HomeMy WebLinkAboutJUNE 17,1986
- I
1
I
1
26:0140
-}
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS ARE TAPE RECORDED AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBER
GILB EXCUSED
MINUTE
APPROVAL
(June 3,1986)
(APPROVED)
ORD. & RES.
READ BY
TITLE ONL Y
M I NUT E S
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
a nd the
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 17. 1986
The City Council of the City of Arcadia and the Arcadia Redevelopment
Agency met in a regular session June 17, 1986 at 6:30 p. m. in the
Arcadia City Hall Council Chamber.
Rev. J. William Daum, Episcopal Church of the Transfiguration
Counci1member Harbicht
PRESENT: Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
ABSENT: Counci1member Gilb
On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht
and CARRIED, Counci1member Gi1b was EXCUSED.
On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht
and CARRIED, the Minutes of the Adjourned and Regular Meetings of
June 3, 1986 were APPROVED.
It was MOVED by Counci1member Harbicht, seconded by Counci1member
Lojeski and CARRIED that all ordinances and resolutions be read by
title only and that the reading in full be waived.
PRESENTATIONS
ARCADIA BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION
{, . 1. AWARDS
(). < ,I
. "c:: Mayor Young introduced the Chairman of the Arcadia Beautiful Commis-
~,~ sion, Gloria A1fery, who, in turn, introduced Beth Constanza, Chairman
r \ of the 1986 Awards Committee. Past Commission members were introduced
as well as the present Commission members.
A1fery, Gloria S.
Bellin, Jayne
Con stanza , Beth
Crumley, Margo
Gal e, Ma rgaret
Giffis, Howard
Green, James M.
Hansen, Mary
Inbody, Milton
McComas, Harriet
Towsley, Marguerite
6/17/86
-1-
,
,.r
26:0141
1986 ARCADIA BEAUTIFUL AWARDS
SPECIAL AWARD:
THE INN AT SANTA ANITA - Charles Bluth
PEACOCK AWARD:
320 W. Wistaria Avenue - Dr. . Mrs. William H. Blair
LUCKY BALDWIN AWARD:
200 Hacienda Drive - Mr. . Mrs. Sam J. Falzone
1
MAYORS AWARD:
1425 Rancho Road - Mr. . Mrs. Don Franco
ARCADIA AWARD:
605 Arbolada Drive - Mr. . Mrs. Thomas Romano
QUEEN ANNE AWARD:
1517 Highland Oaks Drive - Chuck' Linda Johnson
ARCADIA BEAUTIFUL CIJ4MISSION AWARD:
830 Palo Alto Drive - Mr. . Mrs. Phillip M. Hutton
ANITA BALDWIN AWARD:
139 SYClllllOre Avenue - Tom . Ann Ung
HUGO REID AWARD:
40 Rodell Place - Pete' Evie Nickovich
IlMlI:A MlMD:
41 W. Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. George Ban
NEWCASTLE AWARD:
36 W. Santa Anita Terrace - Barbara . John Clark (Presented by Barbara Saelid
Chairman, Sister City Commission)
SANTA ANITA AWARD:
370 Campus Drive - Holy Angels Church- Father Walsh accepted.
HUNTINGTON AWARD:
126 E. St. Joseph Street - Greenscapes - Arthur Mason accepted
CLARA BALDWIN STOCKER AWARD:
471 W. Duarte Road - Lyn Oaks Apartments
ROSE BUDD BALDWIN DOBLE AWARD:
-:.- 4S~63 Christfna-'Street - Villa Christina H.....&u.mers Association
BLOCK AWARD:
West Santa,Anita Terrace including Azure Way
CITY OF ARCADIA A~ - CouncilmemberChand1er announced that this is the first time
this award has been presented. Mrs. Alfery said this is being
presented by the Arcadia Chamber/Commerce and the Commission.
for maintaining the beauty of the City. '
1
6/17/86
.--.....-.......--...-..-..---"'...--..-..---
,,-'~ ~ .'~~'"'"-' " ....'^.., ". ...... ..
"2-
:' -,'
':1
26:0142
1
BlOCK AWARD (continued)
83 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Larry Brakebush
102 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Jules V.Sciarra
103 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Claude W. Meadows
108 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. V. Richard Scott
109 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Paul A. Beach
114 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Da~e A. Kalinger
115 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Ralph C. Seline
120 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Edward H. Mohr
12~ ~ S8Dta "ib TGft'1CO . .... a.... _w ..rat..
124 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. John Clark
125 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. W. E. Hicks
130 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. E. Dexter Derby
131 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. John Agajanian
136 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Paul C. Durkee
137 West. Sant.& Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Zawen [,.1...
142 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Philip C. Leathery
143 lIest Santa Anfta Terrace - Mr. .. Mrs. Rfchard II. Harris
148 lIest Santa Anfta Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. T. T. FftzsilllOn
149 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Morris lIefss
154 West Santa Anita Terrace - Dr. & Mrs. F. K. Gates
155 lIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Donald Cecere
161 llest Santa Anit.a Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. George O'Bryan
165 west Santa Anita Terrace - Ms. Frances Joy
1511 Azure lIay - Mr. & Mrs. L. II. F. Cornelius
1521 Azure lIay - Mr. & Mrs; Archie Ackroyd
1
6/17/86
-3-
"?i'.
~I
, ".",'~,
26:0143
,
~J
BLOCK AWARD
IIest Santa Anita Terrace Including Azll1't! Way
4 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. John McQuarie
10 west Santa Anita Terrace - Ms. Josephine Kaliel
14 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Rando;jlh J.
Betts
15 !leSt Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. n.c.as Joyce
19 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Jack M. Brkich, Jr.
