Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJUNE 6,1961 I nwocm" PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES (5-16-61) CAMPHOUSE (Presentation of Plaque) HEARING (Blons & Ward) J 8"6/ INDEXED I 14:5360 M I NUT E S CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR MEETING JUNE 6, 1961 The City Council of the City of Arcadia met in regular session in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 o'clock P.M., June 6, 1961. The Invocation was offered by Rev. A. Karl Myers, Pastor of the Village Presbyterian Church. " " Mayor Balser led in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. PRESENT: ABSENT : Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser None Motion by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously that the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 16, 1961 be corrected on page 1 under "Hearing - Cordelius" to read "June 6, 1961" instead of "June 20, 1961" and as thus corrected be approved as submitted in writing. Councilman Phillips presented to Councilman Camphouse a plaque honoring his many years of community service and leadership as Councilman and twice serving as Mayor of the City of Arcadia. Hearing on the application of Melvin Blons and Stanley Ward for a business permit to allow soliciting merchants directly for advertising to be incorporated in coupon books for sale to residents by telephone solici- tation was continued at the May 2, 1961 Council Meeting to enable the applicants to endeavor to secure local sponsorship. Mayor Balser inquired if the applicant was present at this meeting and wished to address the Council, and receiving no response he asked if anyone else desired to be heard. Mr. H. Wentworth, Manager of the Arcadia Chamber of Commerce, spoke, stat- ing in substance that'he had communicated with the applicant and had indicated that unless local sponsorship, responsible to the Council, was secured by the applicant the Chamber of Commerce would not look favorably upon the venture; also that he was reasonably sure that the applicant had not obtained sponsorship from the Junior Chamber of Commerce or anyone else. There being no one else desiring to be heard Councilman Camphouse moved that the hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously. Councilman Reibold moved that the Council find and determine that the granting of the permit and the conduct of the business for which the permit was requested will be detrimental to the public welfare of the City of Arcadia and the inhabitants thereof and that the Council deny the application of Melvin Blons and Stanley Ward, partners, doing business as Merchant 's Samp'ler Advertising, 11350 Ventu~a Boulevard, Studio City, for a business permit to allow soliciting merchants directly for advertis- ing to be incorporated in coupon books for sale to residents by telephone solicitation. Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: 1. 6-6-61 IIEARING (Cordelius) :J 6'01 INDEXED 14:5361 AYES: Councilmen Camphouse, Reibold, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINING: Councilmen Butterworth and Phillips due to absence from the May 2, 1961 Council Meeting. Mayor Balser declared the hearing open on Planning Commission Resolution No. 406 recommending Denial of the request of Dr. Henry F. Cordelius for a change of zone from R-2 to R-3 on property located at 747 to 803 West Camino Real Avenue, and inquired if anyone in the audience desired to be heard on the matter. Mr. Henry Hege, 651 West Duarte Road, attorney representing the apPlicantl addressed the Council, and stated in substance that the recommended denia of the Planning Commission should be overruled for the following reasons: That the area involved is approximately 400 feet east of the corner of Baldwin and Camino Real Avenues, there being a gas station located on the southwest corner and a possibility of another on the northwest corner; that the next two lots are occupied by apartment houses and immediately east of applicant's property is the Hinshaw Department Store warehouse, recently constructed; that the area was developed prior to its annexation to Arcadia and cognizance should be taken of the type of construction and building presently there. That applicant does not intend at any time to build an apartment house, but rather individual residential-type units, the number depending upon the type of construction. That there were no objections to the application and no protests made at the hearing before the Planning Commission but that 18 signatures approved the application, and that to deny the applicant the right to develop his property in accordance with the ~egulations as set forth in R-3 zoning rather than R-2 would be detrimental to him and would require a greater amount of restrictions on his property than on property developed immediately adjacent to him. At Mayor Balser's request, Mr. Ervin H. Golisch, Planning Commission's liaison with the Council, explained in substance the conclusions reached by the Commission, to wit: that from the standpoint of good zoning the present R-2 is adequate, affording an economic return to the individual; that it is a good buffer zone to the nearby commercial p~operty; that there is a tremendous influx of additional R-3 zoning within the City and if this particular area is rezoned from R-2 to R-3 there would be no logical reason to deny other applications in that area for change of zone from R-2 to R-3. That the Planning Commission recognizes that in certain instances it is necessary to have additional R-3 zoning, such as along major thoroughfares, but the subject area is what might be called a side street and a residential area. That the Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the requested rezoning on the basis that although it might be to the economic advantage of the individual in question it would not be to the advantage of the City as a whole, and that the Planning Commission looks upon such matters as they affect the entire City. Mr. Golisch continued in part that with regard to the applicant's indication that he would not develop the properl with large apartment houses, that there is nothing to stop him from doing that later on or to stop other people in the area from doing likewise. No one else desiring to be heard, Councilman Butterworth moved that the hearing be closed. Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None The Director of Public Works indicated on the wall map the location of the property in question. 2. 