No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 1 pr ARC tkiPMVI P� ttvi �� a7ohity°` STAFF REPORT Development Services Department DATE: August 26, 2014 TO: Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission FROM: Jim Kasama, Community Development Administrator By: Jordan Chamberlin, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 1910 — TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 72285; MULTIPLE-FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. MFADR 14-02; OAK TREE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. TRE 14-02; AND HEALTHY OAK TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TRH 14-02 WITH A CLASS 3 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR A THREE-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 138 CALIFORNIA STREET Recommended Action: Find that this project qualifies as a Class 3 Categorical Exemption from CEQA, Conditionally Approve the applications, and adopt Resolution No. 1910 SUMMARY Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 72285; Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 14-02; Oak Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 14-02; and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 14-02 were submitted by Jimmy Lee for a three unit, residential condominium development at 138 California Street. An aerial photo with zoning information, the proposed architectural plans, and the Tentative Parcel Map are attached. With the approval of the Oak Tree Encroachment Permit and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit the proposed development and subdivision will be consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Regulations, and Subdivision Code; and as new construction of less than four units this project qualifies as a Class 3 Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1910 to approve TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; THE 14-02; and TRH 14-02 with a CEQA exemption, subject to the conditions listed in this staff report. BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Mr. Jimmy Lee LOCATION: 138 California Street REQUEST: Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map; Multiple Family Architectural Design Review; Oak Tree Encroachment Permit; and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit for a three unit, residential condominium development. SITE AREA: 8,000 square-feet (0.18 acres) FRONTAGES: 50 feet along California Street and 50 feet along the rear access alley EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is currently developed with a one story single family residence built in 1924. The site is zoned R-3, High Density Multiple Family Residential. The minimum density for this site is one (1) unit per 2,200 square feet, or three units. The maximum density is one (1) unit per 1,450 square feet, or five units. SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: Multiple family residential developments, zoned R-3 South: Multiple family residential developments, zoned R-3 East: Multiple family residential developments, zoned R-3 West: Single family and multiple family residential developments, zoned R-3 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential — This designation accommodates higher-density attached housing types for both renter and owner households within a neighborhood context. Such housing types generally are located near transit stops, along arterials and transit corridors, and within easy walking distance of shops and services. Appropriate transition to adjacent lower-density neighborhoods is required through use of yards, other open areas, and building heights. This designation accommodates 12 to 30 dwelling units per acre. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map, Architectural Design Review, Oak Tree Encroachment Permit, and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit for a three unit residential condominium development. The site is zoned R-3, High Density Multiple Family Residential, and has a total land area of 8,000 square feet. The R-3 zone has a minimum density of one (1) unit per 2,200 square feet of lot area, and a maximum density of one unit per 1,450 square feet of lot area. Based on these density factors, a maximum of five (5) units would be allowed on the subject site, and a minimum of three (3) units is required. The applicant's proposal to develop three residential condominium units is consistent with the density requirements. The proposed development will consist of three, attached townhome style, two-story, three bedroom units of 1,532, 1,508, and 1,478 square feet. Each unit will have an TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; THE 14-02; TRH 14-02 138 California Street August 26, 2014— Page 2 of 8 attached two-car garage, and two on-site guest parking spaces will be provided. Access to one of the garages and one guest parking space will be from the rear access alley adjacent to the south side of the property. The proposed development with approval of the Oak Tree Encroachment Permit and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit will be consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Code, Subdivision Code, and State Subdivision Map Act. Tentative Parcel Map The proposal for three residential condominium units requires that they be subdivided through the Tentative Parcel Map process — see the attached Tentative Parcel Map. The proposed subdivision complies with the subdivision regulations of the Arcadia Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act, and will not violate any requirements of a California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The following two findings are required for approval of a Tentative Parcel Map: A.1. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the City's General Plan. Facts to Support the Finding: The proposed project will remove the existing single family residential building and replace it with a new three-unit residential development that is consistent in character with the High Density Multiple-Family Residential designation as described in the City's General Plan. A.2. That the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will comply with existing requirements prescribed by a California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Facts to Support the Finding: The Arcadia Public Works Services Department confirmed that the proposed development will be adequately served by the existing sewer infrastructure and the requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board will be satisfied. The proposed subdivision should not be approved if the Planning Commission finds that any of the findings for denial listed at the end of this staff report are applicable. Architectural Design Review Concurrent with the subdivision application, the Planning Commission is to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the architectural design of the proposed project. The architectural style of the development is described as Spanish — see the attached plans. The design features include S-tile roofing, off-white stucco wall colors, decorative wrought iron, and ceramic tile accents that are consistent with Spanish architecture. The massing and scale of the proposed buildings and landscaping are in character with other multiple-family developments in the vicinity — see the attached photos of the site and neighboring properties. The proposed design is consistent with the City's Multiple- Family Residential Design Guidelines. TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; THE 14-02; TRH 14-02 138 California Street August 26, 2014 — Page 3 of 8 Oak Tree Encroachment Permit There are three Coast Live Oaks located on-site; two adjacent to the westerly side property line, and one at the rear of the property adjacent to the access alley. One of the two oak trees located along the side property line and the one at the rear are proposed to be removed. New garden walls, a driveway, and landscaping will encroach into the protected area of the remaining oak tree. Certified Arborist, Ms. Ann Burroughs, prepared an Oak Tree Report for this project. Ms. Burroughs finds that with protective measures the development will not have an adverse impact on the health of the remaining oak tree. A copy of the Oak Tree Report is attached to this staff report. The recommended tree protection measures are a condition of approval. Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit The applicant is proposing to remove two Coast Live Oak trees, one located adjacent to the westerly side property line and another at the rear of the property adjacent to the access alley (see the attached Arborist Report and Tree Plan). Based on staff's observation and the Arborist's Report, the tree adjacent to the side property line is suppressed by the canopy of the larger oak tree that the applicant is proposing to keep (see attached photos). The tree has been topped which has limited its growth, and because the tree is located only about six feet from the larger oak tree to remain, continued topping will be necessary to prevent interference with the larger tree's canopy. The goal of the Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance is to preserve Oaks because they are considered aesthetic and ecological resources, but this poor specimen detracts from the natural aesthetic value of the tree. As an ecological resource, it has diminished value due to its location beneath a larger mature canopy. It is recommended by the Arborist to remove this tree and replace it with a superior specimen in the front yard where there is ample room for growth. The oak tree located in the rear yard is approximately 15 feet east of the westerly side property line and 20 feet north of the southerly property line and has a 40 foot canopy spread. The excavation that would be required for the proposed project would impact more than 50% of the protected zone of the tree. The structure alone would require the removal of approximately 50% of the tree's canopy. Both of these impacts are well beyond the limits recommended by industry standards and best management practices and per the Arborist's Report, would lead to destabilization of the tree. Due to the narrow width of the lot, the location of the tree presents an unreasonable hardship for developing the site in compliance with the City's Zoning Code requirements; particularly the minimum density requirement of three units. Staff agrees with the recommendation in the Arborist report to remove this tree. With approval of the Oak Tree Encroachment Permit and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit, the proposed development will be consistent with the City's Zoning Code, General Plan, Subdivision Code, Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines, and the State Subdivision Map Act. The proposed plans have been reviewed by the various City Departments, and all City requirements shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; THE 14-02; TRH 14-02 138 California Street August 26, 2014— Page 4 of 8 Building Official, City Engineer, Community Development Administrator, Fire Marshal, and Public Works Services Director. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the Development Services Department has determined that the proposed project is new construction of less than four units, and is therefore categorically exempt from further environmental review per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. A Preliminary Exemption Assessment is attached. PUBLIC NOTICE/COMMENTS Public hearing notices for TPM 72285, MFADR 14-02, THE 14-02, and TRH 14-02 were published in the local newspaper on August 11, 2014, and mailed to the property owners and tenants of those properties that are located within 300 feet of the subject property on August 7, 2014 — see the attached radius map. As of August 13, 2014, no comments have been received regarding this project. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 72285, Multiple-Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 14-02, Oak Tree Encroachment Permit No. THE 14-02, and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 14-02, subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall be developed and maintained by the applicant/property owner in a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for TPM 72285, MFADR 14-02, THE 14-02, and TRH 14-02, subject to the approval of the Community Development Administrator or designee. 2. The project shall be developed and maintained by the applicant/property owner in compliance with all of the recommended tree protection measures listed in the Oak Tree Report prepared for this project. 3. The Tentative Parcel Map shall be revised by the applicant to be consistent with the site plan prior to submitting the Parcel Map to the Engineering Division for approval. 4. The applicant/property owner shall provide a revised driveway paver detail with a much thinner section to minimize impacts to the Oak Tree prior to submitting plans to plan check in Building Services. 5. One 36" box Coast Live Oak tree shall be planted in the subject property's front yard area, the location of which shall be determined in consultation with a Certified Arborist and shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Administrator or designee. TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; THE 14-02; TRH 14-02 138 California Street August 26, 2014 — Page 5 of 8 6. One 48" box Holly Oak tree shall be planted in the City's parkway, and the tree and its location shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Services Director or designee. 7. The applicant/property owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public right-of-way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director and Development Services Director. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check review and approval by the foregoing City officials and employees. 8. The applicant/property owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers, employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 9. Approval of TPM 72285, MFADR 14-02, TRE 14-02, and TRH 14-02 shall not take effect unless on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning Commission adoption of the Resolution, the applicant and property owner have executed and filed with the Community Development Administrator or designee an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Approval If the Planning Commission intends to approve this project, the Commission should move to approve Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 72285, Multiple-Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 14-02, Oak Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 14-02, and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 14-02, state that the proposal satisfies the requisite findings (see below), and adopt the attached Resolution No. 1910 that incorporates the conditions of approval set forth above, or as may be modified by the Commission, and the following findings and action: TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; TRE 14-02; TRH 14-02 138 California Street August 26, 2014 — Page 6 of 8 A.1. That the proposed project together with the provisions for its design and improvement is consistent with the City's General Plan, the City's Subdivision and Zoning Regulations, the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines, and the City's Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance; A.2. That the discharge of waste from the proposed project into the community sewer system will not violate existing requirements prescribed by a California Regional Water Quality Control Board; A.3. That this project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines; and A.4. Authorize and direct the Development Services Director or designee to approve and execute, if necessary, a subdivision agreement for this project. Denial If the Planning Commission is to take action to deny this project, the Commission should state the specific findings that the proposal does not satisfy based on the evidence presented with specific reasons for denial, and move to deny Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 72285, Multiple-Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 14-02, Oak Tree Encroachment Permit No. THE 14-02, and/or Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit No. 14-02 and direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the next meeting that incorporates the Commission's decision and specific findings. The Planning Commission may wish to consider the following findings, which must be expanded upon with specific reasons for denial: D.1. That the proposed map is not consistent with the applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 66451 of the Subdivision Map Act. D.2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans and/or the City's Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines. D.3. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. D.4. That the site is not physically suitable for the density of development. D.S. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. D.6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. D.7. That the requested subdivision injuriously affects the neighborhood wherein said lot is located. TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; THE 14-02; TRH 14-02 138 California Street August 26, 2014 — Page 7 of 8 D.8. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the legislative body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements for access or for use, will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. D.9. That the proposed waste discharge would result in or add to violation of requirements of a California Regional Water Quality Control Board. If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the August 26, 2014 public hearing, please contact Assistant Planner, Jordan Chamberlin at (626) 821-4334, or JChamberlin @ArcadiaCA.gov . Approved: Jim K. :- a Com' unity Development Administrator Attachments: Aerial Photo with Zoning Information Proposed Architectural Plans Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 72285 Photos of the Subject Property and Neighboring Properties Certified Arborist's Oak Tree Report Preliminary Exemption Assessment 300-foot Radius Map Resolution No. 1910 TPM 72285; MFADR 14-02; THE 14-02; TRH 14-02 138 California Street August 26, 2014 — Page 8 of 8 lir at A tF ' Site Address: 138 CALIFORNIA ST Property Owner(s): GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT S,NC ,., ,„ i yam. ' € i M z1 , . 1 ' • fimme,„,„„,,,,s.„ ...vogh-'Aft, ' rior, i---$:::: :Se„,,,,,, ' ter.4r,-A' ' Property Characteristics Selected parcel highlighted t. Zoning: R-3 _l, �i; �, 1 General Plan: HDR w`ik, '— – – Lot Area (sq ft): 8,000 " . Main Structure / Unit(sq.ft.): 1,066 Year Built: 1924 �`�_,� : !r„ Y Number of Units: 1 04 4,' v` r. Overlays ::? Parking Overlay: n/a '! • 4,11 Oink Downtown Overlay: n/a I Special Height Overlay: n/a !!" Architectural Design Overlay: n/a Parcel location within City of Arcadia'. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for Report generated 06-Aug-2014 reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current, Page 1 of 1 or otherwise reliable. ��., ' 90016 VO IdIOV021V 5g 133�1S YINaO.�IT/0 in Z 0 0 IPNV1d 311S ONV s �`° H °Ma�rne Aliwedil1nw sewn a Viva 103 0eld di i I i i ili hill - Ili 1 I11 1 9 t I -- 14/14101414111111 11101 i �' . 0 0 •— j i Q Q T gA q1,0 add = oal1 + Yttt .a' °Qs �$-$�1 i i i 5 �Ig A 1 ' ate r i lzoos 4 - 19- ,),„ 1— i Z o �.-- ir - 2: 7 W W % ;� u `SArtiii: 1 AA.�si � �W 0 ? a a >. Y o i :a �►•AAAA4i,4 , J `o -t=?!? ! _ (n a o i , AAAA>® ..;®Ad.AAAAAAAA L Q 4 A AA $ 1 o -J C c ,1 is j`j�' � § 1 o Q iT 1 4 ; , '^ 1 0 8 i '. 'NIIT '''' Z <Qf m 1 ,rill .11 age �j ds ?'w �rc�i, i RiOn.H5 1 G s A3T1V 301M AZ o 0 • $� � 1 51 i - 111 iil ■ I i .t . q! __F.... , ,_ ; o 1t ,' 11 5 VI 111 a� 90016 d0 'V!GV3 Ib ! hQ ; 13380s° 32�1S V N2�0311V0 8El ^• _o • I� a� 8 ., � Qe JNlallfl9 AIIWVdIllfW Sl1Nfl E ( NV-Id 2JOO1J oNlalin8 dilli1 O 1—;O Q 0 0 0 ASV — ■ i —'— � c _ .. '- - - O 0 f FL— —----- 0 1 I �T . __� n I II ������1 . , e d ¢ ImmmuunnI 1 o;•d. L • 11 $ Y �n�°N-r ® nom_.I Q at ii. 11 ��� i 1 I - a I i is O — — — --- -- • O © ---- a 1 I z I Z II d I EL I �' . I EL I' . ", II �' �s I� : IC• r R IL-^ +, w " z I Q ggr : II: I 5 I t rim: 1 I� _rhu®k I k �IIIII7. . - , C .) d. .. .. I I a 11 I d. t du r L_as__J . O o O O N' f90016 VO 'VIOVO8V } p li€ii 13381S VIN80311VO 8�l " • 13e1 a a 8, Q. , ' owning L31Wd�I -1f1W SllNfl E ! NVId 3008 9NIa1Ine i d 1 i I 1, 1 O O 0 —I- I I 0 - - O © T 1 I 4 - - O 101 y J 0 w\/ of T T 1 y I I I I I 1 e —F----- 1. -- 0 CSI b „ zI 1 90016 d0 'VIOb'021`d o 5 �s@ 13321IS dIN2�0311dO 8�l R e N ma) JeII c 8 . Qe FJNIa31f18 J�IIWddt13f1W SJJNfl£ ! N011VA313 ONIO1If18 di i i I 1 1 I y ru g d .. i------,i pY • d ,, iiiii—J1, . .,,..