HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCTOBER 11,1994
I
I
(;')/10 - ','(J
If) lit! II
36:0343 C(_
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK
ROLL CALL
CITY ATTNY
(Combr Kuhn -
FPPC Legal
Opinion)
/f) 1./0 . ",: '
Nt,P
CHANG
(Televise
Study Sess.)
{ . J -,,,.'111
^~;:l
LOJESKI
(Televise
Study Sess.)
(' I ." f'
'" .1
LOJESKI
(Conflict
of Interest)
?J"1f.J ..t.*,u
,.1' r-"
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
and the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING (STUDY SESSION)
OCTOBER 11, 1994
The Arcadia City Council and Redevelopment Agency met in an
Adjourned Regular Meeting (Study Session) on Tuesday, October 11,
1994 at 5:30 p. m. in the City Council Chambers.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Council/Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, Lojeski and Young
Council/Agency Member Margett (arrived at 5:37 p.m.)
It was MOVED by Council/Agency Member Chang, seconded by
Council/Agency Member Lojeski and CARRIED to EXCUSE the absence
of Council/Agency Member Margett.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
The City Attorney announced that, in comparing a recent legal
opinion, rendered by the Fair Political Practices Commission,
with the agenda items to be considered at this meeting,
Councilmember Kuhn may only participate in discussion and voting
of certain specific items. The City Attorney distributed a list
to Council, earlier given to Counci1member Kuhn, of those items
in which she may participate. Councilmember Kuhn has an
ownership in an office building in the Redevelopment Proj ect Area
which will be under discussion this evening.
QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL REGARDING CLARIFICATION OF AGENDA ITEMS
None
Vincent Havdel, Area Manager, Southern California Edison Company,
stated, in part, that the Edison Company is going through many
changes similar to changes occurring in other businesses. The
Edison Company is in process of downsizing ... He feels that it
is important that Edison work very closely with the City so that
they may address all City service needs. Edison will continue
to provide good service.
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
Mayor Pro tern Chang commented that there are a lot of issues to
be discussed tonight at this open meeting ... television should
have been arranged. The "Mayor explained that only the main
Council meetings are televised.
Councilmember Lojeski concurred with Mayor Pro tem Chang, and
said in part, that although tonight's meeting is a study session
th~ Council lIIa) &l."'vc ~l.~cc;:ion tc st:~~f .::t this c:JtJc vi a
meeting. Council should consid~r the .items on the agenda and
cab1ecast meetings such as this when there are important items
to be considered.
In reply to a question from Councilmemb!!E Lojeski, the City
Attorney stated-in-van', -.that-the-cri:teri:a-considered when.
disqualifying a Councilmember from - 'participating in a
redevelopment project item is own~F'!..hip in..a business or land
within a specific distance of the project__ For example, if
~~"!"1- ----=
10/11/94
'",,,'
,,-:" -
. "
LOJESKI
(210 FWY
Soundwalls)
(Sidewalk
Dining)
(City Treas.
Parker)
(Anoakia -
701 W.
Foothill B1.)
(ic;/, 0-,
NsP
1.
PURPOSE OF
STDY.SESS.&
OVERVIEW OF
AB 1290)
j,S: 03".:4-
within 300 feet of a project and a determination can be made that
participation in that item would have absolutely no economic
effect on that particular Agency Member's interest "Jhatsoever,
The City Attorney further explained other issues '.hich might
preclude participation, basically, disqualification is based on
distance and appraisal information.
Councilmember Lojeski reported that persons living within the
Upper Rancho Homeowners Association have sent letters to
himself and other Councilmembers regarding installation of
soundwalls along the 210 Freeway in their area. Staff '.i11
direct an answer to the president of the Association requesting
that evidence be provided to the City that the Association Board
endorsed the proposal for soundwalls.
I
In reference to restaurant sidewalk dining, staff reported that
this issue will be placed on a November Council meeting agenda
for an update from staff. At that time Council can choose
whether.or not to amend the Arcadia Municipal Code accordingly
to make sidwa1k dining allowable.
Councilmember Lojeski commended City Treasurer Jerry Parker for
setting in place the Santa Anita Fashion Park public parking lot
escrow matter, thus earning quite a sum for the City. Council
expressed their appreciation to the City Treasurer also.
