Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPRIL 3,1984_2 CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ORD:& RES. READ BY TITLE ARCADIA FLAG 1. la. Ll BRARY (CATHERINE MORTENSON) fr'. I 1 b. RECREATION 0 GRANT FUNDS APPROVED 25 :0911 M I NUT E S CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA and the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING APRIL 3, 19B4 The City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in a regular session Tuesday, April 3, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, Mrs. Louise Gelber, First Church of Christ Scientist Mayor Dennis A. Lojeski PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Hannah, Pellegrino, Lojeski Councilman Dring Councilman Dring was excused on MOTION by Councilman Hannah, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried. It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried that all ordinances and resolutions be read by title only. PRESENTATION Mayor Lojeski presented new Arcadia flags to Chief of Police Charles Mitchell, Fire Chief Gerald Gardner, Publ ic Works Director Chester Howard and Librarian Jim Domney, to be flown at public structures. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows to rename the Art and Lecture Room in honor of Catherine Mortenson, whose long association with the Library deserves such recoqnition. Mrs. Mortenson's contributions to the community have been many and renaming the Art and Lecture Room is a most fittin9 bon voyage gift to her. She will soon leave the area to take up residence in Seattle, Washington. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Hannah, Pelle9rino, Lojeski None Councilman Dring Recommendation from Recreation Commission for use of Parks and Recreation Grant Funds. The Director of Recreation explained that the requests are broken up in two areas - 11 projects located on City owned property which the Commission would like to proceed with immediately, and 2J recommended projects for consideration to be done on School District property which would have to be discussed with the Sc hoo 1 personnel. Councilman Hannah questioned if the City is committed to funds for the School District for these purposes only.., of allocating it to painting the schools or does it have for recreation? spend these poss i bil ity to be used -1, 4-3-R4 2b. AGENCY The Assistant Manager for Economic Development stated that, "The draft RELOCATION relocation plan was previously seen by this body on February 21, 1984. HOUSING PLAN At that meeting, Mr. Marvin, a potential displacee and also elected PAC . ~member, raised several questions. The Agency asked that Port & Flor, \ !}the consultants, respond to those questions. Port & Flor are here to- ~ night to speak to them and answer any questions you may have. Notice of this meeting sent to all the eligible displacees in the project area in February. A copy of this agenda package was given also to Mr. Marvin last week for his review. The Project Area Committee has reviewed and approved this in February, The guidelines of the State require that, before the Agency'and Council take any final action, they must permit any displacees or their representatives to address Council. Staff recommends that it be approved as amended, Port & F10r has requested some minor arithmetic corrections in the actual plan." 2. 2a. ROLL CALL ',. , q'l IV / \ ~ 25:0912 Staff said in part that the funds must be used for recreation.., not for general maintenance of the schools, In response to a question staff advised that the shelter at Wilderness Park would be reroofed with Ca1shake incombustible material. Mayor Lojeski said, "I'm in favor of going ahead with the project on our City owned property, I would like to give a little input and would hope that the Council will kind of think in the same line. On the projects potentially located on School District property, there is an awful lot of - I'm going to call it gingerbread - for a lack of a better term and amost creating a Dodger Stadium effect, out of Hugo Reid and Holly Avenue Schools. I think in terms of the amount of money that might be available and aqain this is only direction and I thoughts coming from me as part of the Council. I would like to see them thinking in terms of a lot of projects rather than two major projects. In other words if you looked at the amount of money left, you could get totally hung up on a $60,000 project at Hugo Reid and a $59,000 project at Holly Avenue and leaving out some of the other schools. I think the use of those other fields, such as Baldwin Stocker or Highland Oaks school yard up there are just as important and so I'm just giving that as my input, If we're going to go ahead with that type of a plan, I'd like to see it done as more of a broad based, broad spectrum type of situation rather than just limited usage