Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAY 18,2004 I I I 46:0072 CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF ARCADIA and the ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 18, 2004 MINUTES Audio and video tape copies of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency proceedings are on file in the office of the City Clerk The City Council and Arcadia Redevelopment Agency met in a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber Conference Room pursuant to the previously adjourned Regular Meeting. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Council/Agency Members Chandier, Marshall, Segal, Wuo and Kovacic ABSENT: ,AJJ[)IENCE PARTlClPAllON TIME RESERVED FOR AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION There were no members of the public audience who chose to address the Council. 1. STUDY SESSION A Study Session was conducted on the Gold Line Phase II Project. Bill Kelly, City Manager, noted that the Mayor serves on Gold Line Joint Powers Authority; the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report (DEIS/DEIR) has been released for comment; the City of Arcadia has been very involved with commenting on the project as compared to other cities; the current document needs to be further reviewed in order to insure the City's concerns regarding aesthetics, public safety, and land use are covered; the City will respond to the DEIS/DEIR by the end of June; the Board will not be deciding which alternative to build until December/January. Mr. Kelly further noted that the three options presented tOnight were the only three options the Board will consider; the "all at grade" crossing is the Board's currently budgeted project alternative (1 9 billion dollars); if Arcadia IS unsuccessful at convincing the Board that the grade separation at Santa Anita is a requirement of the project then the grade separation will be considered an "enhancement"; the Board should provide adequate mitigation measures for the significant adverse impacts to Arcadia in the final report; staff will provide an update to Council in November or December that will include computer enhanced graphics of the proposed crossings at Santa Anita Avenue and First Street. Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director, reported that staff has been involved in every step of the project review process; the Board is now In the formal comment process; Council's previous direction was to have the environmental documents address grade separations at Santa Anita and First Street, however, there was an issue on First Street regarding low traffic counts. Three profiles were discussed regarding grade separations. The option with an elevated station is the most expensive. The crossings at Santa Anita and First will have difficulty qualifying as alternatives due to low traffic counts; staff is looking at other variables to qualify the Santa Anita crossing; staff will respond to these issues prior to the deadiine for comments; parking around the station wlli also be a concern; a public comment meeting on the project will be held in Arcadia on June 14, from 7:00p.m. to 9.00 p.m; the Board will be having meetings in each of the ten communities affected by Phase II, the public comment period on the DEIS/DEIR ends on June 21, 2004. 05-18-04 1 RECESS 2. a b. RECONVENE lNV~llON 46:0073 In response to a question by Mayor Kovacic, Mr. Penman noted that the Arcadia station is to be the most heavily used station in Phase II. Mayor Kovacic noted that a few citizens have proposed a station at Baldwin and running shuttles to and from variOUS points in the City, he believes that the MT A is going to be looking for cities to pay for enhancements and that this project is either third or fourth in line in terms of the prioritization of statewide projects; he is in favor of raising issues and alternatives for analysis whether or not they will be ultimately considered; he IS in favor of a grade separation at Santa Anita, either as part of the project or as an enhancement. I Mr Kelly stated that part of the reason the project does not have a higher priority is that the 210 freeway and other arterials are not at capacity, however they will be by 2025 He futher noted that Arcadia was the only City, to our knowledge, that requested a grade separation. Steve Deistch, City Attorney, noted that If the project that the City wants is not adequately described at this time, staff may have a difficult time arguing that the Callfomia Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) analysis performed now, was sufficient to cover the CIty'S new proposed project. Finally, Mayor Kovacic encouraged those interested in this matter to attend the public hearing on June 14, 2004 in the City CounCil Chamber to voice their opinion on the project. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency Board then recessed to hold a Closed Session meeting. CLOSED SESSION I Labor Contract Negotiations (Government Code Section 54957,6) California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees' Union Local 911 (Confidential, Supervisor, Professional and General Employee Unit and Public Works Employee Unit), Arcadia Police Officers' Association, Arcadia Firefighters' Association, Management and non-represented employees (City Negotiators: Tracey Hause and Michael Casalou). Conference with Real Properly Negotiators (Government Code Section 54956.8). ProoerlY Address/ProoerlY Owner 55 West Huntington Drive, Paul Rusnak 21 Morlan Place, Hann Ling Shaw (Church in Arcadia) 28 West Santa Clara, Don and Ray Dahlgren 41 West Huntington Drive, Mrs. Robert Johannsen/Manny Romero 35 West Huntington Drive, Gary and Dan Braun (35 West Huntington Partners) 27 West Huntington Drive, Richard Fisher (Tempelkadian) 130 West Huntington Drive, Linda Chang (Arcadia Land Corporation) 11, 15, 19 West Huntington Drive, Ei JI Sakurada (J A.C. Window, Inc.) 25 North Santa Anita Avenue, EI Ji Sakurada (JAC. Window, Inc.) 5 West Huntington Drive, Anthony Fanticola (Wortmann 011) The Regular Meeting of the City Council and Arcadia Redevelopment Agency was reconvened in the City Council Chamber at 7:07 p.m. I Reverend John Lee, Mandarin Baptist Church, gave the invocation. 