HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPTEMBER 16,1969
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUT!l
APPjlOV AL
HEARING
(ZONE
CHANGE)
f-(07b
I
18:7508
M I NUT E S
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 16,1969
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, met in regular
session in the Council Chamber of the Arcadia City Hall on September
16, 1969, at 8:00 P.M.
Rev. Stanley Hunt, Arcadia Christian Church
Mayor C. Robert Arth
PRESENT:
ABSENT: '
Butterworth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Arth
None
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 2, 1969, were APPROVED
on MOTION by Councilman Hage, seconded by Coun~ilman Considine and
carried unanimously.
Appeal filed by Dale L, Ingram on behalf of owners of property at
141 and 143 W. Colorado Boulevard from the decision of the Planning
Commission in its denial of their application for a zone change from
R-l to R-3 on said property.
The Planning Director summarized the Commission's findings: that the
proposed change is not consistent with good zoning practice; that
the property is capable of being developed with single family dwellings;
that there is adequate property within the City zoned R-3; that the
Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way is elevated and shields the subject
property from any influence of R-3 property and on the northeasterly
side of the right-of-way; all other property adjacent to the subject
property on the southerly side of the right-of-way is zoned R-l and
that an R-3 use of the property would be an undesirable intrusion into
a single family residential area.
Mayor Arth declared the hearing open and Dale L. Ingram, acting as
agent and consultant for the two owners, explored in detail the
topography of the land, the footage on all boundaries of the
triangularly shaped property. One parcel has been unimproved for
many years whereas the Division of Highways recently acquired by
condemnation the railroad access strip from the other parcel
necessitating the removal of an existing duplex building therefrom.
With reference to the railroad he felt that th~ noise and dust
generating therefrom makes the property unsuitable for R-l use,
whereas with R-3 it is possible to screen out such problems. He
noted the adjacent zoning and stated in part that rezoning the subject
property to R-3 would not be detrimental to the single family dwellings
in that it is buffered from the rear yard of properties facing San Luis
Rey Road by the 25' railroad access road. He continued by explaining
setbacks, location of carports, recreation facilities, architectural
aspects and noted revenue which would be forthcoming from the proposed
development. He asked for the opportunity to demonstrate ability and
willingness to construct an apartment complex which would be an asset
to the city.
Speaking in opposition: Fred Fowler, 512 San Luis Rey Road, stated in
part that he represented some of the residents in the so-called Santa
Anita Gardens adjacent to the subject properties who objected to the
9-16-69
- 1 -
18:7509
facility primarily due to the increased traffic which has already
doubled on Colorado Boulevard because of the freeway and spoke of
his personal problems getting to and from his home; that there
was sufficient R-3 property within the city; that residents do
not object to the railroad because they purchased their homes with
the full knowledge of its existence. In conclusion he asked that
the area remain R-l, free from the problems accompanying apartment
bl1ildings.
Charles Kelly, 516 San Luis Rey Road, agreed with Mr.
felt there is ample R-3 property at the present time;
have a right to ask protection from increased traffic
occupancy of multiple dwellings.
Fowler and
that residents
which follows
I
JOe Marsalek, 507 San Luis Rey Road, stated in part that he had heard
no new evidence which would offset the decision of the Commission,
and that the new facility would subject more people to the noise of the
railroad, and the only impediment from R-l development is the refusal
of one of the subject property owners to sell his property making it
economically possible to improve with single family dwellings. Lastly
he referred to the traffic problem which in his opinion would be worse
dl1ring the racing season.
HEARING
CLOSED
No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Considine and carried
unanimously.
Councilman Considine stated in part that he visited the area in question
and observed the increased traffic on Colorado Boulevard; that to him
it would seem logical to improve the two parcels with a joint R-l
development consistent with the zoning therefor. He noted that the
property does not have the unique characteristics of the parcel zoned
for R-3 at what is referred to as the 'y' on Colorado Boulevard in that
the subject property is level, has access and could accommodate a cuI
de sac type of subdivision. He would sustain the Commission in its
recommendation for denial.
Councilman Hage stated in part that he agreed with Mr. Considine that
the property appears to be acceptable for R-l usage.
Mayor Arth observed in part that he would have to agree that there is
good reason to believe the land could be developed R-l; that residents
have lived near the railroad for a number of years without irritation,
that the subject deep lots would lend to a cuI de sac type of development.
Councilman Helms felt there was really nothing presented to logically or
reasonably rezone the subject land to R-3 at the present time.
Councilman Considine then MOVED to sustain the recommendation of the
Planning Commission to deny the application for a zone change; that
the property at 141 and 143 W. Colorado Boulevard remain zoned R-l.
