No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4 r OFARC c:3* ----'''''----— ii;7 C G").4�.nicy °{ito r. STAFF REPORT Development Services Department DATE: July 29, 2014 TO: Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission FROM: Jim Kasama, Community Development Administrator By: Thomas Li, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE APPROVAL OF SINGLE-FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. SFADR 14-03 AND OAK TREE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. TRE 14-06 FOR A NEW RESIDENCE AT 1350 HIGHLAND OAKS DRIVE. Recommended Action: Find that this project qualifies as a Class 3 Categorical Exemption from CEQA, Deny the appeal and uphold the approval of the design review, and Approve the Oak Tree Encroachment Permit. SUMMARY The subject applications were submitted by project designer, Mr. Robert Tong of Sanyao International, Inc., to build a new 6,530 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence at 1350 Highland Oaks Drive. The subject property is located within the Highlands Homeowners' Association. However, the design review application was processed by the City because the Architectural Review Board did not have a chairperson to process applications at the time. Planning Services approved Single- Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 14-03 and TRE 14-06 on April 23, 2014, and March 25, 2014, respectively. The approval of the design review application was based on the determination that the proposal meets the City's Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines and Resolution No. 6770. Due to a typographical error in the original approval letter, a revised approval letter was issued on May 27, 2014. On June 4, 2014, an appeal was jointly filed by Ms. April A. Seymour, Ms. Carol Rosenthal, Ms. Shwujing Jessica Liu, and Ms. Christine Eng, of the City's approval of the subject applications. It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the appeal and uphold staff's approval of the subject applications. . . . .. .. ... .... BACKGROUND In mid-November 2013, Mr. Ralph Bicker retired as Chairperson of the Highlands Homeowners' Association's Architectural Review Board (ARB) after 35 years of service. The ARB was unable to find a replacement until mid-February, 2014, when Mr. Glenn Oyoung assumed the position. During the three months from November 2013 to February 2014, when the ARB did not have a chairperson, the Development Services Department, with the City Attorney's advice, began to conduct design reviews for the projects within the Highlands HOA. It was critical for the City to process the design review applications because under Resolution No. 6770, "the ARB shall render its decision on a Regular Review Process application within 30 working days from the date a complete application is filed with the ARB; failure to take action in said time shall be deemed an approval of the plans, at the end of the 30 working-day period." The Development Services Department had been contacted in late November and December by a number of applicants that were ready to submit projects to the Highlands ARB. Unless the City processed the design review applications, the projects would have been approved by default, and there would not be an opportunity to review the architectural design of these proposals. Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 14-03 and Oak Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 14-06 were initially submitted on January 13, 2014, and February 6, 2014, respectively. On April 23, 2014, Planning Services approved Single- Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 14-03, based on staff's determination that the proposal meets the City's Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines and Resolution No. 6770. TRE 14-06 was approved on March 25, 2014. The approval letter for SFADR 14-03 was re-issued on May 27, 2014, due to a typographical error that stated an appeal fee of$540.00, instead of the correct fee of$210.00. On June 4, 2014, Ms. April A. Seymour, Ms. Carol Rosenthal, Ms. Shwujing Jessica Liu, and Ms. Christine Eng, jointly filed an appeal of the City's approval of the subject applications. The Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the appeal and consider the Oak Tree Encroachment Permit. The Commission's decision may be appealed to the City Council. DISCUSSION The subject property is a 20,470 square-foot interior lot zoned R-1-12,500&D. An aerial photo of the area and photos of the subject property are attached. The subject property is currently improved with a 2,685 square-foot, one-story residence with an attached two-car garage. The applicant is proposing to demolish the residence and build a new 6,530 square- foot, two-story, single-family residence with an attached three-car garage. The floor plan includes six (6) bedrooms, six (6) full bathrooms, two (2) half bathrooms, a library, kitchen with a wok room, a dining room, living room, family room, and a home theater. Appeal of Approval — SFADR 14-03 & TRE 14-06 1350 Highland Oaks Drive July 29, 2014 — page 2 of 7 The architectural style is described as Prairie, which typically consists of horizontal elements, grouped windows, and deep overhangs. The proposed building includes 30- inch eave overhangs, with a smooth concrete tile roof, ledgestone veneer, smooth stucco finish, a front door with decorative wrought-iron, and aluminum-framed garage doors with obscured glass panels — see the attached plans. Staff finds the plans to be consistent with the R-1 Zoning Code and the City's Single- Family Residential Design Guidelines (Guidelines) and City Council Resolution No. 6770. Copies of the Guidelines and Resolution are included in the Planning Commission's agenda packet. The proposal is a two-story house within an area that mostly consists of single-story homes, except for the newly constructed 5,825 square- foot, two-story residence across the street at 1343 Highland Oaks Drive. Staff finds the proposed building to be effectively modulated and articulated to reduce its mass. Furthermore, the architectural style of the building emphasizes horizontal elements, including deep eaves, which de-emphasizes the verticality of the building. The overall building height is proposed at 27'-0" from the average existing grade, where a maximum of 30'-0" is permitted by Code. APPELLANTS' COMMENTS The appeal letter pointed out procedural and design issues on this application. On procedural issues, the appellants state that the City processed the subject application when it should have gone to the HOA ARB for their review and approval, and that the City did not follow the proper procedures when reviewing the plans. The appellants also pointed out size, height, bulk, articulation, architectural style consistency, landscaping, fences and walls, and privacy issues. The letter includes specific comments on the height and bulk of the proposed two-story home, with top plate heights of 10'-0" on the first floor, and 9'-6" on the second floor, is much taller than the adjacent homes with 8'- 0" plate heights; and the proposed home uses stone veneer that is inconsistent with the architectural style, where "skinny brick" is more appropriate. The appellants obtained signatures of support from the two adjacent neighbors of the subject property. A copy of the appeal letter, with the additional signatures, is attached. STAFF'S RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 14-03 was initially submitted on January 13, 2014, during the time period when the ARB did not have a chairperson in place to process design review applications. If the City did not process this application, this project would have been approved by default after 30 working days (February 24, 2014) according to Section 5(E)(5) of Resolution No. 6770. In that case, neither the City, nor the ARB would have had the opportunity to comment on the architectural design of the proposal. Staff consulted with the City Attorney about this situation, and was advised that in the absence of an ARB Chairperson, the City should process these applications though the City's design review process. Appeal of Approval — SFADR 14-03 & THE 14-06 1350 Highland Oaks Drive July 29, 2014 — page 3 of 7 Under the City's design review process, staff sends a Notice of Pending Decision when it is determined that the design of the proposal meets the Guidelines and Zoning Code requirements. If any neighbor, or other interested party submits comments, they would be duly considered and forwarded to the applicant. If they are considered relevant and appropriate, the comments would be taken into account in formulating the decision, which would not be made before the expiration of the comment period. Ms. Seymour submitted the attached comments in response to the Notice of Pending Decision for the subject proposal, which requested a redesign of the subject proposal to a single-story, Ranch-style home that has the same appearance as the existing house, and the surrounding homes. The revisions requested by Ms. Seymour were determined to be in excess of the City's Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines, and staff did not impose the requested changes upon the applicant. In response to the design issues, staff finds the proposal to be adequately modulated and articulated to minimize its mass. The deep eave overhangs and low-pitch roof, and horizontally laid ledgestone veneer all contribute to the Prairie architectural style's emphasis on horizontal lines. The applicant is proposing to maintain all existing mature trees in the front yard area, which includes a 36" trunk diameter sycamore tree, two oak trees with 20" and 30" trunk diameters, an 8" trunk diameter Chinese magnolia tree, and three Hackberry Trees of varying sizes. The applicant is also proposing to plant a 60" box olive tree in the front yard area. This tree species is commonly used in new homes and staff finds that they complement this style of architecture. Regarding privacy, the second floor windows facing the sides are smaller in size and elevated from the finished floor a minimum of 60" to help protect the privacy of the adjoining neighbors. Staff finds that the subject proposal meets the City's Guidelines and Resolution No. 6770, and recommends approval of the proposed home as is. However, the Planning Commission may consider the following changes in response to the appellants' comments that may be more architecturally consistent with the stated architectural style: 1. Replace the stone veneer with a "skinny brick" exterior finish. 