Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3a: Memorandum of Understanding for development of an Enhanced Watershed Management ProgramGPLIFORnr9y�r «a Co�nnity STAFF REPORT Public Works Services Department DATE: May 21, 2013 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Tait, Public Works Services Director Prepared by: Vanessa Hevener, Environmental Services Officer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE AND DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITIES OF AZUSA, BRADBURY, DUARTE, MONROVIA, AND SIERRA MADRE AS WELL AS THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE RIO HONDO /SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATER QUALITY GROUP; AND DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT TO THE CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, LOS ANGELES REGION Recommendation: Approve SUMMARY Under the newly adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4 Permit), municipalities are required to notify the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) of the pathway in which it will take to comply with the new stormwater regulations. The Cities of Arcadia, Azusa, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre, along with County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Flood Control District, have agreed to pursue the collaborative development of an Enhanced Watershed Management Program for the Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River. Therefore, a Memorandum of Understanding was developed to aid in cost sharing and in the development of the Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP). Agencies that elect to develop an EWMP must notify the Regional Board no later than six months after the effective date of the MS4 Permit. By collaborating, the Working Group will reduce overall costs and have a more comprehensive response to the MS4 Permit. In addition, the Regional Board provides additional time for implementation of an EWMP versus a city acting on its own. MOU /NOI for Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group June 4, 2013 Page 2 of 5 DISCUSSION The MS4 Permit establishes the waste discharge requirements for stormwater and non - stormwater discharges within the watersheds of Los Angeles County. This MS4 Permit was adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board), on November 8, 2012, and became effective on December 28, 2012. The new MS4 Permit includes provisions that allow permittees the flexibility to customize their stormwater programs to achieve compliance over time. Specifically, permittees may voluntarily choose to implement a Watershed Management Program (WMP) or an Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP). These programs allow municipalities the flexibility to develop Watershed Management Programs on a watershed scale through customized strategies, control measures, and Best Management Practices (BMPs). The EWMP uses integrated planning to comprehensively evaluate opportunities to implement multi- benefit regional projects. Through the EWMP, permittees will not only implement projects to improve water quality, but also have incentives to evaluate and, where feasible, implement regional projects that retain non - stormwater runoff, commonly referred to as nuisance water runoff, and stormwater runoff from the drainage area tributary to those projects. These projects may also achieve other benefits such as flood protection, water supply enhancement, recreational opportunities, and wildlife habitat enhancement. The Peck Road Water Conservation Park is an example of a publicly owned property that can be used to achieve regional compliance with the mandate. The Group also was tasked with developing a scope of services for the development of an Enhanced Watershed Management Program Plan. The City of Arcadia took the lead on sending out the Request for Proposal (RFP). The RFP was sent to 13 qualified consultant firms. The City received three proposals, and the Group conducted interviews with the consultants. Assuming the Cities formally enter into a Memorandum of Understanding, the next step is to bring a recommendation before the City Council in June, and give a notice to proceed to the consultant in July. A draft of the EWMP Plan has to be submitted to the Regional Board by June 2015. In the meantime, the City will need to implement minimum stormwater control measures and continue stormwater review for projects. Memorandum of Understanding On February 14, 2013, the Cities of Arcadia, Azusa, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre, along with the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, agreed to pursue the collaborative development of the Enhanced Watershed Management Program for the Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality MOU/NOI for Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group June 4, 2013 Page 3 of 5 Group. The Oversight Committee which is comprised of City Managers and /or designated staff was formed to guide the development of the scope of work to be conducted and directed staff to develop the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). (See Attachment "A "). The City of Arcadia agreed to act as the contract manager and will be responsible for the administration of contract services and collecting and administering funds under the MOU. The City of Arcadia will be acting in this capacity at no cost to the participating agencies. The MOU specifies the financial commitment for the