Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJUNE 17,1986 - I 1 I 1 26:0140 -} CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBER GILB EXCUSED MINUTE APPROVAL (June 3,1986) (APPROVED) ORD. & RES. READ BY TITLE ONL Y M I NUT E S CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA a nd the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING JUNE 17. 1986 The City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in a regular session June 17, 1986 at 6:30 p. m. in the Arcadia City Hall Council Chamber. Rev. J. William Daum, Episcopal Church of the Transfiguration Counci1member Harbicht PRESENT: Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young ABSENT: Counci1member Gilb On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht and CARRIED, Counci1member Gi1b was EXCUSED. On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht and CARRIED, the Minutes of the Adjourned and Regular Meetings of June 3, 1986 were APPROVED. It was MOVED by Counci1member Harbicht, seconded by Counci1member Lojeski and CARRIED that all ordinances and resolutions be read by title only and that the reading in full be waived. PRESENTATIONS ARCADIA BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION {, . 1. AWARDS (). < ,I . "c:: Mayor Young introduced the Chairman of the Arcadia Beautiful Commis- ~,~ sion, Gloria A1fery, who, in turn, introduced Beth Constanza, Chairman r \ of the 1986 Awards Committee. Past Commission members were introduced as well as the present Commission members. A1fery, Gloria S. Bellin, Jayne Con stanza , Beth Crumley, Margo Gal e, Ma rgaret Giffis, Howard Green, James M. Hansen, Mary Inbody, Milton McComas, Harriet Towsley, Marguerite 6/17/86 -1- , ,.r 26:0141 1986 ARCADIA BEAUTIFUL AWARDS SPECIAL AWARD: THE INN AT SANTA ANITA - Charles Bluth PEACOCK AWARD: 320 W. Wistaria Avenue - Dr. . Mrs. William H. Blair LUCKY BALDWIN AWARD: 200 Hacienda Drive - Mr. . Mrs. Sam J. Falzone 1 MAYORS AWARD: 1425 Rancho Road - Mr. . Mrs. Don Franco ARCADIA AWARD: 605 Arbolada Drive - Mr. . Mrs. Thomas Romano QUEEN ANNE AWARD: 1517 Highland Oaks Drive - Chuck' Linda Johnson ARCADIA BEAUTIFUL CIJ4MISSION AWARD: 830 Palo Alto Drive - Mr. . Mrs. Phillip M. Hutton ANITA BALDWIN AWARD: 139 SYClllllOre Avenue - Tom . Ann Ung HUGO REID AWARD: 40 Rodell Place - Pete' Evie Nickovich IlMlI:A MlMD: 41 W. Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. George Ban NEWCASTLE AWARD: 36 W. Santa Anita Terrace - Barbara . John Clark (Presented by Barbara Saelid Chairman, Sister City Commission) SANTA ANITA AWARD: 370 Campus Drive - Holy Angels Church- Father Walsh accepted. HUNTINGTON AWARD: 126 E. St. Joseph Street - Greenscapes - Arthur Mason accepted CLARA BALDWIN STOCKER AWARD: 471 W. Duarte Road - Lyn Oaks Apartments ROSE BUDD BALDWIN DOBLE AWARD: -:.- 4S~63 Christfna-'Street - Villa Christina H.....&u.mers Association BLOCK AWARD: West Santa,Anita Terrace including Azure Way CITY OF ARCADIA A~ - CouncilmemberChand1er announced that this is the first time this award has been presented. Mrs. Alfery said this is being presented by the Arcadia Chamber/Commerce and the Commission. for maintaining the beauty of the City. ' 1 6/17/86 .--.....-.......--...-..-..---"'...--..-..--- ,,-'~ ~ .'~~'"'"-' " ....'^.., ". ...... .. "2- :' -,' ':1 26:0142 1 BlOCK AWARD (continued) 83 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Larry Brakebush 102 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Jules V.Sciarra 103 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Claude W. Meadows 108 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. V. Richard Scott 109 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Paul A. Beach 114 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Da~e A. Kalinger 115 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Ralph C. Seline 120 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Edward H. Mohr 12~ ~ S8Dta "ib TGft'1CO . .... a.... _w ..rat.. 124 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. John Clark 125 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. W. E. Hicks 130 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. E. Dexter Derby 131 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. John Agajanian 136 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Paul C. Durkee 137 West. Sant.& Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Zawen [,.1... 142 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Philip C. Leathery 143 lIest Santa Anfta Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. Rfchard II. Harris 148 lIest Santa Anfta Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. T. T. FftzsilllOn 149 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Morris lIefss 154 West Santa Anita Terrace - Dr. & Mrs. F. K. Gates 155 lIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Donald Cecere 161 llest Santa Anit.a Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. George O'Bryan 165 west Santa Anita Terrace - Ms. Frances Joy 1511 Azure lIay - Mr. & Mrs. L. II. F. Cornelius 1521 Azure lIay - Mr. & Mrs; Archie Ackroyd 1 6/17/86 -3- "?i'. ~I , ".",'~, 26:0143 , ~J BLOCK AWARD IIest Santa Anita Terrace Including Azll1't! Way 4 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. John McQuarie 10 west Santa Anita Terrace - Ms. Josephine Kaliel 14 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Rando;jlh J. Betts 15 !leSt Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. n.c.as Joyce 19 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Jack M. Brkich, Jr. 20 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. E8nuel J. Sanzo 25 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. R. Linsalato 30 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Walter Rieder 31 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Albert V. Turner 35 West Santa Anita Terrace - Ms. Joyce A. Stover 36 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. John Clark 41 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. George Ban 42 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Han N. Lee 49 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. G. L. Bowman 50 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Soo Lee 56 \leSt Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. David Hutton 57 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Paul Un , 64 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. MasaJco Hayashi 65 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Samuel Chang 70 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Peters , 1 n