Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJULY 5,1972 CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MINUTE APPROVAL HEARING (CHICAGO PARK) -1/071- 1 19:8098 M I NUT E S CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR MEETING JULY 5, 1972 The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, met in regular session on Wednesday, July 5 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Arcadia City Hall. Rev. Leslie G. Strathern, Arcadia Congregational Church Mayor Dor W. Hage PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Hage None On MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried unanimously the Minutes of the regular meeting of June 20 and the adjourned regular meeting of June 29, 1972 were APPROVED. Mayor Hage .ABSTAINED from voting as he was absent on both dates. Councilman Scott ABSTAINED from voting on the June 29 minutes as he was absent on that date. Both were on officially excused absences. Mayor Hage announced that this is the time and place fixed by the City Council for the public hearing of protests or objections as to whether or not the proceedings for Assessment District No. 72-1 (Arcadia Industrial Park) should go forward without compliance with the provisions of the "Special" Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931". The City Clerk announced that notice of this hearing has been given pursuant to law and that the following affidavits are on file in her -office: Affidavit of Publication Certificate of Posting Notice Certificate of Mailing Notices Certificate of Filing Boundary Map with the County Recorder The Assistant City Manager explained the extent and scope of the proposed work of improvement and acquisition. The engineering con- sultant explored in detail the illustrative map. Mayor Hage declared the hearing open and the City Clerk advised that only one communication had been received and that from Keith Davidson, 1122 W. Huntington Drive, asking that an unnamed Street "B" be deleted as the costs would be too costly to him. It was the consensus of staff that a modification could be made to accommodate this property owner and recommended the deletion. In response to an inquiry by property owner Virgie O. Kipp, 1306 W. Vendencia, Fullerton, the Assistant City Manager advised that under the Arcadia Municipal Code Section 9247.4 PUBLIC ACQUISITION she would have sufficient square footage to build industrial structures even with a reduction in lot size and that she would not be assessed for water and sewer lines but would have to pay her share of the cost of the street lighting conduit which would be installed in the beginning. Harry Ferguson, 11746 Clark Street, Arcadia, felt the cost of the 7-5-72 - 1 - RESOLUTION NO. 4273 ADOPTED -j-/074 RESOLUTION NO. 4274 ADOPTED ::J-!l~ 71 HEARING (Zoning - Animals) 19:8099 improvements to the owners on Clark Street would be burden~ome at this time and asked that the City consider assuming more of the cost. Mrs. Sam Murata, 11650 E. La Salle Street, Arcadia, agreed with Mr. Ferguson, however, she was not lodging a formal protest. It was the consensus of Council that in the subject instance theCity is assuming much more of the cost than is customary. No one else desiring to be heard the Hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously. The City Engineer then reported on the percentage of protests, noting 1 that the unnamed Street "B" would be deleted if Council so determined; that the remarks of Mrs. Kipp were not in protest, and the only property which could be considered in protest was that of Mr. Ferguson which represented 4.16 percent. Mr. Ferguson advised that he was not making a formal protest. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried on roll call vote as follows to overrule and deny all protests. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Rage None None Whereupon the City Attorney presented, explained the content and advised that the document reflects all changes and modifications and read the title of Resolution No. 4273, entitled: liRE SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN THE IMPROVEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 72-1 (ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL PARK)." It was MOVED by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of the resolution be WAIVED and that the same be ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Rage None None The City Attorney then presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 4274, entitled: liRE SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE CERTAIN ACQUISITION AND IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 72-1 (ARCADIA INDUSTRIAL PARK) AND FURTHER THAT THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931" SHALL NOT APPLY." It was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of the resolution be WAIVED and that the same be ADOPTED. 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Rage None None ." Mayor Hage announced the conclusion of these proceedings. Planning Commission recommendation concerning keeping of animals in the R-l Zone (Resolution No. 781). The Planning Director explained that the original intent of the Planning Department in undertaking this study was to clearly set forth the regulations which permit and govern the keeping of horses in Zone R-l and to delete the recent regulations which permit the keeping of livestock. The proposed recommendations 7-5-72 - 2 - 1 1 HEARING Montessori School) J II ~t- 19:8100 do not impose any new or additional restrictions on the keeping of horses. It does prohibit the k~eping of livestock other than small animals. Mqycr Hage declared the hearing open and Thomas R. Henderson, 329 Warren Way, asked to be permitted to keep a calf from birth until about 20 w~eks old - until it could return to the range. He has a cattle ranch as a hobby and his young son cares for the calf at home. He felt existing regulations are sufficient. Howard Garrison, 870 W. Foothill Boulevard, was advised that a change in keeping of horses was not recommended.. Mr. ,Garrison had expressed concern about the legislation in connection with the large parcels of land in his area. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried unani- mously. Councilman Butterworth submitted that perhaps Council would be well advised at this time to leave the present regulation alone; that apparently cows are not being kept in the city and he could see no harm in allowing a child to care for a calf. Councilman Helms observed in part that the citizens were concerned to the point where a petition was filed protesting the keeping of cows in a residential area and that because of the strong feelings Council could not afford to let one instance influence its judgment; that there is a noticeable difference between a cow and a horse in the sanitation factor. Councilman Butterworth felt that because cattle are not being kept in the community that it would be possible to limit the cow to an animal not in excess of 150 pounds and MOVED to amend the Planning Commission recommendation to permit a cow not over 150 pounds which would primarily be kept as a family pet. Mayor Hage seconded the motion which failed to carryon the following roll call vote: , AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Butterworth, Rage Councilmen Arth, Helms, Scott None Councilman Helms then MOVED to SUSTAIN the Planning Commission recom- mendation and that Resolution No. 781 be APPROVED as written. Councilmm Scott seconded the motion which was carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott,.Hage None None Planning Commission recommendation concerning an application for a conditional use permit to enlarge the building and enrollment of the Montessori School at 1406 S. Santa Anita Avenue. The Planning Director explained that the owners, Mr. and Mrs.Robert Firth, desire to enlarge the building with the construction of two ne~ classrooms and to increase the student enrollment from the present 50 to a maximum of 95. There is adequate outdoor and indoor play 'area tQ'm~et the minimum code requirements. The Commission recommends approval. Mayor Hage declared the hearing open and Fred Kennedy, 370 Woodruff Avenue, attorney for the applicants, explained the need for the expansion. He noted the owner-operators have purchased the home to the south of the subject school and this will act as a buffer to any further encroachment in the residential zone. Thus far there have been no complaints as to the operation of the school. Robert Firth, applicant, explored the background of the Montessori 7-5-72 - 3 19:8101 Schools. In response to questions he replied that the subject school was started in 1965 and purchased by him in 1967; that it originally accommodated 28 students, was increased to 50 in 1970. He referred to his request for permission to display a 2' x 2' sign on the front of the premises; that it was only for the purpose of assisting parents who were unfamiliar with the area. He expressed a willingness to delete this from his application. In addition he stated in part that the swimming pool was being filled in. Discussion held on the flow of traffic. There is a circular driveway which permits ingress and egress to the site. Mrs. Hudson Roysher, 1784 S. Santa Anita Avenue, stated in part that the parking facilities did not appear to be adequate; that she had observed quite a backlog of cars parked on Santa Anita both north and 1 south of the subject property and submitted that 95 students would only add to the situation. In response Mr. Firth explained the staggered hours for arrival and dismissal during the regular school year, however, the summer program was different - everyone leaves at about the same time. James E. Dyer, 107 W. Naomi Avenue, asked that study be made of the traffic situation before any decision is made. Mr. Firth recognized the problem of persons driving out of his driveway and making a U-turn at Naomi Avenue. He felt he could discuss the traffic pattern with the parents. No one else desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by - Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unani- mously. Councilman Helms stated in part that he has heard only good reports about the operation of the school and the desirability of parents to utilize this type of private instruction in preference to the public schools, but to him Santa Anita Avenue is totally a residential street from Duarte Road south to Las Tunas Avenue, the only exception being the public schools. He noted the rejection to appiications for apart- ments, mortuaries, etc., in the area and the construction of new residences replacing the old. The progressive nature of the conditional use permit concerned him - from 28 students to 50 and now 95. He felt that if the school should cease to operate there would be a real problem area existing within a sensitive R-l zone. To him it is a commercial use. Councilman Butterworth stated in part that the Commission had been unanimous in its decision and he could not see any reason to deny the request; that it is in the interest of the public that it be granted. He felt private schools