HomeMy WebLinkAboutJULY 5,1978_2
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FlLE IN TIlE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
23:9581
1
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATIONS
1
HEARING
(Naomi Av
zoning)
REFERRED TO
PLANNING
COMMISSION
/'
r'
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 5, 1978
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, met in regular
session on Tuesday, July 5, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber
of the Arcadia City Hall.
Rev. Walter Hanne, Arcadia Presbyterian Church
Assistant City Manager, George Watts
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino, Saelid, Parry
Councilman Gilb
On MOTION by Councilman Margett, seconded by Councilman Pellegriho and
carried unanimously Councilman Gilb was excused.
On behalf of the City Council and as Council Liaison to the Sister
City Commission, Councilman Saelid presented a plaque expressing
appreciation to Mrs. Carol Libby for her many efforts and accomplish-
ments during her tenure on the Sister City Commission. Mrs. Libby
said she will be working along with the Commission on education.
On behalf of the City Council and as Council Liaison to the Arcadia
Beautiful Commission, Councilman Margett presented plaques of .
appreciation to Mrs. Cay Mortenson, Mrs. Marcella Whitmore and William
Wyman for their many efforts and accomplishments during their tenure
on the Commission.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mrs. Edith M. Casey,
new appointee to the Sister City Commission. Councilman Saelid then
presented Mrs. Casey with her credentials and welcomed her to the
official City Family.
Mayor Parry read in full a Resolution of Appreciation to Edward
Chastain, retiring Superintendent of Building and'Safety. Mr. Chastain
has completed 19 years with the City and he was wished every possible
success in the future.
Planning Commission Resolution 1049 recommending approval of a zone
change from R-l, PR-l and R-2 to c-o for property at 671 Naomi to the
northwest corner of Naomi and Lovell, including 1307 - 1315 Lovell
Avenue. The Planning Director explored the background of the zoning
of this area which is now improved with mixed commercial uses and
parking on the north, single-family dwellings and a 26 unit condominium
on the south and single family dwellings on the east with general
commercial on the west. The General Plan designation is for commercial
uses. The staff report indicates that following public hearings a
resolution was adopted amending the General Plan Land Map designations
for the subject area from residential to commercial. The proposed
zone change would provide for consistency with the General Plan.
During the deliberations the need for a D-Overlay (architectural
overlay) was brought out. Concerns were expressed about widening
Naomi Avenue which the staff recommends if the zone change is approved
and the protection of the south side of Naomi. It was felt aD-Overlay'
should be placed on the area,in which case the matter should go back
to the Commission for recommendation in that regard.
Mayor Parry declared the hearing open and Bill Martin, 602 Naomi Avenue,
7-5-78
- 1 -
23:9582
stated in part that the City is a quality one and is known as a
Community of Homes which he hoped would be taken into consideration
by the City Council. He submitted a petition with 124 signatures
opposing the zone change and asked that the zoning remain as it is.
Mr. Martin noted the investment made particularly by those in the
condominium on the south side of Naomi and they do not want commercial
opposite their homes. He noted the amount of water runoff experienced
by the area during the heavy rains... He felt the money necessary to
widen Naomi should be considered now that the budget ts being reduced.
He felt property values for the residential .would drop if the north
side went commercial. He asked the City Council to make a decision
and hopefully in the residents' favor.
Some discussion held on the increased traffic if the area should
become R-3 whereas with CoO it would be less inasmuch as the businesses
are rarely open during the evening.
1
Norman Morris, 606 W. Naomi Avenue, agreed with Mr. Martin and said in
part that a buffer is currently present with the zoning already on the
north.. because the rear of those properties back up to a parking lot.
Referring to increased traffic he has already seen that due to the
parking lot... he felt the properties would deteriorate with the
recommended zoning.. He was opposed to commercial zoning and if the
City Council would come to a definite decision the owners of the
properties on the north side would go ahead and improve with resi-
dential.
Daniel Espinoza, 663 W. Naomi Avenue, speaking for himself and four out
of the six owners on the north side, said in part that they are really
in a dilemma... they have improved somewhat but the existing buildings
are over 60 years old and there isn't much left to do... that the .
area carries the overflow of traffic from Baldwin Avenue. He is
trying to resolve the issue and felt the CoO with a D-Overlay would
make it less commercially oriented. He felt something has to be done
and they are endeavoring to work in a positive w~y.