2. Lower the top plate heights of the first and second floors from 10'-0" and 9'-6", to 9'-6" and 9'-0", respectively. Oak Tree Encroachment The proposed development will encroach into the protected areas of nine (9) oak trees, as shown on the attached Landscape Plan. Certified Arborist, Mr. Michael Crane reviewed the subject proposal and prepared the attached Arborist Report for this project. Mr. Crane finds that with protective measures, the proposed development will not adversely affect the health of these nine (9) oak trees. The recommended tree protection measures are included as a condition of approval. Appeal of Approval — SFADR 14-03 & THE 14-06 1350 Highland Oaks Drive July 29, 2014 — page 4 of 7 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) staff has determined that the development of a single-family residence is Categorically Exempt per Section 15303 (Class 3) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the Planning Commission is to consider denial of the appeal and approval of the design review, the Commission should find that this application qualifies for the Categorical Exemption. PUBLIC NOTICE/COMMENTS Public hearing notices of this appeal were mailed on July 18, 2014, to the owners of those properties within the required notification area — see the attached notification area map, as well as to the appellants, the HOA President, and the previous and current ARB Chairpersons. Because this project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the notice was not published in a local newspaper. An opposition letter to the appeal was submitted by Mr. McCallum, resident at 1730 Alta Oaks Drive. A copy of the letter is attached. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the appeal of the approval of SFADR 14-03 and TRE 14-06, and uphold staff's decision, with the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall follow all findings and recommendations as listed in the arborist report dated February 2014, and amended on March 28, 2014. 2. The proposed project shall be developed and maintained in a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and approved by SFADR 14-03 and TRE 14-06. 3. The applicant/property owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public right-of-way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director and Development Services Director, or their respective designees. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check review and approval by the foregoing City officials and employees. 4. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers, employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Appeal of Approval — SFADR 14-03 & TRE 14-06 1350 Highland Oaks Drive July 29, 2014 — page 5 of 7 Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 5. Approval of SFADR 14-03 & TRE 14-06 shall not take effect unless on or before 30 calendar days after Planning Commission approval of these applications, the property owner and applicant has executed and filed with the Community Development Administrator or designee an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Approval of Appeal and Denial of Design If the Planning Commission intends to approve the appeal and overturn staff's approval of the proposed design, the Commission should move to approve the appeal and deny Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 14-03 and Oak Tree Encroachment Permit Application No. TRE 14-06, and state why the proposed design is not consistent with the City's design guidelines and/or Resolution No. 6770, and/or that the Oak Tree Encroachments are not acceptable. Denial of Appeal and Approval of Design If the Planning Commission intends to deny the appeal and uphold staff's approval of the design, the Commission should find that the subject application is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), state why the proposed design is consistent with the City's design guidelines and Resolution No. 6770, and move to deny the appeal and uphold the approval of Single-Family Architectural Design Review No. SFADR 14-03 and Oak Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 14-06, subject to the conditions set forth in this report, or as modified by the Commission. If any Planning Commissioner or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the July 29, 2014 public hearing, please contact Associate Planner, Thomas Li by calling (626) 574-5447, or send an email to tli(a�ci.arcadia.ca.us. Approved by: C? Ji asama mmunity Development Administrator Appeal of Approval — SFADR 14-03 & TRE 14-06 1350 Highland Oaks Drive July 29, 2014 — page 6 of 7 Attachments: Aerial Photo of the Area Photos of the Subject Property and Neighboring Properties Proposed Plans Neighbor's Comment Letter Appeal Letter Arborist Report Notification Area Map Letter from Mr. McCallum One copy of the City's Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines and City Council Resolution No. 6770 are included separately in the July 29, 2014 Planning Commission agenda packet. Appeal of Approval — SFADR 14-03 & THE 14-06 1350 Highland Oaks Drive July 29, 2014 — page 7 of 7 Lai : Y Site Address: 1350 HIGHLAND OAKS DR 'A :ir''' ‘1.- 1,,,, ;911: ,./: Property Owner(s): SHEN,WEN F . dr ,. 1K,0 , id iii s, ,, . _ .., , .. ., , „.., _ 4/ �u.:. !4 } 5�. sir �j.. pi,. t SS ,.f ‘ ;« - r .` ' , . x. Property Characteristics Selected parcel highlighted to Zoning: R-1 (12,500) '1 i General Plan: VLDR in=volt � s, . _�' �j Ii- • -Lot Area (sq ft): 20 470 rs � �■I nor r 4 = i ;s Main Structure / Unit(sq.ft.): 2,685 �` •: 4�� /+v ��.�� Year Built: 1950 111/111111 iip&iir Number of Units: ''' .Overlays > 1"�r =ri l it ; m i t11R Parking Overlay: n/a ��w41U ��■4�� 1� '■'� .� Downtown Overlay: n/a �m,�r6a Sr �1��ma am Ism NA;•111. Special Height Overlay: n/a 1111•11111. "11".1'''',5 Mi!■■ ■ :12I11111111=1_ Architectural Design Overlay: D Parcel location within City of Arcadia" This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for Report generated 22-Jul-2014 reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current, Page 1 of 1 or otherwise reliable. View of the subject property at 1350 Highland Oaks Drive ,"4 ? 1 y A T -,'1jy y,. " r s r ir S,f r elhol ....,a. dWWriS.. ✓•D 4. 4 View of the neighboring property to the south at 1342 Highland Oaks Drive Y l e A '";;;;.f.., s I . ))1 , i • i s • 1 � �. View ofyyythe neighboring property to the north at 1358 Highland Oaks Drive ti , V - i �.i���iL�/ 1 Oii[-iM litil i•!•110PS•,I9LiI Nl *' VO y V^ '{ - - -� 'roil'Np10WJ:Za oo.r.5.2 quK'a Sit :4 &70. • YJ 1YIQ YJ�d II •soNu ap••••N•n• �,,/ ' ?0 SNVO QNVIHOIH OS£l i i g �. g I l'3NI1MNOI1YNH31NI OVANYS I'"°�° 3S11OH AIIWVd 31DNIS ! 11 I 19 ~ t t I'— ill L - 8 w Yi It r c 1 a si taeteet t 7,l-¢ �y ga M- t ° gs. a s”" a E€,g fig; g t_ 4z.a 9Y +y 11101.i�` I 2, i i- E 93981 5 3:e 89Aggg0W6i 6. . c t 1 yet $4g 11 r„ — k6 1 t\`\, _:® 5 e B� ! 4 z yg xl �i �� I N g€ I \' H ! g 18 7 i SS P. eat n5nn'a z �I� T"'t;'"rinlai:Mi6i i?"s6se"Z 1..A®aaa§e,co g € I .'. �� �I Ai8�gypyp9pp9y A° M ggg pp i: ,;-r ._ it I1,III .I, It .1wik/ it! `3 �Ifilb __ '>�'v;� <./ // MI !c.:'�`) ill/ � iti , i$ ,9! #i° g ,{4 1,4..ri41i 1 i �,. r � �' it f . ., . 5110 9190.9 9;90 IMO pi- rt.m I I tl ('T- i - - ' ° I N i -lI -�T- Yy �1 is i h. X .m I r— Imo..— 'I a� „i. u ! !Rill I �___ ■ I f1 �� i i4 1114 --r t----11:1[ ]] u:: ti• 8 I,' 'g WI i: ° I i� e f 7 ..,.t . i.. .+�rnr ram._< 4III_'�t t _ _J I I II i Ff 1 t,,• 1:s ° li ,� 1Qpg g ill II i '1, - 1 ' 1 I it----:,� ^• J2 1;• E9 ON �g�l� sfi FB 1 �1■pp !. 1 �'<j;� 1 1 6! i i R Y e 1p 1 88 II ., fivail i 1 I I ------- I:; -..,has iJt \' 1 r pgninNII iiil .1gpq�'i 1 i i id Y9 i'l i i �� —_1' I j E �11111���-F '---, I �I�' L-.� g. W 2 .d 12.1v1 d11F i t 5i 9 py b ■W ill.i _ �. _- t g 9"lid y i_.... 'I I� �r t• 1,w n 9i e , 1 g{A P 1�_`�=--II,: .1 .,/ ;L--------- -- 'c\ b 110 1111x '1.1 ' ' 11111 11 to u� 1Y y yge ®/9a ii€lli iv r-r___' ,__._" i5i■ N 11 I=■�R❑ I L = i 1k.i I ° E � 3 ♦ i` � yt Q y441 I`_I__11�.._—�r '�Y t\\` // 4 0�nk 6 al gi 4§01, 4.li 1 100 BE w 6 ■.„- 1-,-14 t,• Y44 Y 4 tlY ribill!.411ii; L $p 4f■■E E to l'�'�� i;J111w wnN'`1 /.1. ._ �5 �i� ,{ � E� p}c� �y¢+ � .m1 �9Q3 ����6j5„�tIVi � ®e®e tl �dL6y5 c; �Sc8SY1tlitn i YBB� diiJ€ tW� --(----:1_---A �5a t' 1 - 1 E 41 f I »n ef4 041/1 4 n,.e � a,�C W i,1 %Iva nnnx 4 ly'a r I 1 11.=1 9 -2190 n 4 ¢q�' eiji i O 1€ ie. 1 4�� * a I , li "iii gi9prw aii g "i{ rill i liI3Ee�€i ii VI 1 zt 11 ti i;ti",,:I ...... R — — ”y. e Be 0_, i � v( � \--'i. — �r--- - a !g S A 1 1 1/ 4 !€ ! 68 ! a a S aaa ! ! ��_!!s _ •(i g._ 6.1< 11 M 1 M k q a l` sag 4 m; i Ao 4 � 1 gARIQ SlIbO QNl07H,JIH — — thuiuiduhii Uhiinlliii I 11 li i i iii !!3 9 1 iiiiiiiiiiiii i • s ,err-.. ie•c np w•aKne v<-`<`<4i4 ao,yrrl■nl..a•■roo-mlanlr. — Y■n'wo.avo'ne.s,vroau'Is •le4°•c aesa VO'VIOVOaV �,,! _�'--j 2IO S)WO ONy 1HJIH OSEL < '• I .� •3Ni IYNOIIYNb3INI O Y 1■lYS �ts?:a 3Sf10H AIIVIV 131DNIS e a �I yy{ I 7r { tl 1 •1q °p CJI ! II;!!! § B. p ji ![j!!!i JiJj al Jij € i i i! i1 1i la ° i • f I,i9 9 e e 1p 6 i { i � { ! ! I 1 ° P8 � a ° �� e 3 ii i 16 !1.ilp i I Q b e ii/= e it 1 . 9 N o1 tlg 1 6V{ I ki :1•1I igi 'El,gs!{ii g Ili q�� $ { i' 3 9 1. i6 1 @il ! I@ I g■ e• >< � � a � C CQ- �i i g QQ 1 ggl• i` E. !!! ! 1– ii .lief ! ■ " 1.4. °i i ! 1 p+_A i 1 !! � l � � ��� !I_�� � 7 x G 491;0 l i{ d { pill Q {sl pfi .% ; pe e2 6 9 II� 19Q� Q P�6 g �.i F°- ���I ding ,q� eC C i iQ1fGb �.■ ii liea h!e G 1 f liyrp9i p.e9,li 6g e6 411, 1 ■ 1 1 NO 1. Fla ie e i gll" c a illyy I;e G. 1 { i. fQBgt I•I� °ii i6i■i -Help! 1".°Plriylle Pl11 V. Nvi: e; ikgl .ti lip! yi�Iil°�iiliQ iQ°vi�ig e iA i�I�p ��pil IlE'C I�iiilq a p■e � ie � � �l i��ele a i�-a !1!Q!A Q ■ iy e – r 5 ■y SpIX B i` 91i1�.. � b ��. ��P P � P �{� �g li i b i . ��$e°b� {e � i-�S tQ 4ie11l6 ° 111":1° ` l��l7•d � �y t- tltle Lt Aiiv_f��1 oit �etlbiblb�gbiiei tAiLicel l ilitih lighl.p , 1.0 ..l ii a i g"litiliii iii. kit tiiiiiiilitt@;l i ii�iii i heoil • •� " . _ - w „ _ __ p _ A k d . a A3 k 11 A 222 22 II d A A 4 if �f 13- !1 i II i t i #7 bi 2 gl { G f■■ e 1 e q 7 . to BQe F to e Q ! / giI ii :I 91 1 B g g fl al { ey A $ e e I e e. f 3 1 � � p • e A l) 1? 6 _ � tai � a� Il,pp,Q I 1 � i > aii7'. I e � II ! I 111!! i i le� Ilii �; I���bp, 6Qi g w q i e g riYi e t fl v t itt 6 9 i 'ga i. ;I e e 1' ° I it qz a i 9i° IGl wil'I �■ i a a: y i ! e E E y 1 k a .f. e Q If ' ti: p' gg f 8 e ■a_ iSo §_F e6 . 3 ac Q1! i 7 ! g c @@! t d� l � i ' 9 8 @ of :r P.�f� Qpe�p'� tls �j3 gi; f � � 1P c �p° lg 7i . l9$ � lit� ��i4§� 1 as. � pdp �–t„ Q ?�r {i �¢ t � ee� g t li lg11lK i E NO Q i ii1.4 'e�plC141"11.°°4 to II GgAltg Lli tt i ii:11! !l p IQ9� i!x' §° °p INiel ii.,ilil� iqi q II: d g a g 9:e,I �' ft Ye 4 1 I tlAIY�I p� tl EI ii 1' i 9Ei .fie gli p ! t- �ii @ 1- i� i 1. 9 , 6 1. 