west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & ~s. Donald Paradis 76 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mrs. Fr.nk Diliberto n west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Frank Schirka 1 82 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Donald w. Freeman 6/17/86 -"4- , .. () ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBER GILB EXCUSED 1 APPO INTMENT , SISTER CITYPI' COMMISSION NAOMI GARDENS Business License \ OCl Request <.: \" Denied r RESIGNATION ACCEPTED CFUTCHEl) 1 ROSE GARDEN MUSEUM P. '. BUILDING 26:0144 COUNCIL RECESSED COUNCIL RECONVENED IN AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING PRESENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young ABSENT: Counci1member Gi1b On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht andliCARRIED, Counci1member Gilb was EXCUSED. The City Manager submitted material relating to two agenda items; also a letter from Jack Barnes. President of the Arcadia Historical Society responding to information that the Historical Commission has been dissolved and that he will be working with the Building Committee of the Society; also a letter to Supervisor Schabarum from Mayor Young and the President of the local Chamber of Commerce, Jerry Voskeritchian, regarding the Arts and Crafts Fair which is held in the County Park; a letter from the President of the School District concerning the renovation of fields at various schools and the all-weather track ' at the High School; and a letter which has been directed to Robert Wooley of Embassy Suites, Inc., concerning the parking problem in the area of the hotel. Council also received a news article concerning Assemblyman Mountjoy's recent surgery... he is progressing well. Council agreed to hear Richard Smith, Emkay Development Company. during the regular meeting to convene shortly. On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski. seconded by Counci1member Harbicht and CARRIED, Jerree Lean was appointed to a full four year term expiring June 30, 1990 on the Sister City Commission. Mrs. Lean ~11 replace Edith Casey whose term expired June 30, 1986. ' The request of the California Trinity Housing, Inc.. dba Naomi Gardens Apartments that they be excluded from paying a business license to the City in an approximate amount of $500 was DENIED on MOTION by Counci1- member Harbicht, seconded by Counci1member Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Counci1members Chandler, None Counci1member Gi1b Harbicht, Lojeski and Young . The resignation from the County Watershed Commissiqn by ~erbert Fletcher was accepted with regret. Staff will supply Council with information concerning a new appointment. Motion for acceptance was made by Council- member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht and CARRIED. Progress report presented on the Rose Garden property. The City Manager advised that Sam Falzone has volunteered to see that the Museum building is completed and will furnish adequate insurance. pull the proper permits, etc. ,It was MOVED by Counci1member Harbicht seconded by Councilmember Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote that Sam Falzone be asked to proceed along these lines and that Nick Poprajac and the architect be thanked for their volunteer work they have performed. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Counci1member Gilb 6/17/86 -5- ',' f.ORESTRY SITE GROUP W. CABLE / i-\q f9 RETI REMENT HOTEL / SUNSET BLVD. WASTE / MANAGEMENT STORAGE I' UNITS ADJOURNMENT ROLL CALL l. 26:0145 <. In response to Counci1member Lojeski's inquiry, staff advised that the U. S. Forestry property is being cleaned up ... and they are also installing an irrigation system. Council concurred in the recommendation of staff relating to the request of Group W Cable for an extension of the multiple dwelling unit construction schedule ... communication to be directed to the General Manager advising that the City would grant a six months extension (see staff report'dated June 3, 1986). In response to Councilmember Lojeski's inquiry about the status of the 1 proposed Regency Retirement Hotel at 601 Sunset Boulevard, staff advised that no word has been received and there isn't much that can be done until after the expiration of the valid conditional use permit which will be December 3, 1986. Councilmember Lojeski advised that he will be attending the Waste Management meeting on July 31 (City of Walnut). Mayor Young was advised on the status of the proposed storage facility at Second and Coloraao Boulevard (under the Freeway). A conditional use permit is in process. It was noted that it is to have a manager's unit. Adjourned at 7:30 p. m. REGULAR MEETING The Regular Meeting convened at 7:30 p. m. PRESENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young ABSENT: Councilmember Gilb COUNCILMEMBER On MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht, GILB EXCUSED and CARaIED, Councilmember Gilb was EXCUSED. RETIRING YOUTH COMMISSIONERS INCOMING YOUTH COMMISSIONERS 6 PRESENTATIONS Councilmember Lojeski as Council Liaison to the Commission, presented certificates of appreciation to outgoing Commissioners James Trigonis and Susan May (Tom Greep and Caryn McNamee were not present). The City Clerk then administered the Oath of Office to incoming Youth Commissioners Eric Stonecipher, Tricia Reno, Tina Mai and Steve Costarella. (New Commissioners Chris Beanes, Kim Embury and Carolin Ascanio were not present. They will take the Oath at a later date.) CoUfteilmembe~ lojeski presented the "ewmembe~s with thei~ credentials and congratulated them on their election to the Commi,ssion. 