I
Motion seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll call 'vote as
follows:
~ AYES:
NOES:
, rll~~~' --) ABSTAIN:
} tY fr'J'
r 1 ~ ABSENT :
~
Councilmen Considine, Hage, Helms, Arth
None
Councilman Butterworth (advised he is involved in another
matter with the applicant, Mr. Ingram, and, wished to
abstain from voting).
None
9-16-69
- 2 -
I
I
CODE
AMENDMENT
(ACCESSORY
BUILDINGS)
LIGHT
STANDARDS
(Height)
18:7510
The Planning Director explained the revised report dated September 10
of the Zoning Committee and the Planning Department on the recommendation
concerning the method of determination of the percentage figures relating
'to accessory building floor area, total building floor area and rear
yard coverag~. It was noted in his presentation that the basic intent
is to protect residential single family areas and to prevent the accumu-
lation of structures which could be used at some future time for living
purposes. (This matter had been referred back to the Commission on
August 19 for additional review and justification for the proposed
restrictions as contained in Resolution No. 679).
A desire for further clarification was indicated on the part of the
Council, Whereupon Councilman Butterworth MOVED to ask the Planning
Commission and staff to work with the City Attorney in the preparation
of a more definitive resolution based on the new concept. Motion
seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously.
The Planning Director advised that the Technical Study Committee concluded
that the height of light standards should be increased to a maximum of 20'
as compared to present requirements of 15'. The proposed light standard
height would be limited to outdoor retail sales located in Zones C-l, C-2,
C-C and C-M zones. The Committee further concluded that present regulation
requiring lighting fixtures to be hooded and arranged to reflect away from
adjoining properties and streets under the proposed 20' height, would pe
sufficient to insure the continuous comfort and safety of adjoining prop-
erties and streets, and that the illumination at ground level not exceed
200 footcandles.
Indicating a desire to receive the Planning Commission's formal
recommendation by'resolution, it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded
by Councilman Considine and carried unanimously that the matter be
referred to the Planning Commission for such purpose. Mr. Helms asked
that a 'demonstration be arnn ged of the range 'of reflection at the
proposed height and expressed concern with the lighting to be installed
at the Huntington Ford Leasing Company, Huntington'Drive and Santa Clara
Avenue. Said company will be advised of the new requirements.
Upon advice of the City Manager and the Director of Public Works that the
contractor for the beautification of Baldwin Avenue median strip has
satisfactorily'completed the project, it was MOVED by Councilman Considine,
seconded by Councilman Hage and carried on roll call vote as follows, that
(Baldwin the work performed by the G. T, S. Company be ACCEPTED and that FINAL
Avenue)' ~ PAYMENT in accordance with the contract be AUTHORIZED. Staff was commended
:r 100'1/7 on the final project.
AYES: 'Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Arth
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
WORK
COMPLETION
AND ACCEPTANCE
WORK
CO~LETION
AND ACCEPTANCE
(Foothill
BlVJ {of I
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(Baldwin
Avenue)
Upon advice of the City Manager and the Director ,of Public Works that the
contractor for pavement repairs and sealing of Foothill Boulevard from
Baldwin Avenue to Fifth Avenue has satisfactorily completed the project,
it was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Considine
and carried on roll call vote as follows, that the work performed by the
C. C. S. Cons truction Company be ACCEPTED and that FINAL PAYMENT in
accordance with the contract be AUTHORIZED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Arth
None
None
The City Manager and Director of Public Works recommended that the
prima facie speed limit on Baldwin Avenue between Camino Real and Live
Oak Avenue be increased to 35 miles per hour. It was noted in their
report dated September 12 that surveys conducted by the Police and
Public Works Departments indicated the need for the establishment of
a posted speed limit.
9-16-69
- 3 -
ORDINANCE
NO. 1402
INTRODUCED
SIDEWALK
PROGRAM
(Phase IV)
l' ( I ;) I C-
~
LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS
NOS. 32 & 33
, 11 ,BANNERS
;\ \' .
EVENT :-.
)(....
l?tL I~\' L'
(I, (\
I)
18:7511
Whereupon the City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the
conterit and read the title of Ordinance No. 1402, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADDING SECTION 3221.8 TO THE
ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING A THIRTY-FIVE (35) MILE PER HOUR
SPEED LIMIT ON BALDWIN AVENUE SOUTHERLY OF CAMINO REAL AVENUE."
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Butterworth
and carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full
body of Ordinance No. 1402 be WAIVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Arth
None
None
I
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Butterworth
and carried on roll call vote as follows, that Ordinance No. 1402 be
INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Arth
None
None
The Public Works Department, with the cooperation and recommendation of
the Arcadia Unified School District, prepared a neW plan for sidewalks
to be constructed during the next three year period, namely Phase IV, V
and VI. A report dated September 12 categorically detailed streets to
be so improved and indicated on a map attached thereto.
