Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 2 OV ARC 'YAWN: z> 14,`°:17,V03°, 'NO 4aaity°I V° STAFF REPORT Development Services Department DATE: October 22, 2013 TO: Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission FROM: Jim Kasama, Community Development Administrator By: Thomas Li, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MODIFICATION NO. MC 13-18 AND SINGLE FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. SFADR 13-48 FOR SETBACK MODIFICATIONS AND SINGLE FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR 1,171 SQUARE FEET OF ONE-STORY ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING 2,749 SQUARE-FOOT, ONE STORY, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 136 WEST SANDRA AVENUE. Recommended Action: Deny appeal and uphold the Modification Committee's conditions of approval. SUMMARY This appeal of the Modification Committee's conditions of approval for Modification Application No. MC 13-18 and Single Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 13-48 was submitted by Ms. Sylvia Hu, the daughter of the property owner, Mrs. Yueh Yu. The subject applications were submitted by the project designer, JWL Associates to complete a partially constructed addition to an existing 2,749 square foot, one story, single family residence — see the attached aerial photo, proposed plans, and photos of the subject property. The Modification Committee, at its regular meeting on September 24, 2013, conditionally approved the applications, subject to specific deadlines for completion of the project. Copies of the September 24, 2013, Modification Committee staff report and the notice of decision letter are attached. It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the appeal and uphold the Modification Committee's conditions of approval for these applications. BACKGROUND APPELLANT: Ms. Sylvia Hu, daughter of Mrs. Yueh Yu, Property Owner APPLICANT: Ms. Felicia Fan of JWL Associates, Designer and Project Manager LOCATION: 136 W. Sandra Avenue REQUESTS: An appeal of the Arcadia Modification Committee's conditions of approval for the following Modifications and Single Family Architectural Design Review for 1,171 square feet of one-story additions to an existing 2,749 square-foot, one story, single family residence: 1. A 23'-0" to 24'-0" front yard setback in lieu of 25'-0" required (Sec. 9252.2.2); and 2. A 5'-2" easterly side yard setback in lieu of the minimum 8'-3" required (Sec. 9252.2.3). SITE AREA: 9,625 square feet (0.22 acre) FRONTAGE: 82 feet along Sandra Avenue EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: On the site is a partially constructed, single family residence. The original residence was constructed in 1960. The site is zoned R-1, Second One Family Residential. SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: One story, Single family residences, zoned R-1 South: Pre-school and Medical Office, zoned C-O East: One story, Single family residence, zoned R-1 West: One story, Single family residence, zoned R-1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (4 to 6 dwelling units per acre) — The Low Density Residential designation accommodates low density single family residential neighborhoods. Development is typified by detached single family residences on lots 7,200 to 10,000 square feet in size. Permitted uses are limited to a single family residence on a single lot. The subject property is a 9,625 square foot interior lot, zoned R-1. There is a one story, 2,749 square foot residence on the property with a 353 square foot, attached two car garage. The house is in a semi-constructed state based on previously approved addition/remodel plans. Construction was halted in 2008, and all City issued approvals and permits have expired. The applicant is reapplying for the permits to complete this project, and has therefore submitted the subject applications. Single Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 13-48 was submitted on April 2, 2013. A letter to the applicant informing them that the proposal is incomplete because Modifications are needed was sent on May 10, 2013, and Modification Application No. MC 13-18 was submitted on July 18, 2013. This project was scheduled for the September 10, 2013, Modification Committee meeting, at which two of the neighbors, Ms. Florence Dai of 142 W. Sandra Avenue, Appeal of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 136 West Sandra Avenue October 22, 2013— Page 2 of 7 and Mr. Philip George of 137 W. Sandra Avenue, spoke in opposition of the project, and for which the attached email in opposition was received from the neighbors at 130 W. Sandra Avenue. The neighbors are mainly concerned about the fact that the project has remained inactive for years, and would like this project completed without further delays. Mr. George is concerned that the applicant will not follow through with this proposal, as has happened with the previous approvals, and that approval of these applications would only allow the applicant additional time. To provide a context for the neighbors' concerns, the following is a history of this project. The applicant began the project in 2004, when permits were secured for an addition/remodel project. Subsequently, the applicant secured building permits in 2006 and 2009, and each of these building permits expired before the completion of construction. The expired planning applications are listed below: 1. Administrative Modification No. MA 06-28 to request a 5'-2" easterly side yard setback for a 420 square-foot garage expansion (approved May 23, 2006). 2. Modification No. MC 06-43: A. An 8'-6" westerly side yard setback in lieu of 16'-5" required for a 308 square foot living room addition with a top plate height of 13'-0" (denied April 24, 2007). B. A 5'-8" easterly side yard setback in lieu of 16'-5" required for a new two car garage addition with a top plate height of 13'-0" (denied April 24, 2007). C. A 46% lot coverage in lieu of 45% permitted for single story residence (approved April 24, 2007). 