HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCTOBER 18,1977_2
,.'
22:9338
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
1
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTE
APPROVAL
PRESENTATIONS
~
OATH OF "
OFFICE ;I't4.(~
ADMINISTERED
1
HEARING
Bingo
(Holy Angels
Parish)
l' , {J,,~r
p,v.; 6/1
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 18, 1977
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, met in regular session
on Tuesday, October 18, 1977 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber
of the Arcadia City Hall.
Rev. J. William Daum, Episcopal Church of Transfiguration
Council Member Parry
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
On MOTION by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Parry
and carried unanimously the minutes of the regular meeting of
October 4 were APPROVED.
Council Member Lauber, as Council Liaison to the Youth Commission,
presented plaques of appreciation to the following retiring Youth
Commissioners: Keri O'Donnell, Dean Shipman, Bertram Kaufmann,
Susie Saunders and Mary Helms.
Council Member Lauber then welcomed and presented identification
cards to new Youth Commission members Nancy McKenna and Bill Bauman,
sophomore representatives from Arcadia High School.
Mayor Seelid welcomed the visiting Santa Anita School Cub Scouts
who were working on their citizen activity bedges.
Mayor Saelid introduced members end presented plaques of appreciation
to the North San Gabriel Valley Senior Babe Ruth All Star Team and
their coaches who participated in the 1977 National Championship
playoffs, this being the second consecutive year that this team has
won the world series.
The Deputy City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to
Martha Bermingham, Christopher McGuire and Marilyn Stoke who were
recently appointed to the Arcadia Recreation Commission. Mayor
Saelid presented each of the new members with credentials and
welcomed them to the official City Family.
The City Council received application for license to conduct Bingo
Games at the Holy Angels Parish in the school auditorium. Mayor
Saelid declared the hearing open. No one desiring to speak the
public hearing was closed on Motion by Council Member Lauber,
seconded by Council Member Parry and carried. Inasmuch as the
application filing date was within 45 days of the first bingo date
of October 21 Council Member Margett MOVED to WAIVE the 45 day
filing requirement, the one game per week limit; APPROVE the
three requested dates October 21, 22 and 23 for the Holy Angels
Fiesta and DENY the dates of November 5 and 19 and that the license
be APPROVED. Motion seconded by Council Member Lauber and carried
on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Member Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None 10-18-77
- 1 -
22:9339
HEARING
PARKING
DISTRICT
Baldwin &
F airview
Consideration of a proposed parking district at Baldwin and Fairview.
It was submitted that a preliminary report relative to proposed
parking district adjacent to and westerly of 645 Fairview Avenue has
been provided to each property owner who was given notice of this:
public hearing, as well as the prospective purchaser of the property
in question, and others interested. The report included two
possible examples of the spread of the assessment for the parking
district so the property owners could know what costs they could
expect should this district be formed. Should the Council determine
that proceedings be initiated for the acquisition and improvement
of the parking facility it is recommended that staff be authorized
to obtain proposals from appraisers, legal, financial and engineering
consultants in order to proceed as rapidly as possible.
Mayor Saelid declared the hearing open and Gail Eagleton, 1002 I
Flower Street, Bellflower, spoke at length representing Kenneth
Nitzkowski, owner of Parcels 6 and 7 in the proposed parking district
He approved generally of the plan desiring an adequate plan which
is equitable and fair to all concerned. He suggested Council
consider the possibility of purchasing an additional parcel of land
lying along the west boundary line of the subject property and made
recommendations for the design which he will put into writing and
submi t .
4- I ~ 80
Paul Friedman, one of two owners of the property to be acquired and
also owners of Parcel #1 stated Lot #10 is being sold for a
condominium. Mr. Friedman owns China Queen's Restaurant which has
an excess of parking space. He couldn't be against the gentleman
who spoke in favor but if it is going to be a parking area it should
go through to Huntington Drive and not have access to Baldwin
Avenue. Also consideration should be made to elevating the parking
lot - the parking lot is of lower elevation with respect to the
adjacent parking lots that are closer to Baldwin Avenue.
Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde, spoke to the traffic problem on
Baldwin Avenue during the racing season; that possibly something
could be done to improve the situation.
Bill White, Manager, 645 Fairview, which is Lot #11 opposed the parking
district and saw no advantage to his tenants in having a parking
lot there.
No one else desiring to be heard it was MOVED by Councilman Parry,
seconded by Councilman Margett and carried unanimously that the
public hearing be closed.
Council Member Margett explained that the formula which has been
outlined in the staff report lis not necessarily the way the
assessments will be made; that consideration should be made as
Mr. Friedman suggested; that'staff look into a possible easement
to Huntington Drive. His main concern was how to spread the
assessment to make sure that it is fair and equitable.
I
In answer to Council Member Gilb's question as to why owners of
quite a number of lots in the proposed parking district were not
represented, Mrs. Ruth White; Manager of the apartment at 645
Fairview Avenue stated she contacted the gentleman who is in
escrow to advise him of the meeting tonight.
1
Council Member Lauber suggested that since hearing from Mr. Eagleton,
who had some valid points, that a plot map incorporating some of
his suggestions be submitted by staff before Council takes action.
Mayor Saelid stated that staff needs from Council some direction as
to whether to proceed with the parking district and a direction to
proceed along the lines being discussed in the event Council wanta
to investagate the possibility of access to Huntington Drive.
Council Member Lauber stated she would favor proceeding with the
parking district; that lot 10 is the only lot left there and that
10-18-77
- '2 - .
1
I
HEARING
NEWMAN
AVENUE
-::ft IS"O-cl-...
22: 9340
in the essence of good planning for the businesses facing Baldwin
that lot should remain open. As to the validity of access to
Huntington Drive, she has an open mind but at this point it doesn't
seem pertinent. The parking district would be backing up to the
condominiums and a vacant lot, which she believed is in escrow for
more condominiums, so the necessity isn't there other than perhaps
for circulation, ingress and egress, without the easement. That
would be the only criteria for going to Huntington Drive in her
opinion. She was ready to move ahead with Lot 10.
In response to Mayor Saelid's question as to whether the possibility
of gaining an easement on the properties facing Baldwin to carry it
north to Huntington Drive had been investigated, the City Engineer
stated that the report prepared and submitted by staff was solely
oriented toward trying to present a realistic cost estimate for the
acquisition of parking and its development and staff did not
consider anything beyond what the initial petition requested.
Council Member Parry observed that several ideas presented had
merit and favored basically doing something to improve the area for
parking purposes. He wished to hear more people speak to the
subject but was not sure which plan or idea would be best at this
point. He favored acquiring Lot 10.
Mayor Saelid stated that the public hearing had been closed. Another
public hearing could be called if the Council thought it would be
worthwhile. He would like to see staff pursue it and thought the
idea of circulation from Huntington Drive south through an 'aCcess
alley has some merit but did not know whether this is something
that can be accommodated or not with the developments that are
presently existing there and asked the City Engineer to have it
investigated. He felt the parking needs there are critical; that
if the City wants to have a viable commercial frontage on Baldwin
Avenue it is going to have to do something for those people
particularly with the race track traffic load. He continued in part
that he thought the whole question of the asses'sment district is
something to be studied. He was not enthusiastic about including
the apartment areas although they do have a parking deficiency
according to code. He wanted to look at that very carefully before
he would consider including those in an assessment district.
In response to a question Paul Friedman said that his timing is set
for tax purposes to complete his escrow prior to the end of the year;
that if the City proceeds with the establishment of the parking
district he has the fear that his buyer would back out and the City
might not want the property and the matter would end up with no one
wanting it one way or the other.
Mayor Saelid submitted that it appears that Council favors tbe
establishment of the district.. the question is what would be
included within the district and what tbe physical configuration
would be.... that the first step will be to adopt a resolution of
intent. Staff will proceed along these lines.
