Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAUGUST 21,1990_2 I 1 CJ{'v-.v v 32:0206 08~;qO CC,. CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MINUTE APPROVAL (Aug. 7, 1990) (APPROVED) ORD. & RES. READ BY TITLE ONLY CLOSED SESSION 1. PUBLIC HEARING CUP 90-010 (40-lot Res. Planned Develop. 702-822 N. First Av.& 105- 119 Haven Av.- John E. Plount, Developer) (APPROVED) O:;8()-tr/ ("1/1'" '/-1.,;)/1') MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA and the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 21, 1990 The City Council and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in a regular session at 7:37 p. m., August 21, 1990 in the City Hall Council Chamber. Father William Ustaski, Holy Angels Catholic Church City Attorney, Michael Miller PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Young Councilmember Gilb On MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED, Councilmember Gilb was EXCUSED. On MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED, the Minutes of the Adjourned and Regular Meetings of August 7, 1990 were APPROVED. It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Mayor Young and CARRIED, that Ordinances and Resolutions be read by title only and that the reading in full be WAIVED. CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney announced that, "pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency met in a CLOSED SESSION to discuss two items of litigation: the existing lawsuit of Arcadia Redevelopment Agency vs. Kiewit and the lawsuit of El Monte vs. Arcadia and Rodeffer". An appeal seeking approval of Conditional Use Permit 90-010 for the properties at 702 - 822 North First Avenue and 105 - 119 Haven Avenue. The Planning Commission at its meetin~ of July 24, 1990 moved to approve this Conditional Use Permit; however the motion failed due to a tie vote. In order to receive approval, the developer has appealed the matter to the City Council. The Planning Commissioners who voted in opposition felt that the proposal should be viewed as a single-family development and not as a multiple-family proj!'ct. They were concerned with the distance between buildings, small lot sizes, and questioned whether or not the required on-site parking was adequate for the proposed five bedroom units. The Commissioners who were in favor of the 8/21/90 1 32:0207 ';' l proj ect realized that, in accordance with the Residential Planned Development regulations, the proj ect could not be judged by the conventional subdivision standards. They felt that the proposed density (40-units) was acceptable; the maximum site density would permit 60 units, and that there would be ample parking within the development since private on-street parking would be available. The proposed residential planned development does not have to comply with the underlying zoning requirements. However, in order to carry out the general purpose and intent of the Residential Planned Development regulations, the project would be subject to all of the terms of a conditional use permit. It is staff's opinion that the applicant's new proposal is well related to existing and planned use and circulation patterns on adjoining properties, and will not constitute a disrupting element in the neighborhood. Furthermore, staff believes that this proposal will provide a more compatible development than possible through a conventional multiple-family subdivision. Additional information supplied by the applicant shows the occupancy of similar units developed by the applicant to be 2.75 persons per unit. That number, if applied to this proposed project with houses of similar size, would result in approximately 110 occupants; at the present time there are 116 occupants in this particular area. A Negative Declaration has been prepared. Staff recommends approval of C. U. P. 90-010 subj ect to the conditions outlined in staff report dated August 21, 1990. , In reply to questions from Councilmembers, staff replied that there is one small planned development in the City, on the curve at Colorado; also that there would be adequate parking for the proposed development and that the streets would have sufficient width to allow passage of fire trucks, if necessary. John Plount, 464 S. Cataract, San Dimas, stated, in part, that he is representing the partnership entity that is the applicant and developer and the reason this has come before Council is because the Planning Commission vote was 2 to 2; one Commissioner was unable to vote because of a conflict of interest. He presented a rendering of the proposed project. They have worked intensely for the past two and one half years to produce a plan that embodies the highest planning standards for this type of development. He noted that the project is welcomed by the neighbors in the community and everyone who is directly affected by it. It is his understanding that there is no public opposition to this project. In answer to question from Councilmember Harbicht, he explained