No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNovember 6, 2001A N N O T A T E4 • A G E N D A Arcadia City Council and Redevelopment Agency Meeting November 6, 2001 5:00 P.M. Council Chambers Conference Room ACTION ROLL CALL: City Council/Redevelopment Agency M_ embers Chandler, Chang, Kovacic, Marshall and Segal Ail present TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (NON - PUBLIC HEARING/ FIVE -MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) No one spoke 1. CLOSED SESSION ENTERED the Closed Session at 5:06 p.m. RECONVENgD the eg lar me. tang at 5:21 p.m. a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to meet with ega� counsel in the conference regarding Request for Amicus Support - Alford v. Superior Court (San Diego room Coun ; 89 Cal. App. 4' 356, 107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 245, (2001) Approved b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to meet with legal counsel regarding Request for Amicus Support - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in City of Auburn v. Owest Corp., 247 F.3d (9 " Cir.2001) Approved 2. STUDY SESSION a. Discussion of the` 2000 -2005 Housing Element Update Pub. xrg. held at regular mtg. b Discussion, direction and adoption/approval of the Library Strategic Plan and proposed Capital Improvement Projects for construction and equipment Approved 5 -0 Gary A. �Kovacic, Mayor • Mickey Segal, Mayor Protempore • Roger Chandler, Dr. Shang Chang, Gail A. Marshall, Council Members William R. Kelly, City Manager ntna n nir...d crn, rra,� INVOCATION. Rev. Cynthia.Fillmore, Village Presbyterian ACTION Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE State Senator, Robert Margett ROLL CALL: Council Members Chandler, Chang, Kovacic, Marshall and Segal A>> rp event 3. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS None MOTION: Read all Ordinances and Resolutions by title only and waive reading in full 4dopted 5-0 City Attorney Deitsch announced the City Council met in Closed.session this evening and directed.staff that.the City would oin as Amicus support re Items la: & lb. 4. PRESENTATION of Proclamation to Cathy and Len Hundshamer for Arcadia Festival of Bands Month 5. PRESENTATION to California Gold Soccer Team 6. PUBLIC HEARING All interested persons are invited to appear at the Public Hearing and to provide evidence or testimony concerning the proposed item of consideration. You are hereby advised that should you desire to legally challenge any action taken by the City Council, with respect to the proposed 6(a), you may be limited to raising only those issues and objections which you or someone else raised at or _ prior to the time of the public hearing. a. Recommendation to approve the 2000 -2005 Housing Element Update and adopt Resolution 6261, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, amending Appendix A, the Community Development Section and the Implementation and Monitoring Section of the General Plan by adoption of the 2000 -2005 Housing Element addressing the statutory. Pub. Hrg. Closed requirements relating to the City's Housing Element Adopted 5 -0 7. TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL (NON - PUBLIC HEARING /FIVE- MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON) No one spoke 8.1 MATTERS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS . City Council Announcements /Statements/Future Agenda Items See Minutes ACTION 'RECESS CITY COUNCIL' 9: MEETING OF THE ARCADIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL: Agency Members Chandler, Chang, Marshall, Segal and M1BX91i& Kovacic All present TIME RESERVED FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (NON- PUBLIC HEARING /FIVE- MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER PERSON No one spoke ADJOURN to November 20, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL 10. CONSENT, a. Minutes of October 16, 2001 regular meeting Approved 5 -0 b. Recommendation to approve the job descriptions for the new classifications of Police Communications - Computer Support Specialist, and Circulation Services Supervisor, as well as approve revisions to the existing job descriptions of Communications and Marketing Specialist I/II,`Assistant City Librarian, Principal Librarian and Senior Library. Technician ._ Approved'5 -0 o: Recommendation to renew the contract with G &S Towing for Official Police Garage Storage and Tow Service from January 9, 2002 through January 8, 2007 Approved 5 -0 d. " Recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6264,a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, designating the week of November 10 -17`x' as California Recycles Week, and November 151h as America Recycles Day Adopted 5 -0 e. Recommendation to award a one -year contract extension in the "amount of $420,910.00 to CLS Landscape Management Incorporated, for Landscape Maintenance Services at City facilities Approved 5 -0 f. ' Recommendation to award a contract in the amount of $1,394,583.00 to° Southwest Engineering, Incorporated for the Santa Anita Reservoir No. 3 Rehabilitation Project Approved 5 -0 • ': • e CONSENT Continued ACTION g. Recommendation to approve Final Map No. 53249 for a 5 -unit residential condominium project at 434 West Huntington Drive Approved 5 -0 h. Recommendation to accept all work performed by EC Construction Company for the concrete rehabilitation project on Baldwin Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and.Las Tunas /Live Oak Avenue as complete, and to authorize the final payment to be made in accordance with the contract documents, subject to a retention of $20,974:07 Approved 5 =0 i. Recommendation to approve. Final Map No. 53303 for a 6 -unit residential condominium project at 33 -41 Genoa Street ?pproved 5 -0 j. Recommendation to award a three -year maintenance services agreement to Urban Graffiti Enterprises, Incorporated for graffiti removal services, in an amount not to exceed $12,500 anually Approved 5 -0 k.: Recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 6265 approving an amendment to the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority Joint Powers Agreement admitting to membership the City of 'Palm Springs, Adopted 5 -0 " 1. Recommendation to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan, in the amount of $57,505 to provide pavement design . . services for street reconstruction and rehabilitation at various locations Approved 5 =0 m. Recommendation to adopt the following items: Resolution No. 6267 approving the application for grant funds for Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers, Museums; and Facilities for Wildlife Education or Environinental Education Program under the Safe Neighborhood 'Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 for the Enhancement of the Ruth and Charles Gilb Arcadia Historical Museum ,"`Adopted 5 -0 Resolution No. 6266,1pproving the application for grant funds for Urban Recreational and Cultural Centers, Museums,, and Facilities for Wildlife Education or Environmental Education Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 for the Refurbishment of the John F. Panatier Nature Center at Wilderness Park Adopted 5-0 1. ACTION 11. CITY MANAGER a. Recommendation to introduce Ordinance No. 2151, an ordinance of the City Coun '1 of the City of Arcadia, California, establishing the Arcadia se Introduced as amended HistoticaY ommi mission 5 -0 12. CITY ATTORNEY a. Recommendation to introduce Ordinance No. 2152, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, California, amending the Zoning Code of the City of Arcadia to rezone the properties located at 1012 through 1026 South First Avenue from R -2 (Medium Density Residential) to R -1 7,500, Zone Change Case Z -01 -001 Introduced 5 -0 ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL to November 20 at 6:00 p.m. in memory of John Niedecken ADJOURNED at 8:10 p.m. "�✓ loud 00�'ORASfO�•o� STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 6, 2001 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: TRACEY HAUSE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR PREPARED BY: SONNY MORKUS, HUMAN RESOURCES AND RISK MANAGER ,d .'Y►� . SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE JOB DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE NEW CLASSIFICATIONS OF POLICE COMMUNICATIONS — COMPUTER SUPPORT SPECIALIST AND CIRCULATION SERVICES SUPERVISOR, AS WELL AS APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE EXISTING JOB DESCRIPTIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING SPECIALIST 1 /II, ASSISTANT CITY LIBRARIAN, PRINCIPAL LIBRARIAN AND SENIOR LIBRARY TECHNICIAN SUMMARY The approval of the proposed new and revised job descriptions will amend the City's existing personnel classification and compensation plan. BACKGROUND Periodically, City departments experience the need to create new classifications or revise existing job descriptions to address new operating needs. They develop requests that are reviewed by the City Manager, and then the Administrative Services Department/Human Resources Office conducts appropriate assessment interviews, meetings and analyses to evaluate the requests and make recommendations. The Human Resources Commission is responsible for reviewing and approving all job descriptions, prior to the job descriptions being sent to City Council for final approval. DISCUSSION The proposed job specifications pertain to two City Departments as follows: 1. City Manager's Office — The City Manager has proposed that job description for the flexible staffing classification of Communications & Marketing Specialist 1 /II (Exhibit 1) be revised to address the needs of the Communications and Marketing operations. LASER IMAGED c-04- loi- PAGE 2 — JOB DESCRIPTIONS (Continued) M 2. Police Department — The Police Chief has proposed that a Police Communications — Computer Support Specialist classification (Exhibit 11) be established and compensated at Salary Schedule No. 64, in order to respond to the increasing computer technology and radio communications support requirements that have been placed on the department. 3. Library Services Department — The City Librarian has proposed that a Circulation Services Supervisor classification (Exhibit III) be established and compensated at Salary Schedule No. 54, and that the job descriptions be revised for the classifications of Assistant City Librarian, Principal Librarian and Senior Library Technician, in order to address the operations needs of the Library. At its regular meetings on 9 -13 -01 and 10- 11 -01, the Human Resources Commission reviewed and approved the proposed new and revised job descriptions. FISCAL IMPACT The approval of the proposed new and revised job descriptions will not have an additional impact on the City budget because their funding have been addressed through the regular budget process. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the job descriptions for the new classifications of Police Communications — Computer Support Specialist and Circulation Services Supervisor, as well as approve the revisions to the existing job descriptions of Communications & Marketing Specialist 1 /11, Assistant City Librarian, Principal Librarian and Senior Library Technician, effective November 7, 2001. APPROVED: urw� William R. Kelly, City Manager i lrY,.(j/z /rS `del STAFF REPORT OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER November 6, 2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: William R. Kelly, City Manager Wilk By: Cindy Rowe, Management Services Officer's SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 2151, establishing the Arcadia Historical Commission BACKGROUND The original Arcadia Historical Museum was operated solely by' volunteers, led by a volunteer Board of Directors, with expenses paid by donations from the community. With the opening of the new Ruth and Charles Gilb Arcadia Historical Museum and the resignation of long -time volunteer curator Carol Libby, the City Council allocated funds to hire a full -time curator to oversee the museum collections and to guarantee a secure future for the new museum. Due to the increased size and scope of the new facility, the Historical Society Board of Directors has agreed to the concept of having the City Council appoint a commission to ensure the on -going operation and maintenance of the museum as a City facility. DISCUSSION The attached ordinance creates a Historical Commission, similar to the commission created in 1982 to oversee the original museum. (That commission was disbanded in 1986 when the volunteer group was able to assume all duties.) The new commission will act in an advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining to the museum, and will be charged with the responsibility to develop a vision and mission statement, identify goals, create collection policies and guide the museum as it develops its programs and collections. It is proposed that the seven (7) member - commission be comprised of four (4) members suggested by the Arcadia Historical Society and approved by the City Council, two (2) members suggested by the City Council, and one (1) member suggested by the Library Board of Trustees. The inclusion of the Library Board in LASER IMAGED ORDINANCE NO. 2151 November 6, 2001 Page two DISCUSSION (continued) the appointment process will enhance communication and build a network between the museum, the library and other organizations that share the same interests and concerns regarding the preservation of Arcadia's history. Additionally, one (1) ex- officio, non - voting member shall be appointed by the City Manager or designee. If the City Council concurs, it is suggested that three members serve an initial two - year term and four members. serve a four -year term, so that staggered terms will result as in other City commissions. FISCAL IMPACT As stated previously, funds to hire a professional curator have already been allocated. A curator, Maren Hackley, has been hired and began her duties on October 30. It is not yet known what the on -going operational costs will be for the new facility; a budget will be created and monitored as in all other City operations. The Historical Society will continue fund - raising efforts and encourage the utilization of volunteers to serve as docents and to assist with other museum activities. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council Introduce Ordinance No. 2151, establishing the Arcadia Historical Museum. Attachment: Ordinance No. 2151 D i z v_ Z u ��R�EATSp` STAFF REPORT CITY LIBRARY November 6, 2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Janet Sporleder, City Librarian SUBJECT: DISCUSSION, DIRECTION AND ADOPTION /APPROVAL OF THE LIBRARY STRATEGIC PLAN AND PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: The Library Board has adopted the attached Strategic Plan that will serve to guide the Library as it develops future programs and services. Funds were allocated for fiscal year 2001 -2002 in anticipation of the additional staffing needs of the Strategic Plan. With the addition of staff and the goal of expanding services, there is also a need to evaluate space allocation in the building in order to accommodate new offices and new service areas. Two Capital Improvement Projects (attached) would provide funds to develop a space allocation plan for additional offices and service areas and to equip new office areas. The Library Board recommends that the City Council adopt the Strategic Plan and approve the Capital Improvement Projects. DISCUSSION: The Library Board of Trustees adopted the attached Strategic Plan on September 20, 2001. The Plan includes a description of the process and procedures followed by the Board as they developed this plan for expending the funds allocated by the City Council for improving Library services. The Strategic Plan includes recommendations for a complete reorganization of the staff and for additional staffing. The Plan will form the basis for future decisions by the Library Board regarding services and programs. The Strategic Plan includes a discussion of the need to provide additional office space at the Library for the staffing levels recommended in the Plan and to develop suggestions for expanding service areas in the facility. One of the attached Capital Improvement Project requests would fund a space allocation study that would guide the development of additional offices and would consider options for expanding public areas of service. The other would provide funds for relocating and furnishing office space. LASER IMAGED ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: The Strategic Plan is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act per section 15306 (Information Collection). FISCAL IMPACT: Phase One funding as identified in the Plan is already available in the Library budget for fiscal year 2001 -2002. The Capital Improvement Project for a Library facilities space planning analysis would require $20,000. The Equipment Acquisition request for relocating and furnishing offices would require $25,000. Sufficient funds are available in the Capital Fund account. RECOMMENDATION: The Library Board recommends the City Council adopt the Strategic Plan and approve the Capital Improvement Projects. Approved by:--- - ' '" William R. Kelly, City Manager •!, op " 7111�\\_ 4 Al t4 DLA . STAFF REPO .T DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IEPTMENT November 6, 2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator ,- SUBJECT: Recommendation to approve the 2000-2005 Housing Element Update and adopt Resolution 6261 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, amending Appendix A, the Community Development Section and the Implementation and Monitoring Section of the General Plan by adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element addressing the statutory requirements relating to the City's Housing Element SUMMARY The California State Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties prepare a Housing Element as part of the comprehensive General Plan. State law requires Housing Elements to be updated at least every five (5) years to reflect a community's changing housing needs. The City's Housing Element update covers the 2000-2005 period, pursuant to the update cycle for jurisdictions within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region. Once adopted by the City Council, the City's Housing Element update will be in compliance with State Housing Element law. The Planning Commission at its September 25, 2001 meeting adopted Resolution 1653 recommending to the City Council adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element. The Development Services Department is recommending that the City Council approve the 2000-2005 Housing Element and adopt Resolution 6261 amending Appendix A, the Community Development Section and the Implementation and Monitoring Section of the General Plan. BACKGROUND The City Council adopted the current General Plan in September 1996. In 1998, the City Council amended Appendix A and the Community Development Element of the Arcadia General Plan addressing statutory requirements to the City's Housing Element. LASER IMAGED Housing Element Update CC Report— Housing Element November 6, 2001 r(2:----)/<--frt--e•-•-t-ft----&-•( i� Page 1 i ' r As noted, Housing Elements are required to be updated every five years and the Housing Element update being considered is for the years 2000-2005. On February 13, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission to receive input from the public as well as the Commission on the Draft 2000-2005 Housing Element. Based on the comments received at this meeting, the Housing Element was revised and submitted to the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), Division of Housing Policy Development for review. On April 27 the City received comments from HCD advising that the element needed to be revised. to demonstrate that the City: 1. Has sufficient land, zoned at appropriate densities to accommodate the development of housing commensurate with Arcadia's share of the regional housing need for all income groups; and 2. That the City's housing programs encourage and facilitate the development, rehabilitation and conservation of housing in Arcadia. Revisions were made in response to HCD's comments and forwarded to them for a second review. On August 13, the City received a letter from the State (see attached) advising us that the City's Housing Element update adequately responds to the statutory requirements..." The revised element will be in "full compliance with State Housing Element law when adopted and submitted for review". The revisions made to the Housing Element are identified by underlines primarily in Sections 4 (Housing Resources) and 5 (Housing Plan). Some of the changes are noted below: ® The City has identified other potential sites for "affordable" housing, further noting that the City recognizes that incentives and assistance are needed to facilitate the consolidation of parcels for larger development, particularly the development of affordable housing for working families. • The revisions to the plan also note that the City permits residential development within certain commercial and industrial areas subject to a conditional use permit. Density levels in these areas are generally considered flexible. • The Element further identifies other agencies that are available to assist the City in accessing funds in support of affordable housing including: Habitat for Humanity, Southern California Presbyterian Homes, Pasadena Neighborhood Housing Services and the Southern California Housing Development Corporation. • Section 5 includes a combination of financial and regulatory tools that may help to facilitate development of housing that is affordable to lower and, moderate- income facilities. Housing Element Update CC Report— Housing Element November 6, 200.1 Page 2 • Five-Year Objectives are identified on page 5-17 and include: o Continue to maintain an up-to-date site inventory, provide inventory,to local developers along with information on development incentives. o Utilize a combination of regulatory and financial incentives to assist in the development of family housing. o Review the zoning ordinance to consider modifications of development standards. DISCUSSION The objectives of the Housing Element are to identify strategies and programs that focus on: • Providing adequate housing sites; • Preserving and improving housing and neighborhoods; • Assisting in the provision of affordable housing; • Removing governmental and other constraints to housing development; and • Promoting fair and equal housing opportunities State Policy As noted in the Housing Element, "attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment. for every citizen is a major housing goal of the State". The Housing Element is part of the City's comprehensive General Plan. Section 65302(c) of the Government Code sets forth the specific components to be contained in a community's Housing Element. Future Housing Needs In 1998 SCAG developed its Regional Housing Needs Assessment commonly referred to as RHNA forecasts based on forecasts of population, employment and households from 1998 to 2000. Based on these forecasts, SCAG determined that the construction need for Arcadia during the 1998-2005 planning period is 461 units. The following table sets forth the need based on income levels: Income Group Units % of Total Very Low (0-50% MFI*) 55 12% Low (51-80% MFI) 32 7% Moderate (81-120% MFI) 46 - 10% Above Moderate (Over 120% MFI) 327 71% Total Units 461 I 100% *MFI = Median Family Income Housing Element Update CC Report— Housing Element November 6, 2001 Page 3 The table below illustrates the annual income for Very Low, Low and Moderate-income households by the size of family. In addition, it indicates the maximum affordable housing costs based on the state standard of 30% of income towards housing costs. Income Levels Income Group Annual Income Affordable Payments** Very Low - One Person $18,250 • $456 — Small Family* $23,450 $586 _ Large Family* $28,150 $704 Low One Person $29,200 $730 Small Family $37,500 $938 Large Family $45,000 $1,125 Moderate One Person $43,750 $1,094 Small Family $56,250 $1,406 Large Family $67,500 $1,688 *Small Family = up to 4 persons - Large Family = 5 or more persons **Includes utilities, taxes and insurance Goals Because of the high housing costs and diminishing residential development opportunities in the City, the Arcadia Housing Element focuses on two major goals: to provide adequate sites for future housing growth and to conserve the existing housing that is affordable to lower and moderate income households. Components of the Housing Element The Housing Element consists of the following major components: • An analysis of the City's demographic profile, housing characteristics and existing and future housing needs; • A review of potential market, governmental' and environmental constraints to meeting the City's identified housing needs. • An evaluation of the land and financial resources available to address the City's identified housing needs; and • A statement of the housing plan with goals, policies and programs to address the City's identified housing needs. Proposed Changes to the General Plan Because of the format of the City's General Plan, adoption of the Housing Element will also include the following changes to the General Plan: • The 2000-2005 Housing Element will replace Appendix A in its entirety. Housing Element Update CC Report— Housing Element November 6, 2001 Page 4 • Text relating to Housing in the Community Development Section located on pages 2- 29 through 2-33 will be deleted and reference will be made to see Appendix A: "HOUSING"— See Appendix A • The General Plan policies CD-24 through CD-26 under "Provision of Adequate Sites for Housing" set forth on pages 2-38 and 2-39 will be deleted and replaced with the following: "Provision of Adequate Sites for Housing" See Appendix A Housing and Population Assessment that includes the 2000- 2005 Housing Element. • In the Implementation and Monitoring Section, "Housing Improvement Program" on page 6-25 should be amended to read: "This program has been developed to meet the City's housing needs for the 2000-2005 housing period pursuant to Government Code Sections 65880- 65889." Table 6-F on pages 6-30 through 6-33 should be deleted and the text revised to read as follows: "HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The City of Arcadia intends to meet its housing needs and achieve identified objectives through the programs identified in Table 33 in Appendix A (2000-2005 Housing Element)." Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission at its September 25 meeting voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution 1653 recommending to the City Council adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element. CEQA Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Community Development Division has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which Housing Element Update CC Report— Housing Element November 6, 2001 Page 5 the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of the 2000-2005 Housing Element as amended. If the City Council concurs with staff's recommendation, the Council should adopt the Negative Declaration and move to approve the 2000-2005 Housing Element and adopt Resolution 6261: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Arcadia, amending Appendix A, the Community Development Section and the Implementation and Monitoring Section of the General Plan by adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element addressing the statutory requirements relating to the City's Housing Element Approved by: William R. Kelly, City Manager Enclosures: City Council Resolution 6261 Planning Commission Resolution 1653 Letters from HCD 2000-2005 Housing Element (Delivered under separate cover) Environmental Documents Housing Element Update CC Report— Housing Element November 6, 2001 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 6261 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA AMENDING APPENDIX A, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SECTION AND THE IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING SECTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTION OF THE 2000-2005 HOUSING ELEMENT ADDRESSING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT WHEREAS, the City initiated this General Plan amendment to amend Appendix A, the Community Development Section and the Implementation and Monitoring Section of the General Plan by adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element addressing the statutory requirements relating to the City's Housing Element; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2001, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on said matter at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to adopt Resolution 1653 recommending to the City Council adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in the attached report is true and correct. Section 2. The City Council finds: 1. That the proposed revisions and amendments to Appendix A, the Community Development Section and the Implementation and Monitoring Section of the General Plan will bring the City's Housing Element into compliance with the statutory requirements set forth in the California Government Code. . 2. That the adoption of the Housing Element will not be detrimental to • the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in areas affected by the Housing Element. 3. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the initial study are appropriate and that adoption of the Housing Element will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act and, when considering the project as a whole, there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project would have any potentially adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends, and therefore, a Negative Declaration has been adopted. Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons, the City Council approves the adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element as proposed. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed, approved and adopted this of , 2001. Mayor of the.City of Arcadia ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Arcadia • APPROVED AS TO FORM: 76-a Steph n Deitsch City Attorney -2- 6261 RESOLUTION NO. 1653 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX A, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SECTION AND THE IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING SECTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTION OF THE 2000-2005 HOUSING ELEMENT ADDRESSING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT WHEREAS, the preparation of the 2000-2005 Housing Element was initiated by the City to address the statutory requirements of the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development; and WHEREAS, on September 25, 2001, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on said matter at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to recommend to the City Council approval of the 2000-2005 Housing Element. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Community Development Division in the attached staff report is true and correct. • Section 2. This Commission finds: 1. That the adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element will bring the City's Housing Element into compliance with the statutory requirements set forth in the California Government Code. In addition the 2000-2005 Housing Element provides more detailed information and clarification to policies within the text of the General Plan, but does not change any of the City's policies or goals as adopted by the City Council in September 1996. 2. That the approval of the 2000-2005 Housing Element will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the City. 3. That the approval of the 2000-2005 Housing Element will not have a significant effect on the environment. Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the proposed revisions to the General Plan as set forth in Amended Appendix A (the 2000-2005 Housing Element) and revised pages 2-29 through 2-33; 2-38 and 2-39 of the Community Development Section of the General Plan and pages 6-25 and 6-30 through 6-33 of the Implementation and Monitoring Section of the General Plan. Section 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held on the 25th day of September by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Huang, Baderian, ' :Murphy, Olson Kalemkiarian NOES: None ABSENT: None • /s/ Paul Kalemkiarian • Chairman, Planning Commission City of Arcadia ATTEST: /G/ ,gonna Butler Secretary, Planning Commission City of Arcadia Approved by: C? / a le Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney -2- 1653 t A t r()I.CAI TFORNTA-ATT,STNFSS TP kNSPORTATION AND HO1TSMGLAGFNCY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANT "'MIN/UNITY DEVELOPMENT rRAYDAVis Governor OVSING/ Division of Housing Policy Develol nt �� •'lb 1800 Third Street,Suite 430 n t7 P.O.Box 952053 p �.. z 3 tt1 all Sacramento,CA 94252-2053 %. e Uww.hcd.ca.Fop \` E O (916) 323-3176 FAX: (916)327-2643 ��Y DE��~ August 13, 2001 • Ms. Donna L. Butler Community Development Administrator City of Arcadia 240 West Huntington Drive - - Arcadia, California 91007 Dear Ms. Butler: RE: Review of the Revisions to the City of Arcadia's Draft Housing Element Update Thank you for submitting the revisions to Arcadia's draft housing element update, received for our review by mail and facsimile transmission on June 26 and August 6, 2001, respectively. We have reviewed the revisions pursuant to Government Code Section 65585(b). Our telephone conversation assisted this review. This letter summarizes that conversation and our review. We are pleased to find the proposed revisions to the City's draft element, including commitments to strengthen incentive programs, adequately respond to the statutory requirements described in our April 27, 2001 review letter. Therefore, with the inclusion of the revisions, we are pleased to find Arcadia's draft housing element meets all the statutory requirements of State housing element law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). The revised element will be in full compliance with State housing.element law when adopted and submitted for review. The City is planning on mixed-use and infill sites to accommodate the new construction need for low- and moderate-income households. The City should monitor the use of such sites and, if development commensurate with the City's regional housing need has not occurred by the end of 2003, additional incentives or regulatory concessions should be provided to encourage and facilitate the needed development. We look forward to receiving the adopted housing element. If you have any questions or would like assistance, please contact Camilla Cleary, of our staff, at (916) 323-3185. In accordance with their requests pursuant to the Public Records Act, we are forwarding a copy.of this letter to the individuals listed below. • Sincerely, _ 4 ici,? W:///140 I(14a4oLLE, ivr I, athy E. ireswell Deputy Itrector STATE.QF CALIFORNIA-BUSYNESS.TRP6NSPORTATIf JD HOUSING;AGENCY 'DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AN -OIYIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRAY nAVrs Gnv mar Division of Housing Policy Development 1800 Third Street,Suite 430 �QVSING qti P.O.Box 952053 p Sacramento,CA 94252-2053 v o ., (916) 323-3176 FAX: (916)327-2643 I c% ti April 27; 2001 . Ms. Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator City of Arcadia 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, California 91007 Dear Ms. Butler: RE: Review of the City of Arcadia's Draft Housing Element Update Thank you for submitting Arcadia's draft housing element update, received for our review February 26, 2001. We have reviewed the draft housing element pursuant to Government Code Section 65585(b). The telephone conversation with you and the City's consultant, Ms. Veronica Tam, assisted this review. This letter and accompanying Appendix summarize that conversation and our review. While the current draft element includes a useful identification of housing needs in Arcadia, revisions will be necessary to comply with State housing element law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). Among the necessary changes, the element should be revised to demonstrate that the City: 1) has sufficient land, zoned at appropriate densities, to accommodate the development of housing commensurate with Arcadia's share of the regional housing need for all income groups, and 2) that the City's housing programs encourage and facilitate the development, rehabilitation and conservation of housing in Arcadia. • For your information, we have enclosed a brief description of new and existing housing and community development programs administered by this Department along with funding levels for the current fiscal year. We are pleased to report a historic increase in housing funds available through HCD. Information on these programs, including recently released Notices of Funding Availability (NOFA), has been posted to our website. Please consult our homepage at www hcd ca.gov for new program infouiiation. We would be happy to work with you in revising your element and welcome the opportunity to meet in Arcadia. We thank you and Ms. Tam for your cooperation throughout the course of our review. If you have any questions or would like assistance, please contact Camilla Cleary, of our staff, at (916) 323-3185. • • Ms. Donna L. Butler Paget . In accordance with their requests pursuant to the Public Records Act, we are forwarding a copy of this letter to the individuals listed below. • Sincerely, /z/, ,g 6,e4AZ/41 Cathy E. reswell Deputy Director Enclosure cc: Veronica Tam, Cotton Bridges &Associates Catherine Ysrael, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, AG's Office Terry Roberts, Governor's Office of Planning and Research Kimberley Dellinger, California Building Industry Association Marcia Salkin, California Association of Realtors Marc Brown, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation Rob Weiner, California Coalition for Rural Housing John Douglas, AICP, The Planning Center Dara.Schur, Western Center on Law and Poverty Michael G. Colantuono, Attorney at Law Carlyle W. Hall,Hall &Phillips Law Firm Fair Housing Council of the San Fernando Valley Mark Johnson, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles Dennis RockY,ray,Legal Aid Foundation of Long Beach Stephanie Knapik, Westside Fair Housing Council Mona Tawatao, San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services Mihn Tran, Inland Counties Legal Services Karen Warner, Cotton, Bridges & Associates David Booher, California Housing Council Jonathan Lehrer-Graiwer, Attorney at Law Ana Marie Whitaker, California State University Pomona Joe Carreras, Southern California Association of Governments Won Chang, Attorney at Law, Davis and Company APPENDIX City of Arcadia The following changes would bring Arcadia's housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change we cite the supporting section of the Government Code. The particular program examples or data sources listed are suggestions for your use. A. Housing Needs, Resources and Constraints 1. The element should include an inventory of land suitable for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public services available to these sites (Section 65583(a)(3)). Arcadia's remaining regional need includes 55 very low- and 32 low-income units. The land inventory indicates 29.98 acres of underutilized R-3 zoned land. The City's land inventory should be revised to address the following statutory requirements: • The City should demonstrate R-3 zoning can encourage and facilitate the development of housing for lower-income households. The City could describe the affordability of recently constructed multifamily developments in the R-3 zone to demonstrate the appropriateness of this zone and whether units have been or are likely to be developed near the maximum permitted density of 24 du/ac. • Virtually all of the City's multifamily-zoned land is listed as underutilized. It appears that the City's ability to accommodate lower-income development is highly dependent upon the recycling of underutilized sites. To demonstrate the viability of underutilized land to accommodate lower-income households the City should describe recent trends involving higher density residential development on underutilized parcels and include a description of the current uses of the underutilized sites, and describe any program or policies to facilitate their redevelopment. • Provide more infonuation on the potential for mixed-use. Table 28 does not indicate any acreage available for residential mixed-use, but lists a potential of 7.0 units of mixed-use development. The City should clarify the amount of land with this zoning, and the density range for residential development in this zone. In addition, the viability of mixed-use development in Arcadia could be supported by indicating whether Arcadia has adopted a mixed-use ordinance. 