1 4. gi �� 5. xe a' 1l.a 101 e ! : °i , 9 A ie' t b m 0 e gfTf{r q Q�r e € � 3 !! p• „R � pa 9 � p d ! a' r ��1 p f I lq bt �` ll � �� 1•�pl' 4 � r' �Y ��� i � 91ea1`+ �� eA e7 i��g � f �"� �IgRi19����1�il� �'${Q ili�i� l'li��� I ifiiiiiliii,-tit�t=�11�1 1■: 9 1i7s�xlia l:l Riligllii,i�;= ailegati I I I O I�ihigi g �iPligiiiii:_ gdgl 19 8 Iq l DI........: . .. ... _ _ _ _ _ a :, d q .2252 R F ., .. 1 2 2 A 511 It f 31 :i„. ! ^. 7 i P:aa J-7* „_. yrni .r, o-, .• 2-2.7.., i -� i!i lilt�; r iii��ll Iliilililll -I' I,. .4 I Iii��i,ili�1 Iil� = , ; $ /, ail, i;ll;E a I!1 'll�aii ° `�ol �,, ; I 1_11' h :ii: ,IT C I Io '' 1°e KiC 1J L� . I I I !i 1.% ►: �� ro7L=�—li is w l ° 11 ED I,.. IF g i 11 II Is 91 ■ .., o-'-Tl4, II 4 r�.....i. I r,p awn Ls, I JJiiL 11llii;_ 4 € - i ° I III II I pll 1.... I �1, 1 F ='_"f':_:.-'t..--.7 ---.. ;=1 ik 1 1 11[1.. 1, ERN, II L I r i i===ii ii===1i ii :r-----RTE---11 i i I I I I I 1 i I. I II II 11 ® II 0 II __'` ,' ",1�iaf C I—fir; B° .. L`___'�F__�`__-�J , II �I I 7F 1 is k VV - {! 1 1 II II 0;<I ;1,111 i _ 1 ., e ,`_==k== a �� ort •�1•Pl x I s __Er_______I a : A 1_-n G7 L f�'I hillignIMAL-%-t14ffr•-4-111 ;-N-4.__ ,1 d� ial 411 1 �� q i; LL • I •°, ❑ ' I yr ' ' ii I I 6'`D I II I 11 II I r IY411 ■.- . l l r II IIlo I • 11 I;1 �, .1� + CD s __ -��__�__ _� I to p S � ■,1 vI _ !�c p ! a e 4J`— --I— --- I— CD ,. I - -- 1• p It '–' – �'ir���IG 1 s �9 g c a �� I 'CD `rr�llllta© I °1, Ii! IN !' II ss yy!/il d°a' ---- - ie– ' °3 : x.:! ;).• Sae. .';* KR—+ 0 ==1 : ' ^ — j Olt I'L EN% 'I 1 ig . IEl I I i t 9` �I ?�i q Id i f E 5 Lii lity. — 0`.? ,T--��;`- r If LCD - 1 !;;�$ ; i ..L, CD ix 43s'Ir. LCD r TN;q Y! ....81 l • r sa N.. ra ...I, i, 4.-/_ tA,. r r: re .1-n ri 7!1 r,l • 444 a oaaran.atan)°..ia4m•awnwrn■n.■u.a)n, 'YC'n'aoos YJAa..M'aat■'la.Aq•NA e'3 sat '3NI ieouvHUatr+l °x— = ;-°:'I *V - I I g -� s: 0ANS I���.:41 VO`VIOV'Z\ § V 210 S)VO ONY1HOIH oi Li wl Q 3SflOH IIWVA 310NIS I1 I i 1 s 11 g ■ y 6,e e ■ I 1 .� i. i g i eie ! ■ai tl g'IiX 1 !!i I ep. 6 it ief • 1 t4a 9 15 p e � �i� i{��� T� �!!Ed �� idi ■ tl P� 1g � ill; 11 otl E R ��7 @i � � e e�6`3� qG �# 1 °i a ei e° " 11 i! 9 t 1 tl 1■ g1e1 1 irii� i! tlgd;! i- ; ;it' X i tlt1!` ill ; g�1 will yy i of °1 9 v i.? �}'■ t � � lX � ! ,,�B! �_!■ie°e p1 4 � _�°�`i '01 E� t .� 9 it � ° �1 �i1� lalg��- #° ei ��1 li p e �� i■ R o"1 '� ° Q1i13�t11 it rgil 11 1 . it c 01 et IX 11! t 1a� 011 ■111 l oil i 6 1y e le 1 i°�_i i t t t 1 t !1 a �-!t a i; 1 I 1� I ye1 1 5 G tl ■ ■ 1 R■y 111'I�R 1F1� i 11&5 ��� � t � 44:1� � s� �g'i��°1aie. 1 1 1.1� 1a 7�� 1"-������ 11 � � tie�t■�eg t4�� � X � ! : `' 11 ee#if ° I _ e E 1 f 1 ■ 'x e P Roil` i l'1 10111 pi g pX' d 0 t1 •� i tl "+ ! f�I �. 9 I4 i� g� [R4 1 .!i! 61ti ti if X !I6�F■tia p ■� 1 yi i t• 1s 1 t 1 6 ! WI a■'p{�I44 lei it i 1: 011.il ie 1 �1 11. ■° i.i NI i ■� owl Zia 1 ii itl Y `Fi �i it � 5 5rr i {u d Rp .tl_ qq 1 a g pyaliX■y t G R 1 ■ ■ ■i � E � ! � e�° t °S�� �G� i i1!■RiX1! 8 ° �1 It1�li9 i i 1 it i°4111��� �g� !e■I•��jn a i�s yT-. �i���tyy_ y fillip i it 1 i' ■ XQ ilhy i/11�I10 a 1 ■b 1` GR`ia 1� i•■ ig esgg a� p °il 4; 111 I �� G rl a €iiit +s� it �� � ! i i!■ ■X le Elie i 13G 1 I It'ili1 111f4 !° 1 { ■'/i 011 li Pth �j Di 9X R1.i�e�e 1011 Xqe 11 10: {ii'P a1■ iR '1l.1X11i1 "gtt11�1 fig E a iie7! G■ 11 S [ � ti 1 �� iR 9 a i� •c 119 � 1 . rli � � e i it �i d' e� igI 1 t. . . t[111i�4 l!WI Qiltityii'` ill tip ti[Eigt -Ugh ! isiih wit.i.ar l° I- ! i;I:-9tcra eYiQlit9 iglEi a Sl tl r a ' y yyi� f psi ' t 9t I}} ! a ■ l! 6itir In l 1 ill i!ib�����vlmil l:�tl it a in 1.ci...ali:rlii.l(Mo.,�ii h. �11� 11 . �Iits��� 1@g; ri lir 16 Xie 1 I IA [�q�1lii ior.i Iir a1�� �.c, t a n ki ■ k 4 ;gig ° a . a ■ r 4 ■ ■ E t t i g !■ P I i.11 i ■ Xe ipe 4,1 p XaeE, ii II f 11— 1 G 11 1Q P lit t fl "g I 1 i 1 R i I R ` 1I ..pig ti I Igiiii lix,g ! ! ii Yi `G!alp ! } HP icY% IP 1 e g� 4l t.1 1I �! ! i e ! /R iv.1 1., 11,..eiii i1-iv:9k r _ �� ��i~I?- 11�' is lei e TR ap Xrp° $RIi v� r2 11q a B¢pJ� R � R til � i� �+R�� � iC6 I 1 p � p a 1 ee#i eq ea e? i e➢l l ° lili $ ' Q i1yEgli fi ii4rT4 iit e!1111&!g "I § i° 1 t1i11;;` X# 1 gil Ir1yi.1 Ii 11llgill ie18 i 6e c a r i r n @ f gi ! i G e i a- ■= i { ■e E.y�� _p�t• �xi I �I a :�p 1 eels i�1't�A° �fp�g tei Gg1°i 'si !!g 1 Rap� t _t Si @G�e.. iI #� ie�ai°• �� fii R X.Y. 1 t 1' 1 1 1 1■ i kn!� a tI11 e`■1io 16` iii rc is 1;•" i i III i1 �e! c p i Pei f y i A iP1 �t�6� � � i�I i g i i ���1 � 1 ! ��t�: a2��� 1111 1� e7 � it'i i � f �' s ■■�e���is i�°���i1`�i�� �� 1 eiiiff,'"Itill'1 iiilit liri ; iiiiilii 51��l�iiiili""i ill iiiliiiliiliiiiidiiiii���� � tth:i _qqqq r i : it �IIiiiiii 4!li9�i��i. °x1�1�1Y"i� s3 9..tE R d d :RRGd e e g ol O X A A «a 0 X :i1 t t t e a 'tA ❑_ = 111 11 III I �3,_,�® ■Mill i ; i ii 91111 41111 �pI �1ai IF, — tp ! L! g!!i! i!!(11�9�_'�itlli i i't. r i i at +1n .I.' i ��1��� i 1 I1 ,_I�yt_i„1,t*s ---- iii[ ci I -1----71COLIN hig--mulliamiorE: i . ...., ... , ..............., ,,„,, i ,,,,,,,.,,,D,,,,,g..„, __ _,_ mil ...„, 4, _man int , _ ______ip 19 0 __. ._. .-.-_,.,T.L......._.—.. .., , -itititi.: ' -04-. -I INAIMPr 1 INV ;6-;...- !:.. - 3. i --- --1 --- 1 'w"-mw ,;11.----4- gy.- . , . 1 , 1,p r� fig, i g i L'}-I gc _ 1 x1 ,,4; 111 A6114. 1"Iiiimr; ___ : nnl I LL 11M7(O3 `ii- - -I k 'i" 4 lti C©]F_�U " I t N Y tt� F --i;"jir 1 ird . lEill i:CD.:' -'—:H I 1 i = 1iii i :°---� �111w r ; o-1 ip , ,■ee. rz+�iA1 � CD +I- ; i -- � `W A III F- _ � `I I I iii \ MU-mr ,—-.:-A7::4;-, 1 ',,4,-,:r Ek`- ' fflEgrA ._ _i___1,_ _i__ISkr 1--111 oe en t.v yA r7 xA A-,. ,-, rA .{ DS' V k 4<4<C wo+ YaU>•i•na► oUealw roll lonawa vben ewp.rvw•am .0: J t•• • y N' j y.- •tIO S)VO ONVIHOIH OS£L 11 g .V ` 1_4-'' 3Sf0H AIIWVd 31ONIS d 1 t 1 a III ! �....1 anmrouV"Wil OVANdS ;i-7_ - N 111:2 i i m m $ i 0 illil g , t%ia tr :IFF� , I Ay g Rp �e �c tc If 4 y ! j R. p, gm Fp .�� ��, Ili ask a 1� ;: 111 ii3 is ti °IP g hi "II a�1 4ap6 u iihi!I! g 1 ii el; ii leo 1 i HY k t t $ ll: 6Ii !66 'li g 1 II it I>Y 1 II $ relit j;€' II 1 t , , , e4 , 1oeo# II 14 .sct° �I \ I I II i!e £(�:11t1I1 £CD £CD -CD IQ() ji I II \ ' 68 11 II II i___ —� II tl�r`IS t e 1 ae II — I TI j l B 1 �s IC© II :e; R II e 1 1 li I T£ 8 —4 1 / it h I! it CDI U ! I! k P. £CD 1 ND 1'� U k f -- 1 '-' - "_til' .i4 9. [ N'Acw H I ill j r � 1 la ir- . cm Ii B i C II L VII._ , — il ���I —4 a... i -- ® I II i ® J. II 1,cT i � :11' II I1I I I ill _.rf ' CD I li 1 t I I H j££CD , \\\I - - I ' 4 __,.....„, • wV , vo`viwv0 . ./I Lid*19Z9)x.i•1.0I1-9■P(9Z8)ma '...?"*' ".Z:1,:".°.'!"Z'. 7".4.-.7 n ZO*1.6 V3 L•11..1/'OM''1S..13.1.8"3 SU 1 .7.4-, < •BLINUOld 1•11.•PI•kl• .. ..r.-r■L.,_7\,...iiTTi.r-r. 1 . '3N11VNOLLYN213.1.N1 OVANVS ,-? .,,,,- A ,,.2, : T._% 1„. ; ..736:Invo°HaAlNIVIVIVHde:11:°97e.SI ' 1 I I 0 / i ..:t-i. 1 :. :ti I It, i I1 i ?If: . A . 1,4... . itt1:. ! ,, ..4 . z : :. . ,...,.1..... : i„ 30-i, ,. .. . ,i,•'a •. --• ii O ' i‘Li ii: itH , 1 :t1H • , ' i It:, ;..ItTI- 1,1"4-1.. •H: ! . ig',4;',,c,,imblif,1 . ,1111 4 „.1...-:,. .. ,;i: ...:w . OlVi,41.1: 's,11,.I 1.1WPjtv tIM lt ' -', r: . .. - ., : • ,. R. ,•ii.,4.,,„ •,,, -: 0 ,ill' '1. = . _ .... ,: 4, ita• rier3I • ' • 1 '4 ''' ' • t . il.... '. 44 y 1.•.,:. .. .• ! i ,. ',.,,,...1"11.. A'401,4"..f, f',. ',itc;:,,,•::1:::, ' t A i.....'41:1=1111111 , .c III I ,I — ti '. 14. '4N* !i gi ;' : :•ii 0 di INAIIVII:EW1 ri.,, 'i.: ' : 1'.:7111 1 ' / .1 ' ,.., B I I, _ i ..,k•_•-.46.1 '.. i,..1...i . •, .!ii! • ::-F, ..I IL ' It - VI I 4111#11"Il' i illi 1 0'.lir :14104i — i ' .; :i;!! ■.I '■t, 0,1', .ij t!I,If ti,.,Eit,to fil i t , , i•:,.:',11ii, . ,1•-•1'.',,,•,,' ' '._11-A ' ' -,0 '411',' > e: '=,,,; • N :.'. gl, 1 -ti. it 4-'• .t :1 ',•., i ‘: 'Ir'it----1.',1',:',L,,' - , ---1,'"•- 1.,111', C ., . 1 ,--.. •.„ . . , :, -,M• •,:i ii:, • i_Jki.k., *4'., .". . .1-,,.:,tT,L.,•, •-: 04';,)=4 ti oh,.,:' • ,-ijiP)I— -,., \ II ;,,L, , !.-..6;t 1 . ti t i-1 t iti',, ■ 111 41/11 ' ›. $11,1 I. .-v 1 s••ti iti•, ,.•:. •1 Cfill'Aii'=ill','.'i::-,-:;.'',:_',"-- -'- t • 'I', PH It 11.111: . s.t ill I,kg,,t 1 ,,:i,.li A 1:11i.! 1'1 0:1111,;'i " c-,'.. 4;",01,1,1,11 • -I - i , , „iii ,1, 1,.,..111.1iii! ,h.11,011!:_•.?" ti•• w i.;.7,4 t(i,,,i ..v,R.0.k_tol rip • lavi. bt6i* i I l'I'' I ..113„,k,4..-- .4-..-,,,..., ,,, t. 1 WI -rn,,r;,,i' , i _Lt.1_1_44-',, -.NIT:--------- II , HO,t______--',4• . F ,...1,111 1 i .1" r. . . ' i ' ' I . 1: 11' - - ‘:..• it 11,1i 1 —-Ill 10,i.r:11111111 1- :z 'A. I i ill I ill ........, .....- ' li n Iliii14 INIIIIP'0 1-1:1 i li 0111 i - -----;x7--- 111.■ '114 .,?,F ,.14,111 „! .. ...4111111 1" .m.11 . 141 'rz--111 . . 1 4. , ill'o-, 'Els -11 .••,-,,,,,,hi i - -gp •--lki A' 7, ..<-. ... LI. II.! :_ I 11 1 i•', • ' ' t 4.11 ',`,'..',::•tlali -XI , 10; lir '.., \I ii ,fliVilitLii 1 i 11,iil 11 ir. .i„ . , „ • .1. t-.4 .11#4 l''N,'ail;• 'pi Iii '1,4:..-.1 i,•r.,Noi9221„.2 mg,.• ' i :' 1 'hill - .-1; / 'HI ,, - .,Rome • . ■l',;, 110,:!...- '101 iii II,,. .■Il'.,,,,..afirk.1;111.Ril 11 lilli ill ■ ill 51-"11 4 I 1 ''''. ':11111'j.,1 • - 1 :. ilV '!1•!1 ;II I– ' 1 Ur li Z . 'I 6111110' 1. I, I ' IX 'IN 1111 II I,' 11 11'1-'1* 'I:1 111 '',:4 II, lir■ ' 11—.21 It 11111 ilf}jil 111411 ,111 I Erri 111 i 1 11::.;;I:11 :II 1111, :11,,,YA.,.■iii:INIF _ I- f ii a 11,11 l■ - — I '11!4,."!I 11----==.1111 • lii I 2:-.E.-11111111 Uji 's',.., -1.4111.1111:111i'lliiii. 11111111,,illi'llillihi:.:1131111115.11.114,i11111 ,--:44 . r Ili,ill, Ilp 1,I)l' moll" • ! 1 '1,1:1 N'. '11111 ,1 111 t,, fi■H : ! 1 i ' i . •• I lil:;:i1j1i1 . . ' ILI • li1 II IL i Iiiii L ' ■ ' ' i•s: -I 1 • 0 .1 . . ..,: ___4. el;,..,f,11,11 . g, i w. ■ I 11 .1, 1 1, 1111':, 1, 11,11:11111 . 1 ---wy- . ..".: ..t a r „.[ •• . ' •CO p: ,, , '' , ',1:1■-it-itlill A. - - 4 ' 1- - , ' II li', 11-=='- : loll lilt , , = ,„, . .... 1;-• 1 ,,:l 1 (..) : • 0 1. .11 1 li 1 1110 ii : 1 , 1 1114 1 =MN t) 1 1 tiOti',I,',,Iirg A•Ipmr,l, , hill! 1111 ','1:, 1,1117VHi\,1 .. ,, •„,i ,,, , :. ,I, .„,, , I, .d. i p , , ,iiiii Is i,,,,p . II. , .-• .;I .- '..• '.,, ., 1.. 1 „,, imo_1.4.0,, . '1! 1 i•--- 1111 1 .- 1- - i' 1 t--"-e li I irovimrcuirti Ai li I I it i 0 liri, Ili;lt, '1410 ":1 ii IM11111,.. . : I ' ti• 11,11,1 ll C ii II fAo.F;i,,, 'ill Immo:ivs. '- .Z, • ""------.it'll 0 0 : . ' IIIA'.III ,I1'.Iii.1 all '11 AC.etil I1111 .1101 11 • " - ' •••••.,1 - .1. . 111' 1-111 , ........,,,, (.....) • - ,: ,i .1, ill 1,E1111 ,-..0 ill_i_111 .1".f. . 1 I . IT, -Id Ili '- --- II .,',1,11, ;HY I ca • - 1-, i• 5. •.:. i •• - 4 i 4: c): ' (1.1 ,1 41) I'll il iii Pi ,1.1.11 ••■ 0.r., , ... . a, ,e, 1 0011 . .U....1.11/. 1 ' • G • e . 1 ---i i0,Nu on.,r,r27_,, :.,1 ,--_=iiigi. al. -„„,•.._. i 1. , -,I S4 ' `' 14 1 111'.. • 1.,..t...:. - . 4 i li 1 - 1 ,,, ,,i -.-ii I ,..,. 11101)11111,1_, ,.1,,,,011,117z/oval ,,. ., ., ..... _ , VI I 1 - • it; 11 II apt II i■ 14= -. . w ti-i-* , 1 1,I I, '1M.'„,1'030111E10111 Lb 13 'h-g-rmWde ----.11').'