HomeMy WebLinkAboutAUGUST 18,1992_2
I
I
(JIIO-'S <:J
o a I 'ir tj ,;j
e.e 34:0266
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTE
APPROVAL
(Aug.4,1992)
(Aug.ll,1992)
(APPROVED)
ORD. & RES.
READ BY
TITLE ONLY
1.
PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLNG.
COMSN.DENIAL
MP 92-003
(16 W.Lemon Av.)
(DENIED)
&-S:-fO.,d l
M I NUT E S
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
and the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 18, 1992
The City Council and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in
a regular meeting at 7:40 p. m., Tuesday, August 18, 1992 in
the Arcadia City Hall Council Chamber.
Bishop James Corrigan, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints
Acting City Manager Pro tem James Dale
PRESENT:
Councilmen Ciraulo, Harbicht, Loje$ki I Margett and
Fasching
None
ABSENT:
Acting City Manager Pro tem Dale stated that, "pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957, the City Council met in closed
session on August 14, 15, and 17, 1992 for the purposes of
recruitment, discussion and the appointment of a City Manager".
On MOTION by Councilman Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Pro tem
Ciraulo and CARRIED, the minutes of the adjourned and regular
meetings of August 4, 1992 and the adjourned regular meeting
of August 11, 1992 were APPROVED.
It waS MOVED by Councilman Margett. seconded by Councilman
Lojeski and CARRIED that Ordinances and Resolutions be
read by title only and that the reading in full be WAIVED.
Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial
of MP 92-003, for setback and building height modifications
to construct a two-story, 6,248 square-foot single-family
dwelling with attached garage at 16 W. Lemon Avenue (Harry Wu,
property owner). The Planning Commission at its July 14, 1992
meeting voted 4 to 0 with one member abstaining to deny MP 92-
003 requesting setback and building height modifications for
a new two-story 6,248 square foot single family dwelling with
attached garage at 16 West Lemon Avenue. On July 20, the
applicant, Harry Wu, appealed the Planning Commission's
decision. The applicant is requesting modifications to plans
which were submitted in January 1990. The particular setback
and building height codes under which this house was designed
were changed in October 1990. It was the consensus of the
Planning Commission that the applicant should comply with
Code. The Commission noted in their findings that:. 1)
Minimal work was done when the permit was active and that
since the permit expired, the owner should comply with the new
regulations; 2) Due to the size of the lot, the owner could
easily comply with the new setback regulations without
1
8/18/92
34:0267
requ~r~ng modifications; 3) That, although they sympathized
with the applicant because of the initial money spenc on this
project, that was not adequate reason to approve the
modifications. It was noted that since the Code changed in
October, 1990, there have been several requests for
modifications, and they have all been denied. The one
Commissioner abstaining noted that he sympathized with the
applicant and felt that the money they had spent warrants
approval, and if they were denied it would be a hardship. The
Commission agreed with staff's opinion that the applicant has
had adequate time (two years) since first obtaining building
permits in Aoril 1990 to construct the new house or to at
least make significant progress in the construction. In
addition, the property is currently "For Sale".
I
In reply to a question from Councilman Harbicht, staff replied
that only one time extension is granted; after which time some
work on the project must be done. After a five or six month
period, some work must be started on the project.
Mayor Fasching declared the hearing OPEN.
Lucv Tai, 26 W. Lemon, stated, in part, that she is present
to reiterate her recommendation to the Planning Commission to
deny the appeal by Harry W~ regarding building modifications.
These rules and regulations were created for the benefit of
all of the residents" in the City and not just for a few
individuals. A deviation should not be tolerated since this
would set a precedent and encourage other people to ignore the
rules and regulations set by the Planning Department. Any
reduction in the side yard setbacks could prove to be
hazardous to the neighboring properties in case of natural
disasters. Approval of the proposed modifications would
adversely affect the quality of living in the area. She cannot
stress enough her concern regarding the request for proposed
modifications. She requests that Council deny the variance
and insist upon conformance with the City regulations.
