HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 15, 1992~: ~~'=~ `
; . . ~k t_.
~k LL .~ ~
, .~~ ~~ ~ ~=
, ~
,. .
• Pre-meetinq -~6:30 p.m. .
~ Presentation regarding purchase of public safaty oomputer system
Update on Orange Grove Project
. . . At~E NDA ,
ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL MEETINCi.
DECBMSER 15, 1992
' 7:30 P.M. , _ ` _
,. ACTION
INVOCATION ~ _
PLEDCi8 OF: ALLEIiIANCB
ROLL,CALLs Council Members Ci;aulo; Harbicht, Lojeski,A~T present
Margett.and Fasching '
. MINIITEB bf the Regular Meeting of November 17, 1992,
the Work'Session of November 24, 1992, and the Approved-
Adjourned and Regular Meetings of December 1, 1992
MOTIONs- Read all ordinances and resolutions by title Adopted. ~
only and waive reading in full.
1. SOARDB AND COMAtISSIONB . ' .
-` ._.:
Request from Sister 'City Commission for short-terta A roved 5_ 0
City loan to cover Koala Band visit expensea, Pp
2. Time reserved for those in the audience who
,wish to address the City Council.(five-minute ~
time limit per person).
3. R8CE88 CITY COONCIL
, .y -~ -~--
A(~ENDA 12/15/92`., ,
. : .., , . . ~ . ~ ~ . . . , f.. . ;
" ~ ~
~ ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ ~. . ~. . .,/
„
~ ~_
4E
4. MEBTIN3 OF T88 ARCADIA RED&VELOPMENT A(iENCY
a. ROLL CALL: Agency Members Ciraulo, AaTbicht, A~~ present
Lojeski, Margett and Fasching
b. APPROVAL of the minutes of December 1, 1992 qpnrovPd 5-0
c. ADJOURN to 7:00 p.m., January 5, 1993
5.
CITY COONCIL
6.
CONSENT ITEMB
a. Conaideration of MC 92-062, an appeal of the
Planninq Commission's denial of a request for
a heiqht of 5'-8" in lieu of 5'-0" (as approved
by MC 91-005) for axistinq decorative metal
gates at the driveway and pedestrian walkway
(William C. Dale, M.D., property owner - PUBLIC
HEARING TO BE SCHEDULED). Public Hearing 1/5
b. Consideration of the adoption of the required
mitigation monitoring program for the proposed
expansion of the Santa Anita Fashion Park
Regional Shoppinq Center Mall at 400 S.
Baldwin Avenue. Ap proved 5-0
c. Report and recommendation to reject bid for ~
one folder/inserter machina for the purposa
oP Polding and inserting water bills. Ap proved 5-0
d. Recommendation to approve~department head
corporata planning session and appropriation
from General Fund, not.to exceed $6,000. Ap proved 4-1
e. Recommendation to approve Arcadia Police Relief
Association's Letter of Agreement. Ap proved 5-0
P. ~
Racommendation to approve specificationa for the
boatinq of six (6) steal water tanks, and
installation of stiffener.beams on two (2)
upper canyon tanks, and authorization to soli-
cit bids. Ap Qroved 5-0
'2' A(iFNDA 12/15/92
j . . ,~ •. ~ . .
ACTION
6. CONBENT ITEMB (ooatinue8)
g. Recommendation for approval of plans and
" specifications and authorization to call for
bids - reconstruction oP deficient concrate
sidawalk and construction of ramps Por the
handicapped at various locations - Job No. APProved sidewalks
535. only 5-0
h. Consideration of an Architect's Agraement with
Charlas Walton Associates AIA, inc., for
architectural services for additions and
alterations to the Arcadia~Library. Approved 5-0_
i. Raqueat for tamporary straet closure. Approved 5-0
7. CITY ATTORNEY
a. ORDINANCE N0. 1981 - For Adoption - Approving
Zone Change 2-92-002, rezoning an 8.2 acre
portion of Santa Anita Race Track Parcel No.
949 at 385 W. Huntington Drive from R-1
(single-family) and S-1 (special use) to
C-2D (general commercial with a design over-
lay). Adooted 5-0
b. ORDINANCE NO. 1982 - For Adoption - Approvinq
Text Amendlaent 92-005 amending Sections 1.2 of
City Council Ordinance No. 1429 and the exhibit
to Resolution No. 4185, to revise the current
boundaries where mall buildings are permitted qdopted 5-0
to be located at 400 S. Baldwin Avenue.
8. MATT8R8 BRO![ STA88 .
9. ?lATTERB HROM SLBCTED OBBICIALB
10. ADJOORN to 7:00 p.m., January 5, 1993
Public Hearing 1/19/93 - Transportation Demand Management
Ordinance .
Rowe - Letter from Mayor to Senior Citizens' Commission
reaffirming general policy for Community Center
-3- AGENDA 12/15/92
December 15 199
TO: ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CORKRAN W. NICHOLSON, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE REQUIRED MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM FOR THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SANTA
ANITA FASHION PARK REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER MALL AT
400 SOUTH BALDWIN AVENUE.
The City Council at its November 17, 1992 meeting, approved Zone Change 92-002
and Text Amendment 92-005 for the proposed expansion of the Santa Anita Fashion
Park Mall at 400 South Baldwin Avenue. The aforementioned zone change and text
amendment are summarized as follows:
Zone Change 92-002 to rezone an 8.2 acre portion of Santa Anita Race Track Parcel
No. 949 from R-1 (Single-family Residential Zone) and S-1 (Special Use) to C-2D
• (General Commercial Zone with a Design Overlay). The rezoning would'allow the
use of a portion of the existing race track parking lot for expanded mall parking; and
Text Amendment 92-005 to City Council Ordinance No. 1425 and Resolution No.
4185, to revise the boundary of Parcel 2 ("Boundary of Building Envelope '& Special
Height Zone"), to allow for the development of a new Nordstrom department store.
Ordinances for the above mentioned applications were introduced to the Council on
December 1, 1992, and will be before the Council, on December 15, 1992, for adoption.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial
Study for the proposed expansion of the mall was prepared by the City o'f Arcadia
with assistance from the City's environmental consultant, The Planning. Center.
Based on the information and environmental analysis contained in this Initial
Study, the Planning Department found that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment because the mitigation measures derived from the Initial
Study have been agreed to by the applicant. These mitigation measures reduce the
project's impacts to levels which are less than significant. Therefore, a !Negative
Declaration was prepared and Iadopted for this project.
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation
monitoring or reporting programs for all projects for which an environmental
impact report or "mitigated" Negative Declaration has been prepared. This new law
City Council Report
Mitigation Monitoring Program
December 15, 1992
Page 1
is intended to ensure the implementation of all mitigation measures 'adopted
through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. Since a
"mitigated" Negative Declaration was adopted for this project, a Mitigation
Monitoring Program has been prepared for the City of Arcadia by the City's
environmental consultant, The Planning Center. This monitoring program (copy
attached) is required to be in place through all phases of the project's construction;
and the City of Arcadia will have the primary enforcement role to implement all of
the mitigation measures as contained in the adopted Negative Declaration for the
expansion and renovation of the mall.
At the time of adopting the Negative Declaration the Council approved the'required
monitoring program; however, the attached specifics of that program should be
affirmed at the December 15th Council meeting.
FINDINGS AND MOTION
The City Council should move to approve the attached specific "Mitigation
Monitoring Program" for the already approved Monitoring Plan regarding the
proposed Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall expansion, as per the requirement of Public
Resources Code Section 21081.6, and direct staff to enforce this program to ensure
the implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.
City Council Report
Mitigation Monitoring Program
December 15, 1992
Page 2
THE SANTA ANITA FASHION PARK MALL
EXPANSION
Mitigated Negative Declaration
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
December 1, 1992
i
1
Prepared for:
The City of Arcadia
Prepared by:
The Planning Center
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring program
Table of Contents
Chapter/Section Page
Chapter One
MONITORING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
AND PURPOSE
1.1 Legislative Mandate 1
1.2 Project Description 2
Chapter Two
ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROCEDURES 4
2.1 Roles and Responsibilities j 4
2.2 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures 4
2.3. Program Operations i 5
Chapter Three
MEASURES TO BE MONITORED 6
3.1 Earth
6
i
3.2 Air 6
3.3 Water .
9
3.4 Plant Life 9
3.5 Animal Life
9
3.6 Noise 9
3.7 Light and Glare 9
3.8 Land Use 9
THE PLANNING CENTER Page i September 29, 1992
THE SANTA A VITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Table of Contents
(Continued)
Chapter/Section ! Page
3.9 Natural Resources
10
3.10 Risk of Upset
10
3.11 Population 10
3.12 Housing 10
3.13 Transportation/Circulation 10
3.14 Public Services 12
3.15 Energy 13
3.16 Utilities
13
3.17 Human Health 13
3.18 Aesthetics 13
3.19 Recreation 13
3.20 Cultural Resources 13
•
Chapter Four
MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX 15
4.1 Matrix 16
THE PLANNING CENTER Page ii September 29, 1992
Chapter One
MONITORING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
AND PURPOSE
1.1 Legislative Mandate
Assembly Bill 31801, require public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting
programs for all projects for which an environmental impact report or "mitigated" negative
declaration has been prepared. This new law is intended to ensure the implementation of all
mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.
