Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5366 RESOLUTION NO. 5366 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THAT CERTAIN DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND STANLEY W. GRIBBLE AND ASSOCIATES, AND RECOMMENDING THE. ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH REGARD THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California (the "City Council") has approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan of the Central Redevelopment Project, as amended (the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Redevelopment Plan, the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and Stanley W. Gribble and Associates, a sole proprietorship (the "Developer") have entered into a certain Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the Agency and the Developer dated May 6, 1986 (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which the Developer shall acquire from the Agency and thereafter develop certain real property located on the south side of east Huntington Drive between the separated grade railroad crossing and 5th Avenue in the Central Redevelopment Project (the "property"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Developer is required to construct on the Property a mixed use commercial complex, appurtenant improvements, landscaping and vehicle parking facilities (the "Project"); and - I - 5366 WHEREAS, following the execution of the Agreement, the Developer has proposed that the scope of development and description of the Project be modified in certain respects; and WHEREAS, the Agency and the Developer have prepared Amendment No. I to the Agreement ("Amendment No.1"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by reference, pursuant to which, among other matters, the scope and development and description of the project, and the schedule of performance of certain obligations, have been modified from that set forth in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, at the time of the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, the City Council and the Agency duly approved and adopted an Environmental Impact Report concerning the Redevelopment Plan, in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"); and WHEREAS, at the time of the approval of the Agreement, the Agency duly approved and adopted an Environmental Impact Report concerning the Proj ect, together with an Addendum thereto and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Agency Staff has prepared an Initial Study of the Project as set forth in Amendment No.1, in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and based upon the Initial Study, the Agency - 2 - 5366 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration (the "Negative Declaration") regarding Amendment No. I, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by reference, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA: and WHEREAS, the Project, as amended, as set forth in Amendment No. 1 falls within the analysis, findings, determinations. mitigation measures and parameters of the Environmental Impact Report concerning the Redevelopment Plan and the Environmental Impact Report, together with the Addendum thereto and Statement of Overriding Considerations, concerning the Agreement, as heretofore adopted; and ( WHEREAS, there is no substantial or other evidence that changes in the Project, as amended, as set forth in Amendment No.1, may have a significant effect upon the environment; and WHEREAS, the Agency Staff has prepared a certain report (the "Report"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and is incorporated herein by reference, which summarizes certain costs to the Agency of Amendment No.1, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 33433: and WHEREAS, the city Council and the Agency have duly conducted a joint public hearing, pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 33431 and 33433, concerning the proposed adoption of Amendment No. 1 and concerning the proposed adoption of the Negative Declaration: and - 3 - 5366 WHEREAS, it is reasonable and appropriate for the City Counci 1 to recommend to the Agency the approva I of Amendment No, 1 and the Negative Declaration based upon the evidence and testimony presented to the City Council at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. are true and correct. The facts set forth in the Recitals hereof Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the project, as amended, as set forth in Amendment No. 1 attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, falls within the analysis, findings, determinations, mitigation measures and parameters of the Environmental Impact Report concerning the Redevelopment Plan and the Environmental Impact Report, together with the Addendum thereto and Statement of Overriding Considerations, concerning the Agreement, as heretofore adopted. Section 3.. The City Council hereby further finds and determines that changes in the Project, as amended, as set forth in Amendment No.1, will not have a significant effect upon the environment, and the City Council hereby recommends that the Agency approve and adopt the Negative Declaration, a copy of which is set - 4 - 5366 forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. The City Council hereby accepts and approves the Report, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "CO and is incorporated herein by reference. Section 5. The City Council hereby ratifies and incorporates herein by reference any and all findings and determinations of the City Council as set forth in that certain Resolution No. 5297 of the City Council adopted on May 6, 1986 approving the Agreement, and the City Council hereby finds and determines that the findings and determinations set forth in said Resolution are applicable to Amendment No.1. Section 6. The City Counci I hereby approves Amendment NO, 1, and the City Council hereby authorizes the sale of the Property by the Agency to the Developer in accordance with the Agreement, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ilth day of August, . xdd~ ~~~- 'Mayor of the City of Arcadia, California 1987. ~fk~. city Clerk of the City of Arcadia, California - 5 - 5366 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ARCADIA ) ) ss. ) I, CHRISTINE VAN MAANEN, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 5366 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 4th day of August , 1987, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski, Gilb None Young and NOES: (.~~~ City of Arcadia, California ABSENT: None - 6 - 5366 . O/--/c)J~o)::::'0 . l?