Councilmember Lojeski inquired about the status of the Anoakia
property as far as its possible designation as a state or federal
historic preservation site. The City Manager advised that staff
did a quick analysis of the site and determined there could be
some historical artifacts on the property. however, to request
state and national historical designation would require
additional staff work, federal designation in particular, since
that process is very time consuming. It was noted that the
owners of Anoakia have not expressed any interest in seeking this
designation. Councilmember Lojeski suggested that a staff
memorandum on this matter be brought back to Council for review
of the background information of the site at, perhaps, a study
session. The Anita Baldwin mansion has historical significance
to the community. Staff will agendize the Anoakia report to
which Councilmember Loj eski referred, for a November Council
meeting.
AT 5:55 P. M. THE MAYOR CALLED A BRIEF RECESS TO ALLOW THE
COUNCIL/AGENCY TO MOVE FROM THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS TO THE
CONFERENCE ROOM FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT REPORTS AND DISPLAYS.
AT 5: 59 P'.M. THE STUDY SESSION RECONVENED
CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
The City Manager/Executive Director stated, in part, that this
study session is a result of a previous meeting in July, 1994.
in an attempt to focus the City's revitalization program,
principally in the downtown area. In July the Agency received a
binder of information on many projects for a definitive
discussion of individual projects page by page. At that time it
was difficult to go through twenty plus projects and the Agency
asked staff to try and focus on certain specific important
projects. The dis~~ssion this ~dte, OctoL~~ 11, was principally
on very specific projects-that may be achievable based upon the
City's income and what is happening out in the business market.
In reference to the downtown area along Huntington Drive, the
City Manager/Executive Director commented that the Agency needs
to be sure that they think about the entire City. At the time
Council begins the 'mid-year' bUdget'review',- December or January,'
staff will provide an update on the individual commercial core
areas throughout the City. There is a need to adopt a Citywide
strategy for economic development. A lot of emphasis has been
put on the downtown area,' Hunt~ngton Drive from Santa Anita to
I
o
--2-
10/11/94
.
I
I
r' ',I).
I" "
36:0345
Se~ond Avenue, and on First Avenue, but the Agency should also
fo~us on the other commercial cores which represent north
Ar~adia. the race track, the mall and other commercial areas in
the City. The City Manager/Executive Director reported that
Ar~adia is exceeding in sales in comparison to other cities and
the Agency should make sure that that position is maintained,
however, .Arcadia is extreme ly vulnerable to changes in 5 tate law,
su~h as, lease rates, and sales tax distribution.
Specifically, in regard to the downtown area along Huntington
Drive, the City Manager/Executive Director commented that the
goal of this meeting is to focus on some very specific projects
and for staff to receive the Agency's direction on individual
sites as to the uses the Agency may want or not want, and
conclude this meeting with a discussion of the downtown
revitalization program... the street and other programs, along
with the budget to achieve all of these goals. At this time, the
City Manager/Executive Director noted, there are more projects
than money ... and creativity is needed to get the projects
ac~omplished at the same time.
OSlc'. .' .., I The City Manager/Executive Director reviewed the effect of
Assembly Bill 1290, which was adopted and became effective in
January, 1994. This bill completely changed the horizon of
redevelopment law throughout the state. AB 1290 was the result
of what the legislators in Sacramento felt were the prior abuses
of redevelopment ... so the law was rewritten. A staff report
will be provided to the Agency at the next Agency meeting that
will recommend changes to the Agency's debt limit; redevelopment
tax increment; a change to the time the plan is in effect; and
th~ debt service. All of these items are being changed and
reduced down ... this will have an impact on how the Agency
plans for the future. The changes must be in place by the end
of 1994. In addition, the City Manager/Executive Director
commented, much of what the Agency decides this evening must be
put together into an implemencation plan for the project area.
Th~ StaCe has mandated thac Agencies be more specific on what
th~y are doing annually ... what money the Agency is receiving
and how it is spent.
2.
Requesc for Redevelopment Agency approval and/or direction on
ch~ following projects:
2a.
SW CORNER
SITE
Oc;.:;-;; . (' '/'1
Consideration of the staff request for Agency approval to
negociate for office, dinner house/rescauranc, retail: and/or
mixed uses on the Southwest corner site. This 51,000 square
fo~t vacant propercy can be combined with the adjacent access
road and island which would increase the size to 57,000 square
fe~c. Dave Powell of Hayes and Company, the Agency's broker,
advises that currently a furniture retailer, an office use and
a ~estauranC have expressed primary interesc in this site. Staff
estimates $15,000 to $100,000 for miscellaneous administrative
costs to acquire the City owned island and access road adjacent
to this site if included in the development. Also, a 5%
commission would be paid to Hayes & Company out of the land sale
pr~ceeds .