1 6/17/86 -6- 1 1 ,', 1. PUBLIC HEARING MORATORIUM IA LAND USE i-{q I<' Y \ IN FAVOR OPPOSED ":0146 It was noted by staff that the 45 day moratorium for land use for the area between Eighth and Tenth Avenues nort~ of Camino Real will expire June 20, 1986. Urgency Ordinance No. 1838 would extend the period five months if so decided by Council. If not so decided, the moratorium will be cancelled as of June 20. It was also noted by the City Attorney that the ordinance requires the vote of four Council- members. Mayor Young declared the hearing open. Harold E11is,1504 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke at length - in part- the moratorium is very important to the residents of the sUbject area and submitted a map indicating owners who had signed a petition for a zone change and those who had not. He said the petition had been presented on February lB .,. and presented to Council on March 18 and then was referred to the Planning Commission. It took 25 working days to clear the Planning Department to go to the Planning Commission; during the interim, the project involving the extension of Linda Way was approved by the Planning Commission and subsequently by the City Council. In reviewing the terms of the moratorium, Mr. Ellis said further. in part, that the property owners could still sell or remodel their property '" it just could not be subdivided. He felt that a possible solution is to reZDne the property as to lot size. He would like a change in the minirrwm lot size. In response to a question by Councilmember Harbicht as to whether or not Mr. Ellis felt the Planning Department had acted improperly, Mr. Ellis referred to the extended period of time the Department took in processing the petition which allowed the develop- ment on Linda Way to be approved. Alli Roysher, 1784 S. Santa Anita Avenue, recalled how the area looked SOme years ago ... it had a rural atmosphere ... and felt the character of the area should be preserved and the horseowners should not be forced to relocate. She asked that the moratorium be extended. Robert Hatchman, 1406, 1408, 1410 S. Eighth Avenue, would not like to see the area changed as he has lived there for 34 years ... likes the large lots and living in the rural atmosphere ,.. asked Council to maintain it. Gwen Johnson, 1414 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke in opposition to the moratorium :::-she feels a person has the right to sell to whom they desire. People are not going to purchase the property if there is a threat of sub- division. Craig Whiles, 1432 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke against the change in zoning and felt a person has the right to manage his property as he sees fit ". that the threat against horseowners does not exist and said the cost of building homes, corrals and the like will keep people from Arcadia '" there are about 400 miles of bridle paths in places like Walnut and San Dimas .._ average income people cannot afford Arcadia and such large lots, Carol Lovato, 1435 S. Eighth Avenue, was not in favor of the large lots and could not understand why the horseowners seem to be trying to cOntrol the other property. William R. Mullins, 301 W. Norman Avenue, said in part, that he has a horse,-but recited another side to this matter ... that he has a neighbor who trains horses although there is a City ordinance against this ... this neighbor brings in 10-horse vans and unloads horses in the street which he feels is dangerous ... and asked that some thought be given to this. 6/17/86 -7- ..'- '. ;J URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1838 (TIE VOTE) L1QIP f\ 26:0147 Bill Schaefer, 1421 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke against the moratorium. ~e-fe1t it would delay progress and growth and was unfair to those who may want to sell their properties. The builders are aware of the 100 foot restriction as far as keeping horses is concerned and that should provi!ie sufficient consideration to the horseowners ... that all sub- divisions must comply with the City Code and he would like to see the moratorium expire. He also felt Eighth Avenue and Tenth Avenue should be considered separately. No,one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Chandler and CARRIED. Counci1member Chandler submitted, in part, that he was against the moratorium originally and is against continuing it. He felt the develOI ment on Linda Way was appropriate. He would 1 ike staff to,"work around a situation that allows one-sided cul-de-sacs and would like to know what the City Council can do to protect all property owners. He would not force out existing horseowners and would not like to see develop- ment come in in little strips. He was not in favor of extending the moratorium or changing the zoning. Councilmember Lojeski noted that this hearing is on the moratorium not on zoning. He was in favor of extending the moratorium as, during the extended time, both the City Council and the Planning Commission could do appropriate study and clear up the confusion. Counci1member Harbicht agreed somewhat with Counci1member Lojeski's observation but felt the moratorium was placed so the matter could be studied ... that now Council should consider what action it might take as a result ... there is the question of rezoning ... he felt it wrong to rezone ... leave the zoning as it is. He felt property rights of others who might wish to subdivide should not be removed ... that a covenant offers significant protection to horseowners ... they would then be protected and it can be enforced. The area has been zoned for 7500 sq. ft. for a very long time and it would be damag1ng to Change that ... no one knows what will happen in the future ... some of those property owners might want to sell in the future ... they might be forced to sell if they had to keep such large lots as 30,000 sq. ft. He could not see what could be accomplished by extending the moratorium. Mayor Young spoke in favor of extending the moratorium as it would help everyone ... and\would give Council and staff the time to do a good job. It was MOVED by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the City Attorney proceed to read in full Urgency Ordinance No. 1838 to extend the moratorium. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Counci1member Gi1b It was then MOVED by Council member Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young 1 that the moratorium be continued by the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. 1838, entitled: "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, IMPOSING A MORATORIUM IN THE CONSIDERATION OF, AND PROHIBITING LAND-USE, AND BUILDING PERMITS OF ALL APPLICATIONS FOR TENTATIVE MAPS OR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS RESULTING IN A DIVISION OF LOTS OR THE ~REATION OF NEW OR ADDITIONAL PARCELS IN A SPECIFIED AREA OF THE CITY". THIS MOTION DID NOT CARRY ON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Lojeski and Young Councilmembers Chandler and Harbicht Councilmember Gilb TIE VOTE The City Attorney advised that he will prepare a legal opinion for Council on the status of the ordinance (due to the tie vote). 