The following is the full text of the legislation:
Section 1. Section 21081.6 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read: 21081.6. When
making findings required by subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a negative
declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21081, the public agency
shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has
adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant
effects on the environment. The reporting of monitoring program shall be designed to
ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been
required or incorporated into the project at the request of an agency having jurisdiction by
law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the •
lead or responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program.
Section 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB
of the California Constitution because of the local agency or school district has the authority
to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of
service mandated by this act.
This legislation does not convey any new powers to public agencies. The conditions and changes
imposed on projects through CEQA have always been enforced :rirough the previously existing
police powers of the agency. This is the same with the implementation of AB 3180.
No regulations or guidelines concerning the implementation of AB 3180 have been issued by the
state and numerous interpretations of its requirements are possible. The program defined in this
document is intended to satisfy the spirit of the new law, and is based on significant research of
ongoing monitoring programs throughout the state.
Codified as Public Resources Code 21081.6.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 1 September 29, 1992
THE SANTA AN/TA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
1.2 Project Description
The Hahn Company and Santa Anita Realty Enterprises, Inc. (owners/developers of the Santa
Anita Fashion Park Mall) are proposing to expand and renovate the existing Santa Anita Fashion
Park Mall. The project applicant has requested approval of a Text Amendment (No. TA 92-005)
to Ordinance No. 1425, Resolution No. 4185 (see Appendix A), to revise the boundary of parcel
2 "Boundary of Building Envelope & Special Height Zone," and Zone Change No. Z-92;002, to
zone Race Track Parcel No. 949 to C-2D to allow use of a portion of the existing race track
parking lot for expanded mall parking.
The shopping center is already fully developed, and a site plan for the proposed expansion of the
mall and identification of the areas proposed for expansion and modifications in land use are
shown as figures in the Initial Study. Table 1, Expanded/Remodeled Center, summarizes the
proposed project.
In addition to the demolition, expansion, redemising (rearranging the subdivision of leased space)
and remodeling listed above, the proposed project includes the excavation of a portion of upper
level parking lot west of the existing Buffum's building to provide lower level parking, to allow
first floor access to the new Nordstrom. Additional parking for the expanded Santa Anita
Fashion Park would be provided by leasing unused parking from the adjacent Santa Anita Race
Track. All existing surface parking would be sealed and restriped.
The proposed project would alter the existing Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall containing 983,719
square feet of gross leasable area by increasing the gross leasable area to 1,125,265 square feet,
for a net increase of 141,546 square feet of gross leasable area.
Building heights allowed in the shopping center are restricted by the C-2 & D H8 (General
Commercial Zone with a Design Overlay and a Special Height Zone) zoning which; allows
buildings up to eight stories or a maximum height of 85 feet. Architectural drawings and
elevations for the proposed expansion are not yet available, but the new Nordstrom and
remodelled Robinson's stores are proposed as three story buildings (consistent with the other
anchor stores on-site) that would be well within this limit.
There are now 5,090 parking spaces for the existing shopping center. On the 8.2-acre portion
of the Santa Anita Race Track parking, proposed to be rezoned and leased for shopping center
parking, there are currently 1,156 race track parking spaces. When this is restriped and
consolidated with the mall's existing parking and access system, it is expected that 838 shopping
center parking spaces would be provided on this 8.2-acre addition, with 289 spaces reserved for
public parking. The proposed overall parking provided for the expanded mall is 5,638 spaces.
Of these parking spaces 68 would be reserved for handicapped parking. With all considered, a
total of 1,629 parking spaces will be deleted from the race track parking lot.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 2 December 3, 1992
•
THE SANTA AI/TA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
1
TABLE 1
EXPANDED/REMODELED CENTER
Gross Gross
Name Floors Building Area Leasable Area
'.:.DEPARTMENT.STORES,
Demolish existing Buffum -80,000 -77,000
New Nordstrom Store 2 145,908 136,384
Existing Robinson's Store -45,450 -45,450
Third Floor Deleted
Robinson's Expansion 2 89,100 83,317
Total Department Store Expansion 109,558 97,21.
NEW DEVELOPEI( BUILDINGS
_ Tenant Area . 2 65,126 43,604
,
Redemise Developer's Existing 3,110
Buildings
Tenant Area Deleted -13,548 -13,548
Food Court Tenant Area - 4,529
Food Court Dining Area 6,600
Redemise Service Area 2,419
Total Redemised Area 53,997 44,295
Total Existing Center 1,102,064 983,719
TOTAL CENTER WITH EXPANSION 1,345,619 1,125,265
•
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 3 September 29, 1992
•
Chapter Two
ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROCEDURES
2.1 Roles and Responsibilities
The Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the proposed Santa Anita Fashion Pak Mall
Expansion will be in place through all phases of implementation of the project. The City of
Arcadia will have the primary enforcement role for the mitigation measures which are the
responsibility of the City to implement. This includes all mitigation measures contained in the
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Director of Planning for the City of Arcadia may
delegate individual enforcement tasks to various City departments.
The Environmental Monitor (EM) will be responsible for the operation of the Monitoring
Program. The EM is responsible for managing the technical advisors and coordinating
monitoring activities with City staff and for directing the preparation of Compliance Reports and
filing of same with the City. EM is also responsible for coordinating the efforts of various City
reviews and maintaining project files.
Monitoring Team
The following briefly outlines the key positions in the program and their respective functions:
Environmental Monitor: Principal manager of monitoring program (City of Arcadia
Director of Planning). .
Technical Advisors: Experts in various fields to assist EM in monitoring effort. This
team includes: Project Archaeologist, Project Geotechnical
Engineer, etc.
2.2 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures
The Environmental Monitor (EM) manages the efforts of all members of the Monitoring team
and coordinates these efforts with key City staff. Some mitigation measures require the help of
a technical advisor or consultation with City staff. In all cases, it is the EM's responsibility to
inform all parties of the proper timing and completion of reports.
It is the intent of this program for the City to oversee the monitoring and be responsible for
submitting a final mitigation monitoring report. It is the intent of this program to use existing
City review procedures and inspectors to the extent possible and without adding significantly to
the paperwork generated by City staff. j
The following section provides a list of all the Mitigation Measures and a matrix that shows the
timing and staff responsibilities for all mitigation measures adopted for the project.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 4 September 29, 1992
• THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
2.3 Program Operations
Mitigation measures shall be implemented as specified by the Mitigation Monitoring Program
Matrix. During any project phase, unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the
refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The Director of Planning (EM) of the City, with
the advice of the Planning Department staff or other City Department(s), is responsible for
recommending changes to the mitigation measures, if needed. If mitigation measures are refined,
the change will be documented by the Director of Planning and the appropriate design,
construction, or operations personnel shall be notified of the refined requirements.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 5 September 29, 1992
Chapter Three
MEASURES TO BE MONITORED
The following text includes a summary of mitigation measures for the Santa Anita Fashion Park
Mall Expansion. The mitigation requirements are based on the analysis contained in the Initial
Study which is part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
3.1 Earth
1. A site specific geotechnical report shall be prepared by a certified geologist or geotechnical
engineer which: 1) reviews recent geologic literature for the area, since the technical report
for the Safety Element is dated 1975 and new information about the Raymond Hill and
other faults with potential to impact the site may now be available, 2) confirms whether
sufficient site specific set-backs have been made for the portion of the site with the Alquist-
Priolo Special Studies Zone and to confirm that no structures would be subject to significant
surface fault rupture hazards, 3) identifies site-specific seismic parameters for the site,' which
the new and renovated structures should be capable of withstanding (note: not the existing
buildings).
2. A site specific probablistic dynamic analysis shall be prepared by a certified structural
engineer to verify the building design. The design analysis shall be based on a site-specific
geotechnical report and is intended to identify additional remediation, if any are needed, that
would be required beyond the UBC code requirements to reduce ground shaking hazards
to the project to a level of insignificance.