-~O-'F?7- ARCA0007-19/0401a/sf 07/09/87 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: ARCADIA REDVELOPMENT AGENCY m~~~~W[@ 'JUL 1 5 1987 VffiEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Arcadia Redevelopment Agency 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, California 91006 Are&:iia ~e:1"elo~,.;t '~"!"I (Space above for Recorder's use) AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ASSOCIATES THE DISPOSITION AND AND BETWEEN THE ARCADIA STANLEY W. GRIBBLE AND This Amendment No.1 ("Amendment No.1") is entered into by and between the Arcadi a Redeve lopment Agency ("Agency" ), a public :body, corporate and politic, of the State of California, and Stanley W. Gribble and Associates, a sole proprietorship ("Developer"), with reference to that certain Disposition and Development Agreement (the "Agreement") by and between the Agency and the Developer dated May 6, 1986. RECITALS . WHEREAS, the Agreement currently provides that the Developer shall develop the Site, as defined in the Agreement, in accordan=e with th~ Scope of Develop~ent and the ~ite P~an set forth in Attachments 2a and 2b of the Agreement: and WHEREAS, following the execution of the Agreement, the Developer entered into negotiations with potential users of the . Site, and such users require certain modifications and revisions to the Scope of Development and the Site Plan in order to accommodate proposed uses of the Site; and WHEREAS, the Developer and the Agency desire and intend that the approval of a subdivision map for the Front Parcel and the approval and recordation of a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions applicable to the Site, as provided in Section 3.01(1) of the Agreement, be postponed until a date no later than the date of issuance of the first Certificate of Completion for the Site: and 'WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms and provlslons of the Agreement, the Developer desires and intends to assign the rights - 1 - Exhibit "A" 5g(pb . and obligations of the Developer under the Agreement to Arcadia Gateway Centre Associates, LTD., a California limited partnership (the "Successor Developer"), and the Developer represents and warrants that such an assignment (the "Assignment") will conform with the requirements set forth in Section 1.06 of the Agreement, as amended herein; and . WHEREAS, the Developer represents and warrants that at the time of the Assignment, the Successor Developer will be a California limited partnership in good standing which will then have been duly organized and will then be in all respects lawfUlly transacting business within the State of California; and WHEREAS, the parties desire and intend to amend the Agreement in certain other respects: and WHEREAS, it is reasonable and appropriate for the parties t~ amend the Agreement in accordance with this Amendment No.1. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and provisions set forth hereinafter, the parties hereto agree to amend subject !)isposition and Development Agreement as follows: Section 1. The Recitals incorporated herein by reference. set forth hereinabove are Section 2. Section 2.09 of the Agreement is amended by deleting therefrom as a condition to the close of escrow the approval and recordation of a subdivision map for the Front Parcel, as defined in the Agreement, and the approval by the Agency and/or the 'City, as applicable, and the recordation, of an executed declaration of convenants, conditions and restrictions applicable to the Site, as otherwise provided in Section 3.01(1) of the Agreement. S.~ll.2.n...1. As a cond!.tion prc.cedent tc the iS~:.l":l,=e by the Agency of the First Certificate of Completion applicable to the Site pursuant to the Agreement, the Developer (a) shall submit to the City and shall obtain the approval by the City and, if necessary, the County of Los Angeles, of a subdivision map . applicable to the Front Parcel, as defined in the Agreement, and (b) shall submit to the City and/or the Agency, as applicable, shall receive the approval of such body and shall record an executed declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions applicable to the Site, as provided in Section .3.01 (l) of the Agreement. The Developer shall solely be responsible for compliance with any and all conditions of approval of any such subdivision map described herein. Notwithstanding any provision set forth herein to the contrary, the Developer shall obtain approval of, and shall record, any and. all subdivision maps applicable to the Site, as defined in the Agreement, no later than five (5) years fOllowing the date of the close of escrow for the conveyance of real property by the Agency to the Developer pursuant to the Agreement. The Agency shall - 2 - 53~~ use its best efforts to cause the City not to impose unreasonable conditions upon the ~pproval of a subdivision map applicable to the Site, as defined in the Agreement. Section 4. therefrom Attachments Attachments 2a and 2b herein by reference. The Agreement is further amended by deleting 2a and 2b, and by substituting therefor (Revised) . attached hereto and incorporated Section 5. The Schedule of Performance set forth in Attachment 3 to the Agreement is amended by deleting the time requirements set forth under Items 14 and 17 thereof, and by substituting deadlines consistent with Section 3 of this Amendment No.1. Section 6. The Developer represents, warrants and agrees that the Developer or Stanley W. Gribble, an individual, shall either (I) be and remain a general partner of the Successor Developer, or (2) own and retain a voting and equity interest in the Successor Developer equal to more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting interests and of the equity interests comprising the Successor Developer. The foregoing representation, warranty and agreement shall be deemed to apply only until the issuance of the last remaining Certificate of Completion for the Site, The requirements of Section 1.06 of the Agreement concerning the Assignment shall be deemed to have been satisfied by the Developer upon the receipt by the Executive Director of the Agency of (a) a written agreement executed by the Developer and the Successor Developer pursuant to which the Developer assigns to the Successor Developer, and the Successor Developer accepts the assignment from the' Developer of, any and all rights and obligations of the Developer under the Agreement and any and all interests of the Developer in the Agreement, and (b) any other notice and documentation concerning the assignment as required by Section 1.06 ~: the Ag,eement, ar am~ndcd. Thereafter, wherever ~te term "Developer" appears in the Agreement, it shall be deemed to be applicable solely to the Successor Developer, and the Agency agrees thereafter to look solely to the Successor Developer for performance of the obligations of the Developer under the Agreement, section '1.. The second paragraph of Section 1.06 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting therefrom the phrase "as to Parcels C and D and the Rear Parcel", and the last paragraph of Section 1.06 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: - 3 - 53{P (0 "The parties understand and agr~e that the initial individual partners in the Successor Developer shall include the Developer, or Stanley W, Gribble, an individual, and may include one or more of the following current agents or employees of the Devefoper or Stanley W. Gribble: Dale F. Allyn, Robert P. Jersey and George Grosso. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, the following actions may be undertaken without the prior approval of the Agency: (i) the initial individual partners in the Successor Developer may transfer their interests to other such initial partners of the Successor Developer, subject to the covenants and conditions set forth in Section 6 of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement; and (ii) the Successor Developer may bring in new partners solely for purposes of obtaining financing for the project; provided, however, that all such new partners admitted following the date of the Agreement, in the aggregate, do not have a majority voting and/or an equity interest; and further provided, however, that the provisions of Section 3.05 of the Agreement shall be applicable hereto. The Developer shall provide to the Agency notice and all documentation pertinent to any assignment, transfer or entry of new or addi tional partners wi thin ten (10) calendar days following the completion of such assignment, transfer or entry." Section a. The first paragraph of Section 2.02 of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows: "Section 2.02. Developer's Purchase Price. As part of the purchase price for the Site (the "Purchase Price"), the De'leloper Sh311 pay to the Ager.cy :)11 or before the close of escrow and by means of the escrow hereunder an initial disposition price (the "Initial Disposi tion Price") for the purchase of the Site in th~ amount of Five Million Eight Hundred Eleven Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars ($5,811,339), which is calculated based upon a sales price of Fourteen Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents '($14.65) per square foot of the Site." The first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 2.02 is amended by deleting therefrom the words "applicable to that portion of the Site in which the Dedicated Area is located." Section 9. Section 2..09 of the Agreement is amended by deleting therefrom (a) Condition No, 9 as a condition for the close of escrow subject to satisfaction or waiver by the Developer, and (b) Condition No, 3 as a condition for the close of escrow subj ect to satisfaction or waiver by the Agency. - 4 - 63(Pf,t, Section 10. Agreement is amended "Performance" the words Subsection (b) of' by adding thereto "and Site Plan." Section 6.07 fOllowing of the the word Section 11. The second paragraph of Section 3.04 of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows: Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the Agency shall not withhold approval of the sale or ground lease prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion therefor of the Rear Parcel or Parcels C and D, as shown on the map set forth in Attachment 2b, or in lieu of the Rear Parcel, all or any portion of Parcel A, if the purchaser or ground lessee of said Parcels, as applicable, meets the cri teri a heretofore set forth in this Section 3.04 for leases to prospective tenants and otherwise is, in the case of the Rear Parcel or Parcel A, a reputable and recognized first-class developer and builder and/or user/operator of office improvements and in the case of Parcels C and D, is a first-class restaurant or financial institution operation: provided, however, that not more than one' (1) parcel of Parcels C and D shall be used for purposes of a financial institution: and further provided, however, that any and all such purchasers or ground lessees shall be reputable and well-recognized and shall have the financial standing and ability to meet the obligations set forth herein for the development and completion of construction of that portion of the Project applicable to their Parcels: and further provided, however, that in the event of a sale of anyone or more of the Rear Parcel, Parcel A and Parcels C and D, the purchaser(s) thereof agree in writing with the Agency to assume any and all rights and obligations of the Developer under this Agreement with respect to said Parcels, as applicable, The Agency shall not withhold approval of the sale of the Rear Parcel (Parcel E) to Cigna or Holiday Health Spa, or of all or any portion of Parcel A to anyone or more of the fOllowing: the Automobile Association of America, Pacific Bell and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company." Section 12, The Developer and the Agency agree that in the event that the escrow for the conveyance of the entire Site to the Developer does not close on or before September 15, 1987, then the Agency shall convey the Rear Parcel (Parcel E) to the Developer by means of a separate escrow which shall close on or before September 15, 1987, The Developer shall pay to the Agency upon the close of any such escrow for the Rear Parcl (Parcel E) as the purchase price therefor a sum of money equal to the prOduct of the number of square feet comprising the Rear Parcel (Parcel E), less - 5 - 63(pjo Dedicated Areas, as defined in the Agreement, multiplied by Fourteen Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents ($14.65). Except insofar as such terms and provisions are inconsistent with this Section 12, the remaining terms and provisions set forth in Article II of the Agreement shall apply to the escrow for the disposition of the Rea~ Parcel (Parcel E) pursuant to this Section 12. Section 13. Subsection A of Attachment "8-1" is amended to read in its entirety as follows: "A. Initial Disposition Price The parties understand and agree that the total Initial Disposition Price to be paid by the Developer to the Agency shall be the sum of Five Million Eight Hundred Eleven Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars ($5,811,339.00), subject to certain reductions applicable to Dedicated Areas as set forth in Section 2.02 of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and for purposes of the Calculation of Adjustment of Initial Disposition Price and the Total Purchase Price as set forth in this Attachment "8", the, Initial Disposition Price to be paid by the Developer to the Agency for the Front Parcel shall be deemed to be Four Million Six Hundred Twenty-Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($4,627,814.00) ($16.00 per square foot), and the Initial Disposition Price to be paid by the Developer to the Agency for the Rear Parcel shall be deemed to be One Million One Hundred Eighty-Three Thousand Five Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($1,183,525.00) ($11.00 per square foot)." Section 14. The Agency and the :)evelope: here!.