HomeMy WebLinkAboutJULY 19,1977_2
22: 9263
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
I
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MlNUTE
APPROVAL
HEARING
(HlLLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT)
I
I
I/.
()..V-1H
OIV
\ . CHAPTER 70
UNIFORM BLDG.
CODE (1976)
Staff to
proceed
MlNUTES
ClTY COUNClL OF THE ClTY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 19, 1977
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, met in regular session on
Tuesday, July 19, 1977 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the
Arcadia City Hall.
Rev. Paul Cheney, Emmanuel Assembly of God
Mayor Protempore David Parry
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
On MOTlON by Councilman Margett, seconded by Councilman Parry and
carried unanimously the minutes of the regular meeting of July 5,
1977 were APPROVED.
CONTINUED - Planning Commission Resolution No. 988 recommending
approval of a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance establishing an
R-M Residential Mountainous single family zone. At the Council
meeting of July 5 Council continued this hearing to permit time for
written input and for review of those remarks. Communications had
been received from S.A.V.E., A. R. Coke, W. T. Beckwith, Russell C.
Graham and Norman Lieberman. Council has received copies of these
comments and staff submitted an analysis of these observations in
its report of July 19. lt was noted therein that the moratorium on
the development of hillside property expires on December 21, 1977.
A proposed Ordinance (No. 1587) had been prepared and submitted for
Council's consideration. Concern was expressed on the recommended
6% street grade and a modification clause was suggested whereby under
certain circumstances a modification for a higher or steeper street
could be considered. Council reviewed a percentage map of some of
the streets in the Highlands area indicating grades which varied from
6% to 15% with the road into the Wilderness area 20%.
Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and John Haigh, 1250 Oakglen,
asked Council to depart from the procedure to the extent that an item
concerning Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code (1976) could be
considered prior to continuing with the subject before Council. ln
order to do so it was MOVED by Councilman Margett, seconded by Council
Member Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that the
provisions of the procedural Ordinance be waived.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
This Chapter regulates excavation and grading and the staff report
identified the more significant differences between this Chapter and
those grading regulations contained in the City's Code Sections 8610
through 8658.1. lt was submitted by staff that there are a number
of sections in the existing City code which should be retained and
7-19-77
- 1 -
22: 9264
these pertain mostly to fees, maintainance, landscaped and irrigation
provisions which are not reflected in the Uniform Building Code.
These are set forth in the report dated July 5, 1977.
It was MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilman Margett and
carried ,on roll call vote as follows that Council declare its intent
to adopt the Chapter 70 with modifications and that staff be directed
to initiate proceedings for Council consideration of adopting Chapter
70 of the Uniform Building Code and for the retention of certain
existing Arcadia Municipal Code sections relative to City work,
excavations in the public right of way, requirement of estimating
starting and completion times on the permit application, fees,
expiration of permits, denial of permits, appeal of such denials,
revocation of permits, maintenance, planting and irrigation re-
quirements.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
I
Mr. Haigh then continued his presentation on behalf of the S.A.V.E.
group and thanked Council for its efforts in keeping the residents
informed on the status of the proposed ordinance for hillside
development. A show of hands indicated a large attendance of those
residents. He felt the Planning Commission and the City Council
have shown insight in ascertaining what is and is not good development
which is evidenced in the community. He evinced interest in guidelines
being made available for those interested in the development of the
unique hillside area.
Phil Latiolait, 1227 Highland Oaks Drive, read his comments which
in summary concerned the size of a lot (15,000 sq. ft.) for a
hillside home. He felt a provision should be included indicating
that no development would be allowed in certain mountainous areas..
He suggested the inclusion of "no building structure shall exceed
for instance II meters in height." Also "cuts and fills shall not
exceed 2 on horizontal and 1 on vertical".. "minimum curb to curb
shall be 11 meters", which would allow for wider streets if the City
so required. He suggested a speed limit be established for those
streets.
Jim Currie, 1691 Alta Oaks Drive, as an architect submitted interest
in maintaining the natural character of the existing terrain and a
level of quality consistent with adjacent residential areas. He
also suggested that Section 9250.5.8 read "ridge and crestlines
shall be preserved wherever possible." He then referred to an
environmental impact report.. that this is the responsibility of the
City for the quality and objectivity of the report. The Planning
Director submitted the manner in which this is done within the City.
