Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
October 7, 1997
October 7, 1997 6:00 p.m. C o " cado ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Kovacic-,EF\uhn, Young and Harbicht All Present I TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (NON-PUBLIC HEARING/ FIVE MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) No one spoke 2. Update on Seismic Reliability Study with Army Corps of Engineers. Patrick Malloy Director, Maint. Services 3. CLOSED SESSION a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) concerning the At 6:52 p.m. Council potential initiation of litigation (two potential cases). Recessed to the Closed Sessions and Reconvened in the Council Chambers at b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to confer with the City 7:10 p.m. Labor negotiators regarding negiotiations with AFSCME Local 2264. 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber Rev. Thomas Shriver, Emmanel Assembly of God PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Police Chief Ronnie Garner ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, Kovacic, Kuhn, Young and Harbicht All Present 4. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS. Nothing 5. QUESTIONS FROM CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS Nothing MOTION: Read all Ordinances and Resolutionse,by title only and waive reading in full. 6. PUBLIC HEARING a. Report and recommendation to revise the 1997 -98 Statement of Objectives and Project Use of 23rd Year Community Development Block Grant funds and to allocate $5,000.00 to assist the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation in their efforts to create a small business capital loan fund. 7. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (NON- PUBLIC HEARING/ FIVE MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) 8. MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS City Council Reports/ Announcements /Statements /Future Agenda Items RECESS CITY COUNCIL ACTION Adopted 5 -0 Public Ng . Closed Approved N. D. Denne G. Roncelli G. Marshall L. Wilson G. Roberson V. Raees See Minutes 9. MEETING OF THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chang, Kova� -ic, Kuhn, Young and Harbicht All Present a. Minutes of the September 16, 1997 regular meeting. Approved 4 -0 with 1 abstension b. Report and recommendation to appropriate $5,000.00 in Approved 4 -1 Redevelopment Agency funds and to assist the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation establish a small business capital loan fund for Arcadia, and for authorization for the executive director to execute contract for such services. C. Report requesting direction for a proposed development by Approved 5 -0 ICD /Heateflex of a 18,000 sq. ft. instrumentation office on one (1) acre of the existing remnant parcel owned by Emkay Development Co. located at East Santa Clara Street, west of Fifth Avenue. d. Report requesting direction regarding redevelopment proposals; Receive & File 1) Inline (Hockey) Development Group, 2) Anza Management (Johnson) Report generally located at the northeast corner of East Santa Clara Street and Second Avenue. e. Report and recommendation to allocate $15,000.00 in redevelopment Approved 5 -0 funds to assist the Arcadia Business Association in implementing a Farmers Market on South First Avenue. 2 ADJOURN Redevelopment Agency to October 9, 1997 at 7:15 p.m. at the Community Center, 365 Campus Drive, Arcadia for a joint meeting with the El Monte City Council. 1 RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL 10. CONSENT ACTION a. Minutes of the September 16, 1997 regular meeting. Approved 4 -0 1 abstension b. Report and recommendation to award a Professional Services improved 5 -0 Agreement in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 to Richard C. Slade & Associates for the 1997 -98 well siting and hydrogeological study. C. Report and recommendation to accept the conversion of street lights Approved 5 -0 from series to multiple circuits project in the Upper Rancho area and to authorize final payment in the amount of $24,003.56 to C. T. & F., Inc. d. Report and recommendation to reject all bids submitted for the Street Reject all bids Light Conversion Project for Santa Anita Oaks - West. e. Report and recommendation regarding Rodeffer Reclamation Plan - app ,--0 Technical Corrections applicable to Conditional Use.Permit 92 -003 (Resolution Nos. 5785 and 5779). 11. CITY MANAGER a. Report and recommendation to fill existing vacant positions in City Approved all departments (1997 -98 Fiscal Budget). b. Report and request for direction on the formation of an Alternative Denied 3 -2 Fire Services Delivery Committee (AFSDC). C. Report and request for direction on the formation of an Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC). d. Report and recommendation to receive and file the County Wide Integrated Waste Management Summary and County Wide Siting Element. Tabled pending the position of Deputy City Mgr./ Dev. Services Dir. filled Receive & file report under protest e. Report and recommendation to fill a vacancy on the Arcadia Beautiful Janice Torrington Commission. unexpired to fill unexpired term of Don Gathers to 6 -30 -2000 3 12. CITY ATTORNEY ACTION a. Report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6008, A Resolution of the City Council of the.City of Arcadia, California, approving and adopting certain amendments to the Conflict of Interest Code pursuant to the provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974, Title 9 of the Government Code. b. ADOPTION - Ordinance No 2077, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, amending Sections 9275 et seq. Conditional Uses) of the Arcadia Municipal Code to add a new designation of "Automobile Fueling Stations" and regulations to conditionally permit convenience retail marts in conjunction with gas stations. c ADOPTION - Ordinance No. 2078, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, amending Chapter 7 of Article I of the Arcadia Municipal Code by adding Sections 1701 et seq. establishing a voluntary campaign expenditure ceiling for elections to city offices. Adopted 5 -0 Adopted 5 -0 Adopted 4 -1 ADJOURN City Council to October 9, 1997 at 7:15 p.m. at the Community Center, 365 Campus Drive, Arcadia for a joint meeting with the El Monte City Council. Adjourned in memory of Anne Levine at 10:15 p.m. 4 L -% 777 1%W lmoi Memorandum arradia agency DATE: October 7, 1997 TO: Arcadia Redevelopment Agency FROM: PL" Peter Kinnahan, Economic Development Administrator SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ALLOCATE $15,000 IN REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS TO ASSIST THE ARCADIA BUSINESS ASSOCIATION IN IMPLEMENTING A FARMERS MARKET ON SOUTH FIRST AVENUE SUMMARY i'✓ t °r !�l: i; 11: F lvle'r The Redevelopment Agency's adopted FY 1997 -98 budget includes $15,000 for "Special Events ". Garland Roberson, President of the Arcadia Business Association (ABA) has requested that the Agency contribute these funds for a Saturday morning downtown "Farmers Market' on South First Avenue (attached). Staff is recommending approval. DESCRIPTION The ABA has been working to obtain merchant support for a downtown Farmers Market. The Market would be held every Saturday morning, approximately from March to October, 1998, and would be located on South First Avenue from just south of Alta to just north of California. It would be a State - Certified Farmers Market and would not initially include other vendors, crafters or amenities. The contract for technical assistance would be negotiated with the Southern California Farmers Market Association. A local part-time (20 hours /week) manager would be recruited to organize and run the market. There would be extensive advertising the first year to ensure success. The preliminary CY 1998 budget includes: Revenue: ABA $5,000 Expenditures: Agency $15,000 FY Total: $20,000 Southern California Farmers Market Assoc. $2,000 P/T Manager $7,000 Portable Restrooms $2,000 Signage, banners $1,000 Advertising $7,000 Admin /Misc/Contingency $1,000 Total: $20,000 A�p Y- 0 L) e 4 L SF?k r 0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF ARCADIA C. 7 DEAR PETE, IN THE SPRING OF THIS YEAR, THE ARCADIA BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, ADDRESSED Y YOUR AGENCY ABOUT ORGANIZING A FARMERS MARKET ON SOUTH FIRST AVE. AT THE TIME WE WERE TOLD THAT THERE MAY BE SOME FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN STARTING THE MARKET. WE HAVE TAKEN THE IDEA OF THE MARKET TO THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND HAVE GOTTEN $5000.00 IN DONATIONS FOR THE MARKET. AT THIS TIME WE WOULD LIKE ANOTHER AUDIENCE WITH YOU TO REQUEST SOME FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO GO FORWARD WITH THE MARKET. PLEASE INFORM US TO THE SOONEST TIME POSSIBLE TO DO THIS. THANK YOU, GARLAND ROBERSON ABA PRESIDENT e i,Iwl October 7, 1997 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: William R. Kelly, City Manager By: James S. Dale, Director of Administrative Services- Prepared By: Cindy Rowe, Community Relations Officer C.4, SUBJECT: Report and Recommendation to Fill Existing Department Vacancies BACKGROUND For more than a year it has been the policy of the City Council to review each position vacancy as a budget- monitoring measure. When a vacancy occurs, it automatically comes before the City Council for formal approval to fill the position. Many positions have been held vacant pending budget discussions and direction by the City Council. The positions on the attached list were included in the adopted 1997 -98 budget and are now presented for City Council approval. FISCAL IMPACT These positions represent $430,065 from the General Fund, and as indicated, have already been included in the adopted budget. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to City Council direction, it is respectfully requested that staff be authorized to fill the attached vacancies in the Fire Department, Police Department, Library, Development Services Department and Maintenance Services Department in order to maintain the current level of service to the community. ED LARK INIAG ,91)prciaej 14 // I CITY OF ARCADIA POSITION VACANCIES OCTOBER 1997 DEPARTMENT POSITION VACANCY AS LARY BENEFITS TOTAL FIRE Fire Technician $27,798 $13,134 540,932* Fire Technician 27,798 13,134 40,932* Department Total $ 81,864 *Based on first year salary range - 6 mos. @ A step; 6 mos. @ B step There are currently two Fire Technician vacancies. The reduction in constant staffing from 19 to 17 makes it critical to keep these positions filled at all times. These positions are currently budgeted within the adopted 1997 -98 budget. DEVEL. SERVICES Dep. City Manager/ Devel. Services Director 17,443 5,215 Bldg. Tech. 1 26,148 10,578 Department Total * Reflects 20% General Fund dollars; the remainder comes from redevelopment and transportation funds. * *Based on first year salary range - 6 mos. @ A step; 6 mos. @ B step 22,658* 36,726** $ 59,384 The DCM /DSD position has been vacant since November, 1996. This position is responsible for the administration of all economic development /redevelopment, planning, building, transportation, code services, and licensing functions. In order to stimulate more economic development, this position is necessary. rt �. Position Vacancies October 1997 Page two DEPARTMENT n POSITION VACANCY AS LARY Devel. Services (continued) F5 BENEFITS TOTAL The current Bldg. Tech. I has successfully completed the promotional process for the Bldg. Tech. II position which has been vacant since early August. This results in a vacancy in the Bldg. Tech. I position which currently is being filled by a contract employee at 525 /hr. The Typist Clerk II whose position was reduced to part -time in Human Resources will be eligible to apply for this full -time position, as will other qualified employees who may be interested. These positions are currently budgeted within the adopted 1997 -98 budget. MAINT. SERVICES Equipment Operator or 2 pt Maint. Wkrs. @ $7.75/hr. for 19 hours.wk. *This is preferred until budget has stabilized. $33,714 $12,052 Department Total $ 45,766 $ 14,600 This position is vacant due to a promotion earlier this year. It is part of the pavement and concrete crew, but rather than hire a full -time Equipment Operator now and have it cut from next year's budget, it would be preferable to temporarily fill the position with two part-time Maintenance Workers. This position is currently budgeted within the adopted 1997 -98 budget. POLICE Police Officer $43,224 $19,624 $ 62,848* Police Officer 43,224 19,624 62,848* Law Enforce. Recruit 36,396 12,489 48,885 Department Total $174,581 *Based on first year salary range - 6 mos. @ A step; 6 mos. @ B step The filling of these three positions is critical to the maintenance of sufficient field presence. Without such, longer emergency response time may result, fewer units are available for response, less officer back -up is available and fewer officers patrol the streets. These positions are currently budgeted within the adopted 1997 -98 budget. Position Vacancies October 1997 ' Page three DEPARTMENT POSITION VACANCY SALARY BENEFITS LIBRARY Librarian 37,182 12,636 Librarian 37,182 12,636 Department Total *Based on first year salary range - 6 mos. @ A step; 6 mos. @ B step i ,- - » '1 TOTAL 49,818* 49,818* $ 99,636 These vacancies are due to resignations earlier this year and are currently being filled with temporary employees. The Librarians are responsible for providing information, planning and supervising special projects with volunteers, and assisting with the maintenance of the Library's collections. If the current level of service is to be maintained, it is essential that these positions be filled. These positions are currently budgeted within the adopted 1997 -98 budget. In addition to the foregoing vacancies, the following four positions are before the Human Resources Commission and will be coming to the City Council in the near future: 1. Transportation Services Officer - This position has already been approved by Council, but a salary adjustment is being recommended in an effort to attract and encourage qualified applicants (100% Transportation Funds). 2. Human Resources Manager - This vacancy is a result of a recent resignation and a salary adjustment is being recommended in an effort to attract and encourage qualified applicants. 3. Library Proctor - This is a new position, pending approval of class specification by the Human Resources Commission and will replace the need for security guards in the Library. 4. Battalion Chief (40 hours) - Approved by Council as a budget savings in department reorganization. It includes the elimination of the Deputy Fire Marshal and the Administrative Captain and is pending approval of class specification by the Human Resources Commission (salary $69,114; benefits $27,294 for a total of $96,408). The two proposed salary increases and two new positions listed above are not included in the adopted 1997 -98 budget. October 7, 1997 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: William R. Kelly, City Manager .p By: Cindy Rowe, Community Relations Officer C4, SUBJECT: Consideration of Appointment to Arcadia Beautiful Commission Vacancy DISCUSSION A vacancy currently exists on the Arcadia Beautiful Commission due to the resignation of Don Gathers. You were previously provided with all Citizen Service Resumes on file for this commission. RECOMMENDATION The City Council may: 1. Make an appointment from the Citizen Service Resumes provided, to a term ending 6/30/00; or 2. Conduct interviews with selected applicants and make an appointment at the conclusion of the interviews or at a subsequent City Council meeting. LASER INV LLD C, r/. 11-e- , 1 lig. =V '"� to •°' MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Date: September 29, 1997 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY ATTORNEY AND COMMUNI Y DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR L• SUBJECT: RODEFFER RECLAMATION PLAN-TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS BACKGROUND Rodeffer Investments through their attorney, Glenn Watson, met with the above City officials to explain the need for certain changes to their Conditional Use Permit which was granted in 1994 by City Council Resolution No. 5785. This is set forth in the attached documents including a letter from Mr. Watson. It was determined that a change to the Resolution would require City Council approval along with a similar change to the resolution certifying the final environmental impact report for the project-i.e. Resolution 5779. The requested changes pertain solely to the name of the property owner applicant and the specific description of the property subject to the conditional use permit. These changes have no bearing on the substantive approval actions of the City Council. They correct two inaccuracies. These corrections are not prejudicial to any interested party and should operate nunc pro tunc which means from the beginning or as it should have been from the initiation of the application. Accordingly, the following action is recommended. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Move to approve striking of the abbreviation Inc. following the name of the applicant. and permittee , Rodeffer Investments wherever that appears in Resolutions 5785 and 5779, delete the current Exhibit "A" legal description and substitute the attached Exhibit A as the correct description. 2. Direct the City Attorney and City Clerk to make the appropriate corrections to Resolutions 5785 and 5779 and any related documents including the Operations Plan and 4ap re) v LASER IMAGED t , Reclamation Plan to reflect the changes approved in #1 above as from the dates of adoption of subject resolutions. Concurred�:q� City Manager '' " ©CCI P Y RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW RICHARD RICHARDS GLENN R.WATSON MICHAEL ESTRADA A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION (1916-1088) ROBERT G.BEVERLY LAURENCE S.WIENER THIRTY-EIGH�H FLOOR - HARRY L GERSHON STEVEN R.ORR DOUGLAS W.ARGUE MICHAEL G.COLANTUONO MARK L LAMKEN B.TILDEN KIM 333 SOUTH HOPE STREET SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE ERWIN E ADLER C.EDWARD DICKER LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90071-1469 TWO EMBARCADERO CENTER DAROLD D.PIEPER PETER M.THORSON SUITE 200 • ALLEN E DORSET BRENDA L DIEDERICHS (213)626-8484 SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFORNIA 94111-3801 STEVEN L DORSEY JAMES L MARKMAN WILLIAM L STRAUSZ DEBORAH R.HAKMAN FACSIMILE(213)626-0078 (416)835-1230 ANTHONY B.DREWRY RUBIN D.WEINER FACSIMILE(416)836-1236 MITCHELL E KI ABBOTT BASA T.ASAMURA Ia©rwQIBW.COT TIMOTHY L NEUFELD KAYBER O.BUME GREGORY W.STEPANIGGH GAUL JAFFE ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE ROCHELLE BROWNE CRAIG A.STEELE NUMBER ONE CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE MICHAEL JENKINS T.PETER PIERCE WILLIAM B.RUDELL DAVID ROBERT DANIELS September 24 , 19 9 7 BREA,CALIFORNIA 92821 QUINN M.BARROW BENJAMIN BARNOUW (714)990-0901 CAROL W.LYNCH WILLIAM P.CURLEY III FACSIMILE(714)900230 JEFFREY A.RABIN D.CRAIG FOX GREGORY M.KUNERT BOYD L HILL THOMAS M.JIMBO TERENCE R BOLA OF COUNSEL MICHELE BEAL BAGNERIS DANIEL L PINES AMANDA F.SUSSKIND USA BOND WILLIAM K KRAMER ROBERT C.CECCON DIANE ARKOW GROSS BAYRE WEAVER ROY A.CLARKE 0044452 STEVEN H.KAUFMANN ROXANNE DIAZ MONTGOMERY GARY E GANS ROBERT A.BALBUENA OUR FILE NUMBER JOHN J.HARRIS ERIKA M.FLEMING KEVIN G.NNIS OUVIAWAI-WEN UAN 10025-00002 ROBIN D.HARRIS AMY W.CHING Ms. Donna Butler . Community Development Administrator it [� ;, City of Arcadia 11 ( `- fJ` �= `� li n 240 W. Huntington Drive Arcadia, California 91006 fULl! SEP 2 41997 Re: Rodeffer Reclamation Plan , ryT-- '��----.. _- ,_ lit ' L`x:-7,-.-- Resolution No. 5785 ' ' . ;-.;: � �, ;r: Conditional Use No. 92-003 Dear Ms. Butler: Rodeffer Investments hereby requests that Resolution No. 5785 adopted by the City Council on April 5, 1994 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 92-003 approving a reclamation plan for an inert landfill at 12321 Lower Azusa Road, including an operations plan, be amended nunc pro tunc to correct two ministerial or clerical errors: (1) Striking the incorrect abbreviation "Inc. " following the name of the applicant and permittee, Rodeffer Investments; and (2) correcting the legal description of the property at 12321 Lower Azusa Road set forth in Exhibit "A" to the Resolution to the correct legal description set forth in the corrected Exhibit "A" hereto attached. These corrections are necessary for the true name of the applicant and permittee and the accurate legal description of the real property at 12321 Lower Azusa road for which the CUP was granted to be set forth in Resolution No. 5785 and Conditional Use Permit No. 92-003 . A copy of Res. No. 5785 is attached as Exhibit "B" . The two errors were inadvertent and were made when the application was prepared and filed by a consultant and signed by E.O. Rodeffer. At that time he was not well and failed to note the "Inc. " behind the name of Rodeffer Investments in the application form, or the error in the legal description which was attached to the application. (Mr. Rodeffer is now deceased. ) A 4N RICHARDS, WATSON &GERSHON Ms. Donna Butler September 24 , 1997 Page 2 copy of the conditional use permit application showing the errors is attached as Exhibit "C" . When the application was filed with the City the subject property was owned by Rodeffer Investments, the official business name of the E.O. and P.M. Rodeffer Revocable Trust dated April 30, 1990. A true and correct copy of the Fictitious Business Name Certificate filed on May 16, 1990 with the County Clerk of Orange County (in which E.O. Rodeffer and Phyllis M. Rodeffer maintained their residence and principal place of business) , together with the Proof of Publication thereof in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of General Circulation, is attached as Exhibit "D" . "Rodeffer Investments" is the legally correct name of the Rodeffer Family Trust which owned the property. . There is no question, and can be none, as to the identity of the property located at 12321 Lower Azusa Road that was the subject of the application for a CUP. A plat of the property was contained in the E.I.R. and is hereto attached as Exhibit "E" . Rodeffer Investments also requests that the abbreviation "Inc. " after its name in Resolution No. 5779 adopted April 5, 1994 entitled A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Arcadia, California, Certifying The Final Environmental Impact Report As Adequate For C.U.P. 92-003 , A Proposed Inert Landfill (Including The Operation Plan) and The Reclamation Plan At 12321 Lower Azusa Road And Adopting A Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program, be stricken nunc pro tunc. A copy of Resolution No. 5779 is attached as Exhibit "F" . Rodeffer Investments also requests that "Inc. " be stricken or deemed to be stricken nunc pro tunc from the Operations. Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program and all other environmental and related documents. Rodeffer Investments also requests that the legal description attached to Resolution No. 5779 as Exhibit A be replaced with a copy of the correct legal description hereto attached as Exhibit A and that the same legal description be deemed to be corrected in accordance with said corrected Exhibit A wherever the legal description appears in any and all related documents. Rodeffer Investments accepts all conditions set forth in Resolution 5785. Rodeffer offers to pay any fee or expenses required for processing this application. Rodeffer also requests that this request be reviewed as necessary and placed on the City Council agenda as soon as possible, but in any event not -later than October 7 , 1997 . 