Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUntitled , 41111116% 6#?kAliCad.et
41 1! :; BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION coMPt.ET C�
ARCADIA - 240 West Huntington Drive
,�c\> jo, Arcadia, California 91006-3104
�l'ORATvo' 8 1 8 ) 5 7 4 - 5 4 1 6
1.
YAU1;' 1 0J'' 1
500 S OLD RANCH RD 10/13/88 09: 57
Permit No : A8802647 Project No : AU001402
Status : APPROVED Validated by : CP
Inspector area: 206
This type : Single Family Project Date Applied : 10/13/88
Date Issued : 10/13/88
Parcel number Date Finaled .
Group-occup/use: Date To Expire:
Owner : GREEN, ROBERT
Applicant : GREEN, JUDY
Applicant Addr : 500 S OLD RANCH RD ARCADIA, CA 91006
Job Address : 500 S OLD RANCH RD
Phone number : 818-447-2479
Valuation 12 , 391
Construction : ADD
Permit to do : GARAGE & WORKSHOP
This type : SFP
Plan No. > 23089
School Certification No> 392
Homeown Assoc. (YES/NO) > YES
Name Of Homeown Assoc. > S.A.VILLAGE
Date Association Apprvd> 070588
Fee description Units Fee/unit Ext fee Data
Garage (Enter Square Footage) 3104> 742 . 00
Building Permit Fee 3104> 196. 55
S.M. I .P. Fee 714-2207> . 87
*** Fees Required *** *** Fees Collected & Credits ***
Receipt No. Date Payment
10/13/88 197 . 42
Total Fees: 197 . 42 Total Payments: 197. 42
Balance Due: . 00
J
CALL FOR INSPECTION DECLARATIONS
Requests for inspections should be made at least In accordance with Health & Safety Code, Section
twenty-four hours in advance by telephone at 19825,all required declarations on the reverse side of
574-5416, 8:00 A.M. -5:00 P.M. this form have been properly signed and dated by
the permittee.
Inspectors office hours are: Verified by:
8:00-9:00 A.M.; 1:00- 1:30&4:30-5:00 P.M. Signature
!JJIII1 ( 1II z O v O❑ U ❑Y�O ❑0 4 0 1! I1mI1II1 nQQV O°g n 0 3 3 » i m 25-2'..m 1 •vc g = o $O--°g .T, 4 - zm ag° > ._< °0-I .7 ? ° x �- m o . o o R z pcv R mo �mff O 3 m f� m avR , 3 oho `',< 0 8 gS9 3 ''' A om 3 vom mog� »'mom m N° _. _ e-.._
i► 6' g o m 3 vE-0QBg g > $ S Y 7_-i tw m o_ h �ov4P ?g $ Hw•�w Po'�y 2.m
' Omcsi. —1 is $ 3 ix,3P� m { 3 :o °- o =w/S4g .° ,s.ipT H3 W3 mg..mfoag � a 2
ta s -� w m v3 s m ,E =m
r m o > 3& S ° R m g' s n» ro a n n, >_n
Zy� m n u y o o m m m,. - r .. ng i
a
ozpmy . . F° p R 3R a S3 - R i - 2af g3 $ �m , a oa 'm3 0 �3. Z 2a4,E.. o... -- . v
mpm v m Zm a m33 m m ago). mc,o m
cFs*. m om R � ° m_ O ❑ m °°5m 'E " S.� 'oo mSmZ O m fn� SC� 3 n ° x °� ° ^.6 3�vvL C1 8 s't ° O 0 2 0 i ��� aS°m 3 � � m hH!flH ° n
a,>»- R. m `� i sod �° O oe 1• arc � EM`� Yoor'aoao p nm ' 3n _.c �»
2 o O � � ; $ o m $o az g° rm 3 m
--39, �° m .rwnv
m �� S X , Z �a� ° o Z E < '•ro < 2; :-9:14 / > . k°oc mm m E
8O p m ()S E _o M c. m 3 J° . ° w n ` °o m 'a v 'v 33
mz<2 7'�� S� S` 15x O ' > . .ono. *o'< co n=E m m .-g m 0 1R •i no vF
m _ n_ o _ 7 s {{{Y_ p _ o .°' �+ O O Li.? O <v m m m 3.
C�N2 °n3 �R� Z� � m R e 7 _. 0 0 = _ a9'?.¢?¢ R.m xw 0E i pia,,,t3 V n w m 3 9 yp�3 �_
1 �v p ° �
I.41 0 �3 c •4 O oa :.i3m �oo$ _. m3 ° � 00m �� 3 4 ••< m 0
Cp gem > r° °cSo nm Nffi m on_.° °. 3m wmin F_°°
agog cq °ts ' 30° R . n �< g� g ffio� =gw�� >� � %m � m3°$ � z
m 3 mo _Ym� � <w a
•D> M °o R Z 2- T 3'4, c ; ? 5i q y a j$ o3o,cS n� m3�gor O_ �m $o= m RR m H
� a3 fi t ail f3 a > p g° n »$ oE gs2 = -p4 .-0 _---go,a. m
g. �� = " al; �. .5', as
P SG s 3 c g 1111 .r g rn2tI1 ;1I$ItiI1Ii 3 DI O R _ > ?m 5 E Y g m m
? T g 4$ k @Rg n Eeffi ° mm.°<'�°�. 3vim�'10 Emg'n Q °g a
1!: an
SQ �ribbmWfNtJ S � �4 Ya m a of 3 � 'O ° ° OO'om� m Aa 4 uk g n
▪ 0 (O ; A W N-W Q O COO CO N V 0) N A W N N O m CO Co V 0) Cfl A CO N -, O (D CO V 0) (T A W N) C Z
y - O
n 9 (p n T o T (n Z__ m o 3 o (n m C7 m 31 T < _ ?1 T 31 ?1 O 5 m 7 U) O > (A m 31 CD (A 11 (n Q
<• ` 5: 10 m $ m Z 0 m 0 3 c O m c° C ? > 'm_ d `� 1 x c ° m 0 m m co O
-, m v y 3 w 3 0 3 3 on . Z O ( m 5 m 3 a 0 cn o- z 1)
33
m go m_ T c coo c0i . K v m c m 0 3 o c0)i to n w o o °-) a) o m a > m 5 Z Oo o m Qo cc)) O m
in y an O o v p a) n �. -o < > r a 3 m Dr) m 0 Dm) y 3• 1 N N _-i
�' v m m 0 7 -- Ds D cmi 3 = n n z `° N ? c° N o N m 0 CD 3 co .. Z o (n m ; 0 v o N o - Z A Z
m co _ 7 m a Z a m C) * m o
.c = N y
.4 _
v v o o °�, s ;0 v
> > > N ‘..4
— >
m m m m
_ Z - ¢� may.