6-6-61 (Hearing - Cordelius) 1- 't07 14:5362 Councilman Reibold stated in part that he felt that although the Planning Commission had stated that at some future time R-J zoning may become necessary such zoning is premature at this time and that there seems to be more need for single family residences than for apartments, he could not imagine building a single family dwelling on property 66 feet wide and 300 feet deep; also that there was a single family residence presently on the property. That he could feel no great concern over the westward movement of Zone R-J since in this particular instance it can only move two lots before leaving the City limits. Also that it has been his feel- ing that Council favored the passing of Zone R-2, I INDEXED Councilman Camphouse then moved that Council accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission as contained in its Resolution No. 406 and that the request of Dr. Henry F, Cordelius for a change of zone from R-2 to R-J on property located at 747 to 803 West Camino Real be denied. Councilman Butterworth seconded the motion. HEARING (Greer) I :JJ5/0 !NDEXE.o Councilman Butterworth stated in part that in his opinion, if a matter is doubtful he thought the correct policy the Council should follow is to sustain its Planning Commission, That he thought the reasons asserted by the Planning Commission are meritorious and justified, and that the Council should sustain the Planning Commission; that it is good policy so to do. Mayor Balser stated in part that he agreed with the Planning Commission that there is an abundance of R-J in Arcadia; but that he could not conscientiously say that in this instance it should not be granted; that R-J would be a better buffer against the warehouse than R-2. Councilman Reibold felt that R-2 would better be in one of the other two classifications; that he did not favor R-2 zoning. Councilman Phillips stated in part that he also did not think R-2 means very much in the City's zoning code; that it is not a good zone, but that he felt it good policy to sustain the Planning Commission. The above motion was thereafter carried on the following roll call: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Phillips NOES: Councilmen Reibold, Balser ABSENT: None Hearing on Planning Commission Resolution No. 407 recommending denial of the application of James C, and Ora Reed Greer for a zone variance to allow the construction and maintenance of a Richfield Service Station at the northwest corner of Duarte Road and Golden West Avenue, The City Clerk advised that two communications had been received in regard to the subject matter, one dated June 5, 1961 from Florence M. and Walter C, Larson, 1218 South Golden West Avenue, protesting the requested zone variance, and one from Fred N, Howser, attorney for the applicants, dated May 25, 1961, requesting that the matter of appeal be continued until the first meeting of the Council in November, 1961 in order to enable him to discuss the matter with the new City Planner, Mayor Balser then declared the hearing open and inquired if anyone in the audience desired to be heard on the matter, Mr, August Goebel addressed the Council, advising that he was an attorney representing Industrial Leasing, and upon being advised by Mayor Balser that it appeared that the matter would be continued, stated that no useful purpose would be served at this time by voicing his client's objections to the granting of the variance and that he would reserve his opportunity to come before the Council until such time as the matter is heard. 3, 6-6-61 (Hearing - Greer) HEARING (Miller) .J <D /I INDEXED 14:5363 Mayor Balser then stated that anyone present in the audience who did not anticipate being able to be present at a future date would be heard by the Council at this time. No one desiring to be heard Councilman Reibold moved that the hearing be continued to the first Council meeting in November (November 7, 1961). Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. Mayor Balser declared the hearing open on Planning Commission Resolution No. 409, recommending denial of the application of Ellen Miller and others for a change of zone from R-l and R-2 to C-3 and D for six lots on the north side of Naomi Avenue, east of Baldwin Avenue. I ' The City Clerk advised that no correspondence had been received regarding the matter. Mayor Balser inquired if anyone in the audience desired to address the Council in favor of the requested zone change. Mr. Henry Hege, an attorney representing the applicants, addressed the Council, stating in part that he felt Councilman Butterworth's statement made during the hearing on the Cornelius matter, that "he thought recommendations of the Planning Commission should be upheld unless they are doubtful," is arbitrary and capricious; that the six lots in question are but a small portion of an area which the Planning Commission, after app~oximately a year's study, recommended for rezoning and in which recommendation the Council unanimously concurred. Mr. Hege continued, stating in part that he did not believe this is strip zoning as stated in Planning Commission's Resolution No. 409, as these six lots immediately adjoin C-2 property and parking lots. That the contents of the Planning Commission resolution, that it may become necessary at some future date to rezone the subject property, is precluded by its recommendation and Council's decision a year ago that it was proper zoning. Mr. Hege also mentioned the Security Building, the Mutual Building (to be completed in July), the bowling alley on Baldwin Avenue and Market Square, all in the immediate vicinity, and that with regard to the Planning Com- mission's statement that the p~operty in question, if rezoned, would not provide a proper buffer for adjacent residential properties, he did not know what residential property was being referred to in that the subject lots are completely surrounded by parking lots or C-2 zoning; that the property owners immediately south of the existing C-2 zoning would not be penalized at this time because proper development of Arcadia would demand more C-2 at a later date. That the Planning Commission's contention that it does not appear the~e is need for more commercial zoning in the area is refuted by the fact that there has been substantial building in the area and additional retail stores are proper and an absolute necessity for the proper development of the City. Mr. Hege also commented that there were no objections expressed at the I Planning Commission meeting and the West Arcadia Home Owners Association, who were the primary objectors to the rezoning at the time it was previou ly passed, went on record in writing that they had no objections to the requested rezoning. Mr. Hege also stated in part that the applicants recognize all the time spent by both the Planning Commission and the Council in the previous study of the area and have no objection to the imposition of all the conditions previously placed upon the rezoning of the area being placed upon the properties in question. That he did not feel an additional study of the entire area would be beneficial at this time as the same circumstances exist that existed at the time the the change of zone was originally approved by the Planning Commission and the Council, except for the fact that there has been a great deal of utilization of the C-2 area, and that in his opinion the public necessity, convenience and general welfare and good zoning practice justifies a change of zone at 4. 