, enexgy costs and xelated administration expenses and collecdon of appxopriate fund 6alances authorized bv the 1972 Acc (hereafter refened to collectively as "O&M'~, which establish an initial calculated assessment rate for O&M. Although the assessment rate calculated for the annual Debt Service will remaio fixed for the life of the Loan Repayment (ten yeaxs), the annual cost of maintaining the improvemencs will cleaxly be affected by infladon over tt~e yeazs and therefore an annual inflanonary adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) will be applied in subsequent fiscal years to the assessment iate established herein foi O&M. Patt IV District Diagram: A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the bistrict is provided in this Repoxt and includes all parcels of land that will receive speciat benefits from the improvements and for which an assessment will be imposed as part of this District. Refecence is hexeby made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines anc] dimensions of each lot and paxce] of land within the Discrict. Part V Assessment Roll: A lisnng of each parcePs combined assessment obligation (amoun~) ta be presented ro the propezty owners of record in the protest ballot proceedings. The totat assessment amount for each paxcel is based on each paxcePs proporrional speciat benefit as outlined in the method of appordonment and the combined assessmenc rate calculated:from the net annual cost for Debt Service and 08dbI. Page 5 ~jMuniFinancial City ofArcadia Enganeer'a Aepart Santa Anita Oak r Lighting De ctrict Pagt I- Plans anci Speci~ications Des~ription of the Dist~iet The terTitory~ wichin the District consists of the locs, paxceis and subdivisions of land in the northern section of the City of Arcadia within the neighborhood known as Santa Anita Oaks, genexally located: :• South of Orange Gxove Avenue; A North of Foothill Boulevaxd; :• Easc of Baldwin Avenue; and 3 Vi~est of Caballexo Road. Collectively, the Discrict encompasses an area of land totaling approzimacely one hundced four acres (104.45 acres) that includes a rotal of two hundred founeen parcels xepresenting two hundred six (205) single-family residential unixs and one (1) single-family iesidenrial lot that is cuzxently vacanc These zesidential pxopecties axe locared on the tollowing stree~s: Arbolada Drive Carmelita Place Gloria Road Hacienda Drive Hampton Road Oak Meadow Road Oaklawn Place Oaklawn Road San Caxlos Road Eight (8) of the two hundred six single-famil~- residenval properues are compxised of two parcels (one lot bifurcated by a tax rate area code) foz which only one of the nvo parcels associaced with that residenrial lot sha116e assessed. The parcels within the District at the ume this Repor~ was pxepared, are idenufied on the Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Ivfaps as: r All pazcels shown in Book 5769 Pages O18 thxough 022; ? A poxdon of the parcels shown in Book ~769 Pages 017, 023, 024 and 02~; S All parcels shown in Book ~770, Pages Oli, 022, 023, and 024; :• A poreion of the parcels shou~n in Boofi 5 r 70, Pages 015, U16, 020 and 021. A diagram idenrif~~ing the boundaries of the Discricc is provided in Part IV and a full lisring of che parcels therein is pxovided in Part V of this Report. Description of Ianprovernents and Services In response to the xesidents within the Santa Anita Oaks area co up~rade the stxeet lighring in theit neighboxhood, the City has pzoposed the fonnation of this Discxict as a mechanism Pa~ e G ~jMuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadia Engineer'r I~eport .Santa Antta Oakr Lzgbting Dirtrict for the pxopertc owners within the Distcict to fund thxough annual installments, the construction and installation of new srseet lighting impxovements as well as the ongoing maintenance, operauon and sernicing of those improvements including, but not limited to the materials, equipment, unlides, labor, appurtenant faciGties and incidental expenses related therero. lmprovemenfs and Services Authorized by the 1972 Act As genexally defined by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and applicable to this Dis~ict, the improvements and associaced assessments maV include bu[ are not limited ro some or all of the following: :• The installadon or construcuon of pu6lic lighdng faciliues; :• The installauon or construcuon of any facilides which axe appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary oi convenient far the maintenance ox servicing thezeof, including, but not limiced tq grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construcrion of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, paving, or electrical faciliries; :• The acquisidon of any e~sung improvement otheru*ise authorized puxsuant to the Act; S Incidental expenses associated with the impxovements including, but not limited to: - The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, esumares, diagram, and assessment; ~ The costs of prinung, adverrising, and the publishing, posdng and mailing of norices, ~ Compensation pay~able co the Counn' for collection of assessments; - Compensauon of any engineer ox aztornev employed to render services; - Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes; ~ Costs associated with any elecrions held far the approva] of a new or increased assessment. - Any othez expenses incidental to the construcrion, inseallation, or maintenance and servicing of the impxovements; :• The maintenance or seroicing, of any of ehe foregoing including the furnishing of seroices and matexials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operadon, and servicing of any improvement including 6ut not limited to: - Repair, remo~rat, or replacemenc of all or any parc of an~~ impravements; - The cleaning, sandblasdng, and paindng of improvements to remove or cover graffiti; - Electric current or ocher illuminaring agent for any public lighting facilides; ~MuniFinancial Pdge ~ City ofArcadia Engineeri Repart Santa Anita Oak r Isghting Diatnct :• The collecdon and accumulation of funds as xeserves for the purpose of ensuing appropriate cash flow fox operational activities and long-term maintenance expenses. Plans and Specificafions (Facilifies and lmprovements) Detailed maps and descriptions of the location and excent of the pxoposed street lighring improvements and esrimated cost of constsuction and insxallauon ace on File in the Office oY Public Woxks Seroices Depanment, and b}~ reference these documents are made part of chis Report. These improvements as summaxized in che following description are based on existing installation plans, however these plans and specificauons may be modified as needed to complete the construcdon and installauon of the proposed stxeei lighting system and facilities to be funded by the Distcict assessments. } Remove and dispose of the e~sting streetlights (luminaries) in forn~-&ve (45) locations, fucnish and install neu~ stxeet light pole, streetlight kits, lamps, winng, and fuses, and modify e~cisting foundation. Paint Arcadia Gxeen; > Install thixteen (13) new street light poles including foundation, sweeps, wiring, stud outs and appurtenances. Paint Arcadia Gxeen; :• Install eighreen (18) #5 Caltrans pullbox; :• Intercept e~sting 1"steel conduit, install sweeps to pull box, rewire conductors from adjacent pulboxes (eight locarions); :• Install 1" Galvanized Steel Conduit including conductors 2-#4 AWG wire from pull box to pull box (440 linear feet - Bored in) :• Install necessarcrn sweeps, conduit and conductors from the pullbox to the new screetlighc poles (13 locarions); :• Install ballast bracket at base of each s~reetlight (fifcy-nine); .• Convext cixcuit to 240V and adjust e~sdng wiring within controller cabinec (seeen locations); :• Convert individual luminary to 240V and furnish ballast, lamps, wicing, fuses (1101 San Caxlos Road); :• Genecal clearing and grubbing. :• All appurcenant facilities, equipment, materials and utilities related co the aforemendoned improvements and acdvities. The sample diagram on the following page provides an overview of the proposed street lighung impxocement plans for the District. A Full size copy of dvs map is on file in the Office of Public W'oxks Seroices Deparrment, and by reFecence this map is made part of this Report. Fan e 8 ~MuniFinancial , ' { f E i _,. L„'i, ~ C ~? rl ~ j;? r~ t "i ~ ~°y w F' ~ s +T „ ~ ~ ip ~'~~ '; . ..S ~ ~ .~ ( Jr G `{ .L ~ 'Ji ? { ff,r,y {'. r~r Y~ ~~ ~,y? ; c r ~ ~p.~°4 ' 1, ,E `i ~ j ~'"~' , S :` ~ iZ~ iC ~ ~ "L'y ~~je ~ . ~ ~ ~E ~. ~.~C y, _r :~Ix.~ ~Ir.ia S . . , .. ~,. _ . Y9 L'i 5 ~ ' i l ~ ' ' ~ ~ r~ I ~ • ~ . ; Y. I ~ ~ ' ...___. _ I ~. O' ._.....~____.... . ~ I I ~ ~ . I t-. ' s ~ . .~ ' . I . , ...,.._.... . - . ~ . . 4 ~~.. ..._._.._ ~~ -. s . i . ~ . i - ~ ~ ~.- ~ ~ ~ I i _; I ~_ ~ ~ 4 .,.. ~ .,v. ~ j~t ..~°~_ ~~ivlZ34~~~e"~Y .__ "N _ ~ ` r l;e,~~~ ~._. ,. _ ' : " ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ . .~' _.. ..,. ~1 . F - ~' ~ I , i ._.. _ ~ Y ' : ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ F ~ ~ ,r . ~~ ` . ~ Yi~~.. ~ ~ y ~~~ ~~ ~ „ • ~ # ~ 4 S + t , ,~, h, ~ ~.. ~Sb1 r 4i~' ~ , ~,~j . ~ . I ~ I ' ----~k't ° ~ ~ ~~ , ~'r~ ~ ~ '~ pxa~~~ +. ' {i , +~ . ,: AS~ .. ,~M1~~L - - ~ ' i ~~-.. .. .. ~. .. K._ - JA ~ ~ ,~ . b ' • ~;' ,4y ~, .. T 4 . i . ~ . .. : 1 3 ' t • ' ' ~' ~ 3 ~ ~ p ` ~ , }~ r 5 I ~ . t n? I ~~. 'i•, S §.Ita ~+ . ! C t F~,~ej. ~~_ 4 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x5 S'. ' ~ ~ p., ih rt ~ , ~ ~ ~.~ I ct~i ~k~ S ~k ~' ~~ ~ k ~~ ' ~ ~~ y ' \ w'~ ', ~ ~ 4.. I =j 1 L 7~Wd ~~ - ~ C i . ~ I,- . ( 1 I . ~ . . 1 l Ja 1 .: a , . ~`i .1 i ' • ~ I i~F - -.~ ~V f {. ~~ ~ r . . ~ , .~y r ~~ '~ ^ _. M~r /~ 5` .. ~ ~~ n rA1 m h ~ Y' Y - ~ ~~ . ~ : , ` ~ I.. .I .., y;, ~. , -. - ~~ _ r+t .. : ~ y ~' ~~r ~ __ V , , ._. ~ F :, -~ . , ~ ~ti ~ s , , ~ ' , j~ ,._ __ f.)CENK31~iT!1'. _ ..- ~- :,'' ' .. ,.;, . ~ , ' . ~ _- I~ _ y ~+ - ' j... i ~ i~{~ '~ ~ : , - ___ ' ~ ~ , . . ,. { , '_.. i I n .~ ~ : .. '}„' ~ i .~' t~`.. ',l 1,}~` t • ~ a~` S ` . ~' : p~ • y-' I ' ~ - T I ~.~ ~ _ ~ _ • .. ~ ~~ I n ~? .f ~? : ` . ~ p .. t~ ~,; Y '1 ` .- . x ~~ I [ ~ , - ` l'; .~~ { ~ ~~. ~ ~ w , _ L~, _ .. . l { ~ \„,. ~^ ~ ~pYll N ' ~ y..• ~ .. , J~ ~ . ,.. !I ' 'I F .I' I . . , ~ e. ^V \ ~V • r: ~ ~~. ti ~ , ~ , I j I ~~ ( f'~ ~ I _'~.. I ~ . I11 ~ ~~~ A 1 ~ ~ . /. ~ ~ . ~ " ~ ~ .~~ 4. _ 7 _' i ~ _ ~ . .h~ ~ ~ ~ .~ i ~ .. ~ _ II .... ~ ~C 41 .~ i ~ _.~ n II ~ tn ~.. ` ~ ~ ~ _. .... ~ r~.: I~ ~ ~ i - . ~ =, i - . I _. 1 .e, ,r , . r ~' F. >, ~ FE., ~ , ~ o „ I .. _ . ~; _. _~ `1 _ _ J . -- °'=^= . "~' ~._ ~ .. ~ ~., _ 'i ~ ~ I F .~_ 5 ~ ~ ~ ..~ ,~,_ ~ ~„~_ M1~ .- i L i ' ~ ~ ~' _- i'I.`v_~C~~ . ..~,. ~ Y _ . 1 .~_ .__ ~ ro ~' ~ ~U ~ ~ ~C ~ Z~ Cidy~ ofArtadr'a Engineer'r Report Santa Anita Oak c Lighting Dirhatt Funding of fhe Improvements The cost of construction and installation of the new decorative street light improvements described in the preceding has been estimated bv the City to 6e appro~mately $550,000. A summary of the specific cost estimates associaced with the proposed streex light conversion project is shown in the budget secnon oF this Reporc. In order to expedite the stzeet light conversion project, the Ciry proposes to loan the Distxict the necessary~ funds for construcdon and installation of the improvemencs. This mst estimace establishes che ma~mum principal amount that is ro be collected in annual installmenrs as part of the proposed Distxict assessments. T'hls principal amount will be paid back co she Ciry in equal annual installments over a 10-year period at an interest rate of five pezcent (5%) as part o£ the annual assessments. These annual installments for principal and intexesc along wich the esnmated incidental expenses associated with the annual administrauon of the Disxrict axe xeferred to collectively as "Debt Seroice". The estimaxed annual Debt Service and the resulting annual assessment zate per equivalent beneFit unic for these costs are outlined in the budget section of this Report and this rate shall remain fixed (no inflanonary adjustmenx) until the original construcdon project msts have been repaid. In addition to the Debt Service installmencs, the Distnct budget idennfies an estimate of anticipaced annual expenses associated with the ongoing opexation, maintenance and seroicing of street lighdng improvemencs that includes, but is not limited to seroicing of the street lighcs and related facilides, energy~ costs and incidenral expenses (including the collection of appropriate fund balances) thac are authoxized by the 1972 Act (hezeafter refexced to collectively as "O&M"). In a separate but similar proceeding, the Cit~~ is proposing che formarion of a citywide lighring district to partially fund the opeiation, maintenance and servicing of sueet lighung improvements thTOUghout the City that provide special benefits to properries witkun the City. This cit}nuide distxict includes three zones that xeflect che pxoponional special benefits various properties ac~d developments receive from stxeet lights within the City. In developing the proposed assessments for the cin~wide district, the City plans to continue its current overall funding sappoct fox stxeet lighting, which significandy zeduces the annual assessments thac would otherwise be assessed to the properties in the district for such services and acdvides. \X~hile it has been determined thac the street lighring improvements in this Disrtict are entirely fox the special benefit of the propexties within this District and the cost of those improvements are cleatiy the finapcial obligation of those properties, to ensuxe that the proposed assessments for opeLation, maintenance and servicing are consistent with those planned for the cirnwide distcict, the budget and calculated assessment ra~e for O&M far this District shall be given the same funding support from the City. Al[hough the assessment rate calculated Eor the annual Debx Sennce will remain fixed for the life of the loan repayment (10-years), the annual cost of maintaining the improvements will clearly be affected by inflation over the years and therefore an annual inflationary adjuscment (Assessment Range Formula) will be appGed to the assessment rate for O&lYI in subsequent fiscal veaxs. The application of an inflationary adjustment is outlined in the Assessment Range Formula discussion in Part II of this Repor[. Far e 10 ~MuniFinancial City ofArcads'a Engineer'r Repart Santa Anida Oak r Lightang Direnct ~?