HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCTOBER 8,1991_2
I
I
o IIcJ - ,-U
IOO~4'
33:0266 Ce.
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTE
APPROVAL
(Sept.17,199l)
(APPROVED)
ORD, & RES.
READ BY
TITLE ONLY
CLOSED
SESSION
OliO - -Ie
AGENDA
ITEMS
M I NUT E S
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
and the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 8, 1991
The City Council and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in
a regular meeting at 7:35 p. m" Tuesday October 8, 1991 in
the Arcadia City Hall Council Chamber.
Rev, Gary Kroah, Associate Pastor, Emmanual Assembly of God
Jo Ann Scott, Library Board of Trustees
PRESENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
ABSENT: Councilmember Young
On MOTION by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember
Ciraulo and CARRIED, Councilmember Young was EXCUSED.
On MOTION by Councilmember Ciraulo seconded by Councilmember
Fasching and CARRIED, the minutes of the Adjourned and
Regular Meetings of September 17, 1991 were APPROVED, Mayor
Gilb ABSTAINED since he was not present at the September 17,
1991 meeting,
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by Council-
member Ciraulo and CARRIED, that Ordinances and Resolutions
be read by title only and that the reading in full be WAIVED.
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney announced that, "the City Council and
Redevelopment Agency met in a CLOSED SESSION pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with legal
counsel regarding the existing claims of R. Logavi and E.
Nagata. Additionally, the Council and the Agency discussed
the current condemnation lawsuit of Arcadia Redevelopment
Agency vs. Willson, Weingard, Franco and Cordova. At the
conclusion of this evening's regular meeting, the Council and
the Agency will meet in CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.8 to give instructions to the City's
negotiator with regard to acquisition of property at the
southwest corner site of Huntington and Second with regard to
Mr. Kinnahan's negotiations with Warren Lortie and the
Schaefers. Additionally, the Council and Agency, pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957,6(a) will be meeting to give
directions to the City's representative regarding a
compensation issue that was raised by the Arcadia Police
Association".
Mayor Gilb announced that at the Pre-meeting, regarding the
Consent Calendar, staff recommended setting Item 8a. for a
hearing on October 22, 1991; it also has been pulled by Mayor
10/8/91
1
l.
PUBLIC HEARING
ZONE CHANGE
Z-91-009
(Rezone Prop.
R-l 7,500 to
R-l 12,500 -
Certain Prop-
erties in
SW Arcadia)
(APPROVED)
()n't1 " '1()
-, if ('/"1
2.
PUBLIC HEARING
SO. CALIF.
WATER CO.
FRANCHISE
(APPROVED)
O;jll!" 1<)\
SC l..Jfr r{'
33:0267
Pro tern Harbicht for discussion. Item 8b, Tree Preservation
added to Municipal Code has been set for hearing November 5,1991.
Consideration of Zone Change Z-9l-009 rezoning the properties
set forth below from R-l 7,500 (Second one-family with a
minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet) to R-l 12,500 (Second
one-family with a minimum lot size of 12,500 square feet).
Area 1: North side of Walnut Avenue between Baldwin Avenue
and Holly Avenue and the south side of Walnut Avenue from 400
to 632 Walnut Avenue. Area 2: Bounded on the north by Palm
Drive, on the west by Baldwin Avenue, on the east by Holly
Avenue and on the north by Woodruff Avenue, including lots on
Florence Avenue and Los Altos Avenue. There is the potential
for both cul-de-sacs and corner lot splits in this area which
would result in lots inconsistent with the existing lot sizes.
Area 3: Properties located at 480-530 Las Tunas Drive (south
side of the street) and 481-535 Workman Avenue. There is the
potential for both cul-de-sacs and corner lot splits in this
area which would result in lots inconsistent with the existing
lot sizes. The rezoning of these properties is based upon the
average lot size of properties within each area. The larger
minimum lot size requirements would apply to all properties,
but would not affect existing lots, However, any new lots
proposed within these areas would have to meet the minimum lot
area requirement of 12,500 sq. ft. The existing development
standards such as building height, setbacks, lot coverage,
etc, will not be affected by any of the proposed changes. The
zone change would prohibit future lot splits of the corner
lots and future development of cul-de-sacs which are
inconsistent with the new zoning designation of R-l, 12,500
sq. ft. There are approximately 181 lots within these areas.
I
Mayor Gilb declared the public hearing OPEN.
No one desiring the be heard the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION
by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Ciraulo
and CARRIED.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Ciraulo, seconded by Mayor Pro
tern Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to
APPROVE Zone Change Z-9l-009; FILE the Negative Declaration;
and FIND that this zone change will not have a significant
effect on the environment and DIRECT staff to prepare the
appropriate ordinance.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
At their meeting of September 17, 1991, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 5618 declaring the City's intention to
grant a franchise to the Southern California Water Company and
set a public hearing for October 8, 1991. As required by
Section 1303 of the Arcadia City Charter, Resolution No. 5618
has been published declaring the time and place of said public
hearing. Ordinance No. 1955 granting the franchise will have
a term of five years and supersedes a 40 year franchise
granted in 1950 pursuant to Ordinance No. 799. The Southern
California Water Company serves 212 customers in southeast
Arcadia and pays to the City of Arcadia a franchise tax
payment of approximately $700 annually.
I
Mayor Gilb declared the hearing OPEN.
No one desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION
by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Fasching
and CARRIED.
10/8/91
2
I
I
ORDINANCE
NO. 1955
(INTRODUCED)
03"~0-1(J~-
3.