Dean Yu, 1835 S. Santa Anita Avenue, stated, in part, that
he owns the property in back of 16 W. Lemon Avenue. He
requests that Council deny this request for modification
because there is a waterway around the perimeter of the lot
that goes from Lemon Avenue south down to Santa Anita Avenue.
During a rainy season, there could be a flood situation
because if the house is built so close to this waterway, it
will be difficult for the City workmen to clean the gutters.
Also, if he should decide to remodel his house sometime in the
future, there would be difficulty because his construction
would have to be set back even further to insure privacy
between the two houses.
Harrv Wu, 539 W. Valley Blvd., Alhambra, owner of the I
property, stated, .in part, that the construction had been
delayed due to financing problems. He had not knowingly tried
to have plans approved before the new building codes were
established. Now he has a partner who is committed to
financial help in return for the agreement that the house will
be his rental residence when it is completed. In answer to
questions from Council, Mr. Wu outlined the preliminary work
. that has been done on the property, including the demolition
of the original house. He also said that the "For Sale" sign
has been left in place to establish the value of the property
for the benefit of his partner. Also, in answer to questions,
he explained that he owned approximately $400,000 to the Bank
of America, and that the Bank WaS unaware that the original
house had been demolished. Mr. Wu stated this will not be a
problem if he can obtain approval for the requested variances
to Code, and proceed with the construction of the proposed
house.
2
8/18/92
I
I
INTRODUCTION
OF JOURNALISTS
2.
3.
4.
4a.
ROLL CALL
34:0268
No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on
MOTION by Councilman Lojeski, seconded by Councilman Harbicht
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows:
AYES:
Councilmen Ciraulo, Harbicht, Lojeski, Margett and
Fasching
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
Considerable discussion ensued among the Councilmen.
Councilman Harbicht felt that, although he is not usually in
favor of deviating from the Code, since there has apparently
been no deliberate attempt to evade complying with the
building codes, and these delays had been the result of
financing problems. he would be inclined to approve the
modifications requested in this appeal. Other Councilmen were
of the opinion that Mr. Wu should comply with the building
code requirements, and did not feel that the financial
problems involved were reason enough to grant the variances
requested. A considerable amount of work has been done,
hearings held, etc. to arrive at the new building regulations
now in place, and they should be adhered to. In this case,
there has been a minimum amount of work accomplished over a
period of two years, and there is no guarantee that the house
will be completed in a timely manner if these modifications
are granted.
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tem Ciraulo, seconded by Councilman
Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to DENY the
APPEAL of the Planning Commission's decision and uphold their
findings; and DENY the application, and find-that, based on
the evidence presented, the requested Modification MP 92-003
will not secure an appropriate improvement, nor prevent an
unreasonable hardship, nor promote uniformity of development;
and DIRECT staff to prepare an appropriate resolution
incorporating the Council's decision and findings in support
of that decision.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Ciraulo, Lojeski, Margett and Fasching
Councilman Harbicht
None
Mayor Fasching introduced and welcomed Catherine Crawley, the
journalist who is now covering the Council meetings for the
Foothill Star-Tribune. Also present was Jo Ann Scott
representing the Sierra Madre News.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
David Erco1ani, 634 Virginia Ann Drive, Azusa, President, G.
R. Leonard & Co., stated that he is present to address Council
with regard to Agenda Item 4b, Arcadia Redevelopment Agency
segment on tonight's agenda. Council granted Mr. Ercolani
permission to address the Council at that point in the
meeting.
CITY COUNCIL RECESSED IN ORDER TO ACT AS THE
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PRESENT:
Agency Members Ciraulo, Harbicht, Loj eski, Margett
and Fasching
None
ABSENT:
3
8/18/92
4b.
RETROACTIVE
FINANCIAL ASSIST.
UNDER PROPOSED
COMMERCIAL
REVITALIZATION
PROGRAM
(47 E. Htg. Dr.)