6/17/86 -R- ',' 1 1 a 2. PUBLIC HEARING URAFT EIR LANDFILL ~ \~ Y 26:0148 The purpose of this hearing is to afford the public and the City Council an opportnity to comment on the potential environmental impacts and/or mitigation measures whi~h may be associated with the proposed inert landfill at the lower side of Lower Azusa Road (C.U.P. 85-22). It was noted that this is not the time to discuss the merits of the project as public hearings will be scheduled at a later date before the Planning Commission for the purpose of addressing the pros and cons of conditional use permit. (DUE TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CONTAIN COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THIS HEARING, A TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN PREPARED.) Mayor Young declared the hearing open and Don McMillan, r~yor of the City of E1 Monte, spoke at length in opposing the proposed landfill ...that the land in question is almost entirely surrounded by residential development in E1 Monte. This was in existence in the 1930's long before the pit was excavated. He said, further in part, that E1 Monte will suffer the greatest impact and that whatever evolves, the City of E1 Monte and its people should be permitted to participate in the control and development of the site ... particularly the pit. He submitted a map for Council perusal; also a copy of the special use permit with the conditions which he would like to become part of the record; also a copy of an irrevocable offer of Unilateral, Agreement. He felt all of the conditions have been violated. Mr. McMillan was advised that this hearing is only upon the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Some discussion held on having a meeting with both entities to discuss this. Mr. M~Mi11an then introduced Robert Litzenberg, President of the BCL Corporation. Mr. Litzenberg said, in part. that he has been involved with solid and hazardous waste for the last seven years and referred to a communication which he understands has been forwarded to the City of Arcadia concerning the subject matter. He then introduced James C. Crisp, Vice-President of his firm. Mr. Crisp spoke at length on the questions,which he believes should be addressed in order to make an informed decision an the i~cts. He enumerated a number of inadequacies. (Please refer to the transcript for all of Mr. Crisp's comments... Pages 4 through 7.) Harold Johanson, Planning Director for the City of spoke at length on specific portions of the DEIR. Johanson's comments on Page 8 of the transcript.) E1 Monte, also (Please see Mr. Ernie Guiterrez, Councilman from E1 Monte, said, in part, that he was here primarily to suggest that the two cities can continue to live as neighbors and that they can come to a mutual agreement '... both can compromise for the sake of making sure that the communities continue their respect. He suggested that the subject land be turned into a recreational area; that both Assemblyman Mountjoy and Assemblywoman ,Sally Tanner negotiate together a settlement with Mr. Rodeffer (owner of the landfill area) and Arcadia so that State funds may be used to secure the west bank, if need be, and provide facilities for parking and other necessities. Also that E1 Monte provide sewer and water to the rest of the properties south of the pit ... and that Arcadia construct homes compatible with the surrounding area. 6/17/86 -9- <J 26:0149 Mark Sullivan, resident of 12166 Hemlock, El Monte, located adjacent to the subject property. He felt the DEIR is ,incomplete and mislead- in9 as set forth in full on Page 9, 10 and 11 of the transcript. Mr. Sealander, 12013 E. Hemlock, El Monte, President of the Hemlock MUtual Water Company, said, in part, they have two wells located about 30 feet apart and probably 2,000 feet from the pit area ... that they are having problems right now with the State Health Department from contamination, and anything that is opposed to the State Health Department is bound to affect their wells. They do not have any other source of water and it could therefore contribute to problems in a number of residences they serve. Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, said she had read the DEIR and felt the City should do the right thing about the residents of El Monte who are Arcadia's neighbors ... it could be Arcadia homes with the residents in the same position. 1 Walter Grant Kreuter, said his residence is right over the top of the 30 foot pit and felt it the duty of the City Council to work with the people of El Monte ... he is aware of water, having been in the business for some years. He recalled a time in the past and what occurred during a flood with rain, rocks and the like washed out from Durfee Road to Baldwin Park. Mel Huber. 11693 Forest Grove, El Monte, President of the Richwood Water Company, serving a little over 200 residences in the subject area ... they have two wells and in February they were forced to shut down due to PCE in the water ... they now receive water from the San Gabriel Valley Water Company. He felt 'the report needs more study to determine what effect it would have on their underground water. Carl Cardella, 4845 Bannister, El Monte, said for some time he has been wondering what is going to happen to the hole .., all of the water down the hole is being pumped out and used for irrigating the food one eats ... he said there is PCE in there ... he has no answers but it is a dangerous situation. Geor!le aWl;~f' President of the Ragen Homes Mutual Water CoIIIpan,y. uid they proba yare the c'oses~ to the site in question ... they serve about 300 residents and their main interest is the same as the others ,.. concern about the safety factor and the slippage situation that is going on. Fran Donovan, 11350 McGirk, El Monte, President of the Cedar Avenue Mutual Water Company... they have two wells and they have good water but are concerned about the effect the landfill would have on their water supply, Doug Crigley,12043 Cherrylee Drive, about 500 feet from the border of 1 the subject property.,. he felt the landfill will definitely affect his property values... he has no assurance that it would or would not affect the quality of life in his neighborhood and he has almost no alternative but to sell his property,.. that if it goes through, he will invest time and material that he has available to investigate the possibility of a class action suit or any other "legal recourse that may be necessary in order to maintain his property values, John Chew, 12036 Hemlock, El Monte, felt that consideration should be given~a very real possibility of contaminated water and questioned what would happen if this landfill becomes a reality. 6/17/86 -10- I'" -' , c. 2~:0150 Katherine Stearns, 12032 Cherrylee, El Monte, said ~rcadians should share their concern about water contamination and environ- mental quality. No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Chandler and CARRIED. 