„ -. ,. - /1 e e % 114 141 :!=8 o fr / .. =s F 0. '. . .��. r > IN 1111111111•11 i - J pas. ;� ■U'■ O EN EIM• /a ® a et■ ��. ,3 w - cc in 1,,,..-: ® ;,dry, ia-�:■a _ z u It iii' 0 ■ a \ -lance. aim_ I, —C O C9 h .�. Imm 1� :ILA:- \ �9i1 �� Z 0 I■a•�: : �� IIIII Ilan O - NM NM 1:7:71: Rai = ” —I °_ ia: ice■ (���) �� 4 .4t��— ��I o Issas.. m� / .. ■ m U •• -- / 1': MOB �� 4 lams ��m �� Q \ luau_: / .• r •: O ..max 9 ° \ pp \� ■ • ' ate— ■ lu■ . ■ la 1:a - Ii■ mom •� I. -i r.MEM O r 416.1-"1.1-1==- e MOO la■•■■ ■•.�1 .:, pa /f •:i li■ - 1�■4 • Ia a■■. �I p \ ■ • a-ta\ 1 9 jj=j .• 1i-./.■ .. s I■ t• U' 1.� I. P ==l \_ .® O /-a/d.e . ■as __ - 1:. ` 1.•.=.,u I W 1`Z- •\; 1 IM=, • i: :: 1; I•. 1∎∎∎ ; r .. ;WC.• ~�- 1�aa■ •: o I,■.;. a 1.a : W. 1:7•11111 ta i ' ¢@ X61 ryy 4 • [Erg fwl �it1I3tI IL ip t• 1; I � as i llilivI ttgrta I X11 111111 V !Si E 8 II_-"--.,,°E °5-- e 8 -- . ±,,',,'I. N a Z'.0..- C lZ 4 3 �� 8� !� d°4 *' 2'012 118 1 6 >�—. u- 1' 0 8 & s .li�li__ ' N " 1 �'� F E '_II• =111 Y Q a.¢ .:2 I i - 1111 J i i c C o rs a „, m h ° c N a z r y t c E c 1 a a '.c 1': n o . m b E. a • s 0 . c y D v g m o 1 c 6 o y ' . s- Ti, .« a I E n. S c E 6' T. C § !, g s v W 133'1S VINLI0317VD=� a � = "t ilPI3 ? a � € g1 „ < . -,fi n < s < E ° a •, 'i ° is O ,. }.-' a H a 4 C 9 . N L 6 L b 9 C f b C f O A y E E - r8 a a y u, ° N o y, E o A � 2 0 `O r ° ,,- E, E 8 -: u E 1-g . u E 3 = P C p_ L'o - U � 1= y N C .ti U E N n a-u O. $ p 9 5 m t+n ti ry n C.i pp_ �� fE1 C P O �E' C �. G O y. E �!i K L U S 3 U m t tl, Q Y .. OOIIIII q'J • • • • •o g� 'pp�p;%%% %%.O •..• ••I Ot O O •�i ••L •••., : . .. . W v a Ili ♦ OO�Yi•S••••A”:0 - E o OQ� yYf,yly,\� • ••••I,i 11.1 1 2 o S2 ._9-g -0. l' .,='. 1 .!7.8 2 •=' i4 F .04,1 - 'marl `+ Z 0 ao W a' ' S Ef �5' 1: O .r ® 1 °� a L'S .- a d a �.,'. pI p. m U w oa ti", Y z u o lob zx as.'°°m° '1 p.IIIIIIIIII o n o Z N a n �0 m� r o� l�l iii�p \ • , o• w v_, la` 163i Q a H n.a _ _-ME�..., � I. w II—41111111111;;;:/ IIIIIII Pus I w o �< • $ o 'II/I,I,l�I�I�J�I < ;ti'II/I�III F IttLiv::!4,,sNaratv L. ��O`2"8,,,21' 3 It n,m ' � rot A)f �:iiii ak, �'g v I �¢ ' Y Ii .p II: e* 61 ' '2' 3 N I..!,liI pi�111111111 N� Vials d � U o z s I�;'?j� O �I Lc, dgx w=ig 1_ Zma Elie 8. a 11p 112l Idipt i. ° g k N €Q o iD r: ,.�1:cal 4 x 1 P a k a a m ' !R�\O�IIIII'' .•FA a pEtteyo Es._ N e a en 5 ° ,V i Ei c �E c JL 'h A O 00 I �-'=_1 s' F§ a fig ; , ,I< s§ [ 0 a k,Iilil*IiI*I*I1bo = w 0 ._ wa - = a`i m '26 °i6 Eaga 60 og ou d o6- 9 />e 5_1 o Cr =)ib y $ N 8 8 . San$ mk SS €< Eg 5 €, 1 sLL - dive N n w n m m 0601-10(tIL):V! O9O1-IL9(Via,131. • • • IMO Y3'13116'OVOU L=3611V1'3 OLf MNC47b IM`7rtPIOOa Gnf19E]bC)C17O D�qgp 900 6 VO'VICVO JV E } V # 7 e 'OM � LLLL �U�LL Q ���V) 133a1S VINaOdllVO B£L y3' e. t U loll �Jl�l!(1 i1J(�l lY i - MOW.701133rO•=_ 1 u a —" K K • a V Z V TY1lM YIM/. "mat y� 177 &5 3 U „'m x�r — aka A wz..<0x ?1l g oU 1[�. in as Epa g w@ a NRQbQ.1 € ee pp yWWy 3 sW ikg ImPi W.7F 4,18, 4 a a <8 ,, i �`7@$p cnN,a s SW< yQ W WSW 81111 R iiihIoCME Z mug ` 0'7. F-O I EILIiUlljgjJ .0 eb h ~ g h . p . ' X & o g 3 8 ° Y b Y gbba g : bb . _ Y hd W. Z s 11 g g Er ' I:114 l 4 n C s Fh 11 t' n yfe bb ATP x.94!g b td! o geld a m� B 8b(D", o a C 8 7; B w gG h �4' �� 9 0 x = a= �-, ;% .s ii 4d:~ ile a2 ., bad'° 1 = ;g WV& Y t h $$ i 3: `fin- a ga ebtl t h“2"LX 8e 44 ; to.,- a a bb 0 g.. a C ba b4W. N! N; s tqa as g= o ' a . 42' BA W. es 4 �"� 8 �pF •" eg, ybaa� ` � iF 0 p g .. do §h i ba 0 gX 4Y gaa �� e a t S y� g 2� r !Vie o F eW 8 33 $ ye §: . =a -a !PRi a” Ra s' g ;4g ba;11e ke !aei �� 3 A a o' a o2 6 ee a to higg tv ie 1 '"!ia; igb it it EF. "Egq m s h 1 b J _ Pi as bo d°Kg ill � h �� � g g t = 8- g° Pm 4 a L i ;1ia $ ii! i ffi b a b =-6 '°41 b Via.NO bl b ~ i ' g xb :!ix AEA, € y d '. ( d i & r h s Z 4 ot Y if hIbr h s.18 : i x� ¢ f g° i i a c it gg REX a' sa 2;8: =1 .a 481 a P 1= r r a g �. a g@� &g 6�g Fx 4 if ri g ag t6; x, r. a y r e 1 : ' ig a�� �m l:� €�i° g,bE5 a�yQii g$� 1 �� �'�' p I$@ .g4 r ps ��� i ea � e g y!h Yl�e IX <`.g E [ '^ b b rb rgg 1 w� i8 aP s p 3.. 1k 4a a 1 ' s~ Vi WIN �.<5' Ws a I = a � o m iff '0i'. a 42 e - R is _; iip gg xlx Ws9g ig Ysfs< adb8 e4 ab p3 sw 5e ;ay a ; iti �� ,s p x iy gi pa a .0 egg. -I€ NO 3; f!; =s ,L.' = g; b" "83� g h cg@ Y. '� ae Ys g:! h� s� bo #dab r. Y � bo eta rhr Y_ b 91 p w 4 B K 00 :i/g Wb id A- 6: . .x it _ !a .6 4 �' // �` ii' ! . ' b$(e .8' 4�=e -4i tg be ba§b a: Xr 4 lg. ad 3 4., 3 E �o iag hg 4b . 4 ` A ae 3 !X bi �� b ,. K a8 8-' O °a 4 ^8b Yc 6g, A O id% .-00 Ge t N, z8 bldg 86 a 8 d. ga ,gsa .o E' < da ap •A2 e II 'z@ N`>; E/1; 8' bfigd; qt1 t� b= <" y h 5 "4 1m bb i6 bi w 212 S Y z 4 1G ig gc; ga � ri'a WHi3H 10 °5 NI g 6a 44 °a 4e 41 4 41 9- wig gt a E III iii• • • • 0601-119(rlc)33 0301-IL9(nd 131 N Inn 3,3'3.368'MU 1338301'3 9L• b W,IATEW�1 J N*K1bC]C7W0[PM 9001.6 V0'VI0VOUV Y I 11 °`(�� `jib ir!(�� PM�,/�t°1v}gyp} !�F 133N1SVINUOJIlVDBEI i. y°: U 0 aDI 904 4M�A/ IAU 111�1�9 :N0Uw001193roaa i 1 q it 7. v , • J c s V. ` f4 ''''.i O; t.\ .J )--I H 1-01 il 1 fli w z i 2 Q it 1111 N A 6 i ii ov os .tp r b G e a,1 e ! 1 il iiiiiIL Rli — —L �:04:00., 111111 v...7,, , (.) .. 00000^'000'0 ® ® avec® e-1j �d---x I ___r__t.____4 ( P. 0 i. ,P\\\\\\\ `1\\\\\\\LL\\\\ I' o-- '" 4 t as II I �, A ° ► �l w8_:.Fall\ Ca r. "II �► cq °o. �'8 _7 � .. ,,,,,. - � 4 CALL.. NN` ` �O°S ,a C.9 LLa. v� M _0,007: 11111, a �' I &�� Z ia.Q .i Irs9+sr Z u•Q� Z°+C� � I �� '. O 8. N, �INI�I \�!�IR©=awry■CO 1 i L o LL e =� _� `�'D �© X �' 9` ! •,., 0 0nI�all 1153 TTTT"'' � �• �,� �q;, II — ti�� �a14 "n 1l1.111.—al _{ o I ot. e2 • a i o/NI-ICS OW x21 KKOl-I/9 014 X31 ' •• •. . • • ♦ • 11116 20'2318 1201 Warm'3/6 • b51GOWa99 a9 NTIM��F sooLS V�'V1aV� V I�11��T11►-(�F `j1if�'1��1'�I1��11�(11�V1'�1�F I��T[❑]/7I/Tl ip]^1 '133a1S VINa0311tlO BEl =EAf t. y.' i 1116 I.f 4A 4A 111♦l9�4l QA\I 1 A 1 1�/, , . rwu2ao,i7a�o1' S 3 a d �, • • it /II a 8&: ° �'" ' o " Z L/, F .p d g \e o 1�� �u _ / WOO u �'p N f11 N i tl o, Il l w 11. .' t" bl O O a w C .y 1Y �< W a i a o �<$ ! 11 ■∎7' In :4 a"t is o 1!* 'i r :IX R ;� ,i. A 6 In Y f§w € 3�� l b £ . k t i1 r�4"' 4F 4„" i 3 0 s ` Y s a -w . E e b 8 .1V b `t: tM !, �' ,1 Z t ax . 1� i < ` Wv R 1< 9 1 ; E! g , _�§ Y a 6 �-1 � '�g > ;<E6 ,q`: � 1N MI � =g �.¥IC � G.„ � HWd a9 k g8ag �g" 19 1144i i rI� 1 � §gte .x =fin : _I ae R q ,,0 g 1 E ' Ra . =tr i'_ 4 i ";3= 5 w°ee o'a v E a ; ig ;'g,1in 2' i4y� n,4 111' x l "e §§ i Y€ 1Y r.,g §! 1 .';� 1� §°s §§ § � � � e.. a ea 1 a��� � � ���: � �< �1 '§ A.: g1 a1 1 �1 ! a"1 ' k 11 @§s a 3 § S i 1 F ;' i t fiI mhh -= fii.h1 i g°' 1I a' J ' a;his ! g16 I gid I :il i' § Iii! li i. III PI .;... ., ... 11 ... i 6 _ " " e " "e S . i i i i i i i i K av<a 111 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\L1\\\\\ jcn I y - .. .c ,roost •--lY[.00AN IZI - s\_,.://, i 1 0 I" IIP CC:: i nn -0 L \R-`C'\ . II vLL NCI .: „,5 " ` II I ---....%\/� dui.a ,, I ;L- - - r �.7 : ~n �— � r II a I� a 0. �y I ac ' ofiLI! t1. t; I io DOI 16r.tlDOrv:.. - I J 1 1 I \- \\\ rrr 1 . .74 S Ri V 1! i x ' _ .N t ... , ..,:.....,,, .., jel ...,,, . . ., ,. .„...--..-_ , -.,„,::._ -...„......i.t.„,4.1,_.„, .. • ,.„..... ,.. .. ...„,.._. ,....:. .....„;.i.,:i....,..„. . ..._ i. . .....,,.,... .. Tr-,.-._- - :‘-'',*,:i".F.,:t-Tiz i''.'.-' f s w V fr • �+ { t fit k X s7a z `# ar by f �,f 'fit Y)aa. ' • • `tee *- `? i., C am, _'tfi4 . ' ■ '''lk 1 i''' ■ 9 Amax _ .,wr& + • t"" .. # r• II • ,•,...•.,..„ :„.:,:!'' ti 1 J q . 'i, ,1 fyn 4 ,, woolgagi, NWMK'h . '';'i' ,. :',.'::',,ii ,., yN h Y7 i'; X91,' ■ 0601-IL9(914:XV! OS01-1L9(via.13.1. • • • • • • 12926 VO'9389'Mb 18381W1•3 9L9 ' �HPII �3IA a IMER']IGOO TGOP 90016VO'VIOVOLJV Q ; t j 1 6 'DM' ( I,�rIIn� I��T[►I] '133211SVINLIOd11VO8El 2 y' { I {A � i�.1.A.�A 1.1 � :Haiv0o»3rodd 1 d b a�v H F k a 929 Z Y O IY U 6 w� °�w z 3 In 5m0 ' Q.4EPki o 11rLwfzp 0 w a 00 U? O , iwse `bb'E Y?nel F� d OWV N cc 0 O ws a o o �1t�od w pKw�LU N LL oW 9 F,,,00 z% o z m '¢aSooz qw � e,.W> ..��11 �WUZ1 ZZ U3.1 z4'wWy (] N�p VI-mp p p Z� NZR'WOQ O ` 2 illi n a Q §B g W- o o o OOODU44 W W �'7� ° to C i ! 5 U ! I�i �' �,nmm�.� 3 OW V CL O W �S r e�OO jjrr xx ppmmE ��lljj Z 1 e. = J ,ZN I L] UUOOWWELL U'ii1,7)F1 Z w pi O W Q, OZ co ,.,co"z d � ~ [V o 0 Q 5. 0 0 0 D z u zIL I- z hi 0 N a o wOa Qoce o ° t € Gw U QO 1- Q O W m � � o �/ 0 W Q U W O 0 F t7 2 g w W • .• cnWQw a o .1Qa- Wgpq Q(n OWW Q 0 w zo„W, QV ^ W %t81`;',8!z5 w W U la- m 0 ? O a o 0 ce u) 0 _ L oiaya� OWO LL - owg¢ 5 to Lc3 1, .6 ? W N W 0 w ��� g S J WwS & �� x w O w tizw0,1� y z F a I11OMx F r Z a ,. yK�O0_ ,„ Pi' ? 3 m(7W FVi u N \F�� V O Q g 8. � z co Q Z x 0.16C'C S C �H O O 01 a §:P.-1g R =ypo 88§ 3 b b F-1 m W CO N¢OS 14 O O N ZO Z O O LT-1 O W a 99��w bRrjjQNQ U,_ W ( 6:f6f26j� N C7 r' �.- wr x ¢, �y ONONO ! . • 1� L, O Z a az Krc�O:ac Q�i k o z�,!?w?,n ` ! 1g�' E�' € 1 ,O C- J In z o: I4' k� ac7- iOw OwOw 1 ;X, v_ 0 w g, 77 F, — yS ZY< w=__Z_ °' '" LL ILILI (� � �>„ W E �(� 4* as ¢ moo$ Q�` $ in W>i.^- Rm h m . ZZ NLL'61' 6 Z Z Z QQYti§5- O§§i §.1 g3 Z Y EO lii f; N Ja < W Zv'INI1,! W p v O+ O 9:• W LL FF 2 8 Ol 0 ~,$ p� 6O g- N (1.,; ,r � O,III, 111 p85' 111 '1 Jom z U m z a G 0_h OaoQ 1?p z .5,E,!:.,=::;§ u V'O ,a00 O�OY LL� w � Z ) O p..wuiw OU a 4yq i� >f,m�.mtim t- w tLi a !A1�l n W C w� 8 i2ztai rg ihj5- gZOZOZO iigf igg igg < G�'w m v mz w o000 id tai z aNN� ��>>i�zl > > •w .t n 8 '�R &I X11\\\\\ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\, f a:liL ! 0 � F ro r.o90« ”. I kl ®I� w �! MI w m I != b _Yo Cl r I, 8 I\ �Iwia 1 zua z O ja it V 11? ./� I \ €�� �_ ■ 7 � a 3 , I. I ( � ��`�: a �: __���[ I— tea.a „"r swill ` f � 1 I i ,, y tl.M ,). !f( i a jkV . fix', } n 9 r y, . rep.. r .. .q;. Photo of the subject property at 138 California Street ,,, 4.4'. ' !t w ,• ^'t,...ff's 1,1`"K .. '''' t r .■ s 't*Itµ4g:.. >n " • ty, • .® ,_w ,. n r let.$t..ua:"x,, x«z,, '+i,' ., m'"^ a:� - w.