HomeMy WebLinkAbout6388
- ~ ., . '!' . .
. , .
" " .
RESOLUTION NO. 6388
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW FEES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Based on the. cost allocation study performed by the
Administrative Services Department, the fees set forth in this Resolution are
necessary for the purposes set forth in this Resolution and said fees do not exceed
the estimated costs for providing the service; the fees set forth in this Resolution
bear a reasonable relationship to the cost of the respective service or program
involved; the fees bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the benefit the payer
obtains from paying the fees or the burden caused; and the fees are not being
imposed for general revenue purposes, but instead for partially recovering the cost
of providing said services. Said fees are to cover the costs of the Architectural
Design Review services set forth below.
SECTION 2.
City Council Resolution No. 5424, which sets forth
certain Architectural Design Review fees, is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION 3.
Pursuant to Arcadia Municipal Code Section 9295.11,
there is hereby established the following fee scheduled for Architectural Design
Review.
-1-
6388
,
. .
. , .
1" " .
A. Prior to the City's commencement of its review of new multiple
family projects for design review, the project applicant shall deposit with the City
the sum of $510.00.
B. Prior to the City's commencement of its review of plans for proposed
alterations or additions to existing multiple family for design review, the project
applicant shall deposit with the City the sum of$245.00.
C. Prior to the City's commencement of its review of new
commerciallindustrial projects for design review, the project applicant shall deposit
with the City the sum of$1,225.00.
D. Prior to the City's commencement of its review of plans for proposed
alterations or additions to existing commercial or industrial buildings for design
review, the project applicant shall deposit with the City the sum of$405.00
E. Prior to the City's commencement of its review for proposed signs,
the project applicant shall deposit with the City a sum of $220.00 with the
exception that the deposit for applications for design review of portable signs shall
be $50.00.
F. In addition to the above, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all
costs associated with design review performed by the City's architectural and
landscape design consultants prior to final approval of the design review.
-2-
6388
,
w , ~
:J1' ~ . ,
SECTION 4.
The City shall deduct and retain from the above deposits
the actual costs incurred in the course of the design review. The City's fees shall
be determined by multiplying the hourly wage rate of each employee by the
number of hours, or portion of an hour, each employee spends on said review, plus
485% of the amount determined by such computation.
If the actual costs of performing the design review exceed the deposit, the
applicant shall pay the balance due upon demand. The City shall not complete its
action until any outstanding balance has been paid.
If the actual costs of performing the design review is less than the amount of
deposit, said unencumbered portion shall be refunded to the applicant following
the City's action on the design review.
SECTION 5. For an appeal to the Planning Commission from an
architectural design review decision rendered by the Community Development
Administrator or the Modification Committee, there is hereby established a fee of
$540.00; provided, however, that the fee shall be one-half of said amount if said
appeal has been filed in conjunction with another appeal pertaining to the same
proj ect.
For an appeal to the City Council from an architectural design review
decision rendered by the Planning Commission, there is hereby established a fee of
$210.00; provided, however, that the fee shall be one-half of said amount if said
-3-
6388
~ ~___ -... ~_..:.._..;;. .. -.....~ - ..__.:r
appeal has been filed in conjunction with another appeal pertaining to the same
project.
SECTION 6.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
Passed, approved and adopted this 2nd day of Sep tember
,2003.
ATTEST:
/ 41
,
Ci lerk of the Cit
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~ P- TdeMi;l
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
-4-
6388
- .
. .
. .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:
CITY OF ARCADIA )
I, JUNE D. ALFORD, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certifies that
the foregoing Resolution No. 6388 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the .
City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 2nd day of September, 2003 and that said
Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
A YES: Council Members Chang, Marshall, Segal, Wuo and Kovacic
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
A
5
6388