HomeMy WebLinkAboutNOVEMBER 21,1972 (2)
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
7
20:8176
INVOCATION
LEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
APPROVED
AS AMENDED
. HEARING
Service
Station
Sign
CONTINUED/
to Dec. 5
I
.MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 1972
The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, met in regular
session on Tuesday, November 21, 1972 at 7:30 p,m, in the Council
Chamber of the Arcadia City Hall.
Rev. Dr. Faith J. Conklin, Church of the Good Shepherd
Mayor Don. W. Hage
PRESENT: . Councilmen Arth, Helms, Scott, Hage
ABSENT: Councilman Butterworth
On MOTION by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Scott and
carried unanimously the Minutes of the regular meeting of November 7,
1972 were AMENDED as follows and as thus amended APPROVED.
Page 3, 5th paragraph, 3rd line, to read "for the Family Game Room;
that no alcoholic beverages be in the room" (which would necessitate
deleting the words "when children are present"), Also the item
concerning traffic, page 3, 8th paragraph, next to the last line,
change the word llfelt" to "said".
Appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission in its denial of
an application for an additional free standing sign at a Standard
Service Station at 186 East Duarte Road. . The Planning Director
explained that the Modification Committee determined that the proposed
sign did not conform with the sign regulations. That the signs were
not necessary for identification purposes and could cause excessive
glare. This determination was sustained by the Planning Commission.
Reference was made to the glare from such signs and it was noted that
the Modification Committee had observed the signs in other locations
and concluded that they do cause excessive glare,
Mayor Hage declared the hearing open and Morris Starr, the applicant,
stated in part that he had been permitted to have the sign in the
beginning and then was asked by the City to remove it. He referred to
two other Standard Stations with the same sign and asked that he be
allowed to have the sign. He expressed willingness to reduce the
wattage in an effort to eliminate any excessive glare although he had
not received any complaint from the neighborhood.
.No one else desir~ng to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Councilman Helms, .seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously.
Councilman Helms expressed concern for the position of Mr. Starr,
however, in his opinion the problem isnlt so much the glare from the
signs as it is the limits to which the sign ordinance can be subverted.
He explored the many public hearings and conferences with business
organizations in developing the sign ordinance and felt the fact that
the lighter boxes were allowed in two other locations through an over-
sight on the part of the City should not be compounded by permitting
another such sign; that steps should be taken to have the signs more
clearly defined in the Municipal Code.
11-21-72
- 1 -
HEARING
(Zone Change)
APPROVED
f .' ~vu.t~
TRACT
NO. 29873
Tentative
Map APPROVED)
:r130~
TRACT
NO. 29540
(Fina 1 Map
APPROVED)
-3"-/.;1- n
20:81fi
Mayor Hage agreed in part although he stated he did not find the signs
objectionable. However, he was concerned about the City's sign
ordinance being in violation in these instances and Council's decision
could affect future applications. He was inclined to favor referring
the matter back to the Commission for recommendation 'in this regard.
Councilman Scott stated in part that in his opinion Mr. Starr is in a
different position in that he had the sign prior to the time at least
one of the other Standard Stations\had them; that Mr. Starr had to
remove his sign whereas the others did not. He would like to see the
applicant given permission to have the sign at this time; that a study
could then be made on the matter and based on its conclusion a time
limit could then be ascertained by the City for the removal of all of
the subject type signs. He then MOVED that the appeal of Mr. Starr be
granted. (MOTION did not receive a second.)
I
. During the above deliberations Carl Rodeheaver (American Permit Service)
stated in part that the lighter boxes were originally installed
throughout the County as a lighting fixture; that the permit issued by
the City was in the same category and apparently the City Code does not
cover this particular type of sign. .He submitted that plans were filed
with the City at the time of permit issuance.