, '
Paul Klein, 640 W. Naomi Avenue, expressed concern about additional
setbacks on the south side and submitted that his three bedrooms face
Naomi. He said something should be done on the north side.. but would
like to see the City Council take steps to finalize the matter and not
keep sending it back to the Planning Commission. He felt a condominium
on the north side would be ideal and that R-3 would be worse than
commercial. He was advised that the City is no~ contemplating any
dedication of property for street purposes on the south side.. only
the north side.
Domenico Parsi, 1312 Lovell Avenue, stated in part that the City Council
should consider the desires of the persons who signed the petition...
that the message is clear.. and asked the City Council to come to a
decision.
Mayor Parry commented in part that of course the 124 signatures will
be considered but at the same time the City Council must consider the
overall effect on the City's some 47,000 residents and decide in the
best interests of everyone.
1
No one else desiring to be heard thehearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Margett and carried unani-
mously.
It was the consensus of the City Council that the matter should be
referred back to the Planning Commission and that it hold a public
hearing with report back to the City Council at the earliest possible
date. It was so MOVED by Councilman Margett, seconded by Councilman
Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows.' Mayor Parry commented
further in part that a definite decision will be made at that time.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino; cSaelid, Parry
None
Councilman Gilb
7,5-78
- 2 -
HEARING
(HARE
KRISHNA)
AUGUST 15
1
.~.~
\1,
~.
"-
1
.'~.. . -' .' ' ;-;...... {.-:-
~ '1,"/ :.J\',\ . "
23:9583
Application of International Society for Krishna Consciousness of
California, Inc. (Hare Krishna) for a religious solicitation permit.
This matter was before the City Council on April 4, 1978 at which time
it was continued to this date for additional data.
Mayor Parry declared the hearing open and Joel Schanker, 3764 Watseka
Avenue, Los Angeles, said he was the representative of Hare Krishna
and in response to a question as to why he did not attend the hearing
scheduled for April 4 Mr. Schapker said he did know about the hearing
but did not receive any correspondence through the mail, only over the
telephone. He has discussed the matter with the City Attorney and
said he has submitted the requested material. He continued in part
that he knew there is a great deal of public opinion in the City but
noted the First Amendment Freedoms.. that it is a bona fide religious
group throughout the country and it has a legal right to come into the
City to disseminate religious views. He explained it is customary to
give out literature and then ask for a donation to help defray the
printing costs to aid with religious programs.
Mr. Schanker said they have been issued permits in many cities in the
County and that the organization has programs such as food relief and
that last year it was working with Governor Brown on mental health
programs, visiting mental hospitals, etc. He said there may be those
who do not want Hare Krishna in the City distributing religious
literature which is a valid and free opinion, however, he referred once
again to the Constitution and that if a person does not want to talk
with a representative of Hare Krishna that is his decision.
Mayor Parry recited his experience at the airport in San Francisco and
noted that the representatives of Krishna did not identify themselves
but did have a badge or a certificate of permit from the City on
purses. He said many people feel intimidated and certainly a religious
group or non-profit organization has a right to certain constitutional
rights but at the same time the City Council has a right to protect the
public from misrepresentations in the City.. that there is a balancing
of these rights. He noted the tremendous amount of material which the
City Council has reviewed in its considerations.
In response to a question by Councilman Margett concerning people with
social problems gravitating to Hare Krishna and does the organization
endeavor to help these people, Mr. Schanker said in part that such a
person would have a difficult time adjusting to the principles..
there is no intoxication, no gambling, no illicit sex. That it
requires strong character to live at the center.. In response to a
question by the City Attorney he said he signed the application as
secretary although he is not the official secretary of the organization.
~
Peter F. Geissler, 43 W. Forest Avenue, said in part he had reviewed
the application and found that the method of approaching persons is not
as indicated in the application.. He recited his experience at the Los
Angeles Airport and other areas; that he has been approached in a
rude fashion. He questioned Some of the items in the financial
statement and felt the information is not sufficient for the issuance
of a permit. He could not ascertain what formula was used for the
statement and noted that a Form known as 596 has not been filed and
he wondered if this has been filed with the Internal Revenue Service.