on two fields." Staff will incorporate their suqgestions with Mayor Lojeski's suggestions to present to the School District, It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino that staff be directed to prepare plans and specifications for the projects located on City owned proper- ty and to discuss possible improvements to School District property with District personnel. Motion seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows; AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Hannah, Pellegrino, Lojeski None Councilman Dring Council recessed in order to act as the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PRESENT: ABSENT: Members Haltom, Hannah, Pellegrino, Lojeski Member Dring On MOTION by r~ember Haltom, seconded by Member Hannah, Member Dring was excused. I Ms. Joan Flor addressed the Agency, stating that, "I thought that I would just paraphrase Mr, Marvin's comments and then briefly capsu1ize our responses to his comments. The first question he raised was as to whether or not we had inspected units to see if they were adequate for the handicapped or if they were available to people who had pets or to people of all races. Actually, during an initial survey of the -2- 4-3-84 25:0913 I community and surroundino communities, this is not appropriate be- cause, frankly, property owners and owners renting are not interested in taking people through their units unless they feel that there is some probability that they may rent to them. Naturally, when we re- locate people we will be very careful to give referrals to places where they will take pets and see that handicapped people will have adequate ingress and egress to th'eir apartments. As a matter of fact, the goal of the survey is to summarize what units are available at that time so that subsequently when we do an updated survey, we will be able to see whether the trend is going up or down in the vacancies. He was entirely accurate and we apologize for our mathe- matical errors, We have made comments on all of them, We did re- check and I don't think I need to go through those. We were one or two off in each instance, basically, "Under the Section 8 Housing issue, he brought up the fact that there were no Section 8 units 'available on the market at this time and by that I'm talking about certificates of eligibility. It is true that at times the County does not offer certificates because they have no funding for those, however, they always have emergency type certifi- cates which are available to people who are displaced and particularly those that are displaced from public programs. Now it is true that these units, perhaps, could be used by other people, however, in order to qualify for a Section 8 certificate, you have to be within a certain income level and, therefore, these people would qualify whether or not they were being displaced from a redevelopment project. The Section 8 program in some instances is very qood for these people because it offers the subsidy for lonqer than four years that are assured through a redevelopment program and so it is our goal to get people into the best housing that we can provide for them at the time of displacement. As a matter of fact, we have gotten three people into Section 8 housing since November of 1983 with a minimum of delay. We did survey the market here in Arcadia and we find that with the rent limits that are put on housing here in Arcadia that there were units available and these are at the bottom of page 3 in terms of what the ceilings are for housing here in Arcadia which demonstrates that we would be able to find housing which would fit into the Section 8 program. I "As to the Naomi Gardens here in the community, the people who will be displaced are citizens of Arcadia and they certainly have every right to go into housing that is made available within the community. When HUD assesses whether or not to fund subsidized housing, there is a complete survey done in terms of the number of elderly people and their incomes, in other words they do not want to subsidize this housino in communities where there is no need, This was done, I am sure, in- Arcadia. I'm sure these people were counted as people who required and needed this housing and there is no reason to exclude them from Naomi Gardens, As a matter of fact, when we initially interviewed them, we found that two of them had already made application to get into Naomi Gardens. Here again, because it's a HUD-subsidized program, the people who are displaced will, as a matter of fact, probably have preference in getting into Naomi Gardens, We did state in our plan that people inflate their income sometimes on our initial interview. As a matter of fact, we do find when we verify incomes, which we do when the time comes to relocate people, that it is not always the same as it was during our