� .g�, Photo of neighboring property to the west at 134 California Street 0. 't�;i , t R4, .;;,. A Photo of neighboring property to the northwest at 139 California Street .„ x 4,...':.,,'', .,,,..„.... ,i,„,r.,..!,,,,t,-,..4,Y,..., , , _ ,-,,,,,,,,,,,,r 4,,,,,„ ,..,4„,. ,,,,pi,,,,,,,,,,,:4irt- � i W t ,', x a: Sur, ;+^tip ,:k‘',-,:, i x'd . ,�re r . s Photo of neighboring property to the north at 137 California Street i 4 F Photo of neighboring property to the northeast at 141 California Street k' 'I # '4�i 'N 'R ,, k'r 4 ■ F 4. *c 1 Photo of neighboring property to the east at 142 California Street 3 !J! Photo of subject property from access alley looking west - • . y Photo of subject property from access alley looking east -o a) a) 70 w Q) a,) an I- a U) U) a) .c o Co -o o E o t13 " E o m Co N - m 0 o a 0 U) 0 . N '- a a) c a a) o cl- "- '- U) U) a) .- co rn c o ca o • CD If H -1 .0 a) c o rid d o (1)� Q. . a • 'f:1`= o a) .,„„ a o . .Co TCo a) --V g` t o a) �r t r rt 4 a_ L M>” :r SF} a a) A d-♦ S�+ ',.� ''�y;�y }Y1�',,, a) ID y. 1 ^{�r Y/ ��� S Q• . . } a�Y *+ .1�' q i � o d7 v:1', ♦�e; 'Veit < r h M x"�J Y ..1 f , 4,a�'" � Q +' Fv R" + :',';'.1-`,1;;;;....::',,,:-'','',,'gt`. r x '° FY 1�y o 'Y r "�A 5 a +'�,:» �, y ,�' F���. Co ... 4.,%'. �` ,�'M7F3T � ;+� r n`� 4 3'�f0r y kk k k < + , �yd, K" ,... .q-4^ ,*{" q ,, ,,,, ,..„ a�r ry � �l °a il'� '',k'. M' ° � k/ n � h U y ocn t CV as ' µ��� 0� e 4 a o it 45, A _ w r 0_ OAR,.TREE RE PL -i NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 BACKGROUND 1 ASSIGNMENT 2 TREE CHARACTERISTICS AND SITE CONDITIONS 2 TREE HEALTH AND DEFECTS 3 IMPACT ANALYSIS AND SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS 3 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS 5 WORK WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE 5 WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROTECTED ZONE 5 PLANTING WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE 5 TREE MAINTENANCE AND PRUNING OPERATIONS 6 WATERING 7 DISEASES AND INSECTS 7 GRADE CHANGES 7 INSPECTION 7 WARRANTY 7 CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE 9 CERTIFICATIONS 10 APPENDIX A-FIELD EVALUATION SHEETS 11 APPENDIX B-PHOTOGRAPHS 18 APPENDIX C-OAK TREE LOCATION MAP 20 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA, CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4 PAGE i NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA SUMMARY Construction of three single-family units proposed for the property at 138 California Street in Arcadia,California requires encroachment into the protected zones of two protected coast live oak trees(Quercus agrifolia)and removal of a third. The property owner has revised the design of the residences and reduced the density from five units to three units in an attempt to retain the tree to be removed. However because of the tree's location removal would still be necessary. The smaller oak tree to remain is suppressed by the larger oak tree to remain and has declined as a result of the suppression. It is highly unlikely that the smaller tree can restored due to its location and condition. The tree should be removed and replaced with a healthy specimen. Encroachment for construction and demolition would come within approximately four feet of the trunk of the larger oak tree to remain. However the encroachment is moderate and the tree is relatively young and healthy. If the work is performed carefully the tree should be able to recover from any impacts sustained during construction. BACKGROUND On October 16,2013 Jimmy Lee of JK Design&Associates,Inc. contacted me regarding an oak tree report for the property located at 138 California Street in Arcadia,California. Mr.Lee stated that the property owner intended to construct three residential units on the site. I met Mr.Lee and the property owner at the site on October 25,2013. The site currently contains a single-family residence and a detached garage. The property contains three protected coast live oak trees(Quercus agrifolia). The property owner is aware of the value mature oak trees contribute to the property and does not wish to damage or remove the trees. This report was prepared in accordance with Chapter Seven of the City of Arcadia Municipal Code, relating to oak trees and with the standards of the City of Arcadia and the International Society of Arboriculture. The City of Arcadia recognizes that native oak trees are significant aesthetic and ecological resources. It is the intent of the Oak Tree Ordinance to maintain and enhance the public health, safety and welfare through the mitigation of soil erosion and air pollution. It is also the intent of the Oak Tree Ordinance to preserve and enhance property values through conserving and enhancing the distinctive and unique aesthetic character of many areas in the City. Unless allowed by an Oak Tree Permit,no protected tree shall be removed or relocated. Removal includes the uprooting,cutting,or severing of the main trunk, or major branches,of an oak tree or any act which causes,or may be reasonably expected to cause a tree to die, including damage inflicted upon the root system by machinery, storage of materials,or soil compaction; substantially changing the grade above the root system or trunk; excessive pruning;excessive paving with concrete,asphalt, or other impervious materials in such a manner which may reasonably be expected to kill an oak tree; excessive watering within the dripline; or encroachment into the protected zone. Protected Trees include specimens of the following species: • Quercus engelmannii(Engelmann oak),or Q. agrifolia(coast live oak)with a trunk diameter larger than four inches measured at a point four and one-half feet above the crown root, or two or more trunks measuring three inches each or greater in diameter, measured at a point four and one-half feet above the crown root. 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. .0 PAGE 1 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA • Any other living oak tree(Quercus spp.)with a trunk diameter larger than 12 inches measured at a point four and one-half feet above the crown root,or two or more trunks measuring ten inches each or greater in diameter,measured at a point four and one-half feet above the crown root ASSIGNMENT On October 18,2013 Mr.Lee contacted me and I agreed to provide the following services: • Document findings related to a field inventory and ground-level visual analysis of the protected trees, including photographs and a tree location map. • Analyze potential impacts to the protected trees that might result due to the proposed construction program. • Present recommendations with respect to protection of the protected trees during construction activities, as well as any treatments that would serve to improve or promote their health. I was retained by the applicant to prepare an oak tree report in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the City of Arcadia Tree Ordinance. This report is based on my site visit dated October 25, 2013,meetings with the Mr.Lee and the property owner,and my review of the undated plans prepared by Mr.Lee and received by me October 28,2013. The scope of work included a basic visual ground evaluation of the cultural and physical conditions of the protected coast live oak trees. Pertinent data was recorded on October 25,2013 on the Field Evaluation Forms contained in Appendix A. A photograph of each tree is provided in Appendix B for general reference and record purposes. A Tree Location Map is included in Appendix C. This map was prepared using the plan provided by Mr.Lee. All information provided by the preparer is certified to be true and correct as of the date of the field observations. TREE CHARACTERISTICS AND SITE CONDITIONS The property is approximately 8,000 square feet and currently contains one single-family residence and a detached garage. The terrain is level. The three coast live oak trees are all located within the rear yard. Two of the oak trees are situated near the northwest corner of the existing residence,on and immediately south of the northerly property line. These two trees are located approximately six feet apart and the smaller of the two is suppressed by the canopy of the larger tree. The third oak tree is located approximately 20 feet east of the rear property line and 15 feet south of the northerly property line. Existing landscape in the vicinity of the trees consists of bare soil. Detailed information with respect to diameter,number of trunks,height,canopy dimensions,form, crown class,age class,and pruning history is provided for the subject trees on the Field Evaluation Forms in Appendix A. The oak trees were tagged on their north sides with round aluminum tags stamped with identifying numbers. 