Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDECEMBER 17,1974 21:8674 CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK I "",oem", PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MINUTE APPROVAL HEARING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31826 CONTINUED TO JAN. 7, 1975 /' I HEARING (General I Plan) I MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 17, 1974 The City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, met in regular session on Tuesday, December 17, 1974 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Arcadia City Hall. Counselor Winston Christensen, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Mayor Alton E. Scott PRESENT: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None On MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Gilb and carried the minutes of the regular meeting of December 3, 1974 were APPROVED. Council members Lauber and Saelid did not vote as they were absent from said meeting. Tentative map of Tract No. 31826 to create a 16 lot subdivision at 232- 250 LeRoy and 227-253 Naomi Avenues. This tract was recommended for approval, subject to conditions, by the Planning Commission, however, at its meeting of November 19 Council requested a hearing as some members expressed a desire to further review the proposed development due to concerns as to the density factor and the general tenor of the tract. It was submitted by Councilman Saelid that he had received information that there seemed to be a legal technicality relating to the sale of a rear portion of one of the lots involved in the subdivision without going through the procedure of obtaining approval of the split. Where- upon he MOVED to continue the matter until the next regular meeting (January 7, 1975). Councilman Helms seconded the motion and suggested that staff submit some input as to the length of the cul de sac versus the code requirement and also the square footage of the various lots. During the discussion those in the audience who were present for this hearing and could not attend the January 7 meeting were asked to submit their position in writing to Council prior to that date. During the interim'staff will prepare reports on the legal status of the lot split in question, the square footage of the lots, the code requirement concerning the length of the cul de sac, Fire Department report, and all aspects of the subdivision which would be helpful to Council in its deliberation. Roll call vote was then taken on the motion to continue. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members, Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None This hearing was scheduled for consideration of amending the City's General Plan on the following areas: Area 1: 6732-6756 Golden West Avenue and 9808-9836 Naomi Avenue - proposed change in the General Plan from Medium Density Residential to General Commercial. 12-17-74 - 1 - 21:8675 Area 2: 756-818 Naomi Avenue; proposed change in the General Plan from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. Area 3: 719-803 Camino Real; proposed change in the General Plan from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. The Planning Commission determined that the current General Plan designations of the above areas should not be changed. Therefore the current General Plan designations remained inconsistent with the zoning classifications of the areas. The Commission subsequently held hearings for consideration of rezoning the areas and the following action was taken: Area 1: Area 2: Area 3: Recommended the zoning be changed from C-l to R-2. Recommended the zoning be changed from R-3 to R-2. Recommended the zoning remain R-3. I Appropriate resolutions were then adopted therefor. It was pointed out by the Planning Director that if the recommended zoning were to be adopted by Council the General Plan designations and zone classifications of Areas 1 and 2 would be consistent however Area 3 would remain in- consistent, The Planning Department now recommends that Area 1 remain as Medium -, Density ReSidential and that the zoning be subsequently changed to R-2; that Area 2 be changed from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential and the existing R-3 zoning not be changed; that Area 3 Medium Density Residential be changed to High Density Residential and that the existing R-3 zoning not be changed. Mayor Scott declared the hearing open and no one desiring to be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilwoman Lauber and carried unanimously. Extensive discussion ensued and the legal aspect was explored with the City Attorney explaining that the zoning must be consistent with the General Plan and that it is presently before the State Supreme Court with no ruling as yet. Councilwoman Lauber felt there has been too many opportunities to develop the land but due to the inconsistency with the General Plan no developer could obtain a sufficient loan. She did not agree with Councilman Helms who had suggested a wait and see position -- if a development should present itself which would require a change it could be considered at that time. He also commented that unless there is some compelling reason for a change it has been the policy of Council to uphold the Commission's recommendations. It was then MOVED by Councilman Saelid, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll call vote as follows that Area 1 remain Medium Density Residential as presently reflected in the General Plan. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: It was Saelid Medium AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Saelid, Scott Council Member Lauber None I then MOVED by Council Member Helms, seconded by, Council Member and carried on roll call vote as follows that Area 2 remain Density Residential - as reflected in the General Plan. Council Members Gilb, Helms, Saelid, Scott Council Member Lauber None It was further MOVED by Council Member Helms, seconded by Councilman Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that Area 3 remain Medium Density Residential as reflected in the General Plan. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Saelid, Scott Council Member Lauber None (Note: At the December 23 adjourned regular meeting this matter was rescheduled for discussion for public hearing proceedings on February 4, 1975.) 12-17-74 - 2 - 21:8676 y.' /.'.r ,j,j l:J , , , "~A) At its meeting of November 5 Council continued consideration of the tentative map of Tract No. 26144 (560 W. Foothill Boulevard) in order to provide for additional time for the applicant and the adjoining property owners to attempt to reach an agreement leading to the develop- ment of the entire island involved with this tract. The Planning Director advised that one of the co-owners of the adjacent property is willing to resolve the matter however the other co-owner is unwilling ....at this point. 'l.(/',>4., . Projecturals of the proposed subdivision were exhibited. Concern was expressed as to a separate parcel adjacent to proposed Lot 1 and Council inquired if the parcel could become part of said lot. Councilman Helms asked about ingress, especially if one were traveling west on Foothill Boulevard and endeavored to enter the subject property.. that it appeared vehicles would have to make a u-turn at Baldwin Avenue and go back to the subdivision. Staff responded to this inquiry by stating in part that to date the State has not approved a cut in the median strip at this location. TRACT NO. 26144 Tentative APPROVED Map I Councilman Helms also felt the 244 foot width of the subdivision is not sufficient for a safe, sound and sensible development to withstand the problems inherent in the design of the tract; that until at some indefi- nite future date the owners to the west decide to develop he could not approve something that in his opinion has too many hazards to the safety and health of the people who will eventually be moving into the sub- division. Gordon Maddock, agent for the applicant, explained the reason for the ingress from Foothill Boulevard and commented that if there were any way in which they could acquire the property to the west it could then be developed along the lines suggested by the Planning Department. In anSwer to the question he stated the small parcel adjacent to Lot 1 could be tied in and maintained for future dedication to the City in the event a street were to be opened. Councilman Gilb MOVED that Council determines the development would not have an adverse impact on the environment and that the tentative map be APPROVED subject to all conditions specified and that the small parcel adjacent to Lot 1 be tied in with said lot for maintenance purposes. Motion seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Gilb, Saelid, Scott Council Members Helms, Lauber None TRACT The Planning Commission recommended denial of the tentative map of this NO. 32563 12 lot subdivision proposed for 1030 Old Ranch Road. It was the consen_ Tentative Map s us of the majority of the Commission members that an alternative Disapproved design would be possible which would provide for safer traffic movement I at the intersection of Old Ranch Road and Foothill Boulevard - that a '. ~'~,?~~F~horter cul-de-sac would then be possible. , t', , Council reviewed projecturals which indicated the proposed cul-de-sac st.eet to be 600 feet. The lots would meet the requirement for mini-' mum lot size and the development would be consistent with the General Plan, however, there would be increased traffic problems with the street as the distance between the proposed new street and Foothill Boulevard would be a minimum for adequate turning radius. The Fire Department submitted that an alternative development would be more desirable than that proposed. In view of the problems inherent in the design it was MOVED by Councilman 12-17-74 - 3 - P: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (day care center)' APPROVED TRACT ,/NO. 31634 V Tentative Map CONTINUED TO JAN. 7, 1975 BONITA PARK v' BASEBALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED ;}-1~J A- HIGH SCHOOL BAND ACHIEVE- MENTS RECOGNIZED HUGO REID (Tennis Court) APPROVED FOR PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Jlo11J- PROCEDURAL ORDINANCE 21 :8677 Helms, seconded by