3. Administrative Modification No. MA 08-34 and Single Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 08-68 to request a 5'-2" easterly side yard setback for a 443 square foot garage expansion (approved January 5, 2009). The subject property has remained in a state of construction and neglect for approximately eight years. On February 25, 2013, the City issued a Notice and Order to Repair or Demolish to all interested parties, and is currently seeking legal action to demolish/abate the semi-constructed structure and clean up the property. Staff has prepared the attached timeline to outline the actions that have occurred for this property since 2004. At its regular meeting on September 24, 2013, the Modification Committee approved the subject applications, with the following conditions: 1. The site shall be cleaned up to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official by October 31, 2013, or this approval shall become null and void. 2. Complete building plans shall be submitted within 30 days (November 2, 2013) from the date of approval for plan check by Building Services, or this approval shall become null and void. Appeal of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 136 West Sandra Avenue October 22, 2013—Page 3 of 7 3. Verification of the deposit of funds into an escrow account to cover the cost of construction shall be submitted to the City by November 14, 2013. The deposit shall be based on an estimate from JWL Associates of the cost to complete the project. If verification of this deposit is not submitted by November 14, 2013, the approval shall become null and void. 4. A building permit shall be obtained within 90 days from plan check submittal or by January 2, 2014, whichever comes first, or this approval shall become null and void. 5. The house shall be reframed within 30 days after issuance of a building permit, or this approval shall become null and void. 6. Rough plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and fire sprinklers shall be installed within 30 days after the house is reframed, or by April 2, 2014, or this approval shall become null and void. 7. The entire project shall be completed within one-year of the date of approval (October 2, 2014), or this approval shall become null and void. 8. Approval of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 shall not take effect until the property owner's representative and the applicant have executed and filed an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. 9. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers, employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. On October 1, 2013, Ms. Sylvia Hu appealed the Modification Committee decision. The attached appeal letter indicates a need for more time to coordinate with JWL Associates, who is the applicant for the subject applications, and the project designer and manager. Ms. Hu, however, has not yet provided any information as to how much more time she and JWL Associates need. Appeal of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 136 West Sandra Avenue October 22, 2013— Page 4 of 7 DISCUSSION Ms. Sylvia Hu, the daughter of the property owner is appealing the conditions of approval to be given more time for the project. She is seeking additional time to work out the details with the applicant, JWL Associates. As of October 17, 2013, she has not provided an alternative timetable, nor has she provided a reason for not being able to comply with the above deadlines. It is expected that Ms. Hu will do so at the October 22, 2013, meeting. The applicant submitted the subject applications to obtain the necessary approvals to complete the partially constructed additions. The proposal consists of a 443 square foot addition to an existing substandard 353 square foot, two car garage, a 280 square foot addition to the existing living room, and a 448 square foot, enclosed patio at the rear of the residence that is not subject to Modifications — see the attached plans. This proposal is consistent with the plans previously approved under Administrative Modification No. MA 08-34 and Single Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 08-68, and has the same setback dimensions as the plans that were previously approved through the building plan check process. Although the proposed plans are consistent with the previous approved plans, which showed the reductions to the front yard setback and was constructed accordingly, the front yard setbacks were not considered under the prior Modifications. For this application, the City's Building Official has confirmed that existing construction is consistent with the setback measurements shown on the plans. The front yard setback Modification requests are as follows: 1. A 23'-0" to 24'-0" front yard setback in lieu of 25'-0" required, and a 5'-2" easterly side yard setback in lieu of minimum 8'-3" required for a 443 square foot, one story garage expansion; and 2. A 23'-0" front yard setback in lieu of 25'-0" required for a 280 square foot, one story living room addition. The Code requires a minimum front yard setback of 25'-0", or the average of the two adjacent neighbors, whichever is greater. The two adjacent properties, 130 W. Sandra Avenue and 142 W. Sandra Avenue have existing front yard setbacks of 21'-0" and 25'-0", respectively, resulting in an average of 23'-0". Therefore, the front yard setback requirement for the subject property is 25'-0". The proposed front yard setbacks for the new living room and garage addition are 23'-0" and 24'-0", respectively. Although the unfinished additions encroach into the