Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5509 . . , , - ~ . ~ RESOLUTION 5509 I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDmONAL USE PERMIT 89-015 A PROPOSED RESTAURANT AT 430 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE (ARCADIA GATEWAY CENTRE) WITH CONDmONS AND FINDINGS WHEREAS, on September 1, 1989, an application was filed by Arcadia Gateway Centre Associates to construct a 9,200 square foot restaurant, Planning Department Case No. c.u.P. 89-015 on property located at 430 East Huntington Drive, more particularly described in attached Exhibit A. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on September 26, 1989; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing the Planning Commission voted 3-0 with one member abstaining and one member absent to approve Conditional Use Permit 89-015 and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 1422 reflecting their decision; and WHEREAS, on October 3,1989, Council Member Lojeski appealed the Planning Commission's approval in order to allow the City Council the opportunity to review the proposed project; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 1989 the City Council heard the appeal; and WHEREAS, as part of the record of this hearing the City Council reviewed and considered: a. All staff reports and related attachments and exhibits submitted by the Planning Department to the Planning Commission and City Council. b, The record of the Planning Commission hearing regarding C.U.P. 89-015. c. All oral presentations and testimony made during the public hearing on November 7, 1989. WHEREAS, after deliberation the City Council voted 5-0 to approve and file a Negative Declaration finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and to approve Conditional Use Permit 89-015 subject to the conditions set forth below and directed preparation of this Resolution to formally reflect that decision and findings. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: -1- 5509 . , , -~ ~ _ M.- Section 1" This Council finds: 1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to tile property or improvements in such zone or vicinity. 2. That the use applied for at tile location indicated is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized. 3. The proposed use would result in a net deficiency of approximately 20 spaces. The applicant presented a plan whereby they could reduce the number of deficient spaces to eight. This would be accomplished by reducing the size of tile compact spaces adjacent to and around the restaurant from 8'-6" to 8'-0" and by replacing one row of standard parking spaces with 8'-0" compact spaces, thus increasing the number of compact spaces to 30% in lieu of the 25% granted by modification. It was the consensus of the Council that they would prefer to see tile parking layout as it exist rather tilan reducing tile size of tile existing compact spaces and increasing the percentage of compact spaces. The Council felt that the parking reduction would not have a significant impact on the site. 4. That tile site abuts streets and highways adequate in widtil and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by an eating establishment. 5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan, 6, That tile use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment. Section 2, That for the foregoing reasons this Commission approves a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 9,200 sq. ft. restaurant upon the following conditions: 1. That the gross floor area ofthe restaurant shall not exceed 9,200 sq. ft. 2. That the 7,208 sq. ft. of office uses which are proposed to be located within the retail building (300 East Huntington Drive), shall not be converted at a later date to retail or other uses which have a greater parking requirement. 3. That Resolution No. 1397, approving Conditional Use Permit 88-028, is amended to allow a maximum of two eating establishments located within the retail building (300 East Huntington Drive), and that the seating within each establishment shall not exceed 12 persons. 4. That the architectural design review of the proposed restaurant shall be subject to the review and approval of the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency. -2- 5509 . . 5. That Cu.P. 89-015 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. 6, Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this Conditional Use permit shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or revocation of said Permit. Section 3, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed, approved and adopted this 21st day of November ,1989. l&.~ ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS: CITY OF ARCADIA) I, JUNE D. ALFORD, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 5509 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council on the 21stdayof November ,1989 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmember Gilb, Harbicht, Lojeski, Young and Chandler NOES: None ABSENT: None Ci -3- 5509 . ,.,./ ./ 1111. H ; ~ i :l ~ ~ : J I ! !l I. I ~ I I I l l ~ l j I III . I I' II hll II 1111 l l l II! ~ . , I i I I I r II r IIII ','1111111 I I I H 1'1 II . . I I Iii i I II ,II III ~~ ~ I I ' IIII t J' !"1 Ill! ~~N~ IN 'M11a-l # 5 % Y~t.:1 /'N.)$T ~ P;E M.,6J~~Pr? .I 1./ .,' .'.,-: ~.. , ,> I I ... f' IA b I I I I . \. UJllJ6~- ext-IIPJn- A ~ ... a: .. z: ... u >- 'C ~ ... ... 'C (:l 'C ::: - .. Q U 'C ~ U ~ a: '" 'C II ... 5509