should be encouraged and that the location is a good one with a public school immediately to the north and the owner- operator residing in the home immediately south. He also submitted that the traffic situation could be watched and noted the lack of complaints in that regard until this meeting. He would approve the request. Councilman Scott was also inclined to be sympathetic to the request 1 and suggested if it is approved that the sign be deleted and noted the applicant has expressed a willingness to eliminate the sign. Councilman Arth stated in part that he had mixed emotions, and expressed concern with the subject use in a residential zone; that with the increased enrollment the traffic could become more of a nuisance so that the street could become less desirable from a residential stand- point; that some of the evidence indicates it would not be compatible with single family residences with the doubled enrollment. Mayor Hage observed in part that the school has been a good neighbor and there are already two schools on Santa Anita Avenue; that with the number of additional students the enrollment would be brought up to the maximum permitted under State Law, and as far as traffic is 7-5-72 - 4 - MOTION 1 HEARING / (Private Clubs, etc.) APPROVED HEARING (Vacation portion of Baldwin Ave.) APPROVED -Psf;1 TRACT NO. 29074 Tentative Map Approved 3-/~7 8 1 ZONE CHANGE Hear ing ,/ scheduled RECREATION / COMMISSION EXPANSION OF EISENHOWER PARK Appraisal authorized 2170/ (J .. . 19:8102 concerned this is something which could be reviewed and considered. Councilman Scott then MOVED to APPROVE the conditional use permit pursuant to conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 783 with the exception of the sign (Item 4 Section 3) which is to be deleted. Councilman Butterworth seconded the motion and with the oonsent of Councilman Scott added thereto the provision that the traffic situation be looked into within a period of six months and that Council reserve the right to impose 'such conditions as it deems necessary at that time with respect to traffic. Roll call vote was then taken on the motion. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Butterworth, Scott, Hage Councilmen Arth, Helms None The Planning Commission recommended by its Resolution No. 785 the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to permit clubs, fraternities, and similar groups in any zone on a conditional use permit basis. Mayor Hage declared the hearing open and no one desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanimously. It was further MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried unanimously that the recommendation be SUSTAINED and that Resolution No. 785 be approved. The City Attorney will prepare the appropriate amending document. Pursuant to Resolution No. 4268 relating to the vacation of a portion of Baldwin Avenue near the intersection of Val Street, it was noted that a lot split had been approved subject to the applicant obtaining an 8 ft. strip of the existing Baldwin Avenue right-of-way. The strip involved is excess to the City's need inasmuch as the vacation was recommended subject to conditions set forth in the report dated June 30, 1972. Mayor Hage declared the hearing open and Henry Hege, attorney for the applicant, asked for favorable consideration. No one else desiring to be heard thehearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried unanimously. It was then MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously that the 8 ft. strip be vacated and that the applicant comply with all conditions. Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the tentative map of Tract No. 29074 located at 1224 and 1306 S. Fourth Avenue subject to conditions. It is proposed to create a six lot subdivision and it was noted that lot sizes and dimensional characteristics have all been changed from that which had previously been submitted and denied. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously that the tentative map be APPROVED subject to conditions set forth in the report dated July 8, 1972. A public hearing was scheduled for JULY 18 on a zone change appli- cation for property at 445 - 461 W. Duarte Road. The Planning Commission recommended rezoning the area from R-l to R-3. Council received and the City Manager summarized the recommendations of the Recreation Commission concerning parks at various locations. Expansion of the existing Eisenhower Park involves the acquisition of additional land, a portion owned by a private party, a portion owned by the County Flood Control District and some State excess freeway land. It was the consensus of Council that inasmuch as the property is available steps should be taken to ascertain the feasibility of such purchase. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded 7-5-72 - 5 - FUTURE PARKS (PRIORITIES) Plans and specifications authorized ~~~ COLORCOATlNG HIGH SCHOOL TENNIS COURTS ~1~1 19:8103 by Councilman Butterworth and carried on roll call vote that an appraiser be retained to determine the cost of the private and State owned property. Fee not to exceed $150. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Rage None None The priorities recommended are 1) Highland Oaks School 2) Santa Anita School 3) Water Department property on Orange Grove Avenue 4) Forest Avenue and 5) Second and Camino Real. It was noted that steps have already been taken on the acquisition of the Forest Avenue property and a public hearing has been scheduled for the proposed park at Second and Camino Real. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried on roll call vote as follows that Smith and Williams be retained to prepare final drawings and specifications for the first three parks at a cost of $3500. Cost ceilings to be: Highland Oaks School $45,000; Santa Anita School $50,000; and $82,000 for the Orange Grove Wa ter Department site. 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Rage None None Council considered the colorcoating of the High School tennis courts and it was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously that staff be and it is hereby AUTHORIZED to negotiate with the School District before any speCific approach is made. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION STATEMENTS ARE SUMMARIZED. Mayor Hage announced that Council will now consider Ordinance No. 1452 relating to property maintenance regulations. Mrs. Suzanne Beatty, Chairman of the Arcadia Beautiful Commission, explored the experience of the Commission in endeavoring to encourage residents to improve their properties; that the aVenues presently open do not solve the problems and referred to situatlons with absentee owners, lack of maintenance to apartments and the like. She felt the majority of property owners were in favor of such regulations and noted other cities with such an ordinance. Mrs. Mary Dyer, 107 W. Naomi Avenue, was advised by the City Attorney that the ordinance would not give permission to anyone to enter her home, that a court order must first be obtained for permission. Wallace Qua, 1605 Hyland Avenue, was advised by the City Attorney concerning standards, appeal periods and the like - these are all judged by the reasonable man standards and the resident may appeal to the City Council and then to the Courts for relief if it should go that far. 1 Councilman Butterworth also responded to this inquiry stating in part that the ordinance under no circumstances is to be construed as indi- cating the City is going to tell residents how they must maintain their property. It sets the minimum standards and is an endeavor to prevent property deterioration to the point where it causes an appreciable diminution of the surrounding properties. That there is no municipal tyranny involved in this ordinance. Sherry Passmore, 501 Santa Cruz Road, stated in part that the ordinance should be more definitive; that it is left up to the Building Inspector or the City Council as to what is deterioration; what is public welfare. Who is going to decide these factors. That if there is 7-5-72 .' - 6 - 19:8104 concern about the outward appearance of a house there should be no need to enter and a court order would not be needed - this only adds to the cost of government. She asked Council to reconsider and to allow more time for all homeowner associations and persons to review the ordinance. ! 1 Edward Passmore, 501 Santa Cruz Road, stated in part that the ordinance as written does not have any safeguards for the citizen; that a citizen can be literally ordered and forced to appeal to the same body which made the demand or seek recourse through the courts. He felt it would be more reasonable .to'put the onus of proof that someone has not satisfied a condition on the City Council and not the burden of proof on the citizenry to defend an attack on his personal property, just or unjust, through the co~rts; that it could wreck havoc on the citizens. Helen Dillon, 131 W. Forest Avenue, spoke to the appearance of the Freeway under Second Avenue, and asked if something could be done to improve its appearance. That it is being used as a disposal area. She also referred to the proposed maintenance ordinance and cited instances where persons liv~ng on a very small income could be subject to its regulations. She felt the ordinance as written is too vague. George Cassat, 1410 Santa Margarita, expressed concern about the application of the proposed ordinance to the area known as the Foothill Strip - east from Michillinda Avenue; that it has deteriorated since the opening of the Freeway; there has been vandalism, untended properties and vacancies. He asked about the procedure to restore these types of properties, and stated the ordinance would be a helpful tool in improving the community and not an intrusion or any unfairness. The City Attorney explained the procedure which would normally start with a complaint which would be turned over to the Building Department.. If conditions were as alleged, from vandalism for instance, the property owner would be notified of steps necessary to correct the situation. This would be the same procedure in other areas of substandard buildings. Mrs. Passmore told of a recent meeting concerning the Foothill Strip with State officials who felt the homeowners could plant their properties so they would not have to look at the freeway. She felt there are things a person can do without having to incur cost. This could apply to backyards - something could be planted or a fence constructed if the view were not acceptable. Mrs. Harold Roysher commented on the Foothill Strip - that the Arcadia Beautiful Commis~ion is endeavoring to seek a remedy. James Dyer, 107 W. Naomi Avenue, submitted that perhaps it is time to think more about people than property beautification and more restrictive legislation. 