HomeMy WebLinkAboutNOVEMBER 18,1980
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
HEARING
Mod if ica tion
Tenth Avenue
I
25:0165
MINUTES
,
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
and the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGUIAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 1 8, 1980
The City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Arcadia Redevelopment
Agency met in a regular session at 7:30 p.m. November 18, 1980 in the
Arcadia City Hall Council Chamber.
Mrs. Mildred Free, Church of Christ Scientist, Arcadia
Scott Olmstead, Cub Scouts - Den 2 Pack 113
PRE SENT:
ABSENT :
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
Councilman Gilb
On MOTION by Councilman Dring, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried
unanimously Councilman Gilb was excused.
Appeal filed by George and Pauline Kallimanis from the decision of the
Planning Commission in its denial of their request to allow a zero south-
erly side yard setback accessory building in lieu of the 5 feet required;
an accessory building of two stories 21 feet in height in lieu of one
story 16 feet in height allowed and a total accessory building area of
4,548 sq. ft., in lieu of 888 sq. ft., allowed. It was noted that the
Commission felt the modifications would not secure an appropriate improve-
ment of the subject property and denied the request.
The Planning Director submitted that the property is zoned R-l and devel-
oped with a single family dwelling and accessory building with a total of
4,548 sq. ft. The second story addition was completed recently even though
a stop work order had been issued by the Building Department as early as
February 1980. It was noted that the side yard is large enough to have
accommodated the square footage for a single story structure. The Planning
Department did not find any justification for the second story addition.
Mayor Pellegrino declared the hearing open and Mrs. Kallimanis, 1031 S.
Tenth Avenue, said in part that prejudice was shown against them because
the structure was built prior to obtaining a modification approval; that
they have already been fined in municipal court' for not obtaining a permit
.. that they felt they are being discriminated against. She referred to a
neighbor who had applred for and received a modification for his zero- side
yard setback ... that no one contested his side yard setback and no one
contested theirs but he was granted his modification and they were denied
theirs ... that the Commission said their (Kallimanis) property is large
enough not to require a modification but the neighbor's property is even
larger than theirs.
Mrs. Kallimanis then circulated photographs of the subject property showing'
various angles of their property along with other properties on south Tenth,
Avenue. In response to a question Mrs. Kallimanis said in part that they
are not claiming hardship and they now understand that they proceeded in
violation of the law which they did not understand in the beginning.
George Kallimanis, 1031 S. Tenth Avenue, then responded to questions stat-
ing in part that they completed the first story without an inspector g1v1ng
them a stop work order ... that when they started the second floor the
-1-
11-18-80
25:0166
Building Department gave them the stop work order ... at that time the
walls were up and the roof was framed ... a month elapsed while they were
drawing up their plans .. and when they endeavored to obtain the permits
they were told a modification was needed .. this was after they received
a second stop work order. He also 2irculated drawings of the property in-
dicating various lot dimensions, some with zero or less then five foot side-
yard setbacks ... that some properties can construct second stories without
modifications because the lots are small and the second story can be attach-
ed to the homes ... they could not build an accessory building because they
do not have the room in their rear yards to build away from their houses.
Some discussion held on the right of privacy which was a concernof the City
Council.
Jerry Gillette, 1034 S. Ninth Avenue, referred to the fine which the appli- I
cants will have to pay through the Court if they do not get a permit from
the City. He said in part that when he saw the building going On he contact-
ed the Building Department - that after the stop work order construction con-
tinued right on. As far as a second story on homes it is sometimes a necess-
ity on smaller lots. He questioned why anyone would build a second story
when the lot was so large .. that it shows a lack of consideration for the
neighbors.
Bryce Dinsmore, 1028 S. Ninth Avenue, said in part the subject second story
was constructed illegally and that to him it is ugly and asked the City
Council how they would like to see it from their backyard.
Mike Nolan, 1122 S. Ninth Avenue, spoke in opposition to the structure in
question and said that it doesn't add to the neighborhood. He also said in
part that he believes they have too many horses ... that they should abide
by the law.
Greg Medeiros, 1110 S. Ninth Avenue, also spoke in opposition stating in
part that regarding the code being discriminatory between large and small
lots, that the Kallimanis' could build a two story structure on their main
house just as the others may do on smaller lots ... that the tack room is
built in such a way that there is a balcony off it .. that there are windows
.. He questioned the need for windows and the balcony in a storage setting
for horse equipment.