(APPROVED WITH
CONDITIONS)
\ '/(1 ,
:J6'r .<~~
34:0269
Consideration of request for retroactive financial assistance
under the proposed Commercial Revitalization Program. The
Agency has received a request from Mr. David Ercolani, the new
owner of 47 E. Huntington Drive, requesting that the Arcadia
Redevelopment Agency reimburse him eligible costs under the
proposed commercial revitalization program, even though the
detailed Program Guidelines have not yet been formally
reviewed and approved by the Agency.
David Ercolani, President, G. R. Leonard & Co., 1072 North
Allen. Pasadena, stated, in part, that his company has
purchased the property at 47 E. Huntington Drive, and they are
considering interior and exterior renovation of the property.
He has learned of the Agency's proposed program offering
rebates for exterior improvements, and is aware that this
program has not as yet been finalized and approved by the
Agency, and there is no provision for reimbursement for
retroactive improvement. However, due to sale and escrow of
the building that they currently occupy, they must move into
the new location by mid-late October. He is present to
request Agency consideration of their participation in the
upcoming program on a retroactive basis.
I
It was noted by staff that Mr. Ercolani's project (as any
other facade improvement. project in Downtown Arcadia) is
subject to City and Agency Review and Code requirements. If
Mr. Ercolani's request is granted, others in similar
circumstances should be given the same opportunity, as Mr.
Ercolani, to apply for the Program and potentially receive
benefits for exterior improvements undertaken and/or completed
between July 7, 1992 and Program approval by the Agency (in
November). Mr. Ercolani is anxious to proceed with the
rehabilitation work. but is reluctant to begin the facade
improvements, due to high costs. He is asking that the Agency
make an exception and allow him to receive retroactive
benefits for the facade improvements under the proposed
Program. The advantages and disadvantages to granting Mr.
Ercolani's request are outlined in considerable detail in
staff report dated August 18,1992. The Agency General Counsel
advises that, should the Agency grant Mr. Ercolani's request,
such approval should provide no assurance or guarantee that
Mr. Erco1ani would receive assistance under the proposed
Program since there is currently no program in effect; all
costs would be incurred at his own risk.
In response to questions from the Agency, Mr. Ercolani stated
that he understands that he will proceed with such
improvements at his own risk, and that all work is to be done
in accordance with the City's and Agency's design review and
Code requirements. Agency Members pointed out that since Mr.
Erco1ani's building is located in the Redevelopment area, he
must conform to design review with regard to specific colors,
materials" etc. Mr. Ercolani stated that, from what he has
learned with regard to the direction the Agency is taking in
the Redevelopment area, he sees no reason why his renovation
will not satisfy the Agency's requirements. It is also planned
that some renovation will be done at the back of the building.
The cost estimate is $38,000 for the entire exterior, front
and back, which is 40% or 50% of the cost of renovation of the
entire building. In response to questions from Chairman
Fasching, he said that bids will be obtained and inspections
done for the renovation work.
I
Considerable discussion ensued among the Agency Members with
regard to determination of those aspects of the renovation
which would or would not be approved under the Commercial
Revitalization Program. Mr. Ercolani recognizes that only
modifications approved under the Program will be eligible for
reimbursement, and that there is no guarantee that there will
be reimbursement.
4
8/18/92
,.
I
I
4c.
SELECTION OF
EXCLUSIVE
BROKER (NW &
SW Corner
Project)
(STUDY SESSION
SEPT.l,1992)
06 'ifJ. fI.'Nlv6
4d.
LANDSCAPING
NW & SW CORNERS
SECOND AVE./
HTG.DR.
OG i(). 'CY'1j '16
34:0270
Member Margett felt this decision should be postponed until
complete details are available and Mr. Ercolani can know
exactly what he can spend and what he can expect to receive
as reimbursement. He thinks that approval of this request at
this time will create administrative problems.
It was MOVED by Member Harbicht, seconded by Member Lojeski
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to AUJlW Mr.