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. a PAGE 2 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA TREE HEALTH AND DEFECTS Specific tree health details are documented for the subject trees on the Field Evaluation Forms in Appendix A. Issues noted include foliage color, density and leaf size,presence of epicormic growth, and twig dieback. Assessments of relative annual shoot growth,woundwood development and vigor are also provided. Specific tree defects were evaluated and noted as to their location(root crown, trunk, scaffolds, or branches), as well as the severity of the defect. Any recommended treatments are also noted on the Field Evaluation Forms. The current overall health and appearance ratings of the trees are provided in the following table: Tree# Botanical Common Height Dbh Spread Name Name (Feet) (Inches) (Feet) Health Appearance Disposition Quercus ercus coast live agrifolia oak 40 16 38 A A Retain 13 Quercus coast live agrifolia oak 30 23 @1.7' 48 B B Remove 14 Quercus coast live agr fol:a oak 11 6@3.0' 5 D D Remove *Tree not being removed due to project impacts(see Tree Number 14 discussion on following page). IMPACT ANALYSIS AND SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS The property owner desires to demolish the existing single-family residence and detached garage and construct three new residential units on the site. The project as proposed would result in the encroachment within the protected zone of two protected oak trees and the removal of one oak tree. Specific comments with respect to potential impacts to the trees are as follows: Tree Number 12—This mature coast live oak tree is located within the rear yard of the property near the northwest corner of the existing residence. Demolition of the existing residence would require encroachment into the protected zone of this tree. Access to the garages for proposed Units A and B would also encroach within its protected zone. To accommodate the tree I recommend that paving within the protected zone be eliminated within the four feet south of the property line and that the semi-circular planter at the tree be enlarged. The paving used must be pervious pavers with a thin section. If a new property line fence or wall is required it will need to be designed to accommodate the tree. Since the tree appears to be on the northerly property line a gap in the fence may be required for the tree. This fence should include custom footings that span over the roots or discontinuous footings so locations can be adjusted if roots are encountered. Since the tree is relatively young and healthy,careful construction should allow it to remain if the work is performed in accordance with the procedures described in the General and Specific Recommendations sections. All work within the protected zone should be performed by hand to insure that the roots of the tree are disturbed as little as possible. Minor pruning would be required to provide clearance for vehicles. Tree Number 13—This mature oak tree is located within the rear yard approximately 20 feet east of the rear property line and 15 feet south of the northerly property line. Excavation for Unit C would impact in excess of 50 percent of the protected zone of this tree. The work would occur to within 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA, CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4. PAGE 3 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA approximately four feet of the trunk. A guest parking space is proposed to be constructed approximately two feet from the trunk on the tree's northerly side. Removal of approximately 50 percent of the tree's canopy would also be required to accommodate the structure. These impacts are considered severe and will likely result in removal of the tree. Mr.Lee and the property owner both expressed the desire to retain the oak tree on several occasions. It is my understanding that they have revised the proposed design to reduce the density from five units to three units. However, impacts that would occur during construction are well beyond the limits recommended by industry standards and best management practices and are almost certain to lead to destabilization of the tree. Tree Number 14—This semi-mature coast live oak tree is located within the rear yard near the northwest corner of the existing residence, immediately south of the northerly property line. It is located approximately six feet from Tree Number 12 and is suppressed by the canopy of the larger tree. Demolition of the existing residence and access to the garages for proposed Units A and B would encroach within the protected zone of this tree. This tree is a poor candidate for preservation. It has been topped in the past at approximately ten feet. All remaining growth consists of sprouts at the location of the topping cuts on the two scaffold limbs. Because of the tree's location continued topping will be required to prevent interference with the canopy of Tree Number 12. This will result in further decline of the tree's health and vigor. I recommend the tree be removed and replaced with a healthy specimen planted in a reasonable location. As mitigation I propose the homeowner plant one 36-inch box size coast live oak tree within the front yard, although the fmal decision regarding mitigation requirements rests with the City of Arcadia Planning Department. The following activities will serve to improve the overall health, safety and long-term aesthetic value of the trees to remain: 1. Fence the trees at the edge of the protected zone or the approved work limits in accordance with the specifications contained in the following General Recommendations section. 2. Prune branches that will conflict with the proposed structures prior to construction. 3. All authorized pruning should be performed by a qualified arborist under the direct observation of the applicant's oak tree consultant. Pruning operations should be consistent with ANSI A300 Standards—Part 1 Pruning and the most recent edition of the International Society of Arboriculture Best Management Practices for Tree Pruning_ 4. No vehicles, equipment,materials, spoil or other items should be used or placed within the protected zone of any oak tree at any time,except as specifically required to complete the approved work. 5. Locate wash-out retention areas as far away from the trees' protected zones as possible. 6. Prior to occupancy,mulch each existing and new protected tree throughout the dripline with four inches of organic mulch as needed to supplement natural leaf litter. 7. Monitor annually for symptoms of stress or decline such as abnormally small or wilting leaves,pale coloration of leaves,early leaf drop,thinning foliage,defoliation,epicormic shoots,poor annual twig growth,twig and branch dieback,peeling bark,or attack by borers or other opportunistic pests. Trees that are stressed should be dealt with as soon as possible. 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. * PAGE 4 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA Consult with a tree care professional to evaluate the health and condition, diagnose problems, and recommend the proper treatment for the stressed trees. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following general recommendations should be followed to establish and maintain a healthy cultural environment for the oak trees. It must be understood that these recommendations apply to oak trees in general; specific questions should always be referred to the oak tree consultant. WORK WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE The protected zone is an area surrounding a tree,defined by local ordinance as all area within the drip line of the tree. This distance must generally be no less than 15 feet from the trunk. Given the high sensitivity of oak trees, great care must be taken when work is conducted within the protected zone. Specifically: Observation--All work conducted within the protected zone of an oak tree should be performed within the presence of a qualified oak tree consultant. Usually this work will also require a permit from the local government. This will help to insure that work is performed in a manner that will not harm a tree. Notice--Forty-eight hours notice should be provided to the oak tree consultant prior to the planned start of work. This notification must usually be provided to the local government also. The notice will insure that the project receives the highest possible scheduling priority and avoid delays. Hand Tools--All work should be accomplished with the use of hand tools only. Except under special circumstances,tractors,backhoes and other vehicles cannot be operated in a manner that will preserve major tree roots,minimize soil compaction,and insure the safety of both the vehicle operator and the tree. Certification--All work conducted within the protected zone should be certified by a qualified oak tree consultant. For work performed under a permit,this may be a requirement of the local government. WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROTECTED ZONE To protect trees within the vicinity of major construction,trees should be temporarily fenced at the edge of the protected zone prior to the beginning of construction operations on a site. The fence should be constructed of chain link material,a minimum of five feet in height. The oak tree consultant should be contacted to develop a fencing plan,generally required by local ordinance. The fence may be removed at the completion of the construction upon approval by the local government. PLANTING WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE Planting within the protected zone of an oak tree is discouraged. Ideally,the leaf litter from the tree should be allowed to collect beneath the tree,creating a natural mulch and fertilizer. If planting is necessary or the natural leaf litter is removed,the following should be considered: 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4. PAGE 5 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA Plant Material--Only drought tolerant plantings should be utilized. All plantings should be compatible with native oak trees. A good reference for compatible plant material is Compatible Plantings under and around Oaks by the California Oak Foundation. Irrigation--No spray-type irrigation systems should be used within the protected zone. It is important that sprinkler systems do not throw water against the trunk of an oak tree. A continuously wet soil condition near the root crown,the area where the tree trunk meets the ground,favors the growth of predatory disease organisms. The two most prominent organisms in Southern California are Avocado Root Rot(Phytophthora cinnamomi)and Oak Root Fungus(Armillaria mellea). As an absolute minimum,all irrigation should be at least 15 feet from the trunk. Resistant Varieties--Avoid plants that are susceptible to either Avocado Root Rot or Oak Root Fungus. Oak trees are particularly susceptible to these diseases in developed areas. Avoiding other plants susceptible to these diseases will also help to keep the diseases in a dormant state. Consult publications by the University of California Cooperative Extension for plant lists. Mulch--Place a three-inch thick layer of organic mulch throughout the protected zone of each tree. Aesthetically pleasing options include crushed walnut hulls and shredded bark. These mulches are beneficial when the natural leaf litter is not available,minimizing evaporation and providing weed control. TREE MAINTENANCE AND PRUNING OPERATIONS Most oak trees require very little pruning,with the exception of periodic removal of deadwood. However, if a tree has a major defect,the employment of proper pruning practices may be more desirable than the uncontrolled damage that could otherwise occur. Always consult qualified professionals for advice. Ornamental or Aesthetic Pruning--Removal of live tissue for the purpose of altering the appearance of an oak tree is not desirable and is generally not allowed under local ordinances. Activities such as thinning out,heading up,or other similar practices contribute to the onset of insect and disease attacks. Deadwooding—Removal of dead tissue,regardless of size,may usually be performed without a permit. All pruning should follow standards endorsed by the International Society of Arboriculture. Other Pruning Operations--Branches that are considered to be unsafe due to decay, cavities,cracks, physical imbalance,fire damage,disease,or insects should be referred to a qualified oak tree consultant for inspection,especially if the branches exceed two inches in diameter.A permit is generally required to remove such branches. A brief written report will be prepared by the oak tree consultant to provide the basis for the request. Cavities and Hollows--Cavities and hollows should be kept free of loose debris. Some contain decayed wood;these should generally be referred to a qualified arborist for treatment. Concrete or other materials should not be used to seal or fill in cavities or hollows. These materials create a haven for diseases and insects over time. Openings may be covered with screening to prevent debris build-up. 