HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPTEMBER 20,1977_2
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
22:9314
I
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTE
APPROVAL
PRESENTATION
OATH OF
OFFICE
ADMINISTERED
HIGH SCHOOL
PRESENTATIONS
AGENDA
CHANGES
I
ZONE CHANGE
646-650 W.
Huntington Dr.
p,
t-~ WfC E'
(j H f 1\\ '1
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 20, 1977
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, met in regular session on
Tuesday, September 20, 1977 at 7:30-p.m. in the Council Chamber of
the Arcadia City Hall.
Rev. Roger Sonnenberg, Our Savior Lutheran Church
Council Member Lauber
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
Council Member Gilb
On MOTION by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried unanimously Council Member Gilb was excused.
On MOTION by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried unanimously the minutes of the regular meeting
of September 6, 1977 were APPROVED.
Mayor Protempore Parry and Council Liaison to the Planning Commission,
on behalf of the City Council, presented to Mrs. Barbara Reiter a
plaque in appreciation of her efforts and accomplishments during her
eight year tenure on the Planning Commission.
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mrs. Carolyn M.
Brink who has been appointed to the Planning Commission for a four
year term.
Jim Riley, Arcadia High School Student Body President, presented
credentials to the City Council for the forthcoming athletic events.
Mayor Saelid announced an agenda item calling for a public hearing on
the zone change at 124 N. Second Avenue would be continued to
October 4. Also that the items under the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency
would not be heard this evening and that a public hearing is being
scheduled for October 4 on a matter under CONSENT ITEMS entitled
Appeal from Planning Commission recommendation for denial of a zone
change at 645-671 Naomi Avenue.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1004 recommending a zone change
from COO to R-3 for portions of 646-650 W. Huntington Drive. The
recommendation for approval indicated that the change would not become
effective until all buildings, structures and fences are removed from
the entire property. It was submitted that the change would provide
uniform zoning within the area and that the public convenience,
necessity and general welfare justify the change. The Commission's
initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially sub-
stantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions affected by
the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna,
ambient noise and object of historical or aesthetic significance. A
Negative Declaration has been prepared.
\,
Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and William Smolen representing
9-20-77
- 1 -
ORDINANCE
NO. 1611 /
INT7ED
f ZONE CHANGE
(Mountainous
areas)
22:9315
the Mayor Construction Company, 8121 E. Florence Avenue, Downey,
and applicant for the zone change in order to construct a multi-
family residential development, stated in part that the proposed
development would be consistent with other improvements to the east
and south of the subject property. In response to an inquiry he
said the condominiums would sell between $70,000 and $100,000. He
asked Council to approve the zone change which would enable his firm
to proceed.
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member Parry and carried
unanimously.
It was MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council approve
and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment and that the zone change
be approved. AYES: Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Gilb
Whereupon the City Attorney presented for the first time, explained
the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1611, entitled: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
RECLASSIFY PORTIONS OF 646-650 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE FROM C-O TO R-3".
I
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member Lauber
and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1009 recommending a zone change
from R-l and R-l 10,000 & D to R-M Residential Mountainous Single
Family Zone and R-M Mountainous Single Family Zone & D for undeveloped
mountainous areas. The mountainous area constitutes 308.58 acres and
is contiguous to portions of the north and east boundaries of the City.
The terrain found in this area requires special controls not found in
Zone R-l to insure proper development, A map indicated areas re-
commended to be changed. These are set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3
of Exhibit "A" of said resolution. It was submitted by the Commission
that this change would provide uniform zoning, would bring the zoning
into conformance with the General Plan, provide adequate protection
for hillside areas and that the public convenience, necessity and
general welfare justify the change. The initial study did not
disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse effect on
the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. The Planning
Director displayed and explained projecturals and noted specific areas
recommended for the zone change.
Reference was also made to a communication from William Beckwith asking
that an eight acre portion of the property be excluded from the zone
change. The tentative map of this property (Tract No. 27195) was
approved some time ago, however it has never been recorded or completed
and the approval has long since expired. This tract provided for a
19 lot subdivision with a connection between Oakglen and Oakhaven with
two additional dead-end streets which could have been used for the
development of additional residential property. Staff submitted
that some additional residential development of the less severe slopes
beyond the present terminus of Oakglen and Oakhaven may be feasible,
but to remove the old subdivision property from the area proposed
to be rezoned would expose the areas north of Foothill Junior High to
potential development which would not be controlled under a stricter
permit process found in the R-M zone requirements and that all un-
developed hillside property,now in the Hillside Development Moratorium,
should be placed in the R-M Residential Mountainous Single-Family zone
to insure proper development.