The Age:1"Y's discussion focused on the uses for the Southwest
Corner s"te, specifically, what would the Agency like to see
devplnnp~ thpy.p.. Also should the development promote image or
economic return or both for the City. Chairperson Young said
she would like to see a dinner house/restaurant or a retail
development... this would be a wonderful corner for a Pier One
store. An office building would be way down on the list.
Ag~ncy Memq~r Chang said that a furniture store or a restaurant
would be 'fine.
Agency Member Margett concluded that if he had to make a choice
between physical improvements or development to increase sales tax,
3
10/11/94
36:0346
he would plan for attractiveness of something that will have the
effect of bringing in other generators for the taxes.
Agency Member Lojeski said he would like to see a quality dinner
house/restaurant, professional or medical office building or any
type of mixed uses, but NO tire stores or fast food places. He
also asked if the Agency is willing to write the land down.
Agency Member Kuhn felt that whatever is developed on the site
has to fit in with the market flow. A quality dinner
house/restaurant would be nice. The site is not good for retail.
She does not want a fast food restaurant.
Agency Member Margett MOVED that the Agency would like to see an I
attractive development on the Southwest Corner site (Huntington
and Second Avenue), so that it would be the catalyst to be able
to get generation to the downtown area, second by Agency Member
Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, Lojeski, Margett and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
2b.
NW CORNER
SITE
(Htg. & 2nd
Ave.)
z.Jl/ t.. t 1
Consideration of the staff request for Agency approval to
negotiate for retail, medium density residential, and/or mixed
uses, on the Northwest Corner site. The subject site is a vacant
175,000 square foot (4 acres) area which can be developed with
'.,& the aforesaid uses. Other possibilities include development as
" (, a soccer/roller hockey sports facility or an ice skating arena.
The site has been marketed by Dave Powell, Hayes and Company,
for commercial office and restaurant use. Mr. Powell noted that
there was developer interest in those uses as well as an eight
story office building, senior housing and a hotel. The sites
lack of visibility, due to the railroad overpass and berm, has
affected its viability, according to Mr. Powell. Staff's cost
estimate for the Northwest Corner site is $5,000 for
miscellaneous administrative costs, and a 5% commission paid to
Hayes and Company out of the land sale proceeds.
In the Agency's discussion of development of this site, Agency
Member Lojeski felt that this would be a good site for a
recreational facility, use of which would increase use of the
local hotels, restaurants and retail shops. He would also be
interested in a planned unit residential development as opposed
to low cost housing on the site.
Chairperson Young felt this to be a good site for a soccer/roller
hockey sports facility or ice rink.
Member Chang said he would prefer medium density residential
housing, senior housing or a hotel on the Northwest Corner site.
I
Member Margett said he would like to see this site developed with
affordable housing.
Member Lojeski MOVED to AUTHORIZE staff to negotiate for retail,
residential use consistent with redevelopment law, or a hotel;
au..Vor mixed uses on the Northwest Corner site, inclusive of an
ice rink or other recreational facilities, second by Chairperson
Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows:
,
2c. "
LIGHT RAIL
STATION/
TRANSIT CTR.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
I~
Members Chang, Lojeski, Margett and Young
Agency
None
Agency
Member Kuhn
Consideration of staff's reque~t for the Agency to designate the
area around Front Street, St. Joseph, .Firs t Avenue and Santa
4
10/11/94
I
I
2d. ASH
2l0/WEST
(Costco)
:J (;, ?1o - ,) I
36,0347
Clara Street, as the potential site for a future Light Rail
Station/Transit Center and provide direction to staff regarding
the possible acquisition of the Cate11us and Metropolitan Transit
Authority properties. The area between the aforesaid streets was
the location of the former Arcadia train station.
Michael Fteedman, the Agency's previous downtown revitalization
consultant, proposed moving the station site to the Huntington
Drive/Second Avenue area, either at Bonita Park and school or
the Northwest Corner site. The Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (MTA) environmental impact report has assessed all
three locations. Staff prefers the Front Street/First Avenue/
St. Joseph site because of its central location, its street
network, availability, practicality, and the fact that the Agency
and City own two of the three properties, also its lower cost.
The City can attempt to lobby the MTA or use MTA funds to acquire
the 30,610 square foot Catellus property east of the railroad
tracks (adjacent to the Agency owned property), and donate MTA
land along Front Street west of the tracks to the city. If this
is not feasible, Proposition A and C funds could be used to
acquire the Catellus owned parcel and to design and construct a
Light Rail Station/Transit Center.