Councilman Helms then MOVED that the matter be TABLED; that it be
referred back to the Planning Commission for study with relationship
to the existing sign ordinance and that a recommendation be forthcoming
as soon as possible. This Motion was AMENDED to DENIAL of the appeal
and that the question of lighter boxes be referred back to the Planning
Commission for recommendation. Mayor Rage seconded this motion and
commented to the applicant that the denial is without prejudice to him
personally. However, this motion was WITHDRAWN as it could not receive
a majority vote - Councilman Butterworth was absent - Councilman Arth
indicated he would abstain due to his business affiliation and
Councilman Scott had stated he would vote against it as he could see
no reason why the applicant should not be permitted to have the sign
at least during the study period. Mayor Hage then ordered the matter
CONTINUED to the next regular meeting of December 5.
Planning Commission recommendation for a change of zone from C-O & D
to R-3 on property known as 400-480 W. Huntington Drive and 504-642 W.
Huntington Drive. The Commission determined that the proposed change
complies with the General Plan which indicates the subject area as
high-density residential and that the public convenience, necessity
and general welfare justify the change, all set forth in Resolution
No, 791 and a report dated September 12, 1972. Mayor Hage declared
the hearing open and no one desiring to be heard the hearing was
CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman
Arth and carried unanimously. It was further MOVED by Councilman Helms,
seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously that the recom-
mendation of the Commi~sion be and it is hereby APPROVED and the City
Attorney was instructed to prepare the enacting ordinance.
On MOTION by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Arth and
carried unanimously the tentative map of Tract No. 29873 was APPROVED
subject to all conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, the
Department of Public Works and the Water Department. It is proposed
to construct a 20 unit condominium at 946-1000 Fairview Avenue.
I
On MOTION by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Scott and carried
unanimously the final map of Tract No. 29540 (9 lot subdivision) at
343 West Colorado Street was APPROVED subject to continued compliance
with the conditions of approval of the tentative map with the added
condition that "the improvements and configuration of the island
11-21-72
- 2 -
'P~
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
(Reading
School)
(RATIFIED)
4:
RECREATION
COMMISSION
(Ho 11y Avenue
School Tennis
Icourts)
taff to
egot iat e
ith
District
RECREATION
COMMISSION
(PARK AT
CAMINO REAL
& SECOND AVE.)
.:j I C;; .3
I
"t
20 :817~
as indicated on the Department of Public Works map for Chelsea Road dated
August 8, 1972 be part of the final tract,"
Planning Commission Resolution No. 793 granting a conditional use permit
for a reading school at III and lI3'W. Huntington Drive, subject to
conditions set forth in said resolution. It was MOVED by Councilman
Scott, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanimously that the action
of the Commission be RATIFIED.
At its las~ regular meeting the Recreation Commission recommended that
Council authorize staff to negotiate with the School District for use of
property at the Holly Avenue School (Duarte and Holly) for the construction
of two new tennis courts as outlined in the Districtls communication dated
October 24, 1972. In response to an inquiry from Councilman Scott the
City Manager stated in part that based on the District's letter the City
would be responsible for removing the old tennis court, the repaving
thereof and the construction of the new tennis courts. The new courts
would be located at the northeasc end of the school property with a mini-
park concept. Councilman Scott submitted that he felt the District should
be responsible for some of the cost if the City were to pay for the new
construction. ,Some discussion held on the financial responsibility of
the project which is still in the negotiation stage. Further discussion
held on the possibility of lighting the courts, which will also be sub-
mitted during negotiations. It was MOVED by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously that staff be AUTHORIZED to
negotiate with the School District along the lines discussed.
The Commission advised that it had reviewed and recommended approval of
the plans for the development of a park wich tennis courts on the
southeast corner of Camino Real and Second Avenue. Courtland Paul and
Jerry Pearson presented in detail plans for the park and tennis courts.
Their conclusions were in part that the total peak occupancy of the
park will not exceed 90 persons, most of whom will be small children.