~$ ~H - ~~$~.Od. Of ~'t10Pfl1'~A~fl'~$ The 1972 Acx permits the escablishment of assessment discxiccs by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include xhe construction, maintenance, and servlcing of public street lights and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit xather than assessed value: `The net amount ta be asrerred upan landr witbin an arretsment dirtrict may be apporlioned by any formula or method whicb fairly distribxter the net amount amang all arrerrable lata orparcel~ in pmporlion to lhe ertimated benefttt to be received by eacb such lot orp¢rcel from the ampmvementr. " The method of apportionment descxibed in this Repart for allocadon of special beneFit assessmencs utilizes commonly accepted engineexing pxactices and have been established puxsuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of the California Constiturion. The formulas used for calcularing assessments xeflects the composidon oE parcels within che Distnct and the unprovemencs and seroices provided, ro faixly appordon the costs based on the special benefits to each parcel. Bene~t Araa~.ysis In ordex to enhance the appearance of their neighbozhood, a pordon of the residents (pcoperry ownexs) within the Santa Aruta Oaks area have indicated to the City, a desire to have their e~sdng street light fixtures converted fxom the current Cobra lights to a more decorative fixture as well as to expand the stxeet light coverage within their neighboxhood. Clearly, such a project would be solely far the benefit of the nearby pTOperues (located on the streets where the new decorarive lights are to be instaUed) and these improvements are not iequixed nor necessarily desired by any propexties or developmenrs outside the Santa Anira Oaks area (proposed Distcict boundary). Likeu~ise, the ongoing operanon, maintenance and servicing of those impxovements direcrly benefit only those properties and such acrivities and celated expenses provide no measuxable benefit to propeiries outside the District ar to the public at lazge. Therefore, che Cirn has proposed che formadon of this Disuict as a mechanism for the pxopert~~ owners within that neighborhood to fund thxough annual assessments, the construcuon and installation of the proposed decorauve street lights as well as the ongoing opexation and maintenance of those improvements that provide a direct and special benefit to those properries. Fa Pe d. ~jMuniFinancial Cit}~ ofArcadia Engineer'r Keport Santa Anita Oak r I igbting Diatnct Specia! Benefit The method of apportionment (method of assessment) established herein is based on. the premise that each assessed parcel within the Discrict xeceives special benefits from the construcnon and installauon oF new decoxadve stxeet lighring (enhancement project) as well as the ongoing maintenance and seroicing of those screet light improvements. These special benefits include, buc are not limited to: 3 Increased sense of pride xesulting from owning pzoperry within a neighborhood that has a unique and upscale chaxacter tha~ is reflected by decorauve stree[ lighting. ? Incxeased nighttime safetv on roads and stxeets for motoxists providing better visibiliry at intersections, of pedestxian uaffic and ingress and egress to pxoperdes; :• Improved night-ume pedesrsian accessibilit~~, safery and ambiance; :• Reduced properry-related cximes (especially vandalism) against properries in the Distria through well-maintained and adequatel~= lighted suzTOUndings and amenities; S Enhanced decerrence of cximinal acticiry' and an aid to police protection; :• Improve reliability of the streeflight system resulting from the inscallation and upgxade of the current lights, cables, connectors, access points and appurtenant faciliries :• Improved traffic circulauon and reduced nightnme accidents and pecsonal pxoperty loss; 'r Enhanced desirabiliry of pioperties through the direct associadon with improvemencs that procide a positice representarion of the neighborhood and aesthetic appeal oFthose pxoperties; All oF the preceding special benefits contribute to the securit~,, esthetic value and desixabilicy of each of the assessed parcels within ehe Disrrict and there6y pxovide a special enhancement of the properties. Genera! Benefit In reviewing the locarion and extent of the planned street light improvements and the relationshlp these irnprovements have to the surrounding propetties, it is e~2dent that the proposed improvemencs are a direct and special benefit to only rhe properties unrhin the Disteict. P,lchough these irnprovements may be available or visible ro the pubGc at large, the insrallation of rhese unprovements as well as the operarion and maintenance oE those impxovements are not required nor necessarily desired by any properdes outside the boundaries of the District or to the general public. I.ikewise because these improvements are entirelq within a defined residendal area, public access or use of diese specific improvements u~ould typically be a xesult of accessing those properties and any other public access or use wouid be considexed incidental. Therefore it has been determined that neither the cost of constructing the unprovements nox the ongoing maintenance of those improvements pxo~dde any measuiable Page 12 ~jMuniFinancial CiZy ofAr~adia Engineer'r Ae~orY Santa Anita Oak.c I~gbting Dirtrict genexal bene&t and the costs and expenses associated with such improvemencs are entizely the &nancial obligarion of the propercies within the District. Assessaaaent Met~a.oclobogy The method of apportionment established foc this Distxict and descxibed herein, reflects the proporrional special benefit each propexty receives from the improvements and seroices. The costs associated with the improvements shall be faiily distributed among the paxcels based upon the benefit received by each parcel. Additionally, in compliance with the California Constimdon Article XIIID Secnon 4, each parcePs assessmenc shall not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit confexxed to that parcel. To idenuf~~ and derermine the special benefit to be ieceived by each parcel and their propornonaxe share of the improvement costs it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the proposed improvements as well as individual properties within the District. Upon xeview of the planned improvements it has been determined that each of the propexties to be assessed, xeceives special benefits from the improvemencs and based on the overaIl development of pxopexties wichin the District a single zone of benefit is appropriate far the allocation of the assessments and pcoporuonal benefit. The benefit formula to be applied to this Distxict reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and sen~ices provided, to fairlp apporuon the costs based on the special benefits to each assessa6le parcel. Equivalent Benefit Units The mechod of appoxtionment commonly used foc districts formed under the 1972 Act is a weighted method of apportionment known as an Equivalent BeneSt linit (EBL~ methodology (someumes xeferred to as Equivalent Dwelling linics) that urilizes the single- family home site as the 6asic unit of assessment. A single-famiJ`, home site is assigned one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) with o~her land uses (mulri-family cesidenrial properties, non- residential properues, etc.) within the discxict being assigned a weighted EBU based on an assessment formula that equates various property chaxacterisrics to that of the single-family home site. The propordonal weighdng may be 6ased on sevexal factors that may include, but axe not limited to the t~pe and status oF development (land use); size of the properry' location of the propexty; development plans or restricdons; vehicular trip genezadon; streec frontage; population densiries or other measurabie propercy relaxed factors. Generally for most districts, the calculadon of each parcePs pxoportional special benefit can 6e reasonably deteimined by applying one or more of these factors. ~X~hile the Equivalenc Benefit Unit method of apportioning special benefit is commonly used and applied to districts that have or ma}~ have a wide xange of land use classifications (both xesidendal.and non-xesidenrial use) or hace significant varianons in the phasing of impiovements and/ox propezty development, chis paxticular District involves only single- family residential properues and it has been determined that each residential properry w-ill xeceive pxoportionately the same special benefits from the street lighting improcements. Pa~ e 1i ~MuniFinancial Cit}~ ofArradia Engineer's Repart Santa Anita Oakr I~ghfing Di.rhitt Therefoze, each single-family residenual properrn shall be assigned one (1.00) EBU and proporrionately assessed for the improvements. The following land use designations and proportional special benefit assignments are applicable co parcels within this District: Single-Family Residential - This land use is defined as a fully subdivided residential home site (residendal ]ot) with ox without a structuxe. This land use is assessed at 1.00 EBU pec lot or paxcel. This is the base value that all other properues are compared and weighced against (i.e. Equivalent Benefit Unit EBL~. Exempt Parcel - This land use ciassificauon idenufies parcels that receive litde or no benefit from the impxovements and are assigned 0.00 EBli. This land use ciassificacion may include, bur is not limited co lots ox parcels idenufied as: • Public s~reets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the Counrn); • Public Easements including paxkwa}~s, utiliry rights-of-ways or other public lands that axe considered part of che Distxict improvements ox have similar charactexistics; and • Private properties that canno~ be developed independently from an adjacen~ properry, such as common areas, slivex parcels or bifurcated lots or properties with ven~ testsictive developmenc use. Within this Distxic[, eight (8) of the two hundred six single-family residential lots are bifurcated by a taY zate area codes, which means a single xesidenval lot has been split into two Assessoz Paxcel Numbers (APNs). For these residenrial lots, only one of the two APNs shall be designated as a Single-Family Reside~tial parcel (assigned 1.00 EBli) and the remaining AP\ shall be designated as an Exempt Parcel (assigned 0.00 EBL~. The fotlowing is a summary of propexn* types and che Equivalent Benefit Unit assignmen~s described above. Property Type EBU Multipliec Single-Family Residenriai 1.00 per parcel Exempt Parcels 0.00 per paxce] Total Parcels Total EBU za~ 20~.00 8 0.00 214 206.00 Assessment Calculations The benefit formula and assessment calculation applied to parcels within the District is based on the paxcePs special benefit received as compared to all other parcels benefiting from the improvements. The net annual cost and assessments for Debt Service and O&i~I ate Pan e 14 ~MuniFinancial City ofArcadia Engineer$ Report Santa Anita Oakr Lightaiag Dzr7nct propoxtionately and equicably spread to all parcels that 6enefit from the Dis~rict impxovements unlizing the pxopoxuonal special benefit allocation outlined pxeviously. The following formulas are used to calculate each parcePs pxoportional speciai 6enefit and assessment. Calculation of Aanual Assessment Rates: The tota] number of Equivalent Bene&t Units (EBU's) is the sum of all individual EBU's applied to parcels that receive specia] benefit from the improvements. An assessmenc amount per EBU (Assessmenr Rate) for the improvements is established by taking the total cost of the improvements ac~d dividing that amount by the total number of EBU's of all parcels bene5ring from the improvements. For this Districc, a separate assessment zate is catculated for annual Debc Service Costs (Equal annual installments for the Loac~ Repayment consisting of the pxincipal, interest and incidental expenses); and foi the annual O&M (Estimated annual opexanon and maintenance of the improvements and related incidental expenses). Aunual Debt Service Bud et = Debt Service Rate per EBU To2a1 Number of Benefit Uruts (EBU) Annual O&M Bud~et = O&M Rate per EBU Total Number of Benefit Units (EBU) Refer to the District Budget - Part III of this Report for the Assessment Rate calculations. Calculation of each Parce!'s Annual Assessment: The Rates established foT Debt Service and O&M are applied ro each parcel's individuai EBU to determine the parcePs proporrional special benefit and annual assessment obligauon. Debt Service Rate x Parcel's EBU = Parcel's Annual Debt Service Amount O&M Rate x Parcel's EBU = Parcel's Amiual O&M Amount Debt Service Amount + O&M Amount = Parcel's Annual Assessment Refer to che Assessment Roll - Part V of this Report for the .°.nnual Assessment Fos each Parcel. (The inida] ma~cimum rare and corresponding assessments calculated for O&1~f as identified in this RepoTt, shall be subjed ro an annual inflacionary adjustment as desctibed in the following section). Pz,~ e 15 ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadia Engineer's Report Santa Anita Oak.r Ligbtang Dzrriict Assessxaaent ~2aaage Forr~aula Pursuant to the California Consdtuuon Ardcle ~IIID, the imposidon oE any new or incxeased assessment cequixes cercain noricing and meeting requirements. Pxior to the passage of Proposidon 218 (Now Arucles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constituuon), legisladve changes in the Bcown Act defined a"new oc incxeased assessment" to exclude cextain conditions. These conditions included "any assessment rhac does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency ox approved by the voters in the area where the assessmene is imposed." This defiruuon and condidons were latex reaffixmed by Senate Bill 919 (Proposition 21 S implementing legislation), which is contained in Tide 5, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 4, Arucle 4.6 of the Califoxnia Govemment Code commencing with Seccion 53750 and iefexred to as the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act. .As part of this Discrict formation and establishment of annual assessmencs to Eund the constmction and installadon of the pianned street light improvements and the ongoing operarion and maintenance of those improvements, the pxoposed assessments submitted to the properry ownexs of xecord, shall include an annual inflauonary adjustment referred to as an Assessment Range Focrnula. The purpose of establishing such an Assessment Range Formula is to procide for xeasoaable inaeases and inflavonary adjustment that axe inevitably associated with the ongoing maintenance and operation of such impxovements, thereby reducing the need for additional noticing and mailing procedures simply because o£ inflationary factors. Therefore, xhe Assessment Range Forsnula described herein shall be applied to only the costs and propordonal assessments associated with the ongoing opexadon and maintenance of the improvements and shall not be applied co the debt services portion of the proposed assessments. This Assessment Range Formula is defined by the following: The "Proposed hlaximum Le~ry~ per Benefit L'nit" for this District (Proposed Rates to be Balloted) as presenred in the Budget of this Report is comprised of two components: an Assessmenc Rate for Debt Service and an Assessment Rate for O&M. The Assessment Rate Eox Debt Sen~ice has been established based on an esumate oY the costs associated with the initial inscallation of the stxeet lighc improvements and related expenses, and this xate s6all remain Fixed far the term of the Loan Repayment (10-~~eacs). However, the Maximum Assessment Rate fox O&M (~26.00) shall be adjusted annually by the three pexcent (3°ro), to esta6lish the new Maumum Assessment Rate authorized for the Districc each fiscal year. This 3% adjustments is based on historical inEladonary adjustmencs and is slighdv less than the average annual pereentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) idenuFied by the U.S. Depaxtment of Labor; Bureau of Labor Statistics fox "All Utban Consumers" in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Oxange Count~~ Area over the past twenty cears. Togethec, the tixed Ma~cimum Assessment Rate for Debt Seroice (~381.00) plus the annually adjusted l~faximucn 9ssessment Rate fox O&M shall constitute the nea Vlazcimum Assessment Rate authorized for the District each fiscal year. Pd~,rr 1G ~MuniFinancial Ctl}~ ofArcadia Engineer'r Report Santa Aaita Oak r Z.ighting Dzftrict Beginning in the second fiscal year (Fiscal Year 2009/2010) and each fiscal year thereaftei, the Maximum Assessment Rate will be recalculaced and a new Maxirnum Assessment Rate (Adjusted Ma~cimum Assessment) will be esta6lished foi the fiscal year utilizing the Assessment Range Foimula described above. The Maacimum Assessment Rate shall be calcutated independendy of the District's annual budget and proposed assessments. When the Debt Service obligation fox the District has been satisfied, the Maacimum Assessment Rate shall be based on the annually adjusted Ma~cimum Assessmen[ Rate for O&M only. To impose a new or increased assessment other than the annual inflationary adjusrment provided by the pieceding Assessment Range Formula, the Cit~~ must comply w7th the provisions of the CaliFornia Constirurion Article XIIID Section 4c, that requires a public hearing and certain pTOtest procedures inclucling mailed nouce of the public hearing and propert~~ owner protest ballonng. Propeity owners, through the 6ailoting process, must approve a new or incieased assessment beEore such an assessment may be imposed. As part of the District formation, properry owners shall be balloted for a special benefit assessment necessary to fund the estimated annual Debt Seroice and O&M. Although this Report esta6lishes an assessment amount fox each of the efcisting propeides within the District and this amount is used to deeermine majority protest, these assessments aze based on the iniual ma~mum assessment xate and method of appardonment described in this Report The nodce and ballot pxesented to the propert~~ owners shall identify the uudal ma~mum assessment rate and the Assessment Range Formula described above. Page 17 ~Muni~inancial Cily ofArcvda'a Engineer's Re~un ,Santa Anila Oak r I ighkng Dartntt ~~~t Yta - ~~~tr~Ct ~~. Estimated Construction Cost Sua~rnaay The following outlines the Cit~~'s esumate of the construction costs for the District's proposed stxeet light conversion pro~ect and is the basis upon which the proposed annual debt seroice assessments and pxoposed Maacimum Assessments have been detexmined. If the final cost of construction is less than the $550,000 shown below, the annual installments foi debt services co be le~ned each year after the project has been completed shall be adjusted accotdingl}' based on the pxincipal amount the City acmallc needed to loan the District foi the project. Should the final cost of construcdon exceed the esdmated $~SQ000, the Cin~ shall fund the difFecence from other available xevenue sources and this excess funding need shall noc be assessed against pxopexdes in the District eithei by increasing che ma~mum assessment race or extending the tetm of the loan xepayment. Item Unii ~ Descri ion Unit Price Total 1 LS 1 Clearirg and Grubbing $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 z EA 8 Intercept e~sting 1"steel mnduit, install meeps to pull box, rewire $ g 300.00 $ fi6,400.00 coMuctors trom adja~nt pulbOxes. 3 LP qq0 From pull hoxto pull box ~~.s~all 1"GaNanizetl Steel Condui[ ~ ~ gp,00 $ 39,600.00 inclu~ing canductors 2~#4 AWG wire. (BOring) Remove and dispose of epsting lirninanes, fumish and insfall 4 EA A5 new Vurrnnaries, streetligM kds, IamFS, wirirg, and fuses, and S 5,850.00 $ 263250.00 mod'rfy existing fwndation. Paint Arcadia Grcen 5 ~q 13 Install newsireet light pole induding foundation, sueeps, winng, $ 6 370 00 810 00 2 stud outs antl appurtenances. Paint Arndia Green , . $ 8 . , fi EA 16 Install p5 Caltrens pWlbar $ 550.00 $ 9,900.00 ~ ~ 13 Installnecessarysweeps,mnduitandconductwsfromihe $ ~g70.00 $ 11,310.00 pull6ox [o the new street light pde. 8 EA ~ Corneh dreuit to 240V. Adjust existing winng within con[rdler $ 73p.00 $ 5,110.00 cabine( 9 EA 59 BallaH 8rackel at base $ 50.00 $ 2.950.00 ~~ ~ ~ Corned indiHdual Wminaryto 240V. Pumish ballast, lamps, ~r 1,670.00 $ 1 67~.00 wirirg, fuses. 1701 San Carlos Road , SUBTOTAL $ 500000.00 10% CONTINGENCIES . $ SO,D0~.00 ConstructionTotal $ 550,000.00 ~~[~,+'C ~h' ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArcadi'a Engineer a Repon Santa Anita Oak r Lighting Dartrict Estiaraated Debt Ser~rices Schedule Foz purposes of esta6lishing the annual Debt Services assessment installments to be levied, the following annual debt seroices schedule has been deceloped based on a pxincipal amount of $550,000 to be iepaid ovex 10 yeaTS at an interest 'rate of five percent (5°/n). Wivle this de6t service schedule reflects annual debc seroice payments thae fluctuate from year co year, an average annual principal and interest payment (equal annual installmenxs) shall be applied to che District budget in oxder to establish a fixed and constant assessment rate for Debt Senice expenditures. Estimate Debt Service Projections Annual Debt Fiscal Year Principal Interest Service 2008J20~9 $ 43,728 $ 27,500 $ . 71,228 2009/2010 $ 45,914 $ 25,314 $ 71,228 2010/2011 $ 48,210 $ 23,018 $ 71,228 2011/2012 $ 50,620 $ 20,608 $ 71,228 2012/2013 $ 53,151 $ 18,077 $ 71,22$ 2013/2014 $ 55,809 $ 15,419 $ 71,228 2014/2015 $ 58,599 $ 12,629 $ 71,228 2015/2016 $ 61,529 $ 9,699 $ 71,228 2016/2017 $ 64,606 - $ 6,622 $ 71,228 2017/2018 $ 67,836 $ 3,392 $ 71,228 Total $ 550,Q00 $ 762,278 $. 712,278 Average Annual $ 55,000 $ 16,228 $ 71,228 Installment Pa~ e ?9 ~MuniFinancial Cit~~ ofArtadia Enganeer't Keport Santa Anita Oak r Iigbtin~ Dirtrzct Proposecl Aaanual ~udget and Assessmaerats The total amount to be collected annually for the impxovements is based on the following budget infoxmation and cesults in a proposed Ininal Ma~cimum Assessment Rate of $407.00 per benefit unit per year ($381.00 for Debt Seroice and ~26.00 for O&Ivn. Debt Service O 8 M Total Direct Costs Average Principal Payment Average Interest Payment Streetlight Maintenance & Utilities Subtota! Direct Cosfs Indirect Costs Rehabilitation & Capital Improvements District Administration Reserve Collections Subtota/ lncidenta/ Expenses City Contribufion for Maintenance BALANCE TO LEW (Budgeted) Total Parcels Total Parcels Levied Total Equivalent Benefit Units Calculated Levy per Benefit Unit Proposed Maximum Levy per Benefit Unit (Pmposed Rates to be Belloted) 55,000 - 55,000 16,228 - 16,228 6,924 6.924 $ 7'l,228 $ 6,924 $ 78,152 - 670 670 7,160 556 7,7.16 - 266 266 $ 7,16~ $ 1,491 $ 8,651 (3,721) $ (3,121) $ 78,388 $ 5,294 $ 83,682 214 214 214 206 206 206 206.00 206.D0 206.00 $ 380.52 $ 25.70 $ 406.22 $ 381.00 $ 26.00 $ 407.00 ~MuniFinancial n. U., ~ a~_..0 City ofArcadia Enganeer't Report Santa Anita Oakt Lighding De'strtct ~~~g ~~ - ~1St$'PC~ The paicels within the District consist of the lots, parcels and subdivisions of la~d within the residenrial developmenc known as Santa Anita Oaks, genexallv located south of Orange Grove Avenue; north of Foothill Boulevard; and east of Baldwin Avenue. The District includes two hundied fourtee~ Assessor's Parcels Numbexs that represent two hundred six residenrial lots. The following District Diagram is based on the Los Angeles County Assessor's Maps and the I.os Angeles County Assessor's informarion that e~sted at the time this Repon was prepared. The combinadon of this Diagcam and the Assessment Roll conrained in Parc V of this Report; collectivelj~ consdtute the District's Assessment Diagram. ndn ~ ~1 ~MuniFinancial ~i ~ w ~ ~ Q F W ~ ~ W ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~J I i ~ ~ ~~.0. i «~ w .r~` ~ ` a~ LL ~ ~~ b~ ~~ ~ o i Wv,~ y U a.,,,,,ow ~ O i- o'~ a a ¢ W g ~ ~ O Qo~ Iff m Q ~ ~ ot 0 W~ f- o~ e yduW I~ . x ~ Z N c7 O~J I ¢ a II ~ ~ ~.,~ ~ ~ $ ~;< ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~G, a a y~ €~~wg ~ ~~g~° i ~ .~ ~3`6'~=E Q og a [~~~~~ m i ~~ ~~b~~~ m ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ 1 ~~ _~ ~~;~ ~ N a ~ ~ ~ U ~ C LL C 7 ~ ~ City ofArcadia Ertgineer'c I~eport Santa Anita Oakr Iightang Dirtrztt Part ~7 - Asses~~a.en~ Roll Paxcel identification fox each lot or parcel within the District is based on the District Diagiam presented heTein and available paccel maps and property data from the Los Angeies County Assessor's Office at tl~e ume this Repoxt was prepared. A lisung of the paxcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amouncs are provided hexein. Non-assessable lots or parcels may include, but are not limiced to public srreets and other roadways (typically noc assigned an APN by the Counry); dedicated public easements, open space areas, xight-of-ways, common areas; small parcels vacated by the .Count~~, bifurcated ]ots, and any other propert~, that can not be developed or has litde or no value. These types of parcels axe considered co receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are theiefore exempted from assessmenc. If any parce] submitted fox collection is idenufied by the Counry Auditoi/Controller to be an invalid pazcel number fox the fiscal year, a corrected paxcel numbex and/or new parcel numbers will be idendfied and xesubmitted to the Count~~ Auditox/Con~roller. The assessment amounc to be levied and collected for the resubmitced parcel oi paxcels shall be based on the method of apporuonment and assessment xates described in this Report as approved by the Ciry Council :ather than a propordonate shaze of the original assessment. The following is a list of the paxcels and pxoposed assessment amounts for each of the parcels within the Distxice as detexmined by the assessment rates and method of apportionment previously descxibed. Assessox Parcel Number EBU Debt Service Assessment (FPOS/09) O& M Assessment (FY08/09) Total Assessment' (FY08/09) Balloted Assessment Amounts 5769-017-005 1.000 $380 .52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-017-006 1.000 $380 .52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-017-008 1.000 ~380 .52 $25. 70 $406.22 $40T.00 5769-017-010 1.000 $380 .52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-017-011 1.000 ~380 .52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.D0 5769-017-012 1.000 $380 .52 $25. 70 $4D6.22 $407.00 5769-017-013 1.000 $380 .52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-017-014 1.000 $380 .52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-017-015 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.OD 5769-018-001 1.D00 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-002 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-003 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-004 1.000 $380. 52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-005 1.OD0 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-006 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 ~arie?i ~'MuniFinancial City ofArcada'a Engineer'c I~epon Santa Anita Oakt I ighkng Da'stnct Assessor Paxcel Numbex EBU Debt Service Assessment (FY08/09) O& M Assessment (FY08/09) Total Assessment (FP08/09) Balloted Assessment ~ Amounts 5769-018-007 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-008 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-009 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-010 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-011 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-018-012 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-001 1.000 ~380.52 $25 J0 $406.22 $407.00 5769-0'19-002 1.D00 $380.52 $25 .70 $4D6.22 $407.D0 5769-019-003 1.000 $380.52 ~25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-004 1.000 $380.52 ~25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-005 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-006 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-007 1.000 $380.52 ~25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-008 0.000 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-019-011 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.OD 5769-019-012 1.000 $380.52 $25 .7D $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-013 1.000 $380.52 $25 ,70 $406.22 . $407.00 5769-019-014 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-Dt9-015 1.000 $380.52 $25 .7D $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-016 0.000 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-019-017 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-015 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-019 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-019-020 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-001 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-002 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-003 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-004 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769•020-005 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-006 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.D0 5769-020-007 1.000 $380.52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-008 1.000 $380.52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-009 1.000 $380.52 ~25 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-010 1.000 5380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.D0 5769-020-013 0.000 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-020-014 1.000 5380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 ' $407.00 5769-020-015 1.000 ^~380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 5407.00 5769-020-016 1.000 5380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-019 1.000 $380.52 $25. 7D $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-020 0.000 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-020-021 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-022 O.ODO $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-020-023 1.OD0 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 Fa~ e 24 ~MuniFinancial City ofArcadia Enganeer'c Aeport Santa Anita Oak.r Zighting Di rtnct Assessor Paxcel Number EBU Debt Service Assessment (FP08/09) O& M Assessment (FY08/09) Total Assessment (FY08/09) , Balloted Assessment Amounts 5769-020-024 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-025 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-020-026 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-001 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-002 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.OD 5769-021-003 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-004 1.OOD $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-005 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $40622 $407.00 5769-021-006 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-007 1.000 $380.52 ~25 .70 $4D6.22 $407.00 5769-021-008 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-009 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-010 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-011 1.D00 $380.52 $25 .70 5406.22 $407.00 5769-021-012 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-013 1.OD0 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-021-014 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-001 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-002 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-003 0.000 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-022-004 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-005 0.000 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-022-D08 1.000 $380.52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-011 0.000 $0.00 $0. 