HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPTEMBER 16,1958
I
INVOCATION
PLEDGE
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
PENDING AGENDA
INDI:ED
I
IIIDEXBI;l
S:Wr
~
~
'Il,r"Q!8
~f.f(,J G
M I NUT E S
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 16, 1958
The City Council of'the City of Arcadia, California met in regular
session in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M.
September 16, 1958.
The Invocation was offered by Rev. Glenn T. Zachary, Pastor of the
South Arcadia Union Church.
Mayor Phillips led in the pledge of allegiance to the flag.
PRESENT :
ABSENT :
Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
None
Councilman Reibold moved that the minutes of the regular Council
meeting of September 2, 1958, as submitted in writing, be approved.
Councilman Jacobi seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously.
Mayor Phillips called for "Matters Pending". Whereupon the City
Clerk announced that the first item on the pending agenda was the
matter of Councilman Balser's suggestion of August 19, 1958 that
Ordinance No. 837, regarding animals on premises, be reviewed and
discussed at a later Council meeting. Mayor Phillips ordered this
matter held over pending completion of a staff report.
The City Clerk then stated that item 2 on the pending agenda was
the matter of the communications received from both the American
Association of University Women and the Health and Sanitation
Commission pertaining to the Pasadena Child Guidance Guild,
mental health facilities; that this matter had been taken under
advisement at the September 2, 1958 Council meeting pending a
meeting when all members of the Council would be present; that
at said meeting it had basically been the consensus of the
Councilmen present that it was not within the prerogative of the
City to use City tax funds for this particular matter, as the
City would then have the moral obligation to do the same in other
areas that are equally beneficial,
Mayor Phillips inquired if any other communications had been
received and the City Clerk read a communication signed by three
members of the Health and Sanitation Commission, to wit:
E. H. Golisch, S. H. Bierly and Dr. Robert Stragnell, dated
September 11, 1958 and addressed to the Council, stating in
part that they believed it should have been emphasized in the
previous letter from said Health and Sanitation Commission that
such assistance should be provided by private fund sources
rather than from tax funds.
There being no other communications Mayor Phillips called upon
Councilmen Camphouse and Balser, who had been absent from the
September 2, 1958 Council meeting, for their opinions. Councilman
Camphouse stated that in the past on similar occasions other
1.
9-16-58
1. ~~f79
HEARING
(Hellen)
~"
(I :I\.~
i'
organizations had called upon the City but that it had been the
practice of the Council not to have the City participate; that in
his opinion to do so in this particular instance would create a
wrong precedent. Councilman Balser stated that he concurred in
this and added that he did not think the City should become involved.
Councilman Reibold commented that the communication from the
American Association of University Homen had stated in part that
they were aware of the worthiness of this project and pointed
out that while they could not make any contribution they wished
to go on record as being available to help in any way within
their power, such as speakers for local groups, making information
available regarding local mental health needs, etc.
I
Councilman Camphouse then moved that the Council instruct the City
Manager to write a letter advising of the City's position and
emphasizing that the City is concerned with their problem but that
it does not feel it is within its prerogative to assist in this
particular program, Councilman Reibold seconded the motion and it
was carried unanimously.
Mayor Phillips declared the hearing open on the application of
Harwood Hellen, 25 Westmont Drive, Alhambra, California (dba
Veterans House Addressing Service) for a business license to
permit the painting of house numbers on curbs.
The City Clerk announced that she had letters of recommendation
as to applicant's service from both the City of Alhambra'and the
City of San Fernando, and also an outline from the applicant as
to his method of operation.
Mayor Phillips inquired if anyone in the audience wished
either in favor of or in opposition to the application.
applicant, Mr. Hellen, addressed the Council, stating in
that he would guarantee the painting of house numbers on
of every dwelling within the City, with the exception of
commercial and multiple dwellings; that this will be done at no
charge to the City or its residents; that during the time the
work is performed a card is left at each residence informing
the owner that a house number is being put on the curb in front
of every house in the City; that there is no charge but is being
done on a strictly donation basis; then from three to ten days
thereafter a call is made to accept the donation, if any; that
the material used and size of lettering is left to the discretion
of the Engineering Department.
to speak
The
part
the curb
As to his use of the name "Veterans House Addressing service",he
informed the Council that his company was composed of veterans but
was in reality a private concern.
Upon being informed of the City's ordinance regarding solicitation
he agreed to abide by such ordinance and stated that although
house numbers would be painted at every residence no solicitation
for donations would be made at premises posted with "No
Solicitors" signs.
I
Mr. C. L. Dorsett, 1020 Holly Avenue, addressed the Council,
expressing approval of the proposed service.
There being no one else desiring to be heard Councilman Balser
moved that the hearing be closed. Councilman Camphouse seconded
the motion and it was carried unanimously.
To Councilman Balser's query as to whether the performance of the
proposed service at posted premises is in violation of the City's
2,
9-16-58
I
I
HEARING
(Fourth
Avenue) ,
-:;1! I
RESOLUTION
No . I3,O 56.::~D
7'119
INTRODUCTION
OF NEW
DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC WORKS
r!aBO
Solicitation Ordinance the City Attorney stated that the applicant
has not qualified as a Veterans' organization and operates as a
private concern and as such is subject to the City's solicitation
ordinance and precludes him from soliciting premises that are
posted; that in this instance the resident is not buying anything
because, according to Mr. Hellen's application and statements,
the work is performed at each house, a card is left to acquaint
the resident of the fact and to solicit the contribution of the
resident toward the cost of the work; that there can be no
violation if Council grants permission for the service and a
violation would occur only if solicitation is made at posted
premises.