PUBLIC HEARING
NUISANCE
ABATEMENT AND
ORDER FOR
REHABILITATION
(2819 Bradford
Av.)
(APPROVED)
() $'.;)("> ,,'()
c) ~ ,J, "
33:0268
The Public Works Director presented for introduction and read
the title of Ordinance No. 1955: "ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA GRANTING TO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS,
A FRANCHISE TO LAY AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING
WATER FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, PIPELINES AND OTHER
FACILITIES, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON AND UNDER THE PUBLIC
STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF ARCADIA".
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by Mayor Gilb
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No.
1955 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching,
None
Councilrnember Young
Harbicht and Gilb
This public hearing has been scheduled pursuant to Section
9407 of the Arcadia Municipal Code co allow the City Council
to determine whether a public nuisance exists and whae action
is necessary to abate the nuisance on property located at 2819
Bradford Avenue. As per the above Section, a "Notice of
Public Nuisance and Order to Abate" was mailed on September
20, 1991 to Andrew Lowell and Yolanda Hernandez, responsible
persons, for the property located at 2819 Bradford Avenue.
A notice was also posted on the property the same day.
The following violations have been cited on the properey: 1)
Excessive, tall, dry weeds and dead vegetation on the premises
which are considered to be a health, safety and welfare
hazard; 2) There is a lack of adequate lawn, ground cover and
irrigation, Landscaping is required to be in conformity with
adjacent residential properties; and 3) Lack of required pool
fencing with constitutes a safety and welfare hazard.
On August 28, 1991, the Planning Departmene received a
complaint regarding the excessive weeds and condition of the
pool at 2819 Bradford Avenue. The subject property is vacant
and has not been properly maintained. On August 30, 1991,
the City's Code Enforcement Officer sent a letter to the
owners advising them of the condition of the property, They
were given until September 6 to bring the property into
compliance. Code Enforcement reinspected the premises on
September 6 and noted there was no change in the condition of
ehe property, Also, there was no contact from the property
owners. On September 6, the Fire Department, ae the request
of the Code Enforcement Officer, drained the pool to eliminate
the hazard of an unsafe pool, On September 20, the City sent
a Notice of Public Nuisance and Order to Abate to Mr, Lowell
and Ms. Hernandez. There has been no response from the
property owners to this date and the condition of the property
has not changed.
Mayor Gilb declared the hearing OPEN.
No one desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION
by Councilmember Fasching, seconded by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht
and CARRIED.
u
Ie was MOVED by Councilmember Ciraulo, seconded by Mayor Pro
tern Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to
determine that a public nuisance exises and that Resolution
No. 5623: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING
THE REHABILITATION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2819 BRADFORD
AVENUE, ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AND PLACING A LIEN AGAINST THE
10/8/91
3
4.
01<;"('>- ~()
N.",,'"
01<;<.) 5~)
.1 ,,,
''1.'' "
(l,i \,)
/lJJ I
", '>
33:0269
PROPERTY, IF ABATEMENT AT CITY EXPENSE IS REQUIRED" be and it
is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Lael Collins, 409 J Fairview Avenue, stated, in part, that she
was present because of her concern about First Avenue Jr. High
School which the School Board Task Force is considering
demolishing. She is concerned that the Council has not seemed
to know or be concerned about the problems of the School
District or proposed any help, advice or financial assistance.
Mrs. Collins felt some money should be made available by the
Council to help the schools. Mayor Gilb and Mayor Pro tern
Harbicht replied that, although the Council is greatly
concerned about the problems of the schools, the School
District is a separate entity and is not under the
jurisdiction of the City Council. Also, that, to this point,
the School District has not requested help from the City.
Councilmember Fasching noted that he had suggested a joint
study session with the School District and the City Council.
I
Mrs, Robert Bozung, 1162 Panorama Drive, stated, in part, that
she was also present to address the question of the plight of
the School District and to ask the City Council for help for
the District, She also wondered why the District had not
previously requested help from the Council with respect to a
loan, She further inquired if the four million dollar
Community Center had been built with City funds. Council
replied that it had. The residents who attended the Task
Force meetings indicated they would be in favor of a bond
issue as an alternative to selling school property, according
to Mrs. Bozung. Mayor Gilb and Mayor Pro tern Harbicht stated
that they, as well as Councilmember Young, have attended the
Task Force meetings and have heard their presentations several
times; that the Task Force had made a presentation to the
entire Council'; and that the Council is well aware of the
problem.
Warren Shaw, 1635 S,Third Avenue, stated, in part, that he
is present to address Item 9b. on tonight's agenda which is
the recommendation for Community Center Usage Policy, He
referred to the policy which addresses use by non-profit
organizations/groups for community wide public meetings in
which the principal purpose is the dissemination of
information of general interest to the citizens of Arcadia,
He suggested that this policy be broadened so that some kinds
of entertainment events might be permitted.
I
Michael Walbrecht, Assistant Director, California Film
Commission, Los Angeles, stated, in part, that he is present
to ask the Council to reconsider their ordinance requiring a
seven day notice, rather than a three day notice, to nearby
residents of the filming sites, He explained that this will
be a difficult requirement for the filming companies to adhere
to, especially those who are filming TV projects or
commercials because they work on a very short time schedule.
This ordinance will effectively preclude much of the filming
done in Arcadia. He suggested that the nearby residents
could be provided a telephone number by which they could
contact the location manager with a request to move trucks,
etc. to another location if that should be necessary. The
filming companies would cooperate in this regard.
10/8/91
4
I
I
5.
6.
6a.
ROLL CALL
6b.