that the concept of a planned unit development embodies the concept of land ownership; the common areas such as the recreation facilities, driveways, recreational vehicle parking, etc. are owned in common with the other homeowners and are perpetually maintained by CC&R's which the City Attorney will review. The parking will exceed the required parking without consideration of any tandem parking. Neil Eskuri, Eskuri and Associates, 248 E. Main, Alhambra, stated, in part, that he has worked on the design of this project for two years with the professinal planning staff of the City of Arcadia. He feels this is the best plan for the area considering the higher density to the north. Actually there are 5 1/2 houses in the R-l zone; the others are in the R-2 zone. He described the size of the lots, distances between the houses and noted the common area which runs through the project, and takes advantage of the jogging trail nearby along the wash. In reply to a question from Councilmember Harbicht, Mr. Plount stated that the price of the homes would probably be somewhere 8/21/90 ~- 2 I 1 32:0208 in the $450,000 to $500,000 range. In response to Council's concerns about density, Mr. Plount also replied that the average occupancy of Santa Anita Estates, a similar project, in County area, is 2 3/4 persons per home. Although the houses will have five bedrooms, he feels these rooms are utilized for other purposes. These houses, however, will not have the same floor plans as the other project. In reply to Council's concern, Mr. Plaunt noted that they intend to save as many of the trees on First Avenue as possible. I Al DeRenzis, L & D Engineering, III N. Melrose, Monrovia, stated, in part, that, although they intend to save as many trees as possible I in some cases it will not be possible because of grading considerations; some of them will be replanted. Councilmember Fasching expressed concern about the density and wondered if there could be some three or four bedroom units rather than having them all have five bedrooms. Also he expressed some concern about the proposed colorful use of garage doors, etc. Mr, Plount responded the matter of the colors used could be worked out in collaboration with the Planning Department. Councilmember Ciraulo inquired about security with regard to the houses which will be along the riding/hiking trail and the wash as well as the RV parking area. Mr. Plount responded that there will be an eight foot wall in that area and that the RV parking area will have a key gate. No one else desiring to be heard, CLOSED on MOTION by Councilmember Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED. the public hearing was Fasching, seconded by ,., ~> I Councilmember Ciraulo complimented Mr. Plaunt on his willingness to re-do the plans and reduce the density in keeping with the Planning Commission's concerns and coming back with a project that is much more acceptable to the City. Councilmember Fasching noted that this planned residential development is a new concept for the City. He feels this will be an improvement over what is there presently. He is concerned about the density and would like to see the trees on First Avenue maintained within the 25 foot setback. Councilmember Harbicht felt this project may be more desirable than some of the condominiums that are being built; there is more green space and fewer units. He has concerns about the lot sizes and about the density in that the units will have five bedrooms each. He is also concerned about satisfying the parking requirement by parking on the streets, even though they are private streets. However, he feels this will be a nicer development than traditional condominium development. Mayor Young agreed that the five bedrooms and the parking are the problems. She does not believe five bedroom homes will be occupied by only 2.75 persons. More people occupying the homes will result in more cars. However, she does not want to stop the development. Councilmember Ciraulo agreed with these concerns, but felt this would probably be the best use of the property. Mr. Plount noted that they were not rigid in their position with regard to the proposal; modifications could be worked out with the Planning Department staff. Counilmember Fasching agreed this is probably the highest and best use of the property in the interest of the City. He suggested that perhaps more subtle colors could be utilized. Considerable discussion ensued regarding the possibility of reducing the number of bedrooms in these units, thereby addressing Council's concerns about density, congestion and parking. Councilmember Ciraulo then stated that with the consideration of a 25% reduction in the 5 bedroom homes, he would MOVE to 8/21/90 3 MOTION CITY MANAGER 3. 