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4 PAGE 6 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA Wound Seal—Pruning wounds should generally not be sealed with any type of compound. Over time,these materials crack and create entry points for disease and insects. A proper pruning cut will heal naturally over a short period of time. WATERING Winter rains should be sufficient to provide the water needed for oak trees in natural areas. Oak trees in landscaped areas will usually receive enough water from adjacent plantings. If you suspect that your tree is in need of supplemental water,contact a qualified oak tree consultant for advice. Watering--If supplemental water is required,use a low volume soaker hose. Apply the water just outside the drip line of the tree.A total of 15 to 20 hours of low volume application should suffice. Repeat this watering cycle every one to two months as needed. Water should generally not be applied in the summer,as most oak trees are dormant and cannot accept the water. DISEASES AND INSECTS Effective pest control starts with observation by the homeowner. Changes, such as abnormal leaf drop,oozing sap, and discolored or dying leaves indicate that something has changed and expert inspection is required. Homeowners should be very careful when using pesticides around an oak tree. Herbicides should never be utilized within one hundred feet of an oak tree,unless applied by a certified pesticide applicator. Misuse of these compounds can lead to the death of beneficial organisms or even to the death of the tree. GRADE CHANGES Any change to the grade at the root crown of an oak tree can have a negative impact. As little as six inches can lead to the death of the tree. Drainage patterns should be maintained to prevent water from flowing and ponding at the base of a tree.If fill soil exists,use a shovel to remove the excess soil. The flare at the root crown should just be visible. INSPECTION Oak trees should be inspected on a periodic basis by a qualified oak tree consultant. The inspection basis should be determined by the relative hazard value of the tree. For example,trees surrounding a high-use business should be inspected on a quarterly basis,whereas trees located within a low-use open space might only require bi-annual inspection. It is the responsibility of the property owner to establish and implement an appropriate inspection schedule upon the recommendation provided by the oak tree consultant. WARRANTY The trees discussed herein were generally reviewed for physical,biological,functional,and aesthetic conditions. This examination was conducted in accordance with presently accepted industry procedures: an at-grade,macro-visual observation only. No extensive microbiological, soil/root excavation,upper crown examination,nor internal free investigation was conducted and therefore, 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. e PAGE 7 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA the reportings herein reflect the overall visual appearance of the trees on the date reviewed. No warranty is implied as to the potential failure,health or demise of any part or the whole of any tree described in this report. Clients are advised that should physical or biological concerns be evidenced for any specimen within this report,prudent further investigation,detailed analysis or remedial action may be required. As living organisms,plants continually exhibit growth and response to environmental changes that influence the development,health and vigor of the specimen. These influences may not be externally visible and may be present or develop over various time periods depending on the site conditions. It is recommended that due to the general nature of plant development and continued environmental and physical influences on vegetation at a specific site,regular monitoring by a qualified arborist is scheduled. Locations of property lines or exact tree locations, site amenities, structures or easements are assumed to be as illustrated on any enclosed maps. They are a composite of information provided by the client,records of fact and/or on-site field review. No investigation was made to verify these conditions. This report represents the independent opinion of the preparer and was conducted per the client's scope of request. The report is therefore limited to the extent described herein. 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. e PAGE 8 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE I,Ann Burroughs,certify that: • I have personally inspected the tree and the property referred to in this report and have stated my fmdings accurately. The extent of the evaluation or appraisal is stated in the attached report and the Terms of Assignment. • I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis,opinions,and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts. • My analysis,opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices. • No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party or upon the results of the assessment,the attainment of stipulated results,or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists and the International Society of Arboriculture. I have been involved in the field of Arboriculture and the care and study of trees for over 15 years. 3U RROUC / y I 0� Signed: i AI Nib .onlru Ml.A11MI111*11 7 ( / w ,' /Date: / 0�04 3 CO�isu 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC.• PAGE 9 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA CERTIFICATIONS The American Society of Consulting Arborists in recognition of fulfillment of the requirements for Registered Consulting Arborist®status confers upon Ann Burroughs, RCA #529 Registered Membership 3/5/2013 4110 Gordon Mann,RCA X480 Beth W.Patys,FASAE,CAE President Executive Director International 4 >9 rrJ Society 5riet►of of Arboric rri1 'le�\ Certified Tree Risk lessor !��4 CERTIF CPS**RBORIST }'? '. signature �j U Debra A -Certficate Number: 3 CTRA g— 1211 Expiration Date: Expires:_ 30 June 2015 WORK SAFE BC Dec 31,2013 �itl �� t rlfli11114'° 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4 PAGE 10 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA APPENDIX A- FIELD EVALUATION SHEETS 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4 PAGE 11 - - THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK - - FIELD EVALUATION FORM Owner: �} ❑public %private ❑unknown El other: Site/Address: /3g eda/ i& '1�4104431$4_. Thomas Guide: Page: Coordinate: Date: AO-5— 3 inspector: / Date of last inspection: ❑not previously inspected TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree#: / 2 Species:; Quercus agrifolia ❑Quercus lobate ❑other #of trunks: / dbH(inches): Pe Height(feet): Compass direction N NE E SE S SW W NW Dripline(feet) 2.t/ / i // , Clearance to canopy(feet) _�•'_ti�_MI�i�i7� gliffill Form:❑generally symmetric ,minor asymmetry ❑major asymmetry ❑stump sprout ❑stag-headed Crown class:,l�dominant ❑co-dominant ❑intermediate ❑suppressed Age class:El young ❑semi-mature mature ❑over-mature/senescent Live crown ratio(conifers only): --- % Pruning history:❑crown cll�eayyed ❑excessively thinned ❑topped ❑crown raised ❑pollarded ❑crown reduced ,tsllush cuts ❑ cabled/braced ❑none •!;multiple pruning events Approximate dates: ❑unknown Special Value:❑specimen ❑heritage/historic ❑wildlife ❑unusual ❑street tree f516creen Pshade %indigenous Arprotected by government agency TREE HEALTH Foliage color: ormal ❑chlorotic ❑necrotic Woundwood development❑excellent . average ❑poor ❑ Epicormics?Y'7Twig Dieback? Y 0 none Foliage density)normal ❑sparse Vigor class:❑excellent lverage 0 fair 0 poor Leaf sizey�normal ❑small Growth,e6structions:❑stakes ❑wire/ties ❑signs ❑cables ❑curb/pavement ❑guards Annual shoot growth:❑excellent Wverage ❑poor ❑other Major pest iseases: SITE CONDITIONS Site character residence ❑commercial ❑industrial ❑park ❑open space/❑natural ❑woodland/forest Landscape type:❑parkway ❑raised bed ❑container ❑mound ❑lawn Ai shrub border ❑wind break Irrigation:none ❑adequ ❑inadequate El excessive ❑trunk wetted Pavement lifted? YQ Recent site disturbance? Y N ❑construction ❑soil dist •_..nce ❑grade change ❑line clearing ❑site clearing %dripline paved: 0% 10-25% 2- .1', 50-75% 75-100% %dripline win soil: a 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% %dripline grade lowered: 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Soil problems:El drainage ❑shallow El compacted droughty ❑saline El alkaline El acidic ❑small volume ❑disease center ❑history of failure ❑clay ❑expansive ❑slope ° aspect 0 ctiprys:❑lights ❑signage ❑line-of-sight ❑view overhead lines ❑underground utilities El traffic ❑adjacent vegetation ❑other Z±1AC%N. Exposure to wind ❑single tree ❑below canopy above canopy El recently exposed ❑windward,canopy edge ❑area prone to windthrow Prevailing wind direction: Occurrence of snow/ice storm never ❑seldom ❑regularly FIELD EVALUATION FORM - PAGE 2 OF 2 Tree Number /Z.