HomeMy WebLinkAbout5406
RESOLUTION NO. 5406
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND
AFFIRMING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION
DENYING A PROPOSED TWO-STORY DWELLING WITH
ATTACHED GARAGE AT 400 COLUMBIA ROAD
WHEREAS, on October 30, 1987, an appeal was filed by Chris
Construction Company,
Inc. ,
of
the
Santa
Anita Village
Architectural Review Board's October 22, 1987 denial of a two-
story, four bedroom dwelling with attached three car garage on
property located at 400 Columbia Road.
WHEREAS, on November 24, 1987 the Planning Commission heard
the appeal; and
WHEREAS,
the Commission determined that
al though the
structure is very attractive and the use of materials is similar
to that in the surrounding neighborhood, the structure is not in
harmony and proportion to the adjacent structures and other
structures in the neighborhood, and denied the appeal; and
WHEREAS, an appeal was then filed to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 1988 the City Council heard the
appeal; and
WHEREAS, as part of the record, the City Council reviewed
and considered:
a. The staff report and related attachments including the
Santa Anita Village Architectural Review Board's findings and
actions of October 22, 1987 and Resolution No. 5286 setting forth
the regulations for the Santa Anita Village Architectural Design
Zone Area.
I
5406
b. Written communications submitted by the appellant and
opponents.
c. All oral presentations, testimony and documentation made
and presented during the public hearing on February 16, 1988.
d. A model and display of the proposed house.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Arcadia (3-2
vote) denies the appeal and affirms the decision of the
Architectural Review Board and Planning Commission, based on the
following f indi ngs and those made by the Archi tectural Review
Board and Planning Commission:
1. The proposed structure is too big for the specific lot.
2. The bulk of the proposed house is out of proportion to
the neighborhood in view of its size in relation to the area and
the corner location of the lot.
3. The
proport ion to
neighborhood.
SECTION 2,
proposed structure
adjacent structures
is not in harmony
and other structures
or
in
ln
the
The decision, findings and conditions contained
ln this Resolution reflect the Council's action of February 16,
1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Lojeski, Young and Gilb
NOES: Councilmembers Chandler and Harbicht
ABSENT: None
-2-
5406
'.
SECTION 3.
That the City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
Passed, approved and adopted this 1st day of March 1988.
~~
, Mayor of the City of Arcadia
ATTEST:
Arcadia
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS:
CITY OF ARCADIA
I, CHRISTINE VAN MAANEN, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia,
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 5406 was passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arcadia signed by
the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting
of said Council held on the 1st day of March, 1987 and that said
Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmember Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski, Young and Gilb
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
City Clerk of the City of Arcadia
-3-
5406