The City Council scheduled this public besring in order to reconsider
Planning Commission recommendation for General Plan changes for the
area bounded on the north and east by the Foothill Freeway, on the
south by La Porte and on the west by Santa Anita Avenue. Mayor
Saelid declared the hearing open and the following addressed the
item:
Mr. & Mrs. Albert Forteville, 33-35 E. Colorado Blvd. whose property
is adjacent to the proposed cut-thru from Newman Avenue to Colorado,
felt this would not be advantageous to tbem inasmuch as the street
would be next to their property. They further stated with race
track traffic going east and west on Colorado it would create a
bottleneck for people making turns in the middle of the block. They
were in favor of leaving Newman as is" but had no preference as to
zoning.
10-18-77
- 3 -
22:9341
Gary Kleckner, 54 E. Newman Avenue spoke in favor of leaving Newman
as it is with suggestions of relocating the 'not a thru street' signs
to more advantageous points of view and felt the zoning of the north
side of Colorado should be R-l. The Director of Public Works will
check the existing signs and make the improvement.
P. J. Hubley, 30 E. Newman stated in part that the traffic problem
is from Newman to the approach of the freeway - that Newman should
remain as it is. He is neither for nor against another street going
from Colorado or First but was strongly opposed to closing Newman
at Santa Anita.
Gordon Maddock, 906 S. Baldwin Avenue represented Mr. Orla Pederson
who owns a vacant lot on the south side of Newman, stated in part
that Mr. Pederson's preference concerning the zoning would be R-l
or R-2. Referring to the proposed street going out of Colorado he
felt a lot of money would be spent to funnel people out onto a street I
that is basically one direction each way and that Santa Anita is
fully improved with islands and two lanes north and south and can
accommodate ingress and egress traffic into and off Santa Anita. He
also represented a Mr. Lee who owns a residence on the north side of
Colorado who would like to see Colorado remain residential zoning.
Mrs. De Visser, 50 E. Newman Avenue asked that Newman Avenue remain
as it is.
No one else desiring to speak the public hearing was closed on motion
by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Lauber and carried
unanimously.
Council Member Parry stated he was not in favor of closing Newman
Avenue and with reference to properties on the north side of
Colorado he would like to see the properties maintained or changed
to R-3 and perhaps developed with a few apartments that would add to
the area. He felt if Santa Anita were R-3, not mixed use, there
probably would be a lesser traffic use than if it were commercial.
Council Member Gilb substantiated what he supported previously.. he
would prefer Newman to remain as is without the new street or a
cul-de-sac. He favored R-3 on the north side of Colorado.
Council Member Lauber supported the General Plan 'Exhibit B' as
proposed. She felt the north side of Colorado with a 2-story
apartment building and duplexes lends atmosphere to multiple family
now that R-l residences are older and lesser developed. She believes
the mixed use on Santa Anita gives leeway at this time, that in the
future a substantial development may be proposed at the corner of
the freeway and felt for all-round protection and balance~planning
Exhibit B is the best proposal.
Council Member Margett felt the cul-de-sac and the proposed street
concept from Newman Avenue to Colorado Boulevard should tie eliminated.
He felt in order to stabilize the area the north side of Colorado should
remain R-l; that traffic is heavy and to make it R-3 would accentuate
the traffic problem and continual deterioration would occur; that the 1
lots are small and not adequate for R-3 use. He speculated on perhaps
the City could hold an auction, clean up the lots and assemble them
somehow into larger parcels before considering it for R-3 use. By
keeping it R-l it would possibly generate a feeling for property
owners to improve their properties.
Council Member Lauber concurred with Council Member Margett relative
to assembling smaller lots into larger parcels, noting the improvement
with those assembled on Alta, Bonita & California areas and that it
should be developed with something attractive.