2. Analyze potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing for all income levels, including land use controls. The analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need in accordance with Section 65584 (Section 65583(a)(4)). The City's parking standard requiring an attached garage with 2 parking spaces per multifamily unit, plus one guest space for every two units, should be analyzed as a constraint to the development of multifamily housing, and in particular housing to be occupied by lower-income • households. This analyst ould include an estimate of the addi al costs imposed by this ' requirement. The element should also analyze the City's restriction on the placement of second units, which are only allowed in multifamily zones. B. Housing Programs 1. Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with public services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including • rental housing, factory-built housing, mobilehomes, and emergency shelters and transitional housing. Where the inventory of sites, pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), does not identify adequate sites to accommodate the need for groups of all household income levels pursuant to Section 65584, the program shall provide for sufficient Sites with zoning that permits owner-occupied and rental multifamily residential use by right, including density and development standards that could accommodate and facilitate the feasibility of housing for very low- and low-income households (Section 65583(c)(1)). As noted in comment A.1 above, further analysis of the feasibility of sites described in the element is needed. The adequacy of sites cannot be established prior to a more detailed analysis. 2. The housing element shall contain programs, which "address, and where appropriate and' legally possible, remove governmental constraints to. the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing"(Section 65583(c)(3)). As noted above (B-3), Arcadia's element requires a more thorough analysis of potential governmental constraints. Depending upon the results of the additional analysis, the City may need to add programs to remove or mitigate any identified constraints. • • • • • Initial Study = and Negative Declaration &,j axc ;5` City of Arcadia 2000-2005 Housing Element July 2001 City of Arcadia Development Services Department 240 W. Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 Consultants to the City: Cotton/Bridges/Associates 747 E. Green St., Suite 300 Pasadena, CA 91101 1211.00 • NEGATIVE DECLARATION City of Arcadia 2000-2005 Housing Element Lead Agency and Project Proponent: City of Arcadia Mailing Address: City of Arcadia Development Services Department 240 W. Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 Contact: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator (626) 5.74-5442 Project Location: Arcadia, CA (Los Angeles County) Project Description: The California State Legislature has identified the attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian as the State's major housing goal. Recognizing the important role of local planning programs in the pursuit of this goal, the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties prepare a Housing Element as part of their comprehensive General Plan. State law requires Housing Elements to be updated at least every five years to reflect a community's changing housing needs. This update covers the 2000-2005 period, pursuant to the update cycle for jurisdictions within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region. Findings: The City of Arcadia has determined that the proposed project has no potential to result in a significant adverse effect on the environment. The documentation supporting this determination is discussed in the attached Initial Study prepared for this project. • • • • • Table of Contents Environmental Checklist Form 1 1. Project Title 1 2. Lead Agency Name and Address 1 3 Contact Person and Phone Number 1 4 Project Location 1 5 Project Sponsor's Name and Address 1 6 General Plan Designation 1 7 Zoning 1 8 Description of Project 3 9 Surrounding Land Uses 3 10 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 5 References 21 • • Preparers of the Initial Study 21 • • • • City of Arcadia • Figures Figure 1 Project Location 2 • City of Arcadia ii • Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project'title: 2000-2005 Arcadia Housing Element 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Arcadia Development Services Department 240 W. Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 3. Contact person and phone number: Donna Butler Community Development Administrator 240 W. Huntington Drive • Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 (626) 574-5442 4. Project location: Encompassing approximately 11 square miles, the City of Arcadia is located in the western San Gabriel Valley of Los Angeles County, at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. Surrounding communities include Monrovia and Irwindale to the east, El Monte and Temple City to the south, Pasadena and Sierra Madre to the west. To the • north, the City borders on the Arroyo Seco District of the Angeles National Forest. Unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County also abut the City borders to the • southeast and west. 5. Project sponsor's name and address: City of Arcadia Development Services Department 240 W. Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 6. General plan designation: - Not Applicable 7. Zoning: Not Applicable City of Arcadia 1 Pasadena IV MN. m 4 rcadia . J Angeles National Forest i \ mi I I lik NI rt . . • y tit/1 Al•Lon© Bach N. © '.�� � �■ ® .' ' 1. � �o�_ ....." IIs1rriI i: i!', 9��� T�V=� ®a ®�b S. .4 i °- 'i� � 81vmmra ago W._., +-. me0 � ���mmmmam.arr- 111 —I �Nal.as `�the ; aIVI .m®®w—�mmfimm.� III,.,,: natl.=M EI Sonfo Andy ■�:fA�.�► AMPS!_ Park .... 191.161.-=M111 Coun ��`-. • ■ �®������ QH1'CCIC4I � .Park:�®® • ��yr�• sr r _ 0,4*.,,,,% r � 1� 11 iii l iktE ��i ,• 4000 ,,,,,--esiii......-us.. ......NRanomi,...,m imh,_. __Itql, , , WWI Wri, villogoleasilammssain 1:2 LAW . Int st.r tiallteed2 1611ffillIMITI■ %''' i„ r , 1111111==r11111111E. I 111 1 ®®o rli 111 Ill11lllrr�ii���°® ®®® d�try ■► ■�r rrr�► ._� grablC� 1 ►�rrrrr 6 �1 �•c 111 1■ 1 '`�W0���� ��� Arcadia'� ' la 1 ' rr� . n .. �1111 � ,I . dm= il Irani ....„.... 0...., vit 1311.,,,a, Atgarveatarorit_ ..,A/A1 Legend City Boundary Streets i . Figure 1 North 0 1 2 miles Regional Location 2 City of Arcadia Environmental Checklist Form 8. Description of project: • The California State Legislature has identified the attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian as the State's major housing goal. Recognizing the important role of local planning programs in the pursuit of this goal,the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties prepare a housing element as part of their comprehensive General Plans. Section 65302 (c) of the Government Code sets forth the specific components to be contained in a community's housing element. State law requires the housing elements to be updated at least every five years to reflect a community's changing housing needs. This update covers the 2000-2005 period, pursuant to the update cycle for jurisdictions within the Southern California Association of Governments region. The Arcadia Housing Element was last updated in 1996 and is currently being comprehensively updated to address existing and projected housing needs. The Arcadia Housing Element contains the following major components: a. An analysis of the City's population, household and employment base, and the characteristics of the City's housing stock, including a summary of the present and projected housing need of the City's households (Section 2); b. A review of potential constraints to meeting the City's identified housing needs (Section 3); c. An evaluation of resources that will further the development of new housing (Section 4); and; d. A statement of the housing plan to address Arcadia's identified housing needs, including housing goals, policies, and programs (Section 5). 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Surrounding areas include Monrovia, Irwindale, El Monte, Temple City, Pasadena, Sierra Madre, Azusa, unincorporated Los County areas, and the Angeles National Forest. Surrounding land uses include residential, commercial, industrial, and open space/recreational uses. 10.Agencies whose approval is required City of Arcadia: Adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element. City of Arcadia 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic • ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact" or"potentially significant unless mitigated"impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. /-7 b/-5/c/f,/ (Signature Date Signature Date City of Arcadia • 4 • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Issues: Significant Significant No Impact with Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporation I.AESTHETICS--Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a o e scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,trees, rock El E outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? • c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or - glare which would adversely affect day or El C El nighttime views in the area? (a through d) Pursuant to City's Zoning Ordinance, residential uses are permitted in certain commercial and industrial areas. Development densities are determined during the Conditional Use Permit process. The 2000-2005 Housing Element includes an action to consider affordable housing development in certain commercial and industrial areas at density levels of greater than 30 units per acre. Also, affordable housing projects in mixed use areas and R-3 designated sites adjacent to commercial areas also may be granted density levels of greater than 30 units per acre. However, this proposal will impact only a limited number of properties as the City is approaching built out. The City will review plans, including site design, landscaping, visual scale and architectural for all new development to ensure compliance with development standards sets forth in the City's Municipal Code and General Plan to ensure visual compatibility, protection of scenic vistas, and avoidance of light and-glare effects on adjoining properties. Furthermore, the Housing Element also sets forth policies and programs to facilitate housing rehabilitatil n, code enforcement and neighborhood upgrading, such as the Home Improvement Loans and Grant programs, code enforcement activities, and the Paint-up/Fix-up program. Therefore, the Housing Element has the potential to improve the visual character of the community. Impact will be less than significant. II.AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: City of Arcadia 5 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant No Impact Issues: with Mitigation Impact • Impact Incorporation p a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance • • (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared ❑ ❑ ❑ ►/ pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑ use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or ❑ El ►1 nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (a through c) The project area does not contain prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance. The project site is located within a suburban area and is zoned for a variety of urban uses. According to the Arcadia General Plan and General Plan EIR, no known agricultural resource exists within the City. Thus, no Williamson Act contract has been executed in the project area. The