6-6-61 I I (Hearing - Miller) 1'6' II " 14:5364 this time, in fact makes it mandatory that the Council g~ant the requested zone change. The Director of Public Works indicated the six subject lots on the wall map, and Mayor Balser inquired if anyone else in the audience desired to speak in favor of the zone change. Mrs. A. L. Wilson, 626 West Naomi' Avenue, Mr. Michael J. Blake, 1245 Lovell Avenue and Mrs. Fred Miller, 630 Naomi Avenue, addressed the Council, expressing favor of the requested rezoning. Mr. Ervin H. Golisch, Planning Commission's liaison with the Council, summarized the reasons arrived at by the Planning Commission which resulted in their recommendation as contained in Resolution No. 409, stating in part that several informal meetings had been held with some of the people appearing at this meeting and representatives of the West A~cadia Home Owners Aasociation. That their thought in calling the requested zone change strip zoning was because it was a matter of only six lots. He pointed to the lots in question on the wall map as well as to the R-l in the vicinity and stated that if the six lots were rezoned commercial it was felt that logically this zoning would have to be granted to the other area; that piecemeal zoning would not be to the advantage of the City; that the reason there is an excellent commercial area on Baldwin Avenue between Duarte Road and Naomi Avenue is because of the uniform development and that should be continued. Also, with the employment by the City of a Planning Director it was felt that the area should be viewed in its entirety so that it will be a uniform and cohesive unit and to the advantage of the City. No one else desiring to speak either in favor of or in opposition to the requested rezoning Councilman Camphouse moved that the hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously. The Councilmen then stated in part as follows: Councilman Camphouse: That several years ago a few residents in the area requested rezoning for their lots and Council suggested that a total proposition would be looked upon favorably; that this was attempted but apparently too much territory was involved. That in his opinion, if the requested rezoning is right at this time it should be granted as a step in the right direction working toward a goal. Councilman Reibold: That had the area previously been rezoned piecemeal it would probably be an accomplished fact at this time; that his opinion coincides with that of Councilman Camphouse in that if it is good zoning it applies, whether piecemeal or as a whole. He added that progress cannot await the arrival of the new Planning Director and that some further staff study, with a time limit, would be advantageous, but that he could not in this instance sustain the Planning Commission's recommendation. Councilman Phillips: That even if the same restrictions as contained in Ordinance No. 1071 were imposed on the property in question it might not develop in the same manner as if it were part of a whole; that if he could be assured that the said restrictions would be sufficient to insure proper development he would not object to the ~ezoning. That section 3 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 409 does not include all the evidence received at this hearing nor at the planning table and that he would hesitate to uphold the Planning Commission in its denial thus terminatin the application; that he would be inclined to take the matter under advise- ment so that Council could have full control of the ultimate disposition. Councilman Butterworth: That he desired to restate his position with regard to the Council sustaining the recommendations of the Planning Commission as he might have stated it awkwardly earlier in the evening. That he felt it is good City policy to sustain the Planning Commission even in doubtful matters and to reverse its recommendations only where there is ~eason to believe it has acted in an arbitrary manner. 5. 6-6-61 (Hearing - Miller) J f! 1/ RECESS SUSPENSION OF BUSINESS PERMITS (73 Huntington Drive) :; 7q & -r !f-737 , ,~lJ~, . ---.....,) IIlWEXED 14:5365 Councilman Butterworth added in pa~t that the Planning Commission has had the benefit of more evidence than the Council and has made a study of the situation. That as he unde~stands its attitude, it does not oppose commercial zoning but p~ima~ily wants consistent commercial zoning in the area. That this is a very sensitive area and the new Planning Director should be given an opportunity to review the matter. That he agrees that the lots cannot remain R-l but that it is just a matter of when it is going to be changed and under what conditions and that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is not to deny but simply'to take some time to have the matter reviewed by the Planning Director, which, in his opinion, is not an a~bitra~y recommendation but one to be supported. Mayor Balser: That he concurred in the sentiment expressed by some of I the Councilmen that commercial zoning is warranted on these six lots but that he agreed with the Planning Commission that it would be difficult to get a D overlay that would be in keeping with the area if the six subject lots a~e zoned comme~cial; that in his opinion a larger area should be considered. That the fact that the residents across the street expressed no objections would start commercial zoning across the street and that he thought a better planning job could be done for the City if a larger area is considered. Councilman Phillips then moved that the application of Ellen Miller and others for a change of zone from R-l and R-2 to C-3 and D for six lots on the no~th side of Naomi Avenue east of Baldwin Avenue be taken under advisement; that the staff be instructed to prepare for the Council the conditions imposed under the o~iginal zoning as contained in Ordinance No, 1071 and their effect upon the subject lots, and that Counsel for the applicants be furnished copy thereof. Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Balser declared a 5 minute recess at 9:20 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 P.M. Hearing closed at meeting of May 16, 1961 regarding the matter of the suspension of amusement game pennits at 73 West: Huntington Drive and continued to this meeting for Councilmanic ultimate decision. Councilman Butterworth stated that in view of the evidence deduced at the last Council meeting, including the statements of the parties involved, that he moved that Council approve the recommendation of the City Manager; that the suspension be sustained and the pennits issued to Robert E. Dunne for the operation of a BaIley Kingpin Bowler and to LaVon I. Hanson to operate a coin operated pool table, at 73 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, be permanently revoked for ,the reason that the person in charge thereof I has permitted infraction of provisions of law applicable thereto. Counci man Reibold seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Butterworth further moved that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare for review by the Council an ordinance, the substance of which would make illegal the operation of any skill game in Arcadia. Councilman Phillips seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None 6. 6-6-61 ZONE VARIANCE (Risser) .JV:b ;/' INDEXED I RESOLUTION No. 3387 ~ ?fIr. - -../ v INDEXED BID AWARD (DJ:illing. etc:. 20 inch Water Well) :J- ?: I 'b (t1 7;f'f5 INDEXEIi I 14:5366 Motion by Councilman Reibold. seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission as contained in its Resolution No. 408. and approve the application of J. Ray Risser for a zone variance to allow the erection of four additional apartment units at 918 West Huntington Drive and to continue the use of the present 16 foot driveway and the covered carports: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, ~alser, NOES: None ABSENT: None Whereupon the City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 3387, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A ZONE VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE ERECTION OF FOUR ADDITIONAL APARTMENT UNITS AND TO USE THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND CARPORTS AT 918 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE UPON SPECIFIED CONDITIONS ." Motion by Councilman Phillips, seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of Resolution No. 3387 be waived: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Phillips further moved that Resolution No. 3387 be adopted. Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth. Camphouse. Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None The following, bids were received June 5, 1961 for the drilling, casing, perforating, developing and testing of a 20 inch water well: ITEM 1 - Furnish equipment, labor and material for drilling water well 850 feet deep: Bidder Amount Roscoe Moss Co. Water Well Supply $23,831.00 24,302.00 ITEM 2 - Amount to be added for each foot in excess of 850 feet: Roscoe Moss Co. Water Well Supply 26.83 26.75 ITEM 3 - Amount to be deducted for each foot less than 850 feet: Roscoe Moss Co. Water Well Supply 25.83 26.00 ITEM 4 - Amount to be deducted for each foot not cased: Roscoe Moss Co. Water Well Supply 13 .83 13.84 ITEM 5 - Furnish equipment, labor and material fo~ developing and testing for 80 hours: Roscoe Moss Co. Water Well Supply 2.640.00 2,750.00 7. 6-6-61 BID AWARD (Orange Grove Reservoirs Nos. 3 & 4) fr i,d:z-;"'v COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT (Annexation Charges) ::f '/ 'Z-- 'J lNDEXED 14:5367 ITEM 6 - Amount to be added per hour for over 80 hours developing and testing: Bidder Amount Roscoe Moss Co. Water Well Supply $18.00 20.00 ITEM 7 - Completion of Item 1 in days: Roscoe Moss Co. Water. Well Supply 60 days 60 days Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried on roll call vote as follows that the Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and the Water Superintendent; that a contract for the furnishing of all material, labor, tools, appliances and equipment, including transportation, for drilling, casing, perforatin , etc. of a plain well in accordance with specifications heretofore approved by the Council, be awarded to the low bidder, Roscoe Moss Co. in the base amount of $23,831.00 in addition to the other amounts as set forth above; that any irregularities or informalities in the bids or bidding process be waived, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute such contract on behalf of the City for the performance of the contract and in the amount specified, in form approved by the City Attorney, and that all other bids becrejected: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None The City Manager reported on bids received June 5, 1961 for protective coating for internal surfaces of steel water reservoirs at the Orange Grove site; that on Orange Grove No.3 there were 8 bids received, the low bid being $13,398 and the high $18,322 and on No.4 there were likewise 8 bids received, the low bid being $13,398 and the high $18,322. Motion by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously that Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and that the above bids be held firm for a period of 30 days as provided for in the notice inviting bids until a complete analysis is made of the bids as well as the specifications submitted therewith. The City Manager submitted the report of the Council Committee (Reibold- Phillips) on their study regarding the liability of those residents in the area south of Live Oak Avenue and east of Double Drive to the City if they are annexed as petitioned. The City Manager advised that the report is predicated on conditions as of June 30, 1960 since the last audit of the City is for the period I ending that date; that the assets of the City reflect only those assets contributing to 'the service requirements of the area or add to the asset of the area, and that the summation of the Committee's conclusions resul in the following recommendations to the Council: 1. That a lump sum of $111,274 be assumed by the area upon annexation. 2. That said sum be spread ove~ a five year period on the basis of assessed valuation in the area annexed. 3. If the annexation is consummated, the amount spread for this purpose shall be set aside and funded for Capital Projects. 4. That the City Council will not assume any obligation to purchase the existing privately-owned water system. 5. If at some future date the residents of the area petition the City to acquire 'the privately-owned water system that the following method be used to pay for same; 8. 