HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH 14,1995
1
'I
:1
O/ff). ";;U
03IV7\-
37:0065 cc
CllY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CllY
CLERK
ROll
CAll
CLOSED
SESSION
0110 - yo!)
1.
2.
3.
LOJESKJ
(Absent -
March
21 Mtg.)
YOUNG
(Recep.
tion -
Sls.CIty /
German
Visitors)
OI:J.O_^'O
rI ,/-
MINUTES
CllY COUNCIL OF THE CllY OF ARCADIA
and
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING (STUDY SESSION)
MARCH 14, 1995
The City Council and the Arcadia Redevelopmem Agency met In an Adjourned Regular
Meeting (Study Session) on Tuesday, March 14, 1995 at 5:30 p. m. In the Council
Chambers Conference Room.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Council/Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, LoJeskl, Margett and Young
None
At 5:34 p. m. the Redevelopment Agency ENTERED a CLOSED SESSION pursuam to
Governmem Code Section 54956.8, to provide direction to the Agency's negotiators
for the possible acquisition and developmem of the Foulger Ford site (55 East
Humlngton Drive) for a theater /restaursm complex, pursuam to an Exclusive Right to
Negotiate with Vlc Georglno, Developer. At 5:45 p. m. the Closed Session ended and
the Adjourned Regular Meeting (Study Session) RECONVENED.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
None
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
None
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/STATEMENTS/FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councllmember Lojeski requested that he be excused from the March 21, 1995 Council
meeting to fulfill a lecture commitmem which will take him away from the City.
Mayor Young announced that there will be a reception at the Community Center
sponsored by the Sister City Commission for a delegation from Zelendorf, Germany
on March 28. The German visitors are Interested In establishing a Sister City
relationship with Arcadia.
1
3/14/95
4.
07:"'0.C(O
37:0066
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ABOUT THE MASTER PLAN FOR PUBUC
BUILDINGS, FINANCIAL PLAN AND LIBRARY RENOVATION PROJECT
1
At the February 14, 1995 study session Council considered the Master Plan fOl' Public'
Buildings prepared by Lisa Sachs of Construction Controls Group, snd the Flnsncial
Plsn presented by Paul McDonald of Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, which set forth
financing options for the payment of the proposed projects. Assislant City
Manager/Fire Chief Gardner gave a report also on the bids received fOl' the renovation
and expansion of the City Ubrary.
The City Council decided at the February 14th study session that Alternative I was the
preferable facilities alternative. Alternative I Involves the demolition of the Armory
facilities which space would In turn be used fOl' the construction of a new slate-of-the-
art police facility. The vacated police facilities would be converted Into City
Development Services offices which would free-up space within the current city hall
buildings. City hall renovations would be required as well. Alternative I assumed also
that excess space In city hall would then exist which could be leased out to help offset
city hall operational costs. The net projected costs fOl' Alternative I were estimated to
be $23,178,650. The unfunded cost for Alternative I has since been revised downward
by $2,100,000 to $21,078,650, reflecting the availability of certain drug seizure and race
track revenues which could be applied to the project cost.
Based upon Input received at the February 14 study session, It was decided that
General Obligation (GO) Bonds snd Certificates of Participation (COP) or s
combination thereof waa the most appropriate and cost-effective means of funding the
facilities.
1-'
Mr. John White of Rauscher Pierce Refsnes (RPR) was In attendance this date to
present an overview of RPR's Revised Financing Analysis fOl' funding the City facl:ltles
projects listed In the Master Plan, Altarnatlve I. Mr. White referred to RPR's March 8
report which stated that GO bonds were the preferable means of financing the projects
from a financial standpoint in that the average net debt service annually to finance the
$21 million would be approximately $t.8 mlllle-n, which Is lower than the annual debt
service of $2.1 million for COP's, or approximately $1.8 million annual debt service fOl'
a combination of GO bonds and COP's. Mr. White pointed out that the lax rate on an
assessed property valuation of $225,000 for all GO Bonds would be approximately $57.
annually per tax bill., The difficulty with a bond Issue Is that It would require a two-
third majority vote of the City electorate. COP's are secured by the City's general
revenue funds which RPR believes could be derived from race track revenue, and an
IncreaBe of 1.84% to the utility users lax of 5%, and annual Interest from the
Redevelopment Agency for Interest owned on loans from the City. A funding
combination of GO bonds and COP's would require approximately $1 million In Ad
Valorem property laxes (GO Bonds); $500,000 from race track revenues and
Redevelopment Interest payments of $300,000 annually. The property tax rate per
$225,000 assessed valuation for this combination would be approximately $36. per
year, with voter approval.
Following Mr. White's comparison of financing alternatives, Council discussed the
Information provided. Council member Lojeskl digressed to a similar discussion the
'previous City Council held just two yeara ago where a bond Issue was merely
contemplated as an alternative to expending City reserves, and this created much
I~
2
3/14/95
_I
-I
,I
ADJOURN-
MENT
ATTEST:
,
'I
.1
37:0067
criticism In the community and became a political issue. Councilmember Kuhn felt
that the community would not accept a bond Issue. Mayor Young felt the community
might accept a bond Issue for a police station only. Councilmember Margett
commented that If Council Is aware that the community would not accept funded debt
then Council should seek other ways of getting the Job done, and suggested that these,
public facilities be constructed with private monies with a City lease-back for a number
of years at which time the facility ownership would revert back to the City. Perhaps
Santa Anita Race Track would be Interested in this sort of an Investment. He did not
think voters would buy Into a bond Issue. Mr. White commented that the annual debt
service for the lease-back alternative financing plan would be greater than the options
he presented. Council member Margett felt the Investors depreciation of the buildings
would offset the capital costa. Staff will research thla optlon and get back to the
Council. Councilmember Margett said If staff Intands to do that, then some guidelines
should be set that the City would pay no more than $1 million a year In lease payments
for a pollee facility, and not any more than $60,000 a year for the Ubrsry facility, for
example. Mayor Young noted that perhaps the City should not try to do everything
at once. Council member Kuhn agreed with Mayor Young. The City Manager pointed
out that the critical need at this time is the Pollee Station and the Ubrsry ... both of
these facilities are suffering physically from deferred maintenance, and the City needs
$20 million now... other City buildings C3n be done at a later date.
Considersble discussion centered on the Ubrsry. Council member Lojeskl suggest':'d
that staff approach the School DIstrict to share In the cost of the Ubrsry renovation,
since the schools benefit from Library services. The City Attorney commented that
libraries are generally deemed as having an educational purpose, and In genersllaw
cities IIbrsrles come under the authority of the Education Code. The City Manager
commented that the School District couid be formally asked if they would be Interested
In assisting the City In the Ubrsry project. He will bring this Information back when
the bJd for construction 01 the Ubrary il considered.
In conclusion, the City Manager noted that the presentation this date was mainly to
provide additional Information to the Council regarding project Ilnanclng. The only
critical Issue at this time Is the Ubrary bid which Is good for 90 days only. A decision
must be reached by the explrstion date, April 17. Council decided to place the Ubrsry
project on the April 4 Council agenda lor conslderstion 01 the base bid, the alternatives
and award 01 the contract.
At 7:05 p. m. the Adjourned Regular Meeting (Study Session) ADJOURNED to 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, March 21, 1995 In the Council Chambers for a regular meeting to conduct
the buslnesl of the City Council and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency and any
Closed Session necessary to discuss personnel, litigation matters and evaluation of
properties.
O~4~~
Ju~b. Alford, 29 Clerk
3
3/14/95