The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAPRIL 6,1982 I I CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 25:0448 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA and the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING APRIL 6, 1982 The City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Arcadia Redevelop- ment Agenc~ met in a regular session Tuesday, April 6, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. 1n the City Hall Council Chambers. INVOCATION: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CAL L Dr. Frank Finkbiner, Church of The Good Shepherd Councilman Saelid PRESENT: Councilmen/Members Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb ABSENT: Councilman Dring On MOTION by Councilman Haltom, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried unanimously Councilman Dring was excused. MINUTE On MOTION by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino APPROVAL and carried unanimously the minutes of the adjourned and regular meetings of March 16, 1982 were APPROVED. PRESENTATIONS Sister City Commissioner Har1 Crockett, on behalf of the Commission, made a presentation to Edward L. Butterworth who inauguarated the original Sister City link with Tripolis, Greece. He enumerated the first steps in the project - one of which was the gift to Tripolis of a skiploader ... also the establishment of the Arcadia Friendship Club which now has 1300 members. Mr. Butterworth responded in part by say- ing this honor brings back memories of 1962. He congratulated the Sis- ter City Commission and the way it has developed through the years and expressed heartfelt appreciation for this honor. C. Robert Arth reported on the recent trip of 30 Arcadians to Sister City, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. Chester Woods of New~ castle was present and introduced. He also noted a pOSSibility of joining in a sister city relationship with another city in Australia. He presented a letter and gifts to the Councilmen and the City Manager. OATH The City Clerk administerd the oath of office to Gloria Alfrey. Mrs. ADMINISTERED Al frev has been aooointe'd tn the Arcarliil Reilllti fill Cnmmi~~inn fnr il four year term. Councilman Sae1id presented credentia1s-. HEARING EIR Consideration of an Environmental Impact Report for a six story office building at 333 E. Huntington Drive. Mayor Gi1b advised that at the pre-meeting of the City Council the provisions of the Procedural Ordinance were waived in order to take all matters per- taining to this item in sequence. The hearing was continued to this date for the sole purpose of staff response to the significant envir- onmental points raised in the Council meeting of March 16. Staff reported that the final supplemental EIR includes communica- tions received during the scoping process, responses received during the review and public hearing process on the draft EIR. Responses are set forth in Section B of the final EIR and in specific resolu- tions of the City Council and the Agency. F; IzQ1 Z. - :;"2.- -1- 4-6-82 RESOLUTION NO. 5032 ADOPTED f /~e"f , 't- . 'A c..- RESOLunON NO. 5035 ADOPTED f- /zq r; z.,2-if., RESOLUTION NO. 5029 ADOPTED ~ /1 '!'/ Z - 22., QUITCLAIM DEED APPROVED r /:~ /y z '/,i:... ORDINANCE NO. 1742 ADOPTED j: - J 2. 11 ,Z 2-1, 25:0449 The hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilma~ Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried unanimously. The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5032 entitled: "A RESOLUTION bF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADOPTING, AS THE LEAD AGENCY, THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND CERTIFYING ITS PREPARATION IN COMPOLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, STATE GUIDELINES AND CITY OF ARCADIA RULES IMPLEMENTING THE SAME." It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution No. 5032 be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES NOES : ABSENT: 1 Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5035 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA CERTIFYING REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS FOR THE EAST HUNT- INGTON DRIVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA. AND MAKING FINDINGS OF OVER- RIDING CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO MITIGATION MEASURES AND PROJECT ALTER- NATIVES FOR ZONE CHANGE Z81-5 IMPOSING A HIGH RISE OVERLAY, AND PRECISE PLAN REVIEW PPR 81-2 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 333-421 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE." It was MOVED by Councilman Pelle9rino, seconded by Councilman Saelid, and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution No. 5035 be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES NOES : ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring. The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5029, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND SUMMARILY VACATING A ROADWAY EASEMENT AT 333 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND MAKING ENVIRONMEN- TAL FINDINGS." It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution No. 5029 be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES NOES : ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows that the City Manager be auth- orized to execute a quitclaim deed in form approved by the City Attorney 1 and that the City Clerk have same recorded. (This to eliminate a dis- crepancy in the description of property in connection with escrow pro- ceedings in deeding the property to Robert Low). AYES : Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb NOES : None ABSENT: Councilman Dring The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1742, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9233.8 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO RECLASSIFY PROPERTY AT 333 - 421 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE FROM CPD-l TO CPD-l & H (HIGH RISE OVERLAY)." -2- 4-6-82 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 5036 ADOPTED F /'/..'/'/ '1;2.~ -, HEARING (Chicago Park Area) Appeal Wi thdrawn f": I~' / If' HEARING Continued t 0 April 20, f--' 11 !l 25:0450 .; ~ ?"