1 Mrs. Edith Dunn, 101 W. Palm Drive, read in full Section 9404 of the proposed ordinance relating to right of entry and stated it gives too much power to the Building Officials. She stated further in part that this is trespassing and she could not interpret it any other way. She agreed with the property maintenance aspect of the ordinance but felt the right to individuality will be jeopardized. That the provisions of the existing Uniform Building Code would cover this and that the subject ordinance would be used to harass older residents into selling their homes for less than fair property value. She referred to the Foothill Boulevard property as not suitable for homes along the freeway and to an article in the Los Angeles Times concerning the ordinance. In concluding her remarks she 'stated in part that if it is adopted those against it will endeavor to secure the necessary signatures to bring it to a vote of the people. Howard Garrison, 870 W. Foothill Boulevard, stated in part that restoring 7-5-72 - 7 - 19:8105 the properties on Foothill Boulevard would be a financial burden on the owners and asked that the area be rezoned so that something constructive may be developed there. Walt Landor, 1654 Rodeo Road, sugges ted that the ordinance be held in abeyance until September because many residents are on vacation. That they should have an opportunity to review the document. In his opinion he stated in part that the ordinance is poorly written and gives too much power to the building officials. He felt it should have protective measures written into it to safeguard against distress to the poor and elderly. Jack Saelid, 821 Balboa Drive, stated in part that he has been in favor 1 of a minimum maintenance ordinance for some time and that he felt the majority of the residents would be for rather than against it. He suggested if Council felt there was not adequate support a citizens committee might be formed. The City Attorney then presented for the second time Ordinance No. 1452, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADDING CHAPTER 4 TO ARTICLE IX OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REGULATIONS." It was MOVED by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Butterworth that the reading of the full body of Ordinance No. 1452 be WAIVED and that same be ADOPTED. Councilman Scott expressed concern that the integrity of the Council was being questioned as he would not vote in favor of any action before Council that would be subversive and not in the best interest of the people or for something that would be aimed at benefiting an individual or a few. He continued in part that he would be the first to admit there are probably some things wrong with the document and that it would have to be administered with great care, feeling and under- standing; that he would welcome suggestions for amending it if it needs to be clarified or more definitive. In his own conscience he would vote in favor of the ordinance. Councilman Arth stated in part that as much as it is disliked just about every law that is passed takes away some freedom from people. He felt there are safeguards written into the ordinance and noted that the building inspector must show cause and secure legal consent to enter a home if he is refused entry. He submitted that during his campaigns for office he found the majority of the residents expressed a need for this type of regulation; that in his opinion a very small percentage of the residents are against it and he would vote in favor of the ordinance. Councilman Butterworth stated in part that he recognized the sincerity of those in opposition. However, on the other hand, anyone can say to the Council that the ordinance is to help developers, that it will 1 drive poor people out of town, that there are secret or even corrupt motives. Anyone can make such charges if they are so inclined - their conclusionary statements unsupported by a single fact. That how it could be thought Council is doing something intentionally which would injure the community or set up some kind of tyranny was difficult for him to comprehend. He noted that three members m the Council will retire in two years and all will go on living in the community. He could not understand what reasoning would suggest that Council is going to enact some kind of a law which would make life untenable in the community. He submitted further that the ordinance will be self policing - no one will act as a sleuth. It will be only when the property deteriorates to such a degree that it depreciates the value of the neighbors' 7-5-72 - 8 - 19:3106 property that action is going to be taken which he felt is reasonable. Un~er the ordinance no one has the right to enter a home without a CDqrt order; that there isn't a man on Council who would vote for an orqinance giving a city official such right and should that occur he waS satisfied it would be negated in court action. He felt every reqsonable safeguard has been set up. He concluded by stating in part that Council is concerned with people and the right of people to live properly in the community; that is the basis for his support of the ordinance. If it should not work out that way he would amend the ordinance. If it proves to be a bad regulation it could be repealed. 