.,..L4K — IVIIIIMIar4P-riLd • • -4,' -- ,.t....--e" %- 11 I i 11 f 1 I . I,1 I 1;;•=t Ir,IIIL iz , , .., _. ' '1 •.i4.,,N• _ l'il 'III - . -, - . WII-°71111--11,"I'. II. , -,V,t" , 1,1,r4wri.) 1;-I "tr\,./il *. d'''2 4-10,111.11 I I't'` 'i *is ' - • 1 I 1 1 . : ----- . R 111 ■ i I '! 1 l' 1..j.ina ! •' . N 0 ;* V I ‘f 1 i, I i ir41•1• 1 , Itt I l'i 11 i 1 :1 N 1P‘ ! li III 11:11 11 Im.. .. ' • 11 '''.11111 ' ,... till i , , iti. - *i--• .)• - , 4,:i li iiii li 11; it 11'1:1,;'Ill ■-•:: '. . — il 111 IF 1 1 IF el .. ',..f: ---',---- - bi 1 1 al i it I. 1 ' / . i !I III! li 1/11 111 1 1 • '1116.- '.'7,- 1 0614.46 1 41R 41 %I 1 •., ., .., 4 . . 1 t - I Y 5IS9 .m 197(Yg WWCII- 9 / 92Sb . - N99SR129IBYI RifSR9i9,'111 2999R-tits v4 az SAY OOII4VDON[WW NYS / ,y'-�\ S41OYJ�'BIY8Y0 NYS 90916 YJ'YtOYJtlY I' y C •W O'18lSMIV IS$t �I 7O 8I1S8'1'M Olt 'nr:v UM'1N'JINISR g 6 f • _ i SILVIDOSSV�'MU9aunz N'3/1 • ul 4110119 MOIS3Q 331 A111111 aSnoH A' kLV.l rIDinns 0f 20, a 3 g @ ft 1 4 '' E. P 6 R A l If- , i' R ° l A 1 ` t``y 01" o , i iti i f i f� , PI ;12 1 11 1 2 ;II IN li 4 ,10%.,,,aalkitsv,1(4---e, =toil. 1 ir ;riot Ivor i iygi 1 —.. ". ?oo o L,ill, 01.0 �s Z — o — : .a c W ! 11 04 1 " a "• �/ 1 F i ; ■ .. :a�;o� 0:o •`� a ii 11 £ z e ,411 fIs'�1I O 111 -' 0'+- . 04 1 8 • r---''' �►V -s rj • ICI `ii 0-- ,C '--1- H 1 �R� r F. k.is , L r�-=.._ 'I �.Y-Y-p:Y-Y�,I ��I i\` g�I Y 4 iv n a ° U:0000 i; I poi i`: 10 Y $ I• .Iii D+ -- ~ 1l�l� ❑ �`; o gksE sP3„ A E° ! a I° g ys 11 -1 I �_�J`9,:r 'ay J E‘: 1 r? I I§ 3 G pml yt ;IT i of i1 ■ ' v t ' � E4 Y !! F 3 " k 0 t f '. ":: 4 11 61 ili pp g h 1 1 Y r 4 &Likt_i• AI e � 3 L. 1541110v•■a e O @ t TT" , ', riSITA7,1"t;00000000-0e40.■ 11 1 I ' $ / 1- / 1PZ 1 ..IXIIII , J2 O A```_, .•,r'.�:,nvu�a,�__:, 1 . i II Ii t o�'3'':? 11Oi 1/. 0I�,''.�i , N` AOl 0 , ' a _ 1 s : Y 0 n % € ii� � 1 — 1 it $ �SzI Cl l ^ 1 ; 11P g 8� , �' r� Qy 1 T � a� B4 C I \�n1nlAI ' 8 S t { --- nu _ : wY 9 l� — — 8 y1'Ai,0:41iik' 1 i P 1 :31:/i 4 ii i it ii• I 1 1 i 1 n il 1 1 - j p 1 I 1 1 Fltiql i 161 1 il 1 II 0 li d ii i 11 1 - a U SYPO ONY7H91A 1� Q O , Y a / %. x 0 0 0 0601-1t9(PIL),XYJ O5OI-1L11(ttt)191 • — j M I6 r9'Y3be'OVO9 1.99/1x1 7 9L9 90016 V3'VOIVOdV I 9 } M aaNly1A�51MagOO 9 maInIgne MOP _ '3AIa0 SHVO ONVIHJIH OS£1. i gq f a 0_ ' V i .U A/01' M0 UN 1 11YD. - . -uouroo------- d Ia 6 1 I� - ' s j I / ,ti id Y T _ C as G ---- r/.- --,-,,... ,. ..,,_____,,, , _.,.. ti i , . . ,J 1 j1) e r,......r7:-:-:-..--,-.7::.:,....:.:.:.:\.,:..-9;:.,„. . .. i I k I .. • P 1^ t m:...T.,.,,,,... .,, , __., k , t. E I d a I e■. ..r y�-K� I�...© t, 1 'lf Y: Il I S Pi! 1. 6 r��/y ''..':,:;:.:%.• J K _u gy!I::` . 7� I�11.• .. �,. _ I ' a s° a+ i�,i._ :o a 8 1 1 'T -i• 1 i O k P® j a ®Ili \,A\ r-: 'I --s_I Lit F3 � $�._lf ,t "-I� L't tt X 1 s s, . , i ••11 " ' �f , \ ■I �\ ,:i., 1 I O 9 N I ' .•Z O m I *1Lm I ° i a 1< I a■ IT ` \ C .is. � 1 } I i t Wn? L `v` \•- \ , $I I 1 A I g I ° r m n al 1L,,,1 ' al\--\0"- - itt`,:-°3.4%1—‘ ':'-:,‘t i a i 0 u.a t!1F C \>1 , Z4°II L <m j 1`: o f I ,� 4-41;•,,H9--; Q ;I ks, O: ,G L- a I �i . �,I [ItW., :' ,'�,. YYY��I;;; 1g 'N I I I: } i ! 1`�...-_ ° �V. .r 4 .{{'ll III .: .1 :...) jl 8 ; __ - '58. 4 F3� � •• I Y R E T • l: ,g a (© y8 - j'• k I DADS n4° °° i v R g 5 5 2�g�$$ zi- 9:I . ."''' -n— R,,,,T. '.4 0. i= - ---- i 1W1 gillYg s2fvo €77l/V7f'.iIH g g Ir . ' 11111iiiilliiiliNhtiflikiiiiil LAW OFFICES OF APRIL A. VERLATO APRIL A. VERLATO 33 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE MAILING ADDRESS ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 POST OFFICE BOX 660309 (626) 445-2411 ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91066-0309 FAX (626) 445-8501 April 2, 2014 Thomas Li Associate Planner Arcadia City Hall 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91006 RE: 1350 Highland Oaks Drive Dear Mr. Li, The proposed Prairie Style single-family residence is architecturally inconsistent with the existing neighborhood. This neighborhood is primarily single-story Traditional Ranch homes and "Prairie Style" does not fit with the neighboring properties nor is it compatible . In addition the mass and scale of the proposed residence is not compatible with the existing residences in the neighborhood. The new residence across the street is grossly disproportionate to the neighboring properties but less offensive due to its position on a corner. I am requesting that the Architectural Review Board reject the proposed plan and request a design more consistent with the neighboring properties . Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF APRIL A. VERLATO . & ' . IL A. VERLATO, ESQ. AAV:ca JUN 0 i; l¢ May 28, 2014aF, City of Arcadia 240 W. Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91006 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPEAL Re : 1350 Highland Oaks Review No. : SFADR 14-03 APPLICANTS : April A. Seymour Carol Rosenthal Shwujing Jessica Liu Christine Eng I . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1350 Highland Oaks Drive faces west and is approximately 20, 521 sq. feet. The property backs up to Los Angeles County Public Works- Santa Anita Wash. The property is approximately 1/10 of a mile north of Sycamore Ave . Highland Oaks Dr. continues another mile before there is a break by another street on the east side . The property is primarily flat and rectangular shaped. The existing home is a very attractive, well-maintained Ranch home with cement board siding. The property to the north of 1350 is 1358 Highland Oaks . This property sits approximately 4 ' higher. The home at 1350 is a traditional Ranch that has been minimally altered with stacked veneer stonework that rises approximately 4 ' on the façade . The height of the home is approximately 15' . The property to the south of 1350 is 1348 Highland Oaks . It is a traditional Ranch house with nominal alterations . The façade is stucco with no veneers . The majority of the homes on Highland Oaks Dr. between Foothill Blvd. and Elkins Dr. are primarily traditional Ranch homes . Out of approximately 60 homes on the east side of Highland Oaks Dr. , there are only about 6 homes that are taller than 15' . This conservative height of the homes was intentional as there are views of the mountains to the north and east of these homes . 1 Attached as Exhibit A to this appeal is a photo of 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Attached as Exhibit B to this appeal is a photo of 1358 Highland Oaks Dr. Attached as Exhibit C to this appeal is a photo of 1342 Highland Oaks Dr. II . PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. is located within the Highlands Homeowner' s Association. Plans were submitted to the City for this proposed residence on 02/19/14 . A decision letter was issued on 04/08/14 . The Highlands Homeowners Association has an Architectural Review Board of at least 3 members as required by City of Arcadia Resolution 6770 . In violation of Resolution 6770, the plans for this structure were not approved by the Highlands Homeowners Association. The purpose of the Architectural Review Board for and by the Highlands Homeowners Association is to preserve the character and quality of its neighborhoods by requiring harmonious design and to protect property values . III . DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS Pursuant to Resolution 6770, Section 5, Paragraph C, notification shall be deemed to include at least the two parcels on each side of the parcel subject to plan approval, the five parcels facing the subject parcel, and the three parcels to the rear of the subject parcel . Unusually situated parcels, those where a second- story addition or modification is involved, or where the slope of the terrain might impact additional neighbors, may require additional parcels to be part of the required parcels to be notified. A noticed scheduled meeting is required pursuant to Paragraph E, deposited in the mail to applicant and all property owners within required notification area not less than 10 calendar days before the date of such meeting. Proper notice and meeting was not provided by the architectural review conducted by the City. A written comment period was provided by the City to noticed neighbors . The City received written objections to the proposed design. No action was taken by the City to address such written objections . In the words of the reviewer within City Planning, by the time the notice of written comment period was mailed out, the reviewer had already made design changes to the plans and there were no comments that could be made to 2 overturn an approval of the plans . In the words of the reviewer, the written comment period was a "courtesy" to neighbors to provide notice that a new home was going up . The reviewer looked only at the plans submitted and did not physically inspect or investigate the character of the neighborhood in which the proposed home was going into. The reviewer saw no pictures or renderings of any of the adjacent properties to determine the compatibility and harmony with existing structures . IV. INCOMPATIBILITY A. SITE PLANNING: The proposed project is inconsistent with the Site Planning Guidelines based on: 1 . The size and design is not visually harmonious and compatible with the character and quality of the surroundings . The proposed home is visually a much greater mass and dwarfs the much smaller homes on either side, adjacent to the proposed home . 2 . The height and bulk of the proposed home is not in scale and proportion with adjacent homes . The proposed structure is 28' high, with a 10' top plate on the first floor. There is no mark identifying the height of the plate on the second floor. The adjacent homes have a top plate of approximately 8 ' and do not exceed 15' in height . The varying heights creates a visual discord attracting the eye to the seemingly "jump up" in height . B. ENTRY: Consistent. C. MASSING: The proposed project is inconsistent with the Massing Guidelines based on: 1 . The front elevation lacks adequate articulation. The proposed second floor is directly above the first floor with no setback along the front elevation. The second floor appears as large as the first floor. 2 . The windows and doors along the front elevation emphasize a vertical line. They are all taller than their width. The adjacent homes have windows that are wider than they are tall . D . HEIGHT: The proposed project is inconsistent with the Height Guidelines based on: 3 The proposed home is 28 ' . Adjacent homes are no more than 15 ' high. This disparity of over 13 ' emphasizes the verticality of the proposed home, dwarfing adjacent homes . E. ROOF: Consistent . F. FACADE DESIGN: The proposed project is inconsistent with the Façade Design Guidelines based on: 1 . The proposed plan' s architectural style is "PRAIRIE. " The façade treatment relevant to this architectural style is inconsistent . "...on the exterior, Frank Lloyd Wright rejected traditional forms for simplified ahistoric lines and ornament, and an emphatic horizonality in broad eaves, dominant hipped roofs, and Roman Brick. " Alan Hess . The Ranch House (Harry N. Abrams, Inc . 