Ercolani, and others in similar circumstances to apply for the
Commercial Revitalization Program prior to Program approval
and implementation, with the following conditions: proposed
Program eligibility be extended to include property and
business owners otherwise eligible for the Program, who are
in the process of completing or have completed exterior
property improvements from the period of July 7, 1992 through
Program approval and implementation by the Agency (estimated
for November 1992); and Mr. Ercolani, and others in similar
circumstances proceed with such improvements at their own
financial risk; and that all work planned, begun and/or
completed prior to Program implementation be done in
accordance with the City's and Agency's Design Review and Code
requirements.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Ciraulo, Harbicht, Lojeski and Fasching
Member Margett
None
Under Agency direction. a Request for Proposals (Commercial
Realty Brokerage Services) was sent to designated commercial
brokers specializing in the San Gabriel Valley area. The RFP
has been circulated in anticipation of letting an exclusive
Commercial Brokerage listing for the Southwest and Northwest
Corner development sites. The RFP generated responses from
six real estate brokerage firms and the results are listed in
staff report dated August 18, 1992.
It was MOVE~ by Member Harbicht, seconded by Member Lojeski
and CARRIED that a study session for the selection of an
Exclusive Broker for the Southwest and Northwest Corner
Projects be scheduled at 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, September 1,
1992.
Consideration of alternatives for landscaping the northwest
and southwest corners of Second AvenuejHuntington Drive
intersection and the southwest corner of First Avenue/St.
Joseph Street intersection. The Public Works Director
referred to staff report dated July 7, 1992 regarding some
alternatives for interim landscaping of the northwest and
southwest corners of the Second Avenue/Huntington Drive
intersection. On August 4, 1992, Agency Members discussed
other alternatives, and directed staff to report back with
cost estimates. The Director of Public Works reported that
if a small berm were to be constructed and hydroseeded with
a "Slope Saver" type of grass using City work forces on the
northwest corner, the cost would be $11,800. The cost for the
southwest corner would be $7,800. If the entire northwest
corner were to be hydroseeded with "Slope Saver", the cost
would be $17,600. The cost for the southwest corner would be
$13,100. If a small berm were constructed and planted with
gazanias using City work forces, the cost for the northwest
corner would be $12,800; the cost for the southwest corner
would be $8,400. With regard to the suggestion of installing
or weaving green horizontal slats in the rented chain link
fences, the company that rents the fences to the City will not
allow this. However, the fence company will install a green
mesh fence. The cost would be $5,100 for the northwest corner
for the first year, and $2,900 for the second year. For the
5
8/18/92
4e.
5.
6.
6a.
VOTING & ALT.
VOTING DELEGATE
LEAGUE/ CALIF.
CITIES ANN. COF.
(Fasching &
Ciraulo)
OI5~-~''''-)
6b.
CONTRACT AWARD
WATERLINE REPLAC.
(Live Oak Av.fr.
El Monte to
Second Av. -
W.0.No.696)
{)11;':'7.~
34:0271
southwest corner, the cost would be $2,000 for the first year,
and $1,100 for the second year. There were two suggestions by
a resident. First, that garden plots cared for by residents
be allowed. Second,' that cardboard murals be painted and
attached to the fence.
Considerable discussion ensued among Agency Members. Member
Margett felt that something should be done to improve the
appearance of these lots, and is in favor of spending the
money for improvements including the construction of the
berms. He also feels that something should be done about the
ugly fence. Member Harbicht did not feel that the three foot
high berm would hide the weeds and dirt in the interior. He
also feels that the northern property has already been I
improved by tearing down ugly buildings. Member Lojeski did
not like the fences and did not think it likely that the
property would be polluted if the fences were to be removed.
He would like to see the fences removed and the sites
hydroseeded; he did not want the berms. Following some
discussion about availability of funds, staff replied that
CDBG funds will not be available until 1993-94. Member
Ciraulo said he could not visualize the berms; he would like
to see the dirt covered. Chairman Fasching did not like the
fence; and felt that mesh screening would be preferable.
Chairman Fasching also .reminded the Members that this
beautification had not been suggested by the residents, but
by the Agency. It was his feeling that, due to loss of
income, i. e. Foulger Ford and Hinshaws leaving the City,
Sacramento budget cuts to the City, etc., there are other
projects which would be more beneficial to the City. He is
not in favor of spending the taxpayers' money for these
projects. Members Harbicht and Ciraulo agreed that this is
a time to be prudent. Member Lojeski said he would like to see
the fences taken down, the weeds abated and the dirt turned
over sO the lots would look clean.