00 $0.00 $0.00 5769-022-012 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $40622 $407.00 5769-022-013 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-014 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 . $407.00 5769-022-015 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-Ot6 1.000 ~380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-017 1.000 ~380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-018 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-019 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-022-020 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $40622 $407.00 5769-023-001 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-002 1.000 $380.52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-003 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $4D6.22 $407.00 5769•023-004 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-005 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-006 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-007 1.000 $38D.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-008 1.000 $38~.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-009. 1.000 $380.52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-023-013 - - 1.000 $380.52 -- $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 ~MuniFinancial - . Fat e Z.i Cit}~ ofArcadia Enganeer'r Keport Santa Ana'ta Oak r Iigbting Dithad Assessor Debt Service Parcel Assessment Numbe: EBU (F1'08/09) O & M Total Balloted Assessment Assessmeni Assessment (FY08/09) (FI'OS/09) Amounts 5769-024-001 1.000 $380 .52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-024-002 1.000 $380 .52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-024-003 1.000 ~380 .52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-024-004 1.000 $380 .52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-024-005 1.000 $380 .52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-024-006 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-024-OD7 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-025-001 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-025-002 1.000 $380. 52 ~25 .70 $406.22 . $407.00 5769-025-003 1.000 $380. 52 ~25 .7D $406.22 $407.00 5769-025-004 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-025-005 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5769-025-012 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.U0 5769-025-013 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $40622 $407.00 5769-025-014 1.D00 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-015-001 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-015-002 1.D00 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-015-003 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-015-004 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-015-005 1.000 $380. 52 525 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-015-006 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.D0 5770-016-001 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-002 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-003 1.000 ~380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-004 1.D00 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-005 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-006 1.0~0 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-007 1.000 $380. 52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016•008 1.000 $380. 52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-009 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-010 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-011 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-012 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-013 1,000 ~380. 52 $25. 70 $40622 $407.00 5770-016-014 1,000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-015 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-016-016 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 . $407.00 5770-017-D01 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-002 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-003 1.D00 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-004 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-005 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-006 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 ~MuniPinancial ?'ab e 26 Clty ofArcadia Engzneer c I~epart Santa Anita Oakt L.rghting Di rtnct Assessor Pazcel~- ~ Number EBU Debt Service Assessment (FY08/09) O& M Assessment (FY08/09) Total Assessment (FY08/09) . Balloted Assessment Amounts 5770-017-007 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-010 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-011 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-012 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-013 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-014 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-016. 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-017-017 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 5407.00 5770-020-001 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-020-002 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-020-003 1.000 $380.52 ~25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-020-004 1.000 $380.52 ~25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-020-005 t.ODO $38D.52 $25J0 $406.22 $407.00 5770-020-006 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-020-007 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-020-008 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-001 1.000 ~380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-002 1.000 $380.52 - $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-003 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-004 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-005 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-006 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-007 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-008 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-009 1.000 ~380.52 $2570 $406.22 $407.00 5770-021-010 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 5406.22 $407.00 5770-022-001 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-002 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-003 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-D04 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-005 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-006 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-OD7 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $40fi.22 $407.00 5770-022-008 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.D0 5770-022-009 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-010 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-011 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-012 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-013 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-014 1.000 ~380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-015 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-016 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-017 1.000 $380.52 $25.70 $406.22 $407.00 ~MuniFinancial Pa~ e 27 Caky ofArcadia Engineer'r Report Santa Anita Oak r Llghkng Dzrtrict Assessoi Debt Service O& M Total Balloted Parcel ~ Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment Number EBU (FY08 /09) (FY08/09) (FY08/09) Amounts 5770-022-018 1.000 $380 .52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-022-019 1.000 $380 .52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-001 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-002 1.000 $380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-003 1.000 $380. 52 ~25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-004 1.000 ~380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-005 1.000 5380. 52 $25 .70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-006 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-007 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-008 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-009 1,000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-010 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-011 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-012 ~.ooo $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-023-013 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-001 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-002 1.000 $38D. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-003 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-004 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-005 1.000 $380. 52 ~25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-006 1.000 y~380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-007 1.000 ~380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-008 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-009 1.000 $38D. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-010 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-011 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 5770-024-012 1.000 $380. 52 $25. 70 $406.22 $407.00 TOTALS 206.~00 $78,387.12 $5,294.20 $83,681.32 $83,842.00 Fary ~ ZB ~MuniFinancial . pF G~,yiroRy~' . ` ~..«M~."~«, c , :'i STAFF REPORT Development Services Department March 4, 2008 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jason Kruckeberg, Development Services Director JLI'~ SUBJECT: Direction Reaardinq the Imolementation of Resolution No. 6602 Establishinq Citv of Arcadia Park Facilities Impact Fees. Recommendation: Provide Direction SUMMARY On January 15, 2008 the City Council approved Resolution No. 6602 approving a revised Park Facilities Impact Fee (Impact Fee). The Impact Fee was based on a Park Facilities Impact Fee Study prepared pursuant to the California Mitigation Fee Act to ensure that new residential development pays its fair share of costs associated with building new park facilities and infrastructure. The fee is effective as of March 14, 2008 and staff is requesting direction on whether any waivers should be provided for existing projects being processed by the City. DISCUSSION The City Council approved a Parks and Recreation Master Plan on November 6, 2007. Subsequent to that, the Council considered establishment of a new Impact Fee to assist in funding new park and recreation capital projects identified by the Master Plan. The current development fee for Parks was established in 1963 as $185 per residential unit and this fee has not been modified since that time. The Mitigation Fee Act, contained in California Government Code sections 66000 through 66025, allows the City to establish development impact fees for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. The City contracted with a consultant, Munifinancial, in the development of a Parks Facilities Impact Fee Study, based on the Mitigation Fee Act. This study was designed to ensure that new development pays its fair share of costs associated with building new park and recreation facilities and infrastructure. The fee schedule recommended by the Study was developed by converting the cost per capita to a fee per square foot of net new development based on dwelling unit densities and historical averages for the size of existing single-family and multi-family residences, which have contributed to the exlsting level of service for parks and recreation. The fee approved by Council on January 15, 2008 was $2.85 per square foot for single family projects and $3.73 per square feet for multi-family projects. This fee applies to NET NEW floor area, so in the case of demolition and rebuild, the developer is credited for the square footage in existence before the project. The question is what projects this fee should apply to. The fee will be effective on March 14, 2008. The Council can apply this fee to all building permits issued after this date or it could take a modified approach where certain projects that have received a level of approval from the City (or have paid plan check fees) may be exempt from the fee. To provide a bit more detail, typically a residential project first must obtain design review approval from Planning Services Staff. This can often include design review approval from a Home Owner's Association as well. Many projects also need a Modification approval or another discretionary approval (e.g. a setback modification). Following these Planning approvals, a project is submitted for Plan Check and all of the various City Departments review the case. Plan Check fees are paid and the project may go through several rounds of comments and corrections before it is approved. Once the Plan Check is approved, additional fees are paid and the Building Permit is issued. With this process in mind, there are several options for implementation of the Impact Fee that are outlined below. Option 1: Apply fee to all building permits issued after March 14, 2008. This is the most straightforward approach: Any building permit issued after March 14, 2008 is subject to the Impact Fee. This approach would not differentiate between any projects in the "pipeline" at any level of review as outlined above. In other words, a project could have received design review approval and be in plan check and this project would still be subject to the fee. Development Services Staff estimates that there are currently 26 new single-family homes proposed, 42 single family additions and 7 multi-family projects with a total of 172 units in the City's "pipeline". Of the multi-family projects, 154 of the 172 units are in two senior housing projects that have been approved. Under this opt'ion, the Impact Fee would apply to all 75 of these projects. This is the method of implementation utilized when the City instated the Transportation Impact Fee. Option 2: Waive all projects that have paid plan check fees and are currently in the plan check process (all required entitlements and design review completed) as of March 14, 2008. This approach would not apply the fee to projects that are in the City's plan check process. This approach assumes that all required Planning Services processes (such as design review and/or modifications) have been approved. In other words, Development Services staff would not accept a plan check submittal with fees paid Implementatlon of Park Facllities Impact Fee March 4, 2008 Page 2 if the project still had outstanding design review issues or still