2004) at page 20 . "Wright' s 1903 Prairie style house...exemplified these radical concepts . A relatively small one-story home with a broad-hipped roof spreading its eaves widely over brick walls, it clung to the ground. " Frank Lloyd Wright was quoted as saying "Houses should be married to the ground. " Diane Maddex. Wright-Sized Houses (Harry N. Abrams, Inc . 2003) at page 24 . "...he placed each house on a foundation - a platform - marked with a base course to emphasize where it began, wedding it to the Earth. Horizontal planes, which he called `the true earth-line of human life, indicative of freedom, ' were stressed with bands of dark wood on light stucco or rows of siding parallel to the ground. Mortar between courses of brick was raked to emphasize the horizontal, and vertical joints were colored to match and troweled flush to minimize their importance. " "The cantilever, an architectural projection reaching well beyond its base of support was Wright' s chief tool for holding the horizontal line . " Id at 27 . The proposed home uses stacked stone veneer. This is wholly inconsistent with prairie style . A long, skinny brick should be used to emphasize a horizontal line . G. DETAIL: Consistent . H. MATERIALS AND COLORS : Consistent . I . LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE : The proposed project is inconsistent with the Landscape/Hardscape Guidelines based on: The proposed plan does not provide landscaping consistent with native plant species inherent with the architectural style of Prairie . The proposed plan introduces a non-native olive tree in the front yard that has a grey tone to it . This color clashes with the general color scheme of the prairie style which is natural and 4 earth tones . French lavender repeats the grey and Mediterranean landscape which is inconsistent with Prairie . J. FENCES/WALLS : The proposed project is inconsistent with the Fences/Walls Guidelines based on: There is no indication of the style or color of the proposed new vinyl fencing. Although it conforms in height, white vinyl fencing would be inconsistent and create a visual disconnect in the color scheme of the proposed residence. K. AFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS : There are many full-sized windows on both sides of the second- story of the proposed new home . There is a complete disregard for the privacy and views of the neighboring homes . The proposed home completely eliminates views of the mountains for 1342 Highland Oaks to the north. These views are highly valued in the Highlands and a main source of property value . IV. CONCLUSION The proposed plan for 1350 Highland Oaks violates the principles of harmony and compatibility as it relates to adjacent homes . It will create a visual "dwarfing" of adjacent homes . This discord will cause a decrease in property values . The proposed structure should be denied based on a lack of compatibility and harmony. le 4.. - sripre- 04-6 Respectfully Submitted, BY � ► , "' � �_. f.pril A eymour Y (7147 lan. Oa. Dr. B miii.-AP Name .410 L 1 $ Address l vy .10.Q,) "'" 61914-S By Name (vtcil� �csl"(� L4- Address m(A-oto-a- , e% ' ti, v,70 5 CJ ) icyt la earth tones . French lavender repeats the grey and Mediterranean landscape which is inconsistent with Prairie . J. FENCES/WALLS: The proposed project is inconsistent with the Fences/Walls Guidelines based on: There is no indication of the style or color of the proposed new vinyl fencing. Although it conforms in height, white vinyl fencing would be inconsistent and create a visual disconnect in the color scheme of the proposed residence . K. AFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS : There are many full-sized windows on both sides of the second- story of the proposed new home . There is a complete disregard for the privacy and views of the neighboring homes . The proposed home completely eliminates views of the mountains for 1342 Highland Oaks to the north. These views are highly valued in the Highlands and a main source of property value . IV. CONCLUSION The proposed plan for 1350 Highland Oaks violates the principles of harmony and compatibility as it relates to adjacent homes . It will create a visual "dwarfing" of adjacent homes . This discord will cause a decrease in property values . The proposed structure should be denied based on a lack of compatibility and harmony. Respectfully Submitted, C By RECEIVED April A. Seymour 1614 Highland Oaks Dr. By Ga JUN o62014 £'t' Cme N Address 1.5_cg 44/6440t4a ()A-ks• j• Planning Services � n City of Arcadia By • C,- -- Name S ; ,t- afN Address l3cf ,f� ip�,j 04*S fit., 5 a . I 1. .c. 1'.. ,q ~ 1 f5'wk., ,, f, 4`: fir,. - .le:t.g,,,,.N. i ...?'..!V ,I'-,'•.‘;..,i A TAfo. ..,%,\,.2;4 i..4. .....•,,,."-. , ' , ‘ , 1 SI- y y• .. yy� , R' k,• • t r • 1 r 1's '.v , to -gnSMi ....t. :L: r r nr EXHIBIT A - • • • .v ' r A D" t, 5 .,,kk ' -, ': ..7.: ',... .,,,,,,,,r1,1$114„-,,,,,,.':..',,t ',.*„ _ ,.: . A a '''''''""...„01i,„„. . .w - EXHIBIT B • ■ 4 t1 r _ �_______ _ 7. • yR • EXHIBIT C ...., Protected Tree Report: Tree Survey, Encroachment, el c � � Protection and Mitigation w g V m C O X U 1350 Highland Oaks Drive Arcadia 91006 Prepared For: Mr. Robert Tong Sanyao International, Inc. 255 E. Santa Clara Street, #200 Arcadia CA 91006 Tel: (626) 446-8048 Fax: (626) 446-7090 Email: Sanyao888 @aol.com Prepared By: Michael Crane Arbor Care, Inc. P.O. Box 51122 Pasadena, CA 91115 Tel: (626) 737-4007 Fax: (626) 737-4007 Email: info @arborcareinc.net January 2014 2r/Kp\ 112v. 14-04 Table of Contents Summary of Data 1 Background and Purpose of Report 1 Project Location and Description 2 Observations&Analysis 4 Tree Characteristics&Health Matrix 5 Construction Impact Matrix 6 Findings 8 Further Recommendations. . 8 Appendix A-Photos 9 Appendix B -Protected Tree Construction Impact Guidelines 14 Author's Certifications 20 Certification of Performance 21 Topographic Site Plan Pocket at back Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 SUMMARY OF DATA Total number of live Protected Trees on property including street trees located in the adjacent public right-of-way area 3 Total number of off-site Protected Trees with canopies(driplines) encroaching onto the property 6 Total number of dead or nearly dead Protected Trees on site 0 Total number of live Protected Trees to be preserved 9 Total number of live Protected Trees to be removed 0 Total number of Protected Trees to be relocated to on-site locations 0 Total number of Protected Trees to be impacted by construction within dripline (encroached) 9 Total number of live Protected Trees with no dripline encroachments 0 Total number of proposed mitigation trees to be planted on site 0 BACKGROUND & PURPOSE I was retained by the Project Manager, Mr. Robert Tong of Sanyao International, Inc.to be the consulting arborist for the planned redevelopment of the property located at 1350 Highland Oaks Dr.,Arcadia. There are Protected Trees located on the property, in the public right-of-way adjacent to the property, and encroaching over the property from off-site. The proposed construction may impact these trees and this report will serve to both notify the City of Pasadena Planning Division of the extent of the potential impacts as well as to inform the builder of the proper protection measures which must be taken in order to preserve the trees. As part of my preparation for this report I made a site visit to the property on January 17,2014. I met with Mr. Tong at that time to view and discuss the proposed construction plans as they relate to the preservation of the Protected Trees. 1 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 PROJECT LOCATION, DESCRIPTION & TREE ORDINANCE Ali' 4 U s_ev:3 7'72 64'd b.>, m "ail. �, O , 2 E _ r c;6 crtas� s 4. N 'e'�'Orange Owe Avr "�`tj K S Sl x . la.� _ s I"t x � 71 1 gi--'' '' ^7 CftSrer"D; t}} �` a .'JiA tjarc,n.'e Q. a L e` k y r ems ; L N.SreainlwaAe ESyc.u.....rf.Ave r'. S ti k 'I v'Foothill Blvd E Footni B,vO Ti x '�M'Floral Ave ;t�el Are F F a•ai Ave ui ; rnwi�wai 1GOCf1 Etores"Avc Z The property is located at 1350 Highland Oaks Dr., Arcadia; two blocks east of Santa Anita Ave. and two blocks north of Foothill Blvd. Above map courtesy of Mapquest.corn. The property consists of a single-family residence that appears to be in fair condition. The home will be demolished and the entire property redeveloped into a single family home. The landscape in in good condition and appears to have been well maintained for many years. The Protected Oak Trees on and off-site appear to be in good health and condition. The trees will be incorporated into the new landscape 2 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 t w , 4°'''' ' 4 ** i 4081 rr N. 3 �" I " y ,., , It } 1 . y 5' 4. . ., )'`-' qua,_ { ?!'T '� „��� v. L_fif __ ihiu., " i This aerial view (courtesy of Google Maps) has been illustrated to show the approximate boundary lines (orange). The majority of the canopy visible in the photo consists of Protected Oak Trees. City of Arcadia Tree Ordinance On January 21, 1992 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1962 recognizing oak trees as significant aesthetic and ecological resources and establishing criteria for the preservation of oak trees. The regulations(Chapter 7 of the Arcadia Municipal Code)provide that the following oak trees shall not be removed,relocated, damaged, or have their protected zones encroached upon unless an Oak Tree Permit is granted: • Engelmann Oaks(Quercus engelmannii) or Coast Live Oak, California Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia)which have a trunk diameter larger than four(4)inches measured at a point four and one half(4 'A)feet above the crown root, or, two(2) or more trunks measuring three(3)inches each or greater in diameter, measured at a point four and one half(4 'A) feet above the crown root. • Any other living oak tree with a trunk diameter larger than twelve (12)inches measured at a point four and one half(4 'A) feet above the crown root, or,two(2)or more trunks measuring ten(10)inches each or greater in diameter measured at a point four and one half(4 'A) feet above the crown root. 3 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 FIELD OBSERVATIONS & DESIGN ANALYSIS Refer to Site Plan located in pocket at back of this report,Tree