,Due to its size and location the park will be used predominantly by
persons within easy walking distance. They were of the opinion that the
number of vehicles which would be associated with the park would not
exceed 15 at any time and more likely fewer, Curbside parking on the two
streets would accommodate at least 20 cars along the frontage of the park.
It was submitted that the available on-street parking would be more than
sufficient to accommodate the parking needs and recommended against on-
site parking facilities because 1) they do not appear to be needed and
2) because the amount of space required for on-site parking would sig-
nificantly deplete the land available for park purposes. In addition
there wD.uld have to be a driveway resulting in vehicle movements on the
site and this could present safety problems.
Mr. Paul indicated the existing and proposed buffer zones to protect
adjacent residences. It was noted that the tennis courts are to be
depressed with a berm brought up to mitigate some of the sound from the
activity and if Council so elects the lighting could be metered for turn-
off at a specific time. He said that an effort was made to create
interrelationship between the shaded areas, the open play areas, the
buffer strips'and the potential tennis area.
R. E. Baker, 224 E. Camino Real, referred to the existing tennis courts
at other locations and questioned the need for more. He said the noise
and proposed lighting would reduce property values in the immediate
vicinity. He opposed the park on the grounds that an environmental
impact study with alternatives was needed to determine the effect on
surrounding residences and concluded in part by stating if a quiet park
were developed without tennis courts he would not contest it, but if
tennis courts were included he would contest. He asked that a copy of
the environmental impact study be made available to him.
11-21-72
- 3 -
RECREATION
COMMISSION
(Expand
Wilderness
Park area)
3- /~1 .&
RECESS
RECONVENED
f); PROPOSED NEW
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
(Zoning)
NEW ROOF
Police Station
(Bids
Rejected)
p;~
~L
NOISE
210 FREEWAY
-j~11
30
20:8l~
Mrs. Leonard Henkey, 230 E. Camino Real, stated in part that the park
would be an invasion of privacy with its activities and noise. She
opposed the development with or without tennis courts because there
were no provisions for off-street parking and felt cars would be parked
in front of all the homes along the two streets. She asked Council to
reject the plans as presented and have new plans prepared for a park
without tennis courts, glaring lights, and to provide off-street parking.
Discussion ensued and Councilman Helms, Council Liaison to the
Recreation Commission, stated in part that he had heard all the
arguments pro and con before the Commission, that the Planning Com-
mission had unanimously voted in favor of the park as planned, and was
of the opinion that Council should at least indicate its attitude
toward the plans and MOVED that Council adopt a Resolution of Intent
to move forward with the plans as presented including the tennis courl
subject to the approval of an environmental impact study. Motion
seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously.
At the last regular meeting of the Recreation Commission it was recom-
mended that Council give consideration to the acquisition of additional
property adjacent to Wilderness Park. Council expressed interest and
it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Arth and
carried unanimously that staff investigate the feasibility of such
acquisition and to discuss the probability with the City of Monrovia
as to the development of the land for park purposes.
At 9:15 p.m., Council recessed for the purpose of conducting a brief
meeting as the Community Redevelopment Agency.
At 9:20 p.m., Council reconvened.
The request of the temporary committee of the proposed Highland Oaks
Homeowners Association for a study of its area for the ultimate purpose
of establishing a "D" overlay was APPROVED on MOTION by Councilman
Helms, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanimously. The
request was directed to the Planning Commission. The new association
will be similar to the others in the community which have an archi-
tectural review board. The temporary committee expressed the opinion
that a ma'jority of the homeowners in the area will join the organi-
zation and will feel the "D" Overlay will give them the greatest
degree of protection in conserving the high quality residential
characteristics.
On November 7 Council continued this matter to permit staff an
opportunity to consult with the low bidder and report back with
supporting evidence concerning a guarantee of labor and material from
the proposed contractor. The City Attorney stated in part that the
guarantee offered by the contractor would not be acceptable to the
City and it was MOVED by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman' I
Arth and carried unanimously that all bids submitted for the new
roof for the police station be REJECTED.