He stated in conclusion that it would be his recommendation that
before any evaluation is given to the issuance of a license that a
detailed examination of their books, records, accounting practices
and credibility should be undertaken by the City Council.
Louise Werner, 878 Monte Verde, said she had experienced a similar
incident at the airport as has been noted by other speakers. ... that
she had been approached by a young girl without identification who
pinned a carnation on her coat lapel and said "that will be one dollar"
however Mrs. Werner just walked away.... she noted other instances of
what she called harassment which could be documented through the Los
Angeles Police Department.
Jean Winberg, 122 White Oak Avenue, submitted the same type of
7-5-78
- 3 -
23:9584
experiences.. She asked whether or not they intend to establish a
church in the city.... or a meeting place.... what age bracket will the
solicitors be... she felt the young have to be protected and does the
money go to counsel the young because the average church does not
spend the majority of its monies on literature.
Jerome Schneider, 215 Leland Way, agreed that everyone should have a
voice.. but he travels a lot and said he sees the representatives
endeavoring to give candy, flowers and general harassment... the First
Amendment does give this freedom but citizens have some freedoms too...
Re felt there should be some restrictions if the City has to permit
them to solicit.. he does not want to be intimidated and he would not
want them coming to his home to solicit as he has enough trouble at
the airports.
1
~'
I \'
Stella Ross, 355 W. Longden Avenue, resented being placed in a position
of being intimidated and agreed the Constitution grants the freedom
but citizens have freedoms also. She felt the exact position with the
organization held by Mr. Schanker should be known... She said in part
tha t they should open up an office in the ci ty and if persons want
their literature they could go in and get it. She recited incidents
encountered in other cities. She said Mr. Schanker emphasized the
negative so strongly... i.e., they do not eat meat, do not do that,
etc., that she could not accept what he said. Mrs. Ross then submitted
material identified as follows:
~'
THE SUNDAY OREGONIAN
Article entitled BLACKMAN TELLS HOW HE JOINED KRISHNA GROUP
May 14, 1978
Las Vegas Sun
KRISHNA SECT FOLLOWER SUES OVER KIDNAP
June 21, 1978
The Bulletin - Salem, Oregon
Hare Krishna Sect object to abduction
Judge says Dad should return son.
April 13 and 14, 1978
Communications: Peter J. Jelito, 1747 Claridge, Arcadia, CA
Muriel A. Call, 406 W. Longden Av., Arcadia, CA
Mrs. Edna McErlain, 356 W. Longden Av., Arcadia, CA
Mrs. G. A. Campbell, 301 W. Longden Av., Arcadia, CA
Regina M. Lang, 482 W. Las Flores, Av, Arcadia, CA
Robert Kladifko, 348 W. Las Flores Avenue, Assistant High School
Principal at the Venice High School, told of what has transpired in
that City in the last five years. He thought Mr. Schanker does not
rep,resent the group as well as s:>me of the other members as he does
not dress in the same fashion nor use the same approach or tactics.
He asked why the application could not be denied on the basis of
misrepresentation because Mr. Schanker said he was not the Secretary
but he did sign the application. At one time when school was letting 1
out a group of the members approached the students in a very hostile
and aggressive manner. They were asked to leave but refused and the
police eventually had to come to assist... police records indicate
they have broken the law many times... battery on a number of citizens
at the Los Angeles Airport. He questioned where the group would be
soliciting --- at Fashion Park, in front of stores, door to door and
what tactics would be used. He said in conclusion that if the City
Council grants the the permit he hopes it understands what is going
to happen in the community.