project will not involve any changes to the existing environment that could result in conversion of farmland to non- agricultural use. No impact will result. III.AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district might be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ❑ El El ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air . quality violation? . c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an ❑ El r El applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which . exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ ❑ @ ❑ pollutant concentrations? . City of Arcadia 6 ( ) ; • • Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant No Impact Issues: with Mitigation Impact Incorporation Impact e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ❑ ❑ II substantial number of people? (a through e) The proposed Housing Element identifies available sites for development and establishes programs and policies to address the City's future housing needs, defined as 461 units for the 1998-2005 planning period. To facilitate in meeting the City's future housing needs, the 2000-2005 Housing Element proposes to increase the development density to greater than 30 units per,acre for affordable residential development in certain commercial/industrial areas, in mixed use areas, and in R-3 sites adjacent to commercial areas. This has the potential to increase the development potential within the City above the level currently allowed by the City's adopted General Plan and evaluated in the General Plan EIR. However, this development would occur within limited areas of the City and air quality impacts would be minimal! Furthermore, the Housing Element implements the General Plan Land Use Policy of providing opportunities for commercial/residential mixed-use projects. By promoting integration of housing with commercial uses close to local services and employment centers, the Housing Element has the potential to reduce dependence on the automobile and hence reduce impacts to air quality. Impacts to air quality will be less than significant. i IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES--Would the project: a) Have substantial adverse effects, either r directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or ❑ ❑ regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ I policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and , Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, ❑ �] but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or ❑ ❑ ❑ migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use • of native wildlife nursery sites? • City of Arcadia , 7 • Potential) Less Than Less Than • Potentially Significant Issues: Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ �� ❑ ordinance? • f) Conflict with the provisions of an.adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community ❑ ❑ ❑ ►1 • Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? '(a through f) The City of Arcadia is highly developed with only a few areas remaining that contain biologically significant resources. These include the Arcadia Wilderness Park and the Los Angeles County Arboretum. The proposed project will not impact these biological resources and does not contain any specific policy or land use change that would affect these resources. Remaining areas that may contain sensitive habitat areas are primarily located along existing creeks, upper watershed areas, existing flood control facilities and in natural hillside areas within the northern portion of the Arcadia planning area. Areas with habitat value or biological resources as identified in the City's General Plan and Biological Sensitivity • map will continue to be protected. The Housing Element does not propose construction of housing within or nearby any sensitive habitat areas. Any future development will be subject to environmental review as required by state laws and City policies. Impact will be less than significant. • The protection of heritage trees has been mandated within the City of Arcadia. The City adopted the Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance in 1992, which recognizes oak trees as a significant aesthetic and biological resource and establishes criteria for their preservation and protection. All future development will be required to comply with the Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance. • No migration corridors are known to have been identified within the City, although such areas may exist within the Los Angeles County Arboretum and the Arcadia Wilderness Park. The 2000-2005 Housing Element does not propose construction of housing within or nearby these sensitive natural resources and the adoption of the Housing Element will not impact or modify existing development regulations or City policies for the preservation of biological resources. Future development within the City will be subject to environmental review as required by State law and City policy. No impact will result. • V. CULTURAL RESOURCES--Would the project: • • a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined ❑ ❑ ® ❑ in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource ❑ ® ❑ pursuant to§15064.5? • City of Arcadia 8 Less Than Potentially Less Than Significant Issues: Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique ❑ ❑ ® ❑ geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including ❑ ❑ �� ❑ those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (a through cd) The proposed project does not involve revisions to development standards that would impact cultural resources. A potential for archaeological resources may_exist within the community based • on what is known regarding the history and location of the Southern California Gabrielino Native American community. However, due to the built out status of the community, the amount of undisturbed land that remains in the community is limited. The Arcadia General Plan identifies the following historical resources located within the City: the Queen Anne Cottage and Coach Barn and the Hugo Reid Adobe both located at the Los Angeles County Arboretum, the Santa Anita Assembiy,Center located on the Santa Anita Racetrack, the Santa Anita Park, the Santa Anita Depot, now located at the Los Angeles Arboretum, and a historical site located within the National Forest Service Center. Most of these resources are within publicly owned land, and are protected- from development. The Housing Element does not involve revisions to development standards that would adversely impact cultural, historical, or archeological resources. Existing policies related to cultural resources will continue to apply to future development projects. Impact will be less than significant. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS--Would the project • a) Expose people or structures to potential • substantial adverse effects, including the risk ❑ ❑ �� ❑ of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. • ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including 0 ❑ ® ❑ liquefaction? ' iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss ❑ ❑ ® ❑ of topsoil? • City of Arcadia 9 • • Potentially Less Than Less Than y Significant Issues: Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in 1=1 1 on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? • • e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? (a through e) An Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone associated with the potentially active Raymond Hill fault is located within Arcadia, which transverses the community in a northeast/southwest orientation. Threats of. ground shaking and seismic activity within the City are also associated with the Sierra Madre Fault Zone, located in the northern portion of the City. In addition, Arcadia like many communities in Southern California is subject to regional seismic activity. Liquefaction may occur in earthquake prone areas when saturated, cohesionless soil is exposed to seismic activity and is temporarily transformed into a liquid. While the potential for liquefaction in the community is difficult to predict, previous occurrences of liquefaction have been identified in areas along the Raymond Hill Fault near the Los Angeles County Arboretum property. Unstable soil conditions or landslides may occur in the community's hillside areas. In addition, the City's General Plan and Municipal Code establish residential development standards for these areas including, maximum densities, as well as setback and height requirements. Housing Element includes a program action to consider a density of greater than 30 units per acre for affordable housing developments, potentially increasing the level of development activity beyond that established by the General Plan and evaluated in the General Plan EIR. However, given the built out character of the City, this program will affect only a limited number of properties. Furthermore, the project sets forth programs and policies to facilitate housing rehabilitation and therefore has the potential to improve the seismic safety of older housing units in the City. In addition, to minimize risks associated from seismic activity, the City's General Plan emphasizes locating development away from hazardous areas and the City's Municipal Code and Uniform Building Code set forth standards and regulations for development in order to mitigate hazards to acceptable levels. Less than significant impact will result. All future development within the City will be subject to site-specific geotechnical studies as determined appropriate by the City and will comply with applicable building code regulations. Impact will be less than significant. City of Arcadia 10 • • .i • Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than Issues: Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions ❑ ❑ ❑ - involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, ❑ ❑ ❑ ►i substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 65962.5 and, as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? • e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or ❑ ❑ ❑ ►.-- public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety ❑ ❑ ❑ hazard for people residing or working in the . project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 plan or emergency evacuation plan? ' h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent ❑ ❑ ® ❑ . to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? • City of Arcadia i 11 I • Potential) Less Than Less Than Potentially Significant Issues: Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact • • (a through d). Within Arcadia, potential exposure to hazardous materials exists related to the transportation of hazardous materials via truck on the 1-210 Freeway and on local roadways. Businesses that handle, store or manufacture hazardous materials including hospitals, drycleaners and gas stations are also located within the City. The handling, transportation, and enforcement of hazardous materials are regulated and enforced by the California Health Department, Cal-EPA, US Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Transportation, California Highway Petrol, and County of Los Angeles. These federal, state and local regulatory framework assist in minimizing risk associated with the transportation, handling and storage of hazardous materials. In addition, the City of Arcadia has adopted the Los Angeles • County Hazardous Waste Management Plan that regulates businesses that handle or generate hazardous . materials. Any future development within the City will be subject to hazardous material designation. The Housing Element proposes to consider residential density of greater than 30 units per acre for affordable housing projects. However, due to the built out character of the City the potential increase in residential population will occur in limited areas of the City. Impact will be less than significant. (e and f) The proposed project area does not contain an airport. The proposed project therefore would not result in aircraft safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. Future development will be subject to compliance with existing land use compatibility regulations for projects within the vicinity of the airport. No impact will result. (g and h). The proposed project is located in a suburban area, the majority of which is developed. Risks of wildfire are associated with the hillside areas within the community located at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. However, the 2000-2005 Housing Element does not change the existing land use designation of the areas adjacent to the wildlands and therefore does not increase the fire risk to these areas. The project will not increase the risk of exposure of people to the potential risk of fire. The Housing Element encourages the enforcement of the Uniform Building Code to mitigate unsafe conditions in the City's • existing housing stock. Impact is less than significant. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY-- Would the project: a)Violate any water quality standards or waste El • discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ❑ �� groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? City of Arcadia 12 • Potentially Less Than Less Than Issues: Significant Significant Significant No Impact Im act with Mitigation Impact p Incorporation p c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through • the alteration of the course of a stream or river, ❑ ❑ ❑ in a manner which would result in.substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, ❑ ❑ ❑ or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or ❑ provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water ❑ ❑ ❑ quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood ❑ ❑ ❑ �� Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect ❑ ❑ ❑ flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,- ❑ ❑ ❑ including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ • City of Arcadia 13 • • Potentially Less Than Less Than Sign t Significant Significant No Impact Issues: with Mitigation Impact Incorporation Impact (a through j) The City of Arcadia is located inland, therefore risks associated with a tsunami are minimal. Portions of the community are located within flood hazard areas of four local dams (Eaton Wash Dam, Sierra Madre Dam, Santa Anita Dam, and the Sawpit Dam). The inundation areas of the Morris S. Jones reservoir, located in the City of Sierra Madre, also extends into the community. The City of Arcadia will continue to work with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works to maintain stormwater management facilities to maintain safety for residents. • • In addition, the Housing Element contains an action for the City to consider affordable housing development within certain areas at density levels greater than 30 dwelling units per acre. Since this will occur in only specific areas of the City, the Element will not result in a significant increase in development above that allowed by the General Plan or evaluated in the General Plan EIR. All future development within Arcadia will be subject to site specific environmental studies as determined by the City and will comply with applicable policies related to water issues. Less than significant impact will occur. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the • project: a) Physically divide an established ❑ ❑ ❑ community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local ❑ ❑ ❑ coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? • c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ❑ ❑ ❑. ►2 conservation plan? (a through c) The proposed project involves adopting the 2000-2005 Housing Element. It will not physically divide an established community. The Housing Element supports land use designations and policies set forth in the City General plans to provide opportunities for development of commercial and mixed use projects close to local services and facilities. No habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans exist in the project area. No impact will result. X. MINERAL RESOURCES--Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally ❑ �� ❑ important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific City of.Arcadia 14 • Potentially Less Than Less Than y Significant Issues: Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact plan or other land use plan? (a and b) Three different mineral resource zones are located within the City designated by the California Department of Mines and Geology. Of these areas, only the Livingston-Graham sand and gravel extraction site, the southern portion which is located within Arcadia, has been evaluated as available for future mining extraction. Sand and gravel extraction is currently occurring in the northern portion of the site in the City of Irwindale. Since the possibility of resuming mining activities within the portion of the site which is located within Arcadia remains, the Arcadia General Plan identifies land uses compatible with future mining extraction activities on land located adjacent to the quarry. In addition, the City will continue to minimize • safety hazards and adverse environmental effects on any future mining operations. The proposed Housing Element works within the framework of the City General Plan and EIR and will not result in the loss of known mineral resources. No impact will result. XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of • noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ❑ ❑ ❑ ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ❑ ❑ excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? • c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity ❑ ❑ ❑ above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic • increase in ambient noise levels in the project ❑ ❑ �� ❑ vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people ❑ ❑ ❑ ��� residing or working in the project area to -excessive noise levels? City of Arcadia 15 Than • • Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant No Impact Issues: Impact with Mitigation Im act Incorporation p (a through f) The proposed project will not result in a significant increase in development above that evaluated in the Arcadia General Plan and EIR. In addition, existing City policies regarding noise related to construction activities and the Community Noise Assessment Development Performance Standards adopted by the City will limit future noise impacts. Less than significant impact will result. The proposed project area does not contain an airport. Therefore, the project would not result in an exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. Future development • will be subject to compliance with existing noise regulations. Less than significant impact will result. • XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING--Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for ❑ ❑ ® 0 • example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing • ❑ housing, necessitating the construction of ❑ ❑ ��� replacement housing elsewhere? • c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ housing elsewhere? (a through c) The Housing Element sets forth an action to increase the residential density to greater than 30 units per acre for affordable residential development in certain areas. However, with only affect a limited amount of properties within the City. Therefore, implementation of the Housing Element will not result in a significant change regarding the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the City's population. Impact will be less than significant. The objective of increasing residential development density in limited areas included in the proposed project is to ensure that the City provides a range of housing choices in type and price for its current and future residents, consistent with the goals and policies of the Arcadia General Plan. No housing or people will be displaced as a result of implementing the Housing Element. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the • provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain • acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the • City of Arcadia 16 • Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant No Impact Issues: with Mitigation Impact Incorporation Impact • public services: Fire protection? 0 Police protection? Schools? LI 0 0, 0 Parks? LI 0 Other public facilities? LI LI ® 0 The proposed project will not result in a significant increase in housing development and associated resident population beyond that established in the General Plan. The proposed density increase for affordable housing projects in commercial and industrial areas will affect only a small portion of properties within the City. Therefore, the level of impact will be less than significant. No need to construct new or alter existing fire or police protection facilities, parks, or other public facilities will result. The provision of additional classroom capacity to accommodate children from the additional units is not anticipated to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with construction or alternation of school facilities. The Arcadia Unified School District conducts the required environmental review for all facilities and improvement projects to reduce any potential impacts. The new housing development will pay the school fees prescribed by State law as the sole means of mitigating school impacts. Impact will be less than significant. • XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or ❑ ❑ other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational • facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might LI 0 have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (a and b) A number of local and regional parks are located throughout Arcadia. Larger recreational facilities include the Arcadia County Park, the Los Angles County Arboretum, Peck Road Park and the Santa Anita Golf Course. In addition, eighteen smaller community parks are located throughout the City. These active and passive parks are located within a one-mile radius of all residential development in the City. The Housing Element contains an action to consider increasing affordable housing development in certain areas of the City at density levels greater than 30 units per acre. However, since the City is approaching build out, this would impact only a limited number of properties. Less than significant impact will result. City of Arcadia 17 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Issues: Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact p Im act Impact Incorporation XV.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC--Would the project: • a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in ❑ ❑ ® ❑ a substantial increase in either the number of • vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the ❑ ❑ ►� ❑ county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a • ❑ ❑ ❑ ►� change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or ❑ ❑ ❑ ►� dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ❑ programs supporting alternative transportation ❑ (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (a through g) The Housing Element sets forth an action to pursue affordable residential development within • certain areas at density levels greater than 30 units per acre. The project has the potential to increase the residential development potential within the City above the level currently allowed by the City's adopted General Plan and evaluated in the General Plan EIR. However, given the limited amount of vacant land available in Arcadia, this would only occur in a small number of areas within the City. Furthermore, the proposed Housing Plan supports the implementation of mixed-use development. The development of residential uses within commercial and retail areas has the potential of encouraging alternative modes of transportation such as bicycling or walking which will result in a reduction of vehicle trips. The proposed project involves adoption of the 2000-2005 Housing Element that does not involve air traffic patterns. The proposed project does not include any design changes to the local roadway network or introduce incompatible uses. Less than significant impact will result. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: City of Arcadia 18 .. _ • 1 . Less Than - Potentially Less Than Significant Issues: Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact • a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements . e of the applicable Regional Water Quality . Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or ❑ ❑ e ❑ expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? - i c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of ❑ , ❑ ® ❑ existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to ❑ ❑ ►1 ❑ serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ❑ ® ❑ permitted capacity to accommodate the LI projects solid waste disposal needs? . g) Comply with federal, state, and local ❑ ❑ • ❑ �� statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (a through g) The City of Arcadia will continue to ensure the coordination of its waste and sewer master. plans with the land uses and intensities permitted by the General Plan. All new development within the City will be required to provide adequate water, drainage, and sewer systems on site, pay hookup fees, and comply with all applicable City and County regulations and requirements, Therefore, new storm water drainage facilities are not required. Less than significant impact will result. i XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF i SIGNIFICANCE-- a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, ❑ ❑ ❑ substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife • City of Arcadia 1 9 , • • Potentially Less Than a Less Than y Significant Issues: Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporation Impact population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal . or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? • b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on 4 human beings, either directly or indirectly? (a through c) The Housing Element of the Arcadia General Plan is a five-year policy document that addresses the State's housing goal of attaining a decent home and suitable living environment for every resident in the City. While the Housing Element recommends that the City pursue increased residential densities within commercial and industrial areas for development of affordable housing, this would occur in limited areas of the City. Furthermore, if implemented, the increased density will only result in impacts that are less than significant. Contribution to cumulative impacts is considered minimal. • • • City of Arcadia 20 } 0 • References 1. City of Arcadia Draft Housing Element. 