HomeMy WebLinkAboutDECEMBER 2,1969
CITY COUNCIL PROCEfDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
18:7544
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 2,' 1969
I
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, ,California, met in regular
session in the Council Chamber of the Arcadia City Hall on December
2, 1969, at 8:00 P,M.
INVOCATION
Rev, Norvall Hadley, Arcadia'Friends Church
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Pro Tempore Edward L, Butterworth
ROLL CALL'
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Butterworth, Considine, Rage, ~elms
Councilman Arth
MINUTE
AP~OVAL
On request of Councilman Helms and on MOTION by Councilman Considine,
seconded by Councilman Hage and carried, the Minutes of the regular
meeting of November 18 were AMENDED to reflect, as part of the record,
a communication from Mr, Helms setting forth his position in opposing
the repeal of the city's parking tax ordinance, Mr, Helms presented
a copy of said letter to the City Clerk and it is hereby made part of
the official record, The Minutes, as thus amended, were APPROVED on
MOTION by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and carried
unanimously, Councilman Helms abstained from voting as he was absent
from said meeting',
I
HEARING Appeal filed by Joseph E. Rognstad from the decision of the Planning
(Lot Split) Commission in its denial of his application for a division of property
p' L-t ~ J,;fat 371 Warren Way, (Continued from November 18),
, ~ (FULL TRANSCRIPT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK). James T,
LeBerthon, attorney for the applicant, addressed Council stating in
PART that there are two arguments in the matter - one based on the
law and the city municipal code as it applies thereto - the second
based on the facts under the law as it has ,been applied by the Commission,
He continued that the minutes of that body indicate that after considera-
tion of the comments of its members it denied the application because
they looked with disfavor on the request in that a,division of the property
would detract from the esthetic value and graciousness of the neighborhood
and in one instance that the lot is not compatible with the general area
according to Code Section 9122.5. He read said'section into the record
(adopted May 7, 1963), He then called attention to the Business and
Professions Code of,the State, Section 11540, as amended in the Statutes
of 1965, ,and read th~ first portion of that section into the record -
which he stated overruled local jurisdiction; that the section upon
which the 'Commission based its authority to make a decision provides
grounds for denial of a lot split different from those for denial in the
case of a s~bdivision and that the continued application of Section 9122.5
of the Municipal Code imposes a regulation more restrictive for lot splits
than for subdivisionso
He explored the dimensions of the proposed lot split which he stated in
part meets and exceeds the requirements in an R-l zone and if the setback
were used to deny the application it would deprive the applicant of the
best use and enjoyment of his premises similar to the taking of a street
or potential public street for public use and possibly grounds for inverse
condemnation; that the use of Section 9122,5 as applied, if the lot is
considered incompatible with the neighborhood, is invalid, and as an
ordinance, in excess of the. legislative jurisdiction of the municipality
12-2-69
- 1 -
18:7545
since it has not been applied to subdivisions; that the Business and
Professions Code applies to Charter Cities and authorizes them to
regulate lot splits within certain limitations and those limitations
being that a City cannot impose any stricter.requirement in the case
of applications for lot splits than applies to applications for sub-
divisions.
A member of the Planning staff referred to its report which noted in
part that the property division is proposed to create two parcels from
one R-l lot; that they have dimensional characteristics; that the
existing structures are to remain. The Department recommended against
the lot split as it believed it would be detrimental in the long range
interests of the city-it could serve to encourage further proliferation I
of minimum sized lots in stabilized residential areas composed of large
sized lots. He noted on a map lots in the area with similar dimensions
which could become future lot splits; that it would provide a basis for
changed population densities, reduced quality of residential construction
'and heavier traffic flow. Reference was made to the possibility of rezoning
:ehe area in order to maintain the present character, He concluded by ad-
vis~ng C9uncil if it were to approve the lot split certain conditions should
be impose'd,
Mr. LeBerthon continued his presentation - in part - that although it is
commendable for the Planning staff to take into consideration the afore-
mentioned points there is no lawful authority, as the code now stands,
by 'which the Commission can deny the lot split on the basis of those con-
siderations under Section 9122,5 - that whether or not those points are
validly made or the opinions cogent - it is immaterial to the granting of
the lot split.
