Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJULY 7,1964 I INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES (6-16-64) (6-30-64) HEARING (Drag Strip) (Res, No. 511) !J. 7q I I 16:6287 M I NUT E S CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR' MEETING JULY 7, 1964 The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California met in regular session in the Council Chamber of the City Hall on July 7, 1964 at 8 P.M, Rev. J. Phillip Ray, Pastor, First Baptist Church of Arcadia PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman~ Reibold, Turner None The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 16, 1964 and the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of June 30, 1964, as submitted in writing, were approved on Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Forman and carried; Councilman Balser abstained from voting due to his absence from said meetings. The Soland Corporation filed an appeal from the Planning Commission recommendation for denial of its application for a special use permit to allow the construction and operation of a drag strip f~r automobile racing and related purposes on property located partially within the City of Arcadia. The matter requiring a public hearing, this is the time and place for same. In order to eliminate repetitious remarks and expedite the hearing continuity, Mayor Turner set forth ground rules by which he requested all persons desiring to speak on the matter to abide. The Planning Director presented his report along with projecturals. The Planning Commission had recommended denial on the basis that the granting of the requested special use permit will be extremely detrimental and harmful to the public health or welfare and particu- larly injurious to the properties in the vicinity in which the property is located; that the racing will be immediately adjacent to the proposed County Equestrian Trail; that the property is presently zoned M-2 with a special use permit for the development of natural resources (rock, sand and gravel); that the granting of the permit is not necessary to prevent financial hardship to the property owner and, if anything, the presently proposed use will only tend to postpone the profitable extraction of natural resources contained therein; that in the findings of the Planning Commission there appears to be no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, Brief discussion was held on the present quarrying activities and the proposed lease between Soland Corporation and the owner of the subject property which was understood by the City Manager to be for a five year period of time with the right of extension solely with the property owner, The location of the riding trails which parallel the San Gabriel Flood Control River Channel was outlined on the map, 1. 7-7-64 16:6288 HEARING OPEN Mayor Turner then declared the hearing open; the proponents spoke in part as follows: William N. Bowie, Jr., attorney for the applicants, spoke at length in support of the request stating in part that it is uncontroverted that the City of Irwindale supports the concept and the location of the Drag Strip, A schematic drawing was displayed for the purpose of illustration of the site (rock quarry). Reference was made to the annexation of the area by the City of Arcadia in 1957 and sub- sequently zoning it for rock quarrying; that the land has not been used since that time; that there is no projective use for it until some five years hence; that it produces income for Arcadia only as taxable unimproved real property, I Mr. Bowie then explained a drag strip operation, its starting and finish lines and referred to the former drag strip in San Gabriel Valley which operated from 1955, was relocated in 1959 and operated until 1963, when the Southern California Edison Company procured the site through condemnation proceedings and commenced its construction of power facilities. An analysis chart was displayed and explained by Mr, Bowie who stated, in part, that the facility is used in the main by amateurs; that there is no pay involved for the racers; that the cars compete in classifications for trophy or small cash awards. Jack Tice, Officer of the Soland Corporation, explained the difference between amateur and professional racers, the latter being almost showmen employed to come out from the East for demonstrations; that they are considered major attractions. Mr, Bowie continued, stating in part that the records of the insurance company will indicate that there have been four minor type accidents and one fatality during the past nine-year period of the former drag strip operation; that during the same period of time, no claim had ever been made by an equestrian for injuries sustained attributable to any noise generated by the racing facility; that the riding trail was in existence during the operation of the drag strip and was 50' closer than would be the proposed facility. In the area of disagreement, Mr. Bowie stated in part that the majority protest originates from the citizenry of Norwood Village which is in an unincorporated territory; that the residents there would be the closest to the strip; the fact is acknowledged that they desire to live in the peaceful enjoyment of their homes; that the consideration before the City Council is one of zoning; that there is need of a drag strip in this area due to the growing population and that the report of the Planning Director had included the need for such a facility but no suggestion had been made by him as to location. He further advised that Mr. Tice had surveyed the entire valley and that this is the only feasible location; that property lines do get as close as 600' from the subject area but that it is located close to the ingress and egress from the highway. I Mr, Bowie also referred to the action taken by the El Monte City Council in opposing the drag strip, its action being based on the noise problem to the neighbors as well as the traffic emanating from the operation, but that the vote was not entirely unanimous for opposition. 