6-6-61 I I (Annexation Charge Report) J '., pj ./ ,:,.."'" r ;, 14: 5368 (a) The area involved shall be obligated to pay the then existing water rates within the City's system, plus an amount required to meet the principle and interest on the purchase price of the system. (b) Maintenance of the system purchased shall be by the City. The City Manager continued that on the basis of the estimated assessed valuation of the area for 1960, the tax rate for the first year would be .657 per $100 of assessed valuation; that if the 1961 assessed valuation for the area has increased by $450,000 the tax rate for the first year would be .580 per $100 of assessed valuation, this rate decreasing annually as valuations increased. Councilmen Phillips and Reibold explained at length their method of arriving at the various figures in the report, adding that they were able to mutually arrive at the figures but that there should not be read into their recommendations that Councilman Reibold agreed to the annexation or that Councilman Phillips agreed to a fee of any kind. After discussion as to whether or not a recreation fee should be added to the annexation fee it was agreed that a compromise recreation fee of half of $25.00, the amount charged in Arcadia on lot splits and subdivisions, be added, increasing the recommended amount $9000, or a total of $120,000. Councilman Butterworth stated that the President of the Board of Education had asked that he remind those interested in annexing that annexation to Arcadia would not insure the area becoming part of the Arcadia Unified School District. He then suggested that the report be amended to the effect that the City of Arcadia has no jurisdiction over the School District and that the residents of the subject area be so informed. Councilman Phillips stated in part that the committee had concerned itself only with matters involving the finances of the City and other matters such as rubbish pickup, etc. Councilman Reibold made the following suggestions: 1) that the Council accept the report as written; 2) that if Council feels that some part of the Recreation fee should be included in the annexation fee, that-it be raised to $120,000; 3) whether a fee shall be charged; 4) the matter of the conditions, such as the fee, the school situation, rubbish, etc. Councilman Camphouse moved that Council accept the report of the Committee as submitted. Councilman Reibold seconded the motion. Councilman Butterworth then moved an amendment to the motion; that the report be amended to include a Recreation fee in the sum of approximately $9000 to the end that the net charge to be assessed on the annexation be $120,000. Councilman Camphouse stated that his understanding of Councilman Reibold's suggestions was that there were to be two motions, because he could vote for one but could not vote for the other. Upon the City Attorney's statement that Councilman Butterworth's motion on the inclusion of an annexation fee was ,in order, Councilman Reibold seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Reibold, Balser NOES: Councilmen Camphouse, Phillips ABSENT: None Councilman Butterworth further moved that the motion to accept the report as thus amended be passed. Councilman Reibold seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: 9. 6-6-61 (Annexation Charge Report) , ,I {/'J",.:', "",/ HOSPITAL LEASE (Proposed Amendment) , ~ ", ./ [INDEXED 14:5369 AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: Councilman Camphouse ABSENT: None Whereupon Councilman Reibold moved that the annexation fee be in the amount of $120,000. Councilman Butterworth seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Inasmuch as the boundaries of the proposed annexation have been altered I by the elimination of the southerly portion thereof, Councilman Phillips moved that the Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and the City Attorney and that the proposal based on the revised description be re-referred to the Planning Commission for its report or recommendation pursuant to Section 35108 of the Government Code, and that the City Attorney present to the Council at the Council meeting of June 20, 1961 a Resolution consenting to the commencement of annexation proceedings under the revised description. Councilman Butterworth seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Butterworth moved that the City Clerk be instructed to place on the agenda for the June 20, 1961 Council Meeting a time when representatives of the area proposed to be annexed may express their opinion on the resolution to be adopted and that copies of said resolution be made available to the leaders of the annexation movement. Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion, suggesting that the newspapers publicize the contents of the resolution prior to said meeting date. Councilman Butterworth agreed that such suggestion be added to his motion. It was then carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Reibold added that he wished the record to show that by so voting he did not wish it implied that he was necessarily in favor of the annexation. Several persons from the audience asked questions regarding annexation fees in general; whether the City would require such fees in other annexations and whether a fee was paid on the southerly portion of the subject area which was recently annexed to Arcadia. With regard to the latter question they were advised that the City purchased that propertY'1 When asked if copies of the report as submitted by the committee could be secured, the City Manager stated that copies of same would be avail- able in the office of the City Clerk the following day. The City Manager advised that with regard to the City's request of the Methodist Hospital to release to the City that portion of the property leased to them by the City, located at Holly Avenue and referred to as the "tip" to permit the City to proceed with some initial beautification pending its possible development by the Chamber of Commerce, an amendment was prepared and submitted to the Board of Trustees of said hospital to comply with the Council's intent. That a communication was received from the hospital administrator pointing out the fact that no provision had been made for the right of the Board to approve any plans for the construction on the property during the balance of the lease period as 10. 6-6-61 I I (Hospital Lease) CIVIL DEFENSE COMMISSION C" o-"/A'~ T' eu,-.vC,J.t<..f"'I/"-U &Lo/VL . INDEXED DISPOSITION OF OLD LIBRARY BUILDING J . INDEXED 14:5370 the City had indicated in its previous communication to the Board and that the Board is requesting to have included in the amendment the reversion of the property on the north presently under option to the hospital, said property being located between the two Huntington Drives at Civic Center Place, containing approximately three acres with a depth of 260 feet south of Civic Center Place, referred to as "additional property" . Whereupon Councilman Camp house moved that Council approve the recommen- dation of the City Manager and authorize the present status of the so-called "additional property" being maintained until July 1, 1966 or until concrete proposals are made for its use either by the City or the Hospital Board, and that the agreement originally submitted to the Board be resubmitted with the inclusion of a provision for review by the Board of any plans for development of the so-called "tip property". Councilman Butterworth seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. The City Manager submitted a preliminary draft for the reorganization of the Los Angeles County and Cities Civil Defense Planning Board into the Los Angeles County and Cities Disaster and Civil Defense Commission. That the creation of the Commission as proposed gives official status to the group and develops an action group through which the State may operate in the County in case of a disaster. That the County of Los Angeles is ready and willing to accept this proposal if the plan is the desire of the Cities and that no additional funds will be required of the County or Cities to carry out the contemplated program. Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried by the "Aye" vote of Councilmen Butterworth, Reibold, Phillips and Balser; Councilman Camphouse voting "No", that the Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and endorse the proposal as outlined in the preliminary draft submitted entitled: "LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND CITIES DISASTER AND CIVIL DEFENSE COMMISSION" and that the Los Angeles County Division of the League of California Cities be advised of Council's action in said matter. The City Manager submitted a report of the Civic Affairs Committee of the Arcadia Board of Realtors rega~ding the proposed lease or sale of the vacated library building and recommended that he be authorized to enter into an agreement with the Arcadia Board of Realtors for their exclusive handling of said property for a period not to exceed six months. Discussion ensued as to the terms and conditions of lease and/or sale, commissions, etc. The City Manager advised that the conditions of lease and/or sale were listed in his communication to the Council of April 14, 1961, adding that the Council will retain complete control of either procedure as any proposal will come before it for ratification. Mr. Bill Williams, Chairman of the Civic Affairs Committee, explained that all the conditions imposed were fully understood; that it had been made clear that in the event of a sale of the property no proposition detrimental to the City will be considered and that no step will be taken without prior approval, and that no proposition will be submitted to the Council unless it comes within the scope of the specifications set forth. Upon questioning by the City Attorney, it was made clear that the agreement constituted an exclusive right of sale; that the realtors would be entitled to the specified commission for any sale made within the six months period regardless of how contact was made with the purchaser; but that no commission would be due and payable to any realtor even if he produced a buyer, unless the sale met with the satisfaction of the Council and was actually consummated. 11. 6-6-61 lUIDEXE;: STREEt The City Manager advised that concurrent with the reconstruction and LIGHTING beautification of Santa Anita Avenue the existing utility poles are (Capital being removed from the center parkway and the following program is Improvement proposed between Camino Real and Live Oak Avenues; that when installed Project No.6) the new system would be placed in a lighting maintenance district and ~ ~ u ~the cost divided equally between the City and abutting property owners: V : I~.l:,-, '-t /o>WCP ~ ~ Existing System: "7V ,'~c" Jr.':'" &-L,:.) (Old Library) FOOTHILL TRAFFIC CONTROL, d.'~ ~~ INDEXED REFUNDS (1960 Weed Abatement Assessments) :.t. -' , J-!~,// . .' , -~. \ (/. ' ,...., . " . ~ INDEXED 1961 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM :j.. ,\,,' , ~-~ r" , ~~ ' " , , ,... <!-'"t < .,; ~ '.' 14 :5371 Councilman Phillips moved that Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and authorize him to enter into an agreement with the Arcadia Board of Realtors for their exclusive handling of the vacated library building for a period not to exceed six months. Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously that the communication received May 18, 1961 from Mr. J. C. Womack, State Highway Engineer, advising that as a result of extensive study the following improvements will be made by the State of traffic conditions on Foothill Boulevard through the City of Arcadia, be ~eceived and filed: I 1. Install traffic signals at Baldwin and Foothill. 2. Install traffic signals at Second and Foothill. 3. Modify existing signals at the intersection of Santa Anita and Foothill to improve signal indications and to provide separate controls for left-turn movements. 4. Modify existing signals at the intersection of First Avenue and Foothill to improve signal indications and to provide separate controls for left-turn movements. 5. Provide left-turn channelization at intersections between Michillinda Avenue and Tindalo Road. Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and the Director of Public Works and authorize the following refunds from' the 1960 weed abatement assessment in order to rectify clerical errors made by the County of Los Angeles as set forth in a communication dated May 17, 1961 from its Auditor-Controller: Gordon B. Tuttle, 7473 Kingard Ave., Whittier James A. Duncan, 1307 S. Third Ave., Arcadia $11,00 $ 8,80 AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously that Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and the Director of Public Works and approve for resurfacing in the fiscal year 1961-62 the streets indicated on the map as submitted, said work to be financed from State and County gas tax funds, I Lamps Total illumination Monthly operational cost 32 46,500 $74.50 Lumens New System: Steel poles and lamps Total illumination Monthly operational cost 69 Steel poles @ $135,00 69 372,000 Lumens $277 .65 $9315.00 12. 6-6-61 (Street Lighting) I TRACTS Nos. 24311 & 25368 (Storm Drainage) rf ,1 '" .c:> ...:r -':-"1" 1 ,;"'1 r !INDEXED I TRACT No. 26077 (Final) .1 /0'1 t[NDEXED NOTICE OF HEARING (1961-62 Budget) :i (/:J i irNDEXED 14:5372 Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council accept the recommen- dation of the City Manager and the Director of Public Works, approve the above program, authorize the sum of $9315.00 being appropriated for steel poles as set forth above; and instruct the Director of Public Works to proceed with the project as outlined: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibol~, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None The City Manager advised that on March 1, .1960 the Council discussed at length a request to ;accept,:or refuse to accept certain improvements in Tract No. 24311 developed by Mr. Max Davis. That the question of acceptance involved a change in street grade made by the subdivider's engineer and inadequate storm drainage installed for a large area dis- charging water into the tract. That the motion to accept the improve- ments as instal~ed failed to car~y and the motion that the improvements in said tract be approved if and when the subdivider deposited with the City one-third of the $5000, being the estimated cost of correcting the situation, was withdrawn, the minutes