HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 8, 1991A G E N D A
ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 8, 1991
7:30 P.M.
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ACTION
ROLL CALL: Council Members Ciraulo, Fasching, Harbicht,
Young and Gilb Young Excused Absence
MINUTES of the adjourned and regular meetings of
September 17, 1991 Approved
MOTIO14: Read all ordinances and resolutions by title
only and.waive reading in full. Adopted
1. PUBLIC HEARING
Consideration of Zone Change Z -91 -009, from
R -1 7,500 to R -1 12,500 for certain properties. Public Hearing Closed;
in southwest Arcadia. Approved
2. PUBLIC HEARING
Recommendation to approve and introduce an ordinance
to grant a franchise to Southern California Water
Company.
ORDINANCE NO. 1955 - For Introduction - Granting
to Southern California Water Company, its
successors and assigns, a franchise to lay and
use, for transmitting and distributing water
for any and all purposes, pipelines and other
facilities, in, along, across, upon and under Public Hearing Closed;
the public streets, ways,.alleys and places Introduced
within the City of Arcadia.
AGENDA '10/8/91
3. PUBLIC HEARING
Consideration of the adoption of a resolution
declaring;a public nuisance and order to abate for
property located at 2819 Bradford (Andrew Lowell
and Yolanda Hernandez, property owners).
RESOLUTION NO. 5623, declaring a public
nuisance and ordering the rehabilitation of
real property located at 2819 Bradford
Avenue, Arcadia, California, and placing a
lien against the property, if abatement
at City expense is required.
4. Time reserved for those in the audience who wish
to address the City Council (five- minute time
limit per person).
5. RECESS-CITY COUNCIL
6.
MEETING OF THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
a. .ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ciraulo, Fasching,
Harbicht, Young and Gilb
b. MINUTES of the meeting of September 17, 1991
ACTION
Public Hearing Closed
Adopted
Lail Collins
Mrs. Robert Bozan
Warren Shaw
Michael Walbrecht
Young Excused Absence
-.
C. Request of Louise Hawkins to lease 146 -170
E. Huntington Drive for the sale of Christmas
trees. Approved
d. Proposed relocation and replacement for
Southern California Edison wooden poles with
two steel poles - Northwest and Southwest Corner
Redevelopment Projects. Denied
e. Agency consideration of Arcon /Schaefer Brother's
site plan concept and project phasing (South-
west Corner Project).
f. Consideration of Civiltec invoices pursuant to
the August 7, 1990 Exclusive Right to Negotiate
with Arcon /Schaefer Brothers.
g. ADJOURN to 6:00 p.m., October 22, 1991
7. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL
-2-
Approved site plan
concept
Approved staff rec-
ommendation
AGENDA 10/8/91
0 •
CONSENT ITEMS
ACTION
a. Underground Utilities District No. 13 - Second
Avenue from Huntington Drive to La Porte. Street Continued to 10/22/91
(PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED),
b.
Consideration of.Text Amendment 91 -005, adding
s
(PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED).
Public Hearing 11/5/9"
8.
0 •
CONSENT ITEMS
ACTION
a. Underground Utilities District No. 13 - Second
Avenue from Huntington Drive to La Porte. Street Continued to 10/22/91
(PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED),
b.
Consideration of.Text Amendment 91 -005, adding
tree preservation to the Arcadia Municipal Code
(PUBLIC HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED).
Public Hearing 11/5/9"
C.
Recommendation for approval of plans and speci-
fications and authorization to call for bids for
installation of new concrete benches and trash
receptacles at various locations - Job No. 661.
Approved
d.
Recommendation for final acceptance of the
1991 -92 Annual Street Maintenance Program -
Slurry Seal - Job No. 664.
Approved
e.
Report on the status of the proposed traffic
Approved; Lopez report
signal at First Avenue and Santa Clara Street -
on feasibility of
Job No. 670.
stop signs
f. Consideration of Final Map 47199, for an 8 -unit
condominium project at 114 -120 California (Hsu
& Associates, owner /developer of the site). Approved'
g. Recommendation regarding Hazard Communication
Training. Approved
h. Report and recommendation for the purchase of on
tractor - loader backhoe for the Water Division. Approved
i. Report and recommendation for the purchase of one
'dump truck with over - the -cab loader for the
Public Works Department. Approved
j.
k.