3.2 Air
Short-Term Mitigation Strategies
Mitigation for construction activities is provided to reduce short-term impacts to a level of less
than significant. Those measures needed for this determination are indicated as required, while
others are recommended for further reduction of construction emissions. While many of the
measures cannot be quantified, expected efficiencies from specific measures are identified by the
percentage effectiveness at reducing emissions from the source category following the measure,
(e.g., 55%).2
Required Mitigation Measures
3. The demolition and remodeling activity shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403 Asbestos
Emissions from Renovation/Demolition Activities to reduce asbestos emissions and protect
sensitive receptors in proximity to the site.
2 Effectiveness percentage provided by SCAQMD, CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 6 September 29, 1992
THE SANTA ANI TA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
To minimize fugitive dust during grading and construction activities, the following methods shall
be applied to the project:
4. Graded surfaces shall be watered at least twice daily to form a wind-resistant temporary
crust. The program should include control of wind-blown dust on site access roadways
and in the paved parking areas of the mall. (45-90%)
5. The site and the construction equipment shall be sprayed with water in the morning and
the evening.
6. Ground cover shall be planted as soon as practical in the construction process. (20-65%)
7. Any earth being transported shall be covered and the wheels and lower portions of
transport trucks will be sprayed with water before they leave the construction area. This
includes trucks moving excavated earth from one portion of the site to the other if
fugitive dust is visible from the transporting activity.
The following mitigations serve to minimize mobile source emissions during the construction:
8. Construction equipment shall be selected considering emission factors and energy
efficiency. All equipment shall be properly tuned and maintained.
9. Electric or diesel-powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-powered engines
where feasible.
10. Construction activities shall minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the
site and, if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to .fisting
roadways.
Recommended Mitigation Measures
11. Construction operations shall be phased to limit large equipment operations during the
smog season from May through October.
12. Ridesharing for the construction crew shall be supported and encouraged.
Long-term Mitigation Strategies
Mitigation for the project, as proposed, must reduce projected emissions by approximately 25%
to be considered mitigated to a less than significant level. The measures presented below would
be adequate to meet this criteria.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 7 September 29, 1992
• 1
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
13.
Energy Use
• The parking lot design should allow for the future installation of dedicated parking
spaces with electrical outlets for electrical vehicles.
• Use light colored roof materials to reflect heat.
• Use building materials that do not require use of paints and solvents such as pre-
primed and a wood molding and trim products and pre-primed wallboard, (80-
100%).
• Require recycling bins in addition to trash bins and contract for recycling services.
• Increase walls and attic insulation beyond Title 24 requirements, (5-9%).
• Provide shade trees consistent with design review process to reduce building heat,
(55%)
• Use energy efficient and automated controls for air conditioners, (30%)
• Use energy efficient parking lot lights (such as metal halide, clean lucalox, high
pressure sodium, low pressure sodium, or other energy efficient parking lo lights)
consistent with design review process,
• Use lighting controls and energy efficient lighting, (60-75%)
• Low-polluting and high-efficiency appliances shall be installed wherever possible.
14. Congestion Relief
• Require on-site truck loading zones.
• Reschedule truck deliveries and pickups for off-peak hours.
15. Work/Non-Work Trips
• Enhance bus stops on-site with seating areas and covered shelters to further
encourage transit use. Where feasible, bus stops should allow passengers to wait
inside air conditioned stores with a line of sight to see arriving buses.
• Provide preferential parking spaces for carpools and vanpools.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 8 September 29, 1992
• THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
• Utilize a mix of services on-site to provide further amenities for employees and
customers that would reduce off-site vehicle trips. Consideration shall be given
to extending postal services beyond the Christmas season, medical office facilities,
auto repair and additional ridesharing information at the existing! transit
information desk.
3.3 Water
16. NPDES permit to be obtained and adhered to in order to prevent significant short term
construction impacts to water quality.
3.4 Plant Life
17. The developer shall submit a new landscape plan prepared by a registered landscape
architect and in accordance with the requirements identified in Resolution No. 485.
3.5 Animal Life •
No mitigation measures are required.
3.6 Noise
No mitigation measures are required.
3.7 Light & Glare
•
No mitigation measures are required.
3.8 Land Use
18. Implementation of the proposed zone change is required to eliminate conflicts between
the proposed land uses and existing zoning.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 9 September 29, 1992
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
3.9 Natural Resources
No mitigation measures are required.
3.10 Risk of Upset
No mitigation measures are required.
3.11 Population
No mitigation measures are required.
3.12 Housing
No mitigation measures are required.
•
3.13 Transportation/Circulation
Construction Mitigation
19. Truck traffic to and from the project site shall use the Baldwin Avenue truck route
traveling to the 210 Freeway. With prior City approval and at times selected to avoid
traffic impacts exceptions may be made to traffic mitigation measure 19.
20. Pre- and post-construction surveys of the.condition of Baldwin Avenue shall be made
jointly by the developer and the City Engineer to determine the extent of construction
related accelerated wear on Baldwin Avenue (or if other routes are later approved by the
City, then also on those routes). If there is damage attributable to construction traffic, the
damage shall be repaired by the developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Traffic Mitigation
Based on the results of the traffic analysis, mitigation measures were recommended at locations
where background plus project traffic impacts produced an unacceptable level of service.' These
mitigations can be in the form of physical improvements or operational improvements. One form
of operational improvement can be the redeployment of traffic police to control the intersection
operation. Previous studies prepared for the City of Arcadia have identified that the efficiency
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 10 September 29, 1992
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
of intersection operations with police control increased by 6 percent. The redeployment of police
at key intersections was only considered a viable mitigation for adverse traffic impacts if those
impacts occurred on race days.
Background Mitigation
The two intersections which are projected to operate at LOS E can be mitigated by re-deployment
of police on race days. The increased capacity from police control (5.6 percent) will improve
these intersections to LOS D. These are the intersections of Huntington Drive and 5th Avenue,
and Baldwin Avenue and Duarte Road. These mitigation measures will improve the level of
service as detailed in the table below.
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH MITIGATION
BACKGROUND JANUARY 1994
Existing Geometry Mitigated Geometry
and Operations or Operations
Intersection V/C I LOS V/C l LOS
Huntington Drive and 5th Avenue 0.92 E 0.88 D
Baldwin Avenue and Duarte Road 0.91 E 0.86 D
Project Related Mitigation
As detailed in Table 16 of the Initial Study, none of the studied intersections required mitigation
due to exceeding LOS E during the PM peak hour for the three background cumulative plus
project scenarios. However, because the LOS calculation averages all the intersection approaches
there can be particular intersection approaches that should be improved even though the i verall
operation of the intersection operation would not exceed LOS E. There are two locations at
existing access driveways and intersections which warrant such improvements.
Baldwin Avenue and Gate 8: This intersection warrants southbound dual left-turn lanes. This
left-turn movement is now primarily impacted by inbound race track traffic which does not occur
during the PM peak hour. However, the closing of Gate 7 to public traffic has increased the use
of Gate 8. Observations by the city planning staff, police department, and race track officials
all identify the need to improve this left-turn movement.
At present, a portable sign is positioned at this location directing southbound traffic to use the
inside southbound through land for through as well as left-turn movements. This temporary or
"event" treatment is problematic since the four-lane access drive at Gate 8 is channelled to three
(3) outbound and one (1) inbound lane during the PM peak hour when the race track discharges.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 11 December 3. 1992
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Often, the dual (optional) left-turn sign is left in place with only a single entry lane at the
driveway.
A second left-turn lane can be provided on the southbound approach by striping the inside
through lane and using the parking lane as a travel lane for the second southbound through lane
(see Figure 17, in the Initial Study). Beyond Gate 8, for a distance of 350 feet, up the first
residential street, a departure transition should be striped to retain parking in front of the
residential developments.
There are two alternatives to managing traffic operations at Gate 8 during the PM peak hour,
given the provision of permanent dual left-turn lanes. These are described as follows and
detailed on Figure 17 in the Initial Study. These alternatives focus on lane balance between the
southbound left-turn and the entry lanes at Gate 8.
21. One of the two following alternative mitigation measures shall be adopted.
21A. Construction Alternative: The outbound lanes at Gate 8 can be restriped for three
outbound lanes and then provide two (2) permanent inbound lanes. This requires
widening of the south side of the driveway for the full width of one lane (11-12 feet) to
provide the second entry lane.
21B. Traffic Management Alternative: This alternative does not require construction.
The outbound lanes are increased from two (2) to three (3) during the track season PM
hour with the use of barricades as is done today. Since the inbound lanes will be reduced
to a single lane, the dual left-turn lane.must be reduced as well. it will be necessary to
barricade or cone (close oft) the inside left-turn pocket at the same time as the exit lanes
are increased at Gate 8. Figure 17 in the Initial Study details the recommended
improvements and alternatives.