-- TARGET Use Under Tree:Kb ' ng ❑parking ❑traffic 65pedestrian ❑recreation Xlandscape hardscape Asmall features (utility lines Can target be moved?Y Can use be restricted?Y Occupancy:❑occasional use ❑intermittent use ❑frequent use constant use TREE DEFECTS - Noted as applicable ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot? Y eMushroomlconk present? YQ1D: Expos oot • ❑severe ❑moderate ❑low Unflerffiined: ❑severe ❑moderate ❑low Root pr ed: feet from trunk Root area affected: % Buttress wounded? Y N When: Restricted root area:❑severe moderate ❑low Potential for root failure:❑severe ❑moderate ❑low LEAN: i ) degrees from vertical 3I/) natural ❑unnatural y(self-corrected Soil heaving? YO Decay in plane of lean? Y ©Roots broke n? YO oi1 cracking?/l© Lean severity: ❑severe ❑moderate ow Compounding factors: CROWN DEFECTS: S=severe,M=moderate,L=low DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper t Bow,sweep ,�,/ Co-dominants,forks /t/ z./ Multiple attachments t� Included bark /l �f Excessive end weight Cracks/splits Hangers Girdling Wounds/seam Decay _ Cavity Conks/mushrooms Bleeding/sap flow Loose/cracked bark Nesting hole/bee hive Deadwood/stubs Borers/termites/ants Cankers/galls/burls Previous failure RECOMMENDED TREATMENT Prune:❑remove defective part ❑reduce end weight ❑crown clean ❑thin ,aise canopy ❑crown reduce ❑restructure ❑shape Pest ol: Cable ce: Other Activities:❑aerate soil ❑remove fill soil ❑remove irrigation/planting ❑remove wire,etc. ❑fertilize/water Inspect further:❑root crown ❑decay ❑aerial ❑monitor Remove tree? Y 67 Replace tree? Y 62 Move target:? Y 0 Other: ❑no action required at this time Effect on adjacent treesone ❑evaluate Notification:❑owner ❑manager 0 governing agency Date: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FIELD EVALUATION FORM Owner: __,, ❑public %private ❑unknown ❑other. nn at Site/Address: /35 C le,r i/41.- y.,/fij1C401.40- Thomas Guide: Page: Coordinate: Date: /0/2S7/3 Inspector: pf3 Date of last inspection: ❑not previously inspected TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree#: /3 Species:X Quercus agrifolia ❑Quercus lobate ❑other #of trunks: / dbH(inches): Z3‘ ! 1 •`I / Height(feet): 30 Compass direction N NE E SE S SW W NW Dripline(feet) /7 _253 Z7 / Z p. Clearance to canopy(feet) s 7 Form:❑generally symmetric 'minor asymmetry ❑major asymmetry ❑stump sprout ❑stag-headed Crown class, I dominant ❑co-dominant ❑intermediate ❑suppressed Age class:❑young ❑semi-mature mature ❑over-mature/senescent Live crown ratio(conifers only): % Pruning history:❑crown cleaned ❑excessively thinned ❑topped ❑crown raised . ❑pollarded ❑crown reduced ❑flush cuts ❑ cabled/braced ❑none ,multiple pruning events Approximate dates: ❑unknown Special Value:❑specimen ❑heritage/historic ❑wildlife ❑unusual ❑street tree screen ,[shade X indigenous protected by government agency TREE HEALTH Foliage color ormal ❑chlorotic C�necrotic Woundwood development:i excellent ,average ❑poor ❑ Epicormics?Y lUTwig Dleback? Y N } none Foliage density:(normal ❑sparse Vigor class:❑excellent average ❑fair ❑poor Leaf size:,it normal ❑small Growth obstructions:❑stakes ❑wire/ties ❑signs ❑cables ❑curb/pavement ❑guard; Annual shoot growth:❑excellent average ❑poor other 4) e it � f2tdM,rt. ,2,00(140-fr(l, Major pests/ se : SITE CONDITIONS Site character: ,,residence ❑commercial ❑industrial ❑park ❑open space ❑natural ❑woodland/forest Landscape ty ❑parkway ❑raised bed ❑container ❑mound Zwn ❑shrub border ❑wind break Irrigation: none ❑adequate ❑inadequate ❑excessive ❑trunk wetted Pavemept'lifted? Y N Recent site disturbance? Y p❑construes� ❑soil disturbance ❑grade change ❑line clearing ❑site clearing %dripline paved: ('I 5% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% %dripline wifill soil: 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% dripline grade lowered: 0 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Soil problems:❑drainage ❑shallow ❑compact$roughty ❑saline ❑alkaline ❑acidic ❑small volume ❑disease center ❑history of failure ❑clay ❑expansive ❑slope ° aspect -- ❑lights ❑signage ❑line-of-sight ❑view l pverhead lines ❑underground utilities ❑traffic ❑adjacent vegetation ❑other Exposure to wind:❑single tree ❑below canopy jiabove canopy ❑recently exposed ❑windward,canopy edge El area prone to windthrow Prevailing wind direction: Occurrence of snow/ice storms:'never ❑seldom ❑regularly 1. IZ°2D°522 E FIELD EVALUATION FORM - PAGE 2 OF 2 Tree Number /. TARGET Use Under Tree:f23;bu+ +ng ($+',parking traffic ❑ estrian ❑recreation �andscape rdscape ,i small features ❑utility lines Can target be moved?Y Can use be restricted?Y Occupancy:❑occasional use ❑intermittent use ❑frequent use 'nstant use TREE DEFECTS - Noted as applicable ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot? Y J7 Mushroom/conk present? Y 6 ID: Exposgd-rots: ❑severe ❑moderate ❑low Unc ed: ❑severe ❑moderate ❑low Root: feet from trunk Root area affected: % Buttress wounded? Y N When: Restric oot area:❑severe ❑moderate ❑low Potential for root failure:❑severe ❑moderate ❑low L degrees from vertical ❑natural ❑unnatural ❑self-corrected Soil heaving? Y N Decay in a of lean? Y N Roots broken? Y N Soil cracking? Y N Lean severity: El severe ❑moderate ❑low Compoug factors: CROWN DEFECTS: S=severe,M=moderate,L=low DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow,sweep Co-dominants,forks t f Multiple attachments Included bark /tf Excessive end weight Cracks/splits Hangers Girdling Wounds/seam Decay Cavity Conks/mushrooms Bleeding/sap flow Loose/cracked bark Nesting hole/bee hive Deadwood/stubs Ceps termites/ants [,,, L—. Cankers/galls/burls Previous failure I RECOMMENDED TREATMENT Pr remove defective part ❑reduce end weight ❑crown clean El thin ❑raise canopy ❑crown reduce ❑restructure 1:1 shape Pes ontrol: Cabl ace: Othertities:❑aerate soil ❑remove fill soil ❑remove irrigation/planting ❑re/rve wire,etc. ❑fertilize/water Inspectter:❑root crown ❑decay ❑aerial ❑monitor fiemove tree? Y CLV Replace tree? Y N� Move target:? Y()Other: o action required at this time Effect on adjacent trees none ❑evaluate Notification:❑owner ❑manager ❑governing agency Date: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ?ern Dole_ FIELD EVALUATION FORM Owner: ❑public private ❑unknown ❑other: Site/Address: /33 yf lO eS/.` eL06� Thomas Guide: Page: Coordinate: fi. Date:14 Inspector: A / Date of last inspection: ❑not previously inspected TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree#: /4. Species:I Quercus agrifolia ❑Quercus lobate ❑other #of trunks: / dbH(inches): be 3 Height(feet): 1/ Compass direction N NE. E SE S SW Dripline(feet) (feet) Z_ I I W NW Clearance to canopy Z 4 Z L5 (./ Form:❑generally symmetric minor asymmetry ❑major asymmetry ❑stump sprout ❑stag-headed Crown class:❑dominant ❑co-dominant ❑intermediate suppressed Age class:❑young ❑semi-mature 'mature ❑over-mature/senescent Live crown ratio(conifers only): % Pruning history:❑crown cleaned ❑excessively thinned stopped ❑crown raised ❑pollarded ❑crown reduced ❑flush cuts ❑ cabled/braced ❑none %multiple pruning events Approximate dates: ❑unknown Special Value:❑specimen ❑heritage/historic ❑wildlife ❑unusual ❑street tree ❑screen ❑shade indigenous , protected by government agency TREE HEALTH Foliage colorormal ❑chlorotiic� ❑necrotic Woundwood development:❑excellent ❑avers EpicormicsN Twig Dieback2 Yf N none 9 e YS poor CI Foliage density ❑normal ,I�sparse Vigor class:❑excellent ❑average fair %poor Leaf size: normal ❑small Growth obstructs :❑stakes ❑wire/ties ❑signs ❑cables Annual shoot growth:❑excellent Wverage ❑poor ❑other ❑guards Major pests/djes: SITE CONDITIONS Site character: residence ❑commercial ❑industrial ❑park ❑open space ❑natural ❑woodlandtforest Landscape type:❑parkway ❑raised bed ❑container ❑mound til:Jawn ❑shrub border ❑wind break Irrigation:none ❑adequate ❑inadequate ❑excessive ❑trunk wetted Pavement lifted? Y N Recent site disturbance? Y ❑construction ❑soil disturbance ❑grade change ❑line clearing ❑site clearing %dripline paved: 0% 10-25% (05-50% 50-75% 75-100% dripline w/fill soil: 6i? 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% %dripline grade lowered: V- 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% Soil problems:❑drainage ❑shallow ❑compacted 18.d50roughty ❑saline ❑alkaline ❑acidic ❑small volume ❑disease center ❑history of failure ❑clay ❑expansive ❑slope ° aspect O tru7 n :0 lights ❑signage ❑line-of-sight ❑view ❑overhead lines ❑underground utilities ❑traffic,djacent vegetation ❑other Exposure to wind:❑single tree jdbelow canopy ❑above canopy ❑recently exposed ❑windward,canopy edge ❑area prone to windthrow Prevailing wind direction: Occurrence of snow/ice storms never ❑seldom ❑regularly FIELD EVALUATION FORM - PAGE 2 OF 2 Tree Number /4' TARGET Use Under Tree:$'building ❑parking ❑traffic ❑pedestrian ❑recreation )landscape�.hardscape -f<small features ❑utility lines Can target be moved?Y 6 Can use be restricted?Y® Occupancy:❑occasional use ❑intermittent use ❑frequent use ?Cconstant use TREE DEFECTS - Noted as applicable ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot? Y N Mushroomlconk present? YO ID: Expose54-ots: ❑severe ❑moderate ❑low Undelp►ined: ❑severe ❑moderate ❑low Root pprKeed: feet from trunk Root arcted: % Buttress wounded? Y N When: Restricted root area:❑severe .kmoderate ❑low Potential for root failure:❑severe ❑moderate ❑low degrees from vertical Onatural ❑unnatural )6 self-corrected Soil heaving? Y 6) Decay in plane of lean? Y L% Roots broken? Y 6)Soil cracking? Y N Lean severity: ❑severe ❑moderate i)fflow Compounding factors: CROWN DEFECTS: S=severe,M=moderate,L=low DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Poor taper Bow,sweep Co-dominants,forks Multiple attachments Included bark Excessive end weight Cracks/splits Hangers Girdling Wounds/seam Decay Cavity Conks/mushrooms Bleeding/sap flow Loose/cracked bark Nesting hole/bee hive Deadwood/stubs Borers/termites/ants Cankers/galls/burls Previous failure RECOMMENDED TREATMENT Pry:❑remove defective part ❑reduce end weight ❑crown clean ❑thin ❑raise canopy ❑crown reduce ❑restructure ❑shape Pes; control: Cablel ce: Other tivities:❑aerate soil ❑remove fill soil ❑remove irrigation/planting ❑remove wire,etc. ❑fertilize/water Inspect further:❑root crown ❑decay ❑aerial ❑monitor Remove tree?ON Replace tree? Y N Move target:? Y 6 Other: ❑no action required at this time Effect on adjacent trees:134none ❑evaluate Notification:❑owner ❑manager ❑governing agency Date: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 415 rss ' 4 /4 min NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA APPENDIX B- PHOTOGRAPHS 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA, CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4 INC. PAGE 18 138 California Street Arcadia, California ,wr wYaq ;�" '�.. '�•<... '-�•r�e... Tree#12 Tree#13 CAI►'::.. e i. • - Tree#14 NOVEMBER 21, 2013 ANN BURROUGHS, ISA APPENDIX C - OAK TREE LOCATION MAP 138 CALIFORNIA STREET,ARCADIA,CA GREEN FIELD INVESTMENT INC. 4 PAGE 20 .I r-.1 ddW NOI1dQ01 O <§ i N ! rif 1 it, i b a Q w O 1 u V ■ 15- % %Y) 13 ir Q � _ I p I= 141 ,ig ; i ?" -... , 41 1 1 O IIQ.'J ZZ �z QX0 J A g _ tl fA W m o 0 ------- 1331:I1SVINeIwr1V0fiE1 pipossalk o Q ic �IIIIIIIII� J /^C\ •��t IIII..i IIIIII' IIIIIIN I/III • �►s 110.............w. ....... ...e. "�IC 110 IIIIII,III.