HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 15, 1999.
;'v
' ,_..---
~ ~
~ A N N 0 T A T E D •
A G E N D A
Arcadia City Councii
and
Redevelopment Agency
Meeting
^~^
June 15, 1999
6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers Conference Room
ACTION
ROLL CALL: Council Members Harbicht, Kovacic, Marshall, Roncelli and Chandler All present
1. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO
ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (NON-PUBLIC HEARING/ FIVE MINUTE
TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) RE: 6:00 P.M. SESSION. No one spoke
2. CLOSED SESSION
a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to confer with City labor
negotiators Carol Przybycien, Dan Cassidy and William Kelly regarding
Teamsters Local 911, APWEA, AFFA, APOA, Management and RECESSED Co Closed
non-represented employees. RECONVEriEV i~~cne~~
Council Chmbrs. at
7:00 p.m. 7:00 pm.
Council Chambers
INVOCATION Reverend Roger Sonnenberg, Our Saviour Lutheran Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Don Penman, Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director
ROLL CALL: Council Members Harbicht, Kovacic, Marshall, Roncelli and Chandler
3. PRESENTATION to Marco, the Arcadia Police Department K-9. officer Robin
K-9 Roy
4. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING
AGENDA ITEMS.
5. QUESTIONS FROM CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS.
MOTION: Read all Ordinances and Resolutions by title only and waive
reading in fuli.
All nresent
Adams.
Letourneau &
None
None
Ad~ted 5-0
.. .. . Y`.. .
. • . ~ , ~ ~
6. PUBLIC HEARING
ACTION
a. Report and recommendation to approve zone change Z-99-002 from eub. Hrg. SCnosed
CPD-1 (Commercial Planned Development) to C-M (Commercial/ T~~
Manufacturing) on the property at 324 N. Second Avenue.
b. Re ort and recommendation to ado t Resolution No. 6119, A ResolutionPub. xrg. closea
p p Res. 6119 Adopted
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, Califomia, adopting a budget for 5-0
fiscal year 1999-2000 and appropriating the amount specified therein as
expenditures from the funds indicated and approving in concept a
spending plan for 2000-2001.
Report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6118, A Resolution Adopted S-0
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, adopting a Capital
Improvement and Equipment Acquisition Program for fiscal years
1999-2000 through 2003-2004.
Pub. Hrg. Closed
c. Report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6112, A RBSOIUtIOIIRes. 6112 Adopted
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, setting city water rates 5-0
and finding the rates will not exceed the estimated amount necessary to fund
operation of the city water system.
d: Report and recommendation to adopt Ordinance No. 2107, An Ordinance P"a. 2i ~ aopcea
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, amending Section 2696 5-0
of Chapter 6, Article II of the Arcadia Municipal Code relating to the sewer
service charge.
Pub. Hrg. Closed
e. Report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6114, A R2SOIUlIOII Res. 6114 Ado~coa
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, setting service rates
for the collection of residential refuse and recyclables pursuant to section
5120.7 of the Arcadia Municipal Code.
Pub. Hrg Closed
f. Report and recommendation to introduce Ordinance No. 2106, An Ord. 2106 Intro.
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, adopting 5-0
the 1997 Uniform Building Code, 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code, 1997
Uniform Plumbing Code, 1997 Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Uniform
Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, 1997 Uniform Code for Building
Conservation, 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings
and 1996 National Electric Code with changes, additions and deletions
thereto, and amending Article VIII, "Building Regulations".
Report and recommendation to introduce Ordinance No. 2108, An Ord.2108 Intro.
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, adopting 5-0
the Uniform Fire Code, 1997 Edition, with changes, additions, and deletions
thereto, the Fire Code Standards and amending various sections of Divisions
1,3,4 and 5 of Chapter I of Articie III of the Arcadia Municipal Code relating
to Fire Prevention and Public Safety.
2
1 •. /
8.
9.
• •
ACTION
TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO
ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(NON-PUBLIC HEARING/FIVE MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON~. None
MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS
City Council Reports/Announcements/Statements/Future Agenda Items see Minuces
CITY CLERK
a. Report and recommendation to appoint members to the following Boards A ointment to cne
and Commissions: L rary Boar
postponed. See
Minutes for other
Arcadia Beautiful Commission (3) Planning Commission (1) appointments
Building/Fire Code Appeals Board (5) Recreation Commission (2)
Handicap Accessibility Appeals Board (5) Senior Citizens Commission (5)
Human Resources Commission (1) Sister City Commission (2)
Library Board (1)
10. CONSENT
a. Minutes of the May 18 regular meeting and the May 19, 1999 adjourned Approved 5-0
regular meeting (budget study session).
b. Report and recommendation to accept a monetary gift of $15,000.00 ffOlll Approved 5-0
the Friends of the Arcadia Public Library for the purchase of library materials.
c. Report and recommendation to extend a contract for a twelve (12) month Approved 5-0
period in the amount of $38,872.00 with Sheldon Mechanical for
maintenance of the citywide heating, ventilation and air conditioning system.
d. Report and recommendation to ratify an emergency purchase order in the Approved 5-0
amount of $48,877.53 to Leatherwood Construction Company for the
replacement of a 24" water mainline valve at Baldwin Avenue and
Foothill Boulevard and to authorize an additional appropriation of $49,000.00
from the Water Reserve Fund to pay for this work.
e. Report and recommendation to accept a corner cut-off dedication for Approved s-o
Parcel Map No. 25184 for a two-from-one lot split for single-family
residential purposes at 1209 S. Fourth Avenue.
f. Report and recommendation to approve Final Map No. 52319 for an Approved 5-0
11-unit residential condominium project at 461 Fairview Avenue.
' ' ' ~ ~
Consent continued ACTION
g. Report and recommendation to approve Final Map No. 52880 for a Approved 5-0
six-lot single-family residential subdivision at 1028-1036 S. First Avenue.
h. Report and recommendation to award a contract to All American Asphalt Approved 5-0
in the amount of $244,947.35 for the rehabilitation of Colorado Street
from Michillinda Avenue to Colorado Boulevard.
Report and recommendation to amend the City's Banking Services Approved 5-0
Agreement with Sanwa Bank for an extension of one year from January 1,
2000 to December 31, 2000.
Report and recommendation to authorize an agreement with Liebert, Anoroved s-o
Cassidy and Frierson for labor relations and personnel legal services for
fiscal year 1999-2000.
k. Report and recommendation for authorization to enter into a contract with Adopted 5-0
Unified Vina Food Corporation dba. Nutri-Meals to provide luncheon meals
for Senior Citizens at the Arcadia Community Center from July 1, 1999 -
June 30, 2000.
Report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6115, A Resolution naopcea s-o
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, establishing an
appropriation limit for the fiscal year 1999-2000 pursuant to article III-B
of the California Constitution.
m. Report and recommendation to renew the Pasadena Humane Society Approved 5-0
contract for animal control services from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000.
n. Report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6113, A Resolution Aaoncea 5-0
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, establishing
compensation and related benefits for management employees for the
1999-2000 and 2000-2001 fiscal years.
Report and recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6123, A Resolution naopcea 5-0
of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, establishing
compensation and related benefits for employees represented by the
Arcadia Firefighters' Association for the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 fiscal years.
11. CITY MANAGER
a. Report and recommendation to approve the size and location of two (2)
stairway/elevator towers on the front fa~ade at Santa Anita Park.
~rn +a~ai ~`? f
location of.towers
3-1.. Kovacic no
Roncelli abstains
A.pprove 4-0 Counci
to have final re-
view of design.
Roncelli abstain:
,, , .
r.. ~I '4. ~ • ~ . •
12. CITY ATTORNEY ACTION
a. Report and recommendation to introduce Ordinance No. 2109, An Introduced 5-0
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, changing
the zoning from C-1 (Limited Commercial) and PR-1 (Single-Family Residential
with a parking overlay) to C-2 (General Commercial) on the property
located at 188 W. Las Tunas Drive.
b. Report and recommendation to adopt Ordinance No. 2105, An Ad~o ted 4-o with
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, deleting Roncelli abstaining
Sections 9273.1.1, 9273.1.7, and 9273.1.17 of the Arcadia Municipal
Code relating to permitted uses in the S-1 Zone.
ADJOURN City Council to July 6, 1999 at 6:00 p.m.
ADJOURNED at 9:35 p.m.
5
7 Q-9 r7
/-4 v A C- Ss;vey'
oA•
"° ATo• STAFF REPORT
MAINTENANCE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
June 15, 1999
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Pat Malloy, Public Works Services Director h
Prepared by: Bryan E. Boeskin, Management Analyst
SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO EXTEND A CONTRACT FOR A
TWELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,872.00 WITH
SHELDON MECHANICAL FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE CITYWIDE
HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM (HVAC)
SUMMARY:
In June of 1996, the Southern California Gas Company was retained to perform a citywide
energy audit and evaluate the existing Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning System
(HVAC). The audit findings resulted in the HVAC Energy Management Retrofit project
which significantly upgraded the system. These major system modifications required staff
to reevaluate the current HVAC maintenance practices and service specifications. Staff
developed a comprehensive HVAC preventive maintenance contract which includes a
detailed scope-of-work, listing all equipment with planned maintenance schedules and
performance ratings. All applicable certifications and Air Quality Management District
(AQMD) testing was also incorporated in the contract.
The initial term of the HVAC maintenance contract was seventeen (17) months with a
provision for two (2), one (1) year renewals contingent upon satisfactory performance. The
existing contractor has successfully demonstrated satisfactory performance during the
initial term of the agreement.
Staff recommends that the City Council award a Twelve (12) month HVAC Maintenance
contract extension with Sheldon Mechanical in the amount of$38,872.00 for Fiscal Year
1999/00.
DISCUSSION:
Currently, the Building Maintenance Section is responsible for day-to-day operation and
basic troubleshooting of the City facilities' HVAC system. The contractor is responsible for
system repairs and performing a detailed preventive maintenance schedule that is outlined
in the contract scope-of work. The contract provides for systematic scheduling and
consolidation of maintenance tasks for multiple departments and facilities. The detailed
preventive maintenance schedule minimizes the incidence of service duplication and the
necessity for unscheduled maintenance repair services. Reductions in annual HVAC
LASS
maintenance costs are already evident and are expected to continue over the long term.
Pending City Council approval, the renewal of the HVAC maintenance contract with
Sheldon Mechanical will be effective July 1,1999. {t/
� e/ e�o �l;.' Zr
Mayor and City Council
June 15, 1999
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the 1999/00 operating budget to cover the costs
of this contract extension. The contract amount for this twelve (12) month period is
$38,872.00.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
Award a one (1) year contract extension with Sheldon Mechanical Corporation in the
amount of $38,872.00 for maintenance of the citywide Heating, Ventilation and Air
Conditioning System for fiscal year 1999/2000.
PM:DM:BB:ds
Approved: . W\A"(
William R. Kelly, City Manager
•
•
��<;,, •r f_/eva~i• %aurr ; a
exdAD A •
� rsr STAF ' REPORT
ORPORATLO
June-15, 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Don Penman, Deputy City Manager/Development Services Directpr�'
By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrate
SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE SIZE
AND LOCATION OF TWO STAIRWAY/ELEVATOR TOWERS
PROPOSED ON THE FRONT FACADE AT SANTA ANITA PARK
SUMMARY
Santa Anita Park is proposing to renovate the grandstand area of Santa Anita
Park that will include a new deck to accommodate a restaurant near the top of
the stands. To provide vertical circulation to the restaurant, two stairway and
elevator towers are proposed on the front façade of the grandstand area.
Because the towers will affect the exterior elevation of the southerly grandstand
façade, the City Council is being requested to approve the location and
architectural design.
The Development Services Department is recommending that the City Council
approve the size and location of the towers and that the exterior elevations of tie
towers be enhanced subject to final approval by the City Council.
DISCUSSION
The proposed restaurant and bar area to be located in the grandstand will ha\e
approximately 25,000 sq. ft. of area with seating in the restaurant for
approximately 1,000 guests.
As noted in the attached memo from Santa Anita (Exhibit A), the need for vertical
circulation and the unique nature of the restaurant have resulted in the design of
two stairways and elevator towers. The towers are approximately 45' square and
84'+ in height. Both towers are adjacent to the edge of the corners of the terrace,
out of the way of the garden area. As noted, the towers have been placed o
align with the west grandstand. Future development will incorporate the towers
into a grand master plan that will allow the towers to serve both the existing
grandstand and any future development.
Towers — Santa Anita
LASER 9 11,n7gune 15, 1999
Page 1
/2/ ,
The west tower flanks the existing main entry and has been located to preserve
the existing art deco façade. According to the applicant, due to the width of the
terrace the tower will be far enough away from the south wall that the entry
façade will not be impinged upon by the tower.
Design
The towers will be stucco painted to match the existing grandstands and are
designed to be compatible with the existing building. Stair landings will be
"open", e.g. exposed to the weather, with railings to match the pattern of
surrounding fences and rails. The parapets have cap molding details found
elsewhere at the top termination of walls on the existing buildings. Colored
renderings will be presented to the City Council at the meeting.
The Development Services Department has some concerns with the overall
design of the towers. Although the towers will be painted to match the building
and have incorporated some of the design elements of the existing buildings, it is
staffs opinion that more architectural treatment is necessary to provide a balance
with the existing structures.
Due to the very condensed time frame under which Santa Anita is working, the
City Council may wish to consider allowing Santa Anita to proceed with the
towers from a structural standpoint and allow their architect time to work on more
architectural enhancements. This would permit Santa Anita to continue with the
tower work, thus not delaying the project, while requiring them to provide for
improved design.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
No discretionary approvals are required from the City and as a result this project
is considered Ministerial per Section 15268(b)(1) of the CEQA guidelines.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department is recommending that the City Council
approve the overall size and location of the towers and instruct the applicant to
add enhancements to the exterior elevations (to be returned to the City Council
for final review and approval).
Towers — Santa Anita
June 15, 1999
Page 2
ACTION
The City Council should move to approve the size and location of the towers
subject to the condition that Santa Anita continue to work with the
Development Services Department to enhance the exterior elevations of the
towers to incorporate more elements of the existing buildings and that said
final design shall be presented to the City Council for final review and
approval.
Attachments: Exhibit A— Memo from Santa Anita
Approved:
William R. Kelly, City Manager
Towers — Santa Anita
June 15, 1999
Page 3
May 27. 1999 - Santa Anita Grandstand Renovation Narrative
The renovation of the Santa Anita Grandstand, in the City of Arcadia, California will
result in the adaptive re-use of the eastern stands. A new deck is being built to carry a
very special restaurant near the top of the stands. The width of the restaurant is very
nearly the same as that of the eastern portion of the existing bleachers. The new deck
steps down three times toward the north to provide sight lines to the track. The
restaurant's unique features include what may be the longest bar in California.