A discussion ensued and Agency Member Margett felt that the light
rail station would better serve customers of the potential
recreational facility at the NW Corner site if the station were
located at the SE Corner of Huntington and Second Avenue, or placed
at the NW Corner if a recreational center is not located there.
Chairperson Young prefers the original train station site on
Front Street which is centrally located. Further, she felt that
a station located at the Southeast Corner of Huntington Drive
and Second Avenue, the Pony League baseball field, would create
turmoil in the city.
Member Lojeski believes the light rail station should be located
on the former site on Front Street which would better serve the
race track ... whose customers would use the train possibly more
than other persons.
Member Chang concurs with staff's recommendation that the station
should be located on the former station site and MOVED to
designate the area around Front Street, St. Joseph, First Avenue
and Santa Clara as the potential site for a future Light Rail
Station/Transit Center; and DIRECT staff regarding the possible
acquisition of the Catellus and MTA properties; also DIRECT that
staff provide the Agency with figures of the costs of locating
the station on the NW or SE Corner of Huntington Drive and Second
Avenue; second by Chairperson Young and CARRIED on roll call
vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Agency Members Chang, Lojeski, Margett and Young
None
Agency Member Kuhn
The Agency previously investigated the possibility of acqulrlng
the parcels in the triangle north of Santa Clara Street, east of
Second Avenue and south of the 210 Foothill Freeway for a 144,000
square foot Costco retail warehouse. The City/Agency would have
to relocate the St. Joseph Water Facility to either Newcastle
Park or Eisenhower Park, obtain permission of the Army Corps of
Engineers and the L. A. County Department of Public Works to
build over the Santa Anita Wash, relocate a county riding and
hiking trail and relocate major Edison service lines.
Based upon an economic analysis by Jim Williams, the Agency's
redevelopment consultant, the project will not yield an adequate
return for the investment due in part to the $9-10 million cost
of relocating the water tanks. Also, staff has not been
5
10/11/94
2e.
FIFTH AVE.
JOINT PROJ.
(Arcadia/
Monrovia)
0(" IrO.f)>{
2f.
FOULGER FORD
SITE
(Rtg, /Morlan
Pi. /Santa
Clara)
06~O _ 0.'\
36:0348
successful in obtaining Corps of Engineers support for
constructing a building ,over the wash.
Agency Member Kuhn felt that it was time to let the 2l0/Costco
project die ... it has been dead a long time. Member Margett
concurred.,
Member Loj eski agreed that the Agency should not proceed any
further with the project, however, if the small water tank on
this site under discussion has to be relocated or rebuilt on
another site, that area could then be used for a parking lot for
a nearby establishment. Also, the door should not be closed to
Costco if Costco should be interested in constructing a vertical
building on another site in the City.
It was MOVED by Agency Member Lojeski, seconded by Member Kuhn I
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to formally DISCONTINUE
consideration of the Santa Clara/Second Avenue/2l0 Freeway/Wash
site for a Price/Costco project as co~figured to this point.
AYES:
Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, Loj eski, Margett and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Consideration of staff's request to continue discussion with
Monrovia and The Festival Group for a joint retail development
on both sides of Fifth Avenue, between the 210 Freeway,
Huntington Drive and the Santa Anita Wash.
Agency staff, City of Monrovia staff, World Vision and their
broker, the Royce Company, have intensively marketed to the
development community a 14.5 acre site on both sides of Fifth
Avenue. The group conducted qualifying interviews with five
interested developers and were prepared to recommend three
companies to respective redevelopment agencies for an opportunity
to submit a full proposal. Recently staff was advised that The
Festival Group (TFG) , a national firm, had agreed to acquire the
World Vision property east of Fifth Avenue adjacent to the 210
Freeway. Monrovia staff and Arcadia staff, based upon comments
from several developers, believe there is a strong market for
10,000 - 50,000 square foot retail stores such as Comp USA,
Sportmart or Circuit City. TFG concurs and is willing to work
with both agencies on a master plan for a j oint development.
The estimated cost to the City of Arcadia is $3,250,000
$7,000,000 depending on the extent of Agency participation in
assembling the land. In reply to Member Lojeski, staff reported
the Agency's cost to-date on this project is $6,000 for brochures
plus staff time. Monrovia and World Vision each put in $6,000
for the brochures also.
