HomeMy WebLinkAboutJULY 17,1990_2
I
I
0//0--50
071'790
32: IJ I 7R (;. (:.
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
MINUTE
APPROVAL
(July 3,
1990)
(APPROVED)
ORD. & RES. '
READ BY
TITLE ONLY
CLOSED
SESSION
1.
o t.fto-3o
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
and the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 17, 1990
The City Council and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in
a regular session at 7:30 p. m., July 17, 1990, in the City
Hall Council Chamber.
Pastor Daniel Allen, Arcadia Christian Fellowship
Councilmember Charles E. Gilb
PRESENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
ABSENT: None
On MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember
Ciraulo and CARRIED, the Minutes of the adjourned and regular
meetings of July 3, 1990 were APPROVED. Councilmember Gilb
ABSTAINED, since he was not present at the July 3, 1990
meeting.
It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Gilb, and CARRIED, that Ordinances and
Resolutions be read by title only and that the reading
in full be waived.
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney announced thnt, "pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956. 9(a) the City Council and the Arcadia
Redevelopment Agency met in a CLOSED SESSION this evening to
discuss issues pertinent to the following cases: Arcadia
Redevelopment Agency vs. Cordova, Franco, Weingard, Wilson and
Arcadia Redevelopment Agency vs. the Santa Fe Railroad".
THE OATH OF OFFICE WAS THEN ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY CLERK TO
TOM ROMANO, INCOMING MEMBER OF THE SISTER CITY COMMISSION
Councilmember Harbicht, liaison to the Sister City Commission
then presented the incoming Commissioner with his credentials,
a City pin, and welcomed him to the City family.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, stated, in part, that
as a life-long animal lover, she is speaking to the matter
under City Manager Item 6c, "Consideration of Los Angeles
Animal Care and Control policy of selling animals for the
purpose of research". She believes the citizens of this City
are against the use of animals for research, .particularly
family pets. She is asking this Council to guarantee every
-1-
7/17/90
0'-/10-30
e -;..., [. -hI)
. ,I) 11 (I P 'j)t-, j_l-..~;
OS-O:;O-bO
~ J~' "lLj
~ '1 \~ (\ 1_.1 ,
32:0179
JL.V./~
pet owner in the City, especially dog owners, whose dogs
require proper licensing, that these pets will not wind up
being sold for research. Another item she would like to call
to Council's attention is a suggestion that a little research
be put into the scandal of the savings and loan institutions
costing the country billions of dollars. Perhaps every
savings and loan as well as every bank should be scrutinized
each year when their business licence becomes due.
Jovce Piper, Mercy Crusade, 23128 Bigler Street, Woodland
Hills, 91364, stated, in part, that she is addressing the same
issue as the previous speaker. Her issue is that of pets in
the laboratory. Mercy Crusade gets a lot of calls from people
telling them that they are very concerned about releasing
their pets to the Shelter because they are afraid of what
might happen to them. They try to give them what assistance
they can regarding kenneling, finding a home, etc.
I
Robert E. Caldwell, 326 Joyce Avenue, stated, in part, that
he has operated a business in Arcadia for thirty-five years
and that he is a member of the Citizens for Sound Wall
Committee and has been involved since the inception of the
210 Freeway in 1968 fighting to have Arcadia give back first-
class citizenship to all Arcadia residents. The freeway noise
level is so high that at the time of a meeting of the
neighbors with then Mayor Lojeski, the Mayor could not be
heard above the noise without the microphone. A petition with
350 signatures was presented at the following Council meeting.