1 0 RICHARDS,WATSON &GERSHON Ms. Donna Butler September 24 , 1997 }5 Page 3 We regret any inconvenience arising from the inadvertent errors made in the application, and thank you for your consideration of this request. Please call on me if anything further is required. I will, of course, be in attendance at the City Council meeting at which this request will be on the agenda. Very truly yours, —04:"-e0 Glenn R. Watson Attorney For Rodeffer Investments Approved: RODEFFER INVESTMENTS B. : Aldir-d_ ' %// Ph lis M. Rode fe / GRW:mae 0044452 EXHIBIT A That certain real property located at 12321 Lower Azusa Road in the City of Arcadia described as follows: That portion of Lot 1 of Tract No. 10369, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 149, Pages 95 and 96 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, lying westerly and northwesterly of the westerly line of the land described in the Condemnation Action, Case No. 574211, Superior Court of said County, a certified copy of the Judgment had in said action being recorded in Book 38373 , page 153 , Official Records of said County, EXCEPT therefrom that portion thereof lying southeasterly of the line described in Parcel 578 in the Final Order of Condemnation in Case No. 740724, Superior Court of said County, recorded in Book D3802 , page 284 of said Official Records. 47-1 �w MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Date: September 29, 1997 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY ATTORNEY AND COMMUNI Y DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: RODEFFER RECLAMATION PLAN-TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS BACKGROUND Rodeffer Investments through their attorney, Glenn Watson, met with the above City officials to explain the need for certain changes to their Conditional Use Permit which was granted in 1994 by City Council Resolution No. 5785. This is set forth in the attached documents including a letter from Mr. Watson. It was determined that a change to the Resolution would require City Council approval along with a similar change to the resolution certifying the final environmental impact report for the project-i.e. Resolution 5779. The requested changes pertain solely to the name of the property owner applicant and the specific description of the property subject to the conditional use permit. These changes have no bearing on the substantive approval actions of the City Council. They correct two inaccuracies. These corrections are not prejudicial to any interested party and should operate nunc pro tune which means from the beginning or as it should have been from the initiation of the application. Accordingly, the following action is recommended. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Move to approve striking of the abbreviation Inc. following the name of the applicant. and permittee , Rodeffer Investments wherever that appears in Resolutions 5785 and 5779, delete the current Exhibit"A" legal description and substitute the attached Exhibit A as the correct description. 2. Direct the City Attorney and City Clerk to make the appropriate corrections to Resolutions 5785 and 5779 and any related documents including the Operations Plan and 17 Reclamation Plan to reflect the changes approved in #1 above as from the dates of adoption of subject resolutions. Concurred: I City Manager 1 . RICHARDS, WATSON &GERSHON Ms. Donna Butler September 24, 1997 Page 2 copy of the conditional use permit application showing the errors is attached as Exhibit "C" . When the application was filed with the City the subject property was owned by Rodeffer Investments, the official business name of the E.O. and P.M. Rodeffer Revocable Trust dated April 30, 1990. A true and correct copy of the Fictitious Business Name Certificate filed on May 16, 1990 with the County Clerk of Orange County (in which E.O. Rodeffer and Phyllis M. Rodeffer maintained their residence and principal place of • business) , together with the Proof of Publication thereof in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of General Circulation, is attached as Exhibit "D" . "Rodeffer Investments" is the legally correct name of the Rodeffer Family Trust which owned the property. There is no question, and can be none, as to the identity of the property located at 12321 Lower Azusa Road that was the subject of the application for a CUP. A plat of the property was contained in the E.I.R. and is hereto attached as Exhibit "E" . Rodeffer Investments also requests that the abbreviation "Inc. " after its name in Resolution No. 5779 adopted April 5, 1994 entitled A Resolution Of The City Council Of The City Of Arcadia, California, Certifying The Final Environmental Impact Report As Adequate For C.U.P. 92-003, A Proposed Inert Landfill (Including The Operation Plan) and The Reclamation Plan At 12321 Lower Azusa Road And Adopting A Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program, be stricken nunc pro tunc. A copy of Resolution No. 5779 is attached as Exhibit "F" . Rodeffer Investments also requests that "Inc. " be stricken or deemed to be stricken nunc pro tunc from the Operations. Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program and all other environmental and related documents. Rodeffer Investments also requests that the legal description attached to Resolution No. 5779 as Exhibit A be replaced with a copy of the correct legal description hereto attached as Exhibit A and that the same legal description be deemed to be corrected in accordance with said corrected Exhibit A wherever the legal description appears in any and all related documents. Rodeffer Investments accepts all conditions set forth in Resolution 5785. Rodeffer offers to pay any fee or expenses required for processing this application. Rodeffer also requests that this request be reviewed as necessary and placed on the City Council agenda as soon as possible, but in any event not -later than October 7, 1997 . 0 j1;2)V ' , , . RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW RICHARD RICHARDS GLENN R.WATSON MICHAEL ESTRADA A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION (1916-1988) ROBERT G.BEVERLY LAURENCE B.WIENER THIRTY-EIGI-fH FLOOR HARRY L.GERSHON STEVEN R.ORR DOUGLAS W.ARGUE MICHAEL G.COLANTUONO MARK L LAMKEN B.TILDEN KIM 333 SOUTH HOPE STREET BAN FRANCISCO OFFICE ERWIN E.ADLER C.EDWARD DICKER LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 80071-1489 TWO EMBARCADERO CENTER DAROLD D.PIEPER PETER M.THORSON • ALLEN E RENNETT BRENDA L DIEDERICHS SUITE 200 STEVEN L DORSEY JAMES L MARl0+1AN (213)626-8484 SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFORNIA 94111-3801 WILLIAM L STRAUSZ DEBORAH R.HAIO.MN FACSIMILE(213)828-0078 (416)836-1230 ANTHONY B.DREWRY RUBIN D.WEINER MITCHELL E.ABBOTT BABICA T.ASAMURA Ia@IWQInW.COT FACSIMILE(416)8.76-1236 TIMOTHY L NEUFELD ICAYSER 0.SLIME GREGORY W.STEPANICICH SAUL JAPFE ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE ROCHELLE BROWNE CRAIG A.STEELE NUMBER ONE CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE MICHAEL LEMONS D T.PETER PIERCE September 2 4, 1997 WILLIAM J NKINS DAVID PETER ROBERT DANIELS BREA,CALIFORNIA 92821 QUINN M.BARROW BENJAMIN BARNOUW (714)990-0901 CAROL W.LYNCH WILLIAM P.CURLEY III JEFFREY A.RABIN D.CRAIG FOX FACSIMILE(714)990-6230 GREGORY M.KUNERT BOYD L HILL THOMAS M.JIMBO TERENCE R.BOLA OF COUNSEL MICHELE BEAL BAGNERI8 DANIEL L PINES AMANDA F.SUBSKIND USA BOND WILLIAM K 163AMER ROBERT C.CECCON DIANE ARKOW GROSS SAYRE WEAVER ROY A.CLARKE 0044452 STEVEN H.KAUFMANN ROXANNE DIAZ MONTGOMERY GARY E GANS ROBERT A.BALBUENA OUR FILE NUMBER JOHN J.HARRIS ERIKA M.FLEMING �1 KEVIN G M S.ENNIS OLA WAI-WEN SUAN 10025-00002 ROBIN D.HARRIS AMY W.CHINS Ms. Donna Butler Community Development Administrator Cit of Arcadia rqr-__________PIN. fiFN- r-m-7 City 240 W. Huntington Drive f( L�+ Arcadia, California 91006 ljF SS/2 4 j� ,� 1 : -■ Re: Rodeffer Reclamation Plan C Resolution No. 5785 .I P << ..t_ Conditional Use No. 92-003 �� Dear Ms. Butler: Rodeffer Investments hereby requests that Resolution No. 5785 adopted by the City Council on April 5, 1994 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 92-003 approving a reclamation plan for an inert landfill at 12321 Lower Azusa Road, including an operations plan, be amended nunc pro tunc to correct two ministerial or clerical errors: (1) Striking the incorrect abbreviation "Inc. " following the name of the applicant and permittee, Rodeffer Investments; and (2) correcting the legal description of the property at 12321 Lower Azusa Road set forth in Exhibit "A" to the Resolution to the correct legal description set forth in the corrected Exhibit "A" hereto attached. These corrections are necessary for the true name of the applicant and permittee and the accurate legal description of the real property at 12321 Lower Azusa road for which the CUP was granted to be set forth in Resolution No. 5785 and Conditional Use Permit No. 92-003 . A copy of Res. No. 5785 is attached as Exhibit "B" . The two errors were inadvertent and were made when the application was prepared and filed by a consultant and signed by E.O. Rodeffer. At that time he was not well and failed to note the "Inc. " behind the name of Rodeffer Investments in the application form, or the error in the legal description which was attached to the application. (Mr. Rodeffer is now deceased. ) A RICHARDS,WATSON &GERSHON Ms. Donna Butler September 24 , 1997 Page 3 We regret any inconvenience arising from the inadvertent errors made in the application, and thank you for your consideration of this request. Please call on me if anything further is required. I will, of course, be in attendance at the City Council meeting at which this request will be on the agenda. Very truly yours, —X40*e. Glenn R. Watson Attorney For Rodeffer Investments Approved: RODEFFER INVESTMENTS • / 1 A' Ph lis M. Rode fe// GRW:mae 0044452 EXHIBIT A That certain real property located at 12321 Lower Azusa Road in the City of Arcadia described as follows: That portion of Lot 1 of Tract No. 10369, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 149, Pages 95 and 96 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, lying westerly and northwesterly of the westerly line of the land described in the Condemnation Action, Case No. 574211, Superior Court of said County, a certified copy of the Judgment had in said action being recorded in Book 38373 , page '153 , Official Records of said County, EXCEPT therefrom that portion thereof lying southeasterly of the line described in Parcel 578 in the Final Order of Condemnation in Case No. 740724, Superior Court of said County, recorded in Book D3802 , page 284 of said Official Records. • RESOLUTION 5785 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 92-003 (INCLUDING THE OPERATIONS PLAN) AND THE RECLAMATION PLAN FOR A PROPOSED INERT LANDFILL AT 12321 LOWER AZUSA ROAD, WITH FINDINGS. WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit application (including Operations Plan) and a Reclamation Plan for an inert landfill were filed by Rodeffer Investments, Inc., on December 9, 1991, Planning Department Case No. C.U.P. 92-003 (commonly known as the "Project and incorporated herein by reference), at 12321 • Lower Azusa Road, more particularly described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on September 14, 1993, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend to the City Council approval of Conditional Use Permit 92-003 and adopted Planning Commission Resolution 1503 expressing the Commission's comments and recommendation to the City Council regarding Conditional Use Permit 92-003 for a proposed inert landfill and Reclamation Plan at 12321 Lower Azusa Road; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 1994, the City Coundl held a public hearing on: (1) Conditional Use Permit 92-003 (including the Operations Plan); (2) the Reclamation Plan and (3) the Final Environmental Impact Report for the conditional use permit and reclamation plan for a proposed inert landfill at 12321 Lower Azusa Road. WHEREAS, as part of the record of this hearing the City Council reviewed and considered: a.- All staff reports and related attachments and exhibits submitted by the Planning Division to the City CounciL b. The record of the Planning Commission hearing regarding C.U.P. 92-003, the Reclamation Plan and the Draft EIR. . c. All letters, information and material presented as part of the public testimony at the City Council public hearing on March 15, 1994, including the staff. • report, the Final EIR, and all oral presentations and documentation presented at the public hearing. . -1- 5785 . Onv5= t 38 22 WHEREAS, the record of the hearing does not include transcripts or ' testimony of the Assembly Select Committee's hearing on groundwater contamination and landfill leakage dated December 10, 1993. WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing the City Council reviewed the record of the proceeding, discussed and deliberated the issues, approved the conditional use permit, operations plan and reclamation plan and directed staff to prepare this Resolution to reflect their findings and derision consistent with the staff report and their deliberations. WHEREAS, a primary goal and purpose of the conditional use permit and reclamation plan is to comply with the State Legislature's mandate to reclaim the quarry to a usable condition which is readily adaptable for alternative land uses as set forth in the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA). WHEREAS, the above recitals are hereby incorporated as part of the findings set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DECIDE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.. Findings. The Conditional Use Permit, Operations Plan and Reclamation Plan are approved and adopted pursuant to the following findings and subject to the conditions set forth below. 1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity because the quarry will be filled, the slopes stabilized consistent with the objectives of the Project and the conditions of approval listed below and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (hereby incorporated by this reference) includes measures to reduce potential impacts on adjoining; • properties. 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which • a Conditional Use permit is authorized because all uses in the M-2 zone require a conditional use permit per Section 9267.1 of the Arcadia Municipal Code. 3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping, and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood in that the Project description for the 85± acre site provides multiple stacking lanes for all trucks based on the worst case trucking scenario; there will be -2- 5785 003518 3822 no off-site stacking. The wall along the west property line will be repaired and the site will be improved with landscaping avid fencing prior to commencement of landfill operations to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. • 4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use in that Lower Azusa Road is designated in the General Plan as a major arterial and is capable of handling the truck capacity anticipated in the operations plan. The Draft EIR provides specific mitigation measures to offset any potential impacts on the I-605/Rivergrade Road interchange at Lower Azusa Road. Per the conditions of approval set forth in this Resolution there will be no truck ingress to or egress from the site from or to the west on Lower Azusa Road. All vehicles except personal automobiles of employees shall enter and exit from the east via Lower Azusa Road and the 605 Freeway. 5. That the granting of such Conditional Use permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan because: (a) the General Plan classification for the • subject site is "Industrial" and the proposed inert landfill operation is consistent with this designation; and (b) the proposed landfill is consistent with the following General Plan objectives to: • (1) Require existing and new gravel mining operations to comply with City Regulations and the 1975 California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act. (2) Reclaim depleted gravel mining sites so that they may be developed with uses consistent with the zoning regulations. The Project as proposed, including all the specific conditions set forth in this resolution, including the mitigation measures, Final EIR (hereby incorporated by this reference) and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will comply with the objectives and policies set forth in the General Plan by returning the site to a usable condition for future use. Section 2. Conditions of Approval. That for the foregoing reasons the City Council approves Conditional Use Permit 92-003 to allow an inert landfill at the Rodeffer Quarry subject to the following condition= 1. As per the entrance enhancement program identified in the Operations Plan (page 10), a detailed plan showing the proposed improvements to the entry shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to beginning any "construction" work on the project. -3_ 5785. 003519 1 1, I . 2. The Operations Plan (page 10) indicates that a landscaped earthen berm is proposed for the perimeter of the property along Lower Azusa Road. A detailed] landscape and irrigation plan for the proposed berm shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and_approval prior to beginning any construction" work on the project. All work shall be completed prior to commencement of the landfill operation. 3. The wall along the westerly property line shall be repaired and maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Division prior to commencement of the landfill operation. 4. The planting area along the westerly property line and adjacent to the wall shall be cleared of all debris prior to commencement of the landfill operation • and shall be maintained on an ongoing basis. • 5. Prior to beginning operation of the landfill, all necessary site improvements induding, but not limited to improvements to the entry, design and construction of multiple stacking lanes, landscaping, etc., shall be completed. 6. The hours of.operation for the landfill shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. The landfill shall not operate on Sundays or legal holidays. 7. No on-site grading activities, equipment operation, compacting, spreading, etc. shall take place after the hours of operation set forth above. 8. The following conditions set forth by the Department of Public Works shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. a. Prior to commencement of the landfill operation, the Public Works Department shall review and approve the applicant's plans for design of the ingress and egress driveway on Lower Azusa Road and parking improvements along the roadway frontage. b. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan on the control of dust, dirt and other debris in the public right-of-way along Lower Azusa Road. Said plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for its review and approval prior to commencement of the proposed landfill operation. c. A wash rack shall be required for all trucks exiting the site, to reduce the PM10 and fugitive dust. d. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan acceptable to the Director of Public Works addressing how the roadway will be maintained throughout the duration of the landfill operation. In the absence of a mutually acceptable plan, the -4- 5785 • 003550 1. 382 applicant, as a minimum, shall be required to maintain the roadway surface and pavement structure in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Public Works throughout the duration of the landfill o'ieration. No maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction work within the Lower Azusa Road right-of-way shall be performed without approval of the Director of Public Works and issuance of a required permit. All required work shall be done at the expense of the applicant. 9. Consistent with Section §2773.1(a) of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and the regulations promulgated pursuant to said act, financial assurances shall be required in an amount to be determined by the City Manager of the City of Arcadia to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. Said amount shall be deposited with the City prior to commencement of landfill operations. 10. The applicant and/or operator as specified in the individual mitigation measures shall be held responsible for: a. Compliance with the mitigation measures and implementation of the Project identified in the Final EIR; . b. Compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program established by the City per Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. 11. The applicant and/or operator as specified in the individual mitigation measures shall be responsible for any costs associated with the mitigation monitoring and reporting required to ensure implementation of those mitigation measures and Project design features identified in the Final EIR that have been incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and conditions of approval. 12. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program which includes mitigation measures and Project design features is attached and made a part of these conditions of approval. 13. An on-site manager shall be present during all operating hours. 14. The operator (Roadway Construction Company or his successor) shall be responsible for the route and safe operation of all trucks coming to or leaving the site. All trucks shall be maintained such that there are no "leaks" from which dirt or gravel can spill onto public streets or highways. The operator will be responsible for the removal of all spill on public streets associated with this project, at his own expense. Such removal must occur within 30 minutes of notification by the City of -5- 5785 • 00351 3826 " 1 1� any safety hazard caused by such spill. The operator will be responsible for the cost of any work by the City to remove such spill material. 15. All gates shall be dosed and locked when landfill operations cease at the end of each day and when an on-site manager is not present. 16. The applicant shall indemnify the City against any legal claims made against the City of Arcadia and shall execute an agreement which meets with the approval of the City Attorney prior to commencement of landfill operations.. ! 17. The project shall be conducted in accordance with the operations plan submitted to the City. 18. The applicant shall be responsible for ensuring a safe traffic flow without congestion or "stacking" of trucks or cars on Lower Azusa Road. In carrying out this responsibility, a flagman must be provided within 24 hours after requested by the Public Works Director. After 24 hours, the City will provide a flagman at the expense of the applicant. Such flagman will also keep a daily count of the traffic! volume into the site. 19. That all traffic to and from this site must abide by all Vehicle codes of both the City of Arcadia and.the City of El Monte. 20. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs incurred pursuant to the monitoring and reporting program adopted by the City Council. Said costs shall'be subject to deposit requirements to be specified by the City Attorney. 21. There shall be no truck ingress to or egress from the site from or to the west on Lower Azusa Road. All vehicles except personal automobiles of employees shall enter and exit from the east via Lower Azusa Road and the 605 Freeway. 22. The entry area and all landscaped areas along Lower Azusa Road shall:be continuously and adequately maintained in strict compliance with the approved • landscape plan and "entrance enhancement program". Maintenance shall include regular cleanup of trash and debris on and adjacent to Lower Azusa Road. 23. The conditional use permit hereby granted shall expire and be of no further force and effect 12,years from the date landfill operation begins. 24. Compliance with all conditions shall be formally reviewed by the Arcadia Planning Commission one year from the effective date of this conditional use permit and each year thereafter. If the Planning Commission finds that there is • failure to comply with conditions, they may recommend to the City Council that revocation proceedings be instituted. -6- 5785 • 0035 52 382' 25. The Rodeffer Inert Landfill shall receive fill material from the operator, Roadway Construction, Inc, or its successor only. 26. That a 24 hour security guard shall be stationed on the property to • prevent trespassing and illegal dumping. 27. That the property shall not be utilized for storage or repair of trucks or other vehicles. Nor storage of any type of equipment lother than equipment being used in the operation of the landfilll shall be permitted on the property. 28. That C.U.P. 92-003 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Division acknowledging and accepting the conditions of approval. 29. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this Conditional Use permit shall constitute grounds for the suspension or revocation of said Permit. Section 3,, Findings for Reclamation Plan. That the City Council finds that the Reclamation Plan meets the requirements set forth.in the State Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and the regulations promulgated pursuant to said act, and Chapter 5 of the Arcadia Municipal Code relating to Mining Permits and Reclamation Plans in that (1) the residual hazards to public health and safety are eliminated and (2) adverse environmental effects are prevented or minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition, w hich is readily adaptable for alternative land uses. As per Condition 9 of the Conditions of Approval, financial assurances shall be required in an amount to be determined by the City of Arcadia to ensure reclamation is performed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. Said amount shall be deposited with the City prior to commencement of landfill operations; Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • Passed, approved and adopted this 5th day of April, 1994. %S/ JOSEPH C. CIRAULO Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: /S/ JUNE D. ALFORD City Clerk of the City.of Arcadia -7- 003553 5785 382,3 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA) - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS: CITY OF ARCADIA) I, JUNE D. ALFORD, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 5785 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council on the 5th day of April, 1994 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Fasching, Lojeski, Margett and Cirauio NOES: None ABSENT: None • ABSTAIN: Council Member Harbicht • /S/ JUNE D. ALFORD City Clerk of the City of Arcadia • 003554 -8✓ 5785 SS2 Parcel 2 That portion of Lot 2, Tract No. 10369, per map recorded in Book 149, Pages 95 and 96, of maps, bounded on the no'r'thwest by the southwesterly line of Lower Azusa Road, formerly El Monte and Covina Road, 50 feet wide, as shown on said map, bounded on the southwest by that certain boundary-line of said Lot 2 shown on said map as having a bearing and length of "N 67°22'55' west a distance of 1,287.40 feet" and bounded easterly and southeasterly by the westerly line of the land described in the above mentioned condemnation action. • • • • • • • EXHIBIT "A" • 003555 3830 Exhibit C • • • File No. C U° 9=D-003 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION A. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name •Rodeffcr Investments. Inc. • Address 11770 E.warner Ave.,Suite 129,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Daytime Telephone No. (714)751-7000 Interest in Property B. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name Rodeffes Investments,Inc. _ Address 11770 E. warner Ave..Suite 129,Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Daytime Telephone No. (714)7514000 C. PROPERTY ADDRESS (LOCATION) 12321 Lower Azusa Road Arcadia. CA • D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 2: That portion of Lot 2,Tract No. 10369,ser map recorded in Book 149, pages 95 and 96, of maps, bounded on the northwest by the southwesterly line of Lower Azusa Road, formerly El Monte and Covina Road,50 feet wide,as shown on said map,bounded on the southwest by that certala. boundary Tine of said Lot 2 shown on said map as having a bearing and length of"N 67°22'55' west a distance of 1,287.40 feet- and bounded easterly and southeasterly by the westerly line of the land described in the above mentioned catdemnatlon action. E. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION m - I"dastrild F. ZONE CLASSIFICATION M-2 G. Proposed Use (State exactly what use is intended for the property. If you are applying for an eating establishment, restaurant, or place of assembly, include the seating capacity and hours of operation) The 'e • .. • -- consists of the establishment of an inert landfill unclassified • ni •- oni soil, rocks,concrete and other inert materials to fill the former gtmrry pit. The pit is estimated to be between 150 sad • . 165 feet deep. Approximately 10 million cubic yards of inert materials will be required to fill the quarry. It is estimated that it will take between B and I2 years to completely gut ma loaner quarry. 000003 CUP -1- 5J26188 PREREQUISITE: CONDITIONS: (The law requires that the conditions set forth below be clearly established before a conditional use permit can be granted.) EXPLAIN IN DETAIL WHEREIN YOUR CASE CONFORMS TO THE FOLLOWING FIVE CONDITIONS: 1. That the granting of such conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity. A comprehensive Operations Plan has been prepared and included in this submittal which contains meanies to ensure the proposed project will not result in detrimental impacts to the surrounding aria. 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is one for which a conditional use permit is authorized. The general plan designation for the site is(I)-IndustriaL The general plan states that lRTMtfillg are permitted Within industrially designated areas with the issuance of a conditional use permit. 3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, including all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, land- scaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. -- The project site was formerly used as a sand and gravel quarry for over thirty years The proposed landfill will utilize similar types of heavy equipment and is considered similar to the former quarry operation. Dec the depth of the pit located on-site very few land uses other than a landfill are considered appropriate. Therefore,the site is considered adequate for the proposed use. 4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width-and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. The site was used as a gravel quarry for over 20 years. The proposed use will generate traffic similar to the former quae y. The existing street system adequately served the quaff and theafors can adequately save the ptccosed project Additiaaally,a traffic study has been prepared for the proposed project which determined that the mimed projeu will not sgrut,cansly attect eustmg lavers of service 5. That the granting of such conditional use permit will not adversely affect the com- prehensive General Plan. The mvposed use is consistent with the City of Arcadia General Plan. Additionally,implementation of the proposed project will allow the site to be reclaimed so that the site would again be available for some eve we consistent with the General Plan. As a resnit,issuance of the requested traditional use permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. NOTE: The Planning Commission is required by law to make a written finding of facts,based upon the information presented at the time of the public hearing, that beyond a reasonable doubt the five above enumerated conditions apply. CUP -2- 00000'i 52&'88 rTh • , APPLICANT(S)' VERIFICATION ,, I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY (OR DECLARE) UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING INFORMATION AND ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. SIGNATURES: E.O. Rodeffer 6� Telephone No. (714)751-7000 Applicant 11770 E.Wailer Ave.,Suite 129,Fotmtain Valley, CA 92708 Address (include street, city, state and zip code) Telephone No.• Applicant (if more than one) Address (include street, city, state and zip code) E.O.Rodeffer ° Telephone No. (714)751-7000 Owner of record (signatur 11770 E.warner Ave.,Suite 129,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Address (include street, city, state and zip code Telephone No. Owner of record (if more than one) Address (include street, city, state and zip code) Received by Receipt No. Jl Date /Z -7‘97 CUP -3- 000005 5r26rss s.,.:•:\ -.), 0N-ptc-‘ (1 • •-• g.s t, .X. . • .. .-,. . -. • ' - • AIV3 1- - , . , . . . 9(1)11 cilisti i • .. . • .,• . ;i. t,tA il . i .. . . . .• .: • • . . (3V1VN INIEkt 110 361.1) , • ** oal .11330103 '0 63 GIRL 1 ainmeiS • . • • .: . -,.. ••:-- :„.; .: 1 •••••••;..i.•...k••• ••., ..4• .;!).1.:. . .:••••r... -. '• . -•- • 'll --•-.•'''.• /,, .. -- ( -- '1 • , W84 uomuccio0 i ., :z : EunwuBlca , .. • '...-... ,.. • nc•Tt.1*-1:-03:- . ,t:.: aq',71:.t-,:-'-••:' .I. . ;•••••:•':'161999 415PIAMPFS1454115-L AF.449-••4'1171 ;W:r.i..*:4 : .:...: • , • •. . • : . • ' _____ •• . "•: ••• ••:,.: •.:). ,,.:itu.. ,13-3,4••,..1.1.4 1,.; luitto thowatioda".1. •... ,... a :: , • • . GO 250111X811.. ,:. •- -.00106411311026111/1111initillill00110ilattiftiONM • : .1:--• . • •:-• - • • • . •:- •: •.• -,‘: ,1 •• -. • •ao . litkilOszeiriataviliM1141131111tIMIMOULlau v• L9ftt .11111 awe dCf•VAYSWA - , '110.101111300•JiallEILVIS sau. aaviawm goal • aurnnuvls arni VENOM • • . •NO anoav aaan(s)mroi '9 2110111g161-illt:V 101811X:1613111001/11WillingWINkleanla aViliAtilzVe'4,•:-v-'''•:S10511sixi•gnolluold afiLli-laNft•SEMNtsno 2 1 4 L Q S avok1Atilstudxs ilekuraiti114111t.3110114,11i;2141011000N •.,.1.0vcit.410:Pip-1/.4virom(s)-LwE14-sOati mu . - • •. u• 1:tiiiti.-4:‘!..1.. ,. ••■••3 ,•-,i; ••••••;LA :-.‘• ti •.: ..‘.." :::(3 1..7"...14.. -7,-- ( /139:11;essetti-retno ( ) aim ILIP!( aliM Pm Puuqsnq ( la.2,41140:1-c_q (.. ) _10.n4.allatISIZIO 0 In .ticamie ( ) *pawed tr mil 164440 1/0116936S6 pemodicoullin tre( ) . ClItisigaVecil$131144t4eY.: 13967airrIvrIPIA!Pu!is( )Aq Perolz02 111 seal!snq sltu.(1.1NO 3NO NO3140) , ..("4 :F.11.,C; ji'c't..*::,:it,'./:'■ P,...r3 l,.7 1•tt" ...:7: •.•i;-)...117 'f.:0,1%/cily. 6p60 dri • 604s AO sseippii abuepisati • , • .• -' • • ..(40:11)3105114344 P.5410;q60146-uoilwodi0 o II) . ... . iug..4siBay lo GUIEU find • •••',.: . • •, ..:1,:r..-!.:::,q) .; • ■• ' • ' • • • • ' ••••• ., . . • 9000'Or .• , , •-•1,Art.I.visz. ,,..;•,?•91E18.:, • ••• •,:. ••••• . • • •-. Aira .•;:e,.,,.. • .. ssaippv ov.lepfs'aiti _ - --------._____. - • •'"(uciiriolobi6C631qili.igillod ill -' - ...-'• •l'-' - az.'''',.;..:‘ ,•...•• -lussqspatt lo alleU pry -_... • 129Z6 SW "Cie WNW 3A.1113 31.413Vd LSE • ,....,....„ - ,,,..!.11:tirCsi ri;••••7.A•g USE 04 3.411.4::s• ,..? !,. •is.1;4 • mg r,..„, 446, .1 2,.....,.., ,•,,....,, • • . ePol al-1 sscuppv aou,appisu . !W um PSIIiii.liViii .#1.34114 4.441POI 11 '41 Pue 'I ',II P letslui 41314363V so •3 '6 • •• ,.. 140413i°dJ°?Lit'ARli/q j".49.74°RPPC499 /1) f 1 ., • lue.14.903e):1 Jo 041.1e0 Brij %...... ' 1013.,....... .. ....r.1 w• :o'• .r...v"o.ci..c'.9.•4'. t-f.4 4'.'...'',,R0. 1-4-,.‘07. ,1.4.1n ycu... rn, u tslow 3 oust *a • '.***Pcibl'il!i::.'" •"4. L.1-0."g4'11'.4e' /74 Abilit6".-OFItirstilSnEfiFaiftfitittollactfielfIlis *lib *30.115pv wails . .. . • - -- •. --`1.is"Y: v•a-••••• .'•.1 ?1•--■ • --..' :• .., ••1-"-•;•;4---.)/Ift* •-•• • . , - . .... ... . ., -. . • •. • • 51111153114E 131.430111 •f - " .• .I.:: :•.,..... :.,.=.7.Pd'. .. • el■cartvlati.mv.aluMPOSIOGNIS48144100,LINO)StASONo40;14.53*PigTrik3H1:....Y,.. ••:. •`..-,,:oi '. •' '••••• 1 :. •tifi ellA • . . , . • .• • • 0••/..,;•..:4:•••■•..: ti.3): ti.;c1,217.6 ' q..,;;;, ZiU;.V.4.•":1,1; •&•i:011ftt .7.4r .?r.;412.11..4• :* .: ..,--Ar:-.!.%, ;. :,....,i,v,) • : ' i...3%:.47%, • -416INSISS3bitSailf'SnaitiLLOIA:' ...7t3 ..".:•‘•:4 --e'•••••,f,1 RIM . la • 4, lt.S:V4.0E.er, .i.:".4 ;-"r,411 alit. % '.. •4 -•'` ..••• ")••••C0V3.9'.•7.'14'.•,•,4i•..,,..*;.- 4xlai PA.b;70;te,A;.1411001, -IT Pe401410-1994S.acui*.:',.-.- 's■• ,1•.•••• " girJ ' . I e ■•'••••.,1 ••• • 7..ir. . ' :, • ' ... .4-:‘ ••'.1-4. ., ,,- '. ...,... *..,:,;••• LI•..; -.7. ..:. t.:.1. r • %4,409crsh.*.mft:1,10 1-: :13=11116115901§11142C1-4.11 •• " .;..)...............,T.,.. , ':r:::.:i......i.1..Z'.,7. t'' •J . ::..:1..:i::...:14:.i...,•!•,1 ;,-.Ai.;." i...:1 .,; :.,........:: .. .,• 7 *lit,....,.;,viara a . . . • .. •. . : . : „.• ,_.,,;,•:./.,.. e:. •:'...f,..to.....,:'' '• • ..:';',"--.0.• .".'''••:'' '... ' ••.".'" I'4110400 '.;-• •• '7..''''_,L.'. . • • • :.:,: •• ...:: .i...•i .'• ‘•:',, '•''......-1•• ..••" ::*•• .;'•■• '■ 4-....'• '..''.:."'•'''0••••'''''. 'IF;' '::':•'■•• t'•'••••• ...i•'•:i, •..r.•9-.'.... L.•:,7,-•:•:.••.:" y•1 t e 7•0.:4.;•,•...„.1•,2-7....,,,7-1,",..•,,.*"I•.:/:'.:-.1,=.;.0-1.0 41:.0,■-.,...:4:.r:'•‘....,7.{.*:::1;.:','.::'".:1..:•.:4...:.,4.'t••1■;`....;...;.-;.-;;7'1i J•A:A'.••..•.-61.1';:',,'.4s'••4a:i-.r'.,.,.'.-'.S."'e.,t....r'...,.. •,;-.'A'',.''..,4'•.•'•'?l"l.'i-....•.-;•7''-.....,.-.-,.'-,•,'•••'••':9,1 ...si-. •'••' ..... .... •:: •''`I •. .7,';1.A... ',,.,',":,-.i.:,o.t.r s•I'er 't..itr.es. 1i'd1...?.e?c1-f,.,..A'„•;„:.•.. '::'.';':ier.'4'.1''•'1>'I):s"4,-.-.,.,.*:-Z. .-,,'......i. ,1Z: 1•• lb :•;-."..i.::"..tifo,...'...:;iiiiir '....;•-•...e.r.;;:,-)....4,;:....,..4i..:).04:::..i.,..v.,:7.7;, ,.- ••••.&`4.• , .•!..!..x... .• -1.;;;;.. .4. ' .1• .3 pr 1 •rt,c,o•A.... .:.... .., , .V ... .4.. ,,,,„eak, . ••••••'-'-i-r-,4.4'...:0:0•!'-:: !,.•Z''...**1:41:,..:.+.li,ifitritai.e;`. „API •A . v,'. - ...,..... .''..,=, .:4......':.,.., I ;'...;-..P4-;;;.,..'i:.-.. 5...'t Kin.`.1'..if 6A."...:.1.1.:.-...: ' 14.0.0P; .ifib...-0: 4.'t4C1I'S 3S%13A.:3 .•,.3.1.S..,'0:::::.i: .' ,SEP-04-1997 09:47 714 751 7720 P.05 b0"d ...:_ ..._..._...1. %66_.,.. ..Iw� 222.2, TSL b1L. ._...__.. 9b:613 L66t-bi 0-d3S Anaheim , 1 l r—f P 771 S. Lewis St., Anaheim, Calif., 92805 1 Pr000 Publication of PROOF OF PUBLICATION '' (2015.5 t C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ss. County of Orange. — i411:1.1 .; 71- ..'T,..:11: -.1:::' f . I am a citizen of the United States and a resident • •Y"" "r" of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of r` eighteen years, and not a part to or Interested In t. • ^'; ? ;'='"? the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk v a. •LS: .• ,�;;:' of the printer of the Anaheim Bulletin, a p CamnDelTiar; kAI- Spa 6ommeca is . newspaper of general circulation, printed and :.' ;kmeirsu.' ,sbo tancoila tradhcsi ' published in the City of Anaheim, County of dal' �`w` "' !ate,19 "! 1• Orange, and which newspaper s O.ate;' has been ad- _•Eo�moo.t L judged a newspaper of general clrcuation by the pt-i6sdm`:iie;3 ki • Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under the date of December 28, 1951, Case Number A-21021; that the notice, of which the annexed Is a printed copy, has been published In each regular and entire Issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement 7 on the following dates, to-wit: Arii,, .. 24.. /,' _//..,1 1 -: • or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. Executed at Anaheim. ornla. Date ... .1.. 199 Signature ^/�/� n- 1 1 Tr.1 -.T I c I L I A ]S7 J J7(TC J I.H-IGC•aril )G.. }72 ra7�� / /// Exhibit E . . Ir(T3'. : 1 • '=1.7". I it: ...sr..c.:.. .....;:i:f:....'.. . .. 1• ‘.• • i • IT LO GDE LE f• LI .3. D ARROW - -.......w.,,;,:.f.:. ' . ' • I WOK.- ., :.: ;c0c. — ,,k- - se. i- Lip,,, x,y Lod- ,. L.,. : 4fr L. NE O 41( I IIIP.s(1- .4•• so crt . 0 ST n woo Iti_ li..i 0 -1.. • • ‘i II U8 0. gr lir'' .' t. ;.,.. ..: , I : ,.. I . 14, ■ ct- - .-. , x =' . /- ...." // •-.: lek '"1" RI)v i A I -,- . . j . I c4. /71: / LIVE OAK 42S° I4, i - c •• ; .., il• "ii.i.:' I I 43) -1- 1 c.9.;-< Dil SANCI. ir • . ,;;If ... .0 0 , sr%N.....44., ..1 I , , . .' • D•■4 , II , ' • - „al' • c9 , • 4..• § CNILCOT pri II, *.:,.... f,..._.'• . 04i1 -1! ita 4:11 A 1 .s. j ,...... ..,,..., ... „.„ _,.. .-44,„,* ., • ... • ..,• 4,c.-. ., 1 . ANADARill NA1 ill I %ft.,. 42-C-1- ....TE v-- Rio -4 I 4° •-7. I I I. .- CE OLNE II 4442 if0Vt&Olk ■.: a "*.• • , 13600 4 '•• 3900 ' v•, int •• 14a2 TO I? PROJECT SITE ' . ,-•KS 01 ir,TE r" . • •"39' ' ii..,..-.L, -- . 4‘; j 0 * V• I • A.,.--.... ... _. - - - , - j spfuN • "fits 4 ---,BT.. • .1. • 6 e . 8. • 1 It INI •71. (Z C' -- 49 01111,7- 414e4 sr.:42-Zgr.'.7. • , . r 445,:r. ... cm., .- . . 41. B OW. lia . -a • .. Ote4357.4.,i.:8. 14, gifo :V..' . 17.... Sr .... .: 4-An....-;.-• I *..:\44.10a747: . - • Al.1 `.' P.aArl„ .BELGATEL .7 2 z — - 4.- .GA .. I;.• E e Iv, a'. 1,6 . 60-4I:W4 • DABL• ao , a ,14:41° •i- 4/...'E "(...t.:4;-r •RD •. (LOS -ANG i : IFAI - AG, _- a Rosec4.4, r.r. 4 I - r 1 . ill • :‘,- . ,,,00. s il* -- ti;•:-Ti*-- ,./ I . : . „ •- 7:. rilliar .1:”.1 1 e,. ... ..— tf 14 Ck DAMN GIR / ...\• .. , ',.. Ct. 1 r / •-•-• •-••• •-••• + ,LT,• ege• a.0 a MORGAN .- • - -. - - - - i • CH,.,. -„,, IIS Do r / z ;I EL wt.:k • i ...," 14t4 & ' - I 1/44,4,, ...., > -it 4, ._.1 ' ,WNW DA r, et.- • - = - . sr cCg) 0000 Sr I ' CO CO 0 .: •Cr • • Lust N ''''' e• IIPIL , N. - CD vAuz vssut :ST ,.. i••.' .SOP tril Ia. ' It• i/E r c? 4tt 7 ;..4 -A , vc 00 t1/4•"1 i.' a- 5/01.,„04 i .•.-• it Ct IRWINDAL-' .zz- ., J2 'A‘ : C6r1D I 6 DI:':'.. • '04.Viti N 4icc r ifik. „,. I ' Cr) • sch484Rtki Au .- ,.., %Lt- lit 0-- ,,,Jo'', . - , '4900 i: -"u 4 p. " ••.: ‘1" VD ....''''..1;2•°°' 4 . 4. ta■ - ' '01. .11.4 ' ••, 13...1..........' i .;.,.. ...c,. .-- r; .- ., *)..E ••;,;4-e•• s't 't. 51 503° 04, q900 4 4, II ' I -: 'r4+ Ctittt.... 4 .06( Sr,„.; 'co, .Z., • 'te...4- 4, 4:1,zsi *40 PC' 45.'0 a r ' i . - eth(%)-"',- - e- ,.... 7..._ -001.— ...t-i§, •,• . IL "C •T ,.., .te .RAI,Aotslik . v.,.,-.,,..,47. ,,. ... ,- . 1. 0 ..,,..c, ,cc., >,,t. / .,.0•44,4s. -. ./r v 1 . t? J • 'v 9 i/I i : ' .-°400 C'' '' '''' 4Z-• .4 CI, se 1 4. I r '-ts 6 4 4144 2 • - '1/•• ' ./ ''.1 SERI ' 'es . 0.,,e ,L _ .f• . -, . i : ;.: _ f _. ..., ,4 E:v4-41 Izbo rr e •Z .i.• "4 cf" .. I 43 / ZAMORA Oiksnat CR A •.ti;;,',.... ..• ...,...• ‘•,.. .r, dr: . 46 .... 4.K..4... 43- ••• ••N'T • •: .„„Ep . ..„.c4, .„, o 4Pc`"". J>: i, ?i. , z,4.,., ,..:., ..-jr. Z .f. ' 4 + 't'A• 1 4, . •co ,,,,,. ' .> :,• ,r . ST 4 • ••■,, .. • - •••. •••• .". 7 • / ' LEGEND • 1 Lower Azusa Road 11/4 2 11800 Clark Street 3 11801 Golding Road It - 4 5460-5500 Peck Road mi... -....mu. 5 1245 East Arrow Highway o .25 .5 .75 1 MILES SOURCE: Engineering-Science • - Figure I-1 Locations of Other Projects 11014 I , • Exhibit F • RESOLUTION 5779 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AS ADEQUATE FOR C.U.P. 92-003 A PROPOSED INERT LANDFILL (INCLUDING THE OPERATIONS PLAN) AND THE , RECLAMATION PLAN AT 12321 LOWER AZUSA ROAD AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds as follows: f A. A Conditional Use Permit application (including Operations Plan) and a Reclamation Plan for an inert landfill were filed by Rodeffer Investments, Inc, on December 9, 1991, Planning Department Case No. C.U.P. 92-003 (commonly known as 1` the "Project and incorporated herein by reference), at 12321 Lower Azusa Road, more particularly described in Exhibit A; and B. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources • Code Section 21000, et seq., "CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.), and the City of Arcadia CEQA Guidelines (City Council Resolution 5157), the City prepared an Environmental Impact Report for the Project entitled "Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Rodeffer Inert Landfill £< ("DEIR")",. State Clearinghouse Number 92041091; and C. The Planning Commission after giving the required notice which was mailed on August 20, 1993, conducted a duly advertised public hearing on September 14, 1993 to consider the DEIR, the Conditional Use Permit and Reclamation Plan; and D. Following the public comment on the DEIR (August 11 through September ' 24, 1993), the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Project was • prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and City of Arcadia Resolution 5157; and E. On March 15, 1994, the City Council of the City of Arcadia conducted a duly noticed public hearing and heard and considered all evidence and testimony by all , interested parties concerning the FEIR for the Project and F. The FEIIt was presented to the City Council of the City of Arcadia who • reviewed and considered the information contained within the FEIR prior to taking action on the Project; and -1- 5779 ' O )35sO 380 ;3 } G. Based upon such evidence and testimony and staff reports for the Project, including all oral presentations and testimony, ii.11 letters, information and material' submitted as part of the public testimony and documentation submitted during the public hearing on March 15, 1994, this City Council makes the following additional findings: Section 2. Project Description. The City Council finds as follows: A. The proposed Project consists of the establishment and operation of an i • nert landfill on a depleted sand and gravel quarry site. The 85 acre site was used for sand and gravel extraction from 1967 to 1990. Operation continued until aggregate depletion and groundwater intrusion rendered it economically infeasible to use the site as a quarry. The proposed landfill will accept only inert material, such as soils, rock and concrete. It is estimated the quarry pit is between 150 and 165 feet deep and•contains approximately 1.1 billion gallons of standing water. Currently the bottom of the quarry is under approximately 40 feet of water. It is estimated that 10 million cubic yards of inert materials will be required to fill the quarry to its pre 1967 surface elevations and take approximately 8 to 12 years to completely fill. The Project site is currently designated industrial in the City's General Plan and is zoned M-2 (heavy 71 industrial). No permanent long term land uses are proposed at this time. B.. The primary objectives of the Project are to: i 1. Stabilize the quarry slopes to reduce hazards to public health and safety consistent with State and local requirements; and 2.. Reclaim the property to a reusable condition consistent with the City of I i Arcadia's General Plan and zoning regulations; and 3. Comply with the requirements of the City of Arcadia as contained in the Mining and Reclamation Plan adopted June 5, 1979; and 4. Comply with the objectives of the 1975 California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act including to ensure: (1) adverse environmental effects are prevented or minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition '• which is readily adaptable for alternative land uses and (2) residual hazards to public ; • health and safety are eliminated. A more detailed Project description is contained in Page 1 of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (the entire document is hereby incorporated by , 7 this reference). ' Section 3, Environmental Review Process. The City Council finds as follows: • -2- 5779 01.1R.551 8 I,. . �,► h _ ' I . ,--h L 1 \6 A. The City of Arcadia prepared and circulated the first Notice of Preparation J (NOP) for the EIR on February 28, 1992. A revised Notice of Preparation was s circulated on April 15, 1992. The Notice identified the following significant adverse impacts: Earth, Air, Water, Plant Life, Animal Life, Noise, Transportation and Circulation, Public Services and adverse cumulative impacts relating to air and transportation.. Two other areas identified in the NOP as potentially significant were energy and human health. These impacts were found to be insignificant based on the ' following: (1) Project related diesel fuel consumption represents less than 0.03 percent of the daily diesel consumption in California. The amount of diesel fuel tequired for the Proposed Project would not impact the regional supply and therefore is not significant. (2) Project related gasoline consumption represents only 0.0003 percent of the annual consumption in Los Angeles County.• This usage would not impact regional supplies and therefore, is not significant. (3) Electrical usage will be primarily for lighting at the load inspection platforms and is not expected to increase , over the past electrical,usage during quarrying operations and therefore it is not significant. . In regards to human health, existing risks to human health due to standing !i water and steep unstable slopes will be eliminated by reclaiming the pit.. The Project - as proposed will not result in the creation of any potential or actual health hazards, . but will eliminate health hazards. Therefore, there is no significant impact. Specific human health issues related to geology, water quality and air quality are analyzed in 1 II the specific environmental disciplines. B. On March 11, 1992 a Scoping Meeting was held in the Arcadia City Hall- i; Council Chambers-to receive input from interested citizens and jurisdictions 1�+ concerning issues they felt should be addressed in the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR and i Notice of Completion were released on August 11; 1993 for the 45 day public review j period (August 11 through September 24, 1993). The public hearing before the I p Planning Commission Commission was held on September 14, 1993, during the public comment period for the DEER, to allow the Commission to comment on the Project, including the Draft EIR. The Planning Commission's comments, record and recommendations were transmitted in Resolutions 1503 and 1504 to the City Council. Responses to comments were prepared by the City, copies of which were , 1 f i sent to all commenting public agencies on March 3, 1994 per Public Resources Code 1 i §21092.5. Public hearing notices regarding the City Council's hearing were mailed on -3- 5779 0 X2532 . 33U7 . i r , • i 1 February 17, 1994. On March 15, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the FEIR, C.U.P. 92-003 (including the operations plan), the Reclamation plan and the mitigation monitoring and reportink program. C. The FEIR contains the mandatory topics identified in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and City's CEQA Guidelines, including an analysis of Project impacts, mitigation measures and Project alternatives. The FEIR contains the responses to comments on the Draft EIR and when combined with the Draft EIR and other portions of the decision-making record, the total package constitutes the Final EIR for certification by the City of Arcadia. Section 4. Review and Independent Judgment. The City Council finds and i; certifies: A. That the Final EIR for the Rodeffer Inert Landfill (Clearinghouse #92041091) has been completed in compliance with CEQA, as more particularly described in Sections 1 through 3 above; and B. That the Final EIR was presented to the City Council of the City of Arcadia and that the Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR prior to approving said Project, as more particularly described in Sections 1 through 3 above; and C. That the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City in that the City contacted with the environmental consulting firm of Harland Bartholomew and Associates and Engineering Science, Inc. and its subconsultants (collectively "Consultants) to assist the City in preparing the EIR, that the Consultants' work and conclusions were independent of those of the applicant and the applicant's 111 , consultants by terms of a contact with applicant, that all work done by Consultants , �;I was reviewed by City staff, including the Community Development Department, the City Attorney and the City's special legal counsel; and 1 D. That all documents and records which constitute the records and proceedings, are currently located in the Planning Division of Arcadia city Hall, 240 •West Huntington Drive, Arcadia. Section 5 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Each of the potentially significant, but mitigable, effects of the proposed Project • are described below in association with the findings and factual substantiation from the Project record, including the FEIR and associated technical documents. ; • • -4- 5779 • 003533 = a • I I t The City Coundl hereby finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project which avoid or,substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR as follows: A. Geoloic Resources and Seismicity {{ 1. The Final EIR identifies that existing quarry walls are unstable, posing threats to adjacent properties; that increased erosion is resulting from surface runoff; :I that steep fill slopes may destabilize during a seismic event and that fill materials could restrict future development or use of the site as more fully explained on pages 30-50 of the DEIR, hereby incorporated by this reference. The City Council hereby finds that: (a) To reduce erosion once final contours are achieved, surface runoff shall be directed into existing drainage facilities; this requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and hereby adopted. (b) To minimize hazards associated with seismically induced landslides, slopes shall be maintained at an angle of 2:1 (horizontal or vertical) or about 25 degrees; this requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and hereby • adopted. (c) To obtain proper compaction and to prevent erroneous compaction testing results, nesting of larger fill pieces shall be avoided; the maximum - dimensions of fill material size shall not exceed 12 inches in any.direction; this requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and hereby adopted. (d) To stabilize slopes during the initial phase of the Project, a geotechnical investigation shall be performed to properly design a stabilizing buttress slope, or other City approved alternative design along the northwestern boundary of the quarry pit This buttress shall be constructed as part of the initial fill sequence to stabilize the slope. This requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and hereby adopted. (e) To reduce erosion, inspection of quarry slopes shall be done on a quarterly basis during implementation of the temporary remedial measures. These inspections should continue until the buttress slope, or other City approved mitigation method is constructed. Inspections should be conducted on a monthly basis during the wet season between October 1 to April 30. Implementation of remedial action such as regrading or covering slumping areas with plastic sheeting or wire mesh and shotcrete would reduce adverse slope stability impacts to an -5- 5779 003534 • I 41 insignificant level. This requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and hereby adopted. 2. Based on the above mitigation measures which have been i incorporated into the Project, the City concludes that the potential for geological hazards to adversely affect the proposed Project or the surrounding neighborhood has been reduced below a significant level in accordance with standard engineering and design practices. B. Surface Water and Groundwater Oualitiv 3! 1. The Final EIR identifies that the potential impacts to water quality with the Project include the impacts related to the initial construction activities for 3 activation of the landfill (including construction of load inspection lanes/platforms and roads), contamination of storm water runoff from rejected stockpiles during operation of the landfill, erosion and subsequent degradation of surface water ! 3 quality resulting from earth moving activities and impacts associated with contaminant migration from materials deposited in the landfill more fully explained in pages 51-72 of the DEER, hereby incorporated by this reference. 2 The City Council hereby finds that: (1) the Operations Plan limits the �. ?roject to.inert materials including soils, rock and concrete; (2) in regard to the �(• ?ossibility of leachate from the decomposition of any undetected non-inert landfill naterials, which could contaminate groundwater, if during groundwater nonitoring, downgradient groundwater quality exceeds both the Waste Discharge Zequirements (WDR) limits and upgradient groundwater quality, groundwater hall be extracted and cleaned until downgradient groundwater quality meets the VDR limits and upgradient water quality; and (3) to avoid leachate from stockpiled eject materials contaminating groundwater, all rejected stockpiles shall be covered nd stored on a nonpermeable surface and removed weekly. These mitigation leasures will reduce the significant environmental impact to an insignificant level nd are hereby adopted. 3. The City Council further finds that it does not have the legal authority impose Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) for landfill projects. That WDR's the responsibility and jurisdiction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board ZWQCB). In the WDR, the RWQCB will specify appropriate materials for disposal, . le type and nature of the monitoring systems required, water quality parameters to .. monitored, and the monitoring frequency. The type and nature of the r.. -6- 5779 003535 • , 1 i J ' monitoring system includes the number, location and construction standards of monitoring wells. 11 C. BiolTal Resources I. The Final EIR identifies that the storage of debris associated with • construction activities on site may result in significant impacts if storage interferes with floral growth, normal drainage patterns, or contaminates the soil. Biological resources are fully discussed on pages 73-79 of the DEIR. 2. The City Council hereby finds that to avoid interference with floral • growth or normal drainage patterns, or contamination of soil construction waste and natural debris should be removed off-site weekly; all construction material shall be removed one week following construction activities. This requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and hereby adopted. All faunal habitat which currently occurs on the 85 acre site may be incidentally and intentionally altered, removed or buried during operation • activities. Faunal species affected will be forced to disperse to other habitats in order to survive. The findings of the winter surveys show that this site does not function as a significant drop-off point for migratory waterfowl. 3. The City Council hereby finds that upon completion of the Project, the site and any areas disturbed during construction should be landscaped with native flora species, such as Tree of Life, holly-leaved cherry, mountain mahogany, white sage and California buckwheat, which are available from commercial nurseries. This requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and hereby adopted. • D. Traffic and Circulation, 1. The Final EIR identifies that trip generation for the Rodeffer Landfill operation is based on projected inert landfill operations to fill the depleted quarry with 10 million cubic yards of material. Approximately 3,500 tons of inert fill material are expected to arrive at the landfill on an average day. On a yearly basis, it is anticipated that 150 trucks would visit the site 220 days out of 305 days a year (72%); approximately 300 trucks per day are anticipated 55 days a year (18%); and • approximately 600 trucks are anticipated for a maximum of 30 days a year (10%). Fill • operations are projected to span an 8 to 12 year period. Traffic and circulation are more fully discussed on pages 85-127 of the DEIR and hereby incorporated by this reference. The left turn volumes at this location for 1997 Project conditions is 565 vehicles during the 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. peak hour and reflects the worst-case conditions for this left turn movement. Of the 565 left turning vehicles, 20 vehicles (or 3.5%) -7- 5779 • 003533 3811 T, .. : ,- . . , . ,.__ ., are Project trips while the remaining 545 vehicles (or 96.5%) are background trips. , Z The Final E1R identifies that truck traffic will add to existing and future peak hour congestion at the I-605/Rivergrade Road interchange with Lower Azusa goad. The City Council hereby finds that to reduce levels of service below a level of significance due to Project-related impacts, the following mitigation measures are required: (1) construct art exclusive right-turn lane and maintain two through lanes at the west approach of Lower Azusa Road and I-605 southbound ramps/Rivergrade Road; (2) restripe or widen the east approach at the intersection of Lower Azusa Road at the northbound I-605 ramp to add an exclusive right lane and maintain two' through lanes; and (3) conduct a signal optimization study to improve signal phasing and timing. These mitigation measures not only reduce Project impacts to i . a level of insignificance, but help to reduce the congestion due to background traffic. The mitigation measures further reduce the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) by 0.05 during the a.m. peak hour and by 0.04 during both p.m. peak hours. These ?j improvements are clearly significant. Selection of the appropriate mitigation measures was based upon the critical movement, i.e., the highest traffic volume :i which requires the most signal time and, therefore, has the most impact on the intersection's operation. In all cases, including the scenario for background volumes which do not include the Project, the critical movement is the east I approach of the intersection of Lower Azusa Road at the northbound I-605 ramp. I Therefore, the mitigation measure selected for the east approach was based upon its ability to provide relief to the most critical problem at the intersection. This mitigation measure is very effective and is physically and economically feasible. These requirements are feasible mitigation measures and hereby adopted. .• Caltra±±ts' suggestion to improve the existing high left turn volumes would be to upgrade the existing traffic sign system from-a fixed time to a real time system. Although this would improve operation of the intersection, it is not necessary or required in order to mitigate Project trips. i 3. Cumulative truck traffic will add to existing and future peak hour , congestion at the I-605/Rivergrade Road interchange with Lower Azusa Road. .. The results of the ICU analysis shows that the intersection of Lower Azusa Road and the I-605 Northbound ram P gr per s/River ade Road would operate at level of ! service F during the three peak hours. The intersection of Lower Azusa Road and the I-605 SB ramps/Rivergrade Road would operate at level of service E or F during • the PM peak hours. -8- 5779 . i 003537 0,,4 / . Ra✓ 4. The City Council finds that the proposed Project mitigation measures set forth in (1) above, not only mitigate the Project's traffic impacts but will also reduce the Project-related cumulative impact to a level of insignificance. E. Noise . 1. The Final EIR identifies the following two types of environmental noise impacts associated with the proposed landfill which has the potential to exceed the noise criteria for the Cities of Arcadia and El Monte during the landfill operations: (1) noise produced by haul truck traffic and construction type equipment (dozers, loader/grader, compactor, water truck) used in landfill operations;and (2) noise produced from roadway traffic, as more fully explained in pages 152-169 of the 1 DEIR. 2. The City Council hereby finds that to reduce educe noise levels to an acceptable level the following mitigation measures are required: (1) the maximum noise level for each piece of landfill equipment shall be 75 dBA when measured at a .•, distance of 50 feet; (2) construct.a six-foot high wall or berm for any residential areas li i. not currently protected by a solid barrier wall; (3) prohibit entrance of haul trucks to III the landfill site prior to 7:00 a.m. and after 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday ands i„ prior to 8:00 a.m. and after 5:00 p.m. on weekends and recognized holidays; (4) when lit the landfill grade has been brought up to a 325 foot elevation within 200 feet of residential properties, which is approximately in the seventh year of operations, .ii: increase the existing six foot high walls along residential ,ft. gh g esidential properties to a 12 foot high . , noise barrier constructed of cement, masonry or earthen berm; (5) check landfill ' u gr ades and prepare pdated grading plans and submit updated grading plans to the • City every six months and (6) keep engine RPM's as low as possible at all times; do not rev engines unnecessarily; conduct random inspections of all landfill I air p equipment.for standard noise control devices; and replace any missing, worn or defective noise reduction devices. The City Council finds that the above . requirements are feasible mitigation measures and are hereby adopted. ., Section & Unavoidable Adverse Impact. The City Council finds: That the Project, as approved, despite the incorporation of the following mitigation measures into the Project, will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to air quality and cumulative impacts upon quality n air uali . +� during the Project's operations phase as explained in pages 128-151 of the DEIR The '' impacts and mitigation measures proposed to minimize the impacts to the greatest degree feasible are as.follows: • -9- 5779 • 003538 ' • A i 4 to A. Air Quality 1. Site access improvements involve covering approximately 54,000 sq. ft of an existing unpaved road with asphalt. This' construction-related activity would, . take place in two separate phases. Phase 1 is the preparation of the area which would occur over three days. Phase 2 includes asphalt delivery, pouring and paving activities which is anticipated to take two days. The Draft EIR identified significant unavoidable PM10 (particulate matter under 10 microns in diameter) air quality impacts during the two-day Phase 2 construction period. 2. The City Council hereby finds that to mitigate the PM10 emissions to insignificance, the current number of 45 trucks delivering asphalt per day will be • limited to 15 trucks per day and Phase 2 construction will be extended from two days to six days of activity (page 271 of the FEIR). The City Council finds that the above • requirement is a feasible mitigation measure and is hereby adopted. • 3. The air contaminant emissions from the operational phase of the Project will exceed the-South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD's) threshold.levels for NOx (nitrogen oxides), ROC (reactive organic compounds) and PM10 resulting in unavoidable adverse impacts. Over 80% of NOx emissions, and over 90% of the Project's total generated ROC and PM10 emissions would result from on-and off-site truck movement, i.e., grading and landfill equipment as well as on-and off-site truck travel. (See page 149 of the DEIR) Operational ROC, NOx, and PM10 emissions exceed SCAQMD's threshold levels during the operational phase. The City Council hereby finds that the following mitigation measures are feasible and would partially ameliorate the air , quality impacts of the proposed Project and are hereby adopted: (1) Discontinue operations during forecast Stage II Smog alerts; (2) use BACT on construction equipment, including retarding timing;and (3) maintain all • vehicles and equipment in proper running condition. B. Air Quality Cumulative Impacts. 1. The Draft ER concludes that cumulativg air quality impacts are significant with or without implementation of the proposed Project. These significant impacts to air quality result from mobile source emissions. There are no �► is directly applicable mitigation measures available to reduce emissions from mobile, i.. sources, aside from ensuring that vehicles are in proper running condition. (Page 148, Draft EIR). -10- 003539 5779 381 ,i 1 2. The City Council hereby finds that the following mitigation measures would partially ameliorate the air quality impacts from cumulative projects relating to Operational ROC, NOx, and PM10 emissions which exceed SCAQMD's threshold levels. However, air emission impacts cannot be reduced to an acceptable level of significance; The following measures may be done to reduce the impacts: (1) discontinue operations during forecast Stage II Smog alerts; (2) use.BACT on constriction equipment, including retarding timing, and (3) maintain all vehicles and equipment in proper running condition. Section 7. Alternatives. In accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and case law, the FEIR • examined a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the Project, and evaluated the comparative merits of the alternatives including the No Project alternative. The following findings are supported by the record on this Project, including but not limited to the facts contained in the FEIR and staff reports on the Project, (hereby incorporated by this reference). The following are a summary of the alternatives outlined in the DEIR: A. No Project Alternative. Under this alternative the quarry would not be " used as an inert landfill and the site would remain in its current condition. The no Project alternative would nsa create any impacts on the following: • Short-term or long-term traffic impacts; • Air quality; • Noise; • Biological resources The City Council hereby finds that the No Project Alternative is infeasible because it does not meet the Project objectives; specifically, it does not comply with either the Arcadia Municipal Code or SMARA in that the quarry would not be reclaimed to a usable condition. Furthermore, if the gravel quarry remains as it is, no mitigation measures would be implemented; public safety issues associated with the presence of an unsupervised, deep water filled pit located in proximity to a residential area and unstable slopes would remain a concern. Contaminatibn of water in the pit may result from off-site sources and could percolate into the groundwater and impact water.quality. The City Council thereby finds this is not an . environmentally superior alternative. B. Slope Stabilization with some Reclamation Alternative. Under this alternative, it is estimated that approximately 3 million cubic yards of material • -11- 5779 0035. 0 f (\ n 7771. 