MINUTE APPROVAL
(Sept.17,199l)
(APPROVED)
6c.
LEASE OF PROP.
146-170 Htg.Dr.
(Christmas Tree
Sales
(APPROVED)
06~eJ 1,..l/..J
Le'llr
33:0270
CITY COUNCIL RECESSED IN ORDER TO ACT AS THE
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Agency Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
Agency Member Young
On MOTION by Member Harbicht, seconded by Member Fasching and
CARRIED, Member Young was EXCUSED.
On MOTION by Member Harbicht, seconded by Member Fasching and
CARRIED, the minutes of the meeting of September 17. 1991 were
APPROVED, Chairman Gilb ABSTAINED since he was not present
at the September 17, 1991 meeting,
Consideration of a request from Louise Hawkins, dba Hawkins
Christmas Trees of Yoncalla, Oregon, to lease the Agency-owned
Southwest Corner Project property at 146-170 East Huntington
Drive for the purpose of selling Christmas trees. Use of the
lot for Christmas tree sales will not interfere with the
ongoing negotiations with Arcon/Schaefer Brothers since escrow
will not close, assuming the DDA is approved, until March
1992.
It was MOVED by Member Harbicht, seconded by Chairman Gilb
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the Arcadia
Redevelopment Agency enter into a Lease Agreement, in form and
content approved by Agency Counsel, with Louise Hawkins for
the use of the property at 146-170 E. Huntington Drive for the
period of October 8, 1991 through December 31, 1991; and that
the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency AUTHORIZE the Executive
Director to EXECUTE the Lease Agreement.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Ciraulo, Harbicht and Gilb
Member Fasching (Felt that the Agency should receive
Member Young more money for the rental of this
property, )
6d.
RELOCATION &
REPLACEMENT
EDISON WOODEN
POLES WITH STEEL
POLES
(NW & SW Corner
Redevelop.
Projects)
(DENIED)
0(;1.0
Consideration of replacement of four Southern California
Edison Company wooden poles on the Northwest and Southwest
Corner Projects with steel poles. The three poles on the
Northwest Corner Project are situated such that their
locations would interfere with almost any future development
of the site by rendering certain portions of the site
unusable, and minimally less attractive. The Southwest
corner project lines are high voltage transmission lines and
are not slated for undergrounding using 20A funds, as are the
.-f 1/" lower voltage lines along Second Avenue between Huntington
~-; Drive and the Foothill Freeway, The Edison Company
responded to the Agency's request for information and
concluded that it is feasible to install the two steel poles
and remove the existing four wooden poles. The estimated cost
for this work is $125,000. The Agency cannot remove only the
wooden poleson either the north or south side of Huntington.
It must replace all four or leave them as-is.
Since negotiations with the developer of the Southwest Corner,
Arcon/Schaefer Brothers, are well under way and have not
included the steel pole project, and since the benefit of a
new metal pole to this project is more indirect, staff
believes that it would be unreasonable to require this
developer to absorb the additional cost. However, staff.would
recommend that half of the cost of the project (approximately
$62,500) be passed on to the future developer of the Northwest
10/8/91
5
6e.
SITE PLAN CONCEPT
& PROJECT PHASING
SW CORNER PROJECT
(Arcon/Schaefer
Bros.)
(APPROVED)
o G 'h f i ';/ L/ <I
!/r:',;' ,"~,'
33:0271
Corner project, since it would most likely increase the value
and utility of the site,
Member Harbicht felt that there are limited benefits of this
replacement of power poles. In reply to a question from
Member Ciraulo, staff replied that the replacement will
probably increase the ,value of the northwest side. Member
Fasching felt he would only want to spend this amount of money
if the utility lines could be placed underground. Staff
replied that the high voltage poles cannot be undergrounded,
Member Fasching does not agree that this will increase the
saleablility of the property. Also, the island property has
some trees on it which will be removed at a cost of $6,000.
He has seen a bid from Alexander Tree Company for $2,190,
Chairman Gilb agreed this Edison power lines project should
not be undertaken at the present time, and that when it is I'
done, he would like to see the lines placed underground.
Staff noted that it'is extremely expensive to underground the
high voltage lines, Member Harbicht felt at the time of
negotiation for the Northwest Corner, it will be difficult for
the Agency to recoup the money expended for this project.
Gregory D. Woodson, Area Manager, Southern California Edison
Company, 1440 South California Street, Monrovia, was present
to explain the difference in costs for under grounding the high
or low voltage lines, The cost is almost double for the high
voltage lines. This no doubt had an effect on the staff
decision to underground only the low voltage lines.
It was MOVED by Member Fasching, seconded by Member Harbicht
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to DENY the proposal
for removal and replacement of Southern California Edison
wooden poleswith steel poles on the Northwest/Southwest Corner
Proj ect sites.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Member Young
At the request of Arcon/Schaefer Brothers (A/SB), Amendment
No, 4 to the A/SB ERN requires that the Agency consider the
current proposed site plan and concept elevations for the
project. The review is designed to provide Agency input at
this time in the design process before A/SB begins preparing
full scale working drawings. This review is not the formal
Agency Design Review which is scheduled for Agency
consideration at the same time the A/SB DDA is to be
(considered later this year. The current scheme anticipates
a subterranean parking garage underneath a 16,667 foot medical
office building and 25,000 square foot professional office
building. Also included are the concept elevations for Agency
comment.
Although not a requirement of the ERN Amendment, A/SB has
requested as part of this review, that the Agency consider the
proposed phasing of the Southwest Corner Project. The ERN
contemplated that the project be completed at one time. A/SB
has requested that the Schedule permit them to complete the
professional office building within eighteen months after
completion of the medical office building.
