Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3172 RESOLUTION NO. 3172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND DWELLING ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 903 NORTH SECOND AVENUE AND ZONED R-1. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That there was filed with the City Planning Commission on J~ay 12, 1959, the application of David C. and Dorothy M. Ryder, as owners, for a zone variance to permit the construction of a second dwelling upon the following described property located at 903 North S(~cond Avenue in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, to wit: The South 55 feet of Lot 10, Block 89, Santa Anita Tract, as shown on map recorded in Book 34, pages 41 and 42, Miscellaneous Re- cordfl of Los Angeles County. That after nottce as required by Ordinance No. 760 of said City, as amended, a public hearing was duly held on the matter by and before said Commission on the 14th day of July, 1959, which hearing was con- tinued to July 28, 1959, at each of which times all interested per- sons were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evi- dence. That upon the conclusion of said hearings, said Commission did, on July 28, 1959, adopt its certain Resolution No. 339 wherein and whereby it made certain findings, and recommended to this Coun- cil that the requested variance be denied. SECTION 2. That within ten (10) days after aforesaid de- cision by the Planning Commission, applicant appealed therefrom in writing to the City Council, pursuant to which appeal a public hear- ing on the matter was set for, and after due notice was held by and -1- 3172 before this Council on September 1, 1959, at which time all inter- ested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to pre- sent evidence or testimony, and the files and the matter generally were considered by this Council. SECTION 3. That although there were no protests to the granting of the variance and numerous owners in the vicinity signed petitions favoring the variance, it was not shown that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the prop- erty or its use that do not apply generally to the property in the same zone and vicinity; nor was it shown that the variance was nec- essary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by other property in the same zone and vicinity. That it was not shown that the granting of the re- quested variance would not be injurious to property and improve- ments in the s~ne vicinity and zone and would not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. SECTION 4. That for the foregoing reasons, the applica- tion of David C. and Dorothy M. Ryder for a variance to permit the construction of a second dwelling upon the above described property is hereby denied. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, held on the 15th day of September , 1959, by the affirmative vote of at least three Councilmen, to wit: AYES: Councilmen Jacobi, Camphouse, Balser, Reibold and Phillips NOES: None ABSENT: None -2- 3172 K~~~f/t~~~ SIGNED AND APPROVED this 15th ATTEST: /?~' . , c:,y ~ ~ A7t- ~ City Clerk (SEAL) -3- 3172