02/0 - 30 O,$/O-,;}O 32:0209 APPROVE and FILE the Negative Declaration; and DIRECT staff to prepare the appropriate resolution. The MOTION died for lack of a second. It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht to APPROVE Conditional Use Permit 90-010 with the condition that the average number of bedrooms be 4.25. The MOTION died for lack of a second. Councilmember Ciraulo MOVED to amend his original motion to the condition that the average number of bedrooms be 4.5. The MOTION died for lack of a second. I Councilmember Harbicht restated his MOTION, seconded by Mayor Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Conditional Use Permit 90-010 be APPROVED subj e('t to the conditions that the average number of bedrooms per unit be 4.25; that the trees on First Avenue within the 25 foot setback be maintained where feasible, as determined by the Planning Department; that approval be subject to the conditions outlined in staff report dated August 21, 1990; that the Negative Declaration be APPROVED and FILED and DIRECT staff to prepare the appropriate resolution. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Young None Councilmember Gilb The City Manager recommended that Council waive procedural ordinance and move Item 3 ahead of Item 2. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Ron Buckholtz, City of Arcadia Police Sergeant, President of the Arcadia Police Relief Association, stated, in part, that he is present as a representative of that bargaining unit, and to address the proposed drug and alcohol policy on tonight's agenda. The Police Association is supportive of a drug and alcohol policy. However, since the policy would affect the Association's working conditions, it is, therefore, subject to negotiations or Meet.and-Confer. The Association does not feel that the Association has had adequate opportunity for negotiation in this matter. They welcome the opportunity to Meet-and-Confer and discuss the content of the policy, the wording, terminology, and phrasing. This is evident by their three formal, written requests. The members of the Arcadia Police Relief Association urge Council to table or reject the proposed policy and direct the City Manager's office to conform with proper procedures of Meet-and-Confer. K. J. Crawford, Representing the Arcadia Firefighters' Association, stated, in part, that he is present this evening also to talk about the drug and alcohol policy. The policy has been taken before the Personnel Board on numerous occasions and has, until this last time, been rejected by them and the City directed to meet with the associations and hammer out the language. There were items in this document that the City staff agreed would have to be handled in Meet-and-Confer; that was not the form that they were in at that time. They request that this process take place prior to Council adopting this policy. I Ed Kline, 1651 Elevado Avenue, stated, in part, that he is present to discuss the stop signs on Elevado - Item 7i. This item has been continued to October 2, 1990. Mr. Kline requested a copy of the staff report to review in preparation 8/21/90 4 I I 2. DRUG & ALCOHOL POLICY - PERS. RULE X (ADOPTED) O.:L;JO - 70 A),A,. 0 "'{,,' FV-IN.:,.),. v " V '" 32:0210 of Council's discussion October 2. supplied by the City Clerk. This information was BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS At its August 6 meeting, the Personnel Board modified staff's proposed Drug and Alcohol Policy, and forwarded their recommendation to the City Council for consideration. In reply to a question from Councilmember Harbicht, the City Attorney stated that the City has engaged in an exchange of information and input with the employee associations. They have been afforded ample opportunity to participate and the City has responded to their participation by making significant numerous changes in the policy. It is the opinion of the City Attorney that the City has met its responsibility to Meet-and- Confer. Richard Kreisler, Liebert and Cassidy, Labor Relations Counsel, stated, in part, that, in his opinion, and referring to a letter from the Police Relief Association, and under Article XIX of the MOU between the parties, there has been a waiver of any Meet.and-Confer; the Association has, in plain language, waived this section of 3505 of the Government Code. The correspondence is not a demand for Meet-and-Confer, it is an offer to become voluntarily involved. K. J. Crawford, Arcadia Firefighters' Association, stated, in part, that they had been concerned that the session they had had with staff would be construed to be a Meet-and-Confer, although they did not have counsel present. They have a letter from Mr. Alex McIntyre stating that this meeting had not been a Meet-and-Confer. In reply to a question from Councilmember Cirualo, Mr. Crawford replied that they had had an opportunity to express their opinion on the language of the drug policy. The statement, "on designated standby or on-call status" appears several times. There is concern about that phrase. Firefighting personnel, for instance, are always on an on-call status. In an earthquake situation, every staff person in the City would be. In this instance, we are dealing with