After a general discussion it was opined by both Councilmen
Balser and Jacobi that the proposed service would be beneficial.
Whereupon Councilman Balser moved that the Council grant a
permit to Harwood Hellen, doing business as Veterans House
Addressing Service, to permit the painting of house numbers on
curbs throughout the City of Arcadia, as set out in his
application, subject to the approval of the City Engineer as to
specifications, and on condition that no solicitation occur at
premises posted "No Solicitors or Peddlers". Councilman Jacobi
seconded the motion and it was carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold
NOES: Mayor'Phillips
ABSENT: None
Recommendation of the City Attorney that the Hearing on the
Improvement of Fourth Avenue, set pursuant to Resolution No.
3047, be rescheduled.
Councilman Jacobi moved that Council approve the recommendation
of the City Attorney and reschedule the Hearing on the Improvement
of Fourth Avenue, fixed by Resolution No. 3047, to the Council
meeting of October 7, 1958 at 8:00 P.M. Councilman Camphouse
seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously.
The City Attorney then presented, discussed and read the title of
Resolution No. 3056, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA SETTING A HEARING FOR THE PURPOSE OF
DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE IMPROVEMENT OF FOURTH AVENUE BETlo/EEN THE CENTER LINE
OF NORMAN AVENUE AND A POINT 200 FEET MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF CAMINO
REAL AVENUE IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA."
Councilman Camphouse moved that the reading of the full body of
Resolution No. 3056 be waived. Said motion seconded by Councilman
Reibold and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Camphouse moved that Resolution No. 3056 be adopted.
Motion seconded by Councilman Jacobi and carried on roll call
vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Mayor Phillips presented to the Council and the audience the
City's new Director of Public Works, Mr. Charles E. Lortz.
3.
9-16- 58
",
4381
HEARING
(Parking
District
No, 1)
1/> '
, I
Mayor Phillips announced: "The hour of 8:00 o'clock P.M. having
arrived, this is the time and place fixed for the hearing on the
assessment filed in the matter of Vehicle Parking District No. 1
of the City of Arcadia,"
The City Clerk presented to the Council the affidavits of mailing
and publication of notice of filing the assessment, and then
presented the assessment roll to the Council.
Mr Franklin T Hamilton, of the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers,
special Counsel employed by the City in the matter of Vehicle
Parking District No.1, outlined the background of the Parking
District, which in part is as follows:
I
In April, 1956 a petition was filed with the City Council 'requesting
the formation of a Vehicle Parking District No 1, Said petition
described the boundr.ries of the District proposed to be assessed
for the acquisition and improvement of parking lots and described
the lots proposed to be acquired and the improvements proposed to
be made on said lots. Said petition was signed by approximately
60% in area of the owners within the district and approximately 65%
of assessed value of land and improvements within the district
Following the filing of the petition the City Council initiated
the proceedings under the Vehicle Parking District Law of 1943,
They ordered the preparation of a debt-limit report which showed
the estimated cost of the project and apportioned the estimated
cost on all parcels of land within the district, Said report was
set down for hearing. The estimated cost of the project was
approximately $53,000.00.
In August, 1956 the City Council, following the adoption of its
Ordinance of Intention and the giving of notice by mail, posting
and publication, held a hearing on the Ordinance of Intention to
determine whether or not to go forward with the project, At that
hearing written protests were filed by certain of the property
owners within the district. Those protests represented
approximately 25% by area and approximately 17% by assessed
valuation. At the conclusion of that hearing the City Council
ordered the District formed with boundaries set forth in the
petition, and ordered the City Attorney to acquire the various
lands which were described in the proceedings and in the petition.
The City Attorney then acquired part of the land by contract and
part by condemnation.,
Following the acquisition of the land the City advanced from
available funds the purchase price and the award and condemnation
of the property and also advanced funds for the improvement of the
lots so that the lots have now been acquired, title is vested in the
City and the lots are improved,
I
Following that, the former Superintendent of Streets, Mr. Michael J.
Carozza, filed an assessment, which assessment apportioned the entire
cost of the project, land costs, improvement costs, and incidental
expenses against all of the lands in the district.
Mr, Hamilton then outlined the procedure which the City Council
might follow. He stated that the primary question before the City
Council is the fairness or the equity of the assessment, whether,
in accordance with the requirements of law, it has been apportioned
in proportion to benefits to be received That the Council has the
following alternatives open to it at the conclusion of the hearing:
4.
9-16-58
~ 9{
I
I
4382
1, Council retains the full and complete power of abandonment of
the proceedings.
2. Council may confirm the assessment as filed with the City Clerk,
or order the assessment amended, altered or modified in any
respect that Council deems just and fair.
If Council confirms the assessment, either as filed or as amended,
the assessment will be (a) recorded in the Street Superintendent's
office and in the County Recorder's office, For a period of 30
days following that recordation, any property owner within the
district may pay his assessment in full or in part without penalty
or interest.
In the event the property owner elects not to pay his assessment in
full or in part in cash, a bond will be issued on his property in
the amount of his unpaid assessment. The bond will then be offered
for sale by the City Council and the interest rate will be fixed by
the successful bidder at that sale, so that the Council will, by the
process of competitive bidding, obtain the best possible interest
rate available under the circumstances, The Council will then
award the bonds, the bonds will be prepared and signed by the City
Treasurer and delivered.
At that time the City will have a cash fund consisting of those
assessments which are paid in cash and the proceeds of the bonds.