initial survey and, you know, this is just human nature for people to change their income a little bit, if they don't know that it's gQing to be verified later on, "The next issue w~s whether or not people preferred to relocate within Arcadia. Although the majority of people stated that they do prefer to remain in Arcadia, six families have relocated and all but one have moved outside the City limits. There was no pressure to relocate in four of these instances and yet they did elect to move elsewhere. It is not untypical in relocation to find that people will take this opportunity to move closer to their jobs or closer to their families and there is no way that you can demand that they remain in Arcadia so I believe that we are going to have to let them move where they want to. We did check services in the surrounding communities and find that Pasadena has excellent services. This is one of the issues that Mr, Marvin brought up, although, of 'course, Arcadia does too, and Monrovia has very similar services. So I don't believe anybody will -3- 4-3-84 MARVIN RELOCATION HOUSING 25:0914 . suffer if they move into adjacent communities for lack of adequate services, whether it be to seniors or whether it be recreational prooram, "Mr, Marvin raised the issue of whether 25% of income was used for ability to pay. We have cited a section of the State Relocation Assistance Guidelines and this clearly states that if someone's in- come of 25%, let's say, represents $200 that in our search we could look for a unit that is as high as $283 because the $4000 subsidy that is to be used over a four year period breaks down to $83 a month. However, in computing the initial $4000 we do use 25% of the income or the old rent whichever is less. "The last issue that was brought up was the availability of units in Arcadia for twelve of the households that would be displaced. It would be our opinion that at this time on a voluntary basis, there is plenty of housing available in Arcadia. And those who elect to move now should be able to find housinq that is adequate. We agree that at such time as it will be necessary to give ninety day notices, it may be necessary for the Redevelopment Agency to adopt a last resort housing policy. The State guidelines allow for payment of over $4000 to make up the shortfall in the rentals available and 25% of people's income and if we find that it is necessary at that time, the plan will be updated and a last resort policy will be recommended. And th~t concludes my remarks unless there are questions," I In response to Member Haltom's question, Mrs. Flor stated that Section 8 is federally funded; that HUD sets limits on what can be paid in a community, The difference in 30% of people's income, 30% of people's adjusted income and the market rent is picked up by HUD or the Federal Government. She agreed with Member Haltom that in relocating people, we supplement their housing, their rent, until the $4000 runs out and then they a re no longer able to fund it themselves, Mrs. Flor said that the Federal Govern- ment adopted the new guidelines in 1972 and the issue of what occurs after the fours years has never been addressed, and the State has adopted a Relocation Act Law that uses the $4000 figure, This is one reason that they prefer and 1 ike to get, particularly elderly or disabled people into a Section 8 program because conceivably that will go on indefinitely. They would re- new the Section 8 funds. Richard Marvin, 28 Nor.th Third Avenue. "I advise the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency of a number of flaws in the draft relocation plan. I am truly shocked that, beyond mathematical corrections, no changes in the draft plan are being offered either by the Agency's Relocation Consultant or by the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency staff, I have reviewed the reply provided by the consultant and find that it is less than satisfactory, however, I prefer to leave it to the Members of the City Council to compare each of my specific objections to the vague responses given by Port & Flor, Inc. There is one issue in the most recent Port & Flor statement to which I would like to draw attention. The consultant .has acknowledged that regular Section 8 certificates may not be available, however, the consultant has not advised the Redevelop- ment Agency to delete the reference to Section 8 certificates from the draft plan. On the contrary, Port & Flor, Inc, affirms that it will be able to obtain some of the housing certificates which have been reserved by the Los Angeles County Housing Authority for emergency cases. But is it appropriate for the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency to solve its relocation problem by using housing assistance which is designed to help the victims of fires and floods? The displacement of families