Clifford Anderson, attorney with offices at 301 E. Colorado, Suite I
704, Pasadena, legal representative for S.A.V.E. suggested some type
of follow up be provided in order for those interested to be aware
of what is taking place in the future. He referred to the inclusion
in the proposed ordinance of a modification proviso which he felt
would be unnecessary when there is a variance procedure. He felt a
6% grade should be the minim~ He reaffirmed confidence in the
Council and its interest in the welfare of the citizens and urged
the adoption of the proposed ordinance together with Chapter 70 of
the UBC.
William Beckwith, 107 W. Huntington Drive, referred to his communication
which was suhmitted previously in response to suggestion from Council
and in s~ry stated that in his opinion the property cannot be
developed with the 6 to 8 percent grades proposed. Grades in excess
of 15 percent were noted. Without such a grade differential he could
not develop his property and it would eliminate the possibilty of
7-19-77
- 2 -
22: 9265
I
additional access to the property from Hillcrest Drive in Monrovia.
He felt this is essential for circulation of traffic, utilities and
additional outlet for surface drainage. He felt the 15,000 sq. ft.
minimum lot size should be changed to 15,000 sq. ft. average lot
size as some would be more and some would be less. Reference was
made to a subdivision in which he, has interest (Tract No. 27195) and
which the Planning Commission had recommended approval some years ago.
He said considerable work had been done on this tract in excavating,
drainage and water. He had asked in his communication that this
tract be excluded from the R-M zoning so it could be completed as
originally planned which would eliminate cutting the hill where it was
previously cut. He also mentioned the possibility of land-locked
property to the north which would not be accessible from the City if
the 6 percent grade were adhered to.
Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde, suggested a prov~s~on be included
in the proposed ordinance whereby the City would not be liable in the
event of unforeseen landslides, cave-ins due to weather erosion,
earthquakes, etc. The City Attorney advised that this could be done if
so directed by the City Council..the development permit could perhaps
require the developer to hold the City harmless by agreement.
Gordon Maddock, 906 S. Baldwin spoke in part to other areas of the
City which are being developed and also expressed concern if the
ordinance would be legal or binding if property became landlocked due
to the 6% grade under consideration. He was advised of the modi-
fication procedure to be included which would make it possible for the
Council if it should so decide to grant an increase.
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Councilman Gilb, seconded by Council Member Lauber and carried unani-
mously.
The following observations were then made by the individual Council
members. Council Member Lauber stated in part that,she appreciated
the work done by the homeowners group and the city st'aff. She
submitted she was 98 percent in favor of the proposed ordinance,
however, she would like to refrain from tying an architect's hands
which would keep him from using his imagination and ingenuity. She
would like to see some leeway in the approach to the property and
noted that the first priority is to try not to scalp the mountains
and to limit the grade to 6 percent would bring about more scarring;
she felt it is too rest~ictive and almost ties a developer's hands
with such a grade. She would like to have legislation in the beginning
to avoid as many modifications and variances as possible.
I
Councilman Parry stated in part that he would like to keep the ordinance
as restrictive as possible and that if a reasonable plan were presented
which would require greater than the 6 percent grade it could be
considered under the modification clause as well as lots which might
be OVer or under the 15,000 sq. ft. provision. He is generally in
agreement with the ordinance other than some of the wording.
Councilman Gilb questioned whether or not the inclusion of the new
modification clause would solve most of the problems which may be
encountered... lt was explained that an application initially goes
to the Planning Commission and that if a modification is requested
that will not only go to the Commission but to the Council. Mr. Gilb
suggested a curb-to-curb width of 11 meters.
Councilman Margett stated in part that an ordinance should be adopted
wherein a quality development could come in. He was in favor of the
modification opportunity. Fairness to the residents and community is
paramount but he did not want to discourage developers due to the
grade and other requirements such as the EIR for instance.
Mayor Saelid remarked in part, for the benefit of a speaker who felt
7-19-77
- 3 -
22: 9266
density should be primary in the proposed ordinance, ..that this is
one of the weaknesses in the Arcadia Municipal Code and it applies to
all residential zones.. it is one of the priorities of the Planning
Department.. to go through the code and restructure certain sections.
