Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 7, 1995; ~ i - AGENDA s ~~~o _,a~ Arcadia City Council Meeting February 7, 1995 Regular Meeting: 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Council Members Chang, Kuhn, Lojeski, Margett and Young aii Presenc PRESENTATION Karch 7, 1995 Presentation by Mayor Mary Young on Arbor Day Proclamation. Arbor Day SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS - Police Chief Garne REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTSISTATEMENTS introduced. Consent Item li3 - revised staff rpt' QUESTIONS FROM CITY COUNCIL REGARDING None CLARIFICATION OF AGENDA ITEMS MOTION: Read all ordinances and resolutions by title only and waive Approved 5-0 reading in full. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (NON-PUBLIC HEARING) -(FIVE MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) Johanna Hofer Harold Schneider PUBLIC HEARING 1. Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of nParo~ea a-i MC-94-054, to permit a 2'-6" side yard setback for a garage addition which would align with the existing garage at 281 Arbolada Drive (Pete Humason, property owner and appellant). ~ MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS City Council Reports/Announcements/Statements/Future Agenda Direction Welcome to Chief Garner. Lo9eski absence Feb. 14 Study Session. Feb. 14 Agenda Item - City contribut3on to Arcadia High School Constitution Team, We The People competition in Sacramento. ~ •~a'YwII~~/Aw • • ~ ACTION MEETING OF THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY & CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Kuhn, Lojeski, Margett & Young nll present 1. Minutes of the January 17, 1995 regular meeting (Agency minutes only). ApPro~ed 5-0 2. Downtown 2000 Streetscape Project Approved all staf~ recommendations. A. Report and recommenclation on Downtown 2000 Streetscape 4-0...1 abstentio. project plans and schedule. B. Report and recommendation for approval of street light design. C. Report and recommendation to pay Larry Moss and Associates and ASL Consulting Engineers for hydrology analysis and preparation of new storm drain design plans and specifications for the Downtown 2000 Streetscape project. D. Report and recommendation to pay Larry Moss and Associates and ASL Consuiting Engineers for additional engineering work on the Streetscape design. E. Report and recommendation to approve ASL Consulting Engineers for construction administration services on the Streetscape projecU inspection services. F. Report and discussion of estimated revised project costs. CLOSED SESSION (to be held at the end of the City Council meeting) Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to confer with Agency real property negotiator regarding instructions concerning the possible sale or lease of the Agency-owned real property located at the Southwest comer of E. Huntington Drive and S. Second Avenue, (154-170 E. Huntington). Negotiations are with Thomas Shannon Outback Steak House. ADJOURN to February 21, 1995 @ 7:00 p.m. -2- AGENDA 02/07195 . • ~ CONSENTITEMS Minutes of the January 17, 1995 regular meeting. anuzo~ed s-o 2. Report and recommendation to approve funds for the purchase of bus Approved 5-0 passes for use on Foothill TransiYs 691 express line. 3. Report and recommendation for the purchase of a 3/4 ton pickup with Approved 5-0 service body for the Street Division of the Maintenance Services Department. . CITY MANAGER 1. Presentation and Discussion on Mid-Year Budget Report. xecei~e 6 File 2. Report and request for action on the Proposed Modification to Water Direcc staff to Conservation Ordinance. No. 1930. rtoaify ora. i93o with Option No: 4 3. Report and recommendation regarding an appointment to the Arcadia Helen Dahlstrom Beautiful Commission. co 6-30-96 4. RePort and recommendation to establish a Risk Management Program. nparo~ed s-o CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO. 5834 - A Resolution of the City of Arcadia, Califomia Adonted 5-0 commencing the formal franchise renewal proceedings between the City of Arcadia and Tele-Communication, Inc. of Arcadia/Sierra Madre. 2. RESOLUTION N0. 5835 - A Resolution of the City of Arcadia, California Adopted 5-0 declaring that weeds growing upon and in frontof, and brush,. rubbish, refuse and dirt upon and in front of certain private property in the City are a public nuisance; and declaring its intention to provide for the abatement thereof. (Public hearing 02/21/95.) 3. ~ ORDiNANCE NO. 2029 = Adoption - An Ordinance ofthe City Council Adopted 5-0 of Arcadia, California amending Section 6434.2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code relating to commercial refuse and the collection thereof. -3- AGENDA 02/07/95 ~ • CITY ATTORNEY (continued) ACTION 4. ORDINANCE NO. 2033 - Adoption - An Ordinance of the Ciry Council . naoncea s-o of Arcadia, California renumbering Sections 8901 through 8908 of the Arcadia Municipal Code regarding unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings and adding Sections 8920 through 8929.1 establishing earthquake safety requirements for tilt-up concrete wall buildings constructed prior to January 1, 1976. ORDINANCE NO. 2035 - Adoption - An Ordinance of the City Council of aa~prP~ s-n Arcadia, California amending the Arcadia Municipal Code by adding Part 7 to Chapter 2 of Article VII pertaining to sidewalk dining on public walkways. 