needed to get a Modification approved by the Modification Committee or Planning Commission. However, if these steps had been completed (or were unnecessary for the specific project) and staff had a record of plan check fees being paid and a project submitted; these projects would not be subject to the fee. This option would exempt the 75 projects listed above and any new projects that pay plan check fees until March 14. This is the implementation method utilized when the City has adopted Code Amendments that modify zoning regulations. Option 3: Waive all projects that have design review approval and/or approval of an entitlement. This is a more permissive approach that would essentially waive the fees for project applicants that have completed design review or an entitlement. Design review can be a lengthy, iterative process. Following Design Review, it can take a good deal of time for project plans to be completed and submitted for plan check. In this option, projects would be waived from consideration of the fee because they have completed design review or an entitlement. This exemption would also include those projects that have paid plan check fees where design review and(or an entitlement was not necessary. This approach would exempt approximately 25 additional projects that have completed design review and/or entitlements in addition to the 75 projects listed above. The Council could also consider modified versions of any of the options listed above. In addition, the Council could exempt affordable housing projects and senior housing projects from the fees due to the cost savings and/or lesser impacts to park facilities expected from these projects. In all cases however, staff recommends that any waiver considered only apply to active permits or plan checks. If a developer or owner allows a plan check, design review, or entitlement approval to lapse, staff recommends that the parks fee be applicable to this project upon re-submittal or renewal. For example, a plan check is active for a period of one year, if the permit is not pulled within that year period, and the developer wishes to keep the plan check active, the parks fee would be payable at the time of renewal. FfSCAL IMPACT There is no cost to the City to administer the fee. The calculations necessary and research necessary to determine whether a project is waived or not would be the responsibility of the Development Services Department as part of the normal processing of building permits. On the revenue side, the differences in fees obtained by the City could be significant. For example, taken together the two Senior Housing projects mentioned above would be subject to over $600,000 in parks fees. If the fees for the Senior Housing projects were waived along with the rest of the 75 projects under Options 2(a mix of additions, net new floor area in Implementation of Park Facilitfes Impact Fee March 4, 2008 Page 3 new homes, and new units) staff estimates a the total fees waived would be in the range of $900,000 to $1,000,000. Under Optipn #3, the fees waived would be in the range of $975,000 to $1,100,00~. However, it cannot be assumed that all of these projects will pull permits and commence construction. For example, the recent downturn in the residential markets may lead developers to decide not to build approved projects. As a result, staff cannot reasonably predict the number of projects that will be put on hold. This may be one of the key issues on larger residential projects, particularly the senior housing units. While these developers may be ready to pull building permits prior to the implementation of the new fee or the expiration of a plan check, developers may not want to due to economic considerations. Should they choose not to pull permits, the question remains should they be permitted to have an exemption from the fee? RECOMMENDATION Provide direction on which option to implement for the collection of the Parks Facilities Impact Fee. Approved by: ~~~~+^M-~ Donald Penman, City Manager Attachment 1: Letter from Scott Yang, Nevis Homes Implementation of Park Facilities Impact Fee March 4, 2008 Page 4 ~^: Attachment 1 Fe6.06,2008 Scott Yang 650 Huntington Dr, LLC Nevis Homes, LLC 650 W. Huntington Dr, #201 Arcadia CA 91007 Jason Kruckeberg Development Service Director 240 W. Huntingtou Dr. Aroadia Ca 91066 Re: 650 Huntington Dr Senior Housing Park Fee Dear Jason: Recently we were made aware of the new Park Fee t6at will be imposed on all residential projects in city of Areadia. As you know, we started our 650 Huntington Dr Senior Housing project in 4/2004. Due to city's contradicting Planning requiroments (C2 vs. R3}at the time, we were instructed by previous Development Director ponna Butler to wait unNl city sort out all the ineonsistent zone coda before we go forward with the pcoject. As a Result, we diddt submit for DRC until 5/2005. From DRC to Tentative Map hearing took another 12 months. We did not obtain our Tentative Map approval until6/12/2006. We submitted for 3`~ Working Drawing plan check in 1 U13/2007. As to date, 11 weeks has passed, we have not received our plans back. As you can see, this has been a lengthy process (4 years) for us. Meanwhile wc have this huge (Park} Fee increase. I believe it is unreasonable and unfair to ask a developer to one-side absorb all the consequence of delay. We strongly feel once a project is Tentative Map approved, all fee at that point of time should remain. I appreciate your time on this matter. Please notify us when city Manager pon Penman is presenting his "how to administrate Park Fee" report lo the Council. We really like to voice our oprion. Thank you. 5incerely, Yang ~ ner Dircetor of Project Management Nevis Homes, LLC 650 Huntington, LLC , ~ ~ ~~f a~ ~s~~q -~ss,•a~, ,3 - y-o 8 ~°"°``Y °`n~ MEMORANDUIVI Office of the City Manager DATE: March 4, 2008 T0: Mayor and City Council ~ FROM: Don Penman, City Manager ~ SUBJECT: ECONOA~IC AND REV'ENUE DATA FOR THE CITY OF ARCADI,S Provided as attachments are some charts and data which illustrate in both specific and general Cerins some economic and revemie inforniation for d~e City. In some instances it includes only Arcadia information and in other esamples provides comparison information to othe: cities. For the most part it involves sales 2ncl property tax information which are the two larsest individual General Fund revenue sources, but also shows Racetrack data. ~ o Saies tax update from HcIL, the City's sales tax consultant • Arcadia sales tax by geoaraphical azea m Gross sales tax - ail agencies in California • Per capitai sales tax - all agencies in California • Arcadia Redevelopment Agency property tax data • Arcadia single family homes sales price data • 2007 assessed value for Los Angeles County cities • City of Arcadia share of general property tax levy compared to all LA County cities • Santa Anita Racetrack revenue breal<down - pazamutual revenue • Multi-yeaz paramutual revenue analysis for Santa Anita Racetrack • Y' W ~: .,_ '~PoxtfbOmrrrfnll,~rf) ~for7'bird;~ium~i~rSn/r,-Iluf,Se(~Zpp;f:.:~~~ SALES ~AX BY MAJOR BUSINESS CaROUP s~,ooo.oaa ~ 3rtl Guatter 20Ge ~ 3N Quarter20~~ ~ 0 Albertsons JohnsArco Allstar Fire Los Angeles Turf Equipment Club Arcadia Chevron Macys Arcadia Mobil NordsVom Borders Old Nary Budfngton Coat Olive Garden Factory Ralphs Cheesecake Ross Factory RusnakArcadia Cdorado Chevron ~~ Chalet CVS Phartnacy Vons Daimler Chrysler Finance yy~tem Medical Dave & Buslers Supply H&M JC Pennay food and Drugs i 8usiness and Indus[ry Builtling end Construction REVENUE CQMPARZSON TwoQuarters-FiscalYearToDate ': ~ . 2006-07 ~ V., ~` 200T•08 .. Point-W~Sala }.i,~~31,338 . ~.. ~.Si,32Q5~39. CouakyPool ~ ~4oE~,z39 ~- -t~i~.5r~... Stste Pool '~. ~: 5,,n} 523 ~ GroasRecBip[s 8A;~444,591 -'E4,792,bLK~ LessTripleFlfp" 5{t.tli,ta8) S(t,t~v,tsa). 'Remibur~sedfrmei cnnnn'eompeusnunnfnnd PuBlisbed hy The HdL Companies in Winter 2008. www.hdicompantes.com~~ 888.861.0220' ~ • l_ J • ~ ~ d z d ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~: ~; ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-, N ~O ~ O~ w N O O~ ~ J N O~ N ~ Z ~"3 ~ fr9 {~q b9 b9 ~ {y9 W _ ~ W pp N r-~ ~-+ ~ 00 ~ ~ w W ~ rP p q ~ N C /1 O~ pp J ~--• Oo J N y N ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~D -P 0o N ~, ~1 ~ ~ a ~ ~ r~ ~~ 7 a p~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ O C ~ o~ a ~ C p~ ~ ~~ ~p~ b ~ /~ ~ O O ~ ~~ ~ O y ~ ~ ~i ~ w r ~~ ~ ~` • • • STA~E OF CAI~IF~RNIA - AI.g, AGENCYES 1% GRQSS SALES TAX {Point of Sale & County/State Pools) cat,srmr+x ~Eax zoo6 . 1 :~LAS ANGELE3 445,267,707 ~ 51 2 :SANDiEGO 229,355,753 '. i2 3 ;SANIOSE 141,257,008 ~ 53 4 'SANFRANCISCO 139,630,Ot1 ~ 54 5 ~FRESNO 81,489,563~ ~ SS 6 `SacnmmmUND~1CORPORATED B1,399,432 i 56 7 ~SACRAMENTO 68,924,348 '• 37 g ;ppLy}~~ 65,565,944 ~ 58 9 ~SAKERSFIELD 65,493,537 ~ 59 10 10NTARIO 63,529,304. ! 60 ~ 11 ~LoskngelesEiNINCORPORkTED 59,506,614 i 6t 12 .~~RIVERSID6. 56,566,393 ~ 62 13 iIItVINE SSA30,296 ~ 63 !4 ~LONG BEACH 51,370,251 ~~ 64 LS ~OAHI,AND 51,3}7,064 ~ 65 16 ~.COSTA MESA ~ 46,099,009 ~~ 66 17 ~TORRANCE 45,836,827 a 67 18 ;SANTAANA 45,277,714 ~ 68 39 IROSEViLLE ~ 44,904,823 ' 69 ~ 20 i3Z'OCP•TON 43,151,246 ~ - 70 ~ 21 iSAN1'ACLARA 42,335,819 ~~ 7i 22 ',CORONA 40,312,770 I 72 - 23 ':Rivecside UNINCORPORATED ~ 3&541,455 -~ 73 24 'iORANOE 35,650,489 ~': 74 25 ~'Kem EINRSCARPOI2ATED 35,372,063 ~ ':' 7i 2b ;SANBERNARDINO 35,316,790- ~ 76 27 '~:FREMONT 34,145,155 i 77 28 lPASADENA 34,0?b,035 ~i Tfl 29 iINDUS1RY 33,9A6,181 i 79 30 ~SANTAROSA 33,413~,160 ~ SEI 31 !3ANTA MOTItCA 32,860,990 i 8k 32 'SANTACLARTI'A 32,109,k43 ~ 82 33 iESCOt;IDIDO 31,458,114 ': 83 34 !BURBANK 30;739,004 ~ &1 35 ~C}LEND.4I.E 30,411,419 ` SS 36 ~CONCORD 30~,068,166 ~ 86 37 ~HAI'WARD . 30,OIO,d08 ; 87 ~ 38 :MODESTO" 29,884,733 ~ BS 39 iTEMECUI,h 29,839.953 ; .%9~ 40 ~SUNNYVAI.E 29,913.183 ~ 90 41 !THOUSANDOAKS 29.460~.870 ? 91 42 ~HUNfINGTON BEACH 29;009,388~ ; 92 43 ~NER~F'ORT BEACH 28,643,758 ~ 93 44 ~CHULA VISTA 27,586,855 ; 94 45 ~CARLSBA- 2fi,989,133 ; 95 46 !SANTAFESPRIAIGS 26,827,110 ~ 96 47 'RANCHOCUCAMONQA 26,806,06~1 t 97 48 ~CERRITDS 26,481,871 ; 98~ 44 1dXNARD 26;465,U7! ~ 94~ 50 kSen Baenazdino iJNINCORPORATED 25,875,026 ~~ 100 BEVERLY I-IILL.S 25,SI S,fi98 ~,~~ ?A,458,128 San Diego I7NINCOREK7RA't'ED 23,960,?A7 SAN LEANDRO 23,644,1~7 EL ClsJON 23,594,753 &EDDING ~ 23,415,126 VEN1'f]RA (SATi BUENAVeirtma) 23,385,494 VLSAF.iA 23~34G969 VICTORVILLE ~ 22,993,853 pLEASANTON 22,657,337 FONTANA - 22,611,231 pp,I,p ~,'('p 21,415,905 g~p p~ 21,119,190 WAI.NUT CREEK 21,t02,420 ~ARSON . 2Q472,608 REDWOOD CITY ZO,~,~ LANCASTER 20,214,109 LIVERMORE 20.164,233 . GARDEN GROVE 19,99D,798 SANTA BARBARA 19,874,555 EL MONTE 19,687,269 I'tTSTAI 19,471,419 BLK GROVE 19,263,895 ~ Smnisteus tTNINCORPGRATED 19,2U2,950 ppytvIDpt.,E 19,111,190 FAIftFIELD ~ 18,89fi,085 FOLSOM 18,542,649 g[~,e, 18,529,638 FULLERI'ON 18,520,503 CULVER CITY 18,312,012 CHICO 18,281,717 Sqpr gpppEI, 17,937.534 PALM DESERT 17,877,693 SIIuII VALLEY 17,875,067 MI3SION t~IFJO ~ 17,751.360 DCEANSIDE I7,686,501 3ANTA MARIA 17,682,091 gAN Mp,'('Ep 17,?A4,210 CHII~IO ~ 17,104,261 , NA1'fONAL CI1'P I6,881,876 WESTMAISTER 16,819,336 9AN MARCOS 16,608,142 pQ(„p-7'pg 16,549,ZG7 . Sen Joequin iTNINCARPORATED I6,507,437 VkCAVII.LE I6,461.345 POMONA 16,33b,799 CLOVLR 16,02q,890 MOUNTAIN VIEW 15.903,807 DpWptgy 15,756,608 Cp2.IMERCE 15,435,039 Hinderliter de Llewas and Associates •(909) 86t1F335 • www.hdlcompanies.com 1 of 6 ~ ~ ~ ; 101 ,PtacerUtJINCORPORATED 15,224,077 : I51 ;EL CEN1R0 10,190,190 ' 102 :BERKELEY 15,168,678 ~ 152 ~IADS 1Qi44,766 ~ 103 ~WEST COV4IA 15,090,338 ~ 153 lREDONDO BEACH 10,085,501 < 104 iLAKE FOREST 15,0?A,704 ~! 154 iRANCHO CARDOVk 10,073,928 ~!OS ~GII.ROY 14,587,891 `~ 155 iCATHE~AF.I. CTf1' 10,046,?AO ~ 106 ~MORENO Vhf.LEY 14,583,209~ ~ 156 ~LA HfiBRA 10,027,145 ! 107 ~Frosoo f.7NINCORPORATED 14,443,085 i 157 ~PA£M SPRIIJCr3 9,937,653 ~ 108 ~DUBLIN 14,192,202 I 158 ~WHITTIER 9,863,722 ' 109'MONTCLAIR ~ 14,081,174 ~ 159 ~CoutraCoslaIJNINCARPORAI'ED 9,828,?31 3' 110 SANLUISOHIS~PO 13,980,tf16 ~ 1601,SANRAMON 9,827,464 ~I 111 ~VALLEJO 13,846,448 ! L61 CAMPBELL ~ 9,793,926 ~; 112 ;MERCE- ~ I3,597,042 162 NORWkLK I ~ 9,739,995 ~ ~~ ~ 113 jVIS'FA 13,541,500 ~; 163 jEUREKA 9,731,874 i~ 114 !Sonoma tJNINCARPCIRAI'ED 13,372,891 ~'. l64 ;BURLINGAME 9,730,408 I 115 ~POWAY - 13,344,919 - ~~. 165 IDALYCFfT 9,690,373 •. 116 ~CUPERTINO ~ 13,229,636 ~ 16Fi':WOODLAND 9.670.185 ~~ 117 ~~'ALf{liMBRA . 13,196,890 `. 1 7! ~ C IA 9,471,945 ~~ 1181WESTSACRAMENTO 13,090,397 I~ ACRUZ 9,406,494 '~ 119 ~SOUTH SAN FRANC[SCO 13,070,3i4 ~': 169 ~GARDENA 9~63,097 ' 17A }TRACY 13,002,T80 j 17D ~IINDIO 9,213,624 ~ 121 {CYPRESS 12,967,455 ~~ 171 IIAS GATd3 9,031,737 'I 122 rRICEIIvSOND 12,$96,963 ~; 172 jMONROVIA 9,~23,743 ~. 123'MON7'EBELLO I2,780,481 ; 173 iCOVWA 9,011.141 `~ l24 ~REDLANDS 12,735,295 : l74 ~iUNIONCITY 8,844,796 ' I25 ;~CITRUS HCIGHTS t2,598,885 ! 175 !COI.MA 8,673,989 • ! 11b ~M[JRRIETA 12,523,544 ~: 176 ~MANTECA - 8,619,479 ~ 127 'NAPA 12,291,297 ~ 177 LA QUIIITA ~ 8,558,689 ~ 128 ~SI6NAL HIL.L 12,211,CQ4 ~~~. 178 Mnu[eroy UNINCORPORA'FED 8,545.374 ; l29 ~WESTHOLLYWOOD 12,165,932 ~~i 179 ~SmLuisObispoUNENCARPORATED 8,510,830 ;~ 130 iCAMARII.LO 12,06B,098 ''~ ISO ".SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 8,465,769 ~~~ i31 ;PETAI.UMA 11,949,656 ~~ 181 Smm Cruz LRJINCORPORATED $368,454 S 132 jLqMESA 11,938,197 i 182 SAN7'EE &308,582 ? 133 ~RiALTO 11,759,079 ~ - 163 EMERYVILLE 8,271,706 } 13d ~HEMET ~ ' 11,7~,547 ~ 184 ~GOLETA ~ ~ 8,246,689 :~ 135 )AN FSOCH 1t,658,507 . IvfANHATTANBEACH ~, 185 8,199,523 ' 136 ~FOI7NTAIN VALLEY 11,638,026~ ~ 186 IHANFORD &196,991 { 137 iNRLOCK 11,672,653 ~ I87 IPASQ KOBLES (EI. PkSO DE R9BL 8,097,715 !' 138 ~F.AKEWOOD 11,59$561 ; 188 !P1T1'SBURG 8,085,912 j 139 ;HAVJTHORNE 11,5ffi,566 ; 184 ~AlamadaUNWCORPORATED 7.958,051 '; l40 +ENCINTTP.F 11,393,214 ' ~ 190 ~O~aoge[]NQdC~RPORATED 7,874,757 ~; 141~iIN(3LEWOOD 11,390,614 ; 19k:,SOUTHGATE 7,844,854 ~. 142 ~UPLAND t 1.293.737 ~ 192 'ROHNERT PARK 7,822.449 ~' 143 :F,AGUNANL4LiEL I1,282,Skd - 193 !FIESPERIfs 7,744.281 ~ t44 ~NEWARK 11,t66,611 i ' 144 ROCKI,IN 7,715,?A6 ~ t45 ~COLTON ~ 1I,00$363 ~~ 195 ;PICORiVERA ~ 7,709,750 i!46 iELSEGL]NDO 10,998,170 1961SenmBecbalsiTNII~TCORPORAI'ED I 7,686,991 j 147 ~El Daado [JNINCORPORATED 10,997,016 197 'NOVA'f'O 7,672,333 ~ 148 ~LAMIRADA 10,8I2,450 ~ 198 ~PARAMOiJNT 7,658,305 ; 149~,YCTBACITY 1Q,63L,41A ~ 194 PLEP.SANTHILL 7,631,2D8 ; I50 !Sen Mateo UNINCORP~RATED 10,301,944 ; 200 TULARE 7,586,SD0 . Hinderliter de Llsmas and Associetes •(909) 861-4335 • w~mv.hdlcompames.cona 2of6 • ~ ~ ~ ! 2(11 LAI.BELSINORE 7,482,415 '~ 251 !SEL.MA 4,906,M5 ~; 202 ~Tulane UNAICORPORAT'ED 7,409,281 i 252 ~ 3AN FERNANDO 4.865,404 ; 203 ~GLENDORA 7,330,098 ~ 253 iDANAPOINT [7N3NCORPORATED ~~~ ~ d i 4,&61,634 IZ4 4 827 I204;SANBRUNO 7,316,918 no 254 Men oc , , ~ 205'MONTEREY 7,197,8G5 ~ 255 ~SRLSBAftE 4,802,790 ~` 206 ~WATSONVII.LE 7,024,215 ' 256 ~LEMON GROVE 4,753,320 t 207!SANCLEMENTE 6.985.458 ~ 257 ~!BRENT'WOOD 4.716,782 ~ 7A8 ~3HAFfEP 6,957,375 ~ ~ 258 ~DANVtI.LE 4,707,989 -209EMENLOPARK 6~,887,563 !2591FdST'ERCl'CY 4,618,070 i 210 ~LAGUNA HD.LS 6,876,376 ! 