Following further discussion concerning the most expeditious time of
year for this work to be a ccomplished it was further MOVED by
Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanic
mously that the call for bid not be readvertised until
staff makes the determination as to the proper time of year.
Council received staff report concerning the noise attenuation and
landscape plans submitted by the State Division of Highways. It was
11-21-72
- 4 -
IBALDWIN
AVENUE
IMPROVEMENT
Approved for
Design
p;~
UNDERGROUND
UTILITY V'"
DISTRICT if5
(T ime
extended)
-8-1J-b~
20:81~
noted that the preliminary plans were presented to and reviewed with
four property owner groups representing the area west of Santa Anita
Avenue. The proposed noise barriers are to provide some immediate
noise reduction.. With future mature growth of landscape material a
further improvement of visual screening and noise attenuation will be
achieved. This project will be advertised for bids in December and
it is anticipated construction will start in February of 1973.
William Weiss, 417 Harvard Drive, was advised concerning the reduction
in decibals which the State Division of Highways believes will be
possible. It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman
Arth and carried unanimously that the report be received and filed.
The development of Fashion Park at the northeast corner of Huntington
D~ive' and Baldwin Avenue necessitates the reconstruction of Baldwin
Avenue between Huntington Drive and Cambridge Drive. Staff submitted
a report and recommendation for the retention of a consultant to
perform the survey, work for the design. The schedule for the proposed
shopping center and the improvement of Baldwin Avenue indicates a
starting date of mid-April 1973 with approximately five months alloted
for the preliminary surveys and design plans to be completed so a
contract may be awarded in late March of 1973 to be reasonably certain
that the roadway improvement may be commenced by mid-April and be com-
pleted by the end of September 1973.
It was MOVED by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the recommendation of staff
be approved and that the firm of Pafford and Associates be retained at
a COSt not to exceed $3,675 and further that the sum of $4,000 be
appropriated from State Gas Tax Funds budgeted for this project..
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Helms, Scott, Hage
None
Councilman Butterworth
Upon advice of staff that the establishment of the Underground Utility
District #5 (Resolution No. 4247) requires the undergrounding of
existing overhead utilities inthe alley immediately north of Huntington
Drive between Santa Anita and First Avenues; that the bids for the
work were considerably higher than initial cost estimates and were
rejected, therefore, the original schedule cannot be adhered to; An
extension of time was recommended 0 Council agreed to the extension
of the completion date to February 28, 1973 and a resolution (No. 4302)
was adopted later in this meeting,
PETITION Council received a petition signed by 9 out of 12 property owners on
(curb/gutters the north side of EI Norte Avenue between Tenth and Mayflower Avenues
El Norte Ave.) requesting the improvement of said street with curb and gutters. The
City provides all engineering and pavement construction at no cost,
P. ~ -~ contingent on the abutting property owner paying the contract cost of
. ~ the curb, gutter and driveway aprons, The City's portion is estimated
~t at $7500 and would be paid for from available Gas Tax Funds.
~f~'
I
It being a long standing policy in the City to encourage participation
by property owners in correcting the subject deficiencies it was MOVED
by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll
call vote as follows that staff prepare the plans and specifications
for construction of the subject improvements with work to be done on
a cash basis.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Helms, Scott, Hage
None
Councilman Butterworth
11-21-72
- 5 -
WORK
ACCEPTED
(S &. W
Electrical)
+, ;). '85"'
SANDRA
.AVENUE
(FENCE)
:flo11
MOTION
. PURCHASE OF
WATER METERS
APPROVED [)
p: Sf (ft<!v
::i?~
20:81~
On advice from staff that the trenching and intersection lighting at
various locations (Job No. 393) has been satisfactorily completed by
S &.W.Electrical Contractors, Inc., it was MOVED by Councilman Helms,
seconded by Councilman Arth and carried on roll call vote as follows
that rhe work be ACCEPTED and that final payment be AUTHORIZED in
accordance with the contract.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arch, Helms, Scott, Hage
None
Councilman Butterworth
This matter was continued from November 7 at which time Council
received a report relating to a now non-existent fence along the south I
side of Sandra Avenue and instructed staff to contact the original
developer qf the subdivision and request him to install a 6 ft.
concrete block wall where the timber fence was originally located.
