HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 16, 2007t; .. i
, AR CITY OF ARCAD IA �0�
O p{,SPOgN y
CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
' REGULAR MEETING
e' TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2007
AGENDA
5:00 p.m..
Location: City Council Chamber Conference Room, 240 W. Huntington Drive
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS:
Roger Chandler, Mayor /Agency Chair
Mickey Segal, Mayor Pro Tern/Agency Vice Chair
Peter Amundson, Council /Agency Member
Robert Harbicht, Council /Agency Member
John Wuo, Council /Agency Member
CLOSED SESSIONISTUDY SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per person)
Any person wishing to address the City Council /Redevelopment Agency during the Public
Comments period is asked to complete a "Public Comments" card available in the Council
Chamber Lobby. The completed form should be submitted to the City Clerk/Agency Secretary
prior to the start of the Closed Session /Study Session.
In order to conduct a timely meeting, there will be a five (5) minute time limit per person. All
comments are to be'directed to the City Council /Redevelopment Agency and we ask that proper
decorum" be practiced during the meeting. State law prohibits the City Council /Redevelopment
Agency from discussing topics or issues unless they appear on the posted Agenda.
CLOSED SESSION
a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to confer about labor contract
negotiations Arcadia Public Works Employees Association, Arcadia City
Employees Association, Arcadia Police Officers' Association. Arcadia
Firefighters' Association, and unrepresented employees: Department Heads,
Division Managers, Supervisors, and Part-time employees _(City Negotiators:
William W. Floyd and Tracey Hause).
b. Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8:
Property Description: Southerly parking area of Santa Anita Race Track
Property.
Negotiating Parties: CCU: City Manager, Assistant City Manager /Development
Services Director and City Attorney.
Property Owner: Caruso Affiliated, Caruso Property
Management Company, Magna Entertainment
Corporation, the Santa Anita Companies and the Los
Angeles Turf Club. -
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
C. Conference with real property negotiators (Government Code Section 54956.8)
Property Property Owner
21 Morlan Pl. Wendy Doo (Church in Arcadia)
Negotiating Parties — Agency'Deputy Executive Director
Under Negotiation — Price and terms of payment
d.. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Government Code Section 54957)
Title: City Manager.
STUDY SESSION...
a. Discussion and direction regarding whether,or not to pursue 'a "community
signature event' in fiscal year 2007 -2008.
b. Discussion regarding a revised "Expense and Travel Policy for the City Council
and select City employees. I I
7:00 p.m., City Council Chamber .
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING TO OPEN SESSION
INVOCATION
Rabbi Alan Lachtman, Temple Beth David
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS:
Amundson, Harbicht, Segal, Wuo and Chandler
REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY /AGENCY COUNSEL ON'CLOSED SESSION /STUDY
SESSION ITEMS
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
MOTION TO READ ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE
THE READING IN FULL
PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per person)
REPORTS FROM MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CLERK
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are. considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no, separate discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council /Redevelopment Agency request specific items be removed from
the Consent Calendar for separate action.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS:
a. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES. JANUARY 2, 2007
Recommended Action: Approve
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS:
b. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES, JANUARY 2, 2007
Recommended Action: Approve
C. ACCEPT $3,000 FROM JOSEPH ALTON HAMILTON TO T
Recommended Action: Approve
d.
Action: Approve
e.
Recommended Action: Approve
f
Recommended Action:
m
Recommended Action: Approve
2. CITY MANAGER
a. FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR 2007.
Recommended Action: Provide direction
a
C.
RAIL STATION.
Recommended Action: Approve
Recommended Action: Introduce
ra
e.
ADJOURNMENT
This meeting will adjourn to January 30, 2007.at 6:00 p.m., for a Joint Meeting with Arcadia
Board of Education in the City Council Chamber Conference Room located at 240 W.
Huntington Drive, Arcadia.
PURSUANT TO THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, PERSONS WITH A DISABILITY
WHO REQUIRE A DISABILITY - RELATED MODIFICATION OR ACCOMODATION IN ORDER
TO PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING,. INCLUDING AUXILIARY AIDS OR SERVICES, MAY
REQUEST SUCH MODIFICATION OR ACCOMODATION FROM THE CITY CLERK AT (626)
574 -5455. NOTIFICATION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING WILL ENABLE THE CITY
TO MAKE REASONABLE ARRANGEMENTS TO ASSURE - ACCESSIBILITY TO THE
MEETING.
LAND USES IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE.
Recommended Action: Adopt
Recommended Action: Adopt
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
ANNOTATED AGENDA
JANUARY 16,2007
CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to confer about labor
contract negotiations — Arcadia Public Works Employees Association,
Arcadia City Employees Association, Arcadia Police Officers'
Association. Arcadia Firefighters' Association, and unrepresented
employees: Department Heads, Division Managers, Supervisors, and
Part-time employees (City Negotiators: William W. Floyd and Tracey
Hause).
NO REPORTABLE
ACTION TAKEN
Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government NO REPORTABLE
Code Section 54956.8: ACTION TAKEN
Property Description: Southerly parking area of Santa Anita Race
Track Property.
Negotiating Parties: Cam: City Manager, Assistant City
Manager /Development Services Director and
City Attorney.
Property Owner: Caruso Affiliated, Caruso
Property Management Company, Magna
Entertainment Corporation, the Santa Anita
Companies and the Los Angeles Turf Club.
C.
G
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
Conference with real property negotiators (Government Code Section NO REPORTABLE
54956.8) ACTION TAKEN
Property
21 Morlan PI.
Property Owner
Wendy Doo (Church in Arcadia)
Negotiating Parties — Agency Deputy Executive Director
Under Negotiation — Price and terms of payment
Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Government Code Section
54957)
Title: City Manager.
STUDY SESSION
NO REPORTABLE
ACTION TAKEN
a. Discussion and direction regarding whether or not to pursue a COUNCIL
"community signature event" in fiscal year 2007 -2008. DIRECTED
STAFF TO BRING
BACK A REPORT
AT A FUTURE
DATE
t
b. Discussion regarding a revised "Expense and Travel Policy for the City COUNCIL
Council and select City employees. DIRECTED
CONSENT CALENDAR
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEMS:
a. REGULAR.MEETING MINUTES, JANUARY 2, 2007
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS:
b. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES, JANUARY 2. 2007
C. ACCEPT $3,000 FROM JOSEPH ALTON HAMILTON TO THE
LIBRARY FOR BOOKS ON COMPACT DISC.
d. FINAL MAP NO. 64609 FOR A 76 -UNIT SENIOR CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT AT 650 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE.
e. AWARD A PURCHASE ORDER EXTENSION TO HUGHES SUPPLY
FOR THE PURCHASE OF DATA LOG RADIO READ WATER
g. WAIVE THE FORMAL BID PROCESS AND APPROVE THE
PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF A SPACESAVER HIGH -
DENSITY MOBILE STORAGE SYSTEM FOR THE POLICE
2. CITY MANAGER
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR 2007.
METRO GOLD LINE PHASE II STATION DESIGN AND ART
REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION FOR ARTWORK,
ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS AND BETTERMENTS FOR THE
PROPOSED ARCADIA LIGHT RAIL STATION.
STAFF TO
PREPARE A
RESOLUTION TO
BE PLACED ON A
FUTURE
AGENDA
APPROVED
5 -0
APPROVED
5 -0
APPROVED
5 -0
APPROVED
5 -0
APPROVED
5 -0
APPROVED
5 -0
APPROVED
5 -0
APPROVED 5 -0
ARTWORK FOR
BASELINE
STATION
ELEMENTS AND
NO ACTION
TAKEN
REGARDING THE
BETTERMENTS
APPROPRIATE THE EXPECTED SALARY SAVINGS IN THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SALARY AND
:
c.
G
e.
PART 3, DIVISION 7 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE INTRODUCED
RELATING TO THE FEEDING OF PEAFOWL WITHIN THE CITY OF 5 -0
ARCADIA.
ADOPTED 5 -0
WITH REVISIONS
ADOPTED 5 -0
WITH REVISIONS
TO PROTECT EXISTING LAND USES IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT ZONE.
I would like to adjourn tonight's meeting in memory of a former City
employee who passed away yesterday - Pete Kinnahan. Pete came to
Arcadia in March 1983 to work for the Redevelopment Agency. Before
coming here he worked for the City of Carson, the Southeast Michigan
Council of Governments in Detroit, the Detroit Mayor's Office and as a high
school teacher in Royal Oak, Michigan.
Pete was instrumental in most of the redevelopment and development
projects around town, including the commercial projects on north
and south Huntington Drive, east of Second Avenue. He was a very active
member of the Chamber of Commerce and served on several inter -
department employee committees. Pete was dedicated to this community
and to doing the very best and most thorough work possible. In additional
to his professional associations in town he had many friends here. He was
an extremely knowledgeable man and one of the nicest, most thoughtful
people you could ever meet. He was also a practical joker, a sports fan, a
"family guy," volunteer referee for AYSO, an Orange County Election Poll
Worker and an enthusiastic volunteer donating his time and expertise to the
Los Angeles Conservancy, the Red Cross, the City of Cypress Community
Festival, and the Anaheim Unified High School District Citizens Oversight
Committee. Some of you may also remember that Pete was known for
coming up with the most creative Halloween costumes every year.
Pete's personal achievements include his three daughters, Jessica, Abi
and Clare, and two grandsons, Nate and Kyle. He would often tell stories
about his daughters and when he did it was usually done with Pete's innate
sense of humor and an abundance of love. He is also survived by his wife,
Pat, with whom he shared a love of soccer, Australia... and of course their
daughters and grandsons.
Pete retired from the City of Arcadia in December of 2004. He passed
away at the age of 65 while playing basketball. He was a vibrant man and,
simply stated, a terrific human being. He will be deeply missed.
49:00 9
CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2007
The City Council and Redevelopment Agency of the City of Arcadia met at 5.00 p.m. in a regular
closed session meeting in the Arcadia City Council Chamber Conference Room.
CALL TO ORDER
The Mayor Chandler called the meeting in order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS:
PRESENT: Amundson, Harbicht, Segal, Wuo and Chandler
ABSENT: None
CLOSED SESSION /STUDY SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to confer about labor contract
negotiations — Arcadia Public Works Employees Association, Arcadia City
Employees Association, Arcadia Police Officers' Association. Arcadia
Firefighters' Association, and unrepresented employees: Department Heads,
Division Managers, Supervisors, and Part-time employees (City Negotiators:
William W. Floyd and Tracey Hause).
b. Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8:
Property Description: Southerly parking area of Santa Anita Race Track
Property.
Negotiating Parties: Cam: City Manager, Assistant City Manager /Development
Services Director and City Attorney.
Property Owner: Caruso Affiliated, Caruso Property
Management Company, Magna Entertainment
Corporation, the Santa Anita Companies and the Los
Angeles Turf Club.
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
C. Conference with real property negotiators (Government Code Section 54956.8)
Property
21 Morlan PI.
Property Owner
Wendy Doo (Church in Arcadia)
Negotiating Parties — Agency Deputy Executive Director
Under Negotiation — Price and terms of payment
d. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Government Code Section 54957)
Title: City Manager.
1 01 -16 -2007
49:0010
STUDY SESSION
a. Discussion and direction regarding whether or not to pursue a "community
signature event' in fiscal year 2007 -2008.
b. Discussion regarding a revised "Expense and Travel Policy for the City Council
and select City employees.
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING TO OPEN SESSION
The Mayor convened the Open Session meeting at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION
Captain Randy Kirby
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Captain Randy Kirby
ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMBERS:
PRESENT: Council /Agency Members Chandler, Segal, Amundson, Harbicht and Wuo
ABSENT: None
REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY /AGENCY COUNSEL ON CLOSED SESSION /STUDY
SESSION ITEMS
CLOSED SESSION:
City Attorney Steve Deitsch reported that the City Council /Redevelopment Agency Board met in
closed session to consider items a, b, c and d on the posted agenda. No reportable action was
taken.
STUDY SESSION:
City Attorney Steve Deitsch reported that the City Council met in study session to consider
whether or not to pursue a "community signature event' in fiscal year 2007 -2008. The City
Council was in favor of a community event and directed staff to prepare a report with
suggestions on a possible community event. No additional action taken.
City Attorney Steve Deitsch reported that the City Council met in study session to discuss a
revised expense and travel policy for the City Council and selected City employees. The City
Council directed staff to prepare the appropriate report and place this item on a future agenda
for further discussion and action. No additional action taken.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
None
2 01 -16 -2007
49:0011
MOTION TO READ ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE
THE READING IN FULL
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Amundson, seconded by Council /Agency
Member Harbicht and carried on roll call vote to read all ordinances and resolutions by title only
and waive the reading in full.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per person)
Jeanne Trefzger, an Arcadia resident commented that she supports the peacocks in town.
Dirk L. Hudson commented on Measure B.
