Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH 7,1978_2 23:9463 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF TIlE CITY CLERK INVOCATION I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MINUTE APPROVAL . ,r .) ~ HEARING CONTINUED 14 E. Huntington .' \) Y y..0 I MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR MEETING MARCH 7, 1978 The City Council of the City of Arcadia, met in regular session on March 7, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Arcadia City Hall. Rev. Leslie G. Strathern, Arcadia Congregational Church City Attorney Charles Liberto PRESENT: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None On MOTION by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Parry and carried unanimously the minutes of the regular meeting of February 21 and the Adjourned Regular Meetings of February 17, 21 and 28, 1978 were APPROVED. Prior to consideration of the scheduled agenda items Mayor Saelid advised of the action the City Council took concerning traffic safety in the Santa Anita Oaks area; that in response to a reque~t from the Santa Anita Homeowners Association four-way boulevard stop signs will be installed at the intersections of Rodeo/Hacienda and Arbolada/San Carlos on a six month's trial period; that the petition concerning the possible closing of San Carlos Road will be discussed at a study session. The other items contained in the communication will be referred to staff to discuss with the,llomeowners Association. Appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission in connection with conditions imposed in the granting of a Conditional Use Permit relating to a restaurant at 14 E. Huntington Drive. The City Council had considered this matter on February 21 in public hearing proceedings and continued to this date. During the interim staff was to endeavor to locate other locations which might be suitable for the restaurant with sufficient parking spaces. The present site is deficient in that area. Staff advised that they had shown other locations to the applicant, Thomas Turiace, but that he preferred to proceed with his appeal relating to his own property. Discussion ensued concerning the parking deficiency and the possible use of the Parking District north of Huntington Drive. Mr. Turiace said that inasmuch as they are starting a new business his present location would be the best and he would like to pursue this. Arthur Palfrey, 15 Alta Street, reiterated his statements of February 21 - in part that the existing parking situation is a matter of great concern to him and felt the appeal should be turned down if the parking could not come up to Code. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Member Lauber, seconded by Member Parry and carried unanimously. Member Lauber stated in part that the design of the proposed facility is most attractive and she would hope Mr. Turiace will construct his restaurant within the City. She felt the restaurant is really too large in scope for his property. She noted the communications and testimony in opposition due to the crowded conditions and the fact that there is parking in the alley. She felt it would be a disservice, not only to the residents of Alta Street, but to the other small 3-7-78 - 1 - HEARING WEED ABATEMENT . ~/; q19 rtrl1!J)~ I. f f' ~ v ./ f. HEARING (Lot Split - Variance) DENIED \ . ~\ \ f c 1;\" \ . ), 23:9464 businesses adjacent thereto. She said it is with regret that she would have to support the Planning Commission and deny the appeal, but she hoped Mr. Turiace would be able to locate elsewhere in the City. Member Gilb felt it is a very difficult situation, but from the viewpoint of the City Council he would have to find something very unusual to overrule the recommendation of the Commission. He too felt the restaurant would be an asset to the City and he would like staff to continue to work with Mr. Turiace to this end, but in view of the parking deficiency he could not grant the appeal. He would support the recommendation of the Commission. Member Parry agreed and stated in part that to approve this would only be compounding the already congested traffic problem; that actually in his opinion the location is not right for a restaurant in view of the lack of parking spaces. lie would sustain the Planning Commission in its recommendation. I Member Margett was in accord and submitted that the rendering was excellent and that there is a need for this type of facility in the City. He felt the endeavor on the part of staff to find another location is indicative of the City Council's desire to keep this particular business in the community. However, the inability to provide the required 21 parking spaces is paramount to him and he would support a motion to sustain the Commission. Mayor Saelid agreed and would support the Commission based on what has already been set forth. It was MOVED by Member Parry, seconded by Member Margett and carried unanimously that the recommendation of the Planning Commission in its Resolution 1031 be SUSTAINED and that the appeal be and it is hereby DENIED. Time and place to hear objections to the proposed removal of weeds, refuse and other flammable material growing upon or in front of properties as listed by the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner. The Fire Chief explained certain areas of concern and Mayor Saelid then declared the hearing open. No one desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Lauber and carried unanimously. It'was then MOVED by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the County Agricultural Commissioner be and he is hereby directed to abate the nuisance by having the weeds, rubbish and refuse removed. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Saelid None Member Parry, due to his business affiliation None Planning Commission Resolution No. 1034 recommending denial of a variance for two substandard lots at 220 - 224 S. Santa Anita Avenue and consideration of Lot Split application (L-78-2). The Planning Director explain~d that the Commission felt by creating two sub- standard lots it could place a hardship on the future development of the area and it was not able to make all of the findings necessary to grant a zone variance based on the proposal before it. Sub- sequently the City Council felt consideration should be given to the future impact of closing a portion of California Street adjacent to the applicant's property (Dr. Herbert Herscher) which could enlarge the site. The City Council reviewed projecturals of the site reflecting dimensions. Some discussion held on the possibility of closing California Street and extending the playground of the First Avenue School. In this event more footage would be added to the Doctor's office providing for parking spaces for the apartments to the north. As it stands now there is a parking deficiency. I 3-7-78 - 2 - I I <{ , , ": .~~ ~" "".f.:' ;::, 23:9465 Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and Dave Paradis speaking on behalf of a group who have entered into an agreement with Dr. Herscher to purchase the apartment building, noted that permits had been issued for the buildings but a lot split was not applied for in the beginning (1956). During the years the zoning laws have become more restrictive so that now it is extremely difficult to split lots. He noted that the structures have been maintained and are in fine condition. He referred to the parking and said there are 15 parking spaces for a 14 unit building; that practically all the units are one-person occupied. He said it is hoped the units may be available for senior citizens and the rents would be kept where they are now. Mr. Paradis continued in part that they have been in escrow for some time now and that Dr. Herscher has been endeavoring to sell the property for some time.. but it is almost impossible to sell it as a unit... two separate buildings with separate financial structures, etc. Some mention was made of the possibility of a County Clubhouse being constructed at the golf course property and the Doctor's property might be acquired for additional parking for that facility. However, this would be in the future. In response to an inquiry he said acquiring the entire parcel has been discussed with Dr. Herscher but it was felt this would lead to many complications - what with his heirs and the attendant legalities, He asked the City Council to favorably consider granting the lot split and submitted that every assurance could be made that the units would be maintained which might not be the case if they could not be sold as a separate package from the Doctor's office. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Member Lauber, seconded by Member Gilb and carried unanimously. Member Margett stated in part that in his opinion the most intelligent approach would be to ente~ into some type of joint effort between the City and the Board of Educ~tion to acquire the property for expanded recreational facilities and an adjustment of property lines would provide for both the field and parking spaces. He was concerned with the non-conforming use. He could not support a lot split at this point. In response to some questions the Planning Director explained that as long as the use continued to be for professional offices without an interlude of more than 90 days there would be no problem. Dr. Herscher could lease it out to some other professional office use...or the structure could be converted and brought up to Code to conform to a multiple family building thus making it into a residential duplex probably.. or the structure could be removed and in that event as many as four or five dwelling units could be built. Member Lauber noted that there hasn't been a problem during the past twenty years and she felt the City Council should do everything possible to protect the housing along Santa Anita primarily for the senior citizens. She submitted that the subject apartment building is within walking distance to all of the senior activities which is important especially for those who do not drive. The building is in good condition and all that is really being considered is making a paper work change.... it is very difficult to put 1978 standards on something constructed in 1957. She said she would support the appeal and commented that if more protection were desired a covenant could be required on the medical building for future development in the event of closure of California street, c Member Gilb agreed with this observation and said that the possibility of expanding the recreation facilities of First Avenue School should be pursued. He did not think this matter should be held up until the California street matter is resolved. He would support the appeal. Member Parry stated in part that at some future date a determination could be made concerning California, but he felt that the situation 3-7-78 - 3 - HEARING General Plan (Naomi Av.) 'I J )D~ \ \ 23:9466 is such that the apartments could continue to be used, the medical building also, but that by granting a lot split two substandard lots would be created and there already is a parking deficiency along with front, side and rear yard deficiencies. lie could not support the appeal. Mayor Saelid said that from a zoning viewpoint there is nothing which could be done to improve any of the deficiencies and that is why he was interested in the closure of California and then shift the property line which could mitigate some of these deficiencies. The apartments could never be brought into conformity with present standards unless half of the units were eliminated which certainly is not practical. By granting the lot split it would sterilize the property in terms of any improvement. He also referred to the vote of the Planning Commission which was 5 to 0 with one abstention. He could not support the appea 1. It was MOVED by Member Parry, seconded by Member Margett and carried I On roll call vote as follows that the recommendation of the Planning Commission in Resolution No. 1034 be SUSTAINED and the appeal be and it is DENIED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Margett, Parry, Saelid Members Gilb, Lauber None Planning Commission recommendation for General Plan amendments for the properties at 625-671 Naomi Avenue and amending the General Plan Circulation Element (Res. No. 1033). The Planning Director explained the subject properties are on the north side of Naomi along with property on the west side of Lovell Avenue and Naomi Avenue known as 1243 to 1315 Lovell Avenue. The existing improvements consist of 11 parcels developed with single family dwellings and a parking lot. Maps were reviewed indicating changes which have taken place since 1960. The Commission recommends a Commercial designation. Discussion ensued concerning the parking situation in the entire subject area. Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and James Plotkin, owner of 1310 to 1316 S. Baldwin Avenue, stated in part that he has great concern for the pedestrians particularly endeavoring to walk across the alley next to the Bank of America; also with traffic trying to make a left turn out of that alley into Baldwin. He felt there is a need for an alley to run from Duarte Road to Naomi. If part of his land is taken for that he would not have sufficient parking space for his customers, however, he would give that up if the area could be improved. He felt this would increase the retail business on Baldwin Avenue and stressed the need for improving Naomi Avenue on the north side. Mark Allen, 707 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, representing the owners of 645, 663 and 665 Naomi, stated in part that his clients are in favor of the Planning Commission recommendation. C. L. Fuller, 640 Naomi Avenue, submitted that those residing in the new condominium on the south side of Naomi Avenue, are concerned about the traffic problem which would occur if more parking were provided; that at the present time there is a great deal of traffic using Naomi Avenue. He did not feel that there is need for more parking space as this would only add to the traffic. He also felt the north side should be residential (R-3) as commercial would only compound the traffic problem. I Oscar Kraft, 630 W. Duarte Road, spoke in favor of the Planning Commission recommendation and submitted in part that he is endeavoring to purchase all of the property on the north side including the corner of Lovell and Naomi for commercial purposes. Steve Worsley, owner of 673 Naomi Avenue, expressed concern about the location of the alley as it affects part of his property, and also 3-7-78 - 4 - I I HEARING (Text Amendment) APPROVED I I HEARING SUBDIVISION (MARCH 21) .<'. 22:9467 submitted that he favors the commercial recommendation. He had empathy for the residents in the condominium but if the subject property were made R-3 it would hamper the future development of his property. Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, commented in part that there is an energy crisis in the Country and that perhaps the contemplated zone change might effect the construction of something to be sorry about later. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Lauber and carried unanimously. Member Parry was in favor of the recommendation of the Planning Commission and commented that the condominiums on the south side are quite nice, but that he can only envision commercial on the north side. Member Margett also favored the recommendation as the zone change would certainly enhance the entire block and area. He did hope that any commercial use would be, of a low profile type commercial and felt it incumbent on the City Council to protect the condominiums from additional traffic problems. Some discussion held on the designation of the northwest corner of Lovell and Naomi. It was the consensus that this should also be commercial so the entire block would be the same designation. Some consideration given to widening Naomi, but this will be taken up at a later date. It was MOVED by Member Lauber, seconded by Member Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that the City Council approve and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; that the recommendation of the Planning Commission as set forth in its Resolution No. 1033 be approved and that the northwest corner of Lovell and Naomi be included in the commercial designation. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None Planning Commission Resolution No. 1032 recommending amendments to the Arcadia Municipal Code relating to Division Titles for the R-O and R-l zone to include lot area designations. It was submitted that these amendments would create a more comprehensive zoning ordinance and allow for consistency between the ,subdivision and zoning ordinance. Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and no one desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Member Margett, seconded by Member Gilb and carried unanimously. Whereupon it was MOVED by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council approve and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; that the text amendment be APPROVED and that the City Attorney prepare the appropriate ordinance to effect this change. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None Ordinance No. 1616 repealing Chapter 1 "Subdivision Regulations" of Article IX of the Arcadia Municipal Code and adopting a new Chapter 1 of Article IX of the Arcadia Municipal Code entitled "Subdivision Code". Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open. No one desired to speak to this item it was MOVED by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Parry and carried unanimously that this hearing be CONTINUED to MARCH 21. 