It was MOVED by Agency Chairperson Young, seconded by Member I
Chang and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to AUTHORIZE
staff to CONTINUE discussions with Monrovia for a joint
development on each side of Fifth Avenue, between the 210
Freeway, Huntington Drive and the Santa Anita Wash; and DIRECT
staff to keep the Agency apprised of the progress of said
discussions with Monrovia.
AYES:
Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, Lojeski, Margett and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Consideration of staff's request for authorization to prepare an
Exclusive Right to Negotiate (ERN) to develop a multi screen
theater, restaurants, and parking lot on th~.Foulger Ford site.
The Agency has received a proposal from Vic Georgino, who
6
10/11/94
I
I
2g.
SOCCER/ROLLER
HOCKEY FAC. "
ICE RINK FAC.
OG <-10 _ .::>0
36:0349
developed and built the AMC theater complex in downtown Burbank.
Mr. Georgino has requested an Exclusive Right to Negotiate (ERN)
with' the Agency on said Foulger Ford site for a 40,000 square
foot building, 4,500 seat, 20 screen theater, with two (2)
restaurants and a parking structure for 1,000 cars. He has been
in contact with the owner, but to-date has been unsuccessful
in negotiating a purchase price or a ground lease. Staff
estimates cost to the Agency of $50,000 - $3,000,000 depending
on the extent of Agency participation in the development.
Following a brief discussion it was MOVED by Agency Member
Lojeski, second by Chairperson Young and CARRIED on roll call
vote as follows to AUTHORIZE staff to prepare an Exclusive Right
to Negotiate (ERN) to develop a multi-screen theater, restaurants
and parking on the Foulger Ford site (Huntington Drive, Morlan
Place and Santa Clara Street) if the Foulger Ford site is an
appropriate site for said development.
AYES:
Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, Lojeski, Margett and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Consideration of staff request for Agency direction on a possible
soccer and roller sports facility and/or an ice rink in the
proj ect area or City. The Recreation Commission has been
considering a proposal from Arena Soccer Parks
International/Pacific Hockey Centers (ASPI/PHC) to joint venture
a sports facility in Arcadia. ASPI/PHC propose to use available
land provided at no cost on which the Agency would construct a
large B5 x 200 foot soccer court, a 50 x 85 foot mini soccer
court, an 80 x 180 foot roller hockey court, concession shop, and
office, on two (2) acres for approximately $900,000, not
including parking. The Agency would receive 5% of all gross
revenues up to $360,000 ($18,000) and 20% above $360,000.
ASPI/PHC estimate that the Agency would receive in excess of $1
million over the 10 year life of the lease (the facility would
therefore have to gross $770,000). ASPI/PHC would manage and
insure the facility. The Agency would own the improvements at
the end of the lease. Staff believe such a facility is designed
for an existing park or school district field since the land and
parking are already available.
With regard to an Ice Rink facility, a development group has
received governmental entitlement from Monrovia to construct a
74,000 square foot, 2,500 seat ice skating facility on the mobile
home park on South Fifth Avenue in Monrovia, abutting the former
AT&SF railroad tracks. The facility plans included two large
ice rinks, with arena seating around one, a concession shop, tog
shop, and parking on 5.8 acres. The developer was unable to
agree with the land owner on a purchase price and has taken his
plans to San Dimas. Possibly this concept could come to an
Arcadia location, e. g., an expanded Northwest Corner site, Fifth
Avenue (Arcadia side), or other City site. The issue for the
City and Agency is whether the city wants such a facility, and
if so, at what possible location.
Following discussion, it was MOVED by Agency Chairperson Young,
second by Member Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
to DIREC~ staff to pursue the potential location of a soccer and
roller hockey facility and a possible ice skating facility in the
project area or City-wide.
AYES:
Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, Lojeski, Margett and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
AT 7:48 P.M. MAYOR YOUNG CALLED A BRIEF RECESS
7
10/11/94
3.
DOWNTOWN
2000 CONCEPT
PLAN & PROG,
V6 ~o_ O-P13
3a.
STREETSCAPE
(Htg. Dr. -
Santa Clara
to Fifth &
First Ave. -
Wheeler to
Calif. )
e;,,!: r;O. ()~~,."
36:0350
THE STUDY SESSION RECONVENED AT 8:00 P. M.
Consideration of the Downtown 2000 concept plan and programs.
The proposed plan and program draws extensively from the last
eighteen months of work by Freedman, Tung and Bottomley (FTB) ,
ASL Consulting Engineers, and City/Agency staff. The concept
plan is based on at least six (6) community meetings, a public
hearing and several other Council/Agency study sessions or
meetings.