1 Councilman Helms and Mayor Hage concurred in the statements following roll call vote was then taken on the adoption: and the AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Hage None None Councilman Helms submitted the advisability of the adoption of a minute resolution requesting the administration to report any action taken under this ordinance to Council; also that it be expressed through the appropriate medium that the ordinance is not going to be applied oppressively to those living on a fixed limited income; that the ordinance is not going to be misused. ~lereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Butterworth, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously that the following minute order be ADOPTED: BE IT RESOLVED that the administration of this city be required to report any action taken under this ordinance; the same to be reported directly in writing to this Council from time to time until further change of this motion. The City Attorney will prepare the necessary resol~tions relating to notice and appeal procedure and detailing Council expressions. ADVERTISE ~B~~ (Library landscaping) On recommendation of staff it was MOVED by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanimously that the plans and specifications for landscaping the west parking lot at the City Library be APPROVED and that the City Clerk be and she is hereby AUTHORIZED to advertise for bids to be returned July 17. AMBULANCE SERVICE FEES APPROVED Council received the recommendations of staff concerning ambulance service fees. See report dated June 30, 1972. 1 s: Arcadia residents Guests in resident's home Arcadia businessman and his employees at work Non-residents $ 15.00 15.00 15.00 30.00 It was recommended that there be no additional mileage, oxygen or .special handling charges. The charges would be in effect regardless ~f whether the city ambulance provided the service oc the Arcadia- .Monrovia Amb~lance provided the service on a back-up basis should more than one ambulance be needed. Council concurred in the proposed fees and it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanimously that the City Attorney prepare the appropriate resolution pursuant to the June 30 report. ~ro~ TECHNOLOGY INC. (FILED) The dommunication dated June 30 concerning the Public Technology, Inc., was received and filed. 7-5-72 - 9 - LAND ACQUISITION for water facility ~/J-11 ADVERTISE lOR BIDS V STREET SLURRY SEAL I R;OB CLASSIFICATION CHANGE ORDINANCE v'NO. 1456 INTRODUCED PROCEDURAL ,/ORDINANCE WAIVED LAND PURCHASE AUTHORIZED (Park) ::J--I'J--gO FREEWAY PROPERTY 19: 8107 The Water Department has indicated the need for additional property just south of its Baldwin plant located between Camino Real and Naomi Avenue east of the alley just east of Baldwin Avenue. It was noted in the report dated June 29 that the subject property may now be purchased. It was the consensus of Council that an appraisal should be obtained and it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried on roll call vote that an appraisal be secured at a price not to exceed $500. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Rage None None On recommendation of staff it was MOVED by Councilman Arth, seconded 1 by Councilman Butterworth and carried unanimously that the plans and specifications for a slurry seal coating of various streets be APPROVED and that the City Clerk be and she is hereby AUTHORIZED to advertise for bids to be returned July 17. The project will be funded with Gas Tax Funds budgeted for street maintenance. On recommendation of the City Manager and the Finance Director the job title of Accountant in the Finance Department was changed to Accounting Supervisor on MOTION by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously. The City Attorney presented for the first time, explained the content and read the tit le of Ordinance 1456, entit led: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING SECTION 9275.2.2 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE FILING FEE FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. II It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried~oll call vote as follows that the reading of the full body of Ordinance No. 1456 be WAIVED and that the same be INTRODUCED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Rage None None In order to consider the following items it was MOVED by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously that the provisions of the Procedural Ordinance be waived. Councilman Helms advised that the Land Committee has considered and recommend the purchase of four lots on Forest Avenue from the State Division of Highways for $1000. This is excess freeway property known as State No. 07-LA-210-3l.6 Parcel Nos. B2053, 2054, 2055, 2056. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Butterworth and carried on roll call vote as follows that the subject purchase be made and that the property be and it is hereby designated for park purposes. 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Hage None None Councilman Scott asked staff to contact the State Division of Highways to ascertain if its property under the freeway at Second Avenue and Colorado Boulevard could be improved in appearance. 7-5-72 - 10 - LITIGATION DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT / 1 ADJOURNMENT 1 19:8108 The City Attorney reported on litigation matters pertaining to throwaway advertising. The City Manager advised that the Land Committee has been reviewing the possibility and have recommended that the City contribute toward the cost of an appraisal to be made of existing Huntington Drive properties in connection with a new development for the old city library site at the southwest corner of First and Wheeler Avenues - $100 was the figure submitted. Whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried on roll call vote as follows that the sum of $100 be contributed toward said purpose. Funds from Council Contingency Account. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Arth, Butterworth, Helms, Scott, Hage None None At 11:25 p.m. the meeting ADJOURNED SINE DIE. A/Cc~ Mayor ATTEST: ~~~/)1 >>r-tL9~~ City Clerk ./ 7 - 5-7 2 ", -. re -"