,
Council then reviewed the ordinance page by ~age.
Page 1 through 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page II
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
- no change
- deleted the words "except slopes" in the
second line of Section 9250.3.8
- 9250.4.2 "B" to read "Curb to curb width
shall not be less than 11 meters (36.1 feet).
"D" to read "Maximum grade of streets shall
not exceed 10 percent for transition roads I
in the areas where driveways are not located
and 6 percent for all others."
- 9250.4.3 - MODIFICATIONS. The City Council
in the exercise of sound, reasonable judgment
and by express findings entered in the Council
minutes, that proof of necessity has been
presented that a modification to the requirements
of this Title is necessary by reason of the
size, shape, topography, or other conditions
of the property or of adjacent property, may,
by majority vote, grant such modifications
to this Title as are not in violation of the
Subdivision Map Act, and as are not inconsistent
wi th the General Plan."
- 9250.5 "A" delete "except as provided in
this Title.
- 9250.5.2 "G" change to City Engineer.
- 9250.5.5 - Filing Fee - delete first line
with reference to fee for under 15,000 sq. ft.
- no change
- Add No. 5 and readjust the numbering and
have No. 2 read "would adversely affect
existing developments or regard future
development in this zone."
- 9250.5.9 - second line - should read "within
125 days"
- The City Attorney suggested the inclusion
of a provision to bring action of the Planning
Commission before Council.
- 9250.5,12 Modifications .. add after the word
Commission 4th line "providing such modifi-
cations do not expand the size or intensity of
development and is not otherwise inconsistent
with the information contained in the public
notice. II
lt was then MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilman Parry
and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council finds this will I
not have an adverse effect on the environment; that Council hereby
indicates its intent to adopt this' ordinance and that same be referred
to staff to make such word changes and/or additions as directed by
Council at this meeting. The ordinance will come before Council at its
next regular meeting (August 2).
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
7-19-77
- 4 -
HEARlNG
(BINGO)
AUGUS T 2
HEARlNG
APPEAL
(C.U.P. )
I
DENlED
.) 'JIJr
\ ,.1""
I
~',~. !",':::~~~.1.:". ;':~~~.
22:9267
The public hearing scheduled on the application of the Foothill
Jewish Temple (Men's Group) will be continued to August 2 at which
time the attorney for the organization advises all required data
will be available.
An application filed by Orlando Clarizio for a conditional use permit
to allow a board and care facility at 716-728 W. Camino Real was
denied by the Planning Commission on July 28. This denial was sub-
sequently appealed by the applicant and the matter is now before
Council. The Commission's Resolution No. 990 sets forth the
findings... that the density is not appropriate for the neighborhood,
the development too dense for the site, insufficient parking space,
the requested height of the building is inappropriate, a minimal
amount of open and recreational space with relationship to the density
and the buildings would be too close to the street. ln response to
an inquiry the Planning Director said in part that the proposed
density would be less than a new retirement hotel on Duarte Road.
Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and Henry Hege, 550 W. Duarte
Road, representing the applicant, Orlando Clarizio, stated in part
that the subject property is surrounded by a service station on the
north in a C-2 zone; on the south there is a convalescent hospital
owned by the applicant and a vacant R-3 lot to the east and property
across the street is zoned R-3 and C-O. The facility is a comparatively
new concept for persons who have reached their later years and desire
board and care although they are well and ambulatory. There would be
recreational facilities inside and out and would be a nice place in
which to reside. There would be 108 units which is one unit for each
746 sq. ft. of area. An investigation of similar facilities indicates
that not more than 30 percent of the units would be double-occupancy
or a total of approximately, 140 persons...not the figure which was
used as a comparison based upon the number of beds. Mr. Hege continued
in part that a statement was made before the Planning Commission that
the parking was inadequate and that an investigation discloses that
only about 15 percent of the occupants have automobiles...which means
there would be about 24 cars and with the proposed 55 parking spaces
this would be more than ample.
The basic history indicates in 1968 a combination convalescent home
and board and, care center was approved for this location for 252 persons.