Characteristics and Health Matrix on page 5,Construction Impacts Matrix on page 6 and Photos in Appendix A,page 8. The two Protected Trees on site are in good health and condition. They differ greatly in age. The street tree is very young and the oak tree in the front yard area is mature. No close-up inspection was done on the offsite tree,but it appears to be in good condition judging by its crown. Trees#1 & #2: Tree#1 is located a few feet off-site and Tree#2 in on the property line. They are in a landscaped area with no hardscape in their driplines. The new design is similar with no encroaching hardscape and an oak-friendly landscape. Tree#3: Located a few feet off-site. The existing landscape shrubs located on the property line will remain. The existing driveway that encroached the dripline will be removed and replaced in the same footprint. Tree#4: Located on the south property line,within ten feet of the corner of the existing home. The new home will be set further from the tree than the existing one so root zone impacts from excavation and compaction will be very minor. Tree#5: Located ten feet off-site. The existing property line fence will be replaced,but it will have a similar design that is set on posts with no continuous footing. A new pool will encroach. All required excavation is well outside the critical root zone. Trees#6& #7: Located on the east property line that borders a wash and walking trail. The existing property line fence will be replaced,but it will have a similar design that is set on posts with no continuous footing. A new pool will slightly encroach Tree#6. All required excavation is well outside the critical root zone. Trees#8 &#9: Located just off-site on the property to the north. A concrete block wall with a continuous footing runs along the property line and this footing has acted as a good root barrier and will buffer the trees from construction impacts in their rootzones. The wall is planned to be removed and replaced with a fence set on posts spaced eight feet on center. The new home will be within the same footprint as the existing one. No pruning of the live crown will be required to accommodate the second story roofline. 4 1011 11EHLO/10011 g � cp7 Q 2IOOd 0_. .-. N ' U 5 0 GOOD x X X X X X X X X N .' AVOW CIOOM o I . 0 w W co 1100c1' o ° 3I ° � - � ° 'IVIAI11oN XXXXXXXXX b w x .› 4 Q; )IDVHHICI DIMI a,c m Q. p [--1 0 pct 2IOOd o 0 gDV I Ad C x C C C X x C >- a �'75 1NgSg11d g T VG a 0-4 r~ 8 IDaSNI WO aSVHSICI a0 w gS11ddS c ° r., a la4 C4 IWW21ON XXXXXXXXX W , 0 o �11ILL�'YV11gAO cn on 0 Qa g11f11VIN XXXXXXXXX U rA V 0 c JNf1OA U V U Clgsg11ddfls N Pa 1NVNIWOCI-OD X X X X X X o 0 U INVNINIOCI X X X 1. w 'b JflI MAIMIS V X X a) a i t U Ow OI111gN VIAS X X X X X X X Q (1gg3) o O O .n .n n kn n v) gdS g9d2I1Ad M N d' M "1t M M M M N (1gg3) kn kr) o o O kn v') v) v) 1HDI II g1dWIX011ddd M M 'r d M M M M H c4 0 I.°' U (SgHnNI) _ �t O O O �t o0 00 k/ N 0 �, w Ia1awvICI NNf1 n, N N M M M .-+ C el..- „5 ra z --� 0 U ° ww ° ° ° ° ° °c 4w 4w 4w > ° a. c c c aS cl a” RI mt cl bEI CA V) v) CI) V) CA c r W '4 40 00000000U = = 00000 p aaaaaaaaa 11gEMIf1.N gg2LL N M �t kr) 'C n 00 C", w d d d d d 0 SWAOW0J gouuiq .J o T s no jo io a u r a m Z Z Z Z Z 2 Fs' 4 paimbai iaiaureip ui a ° ue loam! sino, o I0' uin 0 0 0 0 0 o rg „£ u� i I 9 N o c E O �uiuna s , a U %0£ Paaaxa of ;ou d � ¢ Q cll a a %Oi Paaaxa 03 boa Saianad I Ox o � 5 b U 0 paambaM 2uiun.id ow t 2 b o paaanas JO panowaa 0'q of 0 0 0 0 �, -+ - N N O Q Meal 1oo.I ie�o1 Jo % pa3eurt3sg v v v v g °'• `� aulidpp u-wm J11000 01 daap „9 �, „ H ueq ssai 2uipeiS 3q2Ii ieuomppV Et 0 o, U ( a • ) o 1 H 300.1 ay; yaeoaaua lllM uol3eneaxg a, c..) 'tonal U10.11 HgQ X £ ;seal le Jo 0 o 0 aaav sip a uieaial llIM uoD*Aeaxa cn A-' N 0'J HUG X 01 Oval lu.0 ° , 0 6aX 1 Z a4 o.m onarse LJui .ui3sixa q pa zajjnq M Cl) W o g O 0'i soei R b — ti 0 f ) H an000 iiiM (aadaap 0'o sagoui xis) z z w z T) U uoi�eneoxa aaa1M aan Jo sapIs g Z - - "0 b "0 • H � 0 NOIIIQNO3 0 0 c0 c c H.H Z . 2 b 8 O (HgQ) 2ialMAiVIU NINf12II N o 0 0 . 4.3 g U O▪ g 0' Q., U - 0 0 0 W 0 U c) W cal CCI 4 U 8 .4 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' QaCf'All lN g0' I1 r'^ N M 'It kn 0 sjenotuar gaueaq JoJ sum Jo Jolatuum z z z z q pai!nbai is;atueTp u! go 4 c o, ��£ uetj;Ia�.ij Sena Jo aagtunN o 0 0 0 Yb O a a U %0£ paaaxa o; ;ou 2u!unJd.. goo w Io a a% OI paaaxa o; ;ou SUTUnad 2 u 4) paa!nbag 2u!Unad oN WxT) .2 • paaanas JO panotua z aq o; o 0 0 0 ssU'tu 300.1 p10)40 % paW1.1.1 ;sH v v v v a0 augdu rp U!q inn maao of daap „q uep ssaj 2unpE tB it!$!! Ieuomppv IH now:.301,1N .10 1c tU(l azi e a. [--1 tuna; tuoaj Imo x £) a;ul' ;oo Q .1 ay; yauoaaua II!M uo!;eneaxa 'mull wo.r sea e JO � � 3HgQX £; I ; 3 v) 0 aaUe;s!p u uwuwaa IIIM 110.9ent3Xa [--4 H Muni; num.; Hnu X O I ;seal ;e Jo aPi a m;an.T;sugu! :u!;s!xa q pa iojjnq a.E s3aedm U J OUeneaxa a.Tat4M sapTs ('' c' I I moo() !pm (iadaap Jo sagau! xis) Z uoT;eneaxa OJa4M aa.T;Jo sapis 3 ' v) O �I "C3 -C b O NOILIOD c"? 7 � 0 c c A NzH O (HERD 2na vie INInxS ° °° "° c z O c' U c.--; -(3. w w w W A-. czi at cd al V ) ; c r r ��. aaaoa 2IaHW11■ HMI! c r 00 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 FINDINGS As with many construction projects, soil compaction is the most preventable impact that will need to be monitored in order to provide reliable protection and long-term preservation of the trees. To prevent unnecessary soil compaction a protective fence must be installed around the Protected Trees before any demolition occurs. The goal is to enclose the largest possible amount of space underneath the tree so that the heavy equipment required for demolition and construction can be routed away from root zones. The recommended fence placements are drawn in dashed lines on the Site Plan of this report. The main haul route for the demolition phase and into most of the construction phase shall be the existing driveway. The removal of the hardscape and existing plants near the Protected Trees shall be done by hand. No rototilling or other deep cultivation or grading shall occur within the driplines. Refer to the Construction Impact Guidelines in Appendix B for important general preservation measures concerning the different elements of this project. FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS • Prior to demolition the contractor and consulting arborist shall meet on site to make sure fences are properly placed and installed and to review the goals for the tree protection plan. The location of the protective fences are drawn with a dashed line on the Site Plan included in this report. • Tree Protection Zone fences shall be at least four feet tall and constructed of chain link fencing secured on metal posts. • The fenced protection zones may be altered during construction;however,any alterations of the fenced protection zones must be approved by the arborist of record. • Maintain the fence throughout the completion of the project. No staging of materials or equipment or washing-out is to occur within the fenced protected zone. • If any injury whatsoever should occur to any Protected or preserved tree, call the consulting arborist immediately. Timeliness is critical to being able to provide the best mitigation treatment for injuries. 8 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 APPENDIX A —Photos ,4 ,1 ,. ,- x. r 'i,'. z * 5' L 4 r p r" ?`yam. -,`,4r., 2 1 , , „ ,....,, ., _...,„...... ,.. „_ . ,,..s , ........ ..., w.:. , maimmkminsillit if, say gi l!! a° s ABOVE: Trees #1 and #2 Taken facing east from the street. Landscape renovations will encroach on them. BELOW: Looking east at Tree #3 fr om the street. The driveway will be replaced in the same footprint. d '':9"'6 1 4'4;• tk3` , , *yam Rt,:. r iiT «f•.,.:..., y . ma , , 9� b`./ 3, y • 4 • .V t A, K, ,.-,'.a. � ,.sue ._.,. 4 4.44 9 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 � 4 V4''r, ,t' rE. A0. :s, ;' ' � '� -, J =em ikt u' A- f. ,�Yoe F i f a _ s ! it C',' ., ,' - , V 41 t `a r y ,, :`,..4...:::,...\n . `\_r 'M.....—r--.` v.. jw s._ate. -� r k ry, i J el:'._ k „m, it PHOTO: Tree #4 is located on the property line. The foundation of the new home will be set further from the tree than the existing one. Photo taken facing south from the front yard. 10 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 P. . ,4*.e 7 . yr. �,� * 4 . 44". 44,: '', .' ''''''k yojet, f„.:'!"1,44d.,I11 ,•1+ s. " 9r" i fF 0.141 /1" . ' ,i ,. ' •rod _ , am it , k .cam -- , r 0. . M I_T , 4:r , ;,,,,�� , ,1r, a I a'�. 1# � P p I Te i .g q o. , ,I Otit yp ,,Mt d 11 tk n rr PHOTO: Looking west at the existing house from the south property line. Tree #5 encroaches over. The fence along the property line will be replaced with a vinyl fence set on posts, similar to the design of the existing one. No pruning is required to complete the project. 11 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 i 44' 7 /#°',* { PHOTO: Looking east at Trees #6 and #7. They are located behind the fence on the property line. The area behind the fence is a wash and walking trail. The chain link fence will be replaced with a wrought iron fence with a similar design. 12 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 - .S i /X. 9:, 4 • -k milk , - i ill ,. . ... 4 1 i J i .1: ' `; , t i 11144 -1,-Iii 1,1',ts ;int, mow .++.., ABOVE: Looking north at Trees #8 and #9 from the back yard. The trees are located off site. BELOW: A concrete wall with a continuous footing separates the trees from the property. The new home will be within the footprint of the existing one. The wall will be removed and replaced with a fence set on posts. y r^' 't $ •. yC t °II'iti ",-,t ' - 1 ih,F4. , , 4. ; :,.v sk ' A; l ; I 1 e r, 4 / S Y44, d l �. w ,9 : h i, u �' .• ' " 13 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 APPENDIX B - Protected Tree Construction Impact Guidelines Size and Distribution of Tree Roots—Taken from Arboriculture, Integrated Management of Landscape Trees Shrubs and Vines. Harris,R.W.,Clark, J.W.,Matheny N.P. Prentice Hall 2004. Roots of most plants, including large trees, grow primarily in the top meter(3 ft) of soil (see figure below). Most plants concentrate the majority of their small absorbing roots in the upper 150 mm(6 in.)of soil if the surface is protected by a mulch or forest litter. In the absence of a protective mulch, exposed bare soil can become so hot near the surface that roots do not grow in the upper 200 to 250 mm(8 to 10 in.). Under forest and many landscape situations,however, soil near the surface is most favorable for root growth. In addition, roots tend to grow at about the same soil depth regardless of the slope of the soil surface. Although root growth is greatly influenced by soil conditions, individual roots seem to have an inherent guidance mechanism. Large roots with vigorous tips usually grow horizontally. Similar roots lateral to the large roots grow at many angles to the vertical, and some grow up into the surface soil. However,few roots in a root system actually grow down. Delft In K �R Depth in matlra I ' 1.5 FIGURE In mature trees,the taproot is either lost or reduced in size.The vast majority of the root system is composed of horizdnta ly oriented lateral roots. 