1.
M.
Request for temporary Christmas tree storage
tents.
Recommendation for award of Banking Services
contract.
Approved
Approved
Request to approve financial consultant for pro-
posed mall expansion. Approved
Request to approve Joint Indemnity Agreement
with the County of Los Angeles.
Approved
-3- AGENDA 10/8/91
a
8.
M
10
CONSENT ITEMS (continued)
n. Ratification of settlement of claim - L.
Altameyer
o. Ratification of settlement of litigation -
Orona vs. Arcadia
p. Request for funding of rail transit study.
CITY MANAGER
a Recommendation to amend Arcadia Dial -A -Ride
Agreement.
b. Recommendation for Community Center Usage
Policy.
CITY ATTORNEY
ACTION
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
a. ORDINANCE NO. 1951 - For Adoption - Amending
-Division.6 of Chapter 5, Article VI of the
Arcadia Municipal Code by adding a Section
6616.11 concerning regulations for motion pic-
ture filming - timing of notice to neighborhood. Continued to 10/22/91
b. ORDINANCE.NO. 1952 - For Introduction - Approving
Zone Change Z -91 -006, changing the existing
zoning of R -0 12,500 to R -0 15,000 for certain
properties located in the southwest portion of
the City of Arcadia. Introduced
C. ORDINANCE NO. 1953 - For Introduction - Approving
Zone Change Z- 91- 007,,changing the existing
.zoning of CPD -1 DH to CPD -1 DH7, CPD -1 DHS and
CPD -1 DH4 for properties located at 211 E.
Huntington Drive, 311 E. Huntington.Drive and
420 -440 E. Huntington Drive. Introduced
d. ORDINANCE NO. 1954 - For Introduction - Approving
Zone Change Z -91 -008, changing the existing
zoning of C -2 DH to C -2 DH8 for the property
at 400 S. Baldwin Avenue and from C -0 H to C -0 H6
for the property at 301 W. Huntington. Drive. Introduced'
e. RESOLUTION NO'. 5619, expressing concern regarding
the.City of Sierra - Madre's opposition to the
improvement.of Orange Grove Avenue and offering
to the City of Sierra Madre the realignment of the
City boundary to the south side of Orange Grove. No Action
-4- AGENDA 10/8/91
10. CITY ATTORNEY (continued)
11.
12.
13.
f. RESOLUTION NO. 5620, approving a map and
declaring the City's intention to vacate a por-
tion of Second Avenue; directing the Clerk of
the Council to file said map in her office
showing said portion; reserving easements and
rights -of -way to be excepted; setting a Public
Hearing thereon for November 5, 1991; and
directing notice hereof to be posted and pub-
lished.
ACTION
Continued to 10/22/91
g. RESOLUTION NO. 5621, approving the application
for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Funds
authorized under SB 821. Adopted
h. RESOLUTION NO. 5622, repealing Resolution No.
5586 and amending Resolution No. 5608
regarding leave policy for Management employees
and overtime for Fire Battalion Chiefs. Adopted
i. Claim of T.A. Wheeler
j. Claim of B.A. Campbell
MATTERS FROM STAFF
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
ADJOURN to 6:00 p.m., October 22, 1991
Denied
Denied
Watts - Arrange presentation by Hahn /Santa Anita
Lopez - Report regarding audible intersection signal for
10/22 meeting
Dale - Make We Tip payment as budgeted
-5- AGENDA 10/8/91
M
October 8, 1991
TO: ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM WOOLARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT 91 -005
The Planning Commission at its September 24, 1991, meeting voted 5 to 0 to
recommend approval of Text Amendment 91 -005, adding tree preservation
regulations to the Arcadia Municipal Code.
The Planning Department is recommending that the public hearing on this text
amendment be scheduled for the Council's November 5, 1991 meeting.
LASER IMAGED
v
('
44 op,
rnentotanarunt
��°RP AAT5 10/8/91
Date
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM [v./ PETER P. KINNAHAN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO APPROVE FINANCIAL CONSULTANT FOR PROPOSED
MALL EXPANSION -PROJECT
Anita .Associates, a partnership composed of Santa Anita Realty
Enterprise, Inc. and The Hahn Company, owns the Santa Anita Fashion
Park Mall. The Mall owners have proposed a 430, 000 sq. ft.
expansion to the existing Mall.. The proposed $75 million expansion
includes a Nordstrom, May Company, 50-60 new Mall shops, and
additional .parking, some of it subterranean.