v v v )
,
V QQ m N A W) N O+ T (N m i V 0) N) 0 CO CO CO U U) A A A A A A A y
A W N) - 0 CO CO V CO Cn A CO r . A A W W W W W
m
Z N 1 0 CO OD V 0) T r
* O
r
m C-. T m � - C I G I- 3) m
o m w (c o x ? T 31 (n W (n T 31 3 W
> > o d d � X o o c ?! C n 37 n n 0
3 m m X o O m 0 ' O
a m 0 Q m m � a m N a c 2 Z
n m m m r o < y d m o o m . f c c
m f a m m (p co a Z w m c m E
. m o a N m n m?
{m
_ O D m ° v p n CO
3 c co o Ill° m � G O m O
c N d ° m N G) m G) c r 2 s N m 0 0 Q . < i y n o HT -, cc 0 r -I 3 � m O°) m C a m — n co � �(n o � m m o o 3 3 m v� ° ° n , t n z E . -1-4 O (c 00 7 a O
m c O Z
°O Z
a. N
o o 0 0
-- > -I -I
4 -i
in m m m
E z z Z
0 0 Cl) N
11_5 73
_ - - ` - I . • - - -- • . . - • - • I . . - - • • 4' -. -
z
0
m
I _
~
.
v (77')
- / K ) `-� / r,_{,..\_iki, ��
�� [/l^/ / ) / / (�, P�-/ � / /�/ �_/ ^
-- _____-_ _ -. �_ ______'___-_ -_�__-____ -_
. - _ - ^ __ - ____� -- __--_
..._
) ,/ . )
i ,
.________ coto IP Rao
_ _
......_...... .._____
__.
1 4 -11 ,,, ,,,,,r, 31VG !
a III
i - •
"iii, .'4 "5,=',,. / ) , :
i i ,
i ,,
,.v&) ,-- ,,,,vi -,,
/ f ,
\ \
2 ,1 i
___ _ ______.y __,___
FINDINGS
ARCADIA CITY MODIFICATION COMMITTEE
8:15 a.m., Tuesday, July 26, 1988
CONFERENCE ROOM
PUBLIC HEARING MC 88-061
Address: 500 South Old Ranch Road
Applicants: Robert and Judy Ann Green
Request: Modifications for a new two-car garage and workshop:
A. 3'-0" northerly side yard in lieu of 5'-0" (9252.2.4)
B. Occupancy of 585 sq. ft. (39%) of the required rear yard in lieu of
375 sq. ft. (25%) (9252.2.11)
FINDINGS
The applicant is proposing a new 742 square foot two-car garage and workshop with
a 3 foot northerly side setback and a 10 foot rear setback. The 3 foot setback is
requested so that an existing slab foundation may be used. The slab was put in place
in 1982 when a similar Modification request had been approved. The applicants did
not relocate the garage at that time and the Modification has expired.
The Architectural Review Board of the Santa Anita Village Association has
reviewed and approved this proposal.
The Committee considered the request reasonable and determined that approval of
MC 88-061 would secure an appropriate improvement.
ACTION
Approved
There is a five working day appeal period for this application, building permits
cannot be obtained until August 3, 1988. Please contact the Building Department at
574-5416 to determine the number of building plans required for plan check and
proper permits to be obtained before construction.
Any modification granted by this application must be used within twelve months
(July 26, 1989) or this application shall become null and void. Plans shall be in
substantial compliance with the plans approved by the Modification Committee.
Any minor alteration made to said plans shall be subject to the review and approval
of the Planning Department.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Szany, Butler & McIntyre
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE: Kasama
B06 -04- 90
/1-izi, 7 owoii
' -/5-:,' ,,;(21:
.
xt„... ) h.-,,,,,,,,,'
5j - 430?
i*?C/g (571c, - /_-.- Ifs
(,,.. 9
tilt-1,,teA1-1.'
)
U
Xt 57) \-5)• 061L1 l '- iii:-/If-/ L116 ' ''41772j
i d„, )Ziwid,i(-1-cd 9 164>)7.1)
11/71"- (-/ ' - • 7- i *- 11/,6t 17Le-, /V1--' '
4
(7 ' /11 '
/ e, 4
/249-7/Y /
• ( , ,
, - • `..! -
, , d4/1Ttli ' . 7,/ti/b • , a ,,e__,/
Li/
(if?"11,4•h- -1-1 '`/ ,
—i
SANTA ANITA VILLAGE i
COMMUNITY ASSO7N-Th
/
APPROVED : • .1,. A
mak
. .. 1'HUC U1/1E321i4., 4,..4,..,J., lY.Ur. /14J.:=7bb43 __
`e Post-it"Ft to 7671 Dee o�
• -� Boo-o� g''90.
(1i.: TO From ��� �` `WIL
c°4.41,„Q. �' e; 1 � NER-423
Phone# Phone#
// Re-issued•November 1, 2002
Fax# ' Revision A November 1, 2003
ICC Evaluati� ' 35l - Q3 0, Fax
d.Whittler,California 90601 a(5s2)89e.0543
w .ICC-BS.01"
'wpm's,Lana-MA/muiie woo.ouee w omnmgnam,Alabama 35215 a(205)59139800
J ( Regional Office a 4051 West Flossmoor Road,Country Club Mk,aims 60478 a(701:9759.23o5
Legacy Report on the 2000 international Building Code®with 2002 Accumulative Supplement to the International
Codes®,the 2000 international Residential Code® with 2002 Accumulative Supplement to the International Codes®,
the 1999 Standard Building Code®,the BOCA®Nylons/Building Code/1999.the 1997 Uniform Building Code*"and
the 1998 International One-and Two-Family Dwelling Coda®.