It was submitted by staff that this was done and the developer feels
no obligation to screen the abutting property to the south which is
owned by the Community Bank of Los Angeles. He stated he constructed
the subdivision in conformance with the approved conditions and that
after completion the City approved and accepted the development.
Staff recommended two courses of action: 1) contact the owners of
property to the south of the subject subdivision and request instal-:
lation of fencing along the northerly boundary line of their property
in the interest of preventing illegal entry and dumping trash,
2) explore the feasibility that the owner (Community Bank) proceed
with the residential development of the R-l zoned portion of their
holdings, or that this property be put on the market so that homes may
be constructed in the near future. It was MOVED by Councilman Helms,
seconded by Councilman Scott and carried unanimously that staff
proceed along the lines recommended.
Robert Carr, 83 W.. Sandra Avenue, stated in part that it was a disap-
pointment that nothing had been accomplished thus far. He was advised
that the weeds and rubbish are to be removed from the property in
question within the next few days. . Mr. Carr further explored the
situation and asked for some solutionsG Councilman Helms responded
that in his opinion if the owners of the unimproved property to the
south follow one of the two actions taken by Council at this meeting
the result would be in line with whar is desired by all of the
residents on Sandra Avenue.
Tom Laughlin, 117 W..Sandra Avenue, questioned the legality of
requiring a wall to be constructed to physically divide the commercial
from the single family zoning at the subject site. He also submitted
the possibility of the property to the south of Sandra being acquired
and developed into a neighborhood park.
Mayor Hage assured the petitioners that everything possible will be
done to remedy the situation.
I
The recommendation of staff concerning the purchase of water meters
for the ensuing year was considered at length. The report dated
November 15 stated in part that Rockwell Manufacturing Company had
offered to extend its present contract price for another year. In
response to an inquiry the City Attorney advised that this is legal.
Councilman Scott submitted in part that if the Company is willing to
do this why not go to bid instead of extending the contract, as in
his opinion whenever a city enters into the extension of an existing
contract the question always arises as to whether or not the price is
right.
The Water Manager ~Iained that among the meters examined the meter
furnished by Rockwell met the requirements whereas the other companies
did not, however, meters are also purchased from other suppliers. He
11-21-72
- 6 -
I
PUBLIC
EMPLOYMENT
PROGRAM
REPORT
I R.', pf:P
~CIAL
STATEMENT
(Octo ber)
CIVIC CENTER
PAINTING
...::J II og
I
25.5
20:81~
explored the merits of the meter in question and added that it has eaSe
of repair and a maintenance guarantee. He continued in part that for
operational and economic reasons it would be advantageous to have nearly
all meters of one make, however, this would be impractical as the City
should never be completely committed to one manufacturer. Due to the
low bid principle practiced by the City, ,Rockwell has furnished most
of the meters since 1965 and because the price trend indicates an
increase in the cost of metets he recommended taking advantage of the
offer. He noted that $40,000 is currently budgeted for meter purchase.
Councilman Scott reiterated his position in the matter; that in his
opinion the expenditure of public funds requires the bidding process;
that other city departments ,could do the same. He expressed concern
that $40,000 is being expended in this manner and would not support the
procedure,
It was the consensus of a majority of the Council that the extension
of the existing contract appears advantageous; that it has been done
previously when the price was favorable to the City, and it was MOVED
by' Councilman Arth" seconded by' Councilman Helms and carried on roll
call vote as follows that the contract with Rockwell be extended for
one year from October 31,. 1972 to the same period in 1973 under .the
same terms as in the existing contract.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Counc ilmen
, Counc ilman
Councilman
Arth, Helms,
Scott
Butterworth
Hage
Council received a summary of the results of one year of operation of
the Public Employment Program (PEP) which was made possible by Grants
provided under the Federal Emergency' Employment Act of 1971. As of
the end of the first year the City has received $107,538 in grants to
fund the program. A total of 17 positions were created. The program
is currently being continued on a month to month basis or until
Congress makes final determination for funding for the next fiscal
year.