It was frustrating in August 1983 when they learned that
Monrovia was to receive a wall from Mayflower to California
Streets. They were encouraged when City Council authorized
the hiring of a sound engineering company to conduct a
professional sound survey, which proved that Arcadia did meet
Caltrans' requirements for a sound wall. Political clout
apparently helps. Arcadia City Councils have been most
cooperative in the past, but with the addition of two High
Occupancy Vehicle lanes, starting at Rosemead Blvd. extending
to Azusa Avenue, neighbors will be subjected to increased
noise levels. A wall will be erected in Arcadia from
Michillinda to Baldwin. Now is the time for Arcadia to
complete the wall. Amendment to Section 215.5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, AB 3725, allows local agencies to construct
sound walls using their own funds before a project has been
programmed into the five year State Transportation Improvement
Program; then at some future date the actual cost, without
interest, will be reimbursed to the local agency. To
construct a wall from Santa Anita to Fifth Avenue would cost
approximately one million dollars, according to City staff
information in 1984. He understands that Councilmember
Fasching is intent upon establishing a priority list of
projects; this noise pollution affects so many residents, he
urges that the sound wall be given high priority. He noted
also that Mayor Young is committed to making sure this mistake
in allowing Caltrans carte blanche is not repeated.
I
Councilmember Harbicht pointed out that the Public Works
Director is going to represent Arcadia at the upcoming
Caltrans hearing; and has been directed by Council to express
strongly that if the High Occupancy Vehicle lane goes in, that
it go in concurrently with sound walls for Arcadia.
Councilmember Fasching said Council considers this to be a
high priority item.
Ed Zareh, 1051 Catalpa Road, stated, in part, that he has
worked with Mr. Caldwell on the Committee for a number of
years. It has been very frustrating, particularly because
Cal trans' criteria for decibel scales for measuring sound
levels have been changed several times; also, the time of day
the noise levels are checked makes a considerable difference.
He does not know if the federal government is going to use the
-2-
7/17/90
I
I
2.
3.
3a.
ROLL CALL
3b.
MINUTE
APPROVAL
(July 3,1990)
(APPROVED)
3c.
AGENCY EMINENT
DOMAIN SPEC.
COUNSEL RET'N
(Oliver,Stoever,
Barr & Vose)
(APPROVED)
C(,65"-31l
SI'::c.. Co....tJS/OL
32:0180
same criteria for noise levels. Arcadia is on the threshold
for being on the list. Now he understands it is not the same
list for sound walls; it is going to be supported by the
Interstate Highway System, rather than Caltrans Sound Wall
priority list. There is not a single hour in the 24 that the
Freeway noise level is below the Community Noise Equivalent
Level that most residential areas live by. He feels the noise
level will increase when they construct the additional lanes.
The City Manager recommended that Council adopt a minute
motion supporting the position that Caltrans install the sound
walls concurrent with any improvement regarding the HOV lanes
through Arcadia and that this be presented in writing by the
Public Works Director at the hearing as well as sent to the
California Transportation Commission, the Director of
Caltrans, Assemblyman Mountjoy and Senator Russell.
Upon advise of the City Attorney, it was MOVED by
Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Gilb and
CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the need to take
action tonight arose subsequent to the agenda being posted.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Gilb and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
to ADOPT a Minute Motion supporting the position that Caltrans
install the sound walls concurrent with any improvement
regarding the HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes through
the City of Arcadia.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY COUNCIL RECESSED IN ORDER TO ACT AS THE
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PRESENT: Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
ABSENT: None
On MOTION by Member Harbicht, seconded by Member Ciraulo and
CARRIED, the Minutes of the Meeting of July 3, 1990 were
APPROVED. Member Gilb ABSTAINED since he was not present at
the July 3, 1990 meeting.
The Agency Eminent Domain Special Counsel Steve Deitsch is
now associated with Best, Best and Kreiger. While staff has
been generally pleased with BB&K's handling of eminent domain
work, there has been concern about the distance of their
business locations (Ontario and Riverside) to Los Angeles.
Further, while the BB&K eminent domain attorneys do handle
eminent domain cases in Los Angeles, the Agency does not feel
they have the detailed knowledge of the local practices,
administrative staff, and the Judges, that a Los Angeles firm
would have. Proposals have been requested and received from
three well-known and respected redevelopment eminent domain
counsel. Under a proposed contract. the new firm would
advise the Agency staff on and, if necessary, litigate the
-3-
7/17/90
3d.
UPGRADE ECON.
DEV. CLERICAL
POSITION (Clk.