260 iALi50 VIEJO 4,612,719 ~ 211 iI~IUNTINGTON PARK 6,864.706 ~! 261 UKFAH 4,565,310 ~ 212 ~SANCARLOS 6,946~,166 ~'~ 262 ~SOiJT'AF.AKETRHOE 4,481,746 ~i 213 ~Nepa UNINCORPORATED 6,731,899 ~ 263 ;APPL.E VRLLEY 4,445,597 ~-~ 214 ~MADERA 6,712,230 ! 264 ~SOLTI'HELMONTE 4,4?A,101 : 215 `RANCH06ANTAMARGARITA 6,69FJ,679 ', 265 ~LAGUNABEACH 4,349,728 I 216 ~~~CAI.ABASAS 6,639,954 ! 26G iI~3ARTlNEZ 4,246,947 ' 217 iMedcraUNINCARPORATED 6,631,193 ' 267'STANTON 4,203,289 ~: 218 °:MOR6AN HILL 6,387,914 ! 268 ~~~PLACERVII.LE 4,053,397 i 219 ~BARSTOW 6,365;9k6 ~~ 269 ;AUBURN 4,OSO,7A4 ~'. 2?A ~PERRIS - 6,362,591 '. 270 !SAN GAHRIEL 3,994,671 ~, Z21 iSAN DIMAS 6,291,041 ; 271 .ATA6CADERO 3,986,425 '~~ 222 ~~;YORBA LINDA 6,257,96G ' 272 ~~ WINDSOR ~ 3,923,509 ~ 223 'BALDWIN PARK 6,254,317 ~~~.. 273 ~~.DIAMOhiD BA& 3.902,722 ~~: 223':ALAMEDq 6,230~,970 . 274 ~~IAMPOC 3,902,586 ~ 225 ~VenhuaUNINCORPORATED 6,21Q,698 I 275 ~~OROVILLE ~ 3,866,674 • { 226 ;BEN}CIA 6,159,904 , 276 ~f,EL CERRII'O 3,847,514 i 227}NORCO 6,100,291 ,~'~ 297'~,HumboldtUNINCAP.PORATED 3,803,641 '' 228 iLAPALMk 6,032,550 -- 278 ;LA VERNE ~ 3,801,600 i 229 ~~DAVIS fi,008,426 iButte UIdINCORPORATED ~- 279 3,7TT,638 ~ 230 ~CfRASS VALLEY 5,917,954 ~,~ 26D ~RED HLUF'F ~ 3,739,886 ; 231 2Ma~cedCRJQJCORPORATED Sy01,126 ' 28I ~AGOURAFID.LS 3,738,3]8 ~ 232 ERANCHOMIRAGE S,8T3,168 ~ 2B21,MerinUNfNCORPORATED 3,735,494 4 233 ~SEASIDE 5,868,325 ~' 283 ;TuolumneUNIl~ICORPORAI'ED ~ 3,721,071 ~ 234;PLACFNTIA , 5,861,4D6 ~ 264 ~DELANO ~ 3,595,463 ~ 235 ~POA1'ERVILLE 5,837,t38'~ ~ 285 ~,SEALB£hCSi 3,576,4~1 ~ 236SCORTEMADERA ~ 5,768,177 ' 286'SoverUNINCORPORATED - 3,573,fi32 ~ 237'SELLFI.OWER 5,505,772 ? 287 iPiNOI,E 3,554.b08 :'~ 238 ~CAPITOLA 5,497,512 ; 288 iLYNWOOD 3,535,472 ~; 239 ~IRWAIDALE 5,442,324 ~ 289 i1RUCKEE 3,515,761 }?AO ~VERNON 5,385,095 ` ~ 290 ~ARROYOGRANDE 3,499,125 j 7A1 jCOMPTON 5,345,598~. ? 291 ~~-~She~aUNINCORPORATED 3,467,670 : 1A2~'CERE3 5,309;122 ! 292 !COACftIO.L.A 3,451,516 ~~ 243 %AZUSA 5,?A0,437 ' 293 'WESTLAI~ VILLAGE ~ 3,441,905 ! 244 ~DI7CON 5,240.314 i 294 ~HOLLI3TER 3,M130,515 ' 245 iCHINO HQ,LS ~ 5,239,84fi ~ 293 !OAKDALE 3,399,769 ~ 246 ~DUARTE S,D46,2f5 ~ 296 ~HF,kLD5BUR6 3,386,900 ~t 2471~,qt,E7{ICp 5.034,884~ ~ 297 ~YubaUNINCORPORATED 3,383.129 ~ 248!MONTEREYPARK 5,008,381 ~ 298IAOSEMEAD 3,294,T38 ° 249 5ea4sCkaza UNSNCQ&PORA,T'ED 4,946,3k3~ ~ 299~ ~It1DGECRESZ' 3,270,112 '; 250 jCI.AREMONT 4,910,857 ! 306 ~;WCCA VALLEY 3,243,739 • Hinderliter de Llsm as aud Associates •(909) 561-4335 • www.hdlcompsnies.com 3 of 6 • ; 301 ~BELMONT 3$35,261 i~ 351 ;I,ARKS~PUR 2,035,876 ; 302 ~IAS BANOS 3,209,472 ~ 352 ~Lh CAf~ADAFLINTRIDGE ~ 2,029,419 ~ 303 ~SOLANA BEACH 3,102,974 : 353 ;SIG BEAR LAKE : 2,020,454 ~; 304 ~Yolo UNINCORPORATED 3,064,317 ~~ 354 ~ANDERSON 2,017,205 ~ 305 ~LOMA LAlDA 3,031,934 I 355 ARCATA 1,981,757 - ~ 306 pLako IJNQdCORPORATED 2,984,930 ' 356 ~BELL GARDENS 1,979,461 i 307 jNweda IININCORPDRATED 2,948,239 ; 35~ ~HLY7'HE . 1,938,646 ~~. 308 ~LAWNDALE 2,927,353~ ~ 358 ISCAITS VRLLEY 1,898,655 '~: 309 iAmedorUNINCORPORATED - 2,893,207 i 359 IFII.Lh10RE 1,893,108 ` 310 f.MOORPARK 2,881.247 ; 360 ~SOUTH PASADENA 1,890,741 ~ 311 iSONORA ~ 2,865,372 ~ 361 iWAI,NUf 1,886,381 ~ 312 ~LOSAL.Ahi1T05 2,852,467 ? 362 :KicgsLiNINCO&PORATED 1,837,929 I 313 ~SAND CI7'P 2,843,738 ~i 363 !SANC3ER 1,834,330 ! 314 BANNING 2,796,668 ~-~ 364 iSUSANVILLE 1,825,341 ,~ 315 ~CORNING 2,789.I73 I 365 -;,FORT BRAGG 1,768,328 ~~~ 316 !LAFAYETTE ~ 2,727.403 ~~; 366 ;HRAWLEY ~ 1,958,721 - ~~ 317'CalaveiasLJNINCORPORATED ~ 2,72D,826 ~: 367'~,LEMOORE . 1,749,723 '. 318 ."YCJCAIPA 2>7L5,581 i 368 4PARADISE 1,740,415 ~ 319 !RIPON 2,689,511 '. 369 iMariposaUNINCORPORAi'ED 1,705,006 ~~ 320 ;Imperial UNINCORPORATED 2,682,085 '. 370 ;SAN PABLO 1,692,694 ~ 322 :HEAUMONT 2,676.546 I 371 iLOMITA 1,673,737 ' 322'GALT ~ 2,659,598 '; 372 ~AMERICAN CANYON 1,673,490 i 323 ;EAST PALO ALTO 2,656,30G ~ 373 ~DEL MAR 1,664,416 ~~; 324 '~BELL 2,622,020 i 374 REEDLEY 1,655,031 I 325 ~LAPUENTE 2,568,948 ; 375 ICiJDAFIY 1,642,105 ~ '. 326 ;MILL VAI,LEY 2,452,118 ' 376 ~PACtFIC GROVE 1,633,499 ~. 327 ;HERMOSA BEACH 2,441,910 I i77 ~BUELLTON 1,632,825 ~ 328 4MAMMOTH LAKES 2,438,775 '.~ 378 ~SEBASTOPOL 1,629,fi21 :'~. 329 ~ST FIELENA 2,434,063 i 379 ~ROLS.ING HILIS ESTA1'ES 1,618,455 '~ 330 ~MAI,IBU . 2,421,165 ! 3fl0 ~iLA1'HROP 1,617,558 i 331 ~L03 ALTO5 2,409,498 ~. 381 !TAF1" 1,597,658 ~ 332 ~DINCJBA 2.463.688 i 382 ;1'EMPLE CITY 1,588,232 ~ 333 !SONOMA 2,382,111 ~~ 383 ;PACIF[CA ~ 1,554,297 ~ 334 ~CORONADO 2,365,875 ; 384'~.SAUSALITO ~ 1,548,964 i 335 ~SolavoUNA1CORPORATED 2,352,773 ; 385 jIMPERIAL 1,525,864 ~ 336 +Plumas UNIN(:ORPORATED 2,281.027 ~ 386 ~,TEk3hCSAPI 1.518,833 ~ 337 ~MIl.LBRAE ' 2$61,939 ~ 387 ~~NIORRO BAY 1,514,040 ~ 3381PISMOBEACH 2,261,490 ' 388'~SattBeaitol7NINCORPORATED 1,512,011 ~ 339 ;2vfARYSVILLE 2,2i8,599 j 389 ~COALW6A 1,491,950 ~ 340 iLWCOLN 2,241,367 ~ 390 iLqF~PORT 1.487,914 ` ' 341 ICARME4HY-THF,-SPA 2,231,926 a 391 ~CARPINTERfA 1,480,091 ; 342 ~AL.BANY 2,I88,fl97 ~ 392 IADELANTO 1,471,439 ~ 343 ~YREKPc 2,161,633 ' 393 ~~'~HERCULES l,456,317 ~344lATWATER ~ 2,f31,684 i394?SANIACINTO- 1,452,558 l 345 `AR1'ESIA 2,106,926 j 395 ~FORTT]NA 1,442,018 1 346 ~BLSHOP 2,106,455 ~ 396 iWI}.LTTS 1,439,790 i 347:SANTAPAULA 2,105,308 '~~~ 397 ~MARINA ~ t,398,900 ! 348;HALFMOONBAY 2,068,130 ~ 398 ~PATTERSON 1,351,478 ~ 344 fRFVERSASdK 2,D46,846 ~ 399~ ~FOWLEk 1,346,512 ; 350 iCOTATI 2,041,904 ~ 400 IHI(iHL,AND 1,344.221 • HinderliTer de Llemas and?cssocietes • (909) 861-4335 • wM1w+.fidlcompenies.com 4of6 ~ ~ ~ ~ 401 ~NEVADA CI'fI' ~ 1,331,164 ' 451 '•.AAWAILIN GARDENS 719,975 . ~ 402 iCLEARL.AKE 1,326,522 j 452 ~AVALON 914,S31 '~ 403 ~]ACK30N I301,208 ~ 453 i~7'E7RA5 ~ 700,193 ~ 404 ~GIemUD71NCORPORATED 1$82,951 454 ~LIN~SAY ~ 691.481 978 q 405 ~OAKI.EY ~ 1,225,021 455 ~WEED 679, a 406lKII9GCITY 1,201.229 ~. 456 ~GRffiQFfELD 667,654 ` 407 #InyoIJN1NCORPORA'FED 1~196.678 ~ 457 IARVIN 646,986 ;4081CRESCENTCITY 1,185,630 `458~WILLfAMS 637,211 F 409 ~Colv~[JNINCORPORAT'ED 1,151,463 ~:~ A59'YOUNTVILLE 626,334 " 410 r CHOWCFIILLA 1,F47,93i ', 460 ~SHASTA LAKE 549,825 ! ~ 411 tOJAI t 1,140,609 I 461 Ic~etn~rr+ap UN1NCORPORATED ! 462 ~M ~ 583,548 874 569 412 ~COLUSA ~ • 1,139,537 127 1 137 ono i ~ 463 ;NEEDLES , 560,226 "INDIAN WELL5 ; 413 , , 'i 414 ;R[O VISTA 1,136,522 j 464 ~HIJGHSON 5~.~ E 415 ~LOOMIS 1,134,895 ~' 465 !CLOVERDALE S1b,502 ' 416 ;GROVER.EEACH 1,130,298 `~ 466 -'SOLEDAD 525,198 ~• 417 iRANCHO PAI.OS VERBES 1,129,197 I. 467 iIv~NDOTA 520,600 ~~ 4l8 ;OJASCO ~ 1,117,550 ~ 468 IT[BURON SI9,395 ~; 419 ~~DelNoReUN1NCORPORATED 1,116,S1G ~: 469 :iNEWMAN 507,154 ~~ 420'~.CORCORAN 1,11I,Sb3 ~ 470~ IWOODSIDE . 493,856 ~ :~ 421- ~~~~.SOLVANG 1,095,266 ~ 471 iFARh3ERSYII.LE ~'.~I ; 422 jDESERT HOT SPRINGS k,085,939 i 472 ~jSAN MARINO 432,544 i 4Z3'MAYVJOOD 1.063,436 '~ 473 ~FAIRFAX 47R,20fi ~~ 424 iMOUNT SHASTA 1,062,047 ~ 474 iCALIFORNIA C[T'Y 41Q035 '; 425 ;Qgypl•Ip 1.Q58,525 ~':_ 475 ~SUITERCREEK 385,610 • ', 426 iGRIDLEY I,056,503 ' 476 iGONZALES ' 375,292 370 302 -; 427 iTah~aUNINCORPORATED 1,037,057 WATERFORD i 477 I , fi8 373 ; 428 ;SCJISUN CITP 1,017,590 ~ 478 iDOS PALOS ~ , 3 ; 424 ~SAN ANSELMO I,009,554 ~ 479 iGiJADAS.UPE 354~539 ?. 4gp ;qyu,i,pq~g 999,297 ~ 480 'CLAYTON 350,126 ~'~ 431 ISARATOGA 985,885 ~.. 481 ~WiNfERS 342.386 i 432 iGRANDTERRACE 98QL31 ~ 482 iWOODL.4t~ 321,958 j 433 iLA(3UNAWOODS 976.961 i 4S3 ~PARLIER 298,432 + 434 :ORINDA { 967,592 962 753 i 484;SIERRA MADRE ineilNINCORPOItATED ; 485 ~Al 295~563 285,955 435 }TWENTYNINEPALMS , p ; 436 ~LeesenUNMCORPORATED 950,728 ' 466 IPORTOLA . YFAg VERDES ES1'ATES ! 487 !p 285.34D 593 274 ~ ~ 437 ~LIVING9TON ME ' 935,583 586 930 e ; 488 ~DELREYOAKS , 26&~91 ,, 438 PORTHIJENE -' 439 ~AN(3ELS CRMP , 910,13'7 1 489 ~MCFARF,AND ' ~ 256.657 ~ q4p ~gggpAp,N 8~,OSQ ffNE . ; 496 ~6kJS 244~fl92 ~: 441 :MORAGA ~ 886.790 ModocUNINCORPORATED ~ 491 213.906 "~'~ A42 YESCALON 858,638 I ~ 492 iPIEDb10NT 212.363 '' 443 fY.1NCsSBURG 809,677 ~ 493 ~AVENRL ( ' 203,292 190 008 3 444 ~IMPERIA.L BEACH 807,245 L[VE OAK . 494 , ~ Siski}rouUNiNCORPORATED ' 445 ~ 791,526 ' 495 ISANJOAQUAT 189,028 , ' qqg ippy~pg ~ qq7 :$7[g~g 768,9'/6 758.495 ~ 496 ;HOL1'VQ.LE ~ 497'iATE~R1'ON 184,257 ll1.796 ~ 448 iTrinity UNAICORPORATED ~58.474 ~ 49B !ISLETON ~ 171,755 ~ 449'FIREBAUGH 733,003 ~ 499 jPORTOI.AVALLEY 170,133 ; 450 ;CALISTOOA 728,303 ~ 500 : VfLLA PARK «,n~ • Hinderlitar de Llsmas a~ Associates •(909) S6I-4335 • www.hdlcompanies.com Sof6 C~ C~ I 501 iAIIRON 165,332 ~ 519 j ~502 ~WESTMORLAND 158,443 ~ 520 ' S03 ~PLYMO[J71i 155,849 ~ 521 ' S04 {SAN NkN ~AUTI3TA 155,316 j 522 j 505 ~ORANGE COVE . 150,799 1 523 ~ 506 ~IONE 150,586 i 524 :~ 507 ~FERNDAI.E 133,170 i 525 f 508'Sie~raUNINCORPbRAT'ED 132,699 I 526 509 ~LOYAI.TON 129,552 ; 527 ~ SIO:CALIPA'FRUx 129,111 ; 528 ; 511 `PORT JONES 1?A,665 ~~~ 529 ' S12 ;CANS'ON LAf~ ]05,705 ~~; 530 ~ 513 i'fITI,HLAI:E 102,921 ; 531 '~: 514 ~MONTACiUE 102,381 j 532 ~ 515 IIAS AI.TOS HILL6 101,606 t 533 ~ 516 iRIODELL 101,2~5 i 534 ~ ~ Sl7 ;WHEATLAND 100,137 ~ 535 '~ ! 518 !TR.IIdIDAD 86,980 . fNT ARENA )DEN HILLS HAHRA HEIGHTS LAKE 'E SERENO FIII.IS State Tohal 82,T33 80.447 G5,889 56,I72 42,534 40,086 36,538 35,851 35,016 33,372 29,418 I7,582 13,260 11,725 10,191 2,690 88 5,864,849,372 ~ Hinderliter de Llemas and Associates •(909) 861-4335 • www.hdlcompaniea.com 6of6 M ~ STAT'E OF CALIFORNIA - ALL AGENCIES SALES TAX PER CAPITA (Point of Sale & County/State Pools} CALENDAR YEAR 2006 R~lk ~tk ~ 1 i VERNON ~ 56,685 i 51 ISAN LULS OBISPO ~ ; 2 ,IIQDUSTRY 42,380 52 jSANRAFAEL ~ j 3 1SAND CITY 9,479 ~ 53 ,AUBURN ~ ! 4 +COLMR i 5 iIRWA7DAI,H ~ 5,507 3,491 ~ ' S4 ~TORRANCE ~ 55 ~IAS GATOS ! 6 ISANTAFE3PRINGS ~ 1,509 ~ 56 lWFSTSACRAMENTO i 7~BRISBANE ~ 1,2ffi I 57 `GII.ROY i 8~COMM~ERCE 1,149 ~ 58 ,7fiCK90N ~, 9 ;SI6NALHQ.L 1,161 ~ 59 `DIXON ~ IO ~EMERYVII.LE 969 ~ 60 ~YREKA i 11 {BEVERLYHfLS,S 712 ; 61 ~SANLEANDRO ~ i2 ~ELSEGLfNDO 648 ~~ 62 ~LAKII'ORT i I3 iCORTE MADERA 6l4 I 63 ~HEAI.DBBSIRO j 14 ~SOMORA 596 ~:~ 64 SBURBANK ~ ';~ 15 ~~IBISHOP 583 - 65 iMOUNTSHASTA : ' 16 !CAPTfOLA 553 ' 66 I17t4+1A ~: 17 !CARMEL-BYTHE-SEA ~ 553 !. 67 ~,~OROVtLLE . !, 18 ~CERRITOS 483 ~' 68 jIILV[NE ~I 19 lSHAFTER ~ 480 S 64 ;CALA8ASA5 ~~'. 20 IBREA ~ 468 ~~. 7Q i,VTQ.LITS ' 21 IGRASSVALLEY - 454 ~ 71 ~PASOROBLE& ~; 22 iCULVERCTI'Y 450 ; 72 ~~CORONA ~~- 23 iNEVADACII'Y 431 ~ 73 jFOWLER ~ 7A iROSEVILLE ~- 429 C 74 4COTATf ~ ~'~. 25 iCOLFAX 421 j 75 ~RID BLUFF ~ 26 'COSTAMESA ~ ! ; 407 : 76 1CARLSBAD 7 {GOLETA ; 27 STHELENA ~ 406 7 ~ 28 iPLACERVILLE ~ ~ 399 I 78 ;TRIl~ImP.D ~ ; 29 MONTCLAIR 395 79 4FOLSOM i 30 ~WESTLAKE VILLAGE 388 ~ SO ~TUSTiN ~ 31 jCORNINCi 386 ~ &1 }BARSTOR' i 32 ;3ANTACLARA 382 ! 82 ~REDWOODCITY i 33 iLAPALblA 373 ~ 83 ~NATIONALCITY~ ~ 34 iONTARFO . 37l ' 84 ~CYPRESS j 35 ~DELMkR 36B I 85 ;POWAY ~ 36 ~SANTAMONICA 362 i 86 ~PISMOSEACH 37 IPALMDESERT 36l '~ 87 `REDDfN~ f 38 iEUREKA 360 ~ 88 $HiIENAPARK + 39 ~BUELLDON ~ 359 ~ 89 SORAN6E j 40 ~RANCHO MII2AGE 352 i 90 ~NEGVARK ' 41 INE6dPORTBEACH ~ 42 iPALO hi TO 346 345 ~ 91 sCAt~BEI.L j 92 ~ANGEL3 CAMP ., ~- 43 ~BI7RLINGAME 344 ~ I 93 lFORTBRAGG I i 44 ~DUBLIN 339 i 94 tMILPITAS ~ 45 IPLERSANTON C 334 ~ 95 fTAFT ; 46 BiGBFARLARE ' ~ D 327 324 ~ 96 tLIVERMORE ~ 97 ~CUPERTIIJO 47 WESf HOLLYWOO ~ 48 ~WALNUTCREEK 319 ' 98 fALTURAS ~~ 49 :TEMECULA 31B ~ 94~ yELCAJaI1 ~I 50 ~MAMMOTH LAT~,S 316 ~ 100 ;EL CENTRO 315 313 312 312 312 303 301 299 298 295 292 290 289 288 287 28fi 285 284 284 284 280 279 277 27~ 274 274 272 272 271 271 270 266 266 265 264 262 260 260 259 257 255 255 254 254 251 248 24G 244 244 243 ~ ~ ~ Hinda'}rter de Llames end Associates •(909) 8b1-4335 • www.hdicomp~es.com 1 oF6 ~ ~ LOi IV[CTORV[LLE 102 ~CONCORD ~ 103'SONOMA ~ 104 jSAN CARLOS lOS~MONTEREY 106 ;NepaUNINCORPORATBD 107 iL05 AI.AMITOS 108 ~SATI JUAN CAPISTRP.NO 109 ~1NDIhN WELLS 110 jPA3AAENA 111 ~60LANABEACA I 114 !THOUSAND OAKS -~ 1L5 ~AlpinaUNTNCORPORATED ~~~ S16 iV1EHD ~'~117iPLEASANT HILL '~~ 118!ESCONDIDO .I~ ll9'BENICIA ! 120 ;MANHATTAN BEACH ~: 121 ;MENLO PARR ! 122 ~NORCO ' 123iLAQUINfA ~'. 1?A ~-SUNNYVALE ~~: 125 ~ISANTA BARBARA ; 1?b-':TRUCKEE ~~~ 127 !MOUNTAIN VFEW i 128 ~DUARTE ! 129 VENT[JRA '; 130 ~~CHINO ~; 131 ~LAMIRADA ! 132 iSAN ASARWS { 133'LAbfESA ~~ 134~PALMSPRINGS ; 135 13ELMA ~~ 136 ~3ANTAROSA ~ 137 {COLTON ~ 138 ISOLTTH SAN FRANCLSCA 139 iISLETON ~ 140 ARROYO~ORANDE i" 141 iPETAIAMA ~~142~SEHASTOPOL I 143 ~BAKERSFIEI.D ~aa ~vrsnLu I 145 :SAUSALI'FO i 146 CAR30N ! 147 ~LAC7UNA HILLS~ ~ IA8'~:HAYWARD '~ 149 iAVRI.ON ~~~. 150 ISOLVANG 24y ~ 151'~FOUNTAIN VALLEY 203 Zq2 ~~ 152 ~ROLLINGH[I.LS ESTATES 200 241 ~ 153 (COLUSA ~~ ~g f 154~30UTHELMOPITE 19e yg9 i 155 iCATHEDW~LCITY 197 238 7 156 ~RIVERSIDE 197 aas =' is~ Is.4rrraNrniuA ~~ 235 ~ ~158~MONTEBELLO 195 y3q ~~~. 154 ; SP.N FERNANDO 194 233 .i 160 ~RIPON ~ 193 233 ~ LAKEFOREST ~ l61 193 231 I ' 162 YOiJNTVILLE 192 231 ".163 jSANTACLAIt1TA 192 231 `: 164 iANAHEIM 191 230 ~ 165 ~OAKDALE 1~ 230 ; 166 i SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 190 226 i 167'.ANDERSON 189 Zz7 ~'~ 168 3CAMARILLO 188 Z25 -~: 169 i.LEMON GROVE 18~ 2Z5 '~; 17015ANRAMON i85 Zpq '',171;FORT]ONES ~85 ~{ ~'. IT2 ipINOLE 183 7,~. i I73}LAREELSINORE 183 ~3 :~~ 174 ~;WOODLAND 183 27~ ~ 175'COVINA ]82 221 ~ 176 I SAN MA1'EO 1~ ZZl ~ 177 ~ WESTMINST'ER » 219 4 178 ~ ROHNERT PARK ~~ 219 -, 179 iENCINTfAS I81 2t9 ~ 180 ~MI83~ON VIEJO ~8L 217 ': 181 ~MARYSVII.LE 179 216 ~ 182 ~R&DLANDS ~ I79 ?iq ' 1&3 !FAIRFIELD 179 214 ~ ~~~ 184 ~RANCHOCORDOVA , 1~ 214 ~ 185 ~MII..L VALLEY 1~9 213 ; 186 3MERCID 178 213 ` 187 iCIAVIS t78 21t ~ 188 ~GRIDLEY 178 211 ~' 189 {MALIBU 1T~ 211 ; I901SANBRUNO , l76 211 ~ 191 ~YCiBACIT'I' 176 210 '. 192 jI.00MiS ~ 175 210 '~193j5ANBERNARDINO 175 z~o t i9a ~s.a,ta ~~co i~s 2pg j 195 ;SAN FRANCISCO I75 2pg ~ 196 ~LAGITNABEACH 174 2p~/ '. 197 ~FRESNO 173 205 i 198 IMORfiAN HII.L ~'~ 205 ~ 199 ~'FURL~CK 171 2pq ~ 200'~VACAVILLE 171 • Aindefliter de Llamas and Associates •(409) SGI-4335 • www.hdlcompanies.com 2of6 • • f 2D1 !SATI DIMA3 l71 ~ 251 iCI1RUS HEIGHTS 145 ~ 202ILAGUNAHIC3t1EL 170 ~ 252;HUNTINGTOIVBEACA 144 ': 203 iSEASIDE 170 '~~ 253 ~MORRQ BAY ~ 144 ~ 204 ~LARKSP[TR 169 . 254 ~ATASCAD&RO 144 ~i 2DS;ARCADIIt ~ 169 . ' 235 ~BERI~LEY 144 ~ 206 ~fIEMET I69 ~ 256 ;MODESTO 144 ! 207 ismn~s~ausUNIhICORPORATED 168 ; 257 jPlacetUNINCARPORATED l44 } + ~ qpg~HANFQRD 167 (258~VISTh 143 ~~~ 209 iDEL REY OAKS ' ~ 165 ! 254 ~ SEAL HEACH ~ 141 140 ; 210;SATIT ACRUZ 165 GLENDORA ! 26U ' 211 r9AI.INA6 165 ~ 261 ; WAT90NWTLLE ~ 140 ': 212 ~EL CERRITO 164 262 ?OIAI ~ 140 ' 213 ~;SC011'S VALLEY t64 '~ 263 ~DOVJNEY 139 ! 214 !FREMONT 162 I 264 (LAKEWOOD ~ 139 ~~~ 215 ~HALF MOON BAY 162 .I 265 I OXNARD 139 I2161LAHABRA 162 ~~',266~~CALISTOGA 139 ~~~-~ 217 ~~:1TtACY - ~ 162 ? 267 iLOMALINDA 138 ' 218'LODI 161 ~'., 268 !CALEXICO 139 ~ 219 !AGOi1RA HILL5 - 161 :' 2fi9 iFONTANA 137 ~:~ 220 ~NAPA 160 ! 270 IRP.NCHO SANTA MARGARITA 136 ~ TLl iSanMetaoUN}NWRPORP.TED 159 ~ 271 iFULLERTON 136 I 222 ~WCCA VAI,LEY -158 '~ 272'.~PALMDALE ~ 136 ! 223 ~RANCHO CUCAMONGA 157 273 ~~iMANTECA ~~~ 135 ~ 224 IEL MONTE 157 ~ 274 ~iPE&RIS 135 ~ 225 ~VJILLOV/S I55 '': 275'~Yo1nLJNINCORPORATED 135 ~ 236'~F03TERCITY '. 15h j 276 ~~NNRItIE£A 135 ~ 227 ~RIO VISTA 154 ~~ 277 ~WESTCOVAIA - 134 134 ; ZZg iCRESCENT CFCY 154 ~. 