_v -. J.::: It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows that'the further reading of the full text of Ordinance No. 1742 be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES NOES : ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gi'lb None Councilman Dring The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5036, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING SUBJECT TO CONDITONS PRECISE PLAN REVIEW PPR 81-2 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 333-421 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT." It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution No. 5036 be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring Appeal of the Planning Commission denial of M-81-l5l - request for modification for industrial building on Lots 1810 and 1811 of the Chicago Park Tract, on Goldring Road (La Salle Street) .... continu- ed from Council meeting of March 2, 19B2. Mayor Gilb declared the hearing open and Robert Rodine (the applicant) advised that a resolution had been reached between the Rodines and Hen- ry Hendler, H. K. H. Company. (Letter from the attorney for the Rodines is on file in the office of the City Clerk). Whereupon Mr. Rodine asked that his appeal be withdrawn. The hearing was CLOSED with no further action to be taken. Consideration of an Environmental Impact Report for 2, 4 story office buildings, including a restaurant, and a 7 story 150 room hotel with restaurant, lounge and banquet facilities and related zone change at 130 W. Huntington Drive. T RAN S C RIP. T - 3- 4-6-82 ,\I',IL 6, lq~2 CIT\' ,:ll'~;<:II. ~IEETI:lC ED I TED TH'\~;SCE I I'T F,,,.:' ) C(1~S 1 DEIlAT I (1~ l1f EI I, FOil T\:O fl1I1R-STl1l,Y OFF I CL IIll1 LIJ 1 NGS. A RESTAUIlA:rr AND A SE\'E~-STOR\', I 511 Hl',)~1 110'1'I',L ] NCLUD I :'J(; lIFST,\I!R,..,N'I'. COCKT,\ I L LOUNGE ..\1m BAI-:QL'ET FACILITIES. AND REUTEIJ 1.0:lE CIIANGE for, TilE pr;OI'Ef:TY AT 130 HEST liu:aINGTO:; DR 1 VE. t~illi.lm \~l'o1.1rd. Pl.,n1l111l: lhr\'cror. prl'....I.lll('d Ilw st,lrf report. On November 23. 1981, John Kirkp.itrl.:k 011 lwh.,!! 01 the Tm~'\ Corporation filed applica- tion for (1) .J 7.01h' eh.lngl..' Lo :ldd .1n ":1" (high rise) oV(lrlay to the existing C-2 zonin.c. and (~) ~0r .1 condit iOll,lI lISL' permIt for a seven-story, 150 room hotel and t\vo (ollr-..,tory ottiC't' buildIngs. Including a restaurant. The pur- pose of thl..' En\'irol1l;:l'tlt.Jl Irnp.lct Report i~ not to C'ithc>r approve or disapprove th<, project but :0 llrst id......nt ity potL'nr l.11 cnvlronmcnt.:ll impacts which m<lY reslllt if the proj~ct is c~rricd out: 50cond. to identify mitigation measures which, if impl~mcntcd. would climindt~ or reduce the project impacts;' and. thirdly. alternatives to tll~ proposed project. The PI<lnning Com~lsslon at its March 23, meeting r~vicwed lh~ dr~ft EIR and m~dc the comments as noted in staff's cover letter. Included in the Council's packet are responses to the Planning Commissions comments. On M~rch the 30th the applicant submitted a revised site plan: tile lnajor revisions involve the relocation of the pa~king structure and the redeSign of the parking lot layout. The size of the'hotel and office buildings has not changed. The EIR consultant and traffic consul- tant have reviewed the revised plans' alld concluded (a) that the revisions do not result in impacts not previously addressed in the EIR and (b) that the re- vised Site plan incorporates many of the mitigation ~easures recommended in the EIR. The purpose of tonight's public hearing is to afford the public the opportunity to comment on the potential environmental impacts and/or mitigation measures which may be associated with the proposed project. Following this public hearing the fin~l El~ will be prepared for City Council certification. The City Council actions in reviewing and commenting and certifying the EIR should not be construed as either approving or disapproving the specific pro- ject. This concludes my report unless you have any questions. Mayor Charles Gilb explained thdt the puhlic hearing will be held open to the next m~eting for the purpose of staff to address the comments from tonight's mecting ill the Finnl ElR. The Council's action at this time should not be construed as approving or disapproving the project. John Kirkrotrick, arplicant, 960 Monte Verde. developer of the project. (A picturQ of th~ proj('ct was passed around to the audience.) With the Council's approv~l we plan to develop a first class, qualitYl mixed use project on the 5.6 acre. curr~ntly occupied by the Ramada Inn at 130 Hest Huntington Drive. The current 112 room hotel will be demolished to make way for a 150 roo~ hotel, with support retail, conference spacc, banquet facilities and twin office buildings. 1!1C architectural character of tile entire project will be uniform in style. The proposed project will generate approximately $180,000 in bed tax and s.llrs tax to the City. In addition, the new development will proviuQ (or nbouc 640 permanent on-site and off-site jobs and service related employment. ~Je h.1ve submitted to the City a revised site and parking plan. This plan was prepared taking into account Comments made by the Planning -1- 4-6-82 '. . ~~P:) .. J:f~~ ~ "..... 1 1 1 I EDITCD TR^~SCRlrT E I R - 130 \_EXT lIl'~T I ~;(;TO~j DR 1 \'1: PACE :' Dl'p.lrtm('nt .lnu thl' Rt.til'Vl.lop"ll'llt /\gC'ncv ,1S \/1,11 ,1:-, mitIgation m('.'SlIr<....5 n'- qUI'stc..d by thl' [TH. TIll' nt'\.,! <.;ilp pl;ln proVIUt'<' lor ., more C'fficicllt circula- tion p.:lttC'rn .IS .....t' I I .l~. ,u1d111t.: 100 li~()rl' p.lrkln~ ~;p,lt"t'S abovl' codC' n~quir("m('nt. TIle' proposed proJC'I'( I:. l\(lf rht' rnost lnll'IlSI' :)()~Sd.J!l' Ut'v('lopmC'nt lor th(' sitl', but ratlll'r in b'~'plng \,,'Ith lht' qu.1i it\' ,11H.1 ch.lr,lctC'r of th(' City of Arc.Hlia. It is tIll' tVI1\' 01 'pr'oj('ct which is camp,Hible \....ith t~e area and of the quality C'XPL'ctl'U b\' tIll' pI'uplc of lhe City. which I am also a resident. ~iavor Gilb - in thC' rCrorl~ th:lt I read, the tr,lfflc SCC"ffi5 to be the biggest problem thdt W~ are gOillg to h~vc, I dOll'l know if it is going to be any more than we h.:tve now. but when It came> bL'tore> the rl:lnning Commission. r noticed that twas the main ~OplC of convers.Jtion. I think it would probably have more to do with the trn[fic flow ~Ild how it is str~lgllt('ncd out than with the traffic itself. \Jh.1t could presently be built on this site? William Woolard - III accordancC' with the existing zoning of the property you could develop the sit0 with ~n oftice building of 250,000 