Typist III
to Sec.)
(APPROVED)
v~.",\:---jt'
ED
3e.
ADJOURNMENT
4.
5.
Sa.
WORK ACCEPTED
(PW Lt'ng
Program 113 -
Job No.654)
.;>
()Cp-:--.;;Jn
:J"b6 (;~~
32:0181
four pending condemnation cases. Steve Deitsch of BB&K would
continue to be the Agency's Special Counsel for general
redevelopment. Bart Gaut of BB&K would continue to handle the
Rentype appeal because of his knowledge of the complicated
facts and law in that case.
Member Harbicht inquired why the new firm should not handle
all the redevelopment legal work. Staff replied they could,
but the Agency has been pleased with Mr. Deitsch's firm and
his work to date. Member Harbicht raised the question of
possible inefficiencies in working with three different law
firms. Staff replied there will be a coordination concern,
but the type of work they do is very specific - - eminent
domain is a very specific part of the redevelopment
legislation. The key thing the Agency wants is to get is a
firm familiar with the L. A. court system.
It was then MOVEO by Member Gilb, seconded by Member Fasching I
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the Agency
APPROVE the retention of Oliver, Stoever, Barr and Vose for
eminent domain litigation services, and AUTHORIZE the
Executive Director to sign a retainer agreement in a form
approved by the Agency General Counsel.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and Young
None
None
Request for upgrade of Economic Development Department
clerical position from Clerk Typist III to Secretary.
It was MOVED by Member Harbicht, seconded by Member Ciraulo
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the Agency AMEN~
the Economic Development Department administrative budget by
upgrading the Clerk Typist III position to Secretary, at a
total increased cost of $2,500 and AUTHORIZE Personnel to
recruit for this position.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and Young
None
None
The meeting ADJOURNEO to 7:00 p. m., August 7, 1990.
CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED
CONSENT ITEMS
ACCEPTED work and AUTHORIZEO final payment to Raymor Electric
Company for Public Works Lighting Program No. 3 - Job No.
654, in accordance with the contract documents. Ten percent
(10%) retention payment becomes due and payable 35 days after
the recordation of Council acceptance and will only be
released by the Director of Public Works on completion of all
corrections of record. The final contract amount of $39,989
was funded entirely by Community Development Block Grant
Funds.
I
Councilmember Harbicht inquired if this new energy efficient
lighting system meets the Caltrans lighting standards,
especially in view of a current lawsuit against the City
involving such a question. Staff replied they meet the City
-4-
7/17/90
,
r
\
~
(.
I
a5b.
~ CALL FOR BIDS
C
01{ 1..):" (Reconst. Var.
~7 Sidewalks-
~o~ Job No.657)
5c.
fP ANNUAL REPORT
c~o~~\ EST.fCOSTS -
OQ 0' ARC. CONSOLo
\,,'\ LIGHTING DIST.
o 5d.
)'~ LA VIDA LANE
nt.,1r lo~J!'TRACT NO. 46800
~ (Accepted for
,',
. Maint.by City)
5e.
~O PAMELA CIRCLE
I
I ~oC' ,,\TRACT NO. 4S 791
0" ~ s'\ (Accepted for
f.''-. Maint. by City)
\'
qOSf.
,/ LICENSE AGREE-
yC\1 "\ MENT - ARC. &
, PASADENA (Water-
line Const. -
W.0.689)
I
Sg.
SGVSW-JPA
32:0182
standards that have been in effect for quite some time, as
well as the Edison standards. The City Attorney explained
that generally the standards of the State are guidelines.
That question has not come forward in these projects; the City
is not creating a dangerous situation. In the lawsuit
mentioned that issue is just one being raised by way of
argument. The Ci ty Manager noted. in light of Council' 5
concern, a report and recommendation from the practical and
legal sides should be prepared. This could set forth
Edison's, Caltrans' and the City's requirements. Mayor Young
noted that some of the sodium lights seem to give more light
than others.