employees' time off. They would like to clarify just what the City means by these terms. During the above mentioned meeting, they had been informed by Mr. McIntyre that this would be taken care of later. Alex McIntvre, Assistant to the City Manager, stated, in part, that with regard to Captain Crawford's statement, two issues occurred. One, we had a meeting .. an exchange of information meeting. That was not a designated Meet-and-Confer time. We basically sat down and hashed out some of the issues. The Meet-and.Confer that Mr. Kreisler is referring to was an exchange of information prior to that. We had exhausted our Meet-and-Confer obligations prior to that meeting. The second issue of the designated standby - - my definition of designated standby is when the department head says, "You are to stand by and wait for a call for duty. And if you are going to be impaired during that time, please let us know". The problem is that the Fire Department, specifically, does not have a standby policy. And that's an administrative problem which can be rectified through the Fire Department. In reply to a question from Councilmember Ciraulo, Mr. McIntyre replied that, although all City employees are considered to be on standby all the time in time of emergency, what we are specifically trying to address here is when the department head says an employee is on standby, for a specified period of time. Councilmember Harbicht noted that Council has had an opinion from the City Attorney and from their legal counsel that the 8/21/90 5 1 32: 0211 MOTION obligations under the contract with regard to implementing this policy have been met. It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht that the proposed Drug and Alcohol Policy be ADOPTED for incorporation into the City's Personnel Rules as Rule X, Drug and Alcohol Policy, that the wording "designated" on-call status be changed. This was seconded by Mayor Young. Ron Buckholtz, Arcadia Police Relief Association, stated, in response to a statement by Councilmember Fasching that this could be passed tonight and there would be flexibility in modifying it at a later date, that the Association has a problem with that. Once a policy is approved, adopted and implemented, it is harder to change it. K. J. Crawford, Arcadia Firefighters' Association, reiterated I that they do not feel the City has met its obligation to Meet- and-Confer. They would be happy to have such a Meet-and- Confer session at the City's convenience to express their concerns. One of their concerns is that City policy will be implemented to try and control employees when they're off duty. They do not feel that is a City area of responsibility, although they know that they are public employees and need to be cognizant of that. In the way it is written, there is no definition of what is being talked about. If an employee is put on duty when he is off duty, perhaps there should be some compensation. Councilmember Harbicht inquired if the Associations would be willing to Meet-and-Confer and discuss the drug policy specifically and no other aspect of the current contracts. Mr. Crawford replied they also wished to bring in another issue - - that of the insurance because they feel there has been a unilateral change in the contract. Councilmember Ciraulo noted that he would not be opposed to a formal Meet- and-Confer session; however, for the purpose, specifically, of discussing this drug and alcohol policy only and nothing else. Mayor Young inquired if the Associations would be agreeable to passing this policy tonight and modifying it in a Meet-and-Confer or in meetings right away. Mr. Crawford and Mr. Buckholtz said the Associations would not. Mr. Buckholtz reviewed the interest of the Associations in further reviewing both the drug and alcohol policy and the question of the health insurance increase. These items directly affect terms and conditions of employment and are subject to the MOU as they see it though their legal counsel. Richard Kreisler, Liebert and Cassidy, stated, in part, that Council can make whatever policy decision they determine. The law says you have met and conferred when the parties have met, exchanged proposals and endeavored to reach an agreement. Councilmember Harbicht further noted that the City has an outstanding relationship with the' Police and Fire Departments and that he is not comfortable being in an adversarial I relationship. Unfortunately, when there are labor and management groups, this does occasionally occur. He feels that the City has met the obligations of its contract and that it is important for public safety and for the liability that the City faces that it does have a Drug and Alcohol Policy. He thinks it is an excellent policy; if modifications are needed later, that can be done. Here we are talking about two different issues, and the important issue is health insurance, not the drug enforcement policy. Councilmember Ciraulo added his concern regarding continuing the good relationship between the City and the Police and Fire Departments, and does not want Council's action tonight to damage that. But he also agrees that the City needs the Drug and Alcohol Policy and that there has been opportunity for input from all parties. Councilmember Fasching noted that 8/21/90 6 ", ROLL CALL I 4. 