I
9- 20-77
- 2 -
22:9316
In response to Council Member,'Margett the Planning Director advised
that some work was done, primarily drainage, for the subdivision
which could in the future accommodate the type of development under
discussion. Council Member Lauber read the third paragraph and a
portion of the fourth from Mr. Beckwith's letter concerning
engineering, final drawings and some 80,000 cubic yards of dirt being
removed for the subdivision.. hillside cut and permanent gunite
benches installed; water and underground utilities brought to the
property along with a storm drain to carry the run-off waters which
has been extended to within 150 feet of the property together with
an easement to allow it to be brought to the subdivision, Cuts were
made and the hillside was planted and has withstood the last 11 years
with a minimum of eros~n. She asked if this is correct.
I
The Planning Director responded in part that it is technically correct..
that most of the utilities have been brought to the site not through
the site. Council Member Lauber then asked that if the proposed zone
change is adopted and Council does not allow the exclusion of the
subdivision as requested and because the cuts and pads are there and
preliminary work which has been done would Mr, Beckwith be able to go
ahead and develop the property under the new regulations or will it
just remain there and become an eyesore for perpetuity.
The Planning Director said in part that the pads have not been
created for the lots as depicted and Mr. Beckwith might not be able
to develop the property with the same configurations..that he might
be able to create a street connecting Oakglen and Oakhaven and to
create some lots although perhaps not as many. Council Member Lauber
felt Council should be aware of all the facts of the one section under
I
discussion before going ahead... that she would like to know now if
the ugly scars on the hillside are going to remain there because no
one can get to them.
Council Member Margett submitted that a qualified engineer should be
the one to say whether or not the slopes are okay now; that Council
is not in a position to do this. Mrs. Lauber submitted that the
proposed ordinance is much more restrictive and makes the specifi-
cations for the subdivision a lot tighter,
Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and Irvin LivinRston, 1927
Highland Oaks Drive, representing the Highlanoo Homeowners
Association, submitted support for the proposed zone change and the
D Overlay. Richard Ober of the United States Forestry Service
expressed concern about residential development in the hillside areas
and recalled what occurred in the recent tragic Santa Barbara fire.
He asked Council to give this special attention. Mayor Saelid
commented in part that the R-M zone basically establishes a lower
density and provides guidelines.
I
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member Margett and carried
unanimously.
Council Member Lauber asked for reassurance that a new transition
road would permit access to the north Oakglen property so the scalped
hills will not remain there. The Planning Director responded in
part that there is access. The street which would connect Oakglen
and Oakhaven may exceed the 6 percent figure which is something
which would be up to the City Council to modify or waive the
requirement depending on the specifics of the development. He felt
the property in question could be developed under the new classifi-
cation but doubted 19 lots could be obtained...
Council Member Parry felt the new zoning would meet the objectives
desired by Council and submitted that Council does have the right to
make waivers if necessary and that he is looking for a quality
development in the area with minimal environmental problems. He
supported the zone change.
9-20-77
- 3 -
22:9317
Council Member Margett felt the proposed R-M zoning approaches what
is desired and with respect to Mr. Beckwith's request for exclusion of
his property he felt Council cannot really say at this time whether
or not to exclude or include it. He repeated his previous observation
that an engineer should be the one to advise on the conditions of the
slopes in question. He agreed with Council Member Parry that there
are provisions that Council may waive and noted there is no development
from Mr. Beckwith before Council at this time....that if he does come
in with a proposal it should be in conformity with what may have been
developed on the new area, He supported the zone change.
Mayor Saelid agreed with the proposed zoning; that it is fully appropri-
ate and that Council has been very careful to build in flexibility to
deal with unique problems. ,there is no proposed development before I
Council from Mr. Beckwith at this time and if and when there is a
proposal under the new regulations Council can at that time consider a
variance which might be required under a unique situation. He supported
the zone change.