APPROVED
Deficient
- Job No.
bids.
plans and specifications for Reconstruction of
or Damaged Concrete Sidewalk at Various Locations
657 and AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to advertise for
RECEIVED and FILED report on the annual estimate of costs of
operating the Arcadia Consolidated Lighting District. This
submitted pursuant to the provisions of Section 18164 of the
Streets and Highways Code for the purpose of levying
assessments against the various zones in the District. The
Grand Total is $271,163.56: Total Cost to Lighting District
is $160,029.29; Cost to City is $111,134.27.
ACCEPTED for maintenance by the City, Tract No. 46800, La Vida
Lane, which is a cul-de-sac street located on the west side
of Baldwin Avenue just north of Garibaldi Avenue. Public
improvements have been completed in accordance with Ci ty
requirements and conditions as imposed by the Planning
Commission and City Council.
ACCEPTED for maintenance by the City, Tract No. 4S791, Pamela
Circle, which is a cul-de-sac stree~ located on the west side
of Eighth Avenue between Camino Grove Avenue and Camino Real
Avenue. Public improvements have been completed in accordance
with City requirements and conditions as imposed by the
Planning Commission and City Council.
APPROVED License Agreement between the City of Pasadena
(Licensor) and the City of Arcf.dia (Licensee) for Installation
of the Michillinda Avenue Waterline, Work Order 689, and the
Mayor AUTHORIZED to sign the Agreement approved by the City
Attorney as to form. This License Agreement grants
permission from the City of Pasadena to the City of Arcadia
to construct a waterline in Michillinda Avenue - W. O. 689.
Considered separately. (See below)
Sh.
DIAL-A-RIDE
Agreement
y.SL
.,~~-. RATIFIC'N CLAIM RATIFIED approval of property damage settlement of the claim
/- tI \ SETTLEMENT - 20th by 20th Century Insurance on behalf of Eve Lisoni in the
\.\SO Cent. ins. amount of $3,344.87.
(Lisoni)
)
-0 Sj.
J'> RATIFIC'N CLAIM
I~b ~i) SETTLEMENT
)Gc'j}.\ (Scuito)
.9
Considered separately. (See below)
RATIFIED approval of settlement in the amount of $5,000 of the
personal injury case of Scuito v. Arcadia.
-5-
7/17/90
5g.
SAN GABRIEL
VALLEY SOLID
WASTE - JOINT
POWERS AUTH.
AGREEMENT
(APPROVED)
68;),D- ;;l.b
SG-vsw-jffl
5h.
DIAL-A-RIDE
AGREEMENT
(APPROVED)
o ~. 30 -311
rt :-:\/IIT
32:0183
ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY
COUNCILMEMBER HARBICHT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER GILB AND
CARRIED ON ROLL CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
At its June 5, 1990 meeting, the City Council approved the
concept of joining a coalition of San Gabriel Valley cities
in order to comply with the requirements of AB 939 -- the
California Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of 1989.
That coalition has materialized as a joint powers authority
to be known as the San Gabriel Valley Solid Waste Joint Powers
Authority. As proposed, the SGVSW-JPA will legally bind the
member cities to mutually satisfy the requirements of AB-939.
The fourteen city members will solicit bids through a Request
for Proposals process in order to retain consultants to
prepare and complete each City's Integrated Waste Management
Plan. The JPA will provide for economies of scale in meeting
the requirements of AB 939. The SGVSW-JPA will divide the
costs of the services among the member cities based upon a
pre-determined formula. Staff estimates Arcadia's share of
the cost to be approximately $100,000, based upon previously
submitted quotes. In reply to a question from Councilmember
Harbicht, staff responded that AB 1820, as far as the City is
concerned, has reduced the requirements for a Waste
Characterization Study; however, the waste still has to be
counted. The Sanitation District is still trying to work
through AB 1820; staff will attend a meeting the following
week to obtain additional information with regard to the
impact of this upon the City. There was, however, a reduction
in the statistical representation and should result in a
reduction in the cost of the study. Councilmember Harbicht
noted that the cities would be spending literally millions of
dollars for something which basically has little value. For
instance why should it1be necessary to know within one percent
how much of Arcadia's trash is yard waste in order to come up
with a plan for recycling. However, the City has no choice.