front yard setback requirement of 25'-0", they do not extend beyond the average front yard setbacks of the adjacent neighbors, and therefore would not negatively affect the streetscape along Sandra Avenue. The unfinished garage expansion currently aligns with the existing, legal-nonconforming easterly side yard setback of 5'-2". The current side yard setback requirement is 10% of the 82'-0" lot width or 8'-3". Approval of this request would allow the garage expansion to be a compatible continuation of the existing garage, and would allow through access Appeal of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 136 West Sandra Avenue October 22, 2013 — Page 5 of 7 to the existing portion of the garage without an offset. This request is also consistent with the expired Modification approvals for this property. It is staffs opinion that approval of these Modification requests would secure an appropriate improvement of the lot. Single Family Architectural Design Review The proposed addition will be "Ranch" style to match the existing house, and is consistent with the previously approved plans for the project. The proposed vertical siding, concrete roof tiles, and cultured stone veneer wainscoting are consistent with this architectural style, as shown on the attached plans. It is staffs opinion that the proposal is consistent with the City's Single Family Architectural Design Guidelines. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The proposed project qualifies as a Class 5 Categorical Exemption for Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. A Preliminary Exemption Assessment is attached to this staff report. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public hearing notices for this appeal of the Modification Committee's conditions of approval for MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 were mailed on October 11, 2013 to the property owners and tenants of those properties that are located within 100 feet of the subject property — see the attached radius map. As of Thursday, October 17, 2013, there were no responses to the public hearing notices. RECOMMENDATION Because of the long history of unfinished construction, staff recommends the Planning Commission uphold the Modification Committee's conditions of approval to limit the time that the applicant is allowed to obtain building permits, and complete construction. These conditions were developed in consultation with the Building Official and Code Services. Should any deadline not be met, the approvals of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13- 48 would be null and void, and the project would not be allowed to continue until new approvals are secured. In the meantime, the City will continue with its abatement process to remove the incomplete construction. This project will be required to comply with all current Building and Fire Codes, including the 2010 California Building Code, which requires the installation of a fire sprinkler system throughout an entire house if it exceeds 2,500 square feet in area. If plans are not submitted until after January 1, 2014, the project will be required to comply with the 2013 California Building Code. It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Modification Committee, which was that this project is a Class 5 Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Appeal of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 136 West Sandra Avenue October 22, 2013— Page 6 of 7 Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines, and that MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 are approved based on the Modifications securing appropriate improvements to the lot and that the design is consistent with the City's Single Family Residential Design Guidelines, and subject to the conditions set forth above. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Approval If the Planning Commission intends to approve the appeal to modify the conditions of approval and sustain the approval of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48, the Commission should move to find that the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and uphold the approval of the Modifications and Single-Family Architectural Design Review, with specification of the revisions to the conditions of approval. Denial If the Planning Commission intends to uphold the Modification Committee's conditions of approval and deny the appeal, the Commission should move to deny the appeal and uphold the Modification Committee's decision and conditions of approval. If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the October 22, 2013 public hearing, please contact Associate Planner, Thomas Li, at (626) 574-5447, or tli @ci.arcadia.ca.us. Approved: Ji ► asama ommunity Development Administrator Attachments: Aerial Photo with Zoning Information Architectural Plans Photos of Subject Property & Neighboring Properties September 24, 2013 Staff Report Notice of Decision Letter Email of Opposition Timeline of City Actions on the Subject Property Letter of Appeal Preliminary Exemption Assessment 100-foot Radius Map Appeal of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 136 West Sandra Avenue October 22, 2013— Page 7 of 7 . i, ,131:.,_y* 'IX w 11:'!"11'.41.1* K. e i,i F:,, !'' ":.>, ,•.,,,.., A. . ;:3 ',-,,,,' ‘,,,\;,, 6� g e d Subject ; ' 28 "� property ' . �� s f � I i L a, k Y 4k w bµ x . 7 s „m d. ". 4 l . # • „. f Ii 4 R_I _ X1.5,. ate' �`: � yT".. AA iiL'I. R "� � .: x y}x ''b`+°4 a CEO };� h ■ 3• t.,FT u. . 4 &,.. I r . ; ; 1 i ._ I : 1 I I , I. 1 • •1A ' �.L1FOy` ' 136 W. Sandra Avenue it � ..,;� p "" MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 414uity CCU' r o 3 � 1 _ 6 i (a it il' knrrrom - o,. 61ie[I hid! mammmyssnoH ? V 13 rou/,iiNfil,il 14 7 IC .,,ia,u 11t-.- 3ul! Q qPli K o f 4 6 i g6 Ys�E 16s p o 5 a f ; s z � � o o W 1!!!!! WI 3 + < • II • kIIIt ii 110 111 1 Jib 1 b ss le E 14_1 g I 1f1fi iI 1 1 ill F r iflIlu 1 " " } '"`i 1 j ' 1 tiI I1. 116 I !III IiI I 11IHHIHjfa 1f i it B s .Jh�hii I f I .ia9.Fdaiylig.±€�y F ! 1111111111111 1�1 �f� e f i.Y�6 a �O 11111 ��l�g • hilloiii li s���€s�R1 l • II 1 i 1 I 1 1 i : dill u z • t I I. I II I z ° 3a3y�:IiilEitry9 Y1581aBg eegdlp @E. of h s ! hill 11 1 " I fl i gill ; 1 , 0 li F 1� to 11 'I I 111:11 a f ile i li r f pl , €111 Ia tIp �fl a� IItIIIiMOMMU11IIIN0111 W I1 I1 i 1 II Illa;ll U !iii ;l I it.tliiyi;;EpQa€:E!la5fi1pill l t • II 11 al !I W II X1411114 n WWI Ji' i 1 k 111111 1 sIl f� a�a�ib�E� 6EI 1fE,la II � I I II 11111 III!!1l71Iaiii�hI11�Ef1�h dodDail it a ibl 4#- kr kl YiYfg1g117QatliiAlltl3a6A11�11Eiade9a i R° RE iIIii a C16 1 1 1 . 11 HI [Il iR thu 01III 1 101 lint'111 a I' 1:111 1 1�g • liijIjJiI R < II! 11111b • € €I° bf11�1 1 1p1 Ui�11fpl1 Fi Ibl� o 11.11 11 8�1 le 11'1 11 1 e €R I Q !g b E 111E 8 i! ! il r 4111 I1r Q ff1 i alp 0, al 1 iigggba 1�ti z 1�g! f al �1,:g ! N11 i 110411 — 1 Yf 1111 1 ' 11 81€r ill iii U 141 a II b /111 IR !b !RR g 1 W Ig 1 1-1 I-yi ! l6g owe i` ' a I■°ii t a l 1 R 1 [k p g�E • gg r 111'1;'11 r1`1 1111111°111111,ifillll ° iVIIIIi111111111111111111'111/hi laRi1 111.1liligill 1101111 ; to ll /1101 11111111111#111l111llff1ga11+1i1Qf 11111 `" i11 111R f$ u ! f • 1 1 rilailil6ggfiap < ! .1 1gl ■ ab: l!! : miit 0 - .� . a • s ill fi f I 1- I QII IQ 1SIa! fE 6111 DDu ll. I !it Iq1!1 11 ii,; 1 Ix� ! fit J If . 1r IMO f II !• t R 1 alb i y i !1111 i1 ii !1 ■111 E• 11 g , iEI 1°i111,1 R 111111� g b1� �� €i b !1E 1 �Igf4 e f ` F11 f e1���! c�Y� � �3 a€1161 F 111111111� G ��1�.f�IfiRil+ ��i 1lIgplRa 1a11�1h�� €fg�1 � 1a,,a ��� 111: li� ���' �1�i I� 111E €� E ��y�l �t 1 1 :I 1 it 1 11b ! e, a a 1� I 1 11 1111 1EQEfR z 11 a i b !i 1 all Rg R i 1.111 1 E f 1c 1 1 1 • 11111 ° p ii 1111 411 g b 111 1 11k€I 111if p 111.11 ii a q. R, 1f i € gill; i p 11111 I � l■ if fi 1lgbek < 11 � i1 i b.1� 1 f1 � � f� ° 1 / 11 We'll 1111 1111111111 of ' L'1140"� 1 1 1/ r' 1 311111! B 110 4111(i11� 111 111 1 f M W 11111.1111 11 � - !� � f�f a*�1€"€' b I I�lf if �'Ib1 ii� ���!€I 1Qt 11E1� -1- r • !1li 1 'is i Intl 1 e fa Till 116111°1'1€Es fe�l'i 1/ le a�t�1�1a€ W■!i1 1 a ail r YY ,1!Wit iE ff.; gel1 cif-,€t ib ''''s mow ra'Inman ,;„'-----4) . 1 & * T.- 11,1 1YI��i nn�n�`J/d VO.YpOIq'Mit�1 iitiI•-_ -_ _ —_ & i 3AV `d2IaNVS 'M Id Id .1 1 11 b • . 6g i 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 p i 9 9 4 9 i i 4 9* Z 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Z 9 9 E• 9 4 9 9 9 9 * 11 * 9 9 9 4 9 9 * 9 9 9 9 * 9 * 3 * 9 9 9 i La 9 Q 9 9 j 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 4 hl/ 4 :� �' 'A114ida1l4 9 9 9 9 ��s' 14 ,�. � E���a j 9 ., 9 9 9 9 a, sc ti i I .P,K AV . �_k\ i ix _ i IN 0,0\ ` ---:1 _.d i z-- Li:LI I! i ■ I 1, II 1 I 1 I I 9 9 9 9 9 169 9 9 9 1 19 9 9 9 9 • 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 +9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 9 9 9 9 9 H 9 9 1 9 9 Ns \Q`M ., , 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 g 9 ' <r< 9 9 9 9 9 i 9 i 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 I9 9 \�\ 9 9 9 9 9 * _j� * + * 1 Ij j * *it#* 9 9 9 j , 9 9 9 9 I/4 4 4 9 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 , 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 I VI / 9 + 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 w 4R 9 9 1 `40Vy e S E 9 9 9 9 9 9 i 4 i 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 i 9 > * 9 9 9 i 9 9 9 9 ) 9 9 9 4 9 C � � ., 4 9 4 9 9 y * + * i!i i• 9 9 9 1, i j 9 + 3 9 3 9 9 * 9 9 i 9 1 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 4 9 9 9 * 9 9 9 1 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 * 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 i=1! i * 9 9 9 + 9 9,L 9 9 9 9 i 9 j i 9 4 i 9 ., 9 91\}jl � j 9 9 \�i f 9 \\I/J ; 9 9 9 , lg 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 J. 9 ,�.t ,, a ., 9 * 9 9 9 , 9 19 x� S/�.. , 9 9 9 9 3 4 9 9 9 v _0 '1 1 1 1 {119 '� 9 9 9 i 9 9 i 9 9 i 9 9 i 9 j 9 ; 9 9 9 9 / �: ; 1 --'— PI P AMYddOMd MP 1 1 121:1, maim venom ,•"0 NAV 1/11CINVEMICI • ; I & ‘m.• 4 1 CNi oil go 0, esoluaav3snoN ''' Ntrld LIMA 0380dadd • iii 111 I ...el •Nii : i ei . ' VOADONIMOW1/111,011/ ‘••,L,1,,,-/ Tun lame I i 4- J011 -4. g e ' g . q i: q ,I, ,,, i i / 'v g 6 '1 ilillil o f 7 f:J ,, tA - 4-r , 4b15 8,q., V44 n b ..1 ,,,4 , 4',i, 5-, ::.R ;,,-: z,,4e:p !z ,,zf. :4',,Eti uic4 1 1 ; It; 1 g 1 1 i 1 il i -, i!,hv.,t; liiiiiiiiiiii 4 ai - nq 51-15 rt,4,. ,sT li L 40414 qw, infk le k I I] a *AO 4, vq '18.1''fz. g4,4 z i 1.0 5 aFEiv,i-, 4s1-, AF, 't _RY: T: CID . I ....... J7-A An. ,- a-AI ..-.14 1 .P ' A-s .g, .,-.• .1.-A 1 d , 4 • N e 1, e....IittAj ---le / \ V 1 A 4:: :>. IL'11111' S oil il ' lik. Ill ' 0 I ice .,_.„ 1„. ..) e ' g\ . . ...._,• _ , ___, • ko. --I-4 1 c ,4. ,_,11,,. ri,.:, ,wi■ 11,,,,,,,,,. i,.. re....._ X , 1; . _________ f ill . • -1 __ ______ 1 1P3 g I 1 . , . . J7-A a-71 ..-4 4-.VI s-al "'-' ..-.1. -■ JP-Jat ...I =IP .9 1 1.-. / ( ag i.ig!! £ I.,...... ,,,,-; "4 E I CNI 1111 it 4 :_, NOILIGOV 3snoH (- ',..4 NYld dOON 1:1350dOldd : I it NYld dOON ONLLSCCd I •3, 1 I ill! o ,.. . mad usway.ovaa Lwow -..,_,•f). I i 1 h m I 1 tit j < • - _ - - • P I I e.,)\/1 1 ", '' .•,-, 1 / ii . ri ii li 1 ,.... .... 11 7--7,, .r. ; 1, 11 z ,.“ 0 ij ...,• ,„,.., ,,,„.,...,' k . '..1, ., --, I .. N li 7 1 u_..... 1 -,t- c----- 330111 11 .-„„ Z._ .,"•1: i N 43 :::i a I •, ,, D — il 46, ,1 h' (---■ ■ 1 I I i 1 ll 3:101i1 II 4 i I■ ,t i: I ILI ..J,t:::6 :."11:'.1:.':''''1';'''''5:1 -':::'.'''''''''')''':'7, , id.7.=,-,-_-=..._.:.:711 •,. .4 , N U) , ,,,;-,. ,,, c.,-,,,, 7. 11 D , !! i 1 1 4,1, ■-/, it '..",.. 47! 2 ?'..''. 'iF II /1, '' ) i 1 ±'''. ,,,, ft- 6:,,,:•; ,•'-o I il 0. 