It was the general consensus of the Agency that the fences on
these properties be taken down, the lots to be leveled and
weed abatement by City work forces to be continued on these
lots until their respective sale or dispositon.
The meeting ADJOURNED to 5:30 p. m., September 1, 1992.
CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED
CONSENT ITEMS
APPROVED designation of Mayor Fasching as the Voting Delegate
and Mayor Pro tem Ciraulo as Alternate Voting Delegate to
represent the City at the General Business Meeting at the
League of California Cities Annual Conference on October 13,
1992.
I
AWARDED contract in the amount of $366.240 to W. A. Rasic
Construction Company, Inc. for waterline replacement project
Live Oak Avenue from El Monte Avenue to Second Avenue. W. O.
696; WAIVED any informalities in the bids or bidding process;
and AUTHORIZED the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract
in a form approved by the City Attorney.
6
8/18/92
I
I
6c.
CONTRACT AWARD
LANDSCAPE MAINT.
(Water Facility
Sites)
o 7~o<)'O
6d.
CONTRACT AWARD
SLURRY SEAL
PROGRAM (1992-
93 - Job No.
526) ocr:UJ-"-:O
6e.
EQUIP.PURCH.
PUBLIC WORKS
(Safety Boots)
03.,10- "(J
7 .
7a.
IMPROVED
VISIBILITY OF
CITY NAME
STREET SIGNS
(REPLACE AS
NECESSARY WITH
REFLECTORIZED
SIGNS)
() !,~\-., >~)()
34:0272
AWARDED contract in the amount of $23,000 for the period,
9/1/92 to 8/31/93; $28.800 for the period 9/1/93 to 8/31/94;
and $28,800 for the period 9/1/94 to 8/31/95 to J. 6< S.
Landscape Maintenance for landscape maintenance for ,water
facility sites. Resolution No. 5452 authorized the Director
of Public Works to solicit proposals excusing the City from
strict adherence to low bid requirements. The Mayor and City
Clerk are AUTHORIZED to execute a three year contract in a
form approved by the City Attorney.
AWARDED contract in the amount of $106.451.14 to Pavement
Coatings Co. for the 1992-93 slurry seal program - Job No.
526; WAIVED any informalities in the bids or bidding process;
and AUTHORIZED the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract
in a form approved by the City Attorney.
APPROVED appropriation of $3,336 from the General Fund
reserves and $1,364 from the Water Fund reserves for the
purchase of safety boots for AFSCME-represented field and
water service employees, as well as six employees in the
garage and the City Hall janitor.
ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY
COUNCIU1AN HARBICHT, SECONDED BY COUNCIU1AN LOJESKI AND
CARRIED ON ROLL CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
AYES:
Councilman Ciraulo, Harbicht, Loje!lki, Margett and
Fasching
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY MANAGER
On March 17, 1992, in response to a resident's concern, the
City Council directed staff to investigate the potential of
improving the visibility of street name signs throughout the
City. A "standard" street name sign has been adopted and
installed throughout the City for at least the last 30 years.
Each sign is constructed of a folded steel channel,
approximately 6 inches high by 24 inches long, porcelain
enamel green surface with white letters approximately 4 inches
high. printed on both sides. The letters are not
reflectorized. Therefore. this may cause difficulty for
drivers reading the street name signs at night. The signs are
fabricated by Western Highway Products, Inc. to City
specifications. The size and design of the signs are typical
of the industry. Sign construction and finish are of high
quality with a 20 year warrantee on finish and workmanship.
Individual sign panels are legible from both sides and are
typically mounted together, one each for each intersecting
street. Porcelain enamel street name signs can be
manufactured with ref1ectorized letters which would improve
the night visibility of the street name sign. City of Arcadia
signs do not display block numbers. This would require a
larger sign as well as larger inventory of signs because a
unique sign is required for every corner of each intersection.
The painting of street names on curb faces visible to the
motoring public was performed by contract in the early 1970's.
Such curb painting was subject to removal by street sweepers
and degradation of drainage water and natural elements. The
cost and maintenance effort required to maintain this method
of street identification was excessive, and the program was
discontinued.
7
8/18/92
7b.
WILDERNESS
PARK SECURITY
(AD HOC COMTE.
MTG. WITH
REC. DIR.)
o 7 '1(j.IO
34:0273
There are approximately 660 roadway intersections and
approximately 2,170 existing sign panels installed in the
City. A total sign replacement would require a minimum of six
months to complete. Based on current information from the
manufacturer, the cost of each sign panel used by the City is
$33.75. Alternate sign design could include reflectorized
letters, changes in materials, sizes and colors. The cost of
a new sign of the same size and type as existing signs but
with reflectorized letters is $42.75 each. Depending on the
size and type chosen, the total cost, not including City
labor, to replace 2,170 signs city wide would range from
approximately $55,000 to $114,000. The estimated labor cost
would be approximately $23,000. Therefore, the total cost I
would range from $78,000 to $137,000. The total cost to
replace existing signs with the same size and type sign, but
with reflectorized letters, would be approximately $116,000
including labor.
After considerable discussion among Councilmen, it was the
consensus of Council to DIRECT staff to purchase and install
new street name signs of the same size and type as existing
signs, but with reflectorized letters, as necessary, for new
installations and routine maintenance.
Consideration of report and recommendation regarding security
at Wilderness Park. Jerrv Collins, Director of Recreation
stated, in part, that at its August 4, 1992 meeting the City
Council requested that a report be prepared outlining the
additional costs associated with increasing security at
Wilderness Park. These costs are outlined in detail in staff
report dated August 18, 1992. Costs are presented in such
a way that they can be changed or moved. In reply to a
question from Councilman Loj eski, staff replied the basic
difference between Plan A and Plan B is the fact that in Plan
A, there will be a full-time person with benefits; in Plan B,
there will be two part-time people with only PERS benefit.
In both plans, also there is the $7,000 cost for an additional
person on weekends.
In reply to a question from Mayor Fasching, Police Cantain
Dave Hini~ responded that the recent purchase of radios for
the Police Department was a scheduled replacement. That
purchase replaced radios that were no longer serviceable. At
this particular time, the Police Department has no extra
radios for the Recreation Department. The Police Department
bids at a certain time each year for a certain replacement
factor - - normally five radios per year. This allows the
Department to get rid of radios that are usually about twenty
years old.
The Recreation Director noted there are two radios available
at the Park at the present time. The plan would call for
three employees to be present at the park on Sundays. They
like to have a back-up radio being recharged. This plan will
give them the radios they need, plus a back-up. An estimate
of cost and photographs of a portable kiosk were included in
the report. The Recreation Director noted that under this
plan, there will be a full-time person in the park from 7:30
a. m. to 4:00 p. m., Monday through Friday; another person
there from 4:00 p. m. to 9:00 p. m. every day during the week.
There will be someone in the park on patrol all the time the
park is open. Mayor Fasching noted there are many items to
be considered by Council, including the placement of the
kiosk, material to be printed to be handed out, who will do
this on weekends, the hours the additional employees will be
at the park, etc. This is a large issue and he would like
more time to analyze these items.
I
8
8/18/92
I!
I
I
8.
8a.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5691
(ADOPTED)
oq(,;,(J-(-J(')
8b.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5692
(ADOPTED)
() 3 $'C.') - "i's,-
34:0274
Councilman Harbicht stated, in part, that he is a facts and
figures man, and the City has been operating this park for
thirty years with no problems. Council has reports from the
Police Department which show that this park has no' more
problems than any other park in the City. Councilman
Harbicht referred to a letter received from a resident living
near the park who has used the park one hundred to a hundred
and fifty times a year and has seen virtually no problems
worth noting. Wilderness Park runs just fine. Lots of people
enjoy this park. None of the people testifying about problems
have called the police. There should be signs at Wilderness
Park outlining what is allowed and not allowed. Council wants
more patrol of the park, but is also going to put in a kiosk,
so someone can sit in the kiosk. Those two items seem to be
at odds with each other. The question here is whether or not
Council is justified in spending $40,000 or $50,000 for
something that he believes is not a problem. He asks
Council to take stock and rethink this matter.
Mayor Fasching stated. in part, that he agrees with part of
Councilman Harbicht's philosophy. However, he does not think
that this park can be compared with the other parks in the
City; it is isolated; it is in a ravine; has many secluded
areas, e tc . Res idents have complained. Counc i 1 has to
prepare and address this situation and, with prudence, look
at the future of that park. He does not consider one person
sitting in an office to be" adequate supervision for a park of
this type. He is concerned about adequate staffing, rather
than an entrance fee. The kiosk would just be a means of
refining the park and a place to hand out printed material.
Councilman Harbicht felt it would be more prudent for Council
to wait until there is more indication that a problem exists
or is eminent. He does approve of the proposed signage and
identification of employees in the form of a uniform or
something of that type. His concern is about the cost to hire
additional employees.
Councilman Margett feels Council should move ahead on this
matter, although he would like to see a program which would
cost less money. He is not in favor of the kiosk; someone
patrolling the park would be preferable.
It was the consensus of Council that an ad-hoc committee
consisting of Mayor Fasching and Councilman Margett meet with
the Recreation Director to study these proposals and work out
a firm program.
CITY ATTORNEY
The Acting City Manager Pro tem presented and read the title
of Resolution No. 5691: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, FOR CITY SUPPORT FOR
PROCEEDING WITH THE COUNTRYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (SOM) PROGRAM'S
PILOT PROJECT IN THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY".
It was MOVED by Councilman Margett, seconded by Mayor Pro tem
Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that
Resolution No. 5691 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
Councilmen Ciraulo, Harbicht, Lojeski, Margett and
Fasching
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
The Acting City Manager Pro tem presented and read the title
of Resolution No. 5692: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
9
8/18/92
8c.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5693
(ADOPTED)
,} , '10 . ~ '0
k .219.;< I
9.
10.
HARBICHT
(Sanitation
District
Toxic Mat.
Round-up
Program)
,) -f~" lJ o<f1
N.",)
LOJESKI
(Letter of
Appreciation to
Santa Anita for
Hazardous Waste
Program)
MARGETT
(Recreation
Dept. Policy
Re. Fees &
Use of the
Community Ctr.)
()') SO ,.;;10
NSP
LOJESKI
(Feasibility
of Ne,w
Redevelopment
Project Area
Memorandum)
/)(, (()
iVsP
34:0275
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE
REQUIRED TO BE RAISED FROM PROPERTY TAKES NECESSARY FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 TO PAY THE INDEBTEDNESS OF THE CITY OR
DISTRICTS".
It was MOVED by Councilman Harbicht, seconded by Mayor Pro tem
Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that
Resolution No. 5692 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
Councilmen Ciraulo, Harbicht, Loj eski, Margett and
Fasching
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
The Acting City Manager Pro tem presented and read the title
of Resolution NO. 5693: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DEDICATING CERTAIN PROPERTY
ON ROSEMARIE DRIVE FOR STREET PURPOSES".
I
It was MOVED by Councilman Lojeski, seconded by Councilman
Margett and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that
Resolution No. 5693 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
Councilmen Ciraulo, Harbicht, Loj eski, Margett and
Fasching
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
MATTERS FROM STAFF
None
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
Councilman Harbicht noted that the Sanitation District held
a toxic materials round-up day at the Santa Anita Park parking
lot. He had participated in it. There was a very large
turnout -- hundreds and hundreds of cars. He was impressed
with the number of people who had taken the trouble to get rid
of toxic materials from their homes and take them to the
recycle point. If Santa Anita Park is amenable, and the
Sanitation District can schedule it, he would like to see this
program repeated in the not-too-distant future. He felt some
of the success of this program was due to the notice published
in the City Newsletter.