Mayor Saelid submitted that the consideration at this time was for
either multiple or single family residences, that the zone change
undoubtedly would follow later. The Mayor favored single family for
the north side of Colorado Blvd. and felt with the latitude available
within the Zoning Code, with multiple family residential zoning to
include single family residences, there isn't that much of a gain nor
10-18-77
- 4 -
1
1
PROCEDURAL
ORDINANCE
RESOLUTION
NO. 4669
ADOPTED
:f II ~o
TRACT
NO. 20%9
Tentative
Map
APPROVED
?' '::Y--<..e-J,.r-
TRACT
NO. 21317
Tentative
Map
APPROVED
~
r '
p ~ s j, ~ / ;--'
22:9342
does it give flexibility to what property owners can do. He
further stated he didn't like the idea of not closing Newman Avenue
to Santa Anita. If another ingress point were to be opened up it
would cut off the signalized intersection at Colorado and Santa
Anita and cutting through on Newman would have created an extremely
hazardous situation. If the people on Newman are willing to keep
Newman as it is without an additional ingress point he was in
agreement.
Council Member Lauber MOVED that Council uphold its original position
on proposal 'Exhibit B' for the General Plan, excluding the cul-de-sac
and the additional ingress point. Council Member Gilb seconded the
motion which carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Saelid
Council Members Margett, Parry
None
In order to take an item out of agenda sequence it was MOVED by
Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Lauber and carried
on roll call vote as follows the provisions of the Procedural
Ordinance be WAIVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 4669, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 4439 AND
ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR ADOPTING AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN."
It was MOVED by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member
Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that same be ADOPTED with the deletion
of Item 'g' on Page 3 of the Resolution.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The Planning Director explained that the Planning Commission approved
Tentative Tract No. 2906g located at 511 E. Live Oak Avenue to create
a l7-unit condominium and noted the conditions outlined in the staff
report. The Negative Declaration was prepared. Council Member
Margett MOVED to APPROVE and FILE the Negative Declaration; that
Council finds the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment; that the tentative tract is consistent with the Arcadia
General Plan; that the waste discharge from said tract would not result
in a violation of existing requirements set forth in the Water Code;
authorize the Director of Public Works to approve the subdivision
agreement and that the tentative map be APPROVED subject to all
specified conditions. Council Member Parry seconded the motion which was
carried unanimously.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the tentative
map of Tract No. 21317 creating a 30-unit condominium at 800 W.
Naomi Avenue subject to conditions outlined in the staff report. The
Department prepared the Negative Declaration. It was Moved by
Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Margett and carried
unanimously to APPROVE and FILE the Negative Declaration and find
that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment;
that the tract is consistent with the Arcadia General Plan; that the
waste discharge would not violate the Water Code and to authorize
the Director of Public works to approve the subdivision agreement and
APPROVE the Tentative Map subject to all specified conditions.
10-18-77
- 5 -
22:9343
y'.
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
Restaurant
200 E. Foothill
DENIED
The Planning Director stated that the Planning Commission at its
October 11 meeting adopted Resolution 1012 denying the expansion of
the La Pinata Restaurant located at 200 E. Foothill Boulevard. The
denial was based on insufficient parking with the proposed expansion
and with the extension of de kitchen there could be a hazard for
trash pickups and trucks using the alleyway. On MOTION by Council
Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Margett and carried unani-
mously the conditional use permit application was DENIED.
A~
YOUTH
COMMISSION
(DISNEYLAND)
Council received a recommendation from the Youth Commission to
approve the concept for sponsorship of the annual excursion trip to
Disneyland. Last year the excursion proved to be the most successful
to date - over 750 Arcadia students participated. All the costs are
paid by the participants. A set of explicit rules will be given to 1
everyone entering the bus for the excursion. Council Member Lauber
MOVED to accept the report from the Youth Commission and APPROVE
the Disneyland excursion. Motion seconded by Council Member Gilb
and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
PERSONNEL
-, BOARD
.2),
Safety
Awards
Program
Recommendation of the Personnel Board and City Safety Committee for
a Safety Awards Program. The purpose of the program is to instill
safety consciousness among the employees of the Police, Fire and
Public Works Departments in order to provide s safer working
environment in the City and decrease compensation costs. The program
includes presentation of a perpetual safety award trophy to the
department within the City demonstrating the greatest safety
improvement record for the ensuing fiscal year.
It was MOVED by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the safety
awards program be APPROVED in concept and that the Personnel Board
be asked to consider and submit alternative awards.