0■, ,-, 6 .,-.c`,1, .*!S-1 tl .1 i !Si.1 ',1 d If Ii',.: 8 :...7-1 3 I.,I•Ii' 1 i I, ri I I z I t.. i .L . 1 1 I • 1.4 .0 I 53 ." g• 1.3 N . "A $ r•S ' ■,. 1 e! to ui, -;i3 W t;"; kirS •, II V, „ 1 = § 11 1 N I I i N .. ■ [ 1 1 1 i 1.;:,71%._ 7,7,7,3 r ., / .,„ , , • . ■i •, i ! i N •- Li'. I li 11 :, 11 0 ■1 il / :I cv i 1 ■, c.„ 1 11 II ,.. • 0I F YYI a d4 'II .1.W SMin �`_4 3NYdNOLLO3rOtld3,ONV.Oe I r 3 $ [[ il�,sr 19041D00WOWS 1 S 09� , sr�iouYn� O3s d " Id CO •� : @ d 9 0 I ' ao+,laiaAotw,wYU _n ILIUM* j 0_ 11,k 1 • P 0 I W I ..-.. h.t 11 !f 1 III I 11 ,i i � ll1l II it , 0° ° = . W 12 le 1 III iii Mill tIlIda II/11 iilil 'illll a X. . o © o o El a o o' 111= • . It i 4, mmion iil!II VI =. Tim f/) C W MN .."..1...- -; H III CL Z f . iii: j i-Y-' Q O W a f- IlIlL411�lI�III�10.1 W .."241: J W -_�_ ii ILI - W © _?° "1111 A-A © a Q i ■o■ uo ! • an urY.ON O CI i 1 !1- o r A1 ` A-A .0 ( .1-.1 A • -i-Al .1-At .. . t g. 1 ,,0 i t • .•WWW C NMI _ .. izr, me © +NF MN I i• � is t .... 1 •Gc==%; aaF 3 r ■..■ 9 .: G , al■SSa■: ijr1011111011 -.44e.. CZ r ,,rr,...lam mt, "», !IiiI11 'iF' 7 tIt5iatisriz gm 10, P ti2E it=4: ...< / \ = 1 e.: `i ° --- W O teerea, Ii; ertMee, Cr co i -eiI O E - • I II p -l I______ imill,, .1-At •1_A 1 ./-Al 1 MMOMMUMMOMMINIMMUMMUMMIft y 0 ,- x. ,e I . . . Rttii.,,•-:, - _. . . . ' .' -,.:'''• J:-1...,'..:', •' . ',' ' ' ',':' .. ' ; ' -..-- 1! '• ,•.'_.'i.,-,,'ir,i-,iri.,,,.._ . '•, 1,, • ._ .0., .,•:....ii.„,,..$, , :,. :, . , .....-. - . , :.. -,... _ ,,i....,-.4...3. .. • _ . ..,„ . .. _./.., . --.•.:,., , . 1 ' '''. . ' '' ' '' ' . ' 1'1 ' ' •it,,,' i. 1. • .. . - ,;. '•:,,.Ti'',.* '' . . . •ti..,,.4.,,, ,•,.' . . „ .' . ' . • . ' ' ..`. ' • ,-,ii.lir.,.-:.:',,,'....-",'''•' -, ',,,• .. . , , , , ... ..,. ■ .. ... ,. ,•-, : .. . . - . . . .. . ,.. ,„.._ . , . .. , ....,.. : . .. .„ '',, .h:,'..-'4.y.;:.'',„ . , , . . . . .. .., ... . , . ,,- „: .A ,.. ,;:.' ',••••.,....,',',.,.•..;,•••:.-.:-.-....H- 4- 4.,...• . . : .... ,•„,- . .•4-. .',.:,l'i„."4-.-Fc.,,,,:..1,44,...::::',4,...., . — . . ....,,_,.. ,, .... ...., .. .,.... . .. .. .. ,. .., ,,4_.. ,.. . . ....,. . _. .. . . . . . . . . . . '-' - ' • • ' '-• „, ,, ..„ ........., . , ,....... . , ... .,. .,, . .. . _ . . , .,.. .., . .., . .. ..... .„ . ,..,,, '.4. 4,,;4,'!"-Y• '":',''.- ....... _ .. . . , ._._ ,, ..,..„.. ,. „ ,...., . .. . . ., .. , . , "4":5,-;:':i.'1;,J.-',.-*,:::.•,--.'',.., .'' .... .., ... . . :._-4,•'4,•,,.-4” '-','•:,-.4:••• • :. .__ , . . _::',...i.:,,1,!:-:=4;i:„.•'. ''.',i,....'-'?;':'-',; ,...,..,,,.• . , —. . . . . . . , . .... - . '-"'-•, - . . ., , ;-:,/,, ,;. ..,.' ,.: , ;. , ., .. ,..., . „ .., .., ......, . ' . . ._ . , ... - - '-'*;71...'--fc,•.:'- .,''' ..'I..'i .1.'4. . . .....'i!"-,41f1,,,^,..... •., •...f ., . , . '''''''''l''-':-'''''li''Z : .':,• .- , ':'''''..- .,. ..T.'4,:'' ..,.■ ". .. 1 ,,,j'... `,.. . .1.1.: . . .- .- . .'.- '''. ''',i:ii:■'',4 C''' '- ,' ..7. .,. 1=:".. , • . MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 September 24, 2013 Page 2 of 4 The applicant began the project in 2004, when permits were secured for an addition/remodel project. Subsequently, the applicant secured building permits in 2006 and 2009, and each of these building permits expired before the completion of construction. The expired planning applications are listed below: 1. Administrative Modification No. MA 06-28 to request a 5'-2" easterly side yard setback for a 420 square-foot garage expansion (approved May 23, 2006). 2. Modification No. MC 06-43: A. An 8'-6" westerly side yard setback in lieu of 16'-5" required for a 308 square-foot living room addition with a top plate height of 13'-0" (denied April 24, 2007). B. A 5'-8" easterly side yard setback in lieu of 16'-5" required for a new two-car garage addition with a top plate height of 13'-0" (denied April 24, 2007). C. A 46% lot coverage in lieu of 45% permitted for single-story residence (approved April 24, 2007). 3. Administrative Modification No. MA 08-34 and Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 08-68 to request a 5'-2" easterly side yard setback for a 443 square-foot garage expansion (approved January 5, 2009). The subject property has remained in a state of construction and neglect for approximately eight years. On February 25, 2013, the City issued a Notice and Order to Repair or Demolish to all interested parties, and is currently seeking legal action to demolish the semi-constructed structure and clean up the property. Staff has prepared the attached timeline to outline the actions that have occurred for this property since 2004. DISCUSSION The applicant is reapplying for applications and permits for the partially constructed additions totaling 743 square feet. The proposal consists of a 443 square foot addition to an existing substandard 353 square foot two car garage, and a 280 square foot addition to the existing living room. There is also a 448 square foot enclosed patio at the rear of the residence that is not subject to modifications. This proposal is consistent with the plans previously approved under Administrative Modification No. MA 08-34 and Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 08-68, and has the same setback dimensions as the plans that were previously approved under the plan check process. Although the proposed plans are consistent with the previous approved plans which showed the reductions to the front yard setback and constructed that way, they were not considered under the modifications. For this application, the City's Building Official has confirmed that the setback measurements shown on the plans are accurate. The modification requests are as follows: 1. A 23'-0" to 24'-0" front yard setback in lieu of 25'-0" required, and a 5'-2" easterly side yard setback in lieu of minimum 8'-3" required for a 443 square foot, one story garage