Captain Billy Oliver, Arcadia Police Department, submitted a summary
of records: 1974 a young man murdered his father because the father
refused to furnish money to further the use of Krishna activities; In 1975
a man murdered his wife in a dispute over their Krishna activities; In
1977 another murder occurred and a number of persons were arrested during
the investigation and many were identified as members of the organization;
In 1977 an Ohio man was indicted for murdering his wife..both were deeply
involved in Krishna. In May of 1977 at the L.A. Airport a man was arrested
7-5-78
- 4 -
1
1
\-
1'.
i,""'-""" .-\
,''';
23:9585
for possession of 685 grams of 95% pure Asian herion.. at the time of
his arrest he gave his address and phone number as the Hare Krishna
Temple. Another man was arrested with possession of 20 kilograms of
hash oil and he gave his address as the Laguna Beach Hare Krishna
Temple. Another arrest was made in October of 1977 in Newport Beach
for possession of one pound of 85% Asian heroin.. In December of 1977
an airline employee and female Krishna member had a verbal altercation
over methods of soliciting. A male Krishna interceded and severely
injured the airline employee. A multi-million dollar law suit has
been filed by a communication firm charging Krishna with the illegal
use of their private communication system.. making thousands of
dollars worth of long distance phone calls. Captain Oliver said
every agency he contacted regarding their experiences has been the
same.. the members are disruptive, assaultive and combative. There
is no evidence of gainful employment.
Arcadia Police Officer Ed Winter, said in part that prior to affiliating
with the Arcadia Police Department he was a police officer in the City
of Pacific Grove and was assigned to the narcotics division working
undercover throughout that area including Big Sur, where possible
runaway juveniles were hiding out or living in a Krishna commune.
During an investigation a purchase of one key of marajuana was made
from three members of the Krishna group. An arrest was made and a
conviction in court. There was continuous trouble in the City with
harassment of employees, the merchants and customers in the business
district. In some instances they were unable to produce identification..
He noted that there was a policy of the organization to remove all
worldly identification at which time they take on another name which
the Church gives.and that is not a legal and valid name.
Joel Schanker said in part that he considers it an irresponsible
oversight on the part of the City with relation to a financial statement
which is always considered confidential and he could not see why it
should be made public.... that they deal with the public every day in
the major cities of the world and it would follow that there would be
some who feel they were not treated nicely for one reason or another..
that they also receive letters of appreciation for the canvassing
work of the representatives. That he could easily furnish those
letters. He said he has never heard of the things mentioned by the
police officers. He had however heard of the Laguna Beach case.
Mayor Parry said in part that there is no quarrel with views or
opinions as long as it does not interfere with another's right and by
a spirited approach. That in his opinion based on the testimony thus
far with the specific instances where there has been actual inter-
ference -- that is what he objects to. Everyone is entitled to his
right or his own view which the Constitution guarantees - still
everyone has the right to be free of a forced view being placed upon
him. That the Constitution could be taken to prove or disprove
almost anything. In response to a question Mr. Schanker said he
wouldn't deny the spirited approach of some of its members. That
to be approached in such a manner is not the rule but an exception.
He does not do soliciting but he knows that classes are held and
there are instances where a member isn't sufficiently trained. In
conclusion Mr. Schanker said in part that the City has the re-
sponsibility of limiting the time, places and circumstances for public
safety.... and he submitted a decision cited in the United States
Supreme Court concerning a State's power to prevent or punish when
there is clear and present danger of riot, disorder, interference
with traffic upon public streets or other immediate threat to public
safety, peace or order appears, but the State may not unduly suppress
free communication of views, religious or other guises of conserving
desirable conditions.
Councilman Saelid referred to the concern expressed by Mr. Schanker
concerning the contents of his application and submitted material
and reminded him that he is applying for a religious solicitation
permit which implies a public trust and the information is public
and available for public scrutiny...if that is not to his liking the
application may always be withdrawn. Mr. Schanker responded in part
7-5-78
- 5 -
HEARING
(Apartment
Conversion)
APPROVED
/~ 1R-
/ .' I
, I: ()
jS 1. I
23:9586
that he knows the application is public but not the confidential
information of the corporation.
The City Attorney said in part that the public has a right to know
where funds are going and the only way they can find that out is to
examine the financial statement - they have a right in this instance
because Krishna will be soliciting funds in this City. The City
Attorney then brought to the attention of Mr. Schanker excerpts from
articles which have been submitted to the City and one indicated
that a head member of the Krishna Society had written "that there is
a misconception that the Movement represents a Hindu religion.. that
it is in no way a faith or religion.. it seeks to defeat other faiths
or religion.. rather it is an essential sectarian faith...that the
Movement has nothing to do with the Hindu religion or any system of 1
re1igion~ He noted other charges in some of the submitted material.