Huntington Drive and Driveway E at La Cadena: Peak period outbound movements on weekdays
and Saturdays cause extensive southbound queuing, particularly in the left-turn lane.
22. A shared left, left-right turn lane configuration is warranted on this approach. This dual
left-turn requires widening of the Huntington Drive cut which is designed for a single
lane. In addition to the foregoing, signal phasing should be adjusted to protect
northbound movements approaching form La Cadena to prevent conflicts. A schematic
of these intersection improvements is provided on Figure 18 in the Initial Study.l
i
3.14 Public Services
No mitigation measures are required.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 12 September 29, 1992
•
THE SANTA AN/TA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
3.15 Energy
No mitigation measures are required.
3.16 Utilities
No mitigation measures are required.
3.17 Human Health
23. The demolition and remodeling activity shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403 Asbestos
Emissions from Renovation/Demolition Activities.
24. All fluorescent light ballasts located in all of the areas that are to be demolished shall be
inspected to determine whether the serial number contains a -W suffix. All ballasts that
do not contain a -W suffix shall be assumed to contain PCBs and shall therefore be
handled as hazardous waste for proper disposal in accordance with all applicable
government regulations, unless appropriate testing demonstrates the absence of PCBs. .
25. Unless appropriate testing demonstrates otherwise, paint flakes, fragments, or dust
generated in demolishing areas shall be assumed to contain hazardous levels of lead and
shall be handled as hazardous waste, so as to avoid human contact.
3.18 Aesthetics
Additional aesthetic impacts analysis would occur as part of the Architectural Design Review and
no mitigation measures are necessary.
3.19 Recreation
No mitigation measures are required.
3.20 Cultural Resources
26. The initial stages of grading and excavation for the proposed project should be monitored
by a qualified archaeologist who is prepared to recover and document any significant
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 13 September 29, 1992
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
1
historic material that appears. This may require some delay or redirection of grading
and/or excavation.
1
1
■
1
1
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 14 September 29, 1992
Chapter Four
MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX
4.1 Matrix
The following Matrix outlines all mitigation measures included in the Initial Study, and
responsible agency, timing and action taken. It will be completed as mitigation measures are
implemented.
P:IDATAIPROJDATAICAR-07\MIT-MON.PGM
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 15 September 29, 1992
The Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall Expansion
Mitigation Monitoring Program Summary
IMitigation Measures I Monitoring Activity 'liming Monitorin Agent l Monitoring A�
1. A site specific geotechnical report shall be prepared by a certified geologist or
geotechnical engineer which: 1)reviews recent geologic literature for the area,
since the technical report for the Safety Element is dated 1975 and new
information about the Raymond Hill and other faults with potential to impact the
site may now be available,2)confirms whether sufficient site specific set-backs
have been made for the portion of the site with the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone and to confirm that no structures would be subject to significant surface fault
rupture hazards,3)identifies site-specific seismic parameters for the site,which the
new and renovated structures should be capable of withstanding(note:not the
existing buildings).
2. A site specific probablistic dynamic analysis shall be prepared by a certified
structural engineer to verify the building design. The design analysis shall be
•
based on a site-specific geotechnical report and is intended to identify additional
remediation,if any are needed,that would be required beyond the UBC code
requirements to reduce ground shaking hazards to the project to a level of
insignificance.
3. The demolition and remodeling activity shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403
Asbestos Emissions from Renovation/Demolition Activities to reduce asbestos
emissions and protect sensitive receptors in proximity to the site.
4. Graded surfaces shall be watered at least twice daily to form a wind-resistant
temporary crust. The program should include control of wind-blown dust on site
access roadways and in the paved parking areas of the mall. (45-90%)
5. The site and the construction equipment shall be sprayed with water in the
morning and die evening.
6. Ground cover shall be planted as soon as practical in the construction process.(20-
65%)
7. Any earth being transported shall be covered and the wheels and lower portions of
transport trucks will be sprayed with water before they leave the construction area.
This includes trucks moving excavated earth from one portion of the site to the
other if fugitive dust is visible from the transporting activity.
8. Construction equipment shall be selected considering emission factors and energy
efficiency. All equipment shall be properly tuned and maintained.
9. Electric or diesel-powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-powered
engines where feasible.
10. Construction activities shall minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent
to the site and,if necessary,a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety
adjacent to existing roadways.
11. Construction operations shall be phased to limit large equipment operations during
the smog season from_May through October.____
12. Ridesharing for the construction crew shall be supported and encouraged.
•
16
The Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall Expansion
Mitigation Monitoring Program Summary
Mitigation Measures I Monitoring Activity I liming I Monitoring Agent
13. Energy Use
• The parking lot design should allow for the future installation of dedicated
parking spaces with electrical outlets for electrical vehicles.
•
• Use light colored roof materials to reflect heat.
• Use building materials that do not require use of paints and solvents such as
fire-pr00%}and a wood molding and trim products and pre-primed wallboard,
• Require recycling bins in addition to trash bins and contract for recycling
services.
• Increase walls and attic insulation beyond Title 24 requirements,(5-9%).
• Provide shade trees consistent with design review process to reduce building
heat,(55%)
• Use energy efficient and automated controls for air conditioners,(30%)
• Use energy efficient parking lot lights(such as metal halide,clean lucalox,
high pressure sodium,low pressure sodium,or other energy efficient parking
lot lights)consistent with design review process,
•
• Use lighting controls and energy efficient lighting,(60-75%)
•
• Low-polluting and high-efficiency appliances shall be installed wherever
possible.
14.Congestion Relief
• Require on-site truck loading zones.
• Reschedule truck deliveries and pickups for off-peak hours.
15.Work/Non-Work Trips
• Enhance bus stops on-site with sealing areas and covered shelters to further
encourage transit use. Where feasible,bus stops should allow passengers to
wait inside air conditioned stores with a line of sight to see arriving buses.
• Provide preferential parking spaces for carpools and vanpools.
• Utilize a mix of services on-site to provide further amenities for employees
and customers that would reduce off-site vehicle trips. Consideration shall be
given to extending_postal services_beyond the Christmas season,medical _ _
office facilities,auto repair and additional ridesharing information _
n at the
existing transit information desk.
•
17
NI
•
•13aui9ud duJ all!Jo uouaels!les aql
01 radolanap ay'dq pa.nedar aq!lugs a8ewep aqi'ag)en uo!annsuoo 01 amelnqune
a8ewep s!2=41 JI •(s)tnor nog]no osic uagl 2q1 dq panordde Jai?,
are=floor 121110J!ro)anuand aln+pleg no ream patvralaaae patelar oonanilsooa
10 1aa1x3 2111 au!wiatap of raaut9ug duD ayl pus radopnap aql dq dpmol apcm
aq!legs anuand u!mpleg Jo uo!I!puoa 2111 Jo s62nins uoUannsu0a-lsod pus-Did 'OZ
6I arnseaw uOnS !l!W aylert o1 apew aq dew saolldaoxa staedwi aWerl pone
of palaalas sawn as pus Ienoidde dui roud yl py 'demaard OIZ 2111 of 9mlanen
alma/ganrt anuand u!mpleg 2111 asn!legs atls laaford ay' wo{I par of agJen nan.L •61
.I�odS1�L..
pannbar are sarnseam aoUSBulm oN
pannbar are sarnseaul uoue8nlm oN
....................... ....:.._:.:...;. .. ar are sarnseaw a....... ......
J
pannb� oue8nim-oN
pannbar are samseaw aone8n!m oN
1 I tua!IIUOa aleu!mtla of parmba�sl a8ueq a aoz pasodord a�gt)o uogelaamaldtn
'8[
�:: .. �..: ..: :::.:. .:. :...:,. :.. � .� :.... .:.:;�;::;:kifi::::;:2:;::;:p::::;::�:::::•:>::.::;:;::>::>N•':::::;:;�:c:�;<»::>::;z:><::;:}:p?;:x;i:;>:;isr:i;::::;;:;G:<:5;;;;;:<•::::;.;:<:.:::�::•:.:.::;::s;:•;:.;;:::;:>:i:;:>:; .,t�oWi�T:�'A�
pannbar are samseam aoge8nlm oN
.. :?;:i.>i: i:ii:i:::i:::i iii:iii?i i:iC i:<i:?:<ai?':is iii:>::i:':'rii;::;:?`'ii;:.%::..;'?i;???Ei'it...;`?:::i`.':•:iii?:i:'iTii a ::`E?isi ::2 ii:iic` Eiii:i:i:'i ::;:::r:t7I�1'1l
pannbar are samseam aone8ntm oN
I i pannbar are samseam 00111e2nlm ON
•5814'oN uo!In1os311
a!paynaap!slu2m21!nbar agt qum aaueproaae a!Put laattgare adeaspue!
palatsl9al a dq paredard avid adeaspuel maa a Itmgns!legs radolanap agy •L1
dnlenb stem of slaedw! aoiwnJISUO3 anal
'Jogs loeaq!u9!s luanard 01 rapro at o1 paragpe pus pau!ctgo aq OR t[wrad S3UdN 91
;:. � - � ..:_.�:....:.�::.�:.:::::.:...�::� •' .... :ii.°ii.:i'�:i.''i i 'ii i:'i`iir?::} E�?` ??'z?i�i.?iii �` i?<::» ii�ii?. i:;i.?:?�[�'?><iii_;i:::::;?i>s :��.ii.i.2>:?�zi.i.i::%'?<iiii:ii:.:.:.`.'ir..ii::t:�::<;::;;:;;:5:�.