The proposed final streetscape plans, presented this date,
October 11, were based upon Agency direction at its July 19
meeting. The plans prepared by Larry Moss and Associates merge
the Freedman Plan B and staff Plan C. The October II, 1994 staff I
report, the plan and presentation were intended to finalize all
streetscape issues and obtain the Agency's authorization to
proceed.
When combined with some of the Agency and City projects
considered earlier in this meeting, e. g., the Foulger theater
project, Southwest Corner site, Light Rail Station, the plan and
program constitute a comprehensive effort to revitalize the
downtown area (Huntington Drive and First Avenue) by the year
2000.
The Agency Executive Director presented and explained the
streetscape renderings prepared by Moss and Associates for
downtown Huntington Drive and First Avenue, pointing out the
major differences between the Freedman concept plans and the Moss
"hybrid" plans. The new concept plans encompass a larger area
than the original plan, however, several amenities proposed by
Mr. Freedman were not included in the Moss plan, e. g., custom
designed and constructed median lights, pedestrian lights,
traffic signals, kiosks, fences, and new sidewalks. The Moss
plans are simpler and the amenities taken from vender catalogues.
Other changes were; the parking spaces will remain on Huntington
Drive; sidewalks will not be widened, but will be improved with
special landscaping and pedestrian lights; no traffic signals
constructed at the crosswalks between Santa Anita and Second
Avenue; landscaped medians will be constructed between Santa
Clara and Santa Anita, and Second Avenue and Fifth; no fences
along Huntington Drive; a contemporary theme and style for
lighting on First Avenue. The Executive Director noted that
certain amenities selected by the Agency originally in the
Freedman plan could be added to the new plan at a later date if
the Agency wanted to do so.
The streetscape project has been divided into three sections,
which can be completed at one time or constructed separately.
Economies of scale and minimal disruption of merchant, mall and
race track traffic suggest that the work be done under one I
contract. The streetscape project could also then be better
coordinated with two city c~pital improvement projects, parallel
water mains ($415,000), and Huntington Drive rehabili tation
($945,000).
Mr. Moss estimates costs of Section One at $2,007,000 (Huntington
Drive, Santa Anita to Second Avenue, and .ir.st Avenue, Wheeler
to California). This would include construction costs,
contingency, design and engineering, construction management and
inspection. Mr. Moss estimates costs for Section Two at $503,000
(Huntington Drive, Second Avenue to Fifth), and costs for Section
Three at $310,000 (Huntington Drive, Santa Clara to Santa Anita).
The total for all three sections is then $2,820,000, with an
estimated annual maintenance cost of $19,500, not including
energy costs.
8
10/11/94
I
I
3b.
COM'L FACADE
REHAB.PROG.
(APPROVED)
.!l (1.." ~'.,
UJ:J IJ -
36:0351
Upon approval of the final project concept, and the environmental
assessment, plans, specifications, and engineering completed. the
project can be formally bid by the Agency/City and construction
could begin in late Spring or early Summer of 1995. The project
is expected to take eight to twelve months to complete.
Considerable discussion ensued while viewing the renderings of
the streetscape. Member Margett felt that the width of the
sidewalks on the Moss plans was too small the proposed
sidewalk does not lend well to strolling or outdoor dining. He
prefers wider sidewalks on Huntington Drive.
Member Chang suggested removing the proposed medians in the
street and widening the sidewalks.
Lawrence Moss, Moss and Associates, explained the quality of the
street light standards, walls and benches to be used along
Huntington Drive; the legal requirement for the tall cobra-head
lights which will also be used along with the traditional
lighting. The trees and landscape programs were also explained
in de tail.
Member Lojeski felt that the cobra lights should not be used in
the downtown area ... they are very unattractive. He would
prefer traditional decorative lighting along Huntington Drive
and First Avenue. Also, First Avenue could be the same theme and
style as Huntington Drive.
Chairperson Young said she does not mind the plan
landscaping, pavers, etcetera, on First avenue, however. she
not like the contemporary cobra light fixtures.
for
does
Member Lojeski felt the small center divider on Huntington Drive
from Second Avenue to Fifth Avenue should be eliminated from the
plan, also the proposed divider on Huntington from Santa Clara
to Santa Anita. The divider on Huntington at those locations
could hurt the businesses and restaurants. Also, he likes the
median strips except for those previously mentioned.