2. 7-7-64 16:6289 He stated further in part that the subject property is not exactly choice residential land; that it must be generally conceded that it is valuable as a rock quarry. I The noise,factor was then explored at considerable length. Mr. Bowie advised that the Drag Strip had been moved approximately a quarter of a mile, so that the decelleration does not come within the territorial limits of the City of Arcadia, He then read a letter from Paul F. McGlasson & Associates, sound specialists. The writer of the letter, Mr, Little, addressed the Council to some extent dwelling on the various points of decibel measurements and how he arrived at his figures. The level of noise and the threshold of pain was also explored. Pomona Police Officer Ronald Root stated in part, in support of the facility, that the Pomona Drag Strip is located close to homes; that he is in favor of drag strips for youth participation and also from a sports viewpoint for adults; that such a facility contributes to the lessening of racing on city streets, It was stated that Mr. Root works closely with the Pomona Police Chief who has written articles favoring such an operation. Mike Dougherty, Editor of a Drag Strip Racing magazine, read excerpts from periodicals relating to attendance, participation and safety statistics. He stated that the former San Gabriel Valley Drag Strip was the most popular in the nation; that the proposed one would be also. Mr. Bowie continued his extensive presentation in summary and in conclusion stated in part that a $100,000 investment is anticipated; that the grandstands will act as a partial sound barrier. In revenue the operation would bring about $75 per racing day to the City of Arcadia - with about 57 racing days per year (52 Saturdays and 3 special racing days). Mayor Turner - referring to a comment made by Mr. Bowie that land is becoming scarce for such operations - stated in part that would it not be more beneficial to acquire a permanent location at this time; that it would appear to be more economical to so do as land would become more costly; that the expenditure for the sound barrier at a temporary location is not understandable. Norman Schneider, Mayor of West Covina, spoke briefly in favor of the operation, Mr, Tice once more spoke briefly to the construction of a sound barrier which would begin within one year; that it would be located on the west side - closest to the residences. I Reference was made by Councilman Considine to the possibility of the construction of an oval track which would place the operation entirely within the City of Irwindale. Mr. Bowie stated that juveniles would not be able to use it under those circumstances and he did not know whether or not it would be acceptable to the owner; that the sound problems would increase. Edgar Romaka, Club Sponsor, spoke in favor of a drag strip in the area and referred to a bridle trail within 50' of the Golden State Freeway. Mr, Bowie presented to the City Clerk petitions which he stated contained 4652 signatures, 579 from Arcadia. The petitions were 3. 7-7-64 16:6290 received for the sole purpose of the expression of the desires of the signers and not as evidence of any facts which may be recited therein. Mayor Turner then asked to hear from those in opposition, Adair Allen, 12154 Cherry Lane, El Monte (Norwood Village) stated in part that there are 17,000 residents in the area; that the noise generated from such a facility was the main factor in opposition; also the heavy traffic on the streets when the racing demonstrations were over and that in his opinion it did not eliminate street racing. I C. M. MuggIer, acoustical engineer, presented his findings in relation to the noise levels. Mr, Allen read from an article in which it was stated that 40,000 people attended a racing demonstration and then discussed the traffic problem resulting therefrom. He foresees parking on the surface streets; that the facility was not in keeping with the area. Mrs. Barbara Esbenshade, 11910 The Wye, Norwood Village, El Monte, opposed the drag strip and read articles on activities which are alleged to take place after the races. Thomas Flenniken, 14911 Central Avenue, Baldwin Park, commented on the safety pattern of horseback riding. Ernie Walpler, 10965 Wright Road, Lynwood (President of the Equestrian Trails, Inc,) spoke in opposition due to the proximity to the riding trail. HEARING CLOSED No one else in the audience desiring to be heard, Councilman Reibold MOVED that the hearing be CLOSED. Councilman Balser seconded the Motion which was carried unanimously. As a matter of record, Mayor Turner then made the following remarks: '~irst of all, in addition to the noise factors, I think it is essential that we give close consideration to the property rights, public safety and traffic generation problems. These are essentially the problems that we, as Arcadians, face in this particular proposal. Additionally, we should take into consideration the fact that the entrance is from a street in Arcadia, thus giving an Arcadia address to the proposed Drag Strip. In addition, this also only