In response to Council Member Lauber's inquiry Council Member Parry
(Council liaison to the Commission) said in part that the Commission
did not spell out anything in the way of fire retardant landcover but
did feel Council should consider this. Mrs. Lauber felt this should
be a definite requirement and that Council should be guaranteed of
this type of planting. She referred to a similar development in
Claremont. The Planning Director said an ad hoc committee has been
formed to look into this and make recommendations concerning fireproof
structures as well as landscaping. Mrs. Lauber said she would like
the record to reflect that Council be assured of the added fire
protection and that this provision be brought back for review. Council
concurred.
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member Lauber
and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council approve and file
the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment and that the zone change be
approved for R-l Residential Mountainous Single Family Zone and R-M
Residential Mountainous Single Family Zone & D for undeveloped
mountainous areas.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
HEARING
(APPEAL)
DENIED
(LaSalle
The Planning Commission recommended denial of a request to develop
industrial buildings on substandard lots with additional modifications
on LaSalle Street (Chicago Park Tract). This decision was appealed
St.) l by the applicant. The Commi.ssion was of the opinion that there are
" ol'i~ temporary uses which can be made of the property. Some Commissioners
p\\ felt that proper development would occur in the area in the future
~ .
and that a substandard development should not be encouraged WhlCh
could hinder proper development of the property left between the
subject site and the corner of' Peck Road. It was noted that the
Arcadia Municipal Code requires a minimum lot size of 15,000 sq. ft.
The applicant is seeking a modification of this requirement,
I
~.
p '. \i J;~ I
Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and the appellant, Wallace
Rodine, 5339 N. Peck Road, stated his position and noted that the lots
in question have been taxable since 1936 and his proposed development
would in some small way recoup that. Projecturals were reviewed and
the subject property was indicated along with surrounding improvements;
also portions of property currently in litigation in order to clear
title. Mr. Rodine said he would be willing to purchase more property
but thus far none is available. He felt any development no matter how
small, would be a benefit to the area which is vacant except for weed
patches, trash piles and the like. His transaction is currently in
escrow and he said in part that he would go on with the purchase
regardless. In response to a question he said he would not suffer an
9-20-77
- 4 -
I
HEARING
(Sidewalk
Program
Phase Xl)
APPROVED
I
F:
J 1.1/-1<
;~;:: :',;..f....-,..~~ ;,.....
;" ")f:." "~:';.'" '.
22: 9318
economic hardship if the appeal were not granted but did ask for
favorable consideration.
The City Attorney explained the status of the litigation currently
under way and said in part that it is his understanding that the
owners are eager to develop the property once judgment has been
handed down.
No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member Parry and' carried
unanimously.
Council Member Margett stated in part that he would have to go along
with the Planning Commission and to place that size development in
the industrial park would really dilute it. He referred to the many
extensive studies which have been made of the area and he would be
opposed to permitting substandard lots,
Council Member Parry submitted that in his thinking there is still a
very good chance of development without the problems inherent in the
subject proposal. He would go along with the Commission.
Council Member Lauber referred to a communication from the Kardashian
Enterprises in which it was submitted that their property surrounds
the two lots under discussion and it appears they may have a vested
interest although they are not represented at this hearing. She felt
Council should sustain the Commission at this time.
Mayor Saelid concurred with the above observations and noted the
endeavors which have established building requirements in the area
all of which would be destroyed by the proposed development. He felt
there has been no hardship established and Mr. Rodine does not have
to proceed with the transaction unless he so desires. He would sustain
the Commission.
Whereupon it was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council
Member Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the
appeal be denied and that the recommendation of the Planning Commission
be SUSTAINED,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The City Council recently approved tentative locations for the
construction of sidewalks under the Phase Xl Sidewalk Program and also
received the Negative Declaration for the Project. This public hearing
was scheduled and the Director of Public Works notified property
owners who would be affected of the impending action. Staff submitted
cost estimates for the various locations.
Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open to anyone desiring to speak
concerning any of the following locations:
Camino Real (south side) Eighth to Tenth (property line)
Holly (west side) Palm to Las Tunas (property line)
Colorado (north side) Oakhurst to Chelsea (curb line)
Sixth (west side) Longden to Live Oak (property line)
Fourth (east side) Camino Real to Duarte (property line)
Golden West (west side) Duarte to Fairview (property line between
Duarte and Arcadia, and at the curb line between Arcadia and
Fairview).