DIVISION 07-THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION Shake panels are 443/4 in.(1137mm)wide by 15i/2 in. (394
Section 07320-Roof Tiles mm)deep.
GERARD ROOFING TECHNOLOGIES 'Galvalume is a regIstered trademark of BIEC International
955 COLUMBIA STREET Inc.
BREA,CALIFORNIA 92821-2923
1.800-23ROOFS 4.0 INSTALLATION
www.aerardusa.com
4.1 General
1.0 SUBJECT
Gerard® Stone-Coated Tile and Shake Panels shall be
Coated Steel Roofing Panels: installed on wood or steel battens spaced approximately
1.1 Gerard8 Stone-Coated Tile and Shake Panels 14 to in. (368 mm) on center over open rafters, spaced or
1.2 Armor Stone-Coated Tile and Shake Panels solid sheathing, or an existing roof covering in accordance
1.3 Diplomat Stone Coated Tile and Shake Panels with the following:
1.4 Canyon Shake Stone Coated Panels
4.2 Battens and Counterbattens
2.0 PROPERTIES FOR WHICH EVALUATION iS SOUGHT
Wood battens are nominal 2x2 in. (51x51 mm) and
2.1 Roof Covering Classification counterbattens are nominal 1x4 in. (25x102 mm) standard
2.2 Roof Resistance grade,or better,Douglas fir or other species having a specific
2.3 Weather Resistance gravity of 0.50 or greater. Steel battens are hat-shaped
sections with a 1 112 in. (38 mm)minimum height,fabricated
3.0 DESCRIPTION from minimum No.22 gage[0.0025 in.(0.64 mm))galvanized
steel.Battens are as shown in Figure 1 of this report,
Gerard®Stone-Coated Tile and Shake Panels described in 4.3 Roof Slope and Underlayment
this report are used as roof coverings over new and existing
roofs.
Gerard® Stone-Coated Tile and Shake Panels shall be
The roofing panels are formed from mild steel complying with installed on roof slopes of 2 1/2:12 (20.8 percent slope) or
ASTM A653 Structural Grade 33,minimum,and have a zinc. greater with an undone layer of two layers Tyrga No. er
galvanized G90 coating complying with ASTM A924 or a organic-fiber felt(or one layer of Type II No.30 organic-fiber
Galvalume®'AZ50 coating complying with ASTM A792.The Building It Code),complying In jurisdictions n wiS adopting the Uniform
steel panels have a baked-on primer on both sides with a the roof Code),complying with ASTM panels Type limited Where
semigloss wash coat on the underside. The base metal the roof sloco is less than 2 1/2:12,the panels are limned td
thickness is 26 gage(0.0159 In.(0.40 mm)J.After the panels use as a decorative cyst covering only,and shall a installed
are formed,the upper surface and flange edges are coated codry roof covering system in accordance with the applicable
with crushed stone chips bonded to the panels with an acrylic code.
resin. A clear acrylic overglaze Is applied to the panels to On all steep slope roofs (greater than 2 1/2:12),where the
complete the process.Z The panels weight 1.4 pounds per January average temperature is 25°F(-4°C),or lam,or where
square foot(6.84 kg/m ).
there Is a possibility of ice dams forming along the eaves
Tile panels are 45 3r4 in. (1162 mm) wide by 151!2 in. (394 causing a backup of water,an ice shield shall be installed in
mm)deep. accordance with the following:
ICC-ES iegay reports are not to he construed as representing cfsn,e,tcs or any over attributes not specified'',addressed,nor are they to be can eve d as
an endorsement l'the subject of the report or a recommender/on for it.asses 7,ire tt h 0 Keirronly by ICC Evaluation Service Inc.,express or implied as to ANSI
anyfindinp or other matter io this report,ar ad to any product covered by the rrpor/, ,,_
Page 1
Copyright CO 2003 e,I6
De(44/etn 14:b1 71452'36643 PAGE 02!08
4
' Page 2 of 8 0..... ..,
NER-423
• Spaced or solid sheathing and two layers No.15 or one
Uniform classified roofs,the classification shall remain the same.
►aver No. 30 In jurisdictions adopting the
Building Code)organic fiber felt underleyment shall be For Installations over existing built-up roof coverings,all loose
installed in the field of the roof. gravel and debris shall be swept off.Blisters in the plies shall
be cut and nailed flat. Raised perimeters, such as gravel
• Solid sheathing and two layers No. 15 felt applied, stops,shalt be covered by the Gerard roofing system.Where
shingle fashion,solid-cemented between the plies or a the system is installed over integral gutters, a fascia board
waterproofing membrane shall extend from the eaves nailed to the rafters shall be provided and installed outside
edge to a point 24 in. (610 mm) minimum inside the the gutter,
exterior wall line of the building. Felt layers or Class C:Wood shake and wood shingle ridge and hip caps
waterproofing membrane shall also run the full length of shall be removed, and the existing roof covering cut back
the metal valleys. flush with the fascia or barge cover.Nominal 1 x4 In.(25x102
4.4 Now Roofing Application mm)wood counterbattens are Installed parallel to the framing
(perpendicular to the eaves)at a maximum spacing of 24 in.
4.4.1 Class A: The roofing panels, recognized as Class A, (610 mm)on center.Counterbattens shall be fastened to the
framing members using nails of sufficient are designed to be Installed on woodorsteel fficient length to penetrate
battens placed 14 1/2 in.(368 mm)on center,over spaced or 1 in.(25 mm)into the framing member or through minimum
solid sheathing. 3/4 in. (19.1 mm)thick sheathing.Nall spacing is 12 in. (305
Wood battens are attached to the supporting mm)on center. The diamond point of the nail shall be fully
Wood battens
spaced are attached to ohcesuppo wing ra,with exposed on the underside of the sheathing. Nominal 2x2 in.