On MOTION by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Considine and
carried on roll call vote as follows, the proposed addition to the
sidewalk program was APPROVED and the City Clerk was AUTHORIZED to
advertise for bids on PHASE IV pursuant to a delineated map. Funds
for the project are contained in the Capital Improvements Project
Budget for the fiscal year 1969-70.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Arth
None
None
On MOTION by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried
unanimously that the City Engineer be and he is hereby ordered to file
a report in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Lighting
Maintenance District Act of 1927, Division 14, Part 3 of the Streets
and Highways Code. Be it noted that the reports must be filed by
October 7, 1969, to permit completion of the formation of the districts
by the end of the current year.
It was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried unanimously that the request of the San Gabriel Valley Lapidary
Society for permission to install banners over Baldwin Avenue south of
the intersection at Duarte Road be APPROVED subject to the satisfaction
of the Director of Public Works. It will publicize the Fifth Biennial
Gem and Mineral Show to be held at the Masonic Temple Lodge on November
1, 2, 1969. Appropriate insurance certificates to be filed designating
the city as an additional insured.
I
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Considine and
carried unanimously that the request of the West Arcadia Business and
Professional Association for permission to hold its annual "Petting Zoo"
in the parking area west of the stores on Baldwin Avenue between Duarte
Road and Naomi Avenue on October 6-11 be APPROVED. It was noted that
the required insurance certificate has been filed.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
A prospective resident was advised to contact the Director of Public
Works concerning the construction of sidewalks on the south side of
Camino Real.
9-16-69
- 4 -
"
I
PROCEDURAL
ORDINANCE
WAIVED
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
ADVANCE OF
FUNDS
~'111
BANNERS
r\)
GUIDELINES
TO BE
DR;f
AWARD
PRESENTATIONS
'~()
() , EQUIPMENT
~ PURCHASE
I
LEGISLATIVE
POLICE
FACILITY
PROGRESS
18:7512
In order to consider the following items, it was MOVED by Councilman
Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll call vote
as follows, that the provisions of the Procedural Ordinance be WAIVED,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Arth
None
None
It was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Considine
and carried on roll call vote as follows, that $1,000 be advanced the
Chamber of Commerce from budgeted funds.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Arth
None
None
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Butterworth
and carried unanimously that the Lions Club be permitted to install
banners to publicize its White CaneDrive between September 22 and
October 6, subject to the installation satisfaction of the Director
of Public Works.
On suggestion of Councilman Helms, it was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth,
seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously that the City
Attorney draft a resolution delegating authority to staff for the approval
of requests to install banners, i. e., for non profit organizations and
the like. The City Manager, at his discretion, could submit those in
question to the Council.
The City Council concurred in the suggestion of Councilman Hage that
when retiring Board and/or Commission members are to be presented with
plaques or awards that the members of the individual board or commission
be invited to attend the particular meeting.
It was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the recommendation of the
Fire Chief be ACCEPTED; that two resuscitator-inhalators be purchased
at a cost of $640 each plus incidentals to total approximately $1350,
to be installed on pumpers at the Orange Grove and Baldwin Avenue stations
to service the northern section and the western section respectively; that
the Fire Chief be instructed to report back to Council within six months
as to what effect, if any, they have had on the adequacy of fire protection.
(Funds from Council Contingency Account).
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Arth
None
None
Councilman Butterworth referred to Assembly Bill 325, Chapter 1512,
which was signed by the Governor on September 4, concerning conflict of
,interest of public officials and public employees and candidates for
State, County and local elective offices. Staff will obtain additional
information. The League of California Cities is expected to issue a
detailed analysis.
The City Manager advised that staff is still searching for an expert
in the field of communications whose assistance is necessary before
the employment of an architect for the proposed addition to the
police building.
9-16-69
- 5 -
18:7513
CONFERENCE
ATTENDANCE
Brief discussion held on the forthcoming League of California Conference
to be held in San Francisco.
BUTTERWORTH
EXCUSED
On MOTION by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried unanimously, Councilman Butterworth was EXCUSED from attending
the regular meeting of October 21. He will be out of the city.
ART
EXHIBIT
Councilman Considine commented on a most worthwhile art exhibit at the
City Libr~ry by a twelve year old boy.
EXECUTIVE
SESSION
At 9:30 P.M., the City Council, with the City Manager, entered an
executive session in the Conference Room.
I
RECONVENE
and
ADJOURNMENT
At, 10:10, P.M., the City Council reconvened in the Chamber and adjourned
si~e die immediately thereafter:
(!/~~ &2z
Mayor
~~~
City Clerk
I
9-16-69
- 6-