provides One entrance and/or exit for the handling of the traffic generation. "Insofar as the property is concerned, it is presently zoned with special permit, for the development of natural resources, particularly I rock, sand and gravel, which is considered prime aggregate in high demand and very valuable. The granting of this special use permit is not necessary to prevent financial hardship Dr to preserve any property right to the owner, even though it would provide a source of income to the owner while holding the property until needed in his operations which is the profitable extraction of the natural resources. "The evidence presented tonight gives credence to the possibility that the granting of this special use permit could deny the preser- vation of the enjoyment of the substantial property rights of the immediately adjacent residential property. We cannot ignore this factor just because these properties are not in the City of Arcadia. 4. 7-7-64 16:6291 II As I see it, as I said before, our major concern insofar ?s the effects of this proposed Drag Strip in Arcadia, hinges primarily on the problems of traffic and public safety. I feel if this Drag Strip is permitted, a business license should be required just as if the total strip were in the City of Arcadia, and an admissions tax of not less than 4 per cent be levied on all spectator admissions and participants entrance fees to help defray the additional cost of public safety requirements," I Councilman Forman stated in part that the prior record indicates his presence at the Planning Commission hearings; that the resolution for denial of the Commission contains his vote; that he had not come to this hearing with any preconceived idea of denying it necessarily or approving it until he had heard the evidence; that after hearing same he had reached the same conclusion; that it was his desire to help protect and develop the residential quality of the community; that the denial of the request would not deprive a property owner of any right and he would go on record again as being opposed to the Drag Strip facility and would be in favor of leaving the land as it is presently zoned. Councilman Considine stated in part that the voluntary evidence given seems to be from other areas than the one under discussion; that no reference was made to what occurred during the nine-year operation of the Drag Strip on the former site in the San Gabriel Valley area; that it appeared to him that all difficulties are being anticipated; that he could not find sufficient noise difficulties to oppose the Drag Strip in this location; that the Drag Strip is only to be constructed a quarter of a mile to the north of the former one; that he is curious as to why the protestants are not basing their objections on their own experience and not on antici- pation or the experience of others, that the evidence makes him feel that the former race track was not producing all of the difficulties that are being anticipated. Traffic generation was discussed with the policing which would be required. Councilman Reibold stated in part that most of the problems are solvable. Roads can be built to acrommodate the traffic, personnel can be provided to handle it, revenue can be collected, but the noise problem is totally uncontrollable; that he would oppose it purely on this factor; that he has nothing against this type of racing. I Councilman Balser stated in part that in his op1n10n it was significant to him that the County Regional Planning Commission (which has the responsibility of the welfare of the residents of the 'unincorporated area) strongly oppose the facility being located so close to Norwood Village; that the City has an obligation to the residents adjacent to the facility even though they are not within the limits of the City. He referred to the years of endeavor in securing a bridle trail completed through this area; that in his opinion the proposed facility is not compatible with the businesses and occupants of the Industrial Park in which the City was so selective. Councilman Balser then MOVED that the Planning Commission recommendation as contained in its Resolution No. 511 be sustained and that the appeal be denied. Councilman Forman seconded the 5, 7-7-64 HEARING (Zone Variance Duarte Rd.) d-/o4S 16:6292 motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibold, Turner None None Mayor Turner declared a recess at 10:25 P.M, The meeting reconvened at 10:28 P,M. The appeal filed by the Westman Development Corporation from the Planning Commission recommendation (Res. No. 505) for denial of the zone variance application to allow garden type apartments to be constructed at 82 - 160 W. Duarte Road was removed from the Pending Agenda for possible disposition at this time. I The developer had submitted three plans, the latest of which was explored by the Planning Director and projecturals were reviewed showing the site utilization plan; the buildings had been rearranged, Exterior elevations were reviewed with a comparison of land utilization. The City Council was fully acquainted with what the developer is desirous of constructing inasmuch as the matter had been before the City Council on May 5, 1964. The developer, Arthur Bauman, spoke briefly; that he has submitted three plans and was prepared to proceed with the development. Harold Sumner, President of the West Arcadia HomeoWners Association, stated in part that the Association is of the opinion that there is already an abundance of apartments; that with the number of vacancies a relaxation of regulations may result; that there is