3-7-78 - 5 - HEARING (Light ing) Laurel Av. APPROVED 1V I \-,?CI ~ \, 3<1'/.j (1 TRACT 34M3 Tentative Map APPROVED. ..j / 1" f: -:J ',) , TRACT 34453 Tentative Map APPROVED ~' / ,) fj, , ~i,H; RECESS and RECONVENED 23:9468 On February 7 the City Council reviewed a petition for street lighting on Laurel Avenue ... and scheduled a public hearing for this date. The petition contained 17 signatures representing 65% of the property owners however it did contain three parties which are not on the current assessment roll. Verified owners constitute 54% of the ownerships within the area proposed to be improved with a lighting system. Estimated cost would be $7250 " 75% of the cost of installation would be borne by the City and the other 25% equally divided between the property owners. Power and maintenance costs would be at the property owner's expense. They would be in what is known as Zone E of the Consolidated Lighting District which has a current tax rate of $0.373 per $100 of land valuation. Funds are in the Capital Improvement Program for undergrounding and street lighting. Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and Tom Kasper, 204 E. Laurel Avenue, was advised on the cost per assessed land value. I Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, expressed concern with energy conservation and said in part she would like the City Council and staff to consider this in study sessions and suggested that information be obtained from other sources such as the National League of Cities, etc. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Parry and carried unanimously. It was further MOVED by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the Director of Public be AUTHORIZED to proceed with the installation of the street lighting improvements. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None The Planning Commission recommended approval of the tentative map of Tract No. 34663 at 18, 22 and 26 Lucille Street, which creates a seven unit condominium. It was MOVED by Member Margett, seconded by Member Gilb and carried unanimously that the tract be APPROVED subject to conditions set forth in the staff report of March 7; that Council approve and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; that the tract is consistent with the General Plan and that the waste discharge from the tract will not result in a violation of the existing requirements set forth in the Water Code and that the Director of Public Works be authorized to approve the Subdivision agreement. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the tentative map of Tract No. 34453, 1006 Arcadia Avenue, which creates a six unit condominium. It was MOVED by Member Margett, seconded by Member Gilb and carried unanimously that the tract be APPROVED subject to conditions set forth in the staff report of March 7; that Council approve and file the Negative Declaration and finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; that the tract is consistent with the General Plan and that the waste discharge will not result in a violation of the existing requirements set forth in the Water Code and that the Director of Public Works be AUTHORIZED to approve the Subdivision agreement. I In order to act as the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, spoke to the possibility 3-7-78 - 6 - I HEARINGS SCHEDULED MARCH 21 APRIL 4 APRIL 4 APRIL 4 \ I ;( . CUP 1002 N. Santa Anita APPROVED TRACT NO. 33652 Final Map APPROVED 23: 9469 of harm to the hearing of the youth when exposed to the noise emanating from the unusually loud sounds of music and specifically to tha~at the Marquee West. Member Lauber, Council liaison to the Youth Commission, said a report is forthcoming from,~hat,Commission concerning this subject and Council commented that it is sensitive to the problem. Mrs. Hofer also spoke to the free enterprise system which she felt the City Council is violating by continuing with redevelopment without a vote of the citizens of the community. She suggested that a study be made of what type of rentals are most in demand in \ the City; also the size and types of condominiums most sought by buyers and that the Planning Department and the City Council use these findings in making decisions. Dexter Blindbury, 1419 San Carlos Road, was advised on the action taken by the City Council on the petition concerning San Carlos Road and the communication from the Santa Anita Oaks Homeowners' Association concerning safety measures. Appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission in its denial of modifications for an addition of a second unit at 843 S. Golden West Avenue. MARCil 21. Planning Commission Res. 1037 recommending a zone change from PR-3 to D-2 on the south 162.4 feet of 12-54 E. Foothill Boulevard. APRIL 4. Planning Commission Res. 1038 recommending a zone change from R-3 to c-o for the lot at 250 W. Colorado Boulevard. APRIL 4. Planning Commission Res. 1039 recommending approval of Text Amendment amending the C-O, C-l, C-2 and C-M sections of the Code relating to building heights, rear yard setbacks and side yard setbacks. APRIL 4. On MOTION by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows the following items were APPROVED. I Planning Commission recommendation for approval of a conditional use permit to operate an eating establishment at 1002 N. Santa Anita Avenue, subject to conditions set forth in its Resolution No. 1036. I The final map of Tract No. 33652, 8 unit condominium at 411 E. Duarte Road. It is consistent with the General Plan and the waste discharge would not result in a violation of the existing requirements set forth in the Water Code and the Director of Public Works was AUTHORIZED to execute the Subdivision agreement. Tract The final map of Tract No. 21317, 30 unit condominium at 800 W. No. 21317 y/'Naomi Avenue. It is consistent with the General Plan and the waste Final Map discharge will not result in a violation of the existing requirements APPROVED set forth in the Water Code and the Director of Public Works was authorized to execute the Subdivision agreement. I LIABILITY AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY APPROVED J r: I{)b (0 STREET LIGHTING (SC Edison) APPROVED Assumption of Liability Insurance for contract services with the County of Los.Angeles and AUTHORIZED the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. (An agenda item concerning San Carlos Road was previously considered.) Staff advised on a recent communication from the Southern California Edison Company concerning energy conservation in street lighting. The Company proposes to initiate a program of repl~cing certain existing mercury vapor lamps with high pressure sodium vapor lamps. 