expansion; and MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 September 24, 2013 Page 3 of 4 2. A 23'-0" front yard setback in lieu of 25'-0" required for a 280 square foot, one story living room addition. The Code requires a minimum front yard setback of 25'-0", or the average of the two adjacent neighbors, whichever is greater. The two adjacent properties along Sandra Avenue, 142 W. Sandra Avenue and 130 W. Sandra Avenue, have existing front yard setbacks of 25'-0" and 21'-0", respectively, resulting in an average of 23'-0". Therefore, the required front yard setback for the subject property is 25'-0" per Code. The proposed front yard setbacks for the new living room and garage addition are 23'-0" and 24'-0", respectively. Although the unfinished additions encroach into the required front yard setback of 25'-0", it does not extend beyond the average front setbacks of the adjacent neighbors, and therefore would not negatively affect the streetscape along Sandra Avenue. The unfinished garage expansion currently align with the existing non-conforming easterly side yard setback of 5'-2", in lieu of the minimum 8'-3" required, which is ten percent of the lot width of 82'-0". Approval of this request would allow the garage expansion to be a compatible continuation of the existing garage, would allow proper access to the existing portion of the garage without any offsets. This request is also consistent with the expired modification approvals for this property. It is staff's opinion that approval of these modification requests would secure an appropriate improvement of the lot. Single-Family Residential Design Review The proposed addition will be "Ranch" style to match the existing house, consistent with the previously approved plans for the project. The proposed vertical siding, concrete roof tiles, and cultured stone veneer wainscoting are consistent with this architectural style, as shown on the attached color renderings. It is staff's opinion that the proposal is consistent with the City's Single-Family Architectural Design Guidelines. Because of the long history of unfinished construction, staff recommends a number of conditions of approval to limit the time that the applicant is allowed to submit plans for plan check and obtain building permits, and complete construction. These conditions were developed in consultation with the Building Official and Code Services. This project will be required to comply with all current Building and Fire Codes, including the 2010 California Building Code, which requires the installation of a fire sprinkler system throughout the entire house for a project exceeding 2,500 square feet in area. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The proposed project qualifies as a Class 5 Exemption for Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines. A Preliminary Exemption Assessment is attached to this staff report. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public notice of this item was mailed on August 30, 2013 to the owners of those properties within 100-feet of the subject site. Staff received the attached letter of opposition from the adjacent property owners, Samuel and Fanny Leung of 130 W. Sandra Avenue. They feel MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 September 24, 2013 Page 4 of 4 that the reduced side yard setback would negatively impact their property, and that the sanitary condition of the subject property is unacceptable. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Modification Committee conditionally approve Modification No. MC 13-18 and Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 13-48, subject to the following conditions: 1. The entire project shall be completed within one-year from the date of approval (October 2, 2014). 2. The site shall be cleaned up to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official by October 31, 2013. 3. Complete building plans shall be submitted within 30 days (November 2, 2013) from the date of approval for plan check by Building Services. 4. A building permit shall be obtained within 90 days from plan check submittal or by January 2, 2014, whichever comes first. 5. The house shall be reframed within 30 days after issuance of a building permit. 6. Rough plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and fire sprinklers shall be installed within 30 days after the house is reframed, or by April 2, 2014. Approved: Lisa L. Flies Planning c,ervices Manager Attachments: Timeline of City Actions on the Subject Property Aerial Photo with Zoning Information Photos of Subject Property & Neighboring Properties Letter of Opposition Preliminary Exemption Assessment 100-foot Radius Map Architectural Plans and Color Renderings tiv1 F rc9d,, " 3� A September 24, 2013 OWA.Ya.t5.1903 /, co� �,/0a Ms. Felicia Fan to++aity oil JWL Associates Cl Q f 1221 S. Hacienda Blvd. Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 Arcadia Subject: Modification No. MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 Project Address: 136 W. Sandra Avenue Development Services Dear Ms. Fan: Department At its September 24, 2013 meeting, the Modification Committee voted 3-0 to conditionally approve Modification No. MC 13-18 and Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 13-48. The conditions of approval Jason Kruckeberg are as follows: Assistant City Manager/ 1. The site shall be cleaned up to the satisfaction of the City's Building Development Services Official by October 31, 2013, or this approval shall become null and void. Director 2. Complete building plans shall be submitted within 30 days (November 2, 2013) from the date of approval for plan check by Building Services, or this approval shall become null and void. 3. Verification of the deposit of funds into an escrow account to cover the cost of