14 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 The importance of soil Soil supports and anchors tree roots and provides water, minerals and oxygen. Furthermore, soil is a habitat for soil microorganisms that enhance root function. A soil's ability to sustain tree growth is largely determined by its texture, structure (bulk density), organic matter,water and mineral content, salinity,aeration,and soil-microbe abundance and diversity. Soil physical properties Soil texture—the relative proportion of sand, silt and clay, is important because it affects water—and nutrient-holding capacity, drainage and aeration(gaseous diffusion). Soil structure is the arrangement of individual soil particles into clumps(aggregates). The net result is the formulation of larger voids between the aggregates which serve as channels for gaseous diffusion,movement of water and root penetration. Unfortunately, soil aggregates are readily destroyed by activities that compact the soil(increase bulk density). When this occurs, gaseous exchange,permeability, drainage and root growth are restricted. The influence of the organic matter content of soil properties is quiet significant. Its decomposition by soil organisms releases substances that bind soil particles into larger granules,which improves both soil aeration, and drainage. In essence,the breakdown of organic matter improves water—and nutrient-holding capacity and reduces bulk density. Furthermore, it is the primary source of nitrogen and a major source of nitrogen and a major source of phosphorus and sulfur. Without organic matter soil organisms could not survive and most biochemical processes in the soil would cease. Soil aeration,the movement and the availability of oxygen, is determined by both soil texture and structure. In general, compacted and finer soils, due to a higher proportion of small pore spaces(micropores),tend to drain slowly and hold less air than coarser, sandy, or well-structured find soils. Water retained in the small pores displaces oxygen and inhibits gaseous diffusion. The availability of soil water is largely determined by the size of the pore spaces between the soil particles and the larger aggregates in which water is held. Most of the water in the larger pore spaces drains readily due to gravitational forces. A relatively thin film of water,which is readily available to plant roots,remains following drainage. Much of water held within the smaller pore spaces resists uptake by plant roots because it is held tightly on the soil surfaces. Plant roots require an adequate supply of oxygen for development. Injury or dysfunction results when oxygen availability drops below a critical level. Root respiration is the first process to be restricted, followed by disruptions in growth,metabolism,nutrient and water uptake,and photosynthesis. Furthermore,the accumulation of high levels of 15 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 carbon dioxide,produced by the roots during respiration can also impair root function. Reduced soil aeration resulting from soil compaction, flooding, excess irrigation, or impervious pavement favors the development of crown rot(Phytophthora root disease). It also inhibits mycorrhizal fungi that enhance water and nutrient uptake and resist root pathogens. The forest floor under a canopy in most undeveloped forests and woodland settings is typically covered by a layer of fallen leaves and other woody debris. It is usually cool, shady,well-aerated, and relatively moist—conditions that favor normal root growth. When the natural leaf litter is removed and when a tree's lower canopy is pruned up to provide clearance,the absorbing roots in the upper few inches of the soil experience higher soil temperatures and increased desiccation due to direct exposure to sunlight. Minimizing the Effects of Construction and Development on Tree Root Systems Activities that injure roots or adversely affect the root zone should be avoided or kept as far from the trunk as possible. Design changes or alternative building practices that avoid or minimize construction-related impacts should be considered and proposed when applicable. Soil Compaction Soils are intentionally compacted under structures, sidewalks,reads,parking areas, and load-bearing fill to prevent subsidence,and to prevent soil movement on slopes. Although unintentional, soil within the root zone of trees is often compacted by unrestricted foot traffic,parking of vehicles, operation of heavy equipment, and during installation of fill. Compaction destroys the soil's natural porosity by eliminating much of the air space contained within it. It leaves the soil hardm impenetrable and largely unfavorable for root growth. The soil's natural porosity, which allows for water movement and storage, gaseous exchange,and root penetration, is greatly reduced. Consequently, root growth and tree health suffer. Soil compaction is best managed by preventing it. Bulk density is used to describe a soil's porosity,or the amount of space between soil particles and aggregates. High bulk densities indicate a low percentage of total pore space. Pavement Paving over the root systems of trees is another serious problem because it reduces the gaseous diffusion and soil moisture. Most paving materials are relatively impervious to water penetration and typically divert water away from a tree's root zone. Cracks and expansion joints do,though, allow for some water infiltration into the soil below. Of greater concern, is the loss of roots from excavation to achieve the required grade, and the necessary compaction to prevent subsidence. Once the soil surface is compacted, a 16 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 base material is then added and compacted as well. With that done,the surface can then be paved. Thus,pavement within the root zones of trees can damage roots and create unfavorable soil conditions. One alternative to minimize pavement impacts is to consider placing the pavement on the natural grade over a layer of minimally compacted base material. To reduce sub-grade compaction, consider using reinforced concrete or asphalt over a goetextile blanket to help stabilize the soil. On-grade patios or paving that covers more than one-third of the tree protection zone (TPZ) should be constructed using permeable materials that allow aeration and water penetration. Soil under permeable surfaces should not be compacted to more than 80 percent. Excavation and root pruning Excavation within the root zones of trees should be avoided as much as possible. The extent of root pruning(selective) or cutting (non-selective) should be based on the species growth characteristics and adaptive traits, environmental conditions, age,health, crown size, density, live crown ration and structural condition of the tree. The timing of the root pruning or cutting is another important consideration. Moderate to severe root loss during droughts or particularly hot periods can cause serious water-deficit injury or death. When root pruning/cutting is unavoidable,roots should be pruned or cut as far from the trunk as possible. Cutting roots on more than one side of a tree should also be avoided. Root cutting extending more than half-way around a tree should generally be no closer than about 10 times the trunk diameter. Recommended distances range from as little as 6 times trunk diameter(DBH) for young trees to 12 times trunk diameter for mature trees. The size of the TPZ should,however,be increased for over mature and declining trees and species that are sensitive to root loss. The minimum distance from the trunk that roots can be cut on one side of the tree without destabilizing it, is a distance equal to about three times the diameter(DBH)of the trunk. Roots severed within that distance provide little or no structural support. Root pruning or cutting distances from the trunk should be greater for trees that lean and/or those growing on shallow or wet soil. In cases where the proposed grading will adversely affect trees designated for retention, special attention should be given to proper root pruning and post-construction care for injured trees. Where structural footings are required for foundations,retaining walls,etc., and roots larger than 2 inches in diameter will be impacted, consider design changes or alternative building methods. When excavation within 5 times trunk diameter is unavoidable,roots greater than 1 '/2 inches in diameter should be located prior to excavation and then pruned to avoid unnecessary damage. Hand-digging or use of a hydraulic or pneumatic soil excavation tool is the least disruptive way to locate roots for pruning. Although mechanical root pruners make clean cuts,they are non-selective. A backhoe bucket, dozer blade or 17 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 trencher will typically pull,rip or shatter the larger root, causing additional damage toward the tree. Once the roots that interfere with the structure being built, e.g., foundations, footings,retaining wall, curbs, etc., are exposed,they should then be cut perpendicular to their long axis using a hand-saw, `carbide-tipped chainsaw' or sharp ax, depending on size. Roots that are pruned in this manner typically regenerate new roots from near the cut. Roots exposed by excavation should be protected from exposure to sun and desiccation. Exposed roots that can not be covered with soil by the end of the day should be covered with moistened burlap or similar material. Roots can generally be cut in a non-selective manner when excavating near of beyond the dripline. Ripped, splintered or fractured portions of roots however, should be re-cut. The damaged portion should be removed using sharp tools. The cut should be flat across the root with the adjacent bark intact. Wound dressings should not be applied to pruned or damaged roots except when recommended for disease, insect or sprout control. The best approach to avoid water-deficit injury following root loss during the growing season is to provide ample irrigation. Irrigation should be considered prior to, during, and after root pruning. Watering schedules should also consider local soil conditions, climate,topography,time of year, species