Anita Associates has stated that they will need substantial
financial assistance from the City to complete their proposed Mall
Expansion. The Mall is currently preparing certain market reports,
financial analyses, project proformas of costs and revenues,
traffic studies, and other related information explaining the
costs, impacts, and financing for the proposed project, and setting
forth the rationale and mechanism for City financial assistance.
This is a very complicated development. The City Council and staff
will need to analyze and evaluate numerous project assumptions
which include estimates of construction costs (e.g. building,
parking structure, utility infrastructure) , payments to numerous
consultants to the Mall (i.e. , architect, engineer, financial,
legal) as well as estimates of lost revenues due to canceled
leases, lease buy-outs, redemised retail space. Further, we will
need to analyze future operating statements for the Mall,
projections of sales tax, property tax, utility users tax revenues,
market projections and assumptions, bonding mechanisms and; debt
service schedules, capitalized operating losses, projected interest
rates and projected rates of return on investment to the Mall,
analysis of risk to the City and alternate financing possibilities.
All of these need to be integrated with cash flow considerations
and the time value of money over the 2-3 ..year planning, approval,
and construction process.
Neither the Economic Development Department nor the Finance
Department staff have experience with a regional shopping center
expansion of this size, complexity or long term significance to the
financial health of the City. Staff therefore recommends use of an
experienced shopping center financial consultant to assist the City
in its analysis.
LASER IMAGED
gUz,
1
!f
� L City Council
October 8, 1991
Page 2
Staff has prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) for financial
analysis of the Mall's request (see Attachment 1) . The RFP was
sent to three experienced and well qualified firms - Keyser Marston
and Associates (KMA) , McClelland Coren (MC) , and Kotin, Regan,
Mouchly (KRM) . Two proposals were received.
Analysis of Proposals
1) Kotin Regan Mouchly/McClelland Coren (Their Proposal was
previously forwarded to the Council by separate cover. )
These firms have submitted a joint proposal which breaks the
Agency's desired four objectives or steps into six detailed steps.
Their proposal includes a cost-revenue analysis of the cost impact
of the Mall's expansion on the City's annual operating budget in
addition to the requested proforma analysis and discussion of
alternative financing mechanisms. KRM's experience includes the
Hollywood Promenade Center, Santa Clarita Valencia Towne Center,
Oxnard Towne Center, Indio Fashion Mall, Los Angeles Broadway
Crenshaw Center, Monterey Park Atlantic Square Center, as well as
other projects in Vista, Rancho Mirage, and Cerritos.
Their references were pleased with KRM's services and would use
them in the future.
McClelland Coren (MC) has had experience in financing various bond
issues or tax increment studies in Fontana, Santa Ana, Palmdale,
and L.A. County. Their references were generally favorable of MC
and of Marty Coren, the principal who would be assigned to the
Arcadia contract.
KRM/MC's estimated cost to prepare the final report is $35,150.
However, they point out from their experience that the developer's
submittals often require explanation, clarification and
modification. They believe there could quite possibly be
additional fees in the area of $8, 000 - $10, 000, for a total of
$43 , 150 - $45, 150. This is about a 30% increase.
KRM/MC can perform all the work requested in the RFP under the
tight time schedule the Mall has requested.
2) Keyser Marston Associates, Inca (Their proposal ` was
previously provided to the Council by separate cover. )
Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) will analyze the proformas
requested, but will not be looking specifically at the impact of
the Mall's expansion on the City's annual operating budget. Staff
believes that we can assess these impacts on our own.
LASER IMAGED 1C)
4 ,
City Council
October 8, 1991
Page 3
KMA's experience includes the Long Beach Los Altos Center, Glendale
Galleria Expansions (2) , Burbank's Media Center, Oxnard River Edge
Shopping Center, Pomona (Forest City Development) Center, San Diego
Horton Plaza, Santa Barbara Paseo Nuevo, Montebello Town Center,
Redondo Beach South Bay Galleria, Palmdale Mall, and West Covina
Fashion Center.
KMA's references strongly recommended both the firm and Cal Hollis,
the principal assigned to the Arcadia contract.