This proposal included another lot...both units were to be built con-
currently. There was no trouble in obtaining the financing for the
convalescent hospital but the board and care facility was such a new
concept at that time that financing was not available. Approval was
also given in 1975 for a board and care facility. As far as the 30'
height of the building is concerned this is consistent with the Code and
the location of the building (25' from the street) is the same as any
other building in an R-3 zone would be located.
He continued that an apartment complex could be constructed with 48
units at 2.4 persons per unit amounting to approximately 120 residents
which would bring more noise, more vehicular traffic along with other
distractions. He concluded by submitting in part that the facility is
not to be considered a hotel but an attractive home for well older
persons. There would not be medical services. He asked for favorable
consideration and stated in part that the Planning Department did
recommend approval of this and that it is permitted under the Code and
would not be detrimental to the public health,and welfare and will not
be injurious to the property and would provide the City with a
facility for which there is great need and will be advantageous to the
City.
Eugene Fickas, architect, 107 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia,explored in
depth the plans for the facility which would cost approximately two
and one half million dollars. Size of the various rooms, hallways,
lounge rooms, dining areas, etc, were described at length. Most rooms
7-19-77
- 5 -
22:9268
would have a private patio or balcony...no cooking would be allowed
in the rooms. Plans for the outside were explained... There would
be a pool, sauna, landscaped areas and other amenities planned for
the enjoyment of the residents.' He submitted that in a few years this
type of facility will be much in demand and noted that the traffic
and noise connected with it would be much less than with most any other
type of improvement on the subject property. He felt this improvement
would provide a buffer between the existing service station and the
convalescent home.
Speaking in opposition: Don Curry, 705 W. Callita, compared the
parking required for this proposed facility with the existing retirement
hotel on Duarte. He felt the parking would be inadequate and said
after discussing the matter with the retirement hotel management he I
felt it would not be successful as the latter is not fully occupied
at this time. He felt the persons who would occupy the new facility
would not be able to care for themselves; that it is not needed in
the area and expressed concern that the area is becoming medical
oriented... He did not like the idea of the extra footage required
for the air conditioning units, etc., on the roof of the 30' building.
He referred to the action of the Planning Commission and asked Council
to abide by that.
Sheila Curry, 705 Callita, spoke in opposition and felt it is not
needed inasmuch as the retirement hotel on Duarte is not full. She
referred to some of the patients from the convalescent home next
door to this 'proposed facility walking around the area and felt this
should not be duplicated.
The City Clerk read into the record a communication from Mrs. A. H.
Stephens, 741 W. Camino Real,in opposition to the facility because
of the parking which she felt would be inadequate but would be in
favor if the applicant would consent to providing more spaces if it
were proven they were needed.
Mr. Hege responded that with reference to the remarks made about the
convalescent hospital that it is not a locked facility like an
institution - and could imagine that upon occasion there might be
persons who would want to wander about...but that is not the matter
before Council at this time. Those in the proposed board and care
home would be ambulatory, able to take care of themselves and are not
the same type of persons who are in need of the medical services
provided by a convalescent home.
The applicant, Orlando Clarizio, 1415 Orlando Drive, said on behalf
of the convalescent hospital that in 13 years there has never been an
accident and that his proposed facility would not care for those in
need of medical services and in response to a question said that the
Fire Department has at certain times made requirements with which he
has complied.
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member Parry and carried
unanimously.
Council Member Lauber stated in part that she had questioned the success
of the retirement hotel on Duarte Road from the very first.. its rooms
are small, only 165 sq. ft., whereas the proposed facility would have
195 sq. ft. rooms and that actually Council should not concern itself
about the success or failure of a business as it relates to the denial
or approval of a project and referred to the free enterprise system.
She could not understand the action of the Commission in its denial
because for some years Mr. Clarizio has been endeavoring to improve
the property with something along this line. As far as people wandering
around this happens in residential sections when people do not have all
their faculties. The proposed facility would be quite different from
a convalescent hospital. She was not concerned about the parking
because most of the older people do not drive any longer, and noted
that the proposed facility is in a proper zone.
I
7-19-77
- 6 -
I
I
HEARING
(FRONT YARD
REQUIREMENTS)
./.
~' 1~-I. \ A'-i.