I
Warren H, Lortie, President, WLA Arcon, 18652 Florida St.,
Suite 200, Huntington Beach, stated, in part, that he is
present to discuss the design conceptual approval of the
project by the Agency, He noted that the Agency has the right
of discretionary approval which is retained almost to the end
of the negotiation process. A/SB would like to have some form
of design concept approval. In reply to a question from
10/8/91
6
I
I
33:0272
Member Harbicht, Mr, Lortie replied that, basically, they want
to know if any real problems exist. In the discussion of the
materials to be used for the proj ect, Chairman Gilb noted that
he was disappointed in the appearance of the building at the
NW corner of First Avenue and Huntington Drive and is glad to
hear that different materials will be used for the proposed
buildings.
After further discussion, it was MOVED by Member Fasching,
seconded by Member Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that the Agency APPROVE in concept the current
Arcon/Schaefer Brothers site plan and elevations as prepared
for the SW Corner Project.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
None
Mr. Lortie proceeded to discuss the phasing of the project.
With the current financing environment, it is very difficult
to finance a general office building in Arcadia, according to
Mr. Lortie. A/SB would like to have a firm contractural
agreement with the Agency which would include an 18 month
Entitlement period within which to begin construction of the
second building. In reply to a question from Member Harbicht,
Mr. Lortie agreed A/SB is proposing to buy only half of the
site at this time, plus do all the offsite work for both
sites. Also, if another developer should develop the second
half of the site, reciprocal agreements would be necessary for
access to the underground parking. The second project would
be as approved, unless they wished to design a project which
would be consistent and compatible with what will then be
already built. A/SB would have considerable value in the
second parcel, and they would not want to walk away from it
and $100,000 in offsite improvements. However, they wish to
be cautious and give some thought to the possibility that this
might be necessary at some point. Considerable discussion
ensued between the Agency Members and Mr. Lortie with regard
to the underground parking garage, In reply to question from
Member Fasching, Mr, Lortie and Agency staff replied the
earliest start of construction would be the Spring of 1992.
Following further discussion between Mr. Lortie and Agency
Staff, it was determined that the situation now is that the
escrow will close in February or March of 1992. The period
of time from the purchase of the first parcel to the purchase
of the second parcel will, in the worse case scenario I be
twelve or thirteen months -- February or March of 1993, Also,
there will ~e an accrual of an additional amount of money,
possibly, 6% on the purchase price, plus required investment
of all of the parcelization costs and improvement costs.
Following questions from Member Harbicht and discussion with
Mr. Lortie with regard to possible future marketing of the
second parcel, Agency Staff noted that generally when the
Agency enters into an agreement with a developer, there is a
performance requirement so that if the developer does not
perform according to the contract, then he does not have the
right to re-market the property. The property, if it is sold,
reverts to the Agency or, in this case, the right to develop
the property would be terminated. It would revert to the
Agency and the Agency would re-market it in whatever way they
might see fit at that time.
6f.
SW CORNER PROJECT
(Arcon/Schaefer
Bros. -
Ci vi! tec
Invoices)
o /; YO . t,d,1
( Ii ' ! /._ t\-t1( 'Cr-
Section 109(e) of the August 7, 1990 Exclusive Right to
Negotiate (ERN) between the Agency and Arcon/Schaefer Brothers
(A/SB) requires that A/SB reimburse the Agency for all costs
associated with the preparation of the Civiltec land and
topographic survey of the Southwest Corner Site. Based upon
10/8/91
7
6g.
ADJOURNMENT
7.
8.
33:0273
the work done and the invoices received, verified and paid by
Agency staff, staff estimates reimbursable amount to be
$5,953. Agency staff has repeatedly requested payment for the
Civiltec work from A/SB. A/SB have refused to make the
required payment. Staff report dated October 8, 1991 refers
to the efforts to date to obtain payment. The failure of
A/SB to reimburse the Agency for the Civiltec work is one of
several performance delays experienced by the Agency during
the course of the ERN with A/SB. Staff recommends that the
Agency require that the full $5,953 be paid by October 21,
1991 and if it is not paid, that the Agency pull down the
Letter of Credit ($25,000) good faith deposit and terminate
the ERN.
Howard Schaefer, Director, Schaefer Brothers, Ltd" 9844
Jutland Avenue, Northridge, stated, in part, that the issue I
is the interpretation of Section 109(e) of the ERN, They have
also had problems with compliance with the Agency as far as
giving reports on a timely basis. Also, there were major
problems relating to the building of a three story building,
which required a variance, etc. This was the cause of some
delay. Considerable discussion ensued as to the timing of
the Civiltec invoices, interpretation and why the cost was so
high. Mr. Schaefer reviewed the agreement. He noted that
A/SB were never consulted about some of the work done, He
felt it is unfair that the burden has been placed on A/SB to
determine whether payment of the full $7,000 is appropriate.
They are willing to talk about work done by Civiltec for which
A/SB benefitted; they are willing to talk about and discuss
reimbursement; but not as far as the ERN. A/SB feel this
matter should be negotiated as part of the DDA.
Considerable discussion among the Agency Members, staff and
Mr. Schaefer. The Agency felt these expenses are part of the
ERN, Member Harbicht noted that this is a multi-million
dollar project, and one of the key intersections in the
community. The Agency has paid this money to Civiltec and
A/SB has not even paid the amount they agreed was estimated.
He does not feel this is the kind of situation that should
exist between public/private partners in developing this piece
of property. If necessary, the Agency can start again to
market this property.