The City will then reimburse itself for the prior advances which it
made for the acquisition and improvements of the parking lots. The
bonds will extend over a period of 20 years, One-twentieth of the
principal will be due and payable each year and interest on the unpaid
balance will be due and payable each year During the time the bonds
are outstanding any property owner may payoff the bond on his
property and remove the lien on his land by paying the amount of the
unpaid assessment, plus the amount of the next maturing interest coupon
which, except for the first coupon, will be 6 months, and a premium
of 3% of the unpaid principal.
The City Clerk then administered an oatk ~o the City Attorney,
Mr. James N Nicklin, who swore that he now is and at all times since
the commencement of' the proceedings in the Arcadia Vehicle Parking
District No. 1 has been the duly appointed, qualified and acting
City Attorney of the City of Arcadia.
Mr. Hamilton then proceeded to question the City Attorney as to
the signature of Mr. Carozza on the assessment. He stated that
he had heretofore inspected the assessment; that he was personally
present when Mr. Carozza signed same and when he filed it with the
City Clerk and that Mr. Michael J. Carozza was at that time Director
of Public Works and exofficio City Engineer and Superintendent of
Streets.
Mr. Hamilton then inquired of the City Attorney as to whether the
actual computation and preparation of the assessment, the preparation
of the property descriptions and the apportionment of the assessments
were done by Mr, L. J. Thompson, and whether Mr. Thompson was
employed by the City of Arcadia to assist the Superintendent of Streets
in preparing the assessment, To which the City Attorney replied that
he was; that the bulk of the work was actually done by Mr. Thompson
assisted by the Staff, himself and the Director of Public Works, and
that the assessment as prepared by Mr, Thompson, was prepared under
the direction and'supervision of Mr. Carozza. He also added that the
duties formerly discharged by Mr. Carozza have now been assumed
officially by Mr. Charles E Lortz.
5.
9-16-58
4383
y\\
The City Clerk administered an oath to Mr. L, J, Thompson, who
stated that he was employed by the City of Arcadia as an
Assessment Engineer to prepare, under the supervision and direction
of the Superintendent of Streets, the assessment which has been
filed and is now before the Council.
Mr. Thompson thereafter briefly outlined some of his background
with respect to his experience in preparing assessments both
for Vehicle Parking District and other types of special assess-
ment proceedings, to wit: that he has had approximately 33 years
experience in Southern California, working for the City of Los
Angeles 26 years and then under contract to many other cities,
making all kinds of assessments under the various statutes, and
under statutes which required that an assessment be apportioned
in proportion to benefits to be derived from the improvements
which are specifically assessed-against the property.
I
He then described the boundaries of the District, to wit: the
District is bounded on the northeast by Indiana Street and the
railroad, on the west by First Avenue, on the south by Huntington
Drive, the District being a triangular portion involving some 29
parcels of land; that two parcels have been acquired for parking;
No. 1 is a triangular shaped parcel on Indiana Street, and between
Wheeler and the first alley south of Wheeler, and parcel No. 2
consists of two lots 50 x 160' on the south side of Wheeler,
approximately 135' east of First Avenue. That the improvements
consisted of paving, bumper curbs and lines painted so as to
distinguish various parking stalls; entrance and exit signs and
other appurtenant work which would be conducive to the best operation
of this parking property, That based on his experience as an
Assessment Engineer, and with his knowledge of the District, it
is his opinion that the assessment which has been filed with
the City Clerk has been apportioned in proportion to which the
various parcels will receive benefit from the parking lot and
improvements.
Mr. Thompson continued, that no two parking districts are
exactly alike; that they involve different types of property,
different locations, different relationships of the parking areas
to the business properties, etc. That various methods were used
to arrive at an equitable solution of this problem and that it was
the opinion of all concerned that this particular problem was best
solved by 3/4ths of the cost to be borne on an area basis and
1/4th pro rata on the assessed value of land and improvements; being
3/4ths of the cost of $56,333,95 or $42,250.46 spread on an area
basis (about 2le a square foot), and $14,083.49 spread upon land
and assessed value of $250,880.00, or about 5,6% assessed valuation.
\
The City Clerk then read the written protests filed with her
against the proposed assessments from the following:
I
Henry Bertolotti, 2115 Orlando Road, San Marino - Assessments on
lots 27 and 28, Block 75 - $3906.88;
William L, and Jane E. Sockman, 153 Alta Street - Assessments on
Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 75 - $4607.54;
C. M. Millwork Co., a California Corporation, 115 Wheeler Avenue -
Assessments on Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 77, - $4066,46.
The City Attorney described the location of the above mentioned
lots and added that with respect to the protests made regarding
present usage of the property, that although the present owners,may not
by reason of their use of the land, have immediate use for the
parking, that in spreading assessment the interests of the majority
6.
9-16- 58
; '1 I
I
I
/
438.;l
are the prime factors. That the 1943 Vehicle Parking District Act
by its date indicates the changing times; that the district idea
was conceived to assist property owners to help themselves in
situations where development necessitates off-street parking.
Mayor Phillips then asked if any person who filed a written protest
or his representative desired to be heard orally in support of
such protest.
Mr. Francis Welton, Attorney at Law, Temple City, representing the
C. ~!. Millwork Co., addressed the Council, stating in part that on
behalf of his client he wished to protest the formula of the
assessment on his client's property; that it was excessive in
view of the fact that his client's business was strictly wholesale;
has sufficient parking for its employees; that few customers come
to the plant, as most of the business is done by telephone; and
that his client will not he benefited by the parking district.
Mr. Hamilton commented that the 1943 Act itself does not specify
any particular formula which should be used in spreading an assess-
ment, It requires only that the assessment be apportioned in
proportion to benefits to be received from the proposed acquisition
and improvement and stressed the fact that the 1943 Act refers to
benefits to be received and not benefits to an existing land use.