KMA's estimated cost to prepare the final report is $22, 000. They
also point out that this fee is contingent upon the accuracy,
completeness, and timeliness of the developer's documents. For
this reason, and to be consistent with the KRM/MC proposal, staff
is adding approximately 30% (i.e. , $6, 600) to their estimate, for
a total of $28, 600.
KMA can perform all of the work requested in the RFP under the
tight time schedule the Mall has requested.
Post Report Assistance
Please note that these cost estimates from both consultants do not
include post-report revisions or alternate scenarios in which the
proforma's numerous assumptions and variables are changed, not does
it include assistance with negotiations. Both developers have
included their hourly billing rate for their continued services in
the event the City elects to use them for such.
Hourly Rates
KRM MC KMA
Senior Principal $135
Principal $160 $120 $140
Associate (A) $90
Analyst $80
KRM/MC
Plus charges for computer usage etc. per Schedule and out of pocket
expenses at 115%.
KMA
Plus charges for data processing and out of pocket expenses at
110%.
10l
LASER IMAGED
4
City Council
October 8, 1991
Page 4
Recommendation
Both of the firms and the principals they have assigned are
qualified and experienced. Both are capable of completing this
contract under a tight time schedule.
Staff however recommends the selection of Keyser Marston Associates
for the following reasons:
- From the materials submitted and the check of references Keyser
Marston appears to have more experience with established suburban
malls undergoing rehab and/or expansion.
- KMA is less expensive. (KRM/MC, because it is a joint venture,
requires the involvement of the principals of the 2 companies at
several key points, thus increasing their costs. )
If after the reports are completed and the Council directs staff to
negotiate with the Mall, use of the consultant will be necessary
for purposes of analyzing the changing assumptions, revenues,
costs, and other items in the overall proforma and financing plan.
However, at this time staff is not requesting such authorization.
Staff recommends approval of Keyser Marston Associates for
financial consulting services in connection with the proposed Mall
expansion and the Mall's request for financial assistance at a cost
of $22 , 000 with a contingency of $6, 600 (30%) , for a total of
$28, 600) .
Appr ved'
Attachment
LASER IMAGED 11j3
t� ROBERT C. HARBICHT
��
MAYOR PROTENIPORE
: 7j��XA 240 West Huntington Drive JOSEPH C. CIRALZO
ARCADIA P.O. Box 60 GEORGE FASCHLIG
Arcadia,California 91066-0060
ft\ /o� (818)574-5400 MARY B. YOUNG
ORPORATsv"� COL CIL�IE�fBERS
GEORGE J. WATTS CHARLES E. GILB JUNE D. ALFORD
CITY MANAGER MAYOR CITY CLERK
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL 8/21/91
FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES
The City of Arcadia has received a proposal from the Hahn Company,
managers, and Santa Anita Realty Enterprise, Inc. , owners with Hahn
of the Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall, to expand the Mall by
approximately 432 , 000 sq. ft. . The existing Mall located on the
northeast corner of West Huntington and North Baldwin has
approximately 984, 000 sq. ft. of space with 4 majors. The Mall is
"I" shaped on a North/South axis with Penney's on the north,
Broadway on the South, Robinson' s on the east, and a former Buffums
on the west.
The owners propose to demolish the former Buffum' s department store
on the west side of the Mall, construct a major addition on the
west adding a 142 , 000 sq. ft. Nordstrom' s on the Southwest, a
125, 000 sq. ft. Robinson' s on the Northwest, 125, 000 sq. ft. (1
story) of additional retail shops between these two majors, and to
add 40, 000 sq. ft. to the existing Robinson's store on the east
(this will then become a May Co. ) A subterranean parking lot will
be constructed under the retail and existing western parking areas.
Further, .on the east of the site adjacent to and easterly of the
existing parking areas, the Mall intends to add a surface parking
area for 1, 440 cars. (The proposed concept site plan will be made
available to the successful financial consultant. )
The Mall plans to open the Nordstrom's, Robinson's, May Co, and new
retail in September, 1994, or earlier if possible.
The Mall is not located within the Central Downtown Redevelopment
Project Area, although it is in the original survey area. j
Santa Anita Realty and Hahn Company have stated that they may be
unable to finance this proposed expansion solely out of their own
resources and that, not only is City approval of proposedzone
changes, zone exceptions, street improvements, and utility
improvements needed, but also significant public financial
assistance may be necessary.