►IIII I IIIIIIIIIIIII N oh--. ii EL 0 r 411111M a 1:1nnulu . ,M p Liar ....m." A377d ‘ \-.... —"-- LiP PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT , E�j. (Certificate of Determination When Attached to Notice of Exemption) 1. Name or description of project: Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 72285; Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 14-02; Oak Tree Encroachment Permit No. THE 14-02; and Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 14-02 for a three unit, residential condominium development 2. Project Location — Identify street 138 California Street(between 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue) address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15' or 7 1/2' topographical map identified by quadrangle name): 3. Entity or person undertaking A. project: B. Other(Private) T.J. Build (1) Name Mr. Jimmy Lee (2) Address 13841 Roswell Avenue, #A Chino, CA 91710 4. Staff Determination: The Lead Agency's Staff, having undertaken and completed a preliminary review of this project in accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further environmental assessment because: a. ❑ The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA. b. ❑ The project is a Ministerial Project. c. ❑ The project is an Emergency Project. d. ❑ The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study. e. ® The project is categorically exempt. Applicable Exemption Class: 15303 (Class 3, New construction of less than four units) f. ❑ The project is statutorily exempt. Applicable Exemption: g. ❑ The project is otherwise exempt on the following basis: j h. ❑ The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency. Name of Lead Agency: Date: August 6, 2014 Staff: Jordan Chamberlin, Assistant Planner Preliminary Exemption Assessment FORM "A" tare SUE M NOO PROJECT INFORMATION ,N 'a "'° r"' I0b61066 138 CALIFORNIA ST. 4I OWNERSHIP OCCUPANTS ARCADIA, CA.- U MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE CONSULTING 14-220 SCALE 1"= 150' 12106 LAMBERT AVE.EL MONTE,CA 91732-FAX6326)350-1 I q ' V `! `J `/ ,`J k";�� v LI-°•'-' ° v \J N u 'n`/Porut-I'', 1 J I. I- ID, N7 to 4 5 6 _ 7 1 '! I I h 14 o IK 1p . 1 7 70 Z _Z-�.1$ B-JLK- o g tar 1!'-- n r :k IR so '� . f�..fas _ xI "� e',"E''SHEET 4 1 5 /85 ®v',50 so n,.w as ioo so /9498 I T$ $BONITk 5T.ti, - I• 50 so Alas so • • • • 50 �S tee 60 60.9/ h 6 h r 21 r 1al ®� $ _ 0 ®O 6 ' o � 52 51 $ �' _4-, < t• X33 1 31 30 • - 24 23 2ia2 f,., -- mt r '}E4 6: ® .% SHEET 2 Y. 4 °0 +A If,- .SHEET 3 i4 a w 41 % 1.s r• • ""iv 1.--,voti` .ro /dO4w 40 6. g 04:47"'e h'®• 0 0 5 T 5 0. . 0 0 1 SHEET 4 p �- F 6 7 10 E 0 13 14 5 1"."------ d.. M b d la - *b' 49 ' PIE 101 _ 185 �' ` so /140 -mat 4 cv 50 1 8 CALIFO IA ST$ • EP 101 ,00.05 r� 00 7. 100.04 , 00 ^ °D r a 19 A-.CAD • ' A TA g 0 TR (444—%.:, 7x { ru :_ 31 30 29 28 26 25 2 .. tom, 22 I ri 1 Cf• '_ Q b 00 ao A in (31."1:t "1 O� °° 15005 50 • • 111! oil ,0005 17 (:) ? ` --- 4 In ti i 2 O IB r .1.iN cal 10 11 13 �±,�7 Z ——— 8 e a 1 M R t CD S. 8@ "' • r Ia. ■/ � 9D N:�I I'OF 1N1s B ?0.05 a .o 00 �L 6 ' e n —. E DIAMON[} 111111111111111111r ST I • b B ARCADIA 2 s t 2M !Md., 1 2. O 2116 f► $ 72 V lira° ,s1 '° f 5 roams IB Q 6;Z B °" 28 6:Z ae g f2 C-P M 26611--7-8 u se O -V 41}..11.... 0 ® ® 8- �� O O 7042° n 1 = 1 �.B "ORisss B so wood 60 • BLK w c3 14046 50 eo - 155x4 I 72 PG 6 02 co L R a 4 170 ' 54 50.52 Sam 64 e0 26 H6' 46 5542 45.54 �, 45,.42 A ——— B 3O �N ° EQ. • 24 vm t ss 70 I- aoa ,n w Ito ti 1 4 r W u U, zsz,i3 g¢ 54 B� Et') 6O 0 f0 ff l2.9 a gtoT kg Iiz SHEET gIIR se sort° 6- 4 Tit 1 1n 11 - 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 -c•)1 -col -U 1 51- a F I 1 m " w e 6 M R Imo® s 15 - 89 - 90 6 6 M C1 .. �s:_ �. ,� t s4 5010 5402 60 +s •.• - RESOLUTION NO. 1910 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 72285; MULTIPLE-FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. MFADR 14-02; OAK TREE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. TRE 14-02; AND HEALTHY OAK TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TRH 14-02 WITH A CLASS 3 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR A THREE-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 138 CALIFORNIA STREET WHEREAS, on January 21, 2014, an application was filed by Mr. Jimmy Lee for the design review of a three-unit residential condominium development at 138 California Street, Development Services Department Case No. MFADR 14-02; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2014, an application was filed by Mr. Jimmy Lee for an Oak Tree Encroachment Permit for a three-unit residential condominium development to encroach into the protected area of one oak tree at 138 California Street, Development Services Department Case No. TRE 14-02; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2014, an application was filed by Mr. Jimmy Lee for a Healthy Oak Tree Removal Permit for a three-unit residential condominium development to remove two healthy oak trees at 138 California Street, Development Services Department Case No. TRH 14-02; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2014, an application was filed by David Yu for the subdivision of a three-unit residential condominium development at 138 California Street, Development Services Department Case No. TPM 72285; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on August 26, 2014 at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in the staff report dated August 26, 2014 are true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds and directs: 1. That the proposed project together with the provisions for its design and improvement is consistent with the City's General Plan, the City's Subdivision and Zoning Regulations, the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines, and the City's Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance. 2. That the discharge of waste from the proposed project into the community sewer system will not violate existing requirements prescribed by a California Regional Water Quality Control Board. 3. That this project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. 4. That the Development Services Director or designee is authorized to approve and execute, if necessary, a subdivision agreement for this project. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission approves TPM 72285, MFADR 14-02, TRE 14-02, and TRH 14-02, for a three-unit residential condominium development at 138 California Street, subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall be developed and maintained by the applicant/property owner in a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for TPM 72285, MFADR 14-02, TRE 14-02, and TRH 14-02, subject to the approval of the Community Development Administrator or designee. 2. The project shall be developed and maintained by the applicant/property owner in compliance with all of the recommended tree protection measures listed in the Oak Tree Report prepared for this project. 3. The Tentative Parcel Map shall be revised by the applicant to be consistent with the site plan prior to submitting the Parcel Map to the Engineering Division for approval. -2- 1910 4. The applicant/property owner shall provide a revised driveway paver detail with a much thinner section to minimize impacts to the Oak Tree prior to submitting plans to plan check in Building Services. 5. One 36" box Coast Live Oak tree shall be planted in the subject property's front yard area, the location of which shall be determined in consultation with a Certified Arborist and shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Administrator or designee. 6. One 48" box Holly Oak tree shall be planted in the City's parkway, and the tree and its location shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Services Director or designee. 7. The applicant/property owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public right-of- way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director and Development Services Director. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check review and approval by the foregoing City officials and employees. 8. The applicant/property owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia and its officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officials, officers, employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or conditional approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to any approval or conditional approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section -3- 1910 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter. 9. Approval of TPM 72285, MFADR 14-02, THE 14-02, and TRH 14-02 shall not take effect unless on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning Commission adoption of the Resolution, the applicant and property owner have executed and filed with the Community Development Administrator or designee an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed, approved and adopted this 26th day of August, 2014. Chairman, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Stephen P. Deitsch City Attorney -4- 1910