construction shall be submitted to the City by November 14, 2013. The deposit shall be based on an estimate from JWL Associates of the cost to complete the project. If verification of this deposit is not submitted by November 14, 2013, the approval shall become null and void. 4. A building permit shall be obtained within 90 days from plan check submittal or by January 2, 2014, whichever comes first, or this approval shall become null and void. 5. The house shall be reframed within 30 days after issuance of a building permit, or this approval shall become null and void. 6. Rough plumbing, electrical, mechanical, and fire sprinklers shall be installed within 30 days after the house is reframed, or by April 2, 2014, or this approval shall become null and void. 7. The entire project shall be completed within one-year of the date of approval (October 2, 2014), or this approval shall become null and void. 8. Approval of MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 shall not take effect until the property owner's representative and the applicant have executed and 240 West Huntington Drive filed an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Post Office Box 60021 Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of the conditions of Arcadia,CA 91066-6021 (626) 574-5415 approval. (626)447-3309 Fax wwwci.arcadia.ca.us 9. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City officers, employees, and agents from and against any against the City of Arcadia, its officials, ty of Arcadia and its attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or y claim, action, or fficials, officers, employees or agents to Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision,conditional but of the City to of any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission,which action is brought within the time period including but not limited to Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this ion, or City p iod provided for in Government Code City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or roc the project and/or land use decision and the project or decision. The the matter. The and/or City a reserves the right, at its own proceeding concerning of City shall cooperate fully in the defense of represent the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents n the own attorney to matter. defense of the There is a five (5) working day appeal period for this application. The effective until Wednesday, October 2, 2013, provided the Committee decision is not appealed. An appeal must be submitted in writing to the Community Development y action is not Division with the $540.00 appeal fee by 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 1, 2013. If you have any questions, please contact Thomas Li, Associate' 5447 or by e-mail at tli(cr)ci.arcadia ca us. Planner, at (626) 574- Sincerely, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Community Development Division / Planning Services Gs Thomas Li Associate Planner Attachment: Acceptance Form c: Mrs. Yueh Yu, Property Owner Ms. Silvia Yu, Daughter of Property Owner Mr. Peter Wang, JWL Associates, Inc. Mr. Don Stockham, Building Official Ms. Terry Moore-Korse, Code Services Officer Mr. Philip George, Property Owner at 137 W. Sandra Avenue Ms. Florence Dai, Property Owner at 142 W. Sandra Avenue Mr. Samuel Leung and Mrs. Fanny Leung, Property Owners at 130 W. Sandra Avenue MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 136 W. Sandra Avenue September 24, 2013 Tom Li From: Sam &Fanny Leung <Ieung6054©gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:09 PM To: Tom Li Subject: Application Nos: MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48/site: 136 W. Sandra Ave., Arcadia Hi Thomas, We are the neighbor ,just easterly of of subject property. Our address is 130 W. Sandra Ave. We oppose the modification based on: THE SIDE SET BACK OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IS TOO CLOSE AND WE FEEL: a)Most houses in our street have wide frontage of at least 83b;ck air c'�culation. Ww is very enjoy the previousewider length of garage and back. It becomes a long and tall wall to in-n-out air flow. It will ruin our enjoyment. The city is requesting a 10% side setback which must have its practical reason. b) Every time I pass the side walk, I feel myself walking on a very narrow street and feel very uncomfortable. c)Due to the narrow side,many material from subject property material (eg the loose roof material or nails) were blown to our side. We feel very unsafe. d) We lose some privacy.Noises from neighbor become so easily be heard. Sometimes, I can hear clearly what they said. We also do not want our conversations to be heard too. e) It will affect the value of my house. Many buyers do not like They too close disghbor from neighbors than hat privacy,they do not want to be felt like living in the apartment. y proper is what a single family house for. I believe my house worth over 1.1 to 1.2 million now. I have to make sure my future buyers are happy and have no hassle. We strongly oppose to the modification. Hope city can settle this matter soon. We have been suffered our neighbor for over 8 years. Our neighbor property y has been left unattended.awn Many cat seep breeding season after season ink water. Coaches become cats shed r our their se these few years.That place is very come to our pool to drink unhygienic now. Please confirm receipt of this message.We will not be able to attend the public hearing this time. Please confirm receipt of this email and bring our concerns to the hearings. Regards, Residents of 130 W. Sandra Ave., Arcadia, CA 91007 Chi Chow Samuel Leung & Lai Fan Fanny Leung Leun n6054a,gmail.com 1 136 W. Sandra—Timeline of Actions Date Building& Planning Actions Code Services Actions 5-11-2004 Plan Check 04-213 