Member Chang felt that on Huntington Drive between Second Avenue
and Fifth and Santa Clara to Santa Anita he would like to keep
these medians with an opening for pedestrians to cross the
street. Also, he would not like cobra lights on First Avenue.
There was consensus that the Agency preferred more traditional
decorative light standards as opposed to contemporary. The City
Manager/Executive Director said staff will cost out the
traditional lighting and modify the median islands.
It was MOVED by Agency Member Lojeski, seconded by Chairperson
Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to APPROVE
the Downtown 2000 Streetscape Project, with modifications to the
medians in the center of Huntington Drive, changing the cobra-
head lights, and use of the Huntington Drive concept on First
Avenue; AUTHORIZE staff to proceed with the environmental
assessment, plans, specifications, and engineering.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Agency Member Chang, Lojeski and Young
Agency Member Margett (for reasons so stated)
Agency Member Kuhn
City staff prepared a four-part commercial rehabilitation program
in 1992. This program was derived from ongoing programs in other
cities. The program concepts were reviewed with merchant.s and
owners in the downtown area, as well as several architects.
Their suggestions were incorporated in the final concept. Formal
Agency authorization and implementation was held up because of
the proposed downtown revi talization effort then under
discussion. All commercial businesses in the target area except
9
iO/ll/94
3c.
BUSINESS
ATTRACTION
INCENTIVE
PROGRAM
(APPROVED)
()(, ,"<i . (' He::
3d.
ACCESSWAYS/
SOUTHS IDE HTG,
PK'NG PROG.
(APPROVED)
061:rO.()2I.S
3e,
DOWNTOWN
MARKETING
PROGRAM
(APPROVED)
"J'" ' .
c. '" ,I t> _ (1, ;, , ,
3f.
DIRECTIONAL
SIGNAGE
PROGRAM
(APPROVED)
0(, if " - t).:J 6,
3g.
PRIVATE
COOPERATIVE
PK'NG PROG.
(APPROVED)
OG f(l ~ (1-'6
3h.
LAND USE/
ZONING/DEV.
CRITERIA
(APPROVED)
\ /< ~, ,) , -
. ~.- .. -," "
36:0352
banks, savings ana loans, churches, and gas stations are
eligible.
There are our RehClbilitation Program components; 1
Architectural design services at a recommended budget of $21,000;
2 - Sign ,eplacement rebate at a recommended budget of $45,000;
3- Facade improvement rebate at a recommended budget of $50,000;
and 4 - General property improvement rebate at a recommended
budget of $20,000. The October 11, 1994 staff report sets forth
in detail the four components of the Commercial Facade
Rehabilitation Program.
Mundie and Associates, the economic sub-consultant to Freedman,
Tung and Bottomley (FTB) , recommended that certain uses be
actively solicited to come to the downtown, e. g., convenience
retail, specialty retail and restaurants. To accomplish this
will require Agency financial assistance. It may also involve
the voluntary relocation of one or two downtown merchants to
other locations. Staff recommends a total budget of $130,000.
I
There are no public accessways near the middle of the block on
Huntington Drive between Santa Anita and First Avenue. FTB
pointed out that pedestrian access to the parking lots off either
alley is critical to the ultimate success of downtown
revitalization. This program would permit acquisition of two
public easements; one to the east of the Steerburger and one
through the Arcade building. The program includes the possible
demolition and reconstruction of the parking lot behind the
Arcade building in return for dedicated public parking and
maintenance paid for by the private owner. Alternatively, it
contemplates the acquisition of the properties, relocation of
the bU$inesses, demolition of the building, construction of some
additional parking off the alley with a public plaza connecting
to Huntington .Drive. A portion of the site could be leased.
Staff ~ecommends a budget of $100,000 - $900,000.
In order to ensure success, a sustained quality advertising
campaign to inform the public about the downtown is needed. This
would take the form of newspaper ads, flyers, mailers, brochures,
banners, notices, and other marketing tools. Design' of the logo,
colors, theme, layout, would be provided by a professional firm.
Staff ~ecommends a budget of $20,000.
Using an Agency approved theme, colors, and logo, new directional
signs would be placed in and around the downtown to show parking
locations, traffic patterns, amenities, etcetera. The
recommended budget is $15,000.
FTB, based upon downtown parking surveys by their firm, and by
The Planning Corporation, concluded there was ample parking
available in the downtown area as long as the private owner
permitted such use by the public. This program is intended to
pay for the costs to improve and/or reconstruct deteriorating
private parking lots, remove barriers, and integrate adjoining
lots. Staff recommends a b~~gec f0r one to t~o lots of $25,000.