It was MOVED by Member Harbicht, seconded by Chairman Gilb and
CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the Agency REQUIRE
Arcon/Schaefer Brothers to reimburse the Agency $5,953 for
expenses incurred pursuant to Section 109(e) of the ERN by
October 21, 1991, and determine that failure to do so
constitutes a default under the terms and conditions of the
ERN, and further determine that failure to do so by October
21, 1991 shall cause cancellation of the ERN and drawing down
the Arcon/Schaefer Brothers' Letter of Credit ($25,000) by the
Agency.
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Member Young
The meeting ADJOURNED to 6:00 p. m,. October 22, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED
CONSENT ITEMS
10/8/91
8
I
I
8b.
PUBLIC HEARING
SCHEDULED
(Nov.5,199l)
OtJ~(r) ~l~\
8c. I~I) 'i 00...
ADVERTISE FOR
BIDS (Concrete
Benches & Trash
Receptacles -
Var.Locations -
Job No. 661) I
Or/f) - ."
8d.
WORK ACCEPTED
(1991-92 Annual
Street Maint.
Prog. - Slurry
Seal - Job No.
664)
..:):/.,0 ,~-O
J0', :<; I ./
8f.
FINAL MAP 47199
(8-Unit Resid.
Condominium -
114-120 E.
California St.)
0...,(;\) - j, r'
'Ir '/-1111
8h.
EQUIP.PURCH.
(Tractor-Loader
Backhoe -
Water Div.)
03<(0 - 30
N.J
8i.
EQUIP.PURCH.
(Dump Truck w/
Over-the-cab
Loader - Pub.
Works)
():;jr/tJ 0 w ()
8k. ptJJ
BANK'G SERVo
CONTRACT 1/1/92-
12/31/94
(~,.J,.Jt) ~..- ~
8m.
L. A. CO. -
JOINT INDEMNITY
AGREEMENT
JOt(). ,;0
8n.
RATIFIED SETTLE-
MENT - L.Altmayer
I,) /J '(f j
33:0274
Mayor Gilb noted that Consent Items a, e, g, j, and 1. are to
be considered separately, Councilmember Harbicht noted that
he will ABSTAIN on Item k.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED for November
consideration of Text Amendment 91-005,
preservation to the Arcadia Municipal Code.
5, 1991
adding
for
tree
APPROVED plans and specifications for installation of new
concrete benches and trash receptacles at various locations ..
Job No, 661. City Clerk is AUTHORIZED to advertise for bids,
ACCEPTED proj ect and AUTHORIZED final payment to IPS Services,
Inc. for the 1991-92 annual street maintenance program slurry
seal - Job No. 664. Ten percent (10%) retention payment
becomes due and payable 35 days after the recordation of
Notice of Completion and will only be released by the Director
of Public Works on completion of all corrections of record.
The final contract amount of $129,128.04 was funded from State
Gas Taxes.
APPROVED Final Map of Tract 47199 for an 8-unit residential
condominium project at 114-120 E. California Street on behalf
of Hsu & Associates (owner/developer of the site). Approval
on condition that all outstanding conditions of approval, as
outlined in Public Works Department report dated January 25,
1989 shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works, (The filing period for the Final
Map was scheduled to expire in February of 1991, though a one
year time extension was granted.)
APPROVED purchase of one tractor-loader backhoe from Case
Power and Equipment in the amount of $37,714.30 including
sales tax; and WAIVED non-compliance with the specific bid
process of the City of Arcadia. Funds for the purchase of the
tractor-loader backhoe are budgeted in the Water Equipment
Replacement fund in the amount of $43,500.00,
APPROVED purchase of one dump truck with over-the-cab loader
from the low bidder, Nixon Egli Equipment in the amount of
$90,703.00. Funds for this purchase were budgeted in the
Public Works Department Equipment Replacement Fund in the
total amount of $91,000.00.
AWARDED contract for banking services to the low bidder, First
Interstate Bank for the City's banking services for the period
January I, 1992 through December 31, 1994.
APPROVED Joint Indemnity Agreement with the County of Los
Angeles and AUTHORIZED the Mayor to sign after approval as to
form by the City Attorney.
RATIFIED settlement of claim filed by L. Altmayer for water
damage in the amount of $5,551,00 at 1421 Oaklawn Road.
10/8/91
9
80.
RATIFIED SETTLE-
MENT - Orona vs.
Arcadia
/0'10 ,'-It)
8p.
RAIL TRANSIT
STUDY FUNDING
() ';-: :; 0 ..)()
Ccm""ld
t:' , 1'/
:/L',
8a.
UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES DIST.
NO. 13 - Htg.Dr.
to La Porte St.
(CONTINUED TO
OCT. 22,1991)
o 't< 'Ie - 'if' 0
N~~ 13. Hlj
.
U' I',
8e.
ACCEPTED REPORT
PROPOSED TRF.
SIGNAL - First
Av. & Santa
Clara St. - Job
No. 670
00.;'( ,;
...!,' "
33:0275
RATIFIED settlement
property damage
$30,000.00.
of litigation for personal injuries and
Orona vs. Arcadia in the amount of
APPROVED Arcadia's participation in a preliminary rail transit
study for the Northern San Gabriel Valley - San Bernardino
County Transportation Corridor and fund the project for
$12,000 out of Proposition A Local Return Fund reserves.
(, )
, . '...
ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEMS a,
e, g, j, AND 1 WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM
HARBICHT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FASCHING AND CARRIED ON
ROLL CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
Mayor Pro tern Harbicht (Item 8k)
Consideration of Underground Utilities District No. 13
Second Avenue from Huntington Drive to La Porte Street.