05-18-04 2 I I I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 3. MOTION - ORD. & RES. READ BY TITLE ONLY 4. PROCLAMATION (Bee Hsu, Monika Yeh, Sean Yu.) 5. 46:0074 Teresa Wong led the pledge of allegiance. PRESENT: Council/Agency Members Chandler, Marshall, Segal, Wuo and KovacIc ABSENT: None. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION Steve Deitsch, City Attomey, reported that Council discussed items 2.a. and 2.b. in Closed Session. There were no reportable actions taken. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS The City Manager had no report. It was moved by Council/Agency Member Wuo and seconded by Council/Agency Member Marshall, then carried without objection that Ordinances and Resolutions be read by title only and that the reading in full be waived. PRESENTATION of Mayor's Certificates of Appreciation to Bee Hsu, Monika Yeh, and Sean Yu Mayor Kovacic presented certificates of appreciation to Bee Hsu, Monika Yeh, and Sean Yu for their participation in Arcadia's Sixth Annual Law Day. The Arcadia Chinese Association made significant efforts at Arcadia Law Day; one hundred and ten (110) individuals were processed, who would not have received legal services otherwise. Bee Hsu expressed thanks on behalf of the Arcadia Chinese Association, especially allowing them the opportunity to bring the community together. Monika Yeh stated that she was very happy to contribute to the event. Sean Yu thanked Mayor Kovacic for initiating the event. They also reported that their annual fundraising event will occur on Saturday, June 5, 2004. The money that is raised Will be donated to assist the City. Mayor Kovacic noted that the Arcadia Chinese Association serves the entire community. PUBLIC HEARING a. PUBLIC HEARING Mr Kelly noted that the Council had continued this meetmg from May 18, 2004 at the - STAFF REPORT request of the applicant. (Appeal of Planning Comm.'s denial of SADR-9) Mr. Penman stated that the Item was an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a design review at 2633 South Baldwin Avenue. The project generated from work done at the office bUilding without a permit. The owner subsequently came in and submitted the design review to staff and staff administratively denied the work. The applicant unsuccessfully appealed to the Planning Commission and then further appealed that decision to the City Council. Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator, presented the facts of the appeal. The applicant proposed neon banding on the office building. The project was submitted for design review and was denied by staff on February 19, 2004 for the following reasons; the neon was not architecturally compatible with the design of the existing office building. The Planning Commission voted 3-2 to deny the appeal at ItS March 9, 2004 meeting. The Commission concurred with staffs analysis and denied the project based on inconsistency with the City's architectural design review guidelines. Ms. Butler reported that the two Commissioners who voted In favor of the project noted that any lighting element is an improvement in public safety and that the design elements did not enhance or detract from the design of the building. Those speaking at 05-18-04 3 APPLICANT TESTIMONY PUBLIC COMMENT 46.0075 the Planning Commission meeting on behalf of the applicant stated their opinion that the neon lighting provides additional security and is an overall improvement of the building. Staff noted that the neon design element at the top of the building is not I appropriate for security and there are other appropriate methods for security lighting. The applicant subsequently appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. Council Member Wuo read a statement, as recommended by the City Attorney, that due to his employment with Baldwin Realty, a competitor of the applicant, there is at least an appearance of a conflict of interest and that he should recuse himself from consideration of this item. In response to a series of questions from Council Members, Ms. Butler noted that the office bUilding project did go through the regular architectural design review process and that neon lighting was never proposed. In addition, she noted that by definition of "signs" in the municipal code the neon element IS not considered a sign. In response to a question from Mayor Kovacic, the City Attorney noted that the CounCil should consider this a matter of "first impression" and make findings as if the applicant had applied for a permit in the normal fashion, despite the fact that the neon element was initially installed without the required permit. Mayor Kovacic opened the public hearing and Invited the applicant to come forward to provide testimony. Mr. Ji Han, a representative of the applicant, addressed the Council. He stated that the neon enhanced the building's architectural design and has complimented the neighborhood; that it defines the shape and enhances the feeling of the building; that the tubing enhances the contour and angles of the bUilding. He also noted the I importance of highlighting the building at night. In response to a question from