1 Staff advised in detail the next steps to be taken on the final environmental impact report. Councilmember Lojeski said he would like to see incorporated in the final report some statement with an assurance that all of the environmental agencies, Air Quality Board, the various Water Boards, would put their stamp of approval on the rules and regulations under which the pit would be filled ... so it would be filled to those req~inaments. Mayor Young agreed and said, in part, that the more State Boards which give that type of a statement would be to the benefit of Arcadia as well as El Monte. She would also like a report on what is going on in the pit at the present time,as Council was led to believe that the pit was not operable now. She expressed concern for the water because in filling any pit you do not fill with water in the pit. She would like to know how they are going to keep water out of the pit ... perblps the botton .111 have to be sealed. She would like answers to these questions. Councilmember Harbicht spoke at length, in part, that he senses a great deal of hostility at this hearing and submitted that the City has received an application from a property owner to do something with his property and like everything else, Council has a responsibility to respond to that application. They have a very exhaustive study to review and that is what Council is and will be doing ... all of the comments made this evening will be taken under consideration ... so when ultimately this comes before this body for consideration, it will have facts on which to base a decision, He felt those speaking in opposition tonight really should be glad for the opportunity. (Full statement on Pages 16 and 17 of the transcript.) 1 6/17/86 -11- ,..',' it ~. , 3. PUBLIC HEARING (T.M. 44700 1010-1020 S. Fourth Av.) (APPROVED) 4. PUBLIC HEARING (Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Increase) (APPROVED) ~~ .V~ r' 26:0151 RECESS -- CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER Consideration of T. M. 44700, a proposed 5-10t subdivision (4 single- family lots and one trust lot) at 1010-1020 S. Fourth Avenue (Chris Construction Company, applicant). Staff report given. Planning Commis- sion recommended approval subject to specific conditions. Mayor Young declared the hearing open, and Chris Bade. 2416 Florence Avenue, the applicant. was present to answer questions and submitted in response to an inquiry that the property to the north would eventually ::n::q~:r::a:::a::: c~~~:e::::hw::~:t:eA::::::t::~ted. in part, that 1 he is in favor of this project and felt this will be a real plus for the area. No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED. Councilmember Harbicht stated, in part, that he was concerned about one-sided cul-de-sacs, but felt this would be an improvement in the area. Councilmember Chandler also said he was not in favor of one- sided cul-de-sacs. but was confident that it would be completed if Possible. It was then MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Chandler and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Council finds that the evaluations of the environmental impacts as set forth in the initial study are approp~iate; that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; that the Negative Declaration be approved and filed; find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the Arcadia General Pllft; that the dtsc-'rge of seweage from the subdt,isOft i~o the public sewer system will not violate requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for this region; AUTHORIZE the Director of Public Works to approve and execute the subdivision agree- ment; and that the proposed project be approved subject to the conditions of approval set forth in the staff report. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb Consideration of an amendment to the Arcadia Municipal Code to increase the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax from 5% to 8% effective October 1. 1986. Staff report of June 12 indicated revenue received by the City over the last five years, what the new tax could generate and the tax rates of other cities in the San Gabriel Valley. ' Mayor Young declared the hearing open and Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte verdlr. inquired if hotels in Arcadia, were notified. City Attorney replied tha none were notified; the notice was published in the local newspaper. Mrs. Hofer stated. in part, that she did not feel that people had time to read the small print in the local newspaper to get this kind of information; that the City should be obligated to notify the people involved. Felt the hearing should be held over so that people involved can attend. Inquired what Monrovia pays and staff replied Monrovia 6,5%; Pasadena 9.82%. Mrs. Hofer felt it will hurt business. 6/17/86 ' -12- -. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1839 (lMTIOOUCrD) 1 5. PUBLl C HEARING (Proposed G '. Opera ti ng r Budget 1986-87) " , (AP.~RO'lED) a5:0152 Charles Bluth, Santa Anita Inn, stated, in part, that he had only found out about this tax increase at tonight's presentations. This is a 60% tax increase and the owners of hotels were not notified. He is involved in businesses in other areas -- in Tahoe the room tax is 7.7%; in San Diego it is 10%, but these areas try to promote tourism; Arcadia does not. In Arcadia hotels must do their own advertising. He submitted copies of advertising material to Counci1members. Nothing is put out by the City to encourage people to come into the City. He now pays $35,000 a year; expects to pay $100,000 by 1987; this new proposal would mean $160,000 a year. There are only four hotels in the City and he felt it unfair to raise taxes on one small segment of business as much as 60%. Karen Witt, Manager of the Westerner Inn, stated, in part, that the competition is rough and this increase means they have to discount rates because they have already given certain guarantees to groups and cannot raise them. She felt this unfair and submitted that the City spends no money on tourism. This increase is unjust. No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski. seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED. Counci1member Harbicht stated, in part, that other cities in the area have higher tax rates than Arcadia and did not feel the proposed increase is out of line nor would be an onerous burden ... it is actually long over due. Mayor Young said, in part, that in response to the publishing of the Notice of this hearing '" that public hearings are always published in the Legal Section of the newspaper. The City Attorney then presented for the first time, explained the content and read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 1839. entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA. CAliFORNIA. AMENDING SECTION 2662 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE UNIFORM TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX" It was MOVED by Counci1member Harbicht, seconded by Counci1member Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No. 1839 be INTRODUCED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Counci1member Gi1b Consideration of the Proposed Operating Budget for 1986-87. This hearing had been published as required and a copy had been on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Mayor Young declared the hearing open and Johanna Hofer. 