REPORTS FROM MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY CLERK
Council Member Amundson encouraged everyone to get earthquake kits ready and that an
earthquake list can be obtained from the City's website. Mr. Amundson asked about
communication between the police and fire in the event of a disaster. He also asked if the City
has a plan in place relating to traffic. Council Member Amundson announced that on Saturday,
January 20, 2007, at Wells Fargo Bank at Fifth Avenue and Huntington there will be a children's
identification card event where children will be fingerprinted from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
In response to an inquiry from Council Member Amundson, City Manager Bill Kelly clarified that
the City does have city -wide emergency communication equipment in place in the event of a
disaster.
In response to the inquiry regarding traffic, Assistant City Manager /Development Services
Director clarified that the City currently has a Transportation Master Plan in place; he gave a
brief overview and purpose of the traffic master plan. Mr. Penman also advised that there is a
fee program in place in which various developments in the City contribute an impact fee to the
transportation fund and that money is used toward improving various intersections.
In addition to the inquiry by Council Member Amundson, City Manager Bill Kelly also advised
that the City will be using federal funds for fiber optic projects and traffic signal synchronization
which is all part of the Plan.
Council Member Segal - nothing to report
Council Member Harbicht thanked the staff for a great job putting the Commissioner's dinner
together.
Council Member Wuo thanked the City staff for a great job putting the Commissioner's dinner
together with the 50's theme.
City Clerk Jim Barrows thanked the staff for a great dinner Commissioner's dinner. Mr. Barrows
also noted that Saturday, January 20, 2007 is the annual high school band spaghetti dinner at
4:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m.
Mayor Chandler commented that the Commissioner's dinner was great including the 50's
theme.
01 -16 -2007
49:0012
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES, JANUARY 2 2007
Recommended Action: Approve
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS:
b. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES, JANUARY 2, 2007
Recommended Action: Approve
C.
Recommended Action: Approve
91
Recommended Action: Approve
e.
f.
91
Recommended Action: Approve
Council Member Harbicht requested that item 1 -f be pulled for discussion.
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Harbicht, seconded by Council /Agency
Member Segal, and carried on roll call vote to approve the Consent Calendar items 1 a thru g,
with the exception of f on the City Council /ARA Consent Calendars.
AYES: Council /Agency Members Harbicht Segal, Amundson, Wuo and Chandler
NOES: None
Council Member Harbicht confirmed with staff the intention and purpose of item 1 -f.
Mr. Kelly explained the purpose and intent of what staff is recommending on this item.
4 01 -16 -2007
Recommended Action: Approve
Recommended Action: Approve
49:0013
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Segal seconded by Council /Agency Member
Wuo and carried on roll call vote to approve Consent Calendar item 1 -f on the City Council /ARA
Consent Calendar.
AYES: Council /Agency Members Segal, Wuo, Amundson, Harbicht and Chandler
NOES: None
2. CITY MANAGER
a. FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR 2007.
Recommended Action: Provide direction
City Manager Bill Kelly gave an overview of the staff report regarding federal legislative
advocacy priorities for 2007 relating to Water Projects, and the Fire Suppression /Emergency
Preparedness Joint Training Facilities.
In response to an inquiry by Council Member Harbicht, City Manager Kelly commented that the
chance of receiving money for traffic improvements is very "slim" this year.
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Harbicht, seconded by Council /Agency
Member Segal, and carried on roll call vote to authorize staff to direct the Ferguson Group to
work on behalf of the City of Arcadia to seek funding for the water projects and Joint Training
Facility referenced in January 16, 2007 staff report; and further, authorize staff to submit any
documents or application forms for federal funding as may be needed for each project.
AYES: Council /Agency Members Harbicht, Segal, Amundson, Wuo and Chandler
NOES: None
b. METRO GOLD LINE PHASE II STATION DESIGN AND ART REVIEW
Assistant City Manager /Development Services Director gave a brief introduction regarding this
item and introduced Martha Eros, Transportation Services Officer who gave an overview of the
elements that are being proposed by the Committee relating to the Metro Gold Line Phase II
Station Design and artwork, architectural elements and betterments for the proposed Arcadia
light rail station. Ms. Eros recommends that the City Council approve the Metro Gold Line
Phase II Station Design and Art Review committee recommendation for artwork and baseline
station elements, and determine whether to proceed with betterments for the proposed Arcadia
light rail station as recommended by the Station Design and Art Review Committee subject to
future available funding sources.
In response to an inquiry by Council Member Amundson, Martha Eros responded that the art
work is a wind vane which resembles a tree and each limb represents an Arcadia icon such as
peacocks, leaves, feathers, and horses from the race track; and other work would include
canopies over the exits and the plaza area itself.
In addition to Council Member Amundson's inquiry, Mr. Penman added that using the Gold Line
art money for pavers was not allowable.
01 -16 -2007
Recommended Action: Approve
49:0014
In response to an inquiry by Council Member Harbicht, Martha Eros noted that the Sierra Madre
Villa Station is a standard station with no betterments at that location.
In response to an inquiry by Council Member Segal, Assistant City Manager Don Penman noted .
that staff is recommending that the City Council approve the base artwork with the $120,000
funded by the MTA and consider betterments based upon available funding at a later date.
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Segal, seconded by Council /Agency Member
Harbicht, and carried on roll call vote to approve the Metro Gold Line Phase II Station Design
and Art Review committee recommendation for artwork and baseline station elements.
AYES: Council /Agency Members Segal, Harbicht, Amundson, Wuo and Chandler
NOES: Council /Agency Members
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Harbicht seconded by
Council /Agency Member Amundson to not move forward with betterments for the proposed
Arcadia light rail station as recommended by the Station Design and Art Review Committee.
AYES: Council /Agency Members Harbicht, Amundson, Segal, Wuo and Chandler
NOES: Council /Agency Members
C.
FEEDING OF PEAFOWL WITHIN THE CITY OF ARCADIA.
Recommended Action: Introduce
City Manager Bill Kelly gave an overview on the introduction of an ordinance regarding the
feeding peafowl on private property within the City of Arcadia. Staff recommends that the City
Council introduce Ordinance No. 224 adding Section 4137.8 to Article IV, Part 3, Division 7 of
the Arcadia Municipal Code relating to the feeding of peafowl within the City of Arcadia.
Mayor Chandler announced that the City Council has received several a -mails from the
residents in the college street area relating to this item, including an e-mail from Mr. Jeff Bowen
from the Highland Oaks Homeowner Association which states that the peacocks should not be
relocated to Wilderness Park.
Council Member Amundson read an e-mail received from the Rancho Santa Anita Homeowners
Association encouraging that the City Council take no action on this item.
Council Member Wuo feels that Homeowner Associations should take a more active role in the
peafowl situation.
Council Member Segal commented that he supports the ordinance prohibiting the feeding of
peafowl on private property.
Mayor Chandler also commented that he was in favor of the ordinance prohibiting the feeding of
peafowl on private property.
In response to an inquiry by Council Member Amundson, City Attorney Steve Deitsch noted that
adding peafowl to the City's public nuisance ordinance would be difficult. City Attorney Deitsch
also noted that the Municipal Code includes a prohibition against feeding animals on public
property. Mr. Deitsch advised the City Council that if they wanted to do something about
feeding peacocks on public property, the ordinance best fits the matter at hand.
01 -16 -2007
49:0015
Council Member Harbicht commented that he is not in favor of voting on the peafowl ordinance
and has concerns about telling residents what they can do on their property.
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Segal, seconded by Council /Agency Member
Chandler, to introduce Ordinance No. 2224, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Arcadia, California, adding Section 4137.8 to Article IV, Part 3, Division 7 of the Arcadia
Municipal Code Relating to the feeding of peafowl within the City of Arcadia. The motion was
defeated.
AYES: Council /Agency Members Segal and Chandler
NOES: Council /Agency Members Amundson, Harbicht, and Wuo
RESOLUTION NO. 6551 ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AT A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2007 OF A CERTAIN
Recommended Action:
e. RESOLUTION NO. 6552 SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN
ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY
ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS FOR THE MEASURE.
Recommended Action: Adopt
City Attorney Steve Deitsch presented the staff report and read the resolution titles on items d
and a which was carried over from the January 2, 2007 City Council meeting. City Attorney
Deitsch recommended that the City Council consider adding additional language to the ballot
title. Mr. Deitsch read the ballot language in full and included "and (4) preserve the rights of
private property owners to reasonably and lawfully use and develop their property ". Mr. Deitsch
noted that in the future if a property owner would like to use their property for purposes of auto
related uses and that would include auto dealership, and other auto related uses, then the
purpose of this measure would be in part to enable any such property owner in the future to
continue to have the same right that property owner now has under the City's current zoning
ordinance and that would be to use property for that auto related use.
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Harbicht, seconded by Council /Agency
Member Segal, and carried on roll call vote to add a number 4 to the ballot title as read by the
City Attorney.
AYES: Council /Agency Members Harbicht, Segal, Amundson, Woo and Chandler
NOES: None
A motion was made by Council /Agency Member Harbicht, seconded by Council /Agency
Member Segal, and carried on roll call vote to adopt, as amended, Resolution Nos. 6551, an
ordinance ordering the submission to the qualified electors of the City of Arcadia at the special
municipal election to be held on Tuesday, May 8, 2007 of a certain measure to eliminate
eminent domain and to protect existing land uses in the Central Business District Zone; and as
amended Resolution No. 6552, a resolution setting priorities for filing written arguments
regarding a City measure and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis for the
measure.
01 -16 -2007
49:0016
AYES: Council /Agency Members Harbicht, Segal, Amundson, Wuo and Chandler
NOES: None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. in memory of Pete Kinnahan.
The City Council /Redevelopment Agency adjourned this meeting to January 30, 2007 at 6:00
p.m. for a Joint Meeting with Arcadia Board of Education in the City Council Chamber
Conference Room located at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia.
James H. Barrows, City Clerk
By:
Lisa Mussenden
Interim Chief Deputy City Clerk
8 01 -16 -2007
17 A
0
U7e1111:9
January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council ,�A
FROM: William R. Kelly, City Managerr taw ��
By: Linda Garcia, Communications, Marketing and Special
Projects Manager,
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY "SIGNATURE EVENT"
Recommendation: Provide direction
SUMMARY
Despite the success of the City's 2005 July 4 Celebration, the unavailability of a
• suitable location in 2006 caused the City to cancel the second of what was intended to
be annual event. Subsequent to that decision being made, the City Council directed
staff to put on a future agenda the subject of whether or not another form of community
"signature" event should be held. This report defines the meaning of a signature event
and provides information about similar efforts that have occurred in the past. The report
also sets forth several things to consider as part of the decision - making process and
offers a few ideas for events that could be pursued.
BACKGROUND
In its recent history, Arcadia has "experimented" with a variety of special events that
were intended to go beyond the normal activities provided through our recreation and
library programs and be more of a "signature" event and celebration of community and
civic pride for people of all ages and interests. The first event that fit into this category
was the Holiday Festival, which started in 1996. Through 4 locations, a low of 9 tons of
snow when it started to a high of 60 tons in 2003, the Holiday Festival has been a
success and is a highly anticipated event every year. The Lucky Baldwin Community
Picnic followed several years later, having a similar goal in terms of what it was to
accomplish, but a completely different format. The Picnic was also very well attended
and numerous positive comments were received. The all -day centennial birthday
celebration in 2003 was unique and a great deal of fun. In 2005, the City decided to
attempt a hometown July 4 Celebration. Budget and resource constraints caused the
• cancellation of the Lucky Baldwin Community Picnic in order to host the July 4 event.
The July 4 Celebration generated a considerable amount of "buzz," was attended by
the maximum allowable crowd of 5,000 and received rave reviews from almost
everyone who attended or was involved.
Office of the City Manager
I
Mayor and City Council - Community Signature Event
January 16, 2007
Page 2
As an additional bit of background, although not a "City of Arcadia" function, the other
large -scale event that is targeted to the entire community is the Arcadia Firefighters'
Association Pancake Breakfast.
DISCUSSION
The attached informal outline was put together to help facilitate the Council's discussion
on this matter in terms of what we would try to accomplish with a signature event, what
generally works and does not work when designing an event of this type, and what
resources will be needed. The outline also offers options for a new event. As is the
case with most projects, defining the goal and providing the necessary resources is key
to our being able to achieve success. The nature of this particular activity also requires
an open mind in terms of imagining what is possible and an adequate amount of
planning time.
n
LJ
Provision of a signature event is certainly not a mandatory City service. It is however, a
service that when designed properly has time and time again proven to be something
Arcadians want, appreciate and support. The kind of activity we are talking about now
differs from the annual offering of recreation, library and senior citizen programs by its •
large scope, community -wide orientation and overall design. The promotion of
"community" is also a distinctive feature.