, \)\
\',
~ ,.\1,;
.; .'.~'-~"r
'. ~." :. " -.~
"
22:9269
Councilman Parry explored the reasons the Commission denied the project
and felt there would be a parking problem because the residents would
have visitors. He felt the renderings were most attractive, however,
the Commission did feel strongly in the areas of density, insufficient
parking, building height, the need for more open space and the
closeness of the buildings to the street. He would uphold the Commission.
Councilman Gilb said in part that he would support the Commission and
noted the vote for denial which was 7 to 0 and submitted that he had
heard nothing different at this hearing from what was, considered by
the Commission.
Councilman Margett agreed and submitted that he was concerned about
the success or failure of a business.
Mayor Saelid agreed with the findings of the Commission and submitted
that undoubtedly there will be a need for this type of facility and
what is being proposed is attractive, but the particular location in
his opinion is not proper for the type of improvement.
The City Attorney submitted in part that basically the board and care
facility as defined in the City's Code allows meals, lodging and care,
however, a retirement hotel or hotel per se only allows lodging and
meals. It does not allow care. A board and care facility under the
Code is only allowed in R-2, R-3 or C-O zone on a conditional use
permit. The hotel is more of a commercial use and is allowed in a
C-2 zone or less restrictive zone.
It was MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilman Margett and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the appeal be DENIED and that
the Planning Commission recommendation for denial be SUSTAlNED based
on the following findings set forth in Resolution No. 990:
1. The density is not appropriate for the neighborhood
and is too dense for the R-3 zoning.
2. The development is too dense for the subject site.
3. lnsufficient parking.
4. No justification for granting the increased building
height and the height requested is inappropriate for the
area and the zoning.
S. Minimal amount of open and recreational space in
relationship to the density.
6. Proposed buildings are too close to the street.
7. A conditional use permit could be detrimental to the
public health and welfare and injurious to the property
or improvements in such vicinity.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Margett, Parry, Saelid
Council Member Lauber
None
Planning Commission Resolution No. 992 recommending approval of a
Text Amendment (77-3) which would amend the front yard requirements in
R-3 zone to restrict vehicular accessways. The Commission felt that
under this proposed amendment it would still be possible to pave an
entire front yard with pedestrian accessways and that at least 50
percent of the required front yard should be irrigated and landscaped
with lawn, etc. This passed on a 4 to 2 vote and the dissenting
Commissioners indicated the text amendment would not allow for design
ingenuity and felt the Commission should be encouraging water con-
servation instead of requiring that more land be irrigated. The
Planning Department prepared a Negative Declaration for this project.
Saelid
Mayor/declared the hearing open and no one desiring to be heard the
hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Council Member Lauber, seconded by
Councilman Parry and carried unanimously.
It was further MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Councilman
7-19-77
- 7 -
MASS
TRANSIT
(COUNTY)
~:(r
HEARINGS
jSCHEDULED
AUGUST 16
jAUGUST 2
/ UNIFORM BLDC.
CODE CHAPTER
70-1976
TRACT
NO. 25304
Tentative
Map APPROVED
o (J0
'{ " ..J
INDUSTRIAL
BUILDlNGS
124 N. Second
HEARING
AUGUST 16
.;
MORATORIUM
AREA
DEVELOPMENT
Referred to
Planning
Commission
~\lf\l",
AWARD OF
CONTRACT
Annual Street
Maintenance
(DAMON
CONSTRUCTIO~ ~
CO.) t \''}'r'''' j)
22:9270
Parry and carried unanimously that the Negative Declaration be
APPROVED and FILED and that Council finds the project will not have
a significant effect on the environment and that the appropriate
amendment be prepared.
Gerald B. Leonard, Senior Deputy, Transit Specialist, Los Angeles
County, Office of Supervisor Baxter Ward, spoke at length concerning
a new concept in mass transportation for Los Angeles County. He
circulated material setting forth the present situation, the pending
'problem, transit development and an introduction to construction and
operating costs. He submitted intention to present the concept to as
many Chambers of Commerce, Homeowner Associations, etc., as possible
in an endeavor to pinpoint local problems in consort with the sub-
mitted regional plan.
I
Planning Commission Resolution No. 993 recommending General Plan
amendments for the area bounded on the north and east by the Foothill
Freeway, on the south by La Porte and on the west by Santa Anita -
AUGUST 16.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 994 recommending a zone change
from PR-3, C-2D and PR-2 to PR-3 and a change in zone from PR-2 to
C-2 for 200 sq. ft. located in the northwest corner of the property
adjacent to Baldwin, for 850 S. Baldwin and 653 Fairview - AUGUST 2.
This matter had been acted upon during consideration of the first
item. (Hillside development)
On recommendation of the Planning Commission it was MOVED by
Councilman Parry, seconded by Councilman Margett and carried unani-
mously that the Negative Declaration prepared for the tentative map
of Tract No. 25304 (six lot subdivision at 1100-1110 S. Fourth
Avenue) be APPROVED and FlLED; that Council finds the project will
not have a significant effect on the environment; that the tentative
map be APPROVED subject to conditions outlined in the staff report
of July 19 and that the Director of Public Works be authorized to
execute the Subdivision Agreement.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 995 recommended approval of a Land
Use Permit for the development of property at 124 N. Second. The
resolution sets forth the findings and conditions of approval. lt was
noted in the report that Condition 12 requires that the application
be subject to the approval of Council and Condition 10 requires the
proposed plans be submitted to and subject to the approval of the
Redevelopment Agency. Because of this and in order for the property
owner to have the opportunity of input before the Council a public I
hearing scheduled for AUGUST 16 and on the same date the matter will
be before the Redevelopment Agency.
Council received the final staff report on the development moratorium
area bounded by Santa Clara, Fifth, Huntington Drive and Second. The
report has not been reviewed by the Planning Commission. On
recommendation of staff it was MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by
Councilman Parry and carried unanimously that the report be referred
to the Commission for review and comment and that staff initiate the
amendments to the General Plan as recommended in this report. This
will make it possible for the Commission to consider concurrently
both the report and the proposed General Plan amendment.
Council received the results' of bids received and the recommendation
for the award of contract for the 1976-77 Annual Street Maintenance
7-19-77
- 8 -
I
AWARD OF
CONTRACT
(SWRRY SEAL)
PAVEMENT
COATINGS CO.
...)" ~
"', \? \... V
r'
TRAFFIC
SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT
Rate
Increased
.('-
1
(
/1)
I .
, ~
I
FEDERAL AID
URBAN SYSTEM
(Streets to
be included)
II;. P
., t U
(. J'
?;,'. ~;y-'j' !'-.'~';~'~ '-
.,~... ....~ or' r......':;
22: 9271
Program, A. C. Overlay and Gutter Construction, Job No. 460. Con-
currently, the County Road Department awarded a contract to Vernon
Paving Company for the resurfacing of Michillinda Avenue. A portion
of that roadway is within the City and payment for this work is the
City's responsibility. This is estimated to cost $1,000.
It was MOVED by Councilman Margett, seconded by Councilman Parry and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the Director of Public Works
be authorized to include resurfacing of the portion of Michillinda
Avenue within the City limits in this year's maintenance program and
that $80,000 be appropriated from State Gas"Tax Funds' 'to cover costs
for both projects as well as engineering, inspection and contingencies....
and that a contract in the amount of $73,799.60 be awarded to DAMON
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, that all other bids be rejected; that any
informalities or irregularities in the bids or bidding process be
WAIVED and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute a
contract in form approved by the City Attorney.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
Council received the result of bids and recommendation for the award
of contract for the 1976-77 Street Maintenance Program (Slurry Seal)
Job No. 459. This project consists of slurry sealing various City
streets as part of the annual maintenance program and will be financed
from State Gas Tax Funds. It was MOVED by Councilman Margett, seconded
by Councilman Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that the
contract be awarded to the low bidder, Pavement Coatings Co., in the
amount of $33,777.00; that all other bids be rejected; that any
informalities or irregularities in the bids or bidding process be
WAIVED and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the
contract in form approved by the City Attorney.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
Staff advised that the contract with Signal Maintenance, Inc.,
terminates August 31 of this year and may be extended prior to that
date without going to bid if Council finds it to the City's advantage.
The Company has requested an increase in the contract rate and the
contract permits this if the request is in 60 days prior to the
termination date. This is due primarily to the increase in the
company's liability insurance. It was MOVED by Councilman Gilb,
seconded by Councilman Hargett and carried on roll call vote as
follows that the routine monthly maintenance charge be approved for
increase to $2.96 effective September 1, 1977. The total monthly
maintenance charge would then be $22.72 per intersection. The City
Council in approving this increase did not agree to an amendment to the
contract stating that any future insurance increases would be
negotiated.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Hargett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City of Temple City has requested the City's cooperation in
modifying the Federal Aid Urban routes in that City. lt is their
intent to include El Monte southerly of Live Oak and Longden between
Baldwin and Golden West, Since FAU routes must terminate at another
FAU route, addition of the above mentioned streets to the system
would include short portions of Arcadia and require concurrence of
the City Council. A map indicating the City's FAU system was sub-
mitted for Council's edification. This was adopted by Resolution
No. 4561 on May 18, 1976 and includes El Monte southerly to Live Oak
7-19-77
- 9 -
ADVERTISE FOR
BIDS (12"
waterline
j Huntington Dr)
RESOLUTION
NO. 4633
J' (Salary
Amendment)
DANCE PERMIT
APPROVED
SANTA ANI TA
LANES
'/
'\" \'~"\~~\
. ., \ \' .
\, \
i'
LICENSE FEE
WAIVED
(Ducks
Unlimited)
(,
n)
\\.~ IJ
E~IPMENT
(, \ PURCHASE
1 (Police)
22: 9272
and Longden westerly to Baldwin and the proposed modification is a
logical extension thereof. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman
Gilb, seconded by Councilman Margett and carried on roll call vote
as follows that the modification be APPROVED and that the Director
of Public Works be authorized to submit evidence of same to the
California Department of Transportation for completion of the
modification process.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
On recommendation of staff it was MOVED by Councilman Margett, seconded I
by Councilman Gilb and carried unanimously a 12" waterline in Huntington
Drive between Second and Fifth Avenues be APPROVED. lt was noted that
this waterline will replace an existing 8" riveted steel main that was
installed in 1922 and the 12" main will increase the fire protection
in this area... Cost is estimated at $35,000 with funds in the Water
Division Budget and that the City Clerk be and she is hereby AUTHORIZED
to advertise for bids for said construction.
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No.4633, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNClL OF
THE ClTY OF,ARCADlA AMENDlNG RESOLUTlON NO. 4630 BY ADDING TO SECTION 2
THEREOF THE CLASSlFICATION OF RADIO TECHNIClAN, AND BY TRANSFERRlNG THE
CLASSIFlCATION OF TREE TRlMMER AND WATER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE FROM
SECTlON 2 TO SECTION 1 AND EQUIPMENT MECHANlC FROM SECTION 1 TO
SECTION 2."
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
v
Staff advised that the owner of Santa Anita Lanes, Edward Malkin, had
been previously cleared for two license applications; that Mr. Malkin
has now applied for a dance permit at the location of the Lanes, 188 W.
Las Tunas Drive. A dance permit had at one time been issued for dancing
and Mr. Malkin indicates that he plans to operate the dance area in
much the same way, except live music will not be used. A staff report
dated July 19 indicates that the Business License Review Board approved
the application subject to the same conditions which were imposed by
Council on the previous application (Same are listed on the report).
lt was MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilman Margett and
carried unanimously that the dance permit be approved subject to all
specified conditions.
I
On MOTION by Council, Member Parry, seconded by Council Member Lauber
and carried on roll call vote as follows the request of Dr. Robert
Stragnell to waive the business license fee in connection with an
auction to be held by Ducks Unlimited, a non-profit organization. lt
was noted that the auctioneer will not be receiving a fee for his
services and the event will be held only once. Funds raised are
contributed to the National Ducks Unlimited effort to improve wet
lands for migratory waterfowl.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
On MOTION by Councilman Margett, seconded by Councilman Gilb and
7-19-77
- 10 -
I
I
,
ORDINANCE
NO. 1602
INTRODUCED
ORDINANCE
NO. 1603
lNTRODUCED
RESOLUTION
NO. 4634
ADOPTED
AUGUST 16
RESOLUTION
NO. 4635
ADOPTED
/
\'
\~~ \
22:9273
carried on roll call vote as follows communication equipment for the
Police Department (listed on the report dated July 15, 1977) was
approved for purchase. Funds' are in the Capital lmprovement Account.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1602 entitled: "AN ORDlNANCE OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDlNG SECTION 9220.6.1 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF AUTOMOBILE CAR WASH TO ALLOW SELF-
SERVICE, COIN-OPERATED CAR WASHES."
