No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 15, 2000 . a � yo- Sv oviim,„, �oa►reo• MEMORANDUM Development Services Department DATE: August 15, 2000 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: on Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director By: Peter P. Kinnahan, Economic Development Administrator Prepared by: Brian Saeki, Redevelopment Project Analyst SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND 'IRRIGATION PLANS AND TWO (2) NEW MONUMENT SIGNS FOR PARKING DISTRICTS ONE AND TWO. SUMMARY The Parking District Commission at its February 10, 2000 meeting approved a new concept plan for the landscaping and irrigation for Parking Districts One and Two designed by the landscape and architecture firm, Armstrong and Walker (Attachment One). The new concept includes planting of new landscaping materials in Parking District One, and the removal and replacement of the existing landscaping and installation of a new irrigation system in Parking District Two. Armstrong and Walker also designed two (2) new monument signs, one on the west side of Parking District Two at the corner of Santa Anita and Wheeler and the other on the east side of Parking District Two by the Post Office (Attachments 2 and 3). These concept signs were also approved by the Parking District Commission. The proposed concept landscaping plan was mailed to all property owners and delivered to all tenants in both Districts. All owners and tenants were invited to a meeting with the consultant and staff. No owners or tenants attended. A colored rendering of the landscaping plans and monuments is available in the Development Services Department and will be displayed at the Council Meeting. Staff recommends the approval of the concept for the Landscaping revisions in Parking District One and the Landscaping and Irrigation Plans for Parking District Two, including the two monument signs, as presented by Armstrong and Walker and recommended by the Parking District Commission, and the authorization to proceed with construction plans. DISCUSSION In 1998, Public Works Services informed Development Services of a problem in Parking Districts One and Two with the destructive landscaping and an aging irrigation system (Parking District Two only). Public Works Services staff explained that the existing LASER IMAGED Nvoovc.,1 • • Landscaping & Irrigation .. _ins Parking Districts One & Two Page 2 08/15/00 landscaping (Ficus and Bottle Brush trees) in Parking Districts One and Two was beginning to uplift irrigation lines, curbs, and pavement. If the existing trees were allowed to grow larger, they would inevitably become more destructive, becoming an ongoing maintenance problem and expense to the Parking District. Public Works Services also explained that the irrigation system in Parking District Two was aging and needed replacement. Based upon this information, and since sufficient funds were available in each District to pay for the estimated cost, Development Services suggested at their June 10, 1999 meeting that the Parking District Commission consider the replacement of the existing landscaping in both Parking Districts and the irrigation system in Parking District Two. The Commission concurred with staff's suggestion. The landscape firm, Armstrong and Walker, which had done previous work for Public Works Services, was retained to create the initial landscaping plan for Parking District One and new landscaping and irrigation plan for Parking District Two. Pursuant to the Commission's request, Armstrong and Walker created a new concept landscaping plan for Parking District One and new landscaping and irrigation plan for Parking District Two. This new conceptual plan was approved at the Parking District Commission's February 10, 2000 meeting. The tentative plan coordinates the new landscaping throughout Parking Districts One and Two with the Downtown 2000 project landscaping on Huntington Drive and First Avenue. This new concept includes the removal and replacement of the existing Ficus and Bottle Brush trees in Parking District Two, with different types of new landscaping such as the Australian Willow, Crape Myrtle, and Evergreen Pea. . These species are less destructive to irrigation lines, curbs, and pavement and are tile same plants now in the planter areas on Huntington Drive and First Avenue. Armstrong and Walker is also proposing the addition of new walkways through the median aisles and a new irrigation system. They also suggested that the City clear and re-landscape the island north of the medical center building on North First Avenue to decrease the height of the mound and to rid the area of Bermuda grass. Staff researched the possibility of saving and relocating the trees. However, Armstrong and Walker as well as City Public Works Services staff have advised that Ficus and Bottle Brush trees are very common and grow quickly. It is much less expensive to plant a smaller tree than to relocate a large one. Of more concern would be the added cost of replacing damaged curb and asphalt caused during the removal of the root ball of the trees. In Parking District One east of First Avenue, Armstrong and Walker is proposing an upgrade of the existing irrigation system with new low shrubs but no new trees. They are also proposing turf only on the triangular area at the southeast corner of the eastern lot. Landscaping & Irrigation_-_ins Parking Districts One & Two Page 3 08/15/00 The Parking District Commission also requested that Armstrong and Walker design two (2) new monument signs for Parking District One and Two. The "western" sign would be.constructed at the southeast corner of Santa Anita and Wheeler (Attachment 2) and the smaller "eastern" sign would be constructed in the planter area immediately across Wheeler from the Post Office (Attachment 3). On the "western" sign, the consultant is proposing to incorporate elements from the Downtown 2000 Project as a curving wall with a pilaster at each end. Recessed lettering, a pre-cast concrete cap, and low flowering landscaping around the sign are incorporated into the design. The "eastern" monument sign by the Post Office will have similar design elements but on a smaller scale. Both signs will read "Arcadia Public Parking". There will be ongoing maintenance costs to be paid by the respective districts. However, these maintenance costs would be reduced with the installation of the new landscaping and irrigation because there will be no need to replace curb, less need to replace'broken sprinkler heads or to trim trees. Additionally, the new irrigation system would use less water. Pursuant to the request from the Parking District Commission to inform the business and property owners of this proposed project, staff mailed and hand delivered a copy of Armstrong and Walker's concept and letter inviting all business and property owners in Parking District One and Two to attend a meeting to clarify any issues that they may have had with the proposed project. The meeting was scheduled for April 26, 2000. No one attended the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT The cost estimates for Parking Districts One and Two were prepared by Armstrong and Walker. Costs include design/engineering, construction/installation, monuments (Parking District Two only), and a 15% contingency. Parking District One - $8,100 + Guard Top/Re-striping - $4,000 = Total - $12,100 (slurry seal) Parking District Two - $79,000 + Guard Top/Re-striping - $8,500 = Total - $87,500 (slurry seal) Grand Total - $99,600 Funds are available in the respective Parking District accounts and have been approved by the Council in the FY2000-2001 budget. • Landscaping & Irrigation Parking Districts One & Two Page 4 • 08/15/00 ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt form the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 3.16 Categorical Exemptions, Class 32: In-Fill Development Projects of the 2000 CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the landscaping and irrigation plan concepts for Parking Districts One and Two and the design of the two (2) monument signs, as set forth in the staff report, and authorize staff to proceed with construction plans. Approved: - 0 William R. Kelly, City Manager Attachments: 1. Conceptual Landscaping (Plan Parking Districts One and Two) 2. West Entrance Monument Sign, Parking District Two 3. East Entrance Monument Sign, Parking District Two INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A N N O T A T E D • A G E N D A Arcadia City Council and Redevelopment Agency Meeting August 15, 2000 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers I0I ACTION Reverend Jolene Cadenbach, Arcadia Congregational Church Stephen Deitsch, City Attorney ROLL CALL: Council Members Chandler, Chang, Marshall, Segal and Kovacic All present 1. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS See Minutes MOTION: Read all Ordinances and Resolutions by title only and waive Adopted 5 -0 reading in full. 2. PRESENTATION of Mayor's Community Service Award to Byron Dickson and Dave Hamada. 3. PRESENTATION of Mayor's Employee Recognition Award to Christine Ruelas. 4. PRESENTATION of Mayor's Business Recognition Award to Perini's Hair Plus. PRESENTATION to Santa Anita Soccer Club Stampede - California Gold 5. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (NON- PUBLIC HEARING /FIVE MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) Celia Corral 6. MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS See Minutes City Council Reports/ Announcements /Statements /Future Agenda Items RECESS CITY COUNCIL 7. MEETING OF THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chandler, Chang, Marshall, Segal and Kovacic All present TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (NON- PUBLIC HEARING /FIVE MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) No one spoke Gary A. Kovacic, Mayor • Mickey Segal, Mayor Protempore • Roger Chandler, Dr. Shang Chang, Gail A. Marshall, Council Members William R. Kelly, City Manager June D. Alford, City Clerk 1 h Y • • Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency continued a. Recommendation to appropriate an additional $25,000.00 for traffic signal modifications at Huntington Drive and Second Avenue. ADJOURN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY to September 5, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL 8. CONSENT a. Recommendation to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of Duarte, Monrovia, Sierra Madre, South Pasadena, and Pasadena to form a Consortium to receive funds under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. A C. ACTION Approved 5 -0 Approved 5 -0 Recommendation to accept all work performed by Sheldon Mechanical Withdrawn Corporation for the replacement of a 30 -ton chiller for the City Council Chambers as complete and to authorize final payment to be made in accordance with the contract documents, subject to a retention of $3,166.70. Recommendation to approve the Arcadia Transit FY 2001 -2003 Short Approved 5 -0 Term Transit Plan. d. Recommendation to award a'one -year contract extension in an amount Approved 5 -0 not to exceed $80,000.00 to Schlumberger Resource Management Services, Inc. for water meters. e. Recommendation to appropriate an amount not to exceed $10,000.00 Approved 5 -0 from the Capital Outlay Fund for traffic signal modification at the intersection of Duarte Road and El Monte Avenue, to be performed by the City's traffic signal maintenance contractor. f. Recommendation to approve the concept for the landscaping and irrigation Approved 5 -0 plans and two (2) new monument signs for Parking District One and Two. g. Recommendation to approve Final Map No. 52745 for the Anoakia Approved 5 -0 Residential Planned Development Project at 701 W. Foothill Blvd. 9. CITY ATTORNEY a. Recommendation to approve Text Amendment 00 -002 and to INTRODUCE continued Ordinance No. 2128, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, Public California, amending Section 9275.1.51 of the Arcadia Municipal. Code to Hearing to permit crematories in C -0 or any less restrictive commercial or industrial 9 -5 -2000 zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. Introduced 5 -0 E City Attorney continued ACTION b. Recommendation to ADOPT Ordinance No. 2127, an Ordinance of Adopted 5 -0 the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, amending Article I, Chapter 2, Section 1200; Article II, Chapter 2, Division 5, Section 2215; Article III, Chapter I, Part 3, Division 4, Section 3114, Subdivision 1; Article VIII, Chapter 0, Part 3, Section 8030; Article VIII, Chapter 8, Part 3, Section 8839; Article IX, Chapter 1, Part 4, Division 1, Section 9141.1; Article IX, Chapter 4, Section 9403, Subdivision (a); and Article IX, Chapter 8, Section 9815, Subdivision (a) of the Arcadia Municipal Code pertaining to code enforcement citations and prosecutions. ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL to September 5, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in memory of Jesse Vanlandingham. and Ed Spielman at 7:45 p.m. 3 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT August 15, 2000 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tracey Hause, Administrative Services Directo� Reviewed by: Pat Malloy, Public Works Servic s Director Prepared by: Jan Steese, Purchasing Officet� r/ SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD A ONE -YEAR CONTRACT EXTENSION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $80,000.00 TO SCHLUMBERGER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR WATER METERS SUMMARY It is recommended that the City Council approve a one -year contract extension for water meter purchases. The original contract was a four -year contract and allows for three one- year extensions. DISCUSSION: The City was the lead agency for a multi -city proposal requesting bids for water meters for the 1996 -97 fiscal year and a contract awarded to Schlumberger Resource Management, Inc. to provide water meters. The original contract was for a four -year term and allows for 3 one -year extensions by mutual consent of all agencies involved. Schlumberger Resource Management, Inc. has submitted a written offer to extend the contract with no price increase for an additional year. This is the first requested extension and, if approved, it will be effective from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. The contract extension is to provide new or replacement meters. All agencies involved have mutually agreed to renew the contract at the existing prices, terms and conditions. Schlumberger's delivery and service has been satisfactory. Staff recommends that the City Council approve a one -year extension of the existing contract with Schlumberger Resource Management, Inc. to provide water meters. FISCAL IMPACT Sufficient funds for these meters is provided in the 2000/01 Operating Budget. The total amount of the contract is $80,000.00. NW � LASER 1' . �d . *AO Mayor and City Council August 15, 2000 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award a one -year contract extension in the amount of $80,000.00 to Schlumherger Resource Management, Inc. for water meters for fiscal year 2000 -2001. TH:js Approved: WO William R. Kelly, City Manager sRT� `NCRPowALTg9 ,� STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: August 15, 2000 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager /Development Services Director Michael Busch, Transportation Services Officer uA SUBJECT: Report and Recommendation to Approve Arcadia Transit's FY 01 -03 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) SUMMARY The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) is an annual document prepared by staff and submitted to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for review and approval. Preparation of the SRTP is required in order to maintain eligibility for federal, state and local transit grants. DISCUSSION The SRTP is a two (2) year transit forecast prepared annually for Arcadia Transit. The FY 1999 data provided in the SRTP is used by the MTA to develop future federal, state, and local transit funding levels as well as future non - financial projections. Similar to the City's Bi- Annual Operating Budget for Arcadia Transit, the SRTP also provides a financial and operating plan for the next two years. The first year of the SRTP is consistent with the adopted FY 2000 -01 budget, and the out -year projects indicate Arcadia Transit's direction for the future. The SRTP includes operating budget projections estimating total federal, state and local monies at $1,038,972 for FY 2000 -01. In addition, the SRTP includes a capital project justification of $112,585 for FY 2000 -01 and $600,000 for FY 2002 -03. The capital projects listed in the SRTP include: Fiscal Year 2000 -0 Purchase of an integrated radio communications system with global positioning system (GPS) technology ($112,585) t>", \-7 P�oV 4 ' OSE V AGED Or•. FY 01 -03 SRTP August 15, 1999 Page 2 Aft Fiscal Year 2002 -03 • Purchase often (10) sixteen passenger replacement vehicles and one Road Supervisor vehicle ($600,000) The SRTP is technical in nature and the attached forms are mandated as to format. The figures included in the SRTP are derived from projected revenues received by the City from federal, state and local agencies. In addition, staff uses projections provided by the FTA and MTA to determine the necessary Proposition A Local Return share to include into the operating budget. FISCAL IMPACT The SRTP is completed for planning purposes only and does not obligate the City or other government agencies to specific service or funding levels. The SRTP is a planning tool used to develop both funding and operational models by appropriate federal and regional agencies. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Arcadia Transit's FY 2001 -2003 Short Range Transit Plan. Approved: William R. Kelly, City Manager Attachment PORAT EU 'tiro ARCADIA TRANSIT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2001 -2003 AUGUST 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subiect Page Introduction...................................................... ............................... 1 Goals and Objectives ......................................... ............................... 1 Coordination Activities ........................................ ............................... 2 Public Comment and Fare Service Charges ............ ............................... 2 Public Participation During FY 2000 ....................... ............................... 2 Ride Share Organization ..................................... ............................... 3 FTA, SCAG and LACMTA Comments on FY 2000 SRTP .......................... 3 Overview of Existing Conditions ............................. ............................... 3 Service Description ...................................... ............................... 3 Fleet Inventory and Vehicle Maintenance ......... ............................... 4 EnergyContingency .... ............................... . ..............................4 Spare Ratio Vehicles ................................... ............................... 5 Privatization................................................. ..............................5 Evaluation of Service and Improvements ................. ............................... 5 Service Improvements .................................. ............................... 5 Performance Measures ....................................... ............................... 5 Recommended Capital and Operating Plan ............. ............................... 6 OperatingPlan ........................................ ............................... 6 Capital Project Justification ........................... ............................... 6 Handicapped Accessibility ............................. ............................... 6 Future Arcadia Transit Operational and Capital Plans ........................ 7 Exhibits A and B Tables L -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 2 ARCADIA TRANSIT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2003 INTRODUCTION The City of Arcadia is located in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains approximately 18 miles northeast of downtown Los Angeles. The City covers approximately 11 square miles and has 52,500 residents. It is primarily a residential community that houses the Santa Anita Racetrack, the Los Angeles County Arboretum, and the Westfield Shopping Town at Santa Anita. Geographic terrain is divided between highly populated hillsides at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains in the northern portion of the City and the flatlands throughout the southern portion of the City. Arcadia is primarily a middle to upper - middle income class community with a growing diverse population. Arcadia Transit began its operations on April 21, 1975. The program was started at the direction of the Arcadia City Council with the intent of creating a demand - responsive system that would provide the amount and type of public transportation needed by individuals traveling within the City. The system was designed to provide specialized services for seniors, disabled, and the general public whose individual transportation needs were not met by the then existing fixed route services provided by the then Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD), now the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Since the start of Arcadia Transit, the objective of the City Council has been to provide demand - responsive transportation services to as many passengers as efficiently possible. The primary goals of the program are to provide a transportation system which: Provides a convenient, comfortable, and realistic alternative to the automobile; 2. Is accessible to everyone in the City and provides for the special needs of the transit dependent (i.e., the young, seniors, disabled, economically disadvantaged and other non- drivers); 3. Reduces the vehicle miles, mobile source emissions and improves mobility within the City which leads to the conservation of energy, improved air quality and reduces traffic and parking problems within the City; 4. Is supportive of and consistent with the comprehensive land use goals and policies of the City's General Plan, Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Long Range Plan and Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan; 5. Is consistent with regional, state, and federal transportation goals and policies; 6. Encourages local public participation in the transportation planning process including senior and disabled participation; 7. Is capable of managed growth and effective and efficient operations; 8. Utilizes private sector services to the largest extent possible; 9. Is well maintained and safe; and 10. Has cost and funding sources that can be closely monitored and evaluated to ensure proper and effective expenditures. COORDINATION ACTIVITES On May 6, 1975, the Arcadia City Council executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Arcadia and the SCAG to establish a cooperative and mutually beneficial working relationship between the Regional Transportation Planning Agency and the transit system operators within the region. The purpose of this MOU was to help facilitate a comprehensive, effective, and coordinated transit service within the region and the City. The City of Arcadia has entered into similar agreements with the MTA since 1975. The City continues to forward to the MTA and SCAG copies of its Federal Transit Administration (FTA) National Transit Database Report for review. The City also provides a vital service for those using Arcadia Transit to transfer to or from other public transit systems. As gleaned through recent rider surveys, Arcadia Transit passengers transfer to or from Monrovia Transit, Pasadena DAR, Temple City DAR, Sierra Madre DAR, Foothill Transit and MTA services. Arcadia Transit is also a member of the LACMTA's Bus Operator's Subcommittee. The City plays an active role on this committee. PUBLIC COMMENT ON FARE SERVICE CHANGES Any fare or service change would be implemented through the annual Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) process. As such, public meetings would be held to discuss the change. Public comments are welcome throughout the SRTP process and will be taken at each of the meetings. The comments will be reflected in the minutes of the meeting and addressed in the SRTP. At this time, the City is not planning any fare changes. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DURING FY 2000 During FY 2001, the City is planning to hold several public meetings regarding its transportation service. Similar to public meetings held throughout the late 90's, the Transportation Services Officer will hold two meetings at the Arcadia Senior Citizens' Commission. The first of these meetings was held on May 4, 2000. The purpose of each meeting will be to receive input from the Senior Citizen passenger -type group that constitutes approximately 40% of the system's patronage. In addition, the Transportation Services Officer will follow -up on issues regarding system operations related to service levels, fares, privatization and vehicle maintenance as discussed in FY 2000. Notices on meetings scheduled for later this year will be properly posted in Arcadia Transit vehicles, the Senior Center and in the local newspapers in accordance with City procedures for public hearings. All public meetings will be held in ADA accessible facilities that complied with the accessibility requirements set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The City will also continue to conduct annual surveys of the residents and the riding public regarding perceived transit operations aboard Arcadia Transit. The residential survey will be conducted randomly and will ask questions regarding the understanding and knowledge of the general public of the Arcadia system. The ridership survey will ask specific questions to current riders regarding the quality of services and possible improvements. RIDE SHARE ORGANIZATION The City and its contractor cooperate with Southern California Rideshare and LACMTA's telephone information services by providing updated service information, coordinated marketing programs and coordinated planning including dispatcher response to ride sharing inquiries. The City maintains open communication with its surrounding cities regarding the potential for coordinated services. FTA, SCAG, AND LACMTA COMMENTS TO THE 2000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN No comments were received from FTA, SCAG, or LACMTA on the 2000 SRTP. OVERVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITION Service Description Arcadia Transit provides demand - responsive, shared -ride service to any individual within the legal geographical boundaries of the City of Arcadia. There is no age or other types of passenger - related restrictions that determine eligible riders. However, an adult or older sibling must accompany passengers under the age of five (5). The service has the following general features: Hours of service: 7:00 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. weekdays; 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends. 2. Response time: Average 30 minutes. Average vehicle traveling time is approximately 15 minutes. Average trip length is approximately 3.1 miles. 3. Service area: Approximately eleven square miles. 4. Fare structure: $.75 full fare and $.25 for seniors, disabled, or anyone showing a valid DMV ID or placard, Medicare card, or doctor's note describing their disability. Full fare monthly pass can be purchased for $16.00 and a reduced fare pass for $5.00. Type of service offered: Curb -to -curb with pre- booked or on- demand service available. No fixed route services are offered at this time. 6. Operations: The City of Arcadia administers Arcadia Transit. System dispatching, vehicle operations, vehicle maintenance, personnel administration, driver training and data collection is conducted by R & D Transportation Services LLC, located at 1705 South Mountain Avenue in Monrovia. For FY 1999/2000 the City paid a rate of $29.96 for the first 26,000 vehicle service hours and $18.04 for each hour thereafter up to 30,000 vehicle service hours for services provided to at least 5.2 passengers per vehicle hour. The hourly rate is reduced $1.00 for each tenth below the 5.2 target. In FY 2000/01 the City's rate for Arcadia Transit operations will increase to $30.58 for the first 26,000 vehicle service hours and $18.42 for each hour thereafter up to 30,000 vehicle service hours. R & D Transportation will be in year two (2) year of a five (5) year contract. Other paratransit services operating in the northern San Gabriel Valley include Monrovia Transit, Pasadena Dial -a -Ride, Duarte Transit, Sierra Madre Dial -a -Ride and Temple City Dial -a -Ride which are services developed and funded from the Proposition A Incentive Programs as well as local funds. These services regularly bring riders to the Arcadia City limits to be transported by Arcadia Transit. The LACMTA and Foothill Transit operate fixed route service on major arterials within the City. The City assists the LACMTA and Foothill Transit with its public information efforts and provides for distribution of information materials at public facilities throughout the City. The present relationship between Arcadia Transit and the two fixed route operators is a complimentary one. The LACMTA and Foothill Transit's systems are primarily oriented toward long haul or inter -city transportation needs while Arcadia Transit service connects any two points within the City. Fleet Inventory and Vehicle Maintenance The current operating fleet of Arcadia Transit consists of 19 vehicles. The vehicle inventory includes seven 1998 nine - passenger vans, three 1998 twelve - passenger vans, eight 2000 twenty- passenger vans and one supervisor vehicle. With the recent replacement of the 1995 vehicles during FY 1999/00 seating capacity has grown by 65% to 272 seats. All vehicles are owned by the City of Arcadia and are maintained by the City's contractor, R & D Transportation Services LLC. Currently, the City monitors all vehicle breakdowns and repair forms. In addition, the City's Agreement and Scope of Work with the contract operator sets forth standards for vehicle maintenance. Energy Contingency The City does not have an energy contingency reserve fleet. Spare Ratio Vehicles The City's spare ratio consists of two vehicles or 11 % of the 19- vehicle fleet. Privatization The City is proud of the extent of private sector involvement relating to Arcadia Transit. One hundred percent (100 %) of the operating budget and over seventy -five percent (75 %) of the total budget of Arcadia Transit goes to the private sector provider under contract with the City. In addition, the City consistently uses the private sector to provide all capital projects. EVALUATION OF SERVICE AND IMPROVEMENTS Service Improvements The transportation consulting firm of Booze Allen & Hamilton, Inc. was contracted with by LACMTA to complete a Triennial Performance Audit of Arcadia Transit. The report documents the audit findings, conclusions and recommendations in the areas of progress against prior audit recommendations, TDA and TPM data reporting compliance and trends, use of goals and objectives and functional area performance. For details on the recommendations made on the audit, please see Table L -6. The City continually evaluates the system through the utilization of performance indicators that are collected by the system operator on a monthly basis. Paratransit services are reviewed by hour of day to help analyze system demands and to identify inefficient dispatching practices. Arcadia Transit peak hours range from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. when seniors, students and shoppers utilize the system for essential transportation needs. According to the City's service contract, the contractor is to provide vehicle hours of service in response to system demands, thus there are not guaranteed vehicle hour requirements. However, the contract operator must provide service levels no less than 26,000 revenue hours per year. As a result, the operator is available to dispatch vehicles on an as needed basis to meet system demand and is allowed to remove vehicles when demand is at a low point but without a reduction to current service levels. System efficiency and dispatch monitoring is achieved through utilization of data which details passengers per hour, passengers per mile, response time and review of passenger complaints. PERFORMANCE MEASURES Arcadia Transit's performance measures include passengers per vehicle hour and miles per passenger trip, subsidy per passenger, cost per passenger, cost per mile, percent no loads, no -shows and total vehicle hour costs. All performance measures are developed in a monthly report generated on the contract operator's computer system. In addition to the performance measures, the City maintains accurate records related to daily vehicle hours, vehicle mileage, orders received, no- loads, full fare passengers, senior and disable passengers, fare revenue, maintenance costs and total gallons of gasoline. consumed. All material is available on a daily basis and reports are generated with the 7 City's and the contract operator's computers. Decisions related to system efficiency, service provisions, and system analyses are based upon the data that is collected as detailed above. In addition, the City frequently receives feedback from system users in an attempt to identify system problems, shortcomings or positive points. Other issues are discovered through surveys and public meetings. In recent years, Arcadia Transit unlinked passenger ridership has leveled off and is beginning to rise. It has been assumed that the ridership deflection is the result of changing demographics and the implementation of Los Angeles County's ADA Complimentary Paratransit Program Access Services, Inc. Additional marketing and improved operating /dispatch efficiencies have helped restore Arcadia Transit ridership to old levels. RECOMMENDED OPERATING AND CAPITAL PLAN Ooeratina Plan Arcadia Transit is planning no service decreases for FY 2000 or other years covered under this plan unless reduction in available revenue force changes. Further, in order to sustain an equal level of service the City has capped the number of hours the City's Contractor may provide, at 30,000. This cap is roughly 4,000 hours higher than the past two fiscal years' service levels. Staff analysis indicates that service is utilized during all existing service hours and that the system operator is able to dispatch vehicles in an efficient manner that coincides with system demands. During FY 2000/01, City staff will be working with the Senior Citizens Commission and it's contract operator, R & D Transportation, exploring the possibility of providing medical trips outside the City for seniors and the disabled to nearby facilities. If this service is approved by the City Council, it is assumed this service will be available through advanced reservation and to a limited number of facilities. City staff will also be formulating two new services to enhance and improve current operations. The first will provide fixed scheduled shopping trips to local grocery stores throughout the City. Service to grocery stores is currently provided but is provided like other services and thus is demand responsive and occasionally ineffective. City staff proposes to implement this service during the non -peak hours and have it available to the general public five days a week rotating stores within the City. The second new service will provide courtesy service to patrons of Arcadia's local hotels. This proposed program titled, "Show Your Key and Ride for Free" provides Arcadia Transit service to local hotel patrons at no cost provided they show a room key (limit two passengers per key). It is assumed this service will have minimal impact on the daily operations of the Arcadia Transit system. In addition to promoting the Arcadia Transit system, it is also staff's intent with this program to promote Arcadia restaurants and retail establishments as opposed to those in adjacent communities. Capital Proiect Justification The City's proposed capital program is intended to improve existing dispatching capabilities. As a recipient of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds identified through the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Regional Transportation Alternative Analysis (RTAA), the City will appropriate roughly $112,585 to procure an integrated radio communications system with GPS capabilities allowing Arcadia Transit to operate with the highest level of technology available. Currently, the City is sharing a vehicle dispatching system with two other operators. Given the amount of data sent to and from the Arcadia Transit fleet, a separate and dedicated system is being recommended by the City's contractor to improve data transmission and ultimately service to the community. Handicaooed Accessibilitv In accordance to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 317© of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Arcadia Transit has an approved Handicapped Accessibility Program. The Program details the City's effort to maintain its current "fully accessible" status. For more information on the plan, please see the "City of Arcadia Transit Handicapped Accessibility Program." Future Arcadia Transit Operational and Capital Plans In FY 01 the Development Services Department in conjunction with its transit operations contractor, R & D Transportation will continue the development of the City's first Arcadia Transit Five Year Strategic Plan. The purpose of this Plan is to provide a future direction in the areas of operations, finance, capital procurement, development/implementation of new policies and procedures and the development/implementation of system goals and objectives. Specifically, the Five (5) Year Strategic Plan will incorporate the following: • Revenue Forecasting (Farebox, local funds and FAP) • New /Expanded Services (Medical trips, and shuttle services) • Fare Policies (acceptance of other fare media) • Sale of Passes and tokens (Evaluate monthly Arcadia Transit Passes) • Operational goals and objectives (Patronage and farebox recovery ratios) • Future capital procurements (Vehicles and technology) • New policies and procedures (No shows and service outside the City limits) • Transit system marketing (Show Your Key, Transit Talk and "Tell Us" Cards) The Five (5) Year Strategic Plan will provide a significant level of input into the future development of Short Range Transit Plans. The goal of the Strategic Plan is to identify system opportunities and constraints and develop/ identify implementation strategies with the goal of providing an effective and efficient transit operation. Table L -1 Current Fare Structure: FY 2000 Fare Categories Cash/Token Regular Token Elderly Disabled /Medicare Student College Express - Specify Zone Structure Cash Transfers Regular within System Regular to other System Elderly Disabled /Medicare Multi -use Cards (specify number of uses) Regular Elderly Disabled /Medicare Metro Card Discounts Other Passes Regular Elderly Disabled Student College Express - Specify Zone Stamp Joint Passes Regular Elderly Disabled Student College Not Listed above (please describe) Type of Service Fixed Route Demand Responsive 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.75 0.75 16 5 5 16 16 TABLE L -2 FLEET INVENTORY AS OF JUNE 305 2000 Year Built Manuf. Model Seats Length Type of Fuel Total Vehicles Vehicles used for: Non -ADA Vehicles in Active Service ADA Vehicles in Active Service Vehicles w/ major Rehab Fixed Route Service Demand Rspnsve Service 1998 Ford Supreme 11 20' gas 7 X 7 1998 Ford El Dorado 16 21' gas 3 X 3 2000 Ford Goshin 20 22' gas 8 X 8 1995 Chevy Caprice 4 16' gas 1 X 1 Total Number of Vehicles: 19 19 : mw HISTORICAL & PROJECTED FLEET CHARACTERISTICS *Spare Ratio = Spares for Maint/Peak -Hour Fleet FIXED ROUTE SERVICE 1999 Audited 1999 Audited 2000 Actual 2001 Planned Peak -Hour Fleet 16 16 Spares For Maint. Spares For Maint. 3 3 Spare Ratio* Spare Ratio* 19 19 Energy Contigency Reserve Energy Contigency Reserve 0 0 Inactive Fleet Inactive Fleet 0 0 Total Vehicles Total Vehicles 19 19 New Expansion Vehicles New Expansion Vehicles 0 0 New Replacement Vehicles New Replacement Vehicles 8 0 *Spare Ratio = Spares for Maint/Peak -Hour Fleet DEMAND RESPONSIVE SERVICE 1999 Audited 2000 Actual 2001 Planned Peak -Hour Fleet 16 16 16 Spares For Maint. 3 3 3 Spare Ratio* 19 19 19 Energy Contigency Reserve 0 0 0 Inactive Fleet 0 0 0 Total Vehicles 19 19 19 New Expansion Vehicles 0 0 0 New Replacement Vehicles 0 8 0 *Spare Ratio = Spares for Maint/Peak -Hour Fleet SYSTEM TOTAL 1999 Audited 2000 Actual 2001 Planned Peak -Hour Fleet 16 16 16 Spares For Maint. 3 3 3 Spare Ratio* 19 19 19 Energy Contigency Reserve 0 0 0 Inactive Fleet 0 0 0 Total Vehicles 19 19 19 New Expansion Vehicles 0 0 0 New Replacement Vehicles 0 8 0 *Spare Ratio = Spares for Maint/Peak -Hour Fleet (Table L -4 continued) SOURCE OF OPERATING FUNDS; TDA Carryover - Prior Years 89000.00 80,000 75,000 TDA Current FY allocation 285542.00 289621.00 302968.00 STA Current FY allocation 17835.00 Other State (Specify) L}CAL rkSi RA...T A Passenger Fares 89000.00 80,000 75,000 Special Transit Service Charter Service Revenues Auxiliary Transportation Revenues Non - transportation Revenues Prop. A %40 Discretionary 215572.00 228,791 247,041 Prop. A %25 Local Return 404,713 442,375 Prop. A Incentive fund Prop. A Interest 4359.00 4517.00 Prop. C %40 Discretionary: Base Restructuring BSIP 14854.00 14854.00 14854.00 Foothill Transit Zone Mitigation Transit Service Expansion (TSE) Zero -Fare Compensation Prop. C %20 Local Return Prop. C %5 Security 6030.00 6571.00 Prop. C Interest 10604.00 13550.00 Other Local (Specify) TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 1,038,972 1,118,140 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1,038,972 1,118,140 TABLE L - 4 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED FINANCIAL STATUS SOURCE AND APPLICATION OF CAPITAL FUNDS BY YEAR OF EXPENDITURE ($ 000) MODE: SOURCE OF CAPITAL FUNDS: aisir ` rigs:::: 1999 2000 2001 Audited Actual Planned FTA Sec. 5307(Sec. 9) $357,138.00 $340,815.00 110,000 FTA Sec. 5309 (Sec. 3) 430287.00 410620.00 110000.00 FTA Sec. 5310 28,579 13,200 FTA Sec. 5311 (Sec. 18) 22166.00 CMAQ Funds 19060.00 $96,800.00 Other Federal (Assume 80/20 match) (Specify source) 73,149 Prop. C Other (Specify) 5'flE{AP:Ti`ALRANS A(�#D 57BVITIQ5 TDA (ART 4)- Carryover Prior Year 430,287 410,620 110,000 TDA current FY allocation 430287.00 410620.00 110000.00 TDA (ART 8) 28,579 13,200 STA current FY allocation 22166.00 STA Carryover Prior Year 19060.00 Other State (Specify) 73,149 System Generated 430,287 410,620 110,000 General Fund 430287.00 410620.00 110000.00 Prop. A Local Return 28,579 13,200 Prop. A Discretionary Prop. C Discretionary Prop. C Local Return 73,149 Prop. C Other (Specify) Other Local (Specify) TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE 430,287 410,620 110,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES 430287.00 410620.00 110000.00 City of ARCADIA TABLE L - 5 TPM / TDA REPORT FORM 1999 AUDITED 1"otatsjsii; `:':' Atiti#IStiltly utitlaj$iHtiy;€ BVlfieelsda' s`` €':.' y .. .. FAP Funded Non -FAP Funded QiiitalWekda`:€ ............. Local Service Express p Service Dial -A- Ride FAP Sub o I t to D edicated Fundin 9 2 Dial -A- Ride Other 3 Codes System Total TSE Base Restructuring BsIP Other Total Vehicle Miles (000) 374.0 279 5 5 379.0 284 Vehicle Service Miles (000) 331 249.0 5 5 336.0 254 Total Vehicle Hours (000) 29 22.0 1 1 29.5 23 Vehicle Service Hours (000) 26.0 20.0 0 0 26.4 20 Peak Vehicles 16 16 1 1 17.0 17 Unlinked Passengers (000) 144 115.0 2 2 146.0 117 Linked Passengers (000) n / a n/ a n / a n/ a 0.0 0 Passenger Revenue (000) 89.0 71.0 1 2 90.0 73 Aux. Rev /Local Subs. (000) 451 348.0 n / a n / a 451.0 348 Op. Cost Less Depr. (000) 975.0 748.0 15 15 990.0 763 Full Time Equiv. Employees 26 n / a 26 Base Fare 0.75 1 0.75 1"otatsjsii; `:':' Atiti#IStiltly utitlaj$iHtiy;€ BVlfieelsda' s`` €':.' y .. .. FAP Funded Non -FAP Funded Local Service Express Service Dial -A- Ride' FAP Subtotal Dedicated Funding2 Dial -A- Ride Other 3 Codes System Total TsE Base Restructuring BSIF Other Total Vehicle Miles (000) 374.0 5 379.0 Vehicle Service Miles (000) 331 5 336.0 Total Vehicle Hours (000) 29 1 29.5 Vehicle Service Hours (000) 26.0 0 26.4 Peak Vehicles 16 1 17.0 Unlinked Passengers (000) 144 2 146.0 Linked Passengers (000) n / a n / a 0.0 Passenger Revenue (000) 89.0 1 90.0 Aux. Rev /Local Subs. (000) 451 n / a 451.0 10p. Cost Less Depr. (000) 975.0 15 990.0 "Included Dial -A -Ride" only includes operations that historically have been included in the FAP calculations. z "Dedicated Funding" includes: FEMA, Base Restructuring, TSE & Overcrowding, Other Special Funding arrangements. 3 "Other Codes" includes Subscription, Contract, Special Events service. TABLE L - 5 TPM / TDA REPORT FORM 2000 Actual •.1krii>Ei1ltliekia !! :.:.:.:.:.:.: ' FAP Funded Non -FAP Funded Local Service Express Service Dial -A- Ride FAP Subtotal Dedicated 2 Fundin 9 Dial -A- Ride Other 3 Codes System Total TsE Base Restructuring BsiP other Total Vehicle Miles (000) 343,434 5,833 349,267 Vehicle Revenue Miles (000) 293,549 4,986 298,535 Total Vehicle Billed Hours (00 23,762 404 24,166 Vehicle Revenue Hours (000) 22,591 384 22,975 Peak Vehicles 16 1 17 Unlinked Passengers (000) 128,832 2,188 131,020 Linked Passengers (000) N/A N/A 0 Passenger Revenue (000) 68,978 1,171 70,149 Aux. Rev /Local Subs. (000) 244,768 N/A 244,768 Op. Cost Less Depr. (000) 1 677,808 14,854 692,662 Full Time Equiv. Employees 28 N/A 28 Base Fare 0.75 0.75 0.75 °'tF €3ystir}iis. I Si'ia #rl$SHi)ids .:.:......... ..............:..:..........:.: Skarllky5 FAP Funded Non -FAP Funded Local Service Express Service Dial -A- Ride' FAP Subtotal Dedicated FundingZ Dial -A- Ride Other Codes 3 System Y Total TSE Base Restructuring BSiP other Total Vehicle Miles (000) 400,375 5,833 406,208 Vehicle Revenue Miles (000) 345,245 4,986 350,231 Total Vehicle Hours (000) 27,594 404 27,998 Vehicle Revenue Hours (000) 26,259 384 26,643 Peak Vehicles 16 1 17 Unlinked Passengers (000) 146,817 2,188 149,005 Linked Passengers (000) N/A N/A 0 Passenger Revenue (000) 78,608 1,171 79,779 Aux. Rev /Local Subs. (000) 317,214 N/A 317,214 Op. Cost Less Depr. (000) 1 801,414 14,854 816,267 TABLE L - 6 . PERFORMANCE AUDIT FOLLOW -UP OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE LAST COMPLETED PERFORMANCE AUDIT PERFORMANCE AUDIT RECOMMENDED ACTIONS OPERATOR PROGRESS TO DATE Document reporting requirements and data definitions to help insure consistent and accurate reporting in the future Continue actions and plans to enhance performance monitoring systems and to improve service quality In July 1999, the City selected a new transit provider to operate, maintain and manage the Arcadia System. The new operator, R & D Transportation Services, uses a computer aided dispatch and reservations system that tracks National Transit Database information on a daily basis. Reporting requirements are maintained and managed through the use of this system which insures accuracy in reporting. Through the use of performace incentives / disincentive,, marketing, improved dispatching and reservation techniques and improved customer service training the Arcadia Transit system has greatly improved service The Arcadia Transit service now has an 85% approval rating among its patrons; an increase of 51 % from the prior year. TABLE L - 7 CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY FY 2001 Project Name Funding Federal Amount State/ Local Amount Total Project Cost Radio Communications System 101000 11585 112585 (1 ) supervisor vehicle as replacements to existing fleet vehicles. FY 2002 Project Name Funding Federal Amount State/ Local Amount Total Project Cost Purchase of ten 10 sixteen passenger vans and one 498000 102000 600000 (1 ) supervisor vehicle as replacements to existing FY 2003 Project Name Funding Federal Amount State/ Local Amount Total Project Cost Purchase of ten 10 sixteen passenger vans and one 498000 102000 600000 (1 ) supervisor vehicle as replacements to existing fleet vehicles. THESE TABLES SHOULD MATCH THE TIP SHEETS EXHIBIT A City Of I;, AR WDIA N IA o0 _ e \c�Rj'OtLATE9 �� �^ Arcadia CV a Monrovia Orange Grove oyes (P N Foothill • cow hest u v � adia - �- v Q� � c� Q> CD �a o L C/) Cam use' ai iew Cn � p ante ,-1- o CD _ a i o R al emo o L n den �• cadia Transit LE s T u ac iv a ak Operations Facility Prepared by R S Gonzalez, July 10, 2000 4011 r. AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. in the Arcadia City Hall Council Chambers, 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California, a PUBLIC MEETING will be held by the Development Services Department for the purpose of receiving public input regarding the adoption of ARCADIA TRANSIT'S FY 2001 -2003 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN (SRTP). At said time and place an opportunity will be afforded all those interested and the public in general to be heard. For additional information, please contact Michael Busch, Transportation Services Officer, in the Development Services Department at (626) 574 -5435, 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, Monday through Thursday, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., and on alternate Fridays between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. City Hall will not be open Friday, July 28, or Friday, August 11, 2000. In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (626) 574 -5455, at least three (3) working days before the meeting or time when special services are needed. This notification will help City staff in making reasonable arrangements to provide you with access to the meeting. June D. Alford City Clerk Dated: August 9, 2000 Publish: August 10, 2000 LASE? )�71, rj1E-D vS�a-G U ARCADIA C°R OP"A2F9" STAFF REPO T DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT August 15, 2000 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator SUBJECT: " CONSIDERATION OF FINAL MAP NO. 52745 FOR THE ANOAKIA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT 701 WEST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SUMMARY Tentative Maps and Final Maps are required for all subdivisions that result in five or more parcels or condominiums. The City Council shall approve a final map if it conforms to all the requirements of the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. It is recommended that the City Council approve Final Map No. 52745 for a 31 lot residential planned development at 701 West Foothill Boulevard. DISCUSSION Final Map No. 52745 has been reviewed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the appropriate City Departments. Said map has been found to be in compliance with the vesting tentative pap as approved by the City Council on December 21, 1999 and is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the Arcadia Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should move to approve Final Map No. 52745. Attachments: 1. Letter of compliance from Los Angeles County 2. Final Map No. 52745 Approved: trIA roved: William R. Kelly, City Manager • A e_ R GE • .cJt Of LOS 44,04, COLNTY OF LOS ANGELES • wl, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS •�~' �• 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE 041tFORW' ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone:(626)458-5100 HARRY W.STONE,Director ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: • P.O.BOX 1460 May 3, 2000 ALHAMBRA,CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 • • IN REPLY PLEASE pp REFER TO FILE: LD-8 Mr. Terry Hagen City Engineer City of Arcadia 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91006-6021 Dear Mr. Hagen: • TRACT NO. 52745 The enclosed subject tract map has been reviewed by our Department for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis,title information, and for compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act. The map is now ready for your examination and certification as to compliance with the conditional approval and applicable City Ordinances. The City Council or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Subdivision Map Act. After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the map should be returned to Land Development Division, Subdivision Mapping Section for filing with the County Recorder. 8, If you have any questions, please contact Mr.Armando Aguilar of our Subdivision Mapping Section at (626) 4584915. • Very truly yours, HARRY W. STONE Director of Public=Works MAY 2 2 .20011 _ RONALD D. ONDROZECK • Assistant Division Engineer Land Development Division • • AA:ca P:IMAP PING ITRACT.LTR . End: • 38 LOTS T`-„I�CT NO, 52745 . 19.11 1 OF 4 SHEETS 19.11 ACRES IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDMSION OF A PORTION OF SANTA AMTA RANCHO AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 97 AND 98 OF PATENTS AND A PORTION N THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER BOOK 17,PAGE 21 OF MAPS, • ORDER OF-SAID COUNTY. THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 •OWNER'S STATEMENT k. • WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE RE INTERESTED IN THE E THE OWNERS OF OR ARE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDMSION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE AND WE• OF 5410 MAP AND SUBDM'SION. CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE EASEMENT FOR SEWER I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OF THE PURPOSES SO DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP AND ALL USES RODENT THERETO, STATE OF CALIfORNUN THAT THIS FINAL MAP,CONSLSTINC OF 4 SHEETS, ' INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO MAZE CONNECTORS THEREWITH FROM ANY ADJOINING IS A TRUE MD COMPLETE SURVEY AS SHOWN,AND WAS MADE BY ME • PROPERTIES. OR UNDER M1'DIRECTION IN JULY 1899;THAT THE MONUMENTS OF THE WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC CHARACTER AND LOCATIONS WE VEINS SHOWN HEREON MEIN PLACE OR WILL MAP; UTILITY PURPOSES SO DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP AND ALL USES INCIDENT IN PLACE WITHIN TWELVE ARE U FROM THE FlBLE DATE R DES MBE THAT SAID MONUMENTS ME SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE THERETO,INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO MAKE CONNECTIONS HEREWITH FROM ANY RETRACED AND ALL TIE NOTES TO ALL CENTERLINE MONUMENTS SHOWN ADJOINING PROPERTIES. AS TO BE SET WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER. THE OWNERS OR AN ASSOCIATION REPRESENTING THE OWNERS OF THE • WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS FROM`FILING DATE SHOWN HEREON. I DEVELOPMENT WILL OWN MD MAINTAIN STREETS,SIDEWALKS,AND ALL PRIVATE /1,f IBD J� rte-.T- 09�\ UTILITY STRUCTURES WITHIN SAID DEVELOPMENT. SVZwVVXLC ; ', O,SI ,yo\ DATED JAMES 0.STEINES.P.LS.BOOS •WE HERBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE RIGHT TO PROHIBIT THE REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/01 v I CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITHIN LOTS A THROUGH G. DAINIAI # . AS A DEDICATION TO RE PUBLIC USE,WHILE ALL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. * NAM BALDW I AVENUE AND ANOAKA LANE WRHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SUBDMSION \*..,,..OFCALAEBi# . REMAIN PUBLIC STREETS,WE HEREBY GRANT TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE RIGHT • CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT TO RESTRICT DIRECT VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE SAID STREETS. IF ANY PORTION OF SAID STREETS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SUBDMSION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP:THAT IT CONFORMS ARE VACATED,SUCH VACATION TERMINATES THE ABOVE DEDICATION AS TO THE SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS PART VACATED. THEREOF;THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDMSION OROANCES OF THE CITY _ OF ARCADIA APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS AR TIA OAKS -TIED LIABILITY COMPANY,A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WTIH RESPECT TO CRY RECORDS. i t7 ZaLig n ' DATED STANLEY E SCHOLL.,R.CE. 14527 GUNS R CITY ENGINEER,CRY OF ARCADIA 1 DING ,8ER REGISTRATION EXPIRES_/_/_— NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) • - I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP:THAT IT COMPLIES COUNTY OF 012.4N4E )55 Tam P ALL PROVISIONS T OF STATE MAP;AND D T APPLICABLE AT THE TIME A I y,__• APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAR;AND THAT I M SATISFIED THAT THIS ON Pviwcr 91 ACC S ORE ME, C.WAYTBus 1407,41�u5. MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY EE S +-- THE CITY ENGINEER. PERSONALLY APPEARED �Newc ..PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE)TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAME(S)IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE - WITHB1 INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED-70 ME THAT HE/SHE/4HW EXECUTED THE DATED .B.C.E SAME IN HIS))//NH#TWMLTR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES.AND THAT BY HIS/MER,ONE4R DEPUTY COUNTY ENGINEER OF WHICHE(THEON THE INSTRUMENT E OLECUTEOSTHES INSTRUMEN T ENTITY UPON BEHALF REGISTRATION EXPIRES_/_/ WITNESS MYY HAND: ' SICNATURFF9u.AH ' I�A '4 MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS CfI CLERK'S CERTIFICATE NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR END STATE IN LE COUNTY. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA EN I )3o A4aa G. 1JLIpTTCIAJ$ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 5/ dY MOTION PASSED ON APPROVED THE ATTACHED MAP (NAME PRINTED) AND ACCEPTED THE DEDICATION OF SEWER EASEMENT.PUBLIC UTILITY 1 Cos-04. A t2.0 I(.5 4 EASEMENT,CONSTRUCTION RIGHTS AND VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS. I I SIGNATURE OMISSIONS DATED CITY CLERK-CITY OF ARCAOIA I I PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(o)(3■)(1-MU)OF THE SUBDMSION MAP ACT.THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES NAVE BEEN OMITTED: I 1. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT,HOLDER OF AN CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE I . EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES RECORDED DECEMBER 1. 9. 1958 AS INSTRUMENT NO.4905,IN BOOK 0291 PAGE 392 OF OFFICIAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE RECORDS,RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT,AND WHICH I REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. MAY BE PAID IN FULL HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL i I CONSENT STATEMENT DATED CITY TREASURER-CRY OF ARCADIA THE UNDERSIGNED CONSENTS TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THE FINAL.SUBDIVISION/TRACT MAP. PL.ANNING.COMMISSION CERTIFICATE COAST MS REAL ESTATE,LLC,A CALIFORNIA LIMITED .'=ILRY COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO.52745 WAS I. APPROVED AT A MEETING HELD ON THE_DAY OF • / 2000. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LAP SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WITH .J'- THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. • BY —_ ITS:MEMB RS;MEMBER ' DATED SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION . . e CITY OF ARCADIA •- . NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) - FINANCE DIRECTOR'S-CERTIFICATE SS - COUNTY OF 171201'44"_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FEE REQUIRED BY SECTION 9116.4 OF THE oN AO+ '1,'Lo�,BEFORE TIE.P�mG04`'WTT1,1NS,FJoOM{RAl4C. MUNICIPAL CODE HAS BEEN PAID TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA PERSONALLY APPEARED u°,4, SAIPAIVO.44.0.,.,o'11Ae,4wc J.,1 J • PERSONALLY EVIDENCE)TO RE TIE TO ME PERSONS)WHO ETNAME(S)IS/AE SUBSCRIBED 10ACTHE ' DATED FINANCE DIRECTOR-CTIY OF ARCADIA WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT I-E,WME/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN /THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACIIY(IES)) UPON BEHALF .AND THAT BY WBTY'ITR/IHEIR SIGNATURE(S)THE N PERSON(S)ACTED.EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. OF WHICH • WITNESS SIGNATURE -- 'G' kl-C MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IN 0¢,MA‘•6 COUNTY. .- g(LQNph Cam, v4M-v.N4 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES I+T2f'J.At (NAME PRINTED) Gouty, 44124g I45 • 'I . . . . I I 1 SCALE, t'= 100' TRACT N®. 52'745 SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 MONUMENT NOTES BASIS OF BEARINGS • i THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING • 'N 0259'40' C ALONG THE CENTERUNE OF BALDWIN AVENUE 1 X INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED HEREON. PER TRACT N0.13429.M.B.273/25. i ill,I FD.BRASS PIN IN CONCRETE NO REF.,FITS 2 LEAD U TACT( I ' TIES PER STATE OMSION OF HIGHWAYS AA 210E-0382, ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION. • Pill , © FD.SPIKE U WASHER.NO REF.,ACCEPTED AS CENTERUNE LEGEND ' I INTERSECTION. I INDICATED THE BOUNDARY OF'THE LAND ©I FE.CITY ENGINEERS BOLT PEA TRACT N0.12429.YA 273/ ■• BUNS SUBDIVIDED BY 1105 MAP. I flFFU D.4 210E LEAD 42-0127.TACK TIES PER STATE DM510N OF HIGHWAYS i i V FO.LEND&TACK'LS.2600'PER CITY OF ARCADIA DES 722. 6 Z. fARTR' oV.8693R 89 ACCEPTED AS INDEX AND VICINITY MAP• O FD.=WIN T-BAR 94 CONCRETE NO REF,ACCEPTED AS INDICATES SHEET NO, NW CORNER OF O.R.18693-209. PD 252 HUB TAGGED'LS.2580',NO REF. O Y I.P.TAGGED'LS 8086' TO BE SET AT PLL TRACT • • BOUNDARY CORNERS,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SPIKE&WASHER STAMPED'1.5 6066'TO BE SET AT ALL O STREET CENTERUNE POINTS OF CONTROL UNLESS _ _ ' • OTHERWISE NOTED. ( CURVE TABLE `C/L ORANGE GROVE 3 NO. i RADIUS i DELTA I LENGTH Cl 1].00' 94'18'40°1 2].90' 1 I C/L ANOAK%A LANE ESTABUSAED AT FD.NOTHING, RECORD ANGLE k 01ST.(979.85') C/L INTERSECTION ESTABLISHED Ai ALONG RECORD DISTANCE(833.1] PER TR.NO.13428,M.B.273/ ') ACCEPTED AS N'LY UNE OF O.R. 25.FRS FOUND MONUMENTS ON C/L BALDWIN AVENUE FROM C/L °I 18593-289,MA81./514E0 THRU WIT PROD OF S'LY UNE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PER TR.N0. FOUND MONUMENTS, ANOAKIA UNE 13429,Y.B.273/15. • El 75.20' I� _ _ A I ANF N8041'00'E 079.05' _ "8_ 0 N88'41'00'E 1090.50' / C;. 40' 40' G 15 16 27 28 29 30 BID 14 olm 13 i >• E 53-I2 I • / 26 b 22 31 ik w co / 12 _ // / 9,25 i E T AURA LAN '4. ARBOLADA ill m D(PRNATE STREET) UO (7 O DRIVE iar 23 S 4 TEc.'q:i . 0-5 % , P. I 9a 11 %-y O 24 O ; ,,, tP = to :.r a a • Is=e 19 20 21 E 10 \ O. :I 7. F CARRIAGE HOUSE DRIVE�G . — PRNA- •STREET �1 CO OZ ,E I 0 CR m 8 0' 9 J D 8 7 6 5 4 3 40' 40' 4 I 1 6 { N8B41'S0"E 1051.29' i a '40.0.• p b O m 0 1088.42' 577.52' _ — — 365.05_ _� o1p J03.19' —` N O N O N8B41'S0'E 1245.06' © c° 3.26' c 4 . FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 0 sD / 1 FD.NOTHING. • 30,130 I 6 0' C/L WTERSECBON 6 0' 30'30 ESTABLISHED BY PRORATION 30.30' 0 I BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS f] o 3' EAST AND WEST PER TR.NO. Z 1J '371 28296.Y.B.784/53-54. r • . . ' SCALE: 1'=50' SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS ' FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS AND TRACT NO. 52745 MONUMENT NOTES,SEE SHEET 2. IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I LEGEND THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 INDICATED THE BOUNDARY OF THE LINO BEING CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE EING SUBDNNEO BY iw5 WP. NO. RADIUS 1 DELTA LENG99. CO. RADIUS I 716'5 LENGTH NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH. 9' Cl C1 1].00' 921242 27.98'- C16 100.00' 8716'15 152.34' C35 40.00' * 98'49'31 69.99' 02 5.00' 12455'04' 11.34• C 1 9 35.00' 14533'22 90.75' -C35 40.00' 4750'04' 34.79' ,_C3 40.02 3618'45 25.33'- C20 70.00' 144.52.38 177.00•_ C37 40.00' 405237 20.81' C4 150.00' 85'42'17 224.37' C21 42.00' 12716'22' 89.63' C39 40.00' 31.5247 22.34' I . LINE TABLE C5 .20.00' 31.4011' 11.05' 022 164.00' 2706'37 63.28' 039 114.00' 1702'34' 33.91' • - NO. BEARING DISTANCE C6 27.00' 31'40'21' 14.93' C23 164.00' 1 4'1507 41.931 040 114.00' 15'0715 30.09' LI 116240.22W 18.91' _C7 70.00' 073750' 3.22 024 25.00' 9000.00" 3927' 041 114.00' 44'14'55 88.05' • . L2 N8700'220 84.32' 00 25.00' 475037 18.69'_ C25 39.00' 900007 61.25 ' 042 114.00' 0215.24' 5.15' I L3 749700'20W 8.65' CO 40.001 4650'51' 32.71' C26 56.00' 14756.47 139.72 043 35.00' 4376•]5' 26.42 ' 04 713525.24'E 30.02' 010 75.00' 255546• 37.87' C27 25.00' 900007 39.27' C44 35.00' 4703'49 26.75' LS 53237'09'W 28.95• C11 15.00' 5217'57 15.00' 028 75,00' 200737 38.78' C45 35.02 5513'02 3536 1.8 60940'27W 30.13' 012 40.00' 4447'39' 31.27' C29 . 40.00' 521757 40.00' 046 150.00' 455347 130.83' L7 N0759'47E 52.241 013 184.00' 0715'01' 20.72 030 70.00 76.04'25 92.94' C47 150.00' 2056'55 5484' LB 58200'22E 81.00' 014 50.00' 375237 33.10' 031 70.00' 54'50'35' 67.00' 048 150.00' 14'51'27' 38.90' I L9 58024'52E (12) 24.73' 015 114.00' 7000'25 137,20' 032 70.00' 11'19.43 13.84' 049 116.00' 8642.17 203.43' 010 60542'f7E 41.]1' 016 50.00' 6504'15 80.28• 032 40.00' 26646'10• 168.24' L11 50259'40E 21235' 017 I 68.00' 5548.35 89.27 034 40.00' 4208.27 31.51• I SEE SHEET 2 1 i . �- 0 4, - N3541.08E 979,85• - ANOAKIA E- - - - NO o - N ? ' - N8541•07E 109050 •�- _v'�• • ns.n' • 71Ie.10' 13&15' 147.94' 1 • 1 1 • 0 I40' 4o• I , 29 = 8l0 5 $ 22388 S.F. n 30 • 27 28 23967 S.F. 1 • - 22995 S.F.GROSS . 22119 S.F. !+122D•2q; _�`�' - I• • 20000 S.F.NET (�) I x 1 _NcM!'15E t573^56'00W I I • (Rao) 1 (Rao)P.R.C., I . N4 50'43W \ C42 C43 1 r jMO) \ ,N860.77' 1 .) °F ?f 60.17' .1....... s� •. NBT41.16'E 130.21'. / aAb.,.B!f-,6'• 1 C4� • © , A. . 91875202W 127.831 - 4,� '0 4` . , W I m DEAL,.F LOT o Lr of nRMCwuro2 PUB c U18.11Y PURPOSES. 5�ry '.,ve.F t , 62680 S.. 0N1�. DSB`•L¢:f7� - M 4P 00 012 4'1 6 1A0'-- CEO 2 O �- (�) ,_`�' / ..1., ''SCW N8T00'2OW •14`3 ' I N7$00451 (RAD)P.C.C. 0 ,,, ,***•.N512224351 I N 26 (RAO)P.R.C. \` t7 1 EASEMENT TO THE CRY j4�42'30'W (RAD)PAC. I- 22252 S.F. ♦ OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC (�)P.R,C.\ 31 W ?h N7505'I8'W - O UTILITY PURPOSES. LL \ LLJ 4• (RAoj P.R.C. 22 01 - 23266 S.F. - _ Pao ,5700 0, W c2' 0 1 ` 22208 S.F. CO^ u'714' 84 I' „1• (/) (RAD) . 8 !1.596 E b I 5893,325-S 127.17' " ©2 P 1�(�)P.5. In`4 '.y 8.d _- (RAD)P.A.G- - -- P60410 &TIRE LANE DRIVEWAY--• C I Q 1.rRL2 _ 06 a.,,. l 60020 OS'E 124.63' •/1 0 Z LOG 1\\ N79'IB'02W IN.19• , bI AI`UTA� /��'�1R,�- ,�=_ER' / I •ce COO • / `79'43'OS'K ' a - N87'00'22W 213.85' i O rl N6(Rao)4•J �s '' �(}h (Rao)- Al J 1:13 i © (PRNATE STREET) l3 �vI 40.00' 37'' m\�.N1e•06'3o'E ° g I J D 8438 S.F. �,] m n N T 24 '4 ( ) 23 u O. d'`EASEMENT TO THE CITY 6(� • fn 10 o� 25146 S.F. £ 22013 S.F. ya64e•49'E�i OF ARCAO7 FOR PUBLIC `� (4.40)P.R.C. (15 U7701 PURPOSES. I / 2. 'N i Io (RAD)P.R.C. k � ), N4(642) J/ N N o p t1 Ate( L t6.-5..T 10 N8044.32'E 284.89' 60040'55S 18487 . ,U� 4 1 151.90' --- 7., I 23949 S.F. - al I DU08.5s1 0 rI' �1]ffa5.15E • (�) ', \ / (RAO)PAC. 1 N552102'E 0 21 4._ / \ /'TRAO)P.R.C. Q y 22031 S.F. 1+5809.251 -, C7 I qq . (ROD)P.R.C. . •G N8700'27W 151.10'• £ 20 £ EASEMENT TO THE CITY � /` OF ARCADIA FOR 06030 Y �.y ;7E ) a • t„ 22089 S.F. UOLRY PURPOSES. ff 6• m N2T01'S1W /0 /./ , 8 --�7048'35E CARRIAGE HOUSE DRNE (RM)P.R.C..\ .(1740 rye``• 4'114 IR CAO)P.C.. ^I �• +: 0 . . ' 6'4 -CARRIAGE HOUSE . N6541'SO'E 2;51.i54:_• ` _ 4],Q-� /\ G�h a;1.,crye DRIVE �- 1 26^4( 4'N e a �I 45 o4 58644'55 En 352.15' OOTNL OF(1'RNA7E STREET)` - 2 047 i 0 \ 62880 S.F. I \ 22952 S.F. I - ♦m NBBn'S7E 152.15 LOT E �. ' C23 I C3\ -� 1 734.00' -T 38.16' I 1 \ -j'CS ,+ EASEMENT TO THE CRY . ..• \ LNL£4?'01'E . I_ of ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC N1S57•f7WJl 11 G2 \ (Rao)P.C.C. 4; L.LJ UTILITY PURPOSES. 15'- - (RAD)P.R.C. 5 \` 59'S1E .NJO. ) Lil .823_15'05W, �)- 0' = 15'EASEMENT TO THE 3 (600) 3 '� I S CRY OF ARCADIA FOR -, 0 CV (n .2 SEWER PURPOSES. 7 4 I 4 4 �.v. .. �1 _ I £ 4 z 40' I 40' (� 22781 S.F. 22867 S.F. .7,-, 26114 S.F. Elio' al LU 0 p I L3J (n 15 I f. a 133•50• M I • • .204.12 • �- • T 134.00'. . . • i N8241.520 1051.29' -_ O O J O pp 57732' i0 to - - A m _� - - _ - ' 71 O .3 68041'55E 1245.86 i A O O I 1 I OLD RANCH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD . I 161--0. I k• -i ' SCALE: I"=so' TRACT NO. 52745 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS• • IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGEND • THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 • 5101CATE0 THE BOUN04RT ' OF THE LAMB BEING CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE • $U80N0)ED Bf TNLS LW. CURVE RADIUS_ DELTA LENGTH N0. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CI 118.00' 60'27'42' 143.05' CIS 40.00' 271'56'35' 169.85' C29 40.00' 9303'57' 64.97' FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS AND C2 90.00' 6842.26' 96.50' C16 190.80' 75.00.36' 249.16' • C30 40.00' 5032'10' 35.28' t MONUMENT NOTES,SEE-SHEET 2, a 204.00' 44.10130' 157,29' C17 176.05' 75.0536' 230.62' 031 40.00' 6018'17 42.10' C4 40.00' 471034' 32.94' CIS 204.00' 2838'54' 102.00' 032 176.00' _ 3944.07 122.06' CS' 1115.00' 0025137 6.31' CI9 204.00' 15'31'44' 55.29' C33 90.00' 55119'14' 66.00' UNE TABLE C8 50.00' 51'31'17 44.96' C20 1985.00' 01'10'31' 40.72' 074 190.00' 2713'10 77.00' NO. BEARING DISTANCE 07 15.00' 81'26'47' 21.32' 021 114.00' 2626'34' 52.81' 035 190.00' 51'55'20 172.16• _ 01 63630'18'40 26.02' CB 15.00' 8319'57' 21.82' 023 114.00' 24'24'07' 40.55' C35 90.00' 0723'17 11'.60' L2 43927•57'W 31.61' C9 88.00 5050'41' 75.32' 023 204.00' 1732'02' 4.63' 037 11e.00' 4009.20' 02.70' U N61'37'27'71 •53.92' C10 114.00' 5050'41' 101.18'. C24 204.00' 0312'40 11.43' 038 176.00' 11'34'40 35.57' i L4 65340'31'E 513.00' CII 204.00' 15.44'47 56.08' C25 115.00 0509•30 10.62' . C39 40.00' 4055.30 26.61' LS 54432'31'W 08.97' C12 100.00' 5050'41' 87.74' 026. '1100.00' 161913 351.86' 040 119.00' 24'00'50 .9.73' 10 SOE18'/0E 164.37' C13 104.00' 6950'05' 126.713' C27 176.00' 2349•41' 73.19' C41 2015.00' 03'00'30 105.00' L7 N2457•5517 5635' 014 40.00 2694919 I 166.24• 026 40.00' 6602.11' I 4750' C42 2000.00• ' 0350147 59.36• . LB N24'37'55'W 57.139' L9_ 624'0755'W 168.19' _ LIS 60930'198 226.30' L11 624'57'000 55.44' N 1 N ANO •a C ■ - _N6T4759E n-. • --- (�) 32.09' N69t1'00E 1.85' a o o 66641.00E 1•'0.50' �� 9455' 9\ • • • /` • 126.75'• `� •121042' ` 75.10' /' \ n • n.5F.•' / `38.80' I IJ') 7850' j !/ • G 21-'4.a 6y,E 1 �5 N88U2'35E I N \ 6 I• 1 • .(. J (RAD) /1 i V:, g i • , _N0752'S7E J \5 \"`N6032.20E c ES 1 5 e S. LV I (P.8D) \5 a (RAO) :0, 1 6 £ I 3 22069 S.F. i 25876 S.F. GROSS _• S I4 22969 S.F. NET• 3 24855 S.F.' NI53o•15'w LLJ• 27023 S.F. GROSS \ ,cO)/ r (580) I LrJ• NO 24023 S.F.NET C, �0 / / r u�R THE PUBLIC Y) 401'44:.i' 7 j 091110 PURPOSES. NBT43'10E EASEMENT OF LA.C.F.C.O.-�, \ 1/ � 4 07713•42.E 1 FOR FLOOD CONTROL i•%01 ., ' b r (�) 4. PURPOSES PER BOOK `(J \ l 6 / y"U'. • • 5291 PAGE 392.0.6. `' \ \\ �\G'1 / N7 8�y00E H06'' 7* .80414• 1\ G11 4'� �ktC S w'EY .1 • 159.11' (PRNATE STREET) N8643'SVE 18].]8' + /r ��/ O WO* " �E 67 i6• H� CARRIAD E OUSE• ,94_0,-,,' Tw,T�,'4_$O op, ' �.. PRIVATE RDRNEW'AY'- ,, ' © (`W, 51.65' J„ • • 66050438 cN , N/ CA /, •\�N571 Y00W �� _NI00.'S5W�I I U B (MO) (em) _443'27'08'W (�) 0i. ��' 68938.05E \ EASEMENT TO THE CITY\`/ b (RAID)P.C.C. • 12 Of ARGDN ER PUBDC , (� "r2378.11 • FE N8751'49E 60644'5740 1 I. 23183 SF. \ (RAO)R-1115' 20.12' PRNATE ORNEWAY../ eI I..? / i __65050:�V19 a 25 0'7 k FIRE LANE \• , 14 VIu ry (RAD)6-90' 124.63' ■ .\ 141)4' w` °' 26645 S.F. GROSS '/� N693B'05E 1 N]( 50E 2 8 I�\\ 23167 S.F.NET - / \ 68643.30E 772.08' `' 3\ p b 22194.S.F. N66567CE L1'. /1 �7�.2 1...; etp` \\t f ! / 59'.T,f f o� I col p7' J. `T Yiu• a 1 m� E a\ 0, ` PJ I • 23873 S.F. I% 'S •:.i £;g 5'�p �.1. • - $\ .g9. . . N8844'37E 264.69' • j 1,2.79• 1 N70]7'4F :s1.... .. to 3,\\ '8 (--- (PAD) Egj4 1 4'4 I NBe'tr30E 20539' �� \, ` '.� 22023 S.F. o • , T� \ $ ti NSB'OS'44 E_© v\ Y\a�, 1 _NBI'05'a0'E X60 1 9 i (RAID)v.R.c. • (11AD)R-1115' 22005 S.F. I • _N5037'10E__y - 'ry\1 ,n, ) N34'06'17'E 6ry (�) ,4, ' \ (0.10)0-176' 2' �NI016.39E TE 8.1 O 4'40• 0'f / (RAID) EASEMENT TO •THE CRY /' / OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC m a . 26420 S.F. 6 /6.`78 y CB/ ... \7,1 / © UTILITY 041 SSE 352-1�5' /1 -- 0 9. i.4. / iy. .. "",/....o 152.66'__-�0_-L_ _-_ 0/ a�''F' �h'_0.73 P�yA�STREET) • _68841.50E 1 382.15' N A---•-... . • I CJ -�.i N+ DETAIL OF LOT E _ - _ 4' \ \ ��-m 62660 S.F. �6'4l'SVE 352.15'•.1- - 68643.30E 143.66 1' 0 _ ." _ A�p y$/ w \ -ter c If' /� \9..?i/1Q _ \ -.�TB f6.49.- 133.50'- \ "_C _ /FC11 U 'L` 1 \ ' CARRIAGE HOUSED I _N605126'1 11 ' EASEMENT TO THE CITY I 4_N2T20'44_E DRIVE (RAO) rn I OF ARGDU FOR PU1300( \ (600)R-204' V) ( UTILITY PURPOSES. 3 6075 07 S ' •N 10 Z4 cYl \-- )6--F° I1 0,' . I (RAO)6.1115' $ • m . F- _ 9 ©I z I3 8 I I f 7 a 6 x , LA LL.) •- 30765 S.F. I _ 2: 23282 S.F. I oil Z I0' o m 23543 S.F.. . 22696 5.F. _ I I 8 9 a (n • ■ O I• 4•`-i N 115'115'u FASEMENT OF NTROFL. ' Form CONTROL W 31 I0' 3 0' PURPOSES PER BOOK LL.; --I 0291,PAGE 392,0.5. LLJ 14'74'ly 1 1 (n I '8' • 160.30'• �...li' 126.05'• -`t<I-� • 133.50'• • -�.+• J • • 131.62' • �T NB641'SVE 1051.29' \ze.ar 11 o N • ;• g © p \1 365.05' 202.09' m 577,52' 0 - -- 303.29' - e `L--' __ 142.50'0 • 60611.50E 1245.86' ( 05 DON 320 g: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD • ,OLD RANCH DIABLO D� I • I� ROAD , \\\ /I 6 0'I �1 6Ip, }p' I }p• r . 30' 30' S"""' 9 STAFF REPORT ORpORA289• DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT August 15, 2000 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director 97 By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL MAP NO. 52745 FOR THE ANOAKIA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT 701 WEST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SUMMARY Tentative Maps and Final Maps are required for all subdivisions that result in five or more parcels or condominiums. The City Council shall approve a final map if it conforms to all the requirements of the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. It is recommended that the City Council approve Final Map No. 52745 for a 31 lot residential planned development at 701 West Foothill Boulevard. DISCUSSION Final Map No. 52745 has been reviewed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the appropriate City Departments. Said map has been found to be in compliance with the vesting tentative pap as approved by the City Council on December 21, 1999 and is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the Arcadia Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should move to approve Final Map No. 52745. Attachments: 1. Letter of compliance from Los Angeles County 2. Final Map No. 52745 Approved: UrlejA William R. Kelly, City Manager GED 0.1 ojjiI \C COVN-TY OF LOS ANGELES+ -' a I� �}. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ' 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE oz LIF°RN ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone:(626)458-5100 HARRY W.STONE,Director ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 May 3, 2000 ALHAMBRA,CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE pp REFER TO FILE: LD-8 Mr. Terry Hagen City Engineer City of Arcadia 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91006-6021 Dear Mr. Hagen: TRACT NO. 52745 The enclosed subject tract map has been reviewed by our Department for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis, title information, and for compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act. The map is now ready for your examination and certification as to compliance with the conditional approval and applicable City Ordinances. The City Council or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Subdivision Map Act. After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the map should be returned to Land Development Division, Subdivision Mapping Section for filing with the County Recorder. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.Armando Aguilar of our Subdivision Mapping Section at (626) 458-4915. Very truly yours, V HARRY W. STONE Director of Public Works MAY 22 � ie.?RONALD D. ONDROZECK Assistant Division Engineer Land Development Division • AA:ca P:\MAPPING\TRACT.LTR Enc. ' p1 / 38 LOTS • SHEET. 1 OF 4 SHEETS 19.11 ACRES IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SANTA ANITA RANCHO AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1,PAGES 97 AND S8 - OF PATENTS AND A PORTION OF LOT 3 THE OF TRACT NO. THE COUNTY 948 17,PAGE 21 OF MAPS, • RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. THE KEITH COMPANIES. INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 •OWNER'S STATEMENT • WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF OR ARE INTERESTED IN THE LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES,AND WE CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAD MAP AND SUBOMSION. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT WE HERB!DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE EASEMENT FOR SEWER I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OF THE PURPOSES 50 DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP AND ALL USES INCIDENT THERETO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA:THAT THIS FINAL MAP,CONSLSTINC OF 4 SHEETS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO MARE CONNECTIONS THEREWITH FROM ANY ADJOINING - IS A TRUE AND COMPLETE SURVEY AS SHOWN.AND WAS MADE EN ME PROPERTIES. OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN JULY 1999;THAT THE MONUMENTS OF THE CHARACTER AND LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN PLACE OR WILL BE WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC IN PLACE WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS FROM THE RUNG DATE OF THIS MAP; UTILITY PURPOSES SO DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP AND ALL USES INCIDENT THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE THERETO,INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO MAKE CONNECTIONS HEREWITH FROM ANY RETRACED AND ALL TIE NOTES TO ALL CENTERLINE MONUMENTS SHOWN ADJOINING PROPERTIES. AS-TO BE SET-WILL BE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER, WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS FROM FILING DATE SHOWN HEREON. THE OWNERS OR AN ASSOCIATION REPRESENTING THE OWNERS OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL OWN AND MANTAIN STREETS.SIDEWALKS.AND ALL PRIVATE /�I lA,IOO `� .F� at z,,,,SULUCIURES WITHIN SAD DEVELOPMENT. IS/e1/090 V �,/L O.ST .,, WE HERBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE RIGHT TO PROHIBIT THE DATED JAMES A SNEIEEP.ES 12/1/ �Yw°P • CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITHIN LOTS A THROUGH G. REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12/31/01 '$• ISJWI• AS A DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC USE WHILE ALL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, ♦ /116:66 '../ BALDWW AVENUE AND ANOAKIA LANE WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SUBDIVISION \>4) CTS 1 REMAIN PUBLIC STREETS,WE HEREBY GRAM TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE RIGHT CRY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT . TO RESTRICT DIRECT VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE SAD STREETS. IF ANY PORTION OF SAID STREETS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SUBDIVISION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP;THAT IT CONFORMS ARE VACATED,SUCH VACATION TERMINATES THE ABOVE DEDICATION AS TO THE SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS PART VACATED. THEREOF;THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION ORDANCES OF THE CITY _ OF ARCADIA APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS AR.-CIA OAKS TIEED LIABILITY COMPANY.A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. ,� �1' DATED STANLEY E.SCHOLL.,R.C.E.14527 7 XMAS C R CITY ENGINEER,COY OF ARCADIA INCA RR REGISTRATION EXPIRES_/_/__ NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP;THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF COUNTY OF O12M44• 55) APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP;AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS ON PALR4t'ci _.TORE ME. 0A4 G.WATY4A W."`"wg R,WG MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT W ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TO BY EEC THE CITY ENGINEER. PERSONALLY APPEARED T dE&Fla • PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE)TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAME(S)IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE - SAME IN HIS/MBR�THLTR AUTHORIZED ZED CAPACRY(IES).AND THAT IS/ECMERO4•IEIRE DATED DEPUTY COUNTY ENGINEER R.C.E. OF WHICH THE N THE ENIN INSTRUMENT EXECUTED N(5),OR THE INSTRUMENT. UPON BEHALF REGISTRATION EXPIRES_/_/ WITNESS MY�A HAND: SIGNATURE�yYF .,_CP'Ui4N t MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE NOTARY PUBLIC IN MID FOR SAID STATE IN 1.0- COUNTY. JtjgM CA. VI PYFILINS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SIgl•O'I' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA BY MOTION PASSED ON APPROVED THE ATTACHED MAP (NAME PRINTED) AND ACCEPTED THE DEDICATION OF SEWER EASEMENT,PUBLIC UTILITY CAN b'4. 41.(yPS165 41 EASEMENT,CONSTRUCTION RIGHTS AND VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS. SIGNATURE OMISSIONS ARCADIA DATED CITY CLERK-CITY OF ARCAD PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(c)(3A)(I-VIII)OF THE SUBDIVISION IMP ACT.THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES HAVE BEEN OMITTED: 1. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT.HOLDER OF AN CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES RECORDED DECEMBER 1, $R 1958 AS INSTRUMENT N0.4905,IN BOOK D291 PAGE 392 OF OFFICIAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE RECORDS,RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT,AND WHICH REOUIRED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. • MAY BE PAID IN FULL HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. CONSENT STATEMENT DATED CITY TREASURER-CITY OF ARCADIA THE UNDERSIGNED CONSENTS TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF • THE FINAL SUBDIVISION/TRACT MAP. PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE COAST 5 REAL ESTATE,LLC,A CALIFORNIA LIMITED • 'IUTY COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO.52745 WAS APPROVED AT A MEETING HELD ON THE-DAY OF • 2000. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WITH THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. ' BY: Ira.,__-_ IRE:MEMB RS:MEMBER DATED SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A CITY OF ARCADIA NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) • FINANCE DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF DRATA5 _) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FEE REQUIRED BY SECTION 9116.4 OF.THE ON -- i��,BEFORE ME,� d'`.W.T6.IVS`0.1e0Mj RAI.tc_ MUNICIPAL CODE HAS BEEN PAD TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA. PERSONALLY APPEARED A.,.,a AIMYr4t4.0 r.o'I'Aeg.r. IA,4*1.1 PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE)TO BE THE PERSON(S)WHOSE NAMES)15-/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE DATED FINANCE DIRECTOR-CRY OF ARCADIA WITHIN AUTHORIZED ECAPACITY(IESS)),,AND THAT BBYANIB/H[R/THEIRE SIGNATURES)ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S)ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS D: ��q��y� SIGNATURE(Cm ,"""`4S . MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IN 02*.‘tet COUNTY. l RBFJOA 4. VJM141Nf. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 5 -d°e- ('MME PRINTED) . CouI. 41112441 4.6 •[ '4 • SCALE: 1" = 100' TRACT NO. 52745 SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS• IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 • MONUMENT NOTES BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING 'N 02'59'4!' 0"ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BALDWIN AVENUE • INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED HEREON. PER TRACT NO.13429,M.D.273/25. FD.BRASS PIN IN CONCRETE NO REF..FITS 2 LEAD&TACK • TIES PER STATE DM510N OF HIGHWAYS ALA 210E-0382. ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION. N © INFD.SATE&0N.WASHER,NO REF.,ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE l TER LEGEND • • INDICATED THE BOUNDARY OF THE LINO © FD.CITY ENGINEERS BOLT PER TRACT N0.13429,M.B.273/ ..—.....4-41.—.—r BEING SUBOMDEO BY THIS MAP. NM FD.4 210E-0 LEAD&127.TACK TiES PER STATE DMSION OF HIGHWAYS .. I © FD.LEAD&TACK•L5.2600'PER COY OF ARCADIA DES 723. VICINITY, 6 SOIRMWEST TCORNER•Oi 0?R.�186938209.ACCEPTED AS INDEX AND MAP • UF0.OLD RUSTED T-BMW CONCRETE NO REF,ACCEPTED AS I I INDICATES SHEET NO. NW CORNEA OF O.R.1869}289. `./ 0 FD 2a2 HUB TAGGED'LS.2580',NO REF. . O2'I.P.TAGGED'LS 60135" All TO BE SET AT A TRACT BOUNDARY CORNERS.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I • SPIKE&WASHER STAMPED'LS 6066'TO BE SET AT ALL O STREET CENTERLINE POINTS OF CONTROL.UNLESS — _ _ ._ • OTHERWISE NOTED. 0... CURVE TABLE `C/L ORANGE GROVE • • NO' I RADIU I gDELTA. I LEND e C/L MOAKW LANE ESTABLISHED AT FD.NOTHING, RECORD ANGLE&DIST.(979.85') C/L INTERSECTION ESTABLISHED AT PER TR.NO 13429,M.B.273/ RECORD DISTANCE(833.13')ALONG ACCEPTED AS N'LY UNE OF O.R. 25.FITS FOUND MONUMENTS ON C/L BALDWIN AVENUE FROM C/L n 1 • 15693-289.ESTABLISHED THOU W'LY PROD OF S•LY UNE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PER TR.NO. FOUND MONUMENTS, ANONCW LANE 13429,M.B.273/25. • O El 75.20' 1 \ � a _ �,AyE N BB4I'00'E 9]9.85' �'I 0 N88.41.00'E 1090.5_• • • - 0 40' 40' • • G 29 30 810. • 15 16 27 28 14 olm • • • 13 A _ a E yl„ • F, . b I 31 f22 ill 1E' • 12 o I/ . / E = AN1TA "a, ARSOLADA ;o E o D(PRIVATE 9TREEf) pp DRIVE x 0 1U, 00 24 23 O 113'9'm 11 m(NS�Y O r U 11-1 � :% 18 0 1 doe 19 20 21 E 1 z Y 10 F \ _ 7..CARRIAGE HOUSE DRIVE O, pi —PRNATE STREET —� nm .E Im 4 O0 D8 7 6 5 4 3 40' 40' 9 : E O 1 6 , 2 I NBB41'S0•E 1051.29' 1008.42' 1 i '40.••:x— o b 365.OY m '0.. 57752' _ — — �0 30329' ^�l— _ - —-- _ / Ut p N NBB41'S0'E 1245.86' © o° S.zs o IJ . FOOTHILL BOULEVARD D1 F0.NOTHING. / 30'130' I 6 0' C/L INTERSECTIOry 6 0 30'30 ESTABLISHED BY MONUMENT 30'30' 9I BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS EAST AND WEST PER NO. 1� 2828298.M.B.784/5J-3-54. O . . i, . SCALE: r =50' SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS TRACT NO. 52745 I FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS ANO ' MONUMENT NOTES,SEE SHEET 2. IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I LEGEND THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 a INDICATES THE BOUNDARY THE SU 80M B BEING OED CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE BY THIS MAP. NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH NO. RADIUS I DELTA LENGTH CO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH,'' j 441 17.00' 94'18'40" 27.98'_ C1B 100.00' 8716'58' 152.34' C35 40.00' 9649'35 60.49' I C2 5.00' 129'55'04' 11.34' CI9 35.00' 14633'23 90.75' 036 40.00' 4450.04" 34.79' CO I. 40.00• 3616'45 25.33' C20 70.00' 144'5736 177.00' _037 40.00' 4051730' 28.61' C4 150.00' 85.42.10 224.37' 021 42.00' 12716'22 89.63• 038 40.00• 3759.40 22.34• 1 LINE TABLE CS .20.00' 3740.21' 11.05• 022 164.00• 2706•30 63.28' -039 114.00' 1707344 33.91' NO.1 BEARING DISTANCE C6 27.00' 3740.21' 14.93' C2.3 164.00' 14.39'06' 41.93' COO 114.00' 160729' 30.09' LI N6040.270 16.91' C7 70.00• 073750' 3.22• 024 25.00' 9000'00' 39.27 C41 114.00' 4414'59' 88.05' U ` 6970028* 84.32' CO 25.00• 475037 18.69' 025 39.00' 9000710 61.26' 042 114.00• 0735.29 5.15' LJ I N6700'280 8.65' C9 40.00' 4650.51' 32.71' C26 56.00' 14756'47 139.71• C43 35.00' 4316'35' 26.44' L4 93520'24'E 30.02' 010 75.00' 2055'46 37.87' _027 25.00' 9000.00' 39.27' C44 I 35.00' 4703'46 28.75' LS N323709'19 26.95• C11 15.00' 5717'50 15.00' 028 75.00• 2437.37 38.78• 045 35.00• 5613.02 35.56• • L6 11644017W 36.13' D12 40.00' 44.4734 31.27' C29 40.00' 5717'50 40.00' C46 150.00' 4453'47 130.63• L7 60759.40E 52.24' 013 164.00• • 071901' 20.75• C30 70.00' 7004'26 92.94' 047 150.00' 2056•56' 54.84' L9 587'00'20"E 81.00' 014 50.00' 375930 33.10• C31 70.00' 54'50'35" 67.00• 048 150.00• 14'51.27 30.90• I L9 064424•16E (R) 24.73' 015 114.00' 7400'26 157.20' 032 70.00' 11.19.43' 13.84' 049 136.00' I 8542'10 203.43' LW 905'42'42E 41.35' 016 50.00• 6704.36 60.28' 033 40.00' 26646.16' 186.24' LII /10759'40E 217.35' 017 88.00' 5646'36 88.22' C34 40.00' 400817' 31.51' SEE SHEET) 2 1 . 199 - • ' ANO�y�S O p 91138.41,00-E 979.85 _ _ - No o- _ j N8841'00E 1090.50' 178.27 .� •118.10' - Cam` ,JB.,y�'L�� 143.96' - '\ • 1 1 0 1 _ i 40' 1 40• g 29 830. 4 $ 22388 S.F. i 30 $ 27 - 28 0 23967 S.F. 1 Iv Fl... 22995 S.F.GROSS 22119 S.F. NL-2024E A I 20600 S.F.NET (�) ,1 I 21002..16E c .02156'°9' '1 • (Ra8) "' (RA0)P.R.C.\ ) . N43.50.43W \� CNBT00'20W \ U3 0 + I (' 2. I- (PAD) 60.17' 010 prI t 69743.19E 120.21' y I y4,5 o j°e�k .•'\ U-- • N8754.OS'W 12].11)' �v - � 'S Ry 0 N 07 © 7'P `9 EASEMENT TO THE COY 'j' iI Y: i�.�(1-4jy-/ I y I5 OETA L,• LOT �/ OF W 009 FOR PUBUG MOTY PURPOSES. ;�ti .•°4-P A _ c` , E 62680 S. +44. yy658',2� :. ]Y IP 00 0', --8,-00'- . cty 2 4 (505) \� /�i SSa6'S6W n67Op z0w •o� I N]600.49W (RAD)P.C.C. �`ST22'43'W 1 'L 26 (RAD)P.R.C.\ 1 EASEMENT TO THE CRY .82142'JO'V] L�' (9801 P.R.C. I 22252 S.F. - \\ OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC (RAID \ % 31 I W -•••;,.,. N3605'16'W W UTILITY PURPOSES. LLJ p (RAD)P.R.C.\ �� m A 22 y \ CZ18 • 23266 S.F. - al 1 = ag .87004.56 \ f • , 22208 S.F. 0] ' '4' 14 is h1., (I) (RAD) \ _``�5�8'26E N 604'40'Ot'E o19 i • . 68438.05E 127.17' J © �i ROD P.9.0 4N •°mu ' v (RAO)P.R.C.7 ( S19-" LJ.J PRNATE DRNEwA0 A 1: I L2 C6 1 LLJ &ROE LINE CS / �N114J8'°SE 124.63' © O 1\ N7g 18,p7,W b 1 g �1=� I (n /♦ / 99.19• m a ANN A LANE 0‘,A>, V `]?4)'05-w - N8700'202/ 213.65• p _16656.34') '443.3 /h (�D)" i` + (Rep) c5 _ © (PRrvaTE STREET) �, 40.°6. r x�\ D 8438 S.F. I �01YQB•J0'E 1 4 ow) ei 1 L2- .• to © I/ 23 446 I CS 448 a it ti� 24 F 2 o1n. `OoF ERIE pa°pR Faric 1 ,. W •o� 25146 S.F. 22013 S.F. 6464649'1✓ ^� ....n1'PURPOSES. 1 / 24 (FAO)PAC. 'P I(� ^2 t12640.41_wJ / b Q . (PAD)P.R.C. / of I? .J LL LE 1' 1,n i91 N4(ROD) J Iv Io i o 68644.32E 264.89• N8640.50W 184.62• '' i-41 151.90. 1 ` I i • 23949 S.F. (L j17TOe'SS�\_© II -p79'dS'19'E Z (PAD) / (RAD)P.R.C. NS_SZ7.O7E 21 7TRAD)P.R.C. < 1 E.1. 22031 S.F. .851011'25* 4 \ Cl i • 20 EASEMENT TO ME 0111' 9 7.. OF ARCAOIa POR PUBLIC / t \'`WO4'SSE ) a• 22089 S.F. 11181(0 PURPOSES. y7 2 (RAO) m Y. d B' 670{6'J9'E I 637-.10 5'W /a !y 2 o CARRIAGE HOUSE DRIVE (PAD)P.R.C.\ V .c>d.H ry,,S' 4.114 R (Rao)RIA i 1 i © i 6`,o l CARRIAGE HOUSE a • N8641'S0'E 352.15' / 1001> I �_ I 151.52_ 479`' - G'. uAb 9 DRIVE N NB6{I'S0Er 352.15' DETAIL OF(PRIVATE SIREEf)` - 4447 1 2 1•62680 S.F. Ll > 22952 S.F. i m 60641•50E ssz.lr LOT E • c23 �_�` 134.00• �TI 38.19 I \ I •\ T 7 r EASEMENT TO THE 011' / •' 1 \ C32 0 \.8L03.01'E • j OF IRCAOIA FOR PUBLIC N1553I l9. \ 0 (RAD)P.C.C. L1..1 UTILITY PURPOSES. IS (RAO)P.R.C. \ \`N0._659.50E s`0. 1 i111 i n2g15'06'W,5 i (PAD) ?a i.1 { = 't 15'EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF ARFAOIA FOR 1 0 (�) o at, •SEWER PURPOSES. 2 2 • 1 i 9 ! f P. ' 1 • t 5 ,...,8 4 3 40' I 40' N 22781 S.F. _ 22867 S.F. 26114 S.F. 8 0' LA I o I W • s• I I .204.12• . . 13!.50'• FIJ . 134.0• • • ' l 68641.50E 10M.29' A O o _ _ - j C m - - C - - - 1c 577.52' -'� - A --7-1----,-,2,- o 688.41.50E 1245.86' D C p ° OLD RANCH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ' / fi l 0, ROAD \ • • • .L ... a` \ C , , A. . SCALE: 1" = 50' TRACT NO. 52745 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGEND THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 INDICATED THE BOUNDARY • OF THE LAND 001NC SUBDNIOED BY THIS IMP. CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE N0. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH O. RADIUS I DELTA LENGTH NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 118.00 69'27'42' 14 N 3.05' 015 40.00' 271'56'35 189.85' C29 40.00' 9503'571 64.97' FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS AND C2 90.00 6042'261 98.50' CIO 190.00' 7508•36• 249.18' C30 40.00' 5032'10' 35.28' • MONUMENT NOTES,SEE SHEET 2. C3 204.00' 441036" 157.29' C97 176.00' 75'08.36' 230.82' C31 I 40.00' 6018.17' 42.10' C4 40.00' 471014' 32.94' C18 204.00' 2039•54' 102.00' C32 176.00' 3944'09' 122.06' C5' 1115,00' 0025'37' 5.31' C19 204.00' 1•31'44' 55.29• C33 90.00' 55'1914' 86.90' LINE TABLE C6 50.00' 51'31.17' 44.98' C20 1905.00' 01'10'31' 40.72' _C34 190.00' 2313.16 77.00' NO. BEARING DISTANCE Cl 15.00' 81'26'47' 21.32' C21 II 114.00' 26'26'34' 52.61' 035 190.00' 51'55.20 172.18' . LI 6363016W 28.02' C8 15.00• 8319'5? 21.82' C22 114.00' 24.24'07' 48.55' C36 90.00' 0723'12' 11.00' 12 93927•57* 51.81' C9 86.00' 505041' 76.32' C23 204.00' 1032'07 44.63' C37 118.00' 400027 82-70' 13 461'37.27W • 53.92' CIO 114.00' 5050'41' 101.18'' C24 204.00' 0312'40 11.41 C3B 176.00' 11.34'46' 35.57' L4 6574031'E 58.00' C1I 204.00' 15'44.47 58.06' C25 118.00' 05'09•20 10.62' C39 40.00' 4058•30 28.61' 15 54932.3118 86.97' C12 100.00' 505041' 88.74' C26 1100.00' 1619'38" 351.86'. C40 118.00' 24.08'50' 49.73' . 19 S01•18'10E 164.37' 013 104.00' 6050'05' 126.78' C27 178.00' 2749'41' 73.19' COI 2016.00 0000'30 105.80' L7 3424'57'5518 58.35' CI4 40.00' 2604516 1 186.24' C28 40.00' 600211' 47.50' C42 2000.00' 0•50'47' 99.36' LB N24'57'55'• 57.89' 1.9 524•57.556 168.19' LIO 40035'166 226.30 lit 424'57'55'W 55.44' 1FOTI •I.1 LANE N _90742'580 1 •/-+ A ANOA �„ -+ p -- - (�) C 32.09' O N 348841'000 5' . - p 3488{1'000 1„•x.50' 1 94.58' -. \ • • •121.32' --` • 116.77' `• 128.75' ! \A 7.51• I 346602'35'0 J r ,G 22 1066 F- N 68 1 • 1 R / n/ 9. \N "s _ I- LIJ 3407152'5710 / \\V `90732'280- n 15 S Lv ea 1(R88) \5 (Rao) 8. 16 I\ m 22089 S.F. f 4 25878 S.F. CROSS 13 24855 S.F.' 22999 S.F. NET _ g 3415'50'15'6 IA 27023 S.F. GROSS \ ,('4j/ / (�) Ld Ill24023 S.F. NET , "ip�' / / EASEMENT TO THE C6r I� g''%9 b'�/ OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC Cn a.5/91 yr.44C"' / 4 UTILITY PURPOSES. 348714]'18'0 -- EASEMENT OF CONTROL C.D.�, \ }/\P* U ,Q' N7T 03)- FOR FLOOD CONTROL iN/�O j`019 t. /-'-(yAD)-- 4. PURPOSES PER BOOK `(3 ) L 'D / . 0291 PAGE 392,O.R. `' y\ \ 1 \ Cry/ '/ 347 5,0 E 31fi6 W 4. . \ I \ 3405 NAIE OBEY (ORNATE STREET) 340043'!00 163.38' + \ r'1 C // O,p$RC., PRB PRE 300 159?I" 1 \ CARRIAGE HOUSE _g. , i 34801 67.46' to. DRIVE PRIVATE FIRE LNNC © (?'lPP9 eta. 4-r. • CP / CC6 DS1 ,\�N5T14'06W /A 347006.56_34 346056'42'6 (�) Pg (RAO) (ROD) __3443'27'00'6 ��• NB9'JB'OS'E \ OF ARCADIA TO THE CIIV `/ 6 (ROD)P.C.C. Z OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC , C� 465'51'480 2717 23183 S.F. 130.1.117'PURPOSES. _ N020.127W 1 \ (RAO)R-1115• 28.12' N PRIVATE OWJEWAY.� 1.'I u a\ m h FIRE LANE n V` _-X50}07_2,6 � � � • U! u i (055)0..90' 25 124.83' 14(14' , a , 28645 S.F. GROSS 7 58038'05'0 \ N78559.5TE 4 2 8' I U\5, \5°! 17 / \ 23167 S.F.NET -/ I `� \}O Tx 346656•]610 1 348843'300 172.08' \ N O 22194 S.F. 2 ` _347531'15'0 yA (�) I r (AAO) A, / b _ ���[jyyy�C)t3'14'\w`m ,\t'S,,o I 0 �d�j 0dE - \9, oti ' Iii; f`1 $ 'H `4 1'i., / 1 744(h r'P sU A• 11 07 "4 V. \ \ ' �e _ 23673 S.F. X1111 $` °E\S `°ry J . -N8844'}7E 284.69' -- T. \`0' o' 0.8 v 112.79' , 347037'460 �4 18 N88•43.38E 205.59' \` \�, ` '. 22023 S.F. 4-V _345805'44'0 _ li PAD P.R.C.- °°\ \s\1,„\, I NBf'OS_40E 4-W t 9 ( ) U /" (R4D)R�1115' 22005 S.F.LI, 65037'100 - \' / N34'06'171E_ ,,,," ' r.:. (Rao) .".. . Y °) \,\i,f (RAO)0■176• _, ,, 1.7,0.E-- P PI 1 O '' / \ / (885) EASEMENT TO THE Cm > 4 ? / OF ARCADIA FOR PUBIC p°4'/,.e7/,J o, / /711TIUrr PURPOSES. _ 26420 S.F. 4 9 8. CB/~\ C / . © N88•41'S0E 352.15' - 0 / je.. % C•46.,, 6f6 \"6 /�8 1 152.66_ 41ry/ t/4,41. ;� CS.;CJ'A!F BrREST J N A - • �� �// I ;,\ DETAIL OF LOT E 348841'500 1352.15' 'NA I _ „_ 62680 S.F. ( 3400'41.50'0 352.15',A :7:-.58643'}DE 143.66' / /4 \ 9 /HpC 9 I\\ 7`19 . TA� _- 9. I !�C 46.49' 133.50' 1 �'9 CARRIAGE HOUSE'' I IT• /�/� /4 1 -9555)'J'5 I 66504698 TO THE CITY \,_3427120'4610_ DRIVE (RAl)) � OF PACAOIA FOR,438061 \ (RAD)0..204' Ui1LIlY PURPOSES. (v 4 o ` 348756.07E =o • $4 (7 ` (000)R=f 115' 5•w y ©I 7.9 Im 8 I I f 7 E 6 f W LLJ 23282 S.F. I�z I: 30765 S.F. e' 23543 S.F.. 22696 S.F. I•= o 1Z g u V) g g if _ EASEMENT OF L.A.C.F,C.O. 4 IRO C I4 I75'ITS/ FOR FLOOD CONTROL =1��]] 3 0 PURPOSES PER BOOK W w-1 0291,PACE 392,O.R. (3J � E I 14:14'I (I • (n 1 8' 180.30'• 126.05', --��OJ"� ■ 133.50' �1 i• • 131.82' • -----1 • N88a1.50E 1051.29' -' ' + .00' I O O Ig C © A ]65.05' ' g �-° ,0 , 202_09' S7].sx' �-- 30].28' to _ tt4aa��---- p /- p 14-2.8'-6 --�\ o N8841'S0E 1245.85' -- 1 .�_ I }.28' o o DON g: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD • DIABLO DRIVE-) OLD RANCH O • LD ROAD - / (/ 6 0'1 30,610'30.0'30' 30' 30' • 9 i! ',.- ; J ,) ,-/; ' 9 f�C\ /09 °RpORATS9 STAFF REPORT July 18, 2000 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director By: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator( SUBJECT: Consideration of Final Map No. 52745 for the Anoakia Residential Planned Development project at 701 West Foothill Boulevard SUMMARY Tentative maps and final maps are required for all subdivisions that result in five or more parcels or condominiums. The City Council shall approve a final map if it conforms to all the requirements of the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. It is recommended that the City Council approve Final Map No. 52745 for a 31 lot residential planned development at 701 West Foothill Boulevard. DISCUSSION Final Map No. 52745 has been reviewed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the appropriate City Departments. Said map has been found to be in substantial compliance with the vesting tentative map, as approved by the City Council on December 21, 1999, and is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should move to approve Final Map No. 52745 provided that before the final map is recorded all outstanding conditions of approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Attachments: 1. Letter of compliance from Los Angeles County 2. Final Map No. 52745 Approved: ... *' _ William R. Kelly, City Manager I t"FR °' r`r6 C0A1. /( - L' . t�pF TA,N ° � �i�`�� COLLTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ;�• 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE °4LIFORN'P ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone:(626)458-5100 HARRY W.STONE,Director ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 May 3, 2000 ALHAMBRA,CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 • IN REPLY PLEASE pp REFER TO FILE: LD-8 Mr. Terry Hagen City Engineer City of Arcadia 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91006-6021 Dear Mr. Hagen: TRACT NO. 52745 The enclosed subject tract map has been reviewed by our Department for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis, title information, and for compliance with the State Subdivision ,Map Act. The map is now ready for your examination and certification as to compliance with the conditional approval and applicable City Ordinances. - The City Council or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Subdivision Map Act. After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the map should be returned to Land Development Division, Subdivision Mapping Section for filing with the County Recorder. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.Armando Aguilar of our Subdivision Mapping Section at (626) 458-4915. Very truly yours, HARRY W. STONE Director of'Public Works MAY 2 2 .2000 12763i ,ri RONALD D. ONDROZECK • Assistant Division Engineer Land Development Division AA:ca P:IMAPPINGITRACT.LTR ,_ ,. Enc. 1 h ~ r: .I y 19.11 ACRES TRACT NO. �� / �5 SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS , IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF SANTA ANITA RANCHO AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK I.PAGES 97 AND 98 • OF PATENTS AND A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF TRACT NO.948 AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 17.PAGE 21 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. . • THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 . i I 1 OWNER'S STATEMENT SURVEYORS STATEMENT I j WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF OR ARE INTERESTED IN THE I HEREBY STATE THAT 1 AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OF THE LANDS INCLUDED'WITHIN THE SUBOMSION SHOWN ON THIS MAP WITHIN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA;THAT THIS FINAL MAP,CONSISTING OF 4 SHEETS. . i DISTINCTIVE BORDER UNES,AND WE CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FlUNG IS A TRUE AND COMPLETE SURVEY AS SHOWN.AND WAS MADE BY ME OF SAID MAP AND SUBOMSION... OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN JULY 1999;THAT THE MONUMENTS OF THE CHARACTER AND LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN PLACE OR WILL BE WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE Cm OF ARCADIA THE EASEMENT FOR SEWER IN PLACE WITHINt. V6. MONTHS FROM THE FILING DATE OF THIS PURPOSES SO DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP AND ALL USES INCIDENT THERETO, MAP;THAT SAID M ENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO MAKE CONNECTIONS THEREWITH FROM ANY ADJOINING BE RETRACED AND ALL TIE NOTES TO ALL CENTERLINE MONUMENTS SHOWN PROPERTIES. AS BE SET WILL BE FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER,_'___ TH;ILT1LWWC,.a n. HHL LAND:'.: WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CRY OF ARCADIA THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC 2 I Z{/DD y ge.,�-�(�� .,` ,c0.3,,,_-,..P UTILITY PURPOSES 50 DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP AND ALL SUES INCIDENT - DATED JAMES 0.STEINES,P.LS.6086 P, ', THFAETC,NCL!(D/N4TUE RIGHT TO M/1E'EcoMMFLTI4 EDfVN7H:FROM NA REGISTRATION EXPIRES 42/31/01 c MA111/11PT FttniN1!iSR9fERAES• * Irma ` ---- ;TAYE.OhMAERS:CPU 4A/A5" CIAT/aJ REPRESENT/N.6.TA)E.__ ' "OF CA 0 :"5Y :s w.ni�s°.%V°PO.PA2//v4 E u l r°RtK/mss- CITY ENGINEERS STATEMENT Ty/TN/N SAND LIr'ELOPMENT. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP;THAT IT CONFORMS . SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP ANO ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS WE HERBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA THE RIGHT TO PROHIBIT THE THEREOF;THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION OROANCES OF THE CITY CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITHIN LOTS A THROUGH G. OF ARCADIA APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS AS A DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC USE,WHILE ALL OF FOOTHILL REMAIN DWIN AVENUE MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT WITH RESPECT TO CITY RECORDS. AND STREETS,NA LANE'WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SUBOMSION REMAIN PUBLIC STREETS,WE HEREBY GRAM TO THE Cm OF ARCADIA THE RIGHT TO RESTRICT • DIRECT VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE SAID STREETS.IF ANY PORTION . OF SAID STREETS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THIS SUBDMSION ARE VACATED,SUCH DATED TERRY HAGENR24F90 VACATION TERMINATES THE ABOVE DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATED. CITY ENGINEER.CITY ENGINE ,Cm OF ARCADIA REGISTRATION EXPIRES 12%31./111 ‘ . •.+DIA OAKS UM'ED LIABILm COMPANY,A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ' /) • ,. COUNTY ENGINEERS STATEMENT TH-'MAS L HIM. I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP;THAT IT COMPLIES LNG M :R WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP;AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECTS NOT CERTIFIED TD BY THE CITY ENGINEER. NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA AIIF � ) . DATED ,R.C.E.• COUNTY OFO,GW6E )5S . DEPUTY COUNTY ENGINEER �,,��� ) , REGISTRATION EXPIRES_/_/_ ON-gibe) ,_..FR ORE ME. _ l- �!'w k PERSONALLY APPEARED ---1 hem"< ✓t+[ • . • PERSONALLY KNOWN TO MF(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY ESSENCE)TO-RE THE PERSONI,'J WHOSE NAME) S'ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE WITHIN IN UMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT ALH/Sk[/TMEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN 5LEYI L@/TBOR AUTHORIZED CAPACDY(I[>RT,AN THAT BY 5'PET/WEIR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE Cm COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA BY SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON*,OR THE ENTRY UPON BEHALF MOTION PASSED ON APPROVED THE ATTACHED MAP OF WHICH THE PERSON(S)ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. AND ACCEPTED THE.DEDICATION OF SEWER.EASEMENT,PUBLIC UTILRY ' EASEMENT.CONSTRUCTION RIGHTS AND.VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS WITNESS MY I': ' SIGNATURE RINCIAL OF BUSINESS IS NOTARY PU C IN AND FOR D STA IN Or-AAP /I'AA%AT rte[CWJm. y y V./1-5/03 DATED CITY CLERK-cm OF ARCADIA I'(/r(FQ`W(NAME PRIMA/// MY COMMISSION EXPIRES (NAME PRINTED) • T£ABBEEN TN#IZT709 CONMb'&ON P1Y1TOa1 NOMM WVO-C AO°S CITY TREASURERS CERTIFCATE � ' My APR,On Om Q • SIGNATURE OMISSIONS C I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE • JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED IN • PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 68436(0)(3A)(1-VIII)OF THE THE WITHIN SUBOMSION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUBJECT,AND WHICH SUBOMSION MAP ACT,THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES HAVE BEEN OMITTED: MAY BE PAID IN FULL HAVE BEEN PAD IN FULL ' I. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT,HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1958 AS INSTRUMENT NO.4905,IN BOOK D291 PAGE 392 OF OFFICIAL . DATED CITY TREASURER-CITY OF ARCADIA RECORDS.RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH - THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT • REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE THIS IS 70 CERTIFY THAT THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO.52745 WAS . APPROVED AT A MEETING HELD ON THE_DAY OF • 2000. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WITH . THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. DATED SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ARCADIA FINANCE DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE • , I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FEE REQUIRED BY SECTION 9116.4 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE HAS BEEN PAID TO INC CITY OF ARCADIA. • DATED FINANCE DIRECTOR-Cm OF ARCADIA . i ; • .. •.. M - SCALE: 1° = 100' TRACT N®■ r V2/ 4'V SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 • • MONUMENT NOTES BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING '1 0759'40" 0 ALONG THE CENTERUNE OF BALDWIN AVENUE • INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED HEREON. PER TRACT NO.13429,M.B.273/25. F0.BRASS PIN IN CONCRETE.NO REF..FITS 2 LEAD&TACK • 11 DES PER STATE ONISION OF ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSIECTION 210E-0382. NI © INTFD ECTI.SPIKE U N.WASHER,NO REF.,ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE I LEGEND I ERSO INDICATED THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND © F25.D.CITY ENGINEERS BOLT PER TRACT N0.13429,N.B.273/ -ww-g■-•-•—r BEING SUBOMOED BY THIS NAP. ElFD.42 210E-0127.LEAS k TACK TIES PER STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FU 1 © FD.LEAD N TACK'LS.2600'PER COY OF ARCADIA TIES 722. ' 6 UiHWE57 00 mR Of 0?R.'i8893R289,ACCEPIEO AS INDEX AND VICINITY MAP O FD.OLD RUSTED T-BAR W CONCRETE,NO REF,ACCEPTED AS INDICATES SHEET NO. NW CORNER OF O.R.18693-289. I 0 FD 2x2 HUB TAGGED'LS.2580',NO REF. O 2' I.P.TAGGED'LS 60136-TO BE SET AT ALL TRACT - • BOUNDARY CORNERS.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SPIKE&WASHER STAMPED'LS 6586'TO BE SET AT ALL • OSTREET CENTERLINE POINTS OF CONTROL,UNLESS _ -_ OTHERWISE NOTED. r� I -. LJ C/L ORANGE GROVE 1 CURVE TABLE NO. RADIUS I DELTA I LENGTH CI 17.00' 94'18'40" 27.98. i---C/L ANOAKIA LANE ESTABLISHED AT FD.NOTHING, — n I RECORD ANGLE k MST.(979.85') C/L INTERSECTION ESTABUSHEO AT • PER TR.NO.13429.M.B.273/ RECORD DISTANCE(833.13')ALONG . ACCEPTED AS N'LY LINE OF O.R. 25.FTR FOUND MONUMENTS ON C/L BALDWIN AVENUE FROM C/L _1 . 18693-289.ESTABLISHED THRU ` OILY PROS OF SLY LINE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PER TO.NO. FOUND MONUMENTS. µ0µ1A LANE. 13429,M.B.273/25. 1 El 0 75.20' .o — A_LANE,-N8641'00"E 979.85' - _ r O 11-. s 3488'41•00-E 109D.50' /- 0( 40' 40' D G 29 30 810' . 1 15 16 I: 27 28 • • 14 • ■ 13 e° i \E r1H • / 22 31 " 12 D 1z / 17 E = ANRA LAN om ARBOLADA oMA c • D(PRVATE STREET) Op DRIVE • _M P� O00 ^ 230 .1 • • • '=2c 434 11 9GN9 I ocp u \m 18 All' F IZ 19 20 21 1a , PR. 10 ' \ E D III; Iz• CARRIAGE HOUSE DRIVE / G p 9 PRIVATE STRF,Ef �� CO Z -E • ao• iD 8 7 6 5 4 3 0'/40' 9 z NBB41•SVE 1051.29' 1068.42' / •.0•�— o l0 _ 5)]_52' - _-4'0 303.29' _ 365.05_ .-L---::-..... --- - _ - - O O O N98'41'SD'E 1245.86' LA © 8- / 3.26' 0 4 0' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD .P_ p 0 • 60' / FD.NOTHING. / 6 0, 30'130' I 6 0' C/L INTERSECTION O 30'30 ESTABLISHED BY PRORATION 30'30' BETWEEN FOUND AADNUMENR a a 6 I EAST AND WEST PER 1R.NO. yy 28298,M.B.784/53-54. S + Si 2 i nt 1 iV SCALE:.1" = 50' SHEET NO. 52745 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS FOR 8.1414 OF BEARINGS AND 1 MONUMENT NOTES,SEE SHEET 2. IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ■ LEGEND THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES 0. STEINES, P.L.S. 6086 • ' INDICATED THE BOUNDARY CURVE TABLE OF THE LAND BEING • CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE SUBDMOED BY THIS MAP. NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH - NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH NO. RADIUS I DELTA LENGTH 1 - CI 17.00' 9418.47 27.98' 018 100.00- 601628' 152.34• 035 40.00' 964915' 68.99' • C2 5.00' 1291800 11.34' C19 35,00' 14803•21 I 90.75' C36 40.00' 49'50'04` 34.79' C3 40.00' 3616.48- 25.33• C20 70.00' 14452.36 177.00• C37 40.00' 40513']0' 26.61' CO 150.00' 85'42'10' 224.37' C21 42.00• 12716'27 89.63' -COB 40.00' 3159•40' 22.34' I • LINE TABLE CS 20.00• 31'40.20 11.06• 022 164.00' 220830 83.28• C39 114.00• 170274' 33.91' N0. I BEARING DISTANCE CO 27.00• 3040'20 14.93• C23 164.00' 1419'00' 41.93' C40 114.00• 180727 30.09• Lt 969'40.27W 16.91' C7 70.00• 073750' 3.22' C24 25.00' 080807 39.27' C41 114.00' 4414.50 88.05 L2 48700.27W 84.32' CS_ 25.00' 475237 18.69' C25 39.00' 9800.07 61.26' C42 114.00• 0735'24' 5.15' U 68708280 B.65' CO 40.00' 4650.51" 32.71' 026 56.00- 14256'42, 139.71' C43 35.00' 4116'35 26.44' L4 -90029'24'E 30.02' 010 75.00• 2855.46' 37.87' C27 25.00• 980000' 39.27' CON 1 35.06 4703'46 28.75' L5 93737.07W 26.95' Cl? 15,00• 5717.50' 15.00' COO 75.00• 2937.32, 38,78' COS 35.00- 5613'07 35.56' L6 90800.21W 36.13' C12 40.00' 44147'35 31.27' C29 . 