preparation of the EWMP for each agency based on a cost sharing formula. The Los Angeles County Flood Control District agreed to pay for 10% of the total cost of the contracted services for the preparation of the Plan. The remaining balance will be divided amongst the rest of the agencies based on the agreed cost sharing formula as follows: 10% base for participation plus 90% based on each agency's land area that drains to the Los Angeles River /Gabriel Rivers. The map shows the boundaries of each City and the County of Los Angeles that make up the Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group. (See Attachment "B "). The MOU also includes a consideration of environmental review to be conducted as the plan is being developed. Once the appropriate level of environmental review necessary for the EWMP is determined, the Oversight Committee may direct the City of Arcadia to develop an RFP for environmental review services. The same cost sharing formula that was used for the EWMP Plan may be used to pay for the environmental review services. The term of the MOU is estimated to extend through Fiscal Year 2015 -16 or the time at which the Regional Board provides approval of EWMP. The City of Arcadia will then provide all agencies with a full accounting of the money that was collected and used for those services. Table 1 below shows the cost sharing formula and the cost of each of the participating agencies: Table 1. Cost Allocation Formula Agencies Acres Percent of Area Base Fee (10%) Cost based on Acres (90%) Total Cost City of Arcadia 11 26.51% $10,164.05 $169.727.34 $179,891.39 City of Azusa 9.3 22.41% $10,164.05 $143,496.75 $153,660.80 City of Bradbury 1.9 4.58% $10,164.05 $29,316.54 $39,480.59 City of Duarte 3.6 8.67% $10,164.05 $55,547.13 $65,711.18 City of Monrovia 8 19.28% $10,164.05 $123,438.07 $133,602.11 City of Sierra Madre 2.8 6.75% $10,164.05 $43,203.32 $53,367.37 MOU /NOI for Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group June 4, 2013 Page 4 of 5 Agencies Acres Percent of Base Fee Cost based on Total Cost Area (10%) Acres (90%) County of Los Angeles 4.9 11.81% $10,164.05 $75,605.82 $85,769.86 Los Angeles County - - $79,053.70 - $79,053.70 Flood Control District Total 41.5 100% $150,202.03 $640,334.97 $790,537.00 The City of Arcadia's cost share for the development of the EWMP is approximately $179,891.39. Cost -share payments will be split over three years, beginning in Fiscal Year 2013 -14. The City's first payment is approximately $66,739.83 and the next two payments each will be $56,575.78. However, costs may vary slightly from year to year based on the scheduling of work as directed by the Oversight Committee. Annual costs would be divided among participating agencies based on the MOU's cost share formula. It was recommended that the base fee of $10,164.05 be paid as soon as possible. Annual invoices for the remainder of the costs will be due no later than July 31 of each year, starting with July 2013. Notice of Intent Agencies opting to develop an EWMP are required to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Regional Board by June 28, 2013. The following information and documents must be submitted with the NOI: i. Watershed Management Approach (is the City choosing to develop a WMP or EWMP and which other cities will the City be developing the plan with) ii. Identify all interim and final pollutant limits iii. Verify that Low Impact Development Ordinance and Green Street Policy development has begun iv. Permittees electing for the EWMP option must also provide: a. Plan concept and geographical scope b. Cost estimate for plan development c. Executed Memorandum of Agreement (MOU) among participating Permittees, or final draft MOU among participating Permittees along with a signed letter of intent from each participating City Manager or head of agency d. Interim milestones for plan development and deadlines for their achievement e. Identification of, and commitment to fully implement, one (or a suite of smaller) Infrastructure project(s) at a scale that provides meaningful water quality improvement within each watershed covered by the plan. Project must be completed by June 28, 2015 v. Identify watershed control measures to be implemented during plan development vi. Type of Monitoring Plan to be developed MOU /NOI for Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group June 4, 2013 Page 5 of 5 FISCAL IMPACT Annual costs would be divided among participating agencies based on the MOU's cost share formula. The City of Arcadia's total cost for the preparation of the EWMP Plan is approximately $179,891.39. Cost -share payments will be split over three years with the first installment of approximately $66,739.83 (FY 2013 -14) and subsequent two years $56,575.78 each (FY 2014 -15 and FY 2015 -16). The total cost for the preparation of the Plan has been budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2013 -14 Capital Improvement Program. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize and direct the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the Cities of Azusa, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre as well as the County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Flood Control District regarding the administration and cost sharing for the development of the Enhanced Watershed Management Program for the Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group; and direct Staff to prepare and submit a Notice of Intent to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region. Approved: Dominic Lazzare City Manager Attachment "A" - Memorandum of Understanding between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the County of Los Angeles, the Cities of Arcadia, Azusa, Bradbury, Duarte, Monrovia and Sierra Madre Attachment "B" - Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group Map ATTACHMENT "A" MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, AND THE CITIES OF ARCADIA, AZUSA, BRADBURY, DUARTE, MONROVIA AND SIERRA MADRE REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (EWMP) FOR THE RIO HONDO /SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATER QUALITY GROUP'S WATERSHED This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), made and entered into as of the date of the last signature set forth below by and between the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (LACFCD), a political subdivision of the State of California, the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (LA COUNTY), a political subdivision of the State of California, and the CITIES OF ARCADIA, AZUSA, BRADBURY, DUARTE, MONROVIA, AND SIERRA MADRE. Collectively, these entities shall be known herein as "PARTIES" or individually as "PARTY." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit Order No. R4- 2012 -0175 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4 Permit); and WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012 and requires that the LACFCD, LA COUNTY, and 84 of the 88 cities (excluding Avalon, Long Beach, Palmdale, and Lancaster) within the County of Los Angeles comply with the prescribed elements of the MS4 Permit; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to collaborate on the compliance of certain elements of the MS4 Permit and have agreed to a cost sharing formula set forth in Table 2 of Exhibit A, which is attached and made part of this MOU; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree that each shall assume full and independent responsibility for ensuring its own compliance with the MS4 Permit despite the collaborative approach of this MOU; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES collaboratively prepared a final Scope of Work and Request for Proposal to obtain a Consultant to assist the PARTIES in complying with certain elements of the MS4 Permit, as specified in the Scope of Work, which is incorporated into this MOU by reference; and Page 1 of 13 WHEREAS, the PARTIES propose for the Consultant to prepare and deliver a Final Work Plan, Draft Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) plan, Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Plan (CIMP), Final EWMP plan, and Environmental Review as appropriate to the EWMP and CIMP (collectively, PLANS) in compliance with certain elements of the MS4 Permit, at a total cost of approximately $790,537; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES have determined that hiring a Consultant to prepare and deliver the PLANS will be beneficial to the PARTIES and they desire to participate and will provide funding in accordance with the cost allocation in Table 2 of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to establish an Oversight Committee (comprised of City Managers and /or designated staff from each PARTY) to provide technical oversight and project management for the development of the PLANS, and WHEREAS, the CITY OF ARCADIA will act on behalf of the PARTIES in the administration of the Consultant services agreements for the preparation of the PLANS . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the PARTIES, and of the promises contained in this MOU, the PARTIES agree as follows: (1) Recitals: The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this MOU. (2) Purpose: The purpose of this MOU is to cooperatively fund the preparation of the PLANS and the submittal of the PLANS to the Regional Board. (3) Voluntary: This MOU is voluntarily entered into for the purpose of preparing the PLANS and submitting the PLANS to the Regional Board. (4) Terms: This MOU shall become effective the last date of execution by all Parties hereto ( "Effective Date "), and shall remain in effect until the CITY OF ARCADIA has provided written notice of completion of the Scope of Work described herein, and payment by all Parties of their allocated pro -rata share hereunder. . (5) Responsibilities of the CITY OF ARCADIA: a. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall act as the contract manager on behalf of, and for the benefit of, PARTIES, and as such agrees to invoice the PARTIES for their pro -rata share of the cost for the preparation and delivery of the PLANS as described in Tables 2 and 3 of Exhibit A. 1. Payments to Third Parties — The CITY OF ARCADIA shall have no obligation to pay vendors or consultants any funds other than those owed for its proportional share as set forth in Table 2 of Exhibit A, and those Page 2 of 13 funds remitted to the CITY OF ARCADIA following invoice. In the event the CITY OF ARCADIA elects to make a payment on behalf of a Delinquent Party, the Delinquent Party and /or the remaining Parties shall reimburse the CITY OF ARCADIA the funds expended making the payment as described below. b. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall solicit proposals for, award, and administer a Consultant contract(s) for the preparation and delivery of the PLANS in accordance with the Scope of Work. c. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall utilize the funds deposited by the PARTIES only for payment of the Consultant for the preparation and completion of the PLANS. d. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall provide the PARTIES with an electronic copy of the draft and final PLANS within 5 days of receipt from the Consultant. e. Upon execution of this MOU, each Party shall provide the name or names of those persons from within the Party's organization who is /are to be representing said Party on the Oversight Committee. Within thirty (30) days from the Effective Date, the CITY OF ARCADIA shall notice all parties hereto of the members of the contact information for the Oversight Committee. f. All draft and final Plans shall be reviewed by the Oversight Committee for further revision and /or completion. No PLAN OR PLANS shall be submitted to the Regional Board unless and until it /they have been approved, in writing, for submittal by all PARTIES hereto, excepting only a Party or Parties whose involvement in this MOU has been terminated. g. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall provide an accounting upon the early termination of this MOU pursuant to paragraph (6)t.1 or 60 days after the date the Regional Board gives final approval to the last outstanding portion of the PLANS. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall return the unused portion of all funds deposited with the CITY OF ARCADIA in accordance with the cost allocation formula set forth in Table 2 of Exhibit A. (6) THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE: a. The PARTIES shall make a full faith effort to cooperate with one another to achieve the purposes of this MOU by providing information about project opportunities, reviewing deliverables in a timely manner, and informing their respective administrators, agency heads, and /or governing bodies. b. The PARTIES shall fund the cost of the preparation and delivery of the PLANS and pay the CITY OF ARCADIA for the preparation and delivery of Page 3 of 13 the PLANS based on the cost allocation set forth in Table 2 of Exhibit A within 60 days of receiving an invoice. c. Delinquent Payments — A PARTY's payment is considered delinquent 180 days after being invoiced by the CITY OF ARCADIA. The following procedures may be implemented to attain payments from the delinquent PARTY per instructions from the PARTIES: 1) verbally contact /meet with the manager from the delinquent PARTY or PARTIES; and 2) submit a formal letter to the delinquent PARTY OR PARTIES from the City of Arcadia's legal counsel. If the PARTY or PARTIES remain delinquent after the above procedures, then the CITY OF ARCADIA may notify the Regional Board that the delinquent PARTY OR PARTIES are no longer a participating member of the PLANS, and said PARTY or PARTIES shall then be deemed to have terminated its participation as a PARTY to this MOU ( "EXCLUDED PARTY ") and their name(s) may be removed from the PLANS. Any EXCLUDED PARTY'S delinquent amount(s) will be paid in accordance with the remaining PARTIES pro -rata share pursuant to Table 2 of Exhibit A, as adjusted to remove the EXCLUDED PARTY from the allocation. The CITY OF ARCADIA will revise Table 2 of Exhibit A to show the recalculated costs for each remaining participating PARTY; these revised exhibits will be included with the next invoice to the PARTIES. The PARTIES shall retain all contractual, legal, and equitable rights and causes of action to recover any delinquent amounts paid that were owed by an EXCLUDED PARTY or PARTIES who failed to make such payments. d. Interest Accrual - Any interest accrued on the funds collected per this MOU during the term of this MOU shall be refunded or credited toward any amount owed at the time of the final accounting. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall report to the PARTIES the amount of the interest accrued by the collected funds at the time of the final accounting. e. Excess Funds - Any collected funds not spent in any annual period shall be refunded or credited toward any amount owed at the time of the final accounting. f. Each PARTY shall allow reasonable access and entry to the Consultant, on an as needed basis, during the term of this MOU to the PARTY's storm drains, channels, catch basins, and similar properties (FACILITIES) to achieve the purposes of this MOU, provided, however, that prior to entering any PARTY's facilities, the Consultant shall secure a permit of entry from the applicable PARTY. g. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the CITY OF ARCADIA shall require the Consultant(s) retained pursuant to this MOU to agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each PARTY, its special districts, Page 4 of 13 elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all liability, including but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including attorney and expert fees), arising from or connected with the Consultant's performance of its agreement with the CITY OF ARCADIA. In addition, the CITY OF ARCADIA shall require the Consultant(s) to carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect an insurance policy or policies, and each PARTY, its officers, employees, attorneys, and designated volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) with respect to liabilities arising out of the Consultant's work. These requirements will also apply to any subcontractors hired by the Consultant(s). h. To the maximum extent permitted by law, each PARTY shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other PARTY, including its special districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all liability, including but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including attorney and expert witness fees), arising from or connected with the respective acts of each PARTY under this MOU; provided, however, that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY for that PARTY's own negligence or willful misconduct. In light of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement (as defined in Section 895 of said Code), each of the PARTIES hereto, pursuant to the authorization contained in Section 895.4 and 895.6 of said Code, shall assume the full liability imposed upon it or any of its officers, agents, or employees, by law for injury caused by any act or omission occurring in the performance of this MOU to the same extent that such liability would be imposed in the absence of Section 895.2 of said Code. To achieve the above stated purpose, each PARTY indemnifies, defends, and holds harmless each other PARTY for any liability, cost, or expense that may be imposed upon such other PARTY solely by virtue of said Section 895.2. The provisions of Section 2778 of the California Civil Code are made a part hereof as if incorporated herein. The PARTIES are, and shall at all times remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No PARTY to this MOU shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other PARTY unless expressly provided to the contrary by this MOU. No employee, agent, or officer of a PARTY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee, or officer of another PARTY. k. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports relating to this MOU, and any request, demand, statement, or other communication required or permitted hereunder Page 5 of 13 shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the representatives of the PARTIES at the addresses set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. I. This MOU shall be binding upon, and shall be to the benefit of the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each PARTY; provided, however, no PARTY may assign its respective rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of the other PARTIES. m. This MOU is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. n. If any provision of this MOU shall be determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this MOU shall not be affected, and this MOU shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOU. o. All PARTIES have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this MOU. Accordingly, this MOU shall be construed according to its fair language. Any ambiguities shall be resolved in a collaborative manner by the PARTIES and shall be rectified by amending this MOU as described in paragraph (6)r. p. Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a PARTY represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this MOU on behalf of such PARTY. q. No PARTY shall have any financial obligation to any other PARTY to this MOU, except as herein expressly provided. r. The terms and provisions of this MOU may not be amended, modified, or waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all PARTIES who have not terminated their interests herein or whose involvement has not terminated by reason of non - payment. This paragraph applies to any changes proposed as a result of the following circumstances: 1) changes to the MS4 Permit terms with regards to compliance through an EWMP or CIMP; or (2) changes in the number of parties to this MOU. This list is not intended to be exhaustive. s. This MOU may be signed in multiple counterparts with the same force and effect as if all original signatures appeared on one copy; and in the event this MOU is signed in counterparts, each counterpart shall be deemed an original and all of the counterparts shall be deemed to be one agreement. t. Early Termination or Withdrawal Page 6 of 13 This MOU may be terminated upon the express written agreement of all PARTIES. If this MOU is terminated, any remaining funds not due and payable or otherwise legally committed to a Consultant(s) shall be distributed to the remaining PARTIES (not including any EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN PARTY or PARTIES) so that all such remaining PARTIES have paid no more than their pro -rata share (in accordance with the most current allocation set forth in Table 2 of Exhibit A). Completed work shall be owned by all PARTIES at the time of completion of the work who are not EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN PARTIES. Similarly, rights to uncompleted work by the Consultant still under contract is to be owned by the PARTY or PARTIES who are not EXCLUDED or WITHDRAWN PARTIES at such time. 2. A PARTY may withdraw from this MOU ( "WITHDRAWN PARTY ") upon 60 days written notice to the other PARTIES, subject to payment of any invoice received from the CITY OF ARCADIA prior to or during the 60 -day notice period for its share of the cost of the work completed as of the date of its notice of withdrawal, calculated in accordance with the cost - sharing percentages set forth in Table 2 of Exhibit A. The effective withdrawal date shall be the sixtieth (60th) day after the CITY OF ARCADIA receives the withdrawing PARTY's notice to withdraw from this MOU. The CITY OF ARCADIA shall refund to the WITHDRAWN PARTY any unused funds paid by the WITHDRAWN PARTY's effective withdrawal date. All PARTIES understand, acknowledge, and agree that withdrawal from this MOU will terminate any responsibility, liability, or obligation of the WITHDRAWN PARTY under this MOU commencing on the effective withdrawal date and that the WITHDRAWN PARTY shall remain liable for its share of any loss, debt or liability incurred prior to the withdrawal date, and for any work which could not be suspended. Withdrawal from this MOU does not release any PARTY from the obligations set forth in MS4 Permit. 