Councilmember Harbicht noted this is a similar situation in
the same area discussed earlier where only certain utility
lines can be undergrounded and some will remain. It does not
seem to make sense to underground part of these lines when
some of them will remain in place. Since the transmission
lines cannot be taken down, perhaps Council should move to the
. ,next undergrounding project on the list, The Public Works
Director noted that six poles would be eliminated. There is
an estimate of $750,000 just for the undergrounding of the
high voltage lines. A field study was suggested.
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED that this item be CONTINUED
TO OCTOBER 22, 1991.
In reply to a question from Councilmember Fasching, the Public
Works Director replied there is a priority list for locations
for the undergrounding of utilities which is part of the
Capital Improvement Program, and the next on the list is Santa
Anita Avenue from the railroad crossing to Huntington Drive
at an estimated cost of $600,000.
Consideration of report from the Public Works Department on
the status of the proposed traffic signal at First Avenue and
Santa Clara Street - Job No. 670. Councilmember Fasching
noted that there is a signal a block away at Wheeler Avenue
and inquired about the feasibility of placing stop signs North
and South on First Avenue to help alleviate the traffic
problems, rather than signals. The Public Works Director
replied there is warrant for signals on this street and that
on such a wide street sometimes there are problems with just
having stop signs.
I
It was MOVED by Mayor Gilb, seconded by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the report from
the Director of Public Works on the status of the proposed
traffic signal at First Avenue and Santa Clara Street
including necessary procedural steps be ACCEPTED and that
further consideration of the stop sign or signal be DELAYED
pending receipt of a staff report,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching,
None
Councilmember Young
Harbicht and Gilb
10/8/91
10
I
I
Consideration of appropriation of $1,900 from the General Fund
to be used for Hazard Communication training and literature.
Pursuant to Section 5194, Title 8 of the California
Administrative Code, the City is mandated to develop and
implement a Hazard Communication Program. To meet this
requirement and to formally document the City's ongoing
~ commitment to safety, a written Hazard Communication Program
~~'I ..Jhas been prepared. The program includes comprehensive
training that will improve employee awareness of chemical
exposure and the ability to respond in the event of an
accident.
8g.
HAZARD COMMUNICA-
TION TRAINING
FUNDING
(APPROVED)
o /.J' ~
1(1 (fit ff
" \
8j.
TEMPORARY CHRIST.
TREE STORAGE
TENTS (146-170
E.Htg.Dr.; 801
W.Htg.Dr.;
1045 W.Htg.Dr. &
1401 S.Baldwin
Av.)
(APPROVED)
O;J\ J ..:"
81.
FINANCIAL
CONSULTANT -
SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK
MALL EXPANSION -
(Keyser Marston
Associates)
(APPROVED)
0...,.... W
0" lu' .~l \
~', '
33:0276
\
In reply to a question from Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, Garv
Ro~ers, Personnel Department, explained that the Hazard
Communication Program is a requirement that the State has
placed on all businesses in California to develop a written
program whereby employees will be informed and knowledgeable
regarding hazardous materials.
APPROVED request from Louise Hawkins, owner of Hawkins
Christmas Trees, for temporary Christmas tree storage tents
to be located at 146-170 E. Huntington Drive; 801 W.
Huntington Drive and 1045 W. Huntington Drive; also request
from Sav-On Drug Store #2121 for temporary Christmas tree
storage tent to be located in the Sav-On parking lot at 1401
S. Baldwin Avenue. All tents will be subj ect to Fire
Department regulations, inspected and approved prior to
opening for business.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Fasching, seconded by
Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
that Consent Items g, and j, be APPROVED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo,
None
Councilmember Young
Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
Consideration of contract with Keyser Marston Associates for
financial consulting services in connection with the proposed
Santa Anita Fashion Park mall expansion and the request of the
owners for financial assistance.
Councilmember Fasching inquired why there has not been a
presentation in connection with this major expansion project.
It is his feeling this should be done before committing money
for a financial consultant. Mayor Gilb said plans are not
finalized at this time and perhaps some portions are
confidential.' Staff noted that the developers will be glad
to make such a presentation. The City Attorney noted that,
as a land use issue at a given point in time, the owners have
a right to apply for the land use approvals that they would
need for any expansion and that would have to go through
public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City
Council. So, they do have a right to process an expansion
through the Planning process, irrespective of financial
considerations. Councilmember Fasching reiterated that he
would like to meet the owners and hear their presentation.
In reply to a question from Councilmember Ciraulo, staff
,replied the $28,600 fee is for an initial evaluation; later
on during negotiations, staff will probably need to call on
the consultant again. Mayor Pro tern Harbicht noted the
$28,600 is for a specific task in evaluating a particular
situation. Mayor Pro tern Harbicht continued that he has no
problem with the owners making a presentation, but this is a
10/8/91
11
9
9a.
ARCADIA DIAL-A-
RIDE AGREEMENT
(APPROVED)
J.-;' 3(1
dd,
,
J tJ
J
,
9b.
ARCADIA
COMMUNITY CENTER
USAGE POLICY
(APPROVED)
(J/f:.1 Ie-
/'
err
.t "
33:0277
major situation and the City needs expert help, He feels that
hiring such a consultant is a necessary first step.
It was then MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by Mayor
Gilb and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to APPROVE
Keyser Marston Associates for financial consulting services
in connection with the proposed Mall expansion and the Mall's
request for financial assistance at a cost of $22,000 with a
contingency of $6,600 (30%), for a total of $28,600.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo,
None
Councilmember Young
Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
Councilmember Fasching asked the City Manager to request that
the developer of Santa Anita Fashion Park make a presentation I
to Council, outlining the entire project and the reasons for
their projections.