Councilman Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows the tentative map of Tract No. 32563 be DISAPPROVED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None Council ratified the action of the Planning Commission in its granting a conditional use permit to allow a classroom addition and day care center to the existing American Lutheran Church building at 66 W. Duarte Road subject to conditions specified in Resolution No. 875. The MOTION to approve was made by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilwoman Lauber and carried unanimously. I Council received the recommendation for a time extension to September 1, 1975 as requested by the property owner in relation to a tentative map of Tract No. 31634 which proposes to create a 7 unit planned residential development at 343 W. Colorado Boulevard. Due to concerns expressed relating to, among other areas, the widening of the entrance to Oakhurst Lane which at the present time is a very narrow street coming off of a fast moving traffic street creating a real hazard. On MOTION by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried unanimously this matter was continued to the regular meeting of January 7, 1975. During the interim staff will prepare a report in answer to some of the questions propounded by Council. On recommendation of the Recreation Commission it was MOVED by Council- woman Lauber, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll call vote as follows that $9,318 be APPROPRIATED from the Parks & Recreation Facility Fund account for the reconstruction of the backstop at the Bonita Park Baseball Field at a cost of $4,050; the renovation and removal of the grass infield at a cost of $2,268 and the construction of a 200 sq. ft. equipment facility at a cost of $3,000. All labor will be supplied by the Baseball Leagues under the supervision of the Director of Public Works. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None On recommendation of the Recreation Commission it was MOVED by Councilman Giib, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unanimously that individual certificates be presented to the Arcadia High School Apache Band in appreciation of its outstanding achievements. This was the first and only time in the history of the Long Beach Invitational Band Parade that the Trophy has been retired by a Band on more than one occasion. I On recommendation of the Recreation Commission it was MOVED by Councilwoman Lauber, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried unani- mously that plans and specifications be prepared for Council consider- ation for the construction of one additional tennis court at the Hugo . Reid School. This would be installed immediately north of the two existing courts adjacent to Michillinda Avenue. Due to questions from the audience it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried unanimously that the pro- visions of the Procedural Ordinance be WAIVED in order to consider whether or not Community Redevelopment should be discussed. 12-17-74 - 4 - 21:8678 (}J/J-'17 It was further MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Mayor Scott that at the scheduled time on the agenda for Council consideration on an item on Community Redevelopment that no public testimony be taken. Roll call vote was then taken on this MOTION. C R A AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Helms, Lauber, Scott Council Members Gilb, Saelid None AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION I Walt Landor, 1654 Rodeo Road, spoke to his previous suggestion that a protective crosswalk be constructed in front of the Post Office on Wheeler Street; that the Postmaster was in favor of this. Mr, Landor continued by referring to Community Redevelopment which he felt should be put to a referendum and noted his reasons for this position...that it should be voted down by Councilor placed before the electorate. Mrs. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, quoted from a letter from Senator Cranston concerning the need for increased citizen participation in political and governmental processes. She submitted objection to the adoption by the City Council of Ordinance No. 1525 relating to minors attending public dances contending that the ordinance contains loopholes. She also lodged objection to further loans or appropriations for Com- munity Redevelopment with the observation that it should go before the voters of the community. With reference to an agenda item concerning the need for a new furnace in a portion of the City Hall she hoped this- would fit in with any remodeling plans for the facility. Gerald Murray, 481 Stanford Drive, was informed that lighting is not being considered for the tennis courts to be constructed at the Baldwin Reservoir site. He then referred to Community Redevelopment and sub- mitted that he understands CRA does not benefit the taxpayer and hoped Council would not proceed with the project nor spend money on a specu- lative basis. He concluded his remarks by stating in part that he hopes Council would make expenditures which would give some return to the taxpayer. Bill Gorman, 45 Alice