adaptability, extent of root pruning and tree health. If possible, irrigate the tree 7 to 10 days prior to excavation so that there is an adequate reservoir of soil water. Water can be delivered to large construction sites via water-tank trucks and applied directly to affected trees or stored nearby in plastic tanks. On relatively flat terrain, a 6 to 8 inch soil berm at the tree's dripline should be constructed to act as a watering basin. On steep terrain, soaker hoses should be used. They can be placed across the slope or spirally around the trunk, from about six feet away to the dripline. In addition, a two to four inch layer of wood chip mulch should be applied to as much of the root zone as possible to retard soil water loss. Pruning foliage to compensate for root loss is not supported by scientific research and likely to result in slower recovery. Fertilization to stimulate root growth is generally unwarranted and may be counterproductive. Trenching within the Tree Protection Zone Trenching for underground utilities should be routed around the TPZ. When this is unavoidable,trenching within the TPZ should be done by `hand' or using a pneumatic or hydraulic soil excavation tool, carefully working around larger roots. Roots larger than 1 '/z inches in diameter should not be cut. Dig below these roots to route utilities or install drains. A combination of tools can also produce satisfactory results, for example, a skillful backhoe operator under the arborist's supervision can dig down several inches at a time and detect larger roots by `feel' (resistance). At that point, as assistant can expose the root and dig around it. In this manner,the backhoe can then continue extending the trench though the TPZ. Tunneling (boring)through the TPZ is the preferable alternative. For most large trees,tunneling depth should be at least 36 inches. Tunneling should begin at the edge of the TPZ, but no closer than a distance equal to one foot of clearance for each inch of tree DBH. Tunnels should also be offset to either side 18 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 of the trunk. For trenching that extends only part way into TPZ, consider trenching radially to the tree trunk, as this is less harmful than tangential trenching. All trenches made within the TPZ should be backfilled as quickly as possible to prevent root and soil desiccation. Managing Root Injured Trees Root-pruned trees should be monitored for symptoms of water-deficit injury for a specified period following root pruning. Irrigation should be considered prior to,during, and after root pruning. Irrigation schedules should consider local soil conditions,climate, topography,time of year, species tolerance, extent of root pruning and tree health. Grade Change: Fill Soil Fill soil placed within the root zones of trees can have an adverse effect,particularly if the soil is compacted to support a structure or pavement. Soil compaction reduces aeration and water infiltration. Fill soil, die to textural changes, can also prevent water from penetrating the original soil layer below where the roots are. Furthermore, soil placed against the root crown and lower trunk can lead to root disease problems, especially if the soil near the trunk remains moist during the summer from irrigation. Alternatives to placing fills over roots zones shall be considered and proposed as appropriate. 19 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 AUTHOR'S CURRENT CREDENTIALS (147 X X s� {( ._ 4 Pr 1 o n [► 0 x� ' '� t,3 gg Fg Q 5 d sad } - `gym im8 $ A mi AD it s ��' .... . .,... : p. / z 3 :' Y rd is a A E t o, E J ? ` di d' ?P w. 4 ‘.... .44. _ E iP a Q trS p,i ,7 ilPri 1 yr; 0 0 I tp! a+, r. Yzz W = v t g °I - ! :M Q *Iv /..ice k - . C Q 0 -4 f s - m s a . € .t aL X t Q Cat g l X Lea 0 0, 0 -V d .0. --ft tei In s y d I z c -113 t a e. ; .r to '�-- v ; +,- w f i.. s Z 1- r _ N Q X I[! N U 3e At .3 V r= � t^ 7 JUZ 4 MI / I a. - C a 03 r `,,� e Q ? N ^o a. a. a o a. 2 a. 20 Protected Tree Report: Survey Encroachment and Protection Plan 1350 Highland Oaks Dr. Arcadia 91006 Michael Crane,RCA#440.January 2014 CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE I,Michael Crane,certify that: • I have personally inspected the tree(s) and the property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. • I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis,opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. • My analysis,opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. • No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party not upon the results of the assessment,the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and the International Society of Arboriculture. I have been involved in the field of Horticulture in a full-time capacity for a period of more than 15 years. 2 L __ i Signed: Registered Consulting Arborist#440; American Society of Consulting Arborist Board Certified Master Arborist#WE 6643B;International Society of Arboriculture Licensed California Agricultural Pest Control Adviser#AA08269 January 24, 2014 cx61. Ci, Date: 00113 11Ical&f°4 1 y 21 $44444 •nyn lauxu•ono,two nt rrn'•omva'•••w'nmb•mm•c•am !7 SS � ' y^1 •=W...I.I•Pw01M1• . ......ii,,',. Y J VIO Y oav 1 if •ONI T/NOLLVNa31Nl ovANvs ';r`,;t`,,,,,P r as SNVO ONV1HOIH Ofti _ F= !_ =,, 3Sf1OH AIINIVd 31ONIS 1 1 ! 1 a i eel 1_ N € I� �q � re et 5t:I k1Jf ga I II Nitglq ;' !I11 I ii 5 4 g N i 1 I `„-4 .I €I y 81 _ 1'y I , I I } I %1I I1 I� rf I S i, I NO QI/ qQ . Pi_ v III ,I � I�, ��� k I r p�l� -(.2- It th ;II w..— gi Mi i • P 1 I i*e g i g : `r.* . 1 l '. ,;4 �_ !000 l 1 ire* a I $ u i iliw 1 � rllellII tii. ta. ideY fa1 = '7_,V, 1 � J. dm r �p r �—H i ` �! � r 1 rIM� f 4WWI - J l �� i 4 111 4 I L�__1 }II r I --� aa:-�� 'JI1IIjJIJ RW@ 1 -I w 8. r is III, ` onlic\ 1 --_ ' — — frF 1 :Al r 1 a III �� -� 11 I �NE It o- / g s i a `-� I , ,- 12, r :111 ! a =h_ e�__ �= 1 6R II i tillIlt• " t(724� , ,` 1p 4,1/it rgi IN Br i r: �i spi I 4a1 gp y • . I ' ,.// 111111:-I I �g1 t� "O i ini 1' �IiI W 1 (rr P1utJtm ,I' A\' , a it rr _ �_I�� `�;', �.; riril i�r a#� li 10111111111 r �gl� �.�,�,' F, =gyp;N4 • 191 Nir rl;>g i i 1. 8 19 iii iff is._, a ire=1 �L_�� ,a te r , 11 IR 9i a 1g 11 Mal e1,r ar .a e4 1�r 1 � ■.J r1 it '!r { N�� �- '/ ❑. p- =.11 �irrr�! �Rle..il f Sri Sri ila� 1; �E i r 4f . 1 I � .iier6d.i lr�j r��a ie i�r r�e 'l.g; it � , I � �a: . i'. � �' a R R a ❑ „� �p 111111d im% ; FT IIiJiiIIIiIji IIJ iIi1I1 pi '!.' 1 iI 0't� I • ! 1 ii : _, r ,' r p d r.� r iii_ i =s..:,...,. h lape rah ( g i y 2 \ R iMilli nlun=_ � 0" 1 / @ iigili f6 1=&II=c 1 ri�r l8 ,I M ., ,'_, i , ,. )1 ar mgi� ii lh i: E�i hr1 frli1 :� i5iiliil iiiiia -1 rM ---- _ ii i�! lu ° 1 MVP. -- i= It;r! g- I iftli 'r ii 1 R 111 I 11 1 �; a i ;� 1 � ' 11 r i � / — _? I alt i1 _"�_--1 g —'_1----_--- 1 d. I t ' 1 i ill .V4l2Ie7 511110 QN6'7II,9IH '11114111lt�:r1 !A{{' {Willi �fiilfi.irr1 iia 1Iiilit{}HI, I NI 99 9 9l! !3I i iiiiii3ii3{38d 1 _P.• 6 c !j 1. .•• it t d II `.a Tu U 10 2 to et M a C , _ Y M 3 1 att5 H N N E o J Z H a N it)� N r o D c 1 0 N s` cY =we ° w u c� gan€ Q5 t o `o P of O © N 3 O Eo r 2 e m T O co CV & ae• O � ; w, N 4 i CU co r 4 U o �T = cv `n I- w y 03 r•-•N A t no Q 0'� r N F Q , `.` , N (p N N ryf r N r r In V r o a. o II �/ N o o Y G N N o e> I LA r r N r r Q O 0 a pC I,t�V I..CJ {a 111 I1I»ik.9 ) v O� 'Oi L O C . re t~ ',et',et M N r Wil Irli to all S6 4tY rt, O- 40 0 N L D. 0 cr�� W g c, r O x dj B r r r r al Y P. Q � Ul tto c a u�i M > M4( ) \ K6`r-R-n u ) 0 i� L'co 0 ..Z o Q `~ N M hl C> U -, M O S r July 23, 2014 Mr. Ed Beranek, Chairman Arcadia Planning Commission Dear Ed: I am writing about the Highlands Home Owners Assn and its ARB and the hearing your commission will hold on Friday,July 29U'. I would like to make several points so I'll briefly state each. 1. My wife and I have lived in the Highlands almost 42 years. 2. I understand there are about 850 homes in this area and that, as of July 16th, only 65 were members of the Assn. There have recently been two special meetings of the Assn and each were attended by 20-25 people. 3. During these meetings new members of the ARB were elected as were two officers of the Assn. The new members of the ARB do not represent my views regarding the purpose of the ARB or what is an appropriate home in the Highlands. The ARB members feel strongly that two-story homes do not fit the Highlands. Two story homes have been allowed in Arcadia since the city's founding 110 years ago. And there have been two- story homes in the Highlands for at least 50 years, one just three homes north of ours. I believe the city resolved this issue many years ago. Why is this issue even being discussed? 4. The members also do not lilce "off shore"money coming in, buying homes and no one living in them. How this has anything to do with architectural review is something I simply do not understand. 5. A former chair of the RB recently was complaining that your commission and the Council approving a home with a"small living room and a huge master suite." He thought this design was completely wrong and was upset that the design was approved. I wonder what leads anyone to presume to have the right to design the interior of any home? 6. About 5-6 weeks ago three different ARB members held two meetings, one immediately after the other,to discuss two proposed projects on my street. Some new, current ARB members raised all sorts of complaints in a very emotional way and were so completely out of order with their language that one ARB members spoke up and said he was not going to take this abuse any more and he resigned on the spot. I understand another ARB • member resigned the following day and the then ARB chairman also resigned a few days later. The current ARB members, led by April Verlato have been completely disrespectful to many of us and are so determined to have their way that they have caused a lot of emotion and now some residents are upset with their neighbors. 7. It seems like the members of the ARB have gone way beyond architectural review into areas where they have no business. What gives them the right to judge the ethnicity of a property owner, where the money for the construction is coming from,the size of someone's master suite, encroachment of the drip line of oak trees, etc. 8. It is my understanding that in the United States homeowners have certain property rights and overly aggressive individuals cannot override these rights I urge the Planning Commission to approve these projects. Thank you for your kind consideration of my thoughts. Sincerely, St-e-4-c—e Bruce McCallum 1730 Alta Oaks Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006-1701 R FGEIVED JUL 2 3 2014 Panning Services City of Ar aclia