Estimated cost $72,200. Funds are budgeted in the amount of $65,000.
No one desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member Lauber and carried
unanimously.
9-20-77
- 5 -
PROCEDURAL
ORDINANCE'
ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 76-1
')
t.:
I' -
,-
I '
RESOLUTION
NO. 4659
ADOPTED
(,?l.,'V
('
RESOLUTION
NO. 4660
ADOPTED
,-
t~ \
\~~)
22:9319
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that Council approve
and file the Negative Declaration and find that the project will not
have a substantial adverse effect on the environment; that Phase XI
of the Sidewalk Program be APPROVED and that the City Clerk be and
she is hereby AUTHORIZED to advertise for bids on completion of the
plans and specifications.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Counci 1 Member GUb
In order to take an item out of agenda sequence it was MOVED by
Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member Parry and carried
on roll call vote as follows the provisions of the Procedural
Ordinance were WAIVED.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
Council received the Engineer's Report and Plans and Specifications
for the parking improvements proposed by Assessment District 76-1.
The Boundaries include the frontage on Huntington Drive between
Santa Anita and First Avenues, First Avenue from Huntington Drive,
Huntington Drive to Santa Clara Street, Santa Clara Street west to
Santa Anita and the frontage on Santa Anita in the same area. The
estimated cost of construction is $156,129, construction contingencies
$23,419, incidental expenses including legal fees, surveying, engineering,
bond costs and administrative costs $44,409, land acquisition $18,000 -
or a total of $241,957. Of this amount the City would contribute
$70,201 which would pay for the reconstruction of the alley between
Santa Anita and First Avenues north of Huntington Drive. Property
owners would be assessed, bonds would be sold and the property
owners could either payoff their respective assessments within a
specific period or within a 25 year period. The formation of the
Special Assessment District would be pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 being Division
12 of the Streets and Highways Code and the bonds would be issued
pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 being Division 10 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
F. McKenzie Brown, Bond Counsel for these proceedings, then presented
and explained the contents of each of the following resolutions.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PERFORM
VARIOUS DUTIES FOR PROCEEDINGS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT.
It was MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE GENERAL
NATURE, LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC
WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED FOR CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES OF
SAID IMPROVEMENT.
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
9- 20-77
- 6 -
RESOLUTION
NO. 4661
ADOPTED
I
)
1,6 ./.
ENGINEER'S
REPORT
PRESENTED
13('" t
~II
RESOLUTION
NO. 4662
ADOPTED
I
, . )~(. 'l .
,
RESOLUTION
NO. 4663
ADOPTED
/.
V
3Lt-
I .
.f " . -- _. - <
22:9320
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE
TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913";
DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT AND
DESCRIBING THE ,DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE C9STS AND EXPENSES
THEREOF; DETERMINING LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; AND PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF BONDS.
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
At this point the Economic Coordinator made a formal presentation of
the Engineer's Report which is on file in the office of the City
Clerk. He reiterated most of the report summarized in the opening of
this discussion. In addition however the assessment for the individual
parcels were set forth in this Report. Discussion held on the cost
involved in the removal of post office mail boxes currently located
on,a portion of the proposed District. This has not been considered
as part of the Cost inasmuch as it would be for the benefit of the
Post Office and the cost of removal and relocation will be borne by
that agency.
Landscaping plans were discussed and it was felt by Council that as
presented there would be ongoing maintenance cost as well as water
costs and it appears that the planters would be low and would not add
to the aesthetics of the District. The planting of trees in some
planters was submitted for consideration. The proposed irrigation
system was explained. Discussion held on the realignment of the alley
and the endeavors underway to obtain easements and it was submitted
that an amendment could be adopted prior to the date of receiving
bids (October 25) on the landscaping.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL PASSING ON THE REPORT PRESENTED
PURSUANT TO THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913", GIVING PRE-
LIMINARY APPROVAL AND SETTING TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING.
It was MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
(NOTE: THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD NOVEMBER 1, 1977)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL REFERENCING PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND
DIRECTING CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS.
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the Same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
(NOTE: BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED AT 11 a.m. OCTOBER 25)
(Later in this meeting staff advised that Consultants had recommended
including an alternate in the plans and specifications for the landscaping;)
9-20-77
- 7 -
c. ~.