Street, President of the East Central Residents' Association, objected to Community Redevelopment as well as the ap- propriation of any funds insignificant as they may be. He submitted in part that changes are anticipated in the State Redevelopment Law during the coming year and asked Council to abolish CRA; that the Association would be willing to work with the City in problem areas of the City. I Sherry Passmore, 1109 Columbia Road, explored an extensive discussion she had with the County Assessor concerning the tax effect on the County from the growing number of Community Redevelopment Agencies. She con- cluded in part by asking Council to consider CRA at the County level. Ed Passmore, 1109 Columbia Road, spoke to various City Charter Sections including that dealing with the vote of the electorate on bond propo- sitions; also to the principles and purposes of government which are to provide for the health, freedom and safety of citizens. He asked Council to dissolve the Community Redevelopment Agency before any irreversible action is taken. David E, Parry, 101 Santa Ynez Drive, expressed opposition to Community Redevelopment and asked for an expression from individual members of Council. He felt a detailed report should be made as to the status of CRA..,the total expenditures made thus far, any specific projects which are planned, and concluded by stating the matter should be submitted to the voters. Council returned to matters on the Agenda. 12-17-74 - 5 - COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION 1/d-CJ7 21:8679 The City Manager explained the request for an appropriation of $11,341 for clerical assistance, office operations, primarily contractural services such as appraisal, title search and the like. It was noted in the report dated November 29 that the salary of the Economic[ Coordinator is included in the regular City Budget. Principal projects proposed to be implemented under the requested funds were listed in the report. Councilman Saelid then read a prepared statement for the record: "First I would like to thank Mayor Scott and Councilmen Gilb and Helms for the courtesy of honoring my request that this matter be carried over from the previous meeting -- allowing Mrs. Lauber and me to par- ticipate in this very important matter. '~eviewing the newspaper account of the last meeting -- it was said that I am an avowed foe of community development. I understand what writer meant by that statement, but I think my position needs clari- fication. ".1 "I very much approve the proper deve lopment of our ci ty. However, I very much object to the heavy-handed tactics inherent in the operation of a state-authorized CRA: an agency empowered by state law which leaves practically no control within the hands of our citizens and which will unavoidably require an increase in taxes. "Reasons for my oPPosition to eRA in Arcadia are numerous, but I will limit my comments to cover some of what I judge to be the more important considerations. "Inherent in operation of eRA is the so-called power of eminent domain: the power of an agency to condemn private property for any use consis- tent with the redevelopment goals. "Eminent Domain" is an extremely powerful but potentially dangerous tool. It was originally designed for use in obtaining properties for such public needs as streets, fire and police stations, etc. Of late in Arcadia, it has been used to provide land for public parks. "Under the auspices of CRA, the power of eminent domain is extended to allow the condemnation of private property for private purposes. It is quite foreseeable then, that given this unbridled power of con- demnation, the agency will condemn and purchase private property from one owner, only to turn around and sell at a loss to encourage a developer into the area. "This type of transaction obviously results in a net loss to the agency-- so who pays the bill? Theoretically, this money is ultimately paid back to the agency by the hopefully improved tax base within the project area. In the beginning, of course, operating funds have to be obtained, and only a small portion of that funding is what we're considering tonight only a portion of the beginning operating overhead. I "How about the life duration of this CRA? It is not unlikely that this would last 30 or 40 years. 'The financial impact of such a program is staggering. Having :frozen the revenue base within the project area through the concept of tax increment financing -- any improvements will not benefit the City, or other taxing authorities until the project is completed and all out- standing debts paid, This means that in an inflationary period, such as we are now having and from all indications will continue to have for a long time to come -- the taxing bodies will have diminished means for pacing the inflation. Even though the subject property values may increase, the revenue base will remain constant at last year1s figures. liThe actual result of eRA activity in many instances has been to decrease the value of other parts of the community, in essence generating blighted 12-17-74 - 6 - 21:8680 areas. Should this happen in Arcadia, it would