1aad 3uuo11uoy(I I fluttuu, gnMPY 9u!-101!o01e1 I salnseayy uo!lits3tiniv
Saeurwns 1uua2oJd 2ulaoJIuo uo!pn2!J!J,,
uo!suudx3 IIgIAI 3IiUd uo!gge,4 'I"N IJuUS aqZ
` J
a
December 15, 1992
TO: ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CORKRAN W. NICHOLSON, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE REQUIRED MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM FOR THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SANTA
ANITA FASHION PARK REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER MALL AT
400 SOUTH BALDWIN AVENUE.
The City Council at its November 17, 1992 meeting, approved Zone Cha ge 92-002
and Text Amendment 92-005 for the proposed expansion of the Santa Anita Fashion
Park Mall at 400 South Baldwin Avenue. The aforementioned zone change and text
amendment are summarized as follows:
Zone Change 92-002 to rezone an 8.2 acre portion of Santa Anita Race Track Parcel
No. 949 from R-1 (Single-family Residential Zone) and S-1 (Special Use) to C-2D
(General Commercial Zone with a Design Overlay). The rezoning would allow the
use of a portion of the existing race track parking lot for expanded mall par 'rig; and
Text Amendment 92-005 to City Council Ordinance No. 1425 and Reso ution No.
4185, to revise the boundary of Parcel 2 ("Boundary of Building Envelope & Special
Height Zone"), to allow for the development of a new Nordstrom department store.
Ordinances for the above mentioned applications were introduced to the Council on
December 1, 1992, and will be before the Council, on December 15, 1992, for adoption.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial
Study for the proposed expansion of the mall was prepared by the City of Arcadia
with assistance from the City's environmental consultant, The Planning. Center.
Based on the information and environmental analysis contained in this Initial
Study, the Planning Department found that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment because the mitigation measures derived from the Initial
Study have been agreed to by the applicant. These mitigation measures reduce the
project's impacts to levels which are less than significant. Therefore, a Negative
Declaration was prepared and adopted for this project.
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation
monitoring or reporting programs for all projects for which an environmental
impact report or "mitigated" Negative Declaration has been prepared. This new law
11a'4F.n y.
` City Council Report
Mitigation Monitoring Program
0 e,I,, December 15, 1992
Page 1
(dr-
LASER IMAGED]
is intended to ensure the implementation of all mitigation measures adopted
through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. Since a
"mitigated" Negative Declaration was adopted for this project, a Mitigation
Monitoring Program has been prepared for the City of Arcadia by the City's
environmental consultant, The Planning Center. This monitoring program (copy
attached) is required to be in place through all phases of the project's construction;
and the City of Arcadia will have the primary enforcement role to implement all of
the mitigation measures as contained in the adopted Negative Declaration for the
expansion and renovation of the mall.
At the time of adopting the Negative Declaration the Council approved the required
monitoring program; however, the attached specifics of that program should be
affirmed at the December 15th Council meeting.
FINDINGS AND MOTION
The City Council should move to approve the attached specific "Mitigation
Monitoring Program" for the already approved Monitoring Plan regarding the
proposed Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall expansion, as per the requirement Hof Public
Resources Code Section 21081.6, and direct staff to enforce this program to ensure
the implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.
City Council Report
Mitigation Monitoring Program
December 15, 1992
Page 2
LASER IMAGED
7
•
THE SANTA ANITA FASHION PARK MALL
EXPANSION
Mitigated Negative Declaration
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
December 1, 1992
Prepared for:
The City of Arcadia
Prepared by:
The Planning Center
LASER IMA 'QED o : 8
i
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Table of Contents
Chapter/Section
Page
Chapter One
MONITORING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
AND PURPOSE
1.1 Legislative Mandate 1
1.2 Project Description 2
Chapter Two
ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROCEDURES 4
2.1 Roles and Responsibilities 4
2.2 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures 4
2.3 Program Operations 5
Chapter Three
MEASURES TO BE MONITORED 6
3.1 Earth
6
3.2 Air
6
3.3 Water 9
3.4 Plant Life 9
3.5 Animal Life 9
3.6 Noise 9
3.7 Light and Glare 9
3.8 Land Use 5 9
THE PLANNING CENTER Page i L Aa, JJ2
uti 9
I
THE SANTA ITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXP SION
Mitigation Monitoring rogram
Table of Contents
(Continued)
Chapter/Section Page
3.9 Natural Resources 10
3.10 Risk of Upset 10
3.11 Population 10
3.12 Housing 10
3.13 Transportation/Circulation 10
3.14 Public Services 12
3.15 Energy 13
3.16 Utilities 13
3.17 Human Health 13
3.18 Aesthetics 13
3.19 Recreation 13
•
3.20 Cultural Resources 13
Chapter Four
MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX 15
4.1 Matrix 16
THE PLANNING CENTER Page ii S'
LasERieMegetti' 1992 10
Chapter One
MONITORING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
AND PURPOSE
1.1 Legislative Mandate
Assembly Bill 3180' require public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting
programs for all projects for which an environmental impact report or "mitigated" negative
declaration has been prepared. This new law is intended to ensure the implementation of all
mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.
The following is the full text of the legislation:
Section 1. Section 21081.6 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read: 21081.6. When
making findings required by subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a negative
declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21081, the public agency
shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has
adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant
effects on the environment. The reporting of monitoring program shall be designed to
ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been
required or incorporated into the project at the request of an agency having jurisdiction by
law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the •
lead or responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program.
Section 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB
of the California Constitution because of the local agency or school district has the authority
to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of
service mandated by this act.
This legislation does not convey any new powers to public agencies. The conditions and changes
imposed on projects through CEQA have always been enforced :,rough the previously existing
police powers of the agency.. This is the same with the implementation of AB 3180.
No regulations or guidelines concerning the implementation of AB 3180 have been issued by the
state and numerous interpretations of its requirements are possible. The program defined in this
document is intended to satisfy the spirit of the new law, and is based on significant research of
ongoing monitoring programs throughout the state.
Codified as Public Resources Code 21081.6.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 1
g LASsEe792.
-" THE SANTA A.VITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
1.2 Project Description
The Hahn Company and Santa Anita Realty Enterprises, Inc. (owners/developers of the Santa
Anita Fashion Park Mall) are proposing to expand and renovate the existing Santa Anita Fashion
Park Mall. The project applicant has requested approval of a Text Amendment (No. TA 2-005)
to Ordinance No. 1425, Resolution No. 4185 (see Appendix A), to revise the boundary o parcel
2 "Boundary of Building Envelope & Special Height Zone," and Zone Change No. Z-92 002, to
zone Race Track Parcel No. 949 to C-2D to allow use of a portion of the existing ra a track
parking lot for expanded mall parking.
The shopping center is already fully developed, and a site plan for the proposed expansio of the
mall and identification of the areas proposed for expansion and modifications in land se are
shown as figures in the Initial Study. Table 1, Expanded/Remodeled Center, summari es the
proposed project.
In addition to the demolition, expansion, redemising(rearranging the subdivision of lease space)
and remodeling listed above, the proposed project includes the excavation of a portion or upper
level parking lot west of the existing Buffum's building to provide lower level parking, to allow
first floor access to the new Nordstrom. Additional parking for the expanded Sant Anita
Fashion Park would be provided by leasing unused parking from the adjacent Santa Ani a Race
Track. All existing surface parking would be sealed and restriped.
The proposed project would alter the existing Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall containing 9183,719
square feet of gross leasable area by increasing the gross leasable area to 1,125,265 square feet,
for a net increase of 141,546 square feet of gross leasable area.
