HomeMy WebLinkAbout3494
...
RESOLUTION NO. 3494
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
DENYING A REQUESTED VARIANCE FOR A
SECOND DWELLING AT 931 SOUTH EIGHTH
AVENUE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That there was filed with the City Planning
Commission on March 12, 1962, the application of Saeed E. Murad and
Gloria H. B. Murad, as owners, for a zone variance to allow a second
dwelling on property located at 931 South Eighth Avenue in the City
of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described
as follows:
The south 87.5 feet of Lot 68, Tract No. 808,
as shown on map recorded in Book 16, pages 82
and 83, of Maps, records of said county;
that after due n~tice as required by the Zoning Ordinance of said
City, as amended, a publiC hearing was duly held on the matter by
and before said City Planning Commission on March 27, 1962, which
hearing was duly continued to April 10, 1962, at each of which
times all interested persons were given a full opportunity to be
heard and to present evidence. That on April 10, 1962, said City
Planning Commission adopted its certain Resolution No. 444 wherein
and whereby it recommended the granting of the requested variance.
TOat pursuant to Section 9291.2.8 of the Arcadia Municipal Code
a written appeal from said decision of the, City Planning Commis-
sion was duly filed with the City Council by persons aggrieved
thereby, pursuant to which a public hearing on s,aid matter was
held by and before the City Council on June 6, 1962, at which time
all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and
to present evidence.
-1-
3494
SECTION 2. That there were protests, both oral and
written to the granting of the variance. That although it is pos-
sible to place the second house on subject property, there are
other large properties in the immediate vicinity, and elsewhere
throughout ,the City that do not enjoy the extra dwelling privileges.
That subject property has not been maintained in accordance with
the standards of the neighborhood. That applicants' claimed neces-
sity for the variance is not supported but rather controverted by
the facts set forth in the record of the within proceedings, and
it has not been shown that the variance is necessary for the preser-
vation of any property right of the applicant possessed by other
property in the same zone or vicinity. That the granting of the
requested variance from the zoning requirements would under the cir-
cumstances be injurious to property and improvements 'in the vicinity.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons the recommen-
dation of the City Planning Commission contained in its Resolution
No. 444 is hereby disapproved, the appeal from said recommendation
is hereby sustained, and the request for a variance to allow a
second house on subject property at 931 South Eighth Avenue in the
City of Arcadia is hereby denied.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Arcadia held
on the 19th day of June , 1962, by the affirmative vote of at
least three Councilmen, to wit:
-2-
3494
AYES:
NOES:
-
Councilmen Balser, Phillips, Turner and
Butterworth
Councilman Reibold
,ABSENT: None
, . Z; ~
~th~CiY~~
SIGNED AND APPROVED this 19th day of June, 1962.
I1d /.h~
ATTEST,:
~~
Ci ty Clerk'
(SEAL)
-3-
3494