Mayor Kovacic, Mr. Han noted that the additional lighting, even though it is at the top of the building, lights the neighborhood well. He noted that the applicant would like to emphasize the architectural enhancement in this particular case. In response to a question from Council Member Segal, the applicant's representative stated that the neon element cost $12,000 to install and that he did not know the cost for its removal. Philio Hsu, 606 Warner Avenue, is in favor of keeping the neon architectural element in place. He noted that the neon fits in well With the color scheme of surrounding businesses; that the Development Services Department's conclusion was based on inconsistency with the City's architectural review guidelines which he felt were subjective. Mr. Hsu stated that during the March 9th Planning Commission meeting, a commissioner in favor of the project noted that any lighting in the neighborhood is an improvement and that another commissioner found that the neon did not detract or enhance the building's appearance. In response to a question from Mayor Kovacic, Mr. Hsu stated that architectural review guidelines are dependent on personal opinions and are not equivalent to ordinances or laws; the City should not enforce based on personal opinion as the guideline. In response to a question from Councli Member Chandler, Mr. Penman noted that the permit is a requirement that must be met before construction can commence. The I permit requirement would tngger the design review using the adopted architectural review guidelines. 05-18-04 4 I I I MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL DELIBERATION MOTION ROLL CALL b. PUBLIC HEARING - STAFF REPORT (Text Amendment 03-05, Parking Reg.) 46'0076 A motion was made without objection by Council Member Chandler and seconded by Council Member Segal to close the public hearing. Council Member Segal raised the point that whomever advised the applicant regarding installation of the neon design element gave them bad advice; he asked the Council if they felt the installation without a permit was a $25,000 mistake. Council Member Marshall, noted that she is a liaison to the planning commisSion and stated that the item needs to be considered as if a permit was requested; the applicant should go back to the sign people and make them pay for their mistake; she agreed with staff that the neon element is not a safety issue, but rather one of aesthetics; she does not favor setting a precedent for applicants to bypass the permit process if they feel that Council will approve appeals, if removing illegally installed elements is too costly for the owner. In response to a question from Council Member Chandler, Mr. Penman noted that Temple City had no comment on the matter even though the office building IS located on the border of that city. Mr. Penman further noted that staffs issue is that neon is not typically approved for office buildings since they are "attention-attracting" devices. In response to a question from Mayor Kovacic, Mr. Penman stated that it was undeniable that this construction required a permit regardless of whether the Installation was a sign or a design element. In response to the question about whether a real estate office qualifies as a retail business, Mr. Penman noted that the real estate operations typically do not hold a resale license with the State Board of Equalization, which would then identify them as a retailer. Ms. Butler noted that neon is typically an "attention attracting device" which staff does not feel is compallble with typical uses for office building; she further noted that neon has not been used on office buildings in Arcadia. In response to a sixty (60) day grace period request for removal of the neon from the applicant, Mr. Penman noted that he will work with the applicant to coordinate the number of days acceptable for removal of the neon element. It was moved by Council Member Marshall and seconded by Council Member Chandler then carried on roll call vote as follows to deny the appeal of SADR-4-9 and uphold the Planning Commission's denial based upon inconsistency with the City's architectural review guidelines (the deSign element was not architecturally compatible with the design of the existing office building and that exposed neon tubing is not recommended as an accent material, but in some cases is an appropriate matenal to be used for the primary wall sign). AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: Council Members Chandler, Marshall, and Kovacic Segal Wuo Mr. Kelly stated that the following was a public hearing regarding amendments to the City's parking regulations. Mr. Penman noted that the Text Amendment was proposed by staff since parking regulations have not been amended since 1985. Ms. Butler presented the recommendations that the current parking regulations be amended in total and that a section In the Central Business District (CBD) zone related to shared parking be eliminated. During the past two years, the Development Services Department has been reviewing parking standards from other cities, as well as studies conducted by professional organizations; the proposed revisions were based upon 05-18-04 5 PUBLIC COMMENT MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL DELIBERATION MOTION ROLL CALL 46.0077 industry standards, parking regulations of other cities and staff's experience. Highlights of the proposed revisions included changes in required parking spaces, location of parking, parking stall sizes, parking stall size requirements, wheel stops, loading I requirements, circulation, parking area iandscaping and walls, and bicycle parking. Ms Butler further noted that since the