That it looks to the future, to the potential of the property, the
use which can be made. That in reference to Mr. Welton's client's
protest that its existing land use does not require parking, he
stated that the law does not look to present. land use but to
potential land use. That this property is presently zoned for M-l
purposes. That there are M-l types of industries which would
require parking. That there would be a serious question as to the
validity of this assessment if it were spread in proportion to exist-
ing land Uses.
Mrs, Jane E. Sockman then addressed the Council, stating in part
that she considered the assessment 'on Lots 14, 15 and 16 of Block
75 excessive because her business did not require additional
parking.
The City Attorney then added to the statements of Mr. Hamilton
the information that each Assessee has a voice in the management
of the lots of a parking district. That there is a Parking District
No. 1 Board of Commissioners. That the lots are to be operated
for the benefit of the property owners assessed to pay for them.
Mayor Phillips then inquired if anyone in the audience desired to
speak on the matter in any respect. No one desiring to speak,
Mr. Hamilton stated that the time has come for the determination
by the City Council; that it has the following alternatives: (1) It
may abandon the proceedings; (2) It may confirm the assessment;
(3) It may order adjustments or corrections.
The City Attorney stated that he felt the record should reflect
the accurate application of the City's zoning ordinance; that the
City has a progressive zoning ordinance starting with R-O, R-l, R-2,
R-3, C-O, C-l, C-2, C-3, CM, M-l, and M-2, That each zone permits
any use permitted in the lower zone with few exceptions, and one of
the exceptions is that when you reach CM (commercial-manufacturing)
it permits any use permissible in the C-3 zone except residential;
that CM, M-l and M-2 permit commercial use but may not be used for
purely residential purposes except caretakers houses and the like.
Mayor Phillips inquired whether the City's ordinances set up certain
credits for parking requirements and the City Attorney answered that
the City's ordinance presently makes provision for off-street parking
in all zones but they vary in commercial and residential in accordance
with usage; that the ordinance provides that a person may
7.
9-16- 58
4385
RESOLUTION
No. 3055
L_::'~~"':D
ORDINANCE
No. 1025
(Adopted)
J"~.__=:';:::D
indirectly recoup a portion of his assessment by receiving a credit
towards a cash contribution in lieu of providing off-street parking
required by the zoning ordinance. He may tender a sum which may be
accepted by the Council if they deem that the provision of money in
lieu of off-street parking is reasonable under the circumstances, the
exact amount to be determined by the City Council, based on the
theory that by reason of location, size, development and all it
might not be practical, from the standpoint of solvin" off-street
parking problems, for a person arbitrarily to set aside so many
feet of ground for off-street parking when in fact it could not
be so used; and to get around that he may tender and the City may
accept a sum of money which is deposited into an off-street parking
acquisition fund, and if they elect to avail themselves of that
provision and it is accepted by the Council, then he may obtain a
credit against that cash contribution up to the amount of any
assessment that is levied in any vehicle parking district affecting
that property, That the provision has not yet been availed of in
Arcadia but has been availed of at other places; that such a matter
is not in issue at this particular hearing.
I
Councilman Reibold then moved that all protests and objections, both
written and oral, made or filed in connection with the assessment
filed in the matter of Vehicle Parking District No.1; be and the
same are hereby overruled and denied. Councilman Camphouse
seconded the motion and it was carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Hr. Hamilton then read Resolution No. 3055 entitled: "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA , CALIFORNIA. MAKING
DETER}lINATIONS AND CONFIR}lING ASSESSMENT IN MATTER OF VEHICLE PARKING
DISTRICT NO.1 OF SAID CITY."
He added that this resolution will confirm the assessment as
filed with the City Clerk.
Councilman Reibold moved that the reading of the full body of
Resolution No. 3055 be waived. Motion seconded by Councilman
Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Reibold further moved that Resolution No, 3055 be
adopted, Motion seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried
on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
I
The City Attorney presented, discussed and read for the second time
the title of Ordinance No. 1025, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
17 OF ORDINANCE NO. 760 OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA."
The City Attorney added that the effect of this ordinance
determines the use of property as a roller skating rink shall
not be arbitrarily classified as in any particular zone but shall
be a use permitted in s-l Zone.
8.
9-16-58
I
I
ORDINANCE
No, 1028
(Adopted)
I~~=::::-=D
ORDINANCE
No. 1029
(Introduced)
.Il:DEl::8D
RESOLUTION
No. 3053
I::C::~'J
1~)i
4:386
Councilman Camphouse moved that the reading of the full body of
Ordinance No. 1025 be waived. Motion seconded by Councilman
Jacobi and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Camphouse further moved that Ordinance No. 1025 be
adopted, Motion seconded by Councilman Jacobi and carried on roll
call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The City Attorney presented, discussed and read for the second time
the title of Ordinance No. 1028, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
20 OF ORDINANCE NO. 860."
The City Attorney commented that this ordinance is an amendment
to the subdivision ordinance.
Councilman Balser moved that the reading of the full body of
Ordinance No. 1028 be waived. Motion seconded by Councilman
Jacobi and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Balser further moved that Ordinance No. 1028 be
adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried
on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The City Attorney presented, discussed and read for the first time
the title of Ordinance No, 1029, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
CERTAIN PROPERTY ON LOUISE AND LEROY AVENUES IN ZONE D
(ARCHITECTURAL OVERLAY) IN ADDITION TO THE BASIC R-l ZONING
APPLICABLE THERETO."
Councilman Jacobi moved that the reading of the full body of
Ordinance No, 1029 be waived. Motion seconded by Councilman
Balser and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Jacobi moved th~ Ordinance No. 1029 be introduced.
Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried on roll call
vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The City Attorney presented, discussed and read the title of
Resolution No. 3053, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A ZONE VARIANCE TO
PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE ADDITIONAL DWELLINGS ON CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY. "
9.
9-16- 58
438'7
RESOLUTION
No. 3054
1;;~~~~~.Q
,',-
1~l'
RESOLUTION
No. 305~1~\'\
RESOLUTION
No. 3059
7/10
TRACT
No, 21618
(Greenfield
Avenue -
Tentative)
:~~
Councilman Reibold moved that the reading of the full body of
Resolution No. 3053 be waived. Motion seconded by Councilman
Jacobi and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Reibold further moved that Resolution No, 3053
be adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried
on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
I
The City Attorney presented, discussed and read the title of
Resolution No. 3054, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING FROM THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CERTAIN GASOLINE TAX
FUNDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAID PUBLIC STREETS IN SAID CITY OF
ARCADIA. "
Councilman Camphouse moved that
Resolution No. 3054 be waived,
Balser and carried on roll call
the reading of the full body of
Said motion seconded by Councilman
vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Camphouse further moved that Resolution No. 3054 be
adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Reibold and carried on
roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The City Attorney stated that the next Resolution in sequence
would be No. 3057, relative to the restrictions under D
Architectural Overlay, but it would be held for the next meeting.
The City Attorney presented, discussed and read the title of
Resolution No. 3059, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT
FOR STREET PURPOSES UPON SPECIFIED CONDITIONS,"
Councilman Balser moved that the reading of the full body of
Resolution No. 3059 be waived. Motion seconded by Councilman
Camphouse and carried on roll call vote as follows:
I
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Balser further moved that Resolution No, 3059 be
adopted, Motion seconded by Councilman Camphouse and carried
on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On June 4, 1958 the Planning Commission recommended that tentative
approval of Tract No. 21618 be given subject to the condition that
10.
9-16- 58
I
I
7}81
TRACT
No. 21741
(Louise Ave.-
Final)
+<j-09
ZONE
VARIANCE
(Riggins)
II~D:::SX7:n
P:~~
4388
the property needed for the street be acquired and improved for
street purposes by any appropriate proceedings without cost to
the City. However, the Commission now is of the opinion that
because it is not practical to condemn this property before the
adjoining street is dedicated, they recommend that tentative
approval be amended to require that the subdivider deed in fee
to the City a one foot wide strip around the boundaries of the
property; that the City acquire by condemnation the east 30 feet
of the property at 1416 South First Avenue; that the subdivider
deposit with the City the estimated'cost of conducting the proceed-
ings, the acquisition of the property and its improvement for street
purposes; such deposit to remain with the City at least five years
after the completion date of the Tract or until such time as the
acquisition and improvement has been completed, and any unused
portion of the deposit to be returned to the subdivider.
Councilman Camp house moved that the Council accept the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and that the conditions on the former
approval of the tentative map of Tract No. 21618 be amended as
recommended by the Planning Commission. Councilman Reibold seconded
the motion and it was carried unanimously.
Recommendation of the Planning Commission that FINAL approval be
given Tract No. 21741, located on Louise Avenue north of Camino
Real Avenue, consisting of 9 lots, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Peed lots 10, 11, 12 in fee to the City.
2. Pedicate 5 foot planting and sidewalk easements along
each side of each street.
3. Install all street improvements required by the
subdivision ordinance.
4. Pay all fees and deposits required by the subdivision
ordinance.
5. Remove all buildings within the tract.
6. Provide all necessary rear line easements for utilities.
7. The City shall dedicate lot 12, Tract No. 24350 for street
purposes.
8. The subdivider shall pay the trust established on a
portion of lot 13, Tract No. 24350 and the City shall
dedicate it for street purposes.
Councilman Balser moved that Council accept the recommend~on of the
Planning Commission and give final approval to Tract No. 21741,
subject to the conditions as specified above. Councilman Jacobi
seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 311 recommending denial of the
application of H. R. Riggins for a variance to allow the retention
of kitchen facilities in a guest house at 85 West Lemon Avenue in
Zone R-l.
The City Attorney advised that the applicant asked to have his
application withdrawn; that the City Ordinance makes no provision
for a withdrawal, and that the Planning Commission and he recommend
that the application be denied without prejudice to reconsideration
thereof upon filing of new proceedings.
Councilman Jacobi moved that the Council accept the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and the City Attorney and that the
application of H. R. Riggins for a variance to allow the retention
of kitchen facilities in a guest house at 85 West Lemon Avenue be
denied without prejudice to a reconsideration thereof upon the
filing of new proceedings. Councilman Reibold seconded the motion
and it was carried unanimously.
11.
9-16-58
Li389
ZONE
CHANGE
(Live Oak)
7-'/3:;
ZONE
CHANGE
(Las Tunas
1 ^ ^ 5"
1 d'.
ZONE
CHANGE
(Huntington
Blvd.) 143(,
VARIANCE
(Building
Code)
li..w-,;~.....~
P: V(jAo.-t-D.Lf.
, .
/':>i<'~ ",,l,
Planning Commission Resolution No. 308 recommending a change of
zone on Live Oak Avenue between Third Avenue and Fourth Avenue
from Zone R-3 to Zones C-2, PR-3'and D and setting forth the
restrictions recommended to be applicable to Zone D, on
application by the owners, Robert F. Williams and Louise W. Wordes.
Said
that
P.M.
matter requiring a public hearing Councilman Reibold moved
the hearing be scheduled for October 7, 1958 at 8:00 o'clock
Motion seconded by Councilman Balser and carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 309 recommending the establish-
ment of Zone D on property on Las Tunas Drive east of ,Baldwin Avenue,
Dr.)on application of Ralph D, Stogsdill. Said matter requiring a public
hearing. Councilman Camphouse moved that the hearing be scheduled
for October 7, 1958 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. Motion was seconded by
Councilman Jacobi and carried unanimously.
I
Planning Commission Resolution No. 310 recommending a change of
zone from Zones c-o and D to Zone R-3 on the rear portion of
property at 728 West Huntington Blvd. Said matter requiring a
public hearing Councilman Balser moved that the hearing be
scheduled for October 21, 1958 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. Motion seconded
by Councilman Jacobi and carried unanimously.
The City Council reviewed the report, photographs and communications
in connection with a request for a variance from the Building Code
to permit the construction of a tree house at 318 Fairview Avenue.
Mr. R. L. Stert, owner of the property, addressed the Council,
stating in part that the tree house has been very substantially
constructed thus far; that further construction will use good'
engineering design and first quality materials; that it will have
enclosed walls for safety and an adequate number of guy wires to
stabilize the structure; that restrictions have been placed on its
use (only during daylight hours); that it will have a tumbler lock
on the door leading to the catwalk to preclude use of the structure
without the owner's knowledge or permission; that a petition has
been circulated and submitted to Council which indicated that there
is only one protest; that the structure is being built for the
exclusive use of the applicant's four boys and the neighborhood
children.
A general discussion ensued during which Mr. Stert stated his
willingness that a time limit be specified if Council approves
construction of the said tree house.
The report from the Safety Committee was discussed; said report
made reference to sections of the Building Code and the opinion
was expressed by said Committee that a question of safety was
involved and that it would be very difficult to rescue or render
aid to anyone becoming injured or trapped in the tree house.
I
After further discussion Councilman Jacobi moved that the City
Council grant Mr. R. L. Stert a variance from the Building Code
for a period of eight years from date hereof to permit the
construction and maintenance of a tree house on his property at
318 Fairview Avenue, provided he submits to the City a written
statement agreeing to remove the structure prior to his sale of
the property or in any event upon the expiration of eight years
from date hereof, unless prior to such time the variance shall have
been extended by official action. Said motion seconded by Council-
man Camphouse and carried unanimously.
12.
9-16-58
->
I
I
CALL FOR BIDS
(Beaut i ficat ion
of Huntington
Drive)
1)1~
CALL FOR BIDS
(Removal of
Trees)
'1-<137
CALL FOR BIDS
(Resurfacing
of City Streets)
-::;-;;&(4..-
435G
Recommendation of the City Manager and Assistant City Engineer
that the City Clerk be authorized to advertise for bids for
the beautification of Huntington Drive between Holly Avenue
and Michillinda Avenue in conformance with plans and
specifications prepared in accordance with the preliminary sketches
approved by the City Council. Said work consists in general of
automatic sprinkler system, trees and lawn, together with
directional signs and planters at intersections. It is
estimated the work will cost $109,000.00, and that money has
been appropriated for this project in the Capital Outlay Budget
and will be financed therefrom.
Councilman Reibold moved that the Council accept the recommendation
of the City Manager and the Assistant City Engineer; that the
plans and specifications for the beautification of Huntington Drive
between Holly ,Avenue and Michillinda Avenue be approved as submitted;
that the City Clerk be authorized to call for bids for said
beautification in conformance with said plans and specifications;
expenditure for same to be financed from the Capital Outlay Budget;
said bids to be opened October 6, 1958 at 11:00 A. M. and presented
to the Council at the regular meeting of October 7, 1958. Said
motion seconded by Councilman Jacobi and carried unanimously.
Recommendation of the City Manager and Assistant City Engineer
that the City Clerk be authorized to advertise for bids for the
removal of 27 trees in the City of Arcadia; that these trees
are judged to be dead or dangerous and are beyond the capacity
of the equipment in the Service Division of the Department of
Public Works; and that the financing of the project will be
under funds included in the current budget.
Councilman Camphouse moved that the Council accept the
recommendation of the City Manager and the Assistant City
Engineer; that the specifications for said removal of 27 trees
in the City of Arcadia be approved as submitted; that the City
Clerk be authorized to call for bids for said work in conformance
with said specifications; that the financing of the project be
under funds included in the current budget; and that said bids be
opened October 6, 1958 at 11:00 A.M, and presented to the Council
at the regular meeting of October 7, 1958, Said motion seconded
by Councilman Reibold and carried unanimously.
Recommendation of the City Manager and the Assistant City Engineer
that the City Clerk be authorized to advertise for bids for the
resurfacing of the following 12 City streets:
Ramona Road
Haven Ave. from Rodeo Road to Santa Anita Ave.
Forest Ave. from Second Ave. to Fifth Avenue
LeRoy Ave. from Holly to El Monte
Las Flores from Holly to El Monte
Third Ave, from Live Oak Ave. to Longden
First Ave. from Las Flores to Norman
Woodruff Ave. from Holly to El Monte
Caroline Way from Live Oak to Las Tunas
Catalpa from Murietta to Volante
Santa Anita Ave. (westlane) from Orange Grove Ave, to Sierra Madre Blvd.
Holly Ave. from Las Tunas to Palm Drive
The following streets are included as alternates: (After receipt
of bids, the exact cost will be analyzed, and certain alternates
will be included in the final contract so as to assure the
complete expenditure of budgeted funds).
13.
9- 16- 58
4391
COMPLETION
OF WORK
(Civic
Center)
1pS
AMBULANCE
SERVICE
'7- '1 J~
Sycamore Ave. from Rodeo Road to Santa Anita Ave,
Santa Cruz Ave. from Colorado to San Rafael
Okoboji Drive from Sunset to West City limits
Warren Way from Live Oak to Las Tunas
The project will be financed as follows:
State Gas
County Gas
Tax - for maintenance of secondary streets
Tax -
$25,000.00
5,000.00
Councilman Balser moved that the Council accept the recommendation
of the Assistant City Engineer; that the plans and specifications
for the 1958-59 street improvement Project No.1, consisting in
general of the resurfacing of the above specified City streets,
be approved as submitted; that the City Clerk be authorized to call
for bids for said work in conformance with said plans and
specifications; that the financing of the project be as stated
above; and that said bids be opened October 6, 1958 at 11:00 A.M.
and presented to the Council at the regular meeting of October
7, 1958. Said motion seconded by Councilman Camphouse and
carried unanimously.
I
Recommendation of the City Manager and Assistant City Engineer
that the City Council accept the work on the Civic Center
project as completed by Daniel Brothers Company, and authorize
final payment in accordance with the provisions of the contract.
Motion made by Councilman Jacobi that the Council accept the
recommendation of the City Manager and the Assistant City
Engineer and approve the work under contract to Daniel
Brothers Company and authorize final payment in accordance
with the provisions of the contract, Said motion seconded by
Councilman Balser and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Recommendation of the City Manager that the City enter into an
agreement with the Glasser-Miller Mortuary whereby they provide
ambulance service for all calls made by the Police Department.
He explained that the Police Department finds it necessary to
call an ambulance on many occasions; that Glasser-Miller
collects for said calls and if uncollectible submits a bill to
the Department; that the City Attorney then attempts to collect;
that unsuccessful collections cost the City approximately
$700,00 per year.
That Glasser-Miller will provide ambulance service for all calls I
made by the Police Department and will absorb the loss of unpaid
bills (with the exception of transportation to County General
Hospital or Prison Ward by request of said Department) if the
City will install a two-way radio in their ambulance at the City's
expense and the City to provide maintenance; said radio to be used
only for calling and dispatching the ambulance for police service;
that the agreement is subject to renegotiation at the end of one
year if unsatisfactory to either party.
He added that the cost of installing a Motorola radio in the
ambulance would be approximately $580,00; maintenance
approximately $25.00 per year; replacement of radio approximately
every seven years; estimated cost to the City for radio,
installation and maintenance approximately $108.00 per year.
14.
9-16-58
I
I
LIBRARY
~i~
Circuit)~O
1~
REFUND
(Russell)
~4~~
4392
Councilman Reibold moved that the Council approve the
recommendation of the City Manager and that the City Attorney
be instructed to prepare contracts covering the items as set
forth above with Glasser-Miller Mortuary; that funds for same
in the amount of $600.00 be transferred from the Council
Contingency Fund 109-l9b to the Police Communication account
120-22, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to
execute said contracts in form approved by the City Attorney.
Councilman Jacobi seconded the motion and it was carried on roll
call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Recommendation of the Library Board of Trustees that the Arcadia
City Library enter into a Joint Powers Agreement for a film
circuit with the District of Buena Park, the County of Los Angeles
and the Cities of Long Beach, Redlands and Santa Barbara.
Councilman Camphouse explained that this agreement was for the
purpose of providing for the creation and establishment of a
common pool or supply of film and audio-visual materials to be
made available to the public library of each of the contracting
agencies on a participating basis, which will increase the
availability of a more extensive supply of such material.
The City Attorney added that this agreement would remain in force
and effect until such time as a majority of the members agreed
to terminate; that any member has the right to terminate its
membership at any time provided, however, that such member shall
not be entitled to any refund as to funds heretofore paid into
the joint fund. That in the event a majority of the members
shall elect to terminate the agreement in its entirety all
properties shall be divided equally among each contracting
member.
Councilman camphouse moved that the Council accept the
recommendation of the Library Board of Trustees and that the
Arcadia Public Library be granted permission to enter into a
Joint Powers Agreement, in form approved by the City Attorney,
for a film circuit with the District of Buena Park, the County
of Los Angeles and the Cities of Long Beach, Redlands and Santa
Barbara and such other members as shall hereinafter qualify, and
that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
documents, Councilman Balser seconded the motion and it was carried
on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Request for authorization to refund the sum of $18.75, being the
unused portion of the investigation fee deposited by Patrick
Russell, 229 Woodruff Avenue, Arcadia, in connection with his
application for a business permit.
Motion was made by Councilman Balser that the City Clerk be
authorized to refund the sum of $18.75 to Patrick Russell,
229 Woodruff Avenue, Arcadia, being the unused portion of the
investigation fee deposited by Mr. Russell in connection with
his application for a business permit. Motion seconded by
Councilman Jacobi and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
15.
9-16-58
4393
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
No one in the audience desired to be heard.
MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
AGREEMENT
(Traffic
Signals)
,
-I . \~.;
RESOLUTION
No. 3058 /
"
:/ ~('.1 .
CITY
PROTEST
,-~;)
f:!"'.t..... ~
Recommendation of Director of Public Works that the Council
approve the submitted second supplemental agreement covering
proposed expenditure of gas tax funds within the City for
modification of traffic signals and safety lighting at the
intersection of Huntington Drive with Santa Anita Avenue,
First Avenue and Second Avenue. That this particular budget
is financed $7500.00 from the City's Major City Streets Funds
and in the amount of $8000.00 from State Highway Budgeted Funds.