16d nails of sufficient length to penetrate at least 1 in. (25 for Gerard shake panels,and are nailed to(the counterbattens
mm)Into the framing member. When 1x4 in. (25x102 mm) using 16d nails.Nailing shall be done to prevent splitting the
counterbattens(installed parallel to framing)are used,wood battens or counterbattens. The panels shall be fastened to
battens shall be attached with 16d nails spaced 12 in. (305 the battens in the same manner as described in Section 4.4
mm)on center, of this report.New flashing shall be installed over and around
Steel battens are attached to the supporting framing all existing valleys, vents and chimneys in accordance with
members,spaced 24 in.(810 mm)on center,maximum,with the requirements of the applicable code.The valley used in
two No. 10x3/4 in.(19.1 mm)corrosion-resistant galvanized reroofing shall be as shown In Figure 3 of this report.
sheet metal screws spaced 24 in. (610 mm)on center. Class B:When a Class B roof assembly Is required over an
Panels adjacent to the ridge are field adjusted by cutting and existing non-rated roof covering, installation shall be as
bending vertically, described for the Class C roof with the following addition:
Valleys are framed using wood or steel battens spaced 6 in. Mineral-surfaced 72 pound cap sheet,complying with ASTM
(152 mm)apart,fastened on both sides of the valley.Valleys D3909, shall be fastened in place over the existing roofing
are framed to receive No. 28 gage [0.016 in. (0.41 mm)J material with 2 In.(51 mm)minimum head and side laps,prior
corrosion-resistant metal flashing which extends out at least to the application of 1x4 in,(25x 102 mm)counterbettens and
3 In. (76 mm)on both sides of the center fine.Valley flashing 2x2 in.(51x51 mm)battens.The cap sheet functions as a fire
end laps are 4 in. (102 mm)minimum. Metal valley flashing resistive sheet and is permitted to be used to satisfy the
shall have one layer of Type 30 felt underlayment,36 in.(914 underlayment requirement of Section 4.3 of this report,
mm)wide,under the full flashing length. As an alternative to using mineral-surfaced 72 pound cap
All full size panels shall be fastened to the roof prior to cutting sheet for Class B installations,an underlayment of 1 1/2 in.(38
ridges or valleys.The panels mm)thickfoil-feoedfiberglassbanketinsulation,orl-1f2inch
panels for plaoement at hips,
are staggered a minimum of one module,and are fastened to thick foil-faced fiberglass batt insulation placed between each
the battens with five 6d galvanized Halls, 1 1/2 in. (38 mm)
2x2 batten, or one layer of Elk Corporation's 'Verashield
long, or No. 10x1 1/2 in. (38 mm) galvanized sheet metal Underfaymenr is permitted to be installed. installation shall
screws, Fasteners are positioned 1 1/2 in. (38 mm)from the be with the fail face up and 2 in. (51 mm)headtap5 over the
center of the concave and along the down-turned edge of the existing roof surface prior to the application of 1 x4 in.
panel.Care shall be exercised in nailing to avoid striking the (25x102 mm) counterbattens and 2x2 in. (51x51 mm)
finished surface of the panel. battens.
Ridge end hips shall have a minimum 2 in.(51 mm)nominal Class A:When a Class A roof assembly is required over an
thickness and project approximately 4 in. (102 mm), existing non-rated roof covering, Installation shall be as
minimum, above the rafters or existing roof surface. The described for the Class C roof with the following exceptions:
panels shall be fastened to the side of the ridges and hips • One layer of 114 in. (6.4 mm)thick minimum Georgia
after mitering,cutting,and bending,and shall then be capped Pacific pens-Deck overleyment followed by nominal
with the appropriate trim and finished as the regular panels.
Gable ends shall be capped with gable cap pieces, rake or exs rng shakes or}shingles(((mechanically fastened ever
to
existing shingles molds,or individual trim caps. the roof deck) or attached to 1x4 in. (25x 102 mm)
Roof openings shall be flashed with flashing formed to match counterbattens;or
the shape of the panels. • One layer of Type G3 Cap Sheet,granule side up,shall
4.5 Reroofing Application be placed over existing shakes or shingles followed by
nominal 1x4 in. (25)102 mm) counterbattens
Gerard Stone-Coated Tife and Shake Panels shall be mechanically fastened to the roof deck-Nominal 2x2 In.
installed over existing wood shake, wood shingle, asphalt (51 x51 mm)battens shad be mechanically fastened to
shingle or gravel surfaced roofing, subject to the conditions the nominal 1x4 in.
set forth here and g p complies followed by (21x102 mm) noun SK-faced
provld(n the roof slope corn lies with Y 1 1/2 In. (12.7 mm) thick FSK-faced
Section 4.3 of this report,Battens and counterbattens shall be insulation,foil face u
installed in accordance with the applicable code. When 2x2 in.(51x51 mm)batteln b�wean each nominal
Gerard steel panel assemblies are installed over existing
04/22/2004 14:02 7145296643 PAGE 03/08
Page 3 of B -.
•- NER-423
• Gerard foam Insert/insulation and support panels over ° = 5vL/8EAb+ vUS9800+0.003384L+
a E(n,X)/2b
existing wood shake or shingles shall be placed
between the vertical nominal 1x4 in. (25x102 mm) For SI:
counterbattens and between the horizontal nominal 2x2 ° = 381 vt'I2EAb+vt/2347+0.086L+25.4E(4X)/2b
in. (51x51 mm)battens
where:
• One layer of minimum 1/2 inch thick (12.7 mm)water-
resistant core gypsum Sheathing,complying with ASTM A Area of chord cross section[(in2 (mmz))
C 79, is Installed over the counterbattens using 4d b = Diaphragm width[ft(mm)]
drywall nails or equivalent. The gypsum sheathing
joints must be tightly butted.As an alternative to%2 Inch E = Elastic modulus of chords[Ibf/ft2(kpa)j(perAFPA-
thick (12.7 mm)gypsum sheathing, use two layers of NDS)
Elk Corporation's "Versashield Underlayment". In L = Diaphragm length[ft(mm)]
jurisdictions utilizing the 1997 Uniform Building Code.
when the steel panel roofing system Is installed over v = Maximum shear due to design loads in the
wood shake or wood shingle roofs, the above%= inch direction under consideration[lbf/ft(Wm))
thick(12.7 mm)water-resistant core gypsum sheathing, ° = Deflection(in.(mm))
E(
is installed over the counterbattens and covering the ° =Sum of Individual chord-splice slip values on
entire surface of the existing wood roof or one layer of both side of the diaphragm, each multiplied by X. the
Elk Corporation's"Versashield Underlayment",satisfies splice distance to the nearest support.
the requirements of Section 1516.3 and Table A-15-A of Calculations for diaphragm deflection shall account for the
the UBC Appendix. Steel roof panels so Installed over usual bending and shear components as well as any other
existing roofs comply with UBC Standard 15-2 and are factors,such as nail deformation,which will contribute to the
Class A fire-retardant roofing assemblies. deflection.
In all four assemblies the roof panels shall be attached 5.0 IDENTIFICATION
to the 2x2 in. (51)(51 mm)battens.
4.6 Wind-resistant Assemblies Pallets or bundles of Gerard Stone-Coated Tile and Shake
Recognition in Jurisdictions utilizing the 1997 Uniform Building ddress,hproduct name i and this CC-ES Legacy Evaluation
Code is limited to Exposure B areas where the basic wind Report No. (NER-423).
speed does not exceed 80 mph (129 km/h), the building 8.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED
height is less than 40 ft (12192 mm), and installation is in
accordance with Section 4.4 or 4.5 of this report. In 6.1 Manufacturer's descriptive literature and installation
jurisdictions utilizing the 2000 International Building Code,the recommendations,Product r3installation Manual,Stone
2000 International Residential Code, the 1998 international
One and Two Family Dwelling Code, the BOCA National Coated Steel Roofing,*Gerard Roofing Technologies,
2001-03-01.
Building Code/1999, and the 1999 Standard Building Code 6.2 Test report on Class A fire resistance in accordance
the maximum allowable wind uplift pressure is as shown in with ASTM E108 (UL 790), prepared by Underwriters
Table I of this report The balance of the installation shall be Laboratories Inc., File R12596/87NK4698,dated June
as described in Section 4.0 of this report. 24, 1987,signed by James M.O'Shea and R.L. Dona-
4.7 Structural Diaphragm hue.
6.3 Fire Resistance Classification Tests in accordance with
Structural roof diaphragms using the roof panels described In ASTM E108 (UL 780), performed by United States
this report shall be constructed as follows: Testing Company, Inc.,signed by Michael S.Elliott and
Nominal 1x6 in. (24)(152 mm) standard grade, or better, Petrick V,MeCullen:
Douglas fir sheathing or sheathing of other species having a
specific gravity of 0.50 or greater,spaced a maximum of 9 in Classification Report No. Date
In. (241 mm) on center, shall be nailed to framing in
accordance with the applicable code. The framing shall be B LA21024 6-30-82
spaced a maximum of 24 in. (610 mm) on center. Wood
battens,counterbattens and the roofing panels are Installed (Over Existin LA21992 11-30-82
over the spaced sheathing In accordance with Section 4.1 of Roofs) g (Addendum,to
this report.Fasteners attaching the counterbattens to the roof - ) LA21557
shall penetrate into the framing and shall be within 8 in. 152 C
mm)of the counterbatten ends. ( 1 A4023t 3.27-84
The resulting diaphragm has an allowable shear of 180 lbf/ft 6.4 Test report on static pressure uplift, prepared by
(2628 N/m)and is equivalent to 15/32 In.(11.9 mm)thick CDX date September Research 1984,signed by A.A.Sakhnt417Q
plywood using 8d nails over 2 in. (51 mm) wood framing dated Se ingmaer2a 1nsf signed de design,S prepared y.
members in an unblocked diaphragm, with nails 6 in. (152 6.5 Engineering En ineerngons ter wind beri8, 87, sig by
mm)on center at the edges and 10 In.(254 mm)on center In andnson Engineering, dated October 8, 1987, signed
the face of the plywood. The maximum aspect ratio Is 4:1. 6.6 BRANT Z MT 836 5000 Johnson,aerated Weathering
Diaphragm deflections, based on using 15/32 in. (11.9 mm) Test. Copy of BRANTZ Test MTR 836 certified and
thick CDX plywood,shall be estimated by using the following signed_by J.R.Duncan,head of Building Science Group.
equation: 6.7 BRANTZ Appraisal 128 1985.
6.8 Test report, Assessment of Resistance of Roof
Coverings to Impact of Hailstones, prepared by
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
Organization,Report CSiRO,DBR,August 1978,signed
by K.J.Martin,officer conducting test.and F.A.Blakey,
chief of division.
I04/Z.4/Zk7b4 14:b2. /14bYybb4� p.- t74/bti
Page 4 of 8
NER-423
6.9 Test report. Simulated Wind and Snow Load Tests, Douglas C.Miller,engineer team leader.
prepared by Department of Scientific and Industrial 6.23 Underwriters Laboratories inc., Test Report File
Research, Auckland Industrial Development Division R12396. Project 96NK28830, issued November 27,
(A.I.D.D.), Reference 81/971. dated June 6. 1979, 1996, revised April 15, 1997. containing 2000 hour
signed by J.Phillips. carbon-arc accelerated weathering tests on panels with
6.10 Test report on Cyclic Loading, prepared by Cyclone an alternate base coat, signed by Roger Anderson,
Testing Station. Report TS 126, dated July 23, 1980, senior engineer associate, and James Hatcher, staff
signed by Professor K. P.Stark. engineer.
6,11 Test report on ultraviolet light testing, prepared by 6.24 Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Test Report File
Wakefield Laboratories, Limited, Report 9870, dated R12596, Project 98NK14487, dated May 27, 1998.
August 18, 1983. containing fire tests conducted in accordance with
6.12 Test Report on Test Record 1,Class 8 fire resistance of
reroofing over Class C organic felt shingles,and Class ASTM E108 for Class a fire resistance on 4.5 Class on
A fire resistance of reroofing over Class A fiberglass panel assembly as described in section 4.5 Class A
shingles.Test Report on Test Record 2,penetration test exceptions 1 and 2,signed by Roger Anderson,senior
of 200 lb load with 3 inch diameter steel plate. Test engineer essociate, and Douglas C. Miller, engineer
report on Test Record 3,weatherometertest,2000-hour 6.25 team a leader. Laboratories Inc., Test Report File
carbon arc, performed by Underwriters Laboratories R12596, Project 00NK19313, dated August 10,2000.