20 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. E8nuel J. Sanzo
25 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. R. Linsalato
30 West Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Walter Rieder
31 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Albert V. Turner
35 West Santa Anita Terrace - Ms. Joyce A. Stover
36 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. John Clark
41 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. George Ban
42 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Han N. Lee
49 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. G. L. Bowman
50 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Soo Lee
56 \leSt Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. David Hutton
57 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Paul Un
,
64 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. MasaJco Hayashi
65 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Samuel Chang
70 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Peters , 1
n west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & ~s. Donald Paradis
76 IIest Santa Anita Terrace - Mrs. Fr.nk Diliberto
n west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Frank Schirka
1
82 west Santa Anita Terrace - Mr. & Mrs. Donald w. Freeman
6/17/86
-"4-
,
..
()
ROLL CALL
COUNCILMEMBER
GILB EXCUSED
1
APPO INTMENT ,
SISTER CITYPI'
COMMISSION
NAOMI GARDENS
Business
License \ OCl
Request <.: \"
Denied r
RESIGNATION
ACCEPTED
CFUTCHEl)
1
ROSE GARDEN
MUSEUM P. '.
BUILDING
26:0144
COUNCIL RECESSED
COUNCIL RECONVENED IN AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
PRESENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
ABSENT: Counci1member Gi1b
On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht
andliCARRIED, Counci1member Gilb was EXCUSED.
The City Manager submitted material relating to two agenda items;
also a letter from Jack Barnes. President of the Arcadia Historical
Society responding to information that the Historical Commission
has been dissolved and that he will be working with the Building
Committee of the Society; also a letter to Supervisor Schabarum from
Mayor Young and the President of the local Chamber of Commerce, Jerry
Voskeritchian, regarding the Arts and Crafts Fair which is held in the
County Park; a letter from the President of the School District concerning
the renovation of fields at various schools and the all-weather track '
at the High School; and a letter which has been directed to Robert
Wooley of Embassy Suites, Inc., concerning the parking problem in the
area of the hotel. Council also received a news article concerning
Assemblyman Mountjoy's recent surgery... he is progressing well.
Council agreed to hear Richard Smith, Emkay Development Company. during
the regular meeting to convene shortly.
On MOTION by Counci1member Lojeski. seconded by Counci1member Harbicht
and CARRIED, Jerree Lean was appointed to a full four year term expiring
June 30, 1990 on the Sister City Commission. Mrs. Lean ~11 replace
Edith Casey whose term expired June 30, 1986. '
The request of the California Trinity Housing, Inc.. dba Naomi Gardens
Apartments that they be excluded from paying a business license to the
City in an approximate amount of $500 was DENIED on MOTION by Counci1-
member Harbicht, seconded by Counci1member Lojeski and CARRIED on roll
call vote as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Counci1members Chandler,
None
Counci1member Gi1b
Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
.
The resignation from the County Watershed Commissiqn by ~erbert Fletcher
was accepted with regret. Staff will supply Council with information
concerning a new appointment. Motion for acceptance was made by Council-
member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Harbicht and CARRIED.
Progress report presented on the Rose Garden property.
The City Manager advised that Sam Falzone has volunteered to see that
the Museum building is completed and will furnish adequate insurance.
pull the proper permits, etc. ,It was MOVED by Counci1member Harbicht
seconded by Councilmember Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote that
Sam Falzone be asked to proceed along these lines and that Nick Poprajac
and the architect be thanked for their volunteer work they have performed.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Counci1member Gilb
6/17/86
-5-
','
f.ORESTRY
SITE
GROUP W.
CABLE / i-\q
f9
RETI REMENT
HOTEL /
SUNSET BLVD.
WASTE /
MANAGEMENT
STORAGE I'
UNITS
ADJOURNMENT
ROLL CALL
l.
26:0145
<.
In response to Counci1member Lojeski's inquiry, staff advised that
the U. S. Forestry property is being cleaned up ... and they are
also installing an irrigation system.
Council concurred in the recommendation of staff relating to the
request of Group W Cable for an extension of the multiple dwelling
unit construction schedule ... communication to be directed to the
General Manager advising that the City would grant a six months
extension (see staff report'dated June 3, 1986).
In response to Councilmember Lojeski's inquiry about the status of the 1
proposed Regency Retirement Hotel at 601 Sunset Boulevard, staff advised
that no word has been received and there isn't much that can be done
until after the expiration of the valid conditional use permit which
will be December 3, 1986.
Councilmember Lojeski advised that he will be attending the Waste
Management meeting on July 31 (City of Walnut).
Mayor Young was advised on the status of the proposed storage facility
at Second and Coloraao Boulevard (under the Freeway). A conditional
use permit is in process. It was noted that it is to have a manager's
unit.
Adjourned at 7:30 p. m.
REGULAR MEETING
The Regular Meeting convened at 7:30 p. m.
PRESENT: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
ABSENT: Councilmember Gilb
COUNCILMEMBER On MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht,
GILB EXCUSED and CARaIED, Councilmember Gilb was EXCUSED.
RETIRING
YOUTH
COMMISSIONERS
INCOMING
YOUTH
COMMISSIONERS
6
PRESENTATIONS
Councilmember Lojeski as Council Liaison to the Commission, presented
certificates of appreciation to outgoing Commissioners James Trigonis
and Susan May (Tom Greep and Caryn McNamee were not present).
The City Clerk then administered the Oath of Office to incoming
Youth Commissioners Eric Stonecipher, Tricia Reno, Tina Mai and
Steve Costarella. (New Commissioners Chris Beanes, Kim Embury and
Carolin Ascanio were not present. They will take the Oath at a later
date.) CoUfteilmembe~ lojeski presented the "ewmembe~s with thei~
credentials and congratulated them on their election to the Commi,ssion.
1
6/17/86
-6-
1
1
,',
1.