875 Monte Verde Drive, stated, in part, tHat she had gone to the library on Monday ..after,.. 3:00, p. m., and they had just received the packet for today's meeting. She felt it should have been ,there FridaY or Saturday. She did go through the 'packet and did not see anything on this public hearing for the operating budget; neither did she see anything about the Federal Revenue Sharing Program. She noticed a change in the 1986-87 budget in that curb address painting was to be eliminated. She would like to see that item included. Understands the money is to go to Redevelopment and feels Council is missing the whole concept of what City money is for. Councilmember Harbicht noted that the money is not going into the Redevelmpment budget. No one else desiring to be heard, the meeting was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young and CARRIED. 6/17/86 -13- .\' '. ""~;'n:~, i... ~. ',~ ( . '-,~ " '. RESOLUTION NO. 5303 (ADOPTED) 6. PUBLI C HEARING ( Proposed Federa 1 (,,', Revenue f Sha ri ng Budget 1 986-87) (APPROVED) RESOLUTION NO. 5304 (ADOPTED) 7. 8. 8a. ROLL CALL 8b. lUNUlE APPROVAL 8e AGENCY LOAN (APPROVED) q'\ 'd' f \ 26:0153 The City Attorney then presented, explained the content., and read the title of Resolution No. 5303, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 AND APPROPRIATING THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED THtREIN AS ~.'. EXPENDITURES FROM THE FUNDS INDICATED", It was then MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5303 be and it is hereby ADOPTED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb Consideration of Proposed Federal Revenue Sharing Budget for 1986-87. 1 This Hearing was published as required and a copy has been on file in the Office of the City Clerk. , Mayor Young declared the hearing open. No one desiring to be heard. the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED. The City Attorney then presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5304, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1986-87 FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PROGRAM", It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Chandler and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5304 be and it is hereby ADOPTED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COURCilme~rs Chandl@r, Harbicht, Loj@ski and Young None Councilmember Gilb COUNCIL RECESSED IN ORDER TO ACT AS THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PRESENT: Members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young ABSENT: Member Gilb On MOTION by Member Lojeski, seconded by Member Harbicht, Member Gilb was EXCUSED, On MOTION by Member Lojeski, seconded by Chairperson Young and CARRIED, the Minutes of the regular meeting of June 3, 1986 were APPROVED. The Agency cash receipts and disbursements from July 1,1985 through J April 30, 1986 were submitted to the Agency. The tax increment fund as of April 30, 1986 has a cash balance of $1,042,081.32 and it was recommended that the Agency take formal action to pay back $1,042,081.3 of the existing debt to the City's Capital Outlay Fund, In turn, the Council loan the same amount from the Capital Outlay Fund back to the Agency Project Fund in order for the Agency to use this money to further pay expenses and buy p~operty according to the direction of the Agency Boa rd. (See pa ge 17 ,) It was MOVED by Member Lojeski, seconded by Member Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the Agency make partial repayment of the Agency loan to the City and assume loan from Capital Outlay Fund back to the Agency Project Fund. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Member G~i 1 b 6/17/86 -14- 1 1 ~ 8d. EMKAY PRESENTATION ~1 f' Z6:0154 The City Attorney stated that the following item had been added to the agenda because the City Manager had determined that the Agency discussion of this matter had the status of an Urgency Item. Richard Smith, representing Emkay Development Company, which the Agency had previously selected to develop the North Third Avenue area. was present. Staff gave a brief summary of a letter dated June ii, 1986 from Mr. Smith to the Agency. The letter expressed concern regard- ing several sections of the draft Exclusive Right to Negotiate (ERN) between the Agency and Emkay. The first'item was the matter of the $11.50 per sq. ft. A reuse appraisal will have to be done -- this is required by law. However, staff concurs with Emkay's concern and there would be no linkage of the Reuse Appraisal to the purchase price or to the goodfaith deposit on the renewal ERN. The second item dealt with whether Third Avenue was' to be a public or private street and whether Emkay will design and construct the street. The Agency was concerned about hotel usage, emergency access and traffic circulation. Mr. Smith said such items as emergency access, etc. would be no problem, but Emkay does not feel that Third Avenue should be open to public traffic. This is not fair to the operators of the new hotel, for instance, because there are plans for a large circular drive in front of the hotel. Discussion ensued regarding the approval of final street design. The matter of whether the street will be public or private will be the subject of ne90tiations during the ERN. A third item regarded who will pay for the off-site improvements. The Agency staff felt that this was a matter for negotiations as part of the ERN and will be so included. A fourth item concerned Agency preapproval of owners or tenants of Emkay. Mr. Kinnahan stated that the Agency would reserve final approval rights, but that the Agency will act reasonably. Mr. Smith stated that this was an important point with Emkay and they felt they needed to, retain control over the selection of tenants. The City has