Marvin Westfall, 1101 S. Ninth Avenue, said that when he wanted to add to
his property he had to follow the Code requirements; that they should abide
by the law.
Gerry Yanosky, 1033 S. Ninth Avenue, said that a flagrant violation of the
law has been taken with no justification.
Mrs. Kallimanis said in part that they know they have done wrong; that
they will r~ve to pay a fine and submitted in part reasons for the delay in
preparing the requirements of the Building Department; that she feels they
are being crucified... that if they must they will take the structure down
and apply for new permits and construct something else.
Mr. Gillette, as spokesman for the opposing group, said in part that they
are definitely opposed to the second story structure. Mr. Dinsmore also
spoke again stating in part that if the structure is put up legally no one
could stop them.
I
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Coun-
cilman Dring, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried uananimously.
Councilman Saelid said in part that in this instance the applicants pro-
ceeded without concerning themselves with gaining the approval of the neigh-
bors or even coming to the City to seek some relief ... the matter went to
court which has issued its judgment .. that he was not concerning himself
now with what they did in terms of its legality that he was just point-
ing out that the available process was not used ... that the Modification
-2-
11-18-80
I
I HEARING
(Mayflower
Avenue)
25:0167
Committee and the Planning Commission do not feel it is an appropriate
improvement .. that now it is before the City Council.. that he too does
not consider it to be an appropriate improvement .,. that is the reason the
City has requirements in terms of land use in an endeavor to maintain a
community of nice homes and not invade other people's privacy.. that there
is plenty of land where the additional facility could have been built with-
out encroaching into the air space and into peoples' privacy... He would
have to support the Planning Commission.
Councilman Haltom commented in part that having been in construction all
his life he does not recall anyone violating a stop work order ... that
when the applicants did not obtain the proper permits they set the wheels
in motion against themselves. He expressed empathy for them because of
the financial difficulties but they were twice warned.
Councilman Dring also expressed sympathy for the plight they find them-
selves in and MOVED to approve the modification to allow a zero southerly
side yard setback to the accessory building in lieu of the 5 feet required.
Motion seconded by Councilman Haltom. Councilman Saelid said in part that
a zero yard setback in this instance is not a problem and that he could
support the motion .. that they have gone through the court system and the
court is answering his particular concern. Councilman Haltom then said in
part that the side yard setback may not be a problem now but it may be re-
gretted in the future .. he is against setbacks because it allows no access
to the property for firemen. Discussion ensued and the motion was AMENDED
thusly by Councilman Dring; to APPROVE the modification to allow a zero
southerly side yard setback to the accessory building in lieu of the 5
feet required with the condition that this approval is conditional on, the
accessory building remaining an open structure. Councilman Haltom with-
drew his second to the motion and Councilman Saelid seconded the motion
which carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Saelid, Pellegrino
Councilman Haltom
Councilman Gilb
Councilman Dring then MOVED that the modification to allow the accessory
building to be two stories or 21 feet in height be DENIED. Motion second-
ed by Councilman Saelid and carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
Councilman Dring further MOVED to grant approval for the total accessory
building area to be the existing size of the current single story struc-
ture now in place in lieu of the 888 sq. ft. allowed by the Code. Motion
seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Saelid, Pellegrino
Counc ilma n Ha 1 tom
Councilman Gilb
An appeal was filed by Mr. and Mrs. George E. Dwan, residing at 1506 S.
Mayflower Avenue, from the approval of the Planning Commision of a modi-
fication for a 3'0" southerly side yard setback for a bathroom addition
at 1500 S. Mayflower Avenue. The Commission felt that the applicant lacked
a viable alternative and that the addition would be architecturally compati-
ble with the existing dwelling .. also that the impact of the proposed addi-
tion would be mitigated by being adjacent to an existing garage and a 5'0"
high masonry wa 11 and tha t the 3 '0" s ide yard se tback would secure an appro-
priate improvement.
Mayor Pellegrino declared the hearing open and Howard Piland, the owner
of property at 1500 S. Mayflower Avenue, said in part that they have saved
-3-
11-18-80
25:0168
for this improvement for a long time; that he was asking oniy for the
bathroom addition and had withdrawn the origina,l request for a garage.
He' ~lso said in part that the masonry wall had only recently been con-
structed by Mr. Owan.