not be unlikely to see the CRA expand into not only West Arcadia, but other areas as well. '~t the time when the cost of city government is going up 7-9% a year, and cities are having a difficult time anyway maintaining a reasonable tax rate, it is sheer madness to engage in such a program which will eliminate a valuable source of revenue. "Arcadia's John Q. Citizen will be forced to make up the difference through increased taxes, and with no say in the matter. I "Those who favored CRA in the past for whatever reasons certainly owe it to the community to review their decisions with regards to our present economic situation. "It is ironic that the businessman who invested his own capital to build his business in Arcadia, who assumed his own risks in our system of free enterprise, will now be forced to pay increased taxes to sub- sidize the establishment of his competition within the City. This is not illegal by California Redevelopment Law, but it is immoral and violates any pretext of fairness. "Private redevelopment may, on the other hand, take place due to natural factors. The Foothill Freeway into Pasadena will be completed shortly, and the project area might well see a significant and real increase in demand for office space due to its proximity to the freeway. This increase in demand would occur normally, and without the artificial stimulus of the CRA. "The argument is made that without the leverage of eRA, development or redevelopment will not take place in Arcadiats project area. I submit that -- in the absence of any large-scale give-away program -- any development which requires CRA subsidy to materialize is marginal at best, and we would be better off without it. "As a business decision, disregarding for the moment the moral or philo- sophical questions -- is this an advantageous economic climate in which to enter into such a program as eRA? llWith inflation at its highest rate in many, many years, one could expect significant revenue accruals to the eRA just due to the increase in basic unimproved land values within the project area. This revenue, however, is money which would otherwise go into the City's General Fund. As a result, each property owner will have to help make up the difference through increased taxes -- to the City, and all other taxing agencies. Redevelopment will in aJ 1 probability progress very slowly in the near future regardless of whether or not the CRA is utilized, just because of the economic uncertainty and high interest rates. I I~e are in a time of national concern when every thoughtful citizen should deal cautiously with his financial assets in the interest of his oWn family's fiscal security. Government must do no less. Yet, on the agenda tonight, we have an item dealing with the consideration of a ne~ COuncil Chamber -- which might well take the form of an additional new building, Why do we need a new building? Because we must provide more office space. And here we are tonight considering adding secretarial help to the CRA which will further compound our office space problems by beginning another level of bureaucracy. "Conservative stewardship of Arcadia's operating funds by the Council managed to maintain the present property tax rate at $.94. If we now choose to launch the City into the business of redevelopment through eRA, ~e can promise our citizens a tax increase. This tax increase would not be well-received by our citizens who were promised an average of $78.00/year tax savings in return for the approval of Fashion Park just three years ago. 12-17-74 - 7 - 21:8681 "From a fiscal point of view, CRA offers speculative opportunities to land developers coupled with a potential for the greatest boondoggle in Arcadia's history at a cost to the taxpayer of a certain tax in- crease. "It is true that CRA makes possible the assemblage of independently owned land parcels by the Agency so as to faci li t'a te the introduction of business into the City which might otherwise settle elsewhere. But the cost in sacrificed property rights, the loss of control by the electorate and the histories of other agencies coupled with the con- siderations I've mentioned before makes me judge this to be far too great a risk to warrant my support. "I have up to this point since being elected supported most staff I recommendations. In this instance it seems to me that the City staff has attempted to hang their future on the prospect of CRA. I believe that we have a good, talented administrative staff here in Arcadia. We have problems, but they are not insurmountable; and do not require the use of CRA, Lou Pollard, our Assistant to the City Manager for Economic Development, is a very capable man who has worked very hard on CRA. I would only hope that he would continue his good work here, but with his emphasis directed to private redevelopment rather than CRA. "In closing, I would point out that the vast majority of Arcadia citizens reject the use of CRA in our City, This was certainly apparent during the last councilmanic election campaign. Proponents on the other hand seem to be almost without exception limited to small special interest groups, "The description