>}' agree that neither party shall be deemed to be in default of any term or provision of the Agreement due solely to the failure of anyone or more of the parties to deliver documents or funds to the escrow or for the escrow to close by the date originally set forth in the Schedule of 'Performance (Attachment 3) of the Agreement, or as of the date of execution of this Amendment No.1, The Agency and the Developer further agree that the Schedule of Performance (Attachment 3) is hereby amended by deleting Items 19 through the end of the Schedule of Performance, ,and by substituting therefor the following: - 6 - 53&fp "19. Site Clearance: escrow closes 20. Developer submits revised site plan, concept elevations, tenant list, financing plan, all as appropriate, and preliminary building plans for at least one parcel 21. Developer pulls permits, begins construction 22. Completion of Construction on Parcel B 23. Completion of Construction on Parcels A, C, D, and E Cumulatill Approval of DDA to close of Escrow Close of escrow to completion of construction of all phases TOTAL - 7 - August 31, 1987 wi thin 90 days of Step 19 above Within days Step 19 Within days Step 19 483 days 730 days 180 of above. 400 of above. Within 18 months of Step 21 above 1213 days (3,3 years)" ~fo Section~ used interchangeablj wherever they are used The terms "Rear Parcel" and "Parcel E" are and shall be deemed to have the same meaning in the Agreement and in this Amendment No.1. Section 16. The Developer shall provide to the .Agency on or before August 4, 1987, written evidence satisfactory to the Agency Counsel, that the Developer and the issuer of the Letter of credit, pursuant to Section 2.04 of the Agreement, have extended the terms and provisions of the Letter of Credit to and including November 1, 1987, Section 17. Except as Agreement shall continue in full reaffirmed by the parties. expressly force and amended hereby, the effect and is hereby IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. I as of the dates set forth below. Da /;<,~ff7 ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BY'~" (SEAL) r .~~ Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: l!J;!d ~l1",rn~ Agency General Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM:, s~sE ~ a Professional Corporation Agency Special Counsel STANLEY W. GRIBBLE AND ASSOCIATES, a sole proprietorship Date: 0Yh7 By: ~~~ Stanley W. Gribble (All Signatures Must Be Notarized) - 8 - 6:3~0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA l ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On August 12 , 19 87, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for-siid State, personally appeared Charles E. Gilb , known to me to be the Chairman of the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, the public agency that executed the within instrument and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said Agency, and acknowledged to me that said Agency executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its members. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL ~ CINDY L. ROWE ~' ~)' Notary Pubhc.Callform8 . .. '$ 'b l Principal Office In , :;:;: Los Anrcle$ County . . My Comm. [,po reb 13.1988 ........................... ~~~ (sJ.giaturel r-~~; 13 I?ff My CornmissJ.on Expires: 68&& STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ss. COUNTY OF On this /41}- day of n.l. / 1987, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public .in itd(for said County and State, personally appeared Stanley W. Gribble personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person that executed the within instrument on behalf of Stanley W, Gribble and Associates, a sole proprietorship, and aCknowledged to me that he executed the within instrument. (SEAL) ~~~.... 53(Pfp SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT The Site shall be developed as a mixed-use commercial complex consisting of retail, office and restaurant uses and possibly health club, financial and/or research and development uses, all as described herein," Structures on the Site shall generally be located as shown on the Site Plan in Attachment 2b as amended. The parcels on the Site may be developed in accordance with this Agreement but sUbject to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of the City and any variances or modifications therefrom as approved by the City. The Developer may, at its option, vary the size of the structures on each parcel: provided, however, that the total area of office, financial and research and development uses on the Site shall be a minimum of 96,000 square feet and a maximum of 155,000 square feet; the total area of retail uses on the Site shall be a minimum of 26,000 square feet and a maximum of 30,000 square feet; the total area of restaurant uses on the Site shall be a minimum of 12,000 square feet and a maximum of 16, 000 square feet: and the total area of financial institution uses on the Site, other than financial operations containing solely office uses, shall be a maximum of 5,000 square feet. In lieu of an equal amount of office or research and development uses, the Developer may develop health club uses up to a maximum of 45,000 square feet. The total area of all uses on the Site, exclusive of parking structures, shall not exceed 198,000 square feet. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit an increase in the maximum area of uses to be developed on the Site, subject to compliance with any and all requirements of CEQA at the cost and expense solely of the Developer: provided, however, that the Developer shall have the obligation and responsibility, solely at its co~t and expense, to con~truct and install any and all on anJ off-si te uti li ty improvements which are di rectly and solely attributable to the increase above 198,000 square feet, in the aggregate, of uses permitted on the Site, and on-site parking/traffic improvements which are required in order to provide service for such increased area within uses on the Site. The Agency shall cooperate with the Developer for purposes of compliance with any and all such requirements of CEQA and processing of parking/traffic revisions. The Site shall contain a minimum of two (2) first class quality restaurants on Parcels C & D, an office building or research and development office building on Parcel E or, in lieu thereof, a health club thereon, an office building or two (2) office buildings on Parcel A and a parking structure sufficient to support the buildings on Parcels A and E. The height of the structures on the Site may vary from those heights set forth in this Attachment 2, as amended, at the option of the Developer: provided, however, that no structure shall exceed five (5) stories in height; and further provided, however, that at least one of the bui Idings on Parcel A Attachment "2a" 63&& shall have a minimum of three (3) stories.' The Agency prefers that the tallest and largest structures will be located on the rear of the Site and the Developer shall make a good faith effort to do so. In lieu of purely and solely office uses on the Rear Parcel, the Developer may, at its option, construct on the Rear Parcel research and development uses or a health club subject to the prior approval by the City of a Conditional Use Permit therefor: provided, however, that any and all such research and development uses shall consist of a high technology research and development use which utilizes a skilled and