FISCAL IMPACT
To be sure, a major event will carry with it a sizeable budget. Depending upon the
nature of the event, sponsors may be sought to assist with the cost although we do
need to keep in mind that sponsorships are at their best when they are of considerable
value to both the sponsor and the event organizer. That is, the City needs a relatively
large amount of money to make the event work and the sponsor wants a return on their
investment, generally in the form of publicity. The amount of money staff would seek for
this event would likely only be provided by a large company (or companies) that is
generally inclined to be involved in community affairs. In Arcadia, most of the
companies that fit this bill are currently involved in some type of development activity
that may cause the City to not want to ask them for financial support.
A budget will be prepared when and if the City Council decides to pursue an event.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction on whether or not staff
should create a community signature event to take place in fiscal year 2007 -2008. .
Attachment
1 r 11
u
•
L.J
rt
0
Z
Z
W
J
V
,
W
Z
V
Z
cc
y
LL
0
LL
LU
Z
uj
m
LLI
W
LU
0
V
Q
rt
Z
y
V
2
ti
W
V
Y
O
L
Q)
C
C
m
N
N
a c
•Y >
E `
m U
w N
L °
.E N
L m
•- a
L O
c >
N o
> C-
m O.
L
N
O
U >
C C
m N
L
U Y �
N C
7 >
c E L
07 E N
U
L N
(n w m
> O Q
°) .
cU
m E
L w E
r N o EE
O LO O
w Z ,
C) C w
7
m E c
Ec E=
Ea
O C °O
w O O m
U N
N
01 N O cu
a002U
C
O
E
0
N
N
C
m
N
m
N
m
2
a
>'
m
U
'C
O
N
O7
N
m
�
C
• N
C
m
�
L
N
�
C
O
uj
CL
LU
N
m
0
L
N
C
N
W
0
E
`m
w
@
D1
C
Q
_0
Q
m
6
C
N
O
O
0
w
U_
~
Z
N
0
O
E co
m
N
U
.N
• E
LU
@
Q
W
C L
LU
N
U
$
E
Q
ti
c
o
E
J
0
O
U
o
N
m
N L m
ct
0
W
C
o
Mn
O
f6
>
F
W
LO
U
U
`
L
t
N
�
."'
m
0
c
m
o
O
O
N
N
m
N
O
m
O
- m
0
0
c
U
O
°
C
7
U
m
N N
Cl N L
m
Cl. C
0
N
C)
C
O U
m
CI.
C
C
a N
O
a
E
U D
N >
E
j N
c
a) '
c
U m
>
l N
l.
m N
m
LL
m
w
m E
3
N
c>
m
-0.0
N N
y
N
LLLUU
U U
•.L-.
N LL
O
C
F
h I-
c C l .
m
3 m
Y C
> n
O
052
co
U
0 N
N N
c
m
3 0
3
N
C7
= in
Q °;
N
�`)
CL N
° O
N
N
r a
to
0
uj
LU
N l�0
L
0
c °
W
cUj
T
L °—' a
°
Q
C
Q
w a
ti
~
Z
c `°
0
E co
.N
LU
C:
L
Q
W
C L
LU
_N
c
W
° °
U N
ti
Y
Q
� m a
N
N L m
ct
L
.LN..
3 E
O
Q
c E
T
r °c
3
N O
3 O L
0
O
- m
°'Cl E
O C
Cl.
`
N N
Cl N L
N
C L j
C)
C
r.
m C
E
m
No)
O m
3Zc
L
N
O m
= > U
N
` O
m
C
O
c
>
w
l.
C
C m
C
N
O
E
m U a)
E —°
E
C N
N N w
LLLUU
QFL'1l
§
(
§
k
U .
§
§
�
§
k
\
-
.
CL
c
\ k
2
/
k
\
§
)
ƒ f
\
\
\
\ )
0.
k
\
\
\ CL
§
LLI
_
CL
E )W
\
2
m 0
3
| ®
co
\
§
��c
§
k
}]
2
\
k
E
1
§
,Z6
§
ca
-j
\
\
/ \\
/
$
.
CU
(
) (\
§
\�
}
\28
E
.
\
�
E
m
)0
° -rf
®
7
»
E=
LL
§
k�
0C
/\
Q
®o =\ -
2
0 >1
��
2
#7a E CD
3
66
.
e)
CL
\)
oo
�)
�k
* #
�2
Co
§oE(0
d�
g:�=
2
°�
!ga) /�
)
22
aca
2 = ®rE
Cl) m
LL —P
��
-�
)® ®!:�
}/
/)L
-
k
°�
b22 \`2
{���k�
/ \\
( \))� /o\
\CD
Co
= =
®.�
£ /x±)(DME
E
:GE
\E&& =)
\
\0) > >E_§
)\
o¢o§ /a
§}
- 7E §E
��!�2oo =E
_ C, E
])
%k \ </e
\)\
F- /e0 < §ƒ3
..
...,.
,.,
,....,,,.
0 M= \j
/��\ m - M
E Co \ a
.r- L) 3 k
E �M \/� cu
)\a2
§ c:
7)�@ 2 >27
c &2k# % a)
§ 7 Ek{ §. /2
E i
� 8 » bm
� ) C:
0 mt�k.f m � °
tk , In§&
0 \]/ a = §G
) CL
5 2 - f 0 / ƒ
t ƒ E0 C'. k e\ \ \ / \} \\ \\ {\
» ' ,£mo 2c ° -m£
R fc § - _,-
o =§ _ ,\2
z = \ CO. \®§
CO) §) - { =J� )E:t §I
c - Q)
.\ \�(n
Q) CL \ \� \�
_ - 7e , �,eeC3 In e
■ ®Z °2 /§±o- sf�w)±
¥ /:2 =o »cGEe t U) 0'-
%22g =Do ,@m >, b °4§
`oa, \)�k£f3 : "c— w
momo�
/� %® Gt r CL
r> a) CL
, o
a ofaE`` ®� o
±� - 2 !&`< :.�: : E
�
]]� se =£a »® a
{ � E t'i2 -C cn
ƒ % °: \ §3\.oC :m/7§
#§/ 2 % =_£;``__E_
_ - §0.0 0e3MoE
o \«o = = =,
) \0E omo
- -
° %�f})&�77 ® m
=»R� ) m:oa)
/�% >&o� =!
a ?E - �S���t(D 0
|ke]§2�m
�) / - ®£``®!£ \o,#
/ \\ =k : : £ ; =7 »
, CD 99 - e G«
C �[)G/#0 m
CDz)mCO m ( \ \)\(
/
w
j
§
a
/
{
I
\ \
f
L
§
/f
\
a
§k
)
E
E
me
cm
) :
.
.
0)
[
\
/
m
j\
§_
/\k
\
�\
§
Q
DCL
.
Z
§
]
{
\/
�(
3§
§\
[) \
k)
)=
Q2
/\
\\\
2 &
�)
7®
)o
C:
/§
\)
®,]
/�
\g
ƒc
�e=
§\
�k
#w
a)
f
/j
ƒ \\
)!%
2z
o=
�C2
§
/\
.]
]t)
>
{"
t
��/
a e
0M
\k$
\7®
CL�
-
{&
2 2)
0
5
k
222
/
}
\§
ƒ]/
2/+
2/
n
k�
/
&
7$\
§
iE
co cu
:
/
; -0
§ )
@ � m
_
e
±
§
)§
E
)f»
.-
�\
«
2
°
=
%
{\ ��
(\k
/ : k
!-
§
0 \
&
�
mCL
Sa)o
\/
® a
f
§�f
>
I
0
;
)Epee!
C:
.
[/
_
-
! §2
E
/0
ƒ $]
\ \U)
J
J
2
)))
§ §�\4k
�
±
_0
e
)
/ 0
¢ .
w
-
£
\
4
«
z
]
_.
]
e
{
) [
0
cu
0 0
•
DATE:
January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: William R. Kelly, City Manager UQ,b A
By: Linda Garcia, Communications, Marketing and Special
Projects Manager/
SUBJECT: EXPENSE AND TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE CITY COUNCII
SUMMARY
Recommendation: Provide direction
AB 1234 requires cities that reimburse members of their legislative bodies to adopt, at a
• pubic meeting, an expense reimbursement policy. The City of Arcadia has an officially
adopted policy on the books; however, a few revisions are necessary to make it
consistent with current practice.
Staff is not recommending that the City Council adopt the policy tonight. Rather, we are
bringing this to the Council in study session format so that you have an opportunity for
group discussion on the various elements of the policy, particularly the additions, before
a resolution is prepared and brought to you for consideration.
DISCUSSION
State law mandates that the City Council adopt an expense reimbursement policy that
among other things spells out the types of expenses that are eligible for reimbursement,
how the requests for reimbursement are to be processed, and the reasonable
reimbursement rates for travel. Much of the intent and provisions of the policy adopted
in March 2006 remain the same in the attached updated policy, the difference being that
this version provides more clarification or adds language concerning the following
issues:
• This policy applies to the City Council and all City Officials that serve on a
legislative body, including members of the Planning Commission and some
City employees (e.g. those that serve on Modification Committee and the
Business License Review Board).
Office of the City Manager
Mayor and City Council
January 16, 2007
Page 2
• This policy calls for a $45 per day rate for meal reimbursement when attending a
meeting, conference or seminar, unless unusual circumstances exist. There is
also a provision included that states when attending a City - related function other
than a conference, seminar or meeting that the actual cost of the meal will be
reimbursed.
• This policy allows the City to purchase a "block" of tickets or a "table" for major
community functions at which it is traditional and expected that Council Members
or City Officials attend. These tickets would usually be purchased in advance of
knowing which Officials would attend and then distributed when it is known who
is able to go to that particular function.
• With the adoption of this policy, for major community events the City would be
able to purchase a ticket for the spouse of a Council Member or City Official if
said attendance by a spouse serves a public purpose such as joining the Official
in fostering ties with the community.
FISCAL IMPACT
Although the ability to purchase a block of tickets and /or purchase a ticket for a spouse •
may add some cost to the various department budgets, adoption of this policy should
not have a significant fiscal impact.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council review and discuss the attached Expense
and Travel Policy for the City Council and Select City Employees and either direct
staff to bring back the policy as is for adoption (with the appropriate resolution)
or provide staff with any changes that should be made to the document prior to
finalization and preparation of the resolution.
Attachment
r'1
I�
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
SUBJECT: EXPENSE AND TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE CITY
COUNCIL AND SELECT CITY EMPLOYEES
DRAFT
POLICY STATEMENT
Policy No.:
Adopted:
Amended:
CITY MANAGER
The purpose of this Administrative Policy is to provide guidelines and a procedure for
handling expenses incurred by members of the City Council, the Planning Commission
and of City staff who serve on a legislative body, while conducting City business and /or
attending community functions, conferences and other events.
It is the policy of the City of Arcadia to pay for expenses incurred by Council Members
and other City Officials when the expense is related to municipal affairs and /or when it
serves a public purpose. Said expenses include those related to travel, office supplies,
attendance at conferences, workshops, meetings and special events.
• This Administrative Policy covers the City Council, City Manager and other City Officials
and staff that serve on a legislative body, as defined in Assembly Bill 1234. At the time
this policy was written, examples of legislative bodies referred to in AB 1234 and
therefore subject to this policy, include the City Council, Planning Commission,
Modification Committee, Design Review Committee and the Business License Review
Board.
This policy does not in any way supersede AB 1234 or other State law. Rather, it is
intended to put the City in compliance with the legislation and to provide a framework
for how the City pays for travel to and attendance at events and reimbursement for
expenses incurred while conducting City business.
In this policy the word "Official' is used interchangeably in reference to Council
Members, Commissioners and City employees.
For the purpose of this policy the City does not make a distinction between expense
payments made in advance or reimbursed. Both are considered a use of public funds
and are subject to the procedures defined herein. Again, it should be clear though that
this policy does not supplant any of the requirements of AB 1234, which arguably, may
distinguish between the two types of payments.
Page 1 of 6
° ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Policy No.:
SUBJECT: EXPENSE AND TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE CITY Adopted:
COUNCIL AND SELECT CITY EMPLOYEES Amended:
DRAFT
CM MANAGER
AUTHORIZED EXPENSES
The City will pay for or reimburse Council Members and City Officials for expenses
incurred while conducting City business or while representing the City at community
functions. The City may pay for or reimburse the following types of expenses:
• Office supplies
• Transportation - airfare, mileage or gasoline, rental car, parking
• Lodging
• Telephone
• Baggage handling fees
• Reasonable and customary gratuities
• Internet and fax costs for actual City business
Activities that generally qualify for advance payment or reimbursement include:
• Educational or informational meetings, workshops and conferences
• Participation in regional, state or national organizations whose activities affect
the City's interests
• Attending City functions
• Attending community and community- related events
Transportation
The most economical mode and class of transportation reasonably consistent with
scheduling needs and cargo space requirements should be used.
Airfare is limited to coach class on a commercial air carrier. An Official may obtain
personal frequent flyer credits for flights taken, but the selection of an airline or a given
trip shall not be made for the purpose of accumulating such miles.
Automobile mileage is reimbursed at the prevailing Internal Revenue Service rate.