PUBLIC
HEARING
MORATORIUM IA
LAND USE i-{q I<'
Y \
IN FAVOR
OPPOSED
":0146
It was noted by staff that the 45 day moratorium for land use for
the area between Eighth and Tenth Avenues nort~ of Camino Real will
expire June 20, 1986. Urgency Ordinance No. 1838 would extend the
period five months if so decided by Council. If not so decided, the
moratorium will be cancelled as of June 20. It was also noted by the
City Attorney that the ordinance requires the vote of four Council-
members.
Mayor Young declared the hearing open.
Harold E11is,1504 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke at length - in part- the
moratorium is very important to the residents of the sUbject area and
submitted a map indicating owners who had signed a petition for a zone
change and those who had not. He said the petition had been presented
on February lB .,. and presented to Council on March 18 and then was
referred to the Planning Commission. It took 25 working days to clear
the Planning Department to go to the Planning Commission; during the
interim, the project involving the extension of Linda Way was approved
by the Planning Commission and subsequently by the City Council.
In reviewing the terms of the moratorium, Mr. Ellis said further. in
part, that the property owners could still sell or remodel their property
'" it just could not be subdivided. He felt that a possible solution
is to reZDne the property as to lot size. He would like a change in the
minirrwm lot size. In response to a question by Councilmember Harbicht
as to whether or not Mr. Ellis felt the Planning Department had acted
improperly, Mr. Ellis referred to the extended period of time the
Department took in processing the petition which allowed the develop-
ment on Linda Way to be approved.
Alli Roysher, 1784 S. Santa Anita Avenue, recalled how the area looked
SOme years ago ... it had a rural atmosphere ... and felt the character
of the area should be preserved and the horseowners should not be forced
to relocate. She asked that the moratorium be extended.
Robert Hatchman, 1406, 1408, 1410 S. Eighth Avenue, would not like to
see the area changed as he has lived there for 34 years ... likes the
large lots and living in the rural atmosphere ,.. asked Council to
maintain it.
Gwen Johnson, 1414 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke in opposition to the moratorium
:::-she feels a person has the right to sell to whom they desire. People
are not going to purchase the property if there is a threat of sub-
division.
Craig Whiles, 1432 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke against the change in zoning
and felt a person has the right to manage his property as he sees fit
". that the threat against horseowners does not exist and said the cost
of building homes, corrals and the like will keep people from Arcadia
'" there are about 400 miles of bridle paths in places like Walnut
and San Dimas .._ average income people cannot afford Arcadia and such
large lots,
Carol Lovato, 1435 S. Eighth Avenue, was not in favor of the large lots
and could not understand why the horseowners seem to be trying to
cOntrol the other property.
William R. Mullins, 301 W. Norman Avenue, said in part, that he has
a horse,-but recited another side to this matter ... that he has a
neighbor who trains horses although there is a City ordinance against
this ... this neighbor brings in 10-horse vans and unloads horses in
the street which he feels is dangerous ... and asked that some thought
be given to this.
6/17/86
-7-
..'- '.
;J
URGENCY
ORDINANCE
NO. 1838
(TIE VOTE)
L1QIP
f\
26:0147
Bill Schaefer, 1421 S. Eighth Avenue, spoke against the moratorium.
~e-fe1t it would delay progress and growth and was unfair to those who
may want to sell their properties. The builders are aware of the 100
foot restriction as far as keeping horses is concerned and that should
provi!ie sufficient consideration to the horseowners ... that all sub-
divisions must comply with the City Code and he would like to see the
moratorium expire. He also felt Eighth Avenue and Tenth Avenue should
be considered separately.
No,one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Counci1member Chandler and CARRIED.
Counci1member Chandler submitted, in part, that he was against the
moratorium originally and is against continuing it. He felt the develOI
ment on Linda Way was appropriate. He would 1 ike staff to,"work around
a situation that allows one-sided cul-de-sacs and would like to know
what the City Council can do to protect all property owners. He would
not force out existing horseowners and would not like to see develop-
ment come in in little strips. He was not in favor of extending the
moratorium or changing the zoning.
Councilmember Lojeski noted that this hearing is on the moratorium
not on zoning. He was in favor of extending the moratorium as, during
the extended time, both the City Council and the Planning Commission
could do appropriate study and clear up the confusion.
Counci1member Harbicht agreed somewhat with Counci1member Lojeski's
observation but felt the moratorium was placed so the matter could be
studied ... that now Council should consider what action it might take
as a result ... there is the question of rezoning ... he felt it wrong
to rezone ... leave the zoning as it is. He felt property rights of
others who might wish to subdivide should not be removed ... that a
covenant offers significant protection to horseowners ... they would
then be protected and it can be enforced. The area has been zoned
for 7500 sq. ft. for a very long time and it would be damag1ng to Change
that ... no one knows what will happen in the future ... some of those
property owners might want to sell in the future ... they might be
forced to sell if they had to keep such large lots as 30,000 sq. ft.
He could not see what could be accomplished by extending the moratorium.
Mayor Young spoke in favor of extending the moratorium as it would help
everyone ... and\would give Council and staff the time to do a good job.
It was MOVED by Counci1member Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young and
CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the City Attorney proceed to
read in full Urgency Ordinance No. 1838 to extend the moratorium.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Counci1member Gi1b
It was then MOVED by Council member Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young 1
that the moratorium be continued by the adoption of Urgency Ordinance
No. 1838, entitled: "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, IMPOSING A MORATORIUM IN THE CONSIDERATION
OF, AND PROHIBITING LAND-USE, AND BUILDING PERMITS OF ALL APPLICATIONS
FOR TENTATIVE MAPS OR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS RESULTING IN A DIVISION OF
LOTS OR THE ~REATION OF NEW OR ADDITIONAL PARCELS IN A SPECIFIED AREA
OF THE CITY". THIS MOTION DID NOT CARRY ON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Lojeski and Young
Councilmembers Chandler and Harbicht
Councilmember Gilb
TIE VOTE
The City Attorney advised that he will prepare a legal opinion for
Council on the status of the ordinance (due to the tie vote).