Building heights allowed in the shopping center are restricted by the C-2 & D H8 (General
Commercial Zone with a Design Overlay and a Special Height Zone) zoning which allows
buildings up to eight stories or a maximum height of 85 feet. Architectural drawin s and
elevations for the proposed expansion are not yet available, but the new Nordstro and
remodelled Robinson's stores are proposed as three story buildings (consistent with th other
anchor stores on-site) that would be well within this limit.
There are now 5,090 parking spaces for the existing shopping center. On the 8.2-acre portion
of the Santa Anita Race Track parking, proposed to be rezoned and leased for shoppingl center
parking, there are currently 1,156 race track parking spaces. When this is restrip d and
consolidated with the mall's existing parking and access system, it is expected that 838 shopping
center parking spaces would be provided on this 8.2-acre addition, with 289 spaces reserved for
public parking. The proposed overall parking provided for the expanded mall is 5,638 spaces.
Of these parking spaces 68 would be reserved for handicapped parking. With all considered, a
total of 1,629 parking spaces will be deleted from the race track parking lot.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 2 LASER a g 1 er 3, 1992 1
•
,
1
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPAASION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
EXPANDED/REMODELED CENTER
Gross Gross
Name Floors Building Area Leasable Area
DEPARTMENT:ST:ORES:: ;,
Demolish existing Buffum -80,000 -77,000
New Nordstrom Store 2 145,908
. 136,384
Existing Robinson's Store -45,450 -45,450
Third Floor Deleted
Robinson's Expansion 2 89,100 83, 17
Total Department Store Expansion 109,558
97,251
1sEW:DEVELOPER BUILDIN S
Tenant Area • - 2 65,126 43,004
Redemise Developer's Existing - 3, 10
Buildings
Tenant Area Deleted -13,548 -13,548
Food Court Tenant Area - 4,529
Food Court Dining Area - 6,6100
Redemise Service Area 2,419
Total Redemised Area I 53,997 1 44,295
'Total Existing Center I 1,102,064 I 983,719
TOTAL CENTER WITH EXPANSION 1,345,619 1,125,265
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 3 1992
LAST
g elfra�i , 13
� 1
Chapter Two
ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROCEDURES
2.1 Roles and Responsibilities
The Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the proposed Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall
Expansion will be in place through all phases of implementation of the project. The City of
Arcadia will have the primary enforcement role for the mitigation measures which re the
responsibility of the City to implement. This includes all mitigation measures contained in the
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Director of Planning for the City of Arcadia may
delegate individual enforcement tasks to various City departments.
The Environmental Monitor (EM) will be responsible for the operation of the Mo itoring
Program. The EM is responsible for managing the technical advisors and coordinating
monitoring activities with City staff and for directing the preparation of Compliance Rep•rts and
filing of same with the City. EM is also responsible for coordinating the efforts of vario City
reviews and maintaining project files.
Monitoring Team
The following briefly outlines the key positions in the program and their respective fun.tions:
Environmental Monitor: Principal manager of monitoring program (City of cadia
Director of Planning). • •
Technical Advisors: Experts in various fields to assist EM in monitoring effort. This
team includes: Project Archaeologist, Project Geotechnical
Engineer, etc.
2.2 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures
The Environmental Monitor (EM) manages the efforts of all members of the Monitoring team
and coordinates these efforts with key City staff. Some mitigation measures require the Deip of
a technical advisor or consultation with City staff. In all cases, it is the EM's responsibility to
inform all parties of the proper timing and completion of reports.
It is the intent of this program for the City to oversee the monitoring and be responsible for
submitting a final mitigation monitoring report. It is the intent of this program to use existing
City review procedures and inspectors to the extent possible and without. adding significantly to
the paperwork generated by City staff.
The following section provides a list of all the Mitigation Measures and a matrix that shows the
timing and staff responsibilities for all mitigation measures adopted for the project.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 4 L A S R A epmber 29, 1992 14
•
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
2.3. Program Operations
Mitigation measures shall be implemented as specified by the Mitigation Monitoring rogram
Matrix. During any project ,phase, unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the
refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The Director of Planning (EM) of the City, with
the advice of the Planning Department staff or other City Department(s), is responsible for
recommending changes to the mitigation measures, if needed. If mitigation measures are refined,
the change will be documented by the Director of Planning and the appropriate design,
construction, or operations personnel shall be notified of the refined requirements.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 5 September 29, 1992
LASER IMAGED 15
Chapter Three
MEASURES TO BE MONITORED
The following text includes a summary of mitigation measures for the Santa Anita Fashion Park
Mall Expansion. The mitigation requirements are based on the analysis contained in tl-e Initial
Study which is part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
3.1 Earth
1. A site specific geotechnical report shall be prepared by a certified geologist or geotechnical
engineer which: 1) reviews recent geologic literature for the area, since the technical report
for the Safety Element is dated 1975 and new information about the Raymond Hill and
other faults with potential to impact the site may now be available, 2) confirms whether
sufficient site specific set-backs have been made for the portion of the site with the Iquist-
Priolo Special Studies Zone and to confirm that no structures would be subject to significant
surface fault rupture hazards, 3) identifies site-specific seismic parameters for the site, which
the new and renovated structures should be capable of withstanding (note: not the existing
buildings).
2. A site specific probablistic dynamic analysis shall be prepared by a certified st`uctural
engineer to verify the building design. The design analysis shall be based on a site-specific
geotechnical report and is intended to identify additional remediation, if any are needed, that
would be required beyond the UBC code requirements to reduce ground shaking hazards
to the project to a level of insignificance.
3.2 Air
Short-Term Mitigation Strategies
Mitigation for construction activities is provided to reduce short-term impacts to a level of less
than significant. Those measures needed for this determination are indicated as required while
others are recommended for further reduction of construction emissions. While many of the
measures cannot be quantified, expected efficiencies from specific measures are identified by the
percentage effectiveness at reducing emissions from the source category following•the m asure,
(e.g., 55%).2
Required Mitigation Measures
3. The demolition and remodeling activity shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403 bestos
Emissions from Renovation/Demolition Activities to reduce asbestos emissions and protect
sensitive receptors in proximity to the site.
2 Effectiveness percentage provided by SCAQMD, CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 6 September 29, 1992
LASFR IMAGED
THE SANTA AfVITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Pr ogram
To minimize fugitive dust during grading and construction activities, the following methods shall
be applied to the project:
4. Graded surfaces shall be watered at least twice daily to form a wind-resistant temporary
crust. The program should include control of wind-blown dust on site access roadways
and in the paved parking areas of the mall. (45-90%)
5. The site and the construction equipment shall be sprayed with water in the morning and
the evening.
6. Ground cover shall be planted as soon as practical in the construction process. (20-65%)
7. Any earth being transported shall be covered and the wheels and lower portions of
transport trucks will be sprayed with water before they leave the construction area. This
includes trucks moving excavated earth from one portion of the site to the ther if
fugitive dust is visible from the transporting activity.
The following mitigations serve to minimize mobile source emissions during the constr ction:
8. Construction equipment shall be selected considering emission factors and energy
efficiency. All equipment shall be properly tuned and maintained.
9. Electric or diesel-powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-powered engines
where feasible.
10. Construction activities shall minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the
site and, if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to : .fisting
roadways.
Recommended Mitigation Measures
11. Construction operations shall be phased to limit large equipment operations during the
smog season from May through October.
12. Ridesharing for the construction crew shall be supported and encouraged.
Long-term Mitigation Strategies
Mitigation for the project, as proposed, must reduce projected emissions by approximately 25%
to be considered mitigated to a less than significant level. The measures presented below would
be adequate to meet this criteria.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 7 LAS E R S9 APAr !k , 1992
ist• I '
17
THE SANTA NITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPA VSION
Mitigation Monitoring rogram
13. Energy Use
• The parking lot design should allow for the future installation of dedicated parking
spaces with electrical outlets for electrical vehicles.
• Use light colored roof materials to reflect heat.
• Use building materials that do not require use of paints and solvents suc as pre-
primed and a wood molding and trim products and pre-primed wallbo rd, (80-
100%).
• Require recycling bins in addition to trash bins and contract for recycling services.
• Increase walls and attic insulation beyond Title 24 requirements, (5-9%).
• Provide shade trees consistent with design review process to reduce build ng heat,
(55%)
• Use energy efficient and automated controls for air conditioners, (30%)
• Use energy efficient parking lot lights (such as metal halide, clean lucal x, high
pressure sodium, low pressure sodium, or other energy efficient parking 1 t lights)
consistent with design review process,
• Use lighting controls and energy efficient lighting, (60-75%)
• Low-polluting and high-efficiency appliances shall be installed wherever •ossible.
14. Congestion Relief
• Require on-site truck loading zones.
• Reschedule truck deliveries and pickups for off-peak hours.