professional work force, is clean and non-polluting, and is located within a structure of which at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the space is office related. Possible development of the Site may take the form of one of the following examples, by way of illustration only: Example No.1: . Parcel A: A four (4) story structure containing approximately 86,000 square feet of office uses plus a parking structure containing sufficient parking to meet the Developer's parking obligations for the Site as generally set forth in this Attachment 2, as amended. Parcel B: (a small amount Parcels A and E). Approximately 26,500 square feet of retail uses of service related retail could be located on Parcel C: Restaurant use of approximately 7,200 square feet; Parcel D: Restaurant use of approximately 5,800 square feet. Rear Parcel (Parcel F): A two (2) story structure containing approximately 46,000 square feet of office uses or a health club, plus a parking structure containing sufficient parking to meet the Developer's parking obligations for the Site as generally set forth in this Attachment 2, as amended. Example No.2: Parcel A: A five (5) story structure, on approximately the same footprint as in Alternative No. I, containing approximately 100,000 square feet of office uses, plus a parking structure containing sufficient parking to meet the Developer's parking obligations for the Site as generally set forth in this Attachment 2, as amended. Parcels B, C, D: Uses are the same as Example No. 1 above. Rear Parcel (Parcel E) : A containing approximately 55,000 square development uses or a health club, plus, two (2) story structure feet of research and if required, a parking 53&fp structure containing sufficient parking .to meet the Developer'S parking obligations' for the Site as generally set forth in this Attachment 2, as amended. The Project shall include on-site parking in accordance with applicable City of Arcadia (the "City") regulations; provided that a modification or variance .therefrom may be approved by the City, in its discretion, taking into consideration traffic and parking studies performed by the City and/or by a consultant selected or approved by the City, The Developer shall design all structures, landscaping and parking areas to achieve a high degree of attractiveness and compatibility with the Site. and area in which the Site is located. The Developer acknowledges and agrees with the Agency's desire to enhance the physical appearance of the Central Redevelopment Project Area and the easterly entrance to the City and shall design, construct and maintain attractive buildings, structures, signs, landscaping, parking areas and other improvements tbat have a consistent theme and architectural style, and which meet the requirements of the Redevelopment Plan, the General Plan of the City, the City's Zoning Ordinance and any and all building standards and requirements of the City. The architecture, design and quality of materials used in the development of the Southland Bank building on the corner of Huntington Drive and Fifth Avenue adjacent to the Site shall be deemed to be an acceptable standard to the Agency for purposes of the development of the Project on the Site. The Developer at its cost and expense shall undertake and complete any and all soils and drainage studies, plans and reports pertinent to the development of the Site and shall promptly provide a copy of said studies and reports to the Agency. The Developer shall construct at its cost and expense any and all off-site improvements set forth in this Attachment 2 in accordance with any and all standards, specifications and requirements of the City: provided, however, that the Agency shall construct and install at the cost and expense of the Agency a traffic signal or signals at one (I) main intersection west of the Southland Bank building on Huntington Drive adjacent to the Site at approximately the mid-point between Second Avenue and Fifth Avenue, and the Agency shall cause the City to complete the construction and installation of the Second Avenue/Duarte relief sewer; and further provided that the Agency shall be responsible for payment of any and all costs applicable to the off-site improvements to be constructed by the Developer hereunder in excess of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), exclusive of traffic signal(s) at the intersection of Huntington Drive and Fifth Avenue which shall be the responsibility solely and separately of the Developer to construct and install and exclusive of offsite improvements which are directly and solely attributable to the increase, if any, above 198,000 square feet, in the aggregate, of uses permitted on the Site, The Agency shall in good f ai th use its best efforts to cause the City to vacate any and all streets located on the Si te prior to the close of the escrow. The Agency shall cooperate in 53 &/0 good faith with the Developer for the purpose of assisting the Developer in obtaining any and all approvals from Santa Fe Southern pacific Railroad Company for the installation of landscaping on or along the railroad right-of-way adjacent to the Site. The Agency shall provide or cause to be provided at its cost and expense demolition, site"clearance and site' preparation as described herein. The description of such items herein is for the purpose of establishing general guidelines to assist the parties in the preparation of plans and specifications. Any and all plans and specifications, when approved by the parties as provided in the Agreement. shall take into consideration the w.ork which is the obligation of the Agency. All improvements to be constructed by the Agency and/or the City and the Developer shall be constructed or installed in accordance with the technical specifications, standards and pLactices of the City and in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City. The Agency shall at its cost and expense be responsible for the following: A. Demolition. Site Clearance and Site Preparation. 1. Demolition and removal of all existing on-site buildings, streets, pavements. walks, curbs, gutters, swale, trees (except for those trees located on the west side of Fifth Avenue in the City of Monrovia and any other trees mutually agreed to be retained), landscaping and other improvements, inCluding utility lines and poles, in accordance with the soils engineer's recommendations. 