6/17/86
-R-
','
1
1
a
2.
PUBLIC
HEARING
URAFT EIR
LANDFILL
~
\~
Y
26:0148
The purpose of this hearing is to afford the public and the City
Council an opportnity to comment on the potential environmental impacts
and/or mitigation measures whi~h may be associated with the proposed
inert landfill at the lower side of Lower Azusa Road (C.U.P. 85-22).
It was noted that this is not the time to discuss the merits of the
project as public hearings will be scheduled at a later date before
the Planning Commission for the purpose of addressing the pros and
cons of conditional use permit.
(DUE TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
CONTAIN COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THIS HEARING, A TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN
PREPARED.)
Mayor Young declared the hearing open and Don McMillan, r~yor of the
City of E1 Monte, spoke at length in opposing the proposed landfill
...that the land in question is almost entirely surrounded by residential
development in E1 Monte. This was in existence in the 1930's long
before the pit was excavated. He said, further in part, that E1 Monte
will suffer the greatest impact and that whatever evolves, the City of
E1 Monte and its people should be permitted to participate in the control
and development of the site ... particularly the pit. He submitted a
map for Council perusal; also a copy of the special use permit with the
conditions which he would like to become part of the record; also a
copy of an irrevocable offer of Unilateral, Agreement. He felt all of
the conditions have been violated.
Mr. McMillan was advised that this hearing is only upon the Draft
Environmental Impact Report. Some discussion held on having a meeting
with both entities to discuss this. Mr. M~Mi11an then introduced
Robert Litzenberg, President of the BCL Corporation.
Mr. Litzenberg said, in part. that he has been involved with solid and
hazardous waste for the last seven years and referred to a communication
which he understands has been forwarded to the City of Arcadia concerning
the subject matter. He then introduced James C. Crisp, Vice-President
of his firm.
Mr. Crisp spoke at length on the questions,which he believes should be
addressed in order to make an informed decision an the i~cts. He
enumerated a number of inadequacies. (Please refer to the transcript
for all of Mr. Crisp's comments... Pages 4 through 7.)
Harold Johanson, Planning Director for the City of
spoke at length on specific portions of the DEIR.
Johanson's comments on Page 8 of the transcript.)
E1 Monte, also
(Please see Mr.
Ernie Guiterrez, Councilman from E1 Monte, said, in part, that he was
here primarily to suggest that the two cities can continue to live as
neighbors and that they can come to a mutual agreement '... both can
compromise for the sake of making sure that the communities continue
their respect. He suggested that the subject land be turned into a
recreational area; that both Assemblyman Mountjoy and Assemblywoman
,Sally Tanner negotiate together a settlement with Mr. Rodeffer (owner
of the landfill area) and Arcadia so that State funds may be used to
secure the west bank, if need be, and provide facilities for parking
and other necessities. Also that E1 Monte provide sewer and water to
the rest of the properties south of the pit ... and that Arcadia construct
homes compatible with the surrounding area.
6/17/86
-9-
<J
26:0149
Mark Sullivan, resident of 12166 Hemlock, El Monte, located adjacent
to the subject property. He felt the DEIR is ,incomplete and mislead-
in9 as set forth in full on Page 9, 10 and 11 of the transcript.
Mr. Sealander, 12013 E. Hemlock, El Monte, President of the Hemlock
MUtual Water Company, said, in part, they have two wells located about
30 feet apart and probably 2,000 feet from the pit area ... that they
are having problems right now with the State Health Department from
contamination, and anything that is opposed to the State Health Department
is bound to affect their wells. They do not have any other source of
water and it could therefore contribute to problems in a number of
residences they serve.
Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, said she had read the DEIR and
felt the City should do the right thing about the residents of El
Monte who are Arcadia's neighbors ... it could be Arcadia homes with
the residents in the same position.
1
Walter Grant Kreuter, said his residence is right over the top of the 30
foot pit and felt it the duty of the City Council to work with the people
of El Monte ... he is aware of water, having been in the business for
some years. He recalled a time in the past and what occurred during
a flood with rain, rocks and the like washed out from Durfee Road to
Baldwin Park.
Mel Huber. 11693 Forest Grove, El Monte, President of the Richwood Water
Company, serving a little over 200 residences in the subject area ...
they have two wells and in February they were forced to shut down due to
PCE in the water ... they now receive water from the San Gabriel Valley
Water Company. He felt 'the report needs more study to determine what
effect it would have on their underground water.
Carl Cardella, 4845 Bannister, El Monte, said for some time he has been
wondering what is going to happen to the hole .., all of the water down
the hole is being pumped out and used for irrigating the food one eats
... he said there is PCE in there ... he has no answers but it is a
dangerous situation.
Geor!le aWl;~f' President of the Ragen Homes Mutual Water CoIIIpan,y. uid
they proba yare the c'oses~ to the site in question ... they serve
about 300 residents and their main interest is the same as the others
,.. concern about the safety factor and the slippage situation that is
going on.
Fran Donovan, 11350 McGirk, El Monte, President of the Cedar Avenue
Mutual Water Company... they have two wells and they have good water
but are concerned about the effect the landfill would have on their
water supply,
Doug Crigley,12043 Cherrylee Drive, about 500 feet from the border of 1
the subject property.,. he felt the landfill will definitely affect
his property values... he has no assurance that it would or would not
affect the quality of life in his neighborhood and he has almost no
alternative but to sell his property,.. that if it goes through, he
will invest time and material that he has available to investigate the
possibility of a class action suit or any other "legal recourse that may
be necessary in order to maintain his property values,
John Chew, 12036 Hemlock, El Monte, felt that consideration should be
given~a very real possibility of contaminated water and questioned
what would happen if this landfill becomes a reality.
6/17/86
-10-
I'"
-'
,
c.