I
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Mayor
Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Council
enter into an agreement to jo:n the San Gabriel Valley Solid
Waste Joint Powers Authority when approved as to form by the
City Attorney.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
Recommendation to amend the Arcadia Dial-A-Ride Agreement.
The revised agreement includes changes in the Contractor's
compensation and new requirements for emergency preparedness;
also there has been a dramatic increase in cost of auto
liability insurance. The insurance increase resulted from an
accident where an Arcadia Dial-A-Ride vehicle was hit by an
uninsured driver. In reply to a question from Councilmember
Harbicht with regard to the comparisons with such compensation
from other cities, if those cities provide the vehicles to the
transit contractors, staff responded that only a couple of
them do so. In reply to questions from Council, staff gave
details of the accident in which a Dial-A-Ride vehicle was hit
by an uninsured driver resulting in increased insurance
premium this year; it is expected that the premium will be
lower next year.
I
-6-
7/17/90
I
I
6.
6a.
"QUICK MART"
CONY. STORE
(Compatible Use
CPD-l Zone)
(DENIED)
OS'lYO -dO
c.f>D~1 2:0
32:0184
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
that Council APPROVE the Arcadia Dial-A-Ride Agreement
requesting a $1.10 increase in the vehicle service hour rate;
AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a form
approved by the City Attorney; AUTHORIZE a $28,125 payment
to meet San Gabriel Transit's insurance costs for 1990-91.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY MANAGER
Consideration of a request to determine that a "Quick Mart"
convenience store is a compatible use for the CPD-l zone.
(Continued from July 3, 1990.)
Kirk Downin~, representing Landmark Development Company,
stated, in part, that they felt Council should look at this
application from the standpoint Landmark finds itself in, with
regard to the hotel at the location. They feel guests at the
hotel need some sort of outlet for convenience food; the hotel
itself does not have dining facilities. Landmark is willing
to make changes in the design or the operation of the store
if required by the City. Staff answered questions from
Council concerning the permitted hours of operation,
requirements for Conditional Use Permit, etc. The City
Attorney also stated that one of Council's' options is to make
the business hours subject to a Conditional Use Permit. In
reply to questions from Council, Ronnie Lam, owner and
developer, responded that the location of the Quick-Mart will
be on the far end of the development, near the Hampton Inn;
close to the parking structure; it will not be facing on
Huntington Drive.
Councilmember Fasching noted that he did not find this
operation very different from other types of stores in this
type of development and MOVED that Council determine that a
"convenience store" should be a permitted use only with an
approved Conditional Use Permit.
In reply to questions from Council, Mr. Downing responded that
Quick Mart is similar to a high-class 7-Eleven store; it would
sell beer and wine; and that there would probably be no
vending machines in front of the store; it would be the size
of a Circle-K or 7-Eleven. He also felt they could tailor it
to the needs of the community and that location; the operation
could be modified by means of the lease agreement even though
it is part of a chain ope~ation. The lease agreement could
be submitted to the City Attorney for approval.
Councilmember Fasching's MOTION died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Ciraulo MOVED that Council determine that a
"convenience store" is not a compatible use in the CPD-I zone,
and, therefore, not a permitted use. This seconded by Mayor
Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows:
Councilmember Harbicht noted that there are up-scale
restaurants in the area, with two more going in; he does not
see this operation as consistent with what the City has in
that area. A convenience store is a store that generates a
lot of in-and-out traffic; quick stops; traffic is already a
problem in that area. Councilmember Ciraulo did not see that
any kind of a convenience store would be proper for that spot.
Mayor Young agreed and felt this might develop into a fast-
food store.
-7-
7/17/90
;-
6b.
L.R.S., Inc.
VARIANCE REQ.
(Outside Above-
grnd Waste
Oil Tanks)
(DENIED)
0'-170-;)0
~ms ft~ (J ,1-
6c.
