HomeMy WebLinkAbout3469
RESOLUTION NO. 3469
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
DENYING A REQUESTED VARIANCE TO
ALLOW THE USE OF PROPERTY AT 930 AND
950 WEST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN SAID
CITY FOR THE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT,
ENGINEERING, FABRICATION, ASSEMBLY
AND SERVICING OF ELECTRONIC AND.
ELECTRO-MECHANICAL MATERIALS, PRODUCTS
AND SYSTEMS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That there was filed with the City Planning
Commission on November 1, 1961, the applications of S. V. Hunsaker
and Ruth J. HunSaker, and of Mrs. George Morris, as owners, for a
zone variance to permit the research, development, engineering,
fabrication, assembly and servicing of electronic and electro-
mechanical materials, products and systems on prqperty located at
930 and 950 West Foothill Boulevard in the City of Arcadia, County
of Los Angeles, State of California, described as follows:
A portion of Lots 10, 11 and 12, Los Robles de
Santa Anita Tract, as shown on map recorded in
Book 33, page 20, of Maps, records of said
County, described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the south line of
Foothill Boulevard (80 feet wide) distant East
162.5 feet from the west line of said Lot 10;
thence South along a line parallel with and
distant 162.5 feet East from the west line of
said lot a distance,of 433 feet, more or less,
to the north line of proposed Foothill Freeway;
thence West along said north line 812.5 feet,
more or less, to the west line of said Lot 12;
thence North thereon 445 feet, more or less, to
the south line of Foothill Boulevard; thence
East thereon 812.5 feet to the point of beginning.
That after due notice as required by the Zoning Ordinance of said
City, as amended, a publiC hearing was duly held on the matter by
and before said City Planning Commission on January 9, 1962, at
which time all interested persons were given a full opportunity to
-1-
3469
be heard and to present evidence. That on January 23, 1962, said
.
City Planning Commission adopted its certain Resolution No. 439
wherein and whereby it recommended the denial of the requested
variance.
SECTION 2. That there were many protests, both oral and
written to the granting of the requested variance on the grounds
that any industrial use would be incompatible with the present high-
class residential development on Foothill Boulevard; that the value
of such residential property would decrease; and that once an in-
dustrial use were allowed in a portion of the area, it would be
difficult to keep it from expanding to the balance thereof.
SECTION 3. That subject property is a site with an 812.5
foot frontage on the south side of Foothill Boulevard and a depth
of 440 feet to the north line of the proposed Foothill Freeway, con-
taining 8.15 acres; that it is zoned R-1; that there are two resi-
dences on the easterly portion of subject property and the westerly
portion thereof is vac,ant. That all of the lots on the south side
of Foothill Boulevard are large lots containing two and one-half to
five acres each, and all are zoned R-1; that the property in the
neighborhood on the north side of Foothill Boulevard is zoned R-O
and developed with fine homes, well above the average in the City.
Th~t it has not been shown that there are any exceptional or extra-
ord~nary circumstances or cond~tions applicable to subject property
that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity;
nor has it been shown that the requested variance is necessary for
the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of
the applicants possessed by other property in the same zone and
vicinity.
-2-
3469
SECTION 4. That the granting of a variance to allow an
industrial use in such neighborhood of exceptionally high-class
residential property would be materially detrimental to the prop-
erty and improvements in the zone and vicinity in which subject
property is located. That while the plans and description of the
requested use indicate that the building and the business to be
conducted therein would be a desirable addition to the City of Ar-
cadia, there is ample property in the City presently zoned for in-
dustrial use; and the granting of the requested variance would ad-
versely affect the comprehensive general plan. That on January 30,
1962, applicants in writing requested that their said application
for a zone variance be withdrawn.
SECTION 5. That for the foregoing reasons the request for
a variance to allow the use of property at 930 and 950 West Foothill
Boulevard in the City of Arcadia for the research, ,development, en-
gineering, fabrication, assembly and servicing of electronic and
electro-mechanical materials, products and systems is hereby denied.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted
at a regular ~eeting of the City Council of the City of Arcadia held
on the 20th day of February , 1962, by the affirmative vote of
at least three Councilmen, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Phillips,
Reibo1d and Balser '
None "
ABSENT: None
~~;/JZ~~ a \-.u t1LtZ~
Cfi~v't:re;k of ~ '{~ of Arcadia
SIGNED AND APPROVED this 20th day of February , 1962.
ATTEST:
~fi~i~
' or 0 theCi y 0 Arca ia
-3-
3469