5. Sa. ROLL CALL 5b. MINUTE APPROVAL (Aug. 7,1990) (APPROVED) 5c. ADJOURNMENT 6. 7. 7a. FINAL MAP 45362 (834- 838 Fairview Av.- 16 Unit Res.Condo.) 05'60-60 r;.A 'IS'..j G~~ I 7b. EQUIP PUR. (21 Ton Truck - Pub.Works) <..M(.{Q- ~O Pt-':.I 7c. EQUIP. PUR. (!! Ton Truck - Pub.Works) 031.(0-30 PI" 7d. EQUIP. PUR. (Street Sweeper - Pub.Works) O:JtIO-30 PW 32: 0212 Councilmember Harbicht sounded as if he were willing to amend his motion if the two departments were willing to sit down and discuss just specifically the one issue; they did not show much willingness to do that. He feels Council should get on with this program. However, he understands the concerns about the health insurance costs and increases; perhaps at a future time this could be discussed and/or negotiated. Mayor Young called for a roll call on the MOTION made previously. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Young None Councilmember Gilb CITY COUNCIL RECESSED IN ORDER TO ACT AS THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PRESENT: Agency Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Young Agency Member Gilb ABSENT: On MOTION by Member Harbicht, seconded by Member Ciraulo and CARRIED, Member Gilb was EXCUSED. On MOTION by Member Harbicht, seconded by Chairman Young and CARRIED, the Minutes of the Meeting of August 7, 1990 were APPROVED. The meeting ADJOURNED to 7:00 p. m., September 4, 1990. CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED CONSENT ITEMS APPROVED Final Map 45362 for a 16-unit residential condominium at 834 - 838 Fairview Avenue, filed by James P. McDonough on behalf of Kip K. McBane (trustee of the site). Approval is on condition that before the Final Map is recorded, all outstanding conditions of approval, as outlined in staff report from the Public Works Department dated August 19, 1990 shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. AWARDED contract in the amount of $30,188.29 to the low bidder, Lakeside Chevrolet for purchase of 2 1/2 ton truck and chassis with fiberglass tilt hood for the Public Works Department. Funds are budgeted in the Capital Outlay fund in the total amount of $48,000.00. AWARDED contract in the amount of $39,998.87 to the low bidder, Coleman Truck Center for purchase of 1 1/2 ton truck with conventional cab and chassis for the Public Works Department. Funds are budgeted in the Capital Outlay fund in the total amount of $41,000.00. AWARDED contract in the amount of $88,681.00 to Nixon-Egli Equipment for purchase of a street sweeper for the Public , 8/21/90 7 7e. EQUIP. PUR. (3/4 Ton Truck - Water Div.) 03L/O ..:sO WD 7f. EQUIP. PUR. o Ton Truck wi Utility Body - Water Div.) (;).] ~O-.:.iO wD 7g. CONTRACT AWARD (Reroofing Fire Station No. 1 - Stone Roofing Co.) 0 7.30 '10 7h. RooP EQUIP. PUR. (Forklift - Water Div.) 0-.1 '10 - J() iNID 71. STOP SIGN - Elevado Ave. (CONT'D TO Oct.2,1990) 7j. WINNIE WAY TRACT 45635 (Accepted for Maint.) o S"60 - 60 71- lIS-6.] 5- 7k. METHODIST HOSP.FOUND. (Fireworks Display) 01"-0 _.:;'0 eve-. Ii Is 32:0213 Works Department. Funds are budged in the Capital Outlay fund in the total amount of $83,000.00. The balance of funds, $5,681.00 will be from Capital Outlay Fund surplus cost savings of $18,813.00 from the purchase of 1 1/2 ton and 21/2 ton vehicles. AWARDED contract in the amount of $14,769.18 to the low bidder, Lakeside Chevrolet for purchase of a 3/4 ton cab and chassis for the Water Division. Funds are budgeted in the Water Equipment Replacement Fund in the total amount of $16,200.00. AWARDED contract in the amount of $15,240.53 to the low bidder, Lakeside Chevrolet for purchase of a 1/2 ton short wheelbase truck with utility body for the Water Division. Funds are budged in the Water Equipment Replacement Fund in the total amount of $14,500.00. Balance of funds needed will be from Water Equipment Replacement Fund surplus from purchase of 3/4 ton vehicle. I AWARDED contract in the ,amount of $34,163.00 to the low bidder, Stone Roofing Co. for reroofing Fire Station No. 1 located at 710 S. Santa Anita Avenue. Funds for the reroofing of Fire Station No.1 are budgeted in the Capital Outlay fund in the total amount of $50,000.00. AWARDED contract in the amount of $16,560.13 to the low bidder, Hyster Company, for purchase of a forklift for the Water Division. Funds for the purchase of the forklift are budgeted in the Water Equipment Replacement Fund in the total amount of $19,500.00. Consideration of report on stop sign request for Elevado Avenue between Grand View Avenue and Virginia Drive is CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 2, 1990. ACCEPTED for maintenance by the City, Tract No. 45635, Winnie Way, which is a cul-de-sac street