PROHIBIT SALE
OF ANIMALS FOR
RESEARCH
PURPOSES (L.A.
Co. Dept.
Animal Care
& Control)
(APPROVED)
otflo-30
it pJ/f'l1ft /.., e o,Jf"Ro/..
6d.
L.A. URBAN CO.
CDBG PROGRAM
PARTICIPATION
(APPROVED)
05':3'0- 5;)
l'\ ',1- "\ 4-
32:0185
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Gilb, Harbicht and Young
Councilmember Fasching
None
Consideration of a request from L.R.S., rne.for a variance to
allow outside aboveground waste oil tanks.
Fire Chief Gerald Gardner, stated, in part, that he did not
believe the applicant to be present. In a telephone
conversation with the applicant prior to the meeting, Chief
Gardner explained the recommendation to deny the request and
the applicant did not seem to have a problem with it. It is
anticipated that Fire Code revisions scheduled for early 1991
will include specific recommendations to address this issue.
Staff report recommends that at this time the variance to
allow aboveground tanks be denied.
I
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by
Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that the request from L.R.S., Inc. for a variance to
allow outside aboveground storage tanks in the City of Arcadia
be denied at this time.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmember Fasching commented favorably on the Fire Chief's
Report.
At its June 5, 1990 meeting, the City Council directed staff
to investigate the practice of selling animals for the purpose
of research by the Baldwin Park facility of the Los Angeles
County Department of Animal Care and Control. Staff report
has been provided to Council.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by
Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
that the City of Arcadia send a notice to the Baldwin Park
facility of the Los Angeles County of Animal Care and Control
and ask them to prohibit the practice of selling animals into
research found within the boundaries of the City of Arcadia.
Councilmember Harbicht stated, in part, that he thought this
was the wrong thing to do; that animal research is a necessary
thing; literally thousands or millions of human lives have
been saved because of the discoveries made through animal
research. This is the first step to eliminating animal
research. He does not see the difference between using I
dogs bred for this purpose and other dogs. Councilmember
Ciraulo stated that animal research is important. It is his
understanding that animals are raised specifically for this
purpose. He does not feel that pets that have run astray and
are found in Arcadia should be submitted to that kind of
research.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Ciraulo,
Councilmember Harbicht
None
Fasching, Gilb and Young
On June 29 the City received a letter from the Community
Development Commission regarding the City's interest in
continuing its participation in the Los Angeles Urban County
Community Development Block Grant Program. The City currently
-8-
7/17/90
I
I
7.
7a.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1924
(INTRODUCED)
7b.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1925
(INTRODUCED)
7c.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1926
(INTRODUCED)
32:0186
has a three year cooperation agreement with the County which
expires June 30, 1991. A new agreement must be executed to
continue participation with the County from 1991 through 1994.
City projects funded with CDBG monies are listed in staff
report dated July 17, 1990.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Fasching and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that Council APPROVE participation in the Urban County
1991-1994 Community Development Block Grant program and
AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute the three-year cooperation
agreement between the City of Arcadia and the County of Los
Angeles.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the
title of Ordinance No. 1924: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA AMENDING CHAPTER 9 OF THE BUILDING CODE SETTING FORTH
REGULATIONS FOR THE REOUCTION OF EARTHQUAKE HAZAROS IN
EXISTING BUILDINGS".
It was MOVED by Councilmember Gilb, seconded by Councilmember
Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that
Ordinance No. 1924 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the
title of Ordinance No. 1925: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TEXT
AMENDMENT 90-004, AMENDING THE BUILDING HEIGHT REGULATIONS IN
THE R-M, R-O AND R-l ZONES TO PROVIDE AN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW
WIRELESS RADIO MASTS, TOWERS OR ANTENNAS TO BE A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 35-0" "
It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by
Councilmember Gilb and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows
that Ordinance No. 1925 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED.