LASER IMAGED- 109
ATTACIHMENT 1
- 2 -
The specific task of this proposed contract is four-fold:
a) Analyze the proposed development site plan and pro forma
project cost, income and revenue projections to verify the
accuracy and reasonableness of the developer's projections,
assumptions, numbers, calculations, conclusions, etc. ;
b) Analyze whether third-party e.g. , City, Redevelopment Agency
or other public entity financial assistance is needed to carry
out the proposed project, and if so, to what extent;
c) Analyze alternate financing mechanisms which reduce or
eliminate the City' s or Agency's public financial
contribution, and/or their risk, and/or increase overall
revenue return to the City/Agency;
d) Recommend clearr alternative courses of action for the City
and/or Agency with the advantages and disadvantages of each
detailed.
The City and Agency will provide access to its records and data to
the successful consultant. Some of the information provided by the
City will be of a confidential nature (i.e. , sales tax data on
individual stores, etc. ) and may not be publicly revealed except in
the aggregate. Certain information (e.g. , project pro forma,
income and revenue projections, anticipated sales taxes, Mall
payments to majors, or lease terms etc. ) will be provided by the
Mall. This is also confidential and may not be disclosed without
prior written permission of the Mall and the City.
The City anticipates at least 3 two hour meetings between the
consultant and representatives of the Mall, at least 4 two hour
meetings between the consultant and City staff, and at least 2 two
hour public meetings between the consultant and the City Council.
The contract schedule is set forth below:
1. Proposals due to the City - by August 27, 1991 - noon
2 . Review of proposals, selection of consultant (Note - prior to
selection the proposer may be asked to present its proposal
and management team preliminarily to City officials) - Within
15 days of Step 1
3 . Execution of Contract; Contractor does analysis, presents 5
copies of draft report to City - Within 30 days of Step 2
(Note - this is dependent upon timely and complete information
provided by the Mall. )
110
LASER IMAGED
1
- 3 -
4 . City reviews draft report and forwards comments to consultant
- Within 30 days of Step 3
5 . Consultant provides 20 copies of final report to City;
presents report to City Council - Within 15 days of Step 4
Proposal Process
Prepare and submit a letter and report to the City by the due date
August 27 signed by a principal of the company setting forth how
you will comply with the RFP. (We recognize the developer will
have to make certain assumptions about material to be provided by
the Mall to the Consultant. )
-Attach a reference list of 5 people/organizations, with a contact
name and phone number, with a brief description of the work you
have done for them. Provide the names and resumes of the project
manager and project team you will assign to this contract.
Provide a written statement of the lump-sum cost and cost by task
for your services to do this work and attach a copy of your hourly
billing rates by title, and your service fees, if any (e.g. , fax,
overnight mail, photocopy, phone, mileage, etc. ) .
The City will evaluate proposals based upon satisfaction of the
proposal requirements; reputation, experience and competence of the
company and of the personnel to be assigned to this contract;
reference check; and cost.
If you have any questions, please contact Peter Kinnahan, Assistant
City Manager for Economic Development. We appreciate your interest
and look forward to your proposal .
LASER IMAGED f l
pS�ZO - S U
g-/y /J raG(rrr1
_4
October 8, 1991
TO: ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DONNA L. BUTLER, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: NUISANCE ABATEMENT AND ORDER FOR REHABILITATION,
2819 BRADFORD AVENUE
This hearing has been scheduled pursuant to Section 9407 of the Arcadia Municipal
Code to allow the City Council to determine whether a public nuisance exists and
what action is necessary to abate the nuisance on property located at 2819 Bradford
Avenue.
As per the above Section a "Notice of Public Nuisance and Order to Abate" was
mailed on September 20, 1991 to Andrew Lowell and Yolanda Hernandez,
responsible persons, for the property located at 2819 Bradford Avenue. A notice was
also posted on the property on the same day.
The following violations have been cited on the property:
1. Excessive, tall, dry weeds and dead vegetation the premises which are
considered to be a health, safety and welfare hazard.
2. There is a lack of adequate lawn, ground cover and irrigation. Landscaping is
required to be in conformity with adjacent residential properties.