from Third Avenue is hardly a sudden emergency. It is a catastrophe, but it is one which the Redevelopment Agency has been planning for years. I believe the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency should have a plan to replace the housing which 1S heino eliminated on Third Avenue, I -4- 4-3-84 - I RELOCATION HOUSING MOTION I 25:0915 Such a plan should be part of the relocation plan. Third Avenue is a valuable asset to the City. It is a nei~hborhood where lower and moderate income families are able to find housing which they can afford, Redevelopment in this area would reduce the stock of affordable housin~. Such reductions tend to push lower income people out of Arcadia into other areas with lower housing costs. The California Legislature realized that the activities of Re- development Agencies may have a detrimental effect on the supply of housing for. lower and moderate income people. Therefore, Redevelopment Agencies are required to replace every unit of lower or moderate income housing which they destroy. It is only because Arcadia's redevelopment plan was enacted before 1976 that the specific requirements of one on one replacement do not apply. The Arcadia Redevelopment Agency should, I believe, voluntarily, comply with the one for one replacement of redevelopment law. In fact, in court cases government entitles have often been held to be responsible for replac€ment housing even where the statutes did not, at first, appear to require such replacement. The City has been put on notice by the Southern California Association of Governments that housing for lower income people must be greatly increased in order for the City to meet its fair share under the regional housing allocation model. In light of the fact that Arcadia has done little to meet its fair share, it seems most irregular for the City's Redevelopment Agency to destroy afford- able housing without making plans for replacement." Mrs. Flor advised Member Haltom that one of the residents on Third Avenue is currently being subsidized by Section 8 funds. Mrs, Flor continued, in part, that Mr. Marvin probably knows the inner workings of the Housing Authority better than they do because she believes he is employed there. It was then MOVED by Member Pellegrino that the Agency adopt the relocation plan, as amended, dated January 23, 1984, and seconded by Member Hannah. Member Haltom stated, "I'd like some assurance that their housing will be subsidized beyond the $4000 mark because what you're doing is you are placing them in a bad position if you relocate them into a higher income housing they can ill afford once this subsidy is used up. You know, it would be like moving me to Beverly Hills and in two years, say, swim. That's the position, I think we are going to put these people into. That's my only concern. But I am concerned with it now. If we can work out some assurance or if there is some assurance. I know that there is no certainty for the rest of their lives that it will be subsidized, but I would like some assurance that they will receive assistance for a reasonable amount of time. I don't even know what a reasonable amount of time is. I think it is our obligation if we relocate them -- by relocating by definition -- we become obligated to their welfare, To a degree -- it isn't like somebody buying out a business or something where both parties are amiable to 'it. These people aren't just standing in line to move. And that's my concern. What happens three or four years down the line when some of these people - elderly people - when their income may even be less than it is now. The subsidy then stops. They've got us to thank for it. We are, in effect, causing this and it's our obligation since we're causing it -'we have an obligation to the people that'we're moving to some degree to look after their welfare because we're asking them to'move - or making them move - whichever term you like, They are moving at our request. They know that if they don't move that this Council -- the next Council will have eminent domain or whatever tool they use to move them. At least that's my opinion. It's obvious that Third Avenue is going to go ahead and be developed, but if we're going to develop it we have an obligation to these people that we're moving out of one financial area of housing to a higher financial area." -5- 4-3-84 ROLL CALL 2c LARMOR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 1..\ /1 + q' \ 1J Y MOTION ADJOURNMENT 3. 4. HOFER /' FLETCHER /. 