to 300,000 square feet which would actl1ally rcquire morc cars and cau;c more traffic than the proposed development. ' Mayor Gilb - Any quC'stions of Mr. Kirkpatrick? Councilman Jack Saclid - what is the total number of parking spaces provided now? John Kirkpatrick - 641 are required and we are approximately 100 spaces over that. Councilman Saelid - If this property were developed to its maximum under the existing C-2 zoning regulations with no high risc, what parking requirements would \ole have? John Kirkpatrick - we did a feasibility study and it showed that we could develop the property with a building containing approximately 290,000 square fee~ of offices with approximately 1,000 plus parking spaces. \l!illiam Uoolard - Our analysis \ol<3S that \4ith a 250,000 square foot building you could have 1,000 spaces on there. ~ Councilman Saclid - would that require any approval from us? tHllialn !':ool~lrd - il would probably require ,only a building permit which is a ministerial action on the part of the City. " John Kirkpalrick - in regards to the problem tllat was brought up about the parking and impact of the tr,lf(ic, this was addressed at the Planning Commission and that is why we wellt with a revised plap. We worked with the Planning Department and the Redevelopment Agency to try to get the circulation work,ing better. \ole , - 2- 4-6-82 .'.' J); EDITED TRA~SCRIPT Ell: - 1)0 :,EST 1Il':;T I ~(;TO~ IlR I VE I',\(;C 'j ~r~ only builtlill~ 15 more 110tel rooms ;111d 1,500 squ.lr~ (ect more in conference. b.1nquel [..cilitit'5. ,lI1d the ElK roinlt~d out th,lt we h,lVl' no impact basically on t h",' w('e kc nds . M3vor Gilb - 011 L!ll' ~Oll(!l t'lld at till' pro.jrct. brtwern that and where the soccer fiC'lJ is. is it po~;:"bll' lh.lt thl.'rC' could he .1 p.lssngcway through there where cars coming north 011 lIuntington Drive coutJ ClIt through without going clear up to the corn~r anti Illrn ,lfOUlld? John K(rkpatrick - are you LJlking directly between the office building and the hotel? A drivl' str.1ight through? Mayor GiIb - yes. John Kirkp~trick - When we originally designed thr site plan we had the drive- ways from botll buildings gOil1g through. but wv felt everyone would be goi~g to the race track ~nd would he sllooting lhrough our property just like a freeway. Hayor Gilb - you could barracade it at times. I am talking about like the south end of the Police D~partment for example. If you are coming north on Huntington, you could cut in and go south on Huntington without going up around the corner by Colorado, where the 100 to 1 Club is. John Kirkpatrick - basicnlly people could cut across on our project, however, it wouldn't be a straight shot. Mayor Gilb - There is a way to get through? John Kirkpatrick - Yes. shot, you have to make a There is through access, but it just isn't a straight jog. Mayor Gil~ - Traffic coming south on Huntington has to cut in and then weave through the parking lot ~nd come down the other end. However, there is access and the way it is dcsigl1Cd avoids having a raceway through the lot. John Kirkpatrick - that is what we originally had and we tried to pull as much traffic as we could to the south end of the lot so they could turn right if they were going norlll~ast on Huntington Drive. N,]yor Giib - well the only thing is, I was reading the comments that werE' made by Commissioner Kuyper and if they are lcavins your project and going north on Huntington Drive, they arc in the immediate left turn land and it is very difficult if th~rc is heavy traffic to get into tile outside (right) lane. Councilman Richard lIaltom - I can't tell from the rendering, Mr. Kirkpatrick, if thcr~ is a problem on the north on tIle exiting on Huntington Drive, as it gocs soulll near Colorado Place. There is an island out there, how has it been resolved to kpcp people from exiting onto Huntington Drive and cutting across the island .1nd going up Colorado Place. - 3- 4-6-82 1 I 1 1 i:n I TED TH,\:;SCR II'T E I R - I 10 :IEST Ill':,1' I ::(;Tl1:1 IlR I VI: P,\GE :. John Kirkp.JLrick - \",,' rnov"u lhl' l'lltr:lIlC(~ further south lb.lO ....,hat we> had in thL' ori~in;11 pI.llls. C.:H1nci 1 m.l 11 !1.11tOIll - l~'h.ll \vi II s( 01' [l,'('plt. from clIlt' ing acro~s the isLc1nd to Colorado Place ilS ltll'Y .Ire doing n(~w? John Kirkp.ltrick - nothing - \"r,' had t!w entr.1nce up further on I:unti.ng,ton, towards the lOa to I Club ,IntI we moved it down to try to solve that problem. w~ are k0L'ping it down furrtlL'r on thL' oth0r side of the break of Colorado Place. There was discussion regarding people cptting across Huntington Drive to Colorado Place. CounciLman Haltom - would it be appropriate to consider building something at the island so tllCY can't cut across tll~t, or would that be more detrimental? John Kirkpatrick - I think anything is possible, however, this is a pr~blem just like cars going down the wrong way on Huntington Drive, and 1 don't know if there is an easy ~olution. Mayor Gilb - I think that is a concorn, Mr. Haltom, that should be addressed. This is a public Ileorillg, anyone who would like to come forward and give us Some input on the EIR is welcome. Richard Marvin, 23 Horth Third Avenue, this EIR for 130 West Huntington Drive is very weak on the subject of visual impact. Although noise and traffic cir- culation are major heodings in Section 4, visual impact is not accorded a similar position. Visual impact is mentioned only briefly and inconspicuously under the head "Land Use". The EIR fails to mention the great impact which the project will have on views of the mountains, views from the County Park, the soccer field north of City lIall and from City Hall itself. I am attaching two photographs of tho mountains which show the project site in the foreground. In the few isolated rcfcrences to visual impact, which the environmental impact report docs contain, the adverse impact of the project is simply ignored. On Page 13 the EIR states "no impact on the areas' view will result from the r~zoning". This statement is simply not true. Johanna llofer, 875 Monl~ Verde Drive - !,too, share Mr. Marvin's c~ncern about the view of th. beautiful San Gabriel mountains being blocked by the seven-story building. I hnve some questions for the Council to consider in approving this building? One question is how m~ny offices arc there in the lwo four-story office buildings? This is never mentioned. John Kirkp~trick - There is 120,000 square feet of,total office space; the number of offices will be determined on the size of space each tenant wants. Joh.:Jnn<l IlofC'r - has subterranean garages been considered on this project? -4- 4-6-82 EIJiTl:O TH,\:\SCR1I'T EIR - 1]0 I,EST 1I1':\TI::f:I'(\:~ 111,1 V!: PA(~E 5 John Kirkpatrick - y,'s, hOtvl'Vl'r. \ve h,IVI' l'notlgh p:lrl<Lng right now without going to the C'xpl'nsC' ot :;uht,'rr.lIh'.11l lurking. ~!avor GiIb - 1 don'r think .1TlVOnl' kn(l\"'~ lilt' .ill<;'....cr to that. jl'ctcd nOh' for thl' ('xic,ling r,lcing 5(',ISDn would probably be be YC.1 r round. 