2~:0150
Katherine Stearns, 12032 Cherrylee, El Monte, said ~rcadians
should share their concern about water contamination and environ-
mental quality.
No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION
by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Chandler and
CARRIED.
1
Staff advised in detail the next steps to be taken on the final
environmental impact report. Councilmember Lojeski said he would
like to see incorporated in the final report some statement with an
assurance that all of the environmental agencies, Air Quality Board,
the various Water Boards, would put their stamp of approval on the
rules and regulations under which the pit would be filled ... so it
would be filled to those req~inaments.
Mayor Young agreed and said, in part, that the more State Boards which
give that type of a statement would be to the benefit of Arcadia as
well as El Monte. She would also like a report on what is going on in
the pit at the present time,as Council was led to believe that the pit
was not operable now. She expressed concern for the water because in
filling any pit you do not fill with water in the pit. She would
like to know how they are going to keep water out of the pit ...
perblps the botton .111 have to be sealed. She would like answers
to these questions.
Councilmember Harbicht spoke at length, in part, that he senses a
great deal of hostility at this hearing and submitted that the City
has received an application from a property owner to do something
with his property and like everything else, Council has a responsibility
to respond to that application. They have a very exhaustive study to
review and that is what Council is and will be doing ... all of the
comments made this evening will be taken under consideration ... so
when ultimately this comes before this body for consideration, it will
have facts on which to base a decision, He felt those speaking in
opposition tonight really should be glad for the opportunity. (Full
statement on Pages 16 and 17 of the transcript.)
1
6/17/86
-11-
,..','
it
~. ,
3.
PUBLIC
HEARING
(T.M. 44700
1010-1020
S. Fourth Av.)
(APPROVED)
4.
PUBLIC
HEARING
(Uniform
Transient
Occupancy
Tax Increase)
(APPROVED)
~~
.V~
r'
26:0151
RECESS -- CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER
Consideration of T. M. 44700, a proposed 5-10t subdivision (4 single-
family lots and one trust lot) at 1010-1020 S. Fourth Avenue (Chris
Construction Company, applicant). Staff report given. Planning Commis-
sion recommended approval subject to specific conditions.
Mayor Young declared the hearing open, and Chris Bade. 2416 Florence
Avenue, the applicant. was present to answer questions and submitted
in response to an inquiry that the property to the north would eventually
::n::q~:r::a:::a::: c~~~:e::::hw::~:t:eA::::::t::~ted. in part, that 1
he is in favor of this project and felt this will be a real plus for
the area.
No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by
Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED.
Councilmember Harbicht stated, in part, that he was concerned about
one-sided cul-de-sacs, but felt this would be an improvement in the
area. Councilmember Chandler also said he was not in favor of one-
sided cul-de-sacs. but was confident that it would be completed if
Possible.
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember
Chandler and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Council finds
that the evaluations of the environmental impacts as set forth in the
initial study are approp~iate; that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment; that the Negative Declaration be approved and
filed; find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions
for its design and improvement, is consistent with the Arcadia General
Pllft; that the dtsc-'rge of seweage from the subdt,isOft i~o the public
sewer system will not violate requirements prescribed by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board for this region; AUTHORIZE the
Director of Public Works to approve and execute the subdivision agree-
ment; and that the proposed project be approved subject to the conditions
of approval set forth in the staff report.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
Consideration of an amendment to the Arcadia Municipal Code to increase
the Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax from 5% to 8% effective October 1.
1986. Staff report of June 12 indicated revenue received by the City
over the last five years, what the new tax could generate and the tax
rates of other cities in the San Gabriel Valley. '
Mayor Young declared the hearing open and Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte verdlr.
inquired if hotels in Arcadia, were notified. City Attorney replied tha
none were notified; the notice was published in the local newspaper.
Mrs. Hofer stated. in part, that she did not feel that people had time
to read the small print in the local newspaper to get this kind of
information; that the City should be obligated to notify the people
involved. Felt the hearing should be held over so that people involved
can attend. Inquired what Monrovia pays and staff replied Monrovia
6,5%; Pasadena 9.82%. Mrs. Hofer felt it will hurt business.
6/17/86 '
-12-
-.
1
ORDINANCE
NO. 1839
(lMTIOOUCrD)
1
5.
PUBLl C
HEARING
(Proposed G '.
Opera ti ng r
Budget
1986-87)
" , (AP.~RO'lED)
a5:0152
Charles Bluth, Santa Anita Inn, stated, in part, that he had only
found out about this tax increase at tonight's presentations. This
is a 60% tax increase and the owners of hotels were not notified. He
is involved in businesses in other areas -- in Tahoe the room tax is
7.7%; in San Diego it is 10%, but these areas try to promote tourism;
Arcadia does not. In Arcadia hotels must do their own advertising.
He submitted copies of advertising material to Counci1members. Nothing
is put out by the City to encourage people to come into the City. He
now pays $35,000 a year; expects to pay $100,000 by 1987; this new
proposal would mean $160,000 a year. There are only four hotels in
the City and he felt it unfair to raise taxes on one small segment of
business as much as 60%.
Karen Witt, Manager of the Westerner Inn, stated, in part, that the
competition is rough and this increase means they have to discount rates
because they have already given certain guarantees to groups and
cannot raise them. She felt this unfair and submitted that the City
spends no money on tourism. This increase is unjust.
No one else desiring to be heard, the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION
by Councilmember Lojeski. seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and
CARRIED.
Counci1member Harbicht stated, in part, that other cities in the area
have higher tax rates than Arcadia and did not feel the proposed
increase is out of line nor would be an onerous burden ... it is
actually long over due.
Mayor Young said, in part, that in response to the publishing of the
Notice of this hearing '" that public hearings are always published
in the Legal Section of the newspaper.
The City Attorney then presented for the first time, explained the
content and read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 1839. entitled: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA. CAliFORNIA.