6. ORDINANCE NO. 2034 - Introduction - An Ordinance of the City Council Introduced 5-0 of Arcadia, California amending the Arcadia Municipal Code by adding Section 3214.18 thereto which adds Section 10.17 to Article X of the Uniform Tra~c Ordinance regarding handicapped parking displays. ' CLOSED SESSION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54975.6 for conference with labor negotiators Dan Cassidy and/or Gary Rogers regarding the Arcadia Firefighter's Association and the Arcadia Police Relief Association. ADJOURN to February 14, 1995 @ 5:30 p.m. in memory of Gene Multen. Adjourned at 12'S5 a.m. Feb.B ~- AGENDA 02/0T195 0 8 70 -G d a��oo 4ser `J, A :4 Memorandum \ 4� . ,�C--4poRAT_e0� February 7, 1995 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eldon G. Davidson, Acting City Engineer/Water Manager Ela Prepared by: Rita A. Kurth, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Proposed Modification to Water Conservation Ordinance No. 1930 SUMMARY In October 1991, Governor Wilson signed legislation (AB 11) that required each California urban water supplier to develop a Water Shortage Contingency Plan which would include provisions for restricted water usage up to 50%. Subsequently, in June 1992 , Arcadia's Urban Water Shortage Contingency Plan was approved by the City Council. Since Ordinance No. 1930 (City' s Mandatory Water Conservation Plan adopted in February 1991 - a summary of the main points is attached along with the Ordinance) called for restricted water usage up to 25%, it will need to be modified to agree with the Shortage Contingency Plan, i. e. the addition of Phases VI, VII and VIII, 30%, 40% and 50% water usage curtailments respectively. In conjunction with adding the three additional water usage curtailment phases, the City Council may wish to consider including a section in the proposed ordinance which would provide a way, during mandatory conservation, for water customers who conserve below their allotment, to use the underused units of water (called "credits") in another billing cycle when their usage goes above their allotment. BACKGROUND During the mandatory water conservation program from February 1991 through December 1991, and for six months after, many complaints were received from customers regarding this program. In the beginning, customers were upset because they thought that the amount of water allotted to their property was unrealistically low and wanted increases in these allotments. The Water Division handled over 2 ,500 of these complaints by conferences or letters and one protest was heard before the City' s Review Board composed LASER IMAGED 1 � � 6ro a F Proposed Modification to Ordinance No. 1930 February 7, 1995 Page 2 of the Finance Director, the Planning Director and City Manager' s Administrative Assistant. Toward the latter part of the mandatory conservation program, over 1,000 verbal complaints were received from customers who conserved water below their allotment in one billing cycle and yet were penalized for going over their allotment in another billing cycle. At the time the program was in effect, the City's water billing system was not capable of handling a "credit" balance or over- conservation in customers ' accounts. In early 1993 the City purchased and installed a new water billing system that provided the capability to track the "credit" or the over-conservation (called "banking") . DISCUSSION "Banking" would allow customers to be more flexible in their water usage, saving water at opportune times and avoiding penalties during peak usage times as long as they maintain a "credit" balance. If the City re-establishes the mandatory water usage curtailments in the future, those customers who were highly dissatisfied with the conservation program during 1991 would be considerably less disgruntled. Complaints would be reduced and residents may be more receptive, to mandatory conservation than they were during 1991. On the other hand, during the mandatory conservation period in 1991, the average conservation was 20. 6% while only 10% reduction was called for. This is more than double the amount that was requested of residents. With a "banking" provision, the net percent of achievable conservation would be much more in line with the mandated percent curtailment. For comparison purposes, the Water Division surveyed fifteen (15) cities in the Southern California area who operate a municipal water system. Attached is a summary of that survey. Basically, the City Council could proceed in any of the following directions: 1. Not provide a "banking" program to the customers. 