located on the west side of South Second Avenue between Camino Real Avenue and Norman Avenue. Public improvements have been completed in accordance with City requirements and conditions as imposed by the Planning Commission and City Council. APPROVED issuance of a permit to the Arcadia Methodist Hospital Foundation to conduct a public fireworks display at Santa Anita Race Track subject to the conditions listed in staff report dated August 15, 1990. This display to be part of a fundraising event to be held on September 15, 1990 at 10:00 p. m. This event will be held on the roof top of the Arcadia Methodist Hospital's parking structure. The fireworks display will be conducted at the Santa Anita Race Track's parking lot. I ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM 7i, WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HARBICHT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FASCHING AND CARRIED ON ROLL CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht and Young None Councilmember Gilb 8/21/90 8 1 I 8. 8a. ORDINANCE NO. 1927 (INTRODUCED) 05"80- 6:;- Ji:J qo - 006 8b. RESOLUTION NO. 5547 (ADOPTED) O.J50./.2({ ;?e.~ ,'j:, '/7 9. 10. HARBICHT (Meeting - Newco Reps. - Recycling) (Building Height Restrictions) 32: 0214 In regard to Consent Items 7b - 7h, Councilmember Fasching commended the Departments for saving $26,500 on purchases which were budgeted. Perhaps there could be future consideration to use these savings to implement the new water billing system, just a suggestion. CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney presented for introduction and read the title of Ordinance No. 1927: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TEXT AMENDMENT 90-006 AMENDING THE BUILDING HEIGHT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN THE R-M, R-O, AND R-l ZONES AND AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION AND REGULAR MODIFICATION PROCEDURES". In reply to a question from Councilmember Harbicht, staff replied that this height regulation applies to the R-M zone and is consistent with the other residential zones. It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No. 1927 be and it is hereby INTRODUCED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, None Councilmember Gilb Fasching, Harbicht and Young The City Attorney presented and read the title of Resolution No. 5547: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, FIXING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE REQUIRED TO BE RAISED FROM PROPERTY TAXES NECESSARY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 TO PAY THE INDEBTEDNESS OF THE CITY OR DISTRICTS". It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Ciraulo and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5547 be and it is hereby ADOPTED. AYES: NONE: ABSENT: Councilmembers Ciraulo, None Councilmember Gilb Fasching, Harbicht and Young MATTERS FROM STAFF None MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS Suggested that a representative from Newco corne to a Council meeting to talk about the progress of the voluntary recycling program; what percentage of the households are participating; where those recycled goods are going, etc. The City is facing a mandate to reduce what is going into the landfills. Although the City has taken significant steps, there may be things that are beyond our control which are negating some of those steps, i. e., yard waste, there is no market for it, so it is being separated, but it is all going to the same place. He would also like to begin discussions with Newco as to how to begin a multi-family recycling program. Mayor Young noted that she has had inquiries about this matter, also. There was a discussion some time ago when a redevelopment project proposal was under consideration as to whether or not an eight story building was acceptable. It seemed to be the 8/21/90 9 FASCHING (Employee Med. & Hosp. Plan) 11. ADJOURNMENT (Sept.4,1990 - 7:00 p.m.) ATTEST: 3c: (I,' 1 5 consensus of Council at that time, that Council did not want to see eight story buildings. He would like to know the current height limit in commercial and industrial zones and, if it is eight stories, should there be consideration of changing this. He requested a report outlining the current height limits.' Noted from earlier discussion that the matter of the hospital and medical plan is of great concern to the City employees. Perhaps there are some inequities in the plan which could be modified at no additional cost to the City and, perhaps, provide savings to recipients of the program. He would like to see a rundown of these figures to see if something could be worked out. The meeting ADJOURNED at 9:12 p. m., to 7:00 p. m., September 4, 1990 in the City Hall Conference Room to conduct the business of the Council and Redevelopment Agency and any Closed Session necessary to discuss personnel, litigation matters and evaluation of properties. W7~;J ~~A/na/ Mary B. Dung, or I lerk 8/21/90 10 . I?; ,~ ., 1 1'1 1