issued 10-8-2004 Bldg. Permit B00-018-871 issued 5-19-2005 Insp. &Correction Notice issued 1-13-2006 Revised plans submitted 4-_-2006 Revised plans approved 4-18-2006 Bldg. Permit B00-024-033 issued 5-3-2006 Inspection of foundation 5-=2006 MA 06-28 submitted 5-23-2006 MA 06-28 approved 6-=2006 Re-insp. of foundation Corrections required Construction not consistent with plans _-2006 Citation issued—maintenance,debris, weeds, & non-compliance 6-26-2006 Citation paid 12-15-2006 Insp.to verify complaint regarding debris& unpermitted above-ground pool—NOV issued 12-21-2006 Correction Notice—structural issues 12-28-2006 MC 06-43 submitted 12-29-2006 Incomplete application letter—MC 06-43 4-6-2007 Stop Work Order—inconsistent construction 4-10-2007 Add'I mat'l submitted for MC 06-43 4-24-2007 MC 06-43 partially approved 13'-1" plate ht. denied 5-8-2007 Correction Notice re-issued Submit structural plans w/in 30 days Need to correct unsafe roof issues 136 W. Sandra—Timeline of Actions Date Building& Planning Actions Code Services Actions 6-=2007 Posted unsafe to occupy 6-14-2007 Insp.—NOV issued next day for debris& equipment storage 6-20-2007 Plan Check 07-256 for plan revisions for inconsistent construction B00-027-821 1-3-2008 PC 07-256 returned for 3rd corrections Not resubmitted 3-5-2008 Bldg. Permit B00-024-033 expired 7-2-2008 NOV letter with timeline to comply 7-16-2008 NOV issued—requested inspection 7-23-2008 Inspection—NOV issued next day 9-8-2008 SFADR 08-68 submitted 9-29-2008 Stop Work re-posted 10-2-2008 MA 08-34 submitted 10-8-2008 Re-posted unsafe 10-16-2008 Letter by City Attorney 12-8-2008 Application SFADR 08-68 completed 1-5-2009 MA 08-34&SFADR 08-68 approved 4-20-2009 Insp. & NOV for debris, above-ground pool, weeds& unsafe bldg. needs to be secured 8-20-2009 Foreclosure commences 9-15-2009 Bldg. Permit B00-031-530 issued 9-17-2009 Citibank cleans up premises 3-23-2010 Notice of outstanding citation 4-6-2010 Fire Prevention Insp.& Notice to remove flammable materials—i.e.,debris&weeds 136 W. Sandra—Timeline of Actions Date Building& Planning Actions Code Services Actions 6-3-2010 Bldg. Permit B00-031-530 expired due to lack of progress 6-28-2010 Insp. & NOV for incomplete construction,trash containers,weeds,dead vegetation & pool 8-4-2010 Citation paid 1-25-2011 Insp.—NOV re-issued next day 2-15-2011 Letter regarding payment of outstanding citations and schedule for clean up 4-21-2011 Reimbursement paid for parkway clean up 5-23-2011 Citation paid 5-27-2011 Notice faxed regarding payment of outstanding citations&expiration of all permits 11-8-2011 Owner states desire to complete project 11-25-2011 Referred to City Attorney's Office 8-26-2012 NOV re-issued 2-25-2013 Notice&Order to Repair of Demolish issued 4-2-2013 SFADR 13-48 submitted 5-10-2013 Incomplete application letter—SFADR 13-48 Proposed plans need Modifications 6-26-2013 City Attorney sends letter regarding City's intention to demolish w/copy of Notice& Order 7-18-2013 MC 13-18 submitted 9-10-2013 Public Hearing—cont'd based on Request by applicant 9-24-2013 Public Hearing A.)1/9n o7tee.4-A, LIke 7-0 7ive 7L y24AL c C 6,54.4) 7e/e 7-x1 c 5aecz- Adi' cy.z 4,,f6 A/o , /Lid /3 oy (0// .;7,411/ j;(0/-- 4,9See- .t reds / 2 kt9ttc-ick_ze... eeeette,44.... 406... /so77 <cs Mt_ erk, ? , "1„ 2 4, Lrie7CA PC .)re in I Lt cc) ft:AX.1 :77E- 1-4/7 sC:Y /0 OCT - 12013 gr-cEltr No. 0+501 gr_covr-i) rf : ø)! CITY OF ARCADIA 1' vis '* 240 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVE \o ;• ARCADIA, CA 91007 PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT (Certificate of Determination When Attached to Notice of Exemption) 1. Name or description of project: MC 13-18 and SFADR 13-48 2. Project Location— Identify street 136 W. Sandra Avenue address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15' or 7 1/2' topographical map identified by quadrangle name): 3. Entity or person undertaking A. project: B. Other (Private) (1) Name Felicia Fan of JWL Associates, Inc. (2) Address 1221 S. Hacienda Blvd. Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 4. Staff Determination: The Lead Agency's Staff, having undertaken and completed a preliminary review of this project in accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further environmental assessment because: a. ❑ The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA. b. ❑ The project is a Ministerial Project. c. ❑ The project is an Emergency Project. d. ❑ The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study. e. ® The project is categorically exempt. Applicable Exemption Class: 05— Minor Alterations f. ❑ The project is statutorily exempt. Applicable Exemption: g. ❑ The project is otherwise exempt on the following basis: h. ❑ The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency. Name of Lead Agency: Date: August 15, 2013 Staff: T 1 .1om L.1 A ,o ct a re 4(44.10E-IL SeIV ors 72 MOR594 PROJECT INFORMATION rvices (626)350-5944 ,N OWNERSHIP I OCCUPANTS UST 136 W. SANDRA AVE. ` PAS ARCADIA, CA., ALCOMPLN ECONS INS 40 12106 LAMBERT AVE.EL MONTE,CA 91732-FM626)350-1532 13-257 SCALE 1"=200' -...20 WOODRUFF 44 ® / ®9 a 6b . /4 s40*., 43 1 b // I � 42 41 8 O .. 2 ' ±o. 4 40 e r 0 a, k s(3' N..• , .,. i 39 • s 37 0 8 5 6 �`� • �9� h < O>s N` o e 0 ,,a 4 t� c S - 11 i ANTRA ,,. a 63 •/0.248 � 1 O q ./494%4, go9e •BS.55 '\1°° AVE o V. O g - �h .1 NE' IV .° (Q� �ip it'� 22 2 ,; Q ro O n 20 � 1 (2) 6.� Asa 18 �, - to 3 - 80 v't 6�zo 17 N o , 16 n 2s ‘44.0+$4-O i ost- s:0" _ I g ' 27 28 • tr•29 �V� .., a 30 N 14 \5/ ifil ® . .3�� Bo ° 31 73./;2 80.97 O •90 -,. 33 34 . N.8,9•49'45.E, a 74.0i H ao o>saw DR 8 o LAS TU(�1 w ^ C F. /660-, SANTA TUNA; 30 j AN/T� Q, . E—eo COLON I lIE cc ii I -75 F Ic ; �° �o,000*e. ., I t �Z , 1 E �� 88 i � 0 LOT 6------1 I tol 1 c PoR ' '.., Oj / 0.9,„ ' a ® I 3s72o...Q., i , _