If a rental car is necessary for the performance of an Official's duties, the car shall be
" standard /intermediate /full- size /premium" unless an upgrade is provided at no
additional cost. When using the City's preferred vendor (Enterprise), physical damage
and liability insurance should be provided as part of the quoted cost. If another car
4
Page 2 of 6
.� ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Policy No.:
SUBJECT: EXPENSE AND TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE CITY Adopted:
COUNCIL AND SELECT CITY EMPLOYEES Amended:
DRAFT
CITY MANAGER
rental agency is used the liability insurance /damage waiver offered by the rental car
company should be purchased at the time of rental.
City vehicles are not usually used for transportation on extended trips, but if necessary
they can be used with the approval of the City Manager or appropriate Department
Head.
Taxi fare, shuttle fees and parking fees are eligible for reimbursement as long as said
expenses are incurred for City business.
Lodging
Lodging expenses will be paid for when travel on official City business reasonably
requires an overnight stay. Lodging expenses are authorized for travel outside of a 50-
• mile radius of City Hall unless approved in advance by a majority of the City Council for
Council Members and by the City Manager for employees. Travelers should request the
government rate, when it is available. Government rates are presumed to be
reasonable and therefore reimbursable through this policy. If the government rate is
not available, lodging should be obtained that is at the median retail price for that area.
If lodging is in connection with a conference or group meeting, the cost shall not
exceed the maximum group rate published by the conference or activity sponsor,
provided that lodging at the group rate is available at the time of booking. If the group
rate is not available, comparable (e.g. government rate) lodging may be used, keeping
in mind that it should be within the median retail price for the area.
Meals
Reasonable (market rate) meal expenses and associated customary gratuities are
eligible for reimbursement. Whenever possible, an attempt should be made to take
advantage of meals that are included as part of the event. For the purpose of this
policy, when on a trip the reasonable reimbursement rate for meals is $45 per day,
unless unusual circumstances exist. This daily amount does not preclude the Official's
responsibility to take advantage of meals included as part of the event.
• When attending a City- related function other than a conference, seminar or meeting,
the actual cost of the meal will be reimbursed.
Page 3 of 6
u ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Policy No.:
SUBJECT: EXPENSE AND TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE CITY Adopted:
COUNCIL AND SELECT CITY EMPLOYEES Amended:
DRAFT
CITY MANAGER
Communes Functions
For major community functions hosted by an outside organization, at which it is
traditional and expected that Council Members or City Officials attend on behalf of the
City, it is acceptable for the City to purchase a "block" of tickets or a "table" in advance,
without knowing which Officials will attend, and then distributing the tickets when it is
known who is able to go to that particular function.
For major community events, the City may purchase a ticket for the spouse of a Council
Member or Official if said attendance at the event by a spouse serves a public purpose
such as joining the Official in fostering ties with the community. Examples of functions
covered by this section include the Methodist Hospital Crystal Ball, the Chamber of
Commerce Installation Dinner and Annual Taste of Arcadia event, Independent Cities
Association events, employee association functions and Arcadia Red Cross activities.
UNAUTHORIZED EXPENSES
Expenses not eligible for reimbursement or advance payment by the City include:
• Personal expenses
• Dry cleaning
• Political or charitable contributions
• Entertainment expenses such as movies, sporting events, golf, etc.
• Non - mileage personal automobile expenses such as repairs, traffic citations,
insurance and related
CASH ADVANCES
From time to time it may be necessary for an Official to request a cash advance to
cover anticipated expenses while traveling or doing business on behalf of the City.
Such request for an advance should be submitted to the City Manager prior to the need
for the advance with an explanation of the purpose of the expenditure and the
anticipated amount of the expenditure. This request may be made on a "Travel
Request and Expense Report Form." Any unused advance must be returned to the City.
Page 4 of 6
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Policy No.:
SUBJECT: EXPENSE AND TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE CITY Adopted:
COUNCIL AND SELECT CITY EMPLOYEES Amended:
DRAFT
CITY MANAGER
As noted below, expenses may be pre -paid, with the understanding that receipts still
need to be submitted.
PROCEDURE
Arrangements for attendance at meetings, conferences and events may be made by the
Council Member or by the Council's staff liaison in the City Manager's Office. To the
extent possible, fees and charges may be paid in advance, with any outstanding
documentation to follow when it is available. Whether travel arrangements are made
by a staff member or by the Council Member, it is the elected officials' responsibility to
ensure that all receipts and documentation are submitted as outlined in this policy.
All expense reimbursement requests are to be documented with receipts and submitted
• on the appropriate paperwork, which may include an expense report form, a petty cash
slip or another City Manager approved form. For extended trips, a "Travel Request and
Expense Report Form" is usually required and must be completed and approved by the
City Manager prior to the travel taking place.
As noted above, City Officials shall submit an expense report (or another approved
form) in order to receive reimbursement. Expense reports must document that the
expense in question meets the requirements of this policy. For example, if the meeting
is with a legislator, the local official should explain whose meals were purchased, what
issues were discussed and how they relate to the City of Arcadia.
Expense documentation should be submitted within 30 days of the expense being
incurred, accompanied by receipts. Inability to provide such documentation in a timely
fashion may result in the expense being borne by the Official.
All expenses are subject to verification that they comply with the intent of this policy.
OTHER EXPENSES
All other expenses for activities and materials not included in this policy require prior
majority approval by the City Council at a public meeting.
Page 5 of 6
uF° 4 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Policy No.:
ze ` SUBJECT: EXPENSE AND TRAVEL POLICY FOR THE CITY Adopted:
COUNCIL AND SELECT CITY EMPLOYEES Amended:
DRAFT
CITY MANAGER
AB 1234 REPORTING
Officials subject to AB 1234 must make a brief report at the next meeting of the
legislative body on a conference, event or meeting they attended at the expense of the
City. An exception to this is that if an employee attends a function as a City employee
and not as a member of a legislative body, it is doubtful that AB 1234 reporting is
required. Consult with the City Attorney if there are questions about this requirement.
VIOLATION OF THIS POLICY
The penalties for misusing public resources or falsifying expense reports in violation of
this policy may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Loss of reimbursement privileges
b. Restitution to the City
C. Civil penalties pursuant to Section 8314 of the Government Code
d. Prosecution pursuant to Section 424 of the Penal Code
Page 6 of 6
oV Al2
0 �4� yy ieot�.�C9 dr
.
Auryn 5. 00]
STAFF REPORT
Library and Museum Services Department
January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council l
FROM: Janet Sporleder, Director of Library and Museum Services t
By Mary Beth Hayes, Principal Librarian for Adult Services
SUBJECT: Acceptance: $3.000 from Joseph Alton Hamilton to the Library for books on
compact disc
Recommendation: Accept the donation
Summary: Joseph Alton Hamilton is offering the Arcadia Public Library a donation of $3,000 for the
purchase of unabridged books on CD.
Discussion Mr. Hamilton is an avid user of the Library's collection of books on CD, with a particular
interest in unabridged books by mystery writers. His donation will enable the Library to significantly
increase its collection of popular unabridged books on CD. Each book will carry a special bookplate
indicating that it is donated in memory of Mr. Hamilton's wife, Ruth Hamilton.
All gifts to the Library are subject to approval by the City Council pursuant to City Charter article VIII
section 809 (d).
Fiscal Impact The Library will experience an added $3,000.00 to its budget allocation.
Recommendation: Accept the donation of $3,000 to the Arcadia Public Library for the purchase
of unabridged books on CD.
Approved by: - J
William R. Kelly, City Manager
— Q�Oy
e J4
STAFF REPORT
Development Services Department
January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager /Development Services Director
By: Jason Kruckeberg, Community Development Administrator 3
Prepared By: Thomas Li, Associate Planner 'l V
SUBJECT:
Recommendation: Approve Final Map
SUMMARY
Tentative maps and final maps are required for all subdivisions that result in five or more
parcels or condominiums. The City Council shall approve a final map if it conforms to all the
requirements of the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision
Map Act. It is recommended that the City Council approve Final Map No. 64609 for a 76 -unit
senior condominium subdivision at 650 W. Huntington Drive.
DISCUSSION
The evaluation of environmental impacts as set forth in the Initial Environmental Study required
by the California Environmental Quality Act determined that Tract Map No. 64609 would not
have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore a Negative Declaration was
adopted by the Planning Commission on May 9, 2006.
Final Map No. 64609 has been reviewed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public
Works and the appropriate City Departments. Said map has been found to be in substantial
compliance with the tentative map, as approved by the Planning Commission on May 9, 2006,
and is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State
Subdivision Map Act.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Final Map No. 64609.
Attachments: 1. Land use map
2. Letter of compliance from Los Angeles County
3. Final Map No. 64609
Approved: `4 *
William R. Kelly, City Manager
HUNTINGTON DR
N
too 0
(660) (634)
W C -2
Q
2
3
O
J
m
(820)
C -2
(830)
(850)
(856)
W (802)
N (904)
FA
1n 1LPOIf�.� '
ti
x l
Development Services Department
Engineering Division c
Preps dby. R.S.Goomiez, AO 2006 °0 m °mtr °tom °t
NIF
(642)
(634)
R-3
(630)
650 W Huntington Drive
TM 64609
-.
100 Feet
,
k s } 61 48 t tr t ii r ri ii
IF•� � ' t I � M I� . .
1 , V � t t 4+ a It hf n 1•
f
�^+/
444E Y 7 .A'{s Y 'W YM Yi IS .:a � 4 kl
'aa ,1
i9 ' x i�np F h r^ 1_'+lSSV,,L.�rva a`*ti,1 rx I a � §'l
gt
Ell 'A
RNA
'� • y- I!�f5r "� ', xi i arl� +FyWa.9 �$�.9 r ] "� k - YLL 6 M+�N�'
J [
0,
I ggll t yiiL ".
a ' +
I a 1 Jir �.♦ t G. ia �: ar
vu
1 rj t rnj r I n ,
V8
1 ' r '.w Vt� r r rv,r• � 1� §,,.� S" iI. �z+ �f IU i4". i nYii
AN
V4 l � aF !i r e Wi z°'
�� +� i d ; J� f '� �� � "
t
,
u x,
a
3 r ,ri. r 4Yi J`, ANtw
�I
u3 E i £x r}T'
65 0 W Huntington D
Arcadia
zone
WUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
'To Enrich Lives Through Effective and caring Service"
DONALD L. WOLFE, Dimmr
December 12, 2006
900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331
Telephone: (626) 458 -5100
www.ladpw.org
ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCETO:
P.O. BOX 1460
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802 -1460
Mr. Phillip Wray
City Engineer
City of Arcadia
P.O. Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91006 -6021
Dear Mr. Wray:
TRACT NO. 64609
IN REPLY PLEASE
REFER TO FILE: LD-2
The enclosed subject final map has been reviewed and corrections made by
Public Works for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis, title information, and for
compliance with the Subdivision Map Act. It is ready for your examination and
certification as to compliance with the conditional approval and applicable City
Ordinances.
The City Council, or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the State
Environmental Quality Act and the Subdivision Map Act.
After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the final
map should be returned to Land Development Division, Subdivision Mapping Section,
for filing with the Registrar - Recorder /County Clerk's Office.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Anait Pogozyan of our Subdivision
Mapping Section at (626) 458 -4915.
Very truly yours,
DONALD L. WOLFE
Director of Public Wo
--
DENNIS HUNTER
Assistant Deputy Director
Land Development Division
AP:ca
P:ILPDPUBISUBD IVSNSMAPPINGIFORMSITRACT
Enc.
;1 LOT --
73,837 SO. FT.
TRACT NO, 64609
IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 4 AND 5 OF
TRACT NO. 2828, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 33, PAGE
63 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
OWNER'S STATEMENT
ME HEREBY STATE MAT NE ARE ME OM MS OF OR ARE INTERESTED IN ME
LAWS INCLUDED MMN ME SUBDIVISION SHOMN ON MI5 MAP MTHIN ME
DISTINCTIVE BORDER LNES, AND ME CONSENT TO ME PREPARATION AND HUNG
OF SAID MAP AND SLBDIN40N.
650 HUNTINGTO! DR. U.C. A CAUFGRNIA UMIIEO UANUTY COMPANY
BC (MANAONG MEMBER)
STATE Of
COUNTY O
ON BEFORE ME, A NOTARY
PUBUC PERSONALLY APPEARED
PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME (OR PROVED TO WE ON
ME BASIS OF SATSFACMAY EVIDENCE) TO BE ME PERSON(5) MHOSE NAME(5)
IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO ME NMIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNONTEWED T) ME MAT
NE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED ME SAME N HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES).
AND MAT BY HIS/HER/NEIR SGNATURE(S) ON ME INSTRUMENT ME PERSM(S).
OR ME ENTTY UPON BENZ P O WHICH ME PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED ME
INSTRUMENT.