AMENDING SECTION 2662 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE
UNIFORM TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX"
It was MOVED by Counci1member Harbicht, seconded by Counci1member
Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No.
1839 be INTRODUCED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Counci1members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Counci1member Gi1b
Consideration of the Proposed Operating Budget for 1986-87. This
hearing had been published as required and a copy had been on file
in the Office of the City Clerk.
Mayor Young declared the hearing open and Johanna Hofer. 875 Monte Verde
Drive, stated, in part, tHat she had gone to the library on Monday
..after,.. 3:00, p. m., and they had just received the packet for today's
meeting. She felt it should have been ,there FridaY or Saturday. She
did go through the 'packet and did not see anything on this public hearing
for the operating budget; neither did she see anything about the Federal
Revenue Sharing Program. She noticed a change in the 1986-87 budget in
that curb address painting was to be eliminated. She would like to see
that item included. Understands the money is to go to Redevelopment
and feels Council is missing the whole concept of what City money is for.
Councilmember Harbicht noted that the money is not going into the
Redevelmpment budget.
No one else desiring to be heard, the meeting was CLOSED on MOTION
by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young and CARRIED.
6/17/86
-13-
.\' '.
""~;'n:~,
i... ~. ',~ (
. '-,~
"
'.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5303
(ADOPTED)
6.
PUBLI C
HEARING
( Proposed
Federa 1 (,,',
Revenue f
Sha ri ng
Budget
1 986-87)
(APPROVED)
RESOLUTION
NO. 5304
(ADOPTED)
7.
8.
8a.
ROLL CALL
8b.
lUNUlE
APPROVAL
8e
AGENCY LOAN
(APPROVED)
q'\
'd'
f \
26:0153
The City Attorney then presented, explained the content., and read the
title of Resolution No. 5303, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 AND APPROPRIATING THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED THtREIN AS
~.'. EXPENDITURES FROM THE FUNDS INDICATED",
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember
Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution
No. 5303 be and it is hereby ADOPTED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
Consideration of Proposed Federal Revenue Sharing Budget for 1986-87. 1
This Hearing was published as required and a copy has been on file in
the Office of the City Clerk. ,
Mayor Young declared the hearing open. No one desiring to be heard.
the hearing was CLOSED on MOTION by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by
Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED.
The City Attorney then presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 5304, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1986-87 FEDERAL
REVENUE SHARING PROGRAM",
It was then MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember
Chandler and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution
No. 5304 be and it is hereby ADOPTED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COURCilme~rs Chandl@r, Harbicht, Loj@ski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
COUNCIL RECESSED IN ORDER TO ACT AS THE
ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PRESENT: Members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
ABSENT: Member Gilb
On MOTION by Member Lojeski, seconded by Member Harbicht, Member
Gilb was EXCUSED,
On MOTION by Member Lojeski, seconded by Chairperson Young and CARRIED,
the Minutes of the regular meeting of June 3, 1986 were APPROVED.
The Agency cash receipts and disbursements from July 1,1985 through J
April 30, 1986 were submitted to the Agency. The tax increment fund
as of April 30, 1986 has a cash balance of $1,042,081.32 and it was
recommended that the Agency take formal action to pay back $1,042,081.3
of the existing debt to the City's Capital Outlay Fund, In turn, the
Council loan the same amount from the Capital Outlay Fund back to the
Agency Project Fund in order for the Agency to use this money to further
pay expenses and buy p~operty according to the direction of the Agency
Boa rd. (See pa ge 17 ,)
It was MOVED by Member Lojeski, seconded by Member Harbicht and
CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that the Agency make partial
repayment of the Agency loan to the City and assume loan from Capital
Outlay Fund back to the Agency Project Fund.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Member G~i 1 b
6/17/86
-14-
1
1
~
8d.
EMKAY
PRESENTATION
~1
f'
Z6:0154
The City Attorney stated that the following item had been added to
the agenda because the City Manager had determined that the Agency
discussion of this matter had the status of an Urgency Item.
Richard Smith, representing Emkay Development Company, which the
Agency had previously selected to develop the North Third Avenue area.
was present. Staff gave a brief summary of a letter dated June ii,
1986 from Mr. Smith to the Agency. The letter expressed concern regard-
ing several sections of the draft Exclusive Right to Negotiate (ERN)
between the Agency and Emkay.
The first'item was the matter of the $11.50 per sq. ft. A reuse appraisal
will have to be done -- this is required by law. However, staff concurs
with Emkay's concern and there would be no linkage of the Reuse Appraisal
to the purchase price or to the goodfaith deposit on the renewal ERN.
The second item dealt with whether Third Avenue was' to be a public or
private street and whether Emkay will design and construct the street.
The Agency was concerned about hotel usage, emergency access and
traffic circulation. Mr. Smith said such items as emergency access,
etc. would be no problem, but Emkay does not feel that Third Avenue
should be open to public traffic. This is not fair to the operators
of the new hotel, for instance, because there are plans for a large
circular drive in front of the hotel.
Discussion ensued regarding the approval of final street design. The
matter of whether the street will be public or private will be the
subject of ne90tiations during the ERN.
A third item regarded who will pay for the off-site improvements.
The Agency staff felt that this was a matter for negotiations as
part of the ERN and will be so included.
A fourth item concerned Agency preapproval of owners or tenants of
Emkay. Mr. Kinnahan stated that the Agency would reserve final approval
rights, but that the Agency will act reasonably. Mr. Smith stated that
this was an important point with Emkay and they felt they needed to,
retain control over the selection of tenants. The City has control
because of City Code Regulations and the Conditional Use Permits
necessary for the hotel and dinner house on the project as well as plan
review requirements. Mr. Smith said the City could look at the record
of his Company; however Emkay realizes in this area they have a definite
obligation to,the City and to themselves to bring in quality develop-
ment and both are working toward this goal. Emkay has projects, in
Newport Beach and Mission Viejo which they feel are evidence of their
integrity in the area of selecting tenants for their projects, but they
feel they must have this level of control and do not wish to relinquish it
Member Harbicht stated that Agency/Council had selected Emkay and had
confidence in the firm, however, the Agency/Council is proud of this
community and is merely trying to insure against the possibility of
getting undesirable owners or tenants. Since the Agency is writing down
the land, this requirement is ~ot unreasonable. With Emkay's reputation,
he does not feel ~his is a major problem. Mr. Smith said he appreciated
Member Harbicht's remarks and he did not see it as a major problem either.