4 would be required to stabilize the slopes aloni the west bank next to the residential property, and would take approximately 3 yeas to fill. The banks would be regraded to no more than a 2:1 slope (25 degrees). Fill would be compacted and graded for slope stabilization. After the slopes are stabilized, fill activities would cease. This alternative meets the Project objective of slope stabilization and would require less fill. However, the basic fill operations as described in the EIR would still occur, but for a shorter period of time (approximately 3 years). The potential impacts . and required mitigation measures would remain the same, but the following impacts would be reduced: • Truck impacts • Noise Impacts • Air Quality � • Biological resources The site would continue to be exposed to existing seismic hazards. The potential for future development to be exposed to seismic hazards, however, would be eliminated because the partially filled pit could not be developed for future uses. This project would not meet the Project objective of reclaiming the property to a reusable condition consistent with the City's General Plan designation of Industrial and.the current M-2 zoning of the property. In addition, public health and safety issues associated with the presence of an unsupervised, deep, water-filled pit located in proximity to a residential area would remain a concern. Contamination of water in the pit may result from off-site sources, and could percolate into the groundwater and impact water quality. The City Council finds that this Project alternative is infeasible because it does not satisfy the Project objectives to reclaim the property to a usable condition or alleviate public health and safety concerns. The City Council thereby finds this is not an environmentally superior alternative. C. Groundwater Recharge Basin Alternative. This alternative involves • using the quarry as a dedicated spreading basin for groundwater recharge. The quarry slopes would be filled, compacted and graded for stabilization as with the Slope Stabilization with Some Reclamation Alternative, however, the pit would, not be completely filled. A conveyance system transporting water to the pit to increase the volume of water in the spreading basin would be necessary. Watershed protection measures would also be required to insure the water in the basin does not become contaminated by off site sources. -12- 003541 s?r� 3glh I ' I.II In addition, a water agency or operator would have to buy the property to use the site as a groundwater recharge basin. This alternative also requires approval from other agencies including the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster. This alternative meets the objective of slope stabilization. In addition the following impacts would be reduced: • Truck impacts • Noise Impacts • Air Quality • Biological resources This project does not meet the Project objective of reclaiming the property to . a reusable condition consistent with the City of Arcadia's general plan and zoning regulations. In addition, increased groundwater recharge within the groundwater basin would raise the groundwater level. If the groundwater levels rose to a high enough level by this and other existing recharge facilities, the following secondary • impacts may occur: I) Groundwater may intrude into adjacent existing mining operations .1. thereby reducing the economic feasibility of recovering remaining sand and gravel resources. • 2) Flooding may occur in downgradient surface.and/or subsurface j' facilities. 3) Seismic hazards may increase including liquefaction and ground "j I shaking which intensify as the groundwater level moves closer to the surface. 4) Changes in downstream groundwater flow patterns may occur. This ,I couici affect the focal, area distribution and migration of contaminated groundwater plumes within the basin. ! � The-City Council finds that this Project Alternative is not feasible because the property would have a negative impact on other existing mining operations in the area as noted above; does not satisfy the Project objectives of reclaiming the property to a usable condition and would have to be purchased by a water agency or operator. Section 8, Alternatives recommended during the Draft EIR process. In addition to the alternatives described above, two project alternatives were. recommended in the comments on the DEIR as follows: A. Lockman do Associates,.Consulting Engineers and Planners suggested-as an alternative, excavating the existing land bridge that separates the Rodeffer site -13- 5779 003542 rin , 14 1 from the Livingston Graham property to the north for the purpose of creating one contiguous lake.. An approved Reclamation Plan for the Livingston-Graham site was adopted which calls for beautification and development of the site into a recreational lake with an adjacent commercial and recreational community. The City Council hereby finds that the suggested alternative is infeasible because the quarry operations at the Livingston-Graham site will continue into the next century according to Mr. Brubaker of Livingston-Graham. This alternative would not meet the Project objective of reclaiming the property to a reusable condition consistent with the City of Arcadia's General Plan and zoning regulations. An EIR has not been prepared for the Livingston-Graham quarry Reclamation Plan and there could be unacceptable impacts on water quality and drainage, slope stability, air quality and traffic. B. Another alternative suggested was to consider the partial reclamation of the quarry pit for eventual use as a recreational area. The City Council finds that the suggested alternative is infeasible because, partial reclamation was evaluated as part of the Slope Stabilization with some Reclamation alternative and the Groundwater Recharge Basin alternative and found to be infeasible. Eventual use of a recreation area was not examined because the future use of the quarry is not part of the "Project". . Section 9. Statement of Overriding Considerations. A. The City Council has considered the environmental facts and findings for the proposed Project as summarized above and presented in detail in the Project record. Despite the incorporation of mitigation measures to reduce impacts relating to air quality and cumulative impacts relating thereto, there remains unavoidable significantly adverse impacts on air quality and unavoidable significant cumulative impacts during the Project's operations' phase upon air quality. In its role as decision maker, the City Council has balanced these benefits against the Project's unavoidable impacts and finds for the reasons set forth below that the benefits of the 1 Project outweigh the unavoidable air quality and cumulative air quality impacts. B. Benefits from the Project, including those set forth as Project objectives are as follows: 1. The Project satisfies the City of Arcadia's legal mandate pursuant to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act "SMARA" (Public Resources Code §2710 et seq.) to reclaim the quarry to a usable condition, readily adaptable for alternative. land uses. -14- 003543 5779 • ' 0.Q 1 . 2. The Project satisfies the requirement of SMARA to reclaim mined lands to protect the public health and safety. 11 3. The Project satisfies the City of Arcadia's legal obligation pursuant to the City's Mining Permit and Reclamation Plan (Municipal Code, Article IX, Chapter 5) which requires that adverse environmental effects be prevented or minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition. • 4. The Project satisfies the requirement set forth in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan to reclaim depleted gravel mining sites. 5. The Project eliminates public health and safety concerns relating to the existing site which is an unsupervised, deep, water-filled pit in proximity to a residential area. 6. The Project stabilizes the quarry slopes to reduce hazards to public health and safety. 7. The Project provides economic benefits to the City in that it returns the site to an enhanced economically viable condition. Section 10, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The City Council of the City of Arcadia adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (hereby incorporated by reference) for this Project in accordance with Public Resources Code Section §21081.6 to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted for the Project are fully implemented. In addition: 1. The mitigation measures embodied in the FEIR relating to this Project shall be conditions of Project approval. . L All of the mitigation measures shall be monitored or reported upon under the direction of the Assistant Community Development Director for the City of Arcadia. Section 11. The above recitals are incorporated as findings of this resolution. Section 12, Based upon the above facts and findings, the City Council of the City of Arcadia hereby certifies the Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The Assistant Community Development Director is directed to file a Notice of Determination as required by CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 003544 . -15- 5779 ' Pike go Passed, approved and adopted thils 5th day of April, 1994 . %S/ JOSEPH C. CIRAULO Mayor of the City. of Arcadia ATTEST: 1S/ JUNE D. ALFORD City Clerk of the City of Arcadia STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS: CITY OF ARCADIA ) I, JUNE D. ALFORD, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 5779 was passed and adopted by "the City Council of the City of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 5th day of April, 1994 and that said • Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmember Fasching, Lojeski, Hargett and Ciraulo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Harbicht /S/ JUNE D. ALFORD City Clerk of the City of Arcadia • -16- - i 003545 Parcel 2: 11 That portion of Lot 2, Tract No. 10369, per map recorded in Book 149, Pages 95 and 96, of maps, bounded on the northwest by the southwesterly line of Lower Azusa Road, formerly El Monte and Covina Road, 50 feet wide, as shown on said map, bounded on the southwest by that certain boundary line of said Lot 2 shown on said map as having a bearing and length of "N 67°22'55' west a distance of 1,287.40 feet" and bounded easterly and southeasterly by the westerly line of the land described in the above mentioned condemnation action. • 1 • • i .4' •,I EXHIBIT "A" .I it 00354E -1 ki • koit, STAF+F REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEP. •TMENT DATE: October 7, 1997 TO: Mayor and City Council Arcadia Redevelopment Agency FROM: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator Peter Kinnahan, Economic Development Administrator SUBJECT: JOINT DISCUSSION REGARDING: (1) CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - REVISION TO THE 199 1998 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECT USE OF 23RD YEAR CDBG FUNDS TO ALLOCATE $5,000 TO ASSIST THE GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (2) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $5,000 IN REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS AND TO ASSIST THE GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ESTABLISH A SMALL BUSINESS CAPITAL LOAN FUND FOR ARCADIA, AND FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR SUCH SERVICES SUMMARY The Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation (CDC), composed of several area cities and banks, has established a small business loan fund. CDC has requested up to $10,000 from Arcadia as "pool" rnoneyifor a capital loan program for local small business development. This one-time Agency contributio can be leveraged numerous times to permit loans of$5,000 to $50,000'for slightly higher risk Arcadia businesses. At the September 16, 1997 City CounciVRedevelopment Agency meeting (see staff report, Attachment 1), the CounciVAgency had questions about the interest rate charged to the borrowers, whether there is a "downside" to Arcadia's participation in e program, and what was the performance or success rate of the other CDC's. The responses are in the staff report, below. Staff recommends the appropriation of$5,000 each from the Redevelopment Agency and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for this purpose (tot'al $10,000) and authorization for the City Manager/Executive Director to: (1) execute a contract for such services approved as to form by the City/Agency Attorney; and (2) execute the ���� Z � 3 LASE IMAGED Zxq - • Staff Report Page Two +� 10/07/97 Memorandums of Understanding to be submitted to the Los Angeles County Community Development Corporation. DESCRIPTION The summary of the proposed program is set out in the September 16, 1997 staff report (Attachment 1). In reply to Council/Agency questions, the following is submitted: Interest rates-The rate of interest to the applicant is determined by the CDC loan committee. It is a market rate determined by numerous variables, including risk, typically analyzed by a lender. Lee Fenn, the consultant to the CDC, and the originator of the original and very successful San Diego program, states that the interest rate would probably, though not necessarily, be around 14% in today's market. "Downside"-There is almost no downside to the City or Agency. Neither entity is in any way liable for the actions of the CDC nor are either liable to the lender or applicants. All loan funds come from member banks. If the City/Agency in the future are not satisfied with the performance of the CDC, all we have lost is $10,000 and an opportunity to assist Arcadia small businesses. Performance of other CDC's -Attachment 2 is a package of letters from the Banker's Small Business CDC of San Diego, Inland Empire Lenders CDC (Riverside County), and Banker's Small Business CDC of Orange County. All have experienced reasonable success in a short period of operation. Present at the October 7, 1997 meeting to answer questions will be Mr. Kelvin Tainatongo, Economic Development Director of Monterey Park who also spoke at the September 16,1997 meeting. FISCAL IMPACT Appropriation of$5,000 in Agency funds and $5,000 in FY 1998 CDBG funds. The City Council should reopen the public hearing and receive testimony from the public as to the use of CDBG funds for this project. A public hearing is not required for the allocation of Agency funds. RECOMMENDATION After receiving all testimony staff recommends the following action be taken: > > i Staff Report Page Three 10/07/97 1. That the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency appropriate $5,000 for a small business loan program and authorize the Executive Director to execute a contract with the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation contract for a small business loan program subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form. 2. That the City Council approve the allocation of$5,000 in CDBG funds for the small business loan program; and 3. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandums of Understanding that will be submitted to the County. Approved By: William R. Kelly, City Manager/Executive Director Attachment 1: Agenda Report of September 16, 1997 Attachment 2: Package from other CDC's on performance .y�'.'. ..rt� STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • September 16, 1997 TO: Arcadia City Council and Arcadia Redevelopment Agency FROM: Peter Kinnahan, Economic Development Administrator Donna Butler, Community Development AdministratorG��' SUBJECT: JOINT DISCUSSION REGARDING: (1) PUBLIC HEARING — REVISION TO THE 1997-1998 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECT USE OF 23RD YEAR CDBG FUNDS TO ALLOCATE $5,000 TO ASSIST THE GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (2) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE $5,000 IN REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS AND TO ASSIST THE GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ESTABLISH A SMALL BUSINESS CAPITAL LOAN FUND FOR ARCADIA, AND FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR SUCH SERVICES SUMMARY The Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corp. (CDC), composed of several area cities and banks, has established a small business loan fund. CDC has requested up to $10,000 from Arcadia as °pool° money for a capital loan program for local small business development. This one-time Agency contribution can be leveraged numerous times to permit loans of $5,000 to $50,0 00 for slightly higher risk Arcadia businesses. Staff recommends the appropriation of $5,DDD each from the Redevelopment Agency and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for this purpose (total $10,000) and authorization for the City Manager/Executive Director to: (1) execute a contract for such services approved as to form by the City/Agency Attorney; and (2) execute the Memorandums of Understanding to be submitted to the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission. CDC Report— Agency/Council September 16, 1997 Page 1 ATr 1 • DESCRIPTION The City of Monterey Park, as the leader of the effort-alb-rig-With the-cities of Alhalt ��a; --" - San Gabriel, Montebello, Rosemead and Cathay Bank, Comerica Bank, United Natio al Bank, Cen Fed Bank and Community Bank have created the Greater San Gabriel Val ey Community Development Corporation (CDC). Its mission is to provide "nearly banka le" loans to qualified borrowers and provide technical assistance to small businesses. Ini ial funding to create the loan pool and loan loss reserve fund would come from local cit es and banks (see Exhibit One). Loans would be processed and packaged by experienced contract staff of the C C subject to CDC Loan Review Committee approval. CDC's underwriting criteria is mor flexible than standard bank criteria in order to encourage lending to businesses ho have not been in business long, have insufficient capital, or simply need a s all business loan below normal bank thresholds. All banks in the CDC would share equally in any loan to an approved small business, thereby spreading the risk. Lo ns would be up to five (5) years at an interest rate commensurate with the risk. Lo ns would be serviced by a contract administering bank. Repayment would include a % charge to cover CDC's administrative and operating costs. CDC's loan fund pool is essentially open-ended since member banks can provide as many loans to small businesses in Arcadia, and other participating communities, as t ey want and can fund. CDC has received approval from the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission a d Incorporation status from the State of California. The combined City/Agency payment of $10,000 would provide the following C C services to the City consistent with the City's Economic Development Program: • Continuous marketing to all financial institutions within the city to ensure that thz.ir staffs are familiar with the loans offered by the CDC. • Distribution 6f all brochures and program information to the City's Chamber of Commerce and City offices. • Presentations to businesses, trade groups, and service clubs. • Participation with the City's economic development staff in seminars and trade shows. • Guarantee to-loan funds to businesses within the Redevelopment Project Area and the City in an amount equal to or greater than the City's commitment level within a two-year period. The CDC is still in the process of organization and hopes to be operational by December, 1997. The current President is Mr. Wing Wong of United National Bank. Chris Jeffers, City Manager of Monterey Park, is on their Board of Directors. The Board will be composed 75% of bank shareholders and 25% of Community business pe 'pie (City, Chamber, Utilities, merchants). CDC Report—Agency/Council September 16, 1?97 Page 2 • _ .._ The"Bank_CDC" concept was_developed in an Diego in 1990 and won the California - Association for Local Economic Development (CALED) -Avant Garde Grand Prize -in-- - - - 1993. It is now operating in Orange County and Riverside County as well as San Diego. While the CDC's main thrust is to serve lower income areas, it can make loans anywhere within a member organization's jurisdiction. Agency Funds Sufficient Redevelopment funds are available in unappropriated reserves to provide the $5,000 in funding. CDBG Funds Community Development Block Grant Funds can be utilized for neighborhood revitalization and community development activities. In February, 1997, the City Council approved the programs set forth below. Staff is proposing that $5,000 be reallocated from the from the Housing Rehabilitation Program and a new activity be approved as set forth in the attached Project Description for the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation. The following is a summary of the 1997-98 approved projects as well as proposed amendments: - . Fiscal Year 97-98 Proposed Amendments Housing Rehabilitation $441,422 $436,422 Congregate Meals Program 15,000 15,D0D Senior Citizens social Services 35,000 35,000 Administration 25,DDD 25,000 Community Development Corporation 0 5.000 TOTAL $516,422 $516,422 Changes to any CDBG program require a public hearing and approval of the -City Council. • FISCAL IMPACT Appropriation of $5,000 in Redevelopment Agency funds and $5,000 from FY 1997-98 CDBG funds. This is a one-time request and the City does not receive reimbursement for these funds. The direct benefits to the City are not quantifiable, however we can anticipate increased lending to Arcadia businesses for operation and expansion that would potentially increase employment opportunities and sales tax to the community. CONCLUSION One of the goals of the 1996 General Plan is to "promote programs for the expansion and retention of existing businesses within the City". As part of this goal and the City's ongoing efforts to enhance commercial opportunities in the community, this program will be available to assist both existing businesses as well as new businesses interested in coming to Arcadia. CDC Report—Agency/Council September 16, 1997 Page 3 . . _ _- ._ The City Council should_open_the public-hegnng and receive testimony from the public - as to the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for this project. A --- --- public hearing is not required for the allocation of Agency funds. RECOMMENDATION After receiving all testimony staff recommends the following action be taken: 1. That the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency appropriate $5,000 for a small business loan program and authorize the Executive Director to execute a contract with the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation for a small business ban program subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form. 2. That the City Council approve the allocation of $5,000 in CDBG funds for the small business loan program; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandums of Understanding that will be submitted to the County. 4 - -- --- - - -- Approved By William R. Kelly, City Manager/Executive Director Attachments: Material describing the SGVCDC Business Capital Loan Program Community Development Commission Activity Budgets CDC Report—Agency/Co ncil September 16, 997 Pae4 • Greater San Gat • Valley Community Dev ipment Corporation ' • ' an Organization) DIRECTORS - - Serving the small business community. Fran Chan (iris Jarcrs City of Montercy Park • I , Elsa Monte February 27,i 1997 RECEIVED comcr;ca Bank CITY OF ARCADIA Wilson Ngai Unity!National Bank • MAR 0 3 1997 Mr. William R. Kelly Etna Runicnios CenFcdBank City Manager CITY MANAGER Alma Williams City of Arcadia Community Bank 240 W.Huntinzton Drive wing wont Arcadia, CA'91007 United National Bank Dear Mr. Kelly: OFFICERS Presidmt - Wing Wong In late January,the Greater San Gabriel Community Development Corporation (CDC) held a mixer Vi= de:tt for city council members of the San Gabriel Valley. Municipal and banking representatives listened Parxc Wiliran s to presentations about the positive impacts the CDC will make in the communities throughout the San s - Gabriel Valley and the benefits of creating the proposed public/private partnership to aid the small Din R Lai business community. Tr--2surc Csalaza Mit:adl The Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation, a lending institution made up "-of local banks, will provide micro lopes to small businesses that do not qualify for traditional financing. Besides infusing capital into the local economy, the CDC will also ensure that technical assistance is provided to beneficiaries of the program. This organi7ation's service will be invaluable—providing qualified businesses necessary capital to grow, become prosperous, and hire additional employees. Presenters, which included State Senator Hilda Solis, East-West Bank's Senior Vice President William Chu, City Councilperson Judy Chu, SGVCCC President Jim Hombuckle, and a CDC consultant, emphasized the importance for cities to participate in this program. They explained that participating banks will front most of the start-up costs and assuming all of the loan risks. The CDC's Interim Board of Directors is asking municipalities to make one-time contributions to assist in establishing a capital fund. Establishing the capital fund is a necessary step before becoming operational;this fund will be used to pay for administrative and marketing costs during the first three years until the Corporation reaches its break-even point, after which it will be self-sustaining. Once operational, the CDC's lending power can be unleashed. We also invite your city to participate in this exciting venture. Your participation will result in direct contributions to your city and will help stimulate economic growth in the region. CDBG funds are 4c- , eligible for the one-time contribution. 