2. Take an approach similar to the City of Long Beach where a customer is limited to a maximum number of underused units (e.g. 50 units) to be carried forward as "credit. " Proposed Modification to Ordinance No. 1930 February 7, 1995 Page 3 3 . Take a modified approach to the City of Los Angeles' plan and allow carry-over two months forward (one billing cycle) with no limit on the amount of underused units able to be "banked. " 4. Allow customers to carry forward an unlimited balance of underused units as "credits" and withdraw from the "bank" during a billing cycle when an allotment was exceeded. Credit balances would be applied to future water bills and not to past water bills. FISCAL IMPACT While the goal of the mandatory water conservation plan is to save water, however, it must be pointed out that conservation has a negative impact on water sales revenue. This negative impact is partially offset by the amount of revenue generated by violation penalties from overuse of water. Should a "banking" program be implemented this would decrease those revenues used to offset the reduction in water sales. However, regardless of having a "banking" program or not, it is still expected that there would be some revenues from violation charges to offset revenue loss. CONCLUSION The staff needs some direction from the City Council as to which of the four above options should be utilized when modifying Ordinance No. 1930 at a future City Council meeting. Regardless of what decision is. made on the "banking" options, the addition of the 30%, 40% and 50% curtailment phases to Ordinance No. 1930 must still be processed. Attachments: Main Points of Mandatory Conservation Ordinance No. 1930 Ordinance No. 1930 Survey Regarding "Banking" Provision in Water Conservation Programs [ 1q APPROVED: - William R. Kelly, City Manager LASER IMAGED MAIN POINTS OF MANDATORY CONSERVATION ORDINANCE NO. 1930 o Established Phases for Mandatory Conservation • Phase I Prohibited Uses Phase II - Prohibited Uses plus 10% mandatory water use cutback Phase III - Prohibited Uses plus 15% mandatory water use cutback O Phase IV - Prohibited Uses plus 20% mandatory water use cutback O Phase V - Prohibited Uses plus 25% mandatory water use cutback o Established penalties for violations O First Violation - two times water rate surcharge penalty for billing units used in excess of base allotment O Second Violation - three times water rate surcharge penalty for billing units used in excess of base alloent Thirtmd Violation- four times water rate surcharge penalty for billing units used in excess of base allotment o Provided for appeals for base allotments. Established Water Appeals Board comprised of three representatives from City Departments as designated by the City Manager for customers • not satisfied with Water Division's decision. weir/2217i4on tO©O 2% • Memorandum • CORPOR� DATE: February 7, 1995 TO: Mayor and City Council/Arcadia Redevelopment Agency - FROM: Rick Gomez, Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director Deputy/Executive Director By: prMohammacl Mostahkami, Asst. City Engineer/Engineering fP'eter Kinnahan, Economic Development Administrator 14) !don Davidson, Acting City Engineer/Water Manager RE: 1. PROGRESS REPORT ON DOWNTOWN 2000 STREETSCAPE PROJECT 2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF STREET LIGHT DESIGN 3. REQUEST TO PAY LAWRENCE R. MOSS AND ASSOCIATES AND ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS AND PREPARATION OF NEW STORM DRAIN DESIGN PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DOWNTOWN 2000 STREETSCAPE PROJECT 4. REQUEST TO PAY LAWRENCE R. MOSS AND ASSOCIATES AND ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING WORK ON THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN • 5. REQUEST TO APPROVE ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES ON THE STREETSCAPE PROJECT/DISCUSSION OF NEED FOR INSPECTION SERVICES : • 6. DISCUSSION OF REVISED PROJECT COST ESTIMATES 1. PROGRESS REPORT ON DOWNTOWN 2000 STREETSCAPE PROJECT The City Council and Redevelopment Agency approved the comprehensive Downtown 2000 program on October 11, 1994, and directed staff to begin an aggressive schedule for construction on the Streetscape Project as soon as possible after the close of the winter 1994-95 Santa Anita Race Track season. This is necessary in order to minimize LASER ij' Si GED AA2f4 Z (,6,4 t,E/' Downtown 2000 Page Two distuption to downtown merchants during the 1995 holiday season and to Race Track patrons during the 1995/96 winter Santa Anita season. A week later, on October 18, 1994 the Council and Agency retained Lawrence R. Moss & Associates (LMA) as the principal design consultant to coordinate the project, with ASL Consulting Engineers (ASL) as their civil engineering sub-consultant and RWR Pascoe (RWR) as their lighting sub-consultant. Staff and the consultants have met every week since October 18, 1994 in order to carry out this fast track schedule. The design concept approved by the Agency on October 11, 1994, has with some minor modifications been incorporated into the engineering plans which will be displayed on the walls of the Council Chambers at the meeting. Staff and consultants have added a few more bowouts and median islands and revised the locations of some of the bowouts in order to meet traffic, utility, and aesthetic concerns. Instead of two entry monuments on Huntington Drive just east of Santa Clara, one monument is proposed for a new center median. Schematic drawings of Huntington Drive and First Avenue improvement plans are provided as Attachment 1. The most significant project change is the need for a major new storm drain system discussed in more detail below. We plan to request Council and Agency authorization to go to bid at the meeting of March 7, 1995, with bids to be awarded on April 18, 1995, construction starting approximately May 22, 1995, pending availability of materials (eg. storm drain pipe), and completion by December, 1995. A detailed schedule is provided as Attachment 2. The Streetscape landscaping component