a school enrollment problem; that additional apartments would bring traffic problems and fire hazards. He recommended the subject land remain in Zone R-l. Jackson L. Tillman, 117 W, Magna Vista Avenue, commended the Planning Commission in its recommendation for denial; that in his opinion the proposed structure is not compatible with the residential development on Magna Vista (rear of subject property). He urged support of the Commission's recommendation. Richard Diehl, 127 W. Magna Vista Avenue, stated in part that he was in favor of some development on the vacant land; suggested that it remain R-l. Ronald H, Suess, 107 W.,Magna Vista Avenue, was of the op1n10n that the property should remain Zone R-l; that there is sufficient apartment construction. I Councilman Forman MOVED that the hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously. Mayor Turner stated for the record: "I feel that it is not possible to economically develop the property as R-l because of the land prices which have been generated in the area and because of the land configuration. I am opposed to R-3 or anything resembling R-3 in this area. I feel that there is a compromise usage, however, that will be compatible with all of the neighborhood's likes and dislikes. 6. 7-7-64 I I GUIDELINE PREPARATION DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED LAND HEARING (Variance- Benson) ;j9~o/ 16:6293 "I am in favor of garden type condominium development of this property provided: 1. That adherence is made to single story construction. 2. That underground parking or attached closed double garages are provided. 3. That not less than 4000 sq. ft., of land be allocated to each unit. 4. That buildings be in clusters of not more than four units to a building. "I feel that this would give the appearance of a fine residential area. It would be a home ownership which I think is important to most of the people who have spoken in opposition and it would not tend to congest the property as much as the apartment house development would. "In furtherance of this line of thinking, I am in favor of placing our property located to the east of subject property on the open market at this time for sale to the highest bidder and I would hope we could sell it for the purpose I have just designated." Discussion ensued. It was the consensus of the City Council that guidelines be provided for the proper development of the property without delay; that the denial of the subject zone variance applica- tion would not preclude the applicant from filing again along the guidelines presented. MOTION was then made by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Forman and carried unanimously that the Planning Commission recommenda- tion for denial of the zone variance application be sustained and that the appeal therefrom be disapproved. MOTION was made by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Balser and carried unanimously that the Planning Commission be requested to institute proceedings for the purpose of considering and making re- commendations concerning the granting of a variance to permit development of all or any portion of property on the south side of Duarte Road from El Monte Avenue easterly to the City developed property in accordance with the criteria to be recommended by the Planning Staff and approved by the Planning Commission and forwarded to the City Council for final action. In keeping with the desire of the City Council to endeavor to have the city-owned property developed, MOTION was made by Councilman Forman, seconded by Councilman Balser and carried unanimously that the City owned land located on West Duarte Road be placed with the Land Disposal Committee for sale to the highest bidder. Planning Commission Res. No. 512 recommending denial of the zone variance application to permit second dwelling at 315 Le Roy Avenue. The City Council had approved the application at its May 5, 1964 meeting, but in deference to requests had scheduled a public hearing at this time. The Planning Director summarized the position of the Planning Com- mission in its recommendation for denial as contained in said Resolu- tion; that the lot is zoned R-l and less than 25 percent of the lots in the immediate vicinity have two or more dwellings; that to grant the variance would change the area from R-l to R-2 development which could mean greater density in population and would constitute poor planning. He also projected slides which showed the number of second houses permitted to be built between 1957 and 1963 in the subject area. A diagram of the proposed house was also shown. 7. 7-7-64 16:6294 Henry Hege, attorney for the applicants, Elmer and Esther Benson, spoke at length as to the size of the property which is approkimate1y 75' k 275'; that there is approkimately 150' in the front unde- veloped. He chronologically ekp10red the history of the property; that Mr. and Mrs. Benson had improved the land in 1948 with the garage apartment and an ektra garage; that they could have built the second house at that time under the ekisting ordinance, however, the ordinances were subsequently amended, He further referred to the communications directed to the City Council in favor of the variance request and stated that the development if permitted would unify the front line of all properties on LeRoy Avenue. He continued that the case is extraordinary due to the improvement existing on the property; that it is a proper site for the application of the variance provision which is allowed the property owner under these circumstances. I Peer Clausen, 925 S. Eighth