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the
title of Ordinance No. 1926: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONE CHANGE Z-90-001, CHANGING
THE EXISTING ZONE OF PR-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY ZONE WITH
AUTOMOBILE PARKING ZONE) TO C-2 & D (GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE
WITH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ZONE) FOR THE LOTS LOCATED AT 311
AND 325 EAST LIVE OAK AVENUE AND 2616 SOUTH THIRD AVENUE; AREA
NORTH OF LIVE OAK AVENUE, EAST OF THIRD AVENUE, WEST OF FOURTH
AVENUE AND SOUTH OF THE ALLEY".
It was MOVED by Mayor Young, seconded by Councilmember
Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that
Ordinance No. 1926 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED.
-9-
7/17/90
7d.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5543
(ADOPTED)
07'10- ZS-
FH IV I) I ~J I.,..
8.
9.
HARBICHT
(133-137 E.
Htg. - Bldg.
Repair)
/0 '-10-5':>
/33-/31 '=" 1-176-
,v ~ 1-'
CIRAULO
(Press Release -
Large Homes)
O\So-3~
s,c..Ho" \...
CIRAULO
(School Board
Mtg. - Permit
System)
GILB
(Rodeffer -
Proposed
Landfill -
Status)
05:'''; - 5:7
~C!D'~ i I"L;'"
32:0187
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
The City Attorney presented and read the title of Resolution
No. 5543: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
UNDER THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND
RECREATION GRANT PROGRAM FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING
RECREATION FACILITIES".
It was MOVED by Councilmember Ciraulo, seconded by
Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as
follows that Resolution No. 5543 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
I
AYES:
Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Gilb, Harbicht and
Young
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
MATTERS FROM STAFF
None
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
Inquired if any reply had been received to the letter from the
Planning Director to Al Landsberger regarding the property at
133-137 E. Huntington Drive. Staff replied the plans had been
in plan check but the time had expired, so plans have been re-
submitted. He has corrected the earthquake damage; now must
do the basic cosmetic rehabilitation. The City Attorney noted
that the City will send him notice under the property
maintenance violation ordinance which should give him some
deadlines to meet or face possible action in Municipal Court.
Such a letter should go out tomorrow. Councilmember Harbicht
hoped this could be moved along because a great deal of money
has been spent on Huntington Drive both by the City and by
businesses in that area; this building is the biggest eyesore
on the Boulevard now; it has been sitting there with plywood
on the front for a year and a half now. Councilmeinber
Ciraulo concurred with these remarks.
Commented on the press release concerning the issue of large
homes. He thought it was an excellent idea.; it was a
complete, informative and detailed explanation of that issue.
It should be informative to the citizens. The City Manager
noted he hoped the press would release it.
'-
Inquired if there was any indication as to the subject of the
upcoming luncheon meeting with some members of the School
Board. The City Manager replied they will discuss the permit
system for non~residents. Mayor Young and Councilmember
Harbicht will attend..
I
Inquired about the present status of the Rodeffer matter since
the permit was approved at the last meeting; what happens
next? Staff responded that Rodeffer really did not get a
permit; the reclamation plan was approved which was just one
hurdle that the State has provided. In response to
Councilmember Gilb's question about the $100,000 bond put up
by Rodeffer, staff replied this is a condition to assure that
he will move forward with the plan. It is staff's
understanding that that entire decision is going' to be
appealed to the State Mining and Geology Board. The $100,000
is being put up because both the City and State have
....
-10-
7/17/90
32:0188
I
regulations and it is to ensure that he will actually proceed
to do something with that property. That money will be held
until such time as he gets an approved landfill permit and
actually starts filling the property, then the bond will be
released ... it is a good faith performance bond; it has
nothing to do with a bond for regulation of what goes into the
land. The next step for Mr. Rodeffer and his proposed
operator is to prepare an operating plan in as much specific
detail as possible about what is proposed for the entire
operation. It has been suggested to Mr. Rodeffer that in
putting together this plan, he involve the community of El
Monte as much as possible and get their input from the very
beginning; along with the El Monte, elected officials and
staff. The plan would also be reviewed by Arcadia staff with
their input. Eventually it will be brought before the City
Council. Hopefully, most, if not all of the concerns of the
El Monte people would be addressed and resolved prior to the
operating plan coming before Council. Once they bring the
operating plan, they can then begin the study of the EIR.