NTNESS MY HAND AND OPTCIAL SEAL
SGNATURE
PLANTED NAME
NOTARY PUBLIC I�G F D
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS 15
IN COUNTY
MY COMUMON MUMSER:
MY COMMSSION EMPIRES
CAMAY BANK. A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORP., BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF
TRUST RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 2005. AS INSTRUMENT NO W- 2335662 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS
NAME NAME
TITLE TIRE
STATE O
COUNTY O
CN BEFORE ME. A NOTARY
PUBLIC. PERSONALLY APPEARED
PERSONALLY KNOW TO NE (DO MOM i5 M£ ON
ME BANS OF BATSFACTO2Y EVIDENCE) TO BE ME PENSGN(S) MORE NAME(5)
IS /ARE SUBSCRBED TO ME MTHN INSTRUMENT AND AONO'MEO£p TO ME NAT AUTHORRED
0 NAT By E ER/ME R SGNANRE(SMON ME INSTRUMENT ME PER S,
OR ME ENTITY WON BEHALF OF RXIN THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED ME
INSTRUMENT.
NNESS MY HAND AND CEREAL SEAL
SIGNATURE
PRINTED NAME
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND TSIE AS ID STATE
MY PAINCIPA PUCE OF GUSHERS IS
N COUNTY
MY COMMISSION NUMBER
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
BASIS OF BEARINGS
ME BEARINGS SHDMM HEREON ARE BASED ON ME SEARING NO3 WE O ME
CENTERUNE O BALDNN AVENUE, AS SHORN ON TRACT MAP W. 5L515 N.B.
1243-14 -15
CONDOMINIUM NOTE
THIS SXBDIMSGN 15 APPROVED AS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT FOR 76 UNITS
MEREST ME EATERS OF ME UNITS O AIR SPACE WILL HOD AN UIDIMOED
INTEREST IN ME COMMON ANUS MICH RILL N TURN, PROVIDE ME NECESSARY
ACCESS ANON UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR ME UNITS
SIGNATURE OMISSION NOTES
ME SOIATURES O ME PARTIES NAMED HERIENAPTER AS OWERS OF ME
INTEREST SET FORM, HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 664M
(9) 3A (FWD W TIE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, AS THEIR INTEREST IS SUN NAT
IT CANNOT RPEN INTO A FEE AND SAID SIGNATURES ARE NOT REWIRED BY ME
LOCAL AGENCY
ANITA M. BALLOON, HOLDER OF AS EASEMENT RECORDED IN ROM 5430. PAGE
159 OF DEEDS
SAID EASEMENT IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES RECORDED SEPTEMBER 3. 19M IN BOOK 25200. PAGE 137.
AM JANUARY 12, 1957 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 250. BON OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF CAUFORMA HOLDER OF M EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES RECORDED MARCH 20, 1655 IN BOOK 50545, PAGE
234. O OPICIAL RECORDS.
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON
A FIELD SLRME1' IN CONFORMANCE WITH ME REQUIREMENTS OF ME SUBDIVISION
MAP ACT AND LOCAL DRONANCE AT ME REQUEST Of 630 HUNTINGTON DR. LLC,
A CAUFONIA LIMITED UABIUTY COMPANY ON MAY 11. 205. I HEREBY STATE
MAT ALL ME MDNUMENTS ARE Of ME CHARACTER AND OCCUPY ME POSITIONS
INUNDATED. AND MAT ME MCMIMENTS ARE SJRICIENT TO ENABLE ME SURVEY
TO BE RETRACED. AND MAT MIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO ME
CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MM.
N
ALFRED J. MELMELL LS 6999
EXPIRES 09/30/07
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY NAT .I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAPi MAT IT CONFORMS
SUBSTANTIALLY TO ME TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS
THEREOF: THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES OF ME CITY OF
ARCADIA APRICABLE AT ME ME O APPROVAL O ME TENTATVE MAP HAYS
BEEN COMPLIED ON AID NAT 1 AM SATISFIED NAT THS MAP IS TECHNICALLY
CORRECT MN RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS
DATE CITY ENGNEEK PHILIP WAY
L.5. 7355 UPIRES: 12/31/2005
CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY NAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER ME
XRISDCTION OF ME CITY OF ARCADIA TO WIN THE "NO INCLUDED N ME
WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PMT THEREOF IS SUBJECT, ANON MACH MAY SE PAD
IN FULL HAYS BEEN PAD IN NU-
DATE CITY TREASURER - CITY OF ARCADIA
PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE
THIS 15 TO GMT" NAT ME TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT MM NO 646M WAS
APPpOKO AT A MEETING HELD ON ME 9M DAY OF MAY. 2006. I HEREBY
CERTIFY NAT THIS MAP SUBSTANIALLY COMPUES MM ME PREYWSLY
APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.
DATE SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSCN
- CITY OF ARCADIA
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY NAT ME ME REWIRED BY SECTION 9116.4 OF ME MUNICIPAL
CODE HAS BEEN PAID TO ME CITY O ARCADIA.
DATE FINANCE DIRECTOR - CITY OF ARCAMA
CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY NAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF ME CTT OF ARCADIA BY
MOTION PASSED ON APPROVED ME ATTACHED MAP.
DATE
SCALE: 1 "= 50'
TRACT NO 64609
IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
MONUMENTS NOTE ®r ➢6G4NA'!¢'SN. WJ1164'9.. GVWiI rW RMK
U Wr/ 0.9W4i m AVA[A'I M[ }Jpy N P.R 9M3 P.16 iM ¢A
m SET LkT l5 eNNS 0 r N,x GmE.vr �avnrin WAG'M Eo6d maxr iu w[ uNnr
anasmimtarnc l -I }9I PS NS. x¢➢m vA
aAOrM
nzun
NAM
NnA46RY
�' L1o7
R lEE -nl
MWI ItI
INI G
PAP
N9615YW
MG 11A B AIOA( rceR
nSnIA rIM}N_n
9Mrr ur
j( ➢ ➢I
n
x)9e5'09T
101.9/
b
nur oI
aI
N RDip A) N r
anovrR t9[Nn
I R I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
NOT A PANT v
I
THIS SUBOIMSION
I
I
z
2 I
<I� I
B
�
HICK ImA RxR!
0 I
MA Jl�fl RRI
NN{ I M4.1 RV U[
. l 4 1
q Mq r
EIy I
mPA G
NnMHb aMl Mll6 )n
I
ABLE �LAPIN¢
LME
L[N'
I
LI
61.55'
L1
915A x
I MI
± S
YI
Y WYMN
NFl1 /IQ.
Y rl
N96MY6Y
1n13' � -
.1. nrl.
FAIR _ AVENUE
4 E'
HUNTNGTON
J]]li
uele'
}.� \NBfi tb'WT
l l 1 �
ri
I
I
a
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
k q k 3
y a
ey
SY
�
A
NOT A PART 09
THIS SVBOmSION
6151 1101AV. 9[ 11]9.9s' _
I]SW I
1])N
CL 6 b NR 9YM MON NMMO
M?O MY (bYpXD)
1
S
lane
j
a
a
v
U
a�
nI
B_
INDICATES THE BOVNOARY Q TIE U9D
BEING SUBOINBEO BY THIS MAP.
nlMwxc aMN Nr9Ec
Ae,ec ese N¢¢ir!
rn uew
MG 11A B AIOA( rceR
nSnIA rIM}N_n
9Mrr ur
r M
vl'Mt I¢➢r
N axN. mL
fiifi. `A'
Np6W4l'N DRIVE
211.
k q k 3
y a
ey
SY
�
A
NOT A PART 09
THIS SVBOmSION
6151 1101AV. 9[ 11]9.9s' _
I]SW I
1])N
CL 6 b NR 9YM MON NMMO
M?O MY (bYpXD)
1
S
lane
j
a
a
v
U
a�
nI
B_
INDICATES THE BOVNOARY Q TIE U9D
BEING SUBOINBEO BY THIS MAP.
1,
. cvow STAFF REPORT
Public Works Services Department
DATE: January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council / /
FROM: Pat Malloy, Public Works Services Direc rt6
Prepared by: Tom Tait, Field Services Mana er.
Martin Ray, Utilities Superintendent.
SUBJECT:
TION: APPROVE
SUMMARY
On August 3, 2004, City Council approved an agreement with Hughes Supply, with
optional extensions, for the purchase of water meters. As part of the Annual Meter
Replacement Program, the City Warehouse maintains a supply of water meters for the
Utilities Section. The purchase order with Hughes Supply is nearing the end and needs
to be extended. The current contract provides for annual purchase order extensions
with no price change.
Based on the excellent service provided by Hughes Supply during the past two years
staff recommends that the City Council award a purchase order extension in the amount
of $225,000.00 to Hughes Supply for the purchase of data log radio read water meters
for the City's water distribution system.
DISCUSSION
The Public Works Services Department's warehouse is responsible for distributing all
water meters to the Utilities Section for meter replacement and new installations. The
Warehouse maintains an on -hand inventory to prevent an interruption of this service
and orders replacement meters to keep the inventory at proper stock levels. Proper
Page 1 of 2
Mayor and Council
January 16, 2007
water meter accuracy is important in estimating water demands, forecasting customer
demands and aids in conservation efforts. 5/8" through 2" water meters in our system
are replaced once every fifteen (15) years for accurate water measurements. The
American Water Works Association (AWWA) standard recommends this to ensure that
water meter accuracy is kept at an acceptable level.
On June 29, 2004, the City Clerk publicly opened sealed bids submitted by the water
meter vendors. As a result of a comparison of the bid prices from responsive bidders,
Hughes Supply was the lowest bidder.
Based on the excellent service provided by Hughes Supply during the past year, staff
recommends that the City Council award a purchase order extension in the amount of
$225,000.00 to Hughes Supply for the purchase of data log radio read water meters for
the City's water distribution system. Staff began replacing our water meters with radio
read meters last year. It will take approximately twelve (12) years to convert the entire
system to radio read meters, but once the conversion is complete, we will be able to
read the entire system from a vehicle as opposed to walking the routes and manually
reading each meter. This will allow us to use the meter readers for other water related
maintenance assignments or reduce staff accordingly.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
None
FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds are available in the Warehouse budget to cover the cost of the water
meters.
RECOMMENDATION
Award a purchase order extension in the amount of $225,000.00 to Hughes
Supply for the purchase of data log radio read water meters.
Approved by:
PM:TT:MR:mn
1 + �
William R. Kelly, City Manager
Page 2 of 2
Ci
Iu.uep�uW '
Cow %unity 00NO .` STAFF REPORT
Administrative Services Department
DATE: January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tracey L. Hause, Administrative Services Direct
SUBJECT: Appropriate the expected salary savi nqs in the Police Deoartment
for additional salary and benefits and authorize the hiring of two
additional Police Officers to achieve and maintain full staffing in the
Police Department
Recommendation: Approve
SUMMARY
Staff is recommending the City Council appropriate the expected salary savings
in the Police Department for additional salary and benefits, and authorize the
hiring of two additional Police Officers to achieve and maintain a full staffing
level.
BACKGROUND
Over the last several years, the Police Department has been experiencing
difficulties in recruitment and retention of sworn Police Officers. Recruiting and
retention of Police Officers has proven to be not only a state and local problem,
but agencies nationwide are experiencing these same difficult ties.
The City of Arcadia has 75 sworn positions, which includes the Police Chief,
Captains, Lieutenants, Sergeants, Agent and Officers. It is characteristic to
experience some level of vacancies in the Police Officer ranks at any one time.
In fact, the Department has not been completely at full force for a number of
years. However, the level of vacancies the City of Arcadia has been
experiencing in the last year was at its highest level.
DISCUSSION
The City Council has approved several retention and recruiting incentives
including signing bonuses, longevity pay and retiree health benefits. These
recruitment incentives have helped; however the Department is still facing
vacancies at an unacceptable level primarily due to the significant amount of time
required to recruit, complete background tests and train Police Officers. Once a
new officer is hired and academy training is necessary, it is approximately 12
months before the officer can be out in the field working independently. If an
experienced officer is hired from another policy agency (lateral) field training in
Arcadia is still required and it is usually 5 to 6 months before a lateral can work
independently in the field.
Currently the Department has eight new hires in training, however they are still
dealing with the regular loss of sworn officers through retirements and
resignations for better opportunities. As a result, filling the vacancies is not
materializing as quickly as desired.
Staff is recommending the Department be permitted to increase the number of
approved sworn positions by two Police Officers. This will allow the Department
to step up its recruitment efforts and essentially 'over hire'. The goal is to
achieve and maintain full staffing even in the wake of retirements and
resignations.
FISCAL IMPACT
Annual salary savings is common Citywide. It is also more frequent in the Police
Department due to the reasons discussed earlier in this report. As a result,
staffs recommended annual budget has historically included aline item in the
Police Department budget titled Expected Salary Savings. For the last few years
this budgeted line item has been in the amount of $250,000 formalizing an
anticipated salary savings. Actual salary savings in the Police Department is
usually significantly higher. Staff is recommending that the anticipated salary
savings be appropriated into salary and benefits to cover the cost 'over hiring"
two sworn police officers to accomplish a full staffing level in the Police Officer
ranks.