278 iCLAREMDNT ', 7,2g ~i7pyplVp ~~~; 230 iSuderUNR~CORPORAI'ED 152 152 ~ 279 ~PORTOLA ,' 280 ~~~AANAPOII3T 133 133 ~! 231 ;GARDENA 152 ~~ 281 }PARAMO[JNT 132 ~ 232 iSAN1'EE I52 ~ 282 ~AmedorL7IQINCORPORATED 132 ; 233 iROCKLIN 152 ~~~~ 283 ;SUTTERCREEK 131 i 234';ORLAND ISi ! 284 ~ALBANY 13~ ~~~. 235 ~STOCKTON I51 i 285 HAYJTAORNE 131 ; 236 ~V/lPIDSOR ~' 237 SACRAMENTO 151 151 ~ 286 tCERE6 _ .LE 289 iPORTERVII " 130 129 ~. ~ ' . ~ 238 ;IIvll'ERIAI. ~ 150 ~ 288 ; SAt.'Y'A kNA ~ ~ ~~ 129 129 239 ~REDONDO BEACH ~ 150 TNDIO 289 ~ 290 ~PITTSSURCi , 128 ; ?AO INOVATO ~ ; 150 148 ' 291~ ~MADERA ~ I28 241 ;SAMJOSE i 7A~2'ALHAMBRA 148 ~ ~ 292 ~FORT[JNk 127 ': 243IGLENDALE ' 147 ~ 293'BELMONT ' 244 ~HERMOSABEACH 126 12fi ~, 24q iT[A,qRE ~~ 245 ~ELK GROI~E 147 147 ~ 295 ~WII.LIAMS 125 { 246 tPLYMOUTH 147 !. 296 IFILT.MORE 125 ~: 247 ~IAYALTON 147 ~ 297 ;RICHMOND 125 ~ 248 ~LANCASI'ER 146 ~ 298 ~OAICLAND 125 i 249 ~~S~I~VkLLEY Idb ' 249~~kJty}6N CIT-X ~ 1?A ~.250',SecramearoUNINCORPORAT'ED 145 ;300;CfiULAVfSTA 123 Hinderliter de Llmmas end Associates •(909) 861-4335 • www.hdlcomp¢nies.com 3of6 ~~ ~ 301 iR~~ggST ~I 302 ~DINUBA 123 123 ? 351 !CLEARI.AKE ~ 352 ~LAC.S17ADAFLII~TRIDC}E 95 95 i 303'ESCALON 122 - ~~~ 353 ~SANGABRIEL 94 ~ 304 ~KarnITNINCORPORATED 122 ~ 354 iIAS BANOS ~ 94 i 305 iTEFIACH~APF i ' 1?A 17A ~ 355 ~YORBALAIDA osa LININCORPORAI'ED Meri 1 356 .94 94 ~, 306 ARTESIA ~ p ~ 3W ~SolenoUNINQORPORATED 119 1 357 LOMPOC 93 ~ 308 ~RIALTO 119 ~ 358 ~DAVIS ' 93 ~ 309 ~PLrmesE7NINCORI'ORATED ll8 ~ 359;FERNDAI.E 93 ~ 310 iSen.JoequiaUHINCORPORAI'ED 118 j 360 ;HOLLISi'II2 93 ~ 311 iGARllEN GItOVE 116 ; 361 f DAI.Y CITY NA ~ ~~ 92 90 '~~ 312 ~,MARTII3EZ L16 CORO DO ~- 362 . i 313 ;GALT 116 ~ 363 ~SAN JUAN BALTfISTA 90 ~i 3141BEAUMONT 116 .'~ 35A;WOODSIDE 9U i 315 ~iANTiOCH 115 ~! 365':NORWALK 89 i 316 ~PIfARPVEttA 115 ~ 366'~;MaderaUNINCORPORATED 89 ~ 317 I,ARCATA I15 ~- 367 %SonomaUNINCORPORATEII ~ 88 ' 318 IPLACEN'CIA I14 '~ 368 iLAWNDALE 88 ! 319 iVALLEJO 1}4 ' 369 ;BLYTHE ~ ~ S1 '''~ 320 iLA VER13E ~ ~ ' 114 114 ,. 370 tLOS ALTOS • 371 ~HUGHSON ~ 87 g~ I 321 WHI1 1TER ~ f 322 tLAFAYETTE 113 I 372 fCOAI,INGA - 87 ~ 323 kLO3ANGELES ~~' 112 112 ' 373iGROVERBEkCH UNINCORPORATED ~ 374 ;Gl 86 &! ~. 324 ~~.AIvIES2.ICAN CANYON `~ 32S ~LATHROP 111 enn ~~~~. 375 lSan Bernatdino LiIQITICORPQRAI'ED 84 ~ ~ 326 ~DANVII.,LE 109 ; 376 ?ftLAMEDA 84 ~.` 327 ;FIREBAUGH 109 ' 377 ~MORENQ VALLEY ~ 84 ' 328 ~MII.LBRAE l04 -~ 378 ~FcesnoUSJINGORPORA'IED 83 _ . !329iAZUSA 108 ~'379~iEASTPAIAALTO 83 ~~~ 330'STANTON !08 ; 380'SANANSELMO Bl . : 331 ~ColusaLTNIIVCORPpRLtTED 107 ~ ~' 381'~MOORPARK 80 ~, 332 ~PACIFIC GRDVE ~ 167 ~ 3ffi lSen Bemto UNINCORPORA'I'ED ~ 80 '~ 333~HUNTIN(3TONPARK 106 ' 383'ta}roUNINCORPORATED 80 i 334 ~KING CITY ' 106 ~ 3&1 ~P~INT ARENA "~ MITA I 80 79 ~ 335 SANCLEMENTE TOS _ LO ; 385 ~, 336 ~LONGBEACH ~~ 337 CARPtN1'ERPA 105 ]04 ~ 386 ~GRANDTERRACE + 387 ~CkLtMFSA 79 79 i ~ ' 338 ~BRENCWOOD 103 I 388 iMontoreyLRdINCORPORAT"ED 79 ~ 339 ~ALISO VIEJO 103 ~ 389 ~SANGER 79 ; 340 ITULELAKE ~ 103 : 390 iATWATER '~ ~ 78 ; 341 ipCg,p~gip~ 101 ~ 39l •Me¢docinoUNINCARPORATED 78 ; 342 jPOMONA IOk ( 392 IMONTEREY PARK ~ 78 ! 343 ISUSANVILLE ~ ' ~ 100 99 ~ 393 ~BALDWiN PARK ~ 394 ~EI DrnadoUNINCORPORATED 77 ?7 344 BANNING ` 345 ~NEEDLES 99~ ~ 345 ~SOUTH GATE 77 COACHEI.LA ~ ~ 346 98 : 396 =$m Luis Obispoi7NII~ICARPORATED 7S i Mwo UNINCORPORATED - ~~ 347 97 i 39T ~L&MOORE 75 ~ ~ j 346.:RIVERHAN% ~ 96 ' 398 ~Rivet~dellNINCORPdRA1'ED 75 74 349 ~HESPETtfPt ' 96~ DdS P.4LOS ~ 399 { 350 jINGLEW00- 96 I i 400 ,MARINA 74 ~ Hinderliter de Ltamas and Asso ciates •(909} 861-4335 • www.hdkompazues.com 4of6 _ ~ ~ ~: - ; 401 ~LIVINGSTON 74 ` 45! SMORA6A SA ~ 402 ~Imperial LTNINCORPORATED 74 ~ 452 ' SAN PABI.O 54 ~ 403 i30UTH PASADENA 74 j 453 ~Trinity UNWCORPORATED 54 i 4041DELANO 73 ~ 454 iCAMPTON 54 ', 405 IETNA 72 ~ 455 ~MarinUNINCORPORATED 50. 1 406 ~SANfAPAULR 72 ~ 456 ~Hum6otdttiNBNCORPORATED 54 ' 407 ~xnaassuxa 72 i 457 ~ WCAIPA 54 ~ 408 lBELLFLOWER 71 j 458 !LAC3UNA WOODS ~ 53 ~ 409~iEXETER ~ ~ 71 ' 454 ~De1NorIeLTNfNCORPORAI'ED 52 ' 410iREEDLEY 71 ~ 460 ~Kiugst7NINCARPOR.~!'FED 52 ; 411 iKERMAN . 70 ~ 46i iSeQDiegoiTNINCARPORATED 52 i 412 ~PATTII2SON 70 i 462'SaetaClere[JNINCORPORATED Sl ~~~ 413 !TmlumneUNINCORPORATED 70 ; 463 ~SiecraUNtNCARPCIRAI'EI1 SI i 414 BRAWLEY 69 ~ 464 I SAN JQhQUIN 50 ~ 415 iMaroodIJNINCAP,pORpTER 68 ' 465 ~NEWM?cN 50 I. 416 iBELL 68 ? 466 ~WINI'ERS 50 ~ 1 417 ?MONTAOUE ~'~, 18 iCHINO HII.LS 67 67 f 467'DESERT HOT SPRINGS ~~~. 468'.S6asmi7Ni1SCARPORA.TED 49_ 49 ~ - 419 ~CHOWCHILLA 67 ~~ 469 !LYNWOOD 48 ' 42(! tLINCOLN 67 ', 470 ~Tulaze iJNINCORPORATEB 48 '~~ 421 ~~WESTMORLAND 67 ~~ 471 'CARCORAN 47 '.. 422 ILakc UNINCARPORAT'ED 66 ~~, 472 i SAN JACINTO 47 ~ 423;APPLE VHLLET' 66 ~ 473 ?GU8ITNE 41 ~ 4?A ;PARADISE 66 j 474 ~WASCO 46 ~ 425;OcangetTNINCORPORATED 66 475 ~HAWAI[ANGARDENS 45 . . 426 ~DIAMOND BAR 65 476 ~; WATERFORD 45 . 427 ! Vandua ilNFNCORPORATED 65 . 477 !1'EMPLE CITY 45 ~ 428 jCaiaverasUNIIJCORPORATED '~ 65 ! 4781FAItMERSVII:LE 45 ~~ 4291CUDAHP 64 i 479 ~OONZJil:ES 44 ~ d30 iYmbaiR+TINCORPORATED ~ ; aso Iwaonr~.axE 44 ~; 431 ISenmCnuUNINCORPORATED 63 ~ 48l IDUNSMUIR 44 ~ ' 432 4CLOVERDALE ~ 433 iAMADORCITY 62 62 f 482 IQREENFfEf.D ~ 483 ~NevadaUNINCARPDRATED 44 43 ! 434 fLWDSAY 62 ' 484 iARVIId ~ 43 ~ 435 ~HERCULES~ 61 ~ 465 ~BELLQARBENS 43 j 436 ~ConhaCos~UNMCORPORATED 60~ ~~ 486 fOAKLEY ~ 42 ~ A371LAPUENTE 60 ; 487 ~BWteUNAiCORPORATED 42 ; 438 iMINDOTR 59 ~ 488 ~PORTH[JENEME 42 j 439 ~ADELANTO 59 ; 489 ~FACIFI~A 40 I 440'TIBURON ' S9~~ ~ 490 ~DORRiS ' 38 i 441 ~WrkLN[Tf 59 ~~ 441 ;MARICAPA 37 i 442 iSHASTALAKE 58 j 492 ~PORTOLA VALLEY 37 ', 443 +FAINFAX ; 444 iROSEMirAU 58 58 j 493 ; SUI3UN CITY ~ 494 ~IvFAYW00D 37 36 ; 445 ~AlamadaUNINCORPOIdATED 57 ' 495 :TWENCYNQ~IE PALMS 35 '; 446'IsssenUNfNCORPORATE- 56 ~ 496 ~CALIFORNlACTfY 34 '~~. 447 ;Senm Bedmta UNiNCOR'PORATED ` 448 ~(3L7ADALUPE 55 ~ 55 ' 497 t SAN MARRdO I 498 ~CtAYTC)N 32 32 ~ 449 +ORINDA . 55 ~ 499 ~SARATOGA 32 ~ 450 ~Los Angeles UNINCORPORATED 54 ! 500 :SOLEDAD 32 ~ Hinderliter de Llamas and Associates •(909) 861-4335 • www.hdlcampanies.com Sof6 * ~ ~ j 501 IHOL'FVII.LE 32 i 519;IONE 20 -. 502 ~Sisldyou UMNCORPOR4TED 31 : S1A iPAL05 VERDES ESTATES 20 : 503;RIODELL ` 3] ' S21~ ~PIEDMONT L6 fIIDDEN I-ID ~ 522 19 16 504 ~BELVEDERE 3! . ~ ~ 505 iModwUNINCORPORATED 31 ; 523 ~CALQ'ATRIA V ~ 16 16 ~ 506~~ iIMYER}AL BEACFI 24 ORANQE CA E ~ S1A S f ~ 15 ~~ 507 ~Wf3EATLhND ~ 29 7 RO S 525 i 526 ~AVENAI 12 508 ~VII,LAPhRK ; 2 . ros xn LS sz~ ILOS r,~ ix so~ ~s~Rxnne,wxE ERDES ! ~ z~ 26 . . ; ; 528 !CANYON LARE 10 510 ~RANCHO PALOS V ; ~ 7b LSBOROUGii ~ 529'HFI 7 511 HIGHLAND . ! 512~TehemaUNINCORPORATF.D ~i 513 L1VE OAK 26 25 i 530;ROLLINGHII.LS ~~'. 531 ~LA I-IABRA HEIGHTS 6 6 ; St4 IBLUE LAKE 25 ~ 532 ~BiCi(iS 6 '~ SIS iATAERTON 7A ~ 533!MONTESERENO 5 -~: 516 ~PARLIER 23 ~~~ 534 jHRADBLTRY 3 I 517 !S~RTRON 23 ! 535 ;TEH.4MA ~ ' S18 IMCFARLAND 20 : ~. State TotaF '!52 L~ ~ HinderHter de L}emas and Associates •(904) 861-4335 • un+tiv.hdkompacriee.com 6of6 18-FebOe 2~07-08 Property Data Review GrorRh W Comnonent Totai Lantl 8.50% t$12mNlion Improvements 6.50°k iSi2mdlbn Pereonal Property 0.10% Exemptions 7.60% 31 mmmn TOTAL 5.60% +521 mlilian Countywlde Growth 9.70Yo MEDIAN SALES PRICE OF RpA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES 2006-07 $396,909,850 $22,148,329 Total Value Change Explanatlon of Value Change behveen tax years PercentaaeChenoe Do1larChanoe EveM 32.47% $7.191.118 CPIIMIauonY%AppNetlbyAesr. 27.64 % $6,122,284 irenstere atownarahlp 11.SG°/a $Z.B'I3,147 PercalsubtllvlsloNCM1argm 16.42% $3,635,612 UmecumdCnengemVewe 11.67% $2.584,168 rtemodels.mragresenpv~eieeis ~BVCateaorv sscn.,,a.pycenyarv ucn.~g.nyc.~go~~ IResidentiel $5,766,090 ~1.i7°,'6 ICommercial ~ $10,287,092 3.83% Industrfal d258,348 -D.66% Recreatlonal ~ $6,699 2.U0%~ VacantLand $?,282,973 'i1S.53°~ ~ ~FassJnterest ~$63,302 2.D0~ SBENOnunitary -$76,133 •tOD.O~% Unsecured 83.635,612 11.70% Unimown 526,658 2.00% eels a oo.ei.FO.e gqpy~ypp x°aa~oi 7~-°~ Arcadia RDA 1 0 TOTAL 1 0 A od'Getlons Parcantaae Granted Appeals 10 62.50°h DeniedAppeals 6 37.50% Pendin eals 7 Pendl A 1+Veluauntlerrevl¢w f.i9l,Jl8 Velue loss by % aver pest 5 years '22°/u' VeWeLOSSaver t5 ears -$gZ~4~~5' op 10 Taxpayers 2007 Rank Top 1 D Taxpayers 2006 rcedia Hotel VenWre LP 1 Arcadia Hotel Vanture LP pple Six HospltalKy Ina 2 Apple Six Hospitality Inc. rcadia Gatewey Cenlre Associatas I 3 Arcedia Gateway CenVe Associates LP 'ecos Propeties 4 Pecos Properties IRE ESA Properties LLC 5 eRE ESA Properlies LLC ~a ~~~, 6 Parfinco lnc. d esidence Inn II LP 7 MartioH Residence Inn 11 LP i Hospitality Inc. 8 Heprand Hospitality Inc. di A. & Sediaghah Farezian Trust 9 Ali A. & Sedia9neh Farazian Trust 'Ifth Avenue Group LLC nN m zaoe-o7 10 Yff rn 1oa7~aB Arcatlia Landmark ~ HI.MORICALTAXABLEVALI/ES ~ C u, ~ LL v' ~ 0 0 w` ,tl ~ 1 ~ ~ r Q ~ ~~ O 0 ~ Q ~ T /~ ~ V e- Q W ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ J O a ~ ~ A U N N °' W ~ > 2 ~ F- N LL w z 0 v ~ z w ~/1 ~Y O V oos' g o o g~ o S a~ a ~° g ~ o{p °c~ o g o °o VI N Ml N y . H M N M s~ a ~O~r 9~ 2 so az d~2 ~n_ vl z u $r C F ~oQ ~. 2 Q u z 0~2 ~ E- u. s~ LL e Q V b~,` ~j d ~~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ LL ~ ~ LLII Y1 ~, LL < C ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ss ~ `~, a~ ~ s~ < s o o s~ m~ s~ N 1~ [O N 8~ r ~~ r 9~ r s~ a ~2 fp ~c' r$ z ~~2 °o oz s~ e 8~, e ~s6 < '%~ s~ t `~~ e~ ~ z~ e `~, ~, sg s~ ~ E ~ a v 8 m ~ ~ a m 0 ~ m c d `n u , E N d ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ N d 9 ~ ~~ _~ ~~ ~ W~ ~ W N . ~ a ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ LL N . ~ a ~_____~_.__~._~__. Assessed Valuation , , . . Pazcel Counts ~ ,, _ _ ~. . ,. ~__. . . _.__..... ~ ~ .............._,..,,. ~._.._......_.~.~._.._.~ _~_,_.....~ Amount ~ Single- City 200G 20 of Percen[ Family ResidenUal Commerciel- ~ 07 m~ ~ Change Change ~ Residential ~~ Income ~Y Industrfal ~~ y Total ~Agoura~Hills'~. ~. $3,598,033;477 $3,849~,993,Sb5 $?51,960~388 7.O;i= 7,141 16 386 ~ 7,5§3 Alhambra, ~~~- 5,827,873,395 6,297;773,145 469,899,750 ~;.1 13,616 ~ 3;679 1,331 18,626 Ar'cadia' ~ ~. 8,555364,991 9,104,927,078 549,562,D87 ti.~~ 14,409 884 994 16,287 ~Arteaia' `~. 1,143,809,958 1,236,342,557 92,532,599 u.. 3,272 252 511 4,035 Avalon 572,542;667 620,684,871 48,1~4?,204 f,.::~. 990 248 466 1,654 pzusa ~ 3,033,597,557 3,226,937,003 193,339,446 G.~+ ~ 7,925 763 1,240 9,925 Baldwin Park~ ~ 3,365,541,679 3.682,721,546 317,I79,867 ~;: F L,853 905 1,155 14,913 Bell ~ ~ 1,241,343,549 1,340,915,085 99,571,536 ES.t) 2,096 1,545 519 4,160 BellGardens~~~ 1,233,507,014 1,354,631,284 121,124,270 S'.t; 1,424 2,102 667 4,193 ellflower ~ . 3,721;654,354 '9,07D,445,532 ~ 348,791,178 ..~:~.. 9,762 1,865 1,510 13,137 everlyHills:. ~.16,691,039,354 18,233,831,728 1,542,792,374 3~L: 7,797 1,157 891 9,845 Biadbury ~ 373,618;593 405,106,338 ~~ 31,487,745 t3:#~ 391 6 12 4D9 Burbank' '~~~ 15,554,222j49 16,890,821,982 1,336:599,233 ##.5 21,768 3,253 3,085 28,106 C~alabe'sas , ~~ 5,481,605,234 6,197,568,970 ~ 715,963,736 t 3.1 7,795 10 250 8,055 Catson `.12,000,923,216 12,724,489,072 723~,565,556 (r.t7 20,734 616 2,972 24,322 Cerntos '~~ 6,448,763,575 6,821,559,396 373,395,821 ~.S 15,212 23 590 15,825 ' Clazempnt ; 3,133,622,071 3,466,235,306 332;613,235 f.O.Ci 9,121 290 465 9,876 : Commerce '~.~ :_ 3,668,013,119 3,906,379,887 238,366,788 t;S F 1,709 519 1,412 3,640 fComptoia ;~. `4 4,214,000,472 4,786,487,813 572,487,341 t3.d 15,434 2,ll4 2,246 19,954 - Covtna ` ~~ 3,684,681,758 3,950,388,989 265,707,231 ;."_ 10,467 644 1,402 12,513 .-C~dahy ~~~ 549,278,439 592,530,876 43i252,437 7) 736 765 237 1,738 Cnlver City '. ~, 5,812,920,125 6,379,619,516 SG6,699,341 ~?.7 10,327 1,479 1,525 13,331 Diam`ond Baz' ; 6,421;793,254 6,894,023,460 472~,230,206 7.~: 17,425 1S 608 1$O51 ~he asse.ued values da not include Board of Equa(uadon va[ued properties (pnmarilypubiic ud7ities) or exempt proper7iu (such tu churches, mosl hospitals, schook, and museums) for whith there is na State reimbursemrnt. These values do indude the homeowners' esempiians which ore reimbuned by the State. C~'iL3 Assessed Valuatlon Pazcel Counts ~-"'°--._.,........._..., „_ ~ ._._.~ ~.. ~.._....Y. ~..__ 7 I Atnourtt Single- of Pe[certt Family Residential Commercial- City 2006 ~ .>.........~,.....,.. ~w ' 2007~M~ ,..... ~Change ~Chang_e^.T Residential ..,.6,..,......,4. Income ,~.«.,.~.~.... Industrial ..~.~.,,~_._.... Total ..,....m....,... ~ Downey ~ - ~ - ~;~ , $7 773,278,278 $8~,477,001',714 $703;723;436 /J "a . 19,708 2,046 1,290 23,044 Duarte ~~ -' 1,612,319,619 1~,791,670,213 -'179;355;594 :I..~ 5,555 76 322 5,953 E1Monte 5,177,087,943 S;6ll,109,595 440,D21,652 ~,_w 12,702 2,886 2,247 17,835 ~E1Segundo,'~: -~• 8,219,975;045 8,875,801,772 655;826;727 .;.±3 3,369 789 845 5,003 Gartlena .4,202,663,789 4,516,43&773 313,774,984 ..., ]0,353 1,789 1~,920 14,062 Glendale 19,900,243;699 21,3~SO,Ol9,?23 ~~I,479;775,529 -„ 33,444 5,844 3,542 4?,830 ~Glendora ~.~ 4,565,621,O1i 4,901,790,949 336,175,939 '., 13,879 483 1321 15,678 ~Ha~wa~ianCardens ~ 624;774,478 ~~~.~b97,423,838 72,649,360 ~E.~i.E 1,821 460 321 2,602 "Hawtlio~rne.' ~ ~. ~ 4,794,117,956 Sc344,469,183 i50,351,227 i;.:~ 7,555 3,033 1,327 11,91i ermosa Beach ~ 3,893,389,601 4,357,957,848 464,568,247 i l t~ 4,857 1,464 581 6,902 ~ddenHills ~~ 974,837,471 .1,037,963,578 63;126,107 ti5 696 1 ~ 9 706 ~ Huntlngton Park 2,130,972;839 2~,315,444,768 ~-~ 184,471,929 S.7 3,675 2,367 1,255 7,297 Ind'uetry~ ~ 5,461,858,484 5;760,177,112 298,318,628 9.:i 20 2 1,425 1,447 +" i . :~liiglewood . ,~.. 6,146,683~,940 6,756,780,453 610,096;513 9~> 14,430 4,551 1,960 20,941 '~Irwindale ~~~. 1,715,482,058 1;754,522,133 ~ 39',040,075 23 327 29 590 946 . La Canada Flintridge ~. . 4,629,657,392 4,988,626,480 358;969,088 %.8 7,226 77 ~ 316 7,619 LaHebreHeights~ ~~, 1,033,204,671 1,095,164,893 61;960;222 6.0 2,105 25 29 2,159 La Mireda ,- :,~ 4,597,699,684 4,904,785,981 307;086;297 G.a 13,446 63 486 13,995 `laPuen[e~ ,".,, '~~1,564,233;239 1,709,718,954 "-945,485,715 '~3 6,895 226 448 7,569 ~layerne~~ ,' 2,938,131~~,D04 3;176J36,191 ~~ 238,605,187 ~.i ~ 8,026 348 1,456 9,830 ;~'; ~ L'akewood , '; . ~, ~ 6,413,017,581 . .6,977,453,434 ~ ~564,435,853 S.8 22,829 684 467 23,950 Lancas[er ' ~: 9,683,358;434 ~ 11,725,425,590 2~~,042,067,156 ?i.t 41,409 965 8,636 51,210 L~awndale ~ `~~~~1,653,369~;408 1,812,400,505 ~159,031;097~ SL5 2,993 2,269 507 5,769 ~he astrssed values do not indude Board of Equalizaiion valued propnties (pnmanly pu6lic uti[ities) or exempJ properties (such as churches, most hospitals, schools, and museums) fa~ which there is no Stace reimbursemrnt. These values do indude the homeowners' ecemptions which are rtimbursed by the State ~4~~ _,..._,..._w ._._ . Assessed Valuation Pazce] Counts ~ . ._ v__ ._._.._.~.W.~. _~___,_.,.._..,.e..___.. ._____~.._.W.~ ~_._____...,.. .. ...._ .._....~ Amount Single- a( Percent Family Residen[ial Commercial- City , ~x 2006~~ 2007 ~~ Change ~ , Cha~~'~yge Residential ~ ' Income ~ ~ Induetrialw x Total ~ ~ Lomi[e .:'$1,588,116;919 $1,697,097,161 $108,9$D,242 Fi,9"e 3,823 792 569 5,184 L'ongBeach ' "38,624,195;389 41,991,190;871 3,366,995,482 ~.7 77,832 17,167 11,588 106,587 LosMgeles ~~ 349,468,i90,020 383,768,D80,413 34,299,690,393 St.