HomeMy WebLinkAboutJUNE 30,1970
1
1
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
BUDGET
(Salary
agreements)
( POLICE)
(FIRE)
18:7660
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 30, 1970
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, met in an
adjourned regular session in the Council Chamber of the Arcadia
City Hall on June 30, 1970, at 7:30 P.M.
Councilman C. Robert Arth
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
The City Manager explained that negotiations have taken place with
both the police and fire organizations; that an oral agreement had
been reached with the representatives of the police. The contents
of the proposed agreement were not revealed inasmuch as the member-
ship had not been informed of the proposal. It was pointed out by
the City Attorney that Council could not adopt in the budget an agree-
ment which had not been made public. Whereupon the following action
was taken which would provide for later adjustments relating to police
and fire salaries.
It was MOVED by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the previous staff
recommendation for police salaries be APPROVED and EFFECTIVE July 1,
1970, subject to some increase in the event that management and the
police organization reach a signed agreement by July 6, 1970.
Mayor Butterworth explained the intent of the motion: that management
has recommended salaries .as follows: 7~% increase which would place
salaries for policemen at $942, Sergeants at $1,090, lieutenants at
$1,203 and captains at $1,296; that these salaries are being approved
and adjustments will be made if management and the police organization
reach a signed agreement by July 6 which will be presented to Council
at its regular meeting of July 7. He then called for roll call vote
on the motion.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
None
The City Manager advised that there was also a tentative oral agreement
with the fire organization and recommended following the same procedure
as with the police organization.
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Hage that the
previous staff recommendation for fire salaries be APPROVED and EFFECTIVE
July 1, 1970, subject to some adjustment in the event management and the
fire organization reach a signed agreement by July 6.
Mayor Butterworth explained the intent of the motion: that management
has recommended salaries (based on the average salary of the 16 cities
used as a benchmark) as follows: firemen 7~% $919, engineers 10% $1,038,
inspector 12~% $1,064, captain 10% $1,145, batallion chief 10% $1,264,
dispatcher 7~% $702 subject to a signed agreement by July 6 for presen-
tation to Council at its July 7 regular meeting. He then called for the
roll call vote on the motion:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Arth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
Councilmen
None
None
- 1 -
6-30-70
ADDITIONAL
REVENUE
18:7661
Richard Mauch, 2500 South Santa Anita Avenue, President of the Police
Relief Association, introduced the attorney for the organization.
Ronald Liebow, 6404 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, stated in part
that along with representatives of the police organization he had
met with the City Manager and the Personnel Director and a tentative
agreement had been reached, which is thought will be beneficial to all
concerned. He expressed appreciation for the opportunity to negotiate
which had been made possible by Council granting an extension of time
in which to meet and confer. He then referred to a portion of
Proposition 2 which en toto would repeal, amend, revise and renumber
various provisions of the Constitution relating to local government. 1
His reference was to the possibility of retroactive pay for duties
already performed - all with relation to salaries if the agreement
is not signed until after July 1. The City Attorney responded in the
negative, commenting that Council could not approve retroactive payment.
Don Morgan, a 24 year employee with the fire department, asked if the
averages calculated on the basis of the 16 benchmark cities included
Ell. The City Manager answered that they are included in considering
any education and incentive program or stability payment by this or
any other city.
Discussion ensued on the difference of $209,919 between anticipated
revenue and expenditures as reflected in the preliminary budget for
1970-71. The difference was brought about by changes made during
budget study sessions and salary increases higher than anticipated.
The City Manager summarized adjustments as set forth in his communi-
cation dated June 29 and his recommendation of same date for the
adoption of a utility users tax of 5 percent. He noted that almost
all of the Charter Cities have adopted such a tax which has much greater
potential and growth flexibility than does an addition to the property
tax because it grows almost as rapidly as the sales tax as consumption
and rates both increase. He also noted the threat of State preemption.
He mentioned the various projects on which Council could proceed using
the utility tax as a means.
Councilmen Arth and Considine felt that the entire amount should not
be raised through a utility users tax, but a portion should be placed
on the property tax where property owners could recognize its purpose...
that a utility tax is the same as raising property taxes.
Councilman Hage stated in part that the fact that State could preempt
the City in this field has altered his thinking - that originally he
had also felt a portion should go on the property tax...but based on
the possibility of preemption he had changed his mind and would be in
favor of a 5% utility tax.
The City Manager stated in part that there is a Bill before the
Legislature at this time to impose a 5% tax on private utilities
including telephone, gas, electricity and private water companies;
that if enacted into law it would freeze Charter Cities which had
not adopted the utility tax or who had adopted a utility tax less
than 5%.
1
Councilman Arth submitted that 5% would raise $468,000 - equivalent
to 33~ on the property tax - that if a 5% utility user tax were
adopted (to which he is opposed) it would appear to him to be incumbent
upon Council to lower or make a proportionate decrease in the property
tax. He spoke in terms of a 13~ reduction.
Due to the many variables involved it was the consensus of a majority
of Council that it would be in order at this time to adopt a utility
users tax in principle - that the 5% could always be reduced inasmuch
as there could not possibly be any revenue until after October.
6-30-70
- 2 -
1
.1
ORDINANCE
NO. 1415
(Utility Tax)
ADOPTED
" \.'
" ....
18: 7662
Whereupon the City Attorney presented, explained the content and read
the title of Ordinance No. 1415, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE .CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF ARTICLE II OF
THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO PART 7 RELATING TO A
UTILITIES TAX."
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Hage and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full
body of Ordinance No. 1415 be WAIVED and that same be ADOPTED.