Inc.,File R12596,Project 88NK17073,dated February containing fire tests conducted in accordance with
24, 1989,signed by Kenneth D. Rhodes, engineering ASTM El 08 for Class A fire resistance classification on
group leader, Fire Protection Department,and Wayne panel assembly as described in section 4.5 Class A
A. Kisinfelder, associate managing engineer, Fire exception 4,signed by William G.Marshall,engineering
Protection Department. associate,and Douglas C.Miller,engineer learn leader.
6.13 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.written reply/opinion on 6.26 Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Test Report File
modifications to existing Gerard tile and introduction of R12254, Project OONK11270, dated October 9, 2000,
Gerard shake.Letter dated February 7,1989,signed by containing fire tests conducted in accordance with
Kenneth D. Rhodes, engineering group leader, Fire ASTM El 08 for Class A fire resistance classification on
Protection Department,and William G.Marshall,senior panel assembly as described in section 4.5 Class A
engineering assistant,Fire Protection Department exception 3, signed by Roger Anderson, senior
6.14 Test report on wind-driven rain using a 2:12 roof slope,
prepared by Underwriters Laboratories Inc., File engineer associate, end Douglas C. Miller, engineer
team leader.
R12596,Project 90NK5766,dated May 8,1990,signed 6.27 Underwriters Laboratories inc., Test Report File
b Roger Anderson and Kenneth Rhodes. R19254, Project 99NK45831, dated March 21, 2000,
6.15 Tyest report on wind-uplift resistance, prepared by containing fire tests conducted In accordance with
Underwriters Laboratories Inc.. Flies R14086-2 and ASTM E108 for Class A fire resistance classification on
R14086-3. Project 90NK5787, issued May 31, 1990, panel assembly as described in section 4,5 Class A
revised September 19, 1990, signed by Greg Rezek exception 3 and Class 8 alternative, signed by Roger
and Kenneth Rhodes. Anderson, senior engineer associate, and Douglas C.
6.16 Engineering calculations for wind and diaphragm
design,prepared by Research and Code Development. 6,28 Test rreporrtseunder ASTM leader.108 for Elk Corporation's
dated June 1992 (revised September 3, 1992), and Versashield Underlayment, Underwriters laboratories
additional calculations dated November 16, 1993, Inc., File R19254, signed by roger Anderson and
signed and sealed by T.H. Carter, P.E.
6.17 Test report on racking shear,prepared by United States Douglas of C. Miller.
Testing Company, Inc.. Test Report 186038-1, dated •Project 00NK531151March 21,ix2000.
May 13, 1992, signed by Michael Beaton, P.E., and •Project 00NK33728b,December 5 2000.
David Peres, • Project 01 NK09235,March 15 2002.
6.18 Teat report on wind driven rain and static pressure uplift 6.29 Letter report, Gerard Listing R125�8, Underwriters
performance tests using a 2 1/2 :12 roof slope, Laboratories Inc..October 26,2001,signed by William
re axed by Construction Research Laboratory, Inc.,
G.Marshall and Douglas C. Miller.
p p y 6.30 Engineering calculations, Wind Loadings ASCE 7-96,
Test 5603, dated May 19, 1992, signed by R chard Walker Engineering,Inc.,August 21,2002,signed and
Sambelia.
6.19 Test report on Class A spread of flame test In sealed by Gary W.Walker,P.E.
accordance with ASTM E108, by Underwriters 7.0 CONDITIONS OF USE
Laboratories Inc.. File R12596, Project 92NK11696,
dated June 22, 1992, signed by William G. Marshall, The iCC-ES Subcommittee for the National Evaluation
senior engineering assistant, Engineering Services, Service finds that the Gerard Stone-Coated Tile and Shake
Dept. 411, and Douglas C. Miller, engineering team Panels as described in this report complies with or is a
leader, Engineering Services Dept.411. suitable alternate to that specified In the 2000 International
6.20 Test reports on racking tests In abcordance with ASTM Building Code®with 2002 Accumulative Supplement to the
E72, by United States Testing Company, Inc., Test International Codes®, the 2000 international Residential
Report 178653,dated March 28, 1990,revised April 3, Code® with 2002 Accumulative Supplement to the
1990,and Test Report 176876,dated October 9,1990, International Codesat, the 1999 Standard Building Code@,
signed by Michael Beaton,test engineer,and Stephen the BOCA®National Building Code/1999,the 1997 Uniform
A.Castle,manager,Engineering Department. Building Coder" and the 1998 International One-end Two-
6.21 Report of state,transverse upliftload tests,prepared by Family Dwelling Code®subject to the following conditions:
RADCO,Test Report RAD-185,Project C-5086,issued
June 1993• 7.1 Prior to reroofing with the panels,the existing roof shall
6.22 Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Test Report File be inspected and approved by the code official,when
R12596,Project 93NK11425,dated February 3, 1994, required by the applicable code.
containing fire tests conducted in accordance with 7.2 This report is subject to periodic re-examination. For
ASTM E108 on panels with an alternate base coat and information on the current status of this report,consult
panels installed over wood shingles and shakes,signed the ICC-ES website.
by William G. Marshall, engineering associate, and
04/22/2004 14:02 7145296643 PAGE 05/08
. ' Page 5 of 8 --
-
NER.423
FASTENER REQUIREMENTS FOR REROOFING EXISTING ROOFF PANELS AND BATTENS
BATTEN TO
COUNTER-BATTEN TO RAFTER OVER COUNTER- PANEL
EXISTING WOOD SHAKES' BATTEN 2 TO
ROOF DESIGN (qty-size) (qty-size) BATTEN
HGT WIND 7 in.spaced 10 in.spaced
ABOVE SITE UPLIFT , sheathing sheathing
SPEED GRADE EXP ROOF PRESSURE 24 in. 18 in. 18 in. 24 in.
