HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH 5,1991_2
I
I
011{;-5n
.:.' .~ { -.# ;(
33:0057
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTE
APPROVAL
(Feb.19,199l)
(APPROVED)
ORD. & RES
READ BY
TITLE ONLY
CLOSED
SESSION
RESOLUTION
NO. 5573
(ADOPTED)
0/10 - ~5
M I NUT E S
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
and the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 5, 1991
The City Council and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in
a regular session at 7:35 p. m., Tuesday, March 5, 1991 in
the City Hall Council Chambers.
Minister Gary Stouffer, Church of Christ
Councilmember George W. Fasching
PRESENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht
and Young
ABSENT: None
On MOTION by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by Councilmember
Ciraulo and CARRIED, the Minutes of the Adjourned and
Regular Meetings of February 19, 1991 were APPROVED.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Fasching and CARRIED that Ordinances and
Resolutions be read by title only and that the reading in
full be WAIVED.
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney announced, that, "the City Council and
Redevelopment Agency met in a CLOSED SESSION this evening
pursuant to Government Code, Section 54956.8 to give
instructions to the City's negotiator regarding the potential
acquisition of property at 153 East Wheeler and toward
negotiations with Claude Cotten regarding the possible
acquisition of that property".
PRESENTATIONS TO SUPERVISOR SCHABARUM
Mayor Young read in full Resolution No. 5573: "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
HONORING PETER F. SCHABARUM FOR HIS COMMITMENT AND FRIENDSHIP
TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA".
It was MOVED by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by Councilmember
Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that
Resolution No. 5573 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
1
3/5/91
LOS ANGELES
TURF CLUB
ARCADIA
REPUBLICAN
WOMEN'S CLUB
ARCADIA
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
ARCADIA CHAPTER
AMERICAN RED
CROSS
()/5:o-S0
tv So'"
PARKING PLACE
COMMISSION
(Kuhn)
WATER
CONSERVATION
l.
PUBLIC HEARING
(Weed Abate-
ment)
(APPROVED)
DLfLj-o-SD
IQ'10-9/
I '~': "' I r
33:0058
Mayor Young presented an engraved copy of this Resolution
signed by the Councilmembers to Supervisor Peter F. Schabarum
and expressed the gratitude of the Council and staff for
Supervisor Schabarum's commitment and friendship to Arcadia
over the years, as well as for his help in acquiring the
County Rose Garden property as the site of the new Senior
Citizen Center.
Mr. Art Hershey, Los Angeles Turf Club, presented a plaque
with a golden horseshoe to Supervisor Schabarum as a token of
the gratitude of the Turf Club for Supervisor Schabarum's help
and in remembrance of all he has done for the community
through the years.
Mrs. Jean Cope, Arcadia Republican Women's Club, presented a
plaque to Supervisor Schabarum expressing the appreciation of
the Republican Women's Club for Supervisor Schabarum's
many years of dedicated service in the First Supervisorial
District.
I
Ms. Eloise Ward, President, Arcadia Chamber of Commerce,
presented a plaque to Supervisor Schabarum expressing the
gratitude of the Chamber of Commerce for Supervisor
Schabarum's many years of dedicated service in the First
Supervisorial District, and for his encouragement and
assistance during the years.
PRESENTATION
Mayor Young presented a proclamation to Mr. Jim Parker and Mr.
Richie Mauch of the Arcadia Red Cross declaring the month of
March, 1991 as Red Cross Month, and calling upon the citizens
of Arcadia to support the work of the Arcadia Chapter of the
American Red Cross through financial assistance or volunteer
services, so this vital service to the community may be
continued without interruption.
ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Jim Kuhn,
Parking Place Commission. Councilmember Fasching presented
Mr. Kuhn with his credentials and a City pin, and welcomed him
to the City family.
At the direction of the Council, Mayor Young spoke
specifically to the newspaper reporters at the press table,
and asked them to please place an article or a notation in
their respective newspapers, and box it with a heavy border,
that says to the Arcadia water consumers, .. Please, if you have
automatic sprinklers, turn them off when it rains".
I
On February 19, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
5571 calling this public hearing to allow affected property
owners the opportunity to object to the proposed removal of
noxious weeds, rubbish and refuse from their properties.
(Property list attached to report dated March 5, 1991.) As
required by the Government Code, the County Agricultural
Commissioner has mailed the appropriate notice to all property
owners involved.
Mayor Young declared the hearing OPEN.