2001 2. City of Arcadia General Plan EIR, February 1996 3. Final Environmental Impact Report, Anoakia Residential Development, October 1999. Preparers of the Initial Study Lead Agency City of Arcadia Development Services Department • Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator 240 W. Huntington Drive Post Office Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 Consultants to the Agency Cotton/Bridges/Associates • Urban and Environmental Planning 747 East Green Street, Suite 300 Pasadena, CA 91101 Phone: (626) 304-0102 Fax: (626) 304-0402 Email: cbaplanning.com Veronica Tam, AICP Project Manager • Jessie Barkley Urban/Environmental Planner Responsibility: Overall project management, housing element preparation and environmental analysis. • • City of Arcadia 21 0 .560- G6 t ` iii- 6 3z_/ f � :,g t • ncnn • h /Q, ORPORAT£ STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ICES DEP TMENT November 6, 2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director By: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator ,� SUBJECT: Consideration of Final Map No. 53249 for a 5-unit residential condominium project at 434 W. Huntington Dr. SUMMARY Tentative maps and final maps are required for all subdivisions that result in five or more parcels or condominiums. The City Council shall approve a final map if it conforms to all the requirements of the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. It is recommended that the City Council approve Final Map No. 53249 for a 5-unit residential condominium project at 434 W. Huntington Dr. DISCUSSION Final Map No. 53249 has been reviewed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the appropriate City Departments. Said map has been found to be in substantial compliance with the tentative map, as approved by the Planning Commission on December 12, 2000, and is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of Final Map No. 53249. Attachments: 1. Land use map 2. Letter of compliance from Los Angeles County 3. Final Map No. 53249 Approved: --___1A William R. Kelly, City Manager LASER IMAGED Co /v_ i v_q #. . - , et ....-_ 1 - ... 2 - , ... tle26..i ' . 4 .. > . rfuntington Dr. , - i 1 . I I . ** 1 CV 244 80 1- . ' I.1 • , (--;e6tz.) t.3/:' R-3 1 Pflo 3 . , I : 20 .1 0 kil @ s z ... 42 1.- Nit.klel ill t. i r: . ■ no Ativ , rn el .t .1" ' . \ 'Y IN • , ,,LI -‘i,' G5 1 .7.•di • a • , -1 . . In V. —. ., : L f . - /0 5 ^ ......se.„, . . . .3‘ . - II.. ,-4 . . - - • - ' '1. 17'0.09 caf;. ?I i FZ/W 15 72 L c; 72.5. I i'' •, .,1 4 ' Multiple Family Residential .., ■t4 0 ■., c'd I tx -56 - s Q 0 I CD NC) ■gci ko. I-. .5 I C, R-3'-'.:..i. I l' 1 r : • Li 434 W. Hunti TM 53249 ngtaonndDry s e and Z onin,o- Map ' INORTH scale: 1 inch=200 feet . . ... , •, , • \,ti OF LOS 44, `? le IA11`s. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES • mat, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE CALIFORMP ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone:(626)458-5100 JAMES A.NOYES,Director ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 ' ALHAMBRA,CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 • October 1, 2001 IN REPLY PLEASE pp REFER TO ALE: LD-8 • Mr. Stan Scholl City Engineer City of Arcadia 240 West Huntington Drive • Arcadia, CA 91006-6021 • Dear Mr, Scholl: • TRACT NO. 53249 . The enclosed subject tract map has been reviewed by Public Works for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis, title information, and for compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act. It is ready for your examination and certification as to compliance with the conditional approval and applicable City Ordinances. The City Council or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the State Environmental Quality Act and the State Subdivision Map Act. After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the map should be returned to Land Development Division, Subdivision Mapping Section, for filing with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's Office. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.Armando Aguilar of our.Subdivision Mapping Section at (626) 458-4915. Very truly yours, JAMES A. NOYES Director of Public Works • PHIL K. DOUDAR • Assistant Division Engineer . Land Development Division RS:ca • P:\LDPU B\SUBDIVSN\MAPPING\FORMS\TRACT • Enc. 1 LOT f EET 1 OF 2 SHEETS 18,271 SQ. FT. TRACT IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CAIJFORNIA . , BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 27 OF TRACT NO. 2828 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 33, PAGE 63 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES OWNER'S STATEMENT: SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: YE HEREBY STATE THAT VIE ARE THE MINERS OF CR ARE B THE I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR CF THE STATE OF LANDS INCLUDED WIDEN THE SJPOMSON&NOPI OH THIS HAP NNE THE COMPLETE THAT THIS RN MAP.WAS OF 2 5CR UN IS A TRUE AND DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINES.AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RUNG OF ON FEBRUARY SURVEY 1 SA0LTH AND UME MADE BY!E AR UNDER MY CO ATI N W M HEREON ARE THAT R.THE THAT SAID C TIRE TSAR ARE SUFFICIENT AND IODATIONS SAID MAP MO SUBDIVISION. MOM HEREON ARE El PLACE: THAT STUD INONIJVEH75 A�5UF'FlCE7dT TO MADE THE SURVEY TO RE RETRACED. D!4 C TLC.A LIMITED LIABILITY CONNANY(OWNER) �1t!1'l�1rr, STATE OF CAUFOVEA ALFRED THELIEEU.. ES-8080 . ' COUNTY CF LDS ANGELES )SS RIPIREE 0/30/01 j °'°s-'g {J�� ON BE} LIE.THE UNTIMENNED.A NOTARY V' �` PURUC IN AO FOR SAC STATE.PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY Ml0Y2I TO ME O9 PROVED TO sy�`; .'.S""(`'�.• ME ON THE BASS CF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO 7R:THE PERSON WHORE NAME CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: IS DESCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND AC NOIILFDCFD TO ME THAT HE/SEE EXECUTED THE SAME IN HS/NER AUTHORIZED CAPADTTY VINO THAT BY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP:THAT IT CONFORMS HS/1831 DENATURE ON THE INSTRUMENT,THE Pal.OS THE ENTITY UPON SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS SDIALF OF YAICR TIE PERSON ACTED.EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. THEREOF:THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF SUEOAOSON ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ARCALIA APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATNE MAP HAVE RgN=PLIED YATH AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT OATH RESPECT TO WY RECORDS NOTARY TT'JJI$UC NAVE PRINTED W COMEOS96N EXPIRES MY R5NC3+AL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY DATE COY ONDINEFR.C.STEPHEN DUCONAN.51. FIRST COSAMERCIAL BANK(TAIWAN).EEPIEFTCARY UNDER A DEED CF TRUST R.C.E.20903 DOKTER 0/30/2001 RECORDED.AJNE 13.2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO.01-1018154 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE: • - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL S^SSIAL ASRE.merrS LEVEO LASER THE - JURISDICTION CF THE CTY OF ARCADIA TO INCH THE LAND INCLUDED 24 THE 61111NR SJBITIVION OR ANY PART THEREOF IS DEJECT.AND REICH NAY STATE OF CAUF•OPoVU ) SE PAID IN FULL,HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )SS ON ,BEFORE ME,THE UNCERSRCNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC 04 AVID FOR SAID STATE,PERSONALLY APPEARED PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME CR PROVED ID ILE ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY ETACERCE TO BE THE PERSONS NAMES tub CITY 1'RFA4U A-CITY CF ARCALNA ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE INTRO!INSTRUMENT NM AONOB ED®TO NE THAT THEY EDECUTED THE SAES IN TIER AUTHO5ZED CAPACITIES AID THAT BY THEIR SO NATURES ON THE NSTBJIIERT.THE PEFIS0HS CR DE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE: • 4`$9Ci THE PERSONS ACTED.ETff'C11TED THE INSTRUMENT. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT TINE TENTATIVE MAP CF TRACT NO.83245 WAS • APPROVED AT A MEETING HELD ON THE 12TH DAY OF=EMBER 2010.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP SUBSTANTIALLY L'CMPIJES NTH THE NOTARY PUSUC PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. NAME PRINTED MY COI/MISSCN EXPIRES MY PREICIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY DAB -CITY OF ARCADIA CONDO!ONOIN NOTE THIS SUEDMSOI IS APPROVED AS A COND®ONIUM PRCILECT. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE: Y THE OWNERS OF THE UNITS OF AN SPACE YALL HOLD AN UNDIVIDED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FEE IZfO!lBOD BY SECTION 8116.4 OF THE INTEREST IN'NINE COMMON AREAS Y6BG71 VII.IN TUEV,PROVIDE THE MUNK:PAL CODE HAS BEEN PAID TO THE CITY O ARCADIA. NECESSARY ACCESS AND 11TA11Y EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. HAIRS OF BEAR INLS THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON 11-E CENTERLINE Of FARMER AVENUE MOWN AS N88101D'E ON RECORD CF SURVEY BOOK 8B PALE 86. DATE FINANCE DIRECTOR-CPI CF ANCACA SIGNATURE OMISSION NOTE: THE DENATURE OF ANITA M.SAURIAN.EAST HOLDER FOR CONGUITS CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE: PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOR 6430.PACE 10S OF DEEDS.RECORDS OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CF NE CTV CF ARCADIA BY LOS ANGELES COUNT.HAS BEEN WIRED UNDER THE SONS CF SECTION MOTION PASSED ON APPROVED THE ATTACHED MAP. 08425(a)3A(E-M)OF TEE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.THEIR INIEFIEST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAD SIGNATURE IS NOT.REAUIRED BY THE LOCAL AC}3NCY.SAS EASEMENT IS ENNR TT Pi NATURE. DATE CITY CLERIC-C1Y OF ARCADIA SCALE: 1"=`30' IT 2 OF 2 SHEETS TRACT • 53249 . . IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CAUFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES nJ Fa MCC C.IlL1311=AJ[ FD �`� �— HUNTINGTON alma AT 6S CAI=RI P343/ - DRIVE �,�MI�AT� ws+d —1� �m MAE FM e,.me31rrm smveTrE CL 11=6332 �i � _ ra„as�U. wTarlau%F3 man Ill Ili-F S�YYE 1 I I / 642' 30 Tyy maa I C 30. 1 e 1 L4 1 IL Et91C!u I W eau LT PNICCA21111 U -F MC fft MD CES44 Is 1A197 F�T 18E T MI RC CC LB-22 I 4i .4. 1 W iTDi „� a° NOT A PART OF NOT A PART OF c d m THIS SUBDIVISION r1 z a THIS SUBDIVISION , i Q Cf) o S L 9 M C C WV.T A m 2$ 0= E T.9 L^'z Im 2r m.racm U CI 119-411 BC CU LCS A Z I- tz a na 1311-4:7421 m sq nMA I CeLY OE 11 Ma AT OM CC a. • II --� Q NR!CL •..' s ...---111.711 AT 4S RTC Gant) ¢L 1®19 AME —1 Fm AT BL=a RA lea .7Ell CL [F6 F863 AT(R 7�E amr� and PSI Eat ��FIN V. I MIE rilIl GHAT r 13 60 CL COI OA 4, A021,113 El dLT'L¢ 1 IIn ENICS.i 5I sErrP • _-- 30 30' X1-7' A_4 - . ,aa4� N _lr W` A9ANDONED X60 --Q --- —�SPRR RI l: _ nm+r---�— FA RD TR,R7 as �_ 1;�'mrE I s Etta w NOT A PART OF FIC35131 ME REll 11 SUM I msS4re a THIS SUBDIVISION II FAIRVIEW AVENUE _ nm7/' m NUM r®,c rE u 4 P11.91 tIR FIR RA Brie MCATES THE BWN0AR9 CF THE LARD BONG SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP. • • ARA '. °RPORATSO- STAFF REPORT November 6, 2001 DEVELOPMENT SE:'VICES DEPARTMENT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services DirectorP By: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator .f7- SUBJECT: Consideration of Final Map No. 53303 for a 6-unit residential condominium project at 33-41 Genoa Street. SUMMARY Tentative maps and final maps are required for all subdivisions that result in five or more parcels or condominiums. The City Council shall approve a final map if it conforms to all the requirements of the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. It is recommended that the City Council approve Final Map No. 53303 for a 6-unit residential condominium project at 33-41 Genoa Street. DISCUSSION Final Map No. 53303 has been reviewed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the appropriate City Departments. Said map has been found to be in substantial compliance with the tentative map, as approved by the Planning Commission on September 12, 2000, and is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of Final Map No. 53303. Attachments: 1 . Land use map 2. Letter of compliance from Los Angeles County 3. Final Map No. 53303 Approved: "�"!' y William R. Kelly, City Manager • LASER EMAGLD , :,..• r:—.. a.., . r r r , ♦r x z } ! • •r .e, •. - n••rr.w. ..• r J .... •:r. H 6..) yPACIFIC BELL Lv — oW W OFFICE o n `G o� Co 6? ® o G in ` C- ...,.h, E { 13 9 to `. 139,03 1 J39.0 - 9 _ • /. 1 Mui 0° ".• � , �, h 1v _ U1 `—J 6 .U 6(----F--)D ^I 0-) „" ►fir t N 171. 1 - 0 r- .. this, . 0 u. , Go .....: , . t,, - th • - (.p ,s3 al > :: ° _1. 0 0 . ' J> -. • . l 0 --1 ._ t 7 . 41 • 411110„. ( g`f (),--\ L Jl I 1 u. (L(n ``t of • �`J o J f-�I • • • a .° tio i' 0,„, z — k, 0 . opP3 lir 6 3> AZ a .,., —0-"L-- . -,,, I; • (.s& . ‘,..1 • 9, gi bj r,3 'Li-1 .cp '01 0- — g u, o Pq 0 t-i's° J N R 1390 ,.