320 West Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, California 91754 • B1B-3D7-13B5 • Fax B18-307-1457 • • . . 0. • • • February 27, 1997 Page 2 • Attachments enclosed will further explain the CDC's program and the benefits it can offir your small business community. If you have additional questions or if you are interested in ap o'cipating I encourage you to contact Chris Jeffers, Monterey Park's City Manager, at (818) 307-12 5. Since ely, Wing ong• President Enclosures: As stated - •• - - -- - • • • - - L3 1 57 TtltrxntElen S.ACA++[NT90n•cr LL�4TL CDmsArTTtc• -- STATE AOOOM duo o L _ - _ -' - -- • SENATOR- - - - - '- - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SACRAMENTO.CA 95B1a HILDA L �OLIS SUBCOMMITTEE ON ASIA TRADE• 1816)445•)4%8— AND COMMERCE• aaOI SANTA ANITA AVENUE • TWENTY-FOURTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT memos. SECOND FLOOR FINANCE.INVESTMENT.AND EL MONTE CA 91731 • INTERNATIONAL TRADE 18181 4413•1271 •�.y+`✓)�` HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES A7I6 CESAR CHAVEZ AVENUE I ;Lc..�,1! JUDICIARY LI BUILDING'A' • 1" C�III NATURAL RESOURCES AND WILDLIFE EAST LOS ANGELES.CA 90022 { �" V 'E •'' . PUBUC EMPLOYMENT AND 1213)9130.8560 ! '-i; "? Y RETIREMENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON WORKFORCE PREPARATION SELECT COMMITTEE ON BILINGUAL EDUCATION SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON CRITICAL • THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING IN OUR SCHOOLS February 14, 1997 Dear Friends: It is my understanding that the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation.(CDC) is seeking financial assistance from local city governments on a one-time grant basis for early capital expenditures. This letter constitutes my support for their efforts. Based upon several existing models in Southern California,—the CDC will offer financing and management assistance to those existing companies in the San Gabriel Valley who are currently unable to access credit in the traditional manner. The term loans range from S5,000.00 to S50,000.00 with a pay period for up to 5 years. The CDC is seeking a one-time grant from the public sector and its member cities for early capital expenditures. The long term responsibility for providing loan funds and the inherent risks associated with small business lending remains with the CDC. I recently attended a meeting with proponents of the CDC amd was impressed by their long term commitment to the San Gabriel Valley. The benefit to the region is the additional capital that becomes available to existing entrepreneurs who may have sought financial assistance but were turned down by their local city government. While local government often seeks to accommodate these businesses, the cost and effort to set up loan funds is often prohibitive,time con_mri^g, nrid ha":pered with restrictions. With the CDC bearing all costs and risks, it is a tremendous vehicle to leverage a modest amount of CDBG or similar funding into the vast resources of local financial institutions without any risk to local government. In this regard, I ask that you consider joining with other area cities in supporting this "win- win" program by listening to a presentation by one of the local proponents. If you have questions,please call Mel Ilomin of my district office at (818)4,48-1271. • Sincerely, Hilda L. Solis • Senator, 24th District GREATER SAN GABRLEL VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPOR• TION (In Organization) PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS MISSION: Fund "nearly bankable" loans to qualified borrowers . 8d • to provide technical'assistance TARGET: Businesses in low-moderate income areas of the Great:r San Gabriel Valley who are not quite "bankable" due to: 1) Length of time in business • 2) Lack of sufficient collateral 3) Small amount of loan request LOANS: -• - Parameters:. . 5,000 to $50,000, up to 5 years amortization Interest rates: Commensurate with risk BOARD OF - DLRECTORS: 75% Bank shareholders 25% Community business people MANAGEMENT: Third party non-profit acjmini strator LOAN PA CKAGLNG: Third party non-profit administrator SERVICLNG: Administrator/bank shareholder TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Existing providers in target area (ie. Small Business Development Centers) INVESh' ENT COST: Initial capital stock purchased by participating financi. institutions and financial commitments from target area cities Annual loan pool contributed by shareholders, amount to be determined by Board of Directors annnnlly PROJECTED OPEN DATE: 4th Quarter, 1997 GREATER SAID ABRIEL VALLEY COMML'MTTY DEVELOPMENT. • CORPORATION (In Organization) - ---- - -NON-BINDING EXPRESCION OF MEREST _ The undersigned expresses interest in the successful formation and operation of a Community Development Corporation dedicated to promoting economic growth throughout the Greater San Gabriel Valley. Any municipal grant or other form of participation is subject to all the necessary approvals and appropriations. However, at this time, to ensure the timely formation of such organization, we pledge to seek approval for the following: (please check one option) 1) We support your efforts by seeking approval for a one-time grant of S5,000. In return, we understand that the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation will provide the following: ■ Continuous marketing to all financial institutions _ Distribution of all brochures and application forms to local Chamber of Commerce and City offices ■ Presentations to business groups and service clubs - _ _.___ _= Participation with Economic Development agencies in seminars and trade shows I Publicize city as a sponsoring agency 2) We support your efforts by seeking approval for a one-time grant of S10,000 or more In return, we. understand that the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation will provide the following: i Continuous marketing to all financial institutions Distribution of all brochures and application forms to local Chamber of Commerce and City offices = Presentations to business coups and service clubs = Participation with Economic Development agencies in seminars and trade shows = Publicize city as a sponsoring agency ■ Loan funds available within City to be equal or greater than commitment level of any grant within a two year period Name: Title: • City. Telephone &Fax TICS IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF FUNS AT TIES TLM . TINS IS INT EXPRESSION OF INTENT TO SEEK FORMAL APPROVAL. 34'•COL ihi 51 Ssr.Lig lSd�nlO .f aab2U2 a3u2UT ssautsng • U2ATTTnS 'V X-t2rA 'ATaaaouTS OQO )(U-2g auY u-TM aouataadxs a T4Tsod AaaA S,A4T0 auq. uo uoTa21I.Io;uT aaoar a0; a0 suoTissna Aug -YTr! 5EZ9-9cz (619) 11,2 a1z ao24uob OY a sT4TSau 40U Op asssTc -4uaaruasAob T noT Aq papung- A :2t--.;2G aq pinous 4T aau4sgm pus AYtunuuoo anOA uT sanausadsa4ua TT-2'as -u� oq. ssaoo2 Ts4Tdso passsaouT apTAOad pUnoO OQO- ){ucq-TYTnu T2o0T 2 asggsqM aspTSUO0 ATbu0a4S OY nOA aban 7 'aou24STsss Sate TSngoaOTtZ a0; SaTuOUL 0G0 Qn.H zo SaSn auY UT ATTTTgTxa T buTs2aaoUT t'{TTM ATT2TOads -asT2.I CX3 Uo -pasq S1obaTQ u2S uodn buTzTT24Tdso zo uoTaTs00. sgsun .a07 sq4 uT aas nom -aOU2;sTSS2 C20TUuoa,, ;uaudoTaAap ssauTsnq T2T;uassa uYTM TT buT42aba1ut pus arraboad butourut? S.T buTUTgea ATT2nUT4uo0 0ST2 sT oco Nuag auk, -sassautsnq TTsus pa;aooT-ss t2 aatoouT MoT ao/pu2 pauwo -uaaz.M pus -A4TaouTU o AT Tsoar 'uoTYdaouT s?T aou T s yzy,E�-T$ Ynoq but LT2-4 o, su2oT TT2ars c paa 2UTbtao s2t.T OQO Xt-r E at-14: 42t a a424s •4 pfoad as T -azTad pu2aO apa25-4u2Ay 4uaaLdoTaAaa oTaIOU00` £651 s,Q TTO 7o aauuTM 'OQO xU2g auq paquaa'iaLdaLT pu-2 paATaouoo dTUsaau aad -ag2ATad./OTTgna--at{4 -- o aaqureaL.--butpunoz _s__s2M -ssAT,oaCgo :uaudoTanap oTtuouooa OTTgnd zo Yaoddns uT . s.{u2q T2o0T UIOa7 buTou2uTg a aATad abaaaAaT aToTI A aAT42AODUT U2 t.l M obaTQ u?S go X?TO auY p pTAo.zd s2u DUD ){u2g sq4 'suc2zboad u2oT oaaTp asnou-uT go Ssa00ns aq4 aansua 04 Aa2sssoau Saoanossa sua;s 's .pu2 ggs4s T2uoT-Tpp2 a4sansuaanuo0 auk 4noq;TM guaudoTanap ssau snq TT2UIS aog A;TTTgTsuodsaa T2ooT passsaouT zo 2aa sTgq. UT („OQO Xu2g aqY„) A.unoo oba:tQ u2S go uoT42aodao3 YuaatdoTaAsa A4Tunuuo3 ssauTSng TT2US ,saa3{u2g 3� suosaadggs4s quacudoTaAaa otuouo0g .uauuaaAOO T2ooZ :OZ • ST 111 X3S 661 ' 61 aago430 • .LV WdO ZU IWON00Y Z75"9-9a(619) XYd 5e09-9aZ(6I9) 3NOf:. 131.%t•'8L I6-I0IZ6-YIN'IQ,7V0 BOO QNYS:: -..- .. ..- 0Z9I=S • 317N34V=HI 0021 - • -'-YLri ZI3.IN 3 0.&110 Kir 09,,,4 �O 'WO 3H1. '1> �. ` • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION • COUNTY OF LOS GELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B• .i.:K GRANT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ACTIVITY BUDGET Original X _Amendment No. 1. OPERATING AGENCY: 2. PROJECT TITLE: Sari Gabriel Valley Community CDC DIVISION X CITY COUNTY DEPARTMENT Development Corporation COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATION 3. PROJECT NUMBER: D96620-97 HOUSING AUTHORITY JPA 3A. CDC PROGRAM MANAGER: AGENCY NAME: City of Arcadia (For CDC use only) DIVISION (CDC ONLY): Luci Keeler ADDRESS: 240 West Huntington Drive 4. PROJECT DURATION: Arcadia. CA 91007 • . CONTACT PERSON: John Halminski From: 7/1/97 to 6/30/98 • TITLE: Assistant Planner 5. HUD ACTIVITY CODE: 18A TELEPHONE NUMBER: (818) 574-5423 5A. HUD TITLE: ED Direct Financial Assistance to For-Profit (If more than one HUD activity,complete pane 4.) - ..-. 6. PROJECT SUMMARY: — • - - Assist the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation in continuous marketing to all financial institutions within the city to ensure that their staffs are familiar with the loans offered by the CDC. Distribution of all brochures and program information to the city's chamber of • commerce and city offices, presentations to businesses,trade groups, and service clubs, and participation with the city's economic development staff seminars and trade shows. Program will • - . benefit low income business owners and job creation CDBG funds will be used for staff fees to the San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation. • (Additional pages atta ned 1 .• •. 7. PROJECT LOCATION: • A ADDRESS: City Wide B. CITY/UNINCORPORATED AREA: Arcadia C. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT: 5th D. PROJECT SERVICE AREA Residents of the following census tacts,enumeration districts,or block groups will benefit from this project: (Attach a legible project map whiff identifies the service area.) City Wide • 8. ELIGIBILITY: • Project is eligible under 24 CFR Part 570. (Project may be eligible under several criteria. Indicate all appropriate letters and sub-numbers.) 201 (a-m,o-4) 204 (a-c) 202 (a-f) _ 205 (a-b) 203 (a-b) (b) 205 (a-g) AFven.11'1.96 • OPERATING AG - :Y: City of Arcadia PROJECT f"'"SER: D96620-97 ■ - - - 9. -COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL OBJECTIVE:- - • All projects must meet one of three objectives. This project meets the following objective(s): A. X Activities benefiting low-and moderate-income C. Activities designed to meet community persons under 24 CFR 570.208(a) development needs having a pa `cular urgency, under 24CFR 507.2080 • 1. Area-wide benefit project affecting D. Additional criteria under 24C R 570.208(d) percent low-and moderate income persons as indicated in the 1990 census. 1. For acquisition of real prope ,a preliminary determination of whether the ctivity addresses a 2. Limited-Clientele activities: 570208 national objective may be ba ed on the planned use (a)(2)(I)A_:B_C_D_(ri)_A_B C_ of the property after acquisitio . (RD 2. Required relocation assistan provided by the 3. Housing activities. recipient shall be considered o address the same national objective as add - -•by the displacing 4. X Job Creation/Retention activities that activity. Voluntary relocation assistance may be are designed to create or retain jobs. qualified on the basis of the n-tional objective • addressed by the displacing -ctivity or on the basis S. Activities which aid in the prevention or that the recipients are low-an•moderate-income elimination of slums or blight',under persons. • - • - 24CFR 570208(b) - . - 3. A public improvement activity•esioned to create or - . _ - - _ - - . . 1 _Activity is located in a slum/blighted retain jobs must meet the req irements of 570208(a) area,which has been (check one) (1)as well as 570.208(a)(4). designated as a Redevelopment Project Area. 4. CDBG funds expended for pl-nning and administrative • approved by the CDC as a slum/blighted area costs under 570205 and 570•05,respevely,will be • . • considered to address the na'anal objectives. list-conditions of slum/blight to be addressed by the _ - _ _ project (Complete only for proje= qualifying under JUSTIFICATION(CDC USE ONLY): 570208(b)(1)prevention or elimination of slums or - -- - - - • blight) - 2 Activity is located outside a slum/blighted area,but qualifies as spot slum/blight - • - ••- Activity will address slrmJblicht in an Urban renewal area 10. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND PROPOSED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Identify specific goals of tasks and estimated time of completion (specify whether duplicated or • unduplicated clients will be assisted) Continuous marketing efforts of the Greater San Gabriel Valley Community Development Corporation July 1,1997-June 30, 1998 • Goal is to market all financial institution within the City and the San Gabriel Valley. -11. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: - Identify the entity implementing the project. Include the name(s) and title(s) of the project • • manaoer(s), and the address of the organization implementing the project. City of Arcadia, 240 W Huntington Drive,Arcadia, CA 91007 • • COMMUN`y.OEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM EXHIBIT A • OPER....JG AGENCY: City of Arcadia '•OJECT NUMBER: D96620-97 _ . . 12. PROFESSIONAL SERVICESISUB�ECIPIENTS; (describe duties to be performed) _ 13. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (CDC use only) The operating agency must comply with procurement standards outlined in 24 CFR, Part 85, Section 85.36, of the"Common Rule",for the purchase of all goods and contracted services using CDBG funds. 14. BUDGET SUMMARY:' The Operating Agency understands that no expenditures may be incurred until the contract has been fully executed. Cost Category CDBG Share I Total Cost' • _ :. (1) Personnel Services S 5,000 $ 5,000 (2) Non-Personnel Services S I S (3) Capital Outlays 1 S I S (4) Indirect Costs I S I S (5) TOTAL (1-4) I S 5.000 I 55.000 • *list the source.and amount of other funds used in this project " • Amount Source: • S S S NOTE: All expenditures must conform with appropriate CDBG regulations and with the LA. County Auditor-Controller Contract Accounting and Administration Handbook. All expenditures must • be fully documented by receipts,time records, invoices, canceled checks, inventory records, or other appropriate documentation which completely discloses the amount and nature of the expenditures. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO""""ISSION COUNTY OF LOS ANGEL ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ACTIVITY BUDGET - !1 - Original Amendment No. 1 • • 1. OPERATING AGENCY: 2. PROJECT TITLE: H• • • i•n •• CDC DIVISION X CITY COUNTY DEPARTMENT 3. PROJECT NUMBER: I.6.1 t-•7 COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATION 3A. CDC PROGRAM MA AGER: HOUSING AUTHORITY JPA (For CDC use only) AGENCY NAME: City of Arcadia Luci Keeler • DIVISION (CDC ONLY): • 4. PROJECT DURATION: ADDRESS: 240 West Huntington Drive • Arcadia. CA 91007 From: 711/97 to ./30/98 • CONTACT PERSON: John Halminski 5. HUD ACTIVITY CODE 14A TITLE: Assistant Planner 5A. HUD TITLE: Rehabillitation: Sinal=- iTEELEPHONE NUMBER: (818)574-5423 Unit Residential _ • • (If more than one HUD activity,complete pane 4.) • 6. PROJECT SUMMARY: • • This is a continuation of an existing program offered to low-and moderate-income households to improve or rehabilitate their single-family owner-occupied dwellings. The City is offering grants up to a maximum of$10,000 per household. • Tne purpose of this program is to maintain and preserve those structures which are generally in good condition and to assist in the elimination of conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare. Eligible improvements include but are not limited to exterior and interior painting, stucco repair, roofing, siding, interior code violations including plastering, new flooring, and . driveway improvements. It is anticipated that approximately40 homeowners will be assisted. CDBG funds will be used for consultant fees to administer the program and to pay he contractors • performing the work (Additional pages attached ) 7. PROJECT LOCATION: • A. ADDRESS:240 West Huntington Drive • B. CI T Y/UNINCORPORATD ARE Arcadia _ C. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT: 5th D. PROJECT SERVICE AREA Residents of the following census t-a=,enumeration district,or block oroups will benefit from this project (Attar a lc-able project map whith identifies the serve area.) City Wide 8. ELIGIBILITY: Project is eligible under 24 CFR Part 570. (Project may be eligible under several criteria. Indicate all appropriate letters and sub-numbers.) 201 (a-m,o-q) 204 (a-c) 202 (a-f) fa)f1)(b)(2)(4)(5)(6)(9) 205 (a-b) 203 (a-b) 205 (a-g) _ • f.Fsyea.nn.96 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGXAm EXHIBIT A • OPERA'l AGENCY: City of Arcadia PRI` NUMBER: D96618-97 ___ _. 9. COMPLIANCE WiTH NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: All projects must meet one of three objectives. This project meets the following objective(s): A, X Activities benefiting low-and moderate-income C. Activities designed to meet community persons under 24 CFR 570.208(a) development needs having a particular urgency, under 24CFR 507.2080 • 1. Area-wide benefit project affecting D. Additional criteria under 24CFR 570.208(d) percent low-and moderate income persons as indicated in the 199D census. 1. For acquisition of real property,a preliminary determination of whether the activity addresses a 2. Limited-Clientele activities: 570.208 national objective may be based on the planned use (a)(2)(I)A_B_:C_D_(ii)_A_B_C_ of the property after acquisition. OE)_ (iv)- 2. Required relocation assistance provided by the 3. X Housing activities. recipient shall be considered to address the same national objective as addressed by the displacing 4. Job Creation/Retention activities that activity. Voluntary relocation assistance may be are designed to create or retain jobs. qualified on the basis of the national objective addressed by the displacing activity or on the basis S. Activities which aid in the prevention or that the recipients are low-and moderate-income • elimination of slums or blight',under persons. 24CFR 570208(b) • 3. A public improvement activity designed to create or 1 Activity is located in a slum/blighted - _ retain jobs must meet the requirements of 570.205(a) area,which has been:(cheat one) (1)as well as 570208(a)(4). • designated as a Redevelopment Project Ares" 4. CDBG funds expended for planning and administrative approved by the CDC as a slum/blighted area. costs under 570205 and 5702D5,rt spedively,will be considered to address the national objecves. 'List conditions of slum/blight to be addressed by the project. (Complete only for projeos qualifying under JUSTIFICATION(CDC USE ONLY): •-• 570205(b)'(1)prevention or elimination of slums or blight) • 2 Activity is located ou5ide a slum/bighted area,but •, qualifies as spot slum/blight • 3. Activity will address slum/bight in an Urban renewal area 10. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND PROPOSED ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Identify specific goals or tasks and estimated time of completion (specify whether duplicated or • - unduplicated clients will be assisted). • • July 1997- Program advertising and interviewing qualified homeowners on waiting list Work to • commence after qualification is established. There will be a total of approximately 40 participants. Services will be provided from July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998. 11. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: • Identify the entity implementing the project Include the name(s) and title(s) of the project • • manager(s), and the address of the organization implementing the project John Halminski, Assistant Planner Development Services Departrnent, Community Development Division City of Arcadia . 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 • • • COMMUNITY DES L..JPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM EXHIBIT A OPERATING AGENCY: City of Arcadia PROJECT NUMBER: D96618-97 _ 12. PROFESSIONAL SERVICESISUBRECIPIENTS: (describe duties to be performed) • A consultant is hired to do both the administration and construction management cf the project. • • 13. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (CDC use only) • A professional services agreement must be executed for all contracts/consultants in compliance with Federal requirements. Per 36 CFR 800: Protection of Historic Properties/Floodplain Review (Section 106 Historic Review), the City shall submit to the CDC, a Basic Property Identification Form for all properties to be - • • rehabilitated. Review of potentially historic structures and clearance of those structu es through this • process, must be granted PRIOR to incurring any costs or starting the rehabilitation f the property. Properties requiring an in-depth review and analysis will be evaluated by the State Hstoric Preservation Officer(SHPO)for historical and/or architectural significance. Floodpla'n review and public noticing.alsosnust be completed where applicable. - • • • . 14. BUDGET SUMMARY: The Operating Agency understands that no expenditures may be incurred until the contract has been fully executed_ Cost Category CDBG Share Total Cost' (1) Personnel Services S 5 . - .. • (2) Non-Personnel Services S 44,000 S 44,000 (3) Capital Outlays 5 392,422 1 S 392,422 (4) Indirect Costs S I S (5) TOTAL (1-4) S 436,422 5 436,422 • 'List the source and amount of other funds used in this project Amount Sour e: • • S 441 422 CD, G • S S NOTE: All expenditures must conform with appropriate CDBG regulations and with`.he LA. County • . . • Auditor-Controller Contact Accounting and Administration Handbook. All expenditures must • be fully documented by receipts,time records, invoices, canceled checks, iniventory records, • or other appropriate documentation which completely discloses the amount and nature of the expenditures. PACKAGE OF INFORMATION FROM CDC'S ON PERFORMANCE Attachment 2 September 22, 1997. _ ;' To Whom It:May.-Concerti:. .: :: . The:Bankers Small Business Community Development Co •.:ration of S :: -t�; :..;Diego:, CDC)is a multi-bank consortium that provides microlo: , to women=and minority-owned businesses throughout.San Diego county. BANKERS SMALL BUSINESS •= :. c�o,iryDerel enrc e� Currently:we are in Our-fifth-loanpool,in which 23-banks have chosen to participate. IQuispragram. has approved and funded-:61 loans totaling n ` y•'$1.:8 xni hon_since its.inception:_ We are proud that these loans-were°,dist ■ ed "as follows:'.