3. Lack of required pool fencing which constitutes a safety and welfare hazard.
The purpose of the property maintenance ordinance is to ensure maintenance of
property within the City so that the public health, safety and welfare are not
endangered by substandard properties and the blighting effect such properties have
on the entire community.
The Council further determined that "the keeping or maintaining of properties at
variance with the level of maintenance of surrounding properties will result in
substantial diminution in the enjoyment, use, aesthetic and property values of the
surrounding properties. It is desirous to enhance and promote the maintenance of
property and the enhancement of the liveability, community appearance and the
social economic conditions of the community."
2819 Bradford Avenue
October 8, 1991
Page 1
v
LASER IMAGED
The Property Maintenance Ordinance states:
"The provisions prescribed...will enhance the appearance and value of such
properties rather than be a burden on the owners thereof."
"That unless corrective measures of the type set forth in this chapter are
undertaken to alleviate such existing conditions, the public health, safety and
general welfare, and the property values and social and economic standards of
this community will be substantially depreciated; that the abatement of the
conditions will enhance the environment of the residents of the City."
HISTORY
On August 28, 1991, we received a complaint regarding the excessive weeds and
condition of the pool at 2819 Bradford Avenue. The subject property is vacant and
has not been properly maintained. There are excessive weeds and at the time of
inspection, the pool was green from lack of maintenance.
On August 30, 1991, Don Stockham, the City's Code Enforcement Officer, sent a
letter to Andrew P. Lowell and Yolanda Hernandez whose address is in Sierra
Madre, advising them of the condition of the property (see attached). They were
given until September 6 to bring the property into compliance.
Mr. Stockham reinspected the premises on September 6 and noted there was no
change in the condition of the property. Also, there was no contact from the
property owners. On September 6, the Fire Department, at the request of Mr.
Stockham, drained the pool to eliminate the hazard of an unsafe pool.
On September 20, the City sent a Notice of Public Nuisance and Order to Abate to
Mr. Lowell and Ms. Hernandez. There has been no contact from the property
owners at this time and the condition of the property has not changed.
Attached for the City Council's review is the Notice of Public Nuisance and Order to
Abate.
ACTION
The City Council should open the hearing to receive public input. Based upon
information submitted and the public input the Council may:
1. Determine that the property is not a public nuisance and take no further
action; or
2819 Bradford Avenue
October 8, 1991
Page 2
LASER IMAGED' u,,
2. Determine that a public nuisance exists and adopt Resolution 5623 declaring a
public nuisance and ordering the rehabilitation of real property located at 2819
Bradford Avenue (Andrew P. Lowell and Yolanda Hernandez, responsible
parties), authorizing corrective work by the City and placement of a lien
against the property if the violations are not corrected (abated) by the
responsible parties within thirty (30) days of Council's action.
2819 Bradford Avenue
October 8, 1991
Page 3
LASER IMAGED `�`�
0 SO U 0
October 8, 1991
TO: GEORGE J. WATTS FROM: JOSEPH R. LOPEZ
CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC W RK
/
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO CLAIM SB 821 FUNDS FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
FACILITIES
RESOLUTION NO. 5621
The City's 1991-92 allocation for SB 821 funds is $14,995. In order to claim
these funds it is necessary that the City Council designate a project that is a
bicycle or pedestrian facility.
It is proposed that the City's 1991-92 allocation be used to construct side alk
and ramps for the handicapped. Sidewalk and ramp will be constructed at the
southwest corner of Huntington Drive and Santa Clara Street which will faci l i pate
pedestrian movement and eliminate an ongoing weed abatement problem adjacent to
the 100 to 1 Club. Additional ramps for the handicapped will be constructed in,
response to pedestrian requests and at intersections with insufficient num ers
of ramps.
Available SB 821 funds from the two previous fiscal years (89-90 and 90-91) ave
been used to supplement City expenditures for the construction of sidewalk and
ramps for the handicapped at the Arcadia Community Center.
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 5621 approving the
application for bicycle and pedestrian facilities funds authorized under SB 821
and authorizing the Director of Public Works to sign and process the claim form.
////
APPROVED: �l C /// ^/
GEORGE WATTS
CITY MANAGER
JRL:DAS:mlo
Attachment
LASER IMAGED 74_.