25:0916 RELOCATION HOUSING (CONT'D) Member Hannah stated, "We're providing the same benefits that the Federal government and State government are providing. I don't see that we've got any obligation over and above that unless you want to go into rent control and I really believe that rent control is responsible .for the fact that we now have vacancy rates in apartments in Southern California of 4 to 6% when only two years ago we had maybe 2,3, or possibly 4%. So, I think we've gone as far as the State and Federal governments have prescribed and I feel that's adequate," ROLL CALL VOTE WAS THEN TAKEN ON THE MOTION: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Pellegrino, and Lojeski Members Hanna h, Member Haltom Member Dring I Staff advised that Larmor is proposing to substitute an entity called Cameron V, a California Limited Partnership for itself. The general partners of Larmor are identical to the general partners of Cameron V. They are simply adding three, possibly, four, limited partners to provide more equity capital to the entity. The Agency attorney and staff have both reviewed the partnership agreement and we've had some changes made and Cameron V has agreed to make those changes. They are shown in page 2 of the partnership agreement, whereby they certify that they are aware of and will comply with the precise plan and the disposition of the development agreement. As a further control, the Agency counsel has prepared an agreement between Cameron V which will require both Larmor and Cameron V to sign it and have it recorded against the property as a further guarantee that there will be compliance with the Disposition and Development Agreement. MOTION was made by Member Hannah that the Agency approve the substitution of Cameron V, a California Limited Partnership for Larmor Development Company, seconded by Member Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Haltom, Hannah, Pellegrino and Lojeski None Member Dring The Arcadia Redevelopment Agency adjourned to April 17, 1984. Council reconvened. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive said, in part, with reference to the relocation issue that she would never vote for eminent domain and that she would like to see an advisory vote by the people of the City of Arcadia regarding this issue. She then further stated that she would like to see the City Council meetings taped by Group W who have informed her that it could be made available to the City. I She also referred to debris and clutter, particularly after Friday and Saturday nights in the community and urged the Council to try to resolve this ~roblem. Herb Fletcher, 175 W. Lemon referred to a comment made by Mrs. Hofer at a recent meeting concerning the need for a fire station in the Southern part of the City, He suggested that a public hearing be scheduled for discussion on this matter and also that it might be possible that, since the City has' two paramedic wagons, they could be alternated between three locations. -6- 4/3/84 5a. CUP o SERVICE ~ STATION (APPROVED) 5b. CUP (DENIED) I (r 5c. (; 1 \." WORK \' ACCEPTED 25:0917 CONSENT ITEMS Conditional Use Permit 84-3 to operate an automobile service station at 66 Foothill Blvd. APPROVED. APPROVE the denial by Planning Commission Resolution No. 1255 to expand an existing convalescent home from 74 beds to 170 beds at 1601 S, Baldwin. The Commission in their determination were concerned with the density of the project and the parking as proposed by the applicant. ACCEPTED and AUTHORIZED final payment pursuant to the terms of the contract of the work performed by Wakeham Construction, Inc. in the Bonita Park Improvements, Job No. 532, $66,610. was ,c'v'appropriated for this project from the Parklands Act of 1980. t1 \ ~ The final amount of the contract was $54,751.28. 5d. 1',(' tj.l STOP 5' APPROVED the installation of stop signs at the intersection of SIGNS Oaklawn Place and Arbolada Drive with Oaklawn Road, (APPROVED ) 5e. INSTALLATION 1 OF CONDUIT (APPROVE,D*; r (' ;1 ^' <,\ ~~5f. SAFETY (,.) SURVEY G/~ IMPLEMENTATION '\ (FUNDS APPROVED ) 5g. . so-re1 'I r, ~ 5h, I "'UPDATING (A'IV CODIFICATION \ \ OF MUNICIPAL CODE (APPROVED) I 6b. 1\ SOUND {,. 'V WALLS \ 210 FREEWAY APPROVED application for a permit to install a privately-owned conduit in the Public Right-of-Way on Foothill Blvd. between 41 E. Foothill Blvd. and 50 E, Foothill Blvd. The purpose of the conduit is the inter-connection of computer. and telephone facilities between the two locations. Conditions to be part of the permit as set forth in Staff Report dated April 3, 1984. APPROVED the allocation of $10,990. from the Revenue Sharing Funds to the budgets of the Fire Department ($9,290.) and the Police Department ($1,700,). Also, allocation of $3,500. from the Capital Outlay Fund to the budget of the Public Works Depart- ment, These funds are to make the changes outlined in the Safety Survey Report. DIRECTS staff to make City ambulance rates consistent with the Los Angeles County rate as established by the Board of Supervisors with the exception of the reduced rate charged residents and guests. The resident and guest rate will be adjusted at the same time based on the actual