1 don' l knot.... Th~ way it is pro- the W,lY it would I Joh.lnn.l 1I0f"r - 1 h'lIlld,'r II ~"(' rni~..h' WhCnl'Vl'r, \.,fl' could pO~~llhly !I.I\'I' .111 be 011 this projl'cl~ !lot considt'r Ih,lt in till' near future or YI'.LI" hor"I' r;lcing. vlll,lt would the impact Joh:lnna Hofer - I \.roT1lh'r \"hL'll lye have) had cong('stion of tr.,ffic in this area, has anyone ever lost tlleir life bec3use the emergency vehicl~s could nor get through? t-1ayor Gilb - that \oJ".s " consider<:ltion that the Planning Commission had. tf 1 read the testimony lIlat there has never been ~ time when the emergency vehicles have not been abl~ to g~t through because passage way has been open on the streets and there is aLwtlYs an opening to get in because of the way the traffic is stacked at the race t~ack and the way that the major arterials are at least left open for 0mcrgency vehicles. William 'looLard - the question was brought up at the Planning Commission and then staff had subs0qucnt discussions with the Fire Department and they indi- cated that there has never been a problem of getting the vehicles through the intersection. II may not be as fast as if they had all green lights, but they do get through even if they llave to go over curbs or through parking lots, whatever it takes. Johanna Ilofer - anotllPr question to be considered is how many people do use our County park and 110W many people'would be deprived of this beautiful view cf the mountains? I think t}lerc should be a public notice at that park to let them know what is being consid~rcd. Hayor Gilb - The proposed development would block some of the view of the mountains from the park. The park is actually parallel to the building we are talking about, lh~y would still be able to see the mountains to the north and there probobly would be some blockage looking out to the left (west), but they could look straight ahead at them and there are a lot of trees and I am not too sure how m~ny people go to the park to look at the mountains. Hr. Charles Hnnnnh. ]05 West Leroy - I think the development would be an im- provement to th~ npigllborilood. It would ~crcascjobs for people which we need vcry badly. Loss 01 view in relation to people working is very important, especially with tllC economy. I Rny Brockus, 1309 SLnndish - I looked over the EIR on part of this redevelop- ment situ.ltion~ Wll~t I am concerned about is the impact on the sewers and w;I[er USJlgL'. I ,'r.t nOl so concerned about the view of the mountains. What I -5- 4-6-82 I I FOI1'1:D TH..\NSCl, I j'T EIR - IJO \iFST 1I1';,T::;';Tll:-l IJ,(iVF P.IC;- 6 l",mt to knOt" IS tth' imp let nll thl' \".llt'f U".q!,t'; ho\" much \"at('r i<; this going to 1.1k(' .1110 tilt., impact \\n the St'\"i'r s\'~tt'm. \,1 Ii l1.lIn \.Jonl.lrd _ tlll'ft' \",l~ ',()illt' dl....CW,.,1011 1"'g.lfdlllg rhl' sC'wC'r~ b{'c,1use there was till' pOl('l1l1,ll ....t'~"t'l dl'l Illt'liCV lh.lt \"nuld \'XISr do\"TlstrC',1rn [rom this pro- posC'd projC'ct ,llld lh.11 \",I~ lddrt'<"sl'd ill I Ill' rlH .lnd som(' corrC'ctivc .1ction has to be' l.Jkpn. ,\ls0. 011 !\I_L:I' 1,1 nl I Ill' IIH, I !It'f{, :lft' various tables sPtting lonh tlh' ;1rnOUnl 01 U:',lgl' 1)1 V.lrlDU.., IIlilllll':' tor bOlh tl1(' proposed proJ('ct as wl'll as ,11tl'rn,ltl\." prol"ll~ bUIll more' and 1('s5 int(,Tlsivl' than the projpct. ~I~yor Gilb - III I"cg.lrds tn tll(' scw('r probll!m. thr EIR recognizes the fact that there \"ill be somC' imp.lct on il ,1nd ,,,ho is gOing to P,lY (or it is not the purposc o( the EIIL t:lH,'l'Vt' I" , thC'n' h,IS bt'PTl samp discussion among the Council and agrccm~nt of tll~ dtl\r~lopl'rs that ;Inv 0xtrJ tlow or extra load on the sew~r system would br burn bv the drvelopcrs ill correcting th0 sewer system. Is that not cQrrect~ William Wool~rd - t~at is wllat I understand. Again, thal is something dealing with the specifics of ti,e project and not thr ErR its~lf. Mayor Gilb - is there anyone else to speak to Lhis project - seeing none the Council will entertain a motion to continue the public hearing to April 20 to the next regular meeting for the sole purpose of receiving staff responses to the significant environlncntal points raised at tonight1s public hearing. HOTlO~ Motion was made by COllncilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino to continue this hearing to April 20. ROLL CALL AYES: NOES: ABSENT: lIo11tom. Pdlcgrino. Saclid. Gilb None Dring -6- 4-6-82 HEARING 130 W. Huntington Zone Change . /t/fJ.-r f. . 25:0451 Planning Commission Res. 1190 recommending a zone change from C-2 to C-2 and H for property at 130 W. Huntington Drive. If approved this would allow for the construction of the 7 story hotel. The Commission at its March 23 meeting adopted this resolution for a zone change sub- ject to the following conditions: . 1. That the certification of the final .EIR by the City Council be made. 2. That the development of the property be done as per the plans on file in Conditional Use Permit 81-15; further that the zone change shall not be effective if CUP 81-15 is not approved, or if said CUP is ap- proved or conditionally approved and the proposed project is not developed in accordance with said approved or conditionally approved plans, or if the CUP expires without the project being undertaken. I, 3. That there shall be compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions of approval set forth in CUP 81-15. Comments of the Commissioners for and against the zone change were noted in staff's cover letter. Councilman Saelid asked if this zone change is approved will Council be looking at still denser developments in years to come without the approval of the City Council. The Planning Director responded in part that the conditional use permit ties in with the development of the