appears to be eligible for partial reimbursement under a competitive State of California Tree Grant program. Staff is preparing an application for submittal by the February 8,.1995 deadline. If approved, and upon State acceptance of the City's documentation, the Agency may receive approximately $60,000. . Steve Smith of LMA will make a brief presentation of the design plans. Representatives from LMA, ASL, RWR and staff will be present to answer questions. Staff is requesting City Council and Agency approval of the Downtown 2000 Streetscape Plan and schedule, and authorization to proceed per the schedule. • Downtown 2000 • Page Three 2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF STREET LIGHT DESIGN At the October 11, 1994 meeting the City Council/Agency directed staff to consider the removal of median island cobra head lights and design a better system using more attractive street lights. LMA and RWR will present their proposed lighting system, safety light and pedestrian light design for Council and Agency approval at the meeting: A sample pedestrian light fixture will be on display in the Council Chambers at the meeting. A representative example of the proposed pedestrian light fixture can . be seen in front of Anthony's Restaurant, 1212 So. Baldwin Avenue (see also Attachment 3). The existing cobra head lights at the Huntington Drive and First Avenue intersections will be retained, although new heads are recommended to be installed. Moreover, additional intersection lights will be installed on First Avenue at the intersections of Alta, Bonita and California. Additionally, due to the City's goal of meeting the lighting standards established by the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES), roadway lights using existing marblelite poles will be placed along the parkways on Huntington and First Avenue approximately every 100 feet. Two-headed pedestrian lights will be placed on each side of Huntington approximately 70 feet apart, and single-head lights on First, approximately 55 feet apart. Staff and LMA are requesting Council/Agency approval of the light standard designs shown in Attachment 3. 3. PROPOSAL FOR NEW STORM DRAIN DESIGN PLANS FROM ASL The area between Santa Anita, Santa Clara, the railroad tracks and Huntington Drive has had drainage problems for some time since there are no catch basins or pipes on Huntington in that area and the existing storm drainage system on First Avenue is inadequate. (Council Members may recall the flooding problems at Ralph's Florist and the adjacent office building in 1992.) With the proposed street parking layouts along Huntington Drive and First Avenue, the natural flow of storm water will exacerbate the already poor storm water drainage system. Because of the critical timeframe involved in the Huntington Drive Streetscape Project schedule, staff has directed ASL to proceed with the design of a new storm drain system for this area. y !, rGFD Downtown 2000 Page Four In order to compress time, ASL has been working with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (Flood Control Division) and has researched possible ways and the relative costs to resolve this issue. Based upon their analysis and recommendations, and our aggressive timetables, an application was prepared by ASL for the City and filed with Los Angeles County for a storm drain permit for 3 separate drainage systems. The proposed new system will include 18 to 42 inch pipes on First, Avenue, running south to and west 1400 lineal feet on Huntington Drive to Santa Anita. Other 18 to 24 inch pipes will run 480 lineal feet east of First Avenue on Huntington. Thirty (30) catch basins and junction structures will be constructed generally near or at various intersections. In addition, because the new drain will increase the storm water flow to the existing downstream lines, 1300 lineal feet of new 18 to 42 inch pipe will be constructed on Huntington from San Rafael to the Arcadia Wash (by City Hall). A conceptual drawing of the new storm drain system is shown on Attachment 4. The inital estimate to construct this work is $825,000, not including 10% contingency. Staff is working with L.A. County to seek at least partial reimbursement for this cost since the system is of regional benefit. We are optimistic that the County will assist. The County has already agreed to waive $7,100 in connection fees, as well as plan check charges. At our request, they have also prioritized the processing of our storm drain permit application. A significant amount of the storm water flow handled by the proposed system comes from Parking District 2, and to a lesser extent Parking District 1. Staff will discuss with the Parking District Commission at their next meeting whether the Commission would recommend to the Council the use of District Reserve Funds to reimburse the Agency for storm drain improvements that serve the Parking Districts. ASL's work on the storm drain system includes additional field topography, hydraulic calculations, pipe size analysis, evaluation of boring vs. trenching, review of new NPDES requirements, utility plotting and coordination with water and street plans, alignment studies, preparation and processing of storm drain plans and specifications through Los Angeles County Public Works, and coordination of Gas Company main line and lateral service line installation with storm drain plans. Staff is requesting approval of this additional cost for ASL's design/engineering services. This is estimated to cost $135,614.00. Downtown 2000 Page Five 4. ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR HUNTINGTON DRIVE/ FIRST AVENUE Because of the Council/Agency's desire to begin construction in the spring of 1995, the original proposal for design and engineering was limited to only a very broad scoping. As a result of this extremely fast selection process (one week) and the shift of - engineering firms, a thorough assessment of the engineering issues was not, researched. In the following weeks as staff and the consultants proceeded with the design process, numerous design and construction issues arose which caused unanticipated additional analysis, discussion, and revision of plans in preparation. Some of the additional ASL work was caused by storm water related issues (curb heights, gutter, roof drains, bowout culverts and covers). In addition, LMA/ASL analyzed utility/environmental consultant comments, pavement evaluation, ADA handicapped ramps, and traffic circulation (corner radius, striping, signal relocation), preparation of contractor prequalification documents, additional base mapping, utility coordination, Huntington Drive overlay from Santa Anita to Santa Clara, coordination of Gas Company main line installation with water main, electrical, and other utility plans, construction management and project office analysis. Much of this required additional coordination meetings with City and consultant staff. In order to keep on schedule, some of the work was done on overtime, and ASL brought in additional staff from other offices to assist on the project. As a result, the plans and specifications are approximately 95% complete and will be ready for authorizaton to advertise for bids March 7. Work which would normally take 7-8 months was accomplished in 3 months during the holiday season. This additional design/engineering work is estimated to cost $173,274. In order to meet the City/Agency timeline, the Streetscape plans & specifications are essentially complete. While minor modifications can be made, any substantial changes to the design or infrastructure layouts could have a negative impact on the schedule. Staff is requesting Council and Agency approval of the additional cost for ASL's design/engineering services. 5. REQUEST TO APPROVE ASL ENGINEERS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - In order to keep with the accelerated schedule, maintain continuity and retain their experience, staff recommends using ASL as Construction Adminstrator. Staff has received a proposal from ASL to handle this work for the City and Agency. LASER IMAGE_, Downtown 2000 Page Six Their work would consist of three components: a) rental and operation of a.local project office at 50 E. Huntington Drive (formerly Prince Jewelers - $23,000); b) providing an • experienced full time construction administrator at the project site, including part time backup engineering staff for 22 weeks - $121,504; c) preparation of the record drawings ("as-builts") on the project - $32,000. The total estimated cost for these services is $176,504. As a matter of information, staff is now seeking proposals for qualified independent Public Works Construction Inspection firms. Because of the size and complexity of this project and existing City workloads, City staff is not able to handle the inspection requirements. This contract will be provided to the Agency and Council for approval at a future meeting. Staff estimates costs for inspection services at $150,000. Staff is requesting Council and Agency approval of the proposal for Construction Administration Services. Staff recommends that 70% of this cost be paid by the Agency, 15% by the City (Gas Tax Fund), and 10% by the City (Water Fund), and.5% by Lighting Maintenance District C. FISCAL IMPACT Preliminary Agency Cost Estimate - Chronology 1. Estimated Project Cost Estimate of October 11, 1994: $2,820,000 (Includes design, engineering, construction, construction management & inspection, 10% contingency). 2. Estimated Project Cost Estimate of October 18, 1994: $3,400,000 (Includes design, engineering, construction, construction management & inspection, 10% Contingency. The additional $580,000 was for removal/replacement of cobra head lights, wall seat lighting, palm trees with uplights, additional electrical). 3. Estimated Project Cost Estimate of February 7, 1995: $5,635,000 (Includes original and additional design/engineering, all construction including bowouts, landscaping/trees, lights, storm drain, construction management and inspection, 10% Contingency). Downtown 2000 Page 7 Less Possible Reimbursements: State of-California for Tree Grant: Unknown Los Angeles County for Storm Drain: Parking District 1 & 2: Net Estimated Project Cost - Agency: $5,635,00 *Note: None of the Agency's project costs (above) include costs for previously authorized City Capital Improvement Projects which for purposes of economy, efficiency, and minimal distruption to the downtown will be constructed at the same time, as part of the Downtown 2000 Streetscape Project; i.e. the Parallel Main Water Project - $415,000 (Water Fund); the Huntington Drive Street Rehabilitation Project - $945,000 (Gas Tax); nor the Lighting Conversion Project - $85,000 (Lighting Maintenance' District C). The consultants (LMA and ASL) have advised staff that their estimates have been very conservative, ie. high, because of the fast track nature of the project. There has simply not been sufficient time to do detailed cost analysis. In addition, all of their construction estimates include 10% contingency on top of their estimates. For this reason, staff believe the final project cost will be significantly below the $5.6 million shown above. Agency staff has projected revenues and expenditures to early 1996. Sufficient funds will be available to complete this project. However, staff recommends that no significant new Agency projects be approved until bids for the Streetscape project are received and staff has a clearer picture of project costs. Estimated Annual Maintenance: Estimated Annual Landscape Maintenance.Cost (City): $ 50,000 Lighting/Energy (Lighting District C): $ 20,000 $ 70,000 RECOMMENDATION 1. That the City Council and Agency approve the Downtown 2000 Streetscape plans and schedule as presented, and authorize staff to proceed per the schedule. L.c23,SFR IMAGED Downtown 2000 Page 8 2. That the City Council and Agency authorize staff and consultants to proceed with the proposed.lighting system and pole/lamp design as shown on • Attachment 3. 3. The the City Council and Agency authorize an amendment to the contract with Larry Moss & Associates in the amount of $308,888, for additional design services,.provided by ASL Engineers for the new storm drain ($135,614) and other Huntington Drive/First Avenue design ($173,274) changes. 4. That the ty CoL. ,cil and Agency approve a contract with ASL Engineers for Construction Administration services in the amount of$176,504, 70% to be paid by the Agency, 15% by the City (Gas Tax Fund), 10% by the City (Water Fund), and 5% by Lighting Maintenance District C. (lira • Approved February 7, 1995 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Huntington Drive Streetscape Plan Section - Huntington Drive/ First Avenue Intersection Section Attachment 2 Downtown 2000 Streetscape Schedule Attachment 3 Downtown Lighting Plan Schematic; Downtown Sample Pedestrian Light Attachment 4 Storm Drain Design Engineering Schematic Plan !LASER l',AAGED • - , -- - - • - ----—._... ...I ... ...- . \ - • Peg \ \..1 .----------4-: ---- • . . r•t ' ^ .fi't •.• el''. _ ...z________. / . •,...i___ ./ .., •• o •,,FIlle_t# . . . , . .. _.: •,,,,0 fil ....-.) •:.‘:. . - _. ,.. .,,,,..,0 , ;1 : . ,1. .,,, app. , . • - -..4-e _A, A Jr - -, ... ,-. . . . ,.:-,,, ,,„,, ,.;: --;.c.-,-.:-.r.,... . v ---,-, , ,, ,. , . . . . ,......, - .'' ,-, t.•m• a' , -- -'--:- .. --•:.-- — -____ --.7 - --.!----;-*. -..;,..--r-'••••••-- '''ZX.-- - -"..' ..- ,,-. •.... ..,,I,A ''-'1,4,1 , , 4.1 . 1 _ , . --,-..---„.„--------------..-;.;•-•:?-,:-- . . ---,.-:-.- -- ---- ----,----::: ----, •,.-----7t--s-3.-,..;-r:-.. .,,-- :---,-- .. ..,. ••... - *,...4,i.r.- - •--cio IP .ilit- ir 4 :. ,./ ',„:,.c:;r•-•,,,...r, -..---7------ --- ...._- ...-: _ --:----....-...:-..-a-T--.....,.....---:-- .,;-,-. ...: (.----_-:--,t7---- - --.:0,'--V--„,---- - -;,..ileq, ,-(_, I, ,,,,,r, ' 1#1.•---,,r,f4. _. ra.,■. vire ,,,, L. ., . 110. „-•,...........-..^-, - - -..--: • ; CT- , -1.,,,:- -- - ----- "-z---7_-...• - ..-.....-.4.----,-.:- • .:.1------ . v..,;....i,141-,, r. . 'k.-'. :W.. 1 i tkt• 4. 4.-:. -.-,-.7,— : ,...., _•0.,.% •-• ,- ,.- i. ji, . i ... ._., l&C---V.1.--- -1 ITT,: •ii 1 i 0404, , --I ..=•_•, , .• ,. 1 . . .- i k ...1,..•-• ' •• . . , . LI.—0% 1111,i 0-11 *-0 '•r•--,-ti- ,, _________ — ..:....,i, • 14,,i• ; ,. .i.,', 011'1%1 1 IT ,. 1. ' - 5 7 Ji .r1111111r-I--- 'Ill • , ,, , . r 1 , i . P• 1 '''' `., :.. s', A .. /., i .1 4 ' 't,I.I;• r I it ' ' i .. f 1 Ni,- 1 , o•'. ', • , .41 : . : .4, • t..:- 3,-i:4, 'i' v,t1-1;„ T t - .1 .• . , IP ;) 11. . 1 t '' ' ''''- -. "11 I - t,1)1 \' 1111 ;1 ill fil,• - '. erl bt .' '''' tis' .. . ,, , .).-f.', . ,..., Mtn ..t ,, - , : a ,..-,.... ., I r i , .. ....••,...s. I , %,,, P' .‘? . i• i i . ,,, r i '-■ ,.4.'. it.1 "-'..yrr • 1 . Nn J, /7, ?-- 1--,./1 ‘,..A - \ 'II 1 , p.kt \:,. . ,, . . A 11 alp r • \l'is• . . ) . .., •, t- , . ior, ' .1 iir,:i'l , ., --, , i, . . .n, • 1.'4.. 1- iv .1 --' . , ‘, It - #.. # 44%:% • • - ',-- ,.V 's, ,,,N••-• , , \:11. ' • .. ._;'''' ik '?' "/" !i .'.•. . '. -. ,:,% i . , - N ,i k- 0 t It_ '47 •' . (., ,... ......, • .- --,......_ ft, ., ., -•• \ 1 1— •,/ ,f.,,,• f, IA...C. ... ."0 01,..:4 i la VIS 0 k ■,, ..-- .,'' .-.-'7'. • .0 ■••.--1 •• ■ Sq.. e il ) ,11\ !, • I 1,, —--- , 1 . , — . V . f • ..et.1 '-' 4 ,i _-. 7—'■,,, .4. ts ' , ' l ,, . s - IV ...-.1..h • C . _ . •• ft .,, , ' 1, _-'- ... i. Vvi; • ,. i ,- a'4. , ......, , „......„j \,:, ...,----- lik:f 1, \A •I . i ._ \ ..,..., ,,..- ,_ . ,ilk ____-- 4• C. ., . '44400,; •s. F'.. ZV — ‘ . t 9 41 vtatk '' m z :1.='!•if .1.1r-- : . ..;-...--- % .1g 4, 7,4 ' I ,,..,4s* • C ,Op .-- ' _ ..• • " - :v. I • .. i , 0 f ; ''■ 1 • 10, '.• ''' ‘ , ik "V' 41.1 I, ----- - 1.. ,. 1 \ I ! -, il \ . Y • ' , , 11,101 re ' .I''l ■kN' kt j■liz 11t , II! 4 i (4 r/ \V, . s.'• • f- ' 1',K •.........7•A■1.4...-........ '4'1 , .'141111111 ■ -1i1;: ", •.'elk .. I ... , 1 1 6 0 II R. I+m l' +s R �z �L V it S g;Eli : MATCHLINE SEE SHEET tiL 4.04 E 'e BUILDING i®Papi BUILDING : ' C) C)© In`; it C C3 414111` ID G) 6) ea Y re�i fiiN I iBLcEMi "MIN Bi ` /:dg° = A P P 'WO filj a l. 74,jil i .��.Lyy ,may pr ;o yi: AfrIZZPA I a�t (1) C) CDC) . . .. 01i=i-S4As N is j.fray vipril (` • i e■ Bls . ; •) P 0 f) C ,�a i r 0 Cur- . 0 •IE;°3� BUNNG I *all) C . 3 e II ) EN,. 194 UIIDING _ 3 ;?3i . ' o Irk only I) i Ft —11 t 1 tile' �� �! ° G I o N. i r-s36[Lgss- 3 V) V II j Nii36g(6EE3iPBQ1p$P t p4fiFp ti ' 4 e'5i,i'prAiltiono.e i E b!k EEi 5-4,11:10i (-) ill . F.' •I LNiRY6i �L �Itl ��.{Ll at¢. �3. ,iP3 a 'l 1 1 ell I 1 ' g` ° i I q -I 411111 0 2 ..1�I1., 161 a, Iri' - € I'i' ffiFigiiMiiY>dli AEEiBBg'ii4 co m T n -]� .JI'I ,„ II I. PARI011�lD1 .. [ ��G �if 0 l I 00. 169 ,%1!i� 000 l i�;� 6� 1I�i ilk ,I� PAbUNG L01 Poi Ism/ 160 6)it- '" 10 ® _ fri I � kiwi I In r!I:=1 �� IiliaII 6 6'1 0 2 ,,, S Giai• np ��o 6) 6 .L,„, � E 11h;, BUILDING=6 �) f _ 'per LN M I MATCHLINE SEE SHEET #tL 4.06 . � #dzo ;j II itcp1 r i I Ft N <if .• b 1 j III B-d4n CJt i , I. L I - . , . KEY BOTANICAL WWE/CO MON NAME SZE PEW KS s .�s.r wind W _ .w i aI ,, E E iri► A © `W IFS' 4Su A A x:31 .'S. A RA����© FIRST A ` 0 anal'L"'r ':a: VEliu ' ••�0 W �,,ti '{%,,iIA `iG' v ?f. 1 cs '�� ©,Ain G `- `� = .i I� _ g,��4 bra ..... .mil i �i • `i�� RIos.r11ii I'VE 1' j•� TI� AT��i id-;'ae 1'4 i IA�.V:':--ii ufl ..�y,. yq;L'... _� mI \: u:. Lit in N9t �� `� 'wig y i i q •��� 7 ^ vA, ?rn .•, ©t',7/ . will,i� \. � .7t, v ��+.;•.'j VY Nis p. 41716 • 0 0 © —+--- T.2. 33 /F© �/n. 141 ` .fry 0.3 At1 i IT:\7 V7 illAik• C'J 7i. • © AM% © �R. •s OA :�9's'ri. < 4 Pdl w... __ - 'y��@ REMIT i�vi. �.. "� i:q,$�~Il�'1 .!fig, dri;dl I �� I1111.4iu:g agiali�I_y�dlavab lwimmkthi iilir �l�lVi9ia.p 1c..lt 0 9 �� iL*,:i 6ml! !13!,cUrk ''1711'' A%TrIT: r. V I A T,:, MI Irk LI TM A L :0 z 'L AA w T A __ Z I _I ' ,� v 0 ^� "YaOBt I1- IC g 11311.33.30 a K.am DIAL BEFORE YOU OIC 1-Boo-422-4133 DIGALERT ill • C --..-._..1....-. 54.2.--_-_,..==.-)s-_-...A.g.-,,--,s.-. . Ili • DRAWING KEY n I! .w o to .o .° . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - ' ..."".. Lawrence.R.:.mw1o:c� ..r .. .�. .v.. ..— �r.w I�. r 1�.. ..• M 0 S S 33 " CITY OF ARCADIA PLANTING PLAN �» L4.12 k Associates Lem."33.331133.3 ..w ,:er�� — DEVOLOP1@lT SERVICES DEPARTIENi • . . • a j . . . , a . MIMMEMINEMENIMI , ‘ „:„..„---,4711 —.....imounin.....-___A •I v■rmimmr.4 ARIL MONUMENT SIGN CAP ..-........ .....:.. - - ...■... •1 ', 111111/1r t= • I N1111 cAsT can.BASE ...at ......Nom IIMIBILgiTiNIM slilMi■—■ •I I 1 ll ,,• ,r, 1,, •.. ,, f.WSI WYO.•0.0.0 ,i. v _lit C / •111 rm.AG.C SCES 7-=:=3:: "t11111ffr 171MIL. .1 : A I . • . • . .1,1 ...-,...- _-.___. ,-e,.- - w ••', • lo 1/1 • •.IX CLic I/2"e •kr"SI%DOWEL ANCHORS T ',..,;(4 , , "(.%II• . ...re m SET INTO CLAU 6"-SPACE 16'0.C. ' "WI 8. -T 'Zlatr• SIGN •■•••- • .-... .--=•--.-- -...—_ sm •. ) ___. _ . MEM _. PRECAST CONC.CORNICE ATIACH ,--- PLAQUE 6 . •"".% TO CIAU WALL WI/ImBEDDED MIL--Sa- ,.• • EINI . STRAPS ONE PIECE EA.&DE MS 111 . 2.---:-' _n.... .= MITER 0 CORNERS(TYP.AU_4 SIDES) ® MONUMENT SIGN SECTION „...,., . „eill MASONRY TYP.TIES 0 24" O.C. mwww• I•..7, ., ,• ' gin smi Ill . ••—•i•Z-IM.T.,MI.=r.••I.I I•-.i 0I.i1.E..1 i.'1Mm.10*IiIi W.N-mII=0_.'1.-I-1-M.1•.WIm10-RM1.7I...10 1...mI..1.1E..=.1-..,M e 1•.w.M1.1 1_•11,21..•-•.1..0 OW.1./■c.M•M 0 1 i,I■7,--E1•01--=3..-1•1-1=-1-■0=•1--•N 1'•■1.1=..T•i 1 I•=E=.N.,'..•I.1 1 i•,r...'•..Iw1.0.l=s I.=.I•0 M....•1w Th..=m.11 a..ft.1.R...n_.i•a.1 0mz 1.m•I=..M.1..-0 0--m.1 ... ta s-t ir •. • ,'T'` '. a•,a"7 .. . ...•. „:• .t , • P7SIRG-EN C1 0A"PS AT N•EC4L O.-NC6. 4A m11m .• 6 • .I..■,=,,16'11 I I,.i I IN A"I,kii 1161 4 i,1 S0004 TR UO T NRBAE OE SEU0HFQ,A.L11 UCA,ER IV6NT E G PRc CAT.A(T.e NoTYE0 x OR)tr SIGN G.E DESERT/ . ' : TYP.A 4SIDES. .a . (ONE SIDE ONLY) I.DEEP :1 F HOLLOW • A , ,. — =. .• . •• • . D • ' -.'• .- • • • • •• . • - • ,„,,,w ,__. . . • . • . . .. . . - • • - N. •• , -• . , , . • . ... . •.,.. . • le Mil . •• . .• . • .•• . • . ... • . . .• • • '.. • • ql Bilffl. . • • '• '• '.•..'•• I.T. ■■■m.V 16 ' • • NW,•..., rvi„..,,---, i4 BAR HORiZ. • ..74— • . - CONT.3r O.C. • i 4;F;-.-106- . @ MONUMENT SIGN: FRONT ELEVATION 0 MONUMENT SIGN CAP scar sfe-p-P • N 1...:..•T' —PNECAST CONC.BASE- MITER 0 CORNERS spa:ro.-dr '•'' ri 6:: ..:. • a•-to' . . 4" m B. -11- r- i c......--- . 1 4'1 . • 1.------- . - • /4 BAR HMI m . ., /*10.-1 . .. • • ±j CONT.IN FOOTING , s•-, UZI. I.. IN < ..—.a.ri. r • L _a ZaVgirlsrivo 11'.., . I.RICA-NIT WORX .. "1, LI iP ..., ---1 tr .1.1111 b ,/,• .ma • .. I. . . •. .- :-... 71 y 4 ....1 . _,I. :r. 1 ri,;:' 1 At.F..AaiXT KR 0 .1 .6... .•/:I. CCU.lilt FOCEICIWCA.,,.„ '• ,X, '•'. I ,.l' ...., .I:/ •,.\", " • . I.- . ...' Zglr ,,, pz.z_-_-_-Nj, v-r 1 ANCRIALS.NC. - l' CORNICF MOP n RIXTUAC SANW10..... .1 BASE MOP DING CD ro • c.-.31 • . 0 SIGN PLAQUE ...a.,:.W.W.I.-0. . ® MOULDING - 0 STONE MONUMENT SIGN ....,-,--,---.. ---- Lawrence R.V=4:11"''' ...— .. ....._..... ..... .... .,...,. 1—. .. ...... — . MOSS .:-.°.---7°.:"' ... • . . • mks..., .„, — CITY OF ARCADIA CONSTRUCTION 1 . .240 14100 L. & Associates L....6.m NUMMI.. ... , .• .. DEVELOPIENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DETAILS L2.02 . • . • ........ ---- - .•• . . . . .. . . .. • _ PRECAST CONC.CAP •w(0.161 I #4 BAR-CORE DRILL CURB TO (�� SEE ELEVATION PRECAST CONC.CAP MODIFIED II ,�(�� RECEIVE r PORTION-SET IN FOR ROW' WALL CAP"WCS FINISH: r.