Mr. Smith stated that a fifth item concerned the size of the proposed
hotel. Member Lojeski inquired what kind of hotel Emkay had in mind
-- the Agency would like the best quality hotel that can be developed.
Member Chandler said he did not think there is a problem with this point
either. Chairman Young agreed.
-15-
6/17/86
~
rJ
8e.
ADJOURNMENT
9.
10.
~:0155
City Manager Watts said probably the Agency would like to see a seven
story or so first-rate, Sheraton-type hotel not a two story Rodeway
Motel which would not be acceptable. Mr. Smith said he was in agree-
ment with this. Emkay will do everything it can do to obtain the best
possible hotel that the market will bear. He doesn't see any low-end
hotel on the site,
Mr. Kinnahan stated there were other lessor issues regarding acquisition
of the Nissan and Derby properties and these would be part of the ERN.
Mr. Kinnahan asked whether Emkay had any other concerns with the draft
ERN, Mr. Smith replied that Emkay's letter was comprehensive.
The meeting adjourned to 7:00 p. m., July 1, 1986.
1
COUNCIL RECONVENED
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Johanna Hofer, 875 Monte Verde Drive, said, in part, that she had
noticed at the May 20 regular meeting, as well as this meeting that
much time was spent on equestrian and other matters; that she was
disappointed when discussion was held on fire works that no one
questioned what effect the Santa Ana wind condition could have
should the worst happen under adverse weather conditions ... a report
had not been submitted by the Fire Chief according to the packet or
recorded minutes. She said this would lead one to suspect that Mr.
Moriarity has many friends in this City.., that patriotism is not the
burn i ng of Roman candl es, but the safety, hea lth;, arid we lfa re of the
commun i ty ,
She referred to the Capital Outlay Fund total and the Cash Receipts
and Disbursements indicate that the Redevelopment Agency has one and a
half million dollars to loan and can afford to purchase real estate.
However, the voters never did vote on the redevelo~nt isswe .Ad tn.t,
although Council is considering building a new City Hall and a new
Police Building, no real commitment has been made to construct an
auditorium which would benefit all the citizens ... young and old.
She concluded her remarks by suggesting that Council hold Town
Meetings once or twice a year.
Councilmember Lojeski said, in part, that he respect~ residents who
share concerns with the City Council, but he really resents a citizen 1
getting up and making insinuations. particularly, tying Mr. Moriarity
with any of the members of this Council... and that the citizens of
this City did vote on the fireworks issue electing to keep the sale
of safe and sane fireworks. He suggested that in order to keep in-
fonned as to what the Council.'s decisions are that Mrs. Hofer attend
the pre-meetings also ... but don't make insinuations that this
Council has had any tie-in with Mr. Moriarity.
Mrs. Hofer responded. in part, by saying that as far as the election
on the fi reworks issue was concerned. the' ba 11 ot measure was wri tten
in such a way the people were confused.
6/17/811
-16-
1l.
lla.
CITY SEAL
ITEMS
PURCHASE
BADGES
1
PINS
BUSINESS
CARDS
llb.
AGENCY
LOAN
1
llc.
ADVERTI SE
FOR BIDS
(RELOCATION
CITY YARD)
lld.
JUL Y 4 /()
STREET I
CLOSURE
lle.
AWARD
CONTIlACT
(WATERLINE)
W.O. 597
, ~ ~,\o
f\
.. ,"
':,.. - ,"
26:0156
CONSENT ITEMS
APPROVED the purchase of 50 City Flags.
APPROVED on MOTION by Councilmember Chandler, seconded by Mayor Young and
CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that badges be purchased for
th@ Mayo~, M8YO~ P~o T@mpor@ and Counci1member. This would eoYe~
four year terms. No dates would be indicated.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht and Young
Counci1member Lojeski (Would like to stay with tradition
and not change the present method.)
Counci1member Gi1b
MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember
that the same method be adopted for the purchase of pins
Mayor, Mayor Pro Tempore and Councilmember. No dates to be
Roll call ended with a TIE ...
Chandler
for the
indicated.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler and Harbicht
Counci1members Lojeski and Young
Councilmember Gilb
THIS MATTER WILL BE CARRIED OVER.
Staff recommendation was APPROVED except that prior to ordering
new ones each year, the Councilmembers will be asked if they need
new cards,
Total amount of staff recommendation was $5,950 ... however, the,
matter of pins will be considered again.
ACCEPTED the partial repayment of the loan of $1,042,081.32 from the
Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment Fund and to loan the same amount back
to the Agency Project Fund from the Capital Outlay Fund in order for the
Agency to use the money to further pay expenses and purchase property
according to the direction of the Agency. (See Page 14.)
APPROVED the plans and specifications and AUTHORIZED a.call f(}r bids
for the installation of electrical substructures for the City Corpora-
tion Yard (Job No. 612). Estimated cost of this installation is $30,000
which will be part of the City Yard relocation cost.
APPROVED the request of residents for street closure for July 4 block
party on Magna Vista and Ewell Streets from Lyndon Way to LeRoy Avenue.
All in accordance with conditions outlined in staff report of June 17.