The restaurant will have a capacity of approx. 1,000 guests. There will be two exhibition
cook stations and two exhibition pastry kitchens. Behind the gently bending bar there
will be a dance floor. Dining and bar area is nearly 25,000 square feet combined.
The kitchen will be housed in a new addition perched above the existing Terrace at the
eastern end of the grandstand. The kitchen will sit on its own structural system consisting
of new columns placed between existing columns at the edge of the Terrace roof The
kitchen will be clad to match the adjacent walls. The existing decorative Santa Anita
Horse Friezes and louvers will be re-used and set into furred out panels with radiused
ends in the new kitchen wall. This will blend the new structure with the existing
grandstand's architectural character.
The need for vertical circulation and the unique nature of the restaurant have resulted in
the design of two nearly identical stairway and elevator towers. Each tower has three
high-speed traction elevators. In the east tower there are only two stops; one at grade and
one at the restaurant level. In the west tower there are three stops; one at grade and one at
the restaurant level and one at the mezzanine level. Elevator access to the mezzanine
enhances the facility's accessibility.
•
The towers are designed to be compatible with the existing building. The primary finish
material will be stucco painted to match the existing grandstands. Stair landings are
exposed to the weather with railings to match the pattern of surrounding fences and rails.
A pleasing arrangement of geometric reveals will give the skin the detail it needs to fit in
seamlessly with the body of the original building. The parapets will repeat cap molding
details found elsewhere at the top termination of walls on the existing building.
Given that ownership has extensive and ambitious plans for Santa Anita Park in the near
future, the elements in this phase have been designed to be compatible with the needs of
the current project as well as potential future development. The largest and most
noticeable part of the work will be the stair/elevator towers. Their design compliments
•
\
the existing facility by using finishes and details already in use throughout the park.
There are a variety of existing roofs and building volumes clustered about the Turf Club
that crehte the kind of vitally complex environment into which the towers can be
successfully inserted. The towers, at roughly 45' square, have minimum impact on the
beautifully landscaped walking ring courtyard. Both towers hug the edge of the Terrace
at the corners, so as to be out of the way of the beaux-arts garden. To also be compatible
with plans for the near future at the racetrack, the towers have been placed to align with
the west grandstand. Future development will incorporate the towers into a grand master
plan which will allow the towers to serve both the existing grandstand and future
development. The placement of the west stair tower, flanking the existing main entry is
intended to preserve the existing art deco façade. Due to the width of the terrace the
tower will be far enough away from the south wall that the familiar entry façade will not
be impinged upon by the tower, and the tower will add emphasis to the main entry. In the
future. additional development will continue to emphasize this area as the "grand entry"
into Santa Anita Park, and the stair tower is placed so that it can be incorporated into new
structures with little revision.
Because the stair towers are intended to serve both existing and future development, they
set the outside limits of any development to be constructed. By placing them at the far
limits of the east grandstand, a balanced circulation is created which reinforces the
existing ingress/egress pattern while creating the maximum distance between circulation
elements for future development.
In summary, the addition of the towers and the kitchen will fit in harmoniously with the
existing horse racing facility, the towers will emphasize and reinforce the existing entry
and exit points, future development is accommodated, and the east grandstand will be
elevated to a new level of service and elegance which is expected in a modern sporting
venue.
•
•
•
6). -z
STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
June 15, 1999
•
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Don Penman, Deputy City Manager/Development Services Director
By: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator
SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE ZONE
CHANGE Z-99-002 FROM CPD-1 (COMMERCIAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT) TO C-M (COMMERCIAUMANUFACTURING)
ON THE PROPERTY AT 324 NORTH SECOND AVENUE.
SUMMARY
Zone change Z-99-002 was initiated by Donald and Robert Johnson to change
the zoning on the property at 324 North Second Avenue from CPD-1
(Commercial Planned Development) to C-M (Commercial-Manufacturing) -
The Planning Commission at its April 27 meeting voted 4 to 0 with one member
absent to recommend approval of this zone change to the City Council.
BACKGROUND
On February 2, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution 6101 amending the
General Plan designation on this property from Mixed Use Commercial/Multiple
Family (MU C/MF) to Mixed Use Commercial/Industrial (MU C/I).
In its findings, the Council noted that the property is distinct in character and
physically isolated from other commercial parcels in the same general area. It is
surrounded by uses that are generally considered industrial or public use in
nature and that because of the isolated location, changing the General Plan to
Mixed Use Commercial/Industrial, does not set a precedent that could be applied
elsewhere within the City.
DISCUSSION
The property is currently zoned CPD-1 which is consistent with the General Plan
Designation of Mixed Use Commercial/Industrial. Light industrial/manufacturing
zeta-ZC99-002PC Z-99-002—CC Report
June 15, 1999
LASER l" / �
fptp Ird U� � A 1-/
uses that are clearly compatible with commercial uses permitted in this zone are
allowed with an approved Conditional Use Permit. However, the issue raised is
whether or not this site is really an appropriate site for the CPD-1 zone. The
CPD-1 zone is
"intended to promote appropriate commercial land uses and to encourage
the highest possible quality of design and environment to coordinate
developments on adjacent parcels of property in order to achieve a
functionally and visually integrated development."
Because of the unique location of this site, the purpose of the CPD-1 zoning as
set forth above is difficult to apply to this property.
During the past year, the applicant has been exploring the possibility of a public
storage facility that would be aesthetically pleasing and architecturally
compatible with other commercial developments in the area. A public storage
facility is not a permitted use in the CPD-1 zone.
The applicant is requesting a change in the CPD-1 zoning designation to C-M
(Commercial-Manufacturing). The C-M zoning designation allows more flexibility
in the types of uses permitted including any use permitted in the C-2 zone;
wholesale businesses, storage buildings and warehouses. In addition, the C-M
zone allows certain light manufacturing uses as identified in the zoning
regulations. _
The C-M zone is consistent with the new General Plan designation because light
industrial uses including warehousing and storage facilities are permitted in the
C-M zone and are consistent with the Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial (MU C/I)
General Plan land use designation.
As noted in the Johnson's application, this property has some unique
characteristics that are not typical to most sites in the City. The uses
surrounding the site are predominantly industrial (the Edison sub station and the
City water tanks) or public use in nature (the 210 Freeway overpass and the
flood control channel).
Although staff does not normally encourage what sometimes is referred to as
"spot" zoning, it is very clear that the subject parcel is physically isolated and
distinct in character from the other developable parcels in the same general
area. Because of the isolated location, changing the zoning should not set a
precedent that could be applied elsewhere.
zcna-ZC99-002PC Z-99-002—CC Report
R v June 15, 1999
Page 2
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION
The site is located within the Redevelopment area. The City's Economic
Development Administrator, notes in a memo to staff that the parcel is
"landlocked" and would be difficult to develop for a typical commercial retail or
office project. A C-M use is more realistic and marketable. "However, because
of the hotels in the area a high quality design compatible with the hotels should
be required" for any future development.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed
zone change. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially
substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area
affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient
noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the
record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any
potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the
wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this
zone change.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends that the zoning designation
for the subject site be changed to C-M (Commercial-Manufacturing).
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
If the City Council intends to take action to approve this zone change, the
Council should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration and
direct staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance for adoption at a later
meeting.
Attachments: Exhibit A — Land Use and Zoning Map
Exhibit B —Aerial of subject site and area
Environmental Documents
Approved by: v'^"'
William R. Kelly, City Manager
zeta-ZC99-002PC Z-99-002—CC Report
June 15, 1999
Page 3
•
•
_ I
i
•
.273 9 b4 8 9 " \ _ _=I _th1 _S'I - _I r :.I r. , 51 12: �b. ._I3 -
$I o \3,:7;.,-,
• 1 ,,1 .-1 .•1 .• 1 .' 1 ..-, 1,4 I,,, a y
:'�+ Lr.: L fiSSl �yva.(ca�o, B 1 -•i^ ,e°,1_-I �a,A an) u„v%„"2'J1 I 1 1 a,sl .rrd"
,x=.57!__ 3 0375_-_"�)GV :Ss.. ,l a 4,c rSt /°o• Ibo; 1r� I I]arl (]vd I 7J'�fblIT ;+ • .'
I Ity `. Ix� I s3. r�+ay r :o, u.,.' y•� L.:•.. .'v-^
NEWMA AVE" ,3- JEWMAN
oVIlJp.: 1) . a' f ne. 1 :3 S343: SD sax .i,3. S:.G: e,
4% II of 10 qqu.:', ;NI L�a, CJr ,.J (SOd11 �6,cJ� am) tyGJ } alol (sSO� (J.u' :•e� .::.�"(ticJ mfr I
9�'s o9n '-i- f o ; V °' v I , .s 9' I o r e n .J
�a).r,ar ti . Par} of'.� Lor 5 = r t '1`• t c .a _ _ 1 _ r C �� "1r
yq+cam .•.��5e-� ( Ti .+19.'?? 30 31 r 32= 33 r 34 " 35 ' 3.: 37 55- 59 P
°e ,e/" P 571 \ 1 J
r� /� 2\ ,�r „I3: 14 +- I x SD SD r x .9,. s .. `'t
\ 2.5/7°` 1] �\ iow i. a • c. v :a I^ +0 3:�u ]e in 5:55 7b 1:5 30 Irl
ai' 7\ c' 1 i6 77 T l 75 741 731, 72 v71 II I 1
\� o , 1 a r 1 1 1 i0 69I r
= f
r,�r J _\ °.�. , R 1 I` r{ I r�1 C I r 1
`�. �```.\. `y� .=\ ��Y - ": 1 1 r I 11 M.B. 2 23-14 r15
-t!I� \1..1.11•. " .� (.17: � ( ) I (FL r I—(]z l7_...1 (3S).- (]3„ r] !'I r,l,V I A
\ 1 7111! JL .,v SS 5g2..+,•_S �.+r^:!
� '�\ COLORADO BLVD.
:'f U.. SO Su ��fl�+v/ 1''c • 00.)a GO co co GO co
:41 (.:41 (/3,/ (..(-01 !]0 \ (.'/zl,1' 1 1' y rzza! /73/3/ (:lal (N]J r]k/ f„il
. a0'
`-.7p 1 - 3 V d
ISO G .;- 77 ..``.7.5• r-.. � N \�. 1' r- - .. I ESID Et4TI L' 9
^rU r 240.;25 7 \ 2\ '` - '�,. 14 o„ �J- 1 r� (\ -
:9 SD ;el. S_ :K SD SO..1 c•. r' \ - \ eJ. l rl ..
1' F
u-uvnro �.___� _. ' D`. 15 • c coo 0. a co GO
,. 5J Sr SO S: SD 5� ,\ i`. Gy
�� o c 1G ' J 12`j J I
ME NDUSTRIAl3 US�S6 1a\� � ' i7 a 11
ri •� ',•IT . So.. c. - M.B. Ze9"21(77
t
��\f
L.5..1141478-r 277 . y �..�.\,..\ e .. ~'r 13
F{ 1 Q 0 r tI �e; . '`e•
rs/ r.r/I W./ s/ //S/ Of, r$3/ rr./1, '' .,` -o ��, \ . `\ 0IE , °3 coe (��
LA PORTE STREET h :,o ',..\3' \
5T , 2rO
.`..7 SD SO SO SD SO SO SO '. 4� \ \ `\ • 23
,4) (.w, X/ Alt, r L (..a, rr.: �u-'
z:, '' w a SUB . C .S`_. � 9F � G,
ApX IiRI �ST�1 lit S PRQPE�T 2
J ��
9 '
co r h Q �./ S�(� .
GO SO 54 SO pr I SD do .3, f "7\�\``
a (vAC AT fD D./1231$ 0 ._.J -
J r1 ♦` ro :13.: s.'1 O13c • z
t 0 •',,
7 V bo 9 10 11 12 'o- 1- 1.1' W17 1. W
_',. `\ l,o ( a o4 L07 7 •
P rt ?e
c ., .
._ ,....es,
.: '(i V SO ].� ' ,: SD ,ere ' ,a 95.10 J,
ST. JOSEPH STREET t ST i P E. So \ �i9a1 ° L.
.0 d r/ a o' I A O 0.t 1 (So. ( 3or'.gr 9'4 8 �`'•� rJ'I f
MIXeDIN 1 STRI 4.1M9 2WL ER ANKS " ,I0 20 lie_ z7 1 zo _ 5$ �L� . �\
' i \`�� LOT I (Part t )t. z
w `� �
\
74 3o w I ac a4 3r 357.21
A N I TA �� m M ` :....: :... . . .. .:.:•: .. \ .
• Land Use and Zoning Map
324 North Second Avenue I"NORTH
Z-99-002 Scale: 1 inch=200 feet
EXHIBIT A • _
..
anuanv ,�f�Z U1 I0N17Zr �o 1I01�L'DO1 _ J - •
_a_ 1' ! tii:+ { •,,.rT'' �,� •,i„Sr�.�l. ) CJ ,J.•, S t J+ t I . • �- .•, .s,1.� N WW.rr
r . V4 r' Z•4,":"...t."""
. T'•.�; '.3 : .s3 �.•/,� „ ` :) 4 . 'L1 +.g.. r�r;�` x l Vt ••:. - a r :7: a}a.+ ,r ,i '- - y��* !i's cir I' 1 r •'1 r,.: ,p .t!.a :j'. e.%,. lq -yt�^ !?�'�`*r.+• I � i '7r ' }Cr•- .. • t �T� 4r y kV+' .,1•. -L _ ;-r. .-J_ .b / .,; • : y 1.R,;, i,'? 4�.(' 1rL +!''4r' Jf .r' `.` 'L Y 4iG'lY.. - y; u fk�'. ...•• ./ �;-? r, i °; �;s - t�
•• n,,' ,-1 ,-t--:. 4{=:::-.••••.rItt. :i J! 1-'� ) t7 t ' .r�r'r} r)p. , y! ,a > F z'� t :krj°_ �:Lq{ s r t S -
_? .1, ?,1: �_�. rt T. 11 !�''-<"'. , 8r�', ---,9,..,•-•. :-.-, 1 ;.7' - j'.: t.-. .!t �Af ' t• �U'. �r,.J� f si'•rs 4.•::',11--.:r.., •e !re , 1" {t F. lc-t- ^t"' .1;•) ry* ;i 1,..,..,d.- r. '' , -' e.,J •. �. 7f_ 3f.!•`,� 6 a8.�-.;JS er" ° ''�•-r, .. 1 .�:D3. Z.,..!.,.-1,: • ar,...0 ii 1 7 sJ�ya..'!'" ��^ -,i'= €•• u%0• •"•i yl.r..,,IT'-- w_.�''{` r`�- ; `, ;',4.'
A. ' l ' N >•
• f .•'s }' n . . ..._..1 {R . ,. t. a s. ^ f A',4 },�jr.. -/ . . t .�c7.., . .i •, .-11;514'57:t3+y
�(":ter -r. 3 1j" ti� ,_ �a t••• .t�..e 1.+ rc,` .r.•r `�,.KrY• :� 3 °v, •C'.'' •n'' '' �, 1t.;', r`_` k'!t 7 :r ':17'x+
i fL 3 1 •tls •F' a-IN... a•' f: -i�'`"'t.,� 1 ;i-el,:'�,.X.-l •' :f f'rr r ,n-�!' - i• rLT,-.)..4Tr t t' '�` s - •'i .1•*ti j .14-,.....7 •).f.\ •(-ate } t I �+ L t •:mil+. t •VS.. ,� t'° ��}y, _e ���"1'y��++ ' r ;'; 3,.� !'•- ,r �: .•!'11-''' •�,=
X r ,ir R F {�• f �" r > IV'1• .J •y;`�} paw" �f//.i• ! t '�. ., OA _ ~•t r J`
= 1Y77 :Er„r�}�� r .i �\ `.,..X:.7.5;:'-‘...`"t P x ./ of.. / -i 1.1":"\\ \ i.Z� - Jx •t�.t'`' I 1
•`:, - w ' -. • � •'�t }£�) -1•_.,r��i„+,1` �Sctti S �',ie �. .;1 , S!', '�fXf fM %/ c ,, } a}: aS �r i7 r'. .. W+�•k., R 1 .•i."'•r+'' �'"=:r^ ! •5: chi 4't 1:�_I" V alt f' .I..ti. / ••iY U" r '• !• �!`°2 a� S'`k�, 7�:: i"a.. y'f
....: •:fi t 'r i• a r,. ,1 r ,,,,0 w,, t' ',.....,:;-..f.':•:;-•.j:•, /1 7 `Y .:�•.%/ rti�uc s °i.11 !:3 ,...;-,s_13,1.1 't.. i r, _ -�:-'-'•
2^ii'i. _ T'" i._.;►At .J...r ,! > l:il� :.1 �s�ta..•-,h.I' ,., • s'�`' ✓, / ..,7r _ ,1i�: K� •-r] '.p.O.:i . ;t y .[+ice4:•
�,�o \ t •S,r.-_^ .�, � ) ( � i s •r•- -. • 4.i' ■r•' .:.,t• r .•1,L•../',!i ,3-\ t -`... 'i r•y`''-.,• I;.'.:1- .'• t!." �t•-f c t.", h•�,.y ,..,1... • ' `fi sr..! ..re .�"•/. _.j.. `+u.�,('i •;, r. til ..-:.,,s:,,•::-It_ s' -...-,
p �o Jr4:~ �'-'v: �w�� ) 1. ;�;'f��.'Q{t•$ ,,S.75,t ! r.-1.. , ::‘,1-‘.:I', .• ,^,,. !i':: ` ,.,Z:�°F.0 rt . .:-Y, t"d�>•^°•', ." fM_�-� n
�-. ' #.11.....`...;!,,,4,,i;t, }''�`.;"• Jfr,! '�' tC i� �`'�„„`^��>�Jr�rii•.?1 5 4 t ,'•. r 11 t".,4r+ . 4,.."-,{ t'i: 1 .,-. - ry 3-•° 's�. } ai, .�+ ■.3 Fy$. -.•
'. •. _ .-t,R!•. {3'. ,,I, L' if -, 's' 4;44,_r 0 ••i j '�•_ • Cr. 'Si /' ,if``: ):: T• r,. '' .,a +i.• i?•,,� i. ,..;.-•;•,.} `fy�!'^S'.,,_.'4.S s"'•
i -u- a 'r,r '. P "•v FFf�'w� ��s.= 't tk ''' �' 'h x.-3`34. =1 n .��''t.�-.r''•,C !
-•r.r,,, •.S'l, .`^Jf'.,�:; .5 ,.t,� ti r .!' �� �gg 1.5�1>,sr_¢ J tc ti-',1�'t` �/r ✓a '>I �7�r -:Li^�•'"'rr.r. �'1 a GS 7..�. 'C,�. ,7,,-F.1.,1 -•i l �' .rw �t 4FJ
,, :. '`(,.•ie'y ,1 -T `,x �, ..4, d.� k.. •' I v-,/- .p+�: • •_as tJ 4 -i�ti Ft- �, '.' ' :. t�r' �_ •• •�`
t ..•z, m• •� ,ti r• r ' :1/ 'p L< �F'4Y,)�+�i%=f" Ste'r^ t' s�'z �,,.✓� f! 'I p, -�t
OA VC:,5 f, +`'f ''•3 +., �. }- i ,•! " 11•-r 4 T •,^'4 r,,-t' i� y 1%-' t., '..- '.-''.t+, .0,1....v•-•-•. ;'S �.. J r%
r •i F t+, r SSI l'S{Lt! 3 f,t, it 0�'. VI N �.. -: >b :,� ,ct'M' r rat,s• - r -. ' 3r C '.,? 3d,#L. - } Y•Y:.' 2... '{•11
J .S'f } a
t t � ,
J � r� 7 +. ir°
, ..z,;•,!, .. ..t. J-.!�.r �' �`�f#t" r7'. 1 a.r:�,.> >, t � 'a' Y, p =.,. t-° '{. :,.1;i 7' :_5�.'�1) � '��
r „>,t . 7a'r', !! � ] }•f ,, �J, J 7`r ,,,..:,..,1.,...,f-.. ,, , r i,•,:_t .t.�^ .-b.-•�Y 1 i'"•' (ar -' 4.i1 ,.
-M., ':i{-Y" '. ''L.�.6 i _ `i,,�jji ;l'�• ;{�ursr. .o.��'(4Y„rf,� .''''''.A1•••' ' •.3 ;.{S, t- 1;^5 7,ta. ,.+M•k t �{� 1? ,�.•t� ri1 C T ! G ft.7`.'•,
_:11 a- 'i f.• r�. r, y A 7 yr e'„ aS'1.,' !.• _ rr "+u :1 r..--..s'I 1j ..-•! ', r:
It .b y 1ti". E r, -.f_.....,.1A4. `5.•, f, t `4'a{ Yr S. .,. *.Ih ^}r�` q:tiC .l ,1 .,, : 17r,' t�.fr x •' a.''S I'S•holw
I •° ' - f=l'-.� }i3i- .i ,f c .•..,.. - . .1 r "-----,- x•: ,'lti", `e•y 't ••• ''to- ';. , y r.'\,7 ii7c.1,_ 'e'-ye - _ 3 5. iL S _ qr
' �• - �-•r.�.A a+S•r.- ]) i� -' ' fix..° • #,..'113 .I -.'-‘ r'?` ' qi+�-?� ;''4. i rn �r i,•. a•-•' t{ A� 1V .Ji {rf-''-='1=-.•n TI r7 s, rl i ! 7 9-'• IP �• ,'' “--' •`t`-S -_.,-.1,-2' ''' ,,,, .•, T7 ov r° ` -•ry :7s�3'�'i• [' Y' �'i+ (� �i.:Ij� _ '
vF',. 1` �/� /Y • '.{' =Sl. .!�" i�S. �'• M., �y,�. -�s ..44..,..-N,,, '{� Y -4.... � � � t�
•�. �, 1 '-+ -, ; -t.s.`k.+�-'�. , .IV t'-•• .L 4141. C, !_...'"+V %' 'efit•%,;;,.t...-.•..! V,:-,..,•';',4,:=4-..-II, ` -\ _�
_wa,} -,L.IM 1('Y
II! !:;kiii 'i r•Arri � `Vt - 4 t'i .,`. „...,1:.:---•-‘ 'K'�• .`' ar ;+ « �,i .f` :t
`S�'�ie �� ..,'`.'7,„7, s' ,., • j j"r V rJ F 7:41,i IP 'j )�.._ � 1�, g . . 3 ,.1 ��L (i,y a .. tom,;,�'*.� ,., c� i.,$: e''','''- I -`/ 1st:// JkT. 1`M 1 y'��'F�� _ "Y�' lam` `r, ... -• J: >r ,.., 1.�R:•,�v ,1.�.kf 1 p �l
{._ •T7_ • ill E j',k„7f:3=rs •F�'• .:.r,."' y..• 1Y • y � , . V} ' "'..
j4 ; v.I.TI - �. +' C.7F" _ .. ., , ,, :iit'� ?.',. s`•a,\' '.jam,G y, . 1� i'R r �'v £� „.ii. \•.r +'' %Q°�'+ s` � ` i r tr? F't�r t�=�>' Lea.` 4e°�<s L .fr��.l��.
s ' '.y rY ! �! '(,�J �j )i sky s4 _._J1 k-t..*]`+er '4 1...t t'.9.�°y It �F, �t r .' �_':�•�1.
' III ;!' r,> - - - �, 1---'_ • ._ �j i
�y�Y'�' ^C _ _ "�-_�.'1°;:'��1 ,t .7y w. _ � .-.'J. f:� a= 3.I a °?Iv~. �1, : •�'�'.°? :?.., b• '.1 (LI-J :.'.
ia; t• 'i �I' '. ,-.'` �`• 't3i �f 9-, 4 ,,-- ) �^4ti:c/. •('I�?!o ,J r 4 br4$dd/Onr • ;s4. �t !
, '''�'' - !� 1� • l! <.- .;�.> t.� J ( � �•C•.._ it ':>;�i-'A.',d : atil. -:.._ -t'�9. I 1 I I •�iY�=,,;_ _\.ti ,c% .l ( .,.- +i 'I! '+ - it 1• : 1i '; - T •-' 1 -,:;.•,''..T*, tAE$F' , j 0 '�l r7w,a•3 i�ti�, U'r� -'t A: . :( 6`--. `��a._.'=..K _ _ - ,i - a : ,, .C` (u -a i „ ,R '^;. = '= 1� i. ;/� { ]�`M�'4;.,a _ ���'-..' v r a:-L�'r.. '\∎:Ii t / _ S1'a.�- ..?.P�: 7 .'y-..;� .-•`r : ` �.... }==,;�f ,Y� - iaa/( ;1 ,j " ✓ ~J ; . �- \t` `-�:CAr ]' i`L"','yS�A-at�sG -.� + 1 ,fie. •- .- ;1 R j I,; f .) ! 7i ._.' ..5,'r�, ,:,1:: j ' 1 !r,s• • r f ,• � {` >~r.z. t ,'7,'Q(, .. jlC'- r. i• a,..• . .-0 .-..2. _ r�„�t- • \� L., ^;? r.r.^'F,:_t``. .. 4
7 :_- .�'r'l+ '1. -r^ip � - ,• :f 7r l:i:• tt- {; _s,,,t����2L � �1'�., -L- 1% .j ,•. ,._ � f1 sear: _. ,•e•. _ `.I . tyyy .f, _ _ n :xa r , � rt''''':)t,-` `• 'i:: .fit ,4 .--: •y�: !:s.� ., ' f y,r' .s `.�1.A�•rb�. .7...�, n r •,y.. .Ear.?4'.�r:� E.. t._ rte.)•.`';'.. i 3' �,:_u� _:'�+r-;., %y:•_ w�_ ••zs .1a •�.i� �-rr` S -!f' 1'fi.�.�' t. `t�.,r 'd;. �.: �1���.. � tY• r fL�r lt.!i`J,`,•!{� �`F `<a ,•� j,�,'_ 'J riC. .3LYy-: _ - � a•: , ,. _ .- a��y`�*`a• p:� •..�•„•,--.- s,�. •�.�,�j•'F a.t• �yM�►�� i<,`.�'��f+•��t''�I•�fb'�yd}+�"`4 .{"'',�.'�,,,t'...._3,•;!..1-�t J•
r....-.d. ,�_'',:.` )'_ •• '- ,, ', `f`Gh..i..-3• ., 't,,., ' '•'fir•ti,.0"-� r .-'' °x'' .r'� s 'S Z.'• .: ?"'p• J� L-3* ,w' :L t� r. °,) r•1T?•?..•
....,,}�";r�_�Ii-r +y i
w File No.: Z-99-0,02
r CITY OF ARCADIA
F A 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
c /' ARCADIA,CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
A. Title and Description of Project:
Zone Change from CPD-1 (Commercial Planned Development) to C-M (Commercial-
Industrial)
B. Location of Project:
324 North Second Avenue, Arcadia, California
C. Name of Applicant or Sponsor:
Donald P and Robert W. Johnson
2280 University Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660
D. Finding:
This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached Initial
Study.
E. Mitigation measures,if any,included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects:
No impact
Date Prepared: April 12, 1999
Donna But er, ommunity Development Adminis- 'tor
-1.1011 File No Z-99-002
(r.,,i 5 . h,.
..,:,..„1' CITY OF ARCADIA
�,. o 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
coRroae: O', ARCADIA,CA 9]007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
Zone Change 99-002.
2. Project Address:
324 North Second Avenue, City of Arcadia
3. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number:
Donald and Robert Johnson
2280 University Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 645-1422
4. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia--Development Services Department
Community Development Division --Planning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
•
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
5. Lead Agency Contact Person &Telephone Number:
Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator (626) 574-5442
6. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use Commercial/Industrial (MU-C/1)
7. Zoning Classification: CPD-1
8. Description of Project:
(Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project and any secondary,
support,or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
Proposal to change the Zoning from CPD-1 (Commercial Planned Development) to C-M
(Commercial-Industrial)
-1- CEQA Checklist 7/95
•
File No Z-99-002
9. Other public agencies whose approval is required: None
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use &Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population & Housing [ ] Noise
[ ] Geological Problems [ ] Public Services
[ ] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality [ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Transportation/ Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Biological Resources [ ] Resources
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Finding of Significance
DETERMINATION
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[X] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ ] I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[ ] I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
but that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on that earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, and if any
remaining effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant
Unless Mitigated," an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but
it only needs to analyze the effects that have not yet been addressed.
-2- CEQA Checklist 7/95
File No Z-99-002
[ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
For: The City of Arcadia-- Development Services Department
Date: April 12, 1999
.gnature
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by
the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact" answer
is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects such as the one involved (e.g.,the project is not within a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact" answer
should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project
will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants,based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as
well as project-level, indirect as well as direct,and construction related as well as operational impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If
there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an
Environmental Impact Report is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact."
The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a
less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section 17"Earlier Analyses"may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Environmental Impact Report, or other
CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration {Section
15063(c)(3)(D)}. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist,references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document
should,where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
-3- CEQA Checklist 7/95
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
1. AESTHETICS—Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑
There are no scenic vistas in Arcadia. The proposed zone
change will not affect any scenic vistas.
b) Damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic
highway?
The site is vacant adjacent to a freeway and water storage
facilities. The proposed zone change will not affect any scenic
vistas.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of ❑ ❑ ❑ 12/
the site and its surroundings?
The site is vacant adjacent to a freeway and water storage
facilities. The proposed zone change will not affect any scenic
vistas.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would ❑ ❑ ❑
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
The proposed zone change will not affect lighting within the area.
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES - In determining whether impacts
to agriculture resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Dept. of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program in the California
Resources Agency, Department of. Conservation, maintains
detailed maps of these and other categories of farmland.)
There are no agricultural or farmland areas within the city.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson ❑ ❑ ❑ Layj
Act contract?
There are no agricultural or farmland areas within the city.
3. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
CEQA Checklist
4
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan?
The zone change will not affect or obstruct any air quality plans.
b) Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
an existing or projected air quality violation?
The zone change will not affect or obstruct any air quality plans.
c) Result in a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the ❑ ❑ ❑ 12(
project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions
that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
The proposal is a zone change that will have no affect on air
quality standards or result in any changes to air quality.
d) Create or contribute to a non-stationary source "hot spot" ❑ ❑ ❑ 12(
(primarily carbon monoxide)?
The proposal is a zone change that will have no affect on air
quality standards or result in any changes to air quality.
e) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ -❑ [�
concentrations?
The proposal is a zone change that will have no affect on air
quality standards or result in any changes to air quality.
f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of ❑ ❑ ❑ [-'Y
people?
The proposal is a zone change that will have no affect on air
quality standards or result in any changes to air quality.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would the project:
a) Adversely impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, ❑ ❑ ❑
any endangered, rare, or threatened species, as listed in Title 14
of the California Code of Regulations (sections 670.2 or 670.5)or
in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (sections 17.11 or
17.12)?
The proposed zone change will not impact biological resources.
The site is currently vacant and undeveloped.
b) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through ❑ ❑ ❑
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
CEQA Checklist
5
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
The proposed zone change will not impact biological resources.
The site is currently vacant and undeveloped.
c) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or ❑ ❑ ❑ [✓r
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
The proposed zone change will not impact biological resources,
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. The site is
currently vacant and undeveloped.
d) Adversely impact federally protected wetlands (including, but not ❑ ❑ ❑ 21/
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or
in combination with the known or probable impacts of other
activities through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
There are no wetlands in this area or in close proximity to this
area.
e) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑ ['I"
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery
sites?
The site is not near water and is in an urban setting adjacent to
surrounding development.
f) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological ❑ ❑ ❑ [fr •
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The proposed zone change will not impact biological resources.
g) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation ❑ ❑ ❑ [7�
Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved
local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?
The site is located in an urbanized area adjacent to developed
uses and will not conflict with any habitat conservation plans, etc.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES -Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ ❑
historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of
Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources?
The site is a vacant undeveloped parcel of land that was built with
an industrial use until approx. 10 years ago.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ ❑ 12/
unique archaeological resources (i.e., an artifact, object, or site
GEQA Checklist
6
4/12/99
•
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely
adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high
probability that it contains information needed to answer
important scientific research questions, has a special and
particular quality such as being the oldest or best available
example of its type, or is directly associated with a scientifically •
recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person)?
The site is a vacant undeveloped parcel of land that was built with
an industrial use until approx. 10 years ago.
c) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
historical resource which is either listed or eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of
Historic Resources, or a local register of historic resources?
The proposal is a text amendment that will create more restrictive
standards for residential development. The text amendment will
not have an affect on cultural resources.
The site is a vacant undeveloped parcel of land that was built with
an industrial use until approx. 10 years ago.
d) Disturb or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? ❑ ❑ ❑ [/(
The site is a vacant undeveloped parcel of land that was built with
an industrial use until approx. 10 years ago.
e) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
formal cemeteries?
•
The site is a vacant undeveloped parcel of land that was built with
an industrial use until approx. 10 years ago.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse ❑ ❑ ❑ Er
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the ❑ ❑ ❑ [�J
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
The site is not within an identified earthquake fault area. r/
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ l�
The site is not within an identified earthquake fault area,
however any major earthquake would cause ground
shaking within the area.;
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑
GEQA Checklist
7
4/12/99
•
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
The site is not within a seismic zone identified by the state.
iv) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑
The site is not within a seismic zone identified by the state
v) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
The site is flat and not within an area identified as subject
to possible landslides.
vii) Wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to ❑ ❑ ❑ [2/
urbanized areas and where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
The site is located in an urbanized area and not subject to
Wildland fires.
b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ ❑
topsoil?
The zone change will not have any affect on soil erosion. The
site as noted is flat and should not have soil erosion problems.
c) Would the project result in the loss of a unique geologic feature? ❑ ❑ ❑
The site is totally flat and there are no unique geologic features in
the area.
d) Is the project located on strata or soil that is unstable, or that ❑ ❑ ❑ �/
would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially
result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
There is no evidence that the soil is unstable. Future
development of the site would require a soils study.
e) Is the project located on expansive soil creating substantial risks ❑ ❑ ❑ 12"-
to life or property?
There is no evidence that the soil is unstable. Future
development of the site would require a soils study.
f) Where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater, is ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems?
The site is currently served by sewers.
7. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the
project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ ❑ ❑
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
GEQA Checklist
8
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
• Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
The zone change will not result in any transportation or
movement of hazardous waste.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ ❑ ❑ [v]'
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
The zone change will not result in a significant hazard. Any
project would have to comply with all City code requirements
including hazardous materials, etc.
c) Reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous emissions or ❑ ❑ ❑ [►
handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
The zone change would not result in any emissions of hazardous
materials. Any project would have to comply with all City code
requirements including hazardous materials, etc.
d) Is the project located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ [✓r
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
The project is not located on a site listed as having hazardous
materials.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where ❑ ❑ ❑ Er
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
The site is not located within an airport land use plan.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
The site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted ❑ ❑ ❑ 12"
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The City's emergency response plan does not identify this site in
their emergency response plan.
h) Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death ❑ ❑ ❑
involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
The site is not in an urbanized area and not adjacent to wildland
areas.
CEQA Checklist
9
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY-Would the project:
a) Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality ❑ ❑ ❑ [v/
standards or waste discharge requirements?
The zone change does not affect water quality. Any project on
the site would have to comply with all water quality standards.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ 1E/
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be
a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
The zone change will not affect ground water supply.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation
on-or off-site?
The zone change will not alter the drainage pattern in the area.
Future projects will have to comply with all city drainage
requirements.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site?
The zone change will not alter the drainage pattern of the area.
Specific projects would have to comply with all City and regional
code requirements.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ❑ ❑ ❑ Q(
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems to
control?