I_
It is recommended the City Council:
Appropriate the expected salary savings in the
additional salary and benefits, and authoft
additional Police Officers to achieve and main
Police Department.
Approved: U
William R. Kelly, City Manager
n;
Police Department for
e the hiring of two
ain full staffing in the
\ el�az
V r
Awn M� If0]
%°aley °tK STAFF REPORT
Police Department
DATE: January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert P. Sanderson, Chief of Police
By: Nancy Chik, Management Analyst
SUBJECT: Purchase of a High- Density Mobile Storage System for "the Police
Department
Recommendation: Waive the formal bid process and approve the purchase
and installation of a Spacesaver high - density mobile storage system for the
Police Department's Property /Evidence room from McMurray Stern in the
amount of $48,625.76.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of a high - density mobile
property/evidence storage system from McMurray Stern in the amount of $48;625.76.
McMurray Stern is the sole source vendor of the Spacesaver mobile storage system in
Southern California, and the funds have been budgeted in FY 2004 -2005 and FY 2006-
2007 Capital Improvement budget for this project.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
Due to budgetary constraints during the construction of the new police, facility, no
specialized mobile storage system was installed in the property /evidence room. Staff
realized that storage space would become an issue, so funds for a high - density storage
system having been budgeted over several years to initiate the project.
Property and evidence retention is governed by the severity of the crime and statute of
limitation. This can range from one year to an indefinite period of time. Because property
and evidence cannot be disposed of at will, the Department has run out of storage space
and 'a specialized rotary storage system is required to address the problem.
The Spacesaver high - density mobile storage system consists of steel shelving units
mounted on wheeled carriages that run on tracks. Individual modules compact together to
eliminate the need for multiple access aisles, thereby, reducing the amount of space
required by 50% or more.
Spacesaver has installed more than 75,000 systems in offices, hospitals, libraries,
warehouses, police departments, military bases, and laboratories. The Spacesaver
Corporation also specializes in the storage of property and evidence for law enforcement
use. Spacesaver has designed shelving units and components that offer more flexibility
and durability, and the custom designed storage system can also be locked for security.
Other storage system companies mainly offer shelving units for paper file storage and
lacks in shelving component flexibility. Additionally, a similar type of Spacesaver storage
system was installed in the Records Bureau during the construction of the police facility,
and it has proven to be a functional, reliable, and durable storage system.
Currently enough funds have been accrued to initiate this project with the purchase and
installation of two fixed storage units and six mobile storage units. Additional funds will be
budgeted in future Capital Improvement budget so more storage modules can be
purchased and installed for the entire property/evidence room.
McMurray Stern _ is the sole authorized Spacesaver area contractor for Los Angeles
County, and staff recommends the purchase and installation of the high - density mobile
storage system from this vendor.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff has budgeted a total of $56,000 in the FY 2004 -2005 and FY 2006 -2007 Capital
Improvement budget for this purchase and installation.
RECOMMENDATION
Waive the formal . bid process and approve the purchase and installation of a
Spacesaver high - density mobile storage system for the . Police Department's
Property /Evidence room from McMurray Stem in the amount of $48,625.76.
Approved:
William R. Kelly, City Manager
.r�
DATE: January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: William R. Kelly, City Manager
By`. Linda Garcia, Com nications, arketing and Special
Projects Manager'
SUBJECT: FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY PRIORITIES FOR 2007
Recommendation: Approve
SUMMARY
The Ferguson Group has represented the City of Arcadia for several years with regard
to federal legislative matters and revenue opportunities. Their efforts have resulted in
the receipt of millions of dollars to assist with various City projects.
Every year around Ahis time, the City Council reviews and approves projects for which
The Ferguson Group will focus on in the coming legislative session. This report
summarizes the two areas staff is suggesting we focus on in the coming year and asks
that the City Council set our federal lobbying priorities for 2007.
BACKGROUND
Since the beginning of our association with The Ferguson Group and our efforts to
lobby the federal government for financial assistance,, the City has been successful in
obtaining millions of dollars to assist with projects we would otherwise have difficulty
completing. The majority of this money has been for a comprehensive water
infrastructure improvement project that staff is working on in coordination with the City
of Sierra Madre. Significant monies, have also been received for traffic and road
improvement projects and a smaller amount was obtained for the Ruth and Charles Gilb
Arcadia Historical Museum.
While Arcadia has had excellent results with our federal lobbying program, it should be
noted that the availability of funds and the priorities of the federal government vary from
year to year, as does the willingness of legislators to provide money to local
jurisdictions. At this point it is unclear how the recent change in the composition of
Congress will affect allocations to local government and to Arcadia specifically. It is
important to remember that our ability to qualify for federal funds can sometimes be
hampered by the fact that Arcadia is an "upscale" community in terms of the income
level of our residents and by the fact that as a city we are in very good financial
condition.
Office of the City Manager
Mayor and City Council - 2007 Federal Legislative Priorities
January 16, 2007
Page 2
DISCUSSION
Staff recently met with Trent Lehman of The Ferguson Group and discussed several
projects and alternatives for approaching the City of Arcadia's federal funding requests
this year so that they will best meet federal criteria and be favorably received with
respect to the current environment in Washington, D.C. On the advice of Mr. Lehman,
staff is suggesting that we continue with the approach of concentrating on the highest
priority projects that fall within the general guidelines and areas where there is the most
discretion in terms of appropriations. Accordingly, staff is recommending that the City
pursue federal funding to assist with the following projects:
A. WATER PROJECTS
Joint Water Infrastructure Proiects - Arcadia and Sierra Madre
The cities of Arcadia and Sierra Madre have previously received funding for the
plans,- specifications and estimates for the design and construction of water
system facilities. The design and construction of these projects is imperative in
order to safeguard the quality and reliability of the drinking water supply for the
two cities in the event of a major seismic event in the region. Within this category
is Phase 2 of the East Raymond Basin Water Resources Plan that will increase
the yield of the basins, and construction of an emergency backup supply well that
will provide additional supply capability to serve both cities.
Grant request - $9,350,000 (cost of projects is approximately double this amount)
Zone III Well
The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Seismic Reliability Study in 1997 identified the
need for additional backup water supply wells to service Arcadia and Sierra
Madre. Construction of backup wells would satisfy the recommendation made in
the 1997. Construction of backup wells in our system are in addition to the
emergency backup well referenced above.
Grant request - $850,000 (cost of project is approximately double this amount)
Rehabilitation of the Baldwin Reservoir
Rehabilitation of the Baldwin Reservoir is necessary to ensure that it can
withstand a seismic event.
Grant request - $400,000 (cost of project is approximately double this amount)
t
Mayor and City Council - 2007 Federal Legislative Priorities
January 16, 2007
Page 3
Grant reouests for the U.S. Armv Corps of Engineers Section 219 Program
Water Resources Development Act Grant (WRDA)
Staff would like to continue to seek $20 million through the Water Resources
Development Act Grant Program for the East Raymond Basin Water Resource
Program, which involves joint projects with the City of Sierra Madre and the
County of Los Angeles, as well as the City of Arcadia Wastewater Infrastructure
Program'. Congress took no action on WRDA in 2006 and continues to review
funding requests.
M
There is a limited amount of space within the City of Arcadia for training Fire
Department personnel without disrupting private property owners and /or the
public. In the past, the City has utilized various private and public properties for
training purposes including Santa Anita Park and Westfield Santa Anita.
However, these facilities are becoming more unsuitable due to the lack of
adequate available space and federal and state requirements that prohibit runoff
-- t water from the training to enter the storm drain system.
To address this problem, staff is proposing the construction of a Joint Training
Facility that would be used , by City of Arcadia departments (Fire„ Police. and
Public Works Services) as well as the public safety departments of surrounding
jurisdictions. The facility would be large enough to conduct Fire Department
training such as hose lays large water flow master streams, ground ladder
deployment, defensive driving, search and rescue, confined space rescue, trench
rescue and high /low angle rope rescue. A primary element of the facility would
be a 40' tall steel training tower with an enclosed stairwell, exterior balconies,
accessible rooftops, water standpipe and sprinkler systems, a smoke generating
system, anchor points for repelling and a burn room for live fire training. An
underground "drafting" pit" would also be included to enable personnel to
practice drafting water from an open source such as alake, pool or stream, and
to conduct the annual fire pump testing required of Fire Department pumpers.
The drafting pit would connect to a drainage system to collect wastewater, utilized
during training, thus ensuring compliance with State wastewater requirements.
If constructed, the facility would be made available to Arcadia departments as
well as surrounding jurisdictions in support of our mutual goal of maintaining well -
trained firefighters, police officers and public works employees who are prepared
to respond to emergencies. The regional nature of the facility is also useful in
terms of our ability to obtain federal funding.
Grant request - $750,000 (project cost, not including any land acquisition that
may or may not be necessary)
Mayor and City Council - 2007 Federal Legislative Priorities
January 16, 2007
Page 4
FISCAL IMPACT
The purpose of this report is to ask the City Council to set the priorities for our legislative
advocacy efforts in the coming year, While , there is a City cost associated with
executing the projects mentioned in this report, there is no fiscal impact at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize staff to direct The Ferguson
Group to work on behalf of the City of Arcadia to seek funding for the water
projects and Joint Training Facility, referenced in this report;'" and further,
authorize staff to submit any documents or application forms for federal funding
as may be needed for each project.
A
• fyCOet'OBATf9��eo� P RT
STAFF RE O
Development Services Department
Date: January 16, 2007
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager /Development Services Director V
Martha Eros, Transportation Services Officer, �%q
Subject: Metro Gold Line Phase II Station Design and Art Review committee
recommendation for artwork, architectural elements and betterments
for the proposed Arcadia light rail station.
Recommendation: Approve
SUMMARY
On November 2, 2004, the Arcadia City Council approved staff's recommendation to
create an independent Station Design and Art Review (SDAR) committee to help
formulate the City's vision of public art and choose architectural features for the future
Metro Gold Line light rail station. Six Arcadia residents were appointed by the City
Council to select a station artist and recommend the final design and art features for the
station.
The SDAR committee held a total of eight meetings during the past two years and
selected artist Michael Davis to create a functional and aesthetic space on the station
platform, and address the open space and pedestrian walkway adjacent to the rail line.
The SDAR committee has completed its examination of standard and optional design
elements for the station, and recommends approval of the station architectural features
(as selected by SDAR) and the artwork created by Michael Davis. Additionally, the
SDAR committee respectfully recommends that the Arcadia City Council consider and
approve proposed "betterments ", or upgrades, of select art components. "Betterments"
are those items that exceed the Authority's $120,000 art budget for the baseline
features and amenities, street improvements, landscaping, hardscape, and artwork.
BACKGROUND
In October 2004, the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
(Authority) solicited applications from artists for the Gold Line Phase II station design art
program. The SDAR committee selected three finalists based on resume, portfolio of
previous public art projects, and their proposed vision, theme, style, materials and art
feature for the Arcadia rail station. The SDAR committee selected Michael Davis to
r1
LJ
design the artwork and provide guidance on fusing functionality, environment, and .
aesthetics for the project.
Michael Davis has 25 years experience in studio and public art, and has worked on
transit stations and streetscape projects in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Seattle WA.
Local projects include the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(MTA subway station at Hollywood /Highland, Sunset/Vermont bus shelter design, and
the 7 /Metro bench project.
On July 19, 2005, the Arcadia City Council approved the SDAR committee's proposal
for primary architectural elements, including color scheme, canopy configuration,
platform surface design, and placement of standard platform hardware (i.e., ticket
vending machines, benches).
On June 19, 2006, Authority staff presented the preliminary station artwork and visual
elements to the community at a public meeting held at the Arboretum Exhibit Hall, and
public comments were taken at that time. Based on community input and the SDAR's
goal to link the station platform to the parking structure, Mr. Davis' concept for the
Arcadia station includes pedestrian walkways that guide passengers to the light rail
platform. However, the Arcadia City Council will have final decision over the station
design.
DISCUSSION
The SDAR committee, city staff and the Authority has reviewed, critiqued, and approved •
advanced structural and art designs presented by architect Kathryn Lim and artist
Michael Davis, including secondary visual elements on /around the station, such as the
color of trash receptacles, cabinets, fencing, etc. A traditional scheme consisting of two
shelters with bluish -green canopies and charcoal - colored columns placed symmetrical
on each platform are recommended by the SDAR (Attachment A).
Once the advanced station artwork, visual elements, and betterments are approved by
City Council, these recommendations will be included in the Advanced Conceptual
Engineering drawings and the Final Environmental Impact Report/Statement
documents. The final artwork design is subject to review by the Authority's project
conservator, engineer, fabricator, and the MTA to test for safety, durability and
maintenance. Also, the final color selection will be determined by paint samples.
The Authority requests the Arcadia City Council approve the following recommendations
from the SDAR committee:
L Station Visual Elements
a. Desion Theme Station aesthetics, architecture and color will reflect the City's
logo. The station platform structure and surrounding hardscape follow a
prototype adopted by the Authority and the MTA that must comply with .