Joseph Rognstad, the applicant, addressed Council - in part - that there
are presently 19 non-conforming lots in the subject area and pointed out
property divisions similar to that for which he is applying. He felt
that the requested lot split would not lead to proliferation because
there are so 'few remaining lots which could be so divided,
Mr. LeBerthon then explored the type of residences proposed for construction
which would be in the $50,000 bracket, and in his opinion would not detract
from the neighborhood, He closed his remarks by stating in part that it
has not been shown in the Planning'Department report how the area could be
adversely affected, He asked for and received permission to speak to the
,
matter b~fore the hearing was closed,
Robert Newell, 404 Los Altos, commented that with so few rema.n.ng lots
adequate for dividing, the proposed lot split would improve the area and
cited possibilities.
No one else desiring to speak in favor of the application, those in
opposition were then heard.
Thomas R. Henderson, 329 Warren Way, stated in part that after hearing thel
presentation of Messrs. LeBerthon and Rognstad he could offer only a plea;
that the residents chose the area because of the large lots with low
population density, He felt that a division of the property would lead
to future lot splits and a general degradation of the area - more vehicular
traffic, increased school enrollment and perhaps to an economic depression
in the entire area, He noted that the residents may request a rezoning.
A petition in opposition and signed by property owners in the immediate
area was then presented to the City Clerk, He asked that the Planning
Commission recommendation for denial be upheld,
Dennis Garside, 482 Los Altos, referred to an adjacent substandard street
and a landscaped small corner lot, which he felt detracts from the neighbor-
hood, He asked for denial of the application,
12-2-69
- 2 -
, ,
18:7546
George Enell, 2509 Albert Way, asked that the large lots be preserved
which was one of his reasons for moving into the area,
Tom Dittmar, 356 W, Palm Drive, speaking on behalf of his parents,
explored the present improvements and asked that consideration be
given to what could be constructed if the property were divided, He
asked that the application be denied,
The City Clerk read into the record two communications: Merrill L,
Swan, 372 Warren Way', in opposition, and,from George A, and Emma F,
Burk, 401 Los Altos Avenue, in favor,
I
Mr, LeBerthon stated in part that perhaps it would be a proper step
for the concerned residents to seek a rezoning, but that during the
interim the property is zoned R-l; that the requested lot split
conforms to the Code and the only basis for disapproval is apparently
an esthetic one for which there seems to be no lawful authority; that
he and his client are prepared to litigate the issue if necessary
which would be unfortunate when the law seems to be clear,
Mr, Rognstad clarified the ownership of the very small corner lot to
which Mr. Garside referred - that it is owned and landscaped by the
City. He has no interest in the property,
HEARING
CLOSED
No one else desiring to be heard the Hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried
unanimously.
In view of the appeal based in part on the proposition that as a matter
of law the Council is compelled to grant the lot split if there is no
legal basis for denying it, Mayor pro tempore Butterworth asked the City
Attorney for an opinion,
The City Attorney ruled that the City's ordinance is valid,
Councilman Hage agreed there are substandard lots in the city which
cannot now be changed, that he is primarily concerned with the effect
the lot split could have on the larger lots in the highly developed
area; that he would have to abide by the decision of the Commission
and leave the legality of the ordinance up to the City Attorney.
Councilman Helms stated in part that he was present during the proceedings
before the Commission; that there had not been anything new presented at
this hearing, He concurred with Councilman Hage and felt that the resi-
dential appeal of the subject area is its large lots, He felt that the
conclusion drawn by the attorney for the applicant does not necessarily
follow from the premises that were made; that in his opinion when a
division of property would be injurious to a neighborhood, such division
could be legally and properly denied.
I
Councilman Considine stated in part that he would support the decision of
the Commission and was only concerned with the legal aspect which the City
Attorney has clarified,
In view of the above observations, Mayor pro tempore Butterworth called
for a motion.