CITY MANAGER
It is staff's recommendation that the City Council approve the
Arcadia Dial-A-Ride Service Agreement which requests a $1.65
increase in the vehicle service hour rate and that the City
Council authorize a $33,448 payment to meet San Gabriel
Transit's increased insurance costs for 1991-92.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Ciraulo, seconded by Mayor Gilb
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows to AUTHORIZE the
Mayor to execute the Arcadia Dial-A-Ride Service Agreement in
a form approved by the City Attorney and AUTHORIZE a one time
expenditure of $33,448 which will be paid to San Gabriel
Transit as part of their total compensation for service
provided to the Arcadia Dial-A-Ride.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo,
None
Councilmember Young
Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
Consideration of recommendations for usage of the Community
Center. Mayor Gilb felt the staff's recommended policy is a
good one and would like to try it for a six month period.
Councilmember Fasching felt that consideration should be given
to fund raising events by non-profit organizations and also
a fee schedule in relationship to such use in order to help
offset the maintenance costs. Warren Shaw reiterated his
request that Item 3 under Community Events be modified to
include some recreation activities. Perhaps that phrase could
be changed to include use in which the principal purpose is
of general interest to the citizens of Arcadia, and leave out
the dissemination of information phrase. Jerrv Collins,
Recreation Director agreed. Mayor Pro tern Harbicht is in
agreement with the recommendation for a six month period. At
that point, he would like to see this brought before Council
for further consideration. He would like to see staff get a
few more months of experience with the new Center and get up
to speed. At present the Community Center is restricted to
Senior activities and City activities, It will need to be
determined if it should be available to the,entire community
or continue to be restricted to City sponsored events.
Councilmember Ciraulo felt the policy is too restrictive. He
would like to see a more liberal policy in six months, as well
as a report with regard to fees.
I
10/8/91
12
I
I
10.
lOa.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1951
(CONTINUED TO
OCT.22,199l)
0;1--,,) "',
r I,
IJ
TIE VOTE
lOb.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1952
(INTRODUCED)
() ~ ~; ,'\ 7f1
33:0278
I t was MOVED by Mayor Gilb, seconded by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht
and CARRIED that the October 5, 1991 staff recommendation for
the Community Center Usage Policy be APPROVED.
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney presented and read the title of Ordinance
No, 1951: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA AMENDING DIVISION 6 OF CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE VI OF THE
ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A SECTION 6616.11 CONCERNING
REGULATIONS FOR MOTION PICTURE FILMING - TIMING OF NOTICE TO
NEIGHBORHOOD.
Mayor Pro tern Harbicht stated that he would like to ask
Council to reconsider this ordinance. The Chief of Police has
told him that if this is adopted, it will almost end filming
in Arcadia, This is a multi-billion business and
approximately three billion of that business is now moving out
of California, It is his feeling that business should be
encouraged to stay in California. This position Council has
taken is anti-business. We should try to accommodate this
business, He does not feel that residents are being
inconvenienced that much and that the present notice
requirement clears up a lot of the problems, Mayor Gilb
agreed. In 1960 he was on an Los Angeles Economic Development
Board and the biggest problem was that the film industry had
left California and the Board made many efforts to accommodate
the Industry to encourage it to return to California. Mayor
Gilb also agrees with the three day time period.
Councilmembers Ciraulo and Fasching responded that they did
not want to drive the filming companies out of Arcadia, but
they felt it is more important to consider the wishes of
residents of the City and they are in favor of the seven day
time period. Mayor Pro tern Harbicht noted that when he has
seen filming taking place in Arcadia, people seem to enj oy
watching it, and he has had no complaints of people being
inconvenienced. Michael Walbrecht of the Film Commission
stated that the Filming Location Manager can distribute a
letter to the residents of the affected area three days in
advance. He thought the business license form could be
designed so that if someone had plans for a certain event,
alternative parking could be arranged by the filming company.
Councilmember Ciraulo would be interested in this plan if the
residents could call the filming company when they had an
event planned for that same time. Councilmember Fasching did
not believe this would be feasible.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Ciraulo, seconded by
Councilmember Fasching and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that Ordinance No. 1951 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo
Mayor Pro tern Harbicht
Councilmember Young
and Fasching
and Mayor Gilb
CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 22, 1991
The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the
title of Ordinance No. 1952: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE Z-91-006,
CHANGING THE EXISTING ZONING OF R-O 12,500 TO R-O 15,000 FOR
CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA".
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht,
. Councilmember Fasching and CARRIED on roll
seconded by
call vote as
10/8/91
13
lOco
ORDINANCE
NO. 1953
(INTRODUCED)
l5"~n, It)
10d.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1954
(INTRODUCED)
i)') ~O I,)
10e.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5619
(NO ACTION
TAKEN)
:Y", , r\)
22:0279
follows that Ordinance No. 1952 be and it is hereby
INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the
title of Ordinance No. 1953: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE Z-9l-007,
CHANGING THE EXISTING ZONING OF CPD-l DH TO CPD-l DH 7, CPD-
1 DH5 'AND CPD-l DH4 FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 211 E.
HUNTINGTON DRIVE, 311 E. HUNTINGTON DRIVE AND 420-440 E.
HUNTINGTON DRIVE".