Mr. Schanker said they are just charges. When asked if he was aware
of any other arrests or prosecutions, convictions for fraud where
Krishna members have been so charged Mr. Schanker said he did not,
although he was familiar with Germany cases.. which were thrown out
of court.
Jeff Dring, 205 Alice Street, was advised that the fact Mr. Schanker
signed the application as Secretary and then sa~d he was not sbou1d be
taken into consideration.
Dave Robinson, 144 A1ta Street, suggested that the City Attorney check
to see if Schanker is the legal name of the applicant and does he have
a right to use it on legal documents. Mr. Schanker responded that it is
his legal name; that as far as signing the application is concerned he is
the official representative designated by the Trustees to make applications
and it hasn't been brought up before by any of the Cities --- He is not
the Secretary of the Corporation, and someone else could be designated.
In response to the question about the age of the solicitors Mr. Schanker
said in part that 'there is no set policy; that it would have to be
someone old enough to carryon a conversation.
At this time the City Council entered an executive session and
reconvened - Mayor Parry requested Mr. Schanker to provide a balance
sheet of the last fiscal year including a current profit and loss
statement for the last fiscal year - both certified by a California
Public Accountant. These to be submitted to the City Attorney no
later than August 1, 1978. He advised that the public hearing would
be continued to August 15, 1978 when all Councilmen will be present;
that after receiving any additional testimony and information it is
anticipated that a definite decision will be made one way or another.
Appeal filed by James O. Vandervoort from the decision of the Planning
Commission in its denial of his application to convert an apartment
complex at 1122 - 1128 Fairview Avenue into a condominium. It was
noted in the staff report that the apartment was constructed in 1971
and Mr. Vandervoort plans to bring it into compliance with the
building code.Modifications were requested for side and rear yard
setbacks, building length, distance between buildings and required
parking... It is deficient by five parking spaces.
1
Mayor Parry declared the hearing open and the applicant addressed
the City Council and referred to a comprehensive brochure which he
had submitted for Council's consideration and noted the security
parking would prohibit others from parking on the property and would
also prohibit trade vehicles from blocking access. He felt the
security parking should be considered as opposed to the number of
guest parking spaces which are required. He said the parking on the
street has never been a problem for the tenants and asked the City
Council to grant his appeal.
During this consideration Ray Copley of Loren Phillips and Associates,
137 E. Huntington Drive, noted other conversions which have been
approved recently and asked the City Council to favorably consider
this one.
7-5-78
- 6 -
1
HEARING
(Nuisance
barking
dog)
(JAN. 2, 1979)
1
HEARING
(CABLE TV)
JULY 18
f ~"l ~
"'.' ". I
23:9587
Jay Scatchard, 1122-1128 Fairview, said he has lived in the complex
for over a year and that parking has never been a problem and he felt
the security parking would be an asset to the tenants.
Irene Castleman, 1137 Fairview, said in part that parking is a problem.
Her apartment building is across the street and said the parking should
comply with the, Code.
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Margett and carried
unanimously.
Three of the Councilmen felt the conversion would be an improvement
providing the building is brought up to Code as agreed to by the
applicant especially with the security parking. Councilman Margett,
however, felt there will be many such requests and that the policy
should be strictly adhered to and was opposed to granting the request.
It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino
and carried on roll call vote as follows that the appeal be granted
and that the tentative map of Tract No. 35210 and Modification M-78-57
be and it is hereby APPROVED subject to conditions specified.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT :
Councilmen Pellegrino, Saelid, Parry
Councilman Margett
Councilman Gilb
Pursuant to complaints received concerning a barking dog at 165 W.
Arthur Avenue, the owner was notified to be present at this hearing
to see what could be done to resolve the matter. The owner, Mrs. Gail
Denson, addressed the City Council and said in part they are endeavoring
to train the dog which is about 14 months old; that there are many
young people in the home and fuey play with the dog and he does
bark but that there are other dogs in the neighborhood and she thinks
at times the neighbors are hearing the other dogs. One police officer
had waited out an hour and said he did not hear the dog barking -
however, another said he had. Mrs. Denson said they will continue to
try to keep the dog from barking.