CBD zone Shared Parking Standard has not been utilized by property owners (most are unwilling to sign a non-exclusive parking agreement), staff is requesting its elimination from the municipal code. In response to a question from Council Member Chandler, Ms. Butler responded that restriping would only be required for new buildings or when there were significant changes in building or facility usage. Council Member Chandler commended the work done both by the staff and the Planning Commission on this item. Council Member Marshall noted that she was happy that this matter was discussed by staff and Council and commended staff on their work. She further noted that regular review of parking regulations is necessary since driving hab~s, business needs, and car size preferences are constantly changing. In response to a question from Council Member Wuo, Ms. Butler responded that bicycle parking is a requirement in the City and that an applicant can request that the requirement be waived, however, bicycle parking can be accommodated anywhere on the site, not just within a parking space. She also reported that staff did take restaurant employees into consideration when considering changes to restaurant parking and that parking requirements on mixed-use projects are typically reviewed on a case-by-case basis. None. A motion was made without objection by Council Member Chandler and seconded by Council Member Marshall to close the public hearing. I In response to a question from Mayor Kovacic, Mr. Penman noted that staff would prefer to handle bicycle parking space sizes as part of the design review process to ensure their proper location In regard to pedestrian traffic. In response to a question from Mayor Kovacic, Ms. Butler stated that parking space requirements have changed in several categories due to changes in business practices however, Arcadia's parking space standards still remain higher than other cities. In response to a question from Mayor Kovacic, Ms. Butler noted that most buildings comply with existing parking requirements, however some modifications are requested, for example, in a mixed-use project. Council Member Marshal noted that Increasing some parking requirements will cut down in density and that IS well-warranted in some cases. It was moved by Council Member Marshall and seconded by Council Member Chandler then carried on roll call vote as follows to approve Text Amendment 03-05 and introduce Ordinance No. 2189 amending Section 9264.34 of the Arcadia Municipal Code, deleting table 9264.3.4. and revising in Its entirety Division 9 of Article IX, Chapter 2, Part 6 of the Arcadia Municipal Code regarding parking regulations. AYES: NOES I Council Members Chandler, Marshall, Segal, Wuo and Kovacic None 05-18-04 6 46:0078 AUDIENCE TIME RESERVED FOR AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION I There were no members of the publiC who chose to address the Council. 6. MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBER Council Member Marshall made a request to address Arcadia's new dog park, MARSHALL especially in light of the proposed mixing of large and small dogs in the same area. She slated that due to the size of smaller dogs, the park would not need to be cut in half, but rather, she proposed dividing the park by one-quarter for small dogs and three- quarters for large dogs. She noted that small dogs can be accidentally injured during play with a large dog. It is her opinion that small dog owners would probably not use the park If there were no separation of the dog sizes. She is requesting that the City Council overrule the Recreation and Parks Commission's recommendations that there be no separate provisions for small dogs so that the entire community can use the dog park. She also requested a change in the suggested name (Eisenhower Park Memorial Off-Leash Park Area) by means of a contest or through the schools. She encouraged members of the public who have an opinion on this matter to call City Hall or herself. She ended with a quote from Roger Karras, "Dogs are not our whole lives, but they make our lives whole." COUNCIL MEMBER Council Member Segal reported that he was out of country or out of state for the SEGAL majority of the past four weeks. He also offered congratulations to his daughter who recently graduated from Southern Methodist University In Dallas, Texas. I COUNCIL MEMBER Council Member Chandler offered congratulations to Council Member Segal's daughter. CHANDLER He also gave an update on West Nile Virus (WNV), emphasizing the number of dead crows that have tested positive for WNV. The phone numbers for the public to report dead birds are 877-747-2243 or 877-968-2474. Humans should not handle the bird without some protection via a glove or a plastic bag. People should keep their houses mosquito free via screens and elimination of standing water. COUNCIL MEMBER WUO Council Member Wuo welcomed back Council Member Segal and offered congratulations to Segal's daughter on her recent college graduation. On May 11th he attended the Rotary Club's Salute to Seniors and offered congratulations to Shirley Sanderson as a recipient of the Senior Citizen of the Year award. He also attended the A1trusa Charter Installation on behalf of Mayor Kovacic and offered congratulations to Nancy Ely as the outgoing President and to Carol Libby as the incoming President. He made an announcement regard in\/, the American Cancer Society's Relay for Life, which will be held on July 24th and 25 at Santa Anita Racetrack. A rally will be held In preparation of the Relay event on May 19, 5:30 p.m., at Matt Denny's restaurant. COUNCIL MEMBER MARSHALL'S REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEM (Dog Park) MOTION In response to CounCil Member Marshall's request that the Council appeal the Commission's recommendation of commingling large and small dogs in the proposed dog park, Mayor Kovacic asked the Council if there was enough support to bring the item back on a future agenda for consideration. It was moved by Council Member Marshall, seconded by Mayor Kovacic, and supported by Council Member Segal to bring the item of separating the proposed dog park into large and small dog areas for discussion on a future Council agenda. I COUNCIL MEMBER Mayor Kovacic requested that the City Manager direct staff to bring back a brief update KOVACIC on the state budget and ballot initiative. The City Manager will prOVide an update at an upcoming CounCil meeting. 