of the intended function of the City Council as con- tained in this years annual budget includes the following: One of the basic functions of the Council is the translation of the attitude of the general demands of the citizens into municipal action. "In light of this described responsibility and the considerations I have mentioned already, I urge for the denial of this funding request; or at the very least, if my colleagues disagree with me as to the attitude of our citizens, that we submit this to the voters in an advisory election, and agree to abide with the election results. "We are all aware of how the problem of CRA has caused unrest, turmoil, and even resulted in a recall election in one of our nearby cities. "By demonstrating good faith with the electorate th'rough solLciting its advice through the ballot box, we could avoid such divisive action from taking place in Arcadia. II Councilwoman Lauber: "I haven't prepared any statement of that magnitude and I compliment you on your homework, I feel this philosophy and agency is something that has already happened and we are not here tonight to act on that.. it's really rather a routine matter that we are acting on.. we are simply funding tonight from a budget that has been approved on an I agency that has been created by the Council. We have definite things that the Agency is working on.. Trilco Inc., the vacant service station site, the vacation of Indiana Street, and the development of other sites. We have several very interesting and hopeful signs on our horizon and I feel it is incumbent upon me as a Councilwoman to make available any and all tools at my disposal that could be used to implement the very best planning and action for this community. I have enough confidence in this Council and my own ability to ride herd and keep a close eye on anything that we might do in the future." Councilman Saelid commented in part that he felt if there is good financial backing for the projects listed they would materialize without CRA. Mayor Scott stated in part: "That no one has recognized the fact that the administration of the CRA program is the City Council; that Council comes before the electorate at regular times; that at any time the 12-17-74 - 8 - I IMOTION to approve appropriation 21:8682 electorate is disenchanted with either the Councilor with CRA they have the recourse to the ballot box and that at any time Council may by a vote eliminate CRA. It isn't something that the Community will be saddled with as has been alluded to. By what stretch of the imagination would it be considered that Council would perpetuate a CRA program if it is a give-away or if it is filled with fraud or serves any special' interests. If the community does not have confidence in its elected officials then changes may be made at the ballot box; that things have been said that are not basic in fact. When the Towne Center was being constructed there were arguments against it and now it is a landmark in the City. It was developed with private funds. This is the type of thing that ,I' envision. can be done with CRA. With reference to Fashion Park,which was opposed by many, yet this will and it already has been shown that it will improve the tax base. I feel the business community of the city is in support of CRA; not 100 percent - but in the main." Councilman Gilb stated in part, "Being a businessman I never spend money until I have the money. Spending anticipated earnings is a very dangerous thing. Fashion Park is not a success yet. It is going through the beginning stages. We are not discussing that. I would' like to wait and see. I feel it is a subsidy and I am for free enterprise and do not believe in subsidies. I feel Council members have to take into consideration what they think to be right, I certainly have to vote on various things as I see them, and I agree with Mayor Scott in this regard, however, I have to agree with Councilman Saelid on CRA. True the item before us is merely a request for a loan and appropriation for administrative costs, still just because the money is already budgeted it does not necessarily have to be spent." Counc ilman He lms: "I'll be br ief - - I have spent between 20 and 30' hours in public hearings already on this matter..probably in excess of 100 hours in study. There is very little that has been said here tonight that hasn't been said before. I'm impressed by the fact that very little in the way of factual material has been discussed. Generally we hear broad threats that have no relevance. This discloses to me a total lack of faith and understanding on the part of the speakers. The City Council is elected by the people. It has had the power of condem- nation since it began. The public has never found cause for fear that the Council is going to use this power to its own advantage, or to the detriment of the citizens. I think we must have some faith in our elected leaders to do for the community those things which have to be done and do them in an honorable, just, fair and right way. CRA is a tool, and like many other tools that the City must uSe to improve the community, it has to be used wisely. I am