(mph) (ft) RATING AREA Jfta min.A�of
1 (Ibf ) 16 ins o.c., o.c. o.c. � 24 in.o.c. o.c. o.c. fasteners
110 60 max 9 1.16d @ 1.16d la 1-16d® 1.16d t 2-16d 1 tow" 5-6d in `
125 max 30 1 in.o.c. 7 in.o.c. 10 In. 10 in.o.c_ screw each
90 60 max i FIELD 35.5 o.c. panel
110 max 20
130 60 max E 1-16d@ 2-16d @ 2-16d @ 1-#8x3" 1-16d& 2#8x3"A 5-8d In
140 max- 30 7 in.o.c. 7 in.o.c. 10 in. Screw @ 1 #8x3" screw each
110 60 max C EDGE 84.5 o.c. 10 in,o.c. screw
panel
.130 max 15
140 60 max 9 1-16d @ 2-16d O 1-16d 0 2-16d a 1 #8x3" 1.16d& 5-6d In
150 max 30 7 in.o.c. 10 in. 10 in. 10 in.o.c. screw 1#8x3" each
120 60 max ' C
- FIELD 52.8 o.c. o.c. screw panel
140 max 15
170 60 B 1-16d a 1•#8x3" 2-16d @ 1-16d& 1 2#8x3" 1-16d& 6-8d In
130- 60 max C EDGE 125.9 7 In.c.c. screw© 10 In. #8x3" screw 2#8x3" each
160 max 15 7 in.o.c. o.c. screw O screw panel
160 60 max B� 10 in.o.c.
- 1Ll6d(g3 2-16d @ 2-16d© 2-16d @ 1 #8x3" 2#8x3" 4-8d In
170 max 50 7 in.o.c. 7 in.o.c. 10 in. 10 in.o.c. screw screw each
140 60 max C FIELD 73.8 o.c
., panel
160 max 20
170 60 8 21-18d(ctO 1-16d& 1-#80" 1-#8x3" 2#8x3" 3#8x3" 9-8d in
160 60 max C EDGE 175.9 7 in.o.c. 1 #8x3" screw Q screw i screw screw each
170 max 40 11 screw @ 10 in. 10 in. o.c. panel
7 in.o.c. o.c.
J
For SI: 1 in,=25.4 mm, 1 ph= 1.61 km/h. 1psf=0.047 kPa
Notes to Table 1:
1. Fasteners shall 'enetrate a minimum of 1 in.into or through the roof sheathing or framing member.
2. Fasteners shall ..e spaced at 14-1/2 in.o.c.
3. Wind design crit.ria is ASCE 7-98.
4. Table is based o the following factors:
• Importance F; for of 1.00
• Category II 8u Iding
• Partially snob ed building
• Gable or Gabl:/Hip roofs
• Roof slopes g -ater than 10°(2:12) and less than or equal to 30°(7:12).
5. To convert wind •eed from 3 second gust to faktest mile use Table 1609.3.1 of the IBC or Table R301.2.1.3 of the IRC.
04/22/2004 14:02 7145296643 PAGE 06/08
Page 6 of 8
NER-423
Figure 1*
PRODUCT ILLUSTRATION
,QS►.rn) 04.)b0 NOmIMI
Ir asaN (, .oen,q �` 11 MISSION CAP
41 W°(7 )
1'1IyI I � B"X 151/4"
x
TILE PANEL 15 1/2" X 45 3/4"
2*Meow r/pomp,' tan )mil, Orema)'m
i-F------ y + �) --•_ r SHAKE CAP
I_ s"X15 114"
111-•1)) 11+ m s'
1") Ter")
1.......--- `,Re legroom an second hail d panel. (;m'n)�I �� \C
SHAKE PANEL 15 1/2" X 44 3/4"
r����nt illI�1 NVIII������� �Iall ilintI1 a + 4-Nominal
UIIIE14"
•► f4-
1"Nominal
5"
CANYON S ggKE PROFILE
04/22/2004 14:02 7145296643 PAGE i7i08
. • Page 7 of 8 .- —
NER-423
Figure 2*
BATTENS
MISSION TRIM FRAMING SHAKE TRIM FRAMING
FOUR 2 x 2 6'MART(OUT- (127emY)
OICE EDGE) (, -� TWO 2 X 2 ON OP OF EACH OTHER M$ teethed can be wee*RR
ti• ,1i \ MWOn'Wm.
,� RIDGE •-
TWO2X2 5'APART(Our 1 5-, ( °27"")tem EDGE) ini ONE 2 X 2 AT MP C " Use this moved wlot&
HIP HIP
STEEL BATTEN CHANNEL SECTIONS
PANEL BATTEN CHANNEL SECTIONS
-,.. pr
..L. 1 ,..,. -dif ift,
i,
414.14,4-'"27'l f-114'—,/ X---2,v----.j
04/22/9004 14:02 7145296643 F'A(at d8!08
Page 8 of 8 NER-423
Figure 3*
TYPICAL DETAILS
1 x 4 COUNTERBATTENS
/ PIIOBJ K :,, SEALANT
\ \ Oa .
41 Pr '
I If ' / .:, ,r ' 7 "...-.:- . -...c .-.- , ,-ylr--...; .. ,--
.7,:,...1.,"/ / .,..1.4.,.; ....,, ...::::00.-..-7,."....::::,_,-a..,,/. ., ,
._ , •
,,.. ._� � �,.: ////iii; %;i/�; . .:._.
4 Cut eheulpr hole for dDe Denauelbn ! +"I,
,__---- 0 2 x zX N i► �/`
$CALANT
7/. -L.-r. i RIDGE TRIM
-,r..em ite,, ,/ 4MME /,,.;,f'
MOW
MEA1U*EMENTS
/r 401 o-
`THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE AS
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESIGN, FABRICATION OR ERECTION.
Ago
T• • /0( ` /JepI-SUBJE 'per DATE":: „0,,,,,:4-,'")
i ,
ti:
44;. tom` a Wit ► .. , . ..�
- 1"), it/ - -' ' tit iiie, / i ,,,,-,fr-A--fr,A,11— ''." t -- ' '
PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED
eti,,,,,,,,,,, ,...,
6,, ,,,,,,,.
i
•
DATE I SIGNED
[REDIFORMI® 4S 469 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT. —
voer#09 Aso sees)49 gas PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY.