- Asian - II%` :: African American 1.6% _ Ispanic.'. 22%. Female 31% Esher 19%.- 925 Additionally;22..percent of tllese loans were made in low to moderate"m•.s r • FORT STOCKTON DRIVE are2-S. SAN DIEGO,CA Etirikos CDC a licants"are reviewed on their character and their pot,,. 92103 economic/joos:impact in our Community. Pristine credit and collateral.• not rents for°this`program. Tl a participants.in our program ate riot::qualified fnr SBA=or:conventional`financing b rt-have:proven,to Us-that- are .: de:ervitlg of capital.to=expand their business_ventures:-Start up13usines=: are not eligible in our program �f ti wnilld iiire!ladd.monal infnr nati`rn' l$* 5-cDC- , TEL • ,y nta a/ ._4594 or�t�Ll7tt a c1oa s rrnt ; " • you.for-your interest. (619)291-3594 FAX: Sincerely, :. (619)291-6954 Kimberly Buttemer Administrator • • a - -- --- ---- r _, ,,,-----,. . ., • - r --, VALLEY BANK 117151 yr ere ADMINISTRATION t 960 �� September 18, 1997 I am corresponding with you today as this year's President of the Inland Empire Lenders Community Development Corporation(IELCDC). I thought it would be appropriate to write and bring you up- to-date on what's been happening with the IELCDC. Much has happened during the past year and you as an investor and contributor to the loan pool deserve to know what has been transpiring. The initial investor group, of which you are a part, consists of sixteen (16) banks_ The initial capitalization was $150,000, and the initial loan pool was $450,000. There were a number of financial institutions which indicated they were going to take a"wait and see" attitude, and give serious consideration to joining at a later time. Of immense frustration was the time and bureaucratic tapdance we had to go through to obtain our lender's license from the State of California. Without the license,we could basically do nothing in the way of lending. After six months of "processing", the license was finally issued by the Department of Corporations on April 9, 1997. While waiting for the license, two advisory boards were formed - one in the western part of Riverside County (36 members), and the other in the Desert, or eastern area (23 members). Additionally,two loan committees were also formed,again, one in the western area and one in the Desert. Also while awaiting the lender's license,loan servicing arrangements, accounting services, and administrative support were finalized. The Board of Directors has met on a monthly basis since IELCDC's inception,including a strategic IC planning session in April. We have had good attendance and active participation. The loan committees have met to consider loan applications, and as of this writing have approved four(4) loans for a total of$169,000, two of which are on the books,for a total of$100,000. Additionally, there are loans in process which total$175,000. You can see that we're off to a very solid start. In your mailbox soon will be the paperwork for your financial institution to "re-up"its loan pool commitment. However, with the success of the program to date,new loan pool funds can't come any too soon. Concurrently with the loan pool "re-up" of our existing investor group, we are going out with a secondary offering to those financial institutions which are not currently investors. The same criteria used in the first offering is being used in this secondary offering. It is our intention to expand the investor base and create a second loan pool so that all of the credit requests that make it through the credit approval process will have money available for funding. That's about it for this update. Thanks for your ongoing support of the IELCDC and its mission!! Doug Mills 24070 SUNNYMEAD BLVD., CA 92553 • (909)242-1959 • FAX(909)242-1903 •P.O.BOX 188,MORENO VALLEY, CA 92556-0188 � . ` � Ir •tillifithl' t Bankers'Small Business Community Development Corporation ANRERS'CDC OF ORANGE COUNTY Of Orange County hcmicr founder alifomia United Bank.N.A. _e Fed Bank September 22, 1997 :iv National Bank omcrica Bank • First dank&Trust First Security Thrift To Whom It May Concern: • Fremont investment&Loan Frontier Bank The Bankers' Small Business Community Development . Fullerton Savings&Loan Corporation of Orange County (BSBCDCOC) received its Finance Lac Angeles National Bari k �° Bank Marine National Han Lender License on January 22, 1997. Since that date,the BSBCDCO * , Northern Trost Bank of California has funded five loans totaling approximately $198,000. As of this PFF Bank&Trust writing, there are five loans being prepared for the October, 1997 Lo- silicon Valley Bank Committee. Sterling Bank&Trust On an average,there are two to three inquiries a day, with Founders approximately ten to fifteen percent resulting in qualified applicants. Bank of Yorba finds The remaining inquiries are either referred to an alternative fimncin,. California Korea Bank Comtmmity Bank source, they are just shopping around or they are not ready to apply. Eldorado Bank General Bank The five loans funded consist of a manufacturer of battery charg- , Harbor Bank a facial salon, a CD archival storage company, a technical employm;nt imperial Bank search firm and a clothing manufacturer. Loan proceeds have been i trial Thrift&loan Naanofaataas Bank used for working capital, inventory purchases, equipment purc ases South Coast Thrift&Loan payroll advances and other purposes. All five companies had been Southern California dank business for a minimum of a year and had been turned down by OS Trust Company traditional banking institutions. Western Financial Savings Bank If you should require additional information, please do not hesi .te • Corporate Sponsor to contact me. Southern California Edison AN F7tiON IN l.. ATIONAL COMPANY' Legal Counsel Sincerely, Aldrich&Donncfin b./.4, n/d/dIvey AdIor William A. Davey CDC Small Business Executive Director Finance Corp. 1 265 South AM=Drive.Suitc 130 j Orange_CA 92668 (714)976-1182 (714)978-1297 FAX THE CITY OF i SANT laila:342) . rA i CIVIC CEN7EA PLAZA • 1200 THIRD AVENUE • SUITE 1620 at ,.,}rd • `'+,,4 ••�` SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101-41 78 • 7E EPHOA& (619)236-6039 FAX (6/9)2366512 ECONOMIC . October 19, 1995 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • TO Local Government Economic Development Staffpersons • RE: Bankers' Small Business Community Development Corporation of • San Diego County ("the Bank CDC") In this era of increased local responsibility for small business development without, the commensurate additional staff _and systems resources necessary to ensure the success of in-house direct loan programs, the Bank CDC has provided the City of San Diego with an innovative vehicle to leverage private financing from local banks • in support of public economic development objectives. I was a founding member of the public/private partnership that . . conceived and implemented the Bank CDC, winner of CALED's 1993 Economic Development Avant-Garde Grand Prize. I am proud to Y' state that the Bank CDC has originated 45 small loans•totalling-, about $1.4MM since its inception, mostly to minority- and women- owned and/or low income area-located small businesses. The Bank CDC is also continually refining its financing program and. integrating it with essential business development technical assistance. • • • You are in the fortunate position of capitalizing upon San • Diego's hard-won expertise. Especially with increasing flexibility in the uses of HUD CDBG monies for microbusiness assistance, I urge you to strongly consider whether a local multi-bank CDC could provide increased capital access to the . small entrepreneurs in your community and whether it should be partially funded by local government. Please do not hesitiate to contact ma at (619) 236-6235 with any • questions or for more information on the City's very positive experience with the Bank CDC. • Sincerely, }4......4reW‘11--" . • Mark A. Sullivan * $c Business Finance Manager M• r' �II r Y1.5 4. T • DIVERSITY • aw'G5 J$ALL TOMTF*3t •�� • . — — - - . z n T n ����� f' . T T 1 C •C '7 •C I"1 o -U /• dp1.4.,1 � ,-5."Q/J J�(r -. . 100-vr p°RAt8° STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT October 7, 1997 TO: Arcadia Redevelopment Agency FROM: ByttePeter P. Kinnahan, Economic Development Administrator Prepared by: Dale R. Connors, Redevelopment Project Manager RE: Request for direction regarding conflicting redevelopment proposals; 1) Inline (Hockey) Development Group, 2) Anza Management (Johnson) SUMMARY: In late 1996, the City was approached by Scott Brown and Curtis Tucker (Inline Development Group) with a proposal to develop a 60,000 square foot inline hockey facility located at the northeast corner of Second Avenue at Santa Clara Street (Location Map, Attachment No. 1). The facility would contain 2 rinks and pro shop. During the ensuing period, as staff and the developer discussed the feasibility of the proposal, one of the property owners (Messrs. Donald and Robert Johnson) within the development site expressed their intent, as owner-participant under the Agency's adopted Owner Participation Rules, to develop their portion of the development site. This staff report discusses each of the proposals and seeks direction from the Agency concerning which of the two proposals should be pursued. DISCUSSION: The Inline Development Group proposal involves development of three parcels of land extending northward from Santa Clara Street to the 210 Freeway and eastward to the Santa Anita Wash (See Attachment No. 2). The 4.5 acre site includes the Western Security Bank (WSB) Property (Parcel 2), a portion of the St. Joseph Street Reservoir (Parcel 1A) and the Johnson Property (Parcel 3). The Inline Development Group would acquire directly or through the Redevelopment Agency both the WSB Property and the Johnson Property. To finalize their development parcel, they would trade a portion of the WSB Property (Parcel 2A - 31,500 Sq. Ft.) to the City in exchange for a portion of the St. Joseph Street Reservoir Property (Parcel 1A - 45,400 Sq. Ft.). The Inline Group's site plan is depicted on Attachment No. 3 /' LASER IMAGED ��ece e — � v€ U y 4- E. 9�1. The City would construct a new 3.7 million gallon reservoir on Parcel 2A to replace the old one which currently lies on Parcel 1A. The Maintenance Services Department has indicated that this tank needs to be replaced. However, it could be taken off-line and replaced in its current location if necessary. The cost of constructing the new reservoir in this location as proposed by the Inline Group is estimated by Maintenance Services to be $2,625,000., The Inline Group would be required to pay the City the estimated $300,000 differential cost of constructing the water reservoir in place versus relocating it. During the course of negotiations with Inline Group, staff extended legally required owner participation rights to property owners affected by the Inline Proposal. Messrs. Donald Johnson and Robert Johnson responded (See Attachment No. 4) to the Agency notification with a development proposal for the portion of the site they currently own. On behalf of Anza Management (a medium sized property management company in Orange County), the Johnsons propose to begin construction within 18 - 24 months, of a 41,500 square foot, 2 story or 60,000 square foot, 3 story (with parking structure) office building. The smaller building was previously approved in 1989 but was not constructed due to market conditions. Permits and entitlements have expired. The Johnsons have indicated that they do not desire to participate or joint venture with Inline Development Group on Inline's proposal. WSB did not file a reply within the time deadline. In comparing the two proposals (Submittal Matrix, Attachment No. 5), the Johnson proposal is the simpler development to facilitate. Only one property is involved with plans that were previously approved by the City and Agency (although new building codes will certainly require modifications). It features no Agency or private property acquisitions and appears to have competent principals as developers. This development should be formalized with the Agency by execution of an Owner Participation Agreement (OPA). The'In Line Development Group proposal is more complicated (three properties are involved with a land trade and City construction project included). The Inline Group has met with the Johnsons to negotiate the purchase of the Johnson Property. As stated above, the Johnsons do not want to joint venture and have expressed an interest in developing their own parcel. If Inline is unable to option or acquire the Johnson and WSB properties, the Agency may have to consider using its condemnation powers. While the Inline Group has been involved in the inline skate business, they do not appear to have extensive development or redevelopment experience. • ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: No environmental analysis has been completed on either of the proposals. However, staff expects that,a traffic and circulation study will minimally be required and perhaps a Mitigated Negative Declaration. FISCAL IMPACT: Inline Development Group: (Based upon review of the Inline Group Business Plan by Agency consultant, Jim Williams) Estimated Development Cost (Includes Land) $ 6,750,000 Estimated Annual Tax Increment to the Agency 60,000 Estimated Annual Sales Taxes to the City (2nd Yr.) 17,000 Payments to Agency and City for: Administrative Option Fee ($10,000); Appraisals ($1,200); Environmental Phase I ($1,950), and Engineering Design of Water Line ($9,000) $ 22,150 Inline would be required to pay the City the estimated $300,000 differential in constructing the tank in a new location instead of in place. They would also be required to pay all costs to acquire the Johnson and WSB Properties. Anza Management: Estimated Development Cost $ 4,500,000 - $6,000,000 Estimated Annual Tax Increment to the Agency $40,000 - $ 55,000 Estimated Annual Sales Taxes to the City Unknown, (Probably 0) The Johnson proposal would cost the Agency approximately $5,000 - $10,000 in legal fees for the preparation of an OPA. RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency review the two development proposals and provide direction to staff concerning which of the proposals to pursue. • • • ,a. • If the Agency selects Inline, the following direction and conditions should be given: ti • Within 21 days of Agency direction, Inline will be required to make an initial deposit of a $10,000 Administrative Option Fee, $9,000 for engineering design of water lines, $1,200 for appraisals, and $1,950 for an Environmental Phase I Assessment. ($Total - $22,150) • Inline shall commence preparation of a boundary survey / parcel map and traffic / circulation study at their cost, to be completed in 60 days. • Inline shall attempt to negotiate an option to purchase the Western Security Bank Property and the Johnson Property, to be completed in 60 days.. • Staff is authorized to prepare within 30 days and forward to Inline the draft Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for negotiation and scheduling of a public hearing on the final DDA within 90 days thereafter (Total - 120 days). If the Agency selects Anza Management (Johnson), the following direction should be given: • Staff is authorized to prepare within 30 days and forward to the Johnsons a draft Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) for negotiation and scheduling of a public hearing on the final OPA within 90 days thereafter (Total - 120 days). Approved: juntA William R. Kelly, Executive Director DRC:dc IN-LINE ROLLER HOCKEY DEVELOPMENT SITE 1\1141 R f Spy �oo T PARCEL A �p // / , JOHNSON PROPERTY -57 , C C F NO SCALE > til os� liq�, / Q PARCEL B (.7 . z Z CITY OF ARCADIA(Water) (1l0 0 U W V) Extended Stay , L.l d — America Hotel 1 > PARCEL C I WESTERN STATE BANK PROPERTY IL `,___> E. E. SANTA CLARA ST. d rt n w Possible Hotel ite Marriott Residence Inn (Agency Owne ) \\ i rrt 9/23I97 Z 0 r FIGURE NO. 1 PARCEL 3 SON PROPERT N RTH NO SCALE UJ . Q 1 B z PARCEL 1 w Y OF ARCAD - o , and Pump S at! n) _ 2B • E. SANTA CLARA ST. O PARCEL 2 WESTERN STATE BANK PROPERTY . . • .• • ; • • % arN Rtr YN !f. \ \ fl LL"''n. j Q T'` .1- -, `\\\�\\`•\\\ } '•�- �\ \ .4 \ \\\ Ntir ■ - s.r L} - :- w ;;.AEI = •' \ A -'%'z �jc-• _i - _.. • a+ ;, — ate' \ 4 fir -;^ YF' ." i .t* =is '^- ,...-rr \Z - .• in O :t.t:-•F,- r•�rri'' ,?',' ,-,.`1:i`_-:..:-�...;SF� v ? Si tT. - \T �f• _ 11 ':•p,. Q= �f V. 0 7,f •.rte a' �:rr-r 3 �� \�, ® Fir r��� 5. =°=' f v �L rS`. '•G_k aL \' . t=c. r tom" .1'y t •�•:'{^''v-L•,ft' r4::. 14 a S• I - v: d t sit / r[. ._,. -.p. ar.},{i:�s'.` � \ c r� L�E �t ,� 1�E .1��.,�1..'`ci —_ _ __ Srez - \ F&R F�'rm, - r:1-771'. -,i`'' �e {rsr$a � 1 0 --- \` J' .• t- r _ 1 . • 1 }+^.-. a rL'A-F -F>,n`;;.I .\ c f-»•1 , r JSy g'\ i/. ~-- \ t f ( i�{[(. I.1 =`y+,r.rt �, a.r 117■'� 14 ;y' ,1�,'s.f :f ':0.E ��.`\ "\ L S ,`r-t• •1 P.'- ltt'S•r.-' ✓ i'' ' .•; .f •' M 1 l ' \\ F$ .�?'rhf 4 ,LE4trtGr �tr> IL r°+�TL°+-'�: 1'c-'� � \\\ te__ •t_S.v r..F LC .jrpr • • g •.7'_;t- "�„1 .- . u' j \ t' {';I- ��'„ �`f tt.ee i, 1~-;_r kkcb�'•f 4 L �,; �4r•- _1`t^�• 4 t x,•414- - 7;7 \\ v- - f t L;. 4p- - L. �.'=tt 1.(I..pf}fr c- .{j� - r, r s Y,up 1!..:" \\ i i' sa r} 1 ;;,L} k i rVe`TtiSGt r` ki, ,1;01. •y, .__ t j� f''A47 .! � � Ck, \\ SANTA CLARA STREET I \ • - - 1 - - - -- _. I Attachment No. 3 • r P ' ; SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN IN LINE CITY 1HrU118)D♦SSOCII I r I • BUSINESS-PLAN _ . _ INLINE CITY _ _ _ �FsJ Et "Fl 1i•• r roe • ---' 0011111r a 0 July 15, 1996 INLINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP Scott S. Brown/Curtis E. Tucker 2234 E. Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91107 (818) 795-5522 • • • - - INTRODUCTION- - • In the 1990'S, inline skating and hockey exploded-upon the recreational market as a new - and exciting sport accessible to millions of adults and children. Originally developed as a summer season alternative to ice hockey, last year 2.2 million Americans from ages.5 to 50 played organized roller hockey as an all season sport. International acceptance has followed and in 1996, Inline Roller Hockey will be played as an exhibition sport at the Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia. In 1992, the National In-Line Hockey Association (NIHA)was started. Three years later, the NIHA had grown to 350 leagues nationwide and organizations such as the California Street Hockey Association (CSHA) were formed to locally support and organize the recreational sport. In the State of California, public and private high schools are currently promoting Roller Hockey as an official CIF sport. • By 1996 roller hockey membership exceeded its ice sibling in weekly league play. This incredible growth was acknowledged by Gary Bettman, the Commissioner of the National --- — — 'Hockey League-(NHL) during a 1996 Stanley Cup Series televised interview: In addition, - - - - Roller Hockey International (RIB) professional teams such as the Los Angeles Blades, • Anaheim Bullfrogs and the San Diego Barracudas compete at major venues throughout --- the US and Canada.— Roller hockey has become Americas fastest growing, all season recreational sport. The concept for INLINE CITY took form in 1995 when Mr. Tucker and Mr. Brown's children started playing roller hockey in the CSHA Temple City League. Over a six month period, an incredible increased league membership was observed and as a result, market research was started to determine consumer needs and investment opportunities. Similar to Little League Baseball, it was discovered that Roller Hockey games usually have more parents in attendance than players. Like Little League, these parents are willing to spend both time and significant money to support the sport. Unlike Little League however, the newness and quick growth of Roller Hockey has out paced the _: -- capabilities of local leagues to build quality playing facilities with basic amenities such as . grandstands, scoreboards, lights, rest rooms and food service. Also, because most rinks are located outdoors,many games are canceled due to winter weather-and are extremely uncomfortable for spectator and player alike during the hot summer months. During 1995-96, a proliferation in the number of Southern California commercial indoor hockey conversion rinks built from existing industrial and retail sales buildings was observed. This verified the market for indoor rinks. However, when visiting these converted facilities it became apparent that due to Roller Hockey's unique rink configuration, most building conversions compromised rink size, user amenities and related equipment and food service sales. Thus while conversion rinks are profitable, they are unable to tap the full potential of the market and are transitional when faced with the competition from a custom facility like INLINE CITY. • The basis for-INLINE-CITY is to lead the next ease of Roller Hockey facility - deve oI pment.- A s emnsioned,-INL CITY will-provide-new,-climate-controlled1 — - -- indoor facilities incorporating a regulation size rink for teens and.adults and a minimum - _ sized rink for preteen and beginning players. • Both rinks will be styled to entice and enhance the playef/customer experience through the use of professionally designed, ice hockey dasher boards and-plastic safety walls;-electronic scoreboards, off-rink team benches and penalty boxes, dasher board advertising and extensive use of league and professional team banners. Other skater amenities will include a retail pro shop, food concessions, equipment rental and skate maintenance service. For non-skating visitors, INLINE CITY will offer an upscale food service, a video arcade, and a "Tiny Tot" play center with a special play rink. INLINE CITY has combined concepts that will maximum rink utilization and because of - its design and amenities, it will attract and expand the existing customer base to insure . profitability. In addition, by providing supervised weekend, evening and summer roller hockey programs for local youths and special assistance for underprivileged participants and the handicapped, INLINE CITY is both a good community neighbor and a welcomed addition to any city with a large youth population. The Inline Development Group (IDG) has been formed to seek investors to initially develop a Monrovia- Arcadia area INLINE CITY. IDG will showcase the . Monrovia-Arcadia facility to attract additional investors to allow rapid growth of identical developments in other areas of opportunity. s,1 -DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT AND SERVICES As discussed in the Introduction, the-sport of roller hockey is rapidly expanding -. .. _ throughout Southern California and the nation.:This all season growth trend is particularly notable in the San Gabriel Valley which currently hosts over 400 teams and 3000 weekly players. While local growth has been spectacular, development of facilities has been "make-do" at best In surveying the market, IDG inspected existing regional sites and questioned participants, spectators and retailers to determine product and service needs. The products of INLINE CITY would be the following: • Organized / NIHA Sanctioned Inline Roller Hockey League Play: • Professional Full Size"Sport Court (180' x 80') adolescent and adult rink • Reduced Size (145' x 60')junior rink • Yearly NINA and local league membership. Membership fees includes NIE3A personal injury insurance. - - -- - -- -. -- - Open skate and speciaLrink events:-- • General public open skate rink scheduling _ Pick-up garnes_a.nd special adult leagues_ • Party and special off-time rink rental • Special promotional /practice games with local professional teams . • CIF high school games "The Locker Room" pro shop retail sales: • Skates and Sticks • Protective Gear (Helmets, Pads, Gloves-etc..) • Jerseys, Uniforms and Equipment Bags • High and low-end expendables and replacement parts (pucks/balls, wheels, _ bearings, stick heads etc..) • Hockey Collectibles (water bottles, posters, cards, game software,NHL - merchandise, magazines, books videos etc..) and Leisure Clothing (NHL Jerseys, team jackets, warm- up suits, etc..) • Trophies, Team Banners and Jersey Printing • Digital photographic and special printing services "Home Ice" food and beverage service • Dedicated Food Service Area with general purpose and upscale menu service • - Contract Catering for Team and Special Rental Parties - -- _ • Off-hours vending machines (coffee, soft drinks and candy) "Slap Shot" video arcade - • Video.eliteittinrtient-forspectators-and)p‘re-/-post--game-participants Additional hockey services • --- • Group ticket sales/transportation for professional Rill roller and NHL/EHL ice hockey games • Promotional advertising (dasher board and floor ads, team sponsorship, scoreboard advertising, tournament sponsorship) for area and national brand retailers • Skate and specialty equipment rental and a repair- service shop • Special training and summer "Hockey Camp" clinics • Rental lockers • Party rooms • _ Special events/facility rental • • Sales promotions, conventions and commercial shows (i.e. antique trains sales meet, sci-fi vendor show, etc..) _ - • -77444;3/ • -FACILITY REQUIREMENTS AND SITE SURVEYS _ Attached as Appendix A are INLINE CITY architectural plans designed by Nuttall/ Uchizono,Newport Beach, California. To keep construction and maintenance cost at a minimum, a 66,000 square foot flat roof tilt-up cement building with a decorative facade will be constructed. High efficiency lighting, heating/air-conditioning, skylights and windows have been designed into the facility to minimize operating costs. A 4.5 acres / 196,020 sq. ft building site is required to accommodate this facility while meeting minimum Monrovia/Arcadia parking requirements. It should be noted however, that lot -size can be reduced if the facility is developed on an existing shopping center site where parking facilities can be shared. • As envisioned, INLINE CITY is established around two skating rinks located to either side of a central entrance/ exit. The proposed modular "L" shape/ center court .