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Considine, and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that Council overrule the appeal
and sustain the action of the Planning Commission in its denial of the
application for a lot split at 371 Warren Way,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
12-2-69
- 3 -
HEARING
Used Car
Lot
~$;Z
APPROVED
HEARINGS
L M D
32 & 33
FORMATION
;? /.1//
-r- / ,:lj A..
RESOLUTION
NO. ~ '/103
ADOPTED
~ /.;V/
RESOLUTION
NO. ~ ,//0,/
ADOPTED
~ /.;i/f<
18: 7547
Application of the Cu-Bar Motors, Inc., for a business permit to operate
a used car sales lot at 400 E, Huntington 'Drive, Mayor pro tempore
Butterworth opened the hearing and no one desiring to speak to the matter,
the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Considine, seconded by
Councilman Helms and carried unanimously, Whereupon it was MOVED by
Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously
that the application be APPROVED and that a business permit be so issued,
Pursuant to Resolution Nos, 4093 and 4094 concerning the formation of
Lighting Maintenance District Nos, 32 and 33 respectively, this was the
time scheduled for hearing from anyone interested and the public in
general on the proposed formation, Mayor pro tempore Butterworth deClaredl
the hearings open and Charles Harding, 145 E. Live Oak Avenue, requested
information as to the responsibility of the cost of District No. 33, The
City Manager and Director of Public Works explained that the property
owners will not be assessed for the installation of this particular distri ,
only for the power and maintenance, No one else desiring to be heard, the
hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman
Rage and carried unanimously.
Whereupon the City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No, 5003, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ORDERING THE FORMATION OF LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 32",
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full body
of Resolution No, 5003 be WAIVED,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that Resolution No, 5003 be
ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No, 5004, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA ORDERING THE FORMATION OF LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 33",
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the read~ng of the full body
of Resolution No, 5004 be WAIVED.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that Resolution No. 5004 be
ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
12-2-69
- 4 -
I
I
CIVIL
DEFENSE
&
DISASTER
BOARD
(continued)
-/- f33
PERSONNEL
(Police
Salaries)
J:rf
A' ,
. .
'" ~-;..-:v ,~././
18:7548
Recommendation of the Civil Defense & Disaster Board concerning a
proposed revised ordinance. The matter first came before Council
on pctober 18, The City Attorney submitted detailed comparisons of
the existing ordinance and the proposed revised ~ections. The pro-
posed ordinance follows the models recommended by the State and
County Civil Defense a~d Disaster agencies.
Extensive discussion ensued and it was the consensus of the Council
that it could not at this time vote for the change especially in the
area of the. declaration of emergencies, ,chain of command, etc. A
record of comments made at this meeting will be compared by staff with
the existing ordinance, a compilation thereof will be made and sub-
mitted to the Civil Defense and Disaster Board for its further considera-
tion and recommendation.
Personnel Board recommendation concerning the request of Police Lieutenants
Neal R, Johnson and Howard L, Piland asking for a waiver of Rule IV Section
3,a of the Personnel Rules and Regulations and place them on the D-step of
the Lieutenant classification, It appears that at the time all salaries
were adjusted to be effective July 1, 1969, there was also an adjustment of
the interval between Sergeant and Lieutenant. As a result, a situation was
created where a Sergeant promoted to Lieutenant after July 1, under the
rules and regulations, could be placed in a higher pay step than the two
Lieutenants who had been promoted to the position prior to July 1, 1969,
The Board recommended that the two Lieutenants be placed in Step D of the
Lieutenant classification effective July 1, 1969, and their anniversary
date for the purpose of promotion to the next step be July 1, 1969,
Councilmen Considine and Helms felt that an executive session would be in
order to discuss this personnel matter. However, the City Attorney ruled
that it was not a proper matter for an executive session. Councilmen Hage
and Butterworth accepted the ruling and in order to have it in the record
it was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Helms that
the Council adjourn to an executive session in order to discuss this
particular item, Roll call was then taken,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Helms
Councilmen Rage, Butterworth
Mayor Arth
MOTION FAILED TO CARRY
During the discussion the City Manager explained that it is not unusual
in governmental agencies operating with five-step pay plans to have
overlapping ranges wherein such problems do occur. The Council concurred
that the City Manager and Personnel Director had acted properly under the
present rules and regulations, however, it was the consensus of Council
that relief should be granted the two Lieutenants and that perhaps some
procedure should be worked out whereby the City Manager were given some
flexibility in such situations, Recommendations will be made for Council
cons id er at ion.