containing the statement that the Council had indicated by its vote that they we~e willing to cooperate to some extent and are not adamant in their position. The City Manager further advised that on April 5, 1960 the final map of T~act No. 25368, which comprised properties lying south of the above tract and developed by James J. Cecka of Decal Corporation, was reviewed and given final approval; that submitted at the same time as the tract map was a request for payment from the City of the sum of $3,480.40 for additional drainage required by the City; that the matter concerning possible payment by the City for the cost of additional drainage in Tract No. 25368 was referred to staff for study and report, but to date no official action has been taken on this matter. The City Manager continued that an effort has been made by the City to reach an agreement with the two subdividers but without success as to total agreement; that final construction costs have been thoroughly reviewed and insofar as the City is concerned the final total costs of the additional facilities required to provide an adequate drainage system amounts to $3,690.50. Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously that Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and that he and the City Attorney be authorized to negotiate a settlement based upon a stipulatio,\, from the attorney representing Decal Corporation that the City will be released from all further claims of the Corporation. Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously that the recommendation of the City Manager, the Director of Public Works and the Water Superintendent be approved and that the City accept the improvements in Tract No. 26077 for maintenance, and the surety bond deposited by the subdivider be released. Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously that a hearing be scheduled for June 20, 1961 at 8:00 P.M. on the 1961-62 Budget for the City, and that the City Clerk be authorized to publish such notice of hearing. 13. 6-6-61 ORDINANCE No. 1128 (Adopted) / RESOLUTION No. 3388 ( RESOLUTION No. 3390 / 14:5373 The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1128, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO CHAPTER 2 OF ARTICLE II THEREOF A NEW PART 8 CREATING A PARKING PLACE COMMISSION, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT, REMOVAL, QUALIFICATIONS, TERMS OF OFFICE AND NUMBER OF MEMBERS THEREOF AND SPECIFYING THE POWERS AND DUTIES THEREOF." Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of Ordinance No. 1128 be waived: I AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Reibold further moved that Ordinance No. 1128 be adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 3388, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS THE POSITION OF PARK FOREMAN IN THE CLASSIFIED SERVICE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, SPECIFYING THE QUALIFICATIONS THEREFOR AND THE DUTIES THEREOF, AND ABOLISHING ONE POSITION OF SUBFOREMAN IN SAID DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS." Motion by Councilman Phillips, seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of Resolution No. 3388 be waived: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Phillips further moved that Resolution No. 3388 be adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Bu~terworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title Ofl Resolution No. 3390, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSIO TO PROVIDE AN INTERCHANGE ON THE PROPOSED FOOTHILL FREEWAY AT BALDWIN AVENUE IN SAID CITY." Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of Resolution No. 3390 be waived: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Butterworth moved that Resolution No. 3390 be adopted. 14. 6-6-61 (Resolution 10. 3390) PECK ROAD 1lIlOPERTY I f /J.. 3 :CNDEXED LIBRARY (Identifi- cation Sign) ,-/' ~ '/ I J; INDEXED BID AWARD (Legal Advt.) r:t I y! ( 'o,J 14:5374 Motion seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips. Balser NOES: None ABSENT: N,one Motion by Councilman Phillips, seconded by Councilman Retbo14 ea4 carried unanimously that Council accept the reco~ndation of the City Attorney and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute and deliver to Arcadia Industries, Inc. grant deed covering lots 18, 19, 20 and 21 in Tract No. 26345, the 'purchase price having already been paid to the City. Motion by Councilman Phillips, seconded by Councilmau Reibeld and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council accept the recQmmen- dation of the Library Board of Trustees, approve the construction of an identification sign for the Library at the eornBr of Santa Anita Avenue and Duarte Road, and authorize the appropriation of $900.00 from Library surplus fund for such purpose: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: tfcne Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried on roll call vote as follows that the Council accept the recommendation of the City Clerk and award the contract for legal advertising for the fiscal year 1961-62 to the only bidder, Arcadia Tribune. a semi-weekly newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Arcadia. designated as official publication for the City of Arcadia, which bid was as follows: First insertion - printing and advertising - per column inch $1,75 INDEXED Each subsequent insertion - per column inch to be set in seven point type I BUSINESS PERMITS (Benches) (Kiwanis) (WABPA) 1', ~ ~ (INDEXE:': $1.55 Copies of said printing and advertising on separate sheets, size 6" x 9" for first 25 copies $4.00 Each additional 25 copies, not to exceed 15" in length, plus an equal amount for each additional 15" or fraction thereof $1. 00 AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse, Reibold, Phillips, Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously that Council approve the applications of the Kiwanis Foundation of Gateway for permits to install benches at 401 South First and 802 South First Avenues, said locations having been approved by the Director of Public Works, and that the recommendation of the City Manager be accepted and the fees for said permits be waived. Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously that Council approve the applications of the West Arcadia Business and Professional Association for permits to install benches at various locations in the City as listed by the License Officer and approved as to location by the Director of Public Works, and that the recommendation of the City Manager be accepted and the fees for said permits be waived. 15. 