2. Rough grading and compaction of the Site consistent with C'u:-rent topography with compaction to eighty :;:>ercent (80'%) including, in accordance with the soils engineer's recommendations, the excavation, filling and compaction of all subsurface structures including by way of illustration, but not limited to, tanks, basements, cesspools and the like. The. Developer shall at its cost and expense be responsible for the following: B. Off-Site Improvements, 1. The improvement of Huntington Drive within existing rights-of-way allowing appropriate ingress and egress to and from the Project in accordance with the recommendations of the City's traffic engineer and Caltrans, 2. Construction of street sidewalks, traffic signals the Agency is responsible improvements, curbs, gutters, (other than the signal for whiCh hereunder) and landscaping in and 53~1p along Fifth Avenue and along the' south side of Huntington Drive as required by the City, Caltrans and the City of Monrovia. I . i , t ; 3. Relocation and replacement of street lighting on Huntington Drive and Fifth Avenue as may be required by the City, Caltrans and the City of Monrovia. , , . , I . i j .f 4. The retention and maintenance of existing trees on the west side of Fifth Avenue along the boundary of the Site in the City of Monrovia. I The Agency represents and warrants that telephone/utility mains exist adjacent to the Site of the capacity shown and approximately at the location as shown in the City Utility Location Map attached hereto as Attachment 8. The Developer shall be responsible for causing at its cost and expense the relocation of any and all utility easements on the Site. The Developer shall cooperate with the Agency, the City and any developer or users of any redevelopment project which may be undertaken north of the Site on Huntington Drive in order to permit the adoption and operation of a commuter ride-sharing program or other energy reducing transportation programs; provided, however, that the costs thereof to the Developer shall not exceed the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000). i It is understood and agreed by the parties that the Developer's responsibility to pay for costs for the construction and installation of all off-site improvements (other than the construction and installation of a traffic signal(s) or improvements to existing traffic signals at the intersection of Huntington Drive and Fifth Avenue, which shall be the responsibility solely and separately of the Developer to install and construct and exclusive of ofhite improvements which are directly anti solely attributabJ.e to the increase, if any, above 198,000 square feet, in the aggregate, of uses permitted on the Site) including but not limited to, overhead, architectural and engineering costs; permits and governmenta 1. fees; printing, lega I and loan costs; interim interest. costs: and actual construction costs shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000). In the event that the total costs for such off-site improvements exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), the Agency shall pay to Developer any and all sums in excess thereof following the completion of applicable portions of said off-site improvements within thirty (30) calendar days following submission by the Developer to the Agency of copies of all invoices received and payments made by the Developer prior to that time concerni.ng all off-site improvements which are the obligation of the Developer to complete hereunder. ' 68&0 c:...> -= rt ....rt '<:PJ (') ....::r ~3 ~ III :;I ....rt '" 0: : ......:N 0' ~ <S- 'f)' W :::l Z W > < ::I: l- LL LL OffICE BUILDING RETAIL SHOPS RESTAURANT . IIESTAURAHT .' . . OffiCE R"n.DING / BB,DDD SF 25,000 Sf 7,200 SF 5,BOO SF 45,300 SF 17 1,300 SF BID STALLS enW~IDJ PARCEL A PARCEL 8 PARCEL C PARCEL 0 PARCEL E TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED , . 'JUl 1 5 1987 Ar:l:l!il Relf"efllj:;li:lll ...;;;. The number of square feet, number of parking stalls, sizes and nature of tel ancies and improvements shown is'tenta and sub1ect to change in' accordance wi Attachment 2A to the DDA. ~-~-Hm+tB .~IlIlCU . .1r:TAIL ".000 QU, '. ~ I,IU..O I ITOllY IOIlTtUMD ....Nlt r= N)T A PARr ~ 'illH~ 1Jl()UJ!)~118~ HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADI GATEWAY CENTRE SITE PLAN E }~~ ... o 40 a. nr tr-.~ -----1 .' File No. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA A. Description of project: A mixed-use project consisting of two restau- rants, two office buildings, and retail shopping. (This Negative Declaration is being filed due to change of the original Site plan. Based on the attached initial study, no significant changes were found. ) 8. Location of project: South side of Huntington Drive between Second Avenue and Fifth Avenue, Arcadia, California. C. Name of applicant or sponsor: Stanley W. Gribble & Associates D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached Initial Study. E. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects: See attachment to Environmental Checklist (Initial Study) " February 17, 1987 I~~ Signature Date: Date Posted: N/A Asst. City Mgr. for Economic Development Title Exhibit "B" 5g&<o ~- File No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Amendment to Original EIR Certified by Arcadia City Council, 5/6/86 A. BACXGJlOUND 1. NIIIIlll of Proponent Stanley W. Gribble, Inc. 2. Address and Phone lI1mber of Proponent 1600 Dove St., Suite 130, Newport Beach, CA 92660, (714) 752-2540 B. ENVIJlClNHEN'1'AL IMPACTS (E:lp1anations of 1111 .yes. and "maybe. lID_rs are required on attached sheets.) _ill ... ........1 _.ll 'I' I!! IIml .!2. II! 11m! J!!. 1. ama. .. '''tat.tal nfltcu.. i. ... _t at ....US' M.llIItwl.. ......~1. ~ .. ",,"11 Mn" -'Uhu _ i. ..x 'N' ....lie _Ul' ....U..., -... 11 ...Hille ,"uwt_' ,. __IIA ., .....1. _ .....I"CJ' .. .1I.....UtIft.. U,.,1Io_f1t.., _ ~ to. .".. nlaUlt ......u. ._ .. X ,....u- .. _..-r1'" ., ... ...17 lleeol.1al' c. 0..,. ,. ~....., - ~ X- .. 'lMt Uf., _Ul ... .......1 _..It ..., ._t.c. nU,' f.".....' .. ~ _u-.ni.. _1'1.... :; .:=- J':' ':::1:1 =..~_. x -.dUlc,'''_ If ertf _1.- fIlIll..le X Clllel_lllt t._. .~. ....... ....... or ""..1..1 f..",.....' IUcnU... ... ,,_Uc 1>1-"''' .. ..., 1_'" a.1I W1M 'I' ."1" .. "hnl.. o. ... .-en .f ..,. ....1011 .f IOU.. al...., _ '1' ,u .Jt _1'... "AnI .. ........... "'11:1." X .... Ina' ., ,l_u, .. DI.-.,. 1" .UtIU... .....U.1_ .. !.u....U.. .f _ .,.cl.. ., W ,"_lOll wtllcl'l ., ...Uty .... X ,lulu isto Ul eno.. .. h..it u. . _1 If . 1'.1.., ... .-..-. ~U'I' u.... _1 "",l~t .f .....U.. .,.U." X- ,. ....un of ....1. 1ft ,~"' to .-olotic h.....u ,uCl'l .. ..""-'....... .. ~1L.l,.. _111 ... ......a1 ...dt 1.....U.... ....U.... ~ ..U..... .Jt a. N ..aU., ....rta1 .. 01......1..... lIi..n.l.tJ' .f .....1... .. AU. _.1.11 t.N .........1 "'1I1t 111. _ .....n .f .., .,.cl.. ., ~1a (1.,1"". by aaJ,Ml. .I..c1114~ npU1.. a. .....t~U.l 111.. ......1.. ... X 'l.1l aM .h.11U,h. MftUi.c ......._. "tvlvat.l.M el _l.nt a1.. ...Ut" ....ecu _ a.l.cn4a_I' X- .. 7"- owaU. of """'"__1' ..x ~. ~_................ -.. _1.-. ...... _ ........... ~ X .. ......,., .. U.....U_.f alt _to =:"1II':1=~:~" 'r.:IlJ ,. ..~...... _ 1IJIeOt_ .. X UI~U 1.U UI ..... ... ......it 111 _ ","-.11" . MITt-v u .... .....u.- _ _ X _t"~' .. _. .111 ... ~.l ......It 111. .. .............. _ -uu.il .ucu. X a. a.a.tM .I._ .un_U --- --, .f lIi.....l_ ., _tN _U 111 X ......_-, .. --. .U ... ...-al ........ lal .. ~ .I.. .......U. "'-". .. ....... ... ..uu., .u. ~, ~ ....1.... Jlu...... II' tM "'U .. X _t 01 .1IJ'f_ _tn .-.n ~. :-c.,-" ~ ..- X a. ut.un.