� 1:::::1 ACID WASHED BY RAE VICTORAN • ,_ '1'I'I'1'1'19 11t ...........I 2•-6" a I'-2" , 1/4" STEEL PLATE COLOR: /�_` ` I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SPAN Gu TIER/WALL SUPPORT AW%15W DIH (BIB)575-0693 W. A + `1 I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I IIIXI /4 BAR HOW. �A �, ®�� I ll�.>_ONT.IN WALL REPLACE BULL NOSE(WC5) I�i• 111111111 111111111 I F �✓ W/BLUNT EDGE T 1111111111111111111 1111111 1111111111. -RILL STONE WALL _ I\ I " t I 1/2 I /4 BAR ,- GROUT SOLID r . \�r . .mil HOLE i-� HORIZ.CONT. . ' 'I 4 , " 1---•s. I n" ..Ktwl I FMB 'HIGH DESERT'STONE OR _ �� BOUQUET CANYON'L£OCER CONC.FTC. L=..IIRIIF WI. UNDER WALL ••. CONC. �_ /a D.C.VERT. 25 Mz• J VYIPAL NOM BYE•WS I.•..;y}�• ..."- . ..,.I I– '11=11x1 zs' o 1�uMPatnOB mn.w.owo Pont vs.vw lq 1 _ 1 �� DAM SG 11...al Nn AMMO rI11,0.s.M 1/011-41q /4 BAR HORIZ. ," e""„�• 11 SUPT,f R UN.0.1 • •.•'.j J.---I'-2- I CONT.IN FOOTING -IP NI rnaW.UMW(lw°°' 40C4 JYEN 11111'•LCONG.CURBS —,Y PM A• SECTION A-A PRECAST CONC. \ • �` ilMi nn Inn.0 PLANTER A vir �`�`�`�\O� OI BENCH "11,„� OF SEAT WALL GUTTER , i 1_,/._,._� OC STONE SEAT WALL MU,,,_„?-,.-0. MODEL jr#EL5 b • • • • • SANDSTONE COLOR:'FAWN' �`�`�`• BY:ADMIXTURES,INC.%;i;%;/;• COLORFULL P. • • •'HIGH DESERT'OR'BOUOUET /j�I,'AL4_ A. CANYON'LEDGER/ASHLAR • PRECAST CONC.WALL CAP STONE WALL FACE / PRECAST CONC.CAP Mai VICTORIAN WALLCAP WC5 WC5(MODIFIED EDGE) VIEW (TYP.PRECAST SECTION) (BIB)575-0695 FINISH:ACID WASH COLOR: • �� /4 BAR VERY. ■ 0 12' O.C. 11...11 R �—�•�=�®-� A PLANTER 'A' v"`.,_„r_,.-v•.,� .. 1/4” ST'L TO E BRIDGE 1�GUTTER T �_�� =T_� = __._._ .T.,_ _ i ,....,.„......_ 0 FOOTING OG SEAT WALL © GUTTER—SEC. :11_,r,._,._, OD STONE SEAT WALL — ELEV. ,c,„,„_,,,..,._, Z, .ter rw.. S WS IQ .-- '1 42 r• n916'.tO➢9 N L + .1- el n 1NmTArL A1Mq. I / / • !r I ".I om.P OI `END CAP ` a I. t" ' P,tnNOWO601h \ MID WALL CAP, ' �� MILD Mgtl MS MO -��— tar....... /I • r PUNTER BY HOLE ,M t•-o• M z-o• ,I PRECAST CONC. I/Y DRAINAGE `I 1_��... ,..... {II, SANDSTONE NONE FINISH INC. SANDSTONE FINISH �•.. COLOR:'BISQUE' "W meanod a.. BY:ADMIXTURES, INC. N M.,Iu Oars.rot COLORFULL • 0 TRASH RECEPTACLE SL,,, M6 OE STONE SEAT WALL — TOP SAS:,_„r_,._, OB PLANTER 'B' ,.,,,r_ a,a.". -�� .. _. ®. ._ rR ;, = ,..: W CONSTRUCTION —_'� Lawrence R.IV.",�,� r a ow CITY OF ARCADIA MOSS :'''''11.::::"”' °� °' DETAILS & Associates....w....�.ncl.,e Mw M. •"• '- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT [L2.04] —T>=...1--..� PI— . . ,Tara.ora r... — ",< --'----- —---• . . . . . . • .. , City of Arcadia if. IIIPI%hti 14 p... Downtown 2000 . • A 0 Ilii74,40.11 0 rie 0filr3 +,7141; .1!!:%;" °4Platosu. Project Schedule (revised) Duration Years Item No. 1995 Task Name Work Days Start Date End Date 1994 1996 1 Prepare Plans and Specifications 53 10/12/94 12/30/94 2 Planning Commission Meeting-CEQA-General Plan 1 01/24/95 /1 1 3 Submit to City for Review 1 01/31/95 4 Staff Review 5 02/01/95 02/08/95 5 Return to Consultant for final Corrections 1 02/09/95 / 4 6 Submit Final Plans and Specs to City 1 02/20/95 A . 7 Staff Review 3 02/21/95 0/24/95 I 8 Notice of Publication to City Clerk 1 03/02/95 / ‘ V 9 ARA/CC Approves P&S and Authorizes Advertising for Bids/CEQA Hearittg 1 03/07/95 40 10 Publish Notice Inviting Bids 1 03/09/95 A v Ell 11 Publish Notice Inviting Bids 1 03/16/95 Fe, 12 Mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting 1 03/28/95 ' d _ ... .. .. . .. ..... 13 Bid Opening 1 04/06/95 v 4 14 Bid Results review by Staff 3 04/06/95 04/10/95 • 15 Award Contract - 04/18/95 Y A _ 16 Contractor provide signed Contract, Bond ,Insurance, etc. 1 04/27/95 a 17 Contract Executed 1 05/01/95 •,,, //,2, ,, '1 18 Pre-Construction Meeting 1 05/04/95 19 Review Traffic Control Plan and Construction Schedule 2 05/08/95 05/10/95 20 Issue Notices to Proceed 1 05/11/95 V / -- , 71,—. Distribute Notices to Property Owners 4 05/11/95 05/15/95 =*71,r11.1414' _ 2Z,„ CONSTRUCTION 200 05/22/95 12/15/95 ilIatditla CI) •,---1 • iiie:d2o65j- •Reflecting final utilities,County.City of Monrovia,MTA and Foothill Transit comments. Revised 02/02196 CC: Bill Kelly r.fllick Gomez 0). .f.-.4:inenKatolheran hi .) ldon Davidson . SnetilIIlinoAg hA immad Aest i ka1 eing EMs r Staff CAI L . PC ATE • 14'-6"- � � �:,� xn IlIIM11 ■ ,,,.j®II® A % ' e, , __ ,, ,Lii,_ __.„,,,:, ,,• i, ,.,.. . ._ , 0„--,,,, ,. 3 " Z 01 : :-1M. ��; �I®!li 0 it Steel Shaft 3116'Continuous Weld(2 Places) —I Z Hand Hole rrt , Ground Lug—By Others 1 Ii Bore I.D.of base&caulk to ensure a close fit. .-1 d Caulking to be done in field by contractor. "4 Zr., P.-ox.. lk: 7—."-- -=7---11:.--All -- IJ , av m i+ a p^a . -1 Q ' �g m - ' F T. ,+ to 0' • m u • 111,'•7 y . w • A •• ( , 12'-4"± > ,..._ -rimid so-iiiilliii..41,1 + a r - OJA y Z Steel Shaft O '0 cn .--1 3116"Continuous Weld (2 Places) —I x m > Hand Hole r-0-0 . / / Ground Lug — By Others 311:1118( x Bore I.D. of base & caulk to ensure a close fit. ,: I M ' Caulking to be done in field by contractor..10 a J p d:9 a a lrNn T, R° co''' 0 PARKING DISTRICT AREA DRANAGE y.V J • V W I � � �I /rCY:97 i Q i 1 I PROPOSED STORM DRAN Q PROPOSED STORM DRAN /y� / EXISTNG STORM DRAM I I - Q u 1 PROPOSED STORM DRAN al , / _ I _ �� O III/ FiIAiTWGTON I I DRIVE V In I w •/' I H �I 'lit g ZI ; I' EXISTNG STORM DRAIN 0 I • f.. I: 3 Eli . a J t a I . 5 —I I f • . iii IMMO AS/ q_ Arcadia Downtown 2000 Streetscape AS/ Consulting Engineers — p I�NTNGTON DRIVE �== STORM DRAM tfROVEMENTS t. H .