I
Councilman Balser moved that the Council accept the recommendation
of the Director of Public Works and approve the second supplemental
agreement as submitted covering proposed expenditure of gas tax
funds within the City for modification of traffic signals arid
safety lighting at the intersection of Huntington Drive with
Santa Anita Avenue, First Avenue and Second Avenue; same to be
financed $7500.00 from the City's Major City Streets Funds and
$8000,00 from State Highway Budgeted Funds, and that the Mayor
and City Clerk be authorized to execute said document. Motion
seconded by Councilman Jacobi and carried on roll call vote as
fo llows :
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
In conjunction with the above the City Attorney introduced
Resolution No. 3058, entitled: "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADOPTING BUDGET AND APPROVING SECOND
SUPPLEHENTAL MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR EXPENDITURE OF GAS
TAX ALLOCATION FOR NAJOR CITY STREETS."
Councilman Jacobi moved that the reading of the full body of
Resolution No. 3058 be waived. Motion seconded by Councilman
Balser and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Jacobi further moved that Resolution No. 3058 be
introduced. Motion seconded by Councilman Balser and carried
on roll call vote as follows:
AYES: Councilmen Balser, Camphouse, ,Jacobi, Reibold, Phillips
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
I
The City Manager reported that the City has received a notice
from the State Water Rights Board of the State of California of
Application No. 18130, being an application made by the County of
Los Angeles to appropriate 0.016 cubic feet per second from
springs in Harris Canyon and Tributary Canyon, both tributary
to Clamshell Canyon which in turn is tributary to Santa Anita
Wash. He added that in aprevious and nearly parallel case, the
cities of Pasadena, Sierra Madre and Arcadia successfully
protested such an application. That the protests were made on
the premise that the waters of Clamshell Canyon contribute to
the safe yield of Santa Anita sub-area of the Raymond Basin, and
that all of the ground waters of the basin were adjudicated as
set forth in the Judgment of the Superior Court in Case No.
Pasadena C-1323 and that there is no unappropriated water in the
watershed contributary to the basin,
16.
9-16-58
j,
I
I
ANNUAL
FINANCIAL
REPORT l--"--''''D
L.;..J -A.I..
REPORT
(Alley)
NcJ
COMMUNICA1'lONS
(L. A. Turf
Club)
IZ~ .::::;::;n
(A. A. U. W.)
(Mayor Phillips
re J. I.C.)
4aS4
He continued that it is both the recommendation of the Water
Superintendent and himself that in order to protect the City's
interests in this matter, that Council authorize the City to
enter a protest in the present application.
Councilman Balser moved that the Council accept the recommendation
of the City Manager and the Water Superintendent and authorize
the City Attorney to file a protest on behalf of the City in the
present application as above outlined. Councilman Camphouse
seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously.
The City Manager read a letter received from the Municipal
Finance Officers Association stating in part that a
Certificate of Conformance has been granted Arcadia for the
Annual Financial Report of the City for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1957; that the report prepared by Arcadia conforms
substantially with the high standards for financial reporting
and that Arcadia is the 65th governmental unit in'the Country
and the 11th in the State to receive the coveted certificate
for distinguished financial reporting.
Mayor Phillips stated that such certificates are merited by the
excellence of operation and knowledge of individuals who know
their business, and commended Mr. Lawrence W. Larson, the City
Controller, for bringing this recognition to the City.
The City Attorney reported on the status of the alley in the
rear of Baldwin Avenue at Naomi Avenue, stating that all required
dedications for both the alley and Baldwin Avenue have been
received, with the exception of two lots; that as to one of these
lots, the Baldwin Avenue dedication had already been received and
the party has agreed to dedicate the alley portion when the owner
of the corner lot dedicates the alley portion; that the other lot
is located at the corner of Naomi and Baldwin; that there are
physical problems due to the development of the property, the
owner of a portion of said property being willing but being bound
by a contract under which he purchased the property not to remove
any improvements; that it is hoped that some firm arrangement
may be arrived at by the time of the next Council meeting, He
added that the Engineering Department is of the opinion that it
would be impractical to widen Baldwin Avenue until all of the
dedications have been received.
The City Clerk read a communication from Robert Strub, Assistant
General Manager of the Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc., Arcadia,
expressing their appreciation for the fine service rendered them
by the Arcadia Fire Department.
The City Clerk read a communication from the Arcadia Branch of the
American Association of University Women, stating in part that it
is their intention to postpone their contemplated impartial study
of the government of the City of Arcadia until such time as the
controversy regarding council-manager vs. council-mayor form of
government is resolved. Mayor Phillips stated that he felt the
letter was timely enough to be read at this meeting because of
the publicity in the press.
Mayor Phillips announced that the Joint Interim Committee on
Highway problems will meet for two days September 22 and 23, 1958,
in Los Angeles at 9:30 A.M. That Los Angeles County is invited
to present testimony at the hearing of September 22, 1958. That
the purpose of these hearings is to examine into the local impact
of statewide freeway and expressway systems. He added that he
17.
9-16-58
4395
thought it might be well if the City Manager requested either
Mr. Lortz or Mr. Forbes, or some representative of the City
to attend, to find out what if anything it means to the City of
Arcadia.
(Mayor Phillips Mayor Phillips commented on his attendance at the American
Miami Conference)Municipal Congress for Mayors in Miami, Florida September
10 to 13, 1958; that he had brought back with him copies of
" all papers given and would bind same and present copies to the
Councilmen; that he thought there was some interesting reading
in said papers regarding city government. He added that he would
supply the Council with a full written report on his attendance,
ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Camphouse moved that the meeting adjourn. Councilman
Jacobi seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously.
f"F,{Od~
ATTESr-:,
~~~~
City Clerk
18.
9-16-58
I
I