I
Pursuant to City Council direction, the Planning Division, with
the help of a consultant will be preparing a new General Plan
for the City. Numerous changes to the City's zoning ordinance
and development criteria will be needed to provide for an
enhanced downtown project area. Staff recommends a budget of
$10,000.
10
10/11/94
I
I
3i.
MERCHANT TECH.
ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM
(APPROVED)
0<:"
3j.
SPECIAL
EVENTS
(APPROVED)
/l - 1 .
v-6cc ,,'
FISCAL
IMPACT
0",",
." ~ cJl.~
.
~ . i
36:0353
This program provides business support to the merchants in the
downtown area (and City) by utilizing the existing Chamber of
Commerce three training seminars at no cost to the City. The
Chamber is responsible for this per their annual contract with
the City.
When the streetscape is in place, staff will investigate the
possibility of special promotional events, e.g. shows, concerts
and parades. Future cost unknown.
.Ii'
The grand total of Downtown 2000 - $2,443,000 to $4,056,000.
In a brief discussion of the Downtown 2000 program components,
Agency Member Lojeski felt that the programs set forth are
equally important to the revitalization of the downtown area, the
effort to revitalize the area has to be an all encompassing
program. The other members concurred. In reply to Member
Lojeski, Executive Director Kelly said that staff may need some
additional help for some of the programs.
It was MOVED by Agency Member Margett, seconded by Agency Member
Chang and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to APPROVE the
Downtown 2000 programs B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I and J, and
tentative budgets subject to further refinement by staff.
AYES:
Agency Members Chang, Kuhn (D,F,G,I,J),
Margett and Young
None
Agency Member Kuhn (B, C, E, H)
Loj eski,
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
The summary of possible or pending project expenditures for all
the projects discussed ranged from $5,773,000 to $14,171,000.
The total of estimated funds available for these projects from
Redevelopment funds was $4,363,000, which indicated a difference
ranging from $1,410,000 to $9,808,000.
Staff conclusions were: 1 - There are now or shortly will be
sufficient funds available to implement the complete Downtown
2000 Plan and Program; and, 2 - There are not sufficient funds
to complete both the Foulger (Theatre) project and the Fifth
Avenue Joint Project unless the Agency issues Tax Allocation
bonds. Such a bond issue could provide an estimated $6 - 7 million
in net bond proceeds. This when combined with developer
contributions to the project will enable the Agency to complete
both projects if desired.
City Manager/Executive Director requested Council/Agency
direction to explore the issue of a tax increment bond issue, or
to explore other financing alternatives. With the authorization
of the Council/Agency staff will talk with a financial consultant
and bring a report on financial options for Council/Agency
consideration.
Member Loj eski noted that funds will be available for all the
projects with the exception of the joint venture on Fifth Avenue
and the Foulger Theater project. The initial priority project
could be Downtown 2000 Revitalization and the Southwest and
Northwest Corner projects.
In reply to Chairman Young staff related that in 1986 when the
Gribble Project on Huntington Drive was in process, the Agency
had a three year tax allocation note whiCh was sold for $3.3
million which was rolled over in 1989 into a full term bond for
25 years for $3,780,000. Staff proposes that a similar tax
increment bond issue could be explored again.
10/11/94
11
CLOSED
SESSION
,J Iff) . (If!
ADJOURNMENT
ATTEST:
36:0354
Member Chang felt that there is nothing wrong in exploring the
possibilities. Member Margett also felt that it is all right to
explore financing options. Chairperson Young also agreed that
financing alternatives should be explored.
Member Kuhn felt that all options should be explored.
MATTERS FROM STAFF
The City Manager reported that Governor Wilson vetoed the Solis
Bill... the issue of landfills. The City Attorney noted that
the efforts of the City paid off.
The City Attorney updated the Council on the Rodeffer landfill
issue.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 for a conference with
labor negotiators Dan Cassidy and/or Gary Rogers regarding the
Arcadia Firefighter's Association and the Arcadia Police Relief
Association.
At 9: 50 p. m. the Council/Agency entered the CLOSED SESSION,
RECONVENED the ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING, and ADJOURNED at 10:32
p. m., to Tuesday, October 18, 1994 at 7:00 p. m., in the Council
Chambers for a regular meeting to conduct the business of the
Council and the Redevelopment Agency and any closed session
necessary to discuss personnel. litigation matters and evaluation
of properties.
V/}UA11$ff'T
Mary B. Yo g, May
J
12
10/11/94
I
I