OF
/ 41~ MARY B. YOUNG
9,,5,/„., MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
_ ,
r
240 West Huntington Drive CHARLES E. GILB
ARCAD Arcadia, California 91007 ROBERT C. HARBICHT
in** (818)574-5400 DENNIS A. LOJESKI
r,E\ 40, COUNCILMEMBERS
OR!'ORATE9
GEORGE J. WATTS ROGER CHANDLER JUNE D. ALFORD
CITY MANAGER MAYOR CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION MA 89-050
October 10, 1989
APPLICANT: Robert A. Green
ADDRESS: 500 South Old Ranch Road
REQUEST: A 3'-0" southerly side yard setback in lieu of 5'-0" required for
the installation of new pool equipment (Sec. 9252.2.4.).
FINDINGS: The applicant is proposing to locate new spa equipment
(mechanical pump and filter) within the site's required
southerly side yard area.
The Santa Anita Village Home Owner's Association and the
adjoining property owners have reviewed and approved this
request. Also, it is staff's opinion that approval of MA 89-050
will secure an appropriate improvement.
ACTION: Approved
All mechanical equipment must still comply with the City's noise level
regulations regardless of the setback modification.
There is a five working day appeal period for this application, building
permits cannot be obtained until October 18, 1989.
Please contact the Building Department at 574-5416 to determine the number
of building plans required for plan check and proper permits to be obtained
before construction.
Any modification granted by this application must be used within twelve
months or this application shall become null and void.
ING DEP tT
CORKRAN W. NICHOLSON
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Certificate No. 0392
ARCADIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
234 Campus Drive, Arcadia, CA 91006, (818) 446-0131
(Certificate of Compliance with Fee Provisions of Government Code Section 65995)
Developer Robert & Judy Green iG '----
Si ature of Applicant
Address 500 S. Od Ranch Road The person signing represents
that he/she is authorized to
Arcadia, CA 91006 sign on behalf of the owner/
developer and that the infor-
Telephone (818) 447- -Z 447 mation provided is true and
accurate to the best of his/
her knowledge.
Fee Schedule: The Development Fees levied by the Arcadia Unified School District
under the provision of Section 65995 of the Government Code are:
Residential Development $1.53/sq. ft.
Commercial/Industrial Development $0.25/sq. ft.
Tract/Project Address 500 S. Old Ranch Road, Arcadia, CA 91006
Number of Buildings in Project(s) one
Building Permit Application No(s) 88-533
Lot/Address Use of Building Area (Sq. Ft. )
FEE
500 S. Old Ranch Rd. Residence 742 0
(garage)
INFORMATION BELOW SOLID LINE TO BE COMPLETED BY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Subtotal (attached sheets)
Total Fees Due 0
Receipt No. N/A
( ) This is to certify that all fees due to the Arcadia Unified School District
under provision of Government Code Section 65995 as a prerequisite to the issuance of
a Building Permit by the Department of Public Works have been received. Based on the
above information presented, this Certification of Completion is hereby executed.
( x ) This is to certify that the above-described development has been determined
to be exempt from the development fees of Government Code Section 65995 and Building
Permits may be issued therefor.
Approved: 10/12/88
C. Earl Davis, Assistant Superintendent - Business Services Date
WHITE-Applicant YELLOW-Accounting Dept. PINK-Business Office GOLDENROD-Other
City of Arcadia
Building and Safety Division
PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT
tk-tber+ A. and Jbny f• G-ree , owner of property located at
(please print name)
©o . Old Roy,cL ■ oC , Arcadia, California,
do hereby give my consent for a property inspection at the above address by the Building and
Safety Division.
The ose of the inspection is to inve§f sate work w ' • ay - e been done w' ••. benefit of
permits or ins ss._ The undersigned agree - any violations fou •►: -.I+ is inspection will be
corrected in compft6nc� e'with applicable codes and ordina - withir- irty (30) day .
NOTE: This is not a permit and does not constitute acceptance by this Department. -Alt-corrections
-herein stated must be completed prior to any approval from this Department.
Date &"".Zlv—&7 Signed:x
INSPECTION REQUESTED FOR: F,-'-" / it_95f c_77 ' diV 4.0/aif�a/US„
BUILDING CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: p \I(so,�( ( w jQ ' &F /\lt�w
NL 1 nvc j�tl A-s I/Kew`Fo►J •-+7II akr re-1z n.ir 7( 1'i 3 per ,00 Tt-
3e 0,200 0 (3R1-1-I,2ec s r t wA I lx)S 7'o s`t T s 1/
&A/1A-Oui ( (c e$4Tc ati ' W,k-s oT &G- v -K►-O Uri l' (2,,cce v(rUJ
Ntu) 1 ( isSv CA.
PERMITS REQUIRED: � v �ts - x(ATT. F,,-L A424"'6E l2 l0ci IToru
Building _ _ Demolition Electrical Heating Plumbing
ZONING CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: 1
ZONING:
Setbacks Lot Coverage Open Area Parking
FEE 1 ''n - 3°`g7
INSPECTOR ail!``'d''`r �' ``� INSPECTION DATE 4'1--67
APPROVAL DATE 7`Z'8. -
WHITE COPY — FILE
CANARY COPY —APPLICANT DBS-57
Building Department
City of Arcadia
Re: Room Addition
500 South Old Ranch Road
Arcadia, California
Sirs:
We are the owners of the above-identified property
and will be applying drywall to the room addition ourselves.
We plan to do so with drywall screws and a power operated
gun. No nails will be used on the exterior walls for a
period of at least ten (10) days after each coat of stucco
is applied.
Very truly yours,
gcrt .„7-c
ROBERT A. GREEN
JUDY A. GREEN
t
ReceivFD
JUL 2 0 1977
July 19 , 1977 BU1CDF jy6 p�PrA
500 S. Old Ranch Rd.
Arcadia, CA 91006
Edward G. Chastain
Superintendent of Building
& Safety
City of Arcadia
Building Department
P. 0. Box 60
Arcadia, CA 91006
Dear Mr. Chastain:
We obtained building permit No. 59350 on April 21,
1977 , for the conversion of a closet to a bathroom.
We would like to have the deadline for the rough
inspection on that permit extended 30 days .
The conversion was delayed due to difficulty in
acquiring a double pocket door arrangement with the
proper opening. We now have the pockets, and should
be prepared for a first inspection on the structural,
plumbing and electrical work within 30 days .
Very truly yours,
Judy Green
rill
t
filk
r
n
1
1
ICI
kct 1
l
. in
- ct
tr-
- J
CE