ZONING
GENERAL PLAN
(NEWMAN AVE.)
I
, ,/" 'V
I' ~'
\
<r'
./ PERSONNEL
BOARD
RULES/REG.
RESOLUTION
NO. 4657
ADOPTED
, ,
1\2-: ,:~ \.
'A> ' \d
\'
22:9321
The Planning Commission reviewed the City Council's recommendations
concerning a General Plan Change for the Newman Avenue area which is
bounded on the north and east by the Foothill Freeway, on the south
by La Porte and on the west by Santa Anita Avenue. However, the
Commission reaffirmed its original recommendations (see Resolution
No. 993) and were also of the opinion that R:.l is an appropriate zone
for the City and specifically for the north side of Colorado.. if the
north side were to be designated Multiple Family Residential this
would cause Newman Avenue to become an isolated single family resi-
dential cul-de-sac surrounded by commercial and R-3 uses. Further,
that changing Colorado to Single Family would stabilize the zoning in
the area and encourage property owners to improve properties, whereas
if it were changed to R-3 this could discourage property owners from
improving their R-l homes in anticipation that they could sell their
property for R-3 development. It was also felt by the Commission that
a mixed use (R-3 and commercial) could cause development of more
commercial uses which in turn would create an increase in traffic
which is already a problem on Santa Anita,
I
During the discussion Council Member Parry recalled that initially he
was in favor of R-l for the north side of Colorado as there is presently
so much R-3 property not so developed. As Council Liaison to the
Commission, he submitted that the Commission members felt strongly
that it should be R-l and that he was basically of the same opinion.
Mayor Saelid agreed in part and submitted that R-3 would actually
create an island and he basically also favored R-l zoning. Council
Member Margett agreed in part except that he expressed concern for the
residents whom he felt had been led to believe it would be zoned R-3
as a result of Council's recommendation. Council Member Lauber
recalled the earlier action by Council wherein Exhibit "B" was voted
for without any qualms. She had raised the question at that time
"does this have to go back to the Commission?" and was advised that it
did not. However, she was later informed that it did. She continued
in part that the Planning Commission in her opinion has every right
to substantiate its original action however Council has a discretionary
power to vote the way it feels and suggested that if Council is going
to reverse its action she felt it should await the return of Council
Member Gilb whom she recalled felt strongly that the north side of
Colorado should be R-3.
Council Member Parry felt the matter should be considered again and
although it is not required heMov,ed':thlit a public hearing be scheduled
for October 18 and that the affected property owners be so notified.
Council Member Margett seconded the motion which was carried on the
following roll call vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Margett, Parry, Saelid
Council Member Lauber
Council Member Gilb
Council reviewed the proposed resolution which would amend the
Personnel Rules and Regulations relating to vacations, probationary
periods and employee grievance procedure. These changes are the
result of the meet and confer process with the employee organizations.
During the discussion two changes were made. Page 2, line 2 the word
'or' to be changed to 'of' and Page 2, line 9 the figure 1 to be
changed to 17.
I
Whereupon the City Attorney presented, explained the content and
read the title of Resolution No. 4657 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4186 BY
AMENDING THE CITY OF ARCADIA PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS TO
CONFORM THOSE SECTIONS CONCERNING VACATIONS, PROBATIONARY PERIODS AND
GRIEVANCE HANDLING WITH AGREEMENTS ENTERED INTO AS A RESULT OF THE
MEET AND CONFER PROCESS TAKING PLACE DURING THE YEAR 1977 WITH CERTAIN
RECOGNIZED 'EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS."
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Councilman Parry
9-20-77
- 8 -
.:~..;""W~,;.,:;...,.~ ~',
... :l:..~.-.-u..,...
22: 9322
,and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full
text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED as AMENDED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
I
FOOTHILL
MEDIAN
(October }43) 11
{,I
I
GENERAL PLAN
October 18
SPEED LIMI T
(Foothill
35 mph)
Herb Fletcher, 175 W. Lemon Avenue, referred to a recent tragic fire
in Santa Barbara which destroyed many homes which were located in a
hillside area. He felt these types of developments would probably
be watched very carefully by the insurance companies in the future
and suggested swimming pools could be sources of water to fight fires.
He felt this is something the Fire Department could do by encouraging
the installation of the proper type of pump for homes in the high
fire area.