The zone change will not create or contribute runoff water
exceeding existing capacity. Specific projects would have to
comply with all City and regional code requirements.
f) Place housing within a 1 00-year floodplain, as mapped on a ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation map?
The zone change has no affect on a 100-year flood plain. There
are no proposed changes as a result of this zone change that
would affect hydrology and water quality. Specific projects would
have to comply with all City and regional code requirements.
CEQA Checklist
10
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
•
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
g) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede ❑ ❑ ❑
or redirect flood flows?
There is no 100-year floodplain in this area.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ L�'
The zone change will not physically divide any community.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of ❑ ❑ ❑ [
an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
The zone change would be consistent with the City's general plan
and land use policies.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural ❑ ❑ ❑
communities conservation plan?
There is no conservation plan in this area.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES -Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource ❑ ❑ ❑
classified MRZ-2 by the State Geologist that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
There are no known mineral resource identified in this area.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ R""
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
There are no known mineral resource identified in this area.
11. NOISE-Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of ❑ ❑ ❑ ["1
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
The zone change will not result in development of this site and
has no impact on noise requirements.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne ❑ ❑ ❑ [//
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
The zone change will not result in development of this site and
has no impact on noise requirements.
CEQA Checklist
11
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the ❑ ❑ ❑ []7
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
The zone change will not result in development of this site and
has no impact on noise requirements.
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
The zone change will not result in development of this site and
has no impact on noise requirements.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
The site is not located within an airport land use area.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ L�
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
The site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING -Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly ❑ ❑ ❑ []�
(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
The site is a vacant commercial/industrial lot and will not affect
population growth.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The site is vacant—no housing will be displaced.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ❑ ❑ ❑ Er'
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The site is vacant and no persons will be displaced.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts ❑ ❑ ❑ Q/
associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
CEQA Checklist
12
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for
any of the public services:
Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ []�
Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ [;V
Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ []�
The proposed zone change will not result in a need for additional
public services in this area.
14. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
The zone change does not impact existing parks and
neighborhoods.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
The zone change does not include new recreational facilities or
require construction of any new facilities.
15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC- Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the ❑ ❑ ❑
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result
in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
• The zone change will not increase traffic to this area.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?
The zone change will have no affect on traffic.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an ❑ ❑ ❑
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
CEQA Checklist
13
4/12/99
File Np.: TA 99-004
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
substantial safety risks?
The zone change does not affect air traffic patterns.
d) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp ❑ ❑ ❑ i
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
The site is a vacant lot and the design features will not change in
the area.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
The site is not identified in the City's EOP.
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑
The zone change does not affect parking. Future development
will have to comply with the City's current code requirements.
g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
The zone change has no impact on alternative transportation
modes.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
The zone change does not affect wastewater. Future
development of the site would have to comply with all City and
regional requirements.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
The zone change does not affect wastewater. Future
development of the site would have to comply with all City and
regional requirements.
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage ❑ ❑ ❑ [
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
The zone change does not affect wastewater. Future
development of the site would have to comply with all City and
regional requirements.
d) Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from ❑ ❑ ❑
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
CEQA Checklist
14
4/12/99
File No.: TA 99-004
•
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
The zone change does not affect water requirements. This site
has not been identified as affecting future water supplies.
e) Has the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may ❑ ❑ ❑ [�
serve the project determined that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's
existing commitments?
The zone change does not affect wastewater. Future
development of the site would have to comply with all City and
regional requirements.
f) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ❑ ❑ ❑
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
The zone change does not affect landfill requirements or
activities.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE—
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory?
No potential environmental problems have been identified as a
result of this zone change.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the ❑ ❑ ❑ 12-
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
There are no short-term or long-term impacts as a result of this
zone change.
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but ❑ ❑ ❑ ��
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
There are no impacts identified as a result of this zone change.
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause ❑ ❑ ❑ Z
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
There are no impacts which are adverse to human beings either
directly or indirectly as a result of this zone change.
-CEQA Checklist
15
4/12/99
ci w�� File No. / — 99 -- 1 .c
ir4 : . :`` CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
CORpORATL/° ARCADIAN CA 91007
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Date Filed:
General Information
1. Applicant's Name: Donald P. Johnson & Robert W. Johnson
Address: 2780 University Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660
2. Property Address (Location): 324 North Second Avenue
Assessor's Number: 5773-008-003
3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
Donald P. Johnson or Robert W. Johnson ( 949 ) 645-1422
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, including those required by city,regional,state and federal agencies:
5. Zone Classification: Current CPD-1 Proposed C-M
6. General Plan Designation: MU-C/T
Project Description
7. Proposed use of site (project description): N/A
8. Site size: 2. 1 7 acres
9. Square footage per building:
10. Number of floors of construction:
11. Amount of off-street parking provided:
12. Proposed scheduling of project:
13. Anticipated incremental development:
14. If residential, includk u,e number of units, schedule of i sizes, range of sale prices or
rents, and type of household sizes expected:
15. If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities,hours of operation:
16. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities:
17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated
occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
18. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required:
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes
(attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground ❑ ZI
contours.
20. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public ❑ tit
lands or roads.
21. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. ❑ Jai
22. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. ❑
23. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. ❑
E.I.R.
3/95
-2-
.YES NO
24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing ❑
drainage patterns.
25. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. ❑
26. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more. ❑
27. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, ❑ ❑
flammable or explosives.
28. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire,water, ❑ xEt
sewage, etc.).
29. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil,natural gas, ❑ x®
etc.).
30. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ❑ x®
Environmental Setting
31. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach
photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
32. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants,
animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential,
commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department
stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach
photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data
and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts,
statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
q/ h.,
Date Signature
E.I.R.
3/95
-3-
•
Environmental Setting: (Continued)
31. The site is a vacant lot,periodically plowed for weed control. It consists of gently
sloped alluvium adjacent to the County flood control channel. There is no known
cultural, historical or scenic aspect of the site. Photos are attached.
32. The south side of the property is bounded by the City water tanks, the east side faces
the flood control channel, the west side is directly across the street from the Edison
sub-station, and the northern tip of the property is bounded by the 210 Freeway
overpass. Photos are attached.
•
sF-0 - -?v
,teARaccir,o
FF
STAFF REPORT
June 15, 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Don Penman, Deputy City Manager/Development Services Direct
By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE 2109 —AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA CHANGING
THE ZONING FROM C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) AND PR-1
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH A PARKING OVERLAY)
TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ON THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 188 WEST LAS TUNAS DRIVE
SUMMARY
The City Council at its June 1, 1999 meeting approved Zone Change Z-99-001
changing the zoning from C-1 (Limited Commercial) and PR-1 (Single-Family
Residential with a parking overlay) to C-2 (General Commercial) on the property
located at 188 West Las Tunas Drive. The City Council directed staff to prepare
the appropriate ordinance for adoption at a later meeting.
Attached is City Council Ordinance 2109:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA CHANGING THE ZONING FROM C-1 (LIMITED
COMMERCIAL) AND PR-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH A
PARKING OVERLAY) TO C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 188 WEST LAS TUNAS DRIVE
ACTION
The City Council should move to introduce Ordinance 2109 as attached.
Attachment: Ordinance 2109
APPROVED BY: - Ong/
William R. Kelly, City Manager
LASER 1 AG.D
e°, 4 _ / /,a .