—___configuration is flexible to allow reconfiguration depending on building site geometry. A key feature of this configuration is to intentionally route all rink-users past the glass walled Pro Shop to enhance planned and spontaneous retail sales. In addition, all users are channeled through a central court where primary services, rink information and facility management and security are located for.easy use. Additional features of the entrance and - - center court are: -- — - - 1. Single glassed promenade/ entrance-exit for customer control and ticketing and direct access to "The Locker Room" pro shop 2. General facility information and open skate/special event ticketing to provide a corner control point for entry/exit 3. Information board (league status, game dates, special events, etc..) 4. Facility Management and Security Office centrally located for improved visibility _- - - -.- - - and efficiency : ._... 5. Skate Rental and Repair Shop 6. Rental Lockers and Bench Dressing Areas 7. "Home Ice" food service, off hours vending machines dining area with individual table and chairs. 8. Elevator for handicapped and general second level dining easy access for "Home Ice" food service customers. • • 9: Secured tiny tots play area with tube stvucture, a kiddy rink and a tabled sitting - area for parents wiTh small cl'iildren.'The play arteais• o-cated.next-to-thefood-court - • • to enhance food sales.- . --.. • . 10. "Slap Shot" video.arcade • 11. Rest rooms/public telephones are conveniently located across from the tiny tots play area and food service 12. Rink end viewing areas As discussed, two rinks extend from each side of the center court. The Main 180' x 80' Rink is designed for adolescent and adult league play and meets all NINA and RHI standards. The secondary rink measures 145' x 60' and complying with NINA standards . _has been sized_for junior league players. To provide an exciting sport hockey environment, - both rinks have the following features; 1. Painted/simulated ice surface with advertising and high intensity lighting 2. Ice hockey styled dasher boards with advertising and team logos and Lexan spectator windows • 3. Dedicated team benches - - 4: Penalty box and official scorekeepers box 5. Remote electronic scoreboard 6. Spectator grandstands with upper level tables and seating and party areas 7. Rafter and wall hung RHI,NINA and NHL team banners In addition, space located under the grandstands is utilized for: • - -----•. -•• •- -- 1.- Team locker-rooms with rest rooms _. 2. League and instructor offices 3. Equipment storage • 4. First aid room 5. General storage and supplies (pro-shop stockroom, food court freezer and pantry) Because of desired pro-look aesthetics and aco4stic considerations, the height of the building allows a second level to be located above the center court. Ad esigned,this area ---"--- —� becomes a mezzanine with direct viewing and access to both rink grandstands and the - ___ center court.- Adult "quiet" area seating and tables as w ell as a multipurpose room is provided. IDG Corporate offices are also located on this floor. Specific points of note are: - • 1. Mezzanine dining and viewing areas 2. Multipurpose room for investor presentations, league use and parties. 3. IDG corporate offices • 4. Dual rink grandstand access • 5. Main court stairs 6. Rest rooms 7. Elevator — From the exterior, INLINE CITY has been styled to both enhance_user excitement while blending with community standards. Rink windows are provided to attract passersby interest, the impact of which will be especially dramatic at night. - Parking lot landscaping is used to minimize impromptu "street hockey" and improve aesthetics. In addition, entry/exit traffic routing has been designed away from the street to allow safe and easy drop-off/pick up. Night lighting is provided for safety and security. SITE SURVEYS Surveys were conducted in the Arcadia Monrovia area to establish-land costs and identify . -- _ potential building sites (see fig).- For vacant land in secondary locations, costs ranged from S11.00 to S23.00 per sq. ft. Sites requiring major building removal were not • considered due the additional cost of lot preparation. SiteA Located on Santa Clara St. and 5th in Arcadia, this 3.36 acre site offers a good potential tie-in with the Embassy Suites and the Marriott Residence Inn for convention rental and has excellent freeway visibility. Unfortunately this lot is slightly smaller than needed for on-site parking. However, the use of a small narrow lot across the street or highly available street parking may solve this problem. This lot is currently listed at S2.56m or S17.50/sq. ft. v,5 _ Site B _ - • • _ _ Located off of 5th Street and South of Huntington Drive in Monrovia, this10 acre site is currently a closed,down trailer,court and hassbeen targeted for redevelopment. This site offers a good potential tie-in with the Holiday Inn and Wyndham Hotel for convention rental. No costs were obtained for this site. - - - ---- Site C - - _ _ _ _ . Located within the current K-Mart Shopping Center on Huntington Drive and Shamrock in Monrovia, this site offers good freeway access and visibility and utilizes existing parking facilities. It should be noted however, that while land costs are minimized at this location, the close proximity of K-Mart may have a negative impact on pro shop sales. No costs . were obtained for this site. _ _ . _ • - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - _ . _ ___ . • T • ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY July 30, 1997 Mr. Peter Kinnahan Economic Development Administrator Arcadia Redevelopment Agency - - -240 West Huntington Drive -- -- — - - - P.O. Box 60021.-- - - - - -- - - • _. . - .-. - Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 Re: 324 North Second Avenue Dear Pete, •- • - Bob and I were surprised to receive your notice offering us a two and one-half week opportunity to submit our proposal for the development of our site on North Second -- -- Avenue. -• - — - _ . _ As you are aware, our family has owned our property for over fifty years. With the removal of the industrial facility previously on the property we proceeded diligently to . design a high quality office building to be constructed on the site. With the onset of the recession in real estate we put these plans on hold,pending an upturn in the market which would enable a quality development which both we and the City desired. Rather than commencing with some more expedient development,we felt that as long term owner/investors both we and the City would be better served by waiting for renewed demand for the high-quality development we envisioned. Since my visit to your office last month (before knowing anything about the proposed inline hockey court development) to evaluate market activity relative to the timeliness of our proceeding with our development plans, I have met with Curtis Tucker and Scott Brown to learn of their proposed concept for the site. In that meeting we superficially discussed the possibility of Bob and my participating in their venture. We have since received and reviewed a copy of their business plan and will be exploring the possibility of our joining in their venture. Pending our learning more about the proposed inline hockey development or an attractive offer to sell and exchange the property for another investment property, we remain J U L 3 1 13-""7 2280 UNIVERSITY DRIVE • NEWPO T BEACH, CA 92660 • (714) 645-1422 Attachment No. 4 strongly committed to retaining the site, developing it in an attractive and high quality -•---- -- -- manner compatible with the objectives of the City, and holding the property for many decades into the future. . . While at some valuation, an exchange of our property on Second Avenue for another commercial property could make sense for us as patient, long-term owners/investors, to do so at any valuation based upon a small bank's liquidation of its REO or upon the value acceptable to a large, troubled corporation attempting to liquidate all of its many real estate assets, hardly makes sense. While we will consider participation in the inline hockey development, and would consider an offer to sell at some level which would recognize the inherent long term developed value of the property in stabilized market conditions, our strong preference remains to develop the property ourselves and hold it for many decades to come. In that context, we are enclosing our Statement of Interest in Participation and our Development ____ _ _ __ _-Proposal for oursite at 324 No Second Avenue.--------- - - Yours truly, . Don P. Johnson, CPM Chairman • DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL . 324 North 2°a Avenue Arcadia, California Owners/Developers: Donald P. Johnson Robert W. Johnson Nature of the Proposed Project: 41,500 square foot two story office building. Potential for 60,000 square foot three story office _ -- ----__-- _---_ -- ------- building with parkingstructure-- - - ----- --- - - - - Conceptual Site Plan: See attached site plan and rendering. Estimated Number of People Employed: 180 with 41,500 square feet or 250 with 60,000 square feet. - Estimated Construction - Schedule: Estimate start of construction within 18 -24 months _. _-- . .--_- — • - - --— --and-completion within-approximately seven months - - • - thereafter(or nine months if a parking structure is needed). Qualifications: Co-owner, Donald P. Johnson founded Anza Management Company, of which he has been President and Chairman.During its twenty-two years in business,Anza has managed over 20,000 • apartments and about one million square _ - - feet of commercial space. Prior to founding Anza Management Company he worked for a major " national residential developer and during his career with Anza has personally developed both residential and industrial properties. Source of Financing: The owners have personal resources which would enable the development of the property with cash. Debt financing would probably be arranged at the time of(or possibly shortly following) construction. JUL 3 1 1997 How Public Interest will ----- be Served: A high oluality office building will enhance the City of Arcadia, both aesthetically from the Foothill Freeway corridor, financially through added property and business tax revenues and dynamically through added business and pedestrian activity to complement nearby hotel, restaurant and commercial enterprises. • • I I • • I 14-21•. 41,111114 ' I VWUOJIVO • YQYOUV 7 ' 311N3AV CJN003S' IaPeN • i I ' I /tkUVA7U I11V OH007! �— �1 it I11i 1 '-11 1' 1 1.11'-I L f♦ �s�]I 11'x•• • ,ht - II\ ••1 •Y .r• 1 '7\1 1 I.. 1� 111\`1-,cr..1 'VIII•i. �(.`;1 '1 '1 II i . .l,! �ii ` ii . 'I•'s,'' ,: •'I '1•� i ',•r' .11:,:,.1. i..r • 'I�r t... i r, II, II'�•,� 1�I ( I I, ."_ 11 1 �1,.1. II'i',,•I 1 _.•,/. ��! ,ft • 11 1• �? ii 1i r „''1 • lil • JA ;, ,111 r '.,1 ';R °, •,'''•,•71� 1 I .i ll.2� `•I• '°��, ', 2�,.• �.•.�'i•y,, I i'1 ii i: .Ii 1 ( i.11\; 'y� 1. i�e� +'; � /'',.1 ,.../;;,,.. ,lTl i('1 ,.1 I /.' ! � RI i�/py J.p. ''''•././.A ,, It i • '1 i / 1 / 4 �....1 �:,..0i. {.2li■i i rl+il iir �rr4 i �rrrwi i 41.4•∎•∎r r.1,.r f r 115,,r • /!4—, pi♦; .• 1.:3 ., ,► •► ae.•sirs s11 ::ir■sM 'i IWI= r'I�IMGi�■ii�■���wM�u�, � F--_,,;, � .._ !' = r .r'tl:s // 1I •.1 1 1 �I 1 It ) 1 II Ii .. i �/ •1 r 4. I 1 ,, 1 •. •.�/Al al • t ..:. 1 ' I4. ;"'f'..:• 11 1',,I 1 r)1^1..•'�'+ ... ' - ., r1. ..• \• IZr •r. �•► • A. :• 'l rI :s. 1 Y1 j, l ci „ • j 1'')1.11!! 4 i1 ( 1�ia?r, ` i �, , ,• • I • r f • 1 i• 11• i • • • • 1 1 • I 1 i . . 1 ' • . • . . . . 1 . . . , . , .. . 1 i ....•'N... X / ' , 1 -:4•• lis .;),,. -4.,!.....:.0 or i. SECOND AVENUE 1 • • 1 --- 01. z....,.._..,,•,, 4of 4:k: ARCADIA.CALIFORNIA / . I 4 A / ..- ,••:. / • cr, Ili 1 . i ,„,''. • / / .• , , . . lk.:',f • • . ■ ,,..--.,.. . ; / , .t. .,.:.: idie„,4 1 ,, . // ne o ..4Y 4) "-.--0 st'or WI,. ,z, Z. rf PI' z4V ....- 0 / 7/ - /'''u.':' ' 11101 ,, /014r1.4k A if ,.. i•,I(r ei;;7..■4 I 0.1' n 1 -e, ..... -.--= tio) t ) . ..... M:Mii.: • TWO SFOR•OFFICE BUILDING 1/AX.HEIGHT.. GROUND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR TOTAL AREA PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD ■ CT0OHTAPtACT , 00 FEET 70.600 S F. % , °'''' / 4.Ai , / , ..../ , -- 0 ...' 1 4 y . • , . . . .__-4110 4110.. rz ,r,, -- . • ;,...„. IA. ..••■••••......•a. 41....,.. . ‘,. .. sob ',yob 6011,of** '....0060401•••161 ,' .. I /". ° ' ;. •i r 0,.. ,.. • .:.,.,,,,• ,,,,, . / ,, -•_,, r 0 ,.........,,,...,..,_. .• . . . . I .. _......,...... c__ , .1111 611),;;.:t ., ".-. . . . . •, ri...•3 . ''.. 0 , /".,...,„ • 'S i /64 . , r. ,, , ..*-:, • ar— N. . / . l • • .1 1; .• 7.:4 • ' •, .,.}..:. . Ilk: s.‘,.., %. 4 ..„....1$,,, . ,N; TAN:. ..,,k....„-. • .,....___.... .,..i.. 0 9.. 0 10 TO ••0 ge ALI I I 1 •es:• ,.., .k., .0 i axe, fj, . . .. dik, air =a.. . .v... ..‘o. b. ..„, ./,. N:.. .. .:„,„;.2.„..2.,. .„... ------s.w.,. . . .. _. ).1.:. ,-..iv, . ...:::-.. ..w! .....F ,.., AISI Alr AT A% / - ____/, The Nadel / / SECOND AVENUE Partnership Inc. . 711.1747191 ' 1,:. ... 1 ■I.. 71, 1 ............-....................-...-..................--.-.............•---...-............-..----.........--..-.....-....-..--......---....---- .--.....-......--.—-„„........-....„ . .• . i : . ,� 1 } • ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY U ARCAD4, CALIFORNIA . CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT • STATEMENT OF INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION I hereby express my interest in participating in "the Rede- • velopment Project and . submit the following information : . V0474-75 Date `/`''(c < /9 ? • •. a�aj i fi. Pr- 1. Name c5 6eNt CV- Jo Gir),) Telephane6 /7) G y'5'- • � 2- 2. Home 'Address ll.' �rhe.--s/c-e 85� <�yuh� �3-s c4 C' SzCy7 3 . Name of Business An24- /hs.0`') e�rrc1" T` C`' /415'x/ - - -- --- - - 2_2 Fo GG1-2 iv{0-•s/T}. wP • - 4 : Address of Business -41 te. ,7 ges - C/9 52000 •5. My present involvement in the Project is : 6. I now own property in the Project t k • I now lease property in thu Project . - Explain: _ . . 7. I AM INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING : _ AS A PROPERTY OWNER k• . AS A BUSINESS TENANT " 6. If I participated: • i would like to continue at the same location k . I would like to change my present location _ I would like to acquire real property for- expansion (indicate - approximate requirements) A/o • S ocvele.^z• olc Di-f‘,. Pr,c, ( Co..- vt�.^ s.:" e'5 �S vLr� j4M// REMARKS : ( / de3/fees fo /'6r4", ir, /P,rem-Csr /'7 7,l,.G ,,^Dee...ty .„„,z all SOzh g1 /h Gr.4e% Gen'1oaf tr y //)..e"ter t o/evz(e ' 7 C. F:,vr e`-fiy /4, ai."M 42/2 L2`.- c.•47i /4 ea6ti.pi Le .17Ze c.1`3, c4' A.,7csc-l.e„ . I understand that submission of this Statement of Interest form does not obligate me to participate if the Redevelopment Plan is carried out, nor does it indicate an opinion concerning the • . Redevelopment Project. � • Signed _ C�`rr'--7�- n ` • Exhibit U- SUBMITTAL MATRIX 10/02/97 Proposals: Project Description/ Third Party Revenues/ Development NEC Second/Santa Clara Schedule Involvement Benefits to City&Agency Experience 1. InLine Dev. Group 66,000 sq. ft. roller/ice hockey See attached site map. Need Sales tax to City estimated at Some experience in roller Scott Brown/ facility, including food to acquire: $17,000/year hockey facility operations, Curtis Tucker concession, pro shop, budgeting, marketing 2234 E. Colorado Blvd. equipment rental, parking on - Johnson property for parking Tax increment to Agency Pasadena CA 91107 4.5 acres estimated at$60,000/year Limited experience in - partial portion of Western development, redevelopment, (626)795-5522 Estimated development cost Security Bank property for Memo utility users tax roller hockey facility $6,750,000, including land facility management (from Business Plan-7/15/96 Other benefits: and Jim Williams) - City of Arcadia Water property for facility(land - Arcadia hotels and Start-4 months; complete-4- exchange) restaurants would benefit 6 months later from weekend tournaments - Equity financing from investors and construction/ - Provides recreation and take out loans employment for Arcadia youth -- 2. Anza Management 41,500 sq. ft., 2-story office Property is owned by Sales tax to City-none Anza has managed 20,000 Don and Robert Johnson building on 2.13 acres or Johnsons, vacant and cleared anticipated apartments and 1 million sq. ft. 2280 University Drive 60,000 sq. ft., 3-story office of commercial Newport Beach CA 92660 building with parking structure Financing by Johnsons and Tax increment to Agency- on 2.13 acres construction/take out loans $40,000 to$55,000/year Don Johnson has developed (714)645-1422 residential and industrial Estimated development cost: Nominal utility users tax properties $4,500,00 to$6,000,000 including land (staff estimate) Other benefits: Start 18-24 months; complete - Provides potential 7-9 months later employment to Arcadia rt r residents rt 0 d! N Gea---fS ' «� ���►: e� STAFF REPORT o aa R+ots� DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT October 7, 1997 TO: Arcadia Redevelopment Agency FROM: (\ By: Peter P. Kinnahan, Economic Development Administrator 44/Prepared by: Dale R. Connors, Redevelopment Project Manager RE: Report requesting direction for a proposed development by ICD/Heateflex of a 18,000 Sq. Ft. instrumentation office on one (1) acre of the existing remnant parcel owned by Emkay Development Co. located at East Santa Clara Street , west of Fifth Avenue SUMMARY: Agency staff is seeking direction from the Agency Board concerning a proposed development on the remnant parcel owned by Emkay Development Co. (Emkay). A portion of the Northside Project Parcel E (Location Map, Attachment No. 1) has been approved by the Agency for development as an Extended Stay America hotel. The final disposition of the remaining portion of Parcel E (the "Remnant Parcel") remains uncertain. Staff has received a proposal by ICD/Heateflex (ICD) to develop the Remnant Parcel as a 18,000 Sq. Ft. instrumentation office and assembly facility. Before spending time and Agency resources pursuing this proposal, staff is requesting Agency direction on whether to proceed to a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Emkay and ICD like the Agency did with Extended Stay America and Emkay. Staff _is recommending such approval. DISCUSSION: In July, Agency staff was approached by Bruce Kusada of Capital Real Estate Group. Mr. Kusada represents ICD. ICD is interested in developing an 18,000 square foot office and production (assembly) facility on the .95 acre triangular Remnant Parcel. Their intent is to construct a "showcase" building which will serve as a corporate symbol. Attachment No. 2 is the proposed site plan and elevations. ICD makes and markets liquid and gas heating systems. These systems are used in industrial processes where temperature control and purity are essential parts of the manufacturing process. fi- v.e_d _ LASER IMAGED P�' . • The proposed use appears to fall within allowable uses in the CPD Zone and is allowable under the terms of the February 18, 1997 DDA between Emkay, Extended Stay America (ESA) and the Agency. ICD needs the Agency's agreement to allow the assignment of development rights under the November 17, 1987 DDA and approval to construct their facility as shown in Attachment No. 2 by a reasonable date to be determined. ICD will also need to obtain a Conditional Use Permit. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Development of Parcel E for office and office related uses, as allowed under the CPD Zone and as proposed by ICD, was analyzed and approved as part of the Emkay Mixed-Use Commercial Project (Northside Project) Environmental Impact Report. This EIR was approved and certified by the Agency on November 17, 1987. Additional environmental review and approval has been granted for development of this site, as proposed, in the Program EIR for the Central Redevelopment Project Area and the East Huntington Drive EIR, dated July 9, 1973 and December, 1980 respectively. FISCAL IMPACT: Agency staff anticipates only minor costs in accommodating the ICD request. The DDA required to assign the development rights will be substantially the same as that for the recently completed Extended Stay America hotel on the other portion of Parcel E. The costs will primarily be for the Agency Special Counsel to draft, review and approve documents facilitating the assignment and should not exceed $5,000. ICD has been requested and has agreed to pay the Agency a non-refundable administrative and assignment fee of $5,000 to cover the Agency's document preparation expenses. RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency preliminarily authorize , upon receipt of $5,000 from ICD, staff to prepare a Restated and Amended Disposition and Development Agreement between the Agency, Emkay Development Co. and ICD/Heateflex to permit the development of the .95 acre Remnant Parcel as an 18,000 square foot office and assembly facility. Approved: Wit William R. Kelly, Executive Director DRC:dc e-' . LOCATION MAP ICD/HEATFLEX DEVELOPMENT , X00 RTH T JOHNSON �/` Q >O \ 0 C! �( / NO SCALE U O I Q M J /9 �/ / u_ ti } `2 /10j ui PROPOSED E CITY OF ARCADIA ICD/HEATFLEX Q (SAINT JOSEPH ST.WATER PLANT) PROPOSED TA HOTELNDED BUILDING 0 z 0 U W z \ WESTERN SECURITY BANK PAR L E , E. SANTA CLARA STREET 1 ( \ \ 9197 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 1