Councilman Considine stated in part that he is still of the op~n~on that
salary increases should be based on a merit system; that the present
method of salary increases does not inspire in every instance the effort
necessary to merit a raise; employees tend to feel that if they continue
the way they are that time alone will give them more money and in his
thinking this deadens incentive in some people and, although he is
entirely in favor of adjusting the subject two salaries, a problem still
exists.
It was then MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the recommendation of the
Personnel Board be APPROVED and that the two Lieutenants be placed in
12-2-69
- 5 -
18:7549
Step-D classification retroactive to July 1, 1969, which date is to be
used for the purpose of promotion to the next step on July 1, 1970,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
PERSONNEL The recommendation of the Personnel Board to eliminate the mandatory
(Water certification requirement of certain Water Department personnel was
Departm:j:nt) APPROVED on MOTION by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman'Hage
W 1f; 0-t and carried unanimously, It was noted by the City Manager and the
II,", ""it; ~.... Water Manager that the subject department will continue to encourage
~"'-pr .-'1'.....4'1" '-"':employees to attend school and obtain certificates; and in the event
mandatory and/or voluntary certification should be adopted in the
State, certified personnel would then be available,
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
(Drive-In
Photo)
CONTINUED
UTILITY
FUNDS
(Underground)
, EQUIPMENT
PURCHASE
(Police
Cars)
f: tf.~
WATER
RATES
(Held Over)
CONDITIONAL
USE PERl1IT
(Phillips
Petroleum)
-;: / ri atl
INSURANCE
PROGRAM
~-y'. p;
Planning Commission Resolution No. 688, granting a conditional use permit
for a drive-in photo processing business at the southeast corner of Live
Oak and Welland Avenues. The matter was continued until the regular
meeting of December 16, providing time for the filing of an appeal by any
interested citizen. The appeal period elapses December 5,
I
On MOTION by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried
unanimously, staff was instructed to prepare a resolution to be submitted
to the Public Utilities Commission recommending that it increase the
amount of funds which the utilities must provide for assisting under-
grounding assessment districts in residential areas, and also make
residential areas eligible when property owners of such a district have
created an assessment district under which they pay at least one-half
of the cost. It was noted that this would apply to the old subdivisions,
because such undergrounding is presently ,required in all new subdivisions.
The City Manager and the Acting Purchasing Officer reported on the one
bid received for the purchase of ten police patrol cars and two staff
cars (Police and Fire) and recommended awarding the contract ,therefor,
Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms
and carried on roll call vote as follows, that the contract for the
purchase of ten police cars and two staff cars be awarded to MacKaig &
Sons in the total amount of $21,870,35 which amount includes trade-ins
as set forth in the staff report dated December 2, 1969, Funds provided
,in the 1969-70 budget,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
At the request of the City Council, staff prepared an extensive report
on the possibility and feasibility of reducing the water rates, ,Discussion
and consideration of the matter was held over until the next regular
meeting (December 16) at which time a full council will be present.
I
Charles Finn, representing the Phillips Petroleum Company, owner of a
service station at the northwest corner of Santa Anita and Live Oak
Avenues, explained a misunderstanding relating to the granting of a
conditional use permit for the modernization of the station on December
17, 1968, During the deliberations reference was made to an 18 months
period which Mr. Finn understood was the time allotted for the remodeling.
However, he was advised that the permit expires within six months from
the date of approval and that he should reapply to the Planning Commission;
that the City Council cannot help at this point. The Planning Director
will endeavor to expedite the matter,
Council received, as an informative item, some material on a voluntary
mutual fund insurance program in amounts whereby all employees, regardless
of salary level, could participate, without cost to the City, The matter
will be considered in a study session to be held December 10 at 7:30 P,M.
in the Conference Room.