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, ~auber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City Attorney presented for'the first time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1603 entitled: "AN ORDINANCE, OF
THE CITY COUNClL OF THE CITY OF ARCADlA AMENDING 'ORDINANCE NO. 1380,
AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1539 AND ORDlNANCE NO. 1518, AUTHORlZlNG
AN INCREASE lN COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVlSION RATES."
lt was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
Staff will check into why cable television is not available for the
north side of Singing Wood Drive.
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4634, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE ClTY OF ARCADIA APPROVING A MAP AND DECLARlNG lNTENTION TO
VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF THE ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN SECOND
AVENUE AND THIRD AVENUE AND BETWEEN ALlCE STREET AND DUARTE ROAD;
DIRECTING TIlE CLERK OF THE COUNCIL TO FILE SAID MAP IN HER OFFICE;
DESCRIBING SAID ALLEY PORTION AND RlGHT-OF-WAY TO BE RESERVED AND
EXCEPTED; SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON FOR AUGUST 16, 1977; AND
DIRECTING NOTICE HEREOF TO BE POSTED."
lt was MOVED by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Margett
and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full
text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4635, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE ClTY OF ARCADlA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROJECT NO. 19-0003
AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT THERETO BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND
THE CITY OF ARCADIA TO OBTAlN FUNDS UNDER THE STATE BEACH, PARK,
RECREATIONAL AND HISTORICAL FACILITIES BOND ACT OF 1974 TO ADD A
STORAGE AND UTILITY BUILDING, ENTRANCE SIGN, LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
SYSTEM TO NEWCASTLE PARK."
'.
7-19-77
- II -
APPOINTMENTS
Board and/ or
Connnission
REVENUE
(Race track)
Admiss ion
Tax
f '
'I?
I
"
BALDWIN
AVENUE
CONSTRUCTION
EXECUTIVE
SESSION
RECONVENE &
ADJOURNMENT
J
22:9274
lt was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the
full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
Mayor Saelid suggested a procedure for the appointment of Board
and/or Commission members. Favorable comments were made and all
applications for the various vacancies will be reviewed.
Discussion ensued on the following communication from the Los Angeles
Turf Club concerning admission tax to be paid to the City on passes
issued for promotional groups.
I
'~onorable Mayor and members of the City Council:
We have reviewed our agreement with the City Council
per our letter of December 7, 1976, which called for
the collection and payment to the City of Arcadia of 20~
per person as tax and service charge for all promotional
groups.
As we indicated at that time, it was difficult to expand
this plan beyond this group of patrons because of the
status of our credentials.
Effective with the beginning of the 1977 Oak Tree meeting
and continuing with the Santa Anita meetings, we will
expand this charge as follows:
2s~ City of Arcadia tax and service charge on all
complimentary admissions to the General, Club House
and Turf Club areas, except:
NO charge will be collected from individuals who are
part of the "Show", including owners, trainers,
jockeys, officials, employees, working press and
their wives.
This charge will therefore apply to the promotional groups
as well as season and daily credentials. It is expected to
raise an estimated $40,000. The total amount collected under
this plan will be passed on to the City of Arcadia.
Sincerely,
Glennon E. King"
lt was MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Council Member Lauber
and carried on roll call vote as follows that this communication
indicating intent signed by Glennon E. King on behalf of the Los
Angeles Turf Club, be ACCEPTED for the 1977-78 meets.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The Director of Public Works advised on the status of the Flood
Control project underway on Baldwin Avenue south of Naomi Avenue.
At 12:05 a.m. the meeting adjourned to an executive session.
At 1 a.m. the meeting reconvened and adjourned to July_~5 at 4 p.m.
~:T:~ M or .
~ '7-19-77
'4UJ '4U ~
City Clerk '