George E. Owan, 1506 S. Mayflower Avenue, said: in part that no other prop-
erty owner in the neighborhood has added on to the side yard'wVthin: so'
small a margin of a property line .. that a precedent could' be set which
could on~y lead to a condominium type atmosphere on a street with a rural
flair with every house being distinctly apart from its neighbor. He said
there are safety aspects involved.. that Mr. Piland's gas, line' and meter
are on the same side as the proposed modification and would be within two
feet of their property line. In stating his opposition he said in part
tha t if any loss, is incurred to their property they would hold the Plan-
ning Commission and the City as well as Mr. Piland liable if the modifi-
cation is approved,. He felt the quality of the environment would be ser-
iously threatened. He said further in part that they constructed the wall
to protect their property.. to indicate where the property ends and' not
have it shared'with a neighbor and become permanent.
I
Lowell M. Jones, 1512 S. Mayflower Avenue, was advised that the garage
request has been withdrawn.
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED' on MOTION by
Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Dring and carried.
Councilman Saelid said in part that when the five foot setback was set
it was to preserve a greater open space and yet in this particular in-
stance that open space was violated by a wall which went right through
the center of that open space... he did not see anything to be gained
by withholding a request for a two foot encroachment into the five foot
setback ~ a required setback which did not exist until some' months 'ago
that it sounded to him that this is a neighbor-to-neighbor affair rather
than dealing with what is rational arid reasonable in terms of setback re-
quirements.
Councilman Saelid then MOVED to uphold the Planning Commission's findings
relating to the modification and to deny the appeal. Motion seconded'by
Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT :
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
SCHOOL
CLOS ING
The Recreation and Parks Commission recently considered the possible'
closing of Bonita Park and Baldwin Stocker Schools and expressed concern
regarding the future use and acquisition of the already existing recrea-
tion facilities, i. e., Little League baseball fields, parks, etc. loca-
ted on the two proper,ties. It was recommended by the Commission that a
communication be forwarded to the School Board, indicating that, in the event,
the two schools are to be vacated that the City be notified and considered
for future use and/or acquisition.
During this consideration Councilman Saelid explained the concern of the
Commission and felt such a communication should be directed to the School
Board. Councilman Dring submitted also that the Senior Citizen Commission
had expressed the same concern and agreed that the letter should be sent.
I
Whereupon Councilman Saelid MOVED that the Mayor direct such a. communication
to the School Board. Motion seconded by Councilman Dring and carried on
roll call vote as follows:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
-4-
11-18-80
ROLL CALL
1,-"
TRACT NO.
35704
EQUIPMENT
PURCHASE
(Chipper)
CHRISTMAS
TREES
1 WORK
ACCEPTED
CUP
HEARING SET
December 16
25:0169
The City Council then recessed in order to act as the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMEN~ AGENCY
PRESENT:
ABSENT :
Members Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
Member Gilb
On MOTION by Member Dring, seconded by Member Saelid and carried unan-
imously that Member Gilb be excused.
The meeting adjourned to an executive session to be held at the close
of this regular Council ~eeting.
RE(:;ONVENED
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, was advised on the procedure
for advertising for bids for equipment - the legal requirement etc. and
that all bids are time stamped upon receipt. Mrs. Hofer also referred
to an agenda item concerning the proposed agreement with Community Tran-
sit Services and was advised that the City has all the names and address-
es of the officers of said company. It was also felt by Mrs. Hofer that
some study should be given to the revenues the City might receive if a
certain measure on transportation becomes law.. that perhaps some type
of improved transportation could be offered the residents. Reference was
also made by Mrs. Hofer to break-ins in her neighborhood of late and felt
this should be made public by the press and perhaps in the City Newsletter.
Mrs. Hofer submitted a copy of a letter she has submitted to the local
press for publication.
CONSENT ITEMS
SCHEDULED hearing for DECEMBER 2 on Tract No. 35704 - 18 unit condomin-
ium at 924-928 Arcadia Avenue.
APPROVED the purchase of a chipper for the Public Works Department from
Asplundh Equipment Company in the total amount of $5,823.76 ($3500 trade-
in). Funds are in the Capital Improvment Peojects Account 1980-81.
APPROVED the following requests for permission to erect tents for Christmas
Tree storage through December 1980.
Smith's Christmas Trees
13 E. Foothill Boulevard
C. Hawkins Christmas Trees
201 E. Huntington Drive
721 W. Huntington Drive
1045 W; Huntington Drive
Kare Youth League Christmas Trees
646 W. Huntington Drive
212 E. Live Oak Avenue
ACCEPTED and AUTHORIZED final payment for work performed by Valverde
Construction Inc., in the Huntington Drive Water Main - Phase II.
ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS APPROVED ON MOTION BY COUNCILMAN
DRING, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN SAELID AND CARRIED ON ROLL CALL
VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
The Planning Director explained the status of property at 131' 1/2 E.
Huntington Drive for which a conditional use permit had been issued for
-5-
11-18-80
MOVED
EQUIPMENT
PURCHASE
(Video
Equipment)
PURCHASING
MANUAL
January 20,
1 9 8 1
DISABILITY
RETIREMENT
RESOLUTION
NO. 4920
ADOPTED
EQUIPMENT
PURCHASE
APPROVED
(Fire
Pumper)
DIAL-A-RIDE
AGREEMENT
APPROVED
25:0170
specific hours or operation of a bar. The applicant has applied for ex-
tended hours which the Planning Commission had denied by resolution. It
was noted that there are possibly some zoning and health violations and
it has not been possible to make an investigation or to contact the owner-
operator. It was felt that this should be heard by City Council and it was
MOVED by Councilman Dring, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on
roll call vote as follows that the City Council hereby appeals the denial
of the decision of the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 1151 and
schedules a hearing on the matter for December 16.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
Recommendation of fue,Police and Fire Departments for the purchase of video 1
equipment as listed in the staff report dated October 10. These items had
previously been explored with the Council and it was MOVED by Councilman
Dring, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as fol-
lows that the equipment be purchased from funds in the Revenue Sharing Pro-
gram and the General Fund Budget for 1980-81 with the hope that more re-
straint is exercised on future expenditures.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
The report and recommendation concerning the adoption of the Purchasing
Manual and changes in the City Ordinance relating thereto was scheduled
for consideration January 20, 1981.
Recommendation for disability retirement for Police Officer Antonio
Martinez. The Personnel Director gave the background and basis for the
recommendation. Councilman Saelid then presented, read the title of
Resolution No. 4920, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF ANTONIO MARTINEZ FOR DISA-
BILITY RETIREMENT AND FINDING THAT HE IS INCAPACITATED TO PERFORM HIS
DUTIES AS POLICE OFFICER."
It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Dring and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full
text of Resolution No. 4920 be waived and ADOPTED.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
Council received the report and recommendation for the purchase of a
fire pumper with tools and equipment (see staff report dated November 13,
1980). It was MOVED by Councilman Dring, seconded by Councilman Haltom
and carried on roll call vote as follows that the Fire Pumper be purchas-
ed from American La Franco Company in the amount of $121,009.60 and the 1
tools and equipment from the San Diego Fire Equipment Company in the amount
of $13,032.65; that $899.94 be appropriated for addition of three items to
the Pumper not included in the bid but which must be installed at the time
of construction (1-4" outlet, 1 hose partition and 1 compartment door);
that all other bids be rejected; and any informalities or irregularities in
the bids or bidding process be waived. Funds are in Capital Improvement
Program Budget for 1980-81.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
Staff advised on the proposed agreement for the Dial-a-Ride program with
Community Transit Services, Inc., and noted that the company had reduced
-6-
11-18-80
1
ORDINANCE
NO. 1713
ADOPTED
1
ORD INANCE
NO. 1711
ADOPTED
25:0171
its fixed fee from 12% to 10% of cost, as a result the maximum total cost
to the City would be $149,273 for the year. Changes were explored. Staff
recommended days for extended service. Some discussion held on whether or
not to specify the dates for extended service at this time or await accur-
ate definition.
During this consideration Bill Downing, representing the company, responded
to questions and explained what is meant by travel and living expenses --
that it is incurred when it is necessary to provide the service - mainly
during the initial operation... there would be no living expenses in Arca-
dia it would be primarily for mileage.
Councilman Dring said in part that' he could not support the agreement be-
cause to him it is too high priced... it was some $40,000 to $50,000 above
the competitors " also the start-up cost ... that a company should bear
its own start-up costs ... he felt he was in the minority in his belief and
that he would hope the City receives the service to justify the amount.
Mr. Downing said in part that they will make every effort to provide good
service and with reference to the overhead costs there are documents avail-
able from their independent auditors to support the costs .. that he knows
of no system where they have borne the start-up costs. He also said in
response to a question by Councilman Dring that the fixed fee cannot be
reduced. At this point the Assistant City Manager said in part that the
Urban Mass Transportation Administration frowns on a fee which is not fix-
ed and it does not like to see an Operator and a City enter into such an
arrangement.