Councilman Considine stated for the record that he could not
approve an ordinance for a 5% utility users tax simply to attain a
tax position, without a corresponding reduction by ordinance in the
property tax.
Mayor Butterworth concurred in general, and stated in part that it
becomes incumbent upon Council to, at a later date, consider reducing
concompetently the property tax. He then called for the roll call
vote on the stated motion.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Hage, Helms, Butterworth
Councilmen Arth, Considine
None
MOTION CARRIED ON
A 3 TO 2 VOTE
Councilman Arth explained his negative vote - that it was predicated
on the fact that in his opinion an additional 33~ tax is being placed
on residents without a firm commitment to them -- that the amount it
will raise is over and above normal budgetary needs and it is without
concurrent commitment to reduce other taxes.
Mayor Butterworth observed that based on his previous statement concerning
the matter he had voted AYE.
RESOLUTION The City Attorney presented, explained the content of Resolution No.
NO. ~. <//</3 5043 and read the tit Ie, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
(Salarie~) OF ARCADIA, RE-AFFIRMING THE OFFICIAL SALARY STEP SCHEDULE FOR THE.'
VARIOUS POSITIONS IN THE CITY EMPLOY, ASSIGNING SCHEDULE NUMBERS TO
ADOPTED SUCH POSITIONS, AND ALTERING AND ADJUSTING THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM
COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS POSITIONS IN THE CITY EMPLOY, AND AMENDING
ALL PRIOR RESOLUTIONS TO CONFORM HEREWITH."
The City Attorney recommended its amendment to include previous action
establishing salaries for the police and fire organizations (this would
delete salaries as indicated on page 23 of said resolution under the
Public Safety Series and substitute the salaries announced from the
chair and adopted by minute motion earlier in this meeting). Councilman
Helms MOVED FOR SAID AMENDMENT. Motion seconded by Councilman Hage
and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
None
Resolution No. 5043 as AMENDED was then ADOPTED on MOTION by Councilman
Helms, seconded by Councilman Hage and carried on roll call vote as
follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
None
6-30-70
- 3 -
18:7663
RESOLUTION
NO . 5@<14 'I/<IY
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 5044, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING SECTION 3(a) AND SECTION 4(a) OF THE
(Vacations,etc)PERSONNEL RULES, RELATING TO VACATION AND SICK LEAVE."
ADOPTED
BUDGET
MOTION TO
REDUCE TAXES
TABLED
RESOLUTION
NO. ~ '/IJI.,-
AS AMENDED
ADOPTED
It was MOVED by Councilman Ar'th, seconded by,Councilman Considine and
carried on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full
body of Resolution No. 5044 be WAIVED and that same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Considine, Hage, Helms, Butterworth
None
None
1
Prior to taking action on the proposed budget for 1970-71 Mayor
Butterworth stated in part that with the permission of Councilmen
Hage and Helms, he would like to restate their position in voting
for the utility users tax; that no one likes to be part of a body
which puts in a new tax even with a 3-2 vote. He referred to the
difference in the revenue gap ($209,919) which has to be met by
some additional taxation...that there is no choice in the matter;
that in view of the 94~ levied by the County and the enormous property
tax levied by the School District a utility tax seems more likely to
him than increasing the property tax, along with the fact that there
is reason to believe if it were not adopted at this time the City
could be preempted by the State from ever levying a utility tax.
That there would be some dereLiction of duty on the part of Council
if it did not adopt the tax inasmuch as this is a Charter City.
Councilman Considine stated in part that the revenue gap could have
been closed by placing 15~ on the property tax - that instead a 5%
utility users tax has been levied which will raise the equivalent of
33~ on the property tax...that in his opinion Council should have, in
the same action, moved for a reduction of property tax to correspond
to the difference rather than have what is going to be the equivalent
of 19 or 20 additional funds which will simply go into capital projects
or increase the city coffers at the expense of taxpayers solely for
the purpose of preventing the State from preempting the City. He then
MOVED that the property tax be REDUCED 15~ to compensate for the increase
to taxpayers due to the utility tax. Councilman Arth SECONDED the
MOTION.
Following discussion and to provide time for staff to prepare tabulations
the matter will be.ta01ed....... until the next regular council meeting.
The City Manager recited all adjustments and revLsLons, after which
Councilman Hage MOVED to AMEND the preliminary budget for 1970-71 to
reflect all additions and changes as set forth by the City Manager.
Motion seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll call vote as
follows:
1
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
None
Whereupon the City Attorney presented, explained the content and read
the title of Resolution No. 5045, as AMENDED, entitled: "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1970-71".
It was MOVED by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Hage and carried
on roll call vote as follows, that the reading of the full body of
Resolution No. 5045 as amended be WAIVED and that same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Considine, Rage, Helms, Butterworth
None
None
6-30-70
- 4 -
1
1
APPOINTMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
18:7664
Councilman Hage placed in nomination the name of
as a member of the Arcadia Beautiful Commission.
appointment to the Library Board is expiring.
Mrs. Ernest Mortenson
Mrs. Mortenson's
Councilman Hage placed in nomination the name of Robert A. Huddy as
a member of the Planning Commission. Both nominations were seconded
by Councilman Arth. The nomination motion was carried unanimously
with the exception of Councilman Helms who abstained from voting on
the Planning Commissioner due to his professional relationment with
the appointee.
Councilman Considine then placed in nomination the name of Leonard
McKenzie for reappointment to the Recreation Commission. Nomination
seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanimously.
),1('1
At 9:30 P.M. the. meeting adjourned sine die.
fL4f I W~
Mayor
City Clerk
"
6-30-70
- 5 -