,Council received a monthly financial statement along with &n explana-
tory attachment and expressed gratitude for the extent of the data.
Some discussion held on its content.
Council received a report and recommendation for the award of contract
for the painting of the exterior and interior of the Civic Center -
including the City Hall, ,Annex, Police Facilities, Jail and Firing
Range. Bids from two contractors were received:
Michael's Painting
Wopschall" Inc.
Totals
$ 10,948.00
12,574.00
It was MOVED by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the contract be awarded to
Michael's Painting, in the total amount of $10,948;,that the other bid
be rejected; funds for this project are in the current budget and an
additional $2,588 was authorized for transfer from Council Contingency
Account to General City Account 417-38.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Helms, Scott,. Hage
None
Councilman Butterworth
11-21-72
- 7 -
ORDINANCE
NO. 1468
ADOPTED
TIf;.7
RESOLUTION
NO. 4300
ADOPTED
3-1.J.. S;2-
RESOLUTION
NO. 4301
ADOPTED
:J- ps: ':J-
RESOLUTION
NO. 4302
ADOPTED
:ct-JJ-0f{
CLAIM
REJECTED
.:}: ek,~,
ADJOURNMENT
'3'1
20: 8]7'1'
The City Attorney presented for the second time, explained the content
and read the ti tIe of Ordinance No, 1468, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNClL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA ADDING SECTl.ON 4422 TO THE
ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO WILDERNESS PARK REGULATIONS."
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Arth and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full
body of Ordinance No. 1468 be WAIVED and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, HeLms, Scott, Rage
None
Councilman Butterworth
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4300 entitled: "A RESOLUTlON OF THE CITY COlTNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTlNG EXCLUSION FROM THE UNIFIED
SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF THAT PORTION OF
SAID DISTRICT INCLUDED WITHIN THE CUI' OF ARCADIA BY REASON OF
ANNEXATION NO. 42."
I
It was MOVED by Councilman Arth, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full
body of the resolution be WAIVED and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen
None
Counci Iman
Arth, Helms, Scott, Hage
Butterworth
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4301 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COITNCIL
OF THE C I1'Y OF ARCAD IA REQUESTlNG EXCLUS ION FROM THE WS ANGELES
COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTlON DISTRICT INCLUDED WITHIN THE ClTY
OF ARCADIA BY REASON OF ANNEXATION NO. 42."
It was MOVED by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Helms and
carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full
body of the resolution be WAIVED and that the same be ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Helms, Scott, Rage
None
Councilman Butterworth
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title
of Resolution No. 4302, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CI.TY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4247 TO EXTEND THE
TIME OF UNDERGROUNDING UTlLITIES IN UNDERGROUND DISTRICT NO.5."
It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by
carried on roll call vote as foLlows that the
body of the resolution be WAIVED and that the
Councilman Scott and
reading of the full
same be ADOPTED.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Arth, Helms, Scott, Rage
None
Councilman Butterworth
On recommendation of the City Attorney it was MOVED by Councilman
Scott, seconded by Councilman Arth and carried unanimously that the
claim filed against the City involving the City Refuse Company and
the Southern California Edison Company be rejected, and that the City
Attorney be authorized to so inform the claimant.
At 10:25 p.m., the meeting adjourned sine die.
_19n< ?t)~?(
ATTEST: Mayor
&~.t6/f( J1c~~
City Clerk
11-21-72
- 8 -