40.00' 571757 40.00' C46 150.00- 455147 130.03• L7 00759.47E 52.24' CI3 164.00• 0715.01' 20.75' C30 70.00• 7604.26 92.94• C47 150.00' 285618 54.84' LB 587'00.27E 01.00- C14 50.08 375838 33.10' C31 70.00' 5410.35' 67.00' 048 I 150.00• 1451'27 38.90' L9 96424'15E (14) 24.73' C15 114.00- 7800.26 157.20' 032 70.00' 1 1'19.03' 13.84• C49 1 136.00. 1 8542'10' 203.43' L10 N0502.47E 41.35' • C16 50.00• 680498 60.28' C33 40.00' 26646.16 160.24' _ LI I 140259.47E 217.35' C17 86.00- 584836 68.22• C34 40.00' 4500.27 31.51' SEE SHEET) 2 11 • I N .ANOAKIA LANE _ ° >_ - 4 a - NBB41'07E 9]9.65' - - - - o p I . i 1 O 68641'00"E 1143.54' ` •` .116.10' C ]8.15' 143.94' J!��• • 17827' -�!// j O I. o 40' 29 61 40' 0 F $ 22388 S.F. N 30 27 28 23967 S.F. I 22119 S.F. NL20.2�E A^' 22995 S.F.GROSS N (Rqp) 1 i - i • 20600 S.F. NET 'd11. 1 I ..8022x' , 16"E NZ256.06W ( (RA0) 1 (RAD)P.R.C.\ ' 1 . 41, I (RAD) \\�0N96 ?PW 010 043 4,. _-" I I 69043.16E 120.21' y y1ry978,B�J y� 1., 04/ „ O c N0T54'OS'W 127.83' ` _ - 4. '. 43�Rf AP�yp, w \� a N- L8 2 `P EASEMENT TO THE CITY ' 0I j�.<LyF,kir\ 1 5� d DETAIL.PLOT �I OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC ,¢,S.y E 62680 5.. , .. UTILITY PURPOSES, . 4;14,51, 35$58.17W -4.:.-4, G0 CC°� B1.00'� ' C'i © 0 .,. ( ., 1, /i SA4_,_SBW N8700'20W , I c' d' I M600'46W^ (R42)P.C.C. 0 \`5722'411.4 I 207 (RAD j P.R.C.\ c� 1. 6],_542'](70 (RAD)P.R.C. \ EASEMENT TO THE GI'T 1 �, 22252 S.F. \ OF ARCAO'A FOR PUBOC (W1D)P.R.C. w N3aos•16w I f�1 unB PURPOSES. 4 \\ 31 fl w OW P.R.C.\\ `t l 0 a a 22 ri O j 8 23266 S.F. ) I o N780�4'D56� N 22208 S.F. mN �, (14' 14 la 9:1 (n 440 e _ OB'28E N]4'40'Ot'[ nl,_, \� :9.,.,., (RAU)P.R.C. ( N ry I I 68538.44.E 127.17' © 4 (RAD)P.R.C.7 'R w PRIVATE ATE DRI E AY-) e/I ¢ \I , T 74 0,7- 0+ e L2 ( {y.. I • I��/N8008'55 C 124.8]' / 0 Z / \ N79.18'D7W 104.19• m I ANITA LANE •�=,ce / k7g44.04- m . - N8700'20'W 4 1 N6(56'3)_0 J/ v wC33V /5� (ROD)W J m o`_ © (PPoVATE STREET)21 J.65' - p 1 40.00• • r^ z\ 19•oB•30'E _ PI J D 8438 S.F. • N (RAD) n �z 11 t ♦ 2,, I is n 24 23 1 3' C6(C5 C6 i 19 ry6 s =Ibi F EASEMENT THE ( ¢ -o- 25146 S.F. 22013 S.F. 646 ti8,'4D L- n�N =LOY pURPOSES. 1 / y, (� 2� (PAD)P.R.C. _'2 Ia I2840:,R.CJ / § Ib "!!!x111( - l a N45'S0'tYJ h It y N8644']7E 284.89' NB640'S0'W 184.62' _ ' 1 14 z Ch 151.90• I 23949 S.F. - (L N77013'SS7� ' N76O5.19`E i (�) \\© /TROD)P.R.C. NS_Sg]'02'E 21 y /c(Re)PR.C. ¢ I om, 22031 S.F. 655013'2517 \ C7 • 3 . III 1i (600)P.R.C. \ .... /NT NB700.20W 151.10' I • • 0 20 EASEMENT TO THE CITY 9 OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC \,�L1560=•57E 4 / . G 22089 S.F. UTILITY PURPOSES. y/4 2 B ' (MD) BE . • CARRIAGE n,1 r�on� - NSTO1'S5� /q .I C 6' -�J,Q4g•39'E m CARRIAGE HOUSE DRIVE • (RAD)P.R.C. \ / (Id>d 'Y 54 4.114 I•R (RAD)P,C.C. nl i "I II >. i �a -CARRIAGE HOUSE _ 68841.46E 352.15' �_)_47.97' ©/ G1y �ry`,yN DR1.0 - ,� ISI.S2_ W� PRNATEISTREET)Y 46 '�' p N LR.9 . ?N NBe4t•50_E 352.15' DETAIL OF( - Cal 5 2 •(• 01 • 4+m N88.41'572 352.15• LOT E 62680 S.F. \ '- 22952 S.F. I 134.00. �)f �' 36.16' 023 11 0.5�` P'.\ EASEMENT TO THE CITY / .... ) 1 C32 \ \NL03'01'E 1- �OF ARCAITA FOR PUBLIC 1415'S7'10'WJ \ \ (MD)P.C.C. n LL) UTNTY PURPOSES. 15 (RAD)P.R.C. 5- \`Q9'S9'S5E j'40". 1 w N2715'06'Wj (MD) PJ i.-- 15•EASEMENT TO THE 1 5 (900) I 5 CRY OF ARCADIA FOR A -I-I /•0.j (/) SEWER PURPOSES. ' • { I 06 06 v 5 I , 4 3 401 I 40• 22867 S.F. 26114 S.F.• _I w N 22761 S.F. _ © I 8�0' (n I 15 • J�� 134.DOy ���. 133.50•• �.7��- . .zoa.lz I1 _ NB841•57E 1051.29' o / - 1. } 8 b - -16 co 577.52' - 45 - - - a __EC - C a N88-41.57E 1245.66 - G Q P I) OLD RANCH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD I 610. 7 • • t SCALE: 1" = 60' TRACT NO. 52745 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA t LEGEND THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. JAMES.0. STONES, P.L.S. 6086 • INDICATED THE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND BEING CURVE TABLE ' CURVE TABLE , OF-SUBOMDED BY THIS MAP. CURVE TABLE NO, RADIUS DELTA LENGTH NO. RADIUS DELTA LENGTH N0, RADIUS DELTA LENGTH C1 118.00' 6927'42" 143.05' C15 40.00' 271'56'35° 1139.85' C29 40.00' 970757 64.97'•FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS AND - 02 90.00' 6742'26' 98.50' C18 190.00' 75'08'36' 249.18' 030 40.00' 5032'10". 35.28' MONUMENT NOTES,SEE SHEET 2. 03 204.00' 44.1038- 157.29' 017 176.00' -' 75'08•36 230.82' C31 40.00' 6018'17 42.10' 04 40.00' 4710'34' 32.94' 018 204.00' 2538'54' .102.00' 032 176.00' 3744'09" 122.06' LINE TABLE C5 1115.00' 0025'37' 8.31' 019 204.00' 1531.44° 55.29' 033 90.00' 5519'14' 86.90' NO. BEARING DISTANCE C6 50.00' 51.31.17' 44.98' 020 1985.00' 01'10•31° 40,72' C34 190.00' 2713'16 77.00' C7 15.00' 8726'47 21.37' C21 114.00' 2626134' 52.61' 035 190.00' 5755'22 172.18' LI .6138.30'10'W 28.02' 'CB 15.00' 8719'57 21.02' C22 114.00' 24.24'07' 413.55' 036 90.00' 0723'12° 11.60' L2 N3427.578 51.81' C9 86.00' 5050'41' 75.32' 023 204.00' 1732.07 44.63' 037 118.00' 4039'27 82.70' U N61'37•2716 ' 53.92' CIO 114.00' 5050'41' 101.10' C24 204.00' 0312'40" 11.43' C3B 176.00' 11'34'46 35,57 L4 N5340'31"E 58.00' 011 204.00' 1544'42' 56.06' 025 118.00' 05'09'30 10.62' 039 40.00' 4058'30 28.61' 15 S473211'19 80.97' 012 100.00' 5050'41" 88.74' 026 1100.00' - 1619'39' 351.86' 040 118.00' 24708•50 49.73• L6 501.18.1•E 184.37' • 013 104.00' 6450'05' 128.70' C27 176.00' 2749'41' 73.19' C41 2015.00 03•00'30 105.80• L7 N24.57.55'1,9 58.35' C14 40.00' 26•46•1• I 186.24' C28 40.00' 600711' 47.50' 042 I 2000.00' 0750'47 99.36• LB N24.57'55'W 67.89' L9 N24.5755'9 168.19' LID NO639'16W 226.30' • LII N24'57'55'W I 55.44' 96742254E y o- .ANOAKIA LANE - -> °. - i (TIM) p N8641'OOE 9]9.85' 5) • 1 J2.09' O N8641'OOE 1090.50' --- 94.55' \I • `• . 128,75' 1 `-- •121.32' • • • • 75.20• �1 )\ • 114.5X. 38.60' .7) 78.51' I NO y21 961•G tD e54 E 1460 . _N6T52'SYE� \\ \�ryg032•26E U y LL) (560) \5 (RAD) 1 S m 1 6 4. S°\ f 22089 S.F. s `f .+ 1 Q 25878 S.F. GROSS p°, 13 24855 S.F. 22999 S.F.NET t . ll• 7415'60'158 MI 27023 S:F, GROSS ,�4t// m (RAD) W N 24023 S.F. NET G 6/p?4d i/ OF MGD AF OR PUBLIC I - (/) /J%pl ,E2'g9'• / UMW PURPOSES. /1 __ EASEMENT OF LAC.F.C.D. \ 1 �'A/1R' N7713'42E N574716E FOR 8000 CONTROL p - _ PURPOSES PER ROOK (3 /'., i,,0..,.,O,5" f (�) „0. • 0291,PAGE 392,0.R. '�\ 1( `\ G�9 / ''` 7' si 00050E N�..St t7W s�p'!6g'M1 ■ \ ,11 \ J f ptE OR`E2' 37 5E '�� (PR`/ATO STREET) • 7480432380 163.38' \ `'I. '`: �j .P 9.FlRE 159.11' CARRIAGE HOUSE \ . c„ \. ,.q/0oO''QQ•G - 746012'3.E 61,46' bS. DRIVE • III P90410 DRNEWAY' \ ©=`prl 91.65• 2 i &FIRE LANE \ N6050'iY8_� O , CO /t ' \�N5714.06W 4` _747304.568 I/ (040) ! J N 72]'068 (RAD) 'P� (RAD)_�\ 1 II•---_.___ _ EASEMENT TO THE CITY �' b ---(Rao)P.C.C. _� 748127,17 E- \ • • 1 Z OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLIC / 127.11' UTILITY PURPOSES. 746551.44E N0544'S2'W / ��/ 23183$,F. 1 \ (RAD)R�1115' 28.12' PRNATE DNVEWAY�•�' u c U r,. '\ _--N5050_2O'VE a m &FlRE LANE �'`o (RAD)R=90' ZS `` uI 1‘21.714' ` 24.63• ' 57659.56E 4'_ 5' t5°, i 26645 S.F.SF GROSS / 740438.05.E (�) .' 8' I 15 6 31 17 23167 S.F. NET !\ - 69043.38E 172.08' '\ \ \ 3 b 22194 S.F, o- 746•56.34.E i • 0 �� 7473'3 1.15.E (RAD) • ,1` !r (RHO) c, • o ICie'i�z m 10\\°o ) tTI3o9•edE \4�S .ryb 2'a- � w �£ ��,, I ;tt*6'0 11 0v f if ' • a, • 23873 S.F. .t% off $$'\ �,°R �. __ '$ `g 748644•37E 264,69' , u m 112.79• 1 • N](080) E 4 j`y\ 1 8 I N0643'30E 205.59') --��\` O i0 ," 22023 S.F. 1 t° o 0‘:" \ I.,\ o e N50.05'44'E_© \ \ i N81'OSYOE ,bo 1 9 �' J (RAD)P.R.C. -_ S��P 1 �, r(pqD)R=1115' .^ 22005 S.F. ' • - N5337'10E E. - ) \ N34.06.1TE_ `' (RAD) ;4.. Y (1j'l`,, •' ' (RAO)84076• 26 N7�227 .1_ 1 O. 71 / • V /' EASEMENT TO THE CITY Q.' d 3 / OF ARCADIA UR FOR PUBLC 26420 S.F. 07 v:'s` CI; �, v / z UTILITY PURPOSES. o - - C / 748641.50E 352.15 f' • © ./ ,/' j.4, J C], �6 P \. 1/�8 152.86'_ _ 1_ - j fpbv� a',(� 033 C]RIVATE y )_?-'�N A DETAIL OF LOT'E�_N8641'SO'�752.15 N?_-_ n6043'30E 143.66' ` N ' \ ,3•QaG u \� Cf_- _ 62660 S.F. I 748/674,1.'SO'E 4332.15''1-■ �_ /, /4 y,di Ol \\ 8 36.49•' `1�E'_ 133.50• \ _T-_ -_ _N64'S1'S6W�of/2./ L IO \ CARRIAGE n HOUSE I - EASEMENT TO THE OTT \_N2T25/S.E DRIVE (RAD) I OF ARCADIA FOR PUBLC 1 (RAD)4=209' UTILITY PURPOSES. _ (\f i ` N8756'OTE I , ,t (RAD)R=1115' 6 • 9 ©I 9 I� 8 I I 7 4 6 4 LLi ■ LI_i I 30765 S.F. ` I •_ - 23282 S.F. ml(Z.'(I I� of 23543 S.F.$F 22696 S.F. (n •` I F V I£ I \ -EASEMENT OF LAC.F.C.D. • 4 C w 15 115 u FOR FLOOD CONTROL '7-'$I I. ' 3 0' PURPOSES PER BOOK o • o LLB -I ` 0291,PAGE 392,O.R. w 67,W _ I 14'14•I I I N 131.82• • ---I B -• 160.33'f -}.�Ilr 128.05' • -wl f�-�- • 137.50' • --�1! • • N88.41.50E 1051.29' 28.00' 1 0 ' o ' • I,, O © O ,.l `.∎.-.- ' 202_09' 01 577.52' 'e �_• ‘,1„_______3032194•2.58.O ; Vl� " p __•0 -`�\ o N13041'S0-E 1245.86' • ___ f 3.28' ,n o' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD °- �DOON 1 /OLD RANCH , ROAD i I r , ' r.6 01 • 30' 30' 30.610'3o, I /0i0-/O w , STAFF REPORT OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER DATE: August 15, 2000 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: William R. Kelly, City Manager UiA 11I1( By: Linda Garcia, Special'Projects Manager�� SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF ARCADIA, DUARTE,.MONROVIA, PASADENA, SIERRA MADRE AND"SOUTH PASADENA TO FORM A CONSORTIUM TO RECEIVE FUNDS UNDER THE WORKFORCE INVESAIENT ACT OF 1998 • SUMMARY Since 1983 the City of Arcadia has participated in a Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of Duarte, Monrovia, Pasadena, Sierra Madre and South Pasadena for the purpose of forming a consortium that is eligible to receive funds to provide job training. services. It is now necessary to revise the Joint Powers Agreement to reflect changes required by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. • On March. 21, 2000 the City Council took.the first step toward complying with the new regulations by adopting a resolution authorizing the Foothill Private Industry Council to act as the Workforce Investment Board. under the provisions of the Workforce. Investment Act of 1998. Entering into a new Joint Powers Agreement is the next step in this process. BACKGROUND In 1983 the cities of Arcadia, Duarte, Monrovia, Sierra Madre, South Pasadena and Pasadena entered into a Joint Powers Agreement establishing the Foothill Employment and Training Consortium ("FETC") for the purpose of developing and. implementing job training programs as provided for by the Job Training Partnership Act ("JTPA"). The Agreement created two oversight entities known as the Foothill Private Industry Council and Policy Board. It also named the City of Pasadena as the agency responsible for administering the Consortium on a daily basis. In 1998, the Workforce Investment Act ("WIA") was signed into law and it supersedes the JTPA effective July 1, 2000. This new legislation requires modifications in the local governance, administration and service delivery of federally funded job training programs. I�p P�DJe �o4ty" a • • • • Mayor and City Council (WIA JPA) August 15, 2000 Page 2 DISCUSSION Under JTPA, the Joint Powers Agreement established the referenced Consortium known as the FETC and designated the Foothill Private Industry Council to act as the body to provide, ongoing guidance and monitoring of JTPA. The original Joint Powers Agreement also established a Policy Board (consisting of one elected official from each of the six cities);to act as the Chief Elected Official. WIA requires that local workforce areas be established to receive these federal funds. The Act also establishes categories of entities that may qualify as local areas. One category is single units of local government or consortiums of multiple units of local government meeting the following requirements: a) having an aggregate population of 200,000 or more; b) be a current service delivery area under JTPA, and c) successful program performance and fiscal integrity. FETC qualifies under this category. WIA also requires that a Workforce Investment Board ("WIB") be established to each local area to oversee and monitor the operation of WIA funds. The WIB is assigned essentially the same role with similar membership requirements as the Private Industry Council under JTPA. At its meeting of March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the Foothill Private Industry Council to act as the, Workforce Investment Board in the conduct of WIA transition activities. In the staff report of March 21, staff informed the City Council that the resolution needed to be approved by the other five cities in the Consortium and that following such approval, a revised Joint Powers.Agreement would be brought before the Council for its. review and approval. The other five cities have approved the resolution. The attached Joint Powers Agreement contains minor changes from the Agreement approved for the JTPA. The primary changes involve the substitution of WIA terminology for JTPA_ language. The revised Agreement specifies the roles and responsibilities of the Policy Board under WIA. One important change to the Joint Powers Agreement is that the purpose of the Agreement has been expanded to include the implementation of education, employment and training programs other than WIA. The original Agreement applied only to JTPA funds. Since the original Agreement was signed, FETC has been awarded funds for other programs such as Welfare to Work. The revised Joint Powers Agreement will give FETC clear authority to administer these additional funds. Like the resolution, the revised JPA must be approved by all six cities in. the Consortium. Mayor and City Council (WIA JPA) August 15, 2000 Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City of Arcadia as WIA is federally funded. We expect this action to enable the receipt of over $3 million in federal funds for job training programs in the Foothill area. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement between the cities of Arcadia, Duarte, Monrovia, Pasadena, Sierra Madre and South Pasadena to form a Consortium to receive funds under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. Attachment, • • • • JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT NO. . 17,318 THIS JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT is among the cities of Arcadia, Duarte, Monrovia, Sierra Madre, South Pasadena, and Pasadena, each of which is a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, hereinafter collectively referred to as "the parties." • RECITALS: The following are the facts upon which this Agreement is based: WHEREAS, the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, hereinafter referred to as the "Act" (29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq., Public Law 105-220, 112 Stat. 936), authorizes the expenditure of federal funds to provide workforce investment activities, through statewide and local workforce investment systems, that increase the employment, retention, and earnings of participants, and increase occupational skill attainment by participants, and, as a result, improve the quality of the.workforce, reduce welfare • • dependency, and enhance the productivity and competitiveness of the Nation; and, WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement are willing to accept the responsibilities . and duties as may be prescribed by the Act, as said legislation may from time to time be amended; and, 57378.1 1 WHEREAS, the Act permits any consortium of units of local government with an aggregate population of 200,000 or more to form a separate "local area" so long as it was designated as a Service Delivery Area (hereafter"SDA") under the Job Training Partnership Act of 1938 (hereafter "JTPA"), and had acceptable programmatic outcomes and financial management; and, • WHEREAS, the Cities of Arcadia,. Duarte, Monrovia, Sierra Madre, South •Pasadena, and Pasadena are contiguous cities,located in the West San Gabriel Valley, having an aggregate population in excess of 200,000, and comprising an SDA having acceptable performance under the JTPA; and, WHEREAS, said Cities desire to form a consortium for the purpose of becoming a recognized local area under the Act, which-shall-be-known-as the Foothill Employment and Training Consortium; and, . _ • WHEREAS, the consortium would benefit the residents of the subject communities by maintaining local autonomy and allowing public officials to better respond to the needs of local business; and, WHEREAS, the establishment of a consortium among said Cities would result in a more cohesive, locally based Workforce Investment Board and provide for the development of industry specific training based upon local labor market demands and - characteristics of the eligible population; and, 57378.1 2 • WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the parties hereto and in the best public interest of said parties to join together to establish this Joint Powers Agreement to accomplish the purposes herein set forth; and, • WHEREAS, by this Agreement, the parties hereto intend to exercise their powers • jointly to accomplish common objectives; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: . SECTION 1. PURPOSE. This Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title I of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 6500) relating to the joint exercise of powers common to the parties hereto. The purpose of this Agreement is to exercise such powers jointly in the establishment of a universally accessible workforce development system and in particular to develop, coordinate, and implement the delivery of a locally based Workforce Investment Act (hereafter "WIA") program in accordance with requirements of the Act. An additional purpose of this Agreement is also to develop, coordinate, and implement the delivery of other education, employment, and training programs that may benefit the parties and their residents. • SECTION.2. TERM. . A. This Agreement shall become effective and binding upon the parties hereto when each of the governing bodies of the parties has authorized the execution of this Agreement and the same has been executed by the duly authorized representative of 57378.1 3 each of such parties. This Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated. Additional cities and the County of Los Angeles may by mutual consent of the parties , become parties to this Agreement subject to the approval of the governing bodies of the agencies participating in this'Agreement. Any-party to this Agreement may withdraw from the consortium by giving 90 days written notice to the Administrator of its intent to cease participation in the consortium. Provided, however, that the within Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until all except one party have withdrawn and the State has authorized,another entity to receive and administer WIA funding for the residents of the parties to this Joint Powers Agreement. B. For the purpose of this Agreement, the term "fiscal year" shall mean the period from July 1 to and including June 30 of the following year. SECTION 3. DESIGNATED ADMINISTRATOR -- CITY OF PASADENA Pursuant to Section 6506 of the'Government Code, the City of Pasadena is designated as the Grant Recipient, fiscal agent, and Administrator for the consortium of general local governmental units participating in this Agreement and shall provide the program administration necessary to implement the local Workforce Investment Area WIA Program, under the supervision and direction of the Policy Board and the Workforce Investment Board. SECTION 4. POLICY BOARD. A. This consortium shall be administered by a Policy Board made up of an elected official of each participating public entity. 57378.1 - 4- B. The legislative body of each of the participating public entities shall appoint one policy board member and one alternate board member. Each member of the Board, or subsequent replacement, shall serve a two-year term and each member shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority. Vacancies during a term and successors following expiration of the term of any member shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointments. Members shall receive no compensation except reimbursement for expenses incurred in conducting business on behalf of the consortium. Said expenses . must be allowable under the Act, and reasonable and necessary as determined by the Policy Board. C. If'a board member cannot attend a meeting, the alternate attending shall be fully-empowered to act as the board member for the meeting so attended. SECTION 5. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE POLICY BOARD. It shall be the responsibility of the Policy Board to: • A. • Appoint members to the Workforce Investment Board in accordance with Section 117(c) of the Act; . B. At its discretion, review the Workforce Investment Board's appointment of Youth Council Members; C. Determine general program policy; D. Approve the job training plan in conjunction with the Workforce Investment Board; • 57378.1 5 • E. Review and approve memoranda of understanding entered into by the Workforce Investment Board and required one-stop partners described in Section 1221(b)(1)(B); F. •Approve the Workforce Investment Board's designation or certification of one-stop operator(s); G. With the Workforce Investment Board, conduct oversight with respect to the local one-stop delivery system; H. Ensure that services rendered are in the best interest of the local Workforce Investment Area residents; and I. Ensure that all activities are carried out in accordance with the Act and any other related legislation. J. The Chairperson of the Policy Board shall be designated as the "chief elected official" as that term is used in Section 101 of the WIA. SECTION 6. MEETINGS OF THE POLICY BOARD. A. Regular Meetings. The Policy Board shall provide for its regular, and special meetings, provided, however, that it shall hold at least one regular meeting in each year and such further meetings as the parties.may reasonably request depending upon the pressure of business. The date, hour and place at which_any regular meeting shall be held shall be fixed by resolution and a copy of such resolution shall be filed with each party. The place.of the regular meetings shall be a public building or other facility 57378.1 6 within the County of Los Angeles which complies with the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. The Policy Board shall adopt rules for conducting its meetings and other • business. B. The Ralph M. Brown Act. All meetings of the Board including, without limitation, regular, adjourned regular, and special meetings, shall be called, noticed, held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (commencing with §54950 of the Government Code).- C. Minutes. The secretary of the Policy. Board shall cause to be kept minutes of regular, adjourned regular, and special meetings, and shall, as soon as possible after each meeting, cause a copy of the minutes to be forwarded to each member of the Board and to the parties hereto. D. Quorum - Action. A majority of members of the Policy Board present at a meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, except that a lesser number may adjourn for lack of quorum. No action at a meeting shall be valid unless it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of those present. SECTION 7. OFFICERS OF THE CONSORTIUM. The Policy Board shall elect a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson at its first meeting and, thereafter, at the first meeting in each succeeding fiscal year, the.Policy 57378.1 7 • • Board shall elect or re-elect its Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. In the event that the Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson elected ceases to be a Board Member, the resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next regular meeting of the Policy Board held after such vacancy occurs. In the absence or inability of the Chairperson to act, the Vice- Chairperson shall act as Chairperson. The Chairperson, or in his absence the Vice- . Chairperson, shall preside at and conduct all meetings,of the Policy Board. The Executive Director shall be, and act as, the Secretary of the Policy Board. The Executive Director shall be appointed by the administrator of the consortium, the City of Pasadena. The Director of Finance of the City of Pasadena shall be, and act as, the Treasurer of consortium, and as, Controller of the consortium pursuant to Government Code §6505.5. SECTION 8. POWERS. A. The City of Pasadena shall have the power to operate a local Workforce Investment Area under the Act in the geographical areas comprising the incorporated Cities of Arcadia, Duarte, Monrovia, Sierra Madre, South Pasadena, and Pasadena, and such other communities as the governing legislative bodies of said communities, by resolution or contract, shall prescribe and the Policy Board shall consent to. B. The City of Pasadena is,authorized to do all acts necessary for the • exercise of said common powers for the common benefit of the parties to this Agreement and the citizens thereof and consistent with such federal and state funding provided under the Act, to acquire by lease buildings or sites, and to maintain, operate, or lease the same for public purposes and to purchase general liability insurance; the City of Pasadena is 57378.1 8 authorized to do all acts necessary for the exercise of said common powers for said purposes, including, but not limited to, any or all of the following: to make and enter into contracts, to employ agents and employees; to manage, maintain, or operate any . buildings, facilities, works or improvements above enumerated; to acquire property by lease; to hold or dispose of property by lease or sale; to incur debts, liabilities or obligations required by the exercise of these powers; and to sue and be sued in its own .name. Said powers shall be exercised in the manner provided in said Act, and, except as expressly set forth herein, subject only to such restrictions upon the manner of exercising such powers as are imposed upon the parties in the exercise of similar powers. SECTION 9. DISPOSITION OF ASSETS. At the end of the term hereof or upon the earlier termination of this Agreement, all property of the consortium shall automatically vest in the party hereto which;=has heretofore transferred said property to the consortium and shall thereafter remain the sole property of said party. All other property of the consortium shall be returned to the parties in proportion to their respective contribution to the cost of acquisition of such property or as the Policy Board may direct. SECTION 10. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS UPON TERMINATION Upon termination of this Agreement, any money in possession of the consortium after the payment of all costs, expenses and charges validly incurred under this Agreement, shall be returned to the parties in proportion to their contribution determined as of the time of termination. 57378.1 9 • SECTION .11. ASSISTANCE TO ADMINISTRATOR. The parties may, in appropriate circumstances: A. make contributions from their treasuries for the purposes set forth herein; -B. make advances of public funds for such purposes set forth in this Agreement on such terms of repayment as.may be agreed to between the Administrator and the.party making the advance; and, C. use their personnel, equipment or property in lieu of other contributions or advances. Sums so contributed or obtained shall be paid to and disbursed by the Treasurer. The provisions of Government Code Section 6513 are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. SECTION 12. DISALLOWED COSTS. A. Each party to this Agreement shall pay its fair share of any disallowed costs which is finally determined by the State of California or the Federal Government to be due and owing to the State or Federal Government. B. The apportionment of disallowed costs incurred by the consortium, and payable by the parties to this Agreement involving funds disallowed under the Act, shall be based upon the allocation formula which the State of California is obligated to use in distributing funds to local Workforce Investment Areas as stated in the WIA. • 57378.1 10 SECTION 13. ACCOUNTS AND.REPORTS. A. The Controller of the consortium shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by good accounting practice. The books and records of the consortium in the hands of the Controller shall be open to inspection at all. reasonable times by representatives of the parties. The Controller of the consortium, within 90 days after the close of each fiscal year, shall give a complete written report of all financial activities for such fiscal year to the Executive Director of the WIB and the parties. The Controller furthermore shall either make or contract with a certified public accountant to make audits of the accounts and records of the consortium as required by the Act. Said report shall be filed within twelve months of the end of the fiscal year under examination. The audit shall comply with Section 6505 of the Government Code. B. Any costs of such audits, including contracts with or employment of certified public accountants or public accountants in making an audit pursuant to this section, shall be borne by the consortium and shall be a charge against any unencumbered funds of the consortium available for such purpose. C. The Treasurer of the consortium shall assume the duties described in California Government Code Section 6505.5 including to. wit: (1) Receive and receipt for all money of consortium and place it in the City of Pasadena treasury to the credit of consortium; • 57378.1 11 (2) Be responsible upon his official bond for the safekeeping and disbursement of all consortium money so held by him/her; (3) Pay sums due from consortium from consortium money, only upon warrants of the Controller of consortium; and, (4) Verify and report, in writing, to consortium and to the parties to this Agreement at the Policy Board's regular meetings, the amount of money held for the consortium, the amount of receipts since the last report, and the amount paid out since the last report. SECTION 14. INSURANCE. The Administrator shall maintain in force at all times during the terms of this Agreement, policies of insurance covering the operation of the consortium. Such insurance shall be primary and carriers shall be required to waive any right of contribution from other insurance which may be available to the parties of this Agreement. SECTION 15. FUNDS AND PROPERTY. • A. The Treasurer of the consortium shall have the custody of and disburse consortium funds pursuant to the accounting procedures developed in accordance with the provisions hereinabove, and as nearly as possible in accordance with normal City of Pasadena procedures. _ 57378.1 12 • • B. The Treasurer herein designated as the person responsible for all monies of the consortium, is also designated hereby as responsible for all other property of the consortium. SECTION 16. AMENDMENTS. All amendments to this Agreement shall require an affirmative vote of not less than five (5) of the parties. All amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing • and signed by the parties agreeing thereto. SECTION 17. NOTICES. Notices hereunder shall be sufficient if delivered to the City Clerk of each of the member cities, and the Clerk of the legislative body of any other participating public,entities. :SECTION 18. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The section headings herein are for convenience of reference only and are not to be construed as modifying or governing the language or meaning referred to in the section. B. Whenever in this Agreement any consent or approval is required, the same shall not be unreasonably withheld. C. This Agreement is made in the State of California under the Constitution and laws of such State and is to be construed in accordance with those laws. • • 57378.1 13 SECTION 19. SEVERABILITY. Should any part, term or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, be held to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise be rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining parts, terms, or provisions, or the application thereof to other persons or circumstances, shall be deemed severable and shall not be affected thereby, provided such remaining portions or provisions can be construed in substance to continue to constitute the Agreement that the parties intended to enter into in the first instance. DATED: '7/p/90d0 CITY OF PASADENA By < (0 ,'108, • • • Title Mayor. ATTEST: J fe Rodriguez CMC/ ity Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Carolyn . W7lliams Assistant City Attorney 57378.1 14 • DATED: CITY OF ARCADIA By Title Mayor ATTEST: - APPROVED AS TO FORM: • 57378.1 16 OR7'ORATEO y STAFF A O .6T DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT August 15, 2000 TO: Arcadia City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/ Development Services 6V Director By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE TEXT AMENDMENT 00-002, AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE 2128 —AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING SECTION 9275.1.51 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PERMIT CREMATORIES IN C-O OR ANY LESS RESTRICTIVE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE WITH AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. SUMMARY An application was filed by Arcadia Chapel of Remembrance, Inc. to amend Section 9275.1.51 . of the Arcadia Municipal Code to allow crematories in C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. as The Planning Commission at its Julyy11, 2000 meeting,voted 5-0 to recommend to the City Council approval of the text amendment. Attached is City Council Ordinance 2128: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia amending Section 9275.1.51 to allow crematories in C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit (TA 00-002). BACKGROUND • During March of this year the Arcadia Chapel of Remembrance, Inc. proposed to add a crematory to their existing mortuary business located at 500 S. First Avenue. Staff advised the applicant that the Arcadia Municipal code does not address "crematories" as a permitted use in any zone. Mortuaries are permitted, but only with an approved Conditional Use Permit and based on the definition of mortuary, as set forth in the American Heritage College Dictionary, a mortuary is a place "where dead bodies are kept before burial or cremation". The City's Code prohibits uses that are not listed as "permitted". v\\&e-t\ POol \--\42.NTE E-k11 C- 00 SAT0 du.egLA . lt9 ca , Staff explained to the applicant that although the funeral service business has changed over the years, in order to have a crematory use within the City, a text amendment would be required to change the code to allow such a use to be permitted. PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS The Arcadia Chapel of Remembrance, Inc. is proposing a Text Amendment to permit crematories to be used in conjunction with mortuaries with an approved Conditional Use Permit. According to information provided by the applicant the number of people requesting to be cremated has grown over the last 25 years, from 30% in recent years to a projected 50% within the next ten years. Staff believes the applicant's request will allow mortuaries to better serve the needs of the community and to ensure that mortuary businesses will continue to thrive in a changing mortuary industry, where people are requesting to be cremated and where family members and friends are requesting to witness and/ or participate in the cremation process. It is staff's recommendation that crematories be permitted subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. This would allow the Planning Commission an opportunity to review a proposal based on the adequacy of the site to accommodate such a use and its affect on adjoining properties and the neighborhood. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission at its Judy 11, 2000 meeting voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the text amendment to permit crematories in the C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. CEQA Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed text amendment. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the CC Report T.A. 00-002 August 15, 2000 Page 2 wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this text amendment. As a matter of environmental concerns a crematory equipment system is safe to operate and does not emit pollutants that would be considered harmful by the various local, state, and Federal environmental agencies. Base on the Emission Comparison Table (Table 1) a crematory equipment system does not emit more pollutants than your standard residential fireplace, diesel truck, or restaurant cooking 100 hamburgers per hour. Table l Emissions o on . . 1 p . . -:t =: M i"'''‘'ii: ,I��.�£.+z %1,,Z_ Legend: rIg r : Residential 7 17 r_ Fl �hy' Fireplace A y! :,'''.!..'5., 6I 4 r�,; ?� 6 'prig! r Diesel �� '�4 �? '� �'`* �' s7- , Truck ' g,1111:„.,..te E 3 I ai," I R ';ir Restaurant '" , ' -.' Cooking 100 ,� �e.c� m �4�L .� i Jr ^� su cgra rt fry Hamburgers 0 A aril 4 C." <t Io at T% t: , • Per Hour a Particulate Nitrog n , Volatile Organic a IEE Cremator Matter Oxides Compounds '} tTrci,++- WnrtYa+ ,.:i `, "' Ia As s tmx.:5'hil0aldr++1t a 5 f i ig S. IagraM.k,-EWOM. ty�._'�t,r { „e„;ii2SJl`Pt l 'fiNtE- tU''T0410. WI " `'IP 1 3 �i Fir; P9Pa47:77:"�inR'�'r� . ..rp-M.. -I 3tTjixNT:4*? o"'1-7.: 474:ga"" � L,.iit .5.,; iii .ik5g.,: q�. .. ....-��,r�+n.Pa�t3o�'�a3i�!�Y..,"7��;:rr.�- .. .. , :.^' '.�� •� - a, ds'�'�EiQ I �`�.q'''�._? CC Report T.A. 00-002 August 15, 2000 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends that the following be added to the Conditional Use Permit Division of the Arcadia Municipal Code: 9275.1.51. MORTUARIES AND CREMATORIES. C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone. If the City Council concurs with staffs recommendation the City Council should: 1. Move to approve the Negative Declaration and direct staff to file the Notice of Determination with the County Recorder; and 2. Introduce Ordinance 2128 — An Ordinance of the City of Arcadia amending Section 9275.1.51 of the Arcadia Municipal Code to permit crematories in C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. Attachments:Ordinance 2128 Copy of July 11, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Letter from Chapel of Remembrance, Inc. Environmental Documents Approved B : pP Y William R. Kelly, City Manager • CC Report T.A. 00-002 August 15, 2000 Page 4 • as- e?o-1 • ( Ural z / z Fl ORDINANCE NO.2128 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9275.1.51 OF THE ARCADIA MUNICIPAL CODE, TO ALLOW CREMATORIES IN C-O OR ANY LESS RESTRICTIVE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONE WITH AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. WHEREAS, this text amendment was initiated by the Arcadia Chapel of Remembrance, Inc., to amend Section 9275.1.51 of the Arcadia Municipal Code to allow crematories in C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved conditional use permit, Community Development Case No. T.A. 00-002; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 11, 2000 before the Planning Commission at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia recommended approval of this text amendment; and • WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the City Council on August 15, 2000, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was conducted for this project, and said Initial Study did not disclose any individual or cumulative adverse effect on wildlife resources, and therefore a Negative declaration was prepared for this project; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that based upon the evidence presented, the public necessity, convenience and general welfare justifies the proposed text changes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 9275.1.51 of the Arcadia Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 9275.1.51 MORTUARIES AND CREMATORIES. C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone. • • SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a copy of the same to be published in the official newspaper of said City within fifteen(15) days after its adoption. Passed, approved and adopted this day of August, 2000 Mayor of the City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4eA/F4.4.1 ` � ✓ Stephen P.Deitsch, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF ARCADIA ) Z1 I, JUNE D. ALFORD, City Clerk Qf the City of Arcadia,hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2128 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arcadia, signed • by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of , 2000 and that said Ordinance was adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk of the City of Arcadia 2 2128 • July 11, 20C,, Planning Commiss.a Minutes 5. PUBLIC HEARING TA 00-002 Consideration of a text amendment to amend Section 9275.1.51 of the AMC to allow crematories in C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved CUP. The staff report was presented. Staff explained this text amendment and the Planning Commission's recommendation would be forwarded to the City Council who would make the final decision. After the ordinance is adopted, the applicant can file for a CUP. The public hearing was opened. • Terry Harmon, owner of Chapel of Remembrance, was present. Ken Robinson, Orlando Florida, representing the company that manufactures the equipment was present. They have a branch, which is approximately 40 miles from Arcadia. His company is the largest company that manufactures cremation equipment. Various local, State and federal agencies inspect every installation. Their equipment is safe to operate and does not emit pollutants and would not be a noise nuisance. Most crematories are located in residential areas and serve that community. They provide extensive training for the technicians who would operate the equipment. He went on to say that he was confident that the applicants would do a nice job of tying this in to the rest of their facility. All of their plans would be submitted to the city for approval. The equipment has numerous fail safe features. He explained how the unit would be placed and how it operates. No one else spoke in favor of or in opposition,to this item. • Chairman Bruckner closed the public hearing. Commissioner Sleeter thought that this would be good for the community. He felt they should send a strong message to City Council to approve this request . MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Sleeter , seconded by Commissioner Murphy to recommend approval ofTA 00-002 to the City Council. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioner Huang, Murphy, Sleeter, Bruckner NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Kalemkiarian Arcadia City Planning Commission 7 7/11/00 a ° ape o� em mb6"cLnce, Jii2c. : HS** ; 7, ` San Gabriel Valley's Finest "Family Owned. . . .Thoughtful Service" CA FD#747 500 South First Avenue • Arcadia, California 91006 (626) 447-8148 Fax (626) 447-1569 Toll Free 1-877-447-8148 May 16, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Arcadia ._._. _...__.... Arcadia, California 91006 Dear Friends Much has changed in both Arcadia and Funeral service since our business founders built the • new funeral home in-1939°—Through the years several additions have been built to the original structure to meet community needs and additional property was purchased to expand parking. In order to better serve the changed needs of the community and to insure the continued viability of our firm into the next century, we are requesting peg nission to construct a crematory with a family witnessing room. Over the last 25 years cremation has grown from a small percentage of our business to where it is requested by 30% of our families, and it is projected to grow to over 50% in the next 10 years. This request is consistent with natiofial, state and local usage. Nationally over 70% of all crematories in the U.S.A. are located in funeral homes in residential neighborhoods. The State - of California regulates both-embalming rooms and crematories with the same state agency and _ both are defined by state law as facilities where human remains are prepared for final disposition. This site in Arcadia is actually zoned for business and has been used for this purpose for over 60 years. Our business predates all other businesses and residences in the immediate area. The two closest residences are in habited by ourselves, as the two owners live on premise. This is evidence of our desire to give "old fashioned"personal service 24 hours a day, and our remodeling is evidence of our desire to offer the finest services possible. • • ^ NCCLLLLCL • +r° � _ ape ernemt7Y ance� ✓`2C. � '? ` z x San Gabriel Valley's Finest "Family Owned. . . .Thoughtful Service" CA FD#747 500 South First Avenue • Arcadia, California 91006 (626) 447-8148 Fax (626) 447-1569 TDB Free.1-877-447 14g Death and funerals are not something anyone wants to think ot...an .most people don't until they are forced to. At that time they are concerned with who they entrust and where the work will take place. While some traditional funeral families inquire and appreciate that our staff performs all preparation work on site, not in some distant"central embalming facility", almost all cremation families inquire about where this is to be done. Some express concern and some are upset by what is available to them, but the important thing to realize now, is that at that time, all families would prefer and feel more secure in knowing that this would be taken care of locally by the same person they are dealing with for everything else. In addition,please consider that Arcadia's population is now 30% Asian and in many Asian cultures it is traditional for the family to accompany the deceased to the crematory and for the family to witness and/or participate in the cremation. The current cremation facilities in this area are distant, old, industrial type installations and are very un-desirable for this. There may be someone who objects to this request because they have an irrational fear of death, but probably this type of person would not have moved into a residence close to a funeral home. Most people who object will do so because it is normal to have reservations about anything new and people are resistant to change. However, the leaders of the city are responsible for determining what the needs of the total community are and to make sure that those needs are met. With an open mind it is readily apparent that po difference in our businesses operation will be noticed. To further document this, enclosed are letters from neighbors of a funeral home that is located in Creston, Iowa where Jim Larkin installed a crematory. In 1985, the city council passed, over the recommendation of the planning and zoning commission, our request for a crematory addition. This was in a congested, older neighborhood where the nearest house was a mere 10' away. Of the neighbors who protested, they have since changed their minds and are now willing -- to admit that they were wrong to have opposed this progress. Also, we have enclosed information in regards to the retort (Crematory unit) itself, and to give you an understanding on how"State of the Art"the system is, and in furthering your knowledge so that all-questions can be eased. • . Thank you for your time and attention given to this request. .. Sincerely, /ktot-th4,15-- Terry J. I- on & Jim Larkin, Shareholders Arcadia Chapel of Remembrance, Inc. �YOF w•�. File No.: TA 00-002 it : i . ,!� CITY OF ARCADIA '�\' /9 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE RPonta0- ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Adopted: -DRAFT-- Title and Description of Project: Text Amendment No. TA 00-002: A proposal to amend Section 9275.1.51. of the Arcadia Municipal Code to allow crematories in C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. Location of Project: City-wide Name of Applicant or Project Sponsor: Terry J. Harmon & James E. Larkin Arcadia Chapel of Remembrance Inc. 500 S. First.Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 Finding: The Planning Commission, having reviewed the Initial Study of this text amendment and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public hearing of the Planning Commission, including the recommendation of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed text amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the consistency of the proposed project with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission hereby find that this Negative Declaration reflects its independent judgment. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at the location listed below. The location and custodian of the docume its and any other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration are as follows: City of Arcadia Development Services Dept./Community Development Division/Planning Services 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 Staff member: Kenneth Phung, Assistant Planner (626) 574-5447 Date Received for Filing: #"1r 15;11. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISORM PORATO 1. Project•Title: Text Amendment TA 00-002, a proposal to amend Section 9275.1.51. of the Arcadia Municipal Code to allow crematories in C-O or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Arcadia . Development Services Depai tment Community Development Division/Planning Services 240 W.Huntington Drive P.O.Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 • 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kenneth Phung (626) 574-5447 4. Project Location: City-wide 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Terry J.Harmon&James E. Larkin Arcadia Chapel or Remembrance Inc. 500 S. First Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 • 6. General Plan Designation: N/A 7. Zoning: N/A 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved,including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary,support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheet(s) if neecessary.): Proposal to amend Section 9275.1.51. of tF e Arcadia Municipal Code to allow crematories in C-0 or any less restrictive commercial or industrial zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) ) N/A 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g.,permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None CEQAFORMS/CHECKLIST 07/03/00 Page 1 of 4 • ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. - Aesthetics - Agriculture Resources — Air Quality - Biological Resources — Cultural Resources — Geology/Soils - Hazards &Hazardous — Hydrology/Water Quality — Land Use/Planning Materials Noise - Population/Housing - Mineral Resources — Recreation ' Transportation/Traffic - Public Services Mandatory Findings of - Utilities/Service Systems Significance DETERMINATION(To be completed by the Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation: - I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. - I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGA1i D NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. - I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT£s required. I find that the proposed project MAY hav a "potentially significant or"potentially significant unless mitigated"impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. - I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and(b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project,nothing further is required. 6/15/2000 Signature Date Kenneth Phung CITY OF ARCADIA Printed Name For CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "I,, Page 2 of 4 • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g.the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants,based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: qa a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. z. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are"Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans,zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. CITY/RVPUB/2000/313785 FORM "J" Page 3 of 4 7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats;however, lead agencies should normally address the questions form this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold,if any,used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any,to reduce the impact to less than significance. • CITY/RVPUB%2000/313785 FORM "J" • Page 4 of 4 File No:TA 00-002 ss Than Issues: Significant Potentially With • Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact • I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X X b) Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to, tress,rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to theA California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site m Assessment Model (1997)prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmlatt4i. Would the project: a)Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland, or X Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? • • CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM"J" • 1 File No:TA 00-002 • Less Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact X c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. III. AIR QUALITY. Where available,the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. .Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute X substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "J" 2 File No:TA 00-002 4s Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally. protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including,but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species.or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery, sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? • X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. • CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "J" 3 File No: TA 00-002 Less Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance X of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. • VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS --Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial X adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on X the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fadlt Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?fiRefer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X X iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iiii) Landslides? ti v X CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM"J" 4 File No:TA 00-002 Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact • X b)Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating. substantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: X a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM"J" 5 File No:TA 00-002 Less Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than • Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact X d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, X would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ,r X an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of X loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "J" 6 • •• File No:TA 00-002 _=ss Than Significant Issues: Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there . would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the X site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the X site or area, including through the alteration of the course . of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water Which would exceed — X the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 6 X 6 it g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundar?'or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? i) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ,.. X which would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. • CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM"J" • 7 File No:TA 00-002 Less Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan X or natural community conservation plan? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. X.MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important X mineral resource recovery site delineated onnra local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? • The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: • a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM"J" 8 • File No: TA 00-002 _ •.ess Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact • c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise X levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either X directly (for example,by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)? • b) Displace substantial numbers of existing'housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing • elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating X the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: • CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "J" 9 _ File No:TA 00-002 Less Than • Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X • Police protection? X Schools? N N X • Parks? N X Other public facilities? X The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. XIV. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional X parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be • accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or X require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "3" 10 File No: TA 00-002 • -ess Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact a) Cause an increase in traffic,which is substantial in ti X relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(i.e.,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? • c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including X either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature X (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with adopted policies,plans, or programs X supporting alternative transportation (e.g.,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. , • • XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the - X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or X wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm X water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "J" 11 File No:TA 00-002 Less Than Issues: Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the • X N project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted X capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. • XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the X quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce theb number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? t b) Does the project have impacts that are individually X limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects X which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The text amendment is a change in the code, and does not directly affect land use. • CITY/RVPUB/20002000/546265 FORM "J" 12 �Iw. File No. - _ a92) U -� �O 1,1 CITY OF ARCADIA lam^ ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE r�C� A'CE/ - ARCADIA, CA 91007 RPOR ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Date Filed: /7 c() General Information 1. Applicant's Name: Arcardia Chapel of Remembrance, Inc. Address: 500 S. First Ave. - Arcadia, CA. 91006 2. Property Address (Location): 500 S. First Ave. - Arcadia, CA. Assessor's Number: 340 125 0000 3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Terry John Harmon 447-8148 500 S. First Ave. - Arcadia, CA. 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional,state and federal agencies: The California Board of Consumer Affairs would license the facility for operation and the facility would require a licensed manager, as well as all operators would have to be licensed by the state. 5. Zone Classification: 6. General Plan Designation: Project Description 7. Proposed use of site (project description_): Construction of building to hold crematory unit, processing area, family witnessing area, and three car garage. 8. Site size: /2 5-'/60/x 9. Square footage per building: /9.S.0 -5? AL, __ 10. Number of floors of construction: One • - 11. Amount of off-street parking provided: ,2cr ca r-5 12. Proposed scheduling of project: _As soon as possible 13. Anticipated incremental development: None 14. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sizes expected: DOES NOT APPLY 15. If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: Would operate for benefit of Arcadia and immediately surrounding communities. Unloading areas would be private, out of public view, during 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. seven days. aweek as needed to meet the needs of the public. 16. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: DOES NOT APPLY 17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: • DOES NOT APPLY 18. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: A text amendment would be required to change the code to allow a crematory to be used in conjunction with mortuaries which also require a conditional use permit. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO • 19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground ❑ . rzt contours. 20. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public ❑ lands or roads. 21. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. ❑ 22. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. ® k{, 23. Change in dust, ash, smoke,fumes or odors in vicinity. ❑ =4 _� E,I.Iti. 3/95 -2- • • YES NO 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing ❑ a drainage-patterns. 25. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. ® � 26. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more. ❑ 27. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, ®. flammable or explosives. 28. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police,fire, water, ❑ El sewage, etc.). 29. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, ❑ al etc.). 30. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ❑ M Environmental Setting 31. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polar6.d photos will be accepted. 32. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or sonic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability; and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. - <—//6/,200t) Date ' Si rfture ET F. 3/95 -3- • ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING QUESTION # 31 The entire site. is level and this combinded with irrigated landscaping provides for total soil stability. There are no plants or animals that would be affected by this project in any manner; and there are no cultural, scenic or historical aspects that would be impacted in anyway. The exsisting structures on this site include the funeral home building that was originally constructed in 1939. There have been four additions over the years to meet community needs including an owner occupied apartment. The other structure on the property is a home built by the original mortuary owner and it is currently occupied by an owner of the mortuary also. The other exsisting structure on the property is a 20' x 32' garage with an enclosed fenced area. This would be torn down to make room for the new building. We have previously removed a covered car port and a portable building. Since we would also be relocating the exsisting north driveway slightly to the east, and re-opening a corresponding southern driveway onto the south m alley, we would actually have improved traffic flow and create 8-9 additional parking spaces. The driveway that we recently constructed directly from • First Ave. onto our property to the back parking area, has greatly increased public use of this parking area and reduced the incidence of on-street parking. In addition, we have an agreement with Elloco drive-inn to utilize their parking as needed. . .this agreement did not exsistiin the past. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING QUESTION # 32 Starting across the street north of the funeral home in Elloco drive-inn. Moving eastward is a multi-family home. Crossing Eldorado Street to the south, the three homes directly east of the funeral home are of the same vintage and on each of these lots, additional small houses or garage/apartments have been con- structed on the back of the lots. Across the alley to the southeast are several large multi-unit apartment buildings. West of this is a parking lot for the businesses that face on to First Ave. directly south of Mr. Harmon's home and these are sall small office and retail shops. Across First Ave. on the west side of the street, diagonally from Mr. Harmon's home at 506 S. First Ave. is a small house that has had a commercial sign shop constructed on the front of it. The building directly to the north houses an insurance office and the Arcadia Mailbox. The building directly west of the funeral home is a small office building. Finally, diagonally across from the funeral home in the northwest corner of the intersection is a chiropractic center and a liquor store. All of these properties have little or no landscaping and our facility is the only one in the area landscapped to community standards. There are no cultural, historic, or scenic aspects to any of these locations except for the view of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, which would not be affected for any of these surrounding property owners by the construction of our building.