Dr. Charles McMonigle, 861 W. Foothill Boulevard, referred to the
problem of ingress and egress to his property due to the new con-
struction of a median on Foothill Boulevard. His residence is on a
private road with only three homes. There is no left hand turn for
either entering or leaving his property. He submitted ways in which
the problem could be alleviated which would not detract from the
aesthetics of the roadway. Reference was made by Mayor Saelid to the
extensive public hearings held on the design plans and although there
was a difference of opinion on the part of Council after the hearings,
a policy was ultimately adopted whereby breaks in the center divider
would only be installed at the street intersections where the City
could retain the greatest extent possible of the aesthetic amenities
of having a continuous landscaped median. He regretted the fact that
this was not brought up during the public hearings and if a change
were to be made now it would be tantamount to favoring the special
interests of those who requested the change after the hearings.
Don Sipp, 863 W. Foothill Boulevard, joined Dr. McMonigle in his
presentation and submitted that his idea of the median was that it
was to beautify Foothill Boulevard and to lessen the speed of the
traffic. He was all in favor of the safety factor but he was not
aware that the construction would affect the three homes directly.
He asked Council to consider the fact that a center divider has been
constructed in front of the subject homes and they can only make a
right turn and asked to have the subject location reconsidered...
both for safety of the families using the roadway and for the
aesthetic value of the homes.
Mayor Saelid agreed that there is a potential safety hazard involved
which concerned him at the time the median was approved for construction.
He submitted that perhaps Council should take a look at this in about
two weeks and suggested that at the next meeting it be given further
consideration at which time Council Member Gilb will be back.
Richard Guthrie, Sierra Madre, submitted interest in purchasing
city-owned apartments at 610-618 N. Santa Anita Avenue. He would
upgrade the apartments with the objective of being permitted to turn
the property into a condominium or a multiple apartment. It was
noted that the property presently is zoned M-l and a General Plan
redesignation would have to be accomplished before any judgment could
be made. The matter will be on the October 18 agenda. It was
suggested to Mr. Guthrie that he make some schematic rendering to
give Council an idea of what he has in mind.
Mrs. Barbara Reiter, 210 W. Orange Grove Avenue, asked that during
the construction period the speed limits on Foothill Boulevard be
changed. I.t is now posted for 45 mph, Because of the work being
done there are three different posted speed limits - 45, 35 and 25 at
various locations depending on where the construction is at a given
9-20-77
- 9 -
I
;':'
,
TRAFFI C CONTROL
(OAK TREE MEET)
APPROPRIATION
~ dG~T~~
MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT
(Annexation 7)
(October 18)
PARKING
DISTRICT
HEARING
OCTOBER t8
Baldw1n &
Fairview
J~'O
~'. \
22:9323
time. She noted that the roadway is under City jurisdiction now.
Mrs. Reiter also asked what is to happen to the 10 ft, dedications
which were primarily for widening... that sidewalks have now been
installed and that the areas in question are all in weeds.
Considering the speed limit Council concurred that something should
be done now because of the construction which is dangerous and it
was felt 35 mph would be appropriate during this period except where
the contractor has it posted at 25 mph and then following construction
a study should be made to ascertain the appropriate speed.
It was then MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the speed limit
e:.,})
for Foothill Boulevard between Michillinda and Santa Anita be posted
at 35 mph and in those areas approaching construction unless a lesser
speed limit has been posted by the contractor.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
As to the future use of the 10 feet dedicated for widening it has
been concluded that widening is not really necessary now with the
median; that staff is of the opinion that the wider parkway on the
south side would make an excellent bike path and that as far as the
weeds are concerned there should be an improvement now.
Mrs. Irene Burkner, 1982 Highland Oaks, read a communication previously
submitted to Council by the League of Women Voters concerning goals
and objectives the League would like to see implemented and gave a
number of ways for active informed participation of the citizens in
government.
Bill Connelly, 815 E. Camino Real, spoke to the speed limit on Foothill
Boulevard and the legal aspects. Mayor Saelid noted Council will be
and is being guided by the City Attorney.