sure it will be used wisely and will be an overall benefit. Contrary to what has been said tonight it will reduce the burden on the homeowners in their property taxes, I am not really impressed with any of the speeches against it because no one has really given any good reason why CRA should not continue' to exist in the City, nor why it should not be used as a tool in a proper way at the proper time." Councilman Helms then MOVED to appropriate the sum of $11,341 from CRA Budget as requested by staff. Councilwoman Lauber seconded the MOTION which carried on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Helms, Lauber, Scott Councilmen Gilb, Saelid None Councilman Helms further MOVED to reaffirm the position previously" taken by the City Council in support of Community Redevelopment.' Motion seconded by Councilwoman Lauber which carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Helms, Lauber, Scott Council Members Gilb, Saelid None 12-17-74 - 9 - PLAQUE FOR PARK APPROPRIATION ~ -j-/?/'I<' COUNCIL CHAMBER ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AUTHORIZED 3- f:~ :-: J:-:- STOI' SIGNS Ho lly and Norman :: I ,( j~ -~'f'~" -~,. {I Genoa and First EASEMENT (Riding & Hiking Trail) p: k.'7, L , I '(. l/~ ' ': r ~ J U/ f~L CITY HALL FURNACE REPLACEMENT APPROPRIATION 1- / :J S"" }t 21:8683 On MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilwoman Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows $275 was authorized for appropri- ation from Sister City Budget for the cost of a plaque for install- ation at the Tripolis Friendship Park. Delivery time was estimated to be in approximately three weeks. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None The City Manager presented a proposed contract for architectural services of Ruhnau, Evens, Ruhnau Associates, for the Council Chamber Project. This includes development of studies, cost estimates and graphics for I a new Chamber, alterations to the existing Council Chamber and space studies of certain offices in the City Hall. Total cost indicated at $6,000. During this consideration Herman O. Ruhnau answered questions and estimated the time for completion of the work to be ninety days after receiving notice to proceed. It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that the subject contract be APPROVED and that the Mayor and City Clerk be AUTHORIZED to execute the contract in form approved by the City Attorney. Funds for this project are in the Capital Projects Program. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None In response to Council's directive an engineering study was made on the request for a four-way boulevard stop at Holly and Norman Avenues. The report contained traffic counts, accident history, condition diagrams, nationally recognized guidelines and recommendations of staff which set forth reasons for recommending denial. Elimination of some of the visibility problems was also explored. Staff will meet with the pro- ponents of the petition for a 4-way stop sign in an endeavor to reach solutions. Included in the subject report was reference to the economic impact relating to the traffic flow at Genoa and First Avenues. On recommendation of staff it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilwoman Lauber and carried on roll call vote as follows that an easement over the northerly 6.44 ft. of 1303 Linda Way be quitclaimed to the owner of record subject to the usual processing fee of $50. The easement has not been used since the recently approved spur trail terminates at a point northerly thereof. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None I Council received the report and staff recommendation on the need to replace the furnace which heats the upper section of City Hall. Informal bids were received as follows: David L. Peacock Bowman of Arcadia $1,803 1,307 On recommendation of staff it was MOVED by Councilwoman Lauber, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried on roll call vote as follows that the bid of Bowman of Arcadia in the amount of $1,307 be accepted; that $1,307 be appropriated from the General Contingency Account for transfer to Account No. 417-38. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None 12-17-74 - 10 - DANCE PERMIT WESTERNER CONTINUED TO JANUARY 7, 1975 V" I OTHER DANCE PERMITS TO BE REVIEWEDV' FINANCIAL IEPORT RECEIVED ESOLUTION O. 4470 ADOPTED s; rKO-M !./-.~:J.