AYES: Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
NOES: None ABSENT: None
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Walter Reed, President of Arcadia Police Association, submitted 600
signed mailers and petitions containing 391 signatures received from
business people and citizens of Arcadia. He asked the Council to
~ consider reopening negotiations and take a position which includes
the possibility of the California Highway Patrol retirement plan.
/
'Carl A. Lowry, 501 San Luis Rey Rd., spoke supporting the CHP
retirement plan for the Police Department.
J .,'
Herb Fletcher, 175 W. Lemon, referred to a letter received from the
City stating he should take corrective action in maintaining his 1
lawn. With the water shortage he had chosen to;cut back on the amoun
of water he uses. He asked Council what was meant by "generally
accepted standards of adequate property maintenance". He asked what
the intent of Council was.
The Planning Director stated that the regulations concerning property
maintenance are taken from the Property Maintenance Code and what is
, generally applied is the standards within the neighborhood where the
~ subject property is located. Mr. Fletcher's property was brought to
the attention of the property maintenance inspector who found it
was not up to the general care and maintenance of other properties
on Lemon Avenue.
Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, expressed the need for more
lighting in the parking lot outside the Council Chamber. Mrs. Hofer
~asked Council to consider an ordinance prohibiting bare feet in the
\/' Council Chamber because of the liability and possibly study an
ordinance pertaining to some sort of appropriate dress.
10-18-77
- 6 -
,
1
Ii
I
1
22:9344
"1
;j-/?-1
(Dr. Charles McMonigle, 861 W. Foothill Boulevard recommended a
, postponement of the final acceptance of Foothill Boulevard construction
I (between Michillinda and Santa Anita) and asked Council to reconsider
the opening into and out of the drive servicing 859, 861 and 863 W.
Foothill Boulevard. He contended that this opening is a street
intersection servicing three homes and therefore should have a left
turn pocket as stated in the proposal of the improvement of Foothill
Boulevard EIR. He submitted a petition signed by the ~esidents on
I Foothill Boulevard who have driveways blocked by the center divider
/ median.
\ Don Sipp, 863 W. Foothill Boulevard, joined Dr. McMonigle in his
presentation and speaking for another neighbor, Warren Stute, stated
in part that in contacting the 11 residents for signatures all had
. said the speed had increased since the median has been put in and
; mail delivery has become more hazardous. All the residents contacted
. did not feel that Council acted in the best interest of the residents
. of Foothill Boulevard and that the general attitude was that the
; center median should not have been constructed in the first place. He
made reference to four property owners who have campers, boats and
trailer who have difficulty turning into or out of their driveways
without running over the median strip. He stated further that the
'three residents are in the process of obtaining legal advice regardina
the filing of a class action suit against the totel project. He
asked Council to consider the petition.
--
Terry Schreiner, 255 Lemon Avenue, whose business location il 5 W.
Foothill Boulevard expressed her opposition to the Foothill median
strip and with reference to parking spaces for the handicapped in
shopping centers, malls and restaurants, asked Council to lee if
there was any way the City could control the illegal parking practice
on private property.
CONSOLIDATED
LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT.:r~ 13 ~ 1
(Annexation 7)
Council received the Engineer's Report for Consolidated Lighting
Maintenance District Annexation No. 7 in accordance with provisions
of the Street Lighting Act of 1919. The schedule of proceedings
indicated a public hearing to be held November IS. The following
resolution was adopted therefor.
RESOLUTION
NO. 4672
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 4672, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY
COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ARCADIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX
CERTAIN LANDS TO THE ARCADIA CONSOLIDATED LIGHTING DISTRICT
(ANNEXATION NO.7) AND FIXING A TIME FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS TO
SAID PROPOSALS."