Avenue, reiterated his opposition to permitting second houses on any lot in the City and referred to Ordinance No, 1221 which prohibits second dwellings; that in his opinion the matter should be referred back to the Planning Commission and staff; that these procedures should be declared null and void inasmuch as the requirement for an appeal from a Planning Commission decision had not been complied with by the applicant. Harold Sumner, President of the West Arcadia Homeowner's Association, ekpressed opposition also to permitting second dwellings to be con- structed and stated that he objects on the basis of principle. Councilman Reibo1d then MOVED that the hearing be closed, Councilman Forman seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. Extensive discussion ensued with Councilman Reibo1d stating in part that the subject property has a varied history and the Planning Commission's decision was what it had to do; that it now appears to be a Council responsibility and prerogative to decide a particular case such as this; that normal methods of procedure are set aside in such a situation; that he is impressed with the views of the residents of the immediate neighborhood and in the main they are in favor of the variance and that in his opinion the improvement would benefit the subject street. Councilman Considine observed that he had discussed the situation with many of the residents on LeRoy Avenue and the majority were in favor of the proposed second dwelling; that it would be more uniform and scenic in appearance than the present vacant lot and that contrary to his normal stand he would second the motion, Councilman Balser referred to the letters which had been received in favor of the variance; that they were all in the same vein - that it would enhance the appearance of the street. That in his opinion I the house could become a rental which would be detrimental to the 'area and that to approve the variance request would be a backward step Councilman Forman stated in part that to approve the variance request would be forcing a change of zone from R-1 to R-2 in usage and that he favored retaining the R-l character of the City. Mayor Turner then called for the roll call vote on the Motion by Councilman Reibo1d, seconded by Councilman Considine, to approve the request for permission to construct a second dwelling at 315 LeRoy Ave. AYES: Councilmen Considine, Reibold, Turner NOES: Councilman Balser, Forman ABSENT: None 8. 7-7-64 16:6295 HEARING (Sherman) Mrs, Beatrice Sherman filed a request with the Building Department for permission to use property at 320 E, Foothill Boulevard as a real estate office as well as a residence. The Building Department . had recommended denial of the request for modification of portions P / ~)~~f the Building Code which would permit an occupancy not presently . V.; allowed under the type of construction at said address; that the ~f. liAQ,/. area is properly zoned for the proposed business, but the structure (~b ~ .does not meet the Building Cod~ requirements for that type of business. The building is non-conforming to the Fire Zone No. 1 regulation. I ,Mayor Turner then declared the hearing open and in response to his inquiry if anyone desired'to address Council, Mrs. Sherman stated in part that it was her desire to establish her real estate business and residence at the said address; that she contemplates improvements if she were issued a permit. She also stated in part that she had been aware of the zoning prior to the acquisition of the property. No one else desiring to be heard MOTION was made by Councilman Balser, seconded by Councilman Forman and carried unanimously that the hearing be closed. It being the consensus of the City Council that the proposed usage is not in keeping with the type of development desired in the area and that to permit it would only prolong the use of a non-conforming building in Fire Zone No, 1. Councilman Reibold seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. HEARING (Used car Sales) Mayor Turner declared the hearing open on the application filed by John Bellitti, 2224 N. Santa Anita Avenue, Sierra Madre, for a business permit and an occupancy permit to allow'him to conduct a used car sales business at 154 E. Huntington Drive. '-!f-9Io Paul Doleshal, realtor, urged approval of application - the premises having been used as a car sales lot for many years. Communication from the property owner was also received by the City Council asking favorable consideration. No one else desiring to be heard, Councilman Balser MOVED that the hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously. It was the consensus of the City Council that a permit for one year only be issued (said property being in the moratorium area) Council- man Reibold so MOVED. Councilman Balser seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. I -!) /03 7 Planning Commission recommendation regarding changes in the C-l portion of the Zoning Ordinance (regulations controlling signs, billboards, advertising structures and off-street parking re- quirements as contained in Resolution No. 504), The matter being part of the C-l & D zoning currently under consideration was CONTINUED until a determination is made in the zoning. HEARING (C-l Zone Signs, etc.) HEARING (Zoning C-l & D and M-l & P.I.D.) Planning Commission Resolution No. 516 recommending that certain properties in the Central area be reclassified to Zones C-l & D (Architectural Overlay) and to M-l P.I.D. (Planned Industrial District). 9. 