One of the signers of the petition, Dave Szany, 150 W. Las Flores
Avenue, said the situation has improved and he can hear the Densons
trying to train the dog; that he has two dogs and they bark when
strangers approach the home. He thanked Mrs. Denson for her endeavor
to train her dog and said dogs are part of a family.
The hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Sae lid, seconded by"
Councilman Marge tt and carried unanimous ly. It was the consensus that"
the complaint should be RECEIVED and the report filed;' that if ,the '.. ,'.
situation continues it should be brought back to Council.. that it""'"
appears there will be a remedy. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman
Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino and carried on roll call
vote as follows that the matter be FILED for the time being and
CONTINUED for six months.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino, Saelid,' Parry
None
Councilman Gilb
The City Council received the proposed draft to provide for the
granting of a franchise for a cable TV system for a period of 10
years to Teleprompter, Inc., the current franchisee. Because there
are still some areas to be resolved between both parties in the
agreement the Assistant City Manager suggested the matter be continued
to give staff and Teleprompter an opportunity to discuss these areas
with the attorney for the company and the legal counsel for the City.
Mayor Parry declared the hearing open and Attorney John Nolan
7 - 5- 78
- 7 -
23:9588
discussed some of the language and said he could meet with staff and
endeavor to come to a meeting of the minds. He would redline any
changes so Council could consider them in detail.
Clifford Peterson, 294 W. Foothill Boulevard, asked if Teleprompter
has any plans to expand its TV coverage and Mr. Nolan responded in
part that in order to expand to unserved areas they would have to
have some reasonable expectation of return. It was submitted that if
Mr. Peterson could secure sufficient signatures of those in his
neighborhood to sign up and then petition the City, Teleprompter
would, under the franchise, install the service at the standard rate.
Bruce Douglas, Southern California District Manager for Teleprompter,
Inc., said they would work with staff to work out a schedule for
solicitation within the area to survey if there is an adequate market
for the service.
1
Jeff Dring, 205 Alice, asked the City Council to be cautious in this
transaction and hoped it would not be an exclusive franchise.
It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Pellegrino
and carried on roll call vote that the current franchise period be and it
is hereby extended to September 1 and that the public hearing be
continued to July 18. A proposed ordinance will also be ready for
Council consideration at that time, and all changes will be redlined.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino, Saelid, Parry
None
Councilman Gilb
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Jeff Dring, 205 Alice Street, was advised that the City Council has
not as yet made any determination on the State surplus funds; that
some discussion will have to be in executive session and the decision
will be made in public meeting. He was also advised by the Finance
Director on fund transfers. Mr. Dring asked Councilmen Margett and
Saelid if they would reconsider their position taken on the tax raising
ordinances. He was also advised that the budget had been adopted
except for a few factors. Councilman Saelid responded that once it
has been established how the financing will be and if it is found that
revenue sources have been provided over and above what is necessary
for those essential services he would be one of the first to consider
rescinding all of them.
Mr. Dring said he feels obligated to inform Council that a committee
is being formed to either undo or repeal the ordinances and make an
effort to overcome what in his opinion was an action of the City
Council which did not represent the majority.
Mrs. Sherry Passmore, 1109 Columbia Road, was advised by the City 1
Attorney on certain legal provisions.. specifically Section 419 of .
the City Charter and Section 23a Article IV of the State Constitution
relative to tax levies... also a State Supreme Court decision in
support. Mrs. Passmore was advised to consult with the Finance
Director regarding the financial status of the A!cadia Redevelopment
Agency.
Mrs. Jane Winberg, 122 White Oak Avenue, felt the budget should be
based on this year's needs only.
Louise Werner, 878 Monte Verde Drive, spoke to parking in the City's
new parking lot on Wheeler opposite the main post office. She felt
the design was not conducive to proper parking and said her car was
defaced on one side when she parked there. She felt the spaces were
not wide enough for the large cars.. Staff will check it out.