~ u .... _ _ ...... U'. .a. III 'leieIf, ..un, X- .. ~9:""''':~!riirt :S:"::,...-al .x. .. ~ ... tile __ III -e_ X _tel' ... .,. _ta.. ..." .. tti!de. .111.......-.1 --.1. ... . _UIl allCnU_ .. ... A. .. D:I.I~ "M.e ....f_....... _ ....-. _ ~ 1.- _ III _ _, ... ~ .1t...atl_ ., ....._ _tel' .....U.,.. .l.acl....... .... an u.a.UlI .. .. ::!l11 &1, .11 ... JII'IIfeMl ::::..... .....u... .".. _ X ....' .. .. Z-- 1a ~ .... III _ III ., X a.a......U_ ., .... tinft1M _ "val ....--, rate ., .~ ... ....... ..un, ..x .. '_~1a1~.. of ..,. ,. a..,... ... the ,-UCJ III ...... -.bJ.. Mtaral _, Z. ..ten. .1tb1.. ........" .1..." toiIIIUu._ _ .1UG_ala. 01' .......11 .l.aur...-u_ X .f .., ..v.i.... ., au _ _.,au._, -1- 53&0 , , filII ., UMn. .... UIII ~ 'l'Ol\fe . cUll .f WI ...1_1., -.r aM nl_ of .......... ...~ U...c1........ k" _t u.n.. w. oU. ~:i:l~~:~__~) ..... -.&1u_' G!"~::~:-;;... .~~U':II=-::':t::~ ... .....u. ...u .f ta. ..... ...-1_ u_ .. .. ....' U. ~ ~:...~_~: :'hct ...... r... MOlU_l .....1...., Ia. u. u~ 9rpnonftl"'~.:nlnl-. au ~....iii"'IIJ...rll . '0 ......u.. ell ...u.ua1 ..at- U-..J ~nW" _.7 ... "'MU _ ......u.. .-u-. tedUu. ~ ...... 'er _ ~.. '0 ...u.ua1 ~ _ ..uu.iI ~U_ .,.__, .. Altu-au......-t ......... .. Unlll...... _ -.-to ., ....~ --' '0 .......u............, aU ..,..udUd I. __ y tnlri.1 ...... .. _.. ~.~. .u,.t....... - .....v...., Ia. Bt;1:'-':R'~!p':~1~ ~.~.~ .... 'N _ _ ,h.,... f'll""~ _"'1_ .u ." ., U. fN~l" -, '0 '1n....-u-' .. ""'u.......-u-' '0 .-111 .. ,ab _ ..... _.a_l IMS.UUM' '0 ~t_ ell '-111 'Mil!- u.. ~_ ....., t. 0tMr ....-tal ......1_' la. 1I!:uJl. .ill c.a. ~.1 ...&1. U" '0 11M.. .......ual __u .f 1.1 _ _.1' .. '''''_U.l "-.en... "" ~ ... ..lau.., '''''t'C'W ., "'ITI'. ... ...-",11'_ ..,. ....1...."" ., _ ___ III '_I'D' :1~1~:S',.=1~ ~.r:::: _lilt ..."....111 11..lrltl_ to .... 'o1~ .&at .s.l.uu., ... .. ...... .. ..tUll ..., .. ~_t1_.,..t_' .. ......, e. __.. _ ..,...c ....., .. .... _... ~u..,., ,. ..u. _\e MIl at.....l1' l>. I!!:~t: .H~I.b. IUU U. ........1 .. c.-U..,..,. MialUl ........ _ .-..1&1 ~u. ...... 1..-.1...... ~ ...lU)' .. __utl.,......,...,.u&l -...a.........., Date 'January 19, 1987 ~ x -2- ... I!!. em So ... tritt.le1. _111 U. ........&1 .....11. . ...u.u.. ., .., .~e .....u ... "_ .... U tM .....111'. ... .Ul tIIlI ,~.l ...,.!, s.. tile c:naUOII ., .. _tMU_ll, ."_1_ alM .... tA "'U. on..' ~l=~ ~ :: ::r:-~l,:-.h ....1.11., .. Ulat.Lel I"MZW.U~ ..,..-&-.iU.., ~lrt!tlftittcn'le.t. lUll eM .... -. II 1lU'l.......U.., . aipSUaAt ..._l..J.ol... -.-au.s.l a1u. .~_. ..,--. WtllUltia1t1 z x x ... ... -.a..~"tC..'m .'di~It_. .. _. ,.. .n... ,.....u.1 tlt ..,.... U. ...IUr ., .... ..-n..-." ;=':t~:~lIi~.-=::'. -:~ ... .UtlU. ,..U.U. .. ..... ~ ..It-a.ta1e!.. 1_1.&, .....t_ U .Uai..u . ,1... ... ....1 ~tr. ..... u. ....... ... ..-U1ft ~ ..... ., . ...... er ........... ,1'" _ .-J.ael _ .U...U -...n-. ....- .. ... .,... ........ ., CalU..-u ~...,. ..........&W7' .. _... ~ ..... ... ...-u.1 U 8CIl.1_ ......-tan. .. U. ....__.... ... 1.aRrun ~u1 ...lao' ta -..rt-ea_ ~ . ... ~_, u _ '''In ....... u . ..leU..l, Nhl. _Ua;1U_ ,.al" ., U- *1.1e ~UftI ~ .111 ..... wall ... tile ,__., .. _ 1M ....,... __ ......-u ....... .... lMl..U....Ur ~..... ... ....1.t19.lr _1.....1&' I"~'" ..,. 1"'n. oa ... ... _n ...... ........_ ....n tM u..e.. _ .._ aoM.__ U nleU_l, _11. .... ..n .... .Uen. .1 .... '"&1 al UleM ~ _ u.. ...1~ 111 a1..U1ua'.' :i,'::- ..':-~~r'_=:-.=~ .......... .U.n. _ 11_ ...1..... e1IMa ti..nlr .1' i...........Ur' ...J$ . x x x c. m'_'~ ~ ~~a :;~J'~ ..~IIIL7IC11 .UI ... ~ lit .. .... ...... .. ... ..... .. w.. iaiUal ~I 01 '1.. .. ......... Jl"jen ~ .". .._ a .ipU1caat .rr.n _ ... ....1..--.. ... . aGld'l'ft ~1C11 win... ............ :IJ :1=1:: ::=:-. ':.-=---=~:-~:l~t. ... . .'p1l1caat .".n .... uu ... ...... tba -.1U,aU.. _"111"_ ".au..t _ __ aulldle6 "'-, .... .... ....., .. ... ,n~an. .. ~ ~ICIl .no&. II ."UED. D 1 ft.. sM ~ lIft'jan .. __ . as,p.1UcaJlt .tten _ 1M ~t.. .. . pn-.rA&. lM'Al:'t IlDOI:t 1. -.... /;c~ / ~Q . (Signature) oJ 58~f,o ': Amendment to Ori inal EIR Certified b Arcadia Cit Council 5/6/86 Assessment of Proposed Revised Gribble Site Plan. dated 12 18 86 Attachment to ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM - File No. Proponent: Stanley W. Gribble & Associates (South Side Project) Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers to Section B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. B-I) C. Site is presently flat. Significant fill may have to be provided and compacted to meet building code requirements. B-3) b. Site at present is not completely paved. proposal will call for such, reducing absorption and increasing runoff. Drainage pattern may be altered to accommodate runoff. Pro- ject will be designed and constructed to resolve disposal of the runoff. c. Alteration of drainage pattern may affect course of flood waters. The project will be designed and constructed to re- solve flows and disposal of the runoff. B-12) Four single-family houses will be eliminated, and a motel which may have some long term tenants will be eliminated. Sufficient affordable owner-renter housing is available within three to five miles of this site. Agency relocation benefits will assist in the relocation process. B-13) a. Proposed uses are more intense and are oriented to access by automobiles. The EIR for the Beck Retail Center, and the Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis for Huntington South Side Development Project state that Huntington Drive can accommo- date the uses and traffic flows (October, 1985) as does the January, 1987 analysis of the Revised Site Plan/Proforma by Barton Aschman. b. New parking will be required and is provided for in the proposal and the revised proposal. c. Traffic along Huntington Drive will be increased but peak hours/times will not significantly affect traffic. d. Access points to the site will be at a signalized inter- section between Second and Fifth Avenues. f. This is a possibility, but should be able to be mitigated during the design and implementation stages. B-14) a. New hydrants and increases in water pressure will be provided in a manner conforming to City codes. 