2
3/5/91
I
2.
PUBLIC HEARING
BLDG. CODE VAR.
(315 W. Norman)
(APPROVED)
OS~o..70
I
3.
PUBLIC HEARING
TEXT. AMEND. 91-
007 (Chg.Setback
Require'ts &
Window
Regulations
C-O. C-l &
C-M Com. Zones)
(DENIED)
05?O-b$
33:0059
No one desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION
by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by Councilmenber Harbicht and
CARRIED.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by
Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that the County Agricultural Commissioner be DIRECTED
to abate the nuisance by having the weeds, rubbisb and refuse
removed.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
Consideration of a Building Code variance for an addition
without permits at 315 W. Norman Avenue (Dr. & Mrs. B. L.
Corley, owners/appellants). The appellants are requesting a
building code variance for an addition constructed on their
home sometime in the late 1950' s. The work consisted of
relocating an exterior wall, sliding glass door and large
picture window across the rear of their home, and some related
electrical work. In response to questions from Council, Rudv
Franta, Chief Building Official, replied that the Building
Code is much the same now as it was in 1959 when this work was
done. And that in order to carry out the inspection some
openings will need to be made in the ceiling and walls. Also
glazed safety glass is now required by Code and that possibly
the glass walls and picture window may have to be replaced.
Mayor Young declared the hearing open.
Benton L. Corlev, 315 W. Norman Avenue, owner/appellant, was
present to say that he is in agreement with the decision of
the Building Division and that he will obtain tbe required
permits and provide for the inspections required by the
Building Division.
No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on
MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Mayor Young
and CARRIED.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Ciraulo, seconded by
Councilmember Gilb and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
that Council APPROVE the variance subject to the conditions
set forth in staff report dated March 5, 1991.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
The City Council, at its January 15, 1991 meeting, directed
staff to prepare a text amendment in consideration of revising
setback and window regulations for commercial properties that
are adjacent to residentially zoned properties. Specifically,
the City Council wished to consider a text amendment that
would effectuate a return to the former regulations, i. e.,
a 55 degree angle in lieu of 45 degree, and no prohibition
upon window openings. Staff report dated March 5, 1991
provides diagrams depicting the 45 degree and 55 degree angles
and their effects on the various commercial to residential
setback situations. The commercial zones that would be
affected are the C-O, C-l, C-2 and C-M zones. The existing
regulations are detailed in the March 5 staff report. Staff
3
3/5/91
33:0060
has also included an amendment to eliminate the 20' rear
setback for commercial properties that abut other commercial
or industrial properties, as well as, amendments to the C-M
zone to make it consistent with the other commercial zones.
The Planning Commission at its meeting of February 12, 1991
held a public hearing and voted 5 to 0 to recommend partial
approval of proposed Text Amendment 91-001. The Commission's
recommendations are: 1) to maintain the current 45 degree
angle and not return to the prior 55 degree requirement; 2)
to maintain the prohibition upon window openings, balconies,
etc. from facing adj acent residentially zoned properties. The
Commission felt that relief from this limitation should be
considered on a case-by-case basis through the Modification
process; and 3) to eliminate the 20' rear setback requirement
for commercially zoned properties that abut other commercially
or industrially zoned properties (staff's recommendation).
I
Mayor Young declared the hearing OPEN.
No one desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION
by Councilmember Fasching, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht
and CARRIED.
Councilmember Harbicht had requested that this matter be
brought before Council and proceeded to outline the history
of this ordinance and the difficulties caused to developers
of commercial property abutting res idential property. Because
of this ordinance, commercial buildings cannot be built with
balconies or windows facing residential property and the 45
degree angle forces the buildings to be moved to the front of
the property line. He feels this ordinance is wrong in that
it takes away a considerable property right from one group of
owners in favor of another group of owners. Most of the
commercially zoned property in the City has been so zoned for
a long time, therefore, persons purchasing residential
property next to these areas are aware of the situation. He
also feels this restriction against windows on one side is
causing the construction of office buildings which are
undesirable because they have no windows on one entire side
of the building and, further, is stopping the construction of
what could be very nice office buildings as well as
development of the commercial zones. Finally, the Arcadia
Redevelopment Agency has approved the concept of the Southwest
Corner Project and there is no way that project can be built
under the current regulations. He feels the recommendation
that this requirement be kept and decisions be made on a case-
by-case basis through the Modification procedure is not the
way this should be handled. He feels Council should approve
this and thereby go back to the original ordinance and also
that the elimination of the 20 foot setback requirement be
approved.