Following extensive discussion it was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded
by Councilman Haltom that the agreement be APPROVED and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be AUTHORIZED to execute same with a modification to exclude ex-
tended hours at the beginning of the contract with the idea that the Coun-
cil readdress the question of extended hours after the system has been in
operation for a period of time which might be 30 to 40 days at which time
Council can best assess when those hours should be included in the schedule.
(THIS MOTION WITHDRAWN LATER).
At this point Council entered an executive session. Reconvened.
Councilman Saelid withdrew his motion as did his second and then MOVED
to approve the agreement as it has ,been presented at this meeting based
on a favorable finding by Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Mo-
tion seconded by Councilman Haltom. Roll call vote was then taken.
AYES
NOES
Councilmen Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
Councilman Dring (although with the hope that this becomes a
justified expenditure)
ABSENT: Councilman Gilb
The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1713, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS
4233 and 4233.1 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO OBSCENE LlTER-
TURE. "
It was MOVED by Councilman Dring, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried
on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of
Ordinance No. 1713 be waived and ADOPTED.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
The City Attorney presented for the second time, expLained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1711, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTIONS
-7-
11-18-80
RESOLUTION
NO. 4921
ADOPTED
CLAIM
REJECTED
(Foothill
Jewish Cent.)
CLAIM
REJECTED
(Waite)
CLA 1M
REJECTED
(Warren)
DRING
SAELID
EXECUTIVE
SESS ION
SANTA CLARA
WIDENING
CONTRACTOR
25 :0172
8210 AND 8230 OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA PLUMBING CODE SET FORTH IN ARTICLE
VIII, ADOPTING THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE 1979 EDITION, AND WITH CHANGES,
ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS THERETO AND FINDINGS THEREFOR, REPEALING SECTIONS
8230.1 AND 8230.2 AND READOPTING SECTIONS 8230.7 AND 8230.8."
It was MOVED by Councilman Haltom, seconded by Councilman Dring and carried
on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of
Ordinance No. 1711 be waived and ADOPTED.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of
Resolution No. 4921 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PLUMBING PERMITS."
1
It was MOVED by Councilman Ha Itom, sec ended by Councilman Saelid and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full
text of Resolution No. 4921 be waived and ADOPTED.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
On MOTION by Councilman Dring, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried
on roll call vote as follows the claim of Temple Shaarei Tikvah (Foothill
Jewish Temple) was rejected.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
On MOTION by Councilman Dring, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried
on roll call vote as follows the claim of Leslie A. Waite was rejected.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
On MOTION by Councilman Haltom, secnded by Councilman Dring and carried
on roll call vote as follows the claim of the Teachers Insurance and Pamela
Warren was rejected.
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Dring, Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
None
Councilman Gilb
The Director of Public Works advised that the report on the sewer system
is not exactly on schedule ---but hoped to have it completed by the latter
part of December.
Commended staff, police and fire departments on their perseverence during
the recent fires in nearby areas in an endeavor to be ready should the fire
break through to Arcadia.
1
Referred to the Ibnita Park Baseball Field on which some of the citizens
are working and asked if staff would check to see if the White's Landscape
might be able to assist in this endeavor.
The City Council entered an executive session. Reconvened.
It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Haltom to ratify
the action of the Director of Public Works, taken on September 24, 1980, to
expend $9,759 by prepaying it to Ire ,City's Santa Clara Street widening
-8-
11-18-80
ADJOURNMENT
November 25
7 p. m.
I
1
25:0173
cOQtractor, CroWell and Larson, for the installation of con-current improve-
ments abutting the property of Maidie T. Bong in compliance with the judg-
meQt entered in the action for the Santa Clara Street right-of-way. Motion
carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
Councilmen Haltom, Saelid, Pellegrino
Councilman Dring
Counc ilman Gilb
Councilman Saelid MOVED to adjourn the meeting in memory of former Police
Captain Eric Topel who passed away on November 14. "Eric joined the City
as a police officer in 1939, some may recall he retired as a Captain in
July 1977. Eric was on a fishing trip in Mexico. He was doing the kind
of thing he really enjoyed most, I think. I knew Eric as a friend. I
knew him as an officer. I am sorry that he did not have more years to
enjoy his retirement, but the years that he did have he certainly did en-
joy. We extend our sympathy to his family, Helen and his two sons, Bob
and Jack."
The meeting adjourned to 7 p.m. November 25, 1980 in the Conference Room.
ATTEST:
~_7J~~
City Clerk
-9-
11-18-80