6-6-61 COMMUNICATIONS I //1/'r!lW /W--' lNDEXED --,if "/1 " SANTA ANITA P.T.A. 1, s, f, / DOSHIER AVENUE VACATION j if 1-'::" lNDEXED SALE OF FIREWORKS j- /77 ~EXEr: 14:5375 Motion by Councilman Reibold, seconded by Councilman Phillips and carried unanimously that the communication from the Citizens Committee for Clean Government., Irwindale, California, dated May 12, 1961. regard- ing water contamination, be referred to the Water Board for recommendation. Mayor Balser ordered filed the communication from Saffell & McAdam, dated May 15, 1961 expressing appreciation for services rendered by the City throughout the construction of the new Arcadia Library, adding that the Council valued such expressions of commendation. Regarding the matter of warning signs to be posted in the school:acme I on Santa Anita Avenue at Wistaria Avenue, as requested by the Santa Ani P.T.A. and discussed at the Council meeting of May 16, 1961, Mr. Edwin Johnson of 1905 South Santa Anita Avenue, representing said P.T.A. again addressed the Council, thanking them for the stop sign installed in front of the Santa Anita School. Mr. Johnson added that nhe P.T.A. had been under the impression that traffic traveling north would be surveyed and reported on at this council meeting and that the street would be painted for northbound traffic. That this has not been done and because of the approach of summer school and pl~yground sessions it was wondered if this has been ordered. The Director of Public Works advised that the signs have been ordered, the large signs insta1l~d and the department is presently looking toward the painting of the street. Mayor Balser requested the Director of Public Works to notify Mr. Johnson when the installation is complete and advised Mr. Johnson that the Council would appreciate his and other residents' observation and reference to the matter made to the City Manager. Mr. Cliff Burton, 1830 Highland Oaks Drive, addressed the Council. stating in substance that approximately two years ago a petition from the Highland Oaks Drive residents was submitted to the Council, request- ing that the easement for the extension of Doshier Avenue to the east of Highland Oaks be vacated; that at present Doshier Avenue deadends into Highland Oaks Drive from the west; that there is an easement permitting a street to be cut through into the Wash but no final action was taken; that those living in the area feel that there is no need for the extension of Doshier Avenue out into the Wash, it being not only unnecessary but highly undesirable, and desire to have proceedings started to bring the matter to a concluaion. The City Attorney advised that final action was taken at the time proceedings to vacate the offer of dedication were terminated and it would necessitate new proceedings by resolution of intention to vacate, posting the property and holding a hearing. I Councilman Phillips moved that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare a resolution of intention to vacate. Councilman Camphouse seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried unanimously that Council grant the request of the American Legion, Arcadia Post No. 247, to sell fireworks July 1, 2, 3 and 4, 1961; that the $1500 license fee be refunded to the applicant upon condition that a fireworks display be conducted in the County Park On the night of July 4, 1961; and that the provisions of Divisions 1 and 2 of Part 1, Chapter 3, Article II of the Arcadia Municipal Code be waived. 16, 6-6-61 CLAIMS AGAINST 'THE CITY (Zuckerman) N",~ .J ' rp...bw-<~ 14:5376 Motion by Councilman Butterworth. seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried unanimously that the City Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager and the City Attorney and reject the following claims filed against the City by the survivors of Harry Zuckerman: Bessie Zuckerman. dated May 10, 1961 Damages Expenses $350.000 2.000 INDEXED. Marvin Zuckerman. dated May 10. 1961 I FUND TRANSFER 1; ?;;::!::: INDEXED INSURANCE COMMITTEE REPORT NOMINATIONS (Boards and Commissions) Damages $100.000 Adine Toder Damages $100.000 Motion by Councilman Reibold. seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council accept the recommen- dation of the City Manager and authorize the transfer of $800.00 from Account No. 409-28 (Council General Contingency) to Account No. 409-27 (Manager's General Contingency) to cover alterations and the like in the office of the City Attorney and the Planning Department due to the move of the City Attorney to offices in the main building to provide room, for the P~anning, D~rector: AYES: Councilmen Butterworth, Camphouse. Reibold,Phillips. Balser NOES: None ABSENT: None It was proposed that the matter of the report of the Insurance Committee be continued to an adjourned meeting in order to give the matter thorough study. Councilman Camphouse expressed appreciation for the plaque presented to him earlier in the meeting and the commendations manifested. Councilman Camphouse moved that Mrs. Howard Cheverton be reappointed to the Health and Sanitation Commission for another term, said term to run consecutively from July 1. 1961 to June 30, 1965. Mayor Balser seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. (Responsibility Balser and Camphouse). PERSONNEL 'A S Q" Motion by Councilman Camphouse. seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously that Mr. James H. Hastings be reappointed to the Personnel Board for a term running oonsecutively from July 1. 1961 to June 30. 1965. (Responsibility Reibold and Camphouse)~ WATER BOARD 7J sf Motion by Councilman Camphouse, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried unanimously that Mr. Ray Rogers be reappointed to the Water Board for a term running consecutively from July 1. 1961 to June 30, 1965. (Responsibility Butterworth and Camphouse). ,HEALTH & i1,sf' l;;ANITATION I PLANNING 'hsF Councilman Camphouse commented that the forthcoming vacancies on the Planning Commission were receiving consideration and nominations would be forthcoming. Councilman Camphouse suggested that prior to the forthcoming signal- ization at the Sycamore Bridge that the staff submit at the next Council meeting recommendations regarding the erection of temporary stop signs on key streets so that mo'torists will not use the side streets. Mayor Balser thought the suggestion was good and ordered it done. 17. 6-6-61 LIBRARY BOARD 11.1), p BALSER 1\,6,f ADJOURNMENT 14: 5377 Motion by Councilm~n Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried unanimously that Mrs, H. A. Opel be reappointed to the Library Board for a term running consecutively from July 1, 1961 to June 30, 1965, (Responsibility Balser and Butterworth), Mayor Balser reminded the Council that he would not be present at the next Council meeting inasmuch as he would be attending the Conference of Mayors in Washingtpn, D,C, June 11-14, 1961, and would be back in the City June 25, 1961, At 11:45 P.M. Councilman Phillips moved that the meeting adjourn to June 8, 1961 at 8:00 A.M. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously, ?tf.,1.~ ATTEST: ~~ City Clerk , ".> 18. 6-6-61 I I