Councilmember Gilb agreed with Councilmember Harbicht.
Councilmember Fasching agreed with the Planning Commission
recommendations and would like to maintain the standards the I
City now has. He favors the modification process; there are,
no doubt, some instances where this ordinance should be
modified. Councilmember Ciraulo noted that the present
regulations have been in effect for seventeen or eighteen
years; they seem to have worked pretty well, He would not
like to relax the commercial building standards at this time.
The builders know what the standards are; also, the City has
the modification procedure. He is in favor of denying this
proposal and agrees with the conditions of the Planning
Commission and accepting the elimination of the 20 foot rear
yard setback requirement. Councilmember Harbicht reiterated
there is no way the Southwest Corner builders can build their
proposed building on that piece of property under the present
ordinance; they have already told the Redevelopment Agency
that. He does not think it right to have one set of rules
4
3/5/91
,~~~'.;!;it-' ,
I
I
4.
4a.
PERSONNEL BD.
(Estab.Class'n
- Community
Service
Officer)
(APPROVED)
(J-:l"d.O-IO
Pi)
4b.
RECREATION
COMSN.
(Arc.High Sch.
Softball
Diamond Renov.)
(APPROVED)
IOlo-'}.5
G tTy /SCH IxsT
5.
33: 0061
for property the City has an interest in; and other rules for
the rest of the City. Mayor Young agreed with Councilmember
Ciraulo and feels that the buildings that have been built
under these rules seem to have done very well. The residential
property has been protected.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Fasching, seconded by
Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
to DENY Text Amendment 91-001 with the exception of APPROVAL
of the Planning Commission's recommendation to eliminate the
20 foot rear setback requirement for commercially zoned
properties that abut other commercially or industrially zoned
properties; APPROVE and file the negative declaration for that
portion approved; and DIRECT staff to prepare the appropriate
ordinance for introduction.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching and Young
Councilmembers Gilb and Harbicht
None
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
In order to release Police Officers previously assigned to
jail duties to field operation, and thereby improve community
service levels, it is proposed that the classification of
Community Service Officer be established. The new position
was authorized in the 1990-91 budget approved by the City
Council. The salary range is $2089 to $2540 per month. This
is a non-sworn "general employee" classification.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by Councilmember
Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Council
ESTABLISH the classification of Community Service Officer
(Class -2120) in the Police Department.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
It is recommended by the Recreation Commission that Council
approve a request from Arcadia High School for $2,000 to
assist with the renovation of the Softball Diamond at the High
School. Funds are available in the Parks and Recreation
Facilities Fund.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Gilb and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
that Council AUTHORIZE staff to provide a check in the amount
of $2,000 to Arcadia High School, to be used for the
renovation of the softball diamond.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
William E. Lewis, 300 Arbolada Drive, stated, in part, that
he is present to report to Council that a line of oak trees
along his property line have been partially destroyed by a
fencing contractor building a fence for his next door
neighbor. In the process of digging a foundation for said
fence, the workmen chopped away portions of the roots of the
5
3/5/91
6.
7.
7a.
ROLL CALL
7b.
MINUTE APPROVAL
(Feb.19,199l)
(APPROVED)
7c.
ADJOURNMENT
8.
9.
9a.
CDBG FUNDS
REVISION
05"'0-.;1.0
(1\C,Hd-.
9b.
RETENTION OF
ATTNY B.KAUFMAN
(U.S. v.Montrose
- Potlatch -
Simpson Claims)
/0(,;0-:.>-0
9c.
LABOR RELATIONS
& PERS.LEGAL
SERV.AGREE'T
(Liebert,Cassidy
& Frierson)
od.IO-50
19o,,-9~
10.
lOa.
TREE
PRESERVATION
ORDINANCE
oL/-3o-6o
33:0062
trees. An arborist has told Mr. Lewis that the trees will die
because of this damage to their roots. These trees are
probably between 70 and 100 years old. He presented
photographs of the damaged trees to the Council. He is
present to urge Council most strongly to pass the tree
preservation ordinance to be considered later on this
evening.
CITY COUNCIL RECESSED IN ORDER TO ACT AS THE
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PRESENT: Agency Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
ABSENT None
On MOTION by Member Ciraulo, seconded by Member Fasching and
CARRIED, the Minutes of the meeting of February 19, 1991 were
APPROVED.
The meeting ADJOURNED to 7:00 p. m., March 19, 1991
CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED
CONSENT ITEMS
DIRECTED staff to prepare a revised 1991-92 Cost Summary
including the additional $8,722 in the Housing Rehabilitation
program to be submitted to the Community Development
Commission for CDBG allocation of 17th year funds.
RATIFIED retention of Attorney B. Kaufman at the rate of $185
per hour, with the total fee to be paid not to exceed $6,500
without additional Council approval. Attorney Kaufman to
assist the City Attorney between now and June 1, 1991
concerning required actions involving the U, S. v. Montrose
(Potlatch-Simpsom) claims,
APPROVED renewal of the Agreement for Services with Liebert,
Cassidy & Frierson for labor relations and personnal legal
services at a proposed annual fee of $18,276, and AUTHORIZE
the Mayor to execute the same in a form approved by the City
Attorney.
ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY
COUNCILMEMBER GILB, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HARBICHT AND
CARRIED ON ROLL CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
AYES: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CITY MANAGER
The City Council directed staff to look into possible
requirements which would further strengthen tree preservation
6
3/5/91
I
I
(REPORT TO BE
BROUGHT BACK
TO COUNCIL)
I
I
33:0063
activities. As trees have matured throughout the City, their
importance in contributing to the quality and character of the
City has increased. "The recently adopted General Plan
acknowledges this growing importance. The Land Use Element
calls for an Action Program which will "continue to encourage
the preservation of mature trees as a part of the subdivision
and development of both residential and commercial
properties". Four of the City's homeowner associations have
long recognized the importance of tree preservation and have
had tree preservation requirements incorporated into their
design overlay resolutions. For several years, the Planning
Commission has required new single-family subdivisions to
submit tree preservation plans so that as many mature trees
could be saved as reasonably as possible in new developments.
In' some instances sidewalks have been adjusted to save
existing trees, and house plans are required to be reversed
or modified to save trees. However, factors inherent in the
design of subdivisions such as grade changes required for site
drainage, the location of new streets and the site of the
building pad sometimes require the removal of mature trees.
The adoption of architectural design review requirements has
provided the City with the opportunity to review multiple-
family residential, commercial and industrial projects and to
attempt to retain existing mature trees. A summary of tree
preservation regulations of various California cities was
presented. As individuals and governing bodies become
increasingly aware and concerned with environmental issues,
there is a growing desire to protect and preserve a variety
of tree specimens through protection legislation.
Councilmember Gilb did not feel that a proposed ordinance
should involve permits to trim trees. He also expressed
concern about the enforcement of a tree preservation ordinance
and wondered if there should be penalties attached to it.
Councilmember Ciraulo inquired if violators could be charged
and also required to replace the tree. He felt it would be
necessary to make the residents aware of such an ordinance.
The City Attorney noted that any violation of the Code is
deemed to be a misdemeanor and this could be spelled out in
the ordinance as well as other remedies desired.
Councilmember Fasching pointed out that in instances where
houses are being replaced or remodeled, trees would have to
be removed; perhaps a permit process could be worked out for
this; and he agreed the residents should be made aware of such
an ordinance. Councilmember Ciraulo felt any ordinance
considered should be reasonable and flexible enough to allow
property owners to remove trees, subject to replacement trees.
Mayor Young felt that replacement of trees is a good point,
but that such replacement would not necessarily have to be in
the backyard, i. e., if a swimming pool or tennis court were
to be constructed. She also felt the ordinance should address
the matter of destroying the roots of trees during
construction so they eventually die. Perhaps a financial fine
of $1,000 for indiscriminately destroying trees would be in
order, but should specify what size trees, Tree replacement
together with a fine would be a good starting point.
Councilmember Harbicht does not feel the City needs an
ordinance to protect trees. Any law that is passed is a
restriction on our freedoms; therefore to pass a law, Council
should have a good reason for doing so. Why should Council
pass a law restricting what people can do in their own yards
with their own trees? One possible reason might be that we
are running out of trees, but that is not the case. There are
probably no fewer trees in Arcadia than there were five years
ago or fifteen or twenty-five years ago; probably there are
more; we are not running out of trees. He does not believe
government should be taking this much hand in people's lives
without some justification. He can see a tree ordinance for
an endangered species; some oaks are endangered species; a lot
7
3/5/91
11.
11a.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1932
(INTRODUCED)
0'1/0-30
Co /ltJtr>'HL
c.ctJ'iR,oL.
33:0064
are not. He does not feel there is a justification for such
restrictions. He loves trees; but loves freedom, too. His
philosophy is a conservative one which says that the absolute
minimum of government is the best government. This is moving
toward the absolute maximum of government that is saying this
is what you have to plant or leave in your yard in spite of
the fact that it is private property, There is no emergency
here; we do not need this ordinsnce. Mayor Young agreed with
some of his points, but feels an ordinance is needed for the
future and admits that such an ordinance will be difficult to
write. Councilmember Ciraulo agreed considerably with
Councilmember Harbicht's remarks about freedom to use private
property without these restrictions, but felt that perhaps
this issue has come up because a lot of new people have moved
into Arcadia who perhaps do not value the trees as those who
have lived here longer, and are beginning to indiscriminately I
cut them down. Perhaps this, if allowed to continue, will
eventually change the overall character and appearance of the
community. Perhaps Council can find a compromise whereby
people can be allowed to do as they wish with their properties
to a point, but knowing full well that when they buy property
in this community that large beautiful trees are valued and
are protected. Perhaps some sort of ordinance can take all
this into consideration.
Councilmember Fasching feels 'Council should mainly be
concerned here with front and side yard trees snd trees of a
specific size; backyard trees could be another situation. But
he feels Council should adopt some type of ordinance to
protect the trees. Councilmember Gilb is not in favor of an
ordinance to protect every tree in the City; he would like to
see the oaks protected; possibly a few others.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Fasching ,to INSTRUCT staff to
prepare a text amendment for a tree ordinance with
consideration based upon discussions held tonight and comments
made. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Staff responded
that more direction is needed.
Considerable discussion ensued. Councilmember Harbicht
reiterated that he is in favor of protection for trees which
are unique or an endangered species, or perhaps oak trees, in
general, Councilmembers Gilb and Ciraulo agreed. It was MOVED
by Councilmember Fasching that this matter be TABLED in order
to provide more time for Council to study the matter.
Councilmember Harbicht agreed. Mayor Young does not want the
matter tabled and forgotten, THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A
SECOND.
Council then agreed to DIRECT staff to prepare a report on
this subject, which will include lists of endangered and
indigenous trees to this area, for Council's review at the
April 2nd Council meeting, After such review, a request can
be made to put the matter on a future agenda in accordance
with Council's wishes.
I
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the
title of Ordinance No. 1932: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS
4112,1, 4113.9, 4113.10, 4113.11, 4113.12. 4113.13. 4113.15,
4113.16, 4113.17, 4113,18, 4113.19, 4124.1.3, 4124.2, 4131.5,
4131,6, 4131.7, 4133, 4133,1, 4133.2, 4133.3, 4133.4, 4133.6,
4133,8, AND 4133.8.1 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE
THE COST OF IMPOUND FEES AND VACCINATION REQUIREMENTS,
AMENDING DIVISION 3, OF PART 3 OF ARTICLE IV REGARDING IMPOUND
8
3/5/91
.,
'l\i"
:~~,
'if ','~~.
I
I
12.
13.
GILB
(Financial
Assist. for
Arcadia High
Sch.Students -
Constitution
Competition)
(APPROVED)
0/50-37)
ScAouLS
"Sf
14.
ADJOURNMENT
(Mar.19,199l -
7:00 p.m.)
ATTEST:
.<....~..IJ
J e D. Alford.
33:0065
FEES AND SECTION 4113.9 TO DELETE AUTHORIZING SALE OF ANIMALS
TO RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS".
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Ciraulo, seconded by Mayor
Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance
No. 1932 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht that Section 4113.9 to
delete authorizing sale of animals to research institutions
be withdrawn from Ordinance No. 1932 because he feels animals
are necessary to medical research. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK
OF A SECOND.
ROLL CALL ON FIRST MOTION:
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
MATTERS FROM STAFF
None
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
Council has received a letter from Mr. Somerville in regard
to the Arcadia High School students who went to Sacramento and
came in first in the test on their knowledge of the U. S.
Constitution and Bill of Rights. This group is now going to
Washington, D. C., and have requested financial assistance.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by
Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that Council AUTHORIZE $1,000 to help the students
with their expenses.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
At 9:05 p.m. the City Council ADJOURNED to 7:00 p.m., March
19, 1991 in the Conference Room of the Council Chambers to
conduct the business of the Council and Agency and any Closed
Session, if any, necessary to discuss personnel, litigation
and evaluation of properties.
~~1~r
9
3/5/91