On MOTION by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member Margett
and carried on roll call vote as follows that $28,511 be APPROPRIATED
from Capital Outlay Fund to cover traffic control for the forthcoming
Oak Tree Meet, starting October 7, 1977.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
Section IB040-the Street Lighting Act of 1919-requires the City Council
to order the filing of an annexation report consisting of plans and
specifications, estimate of costs, diagram of the District indicating
the lands and all zones to be benefited by the proposed improvement
and to be assessed to pay the cost thereof. It was MOVED by Council
Member Parry, seconded by Council Member Margett and carried unani-
mously that all such data be filed with the City Clerk prior to the
regular October 18 meeting.
I
At the September 6 regular Council meeting a petition requesting the
establishment of a parking district at Baldwin and Fairview Avenues
was received. Specifically the proposal is that a parcel located
at 653 Fairview Avenue be acquired, modified and developed to serve
the parking needs of the commercial establishments in the area. There
is an urgency inherent in this matter inasmuch as the subject property
is in escrow by a developer of condominiums. The City Council
expressed a desire to hear from those in the area and a public hearing
was scheduled for OCTOBER 18 on MOTION by Council Member Parry,
seconded by Council Member Margett and carried unanimously. Property
owners will be notified and notices of the hearing will also be
posted by the Director of Public Works.
9-20-77
- 10 -
f~
EQUIPMENT
PURCHASE
APPROVED
(Street
Sweeper)
I
,"
DANCE PERMIT
APPROVED
(Ramada Inn)
1,'1' (Ii l)~
I : Ii P "'"
POLICE
PISTOL
TEAM
~ ~,
I
i 1- "- I
I~
I {"'I
11\ I '
~
/'
11- .
WORK ACCEPTANCE
(Slurry Seal)
r ./'?t./"-'
I
p:
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMI T
Entertainment
,Center
APPROVED
'," , ".' j.,-f~-"",< .
" .,.-."f>:;...... ':' ~:.. '.'
22: 9324
Council received the result of a call for bids for the purchase of
a new street sweeper. Only one bid was received and staff recommended
the purchase therefrom. It was MOVED by Council Member Margett,
seconded by Council Member Lauber, and carried on roll call vote as
follows that a Model 2TE3 Mobil Four Wheel Street Sweeper be purchased
from Nixon-Egli Equipment Company in the amount of $34,676.72 (there
is an $1,800 trade in allowed). Funds are in the 1977-78 Capital
Improvement Budget.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
On recommendation of the City Manager and the Business License Review
Board it was MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council
Member Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows a permit
be APPROVED for dancing at the Ramada Inn, 130 W. Huntington Drive,
subject to all conditions and a subsequent review and approval of
the City Council.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The City Manager advised that the Police Department Pistol Team has
been active for a long time in regular monthly "shoots" throughout
the year. Selected members enter competitions thrrnIghout the State
and entry fees are paid from budget funds. They are considered to
be on duty. It was recommended for approval, It was MOVED by
Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member Margett and carried
on roll call vote as follows that this activity be APPROVED. Funds
in the amount of $1,010 are budgeted for 1977-78.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
On advice that the work performed by the Pavement Coatings Company
in the annual street maintenance program (Slurry Seal) Job No. 459
has been satisfactorily completed, it was MOVED by Council Member
Parry, seconded by Council Member Margett and carried on roll call
vote as follows that the work be ACCEPTED end that final payment be
AUTHORIZED in accordance with the contract provisions.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1005 granting a conditional use
permit to operate an entertainment facility at 21 Morlan Place. The
resolution sets forth the conditions to be complied with which were
explored by Council. The only change was in Condition No. 9
concerning parking areas to be used by the facility patrons. This
to be changed to read "That all parking areas to be used by the
entertainment facility patrons be adequately patrolled TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT." During this consideration
Paul Fry, the applicant, stated in part that the facility is to be
geared to and for the high school age; that no alcohol will be
permitted and he would comply with all conditions.
It was MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member
9-20-77
- II -
~~ CONDITIONAL
USE PERMITS
APPROVED
(Pre School)
and
(Weight
Watchers)
HEARING
SCHEDULED
October 4
ORDINANCE
NO. 1607
,
ADOPT/,
ORDINANCE
NO. 1608
ADOPTED
/'
ORDINANCE
NO. 1609
INTRODUCED
22:9325
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the conditional
use permit be APPROVED subject to all conditions.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
On MOTION by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried unanimously the following two conditional use
permits were APPROVED subject to all conditions.
1. Pre-School at 103 W. Las Tunas Drive. Planning
Commission Res. 1006.