Hearing /'
NOV. 15
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
(NOTE:
Public Hearing NOV. IS, 1977)
SANTA ANITA OAKS At the October City Council meeting the Director of Public Works was
AREA - TRAFFIC directed to prepare a progress report on the petition for closure of
~ Arbolada Drive at Foothill Boulevard and a boulevard stop at two
^, c",..L1tl/L" locations in subject area. The Acting City Manager presented
t1 ' n\L/; ;J....- Council with a letter from Mr. L. T. Papay, President of the
Cr~ ~'''' Santa Anita Oaks Homeowners Association with an additional request
'I ~/~ for police surveillance during peak traffic hours and that the
l"f-O~ VI{ Association prefers no action be taken by Council regarding the
I~~ closure and boulevard stops until such time the Association can
l' formulate a program for improvement recommendations for Council
consideration. It was MOVED by Council Member Gilb, seconded by
Council Member Parry and carried unanimously that the report be
filed until Council again hears from the Association.
10-18-77
- 7 -
FOOTHILL BLVD.
MEDIAN
ACCEPTANCE
j 1?,7"7
WORK
ACCEPTANCE
ANNUAL STREET
MAINTENANCE
Job /,460
q j)-q9 k
~SIT
CITY AND
SCAG
=1-135<1
RESOLUTION
NO. 4668
ADOPTED
-::f /351
--'IL
22:9345
The Acting City Manager informed Council Members that the Foothill
Boulevard improvement project has been substantially completed with
the exception of sidewalk construction in various locations. Due to
the utility company undergrounding of overhead lines it has been
necessary to delete from the contract sidewalk construction that would
interfere with undergrounding activity. After completion of the work
by the utility company, the City forces will complete the sidewalk
construction..the total cost will be charged to the project. On
MOTION by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member Lauber
and carried on roll call vote as follows the improvements constructed
by Sully Miller Contracting Company were ACCEPTED and final payment in
conformance with contract specifications was AUTHORIZED. Council
Member Gilb referred to the petition received earlier in the evening
from Dr. McMonigle and Mr. Sipp and asked if another contractor would
have to be hired for the removal of portion of the median. The 1
Director of Public Works said it would be a change order to the existi
contractor. Mayor Saelid said he has heard very favorable comments
from residents on Foothill Boulevard as to the way the contractor did
the job. Roll call vote was then taken.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
"
The Acting City Manager stated the annual street maintenance project
has been completed in conformance with the plans and specifications -
the only remaining work is relatively minor corrections and cleanup.
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Parry and carried on roll call vote as follows that the Annual Street
Maintenance Project performed by Damon Construction Company be
ACCEPTED and final payment be AUTHORIZED in conformance with the
project specifications.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
Council received a request to approve a Memorandum of Understanding
between the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and
the City with regard to coordinating the planning and operation of the
City's Dial-a-Ride Program. The Memorandum of Understanding designates
a City representative to serve on SCAG's Advisory Committee. In May
of 1975 the City approved a similar agreement between the City and
SCAG, however a determination was made by Federal Urban Mass
Transportation that the document was in need of revision. It now
includes the criteria which SCAG will use in evaluating the City's
transit grant application. It was recommended that City Council approve
the Resolution and designate a representative and an alternate
representative. Council authorized, by the following resolution, the
designation of Assistant City Manager George J. Watts, and AdministratiVI
Assistant Jay Corey as the alternate with the Mayor to execute the
Memorandum of Agreement.
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4668, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING THE OCTOBER 1977 MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING WITH THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP ON THE TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE TIlE AGREEMENT AND DESIGNATING
REPRESENTATIVES TO THE TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE."
It was MOVED by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Parry
and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full
text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
10-18-77
- 8 -
-,. ~
I
1
TRAFFIC
SAFETY
PROGRAM
"",-,DO'
JIUtr'~
~4
RESOLUTION
NO. 4673
ADOPTED
5, P?~
.1.'~~i-
ORDINANCE
NO. 1614
ADOPTED
v'
ORDINANCE
NO. 1615
INTRODUCED
'<
RESOLUTION
NO. 4670
ADOPT/,
. ~..,; ':' ,
22:9346
The Acting City Manager presented a proposed Grant Application for
a Traffic Safety Program to be conducted by the Police Department and
funded by the California Office of Traffic Safety. The Grant calls
for complete funding of three officers' salaries for 18 months and
purchase of one police vehicle exclusively used for traffic enforcement
and necessary vehicle equipment including radar. At the end of the
grant period the Council may continue the program or by attrition
reduce the number of officers to the current complement. At the
completion of the program the City retains possession of all the
equipment. It was recommended Council adopt the following Resolution
and authorize the City Manager to enter into the grant arrangement.