& 593,372 108,267 66,562 768,201 ~Lynwoo8 "2,317,878;618 ~ 2,564,120,145 246;241,527 f€t.~:: 7,291 1,825 1,040 10,156 Malibu ~ ~ ~ 8,483,009~~,115 9,295,359,187 - 812,350;072 :.,, 6,160 210 400 6,770 Manhattan Beach 9,925,463,350 10,861,350,753 935,887,003 ", i 10,822 1,520 484 12,826 ~~Maywood ~~ 794,661j5L9 ~.817,273,003 72,611,484 ..,.. 1,619 1,305 389 3,313 'Monrovia ~ 3,48>,308,155 3;785,63Z422 300,329,267 t?.f; i,565 1,606 1,030 10,201 =Montebello -~.~. :~ 4,026,925;598 4,380,915,474 ~ 353,989;876 ~.€; 9,840 1,607 1,255 12,702 Monterey Park ~ 4,N}0,521;547 4,99$272,105 357,750 558 ~.:' 13 343 1,465 1 041 15 849 , , , , ~orwalk ~~- ~ 5,324,044,029 5,825,419,432 501,375,403 i ~+. 21,498 509 1,187 23,154 . Pafmdale ~., 1Q337,752;895 11,959,464,989 1,621;712,094 15.~ 40,972 421 6,003 47,396 Palos Verdes Estates ~~ 4,Si8,558,396 4,828,404,612 249,846q216 :*.:~ 5,147 27 55 5,229 'Pararuount ! ,::2,648,413,206 3,1D4,65$924 456;242,718 k7.2 5,817 1,484 1,845 9,146 Pasadena .17,379,643,616 18,947,203,154 1,567,559~538 '1.t~ 30,150 4,115 3,193 37,458 PicoRivera ~~~ .~~.3,423,323,007 3,721,777,180 298,454;173 5.~ 13,101 454 1,072 14,627 Pomona ~~, S,D54,381,259 8,767,865,911 713,484,652 !i ~; 25,792 2,240 3,670 31,702 Rancho Palos Verdes 5 ~~~ 8,065,466,966 8,498,992,293 433,525,327 .:~ ~3. , 14,991 41 141 15,173 ~ .RedondoBeach ~ ~.Y0,213,309,440 10,938,643,3D2 725,333,&62 ZP. 17,335 2,381 881 20,597 ~RolhngHills ~~. ;~1,052,179,353 1,126,257,086 74,077,733 7.{) 753 0 7 760 ~Ro1lmgHillsEstates ~r2,127,086,250 2,265,129,361 138~~,043;111 6.> 3,055 1 182 3,238 ' R,osemead ~ ~~~..2,882,728,261 3,146,918,748 264;190;487 ':' ~ 7,622 2,101 895 10,618 ;. . ,;~~ -~ - ~e assessed values do not include Baard of Equa[iwrian valued properties (primnrily pu67ic utiliriesJ or erempt properCies (such as churches, mast hospitak, choals, and musevms) for which there is na State reimbursemeni. These values do include the homeoxmers' ezemptions which Are reimbursed by the State. ~ Assessed ValuaGon Pazcel Counts _ ~ ..._~ . ._...._., I,_. ! ..._....~_..~u__ _~__ _ ~~ ~....~.,.,.~ ..._.._v...__....:_ .. . . __ _.~ _ Amount Single- of Percent Pamily Residential Commercia4 2006 2007 Change Change Aesidemial tncome Industriat Total $3,647~,656,015 ~-.$3,916,744,376 $269,088,361 ~ '•,`?;: 9,301 202 1,246 10,749 ~ 1,339,042,702 `~~~~ 1,458,541,782... 1~19~499,080 ts `~ 3,787 509 696 4,992 3,137;48Q834 •.~ 3,332,115,766 - 1~94,634,932 6.3 7,254 1,055 1,048 9,357 - 3,537~~,673,917 '~-: 3,764,04~.351 226;366,43A C;:2~. 4,537 3 176 4,716 ~ 18,905;219,488 ~~~31,485,353,966 ~ 2,580;134,478 i3..i A9,255 436 4.398 54,089 5,061~;784,824 ~~ ~~~~~.5,497,027,160 435,242,336 z;.s; 3,398 51 2,216 5,665 ~~ 19,780;340,014 ;21,197,fi93,564 1,417;353,5"s0 .,.. 16,381 4,140 2,388 22,909 1,385;341,179 ~<~~~: 1,490,657,667 105,316,488 ~7.f~ 3,534 343 191 4,068 1,793,629,766 ~~ ~~ ],9i2,164,891 1i8,335,125 ~3.~ 2,756 547 1,?19 4,522 ' 1,442~,511,361 :~`1,551,241,034 108,729,673 ,... ~ 2,362 456 1,630 4,448 4,257,408,335 ~~~.~: 4,625,303,821 367-;895,48ti ~s r; 10,756 3,373 1,771 15,900 ~ 2,769,277,084 ~~..:' 3,005,878,482 ~ ~ 2~16,601,398 ?.i; 5,603 967 392 6,962 2,843~~,781,961 ~:~~~ 3,089,134,962~ , 245353,001 ?i.L 8,545 923 469 9,937 20,705'~,D39,985 .~~22,181,343,689 T;476;303,704 7.1 35,186 2;068 2,825 40,079 3,332,365,102 ~~-~-:~3,558,929,847~ ~ 226',564,745 Py.K 1 1 1,369 1,371 3,329,498,626 ~~~.-'3,523,502,851 ~ 194,004,225 :,.A 8,642 11 226 8,879 7,715;450,765 ~~' ~:'8,244,940,778 - ~.. ~ 529,490,013 (i ~) 24,348 498 882 25,728 d 5,991;974,086 r~.6,601,947,656 :~b09,973,572 1U.2 6,326 2,075 973 9,374 e 2,441~,427,959 ~~,~.`2,754,249,1% ~ ,~.~ 312;821,217 13.4 3,239 196 176 3,611 6,429~;097,363 ~ ~,~,~~;6,988,382,202 ~ ~ 959.,284,839 t3.7 ~~ ~ 18.379 ~ 2,122 1~,429 21,930 dAreas -~ $845,290,681.897 ~'~~923;518,527,028 79,227,845,131 +)3 1,591,159 223,204 185,183 1,999,546 •atedpreas~ $76,283,505,025 Yr82,357,942,697 ~ ~6,073,93~,622 8A 243,291 21,696 67,968 ~ ~Y 332,455 :aCouuN~p ~$921.574,166.922 $1,005,875,969,675 $84,301J82J53 9.Ni~ 1,834.950 244,900 252,651 2,332,001 ~he assessed values do not indude Board of Equalization valued properties (pnmanly publit uqliries) or ~empt properltiu (such as churches, most hospitaJs, schools, and musevms) for whicM1 there is rm Ssate reimbunement These values do include the homeorvners' ezemprions which are reimbursed by rhe Staiz ~"~ I ' THE CITY OF ARCADIA - 2007/08 ,l~rL(,~~:J,1=~11 REPRESENTATIVE GENEFL4L LEVY SHARE ESTIMATE ~ COREN fY C ONE Estlmate of Aver~e City Repreaentative Share of the Generai Levy City Other City Othec ~~tY Rate` Rates• Total City Rate• Rates* Total Los Angeles 0.2629 02629 Glendora 0.0982 0.0982 Avalon 0.2556 0.2556 Arcadia 0.0960 0.0960 South Pasadena 0.24D0 0.2400 Hawthorne 0.0948 0.0948 San Marino 0.2364 0.2364 La Mirada 0.0671 0.0276 0.0947 Pomona 0.2335 0.2335 Rosemead o.Q668 0.0271 0.0939 Sferra Madre 0.2~91 0.2191 Temple City 0.0666 0.0271 0.0937 Long Beach 0.2166 02166 Nonvalk 0.0663 0.0263 O.D925 Pasadena 0.2109 0.2109 Duarte 0.0689 0.0233 0.0922 Hermosa Beach 0.2030 0.2030 Bell Gardens 0.0920 0.092o Burbank 0.1847 0.1847 Industry 0.0896 0.0896 La Verne 0.~816 0.1816 Pico Rivera 0.0667 0.0225 0.0892 West Holiywood 0.1639 0.0148 0.1787 Westlake Village 0.0639 0.0240 D.0879 Monrovia 0.1744 0.1744 Cerritos 0.0680 0.0193 0.0873 Beverly Hills 0.1742 0.1742 Vernon 0.0782 0.0782 Redondo Beach 0.1654 0.1654 Rancho Palos Verdes 0.0637 0.0115 O.D753 Alhambra 0.1443 0.0199 0.1643 Huntington Park 0.0735 0.0735 Morrterey Park 0.1578 0.1578 Cudahy 0.0700 0.0028 0.0728 Covina 0.1541 0.1541 Whittier 0.07~7 0.0717 Hzusa 0.1492 0.1492 Malibu 0.0704 D.0704 Manhattan Beach 0.1462 0.1462 Commerce 0.0700 0.0700 San Fernando 0.1456 0.1456 Lawndale 0.0700 0.0700 ~ Inglewood 0.1409 0.1409 South EI Monte 0.0690 0.0690 Downey 0.1397 D.1397 Signal Hill 0.0678 0.0678 Santa fiNonica 0.1393 D.1393 Carson 0.0674 0.0674 West Covfna 0.1351 0.0031 0.1382 Paramount 0.0672 0.0672 Hawaiian Gardens 0.0557 0.0802 0.~359 La Canada FliMridge 0.067~ 0.0671 Glendale 0.1357 D.1357 Rolling Hills Estates 0.0669 0.0669 Calabasas 0.0413 0.0820 0.1234 Beiiflower 0.0666 0.0666 Torrance 0.1220 0.1220 Artesia 0.0665 0.0665 Baldwin Park 0.0952 0.0254 0.1206 Palmdale 0.0663 0.0663 Claremont 0.1142 0.1142 La Puente 0.0658 0.0658 Palos Verdes Estates 0.113D 0.1130 Rolling Hills 0.0649 0.0649 Lyrnvood 0.1130 0.1130 EI Segundo 0.0632 0.0632 Gardena 0.1116 0.1116 Santa Fe Springe 0.0625 0.0625 ° Maywood 0.1081 0.1081 3outh Gate 0.0615 0.0615 San Gabriel 0.1064 0.1064 Bradbury 0.0614 0.0614 Invindale 0.1054 0.1054 Hldden Hills 0.0588 0.0588 Culver City 0.1043 0.1043 qgoura Hills 0.0585 0.0585 Lancaster 0.0676 0.0359 D.1035 Lakewood 0.0584 0.0584 Lomka 0.0666 0.0361 0.1026 Bell 0.0537 0.0537 Compton 0.1004 0.1004 Walnut 0.0520 0.0520 La Habra Heights 0.1004 0.'1004 Diamond Bar 0.0519 0.06~9 San Dimas 0.0658 O.D335 0.0993 County Averege: 0.1073 0.0066 0.1140 Santa ClarRa 4.0573 0.0418 0.0991 Montebello 0.0966 0.~986 ~ EI Monte 0.0984 0.0984 'fhe (7ty tu tato is besed m Ihe lerpest ran-retlewpmem Tex Reb Nea in ea~ dry; other roks incude city-pw~rred overleying dishids wch es ighting w mein~nence dfshicls. Dem S~wrtyAaseaea 2007ro6 Combhwtl Tmc Holls Prepered On 1/1&2008 By AN 7lqarepMhmflobe~aalMSUpporto/da6tleswrx:eorcontlnWngWaNowreamtmnentswHMufthawilManeonaelrtofNW..Caan6COno Pegei ,-. ,, ~ Don Penman rom: Tracey Hause ~ent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 2:49 PM To: Don Penman Cc: Linda Garcia Subject: Race Track Revenues For the 2006-07 FY the City realized the following revenues from the Track(s): Regular Season (Santa Anita Meet) 600,838 Oak Tree 164,768 Del Mar 138,181 Misc Off Track 152,755' Hallywaod Park 240,622 Miscellaneous Off Track is Pomona Fair Grounds and other events, i.e. harness racing etc. I can provide more detail if necessary. In looking at the breakdown of revenues for the regular season lasfl year, weekly revenues ran~e frorn almost $3'E,000 to $35,000. There are two weeks, Opening Day and at the end of February, that were $46,000 and 42,D00 respecfively. It is a safe bef (pardon the pun) that our weekly coileeiions are an average of $33,000. If you need anything else, piease let me know. Tracey • . _ : ; ., ~ • Y (~ J ~ Y 7 g v ~~g 4 < 4 V ~ W ~ Q ~ ~ gty' ~ ~ ~ Q w C C ^ O ~ ^y e K ~ 7 Si t a ¢ v ~ e ~, m ~ °° °° 6 ? n ~ a ~ ~ ~ m E=~ 9 ~ ° d m a m e - = e $~ a~vm' a ~ a ~ E- ~ a. ~~m~ ms~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ am~ 9 C p m C a~~ 4 ~ ~ LL <2~°3edg3E2e3e{'d{°~ 3ed.° d°u°~°Z~°2p3~° 3ede3°3°a° ~ o Z e~- 1~ N~ N~ 4~ t~p N A~ t~~] O~ S3 ~ A. O~p O[~'), O C') d' eF f7 V'C ~ff N O) C~ ~~- r tV ~ e- N t7 N Rl N Y ° ° ° ° ° 0 ° o o o o o 0 n-~ roo m~ ~ n ° m ~oa o_ m c m ~» ~ ~ » w vse» °oooo 0 oqv~ mogO ~^n_ ~7 w~w~ en w» a~s~~~~s~sss~sss~sosss~ n m ~nr. (om~ mrco w~nraoav~ uf .-rn e ~ °po°'im~m~~m~~^~n~~~ ioromn mm<n i..e~~n m m~or:n a~nr~ p~ N1 oi t9.p e7 t9 th tV N N N f9MVYtl/tllMM W MMMtliW ~f9W tl9tRtllM~W ~W M O O O O~~ 1a ~~ T ~~ N O~ S~~~~~^ A~ ppp 1~ ~~ p~ p opp N 8000 V~Om~ O m aNOA~IA~N tff mAOt4 n~l~ m 0 'C V N Of tO 1+ N N N tf1 t0 <~ t~ eF f~ t7 V} W 19~lA W MN iT HM NViN!/lMNf MYlN1fA Vlf9t9 a~i~°~'mamw~o°iia~'im~oa'i~miQw'~mSg~oooo 1 1 J I NJ N N N N N N ~ 1rJ ~g 1~ a[pE Oi dp~' NQ~ fp+f~ ~ ~IJ tD hp~~p~ Opf~ oOo~ N(O7 ~ 1oA ~~~ W Ol 01 ~ O! ~ O! Of QJ W~ O~ W Ql N N ~ N~ N N ~ NC W ~ ~ O O %m ~ ~ 8 U ~ w > m 7 ~ a~ m ~ C m C c~~ a ffi ~ ~ ~ U ~ U ~ _9 2~ m ~~ Cg ~ O ~ L ~ W ~p ~ Q ~ J = : ~~ m~ w ~. ~ ~ m ~ ~~ ~ ~ Y m . A ~ ~ ~q~ V A d~ ~~ ~~ ~.. ~~ ~ A J~e~RPORATE0~~0o9 STAFF REPORT Office of the City Clerk DATE: March 4, 2008 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James Barrows, City Clerk~~~ Prepared by: Lisa Mussen en, Chief Deputy City Clerk/Records Manager ~G~~ I SUB)ECT: 2007-2008 ANNUAL WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND PROTEST PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDATION: Approve the 2007-2008 Weed Abatement Property List and direct the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner to abate nuisances upon those properties. BACKGROUND On February 19, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6606 declaring its intention to abate noxious weeds, rubbish and refuse from various private properties within the City. Resolution No. 6606 also set March 4, 2008 as the time and place to hear objections from the owners of such properties to the proposed removal of flammable and otherwise noxious material. As required by the California Government Code, the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner (County) has mailed the appropriate notice to all affected property owners. The attached list identifies the properties requiring weed abatement by street address, or the general location if a street number has not been assigned (see Appendix A). Representatives from the County and the Arcadia Fire Department will be present at tonight's pubiic hearing in order to address any questions regarding this matter. 1 RECOMMENDATION It is staff's recommendation that the City Council move to approve the 2007-2008 Weed Abatement Property List and direct the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner to abate nuisances upon.those properties. APPROVED: .J~Y,~-~~..~..n-J Donald Penman City Manager Attachment - Appendix "A" 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DECLARRTION LIST DATE 12 24 07 -CITY-OF-ARCADIA IN SEQ BY WEED-KEY, THEN PARCEL UNIMPROVED ZONE CITY C'ODE STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NO. KEY 06 035 SANTA ANITA CANYON RD 5765 002 012 6 7 06 035 SANTA ANITA CANYON RD 5765 002 013 5 7 06 035 CANYON RD 5765 002 900 1 7 06 035 HIGHLAND VISTA DAIVE 5765 O11 O11 8 7 06 035 HIGHLAND OAK DRIVE 5765 030 O10 9 7 06 035 NORSH OF TOREY PINES DRIVE 5771 001 007 7 7 06 D35 WHISPERING PINES DRIVE 57?1 032 013 4 7 06 035 TORREY PINES DRIVS 5771 033 O15 0 7 06 035 TORREY PINES DRIVE 5771 033 016 9 7 06 035 TORREY PINES DRIVE 5771 033 017 B 7 06 035 FLOWER ST 5773 005 900 4 7 06 035 FLOWSR ST 5773 005 901 3 7 06 035 FRONT ST 5773 006 910 0 7 06 035 153 E SANTA CLARA ST 5773 007 009 0 7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 010 905 9 7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 O10 906 8 '7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 010 907 7 7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 O11 922 6 7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 O11 923 5 7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 011 924 4 7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 011 925 3 7 06 035 INDIANA ST 5773 011 926 2 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE 5773 015 937 0 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE 5773 O15 938 9 7 06 035 3RD AVENRE 5773 O15 939 8 7 06 035 - 3RD AVENUE 5773 O15 940 5 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE -. 5773 O15 941 4 7 06 035 3RD AVENCT& ~ 5773 015~ 942 3 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE 5773 O15 943 2 7 06 035 3RD AVENC7E 5773 O15 944 1 7 06 035 3rd AVENCTE 5773 O15 945 0 7 06 035 3RD AVENOE 5773 O15 946 9 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE 5773 O15 947 8 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE 5773 O15 94B 7 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE 5773 O15 949 6 7 06 035 3RD AVEN[IE 5773 O15 950 2 7 06 035 3RD AVENUE - 5773 O15 951 1 7 06 035 COLORADO BLVD 5775 022 900 7 7 06 035 COLORADO BLVD 5775 022 901 6 7 06 035 SANTA CLARA STREET 5775 025 025 0 7 06 035 FOOTHZLL FWY 5775 026 902 6 7 06 035 FOOTHILL FWY 5775 026 903 5 7 06 035 FOOTHILL FWY 5775 026 904 4 7 06 035 FOOTHZLL FWY 5775 026 905 3 7 06 035 CORNELL RD 5775 026 906 2 7 06 035 DUARTE RD 5779 O15 004 2 7 06 035 23 H DUARTE RD 5779 O15 005 1 7 06 035 25 E DUARTfi RD 5779 O15 006 0 7 06 035 DUARTE RD 5779 O15 007 9 7 06 035 201 E DUARTE RD 5779 O18 D40 2 7 -1- APPENDIX•.nAn ~ LOS ANGELES COUNTY DECLARATION LIST DATE 12 24 07 CITY OF ARCADIA . IN SEQ HY WEED-KEY, THEN PARCEL UNIMPROVED ZONE CITY CODE STAEET ADDRESS PARCEL NO. KEy 06 035 ~ LEROY AVENUE . 5784 020 014 3 7 06 035 NORMAN AVENUE ~ , 57B8 014 013 3 7 ~6 ~ 035 LIVE OAK AVENIIE ~5790 027 034 6 7 06 035 CLARK ST , 8532 016 001 5 7 ~6 035 CLARK ST 06 ~ 035 CLARK ST 8532 016 004 2 7 06 035 _ GOLDRING RD 8532 016 022 0 7 06 035 ' „ GOLDRING RD ~ 8532 018 005 7 7 06 ~ 035 122 E LIVE OAK AVE 8532 O18 ~11 9 7 06 035 128 E LIVE OAK AVE ~ 8573 024 005 5 7 8573 024 006 4 7 WEED REy 7 ~TOTAL VACANT/IMPROVED RECORDS . ~p . WEED KEy 7 TOTAL UNIMPROVE- RECORDS 60 WEED ICEY 7 TOTAL RECORDS ~ 60 '2' ABATEMENT ORDER Mazch 4, 2008 FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEt1RING HELD, IN THE MATTER OF RESOLUTION TO ABATE NOXIOUS WEEDS, RUBBISH, AND REFUSE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, BY MOTION ADOPTED AN ORDER DIRECTING THE AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES TO ABATE THE NUISANCE BY HAVING THE WEEDS, RUBBISH, AND REFUSE REMOVED. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA BY MA OR ATTEST: BY~ _!~`I(~---~-~s CITY CLERK 4