percent of increase to maintain the established.differential between resident and non-resident rates. APPROVED the recommendation of the City Attorney to obtain the immediate services of a codification company at the cost of approximately $4,000. with $3,000. to be placed in the 1984-85 budget to continue the service. The codification service will accomplish all tasks outlined in the report in a rapid and consistent manner and the municipal code will be distributed periodically with appropriate updates. THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY COUNCILMAN HANNAH, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN HALTOM AND CARRIED ON ROLL CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS: AYES: . NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Hannah, Pellegrino and Lojeski None Councilman Dring " CITY MANAGER Council received and considered the comprehensive report of the Director of Public Works concerning the construction of the sound wall on the 210 Freeway between Santa Anita and Fifth Avenues. This report is dated April 3, 1984 and gives an estimated cost of $1,329,000, up to as high as $1,661,000. The estimated cost of 4/3/84 -7- 6b. . SOUND WALL 210 FREEWAY (cant'd) MOTION . . & ROLL CALL LEWIS / 7. 7a. RESOLUTjON / NO. 5168 ./ (ADOPTED) \~ 7b. RESOLUTION NO, 5169 (ADOPTED) / VON'S & SEN lOR CITIZENS' HOUSING 25:0918 construction of a sound wall between Santa Anita to Michillinda is $4,169,200. to $5,211,00. Staff recommended retainin9 the services of a qualified consultant with the purpose of making a preliminary noise level survey which would not only check the validity of the noise levels as determined by Ca1trans, but also address the feasibility of sound wall construction at all locations as well as costs and predicted noise level reduction. The estimated cost for such a study would be $7,000. and could provide a basis for the entire question of sound wall construc- tion in the City of Arcadia to be reevaluated by Ca1trans. Durinq this consideration,Bil1 Caldwell, 326 Joyce Avenue and Ed Zareth, 1051 Catalpa Road spoke to this issue including possibilities of sources of funds for such a project. A MOTION was made to have staff come back with recommendations as to a consultant. This did NOT 'CARRY on a tie vote. It was then MOVED by Councilman Hannah, seconded by Councilman Haltom and CARRIED on ROLL CALL VOTE that staff be AUTHORIZED to engage the firm of John Van Houten to prepare a preliminary study at a fee not to exceed $7,500. I AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Hannah, Pellegrino and Lojeski None Councilman Dring George Lewis, 240 Oakhurst Lane said, in part, that he had made personal studies of the noise levels in the area where the freeway goes under the Santa Fe tracks. His studies had given readings of over 100 decibels, He felt that Ca1trans should take this into consideration, CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution N. 5168 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG URBAN OPEN-SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM FOR REHABILITATION OF CITY RECREATION FACILITIES - JOB NO. 553". ADOPTED on MOTION by Councilman Hannah, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: - Councilmen Haltom, None Councilman Dring Hannah, Pellegrino and Lojeski The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5169 entitled, "DISABILITY RETIREMENT PROCEDURES FOR SAFETY EMPLOYEES". I ADOPTED on MOTION by Councilman Lojeski, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Hannah, Pellegrino and Lojeski None Councilman Dring In response to a question from Councilman Hannah, the City Attorney submitted' a brief up-date of the status of the, so- called, Von's Property and also on the progress of the Senior Citizens' Housing. As to any liability to the City at the Senior Citizens' Housing location on Naomi, the City Attorney said that he would inspect the site for any dangerous conditions. -8- 4/3/84 25:0919 9. MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS Mayor Lojeski advised that the Annual Mayor's Prayer Breakfast would be held April 6, 1984 and invited all to attend. He further said, in part, that it has been a pleasure for him to serve as Mayor for the past year and expressed appreciation for the Council '5 approvals and acceptances during the year, ADJOURNMENT Councilman Pellegrino asked that the meeting be adjourned in memory of Le Roy P. Patnou, a 20-year resident of Arcadia and native of Chicago who died r1arch 22, 1984. He is survived by his wife, Lois; two sons, Gregory and Bruce; a brother, Warren of Chicago and his mother-in-law, Lottie Lack of Arcadia. Mayor Lojeski adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p. m, to April 17, 1984 at 7:00 p. m. 10. IN MEMORY OF LE ROY P. PATNOU I M yor ATTEST: ~~ I!<<-~ City. 'Cl erk I 4/3/84 -9-