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4673, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A FORMAL APPLICATION
FOR THE CITY OF ARCADIA TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROJECT."
It was MOVED by Council Member Lauber, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows to waive the further
reading of the full text and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City Attorney presented presented for the second time, explained
the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1614 entitled: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
RECLASSIFY DEVELOPED MOUNTAINOUS AREAS IN ARCADIA FROM R-l AND R-l
10,000 & D TO R-M RESIDENTIAL MOUNTAINOUS SINGLE FAMILY ZONE AND R-M
RESIDENTIAL MOUNTAINOUS SINGLE FAMILY ZONE & D."
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the further
reading of the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content
and read the title of Ordinance No. 1615, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING SECTION 6439 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO UNATTENDED NEWSPAPER RACKS."
It was MOVED by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading
of the full text be waived and that the same be INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4670 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4630 BY ADDING THE
POSITION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO EXHIBIT "A" THEREOF."
It was MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by Council Member
Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading
of the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
N9ne
None
10-18-77
- 9 -
RESOLUTION
NO. 4671
ADOPTED
./
CLAIM
DENIED
(Chester)
1:d'II' ;~--
ClAIM
DENIED
(United
Pacific
Insurance Co.
~ I,/] A ' .
::J \.JL/,1~ _:. ~
CLAIM
DENIED
(John Adams
Union
Service)
.
j , (Iil.,
ClAIM
DENIED
(Helie)
.::J . W"I. /, '-1... --'
APPRAISAL
AUTHORIZED
653 Fairview
./' \-1"--'
'4- j-:' ~k
22:9347
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 4671, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA COMMENDING AND EXPRESSING APPRECIATION
TO THE ARCADIA ROTARY CLUB FOR ITS OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO THE
COMMUNITY IN RECOGNITION OF ITS FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY IN THE CITY OF
ARCADIA. "
It was MOVED by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of
the full text be waived and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
On recommendation of the City Attorney the claim for personal damages 1
of John Chester was DENIED on MOTION by Council Member Gilb, seconded
by Council Member Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
On recommendation of the City Attorney the Subrogation Claim of the
United Pacific Insurance Co., subrogee of John Chester, was DENIED
on MOTION by Council Member Margett, seconded by Council Member
Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
,
Before action was taken on this claim Council discussed the unusual
water usage and was assured by the Director of Public Works that
City staff had investigated the premises thoroughly for leaks and
found none; that the water meter was taken into the shop and found
to be working properly and has been replaced with a different meter.
It was concluded that something must have been jammed or an undetected
water leak that would have caused the water to go directly into the
sewer. It was then MOVED by Council Member Parry, seconded by
Council Member Margett and carried on roll call vote as follows that
the claim be DENIED with regret.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
On recommendation of the City Attorney the claim for property damage
of Wayne Hager Helie was DENIED on MOTION by Council Member Margett,
seconded by Council Member Parry and carried on roll call vote as
follows:
1
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The 90uncil then requested the Director of Public Works to prepare a
report and recommendation relative to the height of parkway trees
above parked vehicles.
The Acting City Manager recommended that staff be authorized to
obtain an ,appraisal of 653 Fairview, which parcel is to be included
in the proposed Parking District. It was MOVED by Council Member
Gilb, seconded by Council Member Parry and carried on roll call
10-18-77
- 10 -
RIGHT TURN
LANE
Baldwin/
Huntington
1
LAUBER /'
FOOTHILL BLVD.