2. Weight Watchers School at 1117 W. Huntington Drive.
Planning Commission Res. 1010.
I
A public hearing was scheduled for October 4, 1977 on Planning
Commission recommendation for denial of a zone change at 645-671
Naomi Avenue. This decision has been appealed.
The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1607, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO RECLASSIFY 810
SOUTH SECOND AVENUE, THE SOUTHERLY 45 FEET OF 210 AND 218 ALICE
STREET AND THE ALLEY ADJACENT THERETO FROM R-2 TO R-2P".
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further
reading of the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1608, entitle~ "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE CITY OF ARCADIA BINGO CODE SET FORTH
IN DIVISION 6, PART 1, CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IV OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL
CODE. "
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further
reading of the full text be waived and that the same
be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the
content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1609, entitled: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
RECLASSIFY SANTA ANITA SCHOOL AND EPISCOPAL CHURCH AT 1900 SOUTH
SANTA ANITA AVENUE AND 1881 SOUTH FIRST AVENUE RESPECTIVELY FROM
R-2 TO R-l 7,500."
I
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the Same be INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
9-20-77
- 12 -
-
ORDINANCE
NO. 1610
INTRODUCED
I
ORDINANCE
NO. 1612
INTRODUCED
RESOLUTION
NO. 4664
ADOPTED
(
NEWS RACK /
ORDINANCE
I
CLAIM
DENIED
(Mendez)
I
LEROY AV.
REPAVING
LAUBER
MARGETT
. l~ ~' , ,- .
.
22:9326
The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1610, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO RECLASSIFY
LONGLEY WAY SCHOOL AT 2601 SOUTH LONGLEY WAY FROM R-2 TO R-l 12,500."
It was MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading~of
the full text be waived and that the same be INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1612, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO
ARTICLE I, CHAPTER 5, SECTIONS 1500 AND 1501 RELATING TO INELIGIBILITY
FOR LICENSES, PERMITS AND EMPLOYMENT FOR CRIMINAL CONDUCT AND AUTHORIZING
THE USE OF CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION RELATED HERETO."
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No.4664, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF FEDERAL
SURPLUS PROPERTY FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCY FOR SURPLUS
PROPERTY."
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the Same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The City Attorney explained. the proposed amendments to the Newsrack
Ordinance and will proceed with,the preparation of an ordinance for
Council considerati~n. ,-J \
On recommendation of the City Attorney the property damage claim of
the National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Co., Subrogee of
Dr. Michael and Annette Mendez was DENIED on MOTION by Council Member
Margett, seconded by Council Member Parry and carried on roll call
vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
The Director of Public Works submitted that he would not recommend
the repaving of LeRoy Avenue and because there are similar areas
throughout the City it could set a precedent. (This is in connection
with a complaint lodged by Milton Inbody of 149 LeRoy Avenue.)
The Director of Public Works will have the fire hydrants in the new
sidewalks on Foothill Boulevard painted in an irridescent shade so
they will provide reflectors for those approaching the hydrant.
The Director of Public Works will report on the need for crossing
9-20-77
- 13 -
EXECUTIVE
SESSION
RECONVENE
CLAIM
APPROVED
j
(STREET
NAME
CHANGES) ~
~~
ADJ OURNMENT TO
DATE CERTAIN
22:9327
guards at First and Camino Real and other congested intersections.
The report will include recommendations from the School District
and the Police Department.
The Planning Director will submit report on the request of the
Highlands Homeowner's Association for a uniform tennis court lighting
ordinance.
At 12 midnight Council entered an executive session.
At 12:30 a.m., September 21, 1977 Council reconvened and took action
as follows:
I
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that a $500 Compromise
of claim of the General Telephone Company for an underground telephone
cable broken by City repair crew on January 14, 1977 be APPROVED for
payment.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
Council Member Gilb
On MOTION by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member Margett
and carried unanimously the preparation of documentation for change
of La Salle Street to Goldring Road and Myrtle Street to Kardasian
Avenue in the Chicago Park area was ordered,
Council adjourned at 12:40 a.m. to September 29 at 4 p.m. for the
purpose of conducting interviews of those being considered for \.
appointment to the Recreation Commission.
ATTEST:
({jg~~)~~~
City Clerk
I
9-20-77
- 14 -