05-18-04 7 CITY CLERK BARROWS 7. a. MINUTES (Redev. Agency) b. RESOLUTION ARA NO 210 (CEQA guidelines) c. APPROPRIATION REQUEST (Morlan Place project) d. MINUTES (City Council) e. RESOLUTION NO. 6419 (Property Dedication - Rosemarie Drive) f. RESOLUTION ARA NO. 6431 (CEQA guidelines) g. RESOLUTION NO. 6433 (Delegate - SGVCOG) 46:0079 Mayor Kovacic noted that he received a letter from resident Larry Hasbrook requesting the Council and members of the public to send letters of support to the parents of Clayton Phun who is currently serving in Iraq. He encouraged members of the public to I send the letters to City Hall and staff will direct them to the family. Council Member Marshall noted that the family of Clayton Ph un IS entitled to a Blue Star from the City, as does anyone who has a loved one serving in the military. Members of the public who would like to apply for the Blue Star Program can visit City Hall. Mayor Kovacic offered congratulations to Council Member Segal's daughter on her recent college graduation. Jim Barrows, City Clerk, offered congratulations to Council Member Segal's daughter on her recent college graduation. He also noted that last Thursday he and his wife had the opportunity to attend the 47th Annual Pops Concert at Arcadia High School. He offered congratulations to the band and choir directors for their excellent work. CONSENT AGENDA - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The Consent Agenda items were read as follows by the City Manager: Request for approval of the minutes of the April 20, 2004 and May 4, 2004 Regular Meeting, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND ADOPTING LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PUB. RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21000 ET SEQ.) REQUEST FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO APPROPRIATE $30,000 FROM THE AGENCY'S UNPROGRAMMED RESERVE FOR AN UPDATE OF APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE AND FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT, AND TO UPGRADE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS TO LITIGATION GUARANTEE FOR THE PROPOSED MORLAN PLACE PROJECT. I CONSENT AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL The Consent Agenda items were read as follows by the City Manager: Request for approval of the minutes of the April 20, 2004 and May 4, 2004 Regular Meetings. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DEDICATING CERTAIN PROPERTY ON ROSEMARIE DRIVE FOR STREET PURPOSES (A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23064 AND A PORTION OF LOT 33 OF TRACT NO, 21924) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND ADOPTING LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PUB. RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21000 ET SEQ.) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING AN ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL MEMBER AND AN ALTERNATE MEMBER TO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS I 05-18-04 8 I I I 46'0080 RECOMMENDATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ARCADIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO PROVIDE LUNCHEON MEALS FOR SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM HELD AT THE ARCADIA COMMUNITY CENTER FROM JULY 1, 2004 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2005 i. APPROPRIATION REQUEST FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $8,500 REQUEST (Sidewalk FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 FUND FOR THE Gap Closure Project) SIDEWAlK GAP CLOSURE PROJECT. h. CONTRACT (Senior Nutrition) J. CANCELLATION (Non-Emergency Medical Trans. Pilot Program) REQUEST FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO CANCEL THE NON-EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION PILOT PROGRAM TO TRANSPORT ARCADIA SENIOR CITIZENS AND DISABLED PERSONS TO MEDICAL FACILITIES LOCATED OUTSIDE THE ARCADIA CITY LIMITS MOTION - It was moved by Council/Agency Member Chandler and seconded by Council/Agency CONSENT AGENDA Member Marshall, then carried on roll call vote to approve items 7.a. - j. ROLL CALL ADJOURNMENT (to June 1, 2004, 6:00 p.m.) ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN. CouncIl/Agency Members Chandler, Marshall, Segal, Wuo and Kovacic None Council Member Segal abstained from items 7.a. and 7.d. in regard to the May 4, 2004 minutes as he was absent from that meeting. Noting no additional business, at 8:47 p.m. the City Council Regular Meeting adjoumed in memory of Edward Vernon Ryan, Jr. to June 1, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber Conference Room for a Regular Meeting to conduct the bUSiness of the City Council and Arcadia Redevelopment Agency and any Ciosed Session necessary to discuss personnel, iitigation matters or evaluation of properties. .~. ~~~/ ary Ko aCIC, Mayor L ,~. c- f/fS ~ ( James H. Barrows, City Clerk 05-18-04 9