The EIR would look at the plan in terms of environmental
impacts; this will take some additional time and eventually
that EIR will be brought before Council. Once that is done,
Council can actually take action as to whether or not to grant
a permit for an inert landfill at the site.
I
Councilmember Gilb inquired, assuming Mr. Rodeffer gets his
permits, what kind of regulations or penalties could be put
on the landfill to be sure that the wrong thing does not go
in and' poison the ground water. If they put up a million
dollar bond, it would not mean a thing. If they poison the
water; it can't be undone. Would Arcadia be establishing the
regulations and inspecting the material that goes in there?
Should the wrong material get in there and destroy the
groun~water, all the money in the world will not make any
difference. What kind of a penalty would be put on such a
situation? Staff replied it would probably be out of
Arcadia's jurisdiction to put any kind of a penalty on this
matter; the Federal government or the State would be the
agencies to provide the penalties, i.e., cleanup, EPA, water
people, etc. Councilmember Gilb responded that money would
not make a difference once the water is contaminated. Staff
replied that situation could happen now; there is no landfill;
however, there is exposed ground water which is subject to
pollution; vandals could go in there and pollute the water.
There are no local means of penalizing an owner of property
with exposed ground water should that water become
contaminated. Councilmember Gilb replied chemicals could be
put into exposed ground water to clean it up; once it is
filled there is no such recourse. That is why he is wondering
whose jurisdiction this is to ensure that the right materials
are going into the landfill. Staff replied regulations can
be established regarding checking the loads, etc., to make as
sure as possible that nothing wrong gets into the hole.
Ultimately, it is Council's decision as to whether or not
those regulations are strong enough. The City Attorney
.replied there would be a dual jurisdiction -- the State and
Federal governments would have certain requirements, and as
the City Manager stated earlier, the City could impose lots
of sanctions, inspection requirements, which would have to be
funded by the proponent for the permit. Also, the permit
could be revoked and possibly some sort of liquidated damage
penalty could be imposed. Councilmember Gilb said if the
City should revoke the permit, the water would already be
contaminated. This is a big concern of Council and the people
of this community and everyone; once it is piled up and
ruined, he would like to know what the penalty would be.
Mayor Young said the thing is to see that it does not get
polluted as it is being filled. This may also involve the
water agencies.
-11-
7/17/90
HARBICHT
(Rodeffer -
Proposed
Landfill -
Regulation)
YOUNG
(Dial-A-Ride
Lifetime
Pass)
10.
ADJOURNMENT
(Aug. 7,
1990 -
7:00 p. m.)
ATTEST:
32:0189
Councilmember Harbicht noted that the system of penalties is
not necessarily set up to correct the wrong; it is to be
severe enough so that the person, because he does not want to
lose the million dollars, or whatever it is, won't do it. But
all the laws we have -- if someone murders, putting him in
prison does not bring the murdered person back, but threat of
prison may keep him from murdering in the first place. This
is the same situation -- if a person has to put up a million
dollars that he forfeits in the event he violates this, that
person is going to take great pains to make sure he does not
violate it. Councilmember Gilb replied, this amount of money
seems to have graduated from $100,000 to $1,000,000; but he
thinks that is a good point. He still wants to know what will
happen -- it's nice to see that it will be patrolled and each
load checked and all that ... but it is going to be quite a
while before anything happens.
Informed the Councilmembers, she had the privilege of giving
a lifetime Dial-A-Ride pass to a hundred year old lady. This
lady has been riding Dial-A-Ride a couple of times a day for
fifteen years; she is very energetic and agile. She sent a"
note thanking Council.
The meeting ADJOURNED at 8:45 p. m. to 7:00 p. m., Tuesday,
August 7, 1990 in the City Hall Conference Room to conduct the
business of the Council and Redevelopment Agency and any
Closed Session necessary to discuss personnel, litigation
matters and evaluation of properties.
~?~iery--
-12-
7/17/90
I
I