7-7-64 PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED 16:6296 The Planning Director summarized the recommendations for the reclassification of the Central area along with outlining boundaries - the City Council having previously received all pertinent material for study purposes, Mayor Turner then declared the hearing open. Richard English, 114 St. Joseph Street, Chairman Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee, commented that the Chamber is on record as approving the recommended change of the M-l Zone to M-l PID in the areas as outlined. I Paul Doleshal expressed concern about the proper development of the area in the rear of the present Hutchings Ford Agency (former riding stable property). Don Betsinger, 12 Yorkshire, owning property at 510-514 N. Santa Anita Avenue, stated in part that in his opinion and that of other property owners in the immediate vicinity of his apartment property - the area from the alley south of Colorado Boulevard to the Freeway at Santa Anita Avenue - should remain R-3; that it might be a future development into M-l but seems unfair at the present time. Tony, Gerold, owner of an apartment at Newman and Santa Anita, agreed with Mr. Betsinger as to the R-3 property. No one else desiring to be heard, Councilman Forman MOVED, seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously that the Hearing be closed. Discussion held on certain requirements. Mayor Turner commented on Item 12 of the report and stated in part that in his opinion signs which are of no use to anyone should be removed within 30 to 60 days after the implementation of the downtown area plan; also that he could see nothing detrimental about permitting a sign to be illuminated by a spot light in front of a building if that be the only possible way. Mr. Phelps commented that the Planning Commission had made the same conclusion. Inasmuch as the City Council has not as yet adopted an ordinance changing the text of Zones CoO, C-l and M-l, MOTION was made by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Considine and carried unanimously that the matter be placed on the pending agenda. Planning Commission Resolution No. 518 recommending that the area referred to as the Towne Center be placed in C-C and D Zone (Community Commercial and Architectural Design Zones) requiring a public hearing, same was scheduled for July 21, 1964 at 8 P,M, I August Goebel, attorney representing the A & A Building'Materials Company, addressed Council with respect to procedural matters to govern the conduct of a public hearing to be held on July 21, 1964. He asked that permission be granted him to have a certified short- hand reporter seated at a convenient location; the right of limited cross examination directed to the Chair and in turn to the witness; that witnesses be placed under oath; also that hearsay evidence be excluded - letters which are received by City Council not be considered for contents but as an expression of an opinion. He stated that it would assist him to know at this time whether or not the requests would be granted. 10. 7-7-64 I PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED APPOINTMENTS CIVIL DEFENSE & DISASTER ,BOARD LIBRARY BOARD I 16:6297 The City Attorney stated that the presence of a shorthand reporter would pose no inconvenience; that the right of reasonable cross examination is one guaranteed by the Courts; that if questions are directed to the Cha~r it prevents a debate among the audience and an opportunity is afforded to rule on the pertinency of the question, and should pose no problem to the City Council; 'that the Courts have not yet required the placing of witnesses under oath and this is a matter of judgment for the governing body. He stated further that letters and petitions are admissible - as solely the expression of the desire of an individual and are contained in the record; are not evidence of any factor that may be alleged therein. Mr. Goebel further asked that a transcript of the cross examination portion of the Planning Commission hearing between the Planning Director and Mr. Don Gutoff, Vice President of the Wilsey, Ham and Blair Company (consultants employed by the City to study the Central area) be made available to the members of the City Council. He was advised that the staff had made a rather detailed summary of the evidence in the Planning Commission minutes and it was suggested that he review the same and the tapes of the meeting and then advise if he thought the Planning Commission record was deficient. It was the conSensus of the City Council that all of the requests could be granted with the exception of the swearing in of the witnesses. Planning Commission Resolution No, 519 recommending that properties at 1225 and 1229 Lovell Avenue be placed in Zone 'p' (automobile parking) requiring a public hearing, same was scheduled for August 4, 1964 at 8 P.M. Vacancies occurring on the various boards and/or commissions were filled with the following appointments - all terms to be for four years - ending June 30, 1968. Councilman Balser placed in nomination the name of Joseph C. Boggio for reappointment. Councilman Considine seconded the nomination which was carried unanimously. Councilman Forman placed in nomination the name of Merrick Taylor to fill the vacancy created by retiring Library Board member Gene Gregg. Councilman Reibold placed in nomination the name of Dr. Robert Stragnell to fill the same vacancy. This nomination seconded by Councilman Considine. Mayor Turner stated for the record: "I am not personally knowledge- able of any justifiable reason why Dr. Stragnell should not be on our Library Board, therefore, I could not oppose his nomination for this reason. I am, however, opposed to appointing anyone to this sensitive Board who is controversial or who has raised the displeasure of so many people in our City 'who have called me voicing an objection to Dr. Stragnell's appointment since the information has become public that he was being considered. 