2
. federal standards. The Arcadia station will include two landing platforms,
covered pedestrian shelters, benches, fencing, lighting, safety equipment,
way - finding signs and ticket vending equipment.
b. Station Architectural Elements The following are the station elements and
their corresponding color. The Arcadia City Council approved Baseline
Station Elements numbers 1 -9 (bold highlight) on July 19, 2005.
CACCI IKM CTATInM PI FMFIdTC
Station Visual Elements
Color
1*
Canopy roofing
Blue-green
2*
Canopy utters and flashing
Charcoal
3*
Canopy roofing underside
Cream
4*
Canopy framing members
Charcoal
5*
Canopy post
Charcoal
6*
Lean bar
Stainless steel
7*
Canopy pos base
Natural concrete
8*
Platform pavers
Charcoal and Natural Gray
(Herringbone pattern). Note:
Artist added second color
9*
Light fixtures and pole
Charcoal
10
Bench
Titanium Silver
11
Pedestrian crossing ate
Titanium Silver
12
Trash receptacle
Stone Gra
13
Guardrail
Titanium Silver
14
Bicycle rack
Stainless steel
15
OCS poles station area
Silver
16
Cabinets station area
Silver
17
Picket fence station perimeter)
Titanium Silver
18
Warning Strip (platform)
Black
19
Detectable warning strip
Federal yellow
20
Walkway finish
Concrete with broom finish
21
Ramp finish
Concrete with buff wash
22
Platform stairs and landing finish
Concrete w/ broom finish
23
Map case, Ticket vending machine,
and Validator
Stainless steel
24
Station pylon
Stainless steel
25
Public address intercom, Closed
circuit TV, and Public address
Charcoal
26
Bic cle lockers
White w/ blue-green door
27
Transformer station area
Silver
28
Metering pedestal
Silver
29
Backflow preventor enclosure
Black
30
Traction power substation
Sae Blue -Green
*Highlighted elements No. 1 -9 previously approved by Arcadia City Council.
3
U. Station Art Financed by Metro Gold Line Authority Art Budget
A primary concern the SDAR committee expressed was pedestrian connectivity
between the two station platforms and the parking structure across the street
(Attachment B). Mr. Davis has designed a two -color paver scheme and /or paver pattern
from fhe east/westbound platforms and the parking structure to serve as a way finding
strategy that links pedestrians between the two areas.
Mr. Davis designed a unique sculpture depicting Arcadian icons on the limbs of the
structure for placement in the proposed plaza adjacent to the station parking structure
(Attachment C). The MTA will maintain the landscaping in its right -of -way, but the
Arcadia City Council could consider entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with
the MTA to allow the City to maintain the landscaping in the plaza area. The SDAR
committee is recommending upgrading the vegetation in the plaza to create a cooler
green environment and adding an oak tree to reflect one of the City's signature
trademarks.
A translucent -panel canopy over the parking structure entrance leading into the plaza
area will tie in the landscaping colors and a proposed canopy enhancement on the
station platform (Attachment C, D).
111. Proposed Betterments Requiring Local City Financing
The SDAR committee supports and recommends all enhanced or upgraded elements •
( "betterments ") proposed by the station artist to various portions of the station platform,
pedestrian walkway, and land adjacent to the station parking structure. "Betterments"
are those items that exceed the Authority's budget for the baseline work for the station,
street improvements, landscaping, hardscape, and artwork.
The list of "betterments" include:
1. Replacing the metal canopy cover on the platform shelters with an upgraded
translucent panel (referred to as Kalwal) to reflect the natural lighting of the
environment (Attachment D);
2. Installing brick pavers on the pedestrian ramps and crosswalks connecting the
platforms and parking structure instead of "stamped" concrete;
3. Replacing the metal canopies on platform hardware (i.e., ticket vending
machines and map /wayfinding case) with same upgraded translucent panels;
4. Additional vegetation and lighting, installation of an oak tree, and benches in the
plaza area adjacent to parking structure;
5. Additional pedestrian lighting on the street property leading to the station and
parking structure.
Below is a list of the potential betterments and estimated costs associated with them.
These costs are in 2006 dollars and will be escalated using the CPI Index to the year of
expenditure. The City Council has the option of selecting all or some of these items. •
2
Please note, Item 1 and 1 A are for the same areas and therefore one or the other may
. be selected.
RFTTFRMFNTS TGRI.F
Item Description
Total Difference
Price
Pavers:
1
Change 2.5' concrete (4" total baseline) to 2" pavers on
$ 137,218.4
112" sand
Colored concrete:
1A
Change 4" concrete to stamped colored 4" concrete
$ 54,908.7
Translucent panels:
2
Change metal canopy on NM /Map Case to translucent
$ 1,152.00
_p anels
3
Translucent panels:
$ 16,356.8
' Change metal canopy on platform to translucent panels
Plaza adjacent to station parking structure:
4
dd plaza with upgrade to landscaping and add lighting,
$ 122,861.3
benches, etc.
Pedestrian lighting:
5
Add pedestrian lighting from station to parking structure
$ 90,000.0
SUBTOTAL (1 -5) BEFORE MARK -UPS"
$ 367, 588.5
SUBTOTAL (1A -5) BEFORE MARK -UPS
$ 285,278.8
TOTAL WITH MARK -UPS* (i THRU 5)
$ 606,521.1
TOTAL WITH MARK -UPS (1A THRU 5)
$ 470,710.08
Mark -Ups: Labor (20 %), Equipment (10 %), Materials (10 %), Subcontractors (5 %), Contingency (20 %)
The Art Committee has reviewed all options and architectural suggestions presented by
artist Michael Davis, and support the design as a whole unit for City Council
consideration and approval. However, the Arcadia City Council will have the final
decision over the station design.
The City Council may select one or all of the proposed SDAR betterments, and subject
to availability of future funding sources, prioritize the list (at a future meeting) for
consideration prior to the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension project entering the
Design /Build phase.
I. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT •
The Final Environmental Impact Report/Study (EIR /S) was completed in August 2005
and is currently under review by the FTA. A formal Record of Decision will be issued
when the FTA approves the project.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority will construct the rail
infrastructure and a fully functional station according to Federal, State and Public Utility
Commission (PUC) standards. The average cost of a rail station with mandatory
structural and safety elements is approximately $3 -5 million based on the complexity of
the alignment and a center (one) versus side (two) platform station.
The Authority has budgeted $120,000 for artwork at each station, which includes the
major standing sculpture, the pedestrian canopy at the parking lot entrance, and the
materials, installation, design and construction of these two pieces. Enhancements or
improvements beyond the baseline standard station design, such as additional street
improvements (i.e., brick pavers instead of concrete), hardscape (i.e., concrete
pathways), landscape (i.e., vegetation and oak tree), or structural elements (i.e., canopy
material upgrade to translucent panels), are "betterments" (or upgrades) that may
require up to $600,000 in alternate funding sources.
The City will be responsible for funding the difference between baseline costs and the •
betterment costs as indicated in proposed Betterments Table. The City Council can
select and prioritize betterments subject to availability of future funding sources once
the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension project receives Federal authorization and funds
to proceed with the Design /Build phase. The Arcadia City Council will have final
decision over the station design.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Arcadia City Council approve the Metro Gold Line Phase II Station
Design and Art Review committee recommendation for artwork and baseline
station elements, and determine whether to proceed with betterments for the
proposed Arcadia light rail station as recommended by the Station Design and
Art Review Committee subject to future available funding sources.
Approved by: ` - I
William R. Kelly, City Manager
Attachments:
A. Station Platform, Canopy Placement
B. Station Site Plan and Pedestrian Access
C. Proposed Art Features /Design
D. Example of Kalwal Canopy at Metro Gold Line - Southwest Museum Station
0
'l
P
MIN
lYtr i � r
/ 1
DATE: January 16, 2007
TO: Mayor and City Council ��I��feee�����'
FROM: William R. Kelly, City Manager
By: Linda Garcia, Com unications, arketing and Special
Projects Manager
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
At the December 5, 2006 City Council meeting, staff was directed to bring back for
Council consideration an ordinance to prohibit on private property in Arcadia the
attraction of or feeding of peafowl. Said ordinance is attached and presented for
introduction.
DISCUSSION
At the December 5, 2006 City Council meeting, staff was directed to bring back for
Council consideration an ordinance to prohibit on private property in the City of Arcadia
the attraction of or feeding of peafowl. (The City already prohibits the feeding of these
animals on public property.) While peafowl are cherished by Arcadians, the problems
associated with the birds (noise, damage to landscaping, debris) tend to be exacerbated
because of the large population. The purpose of this ordinance is to try to alleviate the
concentrations of peafowl that are occurring in some sections of the City. The hope is
that if residents do not intentionally feed the .birds or otherwise attract them to their
home that the groupings will spread out and therefore be less troublesome.
The language in Ordnance No. 2224 is self explanatory as to its intent. If introduced
tonight, the ordinance will come back on February 6, 2007 for adoption.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
Office of the City Manager
OF ARCADIA
Recommendation: Introduce
Mayor and City Council - introduction of Ordinance No. 2224
January 16, 2007
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council introduce Ordinance No. 2224, an
ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, adding Section
4137.8 to Article IV, Part 3, Division 7 of the Arcadia Municipal Code relating to
the feeding of peafowl within the City of Arcadia.
Attachment
r
ORDINANCE NO. 2224
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA; CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 4137.8 TO ARTICLE
IV, PART 3, DIVISION 7 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THE FEEDING OF PEAFOWL WITHIN THE CITYOF
ARCADIA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 4137.8 is hereby added to the Arcadia Municipal Code
to read as follows:
Sec. 4137.8. ATTRACTING PEAFOWL PROHIBITED
No person shall feed or leave food, food product, grain, pet food, or refuse on
private property, or otherwise maintain private property in a manner that constitutes
a lure, attraction or enticement to peafowl.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and
shall cause a copy of the same to be published in the official newspaper of the City
of Arcadia within fifteen (15) days after its adoption.
Passed, approved and adopted this day of , 2007.
Mayor of the City of Arcadia
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
kph P,
Stephen P. Deitsch
(74
9
STAFF REPORT
Office of the City Attorney
DATE: January 16, 2007
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 1 n L,.�
FROM: STEPHEN P. DEITSCH, CITY ATTORNEY Sr �� r ' L � a' "I
BY: LISA MUSSENDEN, INTERIM CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6551 ORDERING THE SUBMISSION
TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AT
THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2007 OF A CERTAIN MEASURE TO
ELIMINATE EMINENT DOMAIN AND TO PROTECT EXISTING
LAND USES IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE:
AND
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 6552 SETTING PRIORITIES FOR
FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY MEASURE
AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS FOR THE MEASURE
Ballot Title: Initiative Measure To Amend The Arcadia Municipal
Code To (1) Eliminate The Use Of Eminent Domain for Purposes of
Taking Private Property for Private Use, (2) Promote Economic
Development And (2) Protect Existing Land Uses In The Central
Business District Zone
Recommendation: Adopt Resolutions Calling For Measure to be
Submitted to Voters at a Special Municipal Election (to be
combined with the special election currently scheduled for May 8,
2007)
SUMMARY:
Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9222, the City Council may submit a
legislatively- sponsored initiative directly to the voters by adopting a resolution
ordering a special election on the measure. Elections Code Sections 9218 and
9221 permit the City Council to place conflicting initiatives on the same ballot; the
measure that receives the most votes takes precedence in an initiative election.
Page 1 of 3
BACKGROUND:
On November 21, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6545 ordering a
special election on "An Initiative Measure to Amend the General Plan and Zoning
Regulations Relating to Permitted and Prohibited Uses within the Central
Business District Zone" ( "Initiative "). If approved by the voters, the Initiative
would prohibit new automobile sale, storage, and repair services from being
established in the city block bounded by Santa Anita Avenue, Morlan Place, and
Huntington Drive ( "City Block ") and would establish a two -year moratorium on
existing auto - related uses in the City Block. If approved, the Initiative also would
prohibit the expansion of Rusnak Mercedes into the City Block, which likely
would have the effect of decreasing the amount of revenue that potentially could
be paid into the General Fund by Rusnak.
The City may submit its own competing initiative to the voters on the same ballot
as the Initiative. If both pass, whichever of the two initiatives receives the most
votes prevails. Unlike the prior Initiative, the City's proposed initiative would
eliminate the use of eminent domain by the Redevelopment Agency on the City
Block and throughout the Central Business District Zoning Area and would
protect all existing land uses in the City Block. The City's proposed initiative
would also prohibit the City (not just the Redevelopment Agency) from
condemning private property to give it to another private party for development or
private use. If the voters approve the City's proposed initiative, auto - related uses
would continue to be permitted within the City Block as they are under current
zoning.
At this point, the City Council can elect to pursue one of the following courses of
action:
1. Allow the special election on the Initiative to proceed on May 8,
2007 without the proposed competing measure on the same ballot;
2. Order a special election on the proposed competing initiative to be
held on the same date, May 8, 2007, as the special municipal
election on the Initiative.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council may choose one (1) of the following two (2) options regarding
the competing initiative,
A. Adopt the attached two (2) Resolutions ordering the proposed competing
initiative to be submitted to the voters at the same special municipal
election as the Initiative on May 8, 2007; and setting priorities for filing
written arguments and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial
analysis.
Page 2 of 3
B. Take no further action and allow the Initiative to proceed to the ballot at
the special election set for May 8, 2007.
Should the City Council wish to place the measure before the voters pursuant to
option A, the following specific resolutions require adoption:
CITY SPECIAL ELECTION (OPTION A
• Resolution No. 6551 ordering the submission to the qualified electors of
the City of Arcadia at the special municipal election to be held on
Tuesday, May 8, 2007, of a certain measure to eliminate domain and to
protect existing land uses in the Central Business District Zone.
• Resolution No. 6552 setting priorities for filing written arguments regarding
a City Measure and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial
analysis for the measure. (If approved, the date for filing arguments would
be January 30, 2007)
APPROVED:
iCA
William R. Kelly
City Manager
Attachments
Page 3 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 6551
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION
TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA AT THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2007 OF A CERTAIN
MEASURE TO ELIMINATE EMINENT DOMAIN AND TO
PROTECT EXISTING LAND USES IN THE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE
WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election on Tuesday, May 8, 2007 has
been called by Resolution No. 6545 adopted by the City Council on November 21,
2006; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires and intends to submit to the
voters at said Special Municipal Election a proposed ordinance relating to eminent
domain and to permitted land uses in the Central Business District Zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY, FIND, DETERMINE AND
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council, pursuant to its right and authority, does
order submitted to the voters at the May 8, 2007 Special Municipal Election the
following question:
1
MEASURE "B"
Shall an ordinance amending the Arcadia Municipal
Code and Redevelopment Plan to (1) eliminate the use
of eminent domain for purposes of taking private
property for private use, (2) promote economic
development, (3) protect existing land uses in the
Central Business District Zone, and (4) preserve the
rights of private property owners to reasonably and
lawfully use and develop their property, be adopted?
YES
NO
SECTION 2. The proposed measure submitted to the voters is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A ".
SECTION 3. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the Special
Municipal Election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding
municipal elections.
SECTION 4. Notice of the time and place of holding the election is
given as set forth in City Council Resolution No. 6545, and the City Clerk is
authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the
election, in time, form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
2
Passed, approved, and adopted this 16th day of January, 2007.
1
Mayor of the City of Arcadia
ATTEST:
A ` ■ ■
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
U
City Attorney
3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS:
CITY OF ARCADIA )
I, JAMES H. BARROWS, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certifies
that the foregoing Resolution No. 6551 was passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of January, 2007 and that said Resolution
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Member Amundson, Harbicht, Segal, Wuo and Chandler
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
St JAMES H V'°°PP d' S.
City Clerk of the City of Arcadia
9
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE
ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1) ELIMINATE THE USE OF
EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PURPOSES OF TAKING PRIVATE
PROPERTY FOR PRIVATE USE, (2) PROMOTE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT, (3) PROTECT EXISTING LAND USES IN THE
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE, AND (4) PRESERVE
THE RIGHTS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS TO
REASONABLY AND LAWFULLY USE AND DEVELOP THEIR
PROPERTY
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2006, "An Initiative Measure to Amend the
General Plan and Zoning Regulations Relating to Permitted and Prohibited Uses
Within the Central Business District Zone" ( "CBD Measure ") qualified for a
Special Municipal Election pursuant to California Elections Code Section 9214;
and
WHEREAS, under the existing Arcadia General Plan and Arcadia Municipal
Code, automobile sale, storage, and repair services are permitted on the city block
bounded by Santa Anita Avenue, Morlan Place, and Huntington Drive ( "City
Block "); and
WHEREAS, it is important to the City that the automobile sale, storage, and
repair services be permitted to continue on the City Block to enhance and generate
general fund revenue to pay for necessary city services and city improvements; and
EXHI T "A`
1
WHEREAS, the CBD Measure would amend the Arcadia General Plan and
Arcadia Municipal Code to prohibit automobile sales, storage, and repair services,
and their expansion, on the City Block; and
WHEREAS, the CBD Measure also would require the amortization of
existing automobile sales, storage, and repair services on the City Block within two
years of the measure passing and would create additional permitted uses on the
City Block for businesses existing prior to January 1, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and declares that the promotion and
encouragement of economic development in the City is vital to the City's
continued existence; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that providing property and business
owners certainty regarding the return on their investments effectively promotes and
encourages economic development in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that protecting existing permitted land
uses within the City provides property and business owners with certainty- - --
regarding the return on their investments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that prohibiting the use of eminent
domain for the purpose of transferring private property to private entities is an
effective means of protecting existing permitted land uses within the City; and
WHEREAS, California Elections Code Section 9222 vests a City Council
2
with legal authority to place on a ballot any legislative matter within the subject
matter of the jurisdiction of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to submit to the voters of the City of
Arcadia at a Special Municipal Election an Ordinance prohibiting the City's ability
to use eminent domain to transfer private property to private entities, as an
alternative to the CBD Measure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and declares that property and business
owners' investment expectations would be strengthened by this Ordinance -- -- --
requiring the voters to approve any repeal or amendment of Arcadia Municipal
Code Article IX, Chapter 9, or Section 303 of the Redevelopment Plan for the
Central Redevelopment Project, or Section 9264.2.11 of Article IX, Part 6,
Division 4, Title 2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Article IX, Chapter 9, Sections 9900 -9902 of the Arcadia
Municipal Code are hereby added to read as follows:
"Chapter 9. Eminent Domain.
Section 9900. Purpose and Intent.
3
This Ordinance is adopted to achieve the following purposes, among other
purposes, and the people of the City of Arcadia hereby direct that the provisions of
this Ordinance be interpreted in order to accomplish these purposes:
(a) The people of the City of Arcadia find and declare that the use of
eminent domain by local government agencies to take private property for private
use impedes economic development.
(b) The people of the City of Arcadia find and declare that the protection
of existing permitted land uses in the City promotes economic development.
(c) The people of the City of Arcadia find and declare that adopting clear
policies concerning the City's use of eminent domain and existing permitted land
uses will provide certainty for business and property owners and encourage
economic investment in the City.
(c) The people of the City of Arcadia desire to remove impediments to
economic growth within the City and to promote economic development.
Section 9901. Definitions.
As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following
ascribed meanings:
(a) "Owner" means the owner of the fee title interest in the property to be
acquired, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, or other more current
proof of vesting the City has in its possession.
4
(b) "Property" shall mean any interest in real or personal property
otherwise subject to acquisition through the use of eminent domain.
(c) "City- Affiliated Agency" shall mean the City of Arcadia and/or any
other entity possessing the power of eminent domain, the governing board of
which is solely comprised of, or is solely appointed by, the members of the City
Council of the City of Arcadia.
Section 9902. Limitations on the Use of Eminent Domain.
Neither the City of Arcadia nor any City- Affiliated Agency may exercise the
power of eminent domain to acquire any property from any private owner thereof,
without such owner's consent, where the purpose of the acquisition at the time of
acquisition is the intended conveyance of the property so acquired to any other
private party, for the conduct of any for - profit commercial activity."
SECTION 2. Paragraph 5, Section 303, of the Redevelopment Plan for
Arcadia Redevelopment Agency Central Redevelopment Project is hereby deleted
in its entirety and amended to read as follows:
"The Agency shall not acquire real property through the commencement of
eminent domain proceedings. For purposes of this Redevelopment Plan, the
Agency will be deemed to have "commenced" eminent domain proceedings when
it has adopted a resolution of necessity pursuant to California Code of Civil
Procedure Sections 1245.210 et seq. (or successor statutes)."
5
Section 9264.2.11 of the Arcadia Municipal Code is hereby added to read as
follows:
"Section 9264.2.11. Additional Permitted Uses.
In addition to the uses set forth in Sections 9264.2.2 through 9264.2.10, the
following uses shall be expressly permitted on the city block bounded by Santa
Anita, Morlan Place, and Huntington Drive as those streets existed on January 1,
2006:
(a) Any restaurant, eating establishment, coffee houses, juice bar,
delicatessen, or similar uses, that existed on the block prior to January 1, 2006;
(b) Any public storage facility that existed on the block prior to January
1, 2006;
(c) Any membership club or association that existed on the block prior to
January 1, 2006;
(d) Vehicular parking and vehicular access that existed on the block prior
to January 1, 2006."
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall go into effect ten
(10) days after the date on which the election results are declared by the City
Council.
rl
SECTION 4. Competing Measures.
In the event that another ballot measure ( "Competing Initiative ") appears on
the same ballot as this Ordinance, and such Competing Initiative seeks to adopt or
impose any Municipal Code or Redevelopment Plan provisions that differ in any
regard from or supplement those contained in this Ordinance, the voters hereby
express and declare their intent that if both the Competing Initiative and this
Ordinance receive a majority of the votes cast, and -if -this Ordinance receives -a
greater number of votes than the Competing Initiative, then this Ordinance shall
prevail in its entirety over the Competing Initiative without regard to whether
specific provisions of each measure directly conflict with each other. Under these
circumstances, the Competing Initiative shall have no force or effect and shall be
►o d
SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Ordinance. The people hereby declare that they would have approved this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or
portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one of more sections, subsections,
7
subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
SECTION 6. Repeal, Alteration, Modification, Amendment. All
amendment or proposed repeals of the provisions contained in this Ordinance shall
require voter approval to become effective.
SECTION 7. Codification. Upon the Effective Date of this Ordinance,
as provided in Section 3, the City Clerk, in consultation with the City Attorney, is
hereby authorized and directed to codify this Ordinance in the City's Municipal
Code.
Passed, approved and adopted this day of
200.
Mayor of the City of Arcadia
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Stephen P. Deitsch
City Attorney
L•'
RESOLUTION NO. 6552
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING
WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND
DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS FOR THE MEASURE
WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election is to be held in the City of
Arcadia, California, on Tuesday, May 8, 2007 at which there will be submitted to
the voters the following measure:
MEASURE B
Shall an ordinance amending the Arcadia Municipal Code and
Redevelopment Plan to (1) eliminate the use of eminent domain for purposes
of taking private property for private use, (2) promote economic development,
(3) protect existing land uses in the Central Business District Zone, and (4)
preserve the rights of private property owners to reasonably and lawfully use
and develop their property, be adopted?
WHEREAS, the Elections Code allows the City Council, or a member or
members of the City Council authorized by the City Council, to submit an
argument for or against ballot measures; and
WHEREAS, the Elections Code mandates that the City Clerk, as the City
Election Official, when selecting arguments to print in the official election
materials, must give priority to the following arguments in the following order:
1
(1) the City Council or member(s) of the City Council authorized by the
City Council to submit an argument;
(2) the individual voter, or bona fide association of citizens, or
combination of voters and associations, who are the bona fide
sponsors or proponents of the ballot measure;
(3) bona fide associations of citizens; and
(4) individual voters who are eligible to vote on the measures; and
WHEREAS, the Elections Code also authorizes the City Council to direct
the City Attorney to prepare an "Impartial Analysis" of any measure submitted to
the voters.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Written Argument The City Council authorizes any and
all members of the City Council to file a written argument in favor of or against
the proposed measure as specified above, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3,
Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of California, and to change the
arguments until and including the date fixed by the City Clerk for filing primary
arguments, after which no arguments for or against the proposed measure may be
submitted to the City Clerk, pursuant to Section 9286 of the Elections Code of the
State of California.
2
• 11
SECTION 2. Format of Written Argument. All arguments concerning
the proposed measure shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed
names and signatures of the authors submitting them, or if submitted on behalf of
an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature
of at least one of its principal officers who is the author of the argument. The
arguments shall be accompanied by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Authors
of Argument.
SECTION 3. Priority of Arguments The City Council directs the City
Clerk to abide by Section 9287 of the Elections Code when selecting arguments in
favor of and against the proposed measure by giving preference and first priority to
arguments by the City Council or the member(s) of the City Council authorized by
the City Council to submit arguments.
SECTION 4. Impartial Analysis. The City Council directs the City
Clerk to transmit a copy of the proposed measure to the City Attorney. The City
Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the proposed measure showing the
effect of the proposed measure on the existing law and the operation of the
proposed measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City
Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
3
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
Passed, approved and adopted this 16th day of January 2007.
.�.
Mayor of the City of Arcadia
ATTEST:
/S JAMES H. BARROW
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
j av Z- ;z
�e A
City Attorney
rd
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS:
CITY OF ARCADIA )
I, JAMES H. BARROWS, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certifies
that the foregoing Resolution No. 6552 was passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 16th day of January, 2007 and that said Resolution
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Member Amundson, Harbicht, Segal, Wuo and Chandler
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Clerk of the City of Arcadia
5