7-5-78
- 8 -
HEARING
SEPTEMBER 19
1 HEARING
AUGUST 15
P "
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
APPROVED
HEARING
AUGUST 1
p:
PARCEL
MAP
p:
PARCEL
MAP
STREET
MAINTENANCE
17l
BLOCK
PARTY
23:9589
Richard D r Evelyn, 42 W. Grandview Avenue, expressed disappointment
that Councilman Sae1id voted for the utility tax which he felt is
difficult to collect and no way to control it as utility rates
increase.
CONSENT ITEMS
On MOTION by Councilman Sae1id, . seconded by Councilman Margett and
carried on roll call vote as follows the CONSENT ITEMS were APPROVED.
Scheduled a public hearing for SEPTEMBER 19 on the Planning Commission
recommendation for an amendment to Chapter 17, Section 1704 of the
Uniform Building Code, 1973 Edition, pertaining to roof coverings in
Fire Zone 4, Zone R-M and all property north of Elkins Avenue.
Scheduled a public hearing for AUGUST 15 on Planning Commission
recommendation concerning a conditional use permit to operate an
entertainment facility at 1020 S. Baldwin Avenue.
APPROVED a conditional use permit (Planning Commission Res. No. 1054).
for auto polishing and cleaning of auto interiors at 420 N. Santa
Anita Avenue.
Scheduled a public hearing for AUGUST 1 on Planning Commission
Resolution No. 1055 which granted a conditional use permit to use
four classrooms for school purposes at 21 Morlan Place
APPROVED the tentative parcel map at 215 W. Las Flores Avenue ---
with a substandard lot width.
APPROVED the tentative parcel map at 232 S. Second Avenue requiring
street dedications. .'
APPROVED plans and specifications and gave authorization to advertise
for bids on the annual street maintenance project A. C. Overlay and
Gutter.
APPROVED request for a block party on July 15 and to temporarily
close Sycamore Avenue east of Second Avenue.. subject to conditions.
Scheduled public hearing for JULY 12 at 6 p.m. on the proposed parking
district at Baldwin and Fairview.
HEARING ,/,
JULY 12 II"
16 p.m.
WORK . ACCEPTED work performed by Aman Brothers, Inc., in the construction
ACCEPTED r) 3(,2. of public parking and street work for Assessment District No. 76-1
(Job No. 32-321).
M D S . ( ,.
. 115.)
r.
DENTAL /,
PLAN
APPROVED modifications to the Joint Powers Agreement between the City
of Anaheim and Municipal Data Systems.
The City has provided a group dental plan for all employees and their
dependents since 1975 which provides coverage under a fee schedule
with employee premium paid by the City and dependent costs paid by
the employee. Staff recommends a change from a contractural agreement
with an insurance company to a self-fund program. Reasons for the
change are in a staff report dated June 30.
7-5-78
- 9 -
23:9590
It was MOVED by Councilman Margett, seconded by Councilman Saelid and
carried that the program be approved and the contract presented to
Council at the next regular meeting - July 18.
ROLL CALL VOTE ON AU. CONSENT ITEMS ON PAGE 9.
RESOLUTION /
NO. 4761 ../
ADOPTED
HEARING . /
SCHEDULED V
AUGUST 1
CLAIM
ApPROVED
(Lub in)
v
ADJ~NT
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino, Saelid, Parry
None
Councilman Gilb
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4761 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE
COSTS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION REGUlATIONS."
It was MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by youncilman Margett and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of the
full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
1
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino, Saelid, Parry
None
Councilman Gilb
It was MOVED by Councilman Pellegrino, seconded by Councilman Margett
and carried on roll call vote as follows that the public hearing on
the proposed Handicapped Parking Ordinance be scheduled for AUGUST 1.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino, Saelid, Parry
None
Councilman Gilb
On recommendation of the City Attorney the property damage claim of
Ruth Lubin was APPROVED for payment in the amount of $374.08 upon
receipt of a release executed by claimant in form and content
approved by the City Attorney.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Margett, Pellegrino, Saelid, Parry
None
Councilman Gilb
The meeting adjourned in memory of,Ralph Thorsen to Wednesday July 12
at 6 p.m.
ATTEST:
~
hristine Van Maanen
City Clerk
,
1
9..iBC o~
~.~~
City Clerk -
7-5-78
. - 10 -