control because of City Code Regulations and the Conditional Use Permits necessary for the hotel and dinner house on the project as well as plan review requirements. Mr. Smith said the City could look at the record of his Company; however Emkay realizes in this area they have a definite obligation to,the City and to themselves to bring in quality develop- ment and both are working toward this goal. Emkay has projects, in Newport Beach and Mission Viejo which they feel are evidence of their integrity in the area of selecting tenants for their projects, but they feel they must have this level of control and do not wish to relinquish it Member Harbicht stated that Agency/Council had selected Emkay and had confidence in the firm, however, the Agency/Council is proud of this community and is merely trying to insure against the possibility of getting undesirable owners or tenants. Since the Agency is writing down the land, this requirement is ~ot unreasonable. With Emkay's reputation, he does not feel ~his is a major problem. Mr. Smith said he appreciated Member Harbicht's remarks and he did not see it as a major problem either. Mr. Smith stated that a fifth item concerned the size of the proposed hotel. Member Lojeski inquired what kind of hotel Emkay had in mind -- the Agency would like the best quality hotel that can be developed. Member Chandler said he did not think there is a problem with this point either. Chairman Young agreed. -15- 6/17/86 ~ rJ 8e. ADJOURNMENT 9. 10. ~:0155 City Manager Watts said probably the Agency would like to see a seven story or so first-rate, Sheraton-type hotel not a two story Rodeway Motel which would not be acceptable. Mr. Smith said he was in agree- ment with this. Emkay will do everything it can do to obtain the best possible hotel that the market will bear. He doesn't see any low-end hotel on the site, Mr. Kinnahan stated there were other lessor issues regarding acquisition of the Nissan and Derby properties and these would be part of the ERN. Mr. Kinnahan asked whether Emkay had any other concerns with the draft ERN, Mr. Smith replied that Emkay's letter was comprehensive. The meeting adjourned to 7:00 p. m., July 1, 1986. 1 COUNCIL RECONVENED AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, said, in part, that she had noticed at the May 20 regular meeting, as well as this meeting that much time was spent on equestrian and other matters; that she was disappointed when discussion was held on fire works that no one questioned what effect the Santa Ana wind condition could have should the worst happen under adverse weather conditions ... a report had not been submitted by the Fire Chief according to the packet or recorded minutes. She said this would lead one to suspect that Mr. Moriarity has many friends in this City.., that patriotism is not the burn i ng of Roman candl es, but the safety, hea lth;, arid we lfa re of the commun i ty , She referred to the Capital Outlay Fund total and the Cash Receipts and Disbursements indicate that the Redevelopment Agency has one and a half million dollars to loan and can afford to purchase real estate. However, the voters never did vote on the redevelo~nt isswe .Ad tn.t, although Council is considering building a new City Hall and a new Police Building, no real commitment has been made to construct an auditorium which would benefit all the citizens ... young and old. She concluded her remarks by suggesting that Council hold Town Meetings once or twice a year. Councilmember Lojeski said, in part, that he respect~ residents who share concerns with the City Council, but he really resents a citizen 1 getting up and making insinuations. particularly, tying Mr. Moriarity with any of the members of this Council... and that the citizens of this City did vote on the fireworks issue electing to keep the sale of safe and sane fireworks. He suggested that in order to keep in- fonned as to what the Council.'s decisions are that Mrs. Hofer attend the pre-meetings also ... but don't make insinuations that this Council has had any tie-in with Mr. Moriarity. Mrs. Hofer responded. in part, by saying that as far as the election on the fi reworks issue was concerned. the' ba 11 ot measure was wri tten in such a way the people were confused. 6/17/811 -16- 1l. lla. CITY SEAL ITEMS PURCHASE BADGES 1 PINS BUSINESS CARDS llb. AGENCY LOAN 1 llc. ADVERTI SE FOR BIDS (RELOCATION CITY YARD) lld. JUL Y 4 /() STREET I CLOSURE lle. AWARD CONTIlACT (WATERLINE) W.O. 597 , ~ ~,\o f\ .. ," ':,.. - ," 26:0156 CONSENT ITEMS APPROVED the purchase of 50 City Flags. APPROVED on MOTION by Councilmember Chandler, seconded by Mayor Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that badges be purchased for th@ Mayo~, M8YO~ P~o T@mpor@ and Counci1member. This would eoYe~ four year terms. No dates would be indicated. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht and Young Counci1member Lojeski (Would like to stay with tradition and not change the present method.) Counci1member Gi1b MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember that the same method be adopted for the purchase of pins Mayor, Mayor Pro Tempore and Councilmember. No dates to be Roll call ended with a TIE ... Chandler for the indicated. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler and Harbicht Counci1members Lojeski and Young Councilmember Gilb THIS MATTER WILL BE CARRIED OVER. Staff recommendation was APPROVED except that prior to ordering new ones each year, the Councilmembers will be asked if they need new cards, Total amount of staff recommendation was $5,950 ... however, the, matter of pins will be considered again. ACCEPTED the partial repayment of the loan of $1,042,081.32 from the Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment Fund and to loan the same amount back to the Agency Project Fund from the Capital Outlay Fund in order for the Agency to use the money to further pay expenses and purchase property according to the direction of the Agency. (See Page 14.) APPROVED the plans and specifications and AUTHORIZED a.call f(}r bids for the installation of electrical substructures for the City Corpora- tion Yard (Job No. 612). Estimated cost of this installation is $30,000 which will be part of the City Yard relocation cost. APPROVED the request of residents for street closure for July 4 block party on Magna Vista and Ewell Streets from Lyndon Way to LeRoy Avenue. All in accordance with conditions outlined in staff report of June 17. AWARDED the contract for the replacement of 16" and 12" waterlines, 21 f'iI'El"lIj1lhrallts and appul'teAalllees ell El Monte AYe~ue from Camino Real to Live Oak Avenue and on Palm Drive from El Monte to Holly Avenue, to Macco Constructors, Inc., in the amount of $570,930; appropriated $685,000 from the Water Facilities Replacement Fund to cover the cost of construction, engineering, inspection, and contingencies; any irregularities or informalities in the bids or bidding process were waived and the Mayor and City Clerk were AUTHORIZED to execute the contract in form approved by the City Attorney. 