11. 7-7-64 16:6298 "Normally, the Responsibility Committee makes it easy for us on the Council and is united or in agreement on a nomination. In this case they did not agree on a nomination. Because of these facts, I cannot support Dr. Stragnell and I want the record to show that my negative vote is not being cast in opposition to Dr. Stragnell per se nor his abilities to make a good Board member, but because I feel a non- controversial citizen could be of much greater service to our community. 11 Mayor Turner then seconded the nomination of Merrick Taylor and called for the roll call vote on Mr. Taylor's appointment: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Forman, Turner Councilmen Balser, Considine, Reibold None I Mayor Turner then called for the roll call vote on the appointment of Dr. Stragnell: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Reibold Councilmen Forman, Turner None PERSONNEL BOARD Councilman Balser placed in nomination the name of Mrs. Harry R. Lauber, to fill one of the vacancies occurring on this Board. Motion seconded by Councilman Considine and carried unanimously. Councilman Reibold placed in nomination the name of Thomas C. Sullivan to fill the other vacancy occurring on this Board. Motion seconded by Councilman Forman and carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION Councilman Forman placed in nomination the name of William Kuyper for reappointment to the Commission. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously. RECREATION COMMISSION Councilman Forman placed in nomination the name of Mrs. Sydney S. Larkin to fill the vacancy created on the Commission by retiring Commissioner Syphers, Nomination seconded by Councilman Considine and carried unanimously. PARKING PLACE COMMISSION Mayor Turner placed for nomination 'the following persons for reappointment and appointment to the Parking Place Commission. Thomas C. Sullivan - reappointment James Wallin Kenn it Hartzler I The nominations were seconded by Councilman Balser and carried unanimously. TECHNICAL STUDY COMMITTEE Mayor Turner nominated the following persons for reappointment and appointment to the Committee: Joseph Surra Kermit Ferguson R. E. Tobin ) ) Reappointments ) Ray Kenz ), New Wm. C, Pursley ) Appointments Carl E. Johnson) 12. 7-7-64 ORDINANCE NO, 1247 (Adopted) I ORDINANCE NO, 1249 (Introduced) I ORDINANCE NO. 1250 (Introduced) 16:6299 Nominations seconded by Councilman Forman and carried unanimously, It was observed that the present staff members continue to work with the Committee. The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1247 entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF ARTICLE IX OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS 9262.1.3, 9262.2.5 AND 9263.1.10; BY RENUMBERING SECTIONS 9261.1.3 AND 9261.1.4 THEREOF; BY AMENDING SECTIONS 9262.1.1,.9262.1.5; 9262.1.31, 9262.2.3 AND 9262.2.6; AND BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 9261.1.3," MOTION by Councilman Forman, seconded by Councilman Considine and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of Ordinance No. 1247 be waived: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibo1d, Turner None None Councilman Forman further MOVED that Ordinance No. 1247 be adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Considine and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibo1d, Turner None None , The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1249, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2281,1 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE INCREASING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE PARKING PLACE COMMISSION." MOTION by Councilman Considine, seconded by Councilman Balser and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of Ordinance No. 1249 be waived: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibold, Turner None None Councilman Considine further MOVED that Ordinance No. 1249 be introduced. Councilman Reibo1d seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibold, Turner None None The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1250, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTIONS 8523.3.2, 8523.4.1, 8523.6, 8531,2.3, 8531.2.5 AND 8532,6 THEREOF AND BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 8523.3.7 THERETO," 13. 7-7-64 ADJOURNMENT AT 12:50 A.M, 16:6300 MOTION by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Balser and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading. of the full body of Ordinance No. 1250 be waived: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibold, Turner None None Councilman Reibold further MOVED that Ordinance No. 1250 be introduced. Councilman Balser seconded the motion which was carried on roll call as follows: I AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Balser, Considine, Forman, Reibold, Turner None None Mr. Diffenbaugh, bidder on the Orange Grove No, 5 Reservoir construction, asked when the contract would be awarded, He was advised that tabulations may be ready by Monday June 30 at which time the City Council will hold an adjourned regular meeting. The meeting adjourned UNTIL MONDAY July 13, 1964 at 8 P.M. ATTEST: &~~~~-~~ City Clerk 0~r~ Mayor Turner I 14, 7-7-64