Councilman Lojeski said it would be appropriate for Council
to communicate appreciation to Santa Anita Park for the use
of their parking lot for the household hazardous waste round-
up program.
Councilman Margett referred to a report in the Newsletter from
the Recreation Director. He would like to know what criteria
is used in charging fees for use of the Community Center. The
Recreation Director will provide a copy of the policy to
Councilman Margett. In reply to Councilman Margett' s specific
question, the City Swim banquet paid no fee because it is a
Recreation Department sponsored activity. The Employees'
Banquet, for example, being a City sponsored activity, is also
a fee-free activity. Holy Angels Neighborhood Watch paid a
fee because it was not a City sponsored event.
I
Councilman Lojeski referred to his request to the Assistant
City Manager for Economic Development about feasibility of a
possible new redevelopment project area. He would like to
know why the memo was marked, "Not for Disclosure". Also, why
should such a memorandum be copied to Steve Deitsch. The
10
8/18/92
I
I
iJ.. r-~}) ~~)
J . Alford, Ci Clerk'
CIRAULO
(Flags for
Labor and
Admission
Days)
(Security
Grates on
Pawn Shop
on First Av.)
O'>dlO -?(.)
N.JP
(Nuisance
Abatement on
Property on
Foothill Blvd.)
FASCHING
(Flags at
Community
Center)
LOJESKI
(Damage
Repair at
Post Office)
ACTING CITY
MANAGER PRO TEM
(Closed
Session)
Ol(() - <10
11/ _'if'
FASCHING
(In Memory of
Andrea Peele)
11.
ADJOURNMENT
(Aug.22,1992 -
9:00 a.m.)
ATTEST:
34:0276
Assistant City Manager for Economic Development replied that
he would prefer to answer these questions in a closed session.
Councilman Lojeski reiterated that he wondered why 'Steve
Deitsch was copied. The Assistant City Manager for Economic
Development replied that staff spent some time doing the
write-up and the analysis because it dealt with the possible
creation of a new project area, and he wanted to ensure that
the process described under the law was accurate. This had
been sent to Mr. Deitsch in draft form for his review because
he is the Agency Special Counsel. The City Attorney also
reviewed it.
Councilman Ciraulo inquired if the flags will be ready to be
mounted on the light poles by Labor Day. The Public Works
Director replied the flags will be up on Labor Day and on
Admission Day. They will be put up on Friday and taken down
the following Thursday.
Councilman Ciraulo noted that the security grates are still
in place on the pawn shop at 25 South First Avenue. The
Assistant Planning Director replied that the owner has been
given until tomorrow to remove them. He has been advised
that this is a misdemeanor if he continues to keep them in
place.
Councilman Ciraulo referred to the abatement of the properties
on Foothill Blvd. behind Paco's across from Ralphs. He
noticed there is a fence up now. The Assistant Planning
Director replied the City did not put up the fence; the City
did board up the buildings, and have been in contact with the
owner's attorney about cleaning up the property. No one is
living in those houses at the present time.
Mayor Fasching inquired if the stanchions for the flags have
been put in place at the Community Center. The Public Works
Director replied that they are in place.
Councilman Lojeski noted that the Post Office has begun repair
of the earthquake damage to their building on Wheeler.
The Acting City Manager Pro tem announced that, "pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957, the City Council will meet in
CLOSED SESSION on Saturday, August 22, 1992 at 9:00 a. m. for
purposes of recruitment and the appointment of a City
Manager" .
"I would lIke to close the meeting tonight in honor of Andrea
Peele. Andrea Peele, mother of two of our City employees,
Carol Thompson and Cindy Peele, died suddenly two weeks ago.
She was a life-long resident of the area, and friend to many
City employees. Services were held on August 8, 1992. In
addition to Carol and Cindy, survivors include another
daughter and one grandchild".
At 10:00 p. m. the meeting ADJOURNED to 9:00 a. m., Saturday,
August 22, 1992 in the Conference Room of the Counci amber
for a CLOSED SESSION for the purpose f recruitment a,City
Manager.
8/18/92
11