3-7-78 - 7 - f, INVENTORY & FIXED ASSETS (FIRM ENGAGED) ,\ t\ J ) \' \ (I\.,'" \ 0 d' WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT 208 MILESTONE REPORT RESOLUTION I NO. 4729 V ADOPTED r . Ilo~'A CITY HALL BUILDINGS COURTYARD AREA 23:9470 It also recommends that pending and future installations be limited to high pressure sodium lamps dnd a gradual conversion of existing incandescent and mercury vapor lamps with the same type. (Staff report dated March 7.) It was MOVED by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council give consideration to the proposal and adopt a policy to use the new type lamps where aesthetically and economically feasible. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None The Finance Director presented his recommendation for a complete inventory and valuation of the City's fixed assets which he said would accomplish a safeguard to the investment in the fixed records which would be valuable to substantiate a claim for loss; it would establish custody of fixed assets; it would include a computer print out, would coordinate acquisition and replacement of fixed assets. I In order to accomplish these objectives it would be desirable to retain a professional appraisal firm and he obtained written proposals from two firms in the area with the necessary background. Quotations were received from Tait Appraisal Company $6,755 and from Marshall & Stevens, Inc. $9,850. The low bidder was recom- mened. It was MOVED by Member Lauber, seconded by Member Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that Tait Appraisal Company be engaged to perform the services outlined in its proposal at a total fee of $6,755. Funds to be appropriated from the General Contingency Account. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None Under Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments certain agencies are required to prepare implementable areawide waste treatment management plans, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has requested cities in the 208 Planning Area to adopt a resolution indicating that the City has reviewed the 208 Milestone report on water and air quality conditions. The following resolution was adopted indicating that the City approves the Milestone Report. Whereupon the City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 4729, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING THE 208 MILESTONE REPORT." It was MOVED by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED. I AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None The City Manager recommended the retention of an architect~ral firm to provide preliminary services for enclosing the courtyard area between the east and west City Hall buildings. The afchitect would provide sufficient information so that the City Council could properly consider and make a decision as to whether or not the work should proceed. It was MOVED by Member Margett, seconded by Member Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that R~hnau, Evans, Ruhnau and Associates be retained at a fee not to 3-7-78 - 8 - ORDINANCE NO. 1622 / ADOPTED / I RESOLUTION NO. 4728 ADOPTED ~ '"", ~ CLAIM APPROVED (Brannon) I ~ I C:LAIM DENIED (Coldwell Banker) LAUBER ., r f\.1"'~ i 23:9471 exceed $1500 for the preliffiinary architectural work; that $1500 be appropriated from General Contingency Account for payment. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid Member Gilb None The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1622, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING SECTION 6429.3.2 OF THE ARCADIA MUNIC IPAL CODE INCREASING THE TAXICAB DRIVER I S PERMIT LICENSE FEE FROM $2.00 to $5.00 AND CHARGING A FEE FOR PROCESSING FINGERPRINTS." It was MOVED by Member Margett, seconded by Member Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 4728, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF LOAN AGREEMENTS AND RATIFYING VARIOUS LOANS AND APPROPRIATIONS MADE BY THE CITY OF ARCADIA FROM THE CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE CLEARANCE AND PREPARATION OF SITES IN THE PROJECT AREA FOR REDEVELOPMENT. " It was MOVED by Member Margett, seconded by Member Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None On recommendation of the City Attorney the claim of Thomas M. Brannon in the amount of $217.95 was APPROVED' on MOTION by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None On recommendation of the City Attorney the claim of Coldwell Banker for payment of commission in connection with property at 135 Colorado Place was DENIED on MOTION by Member Parry, seconded by Member Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid None None The record hereby reflects that representatives of Coldwell Banker did not present themselves at this meeting. The Director of Public Works situation at Huntington and particularly concerned with left hand turns. exp la ined the Santa Anita. the hazardous status of the traffic Member Lauber was situation when attempting 3-7-78 - 9 - PARRY ,) ~~ SAELID J r~ ADJOURNMENT 23:9472 Brought up concerns which have been.expressed to him relating to traffic problems which may occur in endeavoring to make left turns from the proposed new development at Second Avenue & Duarte Road. (Study to be made) Brought up the need for protection for the pedestrians going to and from Newcastle Park.. primarily those walking from the so-called College area. Report to be submitted by staff. Reference was made to the need for improved parking for the handicapped. At 11:15 p.m. the meeting adjourned to 4 p.m. March 15 in the Conference Room. 3-7-78 - 10 - I I