MEDIAN
,
GILB
:J-:f311
~.;....-
SAELID
~
PARRY
1 ~
LAUBER
/"~~
CITY ATTORNEY
...;!:..J./J~
22: 9348
vote as follows that staff be AUTHORIZED to expend up to $600 for
an appraisal of 653 Fairview Avenue.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, Margett, Parry, Saelid
None
None
The Acting City Manager informed the City Council that the right
hand turn lane at Huntington and Baldwin has been completed by
E. C. Construction Co. and recommended Council accept the project
and authorize final payment.
On MOTION by Council Member Gilb, seconded by Council Member Parry
and carried on roll call vote as follows the right turn lane project
at Huntington and Baldwin was ACCEPTED and final payment to
E. C. Construction Co. was AUTHORIZED in accordance with contract
documents.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Council Members Gilb, Lauber, ~arry, Saelid
None
None
Council Member Margett
Inquired about the Resolution relating to the Hollywood Bowl Committee.
The Acting City Manager said it would be on the November 1 Agenda.
Council again discussed the median on Foothill Boulevard. Council
Member Gilb felt the subject properties (859-861-863 Foothill) do
have an inconvenience problem with the ingress and egress from the
driveway servicing the three properties. He also felt the medians
are a safety factor and stated the traffic has slowed considerably.
He referred to the Mormon Church property which has a good left
turn lane which holds4 or 5 cars. He said if he had been aware of
the problem at 859, 861 and 863 Foothill he would have voted to do
something about the driveway. In all interest of safety he thought
the Director of Public Works' recommendation was the best.. cut the
median back and put in a left turn lane.
Mayor Saelid stated he would like to give relief to the homeowners
of 859-861-863 Foothill but his concern related to the future effect
of other residents Who may request the same consideration if this
particular request is approved. He felt he couldn't recommend this
change unless Council was willing to accept changes from others who
might have a similar problem on Foothill. He also noted during
previous public hearings there were a number of people in favor of
the center dividers.
Referred to the petition from the residents of 859-861-863 Foothill
stating they were willing to pay the costs to correct the center divider
and to other residents signing same petition that they would not hold
the City of Arcadia responsible to make the same correction for them.
He questioned that if the other residents would change their feelings
on the matter and did request the City to correct the median for
them that the islands would be so cut up it would create more safety
hazards.
Stated if this were a safety problem she would address it, but she
is not convinced that it isn't an inconvenience situation and doesn't
believe special consideration is warranted because the driveway has
multiple use, whether it be used by a single family or 2 or 3
families, ingress and egress is the same.
With reference to Mayor Saelid's concern stated in part that some
persons who'have had medians placed in front of their driveways have
filed suits without success. He said in approaching it in terma of
safety he thoughtit a designed question and felt the determination
10-l8-77
- 11 -
SAELlD
J
;~'-~r""
GILB
~
ADJOURNMENT
22: 9349
was very well analyzed by the Director of Public Works at the
November 10 EIR hearing - that it was in fact safer although the
studies aren't definitive - he didn't think there would be any merit
to a law suit.
Referred to two recent instances where residents have had problems
with tree roots entering the sewer lateral line and the City policy
concerning this.. he felt Council should consider some liberalization
of the policy with relation to trees in parkways in an endeavor to
minimize the inconvenience to the residents. The Director of Public
Works responded at length explaining the solutions staff has employed
in these instances.
Referred to letters concerning the Police CHP Retirement Plan which 1
had been addressed to members of the City Council but had been mailed
to the police association's box number with the result that the
police association received Council's mail. Officer Reed said in part
that there was no intention to alienate any member of the public or
any sector of the City; they were endeavoring to ascertain what type
of support they had within the City and for that support to be trans-
mitted to the City Council so lines of communication with the Council
might be established. They would like to meet with the negotiators
and discuss the matter. Mayor Saelid stated in part that the
negotiators will be happy to enter negotiations on next year's
contract (about February) that you cannot renegotiate a contract
covering a period which has already started...you cannot go back in
time.
At 11:15 p.m. the meeting adjourned to October 28 at 4 p.m. in the
Conference Room.
Mayor
ATTEST:
~~A1~
City Clerk
1
10-18-77
- 12 -