` ... - ^ 1 60, D 1 '41 p {{ rr r �; bl o U, t Q t, (on: ON� — p J T A C 1 U, , 1 �i / r / op O 4., l r o .l .l. ""._• In' I°,9 ((� �� 4Ik 0/1,D:Y095.:3/G , opo t 1 .✓ G r\Jn // In (r'1�0- ')') V� p: 4 CCn,;diTU3l�rn1.: d r Q l O of O? /6a ` 1 '60 1_.-i I � 1 PM 2349a • °"(j,. ul 1�. 4 PM , 4o!JI ' . Iz' 139 . IC •.B GO u 55 .1 55 . SD d5• 45 50 . 48 . . . 49 50 0 > \, r,. V ---- ---_. --- OFFICE — '`y > N b _ A to A o c,■ CI) 1,3 _J4, o '. ;YOUTH CENTER lGZ3� ( /.9J Ka44J (∎.6. I a.5J l6D/J o . ; (7i/j (?o:6.l (?'ai) m ^ 4.& 45 50 45 49 'SO ' 5$.6 55 55 ' 55 55 ..51) °. --C FIRST AVENUE c z • J�S,i'1F LOS ANC` Idaii s COLI TY OF LOS ANGELES -‘11,* DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE OAUFORN0P ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone:(626)458-5100 JAMES A.NOYES,Director ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O.BOX 1460 October 2, 2001 ALHAMBRA,CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE p REFER TO FILE: LD-8 Mr. Stan Scholl City Engineer City of Arcadia • 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91006-6021 • Dear Mr. Scholl: TRACT NO. 53303 The enclosed subject tract map has been reviewed by Public Works for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis, title information, and for compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act. It is ready for your examination and certification as to compliance with the conditional approval and applicable City Ordinances. The City Council or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the State Environmental Quality Act and the State Subdivision Map Act. After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the map should be returned to Land Development Division, Subdivision Mapping Section, for filing with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's Office. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.Armando Aguilar of our Subdivision Mapping Section at (626) 458-4915. Very truly yours, JAMES A. NOYES Director of Public Works 4011.1r fr ECEPIED PHIL K. DOUDAR Do Assistant Division Engineer ,I pai em Land Development Division �`i'r:3"t� J{`t`r66/1 uE ' `on LR:ca P:\LDPU B\SU BDIVS N\MAPPING\FORM S\TRACT Enc. • 16.13030 SQ. FT. (T#N.) TRACT NO. 53303 •_ IN THE .019 )F ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS AN( �TS ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA . BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, IN BLOCK 88-1/2 OF TRACT NQ. 866, AS PER MAP RECORDED'IN BOOK 18, PAGES 198 AND 199 OF MAPS, IN THE ,O'FFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. • FOR CODUYIlYIUI! PURPOSES TT:ITECN ASSOCIATES.INC. OIRIER'S STATEMENT: SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: • WE HEREBY-STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF OR ARE'94TERESTFD IN I-HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A UCENSED LAND SURVEYOR OF THE STATE OFF CALIFORNIA: THEE,HAAS■INCLUDED WWI 1HE SUBOMS10N SHOWN ON THIS NAP INTH9N THAT THIS FINAL YAP. CONSISTING OF 3 SHEETS.IS A TRUE AND COMPLETE SURVEY AS ZH4E,DLSTRICTIVE•33[20ER LINES.AND WE CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AN0 SHOWN.AND WAS HAM BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION ON APRs 14. 2000; THAT FILING•OF.5+1)0 YAP AND SUEMS1OH. THE NONWIENTS OF THE CHARACTER AND LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE W PLACE; OC COT, fa1Dl1 a CAUFORNA CORPORATION. OWNER. THAT SAID NONUIE]ITS ACE SUMMIT TO ENABLE THE WIND TO BE RETRACED. LAND . NASIR EFTEKHARI u '..z $ i P J j 1 D I /rT/�� r, ITS: i'.rP 1.I.N1I h[ 0, Jb.6924 ?S DArr' 0 • ' •-'�� COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1 �/ 9fP CAL\Nj t i NO. 692-42005 • ON ngs iµ1. 1 S 2001.BE ORE NE 7I�FED $� CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: A NOTARY IN AND FOR 550 STATE. PERSONALLY APPEARED. /VOA A. s.>`NP Is Id r i I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE.EXAMINED THIS MA►AND THAT R OCNICRI4 • KRSONN LY KNOW TO MC OR PROVED TO MC ON At WAS at SATISFACTORY SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE TENTATIVE MAP ONO ALL APPROVED ALTERATIONS T0EREOFi CADENCE TO CL RIC PARSON NH05E MANS IS SUEOCRIiEB TO THE MINN THAT ALL PI60nASIGNS OF•S lSOMS10RN OROINApCp CI THE CITY OF I/RCADA INSiRU1eWT ANTI ACKNON DCTD TO WE THAT HE EXEC1ITED THE SALE IN HIS ' APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE NAP ME EON COMPLIED AUTHORIZED CAPACITY,AND THAT BY HIS SIGNATURE CN THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON, WITH AND THAT I AL SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY ACT PATH OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF*UCH THE PERSON ACTED.EXECUTED THE RESPECT TO ETY+RECORDS. INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND DATE • - SIGNATURE my MINOA1AI._�__PL CE CF SS BUSINESS IS - NOTARY PUBIC IN AND FOR AD STATE. IN 1.45 An y''s COUNTY. OTT ENtinEER,CITY OF ARCM... 9 Vri Fa Al S U MY COMMISSION EXPIREw S TNAH1 17,312,5" (144,14 PRINTED) R.C.E. N0. - YYHN fW Anp.M iii EXP I C.....a.I 1YiIa, • ■ 7�.j .AYIa•Cssr.... Ca,p ' Wow,NloneO..n,mCa CITY CLERIC'S CERTIFICATE: GENERAL:HANK. UNDER A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED OCTOBER 13. 2000 I•HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF..ARCADLA BY - AS INSTRUMENT• D. CO-I597000.OFFICIAL RECORDS. •NOTION-PASSED ON MPROAEO THE ATTACAED LAP. • • c. SY:EDDIE GNAW ,� `C. V I . DATE • CITY C ERX-a1r OF ARCADIA STATE CF LOS ANGE }S.S. PLANNING COMMISSION'S CERTIFICATE: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES p THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE TENTATNE MAP OF TRACT NO.53303 WAS APPROVED ON THIS pry I C , 2001 BEFORE ME. U�A '�f AT A MESTIHW HELD ON THE Or . 1 MCREST COMFY THAT A NOT PU IN AND MR 550 STATE. PERSONALLY APPEARED, THIS LAP SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIES WITH THE PRE+ROU81Y APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. •• PERSONALLY KNOWN OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY • - MDENCE TO BE THE PERSON •WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN - INSTRUMEINT AN0 ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE. EXECUTED THE SAME IN -HIS AUTHORIZED CAPACITY AHD THAT BY HIS SIGNATURE CPA THE INSTRUMENT THE • CATE SECIIETARY OF THE PIADINO CCLWWSSION PERSON. OR THE ENOtt UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON ACTED. EXECUTED CITY OF ARCADIA THE NNStRLNrENr. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE: WITNESS MY HAND • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FEE REWIRED BY SECTION 9116.4 OF THE HUIUCPAI. rye" ,,�J, CODE HAS BEEN PAID TO THE OTT OF ARCADIA. SIGNATURE �Tq AL NY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE. IN 14,, A hpp'a. COUNTY. • YA PENT S u LY c0MwsSIOPI `EXRR£R�S 7a N. 1�1 s,CO.$' D ()RECTOR Cf FLNSACE-air OF ARUDA (HALE PRINTED) CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE: • .mac C°"^Y°•1'0y" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SPECM.ASSESSMENTS LEVIED UNDER THE' • "aw'P1O1`.COHdo. I JURISWCTION OF THE OTT OF ARCADIA, TO WHICH THE LAND INCLUDED \. I0Mw0+..JOLT. IN THE WITHIN SUBDMSIOH CR ANY PART THEREOF IS SUSJ€CT,AND w�. es..An,N,m . WHCH MAY BE PAW W FULL, HAIR BEEN PALO IN FULL • JUN C06 TANG, BENEFICIARY UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 26. 2000 AS . CYSTRUMENT NOS. 00-2006158. 00-2006159, 00-2006160,AND RECORDED JUNE 20.2001 Su j 041 TAAve- AS INSTRUMENT NO. 01-3060221,AU.OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATE CITY TREASURER-CRY OF ARCADIA JUN ON TANG • • I.,... ORf1A 1 S.S.h ifr ots n.,..)$1 . • ON.RCS Awlu.CS • l . 2001 BEFORE WE Tessa ERaftal • A NOTARY PUDIC IN MAO FOR 5AU0 STATE. PERSONALLY APPEARED JUN CH! TAAC ' PROVED TO TIE ON THE BASS OF SATISFACTORY CADENCE TO BC T1C PERSON WHOSE NINE IS SUMMED TO THE WHEN WSTRL*EMT AND Aa0NNKEDC£D TO ME THAT NE DEBITED DC SALE IN NIS ALIT N RGIED CAPACITY, AND THAT BY HIS SIGNATURE ON THE BNSTR'J RENT RE PERSON, OR THE'ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF 5H101 THE PERSON'ACTED.'EXECUTED THE INSTR4NIE7FT.. . • S e WITNESS,YY HAND (,'#4r, r SIGNATURE. Jr11�y YY PRNaPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS-IS �di�tr' ' NOTARY'PUBIC.IN AND FOR SAD STATE. IN 'COUNTY. Sena E-Basd :a,,...,.I Nora,OIT161) MY COMMISSION,DWRES NT 1 0 (Hug PRINTED) QS. • • TR CT NO. 53303 IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGtLES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TRITFCH ASSOCIATES, INC. CONDOMINIUM NOTE: NS TRACT IS APPRWEC AS CCNOOImJ.L PROJECT FOR 6 Wa15.uREREftr THE CwNERS OF THE UNITS Cf MR SNAGS IMU.HOLD AN W AmUD INTEREST IN ALL THE COMUON AREAS viotH'WILL IN TURN. PROVIDE THE NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITY • EASEMENTS FOR THE UNITS. SIGNATURE OMISSION NOTE: THE SIGNATURE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY.A CORPORATION, EASEMENT HOLDER FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 26. 1974.AS 6GITBM TNT HO. 4552. OF ICW.RECORDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, HAS BEEN OIMTTED WIDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 664360)1141—V16)OF THE SUBOMSIOII MAP ACT,THEIR,INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE MAO SNO SIGNATURE IS NOT REOURED BY THE LOGI.AGENCY. COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE MIMED THIS MAP, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ALL PROMSTONS OF STATE LAW APPUUBK AT THE TINE OF APPROVAL CF THE TENTATIVE MAP:MO THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ALL RESPECT NOT CERTIFIED TO BY THE CITY ENGINEER. COUNTY ENCNEER DATE BY DEPUTY R.C.E. NO. • • • • EXP. • • • • SCALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS • i • TI _ \CT NO. 53303 'ry IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IRCTECH ASSOCIATES. INC. . • • , r1-c ALLEY L E Y o 9co4•ooE _ _ L • maw 426.60• 1911 aor _ � __�3,11.70 c (G H 90'00'00 E • 6.24' - '�' �_ � R T 401.60' • 600' . ' 11 w 444 "W 331.74 J 144.44 i .$ \ t/2 w $ $f. 2 I mnr coaxal tot n ax fs7 a1N-1I/-fro. -IR $�' $00 'i$-5.419 "° 1-01•t`° ` 8 Z 25' 8 $ gRi 30' i W N 90'00'00�E 46.00' P . NOT APART OF — d THIS SUBDIVISION 2' � $A 4.00'-t8pN • W �y, X4.00 I i1 418. ® 8g� :a T 4§ S1- ry$ a I. s§ a = I- W a 1-t7:1 1y fib $ 5 d E 4$ 9S ' 8 g 4 rj • cn �, :ii g:0 g o s w 8b 2g Igl 2 s1- b i:11 •s7g NOT A OF i • d 16,$80 ;SQ. F.r • BDI Z 25' u 30' 1 4 - W. W W i T . 8: 8 S ' p R E.,. a, • 8 SCLY COMM LOT 15 pX , F 8 65,-I 2 TRACI Lm 1 5. z . 01.1/2 TRACT 101.Mt hL Z z `16-144-109. o aea.w1- z s . a 11-101-159. a Gt�'r d a a 144.04' - 351.70' 1(sy Cl)I 50.04' - 50:00° �L 401_60' r {/� B EAST 3.00'?1' 3.00' 853.30' W • E F .g a �' a 426.60' 4,/ p -.,{� - 100.00' p�381.70• • o T GENOA !— — — — STREET 90834 C M M • MONUMENT NOTES: - , Q FOUND 4 CONCRETE NALS TANGENT TICS IN LIEU Of PUNCHED MARKS PER L.A. CO. FCDFB.FC 2632-149. pB FOUND NOTHING. ESTABLISHED BY FOUND TIES PER CITY TIE 8001( PAGE 114. EASEMENT NOTES: .,::'-;,.. O FOUND pineal. ESTABU9teD AT RECORD ANDES MD DISTANCE s;. �5i. S (208.80') PER TRACT NO. 43429. 1L8. RODS-6-6. '�.E1' 060E COMPANY. A CORPORATION.AS DISCLOSED Sr DEED RECORDED APR%. O: FOUND LEAD AND TACK (NO REFERENCE)AT N 0000'00" W 6.20'. 26. 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 4552.OFFIU4L RECORDS. SET TAG LS 6924. SET LEAD.TACK AND TAG LS 6924. BASIS OF BEARINGS: O FOUND CONCRETE NAIL (NO REFERENCE)AT S 0'00'00 E 3.19'. SAID CONCRETE NAIL WAS SUBSEOUEMIY DELDUSHED. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE DEARING AST OF THE• _ • SET LEAD.TACK AND TAG LS 6924 AT LOCATION SHOWN. CENTERLINE Of GENOA STREET.AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO.46429:ALL-? •' '; 1095-5-6. 't:;:?q,�...-»..=^•) • LEGEND: • INDICATES THE BOUNDARY OF TIC LAta) • e • • metr : el'AFRMI F4 BY TWC MAP e Sato 76 • Op -Z 0 l—0 0 / arlt4% RPOBASo-0 STAFF S AFF PSRT November 6, 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Penman, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator /2 j SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE 2152 —AMENDING THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA TO REZONE THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1012 THROUGH 1026 SOUTH FIRST AVENUE FROM R- 2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-1 7,500, ZONE CHANGE CASE Z-01-001 BACKGROUND The City Council at its October 16, 2001 meeting approved Zone Change Z-01-001 rezoning the properties located at 1012 through 1026 South First Avenue from R-2 to R- 1 7,500. The City Council directed staff to prepare the appropriate. ordinance for adoption at a later meeting. Section 4 of the Ordinance notes that Ordinance 2141, the interim Ordinance prohibiting approval of land use entitlements and permits on these properties shall expire upon the effective date of this ordinance. Attached is City Council Ordinance 2152: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA TO REZONE THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1012 THROUGH 1026 SOUTH FIRST AVENUE FROM R-2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R-1 7,500, ZONE CHANGE CASE Z-01-001 RECOMMENDATION The City Council should move to introduce Ordinance 2152. APPROVED BY: William R. Kelly, City Manager Attachment: Ordinance 2152 . LASER�ySER IMAGED JI x_ 19. „a_ _