15. Work/Non-Work Trips
• Enhance bus stops on-site with seating areas and covered shelters to further
encourage transit use. Where feasible, bus stops should allow passengers to wait
inside air conditioned stores with a line of sight to see arriving buses.
• Provide preferential parking spaces for carpools and vanpools.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 8
LSFR pt Qr 29, 1992,
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXP SION
Mitigation Monitoring P ogram
• Utilize a mix of services on-site to provide further amenities for employees and
customers that would reduce off-site vehicle trips. Consideration shall be given
to extending postal services beyond the Christmas season, medical office facilities,
auto repair and additional ridesharing information at the existing transit
information desk.
3.3 Water
16. NPDES permit to be obtained and adhered to in order to prevent significant sh rt term
construction impacts to water quality.
3.4 Plant Life
17. The developer shall submit a new landscape plan prepared by a registered la dscape
architect and in accordance with the requirements identified in Resolution No. •185.
3.5 Animal Life
No mitigation measures are required.
3.6 Noise
No mitigation measures are required.
3.7 Light & Glare
No mitigation measures are required.
3.8 Land Use
18. Implementation of the proposed zone change is required to eliminate conflicts etween
the proposed land uses and existing zoning.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 9 L RS ay , 1992
19
THE SANTA VI TA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
3.9 Natural Resources
No mitigation measures are required.
•
3.10 Risk of Upset
No mitigation measures are required.
3.11 Population
No mitigation measures are required.
3.12 Housing
No mitigation measures are required.
3.13 Transportation/Circulation
Construction Mitigation
19. Truck traffic to and from the project site shall use the Baldwin Avenue truck route
traveling to the 210 Freeway. With prior City approval and at times selected to avoid
traffic impacts exceptions may be made to traffic mitigation measure 19.
20. Pre- and post-construction surveys of the condition of Baldwin Avenue shall be made
jointly by the developer and the City Engineer to determine the extent of construction
related accelerated wear on Baldwin Avenue (or if other routes are later approved by the
City, then also on those routes). If there is damage attributable to construction traffic, the
damage shall be repaired by the developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Traffic Mitigation
Based on the results of the traffic analysis, mitigation measures were recommended at locations
where background plus project traffic impacts produced an unacceptable level of service. These
mitigations can be in the form of physical improvements or operational improvements. One form
of operational improvement can be the redeployment of traffic police to control the intersection
operation. Previous studies prepared for the City of Arcadia have identified that the efficiency
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 10 September 29 92 20
LASER !WAG
��� THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
of intersection operations with police control increased by 6 percent. The redeployment of police
at key intersections was only considered a viable mitigation for adverse traffic impacts if those
impacts occurred on race days.
Background Mitigation
The two intersections which are projected to operate at LOS E can be mitigated by re-deployment
of police on race days. The increased capacity from police control (5.6 percent) will improve
these intersections to LOS D. These are the intersections of Huntington Drive and 5th Avenue,
and Baldwin Avenue and Duarte Road. These mitigation measures will improve the level of
service as detailed in the table below.
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH MITIGATION
BACKGROUND JANUARY 1994
Existing Geometry Mitigated GeoMetry
and Operations or Operations
Intersection V/C I LOS V/C I LOS
Huntington Drive and 5th Avenue 0.92 E 0.88 I?
Baldwin Avenue and Duarte Road 0.91 E 0.86 Lb
Project Related Mitigation
As detailed in Table 16 of the Initial Study, none of the studied intersections required mi igation
due to exceeding LOS E during the PM peak hour for the three background cumulati a plus
project scenarios. However, because the LOS calculation averages all the intersection app poaches
there can be particular intersection approaches that should be improved even though the overall
operation of the intersection operation would not exceed LOS E. There are two locations at
existing access driveways and intersections which warrant such improvements.
Baldwin Avenue and Gate 8: This intersection warrants southbound dual left-turn lanes. This
left-turn movement is now primarily impacted by inbound race track traffic which does nolt occur
during the PM peak hour. However, the closing of Gate 7 to public traffic has increased he use
of Gate 8. Observations by the city planning staff, police department, and race track officials
all identify the need to improve this left-turn movement.
At present, a portable sign is positioned at this location directing southbound traffic to use the
inside southbound through land for through as well as left-turn movements. This temporary or
"event" treatment is problematic since the four-lane access drive at Gate 8 is channelled to three
(3) outbound and one (1) inbound lane during the PM peak hour when the race track discharges.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 11 December 3, 1992
LASER IMAGED 21
THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Often, the dual (optional) left-turn sign is left in place with only a single entry lane at the
driveway.
A second left-turn lane can be provided on the southbound approach by striping the inside
through lane and using the parking lane as a travel lane for the second southbound through lane
(see Figure 17, in the Initial Study). Beyond Gate 8, for a distance of 350 feet, up the first
residential street, a departure transition should be striped to retain parking in front of the
residential developments.
There are two alternatives to managing traffic operations at Gate 8 during the PM peak hour,
given the provision of permanent dual left-turn lanes. These are described as follo,s and
detailed on Figure 17 in the Initial Study. These alternatives focus on lane balance betw en the
southbound left-turn and the entry lanes at Gate 8.
21.. One of the two following alternative mitigation measures shall be adopted.
21A. Construction Alternative: The outbound lanes at Gate 8 can be restriped f r three
outbound lanes and then provide two (2) permanent inbound lanes. This requires
widening of the south side of the driveway for the full width of one lane (11-12 eet) to
provide the second entry lane.
21B. Traffic Management Alternative: This alternative does not require constr ction.
The outbound lanes are increased from two (2) to three (3) during the track season PM
hour with the use of barricades as is done today. Since the inbound lanes will be reduced
to a single lane, the dual left-turn lane must be reduced as well. it will be necesary to
barricade or cone (close oft) the inside left-turn pocket at the same time as the exit lanes
are increased at Gate 8. Figure 17 in the Initial Study details the recommended
improvements and alternatives.
Huntington Drive and Driveway E at La Cadena: Peak period outbound movements on weekdays
and Saturdays cause extensive southbound queuing, particularly in the left-turn lane.
22. A shared left, left-right turn lane configuration is warranted on this approach. Th.s dual
left-turn requires widening of the Huntington Drive cut which is designed for a single
lane. In addition to the foregoing, signal phasing should be adjusted to protect
northbound movements approaching form La Cadena to prevent conflicts. A sch-matic
of these intersection improvements is provided on Figure 18 in the Initial Study.
3.14 Public Services -
No mitigation measures are required.
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 12 LAg!r1 l7j b 1A r
u4 22
• —. THE SANTA ANITA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring rogram
3.15 Energy
No mitigation measures are required.
3.16 Utilities
No mitigation measures are required.
3.17 Human Health
23. The demolition and remodeling activity shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403 Asbestos
Emissions from Renovation/Demolition Activities.
24. All fluorescent light ballasts located in all of the areas that are to be demolished shall be
inspected to determine whether the serial number contains a -W suffix. All ball sts that
do not contain a -W suffix shall be assumed to contain PCBs and shall ther fore be
handled as hazardous waste for proper disposal in accordance with all a placable
government regulations, unless appropriate testing demonstrates the absence of CBs.
25. Unless appropriate testing demonstrates otherwise, paint flakes, fragments, or dust
generated in demolishing areas shall be assumed to contain hazardous levels of lead and
shall be handled as hazardous waste, so as to avoid human contact.
3.18 Aesthetics
Additional aesthetic impacts analysis would occur as part of the Architectural Design Rev'ew and
no mitigation measures are necessary.
3.19 Recreation
No mitigation measures are required.
3.20 Cultural Resources
26. The initial stages of grading and excavation for the proposed project should be monitored
by a qualified archaeologist who is prepared to recover and document any significant
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 13 LA S ERIMetTEY992
23
THE SANTA A/IVII TA
FASHION PARK MALL EXPANSION
Mitigation Monitoring P ogram
historic material that appears. This may require some delay or redirection of grading
and/or excavation.
THE PLANNING CENTE R Page 14 g�
La litA
24
Chapter Four
MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX
4.1 Matrix
The following Matrix outlines all mitigation measures included in the Initial Study, and
responsible agency, timing and action taken. It will be completed as mitigation measures are
implemented.