AWARDED the contract for the replacement of 16" and 12" waterlines, 21
f'iI'El"lIj1lhrallts and appul'teAalllees ell El Monte AYe~ue from Camino Real to
Live Oak Avenue and on Palm Drive from El Monte to Holly Avenue, to
Macco Constructors, Inc., in the amount of $570,930; appropriated
$685,000 from the Water Facilities Replacement Fund to cover the cost
of construction, engineering, inspection, and contingencies; any
irregularities or informalities in the bids or bidding process were
waived and the Mayor and City Clerk were AUTHORIZED to execute the
contract in form approved by the City Attorney.
6/17/86
-17-
.~~f.~.,
~)
lH.
BIDS
REJECTED
STREET
TREES
l1g.
POll CE
UNIFORMVv.<
,~~
r'
12.
l2a.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1837
(ADOPTED)
l2b.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1840
(INTRODUCED) ,
12c.
ORDINANCE
NO. 1841
(INTRODUCED)
as:0157
REJECTED all bids received for the replacement of existing trees on
Huntington Drive and First Avenue Job No. 588A. Staff advised that
six potential bidders took out plans and specifications but only two
bids were received and it was felt that more competitive bids could
be received if the project were readvertised in the Fall of this year.
APPROVED the change for the police uniforms from brown to b~ue at a
cost not to exceed $35,000 (staff report dated June 10, 1986).
ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSENT ITEMS WERE APPROVED ON MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER
HARBICHT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER LOJESKI AND CARRIED ON ROLL CALL 1
VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
AYES: Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young ,
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Gilb
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the tftle
of Ordinance No. 1837, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.2 TO ARTICLE IV OF
THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SIGNS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY BY
REPEALING SECTION 4912.2 REGARDING TEMPORARY ELECTION SIGNS".
It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Councilmember
Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No. 1837
be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Youn9
None
Councilmember Gilb.
The City Attorney presented for introduction, explained the content and
read the title of Ordinance No. 1840, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA', CALIFORNIA, REPEALING PART 9,
(;HApTfR i, MTiCl.f il OF THf ARCADIA HUHICIPAl CODE REWDIHi THE
ARCADIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION".
It was MOVED by Councilmember L:oiJeski" secondEldby Councilmember
Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance
No. 1840 be and it 1s hereby INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler. Harbicht. Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
1
The City Attorney presented. explained the content and read the title
of Ordinance No. 1841. entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING DIVISION 5, OF PART 1.
CHAPTER 1 OF ARTICLE IX OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
PROCEDURE FOR TENTATIVE MAPS".
It was MOVED by Councilmember Harbicht, seconded by Mayor Young and
CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Ordinance No. 1841 be and
1t 1s hereby INTRODUCED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
-18-
6/17/86
1
1
~)
12d.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5305
(ADOPTED) . e5
\CI '( \
()' 50.
1 r"\'
12e.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5306
(ADOPTED)
26:015R
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 5305, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA; ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION
FOR VARIOUS POSITIONS IN MANAGEMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-1987".
It was MOVED by Mayor Young, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht
and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5305
be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 5306, entitled: "A, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 5235
'e~ REGARDING COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS OF GENERAL EMPLOYEES".
(I
t:;Q \~\ It was MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Counci lmember
0; / Harbicht and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No.
~~ 5306 be and it is hereby ADOPTED.
12f.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5307
(ADOPTED)
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 5307, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION
\t.SFOR VARIOUS PART-TIME EMPLOYEE POSITIONS".
c..Gl \l\ '(" It was MOVED by Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Mayor Young and
(J' J CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5307 be and
\ \^\' it is hereby ADOPTED.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
12g.
RESOLUTION The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
NO. 5308 title of Resolution No. 5308, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
(ADOPTED) 0'\( :OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADiA, CALlEORN1A TO JOIN WITH CERTAIN OTHER
I'" CITIES FOR INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT PURPOSES".
/'
(.' \n? It was MOVED by Cpuncilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht
f' and CARRIED on roll call vote as follows that Resolution No. 5308 be and
it is hereby ADOPTED.
12h.
RESOLUTION
NO. 5309
(ADOPTEO)(),. ~
f.\?
f"lnS, ,
~!.!r...
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
The City Attorney presented, explained the content and read the
title of Resolution No. 5309, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT
TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR INSURANCE AND RISK
MANAGEMENT PURPOSES DATED MAY 21,1986".
6 /17 /86 '
-19-
,,'
.,
,
12i.
CLAIM OF
JOHN &
(,', RICHARD
r LOVRENSKY
(DENIED)
12j.
APPLICATION
f', FOR LATE
CLAIM
VERONE
SHEARER
(DENIED)
13.
14.
15.
ADJOURNMENT
7:00 p. m.
July 1, 1986
ATTEST:
7.6:()159
It was MOVED by Counc ilmember Harbi cht.. seconded
Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote as 'follows
No. 5309 be and it is hereby ADOPTED'.
by Councilmember
that Resolution
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
On recommendation of the City Attorney, the claim of John and
Richard Lovrensky was DENIED on MOTION by Councilmember Harbicht,
seconded by Councilmember Lojeski and CARRIED on roll call vote
as follows:
1
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
On recommendation of the City Attorney, the application for leave to
present a late claim by Verone Shearer was DENIED on MOTION by
Councilmember Lojeski, seconded by Councilmember Harbicht and CARRIED
on roll call vote as follows: '
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Counciln~mbers Chandler, Harbicht, Lojeski and Young
None
Councilmember Gilb
MATTERS FROM STAFF
None
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
None
The Council meeting adjourned at 11 :35 p. m. to 7:00 p. m., July 1. 1986
in the Conference Room to conduct the business of the Council and Agency
and any Closed Session necessary to discuss personnel, litigation matters
and evaluation of properties.
Y1J~i/t:J4Z?~
Mary B. ou~, _yo~_ ,
I
~k
Christine Van Maanen, City Clerk
8/17/. '
-20-
....-""-..~
'I',
~
'........->.