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by I
Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
that Ordinance No. 1953 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the
title of Ordinance No. 1954: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE Z-9l-008,
CHANGING THE EXISTING ZONING OF C-2 DH TO C-2 DH8 FOR THE
PROPERTY AT 400 S, BALDWIN AVENUE AND FROM CoO H TO CoO H6 FOR
THE PROPERTY AT 301 W, HUNTINGTON DRIVE".
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by Mayor Gilb
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No.
1954 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching,
None
Councilmember Young
Harbicht and Gilb
The City Attorney presented and read the title of Resolution
No. 5619: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA. EXPRESSING CONCERN REGARDING THE CITY OF
SIERRA MADRE'S OPPOSITION TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGE GROVE
AVENUE AND OFFERING TO THE CITY OF SIERRA MADRE THE
REALIGNMENT OF THE CITY BOUNDARY TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF ORANGE
GROVE" .
The Public Works Director stated that he had received word
that the City of Sierra Madre had passed the resolution
pertaining to the improvement of Orange Grove Avenue. This
is the same resolution which had been before Sierra Madre
earlier, with the exception of an Exhibit B which Sierra Madre I
added. The next step will be for both cities to contact the
County and ask them to proceed with the design phase of the
project. Mayor Pro tern Harbicht noted that the problem is
that the Sierra Madre Council adopted the design and then
specifically rejected the conditions. The Public Works
Director noted that certain of the items of the Exhibit B have
qualifying statements. Apparently, the Sierra Madre Council
agrees, but they want to review as we go through the process
and design. There will probably have to be some give and take
during the design process between the cities. Also, the
County is a third party and will want to see the County street
standards incorporated, which is not what Sierra Madre wants.
Mayor Pro tern Harbicht stated that he has little confidence
that Sierra Madre will approve the final design. He feels
that the people on the Arcadia side of Orange Grove Avenue and
10/8/91
14
I
I
lOt.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5620
(TABLED UNTIL
OCT. 22,1991)
o ~-. ,'. \ '<) II
..J'llllg
109.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5621
(ADOPTED)
o ..... ., " .) 1)
(i \: ,VI' ,.
10h.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5622
(ADOPTED)
O : ,," -.;\
.,.. - ") ..
33:0280
most on the Sierra Madre side are in favor of the original
plan for improvement of the street.
BY CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL, NO ACTION WAS TAKEN ON RESOLUTION NO.
5619.
The City Attorney presented and read the title of Resolution
No, 5620: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MAP AND DECLARING THE CITY'S
INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF SECOND AVENUE; DIRECTING THE
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL TO FILE SAID MAP IN HER OFFICE SHOWING
SAID PORTION; RESERVING EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO BE
EXCEPTED; SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON FOR NOVEMBER 5,
1991; AND DIRECTING NOTICE HEREOF TO BE POSTED AND PUBLISHED".
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht that Resolution No.
5620 be ADOPTED,
Councilmember Fasching noted that this' has to do with the
Arcon/Schaefer Brothers parcel which was discussed earlier in
this meeting and some decisions have to be made in this
regard, The City Manager noted this question is to be
discussed in Closed Session.
Mayor Pro tern Harbicht withdrew his motion.
BY CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 5620 WAS TABLED UNTIL
OCTOBER 22, 1991.
The City Attorney presented and read the title of Resolution
No. 5621: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES FUNDS AUTHORIZED UNDER SB 821",
Mayor Pro tern Harbicht wondered if this money could be used
for some purpose other than handicapp ramps. Staff responded
that one item to be undertaken is the landscaping of the east
side of the 101 Club on Huntington Drive, which has been an
eyesore for years. The City Manager noted that a report will
be forthcoming to Council with regard to the possibility of
installing an audible intersection signal for the benefit of
a group of residents who are blind. This project will qualify
for use of the SB 821 funds.
It was MOVED by Mayor Pro tern Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Fasching and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that Resolution No. 5621 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
The City Attorney presented and read the title of Resolution
No. 5622: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 5586 AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 5608 REGARDING LEAVE POLICY FOR
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES AND OVERTIME FOR FIRE BATTALION CHIEFS".
It was MOVED by Councilmember Fasching, seconded by Mayor Pro
tern Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that
Resolution No. 5622 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
10/8/91
15
10i.
CLAIM OF
T. A. WHEELER
(DENIED)
In,/' /r
10j.
CLAIM OF
B.A. CAMPBELL
(DENIED)
10 'II! 'It;
ll.
12.
GILB
(City Dinner)
13.
ADJOURNMENT
(Oct.22,199l -
6:00 p.m.)
ATTEST:
~
Alford.
J
33:0281
On recommendation of the City Attorney, the claim of T, A.
Wheeler was DENIED on MOTION by Mayor Gilb, seconded by
Councilmember Fasching and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Counci1members Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gilb
None
Councilmember Young
On recommendation of the City Attorney, the claim of B. A.
Campbell was DENIED on MOTION by Councilmember Ciraulo,
seconded by Mayor Gilb and CARRIED on roll, call vote as
follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Gi1b
None
Councilmember Young
MATTERS FROM STAFF
The City Manager requested a CLOSED SESSION.
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
Mayor Gilb reminded the Council, City Clerk and staff that the
City dinner is next Monday at 6:30 p.m, in San Francisco at
Ernie's (Annual League of California Cities Conference).
The City Council ADJOURNED to a CLOSED SESSION, RECONVENED and
ADJOURNED at 11:05 p,m. to 6:00 p. m., Tuesday, October 22,
1991 in the Conference Room of the Council Chambers to conduct
the business of the Council and Agency and any Closed Session
necessary to discuss personnel, litigation and evaluation of
properties.
Mayor
10/8/91
16
I
I