58&~ B-14) continued c. Continuation High School will be relocated by the Arcadia Unified School District with Agency assistance. B-16) c. Water systems with increased capacity will be designed and constructed to meet additional demand resulting from this project, as necessary. e. Drainage pattern may have to be altered. Paving of most of the site will increase and potentially concentrate runoff. Project will be designed and constructed to resolve this prob- lem. C) The following documents were reviewed in completing this Form: EIR for the Central Redevelopment Project, Arcadia Redevelop- ment Agency by: City of Arcadia - November, 1973 EIR - East Huntington Drive Redevelopment Area by: Beland/ Associates, Inc. - December, 1980 Final Supplemental EIR - Proposed Office Structure by: Beland/ Associates, Inc. - March, 1982 Draft EIR - Arcadia Financial Center by: Donald A. Cotton Associates, Inc. - May, 1984 Traffic Impact Analysis for Arcadia Target Store by: Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. - July, 1984 Final EIR - Beck Retail Center by: The Planning Center - November, 1984 Draft Traffic and Parking Impact Analysis for Huntington South Side Development Project by: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. - October, 1985 and analysis of revised Site Plan/Proforma - January, 1987. - Screen Draft Environmental Impact Report on the North Side (Emkay) project by Atlantis Scientific - January, 1987. NOTE: The original project was reviewed by the City of Arcadia and Arcadia Redevelopment Agency (lead agency). The Environmental Impact Report prepared by The Planning Center and Barton Aschman Associates was certified and the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) was approved May 6, 1986. This proposed revision to the previously approved Site Plan, Proforma and to the DDA has been submitted by Stanley W. Gribble & Associates. This Environmental checklist has been prepared to assess the impact of the revised Site Plan and -2- 63~b . .' Proforma. The revised Site Plan moves two restaurant pads and the retail shop building closer to East Huntington Drive. In addition, it places the two office pads to the rear of the site. One of the office buildings (Parcel E) may become a medical use. All significant impacts caused by the Proforma have been considered in this ment particularly possible impacts in parking and drainage. -3- revised Site Plan and environmental assess- traffic circulation, 63&~ .' . ru. .0. 1E"""",~ffiT ~!.~ \J :;.J, ENVIRONME:N'l'AL INFORMATION FORM JAN 7 l~SS A. applloan~'....., Stanley W. Gribble & Associates .f~.:;i.i ~~,:r:!:.;:':,.:.: I.;: J~r ~aal 1600 Dove Street, Suite 130, Newport Beach. CA 92660 . .. Prcperty Addzaaa (tocaU~11 South Side of Huntinaton Drive between Second Avenue and Fifth Avenue. Arcadia. California e. GIJl.~.leI llaalpaUClftI -f.lanned Dl!veloDml!nt Area-1 <fI2:ll D. loDe Cua1flcaUCllII Commercial Planned Development (CPD-1) &. '10.-.15 11.. (State exaeUy wbat 111' 18 b1:lnc!d fw tM PftIPerty, ~.... cype,. aet191U.a, Ill;llo)tIDm~11 Our DroDosal calls for a mixed use of the property of ap~roximatelY 13~000 square feet of two restaurants. two office structures Of approxlmately 108,00 -150.000 . sauare feet. and retail of a~Droximatl!lY 26.000 s,uare feet. This mixed use would entail the construction of flve structures. two 0 WhlCh would be the free-standing restaurant uses, two office buildin s and one retail buildin. A develo ent of lS ype wou crea e approxlma e y - new JO s or e res auran an re ail alone. The office. of course, would depend upon the size of each individual user. J' . Iqlaare J'ootap of 81 ta 1 396.830 Sauare.Feet G. Iqv,ue rootave of Zz1at1ll9 Bu11d.i.zapl 1. ':0 _...01 ~ I None 2. !o Be. ..151 Approximately 105.000 Square Feet + .. IqD,an J'ootap .of ... ...0"'4"91' 149.000 to 171,000 - Square Feet I. IqD,an J'ooUfI of ..But ]"'4ap co be tled fWI . '" 1. C-n:1a1 k't1vlU", All structures 2. lDd_tri&l k't1v1U", None 3. ....la!1111t.1&1 k't1'riU", None Jlmlber of 1ID1ta I J. CD a ..panta atie~, de.c:r1be ~ toUaw1Ilfl 1. ~ ~t&1 a.tUft9 of the proj.ct a1te u 1~ ulata. 2. ~ pus ~..d a1U1ra~ona co U. p~.et alta. _ _OIIAlpiI II.JIrnY "'.....4h4.. 9861 L N\fr ,,?~,~&~~;]~fdl,l)3 ~/" s. ~.. IIl4 dne1.opment of U. allrZ'Dllftd.i.z9 propuU... " . IInnftlftMatal Information rom It. Cleek t:be app~rbte _n to Ule follGv1DV qgeaUou I Y.. l'o 1. W11l the p~ed pzoject Nault 111 a .,.tantial alteration ---, - of fr01III4 _town and/or alteration of ezlatiJiv draina,. pa~m? X - - 2. Will the propeaed pzoject Nault ill a c:bazIp 111 groUDdvatar qaallty Dd/or Il\Wltity? X - - J. Will the propoaed pzoject ruult ill an incnu. ill Doue. 'ribntiOll. at. dirt. ..... f__. odor or eolid "ute? X - 4. Will the propoeed pzoj.ct Nault 111 the ue or dieposal of potentially hu~ ..~.riale? X - - 5. Ifill the prope.ed project neul~ 1Il a .1lb.tUItial iIlczwue 1Il 4uwId for IlIIIlicipal a.nicea and/or u.1'9Y _UlllPt.iOlu ..L - _laill 1Il d.tail any -us- _.n to Ule abOft qaeaticne on additional aheata. %.. PrD914e any additional information which would elaborate on the potantial annrozmental _&qUencu n.ulunt frea the propeaed pzoject. II. Certification I I hereby certify that the atat_ta fumiah.d above and in the attached uhiJ:lita pnaent the data and ilIfomation nquiNd for thi. initJ.al .yaluation to the beat of f1lY abiUty, and that the facta, atatumlta and iIlfor1ll&tiGrl . pre.anted an true and cornet to the beet of IIY bowled.,. and beUef. Datal ~;. J),;e.. R b ~~ va of AppUcant r -2- 530~ , . \ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Continued) .J. '(1) The environmental setting of the project as it exists: As the site exists. there is a mixed use of retail. food. office. motel and vacant land fronting Huntington Drive. Also. there are 4 single family residences on the site. The above entails approximately .341 of the site. The rear portion'of the site. or approximately 641 of the site. consists of the continuation high school .and the City Vard for City vehicles. which includes both maintenance and painting facilities. (2) The proposed alterations to .the project site: The site would be totally cleared before the new development project would begin. (3) The use and development of the surrounding properties: At the present time. there is no new use proposed for the surrounding properties. K. (5) The project will have an increase in the use of municipal services such as buses or other modes of public transportation. due to the increase of new Jobs created by the project. With the increase above and beyond the 105.000 feet of existing users on the.prpperty now, energy consumption can also be expected to increase. L. Additional Information: The project as proposed will greatly enhance from an aesthetic point of view, the Gateway to the City of Arcadia on East Huntington Drive. It will provide much greater landscaping than now exists and coordinate much more closely a - compatible architecture with the new Southland Bank Building than do the existing structures. 53&~ 8/4/87 DISPOSITION REPORT - AMENDMENT NO. I Building Square Footage Requirements: DDA (5/6/86) Min. Max. Al1ENDMENT (8/4/87) Min. Max. Retail Restaurant Office 26,465 14,000 88,145 41,165 20,000 145,000 26,000 12,000 96,000 30,000 16,000 155,000 Max. Sq. Ft. on Site 190,865* 198,000* Estimated Revenues: Based on a comparison of DDA minimum building square footages, Alternatives 1 & 2 (5/6/86 DDA), and DDA Amendment No. I (provided by Katz, Hollis, Coren Financial Consultants, Los Angeles) DDA MIN. (5/6/86) ALTS. I & 2 (5/6/86) Range Amendment No.1 (8/4/87) 1. Tax Increment to the Agency (FYI989- '30) 145,118 162,000-187,000 150,605 2. Sales ~ax to the City (1989-901 114;779 125,000-151,000 111,875 3. License Fees and utility 'raxes (1989-90) 5,000 $264,897 5,000 10,908 Estimated Total NET CHANGE $273,388 264,897** $ 8,491 *Agreed upon maximum **Estimated Total - 5/6/86 DDA Exhibi t "c" 63&?fo