HomeMy WebLinkAbout5932
RESOLUTION NO. 5932
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA FINDING THE CITY OF ARCADIA TO BE IN CONFORMANCE
WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING
THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089.
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(MTA), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted
the CMP on November 17, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that the MT A annually determine that the
County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MT A of the CMP local
implementation report by September I, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 20, 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That the City of Arcadia has taken all of the following actions, and
that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1993 CMP.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP
Transportation Demand Management Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis
program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use
Analysis Program Chapter.
The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made a
part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances
traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation
improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the
Countywide Deficiency Plan.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the MT A.
Passed, approved and adopted this 20th day of August, 1996.
ATTEST:
/--c~~
MaYOli'ofthe City of Arcadia
Pro Tern
AJ
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
rn~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) s:
CITY OF ARCADIA )
I, JUNE D. ALFORD, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 5932 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Arcadia,
signed by the Mayor;\md attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council
Pro Tern
held on August 20, 1996, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to
wit:
A YES: Councilmembers Chang. Harbicht, Young and Kuhn
NOES: lIone
ABSENT: lIone
<, -<..I..J)
Cit erk of the City of
- 2 - 5932
APPE"UIX F - INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETIKG 1995 LOCAL IMPLEME"TAll0N REPORT
PAGE F-g
EXHIBIT F-2
DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY
JURISDICTION: CITY OF ARCADIA
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal [from Section I] (-) (756.71)
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims [from + -0-
Section II]
Subtotal Current Credit (Goal) = (756.71)
3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's Local Implementation
Report + 11,645.00
I NET DEFICIENCY PLAN BALANCE I = 10,888.29 I
CONTACf: Jim Kasama, Associate Planner
PHO!\'E: (813) 574-5445
1993 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County
November 1993
-3-
5932
APPENDIX F - INSTRUCnONS FOR COMPLETING 1995 LOCAL IMPLEME"TAll0N REPORT
PAGE F-9
EXHIBIT F-3
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category Number of Dwelling Units Impact Sub-total
Value
Single Family -48- x 6.80 = (326.4<)
Multi-Family -35- x 4.76 = (166.69
Group Quarters -o- x 1.98 = ( -0- )
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category Thousands of Value per Sub-total
Gross Square Feet 1000 sq.ft.
Commercial 0-299 KSF -O- x 22.23 = ( -0- )
Commercial 300+ KSF -o- x 17.80 = ( -0- )
Free-Standing
Eating and Drinking -9.62- x 66.99 = (644.4~
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
.
Category Thousands of Value per Sub-total
Gross Square Feet 1000 sq.ft.
Lodging -o- x 7.21 = ( -0- )
Industrial ~5,32" x 6.08 = (32'.35)
Office 0-49 KSF -o- x 16.16 = ( -0- )
Office 50-299 KSF -o- x 10.50 = ( -0- )
Office 300 + KSF -o- x 7.35 = ( -0- )
Medical -o- x 16.90 = ( -0- )
Government -o- x 20.95 = ( -0- )
Ins titutional/Education -o- x 7.68 = ( -0- )
Other (Describe) Daily Trips Impact Sub-total
Value
-none- -o- x 0.71 = ( -0- )
ADJUSTMENTS (OPTIONAL) - Complete Part 2 = + 413.08
I TOTAL CURRENT CONGESTION MITIGATION GOAL (POINTS) = (756.7'). I
1993 Congestion Management Program for UJS Angeles County
No,'ember 1993
-{<,-
5932
ApPENDIX F - INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING 1995 LOCAL IMPLEMEI'ITATION REPORT
PAGE F-lO
EXHIBIT F-3 (continued)
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for I) development permits that were both issued and
revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the
reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Number of Dwelling Units Impact Sub-total
Value
Single Family -48- x 6.80 = 326.40
Multi-Family -14- x 4.76 = 66.64
Group Quarters -O- x 1.98 = -0-
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Thousands of Value per Sub-total
Gross Square Feet 1000 sq.ft.
Commercial 0-299 KSF -O- x 22.23 = -0-
Commercial 300+ KSF -O- x 17.80 = -0-
Eating and Drinking -O- x 66.99 = -0-
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category Thousands of Value per Sub-total
Gross Square Feet 1000 sq.ft.
Lodging -O- x 7.21 = -0-
Industrial -0- , x 6.08 = -0-
Office 0-49 KSF -1. 24- x 16.16 = 20.04
-
Office 50-299 KSF -O- x 10.50 = -0-
Office 300 + KSF -O- x 7.35 = -0-
Medical -O- x 16.90 = -0-
Government -O- x 20.95 = -0-
Institutional/Ed ucation -O- x 7.68 = -0-
Other (Describe) Daily Trips Impact Sub-total
Value
-none- -O- x 0.71 = -0-
I TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS, POINTS = 413.08 I
1993 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County
NOl'ember 1993
-5-
5932
APPENDIX F - INSTRUcnONS FOR COMPLETING 1995 locAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT
PAGE F-II
EXHIBIT F-3 (continued)
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
(NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
Low/Very Low Income Housing
High Density Resid. near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments near Rail
Stations
Development Agreements entered into
I -0- I
I -0- I
EE
-0-
EB
-0-
6
-0-
EE]
-0-
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
1000 gross sf
Dwelling Units
1000 gross sf
Dwelling Units
1000 gross sf
Dwelling Units
1000 gross sf
Dwelling Units
prior to July 10, 1989
Reconstruction of buildings damaged in
the April 1992 Civil Unrest
Reconstruction of buildings damaged in
the January 1994 earthquake
EXEI\WfED DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS:
1. Low/Very Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and
Community Development as follows:
Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the median income, with adjustments for family size.
Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the median income, with adjustments for family size.
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density
allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station, if more than half of the land :rea, or floor area, of the mixed use development is
used for high density residential housinf
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under
Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. April 1992 Civil Unrest Reconstruction: until June I, 1995, buildings and structures damaged or
destroyed in Los Angeles County as a result of civil unrest during the state of emergency declared
by the Governor on April. 29, 1992.
6. January 1994 Earthquake Reconstruction: until June 1, 1997, buildings and structures damaged or
destroyed in Los Angeles County as a result of the January 1994 earthquake.
7. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning
regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval
authority.
These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the Local Implementation Report.
/993 Cong<stion Managem<nt Program for Los Angtlu County
NOVUMU /993 (R<vis<d 2/94)
-6-
5932