subject property that if in the future they wanted to build another office tower or the like they would have to come back to Council. Mayor Gilb declared the hearing open and Richard Marvin, 28 N. Third Avenue, said "Arcadia is fortunate to enjoy pleasant views of the mountains, both at City Hall and from its major park. We should strive to preserve those views and should maintain existing height limitations for 130 West Huntington Drive. I have with me two slides which I would like to show you, with your permission. The view from the County Park, you can see on the left side the two-story motel and in the center of the picture, for comparison, is the three-story Engineering Science Building. So you can see by comparison what's going to happen going from 2 stories to 3 stories, and then imagine the seven-story building there .... I imagine the members of the Council are familiar with that view. That's the soccer field with the parking lot." Bruce Low, 1120 San Carlos Road, stated: "Listening to Mr. Woolard, in regard to the conditional use permit that would be tied to this development, and as I understand it, and I could be wrong, the con- ditional use permits are good for a 12 month period of time and ob- viously this development couldn't be undertaken in a 12 month period of time, so are we going to be in a condition where the conditional use permit will expire prior to the completion of this development, which is tied to the hotel and not to the office buildings. I under- stand the office building does not need a conditional use permit. I wonder if that, #1, is a problem, and whether it has been addressed. 1 I don't know how they plan to either, but I know the conditional use permit expires in 12 months, and what do you plan to do with the con- ditional use permit that you are going to tie to a zone change when obviously the development can't comply with the terms of the original conditional use permit. Are you going to put yourself in the exten- sion situation until the development is completed, or how do you plan to handle that." My second consideration .. and if the contingency wasn't meant that .revocation of the zone change was a method by which the City could revoke the zone change and have some type of control in regards to j' -4- 4-6-82 1 1 PROCEDURAL ORDINANCE WAIVED " 25:0452 the project, and then here I see they are glvlng away a blanket zone change, and as we come to find out that zone cnanges are used as an inducement to have a catalyst between the developer and the City to insure that projects do get done and not give away anything that the City has to other people; and here I see a blanket'zone change being given away as we have requested it, and I just feel that that is a little bit odd, that down one side of the boulevard we have to enter into enough papers, to use your words, in a Chinese Army, to get a development done and here's one t~at we can get done in a simple quick sentence, and I don't know whether the agreement would be to the devel- oper's benefit or the City's benefit or both of them but I feel slight- ed that within a mile of each other one person has to go through an expensive exercise to get approval of a development where another per- son who mayor may not own the piece of property, it is a very simple procedure. I just express a very, very stong concern as to what's fair for the goose and what's fair for the gander. The Planning Director said in part that the developer has 12 months to comply with the conditions of a conditional use permit ... they may apply for an extension or it can be completed within the 12 month period. The Assistant City Manager for Economic Development said in part that prior to January the City Council considered an EIR for the Planned Development Zone between Second and Fifth Avenues along Huntington Drive. That EIR pointed to the fact that the area, based on their analysis, could only handle a certain amount of square footage of commercial office space. Beyond that threshold the EIR recommended to the City ,Council that they consider supplemental impact reports for subsequent projects. That being the case, if the Council were to grant the "H" overl ay zoni ng to Robert J. Low for hi s project, then that would, subject to subsequent EIR's, prohibit the Council from granting "H" overlay privileges to other properties in the Planned Development Zone. In other words, there was only a certain amount to go around. To avoid putting the whole issue in limbo, the City Council at that time was concerned about the Low project proceeding in a timely fashion, and that's why the OPA was requested and that's why it's before Council at this time. Raymond Brockus, l309 Standish Street, stated in part that in his oplnlon an elevation problem is involved - as far as the view is con- cerned ... on both the developments at 130 W. Huntington and 333-421 East Huntington Drive ... that a top level elevation plan is needed. Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, said in part that this may set a precedent and it is her hope that it will not permit high rise development and that it will be possible to maintain the view of the mountains and not bring to the City another Los Angeles or New York. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried unanimously. It was then MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows that the City Attorney be directed to prepare an ordinance for this zone change. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring In order to take an item relating to the same property out of agenda sequence it was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Council- man Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows that the provisions of the Procedural Ordinance be waived. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring -5- 4-6-82 COND IT IONAL USE PERMIT (130 W. Huntington Drive APPROVED subject to adoption of E I_,~ f:;'f,j'; 25:0453 Planning Commission Resolution No. 1191 granting a CUP for the construc- tion of the aforementioned two 4 story office 'buildings. a 7 story hotel and a restaurant at the same address (130 W. Huntington Drive)_ It was MOVED by Councilman Sae1id, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows that Planning Commissio~ Resolution No. 1191 be approved and that same be effective on Council adoption of the resolution on the environmental impact report. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Drin9 HEARING This hearing is being held in order to receive views of the citizens BLOCK GRANT on communicty development and housing needs. Staff submitted 1) State- PROGRAM 82-83 ment of Community Development Objectives which sets forth a number of OBJECTIVES activities which it believes should be included at this time; 2) exam- 1 TO COUNTY p1es of other activities; 3) pages from HUD instructions which set forth the eligible activites, At a later date Council will be required to de- termine the specific activities and supply Los Angeles County with de- tailed descriptions and dollar amounts, County has indicated that Ar- cadia's planned allocation for participation in the 1982-83 program wou1 d be $281,987, f HEARING Street Improvement to proceed (: d5~ The various categories were explored and in Housing Production the goal would be to improve the housing opportunities for persons of low and moderate income. Objectives under this category would be to ac- quire land for the development of low cost housing. Councilman Saelid asked if there would be some way of limiting the application to Senior Citizen Housing rather than low income housing. He would prefer to see Council as a matter of policy identify up front that the application of these monies would be for senior housing rather than low income housing. The City has in the past been interested in providing for the seniors who find themselves in limited resources be- cause of inflation but we have not, as a matter of policy. accepted the position of encouraging low income families into the area by providing housing for them ... there is a difference... perhaps a change in the policy is wanted... perhaps this is what the community now wants ... but he senses very definitely that they are not in favor of that. Councilmar Haltom felt that categorizing just for senior citizen hous- ing would be an injustice to others who may need help with housing. Councilman Pellegrino agreed with this observation and felt the door should be left open and make the decision when the time comes. Mayor Gi1b then declared the hearing open and Raymond O. Brockus. 1309 Standish Street, said in part that he was concerned about the cost of administering this program. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried unani- mously. It was further MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows that staff be directed to submit the Statement of Community Development Objectives 1 to Los Angeles County. AYES : Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Gilb NOES Councilman Sae1id - felt the program is too broad in concept. ABSENT: Councilman Dring Council recieved a report regarding a petition for the improvement of a portion of Camino Real and Mayflower. Property owners on both sides of Camino Real between Loganrita and Mayflower and along the west side of Mayflower from Mayflower to Shrode requested driveway aprons. curbs and gutters. Notices calling the hearing were posted on each property and, estimated costs were hand delivered to the occupants of those prop- erties. -6- 4-6-82 1 1 ROLL CALL 25:0454 Mayor Gilb declared the hearing open and Walt Self. 1101 East Camino Real, said the property owners have wanted thlS improvement for such a long time, however he was concerned about the cost. He was adivsed that bids will be taken. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried unani- mously. It was further MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows the Super- intendent of Streets be authorized to proceed with the work in accord- ance with the provisions of Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911; that the plans and specifications be approved, and that the City Clerk be authorized to advertise for bids. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring Council recessed in order to act as the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PRESENT: Members Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb ABSENT: Member Dring, Excused on MOTION by Member Pellegrino, seconded by Member Haltom and carried unanimously. Consideration of proposed Owner Participation Agreement with Robert J. Low for a 109,000 sq. ft, commercial-office building at 333 E. Huntington Drive. The staff report was read in full indicating that the OPA increases the required period for preparation and submittal of construction drawings from 150 days to 200 days. Staff concurs with this change and recommended the approval of the OPA. The Agency Counsel presented, explained the content and read the title of ARA Resolution No. 66, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CERTIFYING REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL AND PORTIONS OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1 REPORTS FOR THE EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA, AND /1_'1 MAKING FINDINGS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION RELATING TO MITIGATION ~ MEASURES AND PROJECT ALTERNATIVES FOR A PROPOSED OWNER'S PARTICIPATION t, 1- AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 333-411 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE," A R A RESOLUTION NO. 66 ADOPTED f; A R A RESOLUTION NO. 67 ADOPTED f: /J tl'! t ').1-- It was MOVED by Member Pellegrino, seconded by Member Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of ARA Resolution No. 66 be waived and that same be ADOPTED . AYES NOES ABSENT: Members Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Member Dring The Agency Counsel presented, explained the content and read the title of ARA Resolution No. 67, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE ARCADIA RE- DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT J. LOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 333-421 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE THE SAME IN A FORM WITH CONTENT APPROVED BY THE AGENCY GENERAL COUNSEL". It was MOVED by Member Pellegrino, seconded by Member Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of ARA Resolution No. 67 be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES NOES ABSENT: Members Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Member Dring - 7- 4-6-B2 HOMETELS PROJECT Continued t 0 Apnl 20 25:0455 Report regarding financial commitments secured privately for the Granada-Rovale Hometels oroiect (northe~st cnrnpr nf Hun~jnntnn nrivp and Second' Avenue). Staff noted that it has not had sufTlcfent time' to revi ew and study the commitments, It was MOVED by Member Pe11 egri no, seconded by Member Saelid and carried unanimously that the matter be CONTINUED to APRIL 20. The Agency then adjourned to 7 p.m. April 20, 1982 in the Conference Room. Council reconvened. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Herb Fletcher, 175 West Lemon Avenue, expressed appreciation to the 1 City Council for their efforts and the amount of time they have ex- tended on behalf of the City. He noted the amount of his latest bill from Best Disposal - that it had increased 10%, Staff explained the terms of the contract with the company. He also referred to an agenda item concerning irrigation project on Santa Anita ... and felt it will be a lot of money, about $60,000, to water the lawn. Craig Windsor, 225 E. Laurel Avenue, exoressed concern ~bnut cn~~erci~l and residential zoning abutment. ,. particularly around Foothill and Laurel and referred to a letter from the Planning Director in this re- gard. He felt the concept of the Community of Homes should have safe- guards. Mayor Gilb referred this matter to the Planning Commission. Mr. Windsor will make himself available to the Commission. Robert Sperry, 1051 Encanto Drive, advised on the endeavor of the Music Club to raise funds to take the Arcadia Marching Band and auxiliary units to visit Newcastle, Australia. One of the ways would be through door to door solicitation ." residential and commercial areas, He asked Council for its ruling on such solicitation. (Council considered this at length later in this meeting and took action to make this possi- ble for a specific period of time. See Page No. 11. Arthur Fry, 221 W. Camino Real, spoke against the use of telephone poles for the posting of signs. CONSENT ITEMS HEARING May 4, 1982 was set as the date for the public hearing on Planning SCHEDULED Commission Res. 1194 allowing unlimited expansion of main dwellings May 4 on R-l and R-O lots with two or more dwellings and deleting the real _,. , estate inspection report requirement. /lll" , / "'e.. 0" ., 1~ ' I b I' NONCONFORMING APPROVED request for continuation of a nonconforming garage use at USE 40 W. Live Oak Avenue until June 1, 1982. CONTRACT AWARD Irrigation f: /4 ,/d PAVEMENT MARKINGS (Res. 5033) AWARDED the contract for the Santa Anita Irri9ation Project from 1 Huntington Drive to Winnie Way Job No, 514 to California En9ineering Inc., in the amount of $58,969; that all other bids be rejected; that any informalities or irre9ularities in the bids or bidding process be waived and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract inform approved by the City Attorney, $70,000 to be appro- priated from Capital Outlay Funds to cover the cost of construction, engineering, inspection and contingencies. APPROVED request of Director of Public Works of Supplement No.4 to the local Agency/State AGREEMENT No, 07-5131 for Pavement Markings. SEE RESOLUTION NO. 5033. -8- 4-6-82 I' I ADVERTISE FOR BIDS (signals) EASEMENT SCECO Chapman Well 25:0456 AUTHORIZED the City Clerk to advertise fOr bids for the Baldwin Avenue Traffic Signal Modification Job No. 508 FAU PROGRAM supplement No, 5 on Baldwin Avenue at various intersections from Camino Real to Gate 7. APPROVED Grant of Easement to Southern Caifornia Edison Company for electrlcal service to the Booster Pump at Chapman Well and authorized the City Clerk to execute the necessary easement document. CITY/CO. The California City/County Street Light Association has been formed to Street contest street light rate increases and utility company policies regard- Light ing public agency acquisition of their facilities. Based on the formu- Assn. la for determining assessments to various agencies Arcadia's share would See Res, be $675, Council concurred and adopted Resolution No. 5031 later in 5031 _ ~ thi s meeti ng. P ill'tll' g . ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY COUNCILMAN HALTOM, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN PELLEGRINO AND CARRIED ON ROLL CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS: AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring CITY LARlO Council received the report on the City Lario Urban Trail (bikeway) URBAN TRAIL maintenance costs, Council at its meeting of April 1, 1980 approved Maintenance a Joint Powers Agreement under which the County would maintain the Costs bikeway for a period of two years at a rate not to exceed $5000 per APPROVED FOR year payable in advance to the County, The first $5000 was paid out 1982 of City's SB821 Bikeway account. The State disallowed the use of , d4 these funds for maintenance costs ...there exists a $5000 amount which I~' ~ must be repaid to this account. The County has requested the second " /:t..,r1f7 year's $5000 advance payment for the 1982 maintenance. It was t~OVED ~D, by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows that an expenditure of not more than $10,000 be approved from the City's Capital Improvement Funds ($5000 to reimburse the Bikeway account and $5000 to the County for the 1982 bikeway maintenance pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement), STOP LOSS AND LI FE INSURANCE /-:1rl<' -i: .. .. J". " . L. r ' ./ LABOR RELATIONS CONSULTANTS RETAINED AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gi1b None Councilman Dring Council received the report and recommendation regarding Medical StOD- Loss and Life Insurance Carrier Quotes for Self-Insured Program. The Finance Director explained in detail. It was MOVED by Councilman Pelle- grino, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows that the quotation of Galbraith and Green from Hartford Insur- ance Company for the $25,000 specific Loss amount with the Life Time Maximum of $1,000,000 and also that the City accept the Hartford (Life) quote of $7 ,500 each for a rate of $.38 per $1,000 submitted through Galbraith and Green and that they be appointed as broker of record for this insurance package. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring On recommendation of the City Manager and the Personnel Director it was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Haltom and carried on roll call vote as follows agreement with Labor Relations Consultants Liebert, Cassidy and Fierson be APPROVED, The Personnel Director explained the fees which are set forth in the staff report dated March 15 . ,. the consultant fee will remain at $10,800 per year and the representation at administrative hearingS has increased from $85 to $95 per hour. -9- 4-6-82 ORDINANCE NO. 17 41 ADO lED ORDINANCE NO. 1743 INTRODUCED .; RESOLUTION NO, 5030 ADOPTED I RESOLUTION NO. 5031 ADOPTED I RESOLUTION NO. 5033 ADOPTED I 25:0457 AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1741, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADDING A NEW PART 9 TO CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE II OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE CREATING THE ARCADIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION AND SETTING FORTH ITS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES." It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Ordinance No, 1741 be waived and that same be ADOPTED, AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring 1 The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1743, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REPEALING SECTIONS 2831.3 AND 2831.13 AND AMENDING SECTION 2844.1 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE INCREASING AMOUNT OF PUR- CHASES OR SALES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM THE BIDDING PROCESS FROM $100.00 TO $500,00". It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text be \vaived and that same be INTRODUEED. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resoloution No, 5030, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADOPTING A RECREATION DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY FEE SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982-1983 AND FINDING THAT SAID FEES WILL NOT EXCEED THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES FOR WHICH THE FEES ARE CHARGED". It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution No. 5030 be waived and that same be ADOPTED, AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Counc il man Dri ng The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5031, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REQUESTING THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION TO CONSIDER, AMEND, AND ADOPT SPECIFIED REGULATIONS GOVERNING STREET LIGHT- ING". 1 It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Coun~ilman Sael(d and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution No. 5031 be waived and that same be ADOPTED, AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5033, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO.4 TO AGREEMENT NO. 07- 5131 (PAVEMENT MARKINGS JOB NO. 534) PROGRAM OF LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SUCH REVISION". It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Saelid -10- 4-6-82 :....."':'"...~""' -.--.------ RESOLUTION NO. 50'34 ADO,E'D I t. !CLAIM DEN I ED (Boyle) . r CLAIM DENIED (Smith) / SAEL J.D v' ORDINANCE TO BE PREPARED (Solicita- tion) I v '''"'7'"-';''~'''T~'' .', , ': "-.~' ;<q..'~~'. " 25: 0438 and carried on roll call vote as fonows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution NO, 5033 be waived and that same be ADOPTED, AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No, 5034, entitled: ' "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO,S TO AGREEMENT NO, 07-5131 (BALDWIN AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION - CAMINO REAL TO GATE 7 - JOB NO, 508), PROGRAM OF LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID URBAN SYS- TEM PROJECTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAY AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SUCH REVISION", It was MOVED by Councilman Haltom, seconded by Councilman Sae1id and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text of Resolution No, 5034 be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Sae1id, Gi1b None Councilman Dring On recommendation of the City Attorney it was MOVED by Councilman Haltom, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows that the claim of CRS Leasing (Kerry Boyle) be and it is hereby DENIED, AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring On recommendation of the City Attorney it wa~ MOVED by Councilman Haltom, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows that the claim of Alexander F, Smith be and it is hereby DENIED. AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gi1b None Councilman Dring Referred to the request of Robert Sperry relating to the enforcement of the solicitation ordinance and MOVED to suspend the enforcement of the Solicitation Ordinance up to and including July 3, 1982 to allow those organizations with a valid solicitation certificate to: a, Solicit at dwellings on Saturdays between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.; and b. Solicit if under 16 years of age if accompanied by an adult; and c. Solicit without wearing an identification badge if the organization has recieved a solicitation certificate from the City at any time during the last five years, provided those solicitating carry a copy of a letter from the organization authorizing them to solicit, and a copy of the solicitation certificates, and that staff be instructed to prepare an appropriate ordinance to this effect for City Council consideration. 'Motion seconded by Mayor Gilb and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring -11- 4-6-82 A~HISTORICAL COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT 25:0"59 On MOTION by Mayor Gilb, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call vote as follows the fol lowing were appointed to the .~rcadia Historical Commission: Al ice Slater ~1ary Leupold Herbert H, Goddard Lornetta Platford It will be a five member commission with the fifth to be appointed by the new Council (after April 20), AYES NOES ABSENT: Councilmen Haltom, Pellegrino, Saelid, Gilb None Councilman Dring Councilman Pellegrino MOVED to adjourn in memory of Raymond G. Ramuz who passed away March 30, He was past president of the Arcadia Ex- change Club, member of the Arcadia Chamber of Commerce, the Ca(ifornia Association of Nurseries and Arcadia American Legion Post No. 247, Mr. Ramuz was the owner of the Arcadia Nursery, He is survived by his wife, Dorothy and son Ronald, Motion carried unanimously. (NEXT MEETING --- APRIL 20, 1982 at 7 p,m, in the Conference Room. ~ Mayor ATTEST: ~~L.~ Clty erk ~ - 12- 4-6-82 1 I