12-2-69
- 6 -
I
I
ORDINANCE
NO, 1403
READOPTED
~
ORDINANCE
NO. 1404
ADOPTED
~
ORDINANCE
NO. 1405
INTRODUCED
~
ORDINANCE
NO. 1406
18:7550
The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content and
read the title of Ordinance No, 1403, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REPEALING THE PARKING TAX."
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full body
of Ordinance No, 1403 be WAIVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor 'Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that Ordinance No, 1403 be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Butterworth
Councilman Helms
Mayor Arth
The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content ~nd
read the title of Ordinance No, 1404, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING SECTION 7212 OF THE ARCADIA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONCURRENT IMPROVEMENTS."
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried
on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full body of
Ordinance No, 1404 be WAIVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried
on roll call,vote as follows, that Ordinance No, 1404 be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content and
read the title of Ordinance No, 1405, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
CHANGE 531-601 WEST DUARTE ROAD FROM R-l TO RC3."
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full body
of Ordinance No. 1405 be WAIVED,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Helms
carried on roll call vote as follows, that Ordinance No, 1405 be
INTRODUCED,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
and
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content and
read the title of Ordinance No, 1406, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE IN THE R-~ AND R-O ZONES."
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Hage and carried
12-2-69
- 7 -
INTRODUCED
RESOLUTION
---
NO. ~'//<"
ADOPTED
/"
Al'POINTMENT
TO
PERSONNEL
BOAR~
1; -' j' c,.
CONSIDINE
HELMS
18:7551
on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full body of
Ordinance No. 1406 be WAIVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that Ordinance No, 1406 be
INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Rage, Helms, Butterworth
Councilman Considine
Mayor Arth,
I
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No, 5005, entitled: "A RESOLUTION AND ORDER OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PAY 50% OF
THE 1970-71 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT TAX."
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full
body of Resolution No, 5005 be WAIVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carr'ied on roll call vote as follows, that Resolution No. 5005 be
ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Rage, Helms, Butterworth
Councilman Considine
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Considine and
carried unanimously that Conley, Ferguson be appointed to fill the
vacancy on the Personnel Board created by the resignation of John
Sturgeon, Term to expire June 30, 1970, Mr, Ferguson is an official
with the Pacific Telephone Company and was welcomed by the City,Council,
At the request of Councilman Considine, staff prepared a preliminary
report concerning intersection lighting dated 'December 2. Statistical
data, power and maintenance costs, and total installation cost for
improved lighting were included therein, Staff will expand on the
program and make recommendation.
At the request of Councilman Helms, a study will be made of the lighting
in the parking lot and sidewalk area of the City Library. The parking I
area between the Library and the Masonic Lodge is especially in need of
adequate lighting,
At the request of Councilman Helms, staff will look into improved street
name identification in an endeavor to assist persons in locating a certain
street.
Councilman Helms made reference to a recent fire at an apartment complex
on Duarte Road. He commended the City Fire Department in its handling of
this emergency. He noted that in this particular instance it was possible
for equipment to reach the rear of the "building, but when the new apartment
building is completed next door it would be an impossible situation, He
felt that in construction such as this, additional fire hydrants or stand-
pipes should be required, and that same be approved at the planning stage
by the Fire Department, The City Manager explained firecall operations and
the equipment used, Staff will check into the uniform building code for
this and rear exit provisions in facility construction.
- 8 -
12-2-69
I
I
PROCEDURAL
ORDINANCE
RESOLUTION
NO, 5'fttl'6q/~b
ADOPTED
,,/"
ADJOURNMENT
18:7552
In order to consider the following matter, the prov~slons of the
Procedural Ordinance were WAIVED on MOTION by Councilman Hage, seconded
by Councilman Considine and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No, 5006, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA RE APPORTIONMENT AND EXPENDITURE OF GAS TAX FUNDS,"
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Considine and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full body
of Resolution No, 5006 be WAIVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
It was MOVED by Councilman Hage, seconded by Councilman Considine and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that Resolution No, 5006 be
ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
Mayor Arth
There being no further business the meeting was ADJOURNED SINE DIE
at 11:05 P.M" on MOTION by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman
Helms and carried unanimously.
{!I/~ a-ZL
Mayor
~~5?r~
City Clerk -
12-2-69
- 9 -