3. If a PARTY fails to substantially comply with any of the terms or conditions of this MOU, that PARTY shall forfeit its rights to work completed through this MOU, but no such forfeiture shall occur unless and until the defaulting PARTY has first been given notice of its default and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged default. Page 7 of 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of signature of the PARTIES: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, GAIL FARBER Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: John F. Krattli County Counsel Deputy LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT By Chief Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: John F. Krattli County Counsel Deputy Page 8 of 13 Date Date CITY OF NAME, POSITION ATTEST: By NAME, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: NAME, City Attorney Page 9 of 13 Date Date Date EXHIBIT A Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Water Quality Group EWMP Funding Contributions Table 1. Total Contract Costs Work Scope Cost Project Management $111,231 EWMP Work Plan $146,234 CIMP $136,464 Final EWMP $ 394,816 Notice of Intent Review $1,792 Total Contract Cost $ 790,537.00 Table 2. Cost Allocation Formula Party Base Fee (10 %) Acres (Developed Land) Percent of Area (2) Cost based on Acres (90 %) Total Cost City of Arcadia $10,164.05 11 26.51% $169.727.34 $179,891.39 City of Azusa $10,164.05 9.3 22.41% $143,496.75 $153,660.80 City of Bradbury $10,164.05 1.9 4.58% $29,316.54 $39,480.59 City of Duarte $10,164.05 3.6 8.67% $55,547.13 $65,711.18 City of Monrovia $10,164.05 8 19.28% $123,438.07 $133,602.11 City of Sierra Madre $10,164.05 2.8 6.75% $43,203.32 $53,367.37 County of Los Angeles $10,164.05 4.9 11.81% $75,605.82 $85,769.86 Los Angeles County Flood Control District(1) $79,053.70 - - - $79,053.70 Total $150,202.03 41.5 100% $640,334.97 $790,537.00 (1) Los Angeles County Flood Control District's cost share equals 10% of total contracted costs; the remaining costs are then divided by the 10% base fee and land area (90 %). (2) - Based on percent of developed land in each Party area of the total watershed area (excludes Angeles National Forest land) On or before June 30th of each year, the Oversight Committee shall review the Cost Allocation Formula and may adjust the formula as deemed necessary for such reasons including, but not limited to, revision in Contracted Costs, Scope of Work, scheduling of work, and /or costs related to environmental review. Table 3. Invoicing Schedule Invoice # Invoice Date Percent of Cost Share Allocation Page 10 of 13 1 on or before July 2013 10% Base 2 July 2013 1/3 of land Area Allocation 3 July 2014 1/3 of land Area Allocation 4 July 2015 1/3 of land Area Allocation On or before June 30th of each year, the Oversight Committee shall review the Invoicing Schedule may adjust the percent of Cost Share Allocations due each year as deemed necessary for such reasons including, but not limited to, revision in Contracted Costs, Scope of Work, scheduling of work, and /or costs related to environmental review. Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT B Rio Hondo /San Gabriel River Watershed Quality Group EWMP Responsible Agencies Representatives 1. City of Arcadia 240 W. Huntington Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 Representative: Vanessa Hevener E -mail: VHevener @ci.arcadia.ca.us Phone: (626) 305 -5327 2. City of Azusa 213 E. Foothill Blvd. Azusa, CA 91702 -1395 Representative: Carl E. Hassel E -mail: CHassel @ci.azusa.ca.us Phone: (626) 812 -5064 3. City of Bradbury 600 Winston Ave. Bradbury, CA 91008 Representative: Michelle Keith E -mail: MKeith @CityofBradbury.org Phone: (626)358 -3218 ext. 300 4. City of Duarte 1600 Huntington Drive Duarte, CA 91010 Party Representative: Rafael Casillas E -mail: RCasillas @accessduarte.com Phone: (626)386 -6833 5. City of Monrovia 415 S. Ivy Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 Representative: Heather Maloney E -mail: HMaloney @ci.monrovia.ca.us Phone: (626) 932 -5577 6. City of Sierra Madre 232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd Sierra Madre, CA 91024 Representative: James Carlson E -mail: JCarlson @cityofsierramadre.com Page 12 of 13 Phone: (626) 355 -7135 ext. 803 7. County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Watershed Management Division, 11 to Floor 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 -1331 Representative: Gary Hildebrand E -mail: GHILDEB @dpw.lacounty.gov Phone: (626) 458 -4300 8. Los Angeles County Flood Control District Department of Public Works Watershed Management Division, 11 to Floor 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 -1331 Representative: Gary Hildebrand E -mail: GHILDEB @dpw.lacounty.gov Phone: (626) 458 -4300 Page 13 of 13 ATTACHMENT B ONDO SAN ABRIEL RIVE W TE C A ITY GROUP ANGELES NATIO L FOREST CO SIERRA MADRE Co BRA URY MONROVIA DUARTE ARCADIA co AZUSA CO CO co Co Co ECK ROAD LAKE LEGEND RIO HONDO WATERSHED BOUNDARY I� ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY