No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 7, 1993SPECIAL MEETING A G E N D A ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL/ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 6:00 P.M. ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM ACTION ROLL CALL: Council Members Fasching, Harbicht, Lojeski, Margett and Ciraulo CLOSED SESSION: Discussion of real property transactions; closed meeting with negotiator per government code section 54956.6 applicable to property at the northeast corner of Second and Santa Clara to the 210 freeway. ADJOURN to 7:00 p.m. September 7, 1993 DONALD R. DUCKWORTH CITY MANAGER 240 West Huntington Drive P.O. Box 60 Arcadia. California 91066.0060 (818) 574 -5400 JOSEPH C. CIRAULO MAYOR NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING DENNIS A. LOJESKI MAYOR PROTEMPORE GEORGE FASCHING ROBERT C. HARBICHT BOB MARGETT COUNCU.MEMBERS JUNE D. ALFORD CITY CLERK As authorized by Arcadia City Charter Section 408 and California Government Code Section 54956 a Special Meeting of the Arcadia.City Council is hereby called for the Arcadia City Council Chamber at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California at 6:00 p.m. on September 7, 1993. The purpose of this meeting is to review potential development on property at the northeast corner of Second Avenue and Santa Clara to the 210 Freeway, and to conduct a closed session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8 to instruct City negotiators regarding price and terms of payment for potential land acquisitions, sales, leases applicable to property at the northeast corner of Second Avenue and Santa Clara to the 210 Freeway and negotiations with representatives of the Costco Company, John Bell of Western Security Bank, R. Smith of Emkay Development Company, R. Johnson and L. Nicholson of Los Angeles County Public Works. No other business shall be con Dated: September 3 , 1993 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,Lc /�.� Michael H. Miller City Attorney v J Pre - meeting 7:00 A G E N D A ARCADIA`CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 7:30 P.M. ACTION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL. CALL: Council Members Fasching, Harbicht, Lojeski, Margett and Ciraulo Margett absent MINUTES of the August 10, 1993 and August 17, 1993 _ Approved minutes adjourned and regular meetings. from the 8/10 mta. MOTION: Read all ordinances and resolutions by title only and waive reading in full. Adopted PRESENTATION of Proclamation to Celia Kalm 1. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of a request from the Arcadia Board of Realtors to conduct a bingo game at their annual fund raising event on September 18, 1993. Approved 4 =0 2. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of the closure of Wilderness Park on weekends to the general public, with the exception of groups and organization's with a reservation. Approved 3 -1 ACTION 3. Time reserved for those in.the audience who wish to Ralph Bicker address the City Council (five - minute time limit Elmer Black per person). Mel Coen Bob Chaney Olga Hasler 4. RECESS CITY COUNCIL S. MEETING OF THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY a. ROLL CALL: Agency Members Fasching, Harbicht, Lojeski, Margett and Ciraulo Margett absent b. Request to partially repay City loans, re -loan - same and extend the term of the Agency's total indebtedness to the City for fiscal year 1993 - 1994'. Approved 4 -0 C. Design Review = Bank of America automatic teller machine, 201 N. Santa Anita. Continued to 9/21 d. Adjourn to 5:30 p.m. September 14, 1993 6. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL 7. CONSENT ITEMS a. Request,to roll over and extend terms of outstanding Agency debt to the City for fiscal year 1993 -1994. Approved 4 -0 b. Report and recommendation for the purchase of a new telephone system for City Hall. Approved 4 -0 C. Recommendation for final acceptance - W.O. 695 sandblasting, coating and seismic retrofit of six steel tanks. Approved 4 -0 - 2 - AGENDA 9/7/93 ACTION continued d. Recommendation for final acceptance of 1992 -1993 annual traffic striping and pavement markings program. Job No. 540 Approved 4 -0 e. Designation of City Council as final decision - maker regarding Conditional Use Permit application 92 -003•- inert landfill - 12321 Lower Azusa Road. Approved 4 -0 8. CITY MANAGER a. Analysis of Newco Waste Systems report. Continued to 10 /5 b. Capital Improvement Plan modification to A p p r o v e d accommodate library construction. architect's minimum project costs of $4.5 mil. + items 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 & 11 as listed in staff re-port. 4 -0 C. Authorization to retain .a consultant to provide design services for Huntington Drive rehabilitation (Santa Anita Avenue to Fifth Avenue) and Huntington Drive water line reconstruction (Santa Anita Avenue to Second Avenue). CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 17, 1993 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Approved 4 -0 d. Report and recommendation regarding temporary banners for commercial zones. Approved existing regulations, with reduction of modification fee to $63. 3 -1 - 3 - AGENDA 9/7/93 0 0 ACTION 9. CITY ATTORNEY a. ORDINANCE NO. 1995 - FOR ADOPTION - Amending various sections of Chapter 2, Article IX regarding storage, and amending Chapter 1 of Article V to include regulations for the collection and loading of recyclables in the commercial, industrial, multiple family, special use and public use zones. Approved 4 -0 b. RESOLUTION NO. 5747 - Fixing the amount of revenue required to be raised from property taxes necessary for fiscal year 1993 -1994 to pay the indebtedness of the City or Districts. Approved 4 -0 10. MATTERS FROM STAFF 11. .MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS 12. ADJOURN to 5:30 p.m. September 14, 1993 in memory of Cay Mortenson, Robert Huddy and Earl Ricker. Move "Matters From Elected Officials" to middle of Agenda (after Arcadia Redevelopment Agency). Rowe - Proclamation for Neal Johnson Butler - Study of leaf blowers Provide copy of recent report on recreational vehicles parked in front of houses on a permanent basis. McIntyre - Take another look at the possibility of the Arcadia Pops Orchestra providing background music.for the City Council Meeting telecast. Note to applicants for the Cable Television Commission regarding the status of the project. - 4 - AGENDA 9/7/93 September 7, 1993 O Irp -7, e Memotandum TO: Arcadia City Council FROM: Jim Dale, Finance Director /may Becky Pike, Business License Officer SUBJECT: Request for Bingo Permit Arcadia Board of Realtors 601 S. First Ave., Arcadia. SUMMARY The Arcadia Board of Realtors annually holds a charitable fund raising event. This year they are requesting a Bingo Permit from the City of Arcadia to hold a Bingo Game as their annual event. Proceeds from the Bingo Game will go to the Arcadia Welfare and Thrift Shop as the Arcadia Board of Realtors annual Cantree project. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Karren D. Schenck, Executive Vice President, submitted the application as the representative of the Arcadia Board of Realtors. REQUEST: Bingo Permit for one scheduled event to be held on Septmeber 18, 1993 as their annual fund raising event. BACKGROUND: The Arcadia Board of Realtors submitted the required documentation and payment of the Public Hearing fee and the Bingo License fee to the Finance Director of the City of Arcadia. The Arcadia Board of Realtors meet the requirement of holding their regular meetings in the City for the past five years. LASER IMAGED law Page 2 September 7, 1993 When an organization's request is for less than three Bingo Games within a six -month period the Arcadia Municipal Code allows for the investigation process to be waived. A complete financial statement of the distribution of the proceeds of the event will be submitted to the City. The event is scheduled to be held at the Arcadia Community Center, 375 W. Campus Dr. The City has approved their request to hold a fund raising event at the Community Center and the application has been submitted to the Recreation Department. The requested date is Saturday, September 18, 1993. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Arcadia City Council conduct the public hearing and then exercise discretion to issue a Bingo Permit to the Arcadia Board of Realtors to conduct a Bingo Game as their annual fund raiser. Any renewal of this permit, if granted, would be limited to only one annual Bingo Game as a fund raising event. J �`1 ! Qom,• LASER • � 'wry'` REALTOR' August 23, 1993 KARREN SCHENCK Executive Vice President C.A.R. HONORARY Sincerely, DIRECTOR FOR LIFE Gordon Maddock Karren D. Schenck Executive Vice President KDS /bl m 112t enclosures 601 South First Avenue, Arcadia, California 91006 (818) 446.4649 • FAX (818) 446 -4072 Ms. Becky Pike City of Arcadia Business License Officer OFFICERS 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91006 -0060 BARBARA PATTERSON President JUDYWEBB•MARTIN Dear Becky: President-Elect I hope that the enclosed information will satisfy the JOHN BARKER requirements. As I mentioned to you briefly on the phone, all Vice President proceeds from this event go to the Arcadia Welfare and Thrift Shop MICHAEL LUDECKE as part of our annual CanTree project. We collect thousands of Secretary/Treasurer canned goods and funds to be used for children's clothing gift certificates and other necessities that are given to the Arcadia DIRECTORS Welfare and Thrift Shop. They use the food goods and funds at the Holiday Season and throughout the rest of the year. We receive a Al Corrigan report from them as to the disbursement of the funds and canned Margaret Henkey goods. We would be happy to supply the city with a copy of the Edda Hutson final budget after costs are extracted as well as a copy of the Barbara Kuhn Joan O'Rourke check to the Arcadia Welfare and Thrift completion of the upon Yvonne Pirtle event. David Scarminach Henry Velasco We have had this program in existence for many years and in the John Wuo past our major fund raisers have been Las Vegas Nights. Since the Monrovia Board of REALTORS® had such a successful Bingo Night for C.A.R. DIRECTORS their CanTree project last year, we thought we would follow suit. Margaret Barbara Henkey Enclosed are the applicable funds. Please let Bernice or Pat Michael Ludecke Garcia at my office know if there is any further information Barbara Patterson necessary. Judy Webb-Martin Thank you for your assistance. C.A.R. HONORARY Sincerely, DIRECTOR FOR LIFE Gordon Maddock Karren D. Schenck Executive Vice President KDS /bl m 112t enclosures 601 South First Avenue, Arcadia, California 91006 (818) 446.4649 • FAX (818) 446 -4072 i58'D —�v d nQ/)/ z'YS t A September 7, 1993 TO: ARCADIA CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DONNA L. BUTLER, ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TEMPORARY BANNERS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES During the past few months the City has received numerous complaints from business owners regarding the number of days temporary banners are allowed to be displayed on commercial buildings. In response to these complaints, the City Manager requested staff to review the existing temporary banner code and suggest some possible alternatives for consideration by the City Council. BACKGROUND The existing code permits banners for a maximum of 30 days per year. The regulations allow not more than two banners for any one business with a total surface area of 32 square feet. (The specific regulations are attached for your information.) Currently if a business owner wants a larger banner or wants to display a banner for longer than the 30 day period they may apply for a modification to the regulations. The cost for a modification is $210, requires a public hearing before the Modification Committee and takes approximately two weeks. More and more businesses are keeping banners up after the allotted time frame. Business owners believe that banners provide them a means for additional advertising and that banners give them a more competitive edge in attracting customers. Most business owners do not want to go through the time and expense of the Modification process and enforcement of the regulations has become more difficult due to greater non-compliance. Because of Arcadia's historic concern regarding the appearance of our business communities, the City has actively enforced the banner provisions, including criminal prosecutions through the City Attorney's office. In August, the City Council approved the Downtown Revitalization Strategy prepared by Michael Freedman with Freedman, Tung and Bottomley. During the CC Report - Temporary Banners 9/7/93 Page 1 LASER IMAGED rT i .Y y public meetings on the Downtown Revitalization Plan one of the concerns mentioned was the City's strict sign ordinance, especially relating to banners. Part of the Revitalization Strategy includes "New sign design guidelines...that encourage merchants to reflect the variety and color of Downtown Shops and services". One of the high priority actions listed is to "Establish land use, parking, signage and design policies for the downtown that support revitalization objectives." Michael Freedman will be working with City staff on developing new sign regulations for the downtown area. Freedman's recommendations may include changes to the banner regulations. Although the revitalization strategy is focused on the City's downtown area, the concern regarding temporary banners is City-wide. Certain proposed changes to the downtown signing regulations could be implemented through the City. ALTERNATIVES In response to the concerns expressed by business owners the City Council may wish to consider one of the following: 1. Moratorium on Enforcement The City Council could formally adopt a moratorium suspending the enforcement of the 30 day time limitation for temporary banners in all commercial areas until such time as staff has had the opportunity to study the problem and come back to the City Council with a recommendation. The moratorium would be adopted by either a resolution or ordinance of the City Council setting forth the appropriate findings. Businesses still would be required to secure a banner permit (no fee) and comply with banner regulations in relationship to size and number, but would be allowed to keep banners until the end of the moratorium or at such time as the City Council adopts new standards for banners. A moratorium suspending enforcement of the banner regulations in the downtown area only is not recommended. All businesses within the City are affected by the downturn in the economy. Staff does not feel it would be appropriate to eliminate enforcement only within the downtown area. This could perceived by many business owners outside the downtown area as being "selective enforcement". Staff has the following concerns regarding extending, for any significant length of time, the period in which banners may be displayed: CC Report - Temporary Banners 9/7/93 Page 2 i a. The City has no control over the installation, aesthetics and design of banners. Some banners are designed by professionals while other banners are hand printed and not aesthetically pleasing. b. Temporary banners begin to deteriorate over a period of time and do not enhance the overall appearance of the business community. 2. Extend on a permanent basis the allowable time limit for banners. The City Council could direct staff to prepare a text amendment revising the code to allow temporary banners to be displayed for a longer time period, i.e., 45 days, 60 days, 90 days, etc. During the interim the Council could adopt a resolution/ordinance establishing a moratorium on enforcement until the text amendment is effective. 3. Continue compliance with the existing regulations, but reduce the fee for modifications relating to temporary banners from $210 to a lesser amount (the cost for an administrative modification is $63). More businesses might consider applying for a modification to display banners for more than 30 days if the cost is less prohibitive. 4. Maintain the status quo and enforce the existing code. Regardless of which alternative the City Council selects, staff recommends that business owners continue to secure the "no fee" banner permit and comply with all the other regulations pertaining to size, number and location requirements, unless approved otherwise through the modification process. The permit process allows staff the opportunity to review the banner to insure it compliance with all code requirements. ACTION If the City Council wishes to consider one of the above alternatives, with the exception of maintaining the status quo, the Council should direct staff to take the appropriate action set forth in each alternative. If the City Council believes that no changes should be made to the existing regulations, no further action is necessary. Submitted by: As. .v- // i 1� !_1i.- ._.+ _ 1.r�1 __yJ Donna L. Butler,—ding Planning Director Donald . Duckw■ rth• CC Report - Temporary Banners 9/7/93 Page 3 LASER IMAGED fP' � 1 Attachment TEMPORARY BANNER REGULATIONS 9262.4.13. Definition: A temporary banner is a sign which is constructed of pliable materials such as canvas, fabric, vinyl plastic or similar materials which will withstand exposure to wind and rain without significant deterioration and which does not require a building permit for its construction, or installation outside of a building. The Planning Director may issue a permit for temporary banners advertising special events, special sales or promotions, grand openings, changes in ownership or management, going out-of-business sales, and similar events. Request for a temporary banner shall be submitted in writing to the PlanningDirector, and shall incude a description of the banner, its general content, location on the property, size, banner construction (materials), the time period that the banner will be displayed,the address of the property, the name of the business, and the name of, the person requesting the approval of the permit. A maximum of two (2) temporary banners, at any one time, may be permitted for each business. The maximum total surface area of all such temporary banner(s) for each business shall not exceed 32 square feet. The use of temporary banner(s) for each business shall not exceed more than 30 cumulative days in any one calendar year. Temporary banners for events or activities sponsored by nonprofit organizations or for events or activities which principally benefit nonprofit organizations may be authorized for an additional 30 cumulative days in any one calendar year....For the purpose of this Section, any portion of any day in which a banner is displayed shall be counted as one (1) full day. /5,, 3 - 9y rh ip!iiii9111,A emotandum 110 %TWIT, kb ''°"S0- September 7, 1993 Date TO: City Council, City of Arcadia FROM: James S. Dale, Finance Director `j SUBJECT: Request to Roll Over and Extend Terms of Outstanding Agency Debt to the City for Fiscal Year 1993-1994 (See Agenda Item #5b) The Arcadia Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment Fund exists for the re-payment of interest and principal on long term debt. The source of funds for these payments is tax increment revenue and each year at June 30, the agency repays the City any loans outstanding between the City and the Agency to the extent that funds are available in the tax increment fund. The annual repayment of existing debt between the Agency . and the City is recorded in order to utilize tax increment funds for their intended use and to formally recognize and document the loans between the City and Agency annually. The tax increment fund at June 30,. 1993 has an estimate cash balance of $2, 038,957.36. It is recommended that the Agency Board take formal action to remit these monies to the City in partial payment of existing loans and for the City to re-loan these funds to the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency Project Fund for the Agency to use to further pay expenses and acquire property according to the directives of the Agency Board. In addition, the Agency and the City should roll-over or extend the repayment of the balance of all remaining loans to June 30, 1994. Following is a summary of the loans outstanding at June 30, 1993 and the estimated cash balance available for loan repayment: Outstanding Loans from City to Agency $5,024, 635. 17 at 6-30-93 Less: Estimated Cash Balance in Tax 2 , 038, 957.36 Increment Fund 6-30-93 Outstanding Balance at 6-30-93 $2,985, 677.81 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City accept payment of $2 , 038, 957.36 on loans outstanding with the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency on June 30, 1993; and that the City re-loan t - $2 038,957. 36 to the Agency Project Fund. In addition, the City extend • e . eH;yment on the remaining outstanding debt of $2,985,677.81. All lo•: - fiom th= Agency to be due and payable on June 30, 1994. Approved: k. ►-'-.' ' Donald R. Duck •rth City Manager LASER IMAGED 6 G/p�S�o � � -;.��::. en�tota�ta�un�t •-• Ortfm 4.1 40.0- September 7, 1993 Date _-- - -- TO: Governing Board, Arcadia Redevelopment Agency FROM: James S. Dale, Finance Director- SUBjECT: Request to Partially Repay City Loans, Re-Loan Same and Extend the Term of the Agency's Total Indebtedness to the City for Fiscal Year 1993-1994 (See Agenda Item # 7a ) The Arcadia Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment Fund exists for the re-payment of interest and principal on long term debt. The source of funds for these payments is tax increment revenue and each year at June 30, the agency repays the City any loans outstanding between the City and the Agency to the extent that funds are available in the tax increment fund. The annual repayment of existing debt between the Agency and the City is recorded in order to utilize tax increment funds for their intended use and to formally recognize and document the loans between the City and Agency annually. The tax increment fund at June 30, 1993 has an estimated cash balance of $2, 038,957. 36. It is recommended that the Agency Board take formal action to remit these monies to the City in partial payment of existing loans and for the City to re-loan these funds to the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency Project Fund for the Agency to use to further pay expenses and acquire property according to the directives of the Agency Board. In addition, the Agency and the City should roll-over or extend the repayment of the balance of all remaining loans to June 30, 1994 . Following is a summary of the loans outstanding at June 30, 1993 and the estimated cash balance available for loan repayment: Outstanding Loans from City to Agency $5,024, 635. 17 at 6-30-93 Less: Estimated Cash Balance in Tax 2,038, 957.36 Increment Fund 6-30-93 Outstanding Balance at 6-30-93 $2 ,985, 677.81 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Agency pay $2, 038,957.36 of loans outstanding at June 30, 1993 , to the City of Arcadia and that the Agency re-borrow $2, 038,957. 36 and deposit such amount in the Agency Project Fund. In addition, the Agen a• •ept an extension for the re-payment of the remaining outstanding debt $ ' •85 677.81 . All loans to the City to be due and payable on June 3 9 ! . Approved: ■ 1 k a...UL Donald R. Duck orth Executive Director LASER IMAGED J�o41-;4-.11 r� a Ill % September 7, 1993 iTO: Arcadia City Council /' 7 FROM: Joseph R. Lopez j Director of Public Work ; Eldon G. Davidson 0© Water Manager SUBJECT: Authorization to Retain a Consultant to Provide Design Services for Huntington Drive Rehabilitation (Santa Anita Avenue to Fifth Avenue) and Huntington Drive Water Line Reconstruction (Santa Anita Avenue to Second Avenue) Continued from Arcadia City Council Meeting of August 17, 1993 BACKGROUND: At their meeting on August 3 , 1993, the City Council adopted the Downtown Revitalization Strategy and Program Concept. In another action by the Council, staff was authorized to retain Freedman, Tung and Bottomley (FTB) , with ASL Consulting Engineers as a subcontractor, to design the Huntington Drive/First Avenue Streetscape Improvements. In yet another action, the City Council directed staff to report back with a proposal from ASL for the design of Huntington Drive Rehabilitation (overlay) and Huntington Drive water line reconstruction. DISCUSSION: Huntington Drive Rehabilitation Project This project involves the cold planing- of the existing asphalt pavement and construction of new asphalt pavement overlay on Huntington Drive between Santa Anita Avenue and Fifth Avenue. The portion of the project between Santa Anita Avenue and Second Avenue is within the area of the Downtown Revitalization. The project is in the approved Capital Improvement Program with $900, 000 budgeted from the Gas-Tax Fund. ASL has provided the City with a proposal to prepare the plans and specifications (P&S) for this project. The P&S, when completed, would be combined with' the P&S for the Huntington Drive/First Avenue Streetscape Improvements. ASL proposes to do this work at a cost of $20, 000. Huntington Drive Water Line Reconstruction Project Prior to having any knowledge of the specific design concepts for Huntington Drive Streetscape Improvements, the Water Division had approval from the City Council to construct two water projects on Huntington Drive between Santa Anita Avenue and Second Avenue. The two water projects are described below: LASER IMAGED 1. Cement Lining of Existing 16" Steel Water Line This project involves cement lining of the existing 16" water line in Huntington Drive within the area , of the Downtown Revitalization. The City. Council, on February 2, 1993, appropriated $185, 000 from the Water Facilities Replacement Fund to construct the project. The existing 16" water main was constructed in 1936 and has experienced a major leak in January 1993 . The purpose of the project was to prevent future leaks in the 16" water main especially after the construction of the new roadway. 2 . Construction of ten (10) - 8" Water Main Laterals in Huntington Drive This project involves constructing five (5) - 8" water main laterals on each side of Huntington Drive (see Attachment 1) . There is $50, 000 budgeted in the approved Capital Improvement Program from the Water Facilities Replacement Fund. The purpose of this project was to avoid perpendicular street cuts for new water services after completion of the new asphalt pavement. Each property owner needing a new water service would still be required to extend the 8" lateral longitudinally in Huntington Drive to provide water service connection to their building. Since some specific design concepts for Huntington Drive Streetscape Improvements have been made available, Water Division staff felt it necessary to re-evaluate these two projects to determine if they could be modified to better serve the Downtown Revitalization area. One of the key factors in our re-evaluation was to develop a water project that would eliminate the need to replace the existing 16" water main in the near future and minimize street cuts for the longest period of time possible. A second factor was to have water facilities located in Huntington Drive in an area that would require the least amount of street cuts when adding new water services in the future. After careful review of these two factors, it was concluded by staff that the. two water projects should be replaced with a new water main replacement project. Essentially, this means that the existing 16" water main (constructed in 1936) would be abandoned in place and two new water mains would be constructed near the gutter on the north and south side of Huntington Drive (Parallel Main Project - PMP) . (See Attachment 2) The construction of the PMP would allow future water services (domestic and fire) to be added with only minor street cuts (approximately 4' x 4') for connection purposes rather than making any perpendicular or longitudinal street cuts to access existing mains. Without the PMP, any new water service would involve a longitudinal street cut from 50' to 150' in length to connect the property owner's water service to the new 8" laterals. If the property owner, did not .connect to the new 8" laterals, then the LASER 3 only other location for a new water service would be at the existing 16" water main near the median in Huntington Drive which would involve a perpendicular street cut. One economic benefit of the PMP is that new ductile iron mains would last approximately 50 years longer than the cement lining of the existing 16" water main. Another economic benefit would be realized by the business owners because their costs to install a new water service (domestic and fire) would be much cheaper. Depending on the location of a particular property, a business . owner could save between $5, 000 and $15, 000 as a result of the PMP because the PMP would greatly reduce the amount of water main work required to construct a new water service. It is staff's recommendation that the two prior approved water projects be eliminated and replaced with the PMP. The estimated cost to construct the PMP is $415, 000. With the approval of City Council, staff would utilize the already approved funds of $235, 000 toward the PMP. If the PMP is approved, staff requests that the City Council appropriate an additional $180, 000 from the Facilities Replacement Fund for a total of $415, 000 for the PMP. ASL has provided the Water Division with a proposal to prepare the plans and specifications (P&S) for the PMP in Huntington Drive. As with the P&S for Huntington Drive Rehabilitation, the P&S for the PMP would be combined with the P&S for the Streetscape Project. ASL proposes to do this work for $13, 500. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize staff to replace the two prior approved water projects (cement lining of existing 16" main and 8" water main laterals) with the Parallel Main Project in Huntington Drive from Santa Anita Avenue to Second Avenue. 2. Appropriate an additional $180, 000. from the Water Facilities Replacement Fund for the Parallel Main Project. 3 . Authorize staff to issue a Purchase Order to retain ASL Consulting Engineers in the amount of $33 , 500 to prepare plans and specifications for Huntington Drive Rehabilitation and Huntington Drive Water Line Reconstruction (Parallel Main Project) . n Approved: tOkW Donald R. Duckw rth City Manager Attachments -3- LASER 1 AGLD V i — --i 1 sCOA/0 4V41; z ---,== _IF- / Evsmtia SfimiTER L/NE c/To' \--I Oa 2) As') I (/60) 1-4.- 049) 1 048) (/¢3) I _ Qc v Ciao) I </4z) Q W (/34)(!35) ( 038) N. (/3/) ! 034) qc (ail) i 4 ® 8 It/4TER L4TERP4L8 - I (i28) TYPIc4L 5 PL4cP Z I (/??) co (ii5)(i/3) . I C/o 4 .0O) ///) P/RS7 . '----1 , Ave. ,._.______t (�3) EX/ST/NQ 8"1'/4TER L/.�/E (60) (G5) (5'4) W ® (S2) ■ <45)C17) f 6(4) (48) v (41) ec Cog) . <37) . (34) Cam) (39) { (92) 64) (?9) I (3O) 0 CI os) C?6) <?,')(?3) ('a) cm) cz y o9) I (/c) W . (I7)(/4 ) J . 8aW4TER L4TER4CS LASE IMAGED TYPIC44 S PL 4CES I ft/57/NG 30 r1i/47 C i uF. s4 4./74 4�t//74 . /1 VE. Q 774 C4'MENT - / 2 1lval111J1711 r ., W17 P-2i1)'17' tyl1vr3 g/Y.7 t»1 PM,OS 9/ I SrX.f a3O I d3SV1 I (fro I (s ) J) rn A a C6 ) y (OZ) 09) (6Z)C/z) Z &) P (9 Z) Cr)5 Cos) (6z) 6) 0 N i7 a'31 I'M MIN y (66) (Z ) C") 1 V C")/Y/7 2131 p,, 'Ai � l i 3Ni7 a`eem,MIN � ) C (L�) i • J o (ow I op) r, • (8P) (9)9 I (66)(se C05) T— —"mi_ /YO/1.735 SSC�tJJ I 58/v/7 b'31 dM 9/1/?J0 N019N11/YlT/1 1 (s9) M8N UBSCadOa►d (o9) I N/7 X131 bAw JN/151-rg (55) WP -.19c:lid NO (zoo Q o/) (870 U)I [/r y C ) ) Z (dw (az/) Si/Y/7 bz31PA!mire O9S0dO8,11— (A (/4/> M (8E/) (sir)(se/) �0 r. (6 fro Rli (86r) (6Y/) (090 (6 5/y Col') / ____71 - a'N/7 8131 tOM„y 4N/1S/X3 (d,9J� r 'Ab' C/NOJd.S /"------