6/17/86 -17- .~~f.~., ~) lH. BIDS REJECTED STREET TREES l1g. POll CE UNIFORMVv.< ,~~ r' 12. l2a. ORDINANCE NO. 1837 (ADOPTED) l2b. ORDINANCE NO. 1840 (INTRODUCED) , 12c. ORDINANCE NO. 1841 (INTRODUCED) as:0157 REJECTED all bids received for the replacement of existing trees on Huntington Drive and First Avenue Job No. 588A. Staff advised that six potential bidders took out plans and specifications but only two bids were received and it was felt that more competitive bids could be received if the project were readvertised in the Fall of this year. APPROVED the change for the police uniforms from brown to b~ue at a cost not to exceed $35,000 (staff report dated June 10, 1986). ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER HARBICHT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER LOJESKI AND CARRIED ON ROLL CALL 1 VOTE AS FOLLOWS: AYES: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young , NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Gilb CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the tftle of Ordinance No. 1837, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.2 TO ARTICLE IV OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SIGNS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY BY REPEALING SECTION 4912.2 REGARDING TEMPORARY ELECTION SIGNS". It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No. 1837 be and it is hereby ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Youn9 None Councilmember Gilb. The City Attorney presented for introduction, explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1840, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA', CALIFORNIA, REPEALING PART 9, (;HApTfR i, MTiCl.f il OF THf ARCADIA HUHICIPAl CODE REWDIHi THE ARCADIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION". It was MOVED by Councilmember L:oiJeski" secondEldby Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No. 1840 be and it 1s hereby INTRODUCED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler. Harbicht. Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb 1 The City Attorney presented. explained the content and read the title of Ordinance No. 1841. entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING DIVISION 5, OF PART 1. CHAPTER 1 OF ARTICLE IX OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PROCEDURE FOR TENTATIVE MAPS". It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Mayor Young and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No. 1841 be and 1t 1s hereby INTRODUCED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb -18- 6/17/86 1 1 ~) 12d. RESOLUTION NO. 5305 (ADOPTED) . e5 \CI '( \ ()' 50. 1 r"\' 12e. RESOLUTION NO. 5306 (ADOPTED) 26:015R The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5305, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA; ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS POSITIONS IN MANAGEMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-1987". It was MOVED by Mayor Young, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5305 be and it is hereby ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5306, entitled: "A, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 5235 'e~ REGARDING COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS OF GENERAL EMPLOYEES". (I t:;Q \~\ It was MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Counci lmember 0; / Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. ~~ 5306 be and it is hereby ADOPTED. 12f. RESOLUTION NO. 5307 (ADOPTED) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5307, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION \t.SFOR VARIOUS PART-TIME EMPLOYEE POSITIONS". c..Gl \l\ '(" It was MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young and (J' J CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5307 be and \ \^\' it is hereby ADOPTED. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb 12g. RESOLUTION The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the NO. 5308 title of Resolution No. 5308, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY (ADOPTED) 0'\( :OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADiA, CALlEORN1A TO JOIN WITH CERTAIN OTHER I'" CITIES FOR INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT PURPOSES". /' (.' \n? It was MOVED by Cpuncilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht f' and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5308 be and it is hereby ADOPTED. 12h. RESOLUTION NO. 5309 (ADOPTEO)(),. ~ f.\? f"lnS, , ~!.!r... AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the title of Resolution No. 5309, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT PURPOSES DATED MAY 21,1986". 6 /17 /86 ' -19- ,,' ., , 12i. CLAIM OF JOHN & (,', RICHARD r LOVRENSKY (DENIED) 12j. APPLICATION f', FOR LATE CLAIM VERONE SHEARER (DENIED) 13. 14. 15. ADJOURNMENT 7:00 p. m. July 1, 1986 ATTEST: 7.6:()159 It was MOVED by Counc ilmember Harbi cht.. seconded Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as 'follows No. 5309 be and it is hereby ADOPTED'. by Councilmember that Resolution AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb On recommendation of the City Attorney, the claim of John and Richard Lovrensky was DENIED on MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows: 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb On recommendation of the City Attorney, the application for leave to present a late claim by Verone Shearer was DENIED on MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows: ' AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Counciln~mbers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young None Councilmember Gilb MATTERS FROM STAFF None MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS None The Council meeting adjourned at 11 :35 p. m. to 7:00 p. m., July 1. 1986 in the Conference Room to conduct the business of the Council and Agency and any Closed Session necessary to discuss personnel, litigation matters and evaluation of properties. Y1J~i/t:J4Z?~ Mary B. ou~, _yo~_ , I ~k Christine Van Maanen, City Clerk 8/17/. ' -20- ....-""-..~ 'I', ~ '........->.