-- . II L; I" 1. ':Y'I'j.,?r-t-- " ", 21:8684 Council considered the problems which have been reported resulting from the dancing at the Westerner Restaurant. The City Manager reported on the findings by the Police Department indicating that the lack of parking space in the restaurant parking lot did create parking problems on city streets adjacent thereto, along with other problems. Marty Yurich, owner-operator of the restaurant, acknowledged the parking problems and related his endeavors to remedy the situation. He expressed willingness to cooperate in any way possible and suggested closing off the commercial portion of the street from the residential area. In answer to a question he said the parking lot belonging to the Thorobred Owners' Association was not available. He submitted that he employs four off-duty policemen to circle the area until 2 a.m. on weekends. The following persons spoke to the problems encountered and requested relief therefrom. Brian Rowe, 143 Santa Cruz - Mr. Rowe also presented a petition and a letter from Mrs. Zandler, 200 Santa Rosa Road, asking assistance. Mrs. Blanche Mutschler, 231 Santa Rosa Road Gerald DeMars, 133 Santa Cruz Road W. McMath, 200 Santa Rosa Road Thomas Kocaya, 137 Santa Cruz Road Robert Nicol, 129 Santa Cruz Road (also asked for improved lighting on his street.) Lawrence Mutschler, 231 Santa Rosa Road David E. Parry, 101 Santa Inez Tom Chishol, 223 San Luis Rey During the observations made by Mr. Rowe... it was suggested that the street be closed. Various solutions were explored by Council and it was the consensus that a comprehensive report be prepared by staff - whereupon it was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Mayor Scott and carried unani- mously that the owner-operator continue with his week-end policing; that the existing permit be continued to the regular meeting of January 7, 1975 and that staff furnish traffic studies, report on barri- cading and/or closing of the street, fire department report relating to the various suggestions and legal opinions on all aspects. It was MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilwoman Lauber and carried unanimously that dance permits issued to other locations be EXTENDED for 30 days from December 31; that during the interim they be reviewed by Council for any complaints on their operations and whether or not public hearings are indicated. Council received the financial report for November 1974. The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resoludon No. 4470 entit led: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AUTHORIZING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS TO THE 1974-1975 POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET FOR RACE TRACK TRAFFIC CONTROL." It was MOVED by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full text be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None 12-17-74 - 11 - RESOLUTION NO. 4471 ADOPTED D' J.- r , I.,. i- I 1Jt1 >,iC" .-. CLAIM DENIED Gonzales, et a1 FASHION PARK Restroorns j:~:"-7 VANDALISM PROCEDURAL ORDINANCE PARK SITE APPRAISAL APPROVED V' 21:8685 The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 4471 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF INDIANA S'lREET." It was MOVED by Councilman Gilb, seconded by Councilman Helms and carried on roll call vote as follows that the reading of the full text be waived and that same be ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None On recommendation of the City Attorney the claim of Gonzales, Berry and Battle was DENIED on MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried on the following roll call vote: I AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None The City Manager reported that Santa Anita Associates have stated it will install four restrooms in the Fashion Park Mall - two restrooms on each level - Bill Stone, Manager of the facility, explained what is planned. Council concurred and commended the Association for its cooperation. A communication will be so directed. Councilman Helms referred to a report corning to him on vandalism at the Santa Anita Bowling Alley on Las Tunas at El Monte. He noted that at the time Council was considering approving the pinball room at this location this possibility was explored. In order to consider the following item the prOV1Slons of the Procedural Ordinance were waived on MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Saelid and carried unanimously. On MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Gilb and carried on roll call vote as follows an amount not to exceed $1000 was author- ized for appropriation from the General Contingency account for appraisal of park sites in the east central area of the City. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Council Members Gilb, Helms, Lauber, Saelid, Scott None None Councilman Saelid inquired as to what type of legislation it would take to make it legal for a businessman to have a flower cart in front of his store which is not offensive or a problem. He asked for some consideration in this regard. I Councilman Gilb noted the selling of flowers on Foothill Boulevard by young people -- without license. The City Attorney responded to Mayor Scott's inquiry concerning the placing of advertising material on the windshield of cars parked in the Fashion Park parking lot - the parties involved have been notified they are in violation. 12-17-74 - 12 - APPOINTMENTS BICENTENNIAL COMMISSION v ADJOURNMENT TO DATE CERTAIN I I 21:8686 On MOTION by Councilman Helms, seconded by Councilman Gilb and carried unanimously the following appointments were made: Ed Passmore (representing the Rancho Santa Anita Residents' Association). Bill Kramb and Susan Gutenberg, alternate (representing the Youth Commission) . At 11:45 p.m., the meeting ADJOURNED to 4 p.m. December 23, 1974. ATTEST: &~~ ~~3/--<<J Mayor City Clerk 12-17-74 - 13 -