•
P:\DATA\PROJDATA\CAR-07\M IT-MON.PG M
THE PLANNING CENTER Page 15 LASEliteReAeffi92 25
•
•
The Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall Expansion
Mitigation Monitoring Program Summary
IMitigation Measures I Monitoring Activity I luting
I Monitoring Agent gent
1. A site specific geotechnical report shall be prepared by a certified geologist or
geotechnical engineer which: 1)reviews recent geologic literature for the area,
since the technical report for the Safety Element is dated 1975 and new
information about the Raymond Hill and other faults with potential to impact the
site may now be available,2)confirms whether sufficient site specific set-backs
have been made for the portion of the site with the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone and to confirm that no structures would be subject to significant surface fault
rupture hazards,3)identifies site-specific seismic parameters for the site,which the
new and renovated structures should be capable of withstanding(note:not the
existing buildings).
2. A site specific probablistic dynamic analysis shall be prepared by a certified
structural engineer to verify the building design. The design analysis shall be
based on a site-specific geotechnical report and is intended to identify additional
remediation,if any are needed,that would be required beyond the UBC code
requirements to reduce ground shaking hazards to the project to a level of
insignificance. •
3. The demolition and remodeling activity shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403
Asbestos Emissions from Renovation/Demolition Activities to reduce asbestos
emissions and protect sensitive receptors in proximity to the site.
4. Graded surfaces shall be watered at least twice daily to form a wind-resistant
temporary crust. The program should include control of wind-blown dust on site
access roadways and in the paved parking areas of the mall. (45-90%)
5. The site and the construction equipment shall be sprayed with water in the
morning and the evening.
6. Ground cover shall be planted as soon as practical in the construction process.(20-
65%)
7. Any earth being transported shall be covered and the wheels and lower portions of
transport trucks will be sprayed with water before they leave the construction area.
This includes trucks moving excavated earth from one portion of the site to the
other if fugitive dust is visible from the transporting activity.
g. Construction equipment shall be selected considering emission factors and energy
efficiency. All equipment shall be properly tuned and maintained.
P°— 9. Electric or diesel-powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-powered
engines where feasible.
rri 10. Construction activities shall minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent
to die site and,if necessary,a fiagperson shall be retained to maintain safety
adjacent to existing roadways.
II. Construction operations shall be phased to limit large equipment operations during
_the_smog_season_from_May_tluough-ektober
12. Ridesharing for the construction crew shall be supported and encouraged.
•
1O
The Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall Expansion
Mitigation Monitoring Program Summary
Mitigation Measures I Monitoring Activity I liimin>
::;>;;>.::::::�:..�;,»ry<::::>:<:>;:::<::><:;:<;::>::::;<:;;z:;�<::_;:.;:.;:.>:•::.;;:.;:.;:;<.;;:.;:.:;:.:.;;;:::::::::::::.:::::...�::::............ b Monitoring Agent
............. ...:.:::::::::.:.�:.:..::.'.iii:.::.ii+:iii:iviiii:'.:.iiii:::.iii:v.:iii+ii:{::.ii'ivry}iiij:.v:Ci;+:,i'iJii;::,.v::;:::ti:':;.::..}'::'.:;i;:'>':;+:.i;:.'v;•i!J,<::::':'}}
13. Energy Use
• The parking lot design should allow for the future installation of dedicated
parking spaces with electrical outlets for electrical vehicles.
• Use light colored roof materials to reflect heat.
• Use building materials that do not require use of paints and solvents such as
pre-primed and a wood molding and trim products and pre-primed wallboard,
(80-100%).
• Require recycling bins in addition to trash bins and contract for recycling
services.
• Increase walls and attic insulation beyond Title 24 requirements,(5-9%).
• Provide shade trees consistent with design review process to reduce building
heat,(55%)
• Use energy efficient and automated controls for air conditioners,(30%)
• Use energy efficient parking lot lights(such as metal halide,clean Iucalox,
high pressure sodium,low pressure sodium,or other energy efficient parking
lot lights)consistent with design review process,
•
• Use lighting controls and energy efficient lighting,(60-75%)
• Low-polluting and high-efficiency appliances shall be installed wherever
possible.
14.Congestion Relief
•
• Require on-site truck loading zones.
• l
• Reschedule truck deliveries and pickups for off-peak hours. i
15.Work/Non-Work Tripe
• Enhance bus stops on-site with seating areas and covered shelters to further
encourage transit use. Where feasible,bus stops should allow passengers to
(� wait inside air conditioned stores with a line of sight to see arriving buses.
• Provide preferential parking spaces-for carpools and vanpools.
• Utilize a mix of services on-site to provide funher amenities for employees
and customers that would reduce off-site vehicle trips. Consideration shall be
given to extending postal services beyond the Christmas season,medical
off ice-facilities auto-repairandaddi tional-ridesharinginformation-at-the
existing transit information desk.
rn -
CD
17
The Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall Expansion
Mitigation Monitoring Program Summary
Mitigation Measures I Monitoring Activity I Mining I Monitoring Agent
16. NPDES permit to be obtained and adhered to in order to prevent significant short
term construction impacts to water quality.
17. The developer shall submit a new landscape plan prepared by a registered
landscape architect and in accordance with the requirements identified in
Resolution No.4185.
ANIMAL LIEC
No 7iti§!1!?°measures
No mitigation measures arc required. . . . .
No tnitigation measures are required.
1
18. Implementation of the proposed zone change is required to eliminate conflicts I
between the proposed land uses and existing zoning.
No mitigation measures are requited.
No mitigation Ineastucs are required. j .
No mitigation measures are required. . .
19. Truck traffic to and from the project site shall use the Baldwin Avenue truck route
r— traveling to the 210 Freeway. With prior City approval and at times selected to
avoid traffic impacts exceptions may be made to traffic mitigation measure 19.
Cl) 20. Pre-and post-construction surveys of the condition of Baldwin Avenue shall be
ril made jointly by the developer and the City Engineer to determine the extent of
construction related accelerated wear on Baldwin Avenue(or if oilier routes arc
later approved by the City, then also on those routes). If there is damage
attributable to construction traffic, the damage shall be repaired by the developer to
the SaiisjCtion of the City Engineer.
_ --
ril
i\D•
18
00
The Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall Expansion
Mitigation Monitoring Program Summary
IMitigation Measures I Monitoring Activity I Timing Monitoring Agent
21. 0 ...................................... , .................................................. ..................................................... . _ ......._.........
One of the two following alternative mitigation measures shall be adopted.
21A. Cons1rucrion Algernative: The outbound lanes at Gate 8 can be
restriped for three outbound lanes and then provide two(2)permanent inbound
lanes. This requires widening of the south side of the driveway for the full width
of one lane(11-12 feet)to provide the second entry lane.
21B. Traffic Management Alternative: This alternative does not require
construction. The outbound lanes are increased from two(2)to three(3)during
the track season PM hour with the use of barricades as is done today. Since the
inbound lanes will be reduced to a single lane,the dual left-turn lane must be
reduced as well. it will be nrrPcsary to barricade or cone(close off)the.inside
left-turn pocket at the same time as the exit lanes are increased at Gate 8. Figure
17 in the Initial Study details the recommended improvements and alternatives.
22. A shared left,left-right turn lane configuration is warranted on this approach. This
dual left-turn requires widening of the Huntington Drive cut which is designed for
a single lane. In addition to the foregoing,signal phasing should be adjusted to
protect northbound movements approaching form La Cadena to prevent conflicts.
A schematic of these intersection improvements is provided on Figure 18 in the
Initial Study.
No miti a'o
u n measu
g res are required
o miti at'
N ton measur
es ire r uire
g eq d
No miti atio
t n measur
6
es ire r utred
W
23. The demolition and remodeling activity shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403
Asbestos Emissions from Renovation/Demolition Activities.
24. All fluorescent light ballasts located in all of the areas that arc to be demolished
shall be inspected to determine whether the serial number contains a-W suffix.
All ballasts that do not contain a-W suffix shall be assumed to contain PCBs and
shall therefore be handled as hazardous waste for proper disposal in accordance
with all applicable government regulations,unless appropriate testing demonstrates
r'° the absence of PCBs.
25. Unless appropriate testing demonstrates otherwise,paint flakes,fragments,or dust
CJ) generated in demolishing areas shall be assumed to contain hazardous levels of
lead and shall be handled as hazardous waste,so as to avoid human contact.
1r _Additional-aesthetic-impacts analysis-would-occur-as-part-of-rhe-Architectural-Design
-=� Review and no mitigation measures are necessary.
SAD
iND
19
The Santa Anita Fashion Park Mall Expansion
Mitigation Monitoring Program Summary
IMitigation Measures I Monitoring Activity I liming I Monitoring Agent
No mitigation measures are required. I
26. The initial stages of grading and excavation for the proposed project should be
monitored by a qualified archaeologist who is prepared to recover and document
any significant historic material that appears. This may require some delay or
redirection of grading and/or excavation.
r'DAUYYO1nArA-cAa.O7,sT NON.7BL
r' '
yr
qy+q
i ' I
20